Wednesday, 14 May 2014

RE Little Jimmy Townsend and his strange phone calls to mean old me Perhaps he should tallk to his old buddies Alex Hunter and Arty Baby Topham if he does not recall Byron Prior and I buddy Alex Hunter

From: "foghorn.leghorn_175" <foghorn.leghorn_175@zoho.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 10:34:35 -0700
Subject: Re: RE Little Jimmy Townsend and his strange phone calls to
mean old me Perhaps he should tallk to his old buddies Alex Hunter and
Arty Baby Topham if he does not recall Byron Prior and I buddy Alex
Hunter
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

That's what I like about you David; you call it and share it as you see it.
Personally, I haven't had the opportunity to be involved in any mud
slinging between people who share the same common enemy; thus, even if
I do not completely see eye to eye with victims of the corrupt
establishment, I share the same focus and will network with them
regardless. IE: Expose the corrupt RCMP, Government Officials...etc.
and publish the evidence against them, 'til death do I part!!
In the short-term meantime, I need to regroup and heal wounds from the
war staged against me.
Gimme a call anytime, you have my number.

Regards,
Robert Erickson
http://rubiconcrossroad.wordpress.com/


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 13:48:27 -0300
Subject: RE Little Jimmy Townsend and his strange phone calls to mean
old me Perhaps he should tallk to his old buddies Alex Hunter and Arty
Baby Topham if he does not recall Byron Prior and I buddy Alex Hunter
To: frankffrost <frankffrost@hotmail.com>, radical
<radical@radicalpress.com>, townsendjim@hotmail.com,
dan.wendland@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "t.wilson" <t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, The
Disinfector <thedisinfector@hotmail.com>, "foghorn.leghorn_175"
<foghorn.leghorn_175@zoho.com>, "Pete.Berndsen"
<Pete.Berndsen@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
To: <townsendjim@hotmail.com>; "robin reid" <zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>;
<dan.wendland@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <oldmaison@yahoo.com>; "Alex Hunter"
<ahunter100@shaw.ca>; "webo" <webo@xplornet.com>; "maritime_malaise"
<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>; "occupyfredericton"
<occupyfredericton@gmail.com>
Cc: <patricia.townsend@hotmail.com>; <john.cox@gov.bc.ca>;
<kamloops@gov.bc.ca>; <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 3:49 PM
Subject: If Jim Townsend's wife were wise she would print this file ASAP and
make her hubby and the RCMP read it


http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf

I agree that the pen is mightier than the sword Thus within the pdf
file I just gave you again are mostly the crooks words to me many
years ago.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWk06eivAVw&feature=channel_video_title

Feel free to use those words against the RCMP to get you husband out
of jail and perhaps the crooks may fall on their own sword as well.

For the public record I don't like your husband at all. He has been a
Grade A arsehole with me in the past. Hell he is too dumb to realize
that it was he who appoached me with his anti semic bible pounding
bullshit years ago. (Scroll down to see the proof) I merely told him
to take up his bible pounding with a zionist who hates me.

After that I didn't get a word from little Jimmy until he strated
sending his self promoting bullshit this past March. Instead of
reading my response Little Jimmy starts accusing of working with the
RCMP . BULL-FUCKING -SHIT Scroll down to see the proof.

However we do have common foe which is the RCMP and he was too dumb to see.

That said Little Jimmy is correct about the crooks in the RCMP and
does not deserve to be locked up no matter how much of a dumb arsehole
he truly is.

Obviously byway of thier Youtube his family is loyal to him and that
tells me something too. Furthermore Little Jimmy is wearing a Keith's
shirt in this video and nodody dares to deny that I am proud son of
the Keith Clan. Methinks it would be bad karma for the old hippy in me
to ignore that sign even if an arsehole is wearing it.

http://aquaregiagoldrefining.com/?p=255

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369


http://www.tirnasaor.com/profiles/blogs/canadian-activist-jim-townsend-is-being-targeted-and-killed-by

Canadian Activist Jim Townsend is being targeted and killed by the
Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP):
Posted by Alex Hunter on February 11, 2012 at 22:24 View Blog Canadian
Jim Townsend is being targeted and killed by the RCMP, The Provincial
Court System in Vernon, the Canadian Revenue Agency (CRA), Disability
II - all arms of government.
After complaining about
1) a most conspicuous drive by shooting at his trailer in the Monashee
Mountain Pass between Lumby and Nakusp which missed his son by 2 feet
and
2) the subsequent lack of investigation by the RCMP and their
Complaints Commission to
3) the Ombudsman
Jim was set up and arrested on a trumped up charge, robbed of many
oz's of silver, tortured and nearly murdered by those who have sworn
an Oath to protect and serve us.
In December they arrested Jim roughly (harming his injuries), held him
in a jail cell in nothing but underwear, exposed him repetitively to
hot and cold temperatures for hours and drove him around in a Vernon
RCMP K9 unit - with the windows open in sub zero weather.
He threw up for a month and lost 40 pounds over the next few months.
Jim was critically injured in a tractor accident, so he is disabled.
He has been a peaceful justice activist for decades.
He was a member of the Reform Party at the University of Calgary with
the Grassroots Members back in the early 90's before HAARPer, Preston
Manning, Stockwell Day and other higher profile (Nazi) Reform Party
members infiltrated and merged the party with the waning
CONservatives. He was Chairman of the Computer Data Committee f/ the
SE Constituency until he blew the whistle about a couple hundred
thousand dollars worth of missing office furniture after which he got
the boot and ended up in the Alberta Party.
Jim furnished the RCMP with a 3" thick stack of documentation on
Internet Child Pornography.
That the infiltrated Reform Party amalgamated with the ailing
CONservative Party and ended up with a majority government was a NY
Shell Game.
In fact the entire political charade is merely there to prevent us
from seeing the the truth - that it is a master - slave society.
After he started "causing 'trouble' " (some BEGS to be made) he was
targeted by the CRA, the RCMP - all arms and organs of government and
things have been beyond difficult for Jim and his wife since.
While I was investigating judicial/'legal' corruption Jim and I met
back in 2005 when he was forced to live in a tent with his wife and
four children.
I have to admit that despite the fact I was intimately acquainted with
the monolithic and ruthless BC government conspiracy myself, what he
told me shocked me - turned my world upside down - as did his book
first seemed "anti Semetic", but after MUCH study I discovered it was
all true.
It is because of real men like Jim that I am capable of processing the
information I have in an effort to uncover the Black Hand behind and
atop the global conspiracy.
Like politics, ALL information and religion is completely controlled
and weaponised - some of it a great deal more than the rest.
As it was a complete reversal of everything we'd been taught I had a
difficult time with it at first, particularly while I had been left in
surgical urgency... After several years of studying this aspect of the
globalist conspiracy it all fell into place.
As members of the Canadian Coalition of the Walking Wounded Jim and I
are willing to die to tell you the truth about this and we/our
families pay an extreme price to do so.
The people who go along to get along and that are paid to lie to you
tell you - in most cases - complete reversals of the truth. The
greater the lie the more likely it is to be believed...It is the
Satanic Talmudic Masonic technique of reversal that keeps us all
enslaved, robbed, raped, pillaged, tortured and killed on the
pthological parasites' Hamster Wheel from Hell. It is what hides the
master - slave society and shows us a synthetic reality to keep us all
thinking we're free, that we have Rights, a choice and that keeps us
all divided and conquered.
Jim and I are being censored, gagged and outright attacked by the
agencies of social control for telling you the truth.
Who do you trust?
Check out Jim's YouTube Videos, his sites/blogs and you can help the
Townsends stay alive a little longer by contributing to their PayPal
account: jim@jim-townsend.com
As Canadians (with very few exceptions) are reluctant to stand beside
one another they seem weak, cowardly and completely enslaved, but if
you take the little bit of time it takes to familiarize yourselves
with Jim's story (or mine) you'll see why. People outside the country
have nothing to fear so I encourage all of you in foreign lands to
upload Jim's YouTube videos asap in order to preserve the truth.
The breaking RCMP Snuff story - Jim Townsend of the Gentile Defense League
http://gentiledefenseleague.org/
http://gentiledefenseleague.net/
http://gentiledefenseleague.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLIOnhHmdUc
Upload and mirror Jim's YouTube Videos and his website:
http://townsend.be/
Jim & Judy's PayPal account is: jim@jim-townsend.com Please be sure to
report all donations to CCWW/ACWW so that we can ensure they are
getting them.
We will announce the unfolding story on Dr Rebecca Carley's "What's
Ailing America?" on Orion Talk Radio Network Saturday at 12:10 pm PST,
Abby & Aidan's Truth show on These Changing Timez Radio Network 3:00
pm Saturday or any of the other radio shows that my children and I
have been on and are continually plugging.
These radio stations are but a few of the remaining places you are
going to hear the brutal truth, but you must be willing to put up with
all the 'interference'/sound issues, interruptions, etc... Record and
witness the censorship and attack we are routinely subject to for
telling you the truth.
Remember; What they do to one of us they do to us all - when we are
dead and gone you are next.
It is imperative we stand beside one another - GLOBALLY and FTNWO!


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <elijahignatieff@gmail.com>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 8:13 PM
Subject: RE Let Jim Townsend Go Free: New Video by Elijah Ignaetiff



----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
To: "townsendjim@hotmail.com "dan.wendland"" <dan.wendland@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
<william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>; "Gilles. Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
"gilles.moreau" <gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "Randy.McGinnis"
<Randy.McGinnis@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "warren.dosko"
<warren.dosko@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
"brigdit.leger" <brigdit.leger@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "Paulette. Delaney-Smith"
<Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "Wayne.Lang"
<Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "Wayne.Gallant" <Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
<wayne.steeves@gnb.ca>; "robert.trevors" <robert.trevors@gnb.ca>; "pm"
<pm@pm.gc.ca>; "IgnatM" <IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>; "ducepg" <ducepg@parl.gc.ca>;
"LaytoJ" <LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca>; <leader@greenparty.ca>; "splitting_the_sky"
<splitting_the_sky@yahoo.com>
Cc: "george" <george@georgeabbottforbc.ca>; "nichor" <nichor@parl.gc.ca>;
"toewsv1" <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 5:40 AM
Subject: RE: sorry about that


Hey Jimmi Baby

Rest t assured that I am not.

In fact I enjoyed your malicious nonsense.Clearly you have no clue as
to who I and and nor do I care to associate with the likes of you
after you showed me your arse. However I got to see who some of your
nasty friends are. Need I say recognized a few like Robby Baby
Nicholson and Georgy Boy Abbot who play at politics in BC?

For the public record it is i who never heard of you until you
starting begging me to sign you dumb petitions last week. I checked
your work and watched several of your videos before I suggested we
talk. Instead you attacked so I asked why and you got even worse. Too
too funny.

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jim Townsend <townsendjim@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:48:16 -0700
Subject: sorry about that
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, dan.wendland@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca


sorry abou that david.
you are correct, you did send me something
here it is:

Fwd: The Fenchy from Fundy Chucky Leblanc and your buddy Tommy Boy
Young are still pissed eh Iggy?‏
when i received this david, i just assumed you were retarded
and dribbling on your bib

you should be able to communicate quite well with dan.
he's retarded just like you.

nite nite



> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:55:37 -0300
> Subject: RE BC Canada Court Horror Story - arbitrary arrest and unsworn
> indictment = fraud on court
> From: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> To: townsendjim@hotmail.com; dan.wendland@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> CC: william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
> maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca
>
> Hey Jimmy Boy If my memory serves me correctly you are due back in
> court today. Thus your email bravely attacking the RCMP this morning
> begs the obvious question. Why are you fucking with me? Howcome you
> were too chicken to talk to me but you want others to call other
> people on your behalf? Furthermor howcome you want me and many others
> to man up and sign our names on your many petitions against the RCMP
> but you are to chicken to talk to me personally? You record your
> conversations to others and present them on Youtube are you afraid
> that I would record ours and do the same? If i did what harm? I always
> speak openly and honestly thus I have nothing to hide. What say you?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jim Townsend <townsendjim@hotmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 04:25:33 -0700
> Subject: BC Canada Court Horror Story - arbitrary arrest and unsworn
> indictment = fraud on court
> To: dan.wendland@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
> Wendland, you are pathetic.
> sadly, you are all the rcmp have to offer
> an organization of useless lying murderers and criminals is all you are
> http://rcmpwatch.com http://KillTheRCMP.info
>
> BC Canada Court Horror Story - arbitrary arrest and unsworn indictment
> = fraud on court
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qaTRdjl2838
>
>
> http://bcombudsman.com/Sworn_Oaths.html
> Sworn oath - Bank of International Settlements Immunity Act is Supreme
> Law of Canada
> The Bank of International Settlements Immunity Act of 1938, handed
> Canada to them as a plum.
> It has two clauses
>
> 1) They are above ALL our laws
> 2) None of their property can be touched under any circumstances
>
> ALL BANKING IS FRAUD
>
> Here are the documents.
> Read for yourselves.
>
> much love,
>
> Jimi
>
> Please sign these petitions to free your country from the grip of
> foreign tyranny
> http://www.thepetitionsite.com/709/petition-to-kill-the-rcmp-organization/
>
> http://www.thepetitionsite.com/699/petition-to-retire-blindfolded-justice-and-put-her-on-disability/
>
> John Hawks (604) 662-1439 has stolen my money and brochures. As you
> can see from my prior video, he told me weeks ago that he was sending
> back my brochures and money and would send me a letter, but never did
> that until we went into the Post Office in Nakusp to complain on March
> 18 2011. Please call Mr. Hawks and ask him to return my money and
> brochures. Remind him that he is a public servant and is an unelected
> bureaucrat and does not have the right to make up rules that violate
> my right to free speech of carry on commerce. He also refused to
> deliver my wifes brochures which advertise her Iridology and Herbal
> Consulting Business. This is an unacceptable abuse of public office
> and is outright theft not to give my brochures and money back so I can
> have them distributed elsewhere.
> http://vimeo.com/21369024
> http://youtube.com/townsendjim
>
> http://townsend.be

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=40778399

fw: Drive By Shooting on Mining Claim in Cherryville‏
From: Jim Townsend (townsendjim@hotmail.com)
Sent: Sat 8/22/09 6:39 AM
To: john.cox@gov.bc.ca; kamloops@gov.bc.ca; Zuhair (zuhair@shaw.ca);
Eldon Warman (warmael@hotmail.com); Joe Tittiger (joe@tittiger.com);
bigjohnlipscomb@gmail.com; emilia_a1@hotmail.com
(emilia_a1@hotmail.com); Patricia Townsend
(patricia.townsend@hotmail.com); Larry L. Russell
(larry@silverlakein.com); pm@pm.gc.ca

3:30 this morning someone drove by our motor home on our mining claim
in Cherryville and cranked five rounds through the motor home,
narrowly missing my son by less than two feet.

John, you were out here attacking me with the local RCMP and I
explained the situation to you while you were here.

I know you went back to his office and colluded with him and tried to
close down my camp for no reason.

Are you involved in this drive by shooting?

Jim

-----------

3:30 this morning someone cranked five rounds through my motor home
and missed my son by less than two feet.

the local lumby rcmp may be involved

i need you to dial as many media as you can
and tell them about it

we are at 1351 North Fork Rd.

Please contact as many media as you can
so we are not sitting targets in the middle of nowhere

thanks bud

jimi


http://gentiledefenseleague.org/2011/09/20/continued-public-harrassment--is-rcmp-cst-proce-setting-us-up-for-another-drive-by-shooting.aspx

Tuesday, September-20-11



To: RCMP Cst. Henry Proce’s ‘higher ups’



Re: Continued Public
HarrassmentHHhhhhhhhaddfasarfaekfrarkaerfglasdkfgk… is Henry Proce
setting us up for another drive by shooting?



Dear Crown Agent Higher Ups that
can not curb Criminal Constable Proce;



It seems your Henry Proce was not happy with defrauding us
of our mining claim in his ongoing invasions into our lives at his
‘higher ups’
command. He forced us off our mining claim and yet he still finds his way to
our dwelling with the most ridiculous of excuses. He arrived today under the
pretence of asking us if it is all right if the RCMP talk to us. He said the
RCMP were investigating him because of my complaint and wanted to know if
they
could talk to me. Why couldn’t the other cop just come up if numb
nuts here can
just barge right in?



We lost our winter worth of firewood and now have to pay
rent to store our mining buildings since everyone in Canada can use our
mining
claim except for us. Henry Proce claims we had it for non-mining purposes
when
he has public servants attack us, but he is never able to say what that
non-mining purpose is. I don’t want this liar around me in any
circumstance. We
believe he colluded to murder us. We believe this constant activity by Henry
is
an attempt to cover up his involvement in an attempt to murder us. When we
complained about his involvement with other public servants in colluding to
harass us, which lead to an attempt to murder us by the
‘informants’ Henry had
besetting our dwelling, I was charged with ‘uttering threats’ after the
RCMP
made up a lie about what I said and charged me with their lie. Typical RCMP
M.O.; commit crimes and lie about it.



Proce has mocked us that no one is ever going to know who
attempted to murder us, that he closed the investigation and that it is none
of
our business. He claims he is following orders from his ‘higher
ups’; Burgess
and Wendland. Now that they have cost us thousands of dollars and violated
our
right to quiet enjoyment of lawfully acquired property, what is the excuse
for
him invading our lives? You can’t dial a phone? Henry Proce drove all the
way
to Spruce Grove to ask us where we were going to be this winter and what we
would be doing because a Sgt. McMillan from Vancouver wants to make an
appointment
to do an investigation??? What??



