Monday, 19 May 2014

Fwd: Hoka Hey Petey Baby MacKay Say Hey to your buddy Prince Chucky and his wifey for me today will ya?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 11:00:14 -0300
Subject: For the PUBLIC RECORD it was Claude Tremblay of the RCMP who
twisted my right arm in the the DECH loney bin after his buddy Gilles
Blinn arrested me without a warrant
To: BARRY WINTERS <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "mckeen.randy"
<mckeen.randy@gmail.com>, "david.alward" <david.alward@gnb.ca>,
"Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, Brian Gallant
<briangallant@nbliberal.ca>, "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "ian.fahie" <ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Ian.McPhail" <Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "Ron.Francis"
<Ron.Francis@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Pete.Berndsen"
<Pete.Berndsen@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "craig.callens"
<craig.callens@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Yannick.madelaine@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, madeleine
<madeleine@berrevoets2014.ca>, "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, jamiebaillie
<jamiebaillie@gov.ns.ca>, Mackap <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, "scott.macrae"
<scott.macrae@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Grant.Fiander"
<Grant.Fiander@halifax.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, glen
<glen@glencanning.com>, Glen Canning <grcanning@me.com>, deanr0032
<deanr0032@hotmail.com>, "Gary.Rhodes" <Gary.Rhodes@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"gary.forward" <gary.forward@fredericton.ca>, justmin
<justmin@gov.ns.ca>, info <info@gg.ca>, "Tim.RICHARDSON"
<Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>, msegal <msegal@murraysegal.com>, merricra
<merricra@gov.ns.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan" <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"rod.knecht" <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>, frankffrost
<frankffrost@hotmail.com>, radical <radical@radicalpress.com>,
"Geoffrey.McDonald" <Geoffrey.McDonald@gov.bc.ca>, "t.wilson"
<t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "foghorn.leghorn_175"
<foghorn.leghorn_175@zoho.com>, "jennifer.johnston"
<jennifer.johnston@gov.bc.ca>, "JAG.Minister"
<JAG.Minister@gov.bc.ca>, The Disinfector <thedisinfector@hotmail.com>

Furthermore I believe I met Cpl Yannick Madelaine and his boss on
Werner Bock's farm in the fall of 2006 right after I ran in the
Provincial election against the "The Not So Good Dr Ed Doherty. They
took hard copy of my material including a CD and promised to
Investigate them as Mike Murphy later requested when Cpl Warren
MacBeath called with MORE false allegations SCROLL DOWN FOR THE PROOF
MR BACONFAT


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Claude Tremblay <Claude.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 09:42:04 -0400
Subject: Re: The TRUTH is that I never claimed that at all It was just
your bullshit spin on me in order to support the cover ups by the RCMP
and your fellow Zionists involved with the MOB and the BERNIE Madoff
matter (Away on Leave)
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I will be away on leave from May 9th till retirement on June 11th,
Pls contact Cpl Yannick madelaine for any operational needs at
506-261-4175

Thank You.

Claude Tremblay Sgt

Regional Traffic NCO - "J" Division West

**************
Je serai hors de mon bureau a partir du 9 de Mai jusqu'au 11 de Juin
pour la retraite. Pour toute les demandes operationel, contacte le Cpl
Yannick Madelaine au 506- 261-4175. merci

Merci.

Claude Tremblay Sgt

S.-off. de la sécurité routière - région Ouest de la Division "J"

>>> David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> 05/19/14 10:41 >>>

Yo Pervert

Look who else got this email ask them if I am a liar or not and
whether or not they have the balls to put it in writing like I do.

http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf

I got a call from Greg Craig's legal counsel office in the White House
in March or April of 2009. ASK HIM

I was bounty hunting Ol Whitey until he was arrested in CA. ASK the FBI

The Yankees (the DHS byway US Secret Service in fact) threatened to
take me to Gitmo on April 1st 2003 but apologized within a few days
and their Inspector General promised to investigate. ASK THEM

I have been illegally incarcerated in a Yankee jail by false
allegations of a Yankee District Attorney and a Canadian looney bin
by the RCMP However all records off both events have evaporated yet I
still have my copies of the documents. ASK THEM

Now PERVERT answer me a few simple questions what makes you think that
you can get away with your constant sexual harassment and death
threats etc?

Howcome you don't have the balls to tell the world your true name or
your phone number and whereabouts.

Why did you make a complaint against Glen Canning and Leah Parsons
when in fact it is you that attacked them?

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369

On 5/19/14, BARRY WINTERS <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca> wrote:

David tell all the nice people how you get phone calls from the White
House,were a "bounty hunter" fled from US authorities because they
wanted to render you to Guantanamo Bay, and was incarcerated in jail
and a booby hatch!

...."and the truth shall set you free," David!

From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 07:43:09 -0300
Subject: The TRUTH is that I never claimed that at all It was just
your bullshit spin on me in order to support the cover ups by the RCMP
and your fellow Zionists involved with the MOB and the BERNIE Madoff
matter
To: BARRY WINTERS <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "mckeen.randy"
<mckeen.randy@gmail.com>, "david.alward" <david.alward@gnb.ca>,
"Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, Brian Gallant
<briangallant@nbliberal.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, madeleine
<madeleine@berrevoets2014.ca>, "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, jamiebaillie
<jamiebaillie@gov.ns.ca>, Mackap <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, "scott.macrae"
<scott.macrae@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Grant.Fiander"
<Grant.Fiander@halifax.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, glen
<glen@glencanning.com>, Glen Canning <grcanning@me.com>, deanr0032
<deanr0032@hotmail.com>, "Gary.Rhodes" <Gary.Rhodes@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"gary.forward" <gary.forward@fredericton.ca>, justmin
<justmin@gov.ns.ca>, info <info@gg.ca>, "Tim.RICHARDSON"
<Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>, msegal <msegal@murraysegal.com>, merricra
<merricra@gov.ns.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan" <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"rod.knecht" <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>, frankffrost
<frankffrost@hotmail.com>, radical <radical@radicalpress.com>,
"Geoffrey.McDonald" <Geoffrey.McDonald@gov.bc.ca>, "t.wilson"
<t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Pete.Berndsen"
<Pete.Berndsen@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "foghorn.leghorn_175"
<foghorn.leghorn_175@zoho.com>, "jennifer.johnston"
<jennifer.johnston@gov.bc.ca>, "JAG.Minister"
<JAG.Minister@gov.bc.ca>, The Disinfector <thedisinfector@hotmail.com>

Remember when you and your Zionist buddies attacked me in 2009 I had
no idea what the Protocols of the Elders of Zion were nor did I give a
damn BUT now the Det Terry Wilson and YOU seem to think they are so
important I have taken an interest.

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/06/the-confidential-warned-statement-of.html

http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2013/10/david-amos-and-protocols-of-elders-of.html

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/in-2009-i-had-no-idea-what-protocols-of.html


That said your fellow Zionists such as Stevey Boy Harper and his neo
com minions must be really proud of your latest blog EH PERVERT?

http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2014/05/sub-human-big-chiefs-declare-war-on.html


Sunday, May 18, 2014

Sub Human "Big Chiefs" Declare War on Canada

The so called "first nations confederacy of nations," says!

"Should Canada not withdraw and cease all imposed legislation on
"first nations" without free, prior, and informed consent we will
strategically and calculatedly begin the shut down of Canada's economy
from coast to coast. First Nation's will determine whether or not
there is international economic certainty for economic development on
Turtle Island.....(End quote)

The reality is: THERE ARE NO 'FIRST NATIONS. "What really exists are
600,000 to 700,000 little injins and their "big chiefs" on Canada's
633 injin reserves. These under evolved societies and cultures have
never been anything but primitive hunter gatherer tribes and or clans.
That was the reality when the first Europeans came to "turtle island,"
and sadly still is. In the last ten years or so roughly half of
Canada's 1.2"proud natives" have fled their tribes, clans, native
gangs, criminal "governments" and grinding ignorance and poverty....to
a mainstream urban Canadian community near you.

The sub human and drunken fools that call themselves "big chiefs" and
"the leadership of native peoples" are now considering threatening the
economic stability of Canada. Canadians well remember so called "big
chief" Derek Napiniak last year lying to Canadians as Theresa Spence's
spokesperson about her fraudulent claims of a hunger strike, the
urgency of the government capitulating to her fraud, and how close she
was to death.

In a recent op / ed "big chief " Napiniak further prevaricated that
the government's "aboriginal education" legislation was ...."part of
an assimilation agenda involving racial superiority.." (end quote)
Someone ought inform Pammy Palmater, Theresa Spence, and the rest of
the "little injins" that Canadians, do NOT want to give money for your
education, the education of your children, and children's children
without strict financial accountability. YOU, "people" already aren't
educating yourselves, your children or children's children now as we
speak. Roughly forty percent of "you people" graduate from High
School. Roughly 80% percent of real Canadians graduate from High
School. Injins already are "inferior" to the rest of use in every
important way, simply because they are uneducated.

Injins aren't uneducated because there is no money to educate them.
Injins are uneducated because injins are drunks, drug abusers, have
unstable families and do NOT educate their own people. The sad truth
of federal funding of Canada's 633 injin reserves is: Giving money to
the "big chiefs" for any reason, is akin to pissing it against the
wall.
The truly sad thing about this is: Canadians know it! Canadians have
long sense lost "sensitivity" for the injin tale of woe. Whether it be
the "inter-generational trauma of the residential schools," injin
gangs, native crime, homeless "proud natives" begging for money when
they could work at a Tim Horton's. Canadians are well tired and sick
of this nonsense, and none of them want to give back "turtle island to
the injins!

Last Canadian Census showed there are roughly 1.2 million "status
Indians" in Canada, and roughly half of these "people" live on 633
"first nations reserves. There are roughly 30 million Canadians.
Turtle Island forever more belongs to the "white man"

Someone ought to tell these mentally deficient sub humans that it
isn't a good idea to bite the hand that feeds them all.





Posted by Seren at 11:59 PM



On 5/19/14, BARRY WINTERS <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca> wrote:
> OH my. you claiming that you got David Madoff and Whitey Bulger arrested
> again? lol
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: "sunrayzulu" <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan"
> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "rod.knecht" <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>,
> "frankffrost" <frankffrost@hotmail.com>, "radical"
> <radical@radicalpress.com>, "Geoffrey.McDonald"
> <Geoffrey.McDonald@gov.bc.ca>, "t.wilson" <t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "Pete.Berndsen" <Pete.Berndsen@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "foghorn.leghorn_175"
> <foghorn.leghorn_175@zoho.com>, "jennifer.johnston"
> <jennifer.johnston@gov.bc.ca>, "JAG.Minister" <JAG.Minister@gov.bc.ca>, "The
> Disinfector" <thedisinfector@hotmail.com>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "MulcaT"
> <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>,
> "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "jamiebaillie" <jamiebaillie@gov.ns.ca>, "Mackap"
> <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, "scott.macrae" <scott.macrae@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "Grant.Fiander" <Grant.Fiander@halifax.ca>, "PREMIER" <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
> "glen" <glen@glencanning.com>, "Glen Canning" <grcanning@me.com>,
> "deanr0032" <deanr0032@hotmail.com>, "Gary.Rhodes"
> <Gary.Rhodes@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "gary.forward" <gary.forward@fredericton.ca>,
> "justmin" <justmin@gov.ns.ca>, "info" <info@gg.ca>, "Tim.RICHARDSON"
> <Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>, "oldmaison" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "andre"
> <andre@jafaust.com>, "msegal" <msegal@murraysegal.com>, "merricra"
> <merricra@gov.ns.ca>
> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 7:03:15 PM
> Subject: The TRUTH is that the day after I postested a certain email ONLY
> ONE of Glen Canning's and Leah Parsons many cyber stalkers were arrested
>
> Yo Mr Baconfat
>
> Your cop buddies in Edmonton Marianne Ryan and Chief Knecht know this
> is the aforesaid email
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/04/re-corrupt-cops-ignoring-sections-300.html
>
> We all know the only truth coming from your family came from your two
> REAL sons that you abused long ago as children and have not seen them
> since because you are afraid of them wanting to get even. CORRECT
> PERVERT?
>
> Furthermore everybody in the know knows that it was no coincidence
> that the RCMP finally arrested the punk the very next day. Like Hell
> did Google delay the corrupt cops for a year. That just more pure
> bullshit spun by the CROWN Glen Canning and many others knew who that
> particular stalker was last August. at the same time I informed them
> who you were.
>
>
> The RCMP have yet to fess up about their favourite shills who have
> been cyber stalking my family for many years.
>
> For the Public Record YOUR Grande Faux Pas Mr Baconfat was harassing
> rhe whimp Glenny Baby Canning. YOUR blog has become a big
> embarrassment to your old pals in the RCMP and even Chief Knecht.
>
>
> If you are oh so concerned about the truth all of a sudden perhaps you
> should ask the RCMP or Google to finally translate the Motto of the
> Keith Clan for you EH PERVERT?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> PS. This was blog of yours was interesting to Mean Old Me No doubt
> Chief Knecht loved it to N'esy Pas?
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2014/05/police-protocol-war-crimes-union-shills.html
>
> A very current truth is a serious question that the CROWN and Glen
> Canning should wonder about. It is do my children have lawyers yet and
> if so who?
>
>
> https://www.facebook.com/glenfordcanning/posts/589614877746571
>
> Glen Canning
> BARRY WINTERS IP 24.71.223.10 sunrayzulu@shaw.ca from Edmonton AB
> claiming he has Rehtaeh Parsons rape photo. Please stop this
> pedophile!
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2013/08/oh-dear-outed-by-glen-canning.html
>
> Glen Canning The police spoke to him tonight. Guys just a loser
> looking for his 15 minutes.August 27, 2013 at 7:49pm · 2
>
> Walter McCulloch Walter Winters, is Barry Winters' late father.... Or
> me, once upon a time, before my mother changed my name after the
> divorce. what a vomit inducing why to find one's father. I'm glad I
> never new him. I'm going to be sick nowMarch 23 at 11:25am
>
>
> Walter McCulloch oh. I should mention by every account I have heard
> about him....He is a compulsive and pathological liar, and a wife and
> child beater.March 23 at 11:32am
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/re-anatomy-of-bad-dad-that.html
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/06/yo-mr-baconfat-your-pals-such-as-lt-col.html
>
> http://snipernco.blogspot.ca/2007/01/its-all-about-me.html
>
> Saturday, January 27, 2007
>
> "Its all about me"
>
> Mr. Paul N McCulloch once wrote this about Remembrance Day:
>
>
> Posted by snipernco at 11:50 AM
>
> 1 comment:
>
> P. McCulloch said...
> Ah Mr. Winters, you are a total fool.
>
> I still hate Remembrance Day, go on and hate me for that. But your
> remarks are nothing but rhetorical flourish, straw man, and ad hominem
> "arguments."
>
> One thing IS certain though, I certainly don't have any idea as to the
> stories of my grandfather and great-uncle. That is because YOU sir,
> refuse to tell them to me. You refuse to speak to your own children
> solely because they took until their mid 20s to start trying to look
> you up.
>
> Everything I see from you proves just one thing: that you are lying,
> racist, ignorant, trash.
>
> My comments refer to the useless and tired ceremonial of a bad
> holiday. This does not mean, as you seem to think, that I do not
> support Canadian military personnel.
>
> Lets not forget that you do not even know a thing about me beyond the
> text of my blog entry. Yet you dismiss my comments as nothing but
> ignorant stoner speak.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: BARRY WINTERS <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
> Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 15:15:17 -0600 (MDT)
> Subject: Re: Yo Stevey Boy Harper and Jamie Baby Baille Perhaps your
> blogging buddy Glen Canning should hire a lawyer and sue somebody ASAP
> EH ?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
> MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, jamiebaillie
> <jamiebaillie@gov.ns.ca>, Mackap <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, "scott.macrae"
> <scott.macrae@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Grant.Fiander"
> <Grant.Fiander@halifax.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, glen
> <glen@glencanning.com>, Glen Canning <grcanning@me.com>, deanr0032
> <deanr0032@hotmail.com>, "Gary.Rhodes" <Gary.Rhodes@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "gary.forward" <gary.forward@fredericton.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan"
> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "rod.knecht"
> <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>, justmin <justmin@gov.ns.ca>, info
> <info@gg.ca>, "Tim.RICHARDSON" <Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>, oldmaison
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, msegal
> <msegal@murraysegal.com>, merricra <merricra@gov.ns.ca>
>
> It is a legal axiom numbnuts: "The truth is a complete defense." I
> have already whupped you bastards several times over.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "jamiebaillie" <jamiebaillie@gov.ns.ca>,
> "Mackap" <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, "scott.macrae"
> <scott.macrae@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Grant.Fiander"
> <Grant.Fiander@halifax.ca>, "PREMIER" <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, "glen"
> <glen@glencanning.com>, "Glen Canning" <grcanning@me.com>,
> "sunrayzulu" <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "deanr0032"
> <deanr0032@hotmail.com>, "Gary.Rhodes" <Gary.Rhodes@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "gary.forward" <gary.forward@fredericton.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan"
> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "rod.knecht"
> <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>, "justmin" <justmin@gov.ns.ca>, "info"
> <info@gg.ca>, "Tim.RICHARDSON" <Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>, "oldmaison"
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "andre" <andre@jafaust.com>, "msegal"
> <msegal@murraysegal.com>, "merricra" <merricra@gov.ns.ca>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
> "MulcaT" <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 6:47:58 AM
> Subject: Yo Stevey Boy Harper and Jamie Baby Baille Perhaps your
> blogging buddy Glen Canning should hire a lawyer and sue somebody ASAP
> EH ?
>
> What if somebody mentions these blogs to the Queen's strange son
> Chucky while he and his old paramour are planting a tree in Halifax
> and then having some Celtic fun in Pictou?
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2014/05/only-in-amerka.html
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/05/yo-birgitta-who-is-more-of-crook-julian.html
>
> http://glencanning.com/2014/05/judge-upholds-ban-in-child-pornography-case/
>
> http://glencanning.com/2014/03/rehtaeh-parsons-tragedy-interview-father-glen-canning/
>
> http://glencanning.com/2013/08/anatomy-of-a-troll/
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2014/05/glen-and-leahs-revenge-criminals-and.html
>
> Wednesday, May 7, 2014
>
> Glen And Leah's Revenge, Criminals And Fake Guns!
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 02:36:54 -0300
> Subject: RE Corrupt cops ignoring Sections 300 and 319 Sexual
> Harassment and Death threats and of course Glen Canning;s concern
> about Barry Winter and butt Buddy Patrick Doran
> To: "Ian.McPhail" <Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, premier
> <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, PREMIER
> <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, eachtem <eachtem@hotmail.com>, sunrayzulu
> <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, deanr0032 <deanr0032@hotmail.com>,
> windwalker838@gmail.com, msegal <msegal@murraysegal.com>, merricra
> <merricra@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.sk.ca>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, "steve.graham"
> <steve.graham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "roger.l.brown"
> <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bernadine.chapman"
> <bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, David Amos
> <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, frankffrost <frankffrost@hotmail.com>,
> grcanning@me.com, glen <glen@glencanning.com>, "david.fraser"
> <david.fraser@mcinnescooper.com>, sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca, oldmaison
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "rod.knecht" <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>,
> pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan"
> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: patrick_doran1@hotmail.com, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, leader
> <leader@greenparty.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>,
> "justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/03/yo-ian-mcphail-how-much-longer-are-rcmp.html
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/11/here-is-why-glen-canning-retheah.html
>
> Glen Canning and his RCMP pals know that even Mr Baconfat makes his
> real children puke in disgust and still they do NOTHING???
>
> https://www.facebook.com/glenfordcanning/posts/589614877746571
> Glen Canning
> BARRY WINTERS IP 24.71.223.10 sunrayzulu@shaw.ca from Edmonton AB
> claiming he has Rehtaeh Parsons rape photo. Please stop this
> pedophile!
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2013/08/oh-dear-outed-by-glen-canning.html
>
>
> Glen Canning The police spoke to him tonight. Guys just a loser
> looking for his 15 minutes.August 27, 2013 at 7:49pm · 2
>
> Walter McCulloch Walter Winters, is Barry Winters' late father.... Or
> me, once upon a time, before my mother changed my name after the
> divorce. what a vomit inducing why to find one's father. I'm glad I
> never new him. I'm going to be sick nowMarch 23 at 11:25am
>
>
> Walter McCulloch oh. I should mention by every account I have heard
> about him....He is a compulsive and pathological liar, and a wife and
> child beater.March 23 at 11:32am
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 23:43:08 -0300
> Subject: Re Suck it up buttercup! Yo Rod Knecht Methinks I will call
> your client Brent a manager of a Shoppers Drug Mart and inform him of
> Sections 200 and 319 of the CCof C
> To: sunrayzulu <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "rod.knecht"
> <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>, "David.Veitch"
> <David.Veitch@edmontonpolice.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> Tuesday, August 27, 2013
> "Suck it up buttercup!"
>
> Yo Amos, got phone call from cops. It seems they aren't too impressed
> with Mr. Canning or his complaint.
>
> Sorry to annoy but all happed here was a phone call.
>
> Suck it up butter cup
> Posted by Seren at 7:23 PM No comments:
>
> Hell you all know his REAL son Paul agrees with me about the PERVERT
> CORRECT?
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/re-anatomy-of-bad-dad-that.html
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/06/yo-mr-baconfat-your-pals-such-as-lt-col.html
>
> http://snipernco.blogspot.ca/2007/01/its-all-about-me.html
>
> Saturday, January 27, 2007
>
>
> "Its all about me"
>
> Mr. Paul N McCulloch once wrote this about Remembrance Day:
>
>
> Posted by snipernco at 11:50 AM
>
> 1 comment:
>
> P. McCulloch said...
> Ah Mr. Winters, you are a total fool.
>
> I still hate Remembrance Day, go on and hate me for that. But your
> remarks are nothing but rhetorical flourish, straw man, and ad hominem
> "arguments."
>
> One thing IS certain though, I certainly don't have any idea as to the
> stories of my grandfather and great-uncle. That is because YOU sir,
> refuse to tell them to me. You refuse to speak to your own children
> solely because they took until their mid 20s to start trying to look
> you up.
>
> Everything I see from you proves just one thing: that you are lying,
> racist, ignorant, trash.
>
> My comments refer to the useless and tired ceremonial of a bad
> holiday. This does not mean, as you seem to think, that I do not
> support Canadian military personnel.
>
> Lets not forget that you do not even know a thing about me beyond the
> text of my blog entry. Yet you dismiss my comments as nothing but
> ignorant stoner speak.
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/09/ms-blatchford-premier-dexter-ex-cop.html
>
> Clearly Mr Baconfat LOVES his blogging butt buddy Patty Baby Doran
> more than Lori Ink after he did not publish a Valentine to that racist
> bitch EH?
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2014/02/best-birthday-wishes.html
>
> Friday, February 14, 2014
> Best Birthday Wishes
> Mr. Patrick Doran
>
> It appears you and I share a birthday and both our birthdays are on
> flag day. Even though it is few hours short of this "stupendous"
> day...please accept my very best birthday wishes!
>
> Warm regards
>
> Barry
> Posted by Seren at 4:17 PM
>
> Need I say I have had enough of these nasty bastards?
>
> http://themadshangiblog.blogspot.ca/
>
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OFE2ucH8bs#aid=P-BxF7l-Lq8
> Published on Apr 11, 2013
>
> A Nova Scotia teen kills herself after an alleged rape/bullying
> scandal? Apparently, four boys raped her and posted pictures of the
> alleged rape online and spread them around to all her friends at
> school. According to RCMP, there wasn't enough evidence to make a
> case. What's really going on here?
>
> Follow me on TWITTER: TheMadShangi1
> E-mail: patrick_doran1@hotmail.com
> Skype: madshangi
> Facebook: Patrick John Doran
>
> http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/false-rape-culture/prove-your-allegations-glenn-canning/
>
> http://themadshangiblog.blogspot.ca/
>
> Monday, 24 February 2014How Glen Canning Can Help End His Bullshit
> Glen Canning is full of shit. I have no respect for a man who
> shamelessly exploited his own step-daughter's tragic suicide to serve
> his own twisted agenda. Yes, both Leah Parsons and Glen Canning had no
> qualms about using Rehtaeh Parsons' death for their 15 minutes of
> dubious fame. Canning has responded to my post on Men's Rights
> Edmonton's site.
>
> The title of this new post, is of course, called "How Men Can Help End
> Rape." It's not an original title, Feminists have been using that
> slogan since the first Toronto Slutwalks. Of course, it's only men
> that can help end rape, because as we all know - all men are rapists.
> It's a little too much to ask in this day and age, for women to take
> responsibility for their own safety. Why expect any accountability
> from the so-called "gentle sex" when men are too much of a convenient
> scapegoat for modern women's failures and insecurities. Glen writes:
>
> Shame is what sexual predators rely on. Next to alcohol it's their
> preferred WMD. What were you thinking, after all, being alone,
> dressing like that, drinking to much, trusting too much? You should
> have known better. You should have known what would happen. It's the
> same approach pedophiles use when they tell their victims "we're only
> doing what you want."
> I was invited to speak in Ottawa recently and share my thoughts on
> violence against women and the role men play. There are two things
> I've learned since my daughter, Rehtaeh Parsons, died last April and I
> began to speak at conferences and meetings. One, the audience will be
> almost all women, as it was in this case, and two, attempts to hurt
> and silence me suddenly appear when there's anything mentioned about
> Rehtaeh online or in social media. She's worm food because I'm a
> failure, according to one person's post. If I don't shut up I'll join
> her, says another. Some choose words so disgusting I can't bring
> myself to repeat them."
> So here right off the bat, Glen is setting the tone for the rest of
> his post. He's a victim. People are trying to silence and threaten
> him. The truth, as I already outlined in my previous post "A Response
> From Mr. Vengeance: Glen Canning's Dark Alter-Ego " Mr. Canning has a
> habit of seeking out critics that are skeptical of the official story
> the public was sold about his daughter's alleged "gang-rape." From
> changing stories, lack of evidence, and the dubious involvement of the
> group "Anonymous." There are plenty of solid reasons to doubt what we
> were being told. I remind the public, once again, that even though we
> were told matter-of-factly that Rehtaeh Parsons was "gang-raped,"
> there have been two investigations by the RCMP. There still wasn't
> sufficient evidence to proceed with criminal rape charges. In the
> interest of charging the alleged rapists with something. The best the
> crown could do was charge two boys with making and distributing child
> pornography.
>
> Glen continues:
>
>
> You see, according to them, Rehtaeh didn't die from being raped and
> bullied, she died because I'm a bad father. I knowingly let her smoke
> pot, drink vodka, and raised her to be flirtatious and promiscuous.
> Rehtaeh wasn't raped because someone raised their sons to be a
> rapists, she was raped because her father raised her to be raped.
>
> That's not what anybody claimed, you fucking scumbag. What was claimed
> was, due to the lack of evidence, there's reasonable doubt as to
> whether she was even raped at all. Remember, there had been two
> investigations. The reason why charges weren't laid the first time
> around was due to lack of evidence, Rehtaeh's changing stories, etc.
> There was even an eyewitness statement from a girl, who claimed
> Rehtaeh refused to leave the party, and was naked, flirting with the
> two boys (and not FOUR as we were constantly told). In fact, one of
> the boys that was previously identified by Anonymous as one of the
> "rapists," WASN'T EVEN AT THE FUCKING PARTY!
>
> Glen continues:
>
>
> Almost every time her name is mentioned in the news or in an article
> those anonymous posters show up with their fake usernames and who post
> all sorts of nonsense, innuendo, lies, misinformation and outright
> victim blaming. Rarely do they use real names and rarely are they
> women.
> I'm not sure why some people feel a need to weight in on issues they
> know little or nothing about.
> As members of the public that were being fed the misinformation coming
> directly from you and Leah Parsons, they have every right to speculate
> and ask questions.
>
>
> I reply if I can even though it's almost always futile. Some people
> just have the wrong information while others are so out to lunch I'm
> left wondering if they've read anything about this story at all.
> Patrick Doran of the Edmonton Men's Movement thinks I've been using a
> "victim-card" to silence critics in the "…years since Rehtaeh's
> death." It hasn't been a year yet Patrick.
> I try to not to get hooked. I honestly have bigger issues to deal with
> than a hand full of forgettable trolls. It's the people who say
> nothing I want to reach, the people who are shocked by this story and
> don't know, or don't realize, they have a part to play. Men mainly.
> Not the ones trolling rape stories; I'm talking about the good ones.
> Men with hearts, families, compassion, decency, and a sense of virtue.
> You are so full of shit, Glen. It is you who seeks these critics out,
> and when you don't get your way, that's when "Mr. Vengeance" your dark
> alter-ego shows up to threaten and harass. The fact you threaten to
> use Anonymous, the fact you conspire with others to have their blogs
> hacked - all for expressing their opinions on a story that has been
> made public, due to the heavy-handed propaganda coming directly from
> you and Leah Parsons. We wouldn't be talking about this story if it
> wasn't for the fact you used social media to hype up your claims that
> your daughter was gang-raped and that the RCMP just wanted to cover it
> up... because they're mean? Even after a second investigation and all
> the public scrutiny, there's still no rape charges. What does THAT
> tell you, Glen?
>
>
> We need to take an honest hard look at why we befriend rapists, why we
> believe them, allow them, tolerate them, and help them get away with
> the crimes they commit. We should be confronting them, exposing them,
> shunning them from our homes, families, teams, and places of
> employment. We need to use our voices to be a part of the solution and
> not let our silence continue to be part of the problem.
>
> We need to take an honest look at why the public so easily accepts
> whatever they are told without any fact-checking. How much longer will
> we tolerate media whores like Glen Canning, who openly threaten people
> and have the nerve to play the victim? Who use self-important jerkoff
> moralfags like Anonymous as their personal troll army? Quit saying
> things I don't like, or I'll get Anonymous to hack your blog. How much
> longer will we tolerate Anonymous naming people as "rapists" who
> weren't even involved at all?
>
> Posted by Patrick Doran at 09:44
>
>
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/03/yo-ian-mcphail-how-much-longer-are-rcmp.html
>
> Saturday, 8 March 2014
> YO Ian McPhail how much longer are the RCMP gonna protect their sick
> shills in Alberta such as Mr Baconfat, Patty Baby Doran and Dirty
> Dicky Dean????
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aq5Z8HWaHFM
>
> http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/false-rape-culture/prove-your-allegations-glenn-canning/
>
> http://www.mensrightsedmonton.com/support-your-allegations-glen-canning/
>
> http://www.mensrightsedmonton.com/a-response-from-mr-vengeance-glen-cannings-dark-alter-ego/
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2014/02/for-glen-cannings-lawyer.html
>
> Monday, February 24, 2014
> For Glen Canning's Lawyer
>
> I preface these comments with a question. How in the name of whatever
> Deity that may or might exist, can "Mother" Leah Parsons, and "Father"
> Glen Canning can claim, or go to bed at night thinking they did all
> they could do to prevent Rehtaeh's suicide? That they are not morally
> culpable. Do these people have a complete lack of moral fibre?
>
> Glen Canning wrote recently. "If he writes anything more about
> Rehtaeh, I'm going to talk to a civil lawyer." That is a fact, its on
> facebook." But it is also a fact I am not writing about Rehtaeh
> Parsons, nor ever have. Notwithstanding Mr. Canning's
> misrepresentations to his sycophants, my humble comments have nothing
> to do with "Saint" Rehtaeh of Parsons," but her parents whom I and
> many thousands of other Canadians feel were morally culpable, if not
> criminally negligent in their stewardship of young Rehtaeh's life.
>
> That's a fact, "the truth is a complete defense."
>
> Mr. Canning has personally committed frauds and committed crimes in
> the name of "Saint Rehtaeh of Parsons," including myself. Those
> crimes have just been reported to the RCMP K Division. Glen Canning
> armed with my wife's name he got from one David Amos. There upon he
> got pictures of myself from Mr.Amos' posts and created a Face Book
> page as Barry Winters. Mr, Canning there upon impersonated my myself
> to my wife to become "Face Book friends" with her, and gain access so
> her friends and family to threaten, harass and cajole them. but most
> just try to threaten me. It didn't work. As it didn't work when David
> Amos tried it, because I stand by every word I write.
>
> A number of his sycophants including Anonymous have threatened,
> harassed, and have committed frauds upon a very large number of
> people in Halifax and Canada whose only "offense" was they don't buy
> the clearly self serving "party line" spewed by Mr. Canning and Ms.
> Parsons. And they think it very bad parenting, if not insane, to
> permit a fourteen year old girl to engage in promiscuous behavior, and
> the abuse of drugs and alcohol. Mr. Canning et al, have abused anyone
> that had the "temerity" to speak out the truths, they find
> uncomfortable, including prominent national news columnists.
>
> Notwithstanding the platitudes he tells his sycophants on Face Book,
> how he is having difficulty in "letting go of" Rehtaeh, these have
> nothing to do with his years of mischief, but everything to do with
> harassing, and deliberately silencing a large number of people that
> feel Rehtaeh's parents' failure was a very large component in her
> suicide.
>
> Mr. Canning has threatened me with violence. I don't know if he has
> done that others, but Vengeance / Mr. Canning e mailed me that,"he had
> friends at CFB Edmonton looking for me and where I live to get me on
> his behalf."
> Interesting behavior from a "man" that has "reported" to the media
> multiple "death threats" against himself.
>
> So when Mr. Canning walks into a lawyer's office for his initial
> consultation it will have nothing to do with "litigation" but with
> the defense of himself against criminal charges. Not just from the
> criminal complaints of myself but a number of others, and Mr. Canning
> knows precisely who they are.
>
> Mr. Canning, I was over twenty years an infantry officer. Your "
> imaginary friends from CFB Edmonton"" or yourself couldn't harm me on
> the best day you louts ever had. Tell your lawyer that!
>
> Posted by Seren at 4:24 AM
>
> http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/glen-canning/rehtaeh-parsons-glen-canning_b_4846765.html
>
> Men Should Stand Up to Rapists, Not Befriend Them
> Posted: 02/25/2014 12:12 pm
>
> Shame is a powerful weapon.
>
> Shame is what sexual predators rely on. Next to alcohol it's their
> preferred WMD. What were you thinking, after all, being alone,
> dressing like that, drinking too much, trusting too much? You should
> have known better. You should have known what would happen. It's the
> same approach pedophiles use when they tell their victims "we're only
> doing what you want."
>
> I was invited to speak in Ottawa recently and share my thoughts on
> violence against women and the role men play. There are two things
> I've learned since my daughter, Rehtaeh Parsons, died last April and I
> began to speak at conferences and meetings. One, the audience will be
> almost all women, as it was in this case, and two, attempts to hurt
> and silence me suddenly appear when there's anything mentioned about
> Rehtaeh online or in social media. She's worm food because I'm a
> failure, according to one person's post. If I don't shut up I'll join
> her, says another. Some choose words so disgusting I can't bring
> myself to repeat them.
>
> You see, according to them, Rehtaeh didn't die from being raped and
> bullied, she died because I'm a bad father. I knowingly let her smoke
> pot, drink vodka, and raised her to be flirtatious and promiscuous.
> Rehtaeh wasn't raped because someone raised their sons to be a
> rapists, she was raped because her father raised her to be raped.
>
> Almost every time her name is mentioned in the news or in an article
> those anonymous posters show up with their fake usernames and post all
> sorts of nonsense, innuendo, lies, misinformation and outright victim
> blaming. Rarely do they use real names and rarely are they women.
>
> I'm not sure why some people feel a need to weigh in on issues they
> know little or nothing about. I reply if I can even though it's almost
> always futile. Some people just have the wrong information while
> others are so out to lunch. I'm left wondering if they've read
> anything about this story at all. Patrick Doran of the Edmonton Men's
> Movement thinks I've been using a "victim-card" to silence critics in
> the "...years since Rehtaeh's death." It hasn't been a year yet,
> Patrick.
>
> I try to not to get hooked. I honestly have bigger issues to deal with
> than a handful of forgettable trolls. It's the people who say nothing
> I want to reach, the people who are shocked by this story and don't
> know, or don't realize, they have a part to play. Men mainly. Not the
> ones trolling rape stories; I'm talking about the good ones. Men with
> hearts, families, compassion, decency and a sense of virtue.
>
> Rapists rely on other men to excuse and justify their crimes against
> women. Other men who'll laugh at their jokes, invite them to parties,
> play sports with them, introduce them to other women. Men who'll give
> them jobs, feed them, and help them blame their victims even if it's
> by indifference.
>
> Men, good men, need to stand up and do to rapists and their supporters
> what we do to child molesters. Imagine the difference it would make if
> a man who jokes about rape and always doubts victims entered a room to
> silence, whispers, stares, and looks of disgust from other men. That
> is what we need to do as men.
>
> We need to take an honest hard look at why we befriend rapists, why we