So Proce tells me this
McMillan wants to talk to me about me complaining about Proce. Proce wants
to
know what it is all about and says that he needed to drive all the way out
here
because McMillan doesn’t want to drive all the way out here and not find
me
here so he would like to know where I will be this winter and what my plans
are. Everybody on the planet has my phone number and it is even on my
website.
Anytime the RCMP want to talk to me about the crimes committed by their
members, they are more than welcome to dial just like everyone else on the
planet does. Public Records show they are pretty adept at dialing up public
servants and making up unfounded allegations. So you are telling me that
RCMP
Investigator McMillan can’t dial my number and make an appointment
but this guy
is going to carry out an investigation of the guy that tried to have us
murdered by sending the guy that tried to have us murdered out to question
us
about what he wants to talk to us about before he does an investigation???
The
investigation was supposed to be carried out a long time ago and no one
contacted us. What happened to Burgess’ investigation? He NEVER contacted
us
after I told him I didn’t want Taylor around us since I know he is
involved in
grow ops when he terrorized my kids. McMillan can dial my number any time
and I
will show him using his own records how they target us.



We are laying charges against
Burgess, Wendland, Proce and their AG goons. To Henry Proce’s higher ups,
who
believe we have no rights in this country; you have forced us from our North
Fork mining claim. Your scheme to trash our charter rights, make up lies
about
us and defraud us of our property by abuse of process worked, as it always
does. The Mining Office hacked their own computers and compromised their own
security in order to keep me from renewing the license. You boot fucked two
disabled people who committed no crimes and saved the country from us
playing
in a mud puddle in the middle of nowhere. Can Proce go play with Goodyear in
Wendland’s panties and leave us alone now? We have had enough of
homo RCMP grow
operators.



Sincerely, Harry James
Townsend (250) 306 â€" 3112 townsendjim@hotmail.com


Please sign these petitions to free your country from the grip of
foreign tyranny
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/709/petition-to-kill-the-rcmp-organization/

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/699/petition-to-retire-blindfolded-justice-and-put-her-on-disability/

John Hawks (604) 662-1439 has stolen my money and brochures. As you
can see from my prior video, he told me weeks ago that he was sending
back my brochures and money and would send me a letter, but never did
that until we went into the Post Office in Nakusp to complain on March
18 2011. Please call Mr. Hawks and ask him to return my money and
brochures. Remind him that he is a public servant and is an unelected
bureaucrat and does not have the right to make up rules that violate
my right to free speech of carry on commerce. He also refused to
deliver my wifes brochures which advertise her Iridology and Herbal
Consulting Business. This is an unacceptable abuse of public office
and is outright theft not to give my brochures and money back so I can
have them distributed elsewhere.
http://vimeo.com/21369024
http://youtube.com/townsendjim

http://townsend.be



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:23:51 -0300
Subject: Re: a search for truth Perhaps you should ask the zionist
Barry K. Winters your questions
To: Jim Townsend <townsendjim@hotmail.com>, Barry Winters
<sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, WaterWarCrimes <waterwarcrimes@gmail.com>, robin
reid <zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>, tony <tony@peoplestandup.ca>, IgnatM
<IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>, warren <warren@daisygroup.ca>
Cc: David Thomson <idslayer@telus.net>, "Ideas@cbc.ca"
<ideas_proposals@cbc.ca>, elijahignatieff@gmail.com, Eldon Warman
<warmael@hotmail.com>, bigjohnlipscomb@gmail.com, William Hockman
<billhockman@hotmail.com>, Dieter Braun <dieterbraun@sasktel.net>,
Frank BRUNO <ihtbruno@gmail.com>, zac.kremler@gov.bc.ca,
yvonne.hendry@gov.bc.ca, yao.cui@gov.bc.ca, william.kwan@gov.bc.ca,
werner.grundlingh@gov.bc.ca, wendy.leach@gov.bc.ca, WBFLegal
<wbflegal@aol.com>, wayne.meckle@gov.bc.ca,
wayne.guilbeault@gov.bc.ca, Wally Dove <wdove@halhinet.on.ca>,
wally.oppal.mla@leg.bc.ca, victor.koyanagi@gov.bc.ca, Verne Warwick
<warpo88@gmail.com>, vanloan.p@parl.gc.ca, vancouverpropertyrights
<vancouverpropertyrights@shaw.ca>, van@lacunatrust.com,
valerie.tregillus@gov.bc.ca, val.bersenev@gov.bc.ca

Here is his very evil website

http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/

On 8/19/10, Jim Townsend <townsendjim@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> if you are a "judeo-christian", what exactly does that mean to you and how
> many of the tenets of the talmud do you follow?
> what sort of synthesis of 'truth' exists in the marriage of two opposing
> epistemologies?how do these beliefs impact the 'laws' that our foreign
> masters impose upon our free country and free people(that will be shot to
> death if they do not comply with the yellow striped nazis with more
> bullets
> than brain cells..)
> in order to understand how the system works in canada, it is of value to
> study the beliefs of those who attempt to control our lives..the preamble
> of
> the foreign acting script called the bna act states;
> recognizing the supremacy of god and the rule of law<yers>....
> one has to ask what god? of all the ones that are purported to be on the
> menu.
> the corporation CANADA is owned and operated by a coven of jewish
> freemasons
> from the city of london known as the CROWNthey own a private legal system
> franchise called the BAR that runs a rigged game under criminal claim of
> right and criminal color of law.
> land in canada is held by adverse possession... look it upeven though this
> land is our birthright, the crown holds it by adverse possession, another
> term for armed force.that is why the rcmp want your gunsand why you are
> arbitrarily detained as a resident alien in your own country by armed
> military interdictand to shut up and sit down and read and believe the
> bible
> that the crown wrote and owns the copyrights tothat says they are gods
> chosen... except for john 8:42-44 where christ says they are satans
> children...interesting contrast and somewhat contradictory for truth..
> the crown have been the worlds largest drug dealers for centuries and the
> rcmp run their canada drug operations.this is why bc has a 25 billion
> dollar
> a year marijuana industry. http://leap.cc many rcmp officers belong
> directly to this secret society, or coven, of satan worshipping jewish
> freemasons.http://www.youtube.com/townsendjim#p/u/3/S-GK99fqXlQ brit'ish =
> hebrew word = people of the coventhis explains the rcmp activity recorded
> at
> http://KillTheRCMP.infoor in 'the unauthorized history of the rcmp" isbn
> 0-88862-193-0
> in morals and dogma, albert pike explains that this coven of jewish
> freemasons worship lucifer and a goat headed spider god called jahbulon.
>
> in an effort to understand judeo-christianity, i included two links for
> you
> to verify the content of my discussion..a youtube video by the reverend
> ted
> pike discussing the talmud anda website hosted by jews that explain the
> sins
> of jesus the false prophet and why christians are so hated
>
> reference:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vo8gjDrtgxY
> http://www.noahide.com/yeshu.htm
> What is Judeo – Christianity? I have read the texts of a number of
> religions in an attempt to divine the motivation behind various groups.
> One
> has to ask themselves if religious people take their texts seriously. Do
> they believe what is written in them? Are they motivated by what is
> written
> in them?
> The Jewish and Christian religions were of particular interest for an
> interesting reason. After reading the Torah (Old Testament) and Talmud of
> the Jews, it was my impression that Judaism was a 'religion' of banking
> laws. My take on the New Testament of the Christians is that Christianity
> was a refutation of Judaism. Christ whipped the bankers, rebuked the
> lawyers
> and called the Jews liars, murderers and children of the Devil. (John
> 8:42)
> In return, the Jews had the Romans nail him to a cross. Seemed to be a
> fight between servitude to God or Mammon. (Matthew 6:24)
> Given that these two 'religions' are total opposites of each other and
> Christianity being created by jews who were in opposition to the banking
> legal system, one has to wonder what kind of curious synthesis could have
> evolved that could be described as Judeo-Christianity. In an effort to
> illustrate this; I offer the following quotations from the scriptures in
> the
> Babylonian Talmud of Modern Judaism. Which of these do you see in
> accordance
> with Christian values? If you are a Judeo-Christian, which of these would
> you say is your most cherished belief?
> The Talmud is Judaism's holiest book (actually a collection of books). Its
> authority takes precedence over the Old Testament in Judaism. Evidence of
> this may be found in the Talmud itself, Erubin 21b (Soncino edition): "My
> son, be more careful in the observance of the words of the Scribes than in
> the words of the Torah (Old Testament)."
> Moed Kattan 17a: If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city
> where
> he is not known and do the evil there.
> Erubin 21b. Whosoever disobeys the rabbis deserves death and will be
> punished by being boiled in hot excrement in hell.
> Sanhedrin 58b. If a heathen (gentile) hits a Jew, the gentile must be
> killed.
> Sanhedrin 57a . A Jew need not pay a gentile ("Cuthean") the wages owed
> him
> for work.
> Baba Mezia 24a . If a Jew finds an object lost by a gentile ("heathen") it
> does not have to be returned. (Affirmed also in Baba Kamma 113b).
> Sanhedrin 76a. God will not spare a Jew who "marries his daughter to an
> old
> man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a
> Cuthean..."
> Sanhedrin 57a . When a Jew murders a gentile ("Cuthean"), there will be no
> death penalty. What a Jew steals from a gentile he may keep.
> Baba Kamma 37b. The gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God
> has "exposed their money to Israel."
> Baba Kamma 113a. Jews may use lies ("subterfuges") to circumvent a
> Gentile.
> Yebamoth 98a. All gentile children are animals.
> Abodah Zarah 36b. Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from
> birth.
> Abodah Zarah 22a-22b . Gentiles prefer sex with cows.
> Sanhedrin 106a . Says Jesus' mother was a whore: "She who was the
> descendant
> of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters." Also in
> footnote #2 to Shabbath 104b of the Soncino edition, it is stated that in
> the "uncensored" text of the Talmud it is written that Jesus mother,
> "Miriam
> the hairdresser," had sex with many men.
> While it is the standard disinformation practice of apologists for the
> Talmud to deny that it contains any scurrilous references to Jesus Christ,
> certain Orthodox Jewish organizations are more forthcoming and admit that
> the Talmud not only mentions Jesus but disparages him (as a sorcerer and a
> demented sex freak). These orthodox Jewish organizations make this
> admission
> perhaps out of the belief that Jewish supremacy is so well-established in
> the modern world that they need not concern themselves with adverse
> reactions.
> For example, on the website of the Orthodox Jewish Hasidic Lubavitch
> group--one of the largest in the world--we find the following statement,
> complete with Talmudic citations: Read it for yourself online at
> http://www.noahide.com/yeshu.htm
> "The Talmud (Babylonian edition) records other sins of 'Jesus the
> Nazarene':1) He and his disciples practiced sorcery and black magic, led
> Jews astray into idolatry, and were sponsored by foreign, gentile powers
> for
> the purpose of subverting Jewish worship (Sanhedrin 43a).2) He was
> sexually
> immoral, worshipped statues of stone (a brick is mentioned), was cut off
> from the Jewish people for his wickedness, and refused to repent
> (Sanhedrin
> 107b; Sotah 47a).3) He learned witchcraft in Egypt and, to perform
> miracles,
> used procedures that involved cutting his flesh, which is also explicitly
> banned in the Bible (Shabbos 104b).
> Gittin 57a. Says Jesus is in hell, being boiled in "hot excrement."
> Sanhedrin 43a. Says Jesus ("Yeshu" and in Soncino footnote #6, Yeshu "the
> Nazarene") was executed because he practiced sorcery: "It is taught that
> on
> the eve of Passover Jesus was hung, and forty days before this the
> proclamation was made: Jesus is to be stoned to death because he has
> practiced sorcery and has lured the people to idolatry...He was an enticer
> and of such thou shalt not pity or condone."
> Kallah 51a."The elders were once sitting in the gate when two young lads
> passed by; one covered his head and the other uncovered his head. Of him
> who
> uncovered his head Rabbi Eliezer remarked that he is a bastard. Rabbi
> Joshua
> remarked that he is the son of a niddah (a child conceived during a
> woman's
> menstrual period). Rabbi Akiba said that he is both a bastard and a son of
> a
> niddah. "They said, 'What induced you to contradict the opinion of your
> colleagues?' He replied, "I will prove it concerning him." He went to the
> lad's mother and found her sitting in the market selling beans. "He said
> to
> her, 'My daughter, if you will answer the question I will put to you, I
> will
> bring you to the world to come.' (eternal life). She said to him, 'Swear
> it
> to me.' "Rabbi Akiba, taking the oath with his lips but annulling it in
> his
> heart, said to her, 'What is the status of your son?' She replied, 'When I
> entered the bridal chamber I was niddah (menstruating) and my husband kept
> away from me; but my best man had intercourse with me and this son was
> born
> to me.' Consequently the child was both a bastard and the son of a niddah.
> "It was declared, '..Blessed be the God of Israel Who Revealed His Secret
> to
> Rabbi Akiba..."
> In addition to the theme that God rewards clever liars, the preceding
> Talmud
> discussion is actually about Jesus Christ (the bastard boy who "uncovered
> his head" and was conceived in the filth of menstruation). The boy's
> adulterous mother in this Talmud story is the mother of Christ, Blessed
> Mary
> (called Miriam and sometimes, Miriam the hairdresser, in the Talmud). "The
> Editio Princeps of the complete Code of Talmudic Law, Maimonides' Mishneh
> Torah -- replete not only with the most offensive precepts against all
> Gentiles but also with explicit attacks on Christianity and on Jesus
> (after
> whose name the author adds piously, 'May the name of the wicked
> perish')...
> --Dr. Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion, p. 21.
> Rosh Hashanah 17a. Christians (minnim) and others who reject the Talmud
> will
> go to hell and be punished there for all generations.
> Sanhedrin 90a. Those who read the New Testament ("uncanonical books") will
> have no portion in the world to come.
> Shabbath 116a. Jews must destroy the books of the Christians, i.e. the New
> Testament. Dr. Israel Shahak of Hebrew University reports that the
> Israelis burned hundreds of New Testament Bibles in occupied Palestine on
> March 23, 1980 (cf. Jewish History, Jewish Religion, p. 21).
> Gittin 69a . To heal his flesh a Jew should take dust that lies within the
> shadow of an outdoor toilet, mix with honey and eat it.
> Shabbath 41a. The law regulating the rule for how to urinate in a holy way
> is given.
> Yebamoth 63a. States that Adam had sexual intercourse with all the animals
> in the Garden of Eden.
> Yebamoth 63a. Declares that agriculture is the lowest of occupations.
> Sanhedrin 55b. A Jew may marry a three year old girl (specifically, three
> years "and a day" old).
> Sanhedrin 54b. A Jew may have sex with a child as long as the child is
> less
> than nine years old.
> Kethuboth 11b. "When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it
> is
> nothing."
> Yebamoth 59b. A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to
> marry
> a Jewish priest. A woman who has sex with a demon is also eligible to
> marry
> a Jewish priest.
> Hagigah 27a. States that no rabbi can ever go to hell.
> Baba Mezia 59b. A rabbi debates God and defeats Him. God admits the rabbi
> won the debate.
> Gittin 70a. The Rabbis taught: "On coming from a privy (outdoor toilet) a
> man should not have sexual intercourse till he has waited long enough to
> walk half a mile, because the demon of the privy is with him for that
> time;
> if he does, his children will be epileptic."
> Gittin 69b. To heal the disease of pleurisy ("catarrh") a Jew should "take
> the excrement of a white dog and knead it with balsam, but if he can
> possibly avoid it he should not eat the dog's excrement as it loosens the
> limbs."
> Pesahim 111a. It is forbidden for dogs, women or palm trees to pass
> between
> two men, nor may others walk between dogs, women or palm trees. Special
> dangers are involved if the women are menstruating or sitting at a
> crossroads.
> Menahoth 43b-44a. A Jewish man is obligated to say the following prayer
> every day: Thank you God for not making me a gentile, a woman or a slave.
> Here are two early "Holocaust" tales from the Talmud: Gittin 57b. Claims
> that four billion Jews were killed by the Romans in the city of Bethar.
> Gittin 58a claims that 16 million Jewish children were wrapped in scrolls
> and burned alive by the Romans. (Ancient demography indicates that there
> were not 16 million Jews in the entire world at that time, much less 16
> million Jewish children or four billion Jews).
> Abodah Zarah 70a. The question was asked of the rabbi whether wine stolen
> in
> Pumbeditha might be used or if it was defiled, due to the fact that the
> thieves might have been gentiles (a gentile touching wine would make the
> wine unclean). The rabbi says not to worry, that the wine is permissible
> for
> Jewish use because the majority of the thieves in Pumbeditha, the place
> where the wine was stolen, are Jews. (Also cf. Gemara Rosh Hashanah 25b).
> Minor Tractates. Soferim 15, Rule 10. This is the saying of Rabbi Simon
> ben
> Yohai: Tob shebe goyyim harog ("Even the best of the gentiles should all
> be
> killed"). This passage is from the original Hebrew of the Babylonian
> Talmud
> as quoted by the 1907 Jewish Encyclopedia, published by Funk and Wagnalls
> and compiled by Isidore Singer, under the entry, "Gentile," (p. 617).This
> original Talmud passage has been concealed in translation. The Jewish
> Encyclopedia states that, "...in the various versions the reading has been
> altered, 'The best among the Egyptians' being generally substituted." In
> the
> Soncino version: "the best of the heathens" (Minor Tractates, Soferim
> 41a-b]. Israelis annually take part in a national pilgrimage to the grave
> of
> Simon ben Yohai, to honor this rabbi who advocated the extermination of
> non-Jews. (Jewish Press, June 9, 1989, p. 56B).
> On Purim, Feb. 25, 1994, Israeli army officer Baruch Goldstein, an
> orthodox
> Jew from Brooklyn, massacred 40 Palestinian civilians, including children,
> while they knelt in prayer in a mosque. Goldstein was a disciple of the
> late
> Brooklyn Rabbi Meir Kahane, who told CBS News that his teaching that Arabs
> are "dogs" is derived "from the Talmud." (CBS 60 Minutes, "Kahane").
> University of Jerusalem Prof. Ehud Sprinzak described Kahane and
> Goldstein's
> philosophy: "They believe it's God's will that they commit violence
> against
> goyim, a Hebrew term for non-Jews." (NY Daily News, Feb. 26, 1994, p. 5).
> Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg declared, "We have to recognize that Jewish blood
> and
> the blood of a goy are not the same thing." (NY Times, June 6, 1989, p.5).
> Rabbi Yaacov Perrin said, "One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish
> fingernail." (NY Daily News, Feb. 28, 1994, p.6).
> To communicate anything with a Goy about our religious relations would be
> equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach
> about
> them, they would kill us openly." - Libbre David 37
> Well, when I read Deuteronomy 20:10-20 in the Old Testament I truly do
> wonder how the Old and New Testament got stitched together in one book
> since
> the two epistemologies are direct opposites of each other. What about you?
> In all of these passages from the Jewish Talmud, which strike you as the
> most Christian in character? I have been unable to discern what
> Judeo-Christianity is other than it appears to be a belief that their
> saviour died a long time ago and they now worship a cross. Do they share
> the
> Jewish belief that Christ was a magician who was killed four times and is
> now in Hell immersed in a vat of boiling excrement? It seems some people's
> religious texts look an awful lot like hate literature to the uninitiated.
> This is spiritually enlightened Judeo-Christianity?
>
>