> believe them, allow them, tolerate them, and help them get away with
> the crimes they commit. We should be confronting them, exposing them,
> shunning them from our homes, families, teams, and places of
> employment. We need to use our voices to be a part of the solution and
> not let our silence continue to be part of the problem.
>
> There is a stigma attached to rape. A stigma centuries old, created by
> devils, used against their victims to hide awful deeds. It's time to
> put that stigma where it belongs. There is no difference between a man
> who rapes and a man who befriends and defends him.
>
> I tried to end my talk in Ottawa on a big note but couldn't find the
> right words. The message has been said many times already. It's time
> to stop talking and start doing. We're still in a place where a
> 16-year-old will write on Rehtaeh's Facebook page and wonder how she
> couldn't have known what happens to girls when they drink around boys.
> A place where young women ask what they can do to make sure they don't
> get raped.
>
> Truth is there's nothing they can do. Women who don't smoke pot get
> raped as do women who don't drink vodka and women with amazing
> fathers. I hate to think what some of those posters will say to
> themselves if someone they love ever gets raped because according to
> their logic it wasn't the rapists fault, it's the fault of the people
> who love the victim.
>
> https://mobile.twitter.com/PatrickJohnDora/status/442470608551424000?screen_name=PatrickJohnDora
>
> Glen Canning @GlenfordCanning 22 Feb
> The ethics of outing your rapist | Jill Filipovic
> ln.is/gu.com/p/3byne... via @guardian
> View details ·
>
> The Mad Shangi @PatrickJohnDora 22 Feb
> @GlenfordCanning @guardian What's the ethics behind outing your
> critics? mensrightsedmonton.com/support-your-a...
> View conversation ·
>
> Glen Canning @GlenfordCanning 22 Feb
> @PatrickJohnDora why are they hiding?
> View conversation ·
>
> The Mad Shangi @PatrickJohnDora 22 Feb
> @GlenfordCanning So you don't even deny you been using Anonymous to
> hack people's blogs for criticizing you?
> View conversation ·
>
> Glen Canning @GlenfordCanning 22 Feb
> @PatrickJohnDora whose blog was hacked?
> View conversation ·
>
> The Mad Shangi @PatrickJohnDora 23 Feb
> @GlenfordCanning You went to David Amos and claimed you were trying to
> get Anonymous to hack MrBaconFat53's blog.
> View conversation ·
>
> David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos 28m
> @PatrickJohnDora @GlenfordCanning @DaviRayAmos NONE of you know how to
> even act ethical huffingtonpost.ca/glen-canning/r...
> View conversation ·
>
> The Mad Shangi
> @PatrickJohnDora
> @DavidRayAmos @GlenfordCanning Oh did you just show up for the circle jerk?
> 10:23 p.m. Sat, Mar 8
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: BARRY WINTERS <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 22:45:36 -0700 (MST)
> Subject: Re: YO Ian McPhail Remember Complaint # 2013-2824 with The
> Commission for Public Complaints against RCMP????
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, RBauer
> <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, "james.dinkins" <james.dinkins@dhs.gov>,
> "james.dinkins" <james.dinkins@ice.dhs.gov>, "craig.callens"
> <craig.callens@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Barry.Kennedy"
> <Barry.Kennedy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Todd Learning
> <Todd.Learning@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, nathan fox
> <nathan.fox@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Rod.Booth" <Rod.Booth@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> richard dejong <richard.dejong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, lesley smith
> <lesley.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, "roger.l.brown"
> <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan"
> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Birgit@thevalleysentinel.com,
> donalda@thevalleysentinel.com, The Disinfector
> <thedisinfector@hotmail.com>, goatnewspaper <goatnewspaper@gmail.com>,
> "Darren.Woroshelo" <Darren.Woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "brad.anderson"
> <brad.anderson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Glen Canning <grcanning@me.com>, Brady
> Knezacek <Brady.Knezacek@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Shawn <Shawn@nfa.ca>,
> lgunter <lgunter@shaw.ca>, "joshua.skurnik"
> <joshua.skurnik@hotmail.com>, "Pete.Berndsen"
> <Pete.Berndsen@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "jennifer.johnston"
> <jennifer.johnston@gov.bc.ca>, "Ian.McPhail"
> <Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, editor@pgfreepress.com, radical
> <radical@radicalpress.com>, "Geoffrey.McDonald"
> <Geoffrey.McDonald@gov.bc.ca>, yuri <yuri@unb.ca>, "Kent.Kryzanowski"
> <Kent.Kryzanowski@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Paul.Collister"
> <Paul.Collister@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
> David Amos is delighted to fuck each and everyone of you up the ass!
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: "craig.callens" <craig.callens@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Barry.Kennedy"
> <Barry.Kennedy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Todd Learning"
> <Todd.Learning@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "nathan fox"
> <nathan.fox@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Rod.Booth" <Rod.Booth@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "richard dejong" <richard.dejong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "lesley smith"
> <lesley.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, "roger.l.brown"
> <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan"
> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Birgit@thevalleysentinel.com,
> donalda@thevalleysentinel.com, "The Disinfector"
> <thedisinfector@hotmail.com>, "goatnewspaper"
> <goatnewspaper@gmail.com>, "Darren.Woroshelo"
> <Darren.Woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "brad.anderson"
> <brad.anderson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "sunrayzulu" <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>,
> "Glen Canning" <grcanning@me.com>, "Brady Knezacek"
> <Brady.Knezacek@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Shawn" <Shawn@nfa.ca>, "lgunter"
> <lgunter@shaw.ca>, "joshua.skurnik" <joshua.skurnik@hotmail.com>,
> "Pete.Berndsen" <Pete.Berndsen@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "jennifer.johnston"
> <jennifer.johnston@gov.bc.ca>, "Ian.McPhail"
> <Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, editor@pgfreepress.com, "radical"
> <radical@radicalpress.com>, "Geoffrey.McDonald"
> <Geoffrey.McDonald@gov.bc.ca>, "yuri" <yuri@unb.ca>,
> "Kent.Kryzanowski" <Kent.Kryzanowski@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Paul.Collister"
> <Paul.Collister@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "RBauer"
> <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, "james.dinkins" <james.dinkins@dhs.gov>,
> "james.dinkins" <james.dinkins@ice.dhs.gov>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 8:42:28 PM
> Subject: YO Ian McPhail Remember Complaint # 2013-2824 with The
> Commission for Public Complaints against RCMP????
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:39:26 -0400
> Subject: YO Ian McPhail Re: The Commission for Public Complaints
> against RCMP - #2013-2824
> To: Sheldon <Sheldon@nfa.ca>, Blair <Blair@nfa.ca>, "steve.graham"
> <steve.graham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
> <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "steve.murphy"
> <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 03:44:52 -0300
> Subject: YO Ian McPhail Re: The Commission for Public Complaints
> against RCMP - #2013-2824
> To: PCC Complaints <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "Ian.McPhail"
> <Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
> <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "roger.l.brown"
> <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, warren <warren@daisygroup.ca>, jacques
> boucher <jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> Gunther.Schonfeldt@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, rusun@un.int,
> john.adams@queensu.ca, John.Forster@cse-cst.gc.ca,
> td.ombudsman@td.com, christopher.montague@td.com,
> Frank.McKenna@td.com, Glenn.Greenwald@guardian.co.uk,
> info@praxisfilms.org, birgittaj@althingi.is
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>,
> enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk, sarah.chapman@fsa.gov.uk,
> ambassador@brasilemb.org, slrc@itamaraty.gov.br
>
> WOW Ya think somebody within the "Five Eyes" would finally do their
> job now EH Glen Greenwald and the President Rousseff'?
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: PCC Complaints <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:59:52 +0000
> Subject: The Commission for Public Complaints against RCMP - #2013-2824
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This is further to your recent communications with the Commission.
> From September 18, 2013 to the present, our office has received 6
> electronic messages from you. Many of these e-mails are not related to
> RCMP conduct.
>
> On October 1, 2013, you called our office and spoke with an Intake
> Officer. You wished to enquire about three complaint files. When the
> Intake Officer attempted to inform you that you have three enquiry
> files with the Commission, you became agitated and insisted otherwise.
> You raised your voice and spoke over the Intake Officer. You then
> demanded the name of the Intake Officer, and subsequently yelled "see
> you in federal court" and hung up the telephone line.
>
> As a reminder, we request that all future correspondence with our
> office must be courteous in tone and that you are respectful of the
> requests that are made of you. While it is clearly not the intention
> of the Commission to prevent you from making complaints against
> members of the RCMP, your recent emails and telephone call have been
> unproductive for both you and for Commission staff. In the future, we
> request that all communication with our office be respectful in
> language and related to our mandate. In the event that this request
> is not respected, the Commission will consider imposing restrictions
> on how you may communicate with our office.
>
> Should you have a complaint about a specific RCMP member surrounding a
> specific incident, I invite you to visit the Commission's website
> (www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca<http://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca>) to submit an online
> complaint, rather than to send an email that is difficult to follow or
> a copy of a letter you have sent to many others. The complaint form
> will guide you through the information required that will enable the
> Commission to process your complaint. Should you have difficulty in
> accessing the complaint form and wish to have one sent to you, you may
> provide your mailing address and a form will be mailed to you via
> Canada Post.
>
> I would also invite you to send your correspondence regarding any new
> or existing complaints (quoting the appropriate Commission file
> number) by letter mail to:
>
> Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP
> National Intake Office
> PO Box 88689
> Surrey, BC V3W 0X1
>
> Yours truly,
>
> Günther Schönfeldt
> Intake Officer / Agent d'information de liaison
> Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP /
> Commission des plaintes du public contre la Gendarmerie royale du Canada
> Tel/Tél : 1-800-665-6878 | Fax/Téléc : (604) 501-4095
> complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca<mailto:complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
>
>
>
> [Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CCF6DA.65AE7FE0]
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: !enquiries <enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:56:26 +0100
> Subject: IPCC Reference: 2013/015918
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Dear Mr Amos
>
> I acknowledge receipt of 4 emails at the Independent Police Complaints
> Commission (IPCC) earlier today.
>
> I note from our records that you have been advised on the IPCC remit,
> as well as spoken with one of my colleagues in the customer contact
> team. It remains unclear from your emails what your complaint against
> the police is. This may be because you refer to a number of other
> organisations, or matters outside of the IPCC's remit.
>
> If you wish to make a complaint against the police you should provide
> these details to either the IPCC or the relevant police force's
> professional standards department (PSD).
>
> The IPCC does not investigate allegations of crime(s) committed by
> members of the public, nor can we direct a police force to commence an
> investigation into such.
>
> If you have any queries about the IPCC's remit or the complaints
> process please contact us. However, emails to the IPCC that fall
> outside of our remit will be read and filed, but may not be responded
> to.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Elly Goodman
> Customer Contact Adviser
> Independent Police Complaints Commission
> Tel: 0300 020 0096
> Email: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
>
>
> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in
> partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On
> leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
> and/or recorded for legal purposes.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Talk about pissing a guy off. EH Ian McPhail? What planet do CROWN's
> bureaucrats come from anyway?
>
> Need I say BULLSHIT once again??? The other CROWN Corp commonly know
> as the CBC often puts that word over our airwaves so that can't be
> offensive. That said I bet the call was recorded If so I demand a copy
> ASAP. Next time I call I will record the call myself.
>
> I must ask did the oh so silent boss Ian MacPhail and his buddy Bob
> Paulson about the Yankee wiretap tapes being evidence of MURDER?
> Better check the Canadian Ciminal Code about assisting in the cover up
> of such crimes EH?
>
> As for the call I remember it like it was yesterday. Howcome it took
> Günther Schönfeldt three weeks to dream up the same sort of response I
> got in 2007??? The first thing I did was ask for him and the woman
> claimed he was not avaible and offered to help. She started out quite
> nice but as soon as she admited that there was only a faxed complaint
> in November of 2003 and that it did not warrant an answer I told her
> to look some more. She got fairly argumentive and did not wish to
> discuss the complaint I sent in August of 2005 (It appeared to me that
> she read something in my file) I gave up and asked her name when she
> got to snarky and she refused to give other than "Nora" So I said Cya
> in Federal Court and hung up. The I sent your buddy Bob Paulson and
> YOU Ian McPhail a Motherload of emails but I did only sent your
> mindless bureaucrats six that were largely unrelated if they did not
> know how to read deep.
>
> However your Commission should not deny that I argued with its former
> lawyer/boss Shirley Heafey about the aforesaid compliant in 2005
> within emails sent to many Parliamentarians months for a I ran for a
> sent Parliament again and she was replaced by the lawyer Paul Kennedy.
> (The lawyer Heafey and your Commission always denied that complaint
> existed until your office sent me a similar bullshit email after Mike
> Murphy a former Minister of Health and later another former Attorney
> General asked Deputy Commissioner Steve Graham to investigate my
> concerns.
>
> In return the Graham got transferred to Nova Scotia and RCMP falsely
> arrested REMEMBER Stevey Boy Harper?
>
> As I said Cya'll in Federal Court
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 1 902 800 0369
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>
> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
> Senator Arlen Specter
> United States Senate
> Committee on the Judiciary
> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
> Washington, DC 20510
>
> Dear Mr. Specter:
>
> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
> raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
> these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
> contact with you about this previously.
>
> Very truly yours,
> Barry A. Bachrach
> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Lisa Porteous <lporteous@kleinlyons.com>
> Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 14:46:22 +0000
> Subject: RCMP
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> David,
>
> Thank you for your email inquiring about our class action against the
> RCMP. As you may know, the Notice of Claim was filed in the British
> Columbia Supreme Court on March 27, 2012. The lawsuit has been
> brought by former RCMP constable Janet Merlo on behalf of female RCMP
> members. Unfortunately, we cannot assist you with your claim.
>
> We recommend that you contact Mr. Barry Carter of Mair Jensen Blair
> LLP to discuss any claim you may have against the RCMP for harassment.
> His contact information is as follows:
>
> Mr. Barry Carter
> Mair Jensen Blair LLP
> 1380-885 W. Georgia Street
> Vancouver, BC V6C 3E8
> Phone: 604-682-6299
> Fax 1-604-374-6992
>
> This is not intended to be an opinion concerning the merits of your
> case. In declining to represent you, we are not expressing an opinion
> as to whether you should take further action in this matter.
>
> You should be aware that there may be strict time limitations within
> which you must act in order to protect your rights. Failure to begin
> your lawsuit by filing an action within the required time may mean
> that you could be barred forever from pursuing a claim. Therefore, you
> should immediately contact another lawyer ( as indicated above) to
> obtain legal advice/representation.
>
> Thank you again for considering our firm.
>
> Yours truly,
>
> Lisa Porteous
> Case Manager/Paralegal
>
> lporteous@kleinlyons.com
> www.kleinlyons.com
>
> KLEIN * LYONS
> Suite 400-1385 West 8th Avenue
> Vancouver BC V6H 3V9 Canada
> Office 604.874.7171
> Fax 604.874.7180
> Direct 604.714.6533
>
> This email is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
> privilege. It is intended only for the use of the person to whom it is
> addressed. Any distribution, copying or other use by anyone else is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
> telephone us immediately and destroy this e-mail.
>
> üPlease consider the environment before printing this email.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> To: <Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>; <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>; "toewsv1"
> <toewsv1@mts.net>; "danfour" <danfour@myginch.com>
> Cc: <nelson.kalil@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>; "rmordenassoc"
> <rmordenassoc@rogers.com>; <warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "warren"
> <warren@daisygroup.ca>; "warren.dosko" <warren.dosko@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
> "Paulette. Delaney-Smith" <Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
> "WaterWarCrimes" <waterwarcrimes@gmail.com>; "robin reid"
> <zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>; "tony" <tony@peoplestandup.ca>;
> "Ken.Zielke" <Ken.Zielke@gov.ab.ca>
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:18 PM
> Subject: Attn Commissioner Ian McPhail QC I called again and tried to
> speak to you twice today my number is 902 800 0369
>
>
> http://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/nrm/nr/2010/20100126-eng.aspx
>
> As I said I am very serious and have no wish to speak to the likes of
> Ms Leduc EVER again FYI I see that the gossip about my concerns is
> leaking out here there an everywhere following this note is just
> couple of the reasons why I called an tried hard to speak to you again
> today
>
> Please don't try to tell me that your office does not know what
> happened between the RCMP and I within weeks of my sending the email
> immedialy below this note.
>
> If perhaps you people should read some blogs an watch some YOUTUBES ASAP?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>
> http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2008/07/david-amos-picked-up-by-rcmp.html
>
> http://govinjustice.blogspot.com/2008/07/david-amos-picked-up-by-rcmp.html
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/07/feds-institutionalize-determined-nb.html
>
> http://www.leadershipdirectories.com/images/promo/FTC.pdf
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 15,116
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 164.62.7.# (Federal Trade Commission)
> ISP Federal Trade Commission
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : District of Columbia
> City : Washington
> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 7.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727;
> .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1920 x 1200
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Aug 18 2010 1:50:29 pm
> Last Page View Aug 18 2010 2:01:49 pm
> Visit Length 11 minutes 20 seconds
> Page Views 2
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...i=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
> Search Engine google.com
> Search Words "david amos" canada parliament
> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....eblower-part-1b.html
> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....eblower-part-1b.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Aug 18 2010 7:50:29 am
> Visit Number 15,116
>
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 11,630
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 199.212.215.# (DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE)
> ISP DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Ontario
> City : Ottawa
> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> Language English (Canada)en-ca
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 12:50:37 pm
> Last Page View Aug 13 2010 12:52:15 pm
> Visit Length 1 minute 38 seconds
> Page Views 7
> Referring URL
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...3/ides-of-march.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-8:00
> Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 8:50:37 am
> Visit Number 11,630
>
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 11,638
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 199.212.150.# (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)
> ISP Royal Canadian Mounted Police
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Ontario
> City : Ottawa
> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 6.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1;
> INFOWEB-APPROVED; INFOWEB-APPROVED-IE6-FR; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR
> 2.0.50727; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 5:52:40 pm
> Last Page View Aug 13 2010 5:52:40 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.blogger.c...15428735081915360609
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 4:52:40 pm
> Visit Number 11,638
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 11,639
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 199.212.215.# (DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE)
> ISP DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Ontario
> City : Ottawa
> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> Language English (Canada) en-ca
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1466 x 916
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 5:52:51 pm
> Last Page View Aug 13 2010 5:52:51 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-8:00
> Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 1:52:51 pm
> Visit Number 11,639
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:34:30 -0300
> Subject: Attn PAULINE PHILIBERT and ARNOLD HADLEY of the New Brunswick
> Police Commission
> To: nbpc@gnb.ca, arnold.hadley@gnb.ca, john.foran@gnb.ca,
> premier@gnb.ca, Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
> Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca
> Cc: webo@xplornet.com
>
> New Brunswick Police Commission
> 435 King Street
> Fredericton, New Brunswick
> E3B 1E5
>
> A letter to support my complaint about various police forces in New
> Brunswick will follow these emails just as I promised on the phone to
> you people today.
>
> I have no understanding as to why the Police Commission nor anyone
> else holding a governmental mandate in the Province of New Brunswick
> has never called me back or answered one email in nearly four years.
> Shawn Graham should at least recognize his own documents to my framer
> friend, Werner Bock from the time when he sat in opposition and was
> the agricutural critic at the same time .
>
> It appears to me that I am not the only one to get mad at the
> malicious incompetence of John Foran and the cops of New Brunswick.
> What is even more interesting though is the fact that John Foran was
> once mad at the Police Commission and they way they investigated
> things so secretly against the public's best interests. EH Mr. Volpe?
> Rest assured that I ain't holding my breath for the police to continue
> to harass me anymore after their nonsense yesterday. Nor will I wait
> to see Wayne Steeves say or do the right thing after he has covered up
> my concerns about the severe lack of police integrity for his politcal
> party's benefit for four god damned years.
>
> http://www.canlii.org/eliisa/highlight.do?text=JOHN+FORAN+WILSON+MacINTOSH&language=en&searchTitle=Search+all+CanLII+Databases&path=/en/nb/nbqb/doc/1995/1995canlii3862/1995canlii3862.html
>
> For the recod these Youtubes that are this arseholes favoutites were
> created by the RCMP and I have no doubt whatsoever the people
> slandering me are cops as well.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0NdNtvC-YI#GU5U2spHI_4
>
> http://www.youtube.com/user/bigolcanoworms
>
> At least his ID is correct. This is a big old can of worms. N'est Pas?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:17:05 -0300
> Subject: Perhaps Paul Kennedy the current Commissioner of Public
> Complaints Against the RCMP will call us back now EH?
> To: Hermenegilde.Chiasson@gnb.ca, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca,
> scotta@parl.gc.ca, Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca, Holland.M@parl.gc.ca,
> Hubbard.C@parl.gc.ca, jonesr@cbc.ca, nbombud@gnb.ca,
> Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca, T.J.Burke@gnb.ca, roly.macintyre@gnb.ca,
> aleblanc.mla@nb.aibn.com, eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca, brian.kenny@gnb.ca,
> roy.boudreau@gnb.ca, donald.arseneault@gnb.ca, danf@danf.net,
> injusticecoalition@hotmail.com, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> stuart.jamieson@gnb.ca, Margaret-Ann.BLANEY@gnb.ca,
> victor.boudreau@gnb.ca, rick.brewer@gnb.ca,
> John.Ferguson@saintjohn.ca, Ivan.Court@saintjohn.ca
> Cc: complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com,
> newsroom@nbpub.com, carl.davies@gnb.ca, janet.trail@gnb.ca,
> Akoschany@ctv.ca, jtravers@thestar.ca, alan_white@cbc.ca,
> Tim.Porter@gnb.ca, Trevor.HOLDER@gnb.ca, bev.harrison@gnb.ca,
> Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca, Jody.CARR@gnb.ca, Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca,
> David.ALWARD@gnb.ca, bruce.noble@fredericton.ca,
> lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca
>
> Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 13:36:41 -0400
> From: "PCC Complaints" complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> May 23, 2007
>
> File No. PC-2005-1291
>
> Mr. David R Amos
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> On a number of occasions you have called or sent e-mails our office to
> raise matters which are of pressing concern to you.
>
> Each time we have tried to respond by explaining to you the relatively
> narrow mandate of this Commission and the limits of our powers to deal
> with the matters which are of concern to you. I must stress, once
> again, that the purpose of this Commission is to provide the public
> with an opportunity to make complaints concerning the conduct of
> members of the RCMP in the performance of their duties. We have
> neither the expertise nor the legal authority to permit us to become
> involved in issues beyond the scope of this mandate.
>
> While it is clearly not the intention of the Commission to prevent you
> from making complaints against members of the RCMP, an analysis of
> your numerous contacts with the Commission indicates that your
> concerns fall well outside the confines of our mandate. Further, your
> frequent e-mails have been disruptive and unproductive for both you
> and for the staff of this office.
>
> Should you determine that some point in the future you have a
> complaint concerning the conduct of a member of the RCMP in the
> performance of his or her duties, please submit it to the Commission
> by Canada Post only. As of now, your e-mails will be deleted unread.
>
> Yours truly,
>
> Andrée Leduc
> Enquiries and Complaints Analyst
>
> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Say hey to Shawn Murphy for me will ya
> Brian?
> Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 15:25:45 -0400
> From: "REVIEWS" reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
> To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> The Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP has received
> your e-mail message and will be responding in due course.
>
> La Commission des plaintes du public contre la GRC a reçu votre
> courriel et vous rendra une réponse au moment opportun.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
>
> January 30, 2007
>
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP "J" Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,
> John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
> "Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off over
> the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I was not
> ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear that
> Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and the
> US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment policing in
> Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
> From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> Subject: RE: Just so you know
> To: HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, gemerson@tor.fasken.com,
> jgrant@baseconsulting.ca,
> rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca, mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca, csae@csae.com,
> kim.keith@rci.rogers.com, jduncan@tor.fasken.com, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca,
> ahamilton@casselsbrock.com, jm@jmellon.com, treasurer@casis.ca,
> jbronskill@cp.org, RTRiley6@cs.com, pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
> dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca,
> linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca, janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca,
> robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca, Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca,
> arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca, nancy.taillon@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
> CC: info.com@chrc-ccdp.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, Scott.A@parl.gc.ca,
> radionews@mpbc.org, publisher@whatsup.nb.ca, kjamerson@wagmtv.com,
> kbabin@globaltv.ca, jfoster@globaltv.ca, atvnews@ctv.ca, cmorris@cp.org,
> info@ccna.ca, kbissett@broadcastnews.ca, bdnmail@bangordailynews.net,
> ehutton@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, argosy@mta.ca,
> sylvain.martel@csn.qc.ca, events@cpac.ca, mmacdonald@cp.org,
> crgeditor@yahoo.com, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca
>
> No need to Bitch.
> I am about to sue ya anyway but you did receive the same material
> that everybody else got by email anyway. However now I will now
> forward the other emails that various silly servants got after I had
> had many talks with your incompetant and malicious assistants within
> the Commission over the past two years. It seems that I had to insult
> you and bust you in front of your friends to finally get a response
> from you.
> Furthermore on August 2nd I sent you your material byway of the
> US Mail which was received and signed for. It was hard copy of my
> concerns and allegations about you being in bed with the corrupt old
> bastard Zack of the RCMP. I also sent a copy of wiretap tape # 139.
> Instead of you acting within the scope of your employment you go on
> vacation and bury your head in the sand while the RCMP assisted the
> Yankees in throwing my wife and kids into the street without due
> process of law?
> Well your head may be in still the sand but you just stuck your
> arse high up in the air. It is high time for me to give it a boot
> before you stick it up Zack's ass in a vain effort to appear that you
> have integrity after all. The following is the text of that letter and
> after that is the US Mail's confirmation of when it was sent and
> received by you.
> Say hey to McLachlin for me will ya? Tell her I will be suing her
> too. She has been covering up for the crooked Newfy Judge Dereck Green
> for way past too long. To hell with lawyers appointed as commissioners
> and other lawyers appointed as judges. From my point of view they were
> only appointed to cover up public corruption. I look forward to
> meeting the likes of you in court and arguing you on the public
> record. You just proved for me that most lawyers ain't that smart. You
> should have continued to play dumb Bitch. At least then you could have
> blamed your assistants for not telling you what you obviously know.
> however if you had done so, I would have pointed to the fact that you
> are their supervisor and therefore ultimatly responsible. Everybody
> else knows that the RCMP are as crooked as hell, so do you. call me a
> liar now. I double dog dare ya.
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
>
> July 31st, 2005
>
> Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin,
> C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and
> Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay
> Canadian Judicial Council
> 150 Metcalfe Street,
> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8
>
> Shirley Heafey
> Chair of Commission
> for Public Complaints against the RCMP
> P.O. Box 3423
> Station &quo t;D"
> Ottawa,
> ON K1P 6L4
>
>
> RE: Rampant Public Corruption
>
> Hey,
> Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and
> various underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public
> Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and
> emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by
> every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a
> copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as
> officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
> As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest
> Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little
> trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the
> ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to
> answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.
>
> I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending
> to you byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving
> identical material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell
> them I gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter.
> All that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
> mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes.
> However I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material
> than what Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact
> the same material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky
> Boy McKenna in particular received, while I was up home running for
> Parliament last year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so
> I have also included a few recent items to spice thing up for you.
>
> I am tired of trying to convince people employed in law enforcement
> to uphold the law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own
> conscience
> and be careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
> assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse to
> the law or me.
>
> Veritas Vincit
>
> David R. Amos
>
> 153 Alvin Ave
>
> Milton, MA. 02186
>
> Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 484U S
> Detailed Results:
>
>
> [IMAGE]
> [IMAGE]
> Bullet
> Delivered Abroad, August 11, 2005, 6:49 am, CANADA
> Bullet
> Out of Foreign Customs, August 08, 2005, 2:37 pm, CANADA
> Bullet
> Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
> Bullet
> Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
> Bullet
> International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 8:32 am, KENNEDY AMC
> Bullet
> Enroute, August 03, 2005, 8:30 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
> Bullet
> Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:40 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
>
> "Heafey, Shirley" <HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca> wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Heafey, Shirley"<HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
> Sent: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:10:00 -0400
> To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: Just so you know
>
> Just so you know, there was no message attached to the e-mail sent to
> me. SO, in fact, I don't know what you think I should now know.
>
> Try again.
>
> SH
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 1:24 PM
>>To: gemerson@tor.fasken.com; jgrant@baseconsulting.ca;
> rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca; mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca;
> csae@csae.com; kim.keith@rci.rogers.com; jduncan@tor.fasken.com;
> Moore.R@parl.gc.ca; ahamilton@casselsbrock.com
> Cc: Zeman, Arnold; jm@jmellon.com; Taillon, Nancy; treasurer@casis.ca;
> jbronskill@cp.org; RTRiley6@cs.com; pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca;
> dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca; Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca;
> linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca; janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
> barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca;
> robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca; Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca; Heafey, Shirley
> Subject: Just so you know
>
> CSIS can never say they didn't know. This should put Shirley Heafey's
> panties in a knot when she get back from her vacation. I can only
> wonder what Ms. Longo of the RCMP is saying about now.
>
> "Zeman, Arnold" <Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca> wrote:
>
> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: For the record Joan I did talk to
> your boss Abrahamson yesterday and more people you know today
> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:16:11 -0400
> From: "Zeman, Arnold" <Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca>
> To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> This is an automatic reply. I'm away froom the office and will return
> on Monday September 26,2005. If you need information before then,
> please contact Marie-France Kingsley at 990-6306.
> ************************************
> Ceci est une réponse automatique. Je serai de retour au bureau le
> lundi 26 septembre 2005. Si vous avez besoin d'aide, veuillez
> communiquer avec Marie-France Kingsley au 990-6306.
> *******************************
> A. W. Zeman
> Assistant Inspector General of CSIS /
> Inspecteur général adjoint du SCRS
> 340 Laurier Avenue West / 340, avenue Laurier ouest
> Ottawa ON K1A 0P8
> phone / tél : (613) 990-8274
> fax / télécopieur : (613) 990-8303
> email / courriel : arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
> ********************************
>
>
>
>
> http://voices-voix.ca/en/facts/profile/paul-kennedy
>
> Paul Kennedy
>
> What Happened
> Paul Kennedy was removed as head of the Commission for Public
> Complaints (CPC) regarding the RCMP after he advocated a more powerful
> and independent Commission. He sought adequate funding for
> investigations, increased accountability and improved service
> standards. The Harper government appointed a Conservative Party ally
> to replace him.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Paul Kennedy was appointed Chair of the Commission for Public
> Complaints (CPC) Against the RCMP in 2005. He was re-appointed for
> three more one-year terms in 2006, 2007 and 2008.
>
> Throughout his tenure, Kennedy was known as a relentless advocate for
> a more independent CPC. He believed that the CPC relied too heavily on
> the cooperation of senior RCMP officials, and was too limited in
> independent power to probe the RCMP's activities, or to inquire into
> witnesses' testimonials and to demand the production of documents as
> evidence.
>
> Kennedy also advocated for better funding to oversee the RCMP so that
> the CPC could investigate more cases and investigate them thoroughly.
> He argued that the CPC's budget of $5.2 million paled in comparison to
> the RCMP's $4.1 billion budget.
>
> Public Safety Minister Peter Van Loan cut Kennedy's budget by $600,000
> in 2009, seriously limiting the scope of the CPC's investigations.
>
> Kennedy did get funding for the high-profile investigation into RCMP
> involvement in the tasering death of Polish immigrant Robert
> Dzienkanski at the Vancouver International Airpoirt in 2007, and his
> work to reform RCMP policies on taser use. But that funding was only
> made available temporary. Similar investigations in future might not
> get the funding they need given the small size of the CPC's budget.
>
> Media sources have reported clashes between Kennedy and the
> Conservative government during Kennedy's time as head of CPC. He was
> ridiculed by Conservative officials for his stance that Mounties' work
> requires proper review and that access to evidence and witnesses was
> necessary in order to ensure accountability. Although the government
> has promised reform monitoring of the RCMP, this promise was not kept
> during Kennedy's tenure.
>
> Kennedy had other successes: during his tenure, the RCMP was under
> public pressure to modify training and operational procedures. The
> commission now regularly conducts reviews of RCMP activities and their
> policies in self-investigation. Kennedy also addressed investigations
> of death and verbal abuse involving RCMP officers, and proposed
> legislative and policy changes to avoid conflicts of interest.
>
> Kennedy's final weeks in office were marked by the release of a report
> strongly critical of the conduct of the RCMP officers involved in the
> death of Robert Dziekanski. The RCMP would go on to accept all but one
> of the findings in Kennedy's CPC report, and address the report's
> recommendations, eventually creating an Office of Professional
> Integrity, as well as a new policy to ensure independent and impartial
> investigation of RCMP employees.
>
> However, in November 2009, Public Safety Minister Peter Van Loan's
> office notified Kennedy that he would not be re-appointed after his
> contract terminated that December. Kennedy had been prepared to serve
> another term.
>
> In January 2010, Ian McPhail, a long-time contributor to the
> Conservative Party, was appointed interim chair of the CPC. McPhail
> was a real-estate lawyer with some limited experience on other
> commissions. Observers felt McPhail lacked the experience required
> head the CPC. McPhail's appointment was seen by Paul Kennedy and
> others as a wholly partisan move, that placed a strong Conservative
> ally in an important watchdog position. The replacement of Kennedy
> with McPhail has been criticized as an attempt to silence Kennedy's
> criticism of the RCMP, thereby reducing accountability of the RCMP to
> the government and the public.
>
> In January 2010, Kennedy made an appearance on Parliament Hill to
> express concerns about the fate of civilian oversight bodies under the
> Harper government. He was joined by two other watchdogs who the
> government had removed for dubious reasons: Peter Tinsley, who had
> been the Military Police Complaints Commissioner; and Linda Keen,
> former President of Canada's nuclear safety regulator.
>
> Kennedy has said the government was not willing to let the CPC fulfill
> its intended purpose. He has also called on the government to
> institute a fixed term for which a commissioner is appointed, so that
> people who have a job to do on behalf of the public don't end up
> essentially working for the governing party.
>
> In 2011 the new Minister of Public Safety, Vic Toews, re-appointed
> McPhail as head of the CPC for another year.
>
> Relevant Dates:
> October 2005: Paul Kennedy is appointed Chair of the Commission for
> Public Complaints (CPC) against the RCMP.
> October 2007: Robert Dziekanski dies after being tasered by an RCMP
> officer at the Vancouver International airport; Kennedy strongly
> criticizes the way the situation was handled.
> December 2008: Paul Kennedy is reappointed for another 1-year term as
> Chair of the CPC, until December 31, 2009
> August 11, 2009: Kennedy calls for policy changes to enhance
> accountability of the RCMP.
> November 18 2009: The government tells Kennedy his contract will not
> be renewed.
> December 8, 2009: Kennedy publishes a report criticizing some of the
> RCMP's actions.
> January 24, 2010: The government appoints Ian McPhail as interim Chair
> of the CPC.
> January 26, 2010: Paul Kennedy, Peter Tinsley and Linda Keen hold a
> press conference, expressing their concern over the government's
> silencing of watchdogs.
> February 4, 2010: The RCMP announces a new policy to ensure
> independent and impartial investigations of its employees.
> Role or Position
> Paul Kennedy was Chair of the Commission for Public Complaints (CPC)
> Against the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) from 2005 to 2009.
>
> Implications and Consequences
> Transparency: The removal of Kennedy means the loss of a qualified
> civil servant with over thirty five years experience in public
> service, with a proven track record of creating change for increased
> accountability.
> Democracy: The effectiveness and independence of watchdog
> organizations are compromised when leaders are appointed to short
> one-years terms and removed at will by politicians. The slashing of
> the CPC budget means in practice that there will be minimal oversight
> of the RCMP.
> Democracy: If public officials are removed and replaced whenever they
> threaten to hold the government to account, the strength of our
> democracy is diminished.
> Photo: CTV News
>
> Sources
> "CPC Chair responds to the RCMP Commissioner's letter...," Paul
> Kennedy, CPC against the RCMP, 16 December 2009
> "CPC Report on the death of Mr. Dziekanski," William Elliott, RCMP, 10
> February 2011
> "Former RCMP watchdog warns commission heads liable to sway," Janice
> Tibbests, CanWest News Services, 4 January 2010
> "Former watchdogs speak out on Harper government," Susan Delacourt,
> The Star, 26 January 2010
> "Harper Government Names Realtor as RCMP Watchdog," Nathan Griffiths,
> InformedVote.ca, 1 February 2010
> "Ottawa names interim RCMP watchdog," Colin Freeze, The Globe and
> Mail, 24 January 2010
> "Minister Toews announces re-appointment of Ian McPhail as Interim
> Chair of the CPC," Public Safety Canada, 14 January 2011
> "New civilian watchdog agency will oversee RCMP," RCMP Watch, 4 February
> 2010
> "Police Oblivious to pain Tasers inflict: RCMP Complaints
> Commissioner," CBC News, 25 June 2008
> "RCMP response to CPC regarding its report into Robert Dziekanski's
> in-custody death," William Elliott, RCMP, 7 December 2009
> "RCMP should limit self-investigations," CBC News, 11 August 2009
> "RCMP to implement all watchdog recommendations on Robert Dziekanski
> case," CPC against the RCMP, 10 February 2011
> "RCMP watchdog won't be reappointed," CBC News, 27 November 2009
> Report on death of Robert Dziekanski (PDF), CPC, 8 December 2009
> "Report slams RCMP in airport Taser death," CBC News, 8 December 2009
> "Tories drop RCMP complaints commissioner," Tonda MacCharles, The
> Star, 27 November 2009
> Français
>
>
> DEMAND IMMEDIATE APOLOGY FROM CANADIAN ALLIANCE MP
> Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:00 pm
> John Cummins' office replies 'Get a life' when invited to Maher Arar vigil
>
> Ottawa, Canada - 17/12/02) - CAIR-CAN is calling on Canadians to demand
> that John Cummins, member of Parliament of Delta-South Richmond, B.C.,
> offer a public apology for recent remarks made by his office when Cummins
> was invited to a silent vigil for Maher Arar. In response to the
> invitation, Cummins' office replied by email, "Get a life."
>
> Maher Arar is the Canadian citizen who was detained illegally in the United
> States en route to Canada and deported to Jordan and then to Syria. Arar
> was denied access to Canadian officials, prevented from calling his family,
> tried through a non-transparent process without a lawyer present, and
> deported to his country of birth in violation of international law. He is
> currently being held in a Syrian jail.
>
> The statement follows recent comments by Stephen Harper, Diane Ablonczy,
> and Stockwell Day of the Canadian Alliance which condemn Arar without any
> regard to his illegal deportation, the lack of a fair trial process, and in
> the absence of any definitive evidence linking him to terrorism.
>
> (See CAIR-CAN action alert # 84:
> http://www.caircan.ca/cgi-bin/actionalerts/viewnews.cgi?newsid1038072766,60770,)
>
> The remark made by John Cummins' office is deeply insulting and a clear
> breach of his duties as a public official," said CAIR-CAN Executive
> Director Riad Saloojee.
>
> He should immediately offer an unqualified apology to the Arar family and
> to all Canadians," he added.
>
> ACTION REQUESTED (Be firm, but polite):
>
> CONTACT Steven Harper and John Cummins.
>
> E-mail: Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Cummins.J@parl.gc.ca
>
> Telephone or Fax:
>
> Stephen Harper
> Tel: (613) 996-6740
> Fax: (613) 947-0310
>
> John Cummins
> Tel: (613) 992-2957
> Fax: (613) 992-3589
>
> DEMAND an immediate apology from John Cummins for the remarks made by his
> office yesterday.
>
> INFORM Canadian Alliance leader Steven Harper that his party has failed in
> its duty as the official opposition to defend the rights of a Canadian
> citizen. Recent comments by his party indicate a troubling trend of
> treating Maher Arar, a Canadian Muslim and Arab, as a second class citizen.
>
> COPY Canada@cair-net.org on all correspondence.
>
> Colin Mayes, Conservative
>
> This rookie B.C. MP made headlines this year after he defended the PM's new
> restrictions on media access in a column to his local paper. Mayes went
> further and suggested journalists would be more responsible if they faced
> jail terms for professional misconduct. "Boy, would the public get accurate
> and true information if a few reporters were hauled away to jail! Maybe it
> is time that we hauled off in handcuffs reporters that fabricate stories,
> or twist information and even falsely accuse citizens." Mayes quickly
> retracted his comments.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>; <deb@debgrey.com>; <debgrey@gmail.com>;
> <valerielmeredith@aol.com>; <RathgB0@parl.gc.ca>; "MulcaT"
> <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>; "Heather Martin" <martinhea39@gmail.com>;
> "bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "kevin.violot"
> <kevin.violot@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "Wayne.Lang"
> <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "toewsv1" <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>; "bob.rae"
> <bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net>; "Bob.Kerr" <Bob.Kerr@cbc.ca>;
> "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>; "mckeen.randy"
> <mckeen.randy@gmail.com>; "mcknight.gisele"
> <mcknight.gisele@dailygleaner.com>; "mclellana"
> <mclellana@bennettjones.com>
> Cc: <Whistleblower@ctv.ca>; <martine.turcotte@bell.ca>; "oldmaison"
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>; "stop_codex" <stop_codex@hotmail.com>; "josh
> steffler" <canuckfanjosh@yahoo.com>; <webmasterlawrence@gmail.com>;
> "xtofury" <xtofury@gmail.com>; "grenouf" <grenouf@genuinewitty.com>;
> "hiddenfromhistory1" <hiddenfromhistory1@gmail.com>; "J Bowman"
> <canada.acp@gmail.com>; "leader" <leader@greenparty.ca>;
> "maryann4peace" <maryann4peace@gmail.com>; "john.green"
> <john.green@gnb.ca>; "police" <police@fredericton.ca>; "David Amos"
> <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>;
> <Billa.MEDHURST@vpd.ca>; "mark.lord" <mark.lord@fredericton.ca>;
> "Leanne.Fitch" <Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>
> Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 12:17 AM
> Subject: So Debby Baby Grey "Famous Amos" would like to know if Harper
> and the RCMP in BC are paying attention YET???
>
>
> Some Deja Vu for you and Val
>
> http://deanrays.blogspot.com/2009/07/vals-minority-report.html
>
> http://www.debgrey.com/contact.html
>
> VAls minority report!
>
> Heritage Front Affair Val's Minority Reports
>
> THE HERITAGE FRONT AFFAIR: OUR VIEW DISSENTING OPINION of the REFORM
> PARTY of CANADA
>
> Presented by Val Meredith, M.P.
>
> THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE
>
> It was nineteen months ago when the Sub-Committee on National Security
> began its consideration of the Security Intelligence Review
> Committee's Heritage Front Affair report. Finally, after a long and
> often arduous effort, the Sub-Committee has tabled its report.
>
> At this point in time, it is important to clarify a couple of
> significant issues: The delays in producing the Sub-Committee report
> have nothing to do with the activities of the opposition parties, but
> rather are due solely to delays caused by membership changes and
> disagreements among the government members.
>
> Secondly, the so-called report of this Sub-Committee has little input
> from the opposition members. The joint dissenting opinion of the Bloc
> Quebecois and the Reform Party more accurately reflects the
> multi-party consensus of the majority of members of this Sub-Committee
> who actually participated in most of the Sub-Committee's hearings.
> While the joint dissenting opinion does not fully reflect the Reform
> Party's position on this issue, it is included to illustrate the
> changes to the report imposed by the government members.
>
> It must be noted that the major changes to this report did not occur
> during a Sub-Committee meeting, and neither opposition member was
> present. It is clear that the Liberal government was not prepared for
> the Sub-Committee to table the more critical report that is now the
> joint dissenting opinion. With regard to the official report of the
> Sub-Committee, the current government members of the Sub-Committee
> have produced an extremely emasculated version of the original report.
>
> Their report is just an extension of SIRC's Heritage Front Affair
> report which did not provide a sufficiently critical review of the
> Canadian Security Intelligence Service's investigation.
>
> THE SIRC REPORT SIRC claims to be the "eyes and ears of the public and
> Parliament on the Canadian Security Intelligence Service." Yet after
> months of consideration of the Heritage Front Affair report, it is
> clear that SIRC has been not only negligent in this role, but
> deliberately dishonest as well. Instead of providing Parliament with a
> thorough and objective review of CSIS' use of a human source in its
> investigation of the Heritage Front, SIRC's report exonerates CSIS and
> the Source of any wrongdoing.
>
> In its exoneration of CSIS, SIRC ignored or suppressed any evidence
> that was inconsistent with their conclusion that the Service did no
> wrong. SIRC has wilfully mislead Parliament and the Canadian people.
> The exoneration of CSIS by SIRC is a betrayal of SIRC's role as a
> review committee. While the Reform Party is deeply concerned with the
> wrongdoings of CSIS, SIRC's refusal to address these transgressions in
> an open and honest manner is cause for even greater concern.
>
> After nineteen months of reviewing the SIRC report and obtaining
> additional information, it is clear that SIRC is not fulfilling the
> function that Parliament intended. Originally the Reform Party had
> planned to do a thorough and critical review of the SIRC report,
> pointing out numerous inaccuracies and omissions. However, because the
> original version would have been too lengthy, we have chosen to focus
> on two main issues: Grant Bristow - CSIS Source, and the CSIS
> investigation concerning Preston Manning, that formed Chapter VIII of
> the Heritage Front Affair. ; GRANT BRISTOW - CSIS HUMAN SOURCE Unlike
> the government members of the Sub- Committee, I have no hesitancy in
> identifying Grant Bristow as the CSIS Source who infiltrated the
> Heritage Front.
>
> This position is not an assumption, nor speculation. In August 1994, I
> was contacted by an individual who had first-hand knowledge of Grant
> Bristow as a CSIS Source. A former police source, this individual was
> approached by Bristow, who offered to introduce him to a CSIS
> investigator.
>
> In September 1994 I accompanied this individual to a SIRC interview.
> The information this individual provided is faithfully recorded in the
> SIRC report at section 3.1.3, although it does not identify Bristow as
> the Source.
>
> In addition, at his appearance before the Sub- Committee on May 27,
> 1996, the Director of CSIS, Mr. Ward Elcock, inadvertently confirmed
> that Bristow was indeed the CSIS Source. In his opening statement,
> which was also provided in writing, the Director made the following
> comment: "What about our source's arrest in Toronto, along with
> American white supremacist Sean Maguire? That was a co-ordinated
> operation with law enforcement agencies. Mr. Maguire was expelled from
> Canada. Our source was released. No criminal offence was committed."
>
> Now contrast the Director's above comments with the relevant passage
> in SIRC's Heritage Front Affair report: "On September 20, 1991, Sean
> Maguire and Grant Bristow were travelling in the latter's car, when
> they were stopped at gunpoint by the heavily armed Metro Toronto
> Emergency Task Force. Sean Maguire was arrested on an Immigration
> warrant. RCMP and Immigration officials were on hand for the arrest,
> as was a CSIS investigator from Toronto Region.
>
> Grant Bristow, when he was stopped, had guns in the trunk of his car.
> Both men were taken to police station 41." (emphasis added) It is
> obvious from the above-mentioned information that Bristow is the CSIS
> Source in question. It is an issue, because the way that SIRC wrote
> their report, many of the questionable activities were committed by
> Bristow, as opposed to the Source. So it is important to acknowledge
> that Bristow was indeed the Source.
>
> As expressed in paragraph 28 of the joint dissenting opinion ("Having
> concluded that the placement of a human source was acceptable,
> although for a shorter time than this Source was actually in place,
> the opposition members of the Sub-Committee then asked themselves
> whether the Service should have recruited and put in place this
> particular Source?"), there were serious questions about using Bristow
> as the Source. While SIRC made all efforts to downplay Bristow's role
> in the creation and operation of the Heritage Front, clearly he was
> responsible for much of the success of the organization.
>
> The best indication of Bristow's role in the Heritage Front was the
> video that the Front put out with excerpts of Bristow's speeches, that
> had been edited out of the previously released videos. The excerpts
> from this video show that Bristow was the main administrator of the
> Heritage Front. He was responsible for the raising of money, for
> selling memberships, literature and paraphernalia, and for getting
> people out to Heritage Front rallies and demonstrations. His
> questionable contributions can be best summarized from the one video
> where he bragged that the Heritage Front in Toronto raised more money
> to assist incarcerated members of the white supremacist terrorist
> organization, The Order, than any other group in North America. ;
> Bristow under police investigation.
>
> There is one other aspect of Bristow's history that SIRC chose to
> ignore, despite the fact that this incident was in the original
> newspaper story that spawned their investigation. In 1993, the Metro
> Toronto Police Force investigated Heritage Front members Carl Fischer,
> Elkar Fischer and Andrew Maynard, for the kidnapping and assault of
> Tyrone Mason, another Heritage Front member. During the course of
> their investigation the police began to actively investigate Grant
> Bristow.
>
> The police investigators were so convinced that Bristow was involved
> in witness tampering, that they applied to the courts and obtained a
> Criminal Code Part VI warrant to intercept his communications. When
> the Mason case finally made its way to trial in the fall of 1995, a
> plea bargain was arranged. As a result of plea bargaining all charges
> were dropped against Maynard, and though convicted, the Fischer
> brothers received only a thirty day sentence to be served
> intermittently.
>
> Interestingly, a lawyer representing the federal government was
> involved in the negotiations. It would appear that Bristow's role in
> the incident prevented the Crown from aggressively prosecuting the
> case. Despite frequently referring to this case in their testimony as
> an example of the heinous activities that Heritage Front members were
> capable of committing,
>
> SIRC completely ignored the police investigation of Bristow's role in
> the case. ; Bristow and the Reform Party. The Reform Party is also
> deeply concerned about Bristow's activities within the Reform Party.
>
> As reported in the SIRC report, CSIS was aware that Heritage Front
> leader Wolfgang Droege "wanted to discredit Preston Manning and the
> Reform Party before the general election in 1993. This idea would be
> accomplished by the Movement publicly identifying itself and its
> security relationship with the Reform Party's senior executive level.
>