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jim Townsend <townsendjim@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:48:16 -0700
Subject: sorry about that
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, dan.wendland@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca


sorry abou that david.
you are correct, you did send me something
here it is:

Fwd: The Fenchy from Fundy Chucky Leblanc and your buddy Tommy Boy
Young are still pissed eh Iggy?‏
when i received this david, i just assumed you were retarded
and dribbling on your bib

you should be able to communicate quite well with dan.
he's retarded just like you.

nite nite



> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:55:37 -0300
> Subject: RE BC Canada Court Horror Story - arbitrary arrest and unsworn
> indictment = fraud on court
> From: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> To: townsendjim@hotmail.com; dan.wendland@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> CC: william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
> maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca
>
> Hey Jimmy Boy If my memory serves me correctly you are due back in
> court today. Thus your email bravely attacking the RCMP this morning
> begs the obvious question. Why are you fucking with me? Howcome you
> were too chicken to talk to me but you want others to call other
> people on your behalf? Furthermor howcome you want me and many others
> to man up and sign our names on your many petitions against the RCMP
> but you are to chicken to talk to me personally? You record your
> conversations to others and present them on Youtube are you afraid
> that I would record ours and do the same? If i did what harm? I always
> speak openly and honestly thus I have nothing to hide. What say you?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jim Townsend <townsendjim@hotmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 04:25:33 -0700
> Subject: BC Canada Court Horror Story - arbitrary arrest and unsworn
> indictment = fraud on court
> To: dan.wendland@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
> Wendland, you are pathetic.
> sadly, you are all the rcmp have to offer
> an organization of useless lying murderers and criminals is all you are
> http://rcmpwatch.com http://KillTheRCMP.info
>
> BC Canada Court Horror Story - arbitrary arrest and unsworn indictment
> = fraud on court
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qaTRdjl2838
>
>
> http://bcombudsman.com/Sworn_Oaths.html
> Sworn oath - Bank of International Settlements Immunity Act is Supreme
> Law of Canada
> The Bank of International Settlements Immunity Act of 1938, handed
> Canada to them as a plum.
> It has two clauses
>
> 1) They are above ALL our laws
> 2) None of their property can be touched under any circumstances
>
> ALL BANKING IS FRAUD
>
> Here are the documents.
> Read for yourselves.
>
> much love,
>
> Jimi
>
> Please sign these petitions to free your country from the grip of
> foreign tyranny
> http://www.thepetitionsite.com/709/petition-to-kill-the-rcmp-organization/
>
> http://www.thepetitionsite.com/699/petition-to-retire-blindfolded-justice-and-put-her-on-disability/
>
> John Hawks (604) 662-1439 has stolen my money and brochures. As you
> can see from my prior video, he told me weeks ago that he was sending
> back my brochures and money and would send me a letter, but never did
> that until we went into the Post Office in Nakusp to complain on March
> 18 2011. Please call Mr. Hawks and ask him to return my money and
> brochures. Remind him that he is a public servant and is an unelected
> bureaucrat and does not have the right to make up rules that violate
> my right to free speech of carry on commerce. He also refused to
> deliver my wifes brochures which advertise her Iridology and Herbal
> Consulting Business. This is an unacceptable abuse of public office
> and is outright theft not to give my brochures and money back so I can
> have them distributed elsewhere.
> http://vimeo.com/21369024
> http://youtube.com/townsendjim
>
> http://townsend.be


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <rmathews@telus.net>; "hjk" <hjk@quesnelbc.com>; "radical"
<radical@radicalpress.com>; "t.wilson" <t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "toewsv1"
<toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>; "MulcaT" <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>; "bob.rae"
<bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net>; "bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
<judithtownsend@hotmail.com>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; <ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca>;
"oldmaison" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>; "sunrayzulu" <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>;
"premier" <premier@gov.ab.ca>; "premier" <premier@gnb.ca>; "premier"
<premier@gov.sk.ca>; "ddexter" <ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca>
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 1:32 AM
Subject: RE Hans Krampe versus Robin Mathews versus Stevey Boy Harper versus
Hitler


----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Byron Prior
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: Hmmm!!!Byron

You are no more confused than I you should listen to me talking to
politicians that pretend that they care today. I just got off the
phone with an ndp yoyo from Nova Scotia the Green Party and the Action
party are even more ridiculous

----- Original Message -----
From: Byron Prior
To: David Amos
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: Hmmm!!!Byron

What a strange message.Talk about talking & not saying anything.This
is a second person from the one who sends me caring & understanding
E-mails, as usual I'm confused, do you understand what happened.
Byron

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Byron Prior
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 12:45 PM
Subject: Fw: Hmmm!!!

----- Original Message -----
From: foxy1@uniserve.com
To: David Amos
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 5:42 PM
Subject: Hmmm!!!

Oh ya, Arthur at radicalpress thinks I'm ok. I think I am, too. Sh*t
disturber, alternative journalist, poverty advocate, hind-legs
injustice fighter, little old lady with a sting.

A lot of stuff there and very fragmented as to information value.
Boggling, even. I'm English and wrestling with what's going on in all
3 countries. Which is of course all the same sh*t with a different
face.

Did I get it right, you are a lawyer, based in Minnesota? What were
you doing in NFld?

Notice that Kenneth Lay has disappeared inviolate from the news of
Enron Scandals. Note that Accenture is slated to take over managemet
of welfare in BC. Shades of W2 in Wisconsin. Smoke & mirrors.

Fogal? Oh yes, concerned along with Hellyer about the disappearance of
Canada's "sovereignty" (buzzword) but they don't care about
less-than-middle-class people. I didn't realise that Fogal was a
lawyer, though. Figures.

Credit cards? I wouldn't touch one with a bargepole.

Tell me more. Got a website?

FL



About Robin Mathews. Adolf Hitler. Stephen Harper. The Big Lie. By
Hans KrampeSunday, April 17th, 2011


"E quindi uscimmo a riveder le stelle."
~Dante's Inferno

Editor's Preface: Ten years ago I could not have imagined that a day
would come when I would find myself in the unenviable position of
having to openly criticize someone who, throughout the vicissitudes of
the last decade, has been a friend, a colleague, a supporter and a
contributor to RadicalPress.com albeit, at times, tested and tried due
to changing times and the availability of new information that, back
at the turn of the century, was virtually unknown.
Both Hans Krampe and Robin Mathews were two of my most prized
contributing writers during the period when The Radical was being
published in hard copy on a monthly basis. These were the years 1998
to 2002.
The truth be known both myself and Hans Krampe were quite ignorant of
the ideology known as Political Zionism when we undertook the
publishing of an alternative newspaper in June of 1998. Like the vast
majority of people who had grown up in the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s, we
were basically products of a cultural milieu that for all intents of
purposes was Zionist Jewish in essence. We were, like most folks,
truth seekers who for different reasons found the status quo wanting
in terms of answers to the big questions of the day. Why the endless
wars, corruption, poverty, pollution, environmental degradation and so
on? Who was responsible for these perennial crops of evil and
injustice? How were we to address the questions and more importantly
still, how were we to deal with problems when answers were
forthcoming? These were the driving forces that kept us motivated and
willing to undergo the assorted challenges that researchers and
writers experience when
they undertake to explore the hidden dimensions behind what the world
perceives as historic truth.
During those early years of publishing we had yet to learn about who
the real movers and shakers were that controlled the levers of power
and along with our innocence we also were ignorant of the facts behind
the causes of the two major wars of the 20th Century. Steeped, as we
were, in the Zionist literature of the day that portrayed itself as
mainstream, western history, we grew up believing that Adolf Hitler
and the National Socialists who ruled Germany from 1933 until 1945,
represented the supreme zenith of earthly evil and terror. That,
combined with the "Jewish Holocaust" myth that eventually took form in
the mid-1950s and continued to grow with the furor of a unchecked
cancer thanks to the Jewish controlled media we were still under the
spell cast upon us when we decided to "dig to the root of the issues"
in search of answers to lingering questions.
With respect to Robin Mathews' views therefore I was more or less in
synch on all the major issues even though early in our relationship I
detected a bias in his work that leaned toward a Marxist perspective
on global issues and was reflected in Robin's essays that inevitably
aligned themselves with the political left.
It wasn't until around 2005 that I seriously began to question the
historical perspective of the west and its basis and only in earnest
after a friend was kind enough to lend me a copy of Douglas Reed's
classic work on Political Zionism known as The Controversy of Zion.
Upon completion of Reed's opus an epiphany of sorts occurred in my
soul/mind and I could no longer view the world through the
rose-coloured, Zionist-tinted lenses that had hitherto been my
standard mode of perception and upon laying them down and fashioning a
new perspective I eventually came to the realization that what I and
millions of other westerners had taken as political and historic truth
throughout our lives was, tragically, one big lie, so monumental in
scope and depth that it was for many people beyond comprehension.
It was at that point or juncture when Robin Mathews' perspective and
my perspective on world history began to diverge. It was also then
that I sensed his gentle, yet grave disapproval of my new-found
perspective on political issues and his cautionary words to not
attempt to introduce the term "Jew" into anything political for fear
of being tarnished with accusations of "anti-Semitism" and so on and
thus losing any credibility that I may have gained over previous
years.
I tried my best to persuade Robin that to overlook the Zionist Jew
issue in politics could only lead to ill-conceived conclusions that
would ultimately be of benefit only to the Zionists and their agenda
for global governance but all attempts were met with adamantine
resistance that usually resulted in long periods of silence where
communications ceased.
When I was eventually accused by Harry Abrams and the League for Human
Rights of B'nai Brith Canada of violating the infamous Section 13
"hate crimes" section of the Canadian Human Rights Act back in
November of 2007, Robin, beyond expressing a faint semblance of
sympathy, was more inclined to take the viewpoint that I had it coming
because I had not heeded his cautionary words about stepping on the
toes of the Jews. I didn't hold this against him as by then I was well
aware that a great divide existed between those who could see through
the Jew's Big Lie and those who could not.
Since 2007, thanks to the increasingly malevolent machinations of the
state of Israel, the world has taken some rather dramatic leaps
forward in terms of coming to terms with the Zionist Elephant that
tramples and destroys economies and nations and environments and lives
in the great living room we call planet Earth. Things that appeared
but in vague form and outline back in 2007 today stand in stark relief
as the world suddenly is forced to come to grips with the ultimate lie
of the 20th Century - that of the Jewish controlled media's ongoing
propaganda against Germany and Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist
party that guided the German nation from 1933 to 1945.
Both myself and Hans Krampe continued to question the historic roots
of Zionism and along with that the lies brought forth against the
German people. In doing so we have uncovered growing volumes of
evidence that clearly vindicate the German nation of any guilt
associated with a war that was purposely created in order to destroy
the one nation that had the courage and will to stand up to the Jewish
banking consortium of the 1930s. We now know that it was World Jewry
who first declared war on Germany and then used their power of the
"purse" and their media monopoly to bewitch the west into believing
that it was Adolf Hitler and the German people who wanted to take over
the world and turn it into a global concentration camp ruled by fear
and terror.
Today, the world is finally coming to the realization that those who
truly wanted to gain control of the world were the very ones who
vilified the German people and made them out to be cruel, heartless
monsters. By their fruits are they now known to the world and a bitter
fruit indeed it is that now attempts to rule our planet by fear and
terror and it's name is Zionism and its ownership is restricted to
those Jews who subscribe to the political ideology that supports its
existence.
Unfortunately Robin Mathews is still labouring under the illusions
that Marx's dialectic provided to the world and his inability to come
to terms with the reality of Zionism has somehow caused him to revert
to the old Zionist ploy of dredging up the name of Hitler and the
German people to justify his otherwise credible critique of Stephen
Harper and the Conservative party of Canada.
Bearing this all in mind I would therefore highly recommend that
readers take a close look at what Hans Krampe has to say about Robin's
recent article. The vital question, as always, is to discern what the
"Big Lie" is actually about. I believe that Hans Krampe furnishes us
with solid evidence that cannot be dismissed without serious
consideration and subsequent proof.
*** Please bear in mind that Robin's article is posted below Hans'
reply and should be read prior to reading Hans' response.
Sincerely,
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
RadicalPress.com
"Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″
____________________________________
About Robin Mathews. Adolf Hitler. Stephen Harper. The Big Lie.
By Hans Krampe
March 17, 2011