> Among those who allegedly knew of the Droege plan were Gerry Lincoln,
> James Dawson, Ernst Zundel, Terry Long, Jurgen Neumann, Peter
> Mitrevski, and Grant Bristow (emphasis added)." Not only was Bristow
> aware of this plan to discredit the Reform Party, but he was one of
> the major players in it. Bristow, along with Alan Overfield, were the
> two individuals who made all the security arrangements.
>
> While it was Overfield who originally offered the services of his
> bailiff company to the Reform Party, he was not aware of Droege's plan
> to discredit the party. Thus it was left to Bristow, a CSIS source, to
> create the relationship.
>
> According to the representative for the Reform Party, Andrew Flint,
> Grant Bristow did a very effective job in creating the security
> relationship between the Reform Party and the Heritage Front. In an
> affidavit sworn on May 1, 1995, Flint described the June 1991 meeting
> with Bristow and Overfield in the following manner: "The meeting was
> dominated by Grant Bristow who did most of the talking regarding the
> security for the event. I was certainly very impressed by his
> immaculate dress which included an elegant suit and highly polished
> shoes. This was the only meeting I attended involving security for the
> up-coming rally."
>
> Flint also mentioned that "at the meeting of the security team for the
> June 1991 event at the International Centre, Grant Bristow requested a
> letter from me stating that he and Al Overfield were authorized to
> handle the security for this event. I was told he needed it to present
> to the Regional Police which operated a sub-station on the premises of
> the International Centre."
>
> This letter is also mentioned in the SIRC report. However, the report
> stated "Overfield asked for the letter in order to receive recognition
> and to show that he was appointed. Grant Bristow's name was included
> in the letter because he said: #145;Unless we have a letter of
> understanding, there could be legal liabilities if there was a
> confrontation with protesters at a Reform Party event.'
>
> " Naturally, Bristow is the source of this information. It is
> interesting that Bristow claimed that Overfield asked for the letter
> to receive recognition, and that his own name appeared only for
> liability purposes. If Bristow's name was necessary for liability
> purposes, then why were the names of the other individuals who were
> providing security not included as well?
>
> In reality, the most useful application of this letter would have been
> to prove a security arrangement between the Heritage Front and the
> Reform Party. Yet, according to the SIRC report, Overfield was unaware
> of the plan to discredit the Reform Party, so there is little reason
> for him to request the letter. Bristow on the other hand, would
> certainly have pleased Droege by providing him with a letter to
> demonstrate that the security arrangement between the Reform Party and
> the Heritage Front actually existed. SIRC's willingness to accept
> Bristow's version of events is typical of their report.
>
> Much of the report is based on the evidence of Bristow. He is cited as
> the source of information 135 times; 96 times as the Source and a
> further 39 times as Grant Bristow. In addition, the source handler is
> cited 20 times as the basis of information.
>
> SIRC has basically provided the public with Grant Bristow's version of
> events, while contradictory information was generally dismissed. While
> SIRC denied any wrongdoing by Bristow or CSIS, they failed to address
> a very important issue - the entire operation was conducted in
> violation of a 1989 Ministerial Direction.
>
> On October 30, 1989 then Solicitor General Pierre Blais issued the
> following Ministerial Direction on #145;CSIS' Use of Human Sources' to
> the Director of CSIS. The Direction states in part: "that special care
> is required in regard to investigations which impact on, or which
> appear to impact on, the most sensitive institutions of our society. I
> am primarily thinking in this regard of institutions in the academic,
> political, religious, media or trade union fields.... I am writing
> that you personally, or a Deputy Director designated by you in
> writing, approve the use by the Service of confidential sources in
> such investigation."
>
> It is obvious that Bristow's role as one of two individuals who was
> "jointly responsible for the security of all present and future Reform
> Party Events that are planned for this region," would be part of a
> human source operation that "impacted, or appeared to impact on a
> political institution."
>
> According to the Ministerial Direction, this would have required that
> either the Director or the Deputy Director (Operations) approve
> Bristow's role as part of the security team. In reality, Toronto
> Region only sought out CSIS Headquarters' advice in August, two months
> after the Mississauga rally, and even then the file did not go to the
> Director or the Deputy Director.
>
> SIRC goes on to great lengths to point out that CSIS was careful that
> only Droege's activities as they related to the Reform Party were
> investigated, not the Reform Party itself. But they do not address the
> issue of a CSIS source operation that impacted on, or at least
> appeared to impact upon a sensitive political institution, namely the
> Reform Party. SIRC's refusal to address this issue is somewhat
> mystifying, considering that was one of the questions that the Reform
> Party specifically wanted answered when we put forth a series of
> questions to SIRC in a letter, presented to them at the September 13,
> 1994 Sub-Committee meeting:
>
> Question 73: Given the 1989 Ministerial Directive by then Solicitor
> General Pierre Blais, concerning CSIS utilizing sources in sensitive
> institutions such as political parties, religious groups and the
> media, was the Director's approval required prior to Bristow's
> attendance at the Reform Party meeting?;
>
> Question 74: If yes, did the Director approve of this operation?
> Bristow's role in the security group was indeed crucial in forming the
> link between the Heritage Front and the Reform Party. As Andrew Flint
> stated, he was impressed with Bristow's "knowledge of security
> procedures and technical terminology...", as well as his "elegant suit
> and highly polished shoes." Grant Bristow was the one member of the
> Heritage Front who had the respectability and the expertise to make
> Flint believe that he was dealing with a legitimate group of
> individuals. It is extremely unlikely that Flint would have ever used
> this group if he had met with skinheads or other Heritage Front
> members.
>
> In the final analysis, Wolfgang Droege had a plot to discredit the
> Reform Party by linking the party to the Heritage Front through its
> security arrangement.
>
> Grant Bristow played a pivotal role in this conspiracy, if in no other
> way than by providing the security group with the respectability and
> expertise they could not have gotten elsewhere within the Heritage
> Front.
>
> When the story broke in 1992 the Reform Party was indeed discredited,
> although there are no objective means to measure to what extent. It is
> bad enough that Droege, an individual deemed to be a threat to the
> security of Canada, devised a plot to discredit a legitimate political
> party and CSIS did nothing about it. It is much worse when Grant
> Bristow, a CSIS source, played an integral role in accomplishing this
> task, in violation of a Ministerial Direction. But it is a complete
> travesty when SIRC, the body that Parliament established to monitor
> CSIS, fails to even address the issue. CSIS INVESTIGATION OF PRESTON
> MANNING While compiling its report on the Heritage Front Affair, SIRC
> included a chapter that had nothing to do with the Heritage Front. It
> was about the Reform Party and a foreign government, subsequently
> identified as South Africa. SIRC wanted us to believe that by
> including this chapter they could allay any fears amongst Reformers
> that CSIS had investigated the party, or the leadership.
>
> In the SIRC report, the CSIS investigation is portrayed as a
> by-the-book, straight-forward operation. Upon closer inspection this
> investigation proved to be anything but straight- forward. Rather than
> allaying any of our concerns about CSIS investigations, SIRC's
> willingness to lie about the facts has made the Reform Party even more
> suspicious.
>
> Through a Privacy Act request by Preston Manning, CSIS released its
> documents on this investigation. Although they are heavily censored,
> the documents show that SIRC withheld information and misrepresented
> the facts in their report, so that they could demonstrate that CSIS
> conducted a proper investigation. Any evidence that was contradictory
> to their conclusion was suppressed.
>
> In the following pages, we will review the actual investigation,
> SIRC's version of the investigation, and the bizarre fallout from this
> chapter of their report. In exchanges of correspondence and testimony
> that occurred after the tabling of the report, we learned that CSIS
> documents were altered and misdated.
>
> We observed SIRC make admissions, and then subsequently retract these
> admissions, completely contradicting their earlier statements and
> testimony. The Director of CSIS also provided a version of events that
> not only contradicted his earlier testimony, but also required him to
> admit that almost everyone who touched this file made mistakes.
>
> In the final analysis, the Reform Party is convinced that CSIS
> launched an insupportable investigation of Preston Manning in 1989,
> and tried to cover it up five months later. Both the current
> management at CSIS and SIRC have continued that cover-up, frequently
> changing their story when confronted with facts that did not fit their
> version of the events. ;
>
> A dubious source sparks an investigation. As SIRC reported, and the
> CSIS documents confirm, this investigation began with a tip from a
> source who was described by the CSIS investigator as "self-serving and
> very opportunistic, particularly if it benefited himself." This
> dubious source informed CSIS about a conversation that he had with a
> board member of an association that promoted links between South
> Africa and Canada. This source then stated that the board member said
> that his group was giving money to Preston Manning's campaign, as
> Manning was running against External Affairs Minister Joe Clark.
>
> This information by itself should not have been of interest to CSIS.
> In democracies, citizens can financially support whoever they want in
> an election, for whatever reason. For CSIS to investigate they needed
> information that South Africa was actually providing the money. During
> the first meeting between CSIS and this dubious source, the source
> stated that he thought the board member meant that the money was
> coming from South Africa. When the source realized that he did not
> have the key piece of evidence that CSIS required, he miraculously
> obtained it less than three weeks later. The source stated that he had
> been talking to an unidentified, close associate of the board member,
> who supposedly told him that the South Africans may have contributed
> as much as $45,000 to Preston Manning and the Reform Party in trying
> to defeat Joe Clark in his riding of Yellowhead. This is the extent of
> CSIS' information about the Manning campaign receiving money from a
> foreign government.
>
> Third-hand information from a source who is not only of unknown
> reliability, but who had been identified by the CSIS investigator as
> "self-serving and opportunistic", should not be the basis of a CSIS
> investigation of any Canadian citizen, much less the leader of a
> legitimate political party. ; CSIS analyst stated, basis for
> investigation "difficult to support"! We are not the only ones to
> question the validity of this investigation.
>
> After the regional investigator sent two reports to CSIS Headquarters
> in November 1988, a response from the HQ analyst on the South Africa
> desk was sent to the region in January 1989. As the SIRC report
> acknowledged, the analyst stated that in HQ's opinion, the source of
> the alleged funding was most likely the group of Canadian businessmen
> who belonged to the association. But when the analyst addressed the
> possibility of foreign funding, SIRC did not accurately portray the
> analyst's comments. The analyst did state that, "if it were shown that
> South Africa indeed contributed as much as $45,000 to Manning's
> campaign, HQ could in time attempt to make the argument that South
> Africa is unduly influencing Canadian politics." However, SIRC chose
> not to include the following sentence by the analyst in their report:
> "To say the least, this kind of argument would be difficult to
> support."
>
> Since the analyst had stated that there was no basis for a CSIS
> investigation, contradicting SIRC's conclusion that it was a
> legitimate investigation, SIRC chose to suppress this line. It is the
> only line in that section of the report that SIRC did not include in
> the Heritage Front Affair report. The HQ analyst concluded this
> January 10, 1989 message by requesting that the region keep "HQ
> apprised of any forthcoming information which you may obtain in light
> of the above."
>
> There was no further information forwarded by the region. Rather, the
> next document that appears in Manning's file is an authorization of a
> TARC Level 1 investigation, dated October 17, 1989. ; Lead up to the
> TARC Level 1 investigation - January 10, 1989 to October 17, 1989.
> While there is a great deal of controversy over what happened between
> October 17, 1989 and March 30, 1990, we are equally perplexed about
> what happened between January 10, 1989 and October 17, 1989.
>
> The Reform Party has never received a logical answer to why an analyst
> on the South African desk in CSIS HQ stated that there was no basis
> for an investigation into the alleged contribution to Preston Manning
> on January 10, 1989, and yet without any additional, or new,
> information, an analyst on the South African desk in CSIS HQ submitted
> a request for a TARC Level 1 investigation on October 17, 1989? SIRC
> attempted to provide the following as an answer: A reliable source
> provided CSIS with information that a foreign country (read South
> Africa) had transferred over a quarter of a million dollars to Canada,
> to try to influence 24 Members of Parliament from other political
> parties (read Progressive Conservatives and Liberals).
>
> When asked, SIRC stated that CSIS did not take any steps to
> investigate these M.P.s. If the information about South Africa funding
> these 24 M.P.s did indeed inspire the investigation, why was there no
> mention of this on the form (REQUEST FOR AND APPROVAL OF COLLECTION
> LEVELS 1, 2 AND CATEGORY A aka 4002) authorizing the investigation?
>
> It is therefore unlikely that this information played any role in the
> investigation. SIRC would still have us believe that CSIS received
> information from a reliable source that the South African Government
> was using over a quarter of million dollars to influence 24
> Conservative and Liberal M.P.s, but did not investigate them. Instead,
> CSIS proceeded to launch an investigation of Preston Manning, who was
> neither an M.P., nor a Progressive Conservative nor a Liberal.
>
> We find SIRC's logic to be less than satisfying. ; The Actual
> Investigation: Who, What, When, Why? >From the moment the Solicitor
> General tabled the Heritage Front Affair report, one particular
> passage has caused a great deal of grief for the Sub-Committee, SIRC
> and CSIS. This passage resulted in a number of admissions,
> explanations, contradictions, retractions and accusations.
>
> The Reform Party believes that the best way to present this complex
> subject is in the following chronological manner:
>
> December 15, 1994 The Solicitor General tabled SIRC's report, the
> Heritage Front Affair, in the House of Commons. Included in section
> VIII, at paragraph 8.3 is the following passage: "On October 17, 1989,
> the Service decided to formally investigate the alleged $45,000
> contribution. CSIS said that they could not go back to the informant
> as all contacts had ended on December 31, 1988.
>
> The Service authorized a three-month Level 1 investigation entitled:
> #145;LNU FNU (Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
> Campaign)'. The Service cited section 12 and paragraph 2 (b) of the
> CSIS Act as the legal basis for the investigation." ;
>
> December 16, 1994 ;SIRC appeared before the Sub-Committee on National
> Security. Having been advised that the above-mentioned passage was
> inaccurate, the Reform Party made the following request:
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Can you have your officials go back to CSIS and have
> them examine the hard copy of the original authorization of the Level
> one investigation on the Reform Party and a foreign government, not
> just the corrected copies? Specifically, can your employees examine
> the caption on the file?"
>
> Summary - After the meeting, the Reform Party was approached by SIRC
> research officials. They asked what they should be looking for
> specifically. This led the Reform Party to believe that SIRC was not
> aware of a changed caption. ;
>
> January 27, 1995 In a letter from Maurice Archdeacon, the Executive
> Director of SIRC, to Derek Lee, M.P., the Chairman of the
> Sub-Committee on National Security, Val Meredith's request was
> answered in the following manner:
>
> "Ms. Meredith, M.P. requested that SIRC have its officials re-examine
> the original authorization of the Level I investigation on the Reform
> Party and a foreign government. Specifically, Ms. Meredith asked to be
> told what the caption was on the file.
>
> The nature of Ms. Meredith's question suggests that the answer may
> well already be known to her. Nevertheless, the caption she referred
> to for the targeting authority dated October 17, 1989 was #145;Preston
> Manning.' The caption was revised on March 30, 1990 to state,
> #145;LNU/FNU (Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
> Campaign).'
>
> I would be remiss if I did not point out that, aside from the amended
> caption, there were no other changes to the text of the targeting
> requests/authorizations. That is, the text in each of the documents
> was identical, and clearly stated that the investigation was to
> determine whether a #145;foreign influence' threat existed. CSIS did
> not suspect Mr. Manning of complicity..."
>
> Summary - Mr. Archdeacon admitted that the name on the targeting
> authority dated October 17, 1989 was #145;Preston Manning.' He also
> mentioned that "there were no other changes to the text of the
> targeting request/authorizations. That is, the text in each of the
> documents was identical." It is quite apparent that Mr. Archdeacon is
> stating that there were two versions of the same document, with the
> only change being to the caption. From his choice of words being the
> #145;targeting request/authorizations', there is no doubt that Mr.
> Archdeacon is referring to the form 4002. ;
>
> March 30, 1995 The Solicitor General appears before the Standing
> Committee on Justice and Legal Affairs, for the Main Estimates. He is
> accompanied by his Deputy Minister and the heads of the various
> agencies under his control, including Mr. Ward Elcock, Director of
> CSIS. The Reform Party asked Mr. Elcock a number of questions about
> this particular investigation.
>
> The following excerpts are from the transcript of this meeting: (Page 15)
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Can you explain then why Mr. Manning's name was used
> for a TARC level one investigation and why that investigation was not
> conducted under the foreign government?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "I don't know why that name was used. I suspect that, as
> much as anything else, it may have been just used as a convenient tag.
> I don't know the precise reason why it was used, but there is no
> question from the file that at any time the subject of the
> investigation was ever Mr. Manning himself."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Why was that file named under Mr. Manning, then, and
> not under #145;unknown contributor?'"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "I said, Mr. Chairman, that I didn't know the reason why
> that name was used. It clearly was in error, because in substance, the
> investigation at all times was an investigation of the actions of a
> foreign government, not an investigation of Mr. Manning."
>
> (Page 17) Ms. Meredith: "So Mr. Manning's name never came up under a
> requisition or a request for a TARC Level One investigation?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "It was in the sense, Mr. Chairman, that the title of the
> TARC was initially in Mr. Manning's name. His name was there. Was
> there an investigation of Mr. Manning? Absolutely not."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "I didn't ask if there was an investigation of Mr.
> Manning. I asked if a TARC Level was ever instituted under Mr.
> Manning's name?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "The answer, Mr. Chairman, was that there was a TARC Level
> in Mr. Manning's name. But as I have said, the subject of that TARC
> was not Mr. Manning at any time, ever."
>
> (Page 34) Ms. Meredith: "I have your policy manual here, the
> declassified version of the CSIS Operational Manual. For a TARC Level
> one authority, an investigator must submit a request for an approval
> form, CSIS form 4002. There's a space for the name of the individual
> to be investigated. Can you tell me whose name was in that spot on the
> form 4002 in question, signed on October 17, 1989?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "As I think I said earlier, there was in the TARC title
> Mr. Manning's name. However, as I said quite clearly, the subject of
> that file was at all times an investigation of contributions in terms
> of the possibility of contributions having been made by a foreign
> government to a Canadian political party. It was at no time an
> investigation of Mr. Manning himself, notwithstanding the title. I
> would that (sic) the title had been otherwise, but it wasn't. That's
> the fact."
>
> Summary - During this meeting, the Director of CSIS made it quite
> clear that on October 17, 1989 the TARC Level 1 authorization, the
> form 4002, was on Preston Manning. Mr. Elcock did not once suggest
> that the caption was "Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's
> Electoral Campaign." (Nor did Mr. Elcock suggest that the error
> occurred with a different document known as a FILE OPENING REQUEST -
> PEOPLE FILES form.) At this same meeting the Reform Party also
> questioned the Director as to why SIRC was not made aware that the
> original 4002 was in the name of #145;Preston Manning'.
>
> That led to the following exchange: (Page 17)
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Can you explain to me why that information wasn't
> provided to SIRC? In their report, they reported very thoroughly on
> that investigation, with the exception of the original TARC level?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "Why what information?"
>
> Ms. Meredith: "That the TARC level on Mr. Manning was excluded from
> the SIRC report, that SIRC was unaware of that having happened?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "I don't know that in fact SIRC was unaware. I don't know
> why they would not have put it in their report or would have chosen
> not to do that. That's SIRC's business, and you would have to address
> that question to SIRC."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "When we brought it to SIRC's attention, they were
> unaware of that fact. It was only by it being brought to their
> attention that they were able to go back and find out the information.
> So I assumed from that they did not know that information was not
> provided to them, and I would like to know why it wasn't?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "I don't know that that assumption is correct; I would
> have to check. In fact, my belief is that they did have that
> information, but I'll certainly check that for the hon. member."
>
> Summary - This was the first information that the Reform Party
> received that SIRC was aware that the original TARC Level was on
> Preston Manning. ;
>
> March 31, 1995 In response to Mr. Elcock's testimony, Val Meredith
> wrote to SIRC, seeking clarification of what SIRC knew and when. "Was
> any member or employee of SIRC aware that the original TARC
> investigation launched on October 17, 1989 (was) in the name of
> Preston Manning and not "LNU FNU (Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston
> Manning's Electoral Campaign), when the Heritage Front Affair report
> was tabled on December 9, 1994?" Summary - The Reform Party
> specifically asked SIRC if they knew prior to the tabling of their
> report that the TARC investigation was in the name of #145;Preston
> Manning.' ;
>
> April 7, 1995 In a letter, under the name of Jacques Courtois, P.C.,
> Q.C., but signed by Maurice Archdeacon, Val Meredith's letter was
> responded to in the following fashion: "You asked whether any member
> or employee of SIRC was aware of the TARC investigation launched on
> October 17, 1989 in the name of Preston Manning and not the corrected
> title. SIRC staff saw the original title of the targeting
> authorization, as well as the corrected title and all other documents
> pertaining to the investigation. As I mentioned in my letter dated
> January 27, 1995 to Mr. Derek Lee, M.P. Chairperson of the
> Sub-Committee on National Security, the description (narrative text)
> of the authorization never changed... The original caption was seen
> for what it was - an error, and the Service corrected that error five
> years ago."
>
> Summary - Once again SIRC admitted that the caption on the TARC on
> October 17, 1989 was in the name of Preston Manning. They also
> admitted that they knew this prior to tabling their report. Although
> Mr. Archdeacon does not specifically state why SIRC chose to exclude
> this information from their report, the only possible explanation they
> offer for its exclusion is that the original caption was seen as an
> error, and that CSIS corrected that error in 1990. ;
>
> June 20, 1995 SIRC appeared before the National Security Sub-Committee
> for the Main Estimates. The Reform Party asked SIRC a number of
> questions about this particular investigation.
>
> The following excerpts are from the transcript of this meeting: (Page 7)
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Are you trying to tell this committee that there was
> not a TARC Level one investigation opened on Preston Manning?"
>
> Mr. Archdeacon: "No, I'm not, obviously, because we're repeating
> discussions we had over several hours earlier. You know very well that
> I'm not doing so. Someone - and we admitted it was sloppy work, and
> I'm sure the Director of CSIS would admit that - instead of taking the
> trouble to write on the TARC title #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston
> Manning's campaign' just wrote #145;Preston Manning.' The text,
> however, in the TARC report makes it absolutely clear - and you read
> the text - that Mr. Manning was not being investigated. We can't say
> it any more than this. It's question asked and answered."
>
> (Page 20)
>
> Mr. Archdeacon: "The fact is at the moment you're looking at the form
> - I understand your point - and saying the form of that 4002 gave the
> impression, because the name Preston Manning was there, that the TARC
> was on Preston Manning. That is the form of it."
>
> Summary - SIRC once again confirmed that the 4002 was in the name of
> Preston Manning. Mr. Archdeacon went so far as to state that he
> obviously wasn't denying that there was a TARC Level one investigation
> opened on Preston Manning. ;
>
> June 21, 1995 to November 7, 1995 During this time period, the
> Sub-Committee on National Security considered its report on the
> Heritage Front Affair. During these meetings, the Sub-Committee was
> operating on the understanding that the original 4002 was in the name
> of "Preston Manning" and this was altered to "LNU/FNU (Unknown
> Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign" on March 30,
> 1990. ; November 9, 1995 To clarify questions about alterations to
> 4002, and who knew about the caption "Preston Manning", the
> Sub-Committee sent a letter to the Director of CSIS. The following are
> the key excerpts from this letter: "On January 27, 1995, SIRC advised
> the Subcommittee, in response to its questions, that the caption on
> the October 17, 1989 targeting authority dealt with in Chapter VIII of
> the SIRC Report was originally #145;Preston Manning.' The Review
> Committee went on in the same letter to advise us that the caption was
> changed on March 30, 1990 to read #145;LNU-FNU (Unknown Contributor(s)
> to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign).' How was the caption change
> made on the Form 4002 - was the original form altered or was the
> original form destroyed and a new, back-dated, re-signed or
> re-initialled form created? Another of the documents contained in the
> file obtained by Mr. Manning is a November 10, 1989 Transit Slip (Form
> 3040) from the Chief of Counter Intelligence - General Desk to the
> Director General of Counter Intelligence. I would like to draw your
> attention to item 5 on this document where it is asserted #145;caption
> is considered appropriate under policy provision.' Can you provide the
> Subcommittee with an explanation of this assertion in light of the
> fact that at the time the caption read #145;Preston Manning' and was
> not changed until March 30, 1990? If the caption was appropriate as it
> was on November 10, 1989, what made it unacceptable on March 30,
> 1990?" Summary - These questions challenged SIRC's and CSIS'
> contention that #145;Preston Manning's' name appearing in caption was
> just a #145;clerical error.' It would be difficult for CSIS to
> maintain the #145;clerical error' excuse if the Director General of
> Counterintelligence was aware of the caption, and agreed with it. ;
>
> March 29, 1996 According to CSIS, they did not receive the November 9,
> 1995 letter from the Sub-Committee until this date. There is no
> explanation as to what happened to the letter during the intervening 4
> 1/2 months. ;
>
> April 15, 1996 The Director of CSIS responded to the Sub-Committee's
> letter of November 9, 1995. In a complete departure from previous
> statements and testimony from CSIS and SIRC, the Director contended
> that the Form 4002 never read #145;Preston Manning', but the original
> caption was #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
> Campaign.' Key excerpts from his letter are as follows: "In response
> to your query regarding the #145;REQUEST FOR AND APPROVAL OF
> COLLECTION LEVELS 1, 2 AND CATEGORY A' form, dated October 17, 1989, I
> am satisfied that this is the original document associated with this
> file. As is shown on this form, the original caption was #145;Unknown
> Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign'. The
> collection authority and a second form, #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST -
> PEOPLE FILES', is required by the Service's Information Management
> branch, in order to create a file. It was at this stage in the process
> that the clerical error occurred regarding this file caption. In an
> effort to facilitate the electronic opening and future retrieval of
> this file and the relevant documents, the caption that was erroneously
> entered on the #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES' form was
> #145;Preston Manning'. This error caused the creation of an automated
> hard copy file under this incorrect caption. It was during the latter
> part of March, 1990, while preparing this assessment report, that the
> file caption error was corrected. Item 5 on the #145;TRANSIT SLIP'
> (Form 3040), dated November 10, 1989, discusses the appropriateness of
> the caption as presented originally - #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to
> Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign' and the comments indicate that
> the author believed the caption to be appropriate."
>
> Summary - This was an astounding development. The Director totally
> contradicted 15 months of statements and testimony from both SIRC and
> himself. According to the January 27, 1995 letter from Maurice
> Archdeacon to Derek Lee, M.P., the targeting authority (form 4002)
> read #145;Preston Manning' on October 17, 1989 and was changed on
> March 30, 1990. Mr. Elcock made no reference to this fact in his
> letter. Nor does the Director address his own testimony before the
> Standing Committee on Justice and Legal Affairs on March 30, 1995,
> where the following exchange took place:
>
> Ms. Meredith: "So Mr. Manning's name never came up under a requisition
> or a request for a TARC Level One investigation?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "It was in the sense, Mr. Chairman, that the title of TARC
> was initially in Mr. Manning's name. His name was there. Was there an
> investigation of Mr. Manning? Absolutely not."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "I didn't ask if there was an investigation of Mr.
> Manning. I asked if a TARC Level was instituted under Mr. Manning's
> name?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "The answer Mr. Chairman, was that there was a TARC Level
> in Mr. Manning's name."
>
> There is no explanation of why Mr. Elcock would state on March 30,
> 1995 that "the title of the TARC was initially in Mr. Manning's name,"
> and then on April 15, 1996 he would write that "the original caption
> was #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
> Campaign.'"
>
> It must also be noted that in none of the correspondence or testimony
> from CSIS or SIRC, between December 16, 1994 and April 14, 1996, was
> there even a single mention of a "FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES"
> form. This particular form was certainly known to CSIS, as it was
> included in Preston Manning's Privacy Act request. However, subsequent
> investigation and testimony would show that Mr. Elcock was not
> completely forthcoming in this letter. ;
>
> May 15, 1996 SIRC appeared before the Sub-Committee on National
> Security for the Main Estimates. While there was little discussion
> about this issue at this meeting, the following exchanges occurred:
> (page 30)
>
> Mr. Discepola: "I'd like to know, then, in your opinion why in the
> world Preston Manning's name was used at all in any of the
> documentation that related to the investigation of the suspected third
> country contribution to the election campaign."
>
> Mr. Archdeacon: "I've forgotten the exact date but the original title
> was #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning's Election Campaign.'
> It should of had more on it then that, but that was the exact title.
> It was not titled #145;Preston Manning', and Mrs. Meredith has a copy
> of the sheets of paper. Here it is, and the title on it is
> #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign.'
> Then there's the text of what is to be looked at, which is whether
> somebody, some country, was going to contribute money to Preston
> Manning's electoral campaign. When you have a TARC like that you must
> open a file, and this TARC was sent down to the management information
> section in CSIS. Because it didn't have LNU/FNU in front of the
> #145;Unknown Contributor(s)', which means last name unknown, first
> name unknown, the only name the clerk down there could see was Preston
> Manning, and you have to have a name on a file. So he didn't write
> #145;Unknown Contributor(s)' , he wrote #145;Preston Manning'. That
> was an error. He shouldn't have done that. That error remained like
> that for at least three months without being corrected. It wasn't
> corrected until about March, when the assessment was being done. There
> have been allegations that the title on the TARC was changed. Written
> in ink was #145;LNU/FNU' ahead of what had always been there and had
> never been changed. Because Mrs. Meredith was so sure of this, and
> because we knew she had our information from somewhere else, we
> decided to have the original TARC X-rayed. We have exact evidence that
> everything Mrs. Meredith has said about this - about it having been
> titled #145;Preston Manning', about things having been typed around
> it, and about all those sorts of things - is completely and totally
> incorrect. The file was mistitled and the file does not give anybody
> any reason to investigate anybody. A file title does not authorize
> anybody to investigate anybody. There was never any time when every
> CSIS agent across the country could have investigated Mr. Manning.
> That is a figment of someone's imagination." (page 32)
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Then I would like to put something on the record, Mr.
> Chair. I'd like to put on the record, Mr. Archdeacon, that the
> comments you just made are in complete contradiction to a letter on
> January 27, 1995, addressed to Mr. Derek Lee, and in testimony you've
> given before this committee. It's a complete contradiction."
>
> The Chairman: "I'm sure SIRC would want to address that. Perhaps this
> is something that can be clarified later. Can I take it, Mr.
> Archdeacon, Mr. Courtois, that you would differ?"
>
> Mr. Archdeacon: "We would differ with that characterization." ;
>
> Summary - Mr. Archdeacon's comments are a complete departure from
> SIRC's previous correspondence and testimony.
>
> First of all, it was not Ms. Meredith who stated that the original
> TARC was captioned #145;Preston Manning', it was Mr. Archdeacon
> himself who first made this statement in his letter of January 27,
> 1995, when he stated:; "The caption she referred to for the targeting
> authority dated October 17, 1989 was #145;Preston Manning'.
>
> The caption was revised on March 30, 1990 to state, #145;LNU/FNU
> (Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign).'"
>
> Then there is the letter that Mr. Archdeacon signed on April 7, 1995,
> in which he stated:; "You asked whether any member or employee of SIRC
> was aware of the TARC investigation launched on October 17, 1989 in
> the name of Preston Manning and not the corrected title. SIRC staff
> saw the original title of the targeting authorization, as well as the
> corrected title and all other documents pertaining to the
> investigation."
>
> Once again Mr. Archdeacon confirmed that the original title was
> "Preston Manning", and admitted that SIRC staff saw both the original
> title of the targeting authorization, as well as the corrected title.
> If, as Mr. Archdeacon maintained on May 15, 1996, the original title
> was "Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign",
> why would he state in two pieces of correspondence that the caption
> was "Preston Manning".
>
> Furthermore, during SIRC's appearance before the National Security
> Sub-Committee meeting on June 20, 1995, there was this exchange:;
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Are you trying to tell this committee that there was
> not a TARC Level one investigation opened on Preston Manning?"
>
> Mr. Archdeacon: "No, I'm not obviously, because we're repeating
> discussions we had over several hours earlier. You know very well that
> I'm not doing so. Someone - and we admitted it was sloppy work, and
> I'm sure the Director of CSIS would admit that - instead of taking the
> trouble to write on the TARC title #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston
> Manning's Campaign' just wrote #145;Preston Manning.'"
>
> Mr. Archdeacon made no effort to explain why, on May 15, 1996, he told
> the Sub-Committee that there was not a TARC Level one investigation
> opened on Preston Manning, when on June 20, 1995 he stated the exact
> opposite.
>
> Clearly, Mr. Archdeacon and SIRC have fully endorsed the April 15,
> 1996 letter from the Director of CSIS. Like Mr. Elcock, they make no
> effort to explain the contradictions.
>
> There is one comment of Mr. Archdeacon that would be contradicted by
> the CSIS Director two weeks later. Mr. Archdeacon made a definitive
> statement that the error was caused by a clerk in the Management
> Information Section, who wrote "Preston Manning." As we will see in
> the next section, this statement has no basis in fact, but is rather a
> figment of Mr. Archdeacon's imagination. ;
>
> May 27, 1996 Mr. Elcock appeared before the Sub-Committee to answer
> questions about the Heritage Front Affair. During his appearance the
> Reform Party asked him about a number of discrepancies contained in
> his letter of April 15, 1996.
>
> Four of the specific subjects that were broached, included:
>
> I) The Altered #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES' Form. In his
> letter, Mr. Elcock stated, "the caption that was erroneously entered
> on the #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES' form was #145;Preston
> Manning.'" However, the copy of that form that Mr. Manning received in
> his Privacy Act request did not read #145;Preston Manning', but rather
> #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign'.
> It is obvious that the section of the form for the subject's name has
> been altered, as have the sections for #145;Present Address' and
> #145;Occupation'.
>
> The following exchange took place in relation to this form:
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Mr. Elcock, your letter clearly states that it was on
> this file, this PEOPLE FILES form here, and if people look carefully
> you can see where there has been alterations made to this document.
> The alterations have been made not only on the subject line, but on
> the #145;Occupation' line and the #145;Present Address' line. Your
> letter states that it was this form that Preston Manning's name was
> put on by mistake. I'm asking you why does this form not have Preston
> Manning's name on it? It has #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston
> Manning's Electoral Campaign."
>
> Mr. Elcock: "Mr. Chairman, Mr. Sundstrom reminds me that although it
> doesn't show here underneath, it was just Preston Manning when the
> form was first completed."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "So, if you agree, or if you read Mr. Archdeacon's
> comments where he noted it had been a clerk and it was a clerk in the
> Management Information Section that changed the document from
> #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning' and put Preston Manning's
> name in it. It's obvious that #145;Occupation' and #145;Present
> Address' have also been altered, changed, whited-out. Did this clerk
> also put Preston Manning's address and his occupation in there? Do
> they have the right to just add that in as they saw fit?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "Mr. Chairman, it compounded the clerical error, but
> there's nothing that prevents them from adding those details."
>
> Summary - While Mr. Elcock confirmed that the #145;Subject Name',
> #145;Occupation' and #145;Present Address' sections were all altered,
> he maintained that it was a "clerical error". Well it might be
> possible that a CSIS clerk would not use the proper caption in this
> case, it is ludicrous to suggest that the clerk would, on his or her
> own initiative, add Mr. Manning's address and occupation. Besides, if
> as CSIS and SIRC maintain, Mr. Manning was never investigated, how did
> CSIS even know his present address. In any event, as we shall see in
> section #145;IV', the story of the clerk making a mistake is soon
> retracted. ;
>
> II) Citing a document two weeks before it existed. In the form 4002,
> which authorized the TARC Level 1 investigation on October 17, 1989,
> there is a reference to a proposed meeting between Mr. Manning and an
> unidentified Ambassador. The reference goes on to state that the
> meeting was canceled at the last minute by the Embassy. Only one
> N.S.R. (CSIS database) message in the package obtained by Mr. Manning
> in his Privacy Act request contained this information. It was dated
> November 1, 1989, two weeks after the form 4002 was supposedly
> completed.
>
> Questions about this discrepancy went as follows:
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Can I get you to go to tab #145;L' in the documents
> that we've provided for you? This document is the only document that
> was received under the access, under the Privacy Act, to Mr. Manning,
> that makes any reference to an Ambassador and Preston Manning meeting,
> and the meeting being canceled by the Embassy. Can you give me the
> date of that message?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "The date at the top is 89- 11-01."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "What does that equate to... November 1, 1989?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "Yes, it should do."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "How is it possible that this message number and this
> date can be an additional background on a document that is dated
> October 17, 1989? How is it possible that this information is on a
> document when it didn't exist at the time?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "The honourable member is concluding that it's the same
> reference; I don't know that it is."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "If that is not the report, then why was the report not
> included in the Privacy request by Mr. Manning? This is the only
> document that was in the information provided to him."
>
> Mr. Elcock: "I will check and see what the date is and advise the
> committee what the date of the document was."
>
> Summary - The Reform Party did ask, in writing, for CSIS to confirm
> the date of this message. At the time this dissenting opinion was
> written, CSIS had not responded to our request. If this is the report
> in question, then it lends credence to the suggestion that this form
> 4002 was re-written some time after October 17, 1989. It also suggests
> that someone believed that the original justification for the
> investigation was so weak, that additional information had to be
> provided. If, on the other hand, there was documentation withheld from
> Mr. Manning's Privacy request, one wonders what else has been
> withheld. ;
>
> III) The Altered Form 4002. If the inclusion of information from a
> message that was not yet reported suggested that the form 4002 had
> been re-written, another fact that supported this suggestion was that
> the date on the top right corner of the document had been altered. The
> Reform Party employed the services of forensic consultant, an expert
> in the examination of questioned documents, who stated "as a matter of
> information it should be noted that within the questioned handwritten
> digital date #145;1989-10-17' on exhibit A1 (a), partially within and
> immediately above the handwritten numbers there exist undecipherable
> fragmentary markings foreign to the handwritten #145;1989-10-17'
> numbers."
>
> This information led to the following exchange:
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Mr. Elcock, I want to bring your attention back to the
> first page of form 4002 and I want you to look at the handwritten date
> at the top, right-hand corner. That handwritten date was altered,
> wasn't it? Tab #145;B'."
>
> Mr. Elcock: "And it goes back, I think, to the piece that you had
> asked... I noted that Mr. Archdeacon had indicated the piece had been
> X-rayed and in fact there was another date underneath."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Can you tell the committee what the date was that was
> underneath?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "The date was 1990...March 29, 1990."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Thank you, Mr. Elcock. I think that just proves what I
> have considered, that this document was typed up in full with a
> changed subject-matter on March 29, 1990; that this document did not
> originate on October 17, 1989."
>
> Mr. Elcock: "No, Mr. Chairman, I don't agree that it does."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Can you explain how the date March 29, 1990 would be at
> the top of that file if that was not the case?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "At the time, often the dates on those files, on those
> documents are left open and completed later when the documents are
> first issued because they don't have a file number either when they're
> first issued."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Mr. Elcock, so you want me to believe, you want this
> committee to believe that they filled in the form, that the effective
> date was put in at the bottom, the expiry date was put in at bottom,
> that it was signed off and the date was put in at the bottom, but that
> at the top it wasn't. Is that what you want this committee to
> believe?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "I believe there was a mistake made. We believed that at
> the time the typist entered the date and subsequently crossed out
> because she had mistakenly entered it and they put back in the
> appropriate date."
>
> Summary - Although Mr. Elcock admitted that the form 4002 carried the
> date March 29, 1990, he maintained that this was the original 4002
> filled out on October 17, 1989. His argument that the date wasn't put
> in because the document did not have a file number is extremely weak,
> since the FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form that was signed on
> October 17, 1989 was filled out specifically to obtain a file number.
>
> In the documents obtained by Mr. Manning under his Privacy Act
> request, we know that the first N.S.R. message that was sent on this
> file was dated October 17, 1989, and since a message can not be sent
> without a file number, a file number was obviously assigned on this
> date. It is highly unlikely that CSIS would wait an additional five
> months to fill in the rest of this form. This admission also calls
> into question the testimony of Mr. Archdeacon from May 15, 1996, who
> first brought up the subject of having the form X-rayed, and then
> stated the form was never changed. ;
>
> IV) Both Documents filled out by the Same Individual. The last area of
> questioning concerned the contention put forth by CSIS and SIRC, that
> the error in captions occurred not with the form 4002, but when a
> clerk made an error in filling out a second form, a FILE OPENING
> REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form. Mr. Elcock called this a "clerical
> error".
>
> In his May 15, 1996 testimony, Mr. Archdeacon went even further when
> he stated, "this TARC was sent down to the Management Information
> Section in CSIS... The clerk down there thought that the only name
> that he had, and you've got to have a name on a file, the only name he
> could see was Preston Manning. So he didn't write #145;Unknown
> Contributor', he wrote #145;Preston Manning'. That was an error. He
> shouldn't have done that." Again these sound like plausible
> explanations. Plausible that is until one examines the forms.
>
> The Reform Party and the Sub- Committee were somewhat hampered because
> of the censoring of the documents, which deleted the names of the CSIS
> employees who filled out these forms. We were instead forced to
> examine the handwritten dates on both the form 4002 and the FILE
> OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form. It is apparent that they were
> written by the same person. The Forensic Consultant, an expert in the
> examination of questioned documents confirmed the similarities.
>
> While it may have been plausible that a clerk put in the wrong caption
> on the second form, it is absolutely ludicrous to suggest that an
> intelligence officer in CSIS HQ would fill out a form 4002 to
> authorize an investigation in one name, and then on the very same day
> he would fill out a second form to obtain a file number, and use a
> different caption. As absurd as that sounds, that is what the Director
> of CSIS wanted us to believe.
>
> Witness the following exchange:
>
> Ms. Meredith: "And that this unit head authorized a TARC Level
> investigation on #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning's
> Electoral Campaign?' Is that right? That is in essence what this is
> all about, right, is that they authorized a TARC one on an
> #145;Unknown Contributor.'"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "An Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning's Electoral
> Campaign, yes."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "And that the problem originated or the problem was
> picked up when somebody filled out the FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE
> FILES, and then wrote in #145;Preston Manning.'"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "Yes." Ms. Meredith: "It wasn't a clerk who filled out
> those forms, was it?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "No, Mr. Chairman. I'm not sure what the honourable
> member's point is."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "My point is that if you look at the date in the top
> right- hand corner of the FILE OPENING REQUEST and you look at the
> date under the authority section on the same form, the PEOPLE FILE,
> FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES, and then you look at the date
> which is hand-written in at the top of the form 4002, I would suggest,
> Sir, that it's the same person that wrote these two documents, that
> worked with these two documents. How is it possible that the same
> person on one file can put #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston
> Manning's Electoral Campaign' and on the other file, the very same
> day, put #145;Preston Manning.' And that his unit head, in reviewing
> these on the same day, wouldn't pick up the mistake."
>
> Mr. Elcock: "I'm not -- the honourable ...."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "These are things that, I'm sorry, how is it possible
> that a Counterintelligence officer can mistakenly, this is who filled
> out this form, is an intelligence officer in Counterintelligence. How
> could he look at a TARC form that he also filled in and filled it in
> with #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning' and on the very same
> day on another form put Preston Manning's name down?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "These things happen. Names are sometimes left in
> documents when they ought not to be." Ms. Meredith: "And his unit
> chief who is authorizing and okaying these didn't notice that one of
> the forms was under Preston Manning's name?" Mr. Elcock: "I'm sure as
> the honourable member will know, these things happen from time to
> time."
>
> Summary - Mr. Elcock's defence, given this information is simply that
> these things happen. That is even more frightening than a planned
> investigation of Mr. Manning. The Director of CSIS stated that he
> wanted to re-assure the Reform Party that nothing untoward happened
> with this file. Yet, the only explanation Mr. Elcock offers for the
> conduct of his department, is that the employees who were involved in
> this investigation were grossly incompetent?
>
> However, the Reform Party has more faith in the ability of working
> level staff at CSIS than the Director does. However, the Director did
> confirm that the FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form was never
> filled out by a clerk in the Information Management Section of CSIS.
> That begs the question: Why did the Executive Director of SIRC, Mr.
> Archdeacon, make up his story to mislead the Sub-Committee? ;
>
> CONCLUSIONS The Reform Party regrets having to present such a
> painstakingly, detailed review of the Preston Manning investigation,
> but it was necessary to demonstrate the extreme lengths that we have
> had to go to in our attempts to find the truth in this matter.
>
> The documents obtained by Mr. Manning through his Privacy Act request
> afforded us the opportunity to challenge SIRC's version of events
> directly. SIRC has demonstrated that their word cannot be accepted at
> face value. But what does this all mean in the final analysis?
>
> Two issues need to be resolved. The first is what initiated the
> October 17, 1989 TARC Level 1 investigation. Since the South African
> desk in CSIS HQ wrote off any investigation on January 10, 1989, what
> suddenly spawned interest nine months later. One would think that it
> would be logical for someone to have something in writing suggesting
> that an investigation be opened. But that didn't happen.
>
> The questions that remains unanswered, are:
>
> Who ordered this matter re-opened, and why? The other issue that must
> be answered is: Why are CSIS and SIRC going to such extreme lengths to
> mislead the Sub-Committee, Parliament, and Canadians? If they had
> maintained their original explanation that the file caption was
> inappropriately opened in the name of #145;Preston Manning', and
> subsequently changed, the Reform Party would have little to complain
> about. But for CSIS and SIRC to retract all their previous admissions
> without explanations, and to out-and-out lie to a Parliamentary
> Sub-Committee, it is clear that there is something important they are
> hiding.
>
> The question is: What? Contrary to the assurances from SIRC and CSIS,
> the Reform Party has learned that from October 17, 1989 to January 17,
> 1990, it was recorded in CSIS' main database, N.S.R., that there was a
> TARC Level 1 on Preston Manning. There was no restricted security on
> this file, so this information was available to any CSIS employee who
> had access to N.S.R.
>
> Any employee who came across this information would have believed that
> there was a legal TARC Level on Manning, and could have legitimately
> carried out a Level 1 investigation. If the government members of the
> Sub-Committee weren't so intent on burying this report, the Sub-
> Committee itself may have been able to produce some of its own
> answers.
>
> However, it became apparent, especially after the Liberals changed the
> membership of the Sub-Committee, that government members are just as
> interested in covering up the truth, as are CSIS and SIRC. This is
> typified by the member from Windsor - St. Clair's vociferous objection
> to the Bloc Quebecois attempting to give their time to question the
> Director of CSIS to the Reform Party at the May 27, 1996 meeting. Why
> else would they object to the Reform Party having a few extra minutes
> to ask questions?
>
> It is clear to the Reform Party that SIRC's Heritage Front Affair
> report is a complete whitewash. SIRC was able to divert what should
> have been a review of the activities of a CSIS Source into a review of
> the Heritage Front itself. Both SIRC and CSIS champion this case as a
> great success for the Service, but the mere fact that the Source's own
> actions made this case public, should suggest it was a failure. But
> what this case has done is to show that the review system established
> by the CSIS Act does not work.
>
> The government has joined with CSIS and SIRC in covering up the truth.
> Why? What are they afraid of? This government has expressed no concern
> that the leader of a legitimate political party had his name on a
> document authorizing a CSIS investigation on him. They have expressed
> no concern that all the original documents authorizing that
> investigation were altered in one manner or another. They have shown
> no concern that both CSIS and SIRC admitted that originally the TARC
> level was on Preston Manning, then fifteen months later proceeded to
> deny it, with absolutely no explanation.
>
> It would appear that this government is not interested in holding the
> bureaucracy accountable. How is it possible that the government is not
> concerned that one of its agencies operates without accountability.
> Was that not why a civilian intelligence agency was formed? Did not a
> previous Liberal administration pass the CSIS Act, to make Canada's
> intelligence community accountable to Parliament?
>
> Those Canadians who care about the truth will have to wait until this
> country has a government committed to Parliamentary accountability,
> before the true version comes out. In the meantime, the Reform Party
> hopes that those journalists, researchers or academics who are
> interested in pursuing security issues continue their search for the
> real story. The truth is out there!
>
> RECOMMENDATIONS In light of the negligent performance of the Security
> Intelligence Review Committee in reviewing this investigation, it is
> clear that there is no place in the review process for a group of
> patronage appointees who believe that they do not have to answer to
> Parliament.
>
> To find an alternative we need look no further than to our neighbours
> to the south. The Americans utilize not only a House Select Committee
> on Intelligence, but a Senate Committee as well. Given the immense
> Intelligence network in the United States with the CIA, the NSA and
> the Intelligence Division of the FBI, the Americans have demonstrated
> that review by elected representatives is not only workable, but in
> the Reform Party's opinion is preferable. ;
>
> Reform Party Recommendation The Reform Party recommends that this
> government introduce legislation in Parliament that would amend the
> Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act, deleting all references to
> the Security Intelligence Review Committee. All references to the
> Security Intelligence Review Committee should be replaced by the
> Standing Committee on National Security. ;
>
> ; Created by Maurice Murphy Revised: December 01, 1996
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 04:02:33 -0300
> Subject: RE Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the
> mindless lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???
> To: ABrander@highriver.ca, highwood <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>, premier
> <premier@gov.ab.ca>, mclellana <mclellana@bennettjones.com>,
> "Ian.Shardlow" <Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Ian.McPhail"
> <Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Dale.McGowan"
> <Dale.McGowan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "calgary.acadia"
> <calgary.acadia@assembly.ab.ca>, "calgary.northwest"
> <calgary.northwest@assembly.ab.ca>, Calgarynews <Calgarynews@ctv.ca>,