Our Fuehrer
_________________________________________
I have been following almost every article of yours on the Vive le
Canada website about the Basi-Virk-Basi case, the corruption of the
B.C. judiciary and "Premier" Gordon Campbell's — and his cronies —
involvement in it and was struck by your meticulous — almost pedantic
— attention to detail in your tenacious in-depth investigation. You
have produced a complete record for present and future generations to
be able to review the facts which are currently being suppressed in
the mainstream.
But not so with your April 14, 2011 article "Adolf Hitler. Stephen
Harper. The Big Lie." [see below. Ed.] There your meticulousness, let
alone your professed love for the truth and abhorrence of the Big Lie
went poof, out the window.
Your comparison of Harper with Hitler is a cowardly, though
politically correct, insult of the latter who can't answer your
ignorant attack on his good name. In this you've just joined the same
mob that goes under what you ignorantly call neonazis.
In case you don't know, neonazis have nothing in common with either
Adolf Hitler or the National Socialists, but they have a lot in common
with today's Jews, as the entire world has ample opportunity to
observe daily. By applying, in your hair raising ignorance, the
fraudulent images and allegations which you are so fond of, to the
German National Socialists, you have become indistinguishable from a
Zionist fascist mouthpiece, i.e. a true fascist, that is; though you
coyly call yourself a democrat.
I don't think you know the difference between National Socialism and
Fascism. In fact, hordes of Ph.D.s have bent over backwards to stick
the label of fascism on Adolf Hitler, and failed miserably, because
Hitler and the National Socialist movement were just what the name
says. They were not run by, nor controlled by, nor in cahoots with
corporate interests.
It was the other way around. Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist
government put not only strict controls on corporate activities,
allowing them just enough lee-way to operate profitably to the benefit
of the German nation, but also controlled Germany's money supply, an
insignificant detail which apparently you've got not the slightest
inkling about.
The result was, that Germany, under Adolf Hitler's leadership emerged
within four years from abject destitution and national bankruptcy in
1932 — thanks to the Weimar Republic's spineless, corrupt,
incompetent, yet democratic malfeasance — as the most prosperous
nation on earth with the highest standard of living, which hasn't been
surpassed by any other nation to date, while the rest of the world,
including "democratic" Canada, remained in a deep depression; even
though Germany had no natural resources to speak of. Adolf Hitler was
more popular, and not just in Germany, than any person dead or alive,
on this globe since then, your ignorant and biased frothing at the
mouth notwithstanding.
It may be news to you, but Hitler governed by referenda (six within
four years). How many referenda have there been within Canada's entire
history, pray tell? And were they internationally supervised, as was
the case in all six "nazi" referenda??
Compared with AH's leadership method of government, Canada's democracy
has been a quisling and bungling basket case forever, despite rubber
stamping votes every four years, whose parliaments serve no other
function than as troughs for a never ending line-up of criminal swine,
like Harper, to feed at. Compared to Hitler's and National Socialism's
accomplishments, Canada's so-called democracy is a disgrace and an
utter failure, considering that it's been sitting on a treasure trove
of unlimited resources, unsurpassed in the world, for two centuries.
Here is a classical example of evil for you, a real genocidal and
sadistic champion of sociopathy. Just take a closer look at your
Commonwealth hero: the Jew Winston Churchill. A homosexual pederast
with a genocidal record, having successfully starved millions of
Bengalis to death with nary a twinge of conscience. He never had to
tie his own shoelaces, having always had "his man" doing this job. He
also was fond of welcoming diplomats in his bathroom, in the nude, a
practice nick-named "the order of the bath". Being soused out of his
gourd was his normal everyday condition and the Canadian military,
inspired by his booze soaked schemes on how to more effectively roast
German women and children alive under a hail of phosphorous bombs —
the more the merrier — were never in the least ashamed to participate
in and enhance Churchill's menace with a menace of their own.
Canadians like you are blessed with a convenient tunnel vision and
honor
Churchill's memory since the war with a bizarre sense of ignorant and
self-satisfied approval that can only be described as criminally
insane. In your historical version of the war, all responsibility for
allied atrocities has been assigned to Adolf Hitler, allegedly because
he didn't want to unconditionally surrender. It's like me saying,
after I murdered you, it's all your fault because you refused to
surrender to me all your money, unconditionally.
As the photographic and documentary record shows, his refusal to
unconditionally surrender was more than justified, judging by the
demented and sadistic horrors allied ghouls then commenced to
perpetrate on a defenseless and vulnerable German population after
war's end for years. Your unreasonable and vindictive malice shows me
that you haven't a clue of what really happened there.
This, in a nutshell was, and still is, real and manifestly obvious
evil, no fabrications, fictions and unsubstantiated allegations
necessary. The evidence is undeniable that this was what the allies
indulged in with orgiastic glee, not Hitler.
Now let's look at another hero of yours, Joseph Djugashvili Stalin, a
paranoid and malicious psychopath, a megalomaniac and deadly enemy of
not just Germany but all of Europe, undeniably the biggest mass
murderer in the history of the world, having presided over the brutal,
gratuitous and sadistic torturing to death of over 60 million of his
own people, executed under the leadership and personal participation
of Jewish Marxist fanatics, according to Alexander Solzhenitzyn, one
of his more prominent victims, who survived and the testimonies of
many others. To compare this guy with Harper would've been a much more
fitting choice for you.
Compare this with Adolf Hitler, a highly decorated WW I veteran, EK1,
a decoration normally only awarded to officers; who spent the entire
first world war as a runner in the trenches, the most dangerous job
there was; a non-smoking vegetarian and a teetotaler, who became a
millionaire from the royalties of "Mein Kampf". Contrary to your
vitriolic allegations, he never broke a promise he made to the German
people, in fact he exceeded their wildest expectations, which earned
him the undying love and loyalty of especially the workers and
farmers.
The image of Hitler you entertain, is your own biased embellishment of
the fabrications of historical nitwits, a pathological case of
Germanophobia. Hitler never shied away from his responsibilities.
Taking responsibility and being accountable was a cornerstone of the
National Socialist idea and he promoted it by example. He didn't lie,
nor did he avoid problems, he solved them. The evidence to this is
overwhelming, but only visible to those who aren't deafened, dumbed
down and blinded by prejudice. It speaks for itself. But you keep
shying away from the obvious because it exposes your ignorant malice.
This is a manifest obviousness you, brave Robin, wouldn't be found
dead acknowledging. You were just old enough to absorb your full
measure of anti-German hate propaganda at the time, which seems to
have unalteringly calcified within your brain since then.
Did you ever ask yourself what business Canadians had killing Germans,
half way around the earth, who had never done them any harm, let alone
being a threat?
To anyone knowledgeable about what you keep ignorantly mangling beyond
recognition, it becomes immediately obvious that you haven't done any
— Zilch — research worth the name on National Socialism and Adolf
Hitler; but you have swallowed, wholesale, the Big Lie you profess to
deplore, as if it was candy, i.e. wartime anti-German hate propaganda,
conveniently formatted by lynch mobs after the war and made available
in literally billions of tons of vitriolic incitement to hate,
disguised as historical literature, which you now chuck up and trumpet
about as if it was divine gospel.
When Goebbels — and Hitler, et al — were talking about the Big Lie,
they meant the common practice of Jews and not, as you suggest, a
nifty proprietary method of theirs to deceive the German masses. It
becomes immediately apparent when read in the context of transcripts
and documents, which you apparently don't even know exist. I have, but
then again, I'm not a Ph.D., suffering from delusions of grandeur.
Uncritically parroting other people's regurgitated Big Lies as if they
were established fact, does not make one a credible authority on
history, only an ignorant parrot.
In your little anecdote of Winifred Wagner, spelled with one "n" —
offered to illustrate your historical astuteness, no doubt — you
allege that she complained about Nazi brutality; one among many
fictitious allegations and distortions put into the mouths of
countless prominent NS personalities, ex post facto, for the sake of
emphasis and entrenchment of the Nazis' "evil reputation". It's only a
fact in your biased mind, Robin. For anyone who, like myself and
unlike you, has diligently researched the period in question, it's
hackneyed and irrelevant nonsense.
That the National Socialist's movement had to organize a volunteer
guard (yes, the SA) to defend themselves against the constant and very
real brutal attacks of well organized communist shock troops, led by
Bolshevik Jews, fomenting strife and division among Germans at a time
when Germany was in terrible distress, is in your mind Nazi brutality.
Since Winifred is alleged to have said so, it must be true, eh?
Besides, Hitler would have to have been a Saint not to have had any
enemies busily subverting, undermining and spreading rumors and venom
about him, welcome fare now to feed your bias with.
As to Hitler's alleged avoidance of truth, his alleged lying, or his
alleged blaming of others, or any other offal you're fond of splashing
on his character, name your sources and provide the proof. When and on
what occasions did he behave in that way? The traits you're talking
about are primarily Harper's, not Hitler's, and those of Soviet,
Canadian, British and lately also of quisling politicians of the FRG
who, after 75 years of relentless "denazification" (your kind) are now
celebrating the total destruction of Germany by the allies and the
mass murder of over 13 million POWs, old men, women and children AFTER
THE WAR, as LIBERATION. The unmitigated insanity of it all!! There is
no comparison whatsoever possible between Hitler and any despots,
contemporary or otherwise, least of all Harper.
In fact, yours is the cowardly denigration of the memory of an
honorable man who was not only an outstanding genius but probably the
greatest statesman and leader of any nation that ever lived. Little
backwoods Ph.D.s, such as yourself, couldn't hold a candle to his
unsurpassed accomplishments, his integrity and his unfailing
commitment to Germany's well being.
To think, that you once stood in front of students, teaching them your
uncritically accepted baloney, laced with your own invented
associations, is downright scary. It's people like you who perpetuate
the Big Lie, complete with all the malice you're capable of loading it
with.
Finally, for me, as an ethnic German, you're an offensive and
malicious hate monger who welcomes and celebrates his irrational hate
of Germany with equally irrational satisfaction; broadcasting
undigested rumors, unproven hearsay and personal invention, while
ignoring any and all historical fact.
You're also a coward, who only gets "brave" within the approved
perimeters of political correctness, but lacks any and all civic
courage outside of it, where it counts.
Maybe it's an old age thing, like dementia setting in.
—————-
Hans Krampe is a former feature writer for The Radical. He lives in
the Cariboo region of central B.C.
Contact Hans at hjk@quesnelbc.com
_________________________________
Adolf Hitler. Stephen Harper. The Big Lie.
By Robin Mathews
April 14, 2011

Robin Mathews
__________________________
A column like this one opens a question that can't be answered
immediately – perhaps not for a long time.
Fifteen years from now an observer may say this column shows how far
from reality a commentator could go in the contentious days of 2011 in
Canada.
Or, the commentator may ask why only the writer of this column saw the
inevitable coming … what became obvious to everyone else … but only
when it was too late?
A clue that the second case might be true is the repeated summing-up
of the leaders debate on Tuesday, April 12 by Chris Hall (CBC
parliamentary reporter).
Over and over he reported that the leaders of the NDP, the bloc
quebecois, and the Liberals attacked Stephen Harper – and that he
answered them. Not once did Chris Hall – or any of the other
('mainstream') commentators I have observed say that very many of
Stephen Harper's replies were manipulations of fact to convey
falsehoods … when they were not outright lies.
Stephen Harper repeatedly said there was no tax cut for corporations
in the latest budget (before Parliament closed for the election).
That was not the point. A six billion dollar tax cut for the large
corporations will come into effect if the Harperites win government.
Those cuts need not come into effect. And so, in fact, the Harperites
are giving large corporations a six billion dollar tax cut.
Lying flagrantly, Stephen Harper insisted his Party is not in contempt
of Parliament when it is so without question.
On the matter of the Harperites refusing to provide spending
information (one of the bases of the contempt ruling) Harper said his
agents gave all information – a statement which is simply not true.
Perhaps most important of all, he denied the fundamental facts of
parliamentary government, insisting that "Canadians" believe the Party
with the most votes must govern. What he argued, in fact, is a denial
of the democratic parliamentary system. In short, he lied.
This morning on an open line show a caller claimed his statement that
the Canadian Labour Congress endorses his budget is an outright lie.
Those are five random examples. Random, I say, because one would need
a script of the debate to count up the number of times Stephen Harper
lied outright or manipulated facts to convey falsehoods.
He didn't disable his opponents by superior argument. He disabled the
whole debate by using persistent falsehood and near falsehood.
The latest, mid-election flurry of revelations of misdoing concerns
expenditures on the G20 Summit. Allegations are of misleading
Parliament by the Harperites (words for 'lying to Parliament'?),
misallocation of huge amounts of money, insider indulgences of Roman
proportions. All that through "leaks" of a forthcoming Report by the
Auditor General Sheila Fraser.
In Ottawa, Harperite insider John Baird has spoken with apparent
confident authority about what is contained in the confidential
Report. How can he do so? Who gave him copies of the Report? Did
Sheila Fraser? Stephen Harper (characteristically) is avoiding
responsibility … for as long as he can. Canadians must ask how many
such seamy revelations are waiting for an opening of the secrecy-bound
activities of the Harperites? They must ask the question.
Meanwhile, almost unnoticed, it has been revealed the Harperites took
words of praise Sheila Fraser wrote about Liberal financial activities
and quoted them about Harperite "work". Sheila Fraser is apparently
upset! Stockwell Day apologized profusely. But the question remains
– who did that piece of chicanery? Did Stephen Harper order it? Can
the Harperites be trusted on any matter whatever?
The conclusions which I have come to are quite clear. I believe
Stephen Harper is more comfortable lying than telling the truth. I
believe he is a psychopathic liar – which means I believe he will lie
(and follow up his lies) in any way he can to gain his ends and
aggrandize his position.
To take the logic of that position to its conclusion, I believe that -
if Stephen Harper were to gain enough power – he would murder his
political opponents, would have innocent Canadians shot down in the
streets. [Remember the Toronto G20 violations of free assembly.]
If what I write is fair comment on observed public affairs, then
Stephen Harper may properly be described as a neo-Fascist.
Historians of Nazism sometimes suggest the architect of "the Big Lie"
in Nazi politics was Josef Goebbels, the only Ph. D in the inner
circle and an early Party member. But the ultimate author of all Nazi
strategies of falsehood in that brutal despotism was Adolf Hitler
himself.
He was a friend of Winnifred Wagner, manager – preceding and during
the Second World War – of the famous Bayreuth (Wagner) Festivals.
Early in Hitler's time of growing power Winnifred Wagner would express
dismay to him about Nazi street brutality against political opponents
and others. Like Stephen Harper when faced with evidence of undeniable
wrong-doing by the Party, Hitler would say he knew nothing about it,
or someone else did it without his orders. Or he would belittle the
evidence or … change the subject or … lie outright.
When faced with inescapable need to act with courage and honesty,
Hitler, like Stephen Harper, would take the coward's way out.
In a moment of brazen bravado, for instance, Harper suggested a
one-on-one election debate with Michael Ignatieff – who agreed
immediately. On April Fool's day, the press announced Stephen
Harper's retreat, babbling nonsense and, again, repeating a simple lie
– that a coalition exists and is led by Michael Ignatieff.
Harper's campaign is built and based upon that and worse kinds of
lying. As the Encyclopedia Brittanica writes in relation to Fascism,
Stephen Harper makes a "proud sacrifice of all ethical scruples to
success". What Canadians must realize is that Stephen Harper employs
a complex strategy of lies that are well thought out and employed in
no accidental way.
To say Harper is fairly called a neo-Fascist may seem harsh. But
people in democracies must be clear-eyed if they wish to protect
democratic freedoms. Even Plato – 2500 years ago – observed that
Tyranny develops most naturally out of Democracy.
The characteristics of Fascism across Europe in the first half of the
twentieth century were plain: the sharing of State power with private
corporations to pursue common goals. Using the police to destroy
civil freedoms. Operating all activities under 'the Big Lie".
Enrolling the Mainstream Press and Media as accomplices in political
gangsterism. Persecuting, starving, torturing, murdering any number
of people opposed to the Fascists.
Hitler was determined to take power by constitutional means after
having failed in a violent attempt at a coup in Munich in 1923.
Twisting, perverting, exploiting, debasing constitutional practice
(like Stephen Harper), Hitler managed to bully and coerce his way to
supreme power in Germany – with results we know too well.
Stephen Harper's wholly perverse manipulation of prorogation to avoid
votes in Parliament might have been learned directly from Adolf
Hitler.
Harper's actions to deny Parliament rightful information and to
support the alleged lies of a cabinet minister might, also, have been
learned from the earlier "drive to power" of a dictator-in-waiting.
Like Adolf Hitler, Stephen Harper is, I have no doubt, the author of
all his Party's 'strategies of falsehood", all its attempts to destroy
the democracy in which it presently works. Harper's use of the RCMP to
eject the unwanted from "democratic" election campaign meetings
matches Hitler's "strong-arm squads" created to protect Nazi meetings
from attendance by "the unwanted".
Indeed, before the present election was announced, I wrote a column on
the RCMP and its growing corruption. In that column I guessed that
the dismissal of the top man at the RCMP, William Elliott, was
post-dated by Harper because the Mounties would be needed for dirty
work in the election.
As happened, RCMP officers have been used as thug "security" in the
Harper meetings. Did those RCMP officers wear the brown shirts of the
Nazis? We know nothing about them. Who are they? What are their
names? Why have they not been identified? Who ordered them to act at
those meetings? Was it Stephen Harper? We must know – before the
election.
Nor is it accidental, I believe, that William Elliott - the recently
fired top RCMP officer - was, earlier, a key actor in the Prime
Minister's Office undertaking the approval of much-charged Bruce
Carson to become a top advisor to Stephen Harper.
Carson is presently under investigation by the RCMP for alleged
improper behaviour in attempts to get contracts awarded. He has a
record of misdeeds and dubious connections. Stephen Harper alleges he
knew almost nothing of Bruce Carson's past.
One may guess that for his good and faithful service first in the PMO,
and then in Stockwell Day's Public Safety Department, and then as head
of the RCMP, William Elliot will fall from grace onto a very carefully
prepared, soft, luxurious bed.
Under Guiliano Zaccardelli, the RCMP used its "investigation" of Ralph
Goodale and the Department of Finance in 2006 to help defeat the
Liberals. Now the RCMP makes clear it can say nothing about the tale
of Stephen Harper's senior henchman Bruce Carson, involved, it is
alleged, in a dirtier piece of business than any Ralph Goodale has
ever been remotely connected to.
Having very recently discovered ethics, "ethics" is apparently the
basis upon which the William Elliott RCMP refuses to report about
Bruce Carson.
Carson's close relation to Stephen Harper and the PMO has, we may be
sure, nothing to do with the RCMP's newfound "ethics" and
"discretion".
The same slippery dishonesty, I believe, is involved in the case of
Elizabeth May's exclusion from the leaders debate. The key force
rejecting her has been, I believe, Stephen Harper. When the decision
of the "media consortium" was announced, both Jack Layton and Michael
Ignatieff said she should be included in the debate.
Characteristically shifting responsibility, Stephen Harper said he
would accept the decision of the "media consortium" – which, of course
– consulted the Parties. Only when it became plain that public
sentiment wanted Elizabeth May in the debate – only then did Harper
change his tune and say he supported her presence.
If truth is ever told by members of the media consortium, I am almost
certain they will report that Harper publicly supported May's presence
while privately telling the consortium he would withdraw if she was
allowed in. Harper knows she threatens his nondescript candidate Gary
Lunn. And so I believe Harper – in typical covert fashion – acted to
keep her out.
Consider the next minority government. I believe the Mainstream Press
and Media are doing what they can to secure a Harper victory. If they
were being genuinely impartial, they would have to be reporting
simple, factual things they are not reporting. 1. Minority
governments occur commonly in parliamentary systems. 2. Such
governments often do excellent work. 3. Coalitions may form – and, if
they do, they can govern effectively. 4. If they don't form,
'agreements to govern' (as has, in fact, been the case in Canada since
2006) can be effective. 5. And so Stephen Harper's attack on those
possibilities is a sham. It is a hoax which he is attempting to
perpetrate on the Canadian public.
But … more! The Mainstream Press and Media should expose Stephen
Harper's real goal … the one he is trying to use a pattern of lies to
achieve.
Having gone Right to the point of having 'nut case Yankee policies",
Harper knows they won't be supported by a minority government. $30
billions (plus) for fighter planes. A $6 billion gift to large
corporations. Multi billions to build [who will get the contracts?]
new nineteenth century jails to pack with people who shouldn't be in
jail. And more….
Harper has set up a situation that is so obscene no minority
parliament could accept it.
That means the minority parliament will vote him down and will seek
from the Governor General the right to rule. Stephen Harper has, I
believe, anticipated that (as I believe he anticipated he would need
William Elliott as head of the RCMP during the election). And so he
appointed a Harperite Hack as Governor General. That opens huge and
dangerous possibilities. If the Governor General attempts to work
politically for Stephen Harper, instead of constitutionally for
Canada, he will create a crisis in Canadian democracy.
In that situation a Harper attempted coup d'etat will be used to
prevent a Liberal-led minority government.
If that happens, the Opposition parties will be forced into some kind
of coalition. To save Canadian democracy, the matter may demand an
all-party Opposition coalition. Stephen Harper knows that, I am sure.
He is trying to lie enough to make Canadians believe (in advance)
that a coalition is undemocratic and illegitimate. That is why he
lies about it consistently…on and on and on.
Stephen Harper has never let the truth stand in the way of his
ambition to rule as what Plato called a Tyrant.
The Mainsteam Press and Media – which opens up none of the facts on
this matter, supports, I believe, what is in fact Stephen Harper's
baldfaced lying. Even the CBC does. In the face, for instance, of
what the Friends of Canadian Broadcasting insist is an outright lie by
the Prime Minister's Office, by Stephen Harper, and by the arts and
culture minister James Moore about cuts to CBC funding … the CBC
remains mute.
Complicity with lies and wrongdoing can't go much farther than that.
It is plain that Canadians are going to have to figure out the pattern
of lying laid out by Stephen Harper and what it is intended to
produce. They are going to have to figure it out in the face of the
failure of the Mainstream Press and Media to do their job. Canadians
would be wise to be ready for a major attempt to hi-jack democracy in
Canada and to have set up in its place a Harper Tyranny.
Canadians are going to have to realize they're facing what I believe
is a neo-Fascist leader of the Conservative Party of Canada. And
Canadians are going to have to reject him with all the energy they
have.
———–
Contact Robin Mathews at rmathews@telus.net
Posted in Editor's Zone, Political Zionism, 'state' of Israel, Israeli
Terrorism, Robin Mathews/Contributor, Arthur Topham/ Contributor,
anti-Semitism, Jewish Lobby, Jews Behind Bolshevik Revolution,
Alternative Media, Canadian Identity/Sovereignty, Jews, Jewish Banking
Cartel, Law & Justice, Jewish Holocaust Industry, National Socialism
(NAZI), Communism, B'nai Brith, Jewish Media Monopoly, Canadian Human
Rights Commission, Fascism, Harry Abrams, Canadian Human Rights
Tribunal, Adolf Hitler, Canadian Human Rights Act, Hans Krampe, PM
Stephen Harper, Section 13, National Socialism | No Comments »