> calgarynewstips <calgarynewstips@cbc.ca>, cal-news
> <cal-news@sunmedia.ca>, eblokland <eblokland@highriver.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, gunfighter@fritze.com, Sheldon@nfa.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: PCC Complaints <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:14:53 +0000
> Subject: RE: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me
> off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the
> Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya...
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Hello Mr. Amos:
>
> This e-mail is to acknowledge your recent communication with our
> office about the RCMP.
>
> If you wish to submit a complaint regarding the on-duty conduct of a
> member(s) of the RCMP, you can do so through our online complaint form
> located at:
>
> https://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/cnt/srv/mac/index-eng.aspx
>
> Alternatively, we can also be reached by:
>
> Telephone : 1-800-665-6878
> E-mail: complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
> Fax : 604-501-4095
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> Günther Schönfeldt
> Intake Officer / Agent d'information de liaison
> Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP /
> Commission des plaintes du public contre la Gendarmerie royale du Canada
> Tel/Tél : 1-800-665-6878 | Fax/Téléc : (604) 501-4095
> complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
> Sent: September-07-13 11:38 PM
> To: gunfighter@fritze.com; Sheldon@nfa.ca; bob.paulson; ORG; McPhail, Ian
> Cc: David Amos; Cogan, Tim
> Subject: Fwd: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me
> off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shard low? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the
> Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya
>
> http://nfa.ca/news/video-analysis-reveals-rcmp-targeting-houses-firearms
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Al Brander <ABrander@highriver.ca>
> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 07:36:10 -0600
> Subject: RE: Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the
> mindless lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> For the record, these current missive are the only ones I have seen.
>
> Please delete my from your address book since it appears you only want
> a platform to rant from.
>
> Al Brander
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 9:46 PM
> To: Al Brander; Ian.Shardlow; bob.paulson; mclellana; premier; Ian.McPhail
> Cc: David Amos; highwood
> Subject: Re: Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the
> mindless lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???
>
> My question would obviously be:
>
> Why did you and Ian Shardlow your new local top cop ignore me for
> nearly a month?
>
> Obviously I am the guy who answered Greg Kvisle's quandry about why
> the RCMP ignored the Charter and felt free to invade his home three
> time in order to find and take his old 303 and shotgun but he did not
> believe me. I suspect you know as wel as I Correct?
>
> As far as who I am scroll down this is lots of info that you had a
> month to check out. If you don't believe it ask Ian Sharlow or his
> bosses Dale McGowan and Bob Paulson or the lawyers Landslide Annie
> McLellan or Alison Redford if I am a liar or not.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> On 9/8/13, Al Brander <ABrander@highriver.ca> wrote:
>
>> Mr. Amos: Is there a question for me here?? If so please present it and
>> will you then also identify who you are please.
>>
>> Thank you;
>>
>> Al Brander
>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2013 9:45 PM
>> To: Emile Blokland; christopher@diarmani.com;
>> brian.topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
>> bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca; Josee.Valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Dale.McGowan;
>> bob.paulson; steven.blaney; Sylvain.Roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
>> bloke@shaw.ca;
>> premier; highwood; airdrie; mclellana; finditherefirst@gmail.com;
>> Doug.Potts@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; ppalmater;
>> xchief;
>> gunfighter
>> Cc: Ian.McPhail; David Amos; James Thackray; kevin.rushworth@sunmedia.ca;
>> Al
>> Brander; Jessica Hume; greg.weston; pm; MulcaT; justin.trudeau.a1
>> Subject: Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the
>> mindless
>> lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???
>>
>> http://nfa.ca/news/video-analysis-reveals-rcmp-targeting-houses-firearms
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: ORG <ORG@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
>> Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 03:38:08 +0000
>> Subject: CPC AutoResponse / Réponse préenregistrée de la CPP
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for contacting the Commission for Public Complaints Against
>> the RCMP. Your message has been received and if necessary, we shall
>> respond as soon as possible.
>>
>> Thank you for your interest and comments.
>>
>> Nous vous remercions d'avoir communiqué avec la Commission des
>> plaintes du public contre la GRC. Nous avons reçu votre message et y
>> donnerons suite, si nécessaire, dans les plus brefs délais.
>>
>> Nous vous remercions de l'intérêt que vous manifestez à l'égard de la
>> Commission et de vos commentaires.
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Emile Blokland <eblokland@highriver.ca>
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:38:46 -0600
> Subject: Out of Office: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High
> River piss me off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith
> at the Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> I am away from the office August 30, until September 16, 2013
> inclusive. In my abscence please contact Deputy Mayor Al Brander at
> abrander@highriver.ca
>
> Mayor Emile Blokland
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Josee VALIQUETTE <josee.valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 20:38:36 -0400
> Subject: Re: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me
> off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the
> Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya (Sgt. Valiquette is Away on
> September 5th, 2013)
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Hello, I am away today. For any inquiries in regards to "K"
> Division Media Relations, please contact S/Sgt. Ron Campbell at
> 780-412-5268.
>
> Thank you
>
> On 9/5/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <eblokland@highriver.ca>; <christopher@diarmani.com>;
> <brian.topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca>;
> <Josee.Valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "Dale.McGowan"
> <Dale.McGowan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>; <Sylvain.Roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
> <bloke@shaw.ca>; "premier" <premier@gov.ab.ca>; "highwood"
> <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>; "airdrie" <airdrie@assembly.ab.ca>;
> "mclellana" <mclellana@bennettjones.com>; <finditherefirst@gmail.com>;
> <Doug.Potts@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
> "ppalmater" <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca>; "xchief"
> <xchief@bell.blackberry.net>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>;
> <jthackray@highriver.ca>; <kevin.rushworth@sunmedia.ca>;
> <abrander@highriver.ca>; "Jessica Hume" <jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>;
> "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>; "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>; "MulcaT"
> <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>; "justin.trudeau.a1"
> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 9:38 PM
> Subject: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me off
> today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the Townhall
> Meeting tonight for me will ya
>
>
> http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Tories+Wildrose+exchange+fire+over+High+River+seizures/8866170/story.html
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 02:51:37 -0300
> Subject: The latest top cop in High River Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow and
> his boss Bob Paulson should be able to explain this email to Greg
> Kvisle and the other pissed off folks
> To: eblokland@highriver.ca, christopher@diarmani.com,
> brian.topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca,
> Josee.Valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "Dale.McGowan"
> <Dale.McGowan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, Sylvain.Roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> bloke@shaw.ca, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, highwood
> <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>, airdrie <airdrie@assembly.ab.ca>, mclellana
> <mclellana@bennettjones.com>, finditherefirst@gmail.com,
> Doug.Potts@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, ppalmater
> <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca>, xchief <xchief@bell.blackberry.net>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, jthackray@highriver.ca,
> kevin.rushworth@sunmedia.ca, abrander@highriver.ca, Jessica Hume
> <jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>, "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>, pm
> <pm@pm.gc.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
>
> FYI I called Greg Kvisle after I saw him on Sun TV he said he didn't
> need any help but he wanted to know who took his guns I told him I
> knew but he didn't believe me. Clearly Ken Braat knows Greg Kvisle and
> the cops very well. He should be able to tell Kvisle who took his
> guns.
>
> http://www.highrivertimes.com/2013/07/29/new-staff-sergeant-to-run-high-river-rcmp
>
> I bet Harper and the RCMP remembers what this Maritimer said about his
> old 303s and shoguns when I ran for seat Parliament the first time
> after the Maritimers Landslide Annie Mclellan Wayne Easter and a
> boatload of corrupt cops pissed me off. If a don't feel free to scroll
> down N'esy Pas?
>
> I bet Danielle Smith, Bobby Baby Paulson remembers Robin Reid. Clearly
> Insp Dougy Potts and Sgt Ian Shardlow pissed her and a bunch of
> Indians off bigtime last year EH?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: robin reid
> To: bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; pm@pm.gc.ca ; people stand up ;
> david.raymond.amos@gmail.com ; dominic ; calgary.west@assembly.ab.ca ;
> toewsv1@mts.net ; jspottedbear@yahoo.com ; jimsisson@inac.gc.ca ;
> hiddenfromhistory1@gmail.com ; admin@turnervalley.ca ;
> aimggc@worldnet.att.net ; alex@globalmedicaltourism.com.mx ;
> amyrae4@hotmail.com ; archbishop@archtoronto.org ;
> barry.shaw@forces.gc.ca ; bewerbung@rothschild.com ;
> bishopfh@rcdiocese-calgary.ab.ca ; calgary@jasonkenney.com
> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 11:44 PM
> Subject: I SEE NOTHING HAS CHANGED WITHIN YOUR CORRUPT FEDERAL ORGANIZATION
>
> Bob Paulson,
> Commissioner of RCMP
> Canada.
>
> Mr. Paulson,
>
> I write once again after the disappointing bullshit letter I received
> from Inspector Potts, and then my discussion with Sgt. Shardlow
> yesterday in Okotoks over assaults, false arrest, murder, all kinds of
> nasty things you are responsible for setting people up using your "
> interception of private communication ".
> You people neglect doing your duty here and as I see what is coming
> out in the media, makes one wonder just how much death you have
> covered up over the years.
> Afraid the truth is coming out is what it seems,hmmmm. And as far as
> your arresting officer Degroot goes he seems to have a lot of contact
> with Juiliann Barna Reid, as I
> asked Shardlow - does this abusing woman work for you????????? Perhaps
> you could look into this and get back to me.
>
> Honestly for men you have no balls, just like Harper - has god got
> your balls also??????? And then you have your women godly agents who I
> am thinking took your balls cuz they are as cruel as you men. Now is
> that not shameful.?????? Just as Alison Redford ignored me when she
> was justice minister.
>
> You people do not care about children, woman or men in your game of
> human abuse for
> profit. You always have the same excuse.
>
> Now Mr. Paulson, since you are at the top, do you condone these lies
> and abuse of children, woman and men ???????
>
> I do have some other concerns from many years ago involving the
> okotoks RCMP putting the blame on 1 officer, an Indian, are you racist
> Mr. Paulson, do you condone white supremacy and genocide upon the
> Indian people and then every other race by thair own ????? Just as the
> security guard who assaulted me - thair excuse was he just got out of
> security school.
>
> Also Mr. Paulson do you carry the dead peasant insurance upon your
> workers???????? how does one find out if this type of insurance is on
> people and who has used it?????????
>
> And let's not forget the abuse on human life by religion, sit's at the
> top on the abuse game for profit, would you not say???????
>
> Now Mr. Paulson, do you feel this is right what has been done, the
> medical abuse, assaults, false arrests and so much more I would like
> to discuss in person.????????????
>
> REMEMBER IT'S ALL INDIAN LAND THAT YOU PERSONS UNDER THE SUPREMACY OF
> GOD, KILLED CHILDREN, WOMAN AND MEN FOR WHAT YOU HAVE, AND REMEMBER
> INDIANS OF THE LANDS COME IN ALL RACES. SHAME ON YOU ALL CORRUPT
> CHIEFS KILLING CHILDREN IN SO MANY WAYS, ESPECIALLY YOU CONDONED
> PEDOPHILE LAIR.
>
>
> Thank you
> Robin Reid
> Red Nations
> PPOF
>
>
> http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/politics/archives/2013/06/20130628-151342.html
>
> http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/alberta/Hell+Residents+angry+RCMP+sieze+guns+from+High+River+homes/8588851/story.html
>
> RCMP revealed Thursday that officers have seized a "substantial ...
> that we control, simply because of what they are," said Sgt. Brian
> Topham
>
> http://www.canada.com/story_print.html?id=29c1b59c-694d-4d33-9fdc-d5a57f14ec39&sponsor=
>
> Some Alberta RCMP Disciplinary Cases in 2005-06 (Year to Date)
>
> - Sgt. Brian Topham -- reprimand and forfeiture of 10 days' pay.
>
> Topham, who served at the Fox Creek detachment between 2002 and 2004,
> made insensitive and degrading comments about women in the presence of
> a female civilian employee.
>
> On another occasion, Topham said "1974 was the worst year in the RCMP
> because that is when the RCMP let women in the force."
>
> The allegations also involved stereotypical comments about aboriginals
> and people from Newfoundland made in the presence of officers who had
> those backgrounds.
>
>
> http://christopherdiarmani.com/10532/police/abuse-of-police-authority/high-river-rcmp-looters-criminals-treated-immediately/
>
> http://www.calgarysun.com/2013/08/09/high-river-homeowner-upset-police-entered-his-home-three-times-after-flood-hit-and-seized-antique-firearms
>
> Greg Kvisle. CENTURY 21 Foothills Real Estate. Bldg. F, 1103 18 Street
> SE. High River, ABT1V 2A9. Office: 403-652-2121. Cell: 403-601-3533
>
> Ken Braat Associate,Realtor. Century 21 Foothills Real Estate 1103 F
> 18 Street SE, T1V 2A9 High River, Alberta 403-601-2070.
>
> High River homeowner upset police entered his home three times after
> flood hit and seized antique firearms
> 205
>
> By Bill Kaufmann ,Calgary Sun
>
> First posted: Friday, August 09, 2013 03:42 PM MDT | Updated: Friday,
> August 09, 2013 04:59 PM MDT
>
>
> The RCMP's post-flood seizure of two family heirloom firearms that
> were hidden in his home is an outrageous trespass, says a High River
> man.
>
> The Mounties made three trips into the home of Greg Kvisle before
> seizing the guns, a 1912 Winchester long-barreled shotgun and a
> 50-year-old .303 rifle in the days following June's deluge.
>
> "My grandfather passed them down to my dad and when he passed away we
> brought them here for safekeeping," said Kvisle, adding neither weapon
> has been fired in decades.
>
> "It's a sentimental thing for me."
>
> He said both guns were stashed in a corner of his basement in a
> storage area beneath boxes and far from any ammunition.
>
> "They weren't visible and were secure as far as I saw it," said Kvisle.
>
> His street wasn't impacted by the flooding and hadn't been evacuated,
> but Kvisle said he was in Calgary when the water hit its height, and
> was barred from returning home for nine days.
>
> Once home, his suspicions that the two weapons might have been seized
> were quickly confirmed.
>
> About half of his neighbours had remained home, including those next
> door who kept an eye on his property and helped Mounties enter his
> home three times, said Kvisle.
>
> "I just don't understand why they were searching for them," he said.
>
> "They're supposed to be protecting our home, not looting it."
>
> Kvisle said he had no trouble getting back his weapons from RCMP
> officers, whom he called courteous and professional.
>
> But the fact Mounties had taken hidden guns from his home on a
> partly-populated street police were patrolling rankles him.
>
> "What's next?" he said.
>
> The Mounties said they seized firearms to prevent them from falling
> into the hands of burglars in vacated, unsecured areas.
>
> Kvisle's guns were situated in open view because it would have taken
> very little to uncover them, said RCMP Sgt. Josee Valiquette.
>
> "It could be in plain view under a bed, in a closet -- somewhere
> somebody could hide," said Valiquette.
>
> "If they happened to open a closet, it is in plain sight...these
> firearms were inappropriately secured."
>
> Kvisle said he's been told a civilian group that oversees the RCMP is
> reviewing his case.
>
> "I hope we get some answers," he said.
>
> bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca
>
> Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
>
> By Erin Hatfield
>
> "If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
> world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
>
> The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
> the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
> watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
> unofficial, theme song for the debate.
>
> The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
> they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
> Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
> chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
> left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
> mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
> the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
>
> The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
> organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
> of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
> and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
>
> Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
> responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
> exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
> Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
> other on their answers and criticizing eachothers' party leaders.
> Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
> questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
> relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
> response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
> getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
>
> Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
> party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
> well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
> on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
> places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
> shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
>
> The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
> one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
> front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
> voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
> Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
> readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
> final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
> register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
> abiding citizens."
>
> The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
> women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
> yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
> spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
>
> Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
> Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You're out of touch," Armstrong
> yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
> post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
> Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
> anyplace," Armstrong responded.
>
> As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
> candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
> fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
> process for the June 28 vote.
>
> Cutline - David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
> favourite possessions--motorcycles.
>
> McKnight/KCR
>
> The Unconventional Candidate
>
> David Amos Isn't Campaigning For Your Vote, But....
>
> By Gisele McKnight
>
> FUNDY--He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
> wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
> that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
>
> Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot--David Amos.
>
> The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
> and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
> running for office in Canada.
>
> One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
> to meet Elections Canada requirements.
>
> When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
> favourite place to do so--Fundy.
>
> Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
> dissatisfaction with politicians.
>
> "I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
> said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
>
> The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
> 1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
> needed to change his life.
>
> "I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
> sometimes in midlife."
>
> So Amos, who'd lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
> motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
> Panhead motorcycle.
>
> "Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
> experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
> renew your faith in mankind - you help anyone you can, you never ask
> for anything, but you take what they offer."
>
> For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
> and conversation all over North America.
>
> Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
> and a daughter and become a house-husband - Mr. Mom, as he calls
> himself.
>
> He also describes himself in far more colourful terms--a motorcyclist
> rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
> individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
> Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
>
> Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.
>
> "But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
> "It's alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
>
> Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
>
> "I didn't appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
> interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
> call me. I'm not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
>
> And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
>
> "I won't take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It's
> not about money. It goes against what I'm fighting about."
>
> What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues - tainted blood,
> the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
> name a few.
>
> "The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs - fishing,
> farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm
> death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
> (NAFTA) out the window.
>
> NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
> easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
>
> Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
>
> "There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
> especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
> Don't necessarily vote for me, but vote."
>
> Although...if you're going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
> your X by his name.
>
> "I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
> say, 'what the hell.'"
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: rmordenassoc@rogers.com ; info@gg.ca ; brian.macdonald@bellaliant.net ;
> James.Spurr ; Randy.McGinnis ; rob.lafrance@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ;
> Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; Gilles. Blinn ;
> gilles.moreau ; danfour ; JAF@UNB.ca ; oldmaison@yahoo.com ;
> mcappe@irpp.org
> Cc: Mackap ; david.alward@gnb.ca ; DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca ; pm ; robin
> reid
> ; tim. porter ; tony ; infomorning ; treasurer@do.treas.gov ;
> madd_professor@cox.net
> Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 7:33 PM
> Subject: I bet the GG David Johnston and his RCMP members remember this
> email EH Reid M
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:48:06 -0400
> Subject: Professor Johnston I suspect I will be suing the Crown before
> you can advise Mr Harper to finally act ethically
> To: president@uwaterloo.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Nov 7, 2007 11:10 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Brian My cell # is 506 434 1379 feel free to use it ASAP
> or say Hoka Hey to Petey Mackay for me will ya?
> To: damian.brooks@gmail.com
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Nov 7, 2007 6:56 PM
> Subject: Brian My cell # is 506 434 1379 feel free to use it ASAP or
> say Hoka Hey to Petey Mackay for me will ya?
> To: brian@brian-macdonald.ca
>
>
> Contact Brian
> http://www.brian-macdonald.com/contact/
> Cellular: 440-5566
>
> Office: 472-4894, 472-7426 (140 King St, Fredericton)
>
> Email: brian@brian-macdonald.ca
>
> For information:
> Fredericton: 472-4894
> Minto: 327-3996
> Oromocto: 357-8878
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos < david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Oct 17, 2007 7:30 PM
> Subject: I tried to talked to you today lady before you were well paid
> to preach to Canadian kids
> To: info@helencaldicott.com
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos < david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >
> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:05:11 -0500
> Subject: This just a small portion of one wiretap tape Ralph my
> matters are pretty serious eh?
> To: racarr@nbnet.nb.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >
> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 19:59:52 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: Welcome to the Big Big Game Det. Louie LaFleur of Fat
> Fred City Finest Do ya think Mr. Dion and his pal Dizzy Lizzie May are
> paying attention yet?
> To: impolitic@rogers.com, wgilmour@pdclawyers.ca ,
> lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca, william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca , days1@parl.gc.ca, day.s@parl.gc.ca,
> warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, derek.strong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Raymond Amos < davidramos333@yahoo.ca>
> Date: Jun 16, 2007 2:40 AM
> Subject: Welcome to the Big Big Game Det. Louie LaFleur of Fat Fred City
> Finest Do ya think Mr. Dion and his pal Dizzy Lizzie May are paying
> attention yet?
> To: fbinhct@leo.gov, Easter.W@parl.gc.ca, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca,
> bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com, bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, days1@parl.gc.ca ,
> day.s@parl.gc.ca, jonesr@cbc.ca, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca, Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca ,
> Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca, Casey.B@parl.gc.ca,
> Comuzzi.J@parl.gc.ca, Thibault.L@parl.gc.ca, Arthur.A@parl.gc.ca,
> Sandra.Conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca , complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca,
> wgilmour@pdclawyers.ca, moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca, kennyco@sen.parl.gc.ca,
> gautht@sen.parl.gc.ca, zimmer@sen.parl.gc.ca, louiselorefice@ndp.ca ,
> leader@greenparty.ca, defence@sen.parl.gc.ca, atkinn@sen.parl.gc.ca,
> dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca, Clabchuk@greenparty.ca, maychair@dal.ca,
> kmcgowan@greenparty.ns.ca , juan.behrend@europeangreens.org
> Cc: whistleblower@ctv.ca, tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com ,
> John.Ferguson@saintjohn.ca, wrscott@nbpower.com, dhay@nbpower.com,
> arsenault_chris@hotmail.com, bill.corby@gnb.ca, lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca,
> Kathy.Alchorn@fredericton.ca , Kim.Quartermain@fredericton.ca,
> Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca, Danny.Copp@fredericton.ca ,
> forest@conservationcouncil.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca,
> abel.leblanc@gnb.ca, jonesr@cbc.ca
>
> I am not within your jurisdiction nor do I plan to come back until it is
> time to argue mr harper and his cohorts in Federal Court however I may drag
> some of you dudes or your lawyers back down to the USA with me to answer me
> in the Second Circuit of the USA as to your involvement in the cover up of
> many Yankee crimes.
>
> I do not have to answer any questions put to me by Fat Fred Fity 's
> Finest about whatever it is you may wish to know about my doings with the
> RCMP but you corrupt city cops must certainly answer someday to your
> support
> and cover up of my false imprisonment in the USA years ago.
>
> Louie tell me honestly if you can find it in your soul to do so, why
> did you laugh and make fun of my plight? I gave you a fair and square
> chance
> to act ethically. i sent you a lot of material byway of this email address
> and i sent it only to you just in case you would act ethically. Now I must
> ask were you born an arsehole or did you work at it your whole life? What
> if
> this shit had happened to you? What would you think of you if you were I?
> Do you and Chucky Leblanc and the crook Alan MacFee have that sinking
> feeling that you pissed off the wrong Maritimer yet or do you think i am
> the
> ultimate loser? If i do lose bigtime I will you sleep at night knowing the
> part you played in my demise? If a sudden fit of integrity overcomes you
> say hey to your bosses Barry MacKnight, Insp Kelly and S/Sgt Copp for me
> will ya and have them provide you with the file that the Police Commission
> gave your god damned police force three years ago and start doing some
> serious work for a change, will ya? Rest assured a lot has happened since.
>