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Ruth.Ross@christianlegalfellowship.org
Cc: thannigan@ropesgray.com ; csu@jesuits.ca ; robmoore@atrueconservative.ca
; Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier ministre ;
plocatelli@scu.edu ; elliottx@nb.sympatico.ca ;
bishop@dioceseofsaintjohn.org ; nenprvsj@bc.edu ; curia@sjcuria.org ;
tsmolich@calprov.org ; noprovsj@norprov.org ; moprov@jesuits-mis.org ;
nykprov@nysj.org ; oregonprov@nwjesuits.org ; wisprov@jesuitswisprov.org ;
sjdet@aol.com ; chgprov@jesuits-chi.org ; joseph.herlihy.1@bc.edu
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 10:24 PM
Subject: One hell of an Email


"From a little spark may burst a mighty flame." Dante from The
Divine Comedy

Heres hoping but I ain't praying I am doing something about
it.

Sent after
Midnight December 25th, 2004 in Rome

David McMath and Walter Kubitz

Ruth Ross Executive Director

Christian Legal Fellowship

790 Franklinway Crescent,

London, ON, Canada. N6G 5C8

RE: Corruption of the Church State and Justice System

Hey,

Pursuant to my calls to all three of your offices yesterday and also
to the office of Msgr. George Martin, the Vicar General of the Diocese of
Saint John. Please find enclosed the hard copy of the material I promised to
send. The CD of the copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in
confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly
investigated by law enforcement. This material includes an exact copy of all
material given to our present MP Rob Moore and a copy of a letter given to
the Priest Bill Elliot the following week along with the same material and
three original wiretap tapes. There is no need to give your copies of this
material to the RCMP or CSIS or the Arar Commission because they already
have had theirs for many months. This email was composed in a hurry and sent
out just before leaving our home.

If Mr. Kubitz wishes he may contact me and if we agree he can use
this material to aid him in entering into a personal injury complaint on my
behalf. I have already contacted the lawyer Ann Wheeler of Fredicton and
faxed her this letter and a copy of the Affidavit of mine that was filed in
US District Court on Dec 12th, 2002 that no doubt caused Cardinal Law to
quit his job and run off to Maryland and then Rome. To everyone's chagrin
the Pope forgot to take him off the Boston Arch Diocese payroll until I
announced my run for Parliament and began attacking the partners of some of
the lawyers that had settled with O'Malley's new lawyer, Hannigan in 2003. I
had been arguing the Cardinal Law's other lawyers Todd and Rogers for over a
year and was ignored but as soon as I introduced the other side of the fence
in another dispute into my matters they quickly settled and tried hard to
ignore me some more. Obviously their conspiracy worked against them and
allowed me more time to rope many more corrupt lawyers etc. and drag them
into my affairs. Consider it a simple Maritimer's backward way of pursuing
justice by intervening into many matters in a unusual and unpredictable
fashion. Feel free to stress test my ethics in any matter but watch out I
don't drag you into them as well. Some of my concerns involve the crime of
murder.

Stephen Harper should have made certain that his lawyer buddy Rob
Moore had upheld the law as soon as he announced in June on CBC that he had
information about the Arar matter. He made that announcement after stopping
for ice cream in Sussex with Rob Moore and Elsie Wayne. I made certain the
RCMP Officers guarding Harper and the others that day were made well aware
that Rob Moore possessed evidence of criminal matters that should be
investigated immediately. I had someone witness me telling them so and had
photos taken to record the encounter. Call me a liar I dare ya.

When David McMath refused to come to the phone to speak to me, I knew
for certain he knew the score. His secretary was confused as to why he would
not pick up the phone but I was not. He did not want to speak to me because
he knew that in a very few words I could force him to display the integrity
that must befit one of his profession or compel him to prove to me that he
is just another liar. So like most lawyers he tried to duck my concerns and
me. I loved it and laughed at his faint-hearted and predictable antics. I
called the Vicar General Martin and left the voice mail that McMath desired
from me. Nobody has called back to disagree. Perhaps they should talk and
call me back after they receive a copy of this letter by fax and email and
have a long talk with the priest, Bill Elliot. I know for a fact I really
pissed that old bastard off by merely shaking his hand and stating my name
in front of over a hundred of his followers and almost every other Candidate
from two ridings including the winners the liberal Paul Zed and the new
conservative, Rob Moore. I consider both me to be just opposites of the same
counterfeit coin that the people are supposed to trust as genuine. Causing
that evil old priest to lose his temper is one of my fondest memories of my
political campaign along with pissing off Leroy Armstrong in front of his
friends during a debate of federal politicians that he had no business
mouthing off in. Since Bill Elliot wanted people to vote with their
conscience, perhaps he should ask the man they elected Paul Zed and his
friends Joe Day, Henrick Tonning and David Lutz to act according to theirs
if they have any.

Whereas as your organization claims that acting through its
Executive Director, its Board of Directors, its member volunteers, its
lawyers, law students, and friends, the CLF: promotes Alternative Dispute
Resolution which is designed to help Christians solve their disputes outside
of court amongst other things. Perhaps you should inspire the Catholic
Church to settle with me before I sue its fat pious ass. Forgive me for
speaking plain but if you folks do not uphold the law and the Public Trust,
I will also sue you in the same complaint. There is no middle ground for any
lawyer to stand on once I have made them well aware of the reasons behind
this unholy war of words with priests, bankers, statesmen and lawyers.
Whereas you folks brag of your interventions into other matters, why not
invite you to my circus out of the gate?

If anyone cares to notice the Affidavit crucifying Cardinal Law is
witnessed by my brother in law, the lawyer Reid Chedore. He is a religious
man who failed to prove his ethics to me when he sided with my foes to
protect his own pocket book. I am not religious and do not hold with all the
opinions within your good book but agree with many of its words. In my book
there are no degrees of honesty. Lawyers must maintain their oath under rule
of law and answer to the public that trusts them to the same degree as I do
to my own conscience. I answer only to my kin that I respect. Maybe you
folks should talk to Reid and make him see the light, repent his evil ways
and seek my forgiveness instead of talking to my friends and family about my
so-called crazy ways. Yea I am crazy. Crazy like of fox. I never expected
politicians, priests, bankers and lawyers to be honest, so I played them all
like a fiddle in order to dance to my own jig.

I must clearly state that IF I have an unnatural or questionable
demise then my blood will be found on the hands of many a low man in high
places. The Puppet Master over all is none other than the evil Count
Peter-Hans Kolvenbach the Superior General of the Society of Jesus. The fact
that I have encountered so many corrupt Jesuit educated people should make
this painfully obvious to all. It is the General that I am picking a fight
with today because I have lost patience with the incompetence and stupidity
of his foot soldiers. Tis time to take on the Boss. I became very angry by
the fact that he came to speak in Omaha prior to the Federal Election while
his BUDDYS (Bunch of Unethical Dandy Damned Yankee Solicitors) tried to keep
me under lock and key like a caged crazy animal. Yea yea I studied all about
lawyers and Masons and politicians and priests and bankers and their signs
on the dollar etc. I do understand the wicked game and want no part of it. I
view everyone as just people and have no respect for any authority given to
anyone if I do not feel they deserve it.

If someone is sent to my door to attack my kin or me under the veil of
some authority, I take it very personally with the person that approached
me. If they admit their mistake and apologize, I accept it but I demand to
know who sent them and why. If they are liars and will not tell the truth I
find it out for myself. The most glaring example of minor but well connected
crooks would be my wife's uncle William J. Kickham a wealthy ex FBI agent
and her cousins Charles J. Kickham Jr. and the secretary of Cardinal Law,
then Bishop Lennon and now Bishop O'Malley, Robert T. Kickham. The latter is
priest that shares the same name as the long dead Monsignor Robert T.
Kickham. That bastard in a Black Robe died at a family reunion on Prince
Edward Island. I would not be surprised if Bishop J. Faber MacDonald knows
the Kickhams quite well. I have no doubt that my name has been cursed many
times in conversations between priests and lawyers in Boston and Saint John
in their efforts to impeach my character. I must ask them all why an honest
man is so hard to believe? Let just say that I was not surprised by the fact
that it was a Assistant District Attorney by the name of MacDonald that was
so willing to make false allegations in order to have me sent to jail
without bail to have my head examined.

It has always been hard times for an honest man in the Maritimes and
everywhere else. However the most obvious example that I can present of how
bad the corruption and conspiracy is within the Church, State and Justice
System occurred on Sept 17/02. On the same day that Michael J. Sullivan the
US Attorney filed his malicious EX PARTE Motion to Dismiss Charles J.
Kickham Jr. signed a new will leaving one hundred and fifty grand to the
Jesuits at Holy Cross no doubt as a form of modern day dispensation to pay
for the incompetant actions of the Rogers Law firm in their defense of
Cardinal Law in my complaint. Everybody must have had a heart attack when
they filed answer to a complaint that the Cardinal had already been
fraudulently removed from. It was a small wonder to me that O'Malley fired
them as soon as he got his new job as Bishop. Only thing was he hired Mr.
Hannigan of the Ropes and Gray Law Firm.

Mr. Caner of the same firm as Hannigan was involved in the SEC cover
up of the Brookline Savings Bank and Putnam Investments Securities
Fraud. O'Malley's
ex Banker turned priest secretary should have better informed him of my
actions against his own relatives. This truly is a comic tragedy of huge
proportions. Although murky and complicated, the conspiracy is also very
easy for ordinary people to understand. That is why the courts have done
their best to keep me away from a jury. As soon as I introduced the fact
that I had many wiretap tapes about unrelated matters that irrefutably
proves that Federal Law Enforcement is full of Rampant Corruption. The FEDS
tried their worst and I was lucky enough to meet a few honest people within
the system. Now the crooks do not know who to trust and have no idea what to
do now except kill me. They know I won't quit and cannot be bought off. They
also know that if someone does kill me that I have taken the proper steps to
make matters get worse not better. They cannot get us all. Now you folks
know the truth too. It is high time that the truth is revealed for the
benefit of all. Why not side with me after you check my work? You have
nothing to lose and our children have the world to regain from the Masters
of War.

You may rest assured that I cannot wait until the Pig Farming lawyer,
Frank McKenna that grew up down the road from my Bike Shop makes his
appearance in Washington. I have a few bones to pick with that sly dog. He
is not a bit bigger or smarter than me. He does have many powerful and
crooked acquaintances but there is no honour amongst thieves. Frankly likely
has far fewer friends that I that he can really trust. Most of my true
friends are as poor as church mice or are in debt to their eyeballs. They
stand with me to protect our rights and personal freedom out of mutual love
and respect for each other rather than pocket book defensive actions of the
wealthy men that surround Frank Boy and his cohorts that promote his own
propaganda. He ain't fooling Maritimers. Why do you think the good folks of
New Brunswick swept the liberals out of power right after Franky Boy quit?
No doubt Bernard Lord is considering not running again right now after the
results of his long delayed by election. The only crook that made out there
was the turncoat, Bernard Richard. Ask John Herron what we think of
turncoats. If he had been ethical he should have ran as an independent. At
least he would have lost with his pride intact like I did. We all know what
a scumbag Franky Boy really is. Paul Martin in order to suit his own crooked
ends was not so wise to pick him to go to Washington. Although he will fit
in well with the other snakes in Washington, he will eat his own tail if it
furthers his own ends. Everybody thinks that he wants Martin's job but in my
opinion he is being groomed to replace the aging and very evil Maurice
Strong. He is by far more well connected than Chucky Kickham once was and a
thousand times more ruthless if that is possible. I will use Chucky's bad
acts to expose Franky's failings because I consider him to be a very
dangerous threat to the future of Canada. Check his work and watch him
closely.

The Yankees are making noises about Drafting people again. As a man
who is raising a fourteen year old son to hate war I will not hesitate to
move him to save haven in my native land. Ask David Lutz the Yankee
Carpetbagger and a friend of Franky's why I think this way. One of Franky's
first jobs as Ambassador may be to insure my son's birthright. That said I
must do my best that Canada remains an independent sovereign nation worth
living in and defending.

All that said Franky Boy and I will have lots to argue about on how
the Canadian Consulate treated me and protected my freedom while I was in a
Boston jail held under the charges of "other" by a Sheriff that had
supported fraud and perjury against me in a federal court. First I must I
ask him why he failed to answer the same letter I composed on Canada Day
that Brad Green was so quick to answer. That one should bring a comical
response to start things off in a proper manner. I choked laughing when I
read how Franky courted the blessings of B'nai B'rith Boys and the Bell
Canada doings after B'nai B'rith had condemned Martin's last choice of for
an ambassador and Bell Canada had shown me their ass. Hopefully Franky boy
and I shall display to the world how pigheaded Maritmers truly are when we
butt heads. We are both from the same point on the planet but are worlds
apart as men. It should be quite a hoedown particularly after Premiers
Williams and Hamm just displayed their Maritime willingness to fight.

Maybe the rest of the world will finally realize just how important
the Maritimes truly is in world affairs EH? It constantly amazed me why no
one wondered why nominds such a Bernard Lord and Frank McKenna were invited
to Bilderberger's meetings and why everybody wants to golf and fish with men
I wouldn't cross the street to talk to. To see evil men like T. Alex Hickman
and Lord Beaverbrook honoured should raise the flag of contempt of any
honest hard working Maritimer. It is them I am speaking for. Get it?

I consider myself to be a very powerful friend of honest people and a
very formidable foe for any crook. IF a man is measured by the strength and
number of his enemies then I can easily support that thinking and I agree
with Kipling in his poem labeled IF and I strongly disagree with Dostoevsky's
attempt to defend the actions of the evil Grand Inquisitors of old. I would
dearly love to debate Paul L. Locatelli, SJ about his teachings and opinions
but would prefer to argue his legal counsel John Ottoboni or anyone else in
front of a jury of my peers first. What do you think should I send these
Italian dudes the same copy of the wiretap tape I just sent you? The
Commissioner of the RCMP and his General Counsel should have listened to the
tapes before he taught another Italian Catholic lawyer Argeo P. Cellucci how
to ride a horse in Ottawa so he would not appear to be the horse's ass that
he is during the parade for the Calgary Stampede. Mr. Kubitz you may have
attended the Parade what did you think of the Yankee US Ambassador Argeo's
performance on a horse? Was the picture the same whether he was coming or
going. A horse's ass by any other name still smells the same. I pity the
poor bastard that has to come along and clean up after him.

What do ya think should I chuck Argeo in bed with Franky Boy as soon
as Bush appoints a new Ambassador to Canada? A blind man can see that Argeo
has worn out his welcome just current ambassador Michael Kergin the lame
duck in Washington has. That bastard certainly wasn't around when I needed
him and Franky will do no better.

By the way before I go did everybody think I didn't know that
Chucky graduated from the same class at Harvard the Redstone did? I died
laughing when Redstone endorsed Bush at Mulroney's CEO party in China at the
same time his man Dan Rather was being hung out to dry. The fact that
Redstone hired one of the very people I sued along with Cardinal Law to
check Viacom's ethics is simply too funny for words right now. I will let
you figure out who he is. Another thing thing that really pissed me off was
the fact that a Canadian Company, McGraw Hill partied with Accenture in the
Big Apple while I sat in jail in Beantown. Ask them or Brian Mulroney or
William Cohen or Cendant Corp or Bill Gates why. I ain't telling I will
explain it in court but rest assured Sun Life and Bell Canada are very
nervous campers about my actions in the USA. Ask Robert C. Pozen.

In conclusion I ask that you all review Mr. Kubitz's words, check my
work closely and realize you have just encountered a rather unusual
political animal that has no fear of litigation. Whether you believe me or
not it is no matter to me. As I said to Mr. Kubitz you now have my fair
warning that I am about to raise some Hell. I have no doubt the Black Pope
will be curing my name at the Black Mass tonight. He can pray to his god for
help as he enters into a war of words with a man that stands alone. Wanna
bet he will not argue me Pro Se? Would you like to take bets on my life
expectancy? I feel lucky. Do you? Many times in my life I have bet my ass on
my actions? Have you? I am a seasoned veteran in dicey situations. Are you?
Why not just act honestly speak the truth and let the cards fall where they
may? Otherwise we all lose and the bad bastards win again. I am sick of it.
Aren't you? I simply don't care about anyone political standing on any
matter as long as it is backed by ethical consideration. Democracy is the
ethical argument. The majority rules after people worthy of the Public Trust
properly speaking for the people they were elected to represent argue the
merits of all sides. The interests of the wealthy should consist of less
that five percent of any vote not all of every vote simply because they
funded the representative's rise to power. What reason did the Yankees give
for rebelling from our Monarchy? No Taxation without proper representation?
Well? Act like ethical Religious lawyers and speak up goddamnit!!!

Mr. Kubitz your words are as follows.

"A decade or so later, pre-election polls predicted the Conservative Party
might win the June 28, 2004 Federal election. The Party came close. To the
disappointment of many conservative Christians, the cost of this electoral
popularity was a retreat from politically unpalatable beliefs regarding
abortion and same-sex marriage. If some commentators are correct, it appears
that the prevailing current social morality of Canadians is founded on
individual self-fulfillment and tolerance. But the good news is that the
widely-regarded myth of a "Christian North America" has been shattered.
Christians now realize that we no longer live in a "Christian" society. The
naive blinders are off. What is God's agenda for Christians in a political
sense? My thesis is that God's agenda always has been, and continues to be,
an agenda of being salt and light in every arena of endeavour (including
politics, the judiciary, and even the organized church), the betterment of
what can be bettered in society, and the attainment of eternal life for as
many as are called and who accept His message."

I think your thesis sucks but I recognize your right to speak of it
and I am jealous of your connections that allow your to spread your words.
At least I did you the honour of recognizing your work and inserting it in
mine. I dare you to do the same with me. In rebuttal to your theory on your
god's agenda I believe his agenda comes from the minds of men to suit their
own ends. I say your lament should fall on deaf ears. Our Society clearly
mandates that we keep the state, the courts and the church separate for the
obvious reason that a religious political lawyer would want it changed. Why
must our society abide by your Christian beliefs and standards as long as we
all abide by the golden rule and our own conscience. You must agree that
Shakespeare made a pretty good point about being true to yourself and then
what surely follows. My question to any pious person that reads this can be
found in Matthew 16:26. Methinks your god asked the question. My answer is
simple. Nothing. However being the self confessed. Righteous feeling dude
that I am, I must quote the Psalm 37:16 of another David because I agree
with him not you. "a little that a righteous man hath is better than the
riches of many wicked." Can you tell I am having fun with this shit? Do you
think it will make the Black Pope who is having a party right now as pissed
off as I am? If so, then I will have done some good. I don't care if any
lawyer admits it just as long as they argue me. I am so afraid that they
will drop the charges against me and I will lose my long awaited jury of my
peers, I must keep the bastards upset or die trying.

Whereas everything in the supposed Heaven and Hell is purportedly done
in threes. I have faxed, emailed and sent this document by mail or courier
to the Superior General and many of his cohorts the best way I know how. He
can never say he has never heard of me and my beefs against him. If ever we
meet the first question I will ask him is whether or not it is true what I
heard about the other guy he hangs around with that is dressed in white and
what he sold in World War II before he became a priest. Maybe I will get to
ask the famous Canadian lawyers Doug Christie or Ian Hanomansing first. They
implied that my friend Byron Prior is a liar. They are the ones in the wrong
not him. the following is an email exchange between Rob Moore and I before I
came home to run for Parliament. Look how many people in Parliament were
well aware of some of the reasons the reasons for my homecomings.

Enough is enough Count Peter-Hans Kolvenbach quite messing around
and sending your small fry after me and torturing my kin. It is high noon
somewhere on this planet. Skitter scatter lets get at her. Do your worst or
get honest. You chose. We both ain't getting any younger. It is high time we
argue. I will wager that I will sue you first or die trying. What say you?
Wanna bet?

Cya'll in
CourtJ


David R. Amos


153 Alvin Ave


Milton MA. 02186


----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: fundshow@robtv.com
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 10:50 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: frankmag@rogers.com
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 11:35 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: leaders@ceocouncil.ca
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 6:46 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: george@nb.sympatico.ca
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 3:22 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: RADIATOR@nb.sympatico.ca
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 2:21 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: efh@unb.ca
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 1:58 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: kentfox@nbnet.nb.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 11:59 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: premier@gnb.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:15 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Chisholm.Pothier@gnb.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:08 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: submit@ftowncrier.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 1:22 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: editor@fredthepaper.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 12:53 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: digeo@nbnet.nb.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 12:29 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: oldmaison@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 11:40 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Yelich.L@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:32 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home


Roy.J@parl.gc.ca ; Saada.J@parl.gc.ca ; Sauvageau.B@parl.gc.ca ;
Savoy.A@parl.gc.ca ; Scherrer.H@parl.gc.ca ; Schmidt.W@parl.gc.ca ;
Scott.A@parl.gc.ca ; Serre.B@parl.gc.ca ; Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Shepherd.A@parl.gc.ca ; Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca ; Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Sorenson.K@parl.gc.ca ; Speller.B@parl.gc.ca ; Spencer.L@parl.gc.ca ;
St-Julien.G@parl.gc.ca ; St-Jacques.D@parl.gc.ca ; St-Hilaire.C@parl.gc.ca ;
St.Denis.B@parl.gc.ca ; Steckle.P@parl.gc.ca ; Stewart.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Stinson.D@parl.gc.ca ; Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca ; Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca ;
Szabo.P@parl.gc.ca ; Telegdi.A@parl.gc.ca ; Thibault.R@parl.gc.ca ;
Thibeault.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca ; Thompson.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Tirabassi.T@parl.gc.ca ; Tobin.B@parl.gc.ca ; Toews.V@parl.gc.ca ;
Tonks.A@parl.gc.ca ; Torsney.P@parl.gc.ca ; Tremblay.S@parl.gc.ca ;
Tremblay.St@parl.gc.ca ; Ur.R-M@parl.gc.ca ; Valeri.T@parl.gc.ca ;
Vanclief.L@parl.gc.ca ; Vellacott.M@parl.gc.ca ; Venne.P@parl.gc.ca ;
Volpe.J@parl.gc.ca ; Wappel.T@parl.gc.ca ; Wasylycia-Leis.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Wayne, Elsie - M.P. ; Whelan.S@parl.gc.ca ; White.R@parl.gc.ca ;
White.T@parl.gc.ca ; Wilfert.B@parl.gc.ca ; Williams.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Wood.B@parl.gc.ca
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Rock.A@parl.gc.ca
Cc: McNally.G@parl.gc.ca ; McTeague.D@parl.gc.ca ; Menard.R@parl.gc.ca ;
Meredith.V@parl.gc.ca ; Merrifield.R@parl.gc.ca ; Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca ;
Mills.B@parl.gc.ca ; Mills.D@parl.gc.ca ; Minna.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Mitchell.A@parl.gc.ca ; Moore.J@parl.gc.ca ; Murphy.S@parl.gc.ca ;
Myers.L@parl.gc.ca ; Nault.R@parl.gc.ca ; Neville.A@parl.gc.ca ;
Normand.G@parl.gc.ca ; Nystrom.L@parl.gc.ca ; Obhrai.D@parl.gc.ca ;
OBrien.L@parl.gc.ca ; OBrien.P@parl.gc.ca ; OReilly.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Owen.S@parl.gc.ca ; Pagtakhan.R@parl.gc.ca ; Pallister.B@parl.gc.ca ;
Pankiw.J@parl.gc.ca ; Paquette.P@parl.gc.ca ; Paradis.D@parl.gc.ca ;
Parrish.C@parl.gc.ca ; Patry.B@parl.gc.ca ; Penson.C@parl.gc.ca ;
Peric.J@parl.gc.ca ; Perron.G-A@parl.gc.ca ; Peschisolido.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Peterson.J@parl.gc.ca ; Pettigrew.P@parl.gc.ca ; Phinney.B@parl.gc.ca ;
Picard.P@parl.gc.ca ; Pickard.J@parl.gc.ca ; Pillitteri.G@parl.gc.ca ;
Plamondon.L@parl.gc.ca ; Pratt.D@parl.gc.ca ; Price.D@parl.gc.ca ;
Proctor.D@parl.gc.ca ; Proulx.M@parl.gc.ca ; Provenzano.C@parl.gc.ca ;
Rajotte.J@parl.gc.ca ; Redman.K@parl.gc.ca ; Reed.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Regan.G@parl.gc.ca ; Reid.S@parl.gc.ca ; Reynolds.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Richardson.J@parl.gc.ca ; Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca ; Robillard.L@parl.gc.ca ;
Robinson.S@parl.gc.ca ; Rocheleau.Y@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:29 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca
Cc: Hill.G@parl.gc.ca ; Hill.J@parl.gc.ca ; Hilstrom.H@parl.gc.ca ;
Hinton.B@parl.gc.ca ; Hubbard.C@parl.gc.ca ; Ianno.T@parl.gc.ca ;
Jackson.O@parl.gc.ca ; Jaffer.R@parl.gc.ca ; Jennings.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Johnston.D@parl.gc.ca ; Jordan.J@parl.gc.ca ; Karetak-Lindell.N@parl.gc.ca ;
Karygiannis.J@parl.gc.ca ; Keddy.G@parl.gc.ca ; Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Keyes.S@parl.gc.ca ; Kilger.B@parl.gc.ca ; Kilgour.D@parl.gc.ca ;
Knutson.G@parl.gc.ca ; KraftSloan.K@parl.gc.ca ; Laframboise.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Laliberte.R@parl.gc.ca ; Lalonde.F@parl.gc.ca ; Lanctot.R@parl.gc.ca ;
Lastewka.W@parl.gc.ca ; Lavigne.R@parl.gc.ca ; Lebel.G@parl.gc.ca ;
Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca ; Lee.D@parl.gc.ca ; Leung.S@parl.gc.ca ;
Lill.W@parl.gc.ca ; Lincoln.C@parl.gc.ca ; Longfield.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Loubier.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca ; Lunney.J@parl.gc.ca ;
MacAuley.L@parl.gc.ca ; Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca ; Macklin.P@parl.gc.ca ;
Malhi.G@parl.gc.ca ; Maloney.J@parl.gc.ca ; Mahoney.S@parl.gc.ca ;
Manley.J@parl.gc.ca ; Manning.P@parl.gc.ca ; Marceau.R@parl.gc.ca ;
Marcil.S@parl.gc.ca ; Mark.I@parl.gc.ca ; Marleau.D@parl.gc.ca ;
Martin.K@parl.gc.ca ; Martin.Pd@parl.gc.ca ; Martin.P@parl.gc.ca ;
Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca ; Mayfield.P@parl.gc.ca ; McCallum.J@parl.gc.ca ;
McCormick.L@parl.gc.ca ; McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca ; McGuire.J@parl.gc.ca ;
McKay.J@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:22 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Herron.J@parl.gc.ca
Cc: Duncan.J@parl.gc.ca ; Duplain.C@parl.gc.ca ; Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ;
Eggleton.A@parl.gc.ca ; Elley.R@parl.gc.ca ; Epp.K@parl.gc.ca ;
Eyking.M@parl.gc.ca ; Farrah.G@parl.gc.ca ; Finlay.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Fitzpatrick.B@parl.gc.ca ; Folco.R@parl.gc.ca ; Fontana.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Forseth.P@parl.gc.ca ; Fournier.G@parl.gc.ca ; Fry.H@parl.gc.ca ;
Gagliano.A@parl.gc.ca ; Gagnon.C@parl.gc.ca ; Gagnon.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Gallant.C@parl.gc.ca ; Gallaway.R@parl.gc.ca ; Gauthier.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Girard-Bujold.J@parl.gc.ca ; Godfrey.J@parl.gc.ca ; Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca ;
Goldring.P@parl.gc.ca ; Goodale.R@parl.gc.ca ; Gouk.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Graham.B@parl.gc.ca ; Gray.H@parl.gc.ca ; Grewal.G@parl.gc.ca ;
Grey.D@parl.gc.ca ; Grose.I@parl.gc.ca ; Guarnieri.A@parl.gc.ca ;
Guay.M@parl.gc.ca ; Guimond.M@parl.gc.ca ; Hanger.A@parl.gc.ca ;
Harb.M@parl.gc.ca ; Harris.R@parl.gc.ca ; Harvard.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Harvey.A@parl.gc.ca ; Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:17 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: bihal_sm007@rogers.com
Cc: pm@pm.gc.ca ; pmo@pm.gc.ca ; Abbott.J@parl.gc.ca ; Ablonczy.D@parl.gc.ca
; Adams.P@parl.gc.ca ; Alcock.R@parl.gc.ca ; Allard.C@parl.gc.ca ;
Anders.R@parl.gc.ca ; Anderson.D@parl.gc.ca ; Anderson.Da@parl.gc.ca ;
Assad.M@parl.gc.ca ; Assadourian.S@parl.gc.ca ; Asselin.G@parl.gc.ca ;
Augustine.J@parl.gc.ca ; Bachand.A@parl.gc.ca ; Bachand.C@parl.gc.ca ;
Bagnell.L@parl.gc.ca ; Bailey.R@parl.gc.ca ; Baker.G@parl.gc.ca ;
Bakopanos.E@parl.gc.ca ; Barnes.S@parl.gc.ca ; Beaumier.C@parl.gc.ca ;
Belair.R@parl.gc.ca ; Belanger.M@parl.gc.ca ; Bellehumeur.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Bellemare.E@parl.gc.ca ; Bennett.C@parl.gc.ca ; Benoit.L@parl.gc.ca ;
Bergeron.S@parl.gc.ca ; Bertrand.R@parl.gc.ca ; Bevilacqua.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Bigras.B@parl.gc.ca ; Binet.G@parl.gc.ca ; Blaikie.B@parl.gc.ca ;
Blondin-Andrew.E@parl.gc.ca ; Bonin.R@parl.gc.ca ; Bonwick.P@parl.gc.ca ;
Borotsik.R@parl.gc.ca ; Boudria.D@parl.gc.ca ; Bourgeois.D@parl.gc.ca ;
Bradshaw.C@parl.gc.ca ; Breitkreuz.G@parl.gc.ca ; Brien.P@parl.gc.ca ;
Brison.S@parl.gc.ca ; Brown.B@parl.gc.ca ; Bryden.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Bulte.S@parl.gc.ca ; Burton.A@parl.gc.ca ; Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca ;
Caccia.C@parl.gc.ca ; Cadman.C@parl.gc.ca ; Calder.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Cannis.J@parl.gc.ca ; Caplan.E@parl.gc.ca ; Cardin.S@parl.gc.ca ;
Carignan.J@parl.gc.ca ; Carroll.A@parl.gc.ca ; Casey.B@parl.gc.ca ;
Casson.R@parl.gc.ca ; Castonguay.J@parl.gc.ca ; Catterall.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Cauchon.M@parl.gc.ca ; Chamberlain.B@parl.gc.ca ; Charbonneau.Y@parl.gc.ca ;
Chatters.D@parl.gc.ca ; clark.j@parl.gc.ca ; Coderre.D@parl.gc.ca ;
Collenette.D@parl.gc.ca ; Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca ; Comuzzi.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Copps.S@parl.gc.ca ; Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca ; Crete.P@parl.gc.ca ;
Cullen.R@parl.gc.ca ; Cummins.J@parl.gc.ca ; Cuzner.R@parl.gc.ca ;
Dalphond-Guiral.M@parl.gc.ca ; Davies.L@parl.gc.ca ; Day.S@parl.gc.ca ;
Desjarlais.B@parl.gc.ca ; Desrochers.O@parl.gc.ca ; DeVillers.P@parl.gc.ca ;
Dhaliwal.H@parl.gc.ca ; Dion.S@parl.gc.ca ; Discepola.N@parl.gc.ca ;
Doyle.N@parl.gc.ca ; Dromisky.S@parl.gc.ca ; Drouin.C@parl.gc.ca ;
Dube.A@parl.gc.ca ; Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca ; Duhamel.R@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:13 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Connie Fogal
Cc: adamsw@sen.parl.gc.ca ; andrer@sen.parl.gc.ca ; angusd@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
atkinn@sen.parl.gc.ca ; austij@sen.parl.gc.ca ; baconl@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
bankst@sen.parl.gc.ca ; beaudg@sen.parl.gc.ca ; bironm@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
boldur@sen.parl.gc.ca ; brydej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; buchaj@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
callbc@sen.parl.gc.ca ; carnep@sen.parl.gc.ca ; carsts@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
chalit@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cochre@sen.parl.gc.ca ; chrisi@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
cohene@sen.parl.gc.ca ; comeag@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cookj@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca ; corbie@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
debanp@sen.parl.gc.ca ; days@sen.parl.gc.ca ; dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
doodyw@sen.parl.gc.ca ; eytonj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
ferrem@sen.parl.gc.ca ; finess@sen.parl.gc.ca ; finnei@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
fureyg@sen.parl.gc.ca ; fitzpd@sen.parl.gc.ca ; forrej@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
frasej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; gauthj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; gilla@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
grafsj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; grahab@sen.parl.gc.ca ; gustal@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
haysd@sen.parl.gc.ca ; hervic@sen.parl.gc.ca ; hublee@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca ; johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; joyals@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
kellej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kennyc@sen.parl.gc.ca ; keonw@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kirbym@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kolbel@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
kroftr@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lapiel@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lapoij@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
lawsoe@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca ; legerv@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
losier@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lynchj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; maheus@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
mahovf@sen.parl.gc.ca ; mahouf@sen.parl.gc.ca ; meighm@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca ; moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca ; moriny@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
murral@sen.parl.gc.ca ; nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca ; olived@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
pearsl@sen.parl.gc.ca ; pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca ; phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
pitfip@sen.parl.gc.ca ; poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca ; poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; rivesj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; roberf@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
roberb@sen.parl.gc.ca ; roched@sen.parl.gc.ca ; rompkw@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
rossie@sen.parl.gc.ca ; setlar@sen.parl.gc.ca ; sparrh@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
spivam@sen.parl.gc.ca ; stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca ; sibben@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
stollp@sen.parl.gc.ca ; stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca ; taylon@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
tkachd@sen.parl.gc.ca ; tunnej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; wattc@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
wiebej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; wilsol@sen.parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 9:21 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: robanders@telus.net
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:44 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Harper.S@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:41 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Goldring.P@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:39 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:36 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: agarden@nb.sympatico.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 10:58 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: leblad@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 8:03 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: scotta@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 8:01 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: castoj@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:59 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: hubbac@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:58 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: bradsc@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:56 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: savoya@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:55 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: info@paulzed.com
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:34 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: megan@lutz.nb.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 4:05 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Brison.S@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:56 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Bachand.A@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:53 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: jim.prentice@shaw.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:41 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: rosent@math.toronto.edu
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:30 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: davidorchard@sasktel.net
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:15 PM
Subject: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home


Just so ya know David I am forwarding these emails to other politicians as
well. But I didn't bother to call them because they are lawyers as well.
Therefore I see no need to explain my actions to them. Plus the smart one's
have a bad habit of trying to ignore me anyway. I t appears that standard
operating procedure for them is to ignore. delay, deny and then try to
settle. They are confused by someone that wants to argue law rather than go
away with the gold. What should be interesting to both of us is whether or
not they have a sudden fit of ethical behavior after they discover that an
honest western farmer and wild but ethical maritime biker have been talking
about them. Please notice that I am more than willing to help such a man as
Byron Prior anyway I can. I just wish there were more men like him on this
planet. Trust me the US Attorney backtracking in the Martha Stewart matter
and prosecuting a Secret Service Agent is too funny to relate in this email.
Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: <robmoore@atrueconservative.ca>
To: <davidamos@comcast.net>
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Regarding your e-mail


> David,
>
> Thanks for the e-mails. I will read them all and hear what you have to
> say.
>
> All the best.
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 5:08 PM
> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > Elsie, I like you more and more. If anyone understands about
> > being forced to be away from his family its me. Give my mom a
> > call. Her laugh alone will make your day. To hell with the
> > smiling bastards in Ottawa their grins ain't genuine. Maritimers
> > can still find some fun in a long hard day :) Come to think of
> > it, maybe thats why the Upper Canadians think we are crazy. By
> > the way I have managed to get a rather famous lawyer to speak on
> > my wife's behalf down here while I run for Parliament uphome. But
> > before I go I have been invited to go fishing with Martha
> > Stewart's brother Frank in the Gulf of Mexico. My matters are
> > about to bust wide open down here. That is why I have chosen this
> > time to make appearance uphome. Once I make the news down here I
> > will step on the stump uphome.
> > Best
> > Regards
> > Dave
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > To: David Amos
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 3:42 PM
> > Subject: RE: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > Dear Dave,
> >
> > I try to respond to as many people as I can. We do get a lot of email
> > around here.... I decided to retire because I truly miss my family.
> > It's hard being on the road back and forth by yourself. It gets very
> > lonely.
> >
> > God Bless,
> > Elsie
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos [mailto:davidamos@comcast.net]
> > Sent: March 22, 2004 3:28 PM
> > To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > No problem, Elsie. By the way my mom is a fan of yours. She told
> > me you were quitting. Too bad if it is true.You are the first
> > politician to respond to me. That fact alone wins my respect. Ask
> > around Saint John about me in certain circles I am fairly well
> > known. You may even know my sister, Nancy and her husband, Reid
> > Chedore. Perhaps you crossed paths with my dad C. Max Amos he was
> > a tax Supervisor for the Province years ago. And maybe even my
> > mom's second husband, Lloyd Nickerson, from Fredericton. He was
> > somewhat of a political person whereas my dad was not. (Lloyd was
> > chief electoral officer for about twelve years and did run as a
> > Conservative) If you wish to warm my mom's heart please give her
> > a call and simply say that you appreciate her good words about
> > you to her wild child Dalevid. She will get the joke. She is
> > always confusing me with another brother. Her name is Anna and
> > her number is 506 455 3600. Do with it what you will. Trust me I
> > would love to see another out spoken Maritimer step up to the
> > plate and speak of rights and wrongs. The sooner that I can go
> > back to being just Papa the happier my little Clan will be. I
> > would truly appreciate if someone would let my mom know that they
> > are at least aware of my concerns whether they agree with me or
> > not.
> >
> > Best
> > Regards
> >
> > Dave
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > To: David Amos
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:15 PM
> > Subject: RE: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > Thank you for the notice.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos [mailto:davidamos@comcast.net]
> > Sent: March 16, 2004 2:07 PM
> > To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: ethics@harvard.edu
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:06 PM
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: tedcardwell@mail.gov.nf.ca
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:05 PM
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: alltrue@roadrunner.nf.net
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:03 PM
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier ministre
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:57 PM
> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > I already received Anne's response. Can't you people read what
> > you wrote to me? Why else would I be so pissed off?
> > I am who I say I am and that is as follows:
> > David R. Amos
> > 153 Alvin Ave,
> > Milton, MA. 02186
> > Phone 617 240-6698
> >
> > Now just exactly who are you Mr. Correspondence Deputy Prime
> > Minister and are you a lawyer?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier
> > ministre" <dpm@pm.gc.ca> To: <davidamos@comcast.net>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:34 PM
> > Subject: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > > If you wish to receive a response to your comments addressed
> > to the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety and
> > Emergency Preparedness, please include your return mailing
> > address along with your original e-mail message. All official
> > responses will be sent by regular mail.
> > >
> > > If you wish to send correspondence addressed to the Minister
> > through the regular mail, please use the following mailing
> > address:
> > >
> > > The Honourable A. Anne McLellan
> > > Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety
> > > and Emergency Preparedness
> > > 340 Laurier Avenue West
> > > Ottawa, Ontario
> > > K1A 0P8
> > >
> > > From: David Amos <mailto:davidamos@comcast.net>
> > > To: dwatch@web.net
> > > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 11:32 PM
> > > Subject: Read real slow then forget what is politically
> > correct.
> > >
> > > Deal with your own conscience. After that try to think of
> > a good
> > > reason why I should not run for Parliament and at least speak
> > my mind about the sad state of our affairs. You know who I am.
> > If you don't, trust me, you are way behind the eight ball.
> > > Once I make my mark in the American Justice System and
> > political
> > > process, I am coming home to stress test the ethics of many a
> > lawyer/politician in my nativeland during the course of the
> > next federal election. My question to all of you will be why
> > did you wait for me to say something? Am I the only one paying
> > any attention. Even Jesus got mad a time or two and tore up a
> > temple when he saw all the money changing hands in a place
> > that should not be concerned about such things. But forget
> > about the money for a minute. What did he have to say about
> > anyone that harmed a child? Rest assured I will remind you.
> > Although I ain't religious, I must say that Jesus had more of
> > sand than most men and he made some very good points about
> > what is right and what is wrong. Can any of you even hold a
> > candle to Byron? He has at least one friend that will back him
> > up all the way down the line. I don't mind dying it is what I
> > didn't do while I was living that will haunt me in in my
> > grave. What is the golden rule these days? Is it truly a fact
> > that he with the gold makes the rules. Do you think voters
> > agree with that fact? What say you?
> > > Canadian Corruption
> > >
> > > Sexual Abuse & Political & Legal Conspiracy.
> > >
> > > RCMP Incompetence & Cover up.
> > >
> > > Priors Of Grand Bank NFLD Canada
> > >
> > > How do I get a corrupt legal system to investigate, charge and
> > convict itself? After years of asking the Canadian Legal
> > System to do its job, it's long past time to inform the public
> > myself about this lack of action or justice.
> > > If T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, 1966 to 1979 also Health
> > Minister 1968 to 1969 and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
> > of Newfoundland 1979 to 2000, 34 YEARS OF COMPLETE LEGAL
> > SYSTEMS CONTROL,at 41 years of age, rapes and impregnates your
> > younger sister Susan, at 12 years old, and in grade 8, what
> > would you do?At 12 years old she was the youngest child
> > ever,in Grand Bank,to have a baby. I am willing to take any
> > tests and answer all questions regarding my entire life. All
> > he has to do is take one blood test. It's time for him to stop
> > manipulating our legal system and face the truth which I have
> > been telling the legal System,and anyone else who would
> > listen, all of my life.I didn't just awake one morning and
> > decide to accuse the most powerful and most corrupt legal
> > animal in this province. I have had, no childhood, no
> > education, no family, no hometown, no self- esteem or
> > self-respect and no past, present or future as a contributing
> > person.
> > >
> > > By the time I was 14 years old I was responsible for 9 younger
> > children, all of us abused and molested while our hometown
> > either joined in, bothered us about our situation, or looked
> > the other way and said we were all trouble. Our mother has
> > always been a hypochondriac and married prostitute in a town
> > of 2500 people. She can go blind instantly, become a cripple
> > instantly, go insane instantly and even convinced the doctors
> > at our Health Science Center 4 years ago she was dying of
> > cancer. They called her family and said she had a maximum of
> > two weeks to live, but out of every situation she can
> > instantly become well. This person is a disgrace to the human
> > race and also so are all those who support her. I am Byron
> > Prior, the oldest of her 12 children.
> > > (A) I was sexually abused by my mother from age 4 to 14.
> > >
> > > (B) Physically beaten by my mother until I bleed because I
> > tried to stop her friends and family from molesting my younger
> > sisters.
> > >
> > > (C) Sent next door with my mother's gay boyfriend almost daily
> > for money from age 5 to 14.
> > >
> > > (D) Brought to her drunk girlfriend's summer cabin to be
> > sexually abused for money.
> > >
> > > (E) Had to clean the blood from my 4 year old sister after she
> > was sexually molested by our grandfather and left on the
> > kitchen floor in a pool of blood.
> > >
> > > (F) Had to watch while my oldest sister had three miscarriages
> > and two children by the age of 15. One child for a member of
> > the Newfoundland Government when she was 12, and a second
> > child when she was 15 for another Politician, a girl, Majorie
> > and a boy, Arron. In 1983 the girl, age 15, was given an
> > illegal abortion in Montreal with everything arranged and paid
> > for with spending money for her and my sister Joan, by a
> > friend of the family. This girl has worked for Hickman's
> > family business from high school to this day. Five of my
> > sisters and one brother suffered similar abuse as I did.
> > > Why is this situation allowed to continue for more than 40
> > years and ruin all my families lives? Is it because,
> > > (A) Our mothers past customers are politically connected and
> > run our legal system.
> > >
> > > (B) Our mothers past customers are Grand Bank business men
> > whose children are now politicians.
> > >
> > > (C) One of our mothers family is a big wheel with organized
> > crime all of his adult life and is a partner to politicians.
> > >
> > > (D) Is it because two of her past customers are Salvation Army
> > officers, who came by to help us but became customers as well.
> > (E) Is it because all of North America is corrupt and a family
> > of 12 really means nothing to anyone when business and
> > politics are concerned in an economy controlled by corruption.
> > (F) Is it to cover up Child rape and corruption by T. Alex
> > Hickman and a business family with influence and business
> > contacts all across Canada. The legal system now tells us
> > justice for my family and I are three charges against one
> > mentally delayed man with a judge and jury at the T. Alex
> > Hickman building in the same town where we spent our entire
> > lives with abuse and persecution. Two R.C.M.P. officers and
> > the Crown prosecutors office will make no effort to have the
> > location changed. Again there will be NO JUSTICE SERVED and as
> > much covered up as possible. This I'm told will begin in Sept.
> > 2001, at Grand Bank, NFLD I spoke with the Crown Prosecutor on
> > Sept,18/01. He said his office has been trying to get the
> > complete investigation reports from the RCMP for more than two
> > years now and to this date still hasn't received them. He said
> > this was in his experience, the first time he had ever seen
> > such an unexplained delay to get information. On Nov 29/01 I'm
> > told by Victim services, this has changed to Jan.11/02 for a
> > trial date to be set.
> > >
> > > To whom it may concern: 04/13/98 There are many horrors that I
> > can recall from childhood. Byron's too frequent trips to the
> > woodshed next door; his having to sleep in the same bed as our
> > Mother; his little hands, palms down, being held on the hot
> > coal stove burner; the never ending beatings with belt
> > buckles; braided nylon ropes; old- fashioned ironing cords;
> > hot tea thrown in our faces or the face of my Father; knives
> > and forks thrown at us; hot grease thrown at us or our Father;
> > continual molestation - sexual - to myself and other siblings;
> > continual verbal and emotional abuse; at eight years old I was
> > locked in the cupboard under the stairs for hours with rats
> > crawling around me because my little brother had misplaced his
> > baby bottle while I was in charge of him; continual
> > abandonment when Mother would take her vacation and leave us
> > at seven and eight years old to take care of ourselves and the
> > babies; being forced to quit school to go to work to provide
> > yet more money for our beloved Mother; my younger brother,
> > Allan, being thrown into jail for no legitimate reason, other
> > than she wanted him out of the house - by the way; if you
> > check, you will also find that there is no record of his
> > incarceration; the abuse that we suffered was, and remains,
> > never ending........ Our lives have been destroyed. We all
> > suffer from severe emotional problems. We have extreme
> > difficulty trusting others. We cannot form loving
> > relationships. It is very difficult for us to allow others to
> > get that close to us without pushing them away. All we ever
> > wanted was someone to love us for who we were; but, when we
> > get close to others, we tend to sabotage those relationships -
> > unconsciously. The cycle of abuse continued with my own
> > daughter. My younger brother, Randell, molested her from the
> > age of four years. This fact my daughter was afraid to confide
> > to me until a year and a half ago. May God have mercy on his
> > soul because "I Don't"!!!! Both Byron and myself have tried to
> > have those in authority - RCMP, Social Services, Clergy and
> > Teachers help us, but, our cries for help fell on deaf ears.
> > We were, to them, a disposible family of liars and children
> > with overactive imaginations. Nothing can make the nightmares
> > go away. Even the sleeping pills don't work anymore. It has to
> > end! There has to be justice and a sense of closure for all of
> > us. Please, if we stop this cycle of insanity from happening
> > to other innocent children, then maybe our lives would have
> > not totally been in vain. You are our hope. Please help us to
> > find justice.
> > > Sincerely Yours,
> > > Sharl (Donna) Prior
> > >
> > > April 14, 1998
> > > A letter of Shame;
> > > This letter concerns what happened to my family and myself.
> > The things that I remember are also the things I try to
> > forget. I'm not very good with words so I will only tell you a
> > few things of many which have happened within my family.
> > Leather belts, ironing cords, ropes were only some things I
> > was beaten with so many times I can't count. Verbal and mental
> > abuse, the same humilating things that were done to my sisters
> > and brothers. Girls having to pull down their pants and pea in
> > their underwear for our mothers long time friend, for money. I
> > remember our mother going into a bedroom with him and coming
> > out some time later. We have a brother and sister (who I love)
> > who look and act like this guy. I expect, without much doubt,
> > are his. I remember the abuse to my father, a man I loved with
> > all my heart. Attacks on him with anything our mother could
> > put her hands on, knives, hot water, chasing him out of the
> > house. This man was home maybe a day every ten, and she would
> > blame him for everything and when Dad wasn't around, we were
> > blamed for everything, which was anything. This is a woman who
> > every chance she had would call the police on me to try to
> > have me charged with something. This was when she couldn't
> > beat me anymore because I was a little older, but she still
> > had to have control over me. This was a small town in
> > Newfoundland with a population of 3500 people. So she would
> > have me taken away from my home by the police and I would have
> > nowhere else to go, this was control over me and she knew it.
> > I would have to kiss ass just to have a roof over my head. (Of
> > course this was after my father had passed away. He was afraid
> > of her but he would never have let her do this to me.) This is
> > a woman that had me put in jail during Christmas and New
> > Year's when I was very young. This was for trying to teach my
> > niece her homework, she said I had to ask her. Education was
> > not something she was concerned about for her kids. All she
> > wanted was when I had turned 15 was to get out of school and
> > go to work in the fish plant so I could pay my way every week.
> > She would loan me $20 and I would have to repay her $40 plus
> > rent. This woman has a lot of problems. I do not hate her
> > because she is my mother but I do not like her as a person.
> > > I finally got out and moved to Ontario, uneducated with no
> > direction, but out. I really haven't had any contact with her
> > since then and have not seen her since. I think because of all
> > these things and many more which as happened to me and things
> > I saw that had happened to other members of my family is the
> > reason I have a hard time to meet anyone, develop a
> > relationship, or hold down a job. I'm always lost, I don't
> > know if I should see a doctor or if it's just me, I'm lost.
> > The way I am now is the way the rest also is, it must be
> > because of her, take a look, it has to be. I'm writing this
> > letter now so that this woman and the others who knew what was
> > happening but did nothing face up and admit what happened. All
> > of my family have the same problems and the same memories
> > which affect our lives. This is something I have never spoken
> > about with anyone, but now maybe it's time. Hopefully, this
> > will help me start to became a real person a whole person.
> > Please do what you know is the right thing to do.
> > > Sincerely yours,
> > > Allan Prior
> > >
> > > To Whom It May Concern:
> > > July 24, 2001
> > > My name is Byron Prior. I'm the oldest living of these 12
> > children. I not only had to live through my abuse but, watch
> > as the rest of my sisters and brothers were abused and raped.
> > Three of my sisters raped, 1 by a grandfather at the age of 4,
> > a second raped by T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, at age
> > 11. A third sister raped by a young man in our home town. The
> > legal system are only concerned with keeping all this under
> > cover and protect themselves. Please people, if you have a
> > heart, walk one day in my shoes and tell me you would just
> > forget because these bureaucrats say so. I have copies of my
> > full statement on all the details of what happened, which I
> > gave the R.C.M.P. on March 9, 1998, 52.5 hours at their
> > office. I will send it to anyone who will send me an E-mail
> > address. I will never forget the abuse, shame, and persecution
> > to this day, from the animals who did this to my family.
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Byron Prior
> > >
> > > On April 3, 2000, the second in command of the R.C.M.P. for
> > all of Canada, said in an interview from Toronto, organized
> > crime totally controls Canadian businesses and affects every
> > Canadians daily life, from video arcades to laundry mats. This
> > is very sad, here in Canada we are lost and we all need help.
> > Here in Newfoundland our Dictator, T. Alex Hickman, has had
> > his hands in our Political and legal systems from 1957 to this
> > very day. His family and friends control everything, including
> > whether my family and I ever get justice for what was done to
> > us in the town of Grand Bank. We've tried for justice at least
> > 9 times from Police, Social Services, Clergy and Family
> > members. This last attempt started on March 9/98. On July
> > 24/98 an RCMP officer told me they have enough information to
> > charge our mother and one boyfriend now.
> > >
> > >
> > > On February 25/00 an RCMP officer said he was recommending the
> > justice department should lay 35 charges against several
> > people. This officer was taken off the case, transferred from
> > Grand Bank to St. John's custom's department position and his
> > wife transferred to a new position in St. John's with
> > Provincial social services department. To this day August
> > 20/01 only 3 charges are laid against one mentally delayed
> > boyfriend and no trial date set yet . The trial date has been
> > set for April 29/02. On April 5/02 I spoke with the Crown
> > Attorney, Ted Cardwell, he said the only two witnesses for the
> > trial on our behalf will be my sister Joan and me. The
> > investigating officer John Warr of the RCMP is not necessary,
> > my therapist of two years is not necessary, my social worker
> > from victim services is not necessary and my sister Joan's
> > therapist is not necessary. It seems to me like the final
> > verdict has already been decided and again for the victims
> > there is no justice.
> > >
> > >
> > > The Court did not proceed on April 29/02. It was found by the
> > Judge and both attorneys that they did not have an unbiased
> > jury toward the defendant and another attempt to find a jury
> > in this same town will be made again on May 21/02. This is
> > also the home town of my family and I and I asked the Crown
> > Attorney, at the beginning of this trial, if it could be held
> > in a neutral town to be fair to my family and I. If you have
> > read some of the statements in this web site guest book you
> > can understand why I made this request. It seems all
> > consideration is given for the defendant but none for the
> > victims. The R.C.M.P. freely admit that they are in position
> > of 3 statements I had given them about the abuse in our family
> > when I was a child but for some reason will not make these
> > statements available to me or my lawyer. I would like you to
> > read this request made of the R.C.M.P. by a local law firm on
> > >
> > > May 16/01 via fax (279-1871):
> > > Royal Canadian Mounted Police
> > > Marystown Detachment
> > > Marystown, Nfld.
> > > Attention: Constable Jackie Remillard
> > > Dear Constable Remillard:: Re: Our Client - Mr Byron Prior
> > Further to the above and to our various past communications,
> > most particularly our letter of February 16/ 01, despite the
> > passage of several months we have yet to receive the
> > information requested at that time. As it is ordinarily a
> > straightforward matter to obtain, with that person's consent,
> > the statements of a complainant we are at a loss to explain to
> > our client why our request has not been answered to date. We
> > would, therefore, appreciate your early attention to this
> > matter and look forward to the immediate receipt of the
> > requested material. Trusting the above to be satisfactory.
> > > Yours very truly
> > > BUDDEN, MORRIS
> > > GEOFFREY E. BUDDEN
> > >
> > >
> > > Questions for John Warr, R.C.M.P. lead investigator who will
> > no longer speak with me personally.
> > > 1. Why would you say most of the R.C.M.P. Officers and Doctors
> > in my case are retired and you couldn't find them now. Don't
> > any of them get a pension? What address is that sent to?
> > > 2. Why did you tell two witnesses who volunteered information
> > - a lady from Garnish and a man from Fortune, that this case
> > would be very messy and they should think very hard before
> > volunteering information, you would contact them in a couple
> > of days for an appointment. They both changed their minds
> > about witnessing.
> > > 3. Why didn't you question witnesses whose names you were
> > given at the beginning of this case four years ago. People in
> > Ontario and people 15 minutes from your office. One witness
> > #85 & 86 in my guest book on my website and others who have
> > telephoned me.
> > > 4. Why did you go to a Grand Bank business man, who had no
> > information about this case, more than 2 years ago and tell
> > him there was a very messy case coming up soon involving my
> > family and I. Then immediately after you were transferred and
> > only 3 charges laid against one person. 5. Why is the lead
> > investigator not a necessary witness in this case? You
> > investigated and recommended the charges be laid, you must
> > have some information regarding this case.
> > > 6. Why in 2 years of your investigation, did you not once
> > approach or ask Harriett Prior one question at all?
> > > After all these years of reporting to the R.C.M.P. can
> > everyone see why I have to inform the public myself. IT'S A
> > DISGRACE.
> > >
> > > On April 19/00 our Prime Minister is in the Middle East
> > fighting for Basic Human rights. Here in your own house Mr.
> > Prime Minister we need Basic Human Rights also. We are now
> > fighting in Afganistan for the rights of abused and persecuted
> > people, most of whom are women, please allow my family and I
> > some personal rights and dignity here in Canada. If anyone
> > requires more info I have statements to Police, names and
> > positions of all persons involved and letters from family
> > members on what has happened to our dysfunctional family.
> > Please contact us at <mailto:byronprior13@aol.com>
> > byronprior13@aol.com or call (709) 834-9822 Byron Prior. After
> > you view our site please tell your friends and e-mail
> > <mailto:pm@pm.gc.ca> pm@pm.gc.ca, or,
> > > <mailto:paul@paulmartin.ca> paul@paulmartin.ca and tell him,
> > Justice for The Prior family of Grand Bank NFLD. is long past
> > due, you need to give them Justice today. Visit their website
> > at
> > > <http://maxpages.com/sexualabuse>
> > http://maxpages.com/sexualabuse I Look forward to living with
> > Democracy, Freedom and Justice for my family also, here in
> > Canada.
> > > For additional informational pages go to the links at the top
> > left of our homepage. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
> > >
> > > To Whom It May Concern:
> > > What I am about to disclose is extrememly painful for me but
> > what I'm writing is completely honest to the best of my
> > knowledge and recollection. I would like it to be known for
> > the record that I have no desire to hurt anyone. All I am
> > trying to accomplish is to help my brothers, sisters and
> > myself get some closure in their lives; for them and for their
> > families. For me, personally, I was and still am very strong.
> > I endured nothing in comparision to some of my other siblings.
> > I Love my Mother because she is my Mother and she did give me
> > life; such as it was. However, there is no LOVE that compares
> > with the love I have for my brothers and sisters. Therefore, I
> > must tell the Gods honest truth. What I strongly feel for my
> > Mother though is a sense of pity. She is and always has been a
> > Manic Depressant. She has taken so many drugs in her lifetime
> > that I sometimes wonder if even she realizes the extent of the
> > damage she has caused us all.
> > > Besides, she never had a chance anyway. Her Mother was a
> > diagnoised Manic Depressant and her Father was nothing short
> > of a pervert. Uncle Max told me and Suzanne that Grandmother
> > was a diagnoised Manic Depressant and her Mother before her. I
> > have to wonder what went on in their lives and their home. I
> > bet if Moms family were to be honest they would have many a
> > story to tell. For me this whole story is regarding abuse.
> > Mental, Physical and sexual abuse. Abuse upon ones own
> > children. If I waver back and forth from one subject to
> > another please bare with me for I am trying to write this as
> > it comes to me in all honesty. Of my youth I recall most of
> > all is FEAR. Fear of MOM. Fear of life. Fear of Love. Fear of
> > being unloved. Fear of not being accepted by my peers. Fear of
> > failure. Fear of becomming a whore, a drunk, a drug addict and
> > God forbid, the fear of becomming a murderer.
> > >
> > > By the grace of God I became none of the above. Unfortunately
> > for some of my brothers and sisters they have had some
> > difficulty dealing with the past and sometimes turned to drugs
> > as an escape. But they have all done pretty well to date
> > keeping themselves on track. We have no hardened criminals and
> > no murderers among us which you may find amazing as the story
> > unfolds. We were all very strong individuals; we had to be in
> > order to survive the ordeal. It has not been an easy road for
> > any of us but we made it and maybe we can become a family for
> > once in our lives. Maybe we can look each other in the eye
> > someday and understand why we did and do the things we do. I
> > Love each and everyone of my borthers and sisters so much. We
> > all had so much potential if given even half a chance at life.
> > Our Mother stole away our chances at life. She played us all
> > one against the other from the day we were born. She still
> > continues to do so to this very day. She played us all so much
> > that we carried it into our adulthood. We are, to put it
> > mildly, a dysfunctional family.
> > > For all the people who were aware of our abuse and chose to
> > ignore and or stifle it; I THANK YOU!!!! I thank you for
> > nothing. God knows that you all knew. Everyone in town knew.
> > The people who never actually witnessed it were told. We asked
> > for their help. No one wanted to get involved. Let them do it
> > themselves. They are nobody. They are disposable trash
> > TRASH!!! That is what we were always told and always
> > programmed to think. We were poor; yet Dad made a good living.
> > (Mom drank it) We were dirthy. NOT!!! We had head lice. WE did
> > not!!! My sister Lucy and I were almost always inseperable.
> > One night we were given a lacing and sent to bed without any
> > supper. Lucy and I decided that this was all wrong and we were
> > tired of living in fear and getting beaten. So we decided to
> > climb out of the bedroom window onto the porch roof and run to
> > the police station in order to tell on her. Well, Lucy was
> > half way out the window and I remained inside when Mom burst
> > into the room. She tried to grab us but I managed to push Lucy
> > out the window. I was a Tom Boy and no one could hurt Lucy
> > while I was around (no one except Mom of course) I always
> > tried to protect her. I then proceeded out the window myself.
> > Mom bit down into my breast and took a piece of fleash right
> > out of me. But I got out of the window anyway. Lucy and I made
> > our way to the police station where we found ourselves being
> > treated like criminals. They put us in a room by ourselves.
> > They never looked at my breast or even asked us any questions.
> > They just did not want to listen to us. It was as if they were
> > expecting us. I assume they called Mom because the next thing
> > we knew we were sent home to another more severe beating. From
> > that moment on Lucy and I decided that if the Police would not
> > help us then nobody would. We just lived in fear and longed
> > for the day we could get away from it all. We therefore
> > endured it and never told clergy, teachers, relatives or
> > anyone else of out delima. I lived with my friend Ellen
> > Piercey and her Mom for a while when Mom kicked me out of the
> > house. I did disclose to them what our life was like. Ellen
> > did also witness some of the abuse when I was at home.
> > >
> > > Though it is not my aim to hurt anyone I feel that a grave
> > injustice has been done to all of us by our families. They all
> > knew. They saw. They were told by my brother and sister. They
> > all ignored it. Not one of them helped. NO ONE!!!! Even my
> > Aunt Melinda, whom I love and adore as a Mother, is also at
> > fault. She knew we were being abused. Donna always ran to Aunt
> > Melinda's house after she was abused. She would tell Aunt
> > Melinda. She also knew Dad was being abused. He also ran to
> > her house after he was abused. He told her of his abuse and
> > she admitted that to me. Even Dad himself was at fault. I
> > sometimes want to hate him but I can not. For he was a victim
> > also. I often ask myself why he left us with her when he knew
> > we were being abused. We may not have told him but he must
> > have known that if she was abusing him she had to be abusing
> > us. He knew she abused my brother Byron so why did he not help
> > us?? He could just go away from it all on the boats but we
> > lived a nightmare every day of our lives. Waking up in the
> > morning was a task for us. We would get jolted out of our
> > sleep with her yelling and screaming get out of that bed you
> > lazy good for nothings. Start cleaning the house, change the
> > kids, cook the food and whatever else she wanted us to do. If
> > we could make it through the day without a beating we were
> > considered lucky. That was our idea of having a good day. That
> > is something to aim for, HEY??
> > >
> > > You ate whatever food you were given whether it was disgusting
> > or not. Even if it made you puke. If you had a pet you really
> > loved she would summon the local Police to have it taken away
> > and shot to death. Chuck Laundry killed my dog that I adored
> > because Mom insisted. He tried to talk her out of it because
> > it was breaking my heart but she was so damn cold she just did
> > not care. I am certain Chuck remembers it because he returned
> > to the house after to make sure I was OK. He hated to do it
> > also but she insisted.
> > >
> > > Cruelty to Dad? Boy it that an understatement! It continued
> > right down to the day he died and may have contributed to his
> > death. On the evening of June 20, 1976 I was out with my
> > friends. Mom slept on the couch for some time now because Dad
> > did all his natural bodily functions in the bed. Mom did not
> > want to be changing the sheets all of the time so she gave him
> > very little food and barely any drink. She had started to give
> > him popsicles though. Sometimes it would be two days that he
> > laid in his own functions in the bed. She would say that the
> > smell coming from his bedroom was a result of his being rotten
> > inside from cancer. I recall my Dad being so hungry that he
> > picked Salt Beef fat from the kitchen garbage container and
> > ate it. She would rather throw it out than give it to him. Dad
> > was a smoker for most of his life and he really enjoyed it.
> > When he would have time off from the boats for a vacation Mom
> > would not let him have money for cigarettes. Not because she
> > was concerned for his health but because whe wanted the money.
> > During these times I saw Dad walking down the street and
> > picking up cigarette butts as he went. He would tuck them in
> > his pocket and smoke them on the sly later. I never told Dad I
> > knew and I certainly did not tell Mom. Do you not think
> > smoking someone elses butts helped contribute to a greater
> > extent to his lung cancer?
> > >
> > > Is she not indirectly responsible for that? One day I was in
> > my bedroom with my window up and smoking a cigatette. Dad
> > caught me. He did not scould me. You know what he did? He said
> > give me a smoke and I will not tell your Mother. Happily I
> > obliged. He and I sat at the window and smoked together. It
> > was real neat sitting with my Dad for at least five minutes
> > for once in our lifetime. Getting back to June 20, 1976. I
> > arrived home later in the evening. All the lights in the house
> > were out. As I entered the kitchen I heard Dads sore raspy
> > voice say Joanie please give Dad a drink. I said Dad you know
> > you are not allowed to have a drink but I will give you a
> > popsicle. As I approached the refrigerator to get Dad a
> > popsicle Mom shouted, you get to bed. I told her Dad was
> > extremely thirsty but she said, you get to bed before you get
> > the belt. I told Dad Mom would not let me give him anything
> > and he begged me to. I was so afraid of her that I went
> > directly to bed. She went to sleep and I had assumed that Dad
> > had gone to sleep. Sometime during the night I was awakened by
> > a terrible thirst. I went to the bathroom sink to get a drink
> > but I could not seem to guench the thirst. I went back to
> > sleep only to be awakened once again by that same nagging
> > thirst. I tried the washroom sink again, to no avail. I was so
> > dry I spit in the sink. The next day and for as long as I
> > lived in that house there was a stain in that sink where I
> > spit. I could not quench my thirst that evening with water. I
> > went downstairs to ask Mom if I could have one of Dads
> > popsicles and to tell her that I would replace it the
> > following day. She said ok. Then Dad again asked me for a
> > drink. I said that Mom would not permit me to. I went to bed.
> > I heard Mom shouting at him to get to sleep. I went to sleep
> > after eating the popsicle.
> > >
> > > Next morning I got up early to go to school to do my
> > scholarship exam. As I entered the kitchen to go to the sink
> > to wash up I glanced toward Dads bedroom. I saw Mom bending
> > down in the closet. I saw Dad laying there in the bed. He was
> > so yellow in colour and completely motionless. I knew at that
> > moment that he was dead. I shouted at Mom and started
> > screaming. The younger children ran downstairs and jumped on
> > me. I took them all outside in the front yard and held them.
> > They cried. I did not. I knew I had to be strong for them. We
> > just stood there in the yard holding each other and waiting
> > for the ambulance to arrive. I believed then and I believe now
> > that the terrible thirst I was feeling the previous night was
> > the same that Dad was feeling. I believe it was Gods way of
> > letting me know how it felt. I also believe that the stain in
> > the sink was meant to be a constant reminder to me of what I
> > could have done to help my Father and did not. For many years
> > I blamed myself for his death but I have come to realize that
> > it was out of my control. If there is anyone to blame it is
> > Harriet. About two weeks after my Fathers death my M
> > >
>
>
>

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please Leave Comments here