> The chickenshit S/Sgt Kathy Alchorn can say hey to the not so scary
> spooks Norm Plourde and Kevin Jackson and Mikey Guitar and the Louie
> Lefebvre character (his name sounds like yours Louie) for me as well. The
> very shy S/Sgt. Kim Quartermain can tell the crook MacPhee that I will send
> a buddy around to pick up my bike. I will look forward to meeting all you
> bastards
> in court someday but I must remain true to my word and sue Harper first.
>
> Whereas Herménégilde Chiasson, Lieutenant Governor of New
> Brunswick, just appointed Acting S/Sgt. Kim Quartermain, S/Sgt. Kathy
> Alchorn, S\Sgt. Brian Ford and D/Chief Leanne Fitch of the Fredericton
> Police
> Force, as Honorary Aides-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor of New
> Brunswick
> to guard him and the mean old Maison from the likes of me and Chucky
> Leblanc,
> they should have no trouble locating all the documents and CDs that I have
> been
> serving upon all the crooks in and around that house for years.
>
> If you don't believe me just scroll down and find the words of
> the former Governor General. While you are reading and listening to this
> crap consider what "Al" may do next. As you listen again to the portion of
> just one police surveilance tape know that I will him and a couple of his
> friends a complete copy of 139 and a few more even if I am falsely
> imprisoned again A buddy or two jusst has to drop my material into the
> mail.
> Never forget the nutbag blogger Chucky Leblanc has a complete set of
> documents and a CD from 2004 that he did not give to Brad Green as he
> promised. Depupty Dog in one of his rants has already informed me that "Al"
> is pissed off. It is likely just his usual bullshit but if it were true I
> would say Good. Shame on you all and Cya'll in Court.
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> Whereas Mr Scott the spin doctor for NB Power and John Ferguson of Saint
> John both commented that they enjoyed what I said on the dumb Tom Young's
> talk radio show over a year ago on Ground Hog Day I will send it again.
> Maybe Andre Arthur will enjoy it too. N'est Pas?
>
>
> *David Raymond Amos <davidramos333@yahoo.ca>* wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 23:37:32 -0400 (EDT)
> From: David Raymond Amos <davidramos333@yahoo.ca>
> Subject: Fwd: I called you again today Gilmour. Who is more of a
> chickenshit
> you or your new cop client Ken Smith? Sprout some balls will ya and call me
> back
> To: Christopherson.D@parl.gc.ca , Williams.J@parl.gc.ca,
> Wrzesnewskyj.B@parl.gc.ca , Doyle.N@parl.gc.ca, Jennings.M@parl.gc.ca
>
>
>
> *David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com >* wrote:
>
> Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 22:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
> From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> Subject: I called you again today Gilmour. Who is more of a chickenshit you
> or your new cop client Ken Smith? Sprout some balls will ya and call me
> back
> To: wGilmour@ProuseDash.ca, dohertylaw@rogers.com, premier@gnb.ca,
> abel.leblanc@gnb.ca, t.j.burke@gnb.ca, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca ,
> pierre_nollet@cbc.ca, susan_king@cbc.ca, dan_goodyear@cbc.ca,
> allan_white@cbc.ca, mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com,
> execdir@nblib.nb.ca, mleger@stu.ca , jwalker@stu.ca, plee@stu.ca,
> carleton@stu.ca, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca , oldmaison@yahoo.com,
> John.Foran@gnb.ca, kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca, Byron < alltrue@nl.rogers.com>,
> samperrier@hotmail.com
> CC: bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, days1@parl.gc.ca , day.s@parl.gc.ca,
> warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, derek.strong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Aurele.Daigle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Roger.Gillies@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, John.DeWinter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> samperrier@hotmail.com, lorraineroche@gov.nl.ca, deanr0032@hotmail.com ,
> bill.corby@gnb.ca, police@fredericton.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca,
> fbinhct@leo.gov, Easter.W@parl.gc.ca
>
> 506 434 1379
>
> Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 20:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
> From: David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> Subject: So much for the Integrity of the RCMP EH Bevy Baby Busson?
> To: bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, days1@parl.gc.ca, day.s@parl.gc.ca,
> warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ,
> Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, derek.strong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Aurele.Daigle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Roger.Gillies@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, John.DeWinter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> samperrier@hotmail.com, lorraineroche@gov.nl.ca, alltrue@nl.rogers.com ,
> kmdickson0308@yahoo.com, deanr0032@hotmail.com, bill.corby@gnb.ca,
> police@fredericton.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, t.j.burke@gnb.ca,
> John.Foran@gnb.ca, fbinhct@leo.gov, Easter.W@parl.gc.ca,
> alan_white@cbc.ca, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> John.Ferguson@saintjohn.ca, Ivan.Court@saintjohn.ca,
> Christopher.Titus@saintjohn.ca, thespur@hotmail.com, lisah@whooshnet.com,
> dougchristie@shaw.ca , lawald@web.net
> CC: xzone@xzone-radio.com, brinson6@telus.net, wespenre@illuminati.ca,
> choose2reason@yahoo.com, rwnicholson@rwnicholson.com,
> starchamber@sasktel.net, JDHOOK@cox.net, Tim.Porter@gnb.ca,
> news@politicswatch.com, investor@dundeebancorp.com,
> webadmin@justice.gc.ca, info@tbs-sct.gc.ca, dtennant@mccarthy.ca ,
> 2026@gnb.ca, Brendan.Langille@gnb.ca, Martin.Paul@parl.gc.ca,
> Owen.S@parl.gc.ca, Steckle.P@parl.gc.ca, steckp@parl.gc.ca,
> McGuire.J@parl.gc.ca, Peterson.J@parl.gc.ca, Bonin.R@parl.gc.ca,
> Karetak-Lindell.N@parl.gc.ca, Chamberlain.B@parl.gc.ca , dbrown@dwpv.com,
> BCarr-Harris@blgcanada.com, McTeague.D@parl.gc.ca,
> info@politicswatch.com, Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca, Baird.J@parl.gc.ca,
> Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca, McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca, Dhalla.R@parl.gc.ca,
> Casey.B@parl.gc.ca, Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca, Holland.M@parl.gc.ca,
> wickedwanda3@adelphia.net, madd_professor@cox.net, Iolmisha@cs.com ,
> derrickcrobinson@gmail.com, khr909@hotmail.com, erniemusic2@yahoo.com,
> kevin_annett@hotmail.com, radical@radicalpress.com
>
> Just Dave <http://davidamos.blogspot.com/>
> By Location *Visit Detail**
> Visit 1,079
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 199.212.150.# (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)
> ISP Royal Canadian Mounted Police
> Location
> Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts
> State/Region : Ontario
> City : Ottawa
> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> Language unknown
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 6.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0;
> Windows NT 5.1; INFOWEB-APPROVED; INFOWEB-APPROVED-IE6-EN; .
> NET CLR 1.1.4322)
> Javascript disabled
> Time of Visit May 30 2007 11:49:18 am
> Last Page View May 30 2007 11:54:27 am
> Visit Length 5 minutes 9 seconds
> Page Views 3
> Referring URL unknown
> Visit Entry Page http://www.davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Out Click
> Time Zone unknown
> Visitor's Time Unknown
> Visit Number 1,079
>
> Just Dave <http://davidamos.blogspot.com/>
> By Location *Visit Detail**
> Visit 1,078
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 199.212.150.# (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)
> ISP Royal Canadian Mounted Police
> Location
> Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts
> State/Region : Ontario
> City : Ottawa
> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> Language unknown
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 6.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0;
> Windows NT 5.1; INFOWEB-APPROVED; INFOWEB-APPROVED-IE6-EN; .
> NET CLR 1.1.4322)
> Javascript disabled
> Time of Visit May 30 2007 9:29:25 am
> Last Page View May 30 2007 9:29:25 am
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL unknown
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Out Click
> Time Zone unknown
> Visitor's Time Unknown
> Visit Number 1,078
>
> Just Dave http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 1,032
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 159.33.10.#(Canadian Broadcasting Corporation)
> ISP Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
> Location
> Continent : North America
> Country :Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Ontario
> City : Ottawa
> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 6.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 16 bits
> Time of Visit May 25 2007 8:06:36 am
> Last Page View
> May 25 2007 8:06:36 am
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.blogger.com/profile/7645241
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Out Click
> Time Zone
> UTC-4:00
>>
> Visitor's Time May 25 2007 8:06:36 am
> Visit Number 1,032
>
> N.B. government to await federal probe into possible RCMP wrongdoing May
> 30,
> 2007 - 19:47
>
> By: KEVIN BISSETT
> FREDERICTON (CP) - New Brunswick Attorney General T.J. Burke declined
> comment Wednesday on allegations of wrongdoing within the provincial RCMP.
> At least two current and former Mounties in the province are among more
> than
> a dozen officers across the country who have alleged wrongdoing within the
> force, including abuse of power, harassment and the coverup of evidence.
> One of the published allegations was made by Daniel Bernier, a former RCMP
> corporal who lives near Fredericton. He claims he was removed from an
> investigation in which he said he found evidence of the misuse of federal
> funds by New Brunswick government officials in 1999.
> He alleges grants were wrongly approved to farmers.
> Once he was removed from the case, Bernier said an internal investigation
> by
> the RCMP was called into his conduct.
> "Our government doesn't respond to allegations," Burke said Wednesday when
> asked by reporters about the claims published this week.
> "We respond to factual information that is provided to us, information that
> we need to investigate and look at."
> William Gilmour, an Ontario lawyer representing some of the Mounties who
> made the allegations, said the current and former members are anxious to
> tell their stories, but there must be protection from reprisal.
> "We're actively seeking the government to afford a venue in the nature of a
> parliamentary committee, where there's some protection for these people,
> where they have agreed to come forward and tell their stories," he said
> Wednesday.
> Gilmour, who is an ex-Mountie, said he has been trying to get the federal
> government to call his clients before such a committee for a year, but so
> far nothing has happened.
> In the Commons on Wednesday, Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day was
> accused by the opposition of ignoring the turmoil.
> "The Conservative public safety minister's response is to shrug his
> shoulders, plug his ears and see no evil, hear no evil," said Liberal Sue
> Barnes.
> "Is this wilful blindness or gross negligence? When it comes to protecting
> the integrity of Canada's national police, why is the public safety
> minister
> thwarting real action?"
> Day responded by saying the government is "taking action to get to the
> bottom of some of the concerns that have been raised."
> Another New Brunswick Mountie, Staff Sgt. Ken Smith, is suing senior
> officers at J Division in Fredericton for alleged harassment, but the New
> Brunswick government has stepped in and stayed proceedings.
> The province has asked the Fredericton police force to fully investigate
> the
> Smith case, which includes allegations of unauthorized use of tracking
> devices on his police vehicle.
> "For the 30 years that I have had with the police force, my job has been to
> go out and investigate crime," Smith said. "To find that we have just as
> much crime happening within our organization, which is stopping us from
> doing our job, is very troubling for me and for the individuals who have
> come forward."
> Bernier said he's not surprised to hear that as many as 30 current and
> former Mounties would be willing to testify before a parliamentary
> committee.
> "The country of Canada is quite vast and the RCMP is all over the place,
> and
> I'm sure I'm not the only one who has been treated like a piece of shit,"
> Bernier said.
> Gilmour said the appointment of a new RCMP commissioner with the mandate to
> fix the problems in the force could prevent having to launch an inquiry or
> royal commission.
> In the meantime, he said, the reputation of the force is taking a beating.
> "That's really quite unfair to the members on the street who are performing
> such a valuable function and putting their lives at risk every day," said
> Gilmour. "They don't deserve that and it needs to be dealt with far sooner
> than later."
>
> Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 16:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
> From: David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Dirty Dickie Dean hates us all for one reason Sam. Methinks it is
> because he is the FED. What say you Bev Busson?
> To: samperrier@hotmail.com , alltrue@nl.rogers.com,
> kmdickson0308@yahoo.com,
> deanr0032@hotmail.com, bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, derek.strong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, bill.corby@gnb.ca, police@fredericton.ca,
> carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, t.j.burke@gnb.ca, John.Foran@gnb.ca,
> Aurele.Daigle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Roger.Gillies@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> John.DeWinter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, fbinhct@leo.gov, Easter.W@parl.gc.ca,
> days1@parl.gc.ca, day.s@parl.gc.ca, alan_white@cbc.ca,
> jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> John.Ferguson@saintjohn.ca, Ivan.Court@saintjohn.ca,
> Christopher.Titus@saintjohn.ca , lorraineroche@gov.nl.ca
> CC: xzone@xzone-radio.com, brinson6@telus.net, wespenre@illuminati.ca,
> choose2reason@yahoo.com, rwnicholson@rwnicholson.com,
> starchamber@sasktel.net, JDHOOK@cox.net, Tim.Porter@gnb.ca,
> news@politicswatch.com, investor@dundeebancorp.com,
> webadmin@justice.gc.ca, info@tbs-sct.gc.ca, dtennant@mccarthy.ca ,
> 2026@gnb.ca, Brendan.Langille@gnb.ca, Martin.Paul@parl.gc.ca,
> Owen.S@parl.gc.ca, Steckle.P@parl.gc.ca, steckp@parl.gc.ca,
> McGuire.J@parl.gc.ca, Peterson.J@parl.gc.ca, Bonin.R@parl.gc.ca,
> Karetak-Lindell.N@parl.gc.ca, Chamberlain.B@parl.gc.ca , dbrown@dwpv.com,
> BCarr-Harris@blgcanada.com, McTeague.D@parl.gc.ca,
> info@politicswatch.com, Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca, Baird.J@parl.gc.ca,
> Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca, McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca, Dhalla.R@parl.gc.ca,
> Casey.B@parl.gc.ca, Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca, Holland.M@parl.gc.ca,
> wickedwanda3@adelphia.net, madd_professor@cox.net, Iolmisha@cs.com ,
> derrickcrobinson@gmail.com, khr909@hotmail.com, erniemusic2@yahoo.com,
> kevin_annett@hotmail.com, radical@radicalpress.com, thespur@hotmail.com,
> lisah@whooshnet.com , dougchristie@shaw.ca, lawald@web.net
>
> I must say your silence has been deafening for a lady acting as the
> Commissioner for the Crown Corp commonly know as the RCMP. It has been six
> months since you took over from the mean nasty old Zack and you are not one
> bit more ethical. How else can you be so quiet particularly with all the
> scandals breaking out daily about the RCMP?
>
> I hear that the crook Rod Smith who was supposed to advise everyone
> how to be ethical retired just in a nick of time after he and I had a
> little
> pow wow on the phone. I was not surprised that you shitcanned Zack's old
> assistant Mikey MacDonald in your office and that you replaced him with
> your
> own nomind assistant Pierre Leduc. It was too funny that he has the same
> last name as the nasty dude that finally answered me from the Commission of
> Public Complaints Against the RCMP after five long years of pure hell for
> my
> little Clan. Why don't one of you just tell the truth, the whole truth and
> nothing but the truth just like you are supposed to do and let the
> political
> cards fall where they may? Qiut the false allegation game will ya? It is
> getting a little redundant, don't ya think?
>
> I sure hope some cop blows the whistle bigtime real soon but I ain't
> betting on it. However I will lays odds that the only ones to respond to
> this email will be the nasty Yankee Depupty Dog and his little buddy Dirty
> Dickie Dean with more of their Bullshit. That said I have no doubt you
> crooks are just wondering who I send this email to next and when i will
> Blog
> it. Right? (Its already done scroll down to the bottom do ya think the new
> Accountability Commissioner will find it first?
>
> Say hey to the crooked NSIS agents Norm Plourde, (AKA "Porcupine
> Prique" ) and his pals, Cpl Jackson and Sean Lowe for me will ya Dirty
> Dickie Dean?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 506 434 1379
>
> Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 13:36:41 -0400
> From: "PCC Complaints" < complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
> To: <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com >
>
> May 23, 2007
> File No. PC-2005-1291
>
> Mr. David R Amos
>
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> On a number of occasions you have called or sent e-mails our office to
> raise
> matters which are of pressing concern to you.
>
> Each time we have tried to respond by explaining to you the relatively
> narrow mandate of this Commission and the limits of our powers to deal with
> the matters which are of concern to you. I must stress, once again, that
> the purpose of this Commission is to provide the public with an opportunity
> to make complaints concerning the conduct of members of the RCMP in the
> performance of their duties. We have neither the expertise nor the legal
> authority to permit us to become involved in issues beyond the scope of
> this
> mandate.
>
> While it is clearly not the intention of the Commission to prevent you from
> making complaints against members of the RCMP, an analysis of your numerous
> contacts with the Commission indicates that your concerns fall well outside
> the confines of our mandate. Further, your frequent e-mails have been
> disruptive and unproductive for both you and for the staff of this office.
>
> Should you determine that some point in the future you have a complaint
> concerning the conduct of a member of the RCMP in the performance of his or
> her duties, please submit it to the Commission *by Canada Post only*. As
> of
> now, your e-mails will be deleted unread.
>
> Yours truly,
>
> Andrée Leduc
> Enquiries and Complaints Analyst
>
> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Say hey to Shawn Murphy for me will ya
> Brian?
> Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 15:25:45 -0400
> From: "REVIEWS" <reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
> To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com<
>
> The Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP has received your
> e-mail message and will be responding in due course.
>
> La Commission des plaintes du public contre la GRC a reçu votre courriel et
> vous rendra une réponse au moment opportun.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 03:29:59 -0300
> Subject: Re Glen Greenwald and the Brazilian President Rousseff's
> indignant tweets So Stevey Boy Harper your CSEC dudes and their NSA
> pals no doubt know all about my conversation with the dudes from
> Brazil last month Wheras the CBC and the Guardian etc want to know it
> all we should share EH?
> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, rusun@un.int,
> john.adams@queensu.ca, John.Forster@cse-cst.gc.ca,
> td.ombudsman@td.com, christopher.montague@td.com,
> Frank.McKenna@td.com, Glenn.Greenwald@guardian.co.uk,
> info@praxisfilms.org, birgittaj@althingi.is,
> ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk, steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca,
> roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, ambassador@brasilemb.org,
> slrc@itamaraty.gov.br, cuba@un.int, protocol@dn.mofa.go.jp,
> japan.mission@dn.mofa.go.jp, protocol@s1.mofa.go.jp,
> j.kroes@interpol.int, craig.dalton@forces.gc.ca, bairdj@parl.gc.ca,
> MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca,
> shy.winkfield@guardiannews.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
> sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca, justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca,
> bginsberg@pattonboggs.com, RBauer@perkinscoie.com, justmin@gov.ns.ca,
> rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca, rmordenassoc@rogers.com, merricra@gov.ns.ca,
> stephen.m.cutler@jpmorgan.com, boston@ic.fbi.gov,
> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, prenquiries@eiu.com,
> mailbox@brasembottawa.org, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca,
> newsroom@theguardian.pe.ca, criminal.division@usdoj.gov,
> lachapelle.edith@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Janet.MacLean@international.gc.ca,
> dfildebrandt@taxpayer.com, ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca,
> themayor@calgary.ca, atlantic.director@taxpayer.com,
> premier@gov.ab.ca, premier@gnb.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
> jamiebaillie@gov.ns.ca, bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net,
> nichor@parl.gc.ca, greg.weston@cbc.ca, Manon.Hardy@priv.gc.ca,
> Dion.Mario@psic-ispc.gc.ca, csu@jesuits.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, Julian.Borger@guardian.co.uk
>
> http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/31/greece-imf-brazil-idUSL6N0G05GI20130731
>
> http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/24/brazil-president-un-speech-nsa-surveillance
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/politics/story/1.1928147
>
> https://mobile.twitter.com/dilmabr
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 03:14:34 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
> Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> Hey
>
> The sneaky ex CSIS dude Michelle Juneau-Katsuya was not wise to call
> the President of Brazil a Prima Donna but what he said is true about
> her merely playing politcs Everybody who wants to know can know what
> happened between Brazil and I since early 2005. All they have to do is
> ask me. If they don't believe me they can call the Boys from Brazil
> and ask them if what I said in the video hereto attached or the
> documents I to them and many other UN dudes long ago is true or false.
> Trust that Stevey Harper, Franky McKenna and the rest of the
> IMF/Bilderberger crowd ain't gonna tell anyone anything. EH Bobby
> Bauer and Stevey Cutler?
>
> The video is just a clip from a longer conversation with a good friend
> weeks ago. Perhaps your snoopy minions in the RCMP/DND should be wise
> to listen to it all if they haven't already EH?
>
> Anyone can find that chat saved here
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/index.php?dir=DavidAmos/
>
> It is entitled as follows
>
> 2013-09-21 time 16_34_08 Incoming Peer-to-Peer Call david.raymond.amos
>
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/index.php?dir=DavidAmos/
>
>
> These are the cover letters for the documents I sent to the UN Dudes
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/UN%20DUDES-txt.pdf
>
> BTW Perhaps the times are a changing now that the stock market is
> falling bigtime once again. Believe or not I am kinda sorta impressed
> by the words of the latest Pope. I can'tbelieve a Jesuit would say
> such things. Amazing things never cease.
>
> The Dec 12th,2002 date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of
> mine and the name of Cardinal Bernard Francis Law should mean a lot to
> him if he truly has an ethical soul and is wise enough to ignore his
> many lawyers.
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Francis_Law
>
> Law resigned as Archbishop of Boston on December 13, 2002, in response
> to the Roman Catholic Church sex abuse scandal after church documents
> were revealed which suggested he had covered up sexual abuse committed
> by priests in his archdiocese.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 1 902 800 0369
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <ambassador@brasilemb.org>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 7:04 PM
> Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
> Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <slrc@itamaraty.gov.br>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 1:06 AM
> Subject: Re A call back from the Embassy for Brazil in Washington from
> (202 238 2770)
>
>
> I just got your message now and called back I know it is off hours so
> I left a voicemail attempting to explain my concerns. I am kinda hard
> to get ahold of ask the NSA people listening to your Embassy and
> reading this why that is necessary
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> ----- Forwarded Message -----
> From: magicJack <voicemail@notify.magicjack.com>
> To: DAVID AMOS
> Sent: Friday, September 6, 2013 10:07 AM
> Subject: New VM (2) - 0:23 minutes in your magicJack mailbox from
> 2022382770
>
> Dear magicJack User:
>
> You received a new 0:23 minutes voicemail message, on Friday,
> September 06, 2013 at 09:07:46 AM in mailbox 9028000369 from
> 2022382770.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:52:55 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
> Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
> To: slrc@itamaraty.gov.br
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <braun@delbrasonu.org>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 6:39 PM
> Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
> Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <cuba@un.int>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 6:32 PM
> Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
> Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <protocol@dn.mofa.go.jp>; <japan.mission@dn.mofa.go.jp>;
> <protocol@s1.mofa.go.jp>; "j.kroes" <j.kroes@interpol.int>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 6:31 PM
> Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
> Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
>
>
> The Permanent Mission of Japan to the United Nations
> 866 U.N. Plaza, 2nd Floor
> New York, NY 10017
> E-mail : japan.mission@dn.mofa.go.jp
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:11:03 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
> Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
> To: jicc@ws.mofa.go.jp
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:06:03 -0300
> Subject: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the Boss
> of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
> To: rusun@un.int, bairdj <bairdj@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, MulcaT
> <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>,
> "justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, bginsberg
> <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>, RBauer <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "craig.dalton"
> <craig.dalton@forces.gc.ca>, dnd_mdn <dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca>
>
> The document hereto attached is very real and I made certain that the
> Russians remember what I sent all the G20 people in the UN within
> August of 2005 Ask the warmongers John McCain if and his buddy Obama
> or their lawyers Mr Bauer and Mr Ginsberg I am a liar or not
>
> Address: 136 East 67 Street,
> New York, N.Y. 10065
> Phone: 1(212)861-4900;
> 1(212)861-4901;
> FAX: 1(212)628-0252;
>
> E-mail: rusun@un.int
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <ambassador@brasilemb.org>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 8:07 PM
> Subject: Brazil and I just got cut off again here is what I was trying
> to tell you folks
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <Glenn.Greenwald@guardian.co.uk>; <info@praxisfilms.org>;
> "birgittaj" <birgittaj@althingi.is>; "ed.pilkington"
> <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>; "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>; "roger.l.brown"
> <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "shy.winkfield"
> <shy.winkfield@guardiannews.com>; "oldmaison" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>;
> "sallybrooks25" <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>; "Mordaith"
> <Mordaith@gmail.com>; <wayne.lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
> <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>; <david.alward@gnb.ca>; <nancy.forbes@gnb.ca>;
> <judith.keating@gnb.ca>; <luc.labonte@gnb.ca>;
> <marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>; <wishart.john@dailygleaner.com>;
> "macpherson.don" <macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>; "ian.fahie"
> <ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <david.eidt@gnb.ca>;
> <Richard.Williams@gnb.ca>; <ddelaquis@cldglaw.com>;
> <cfawcett@lawsoncreamer.com>; "Mackap" <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>; "premier"
> <premier@gnb.ca>; "bernadine.chapman"
> <bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "john.warr"
> <john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "jennifer.johnston"
> <jennifer.johnston@gov.bc.ca>; "t.wilson" <t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
> "radical" <radical@radicalpress.com>; "maryann4peace"
> <maryann4peace@gmail.com>; "police" <police@fredericton.ca>;
> <kselick@canadianconstitutionfoundation.ca>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "glen"
> <glen@glencanning.com>; "ddexter" <ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca>; "justmin"
> <justmin@gov.ns.ca>; "rmellish" <rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca>;
> "rmordenassoc" <rmordenassoc@rogers.com>; "merricra"
> <merricra@gov.ns.ca>; "stephen.m.cutler"
> <stephen.m.cutler@jpmorgan.com>; "StephenMcNeil"
> <StephenMcNeil@ns.aliantzinc.ca>; "jamiebaillie"
> <jamiebaillie@gov.ns.ca>; <Brian.Topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
> "Ian.Shardlow" <Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "Gilles.Moreau"
> <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "msegal" <msegal@murraysegal.com>;
> <DANIEL.POULIN@chrc-ccdp.ca>; <abromberg@bnaibrith.ca>;
> <habrams@pacificcoast.net>; "ndesrosiers" <ndesrosiers@ccla.org>
> Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 11:17 PM
> Subject: Re: Snowden ain't got nothing on mean old me when it comes to
> dealing with corrupt Feds and keeping one's Integrity as well
>
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/fwd-snowden-aint-got-nothing-on-mean.html
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/fwd-if-murray-segal-were-to-conduct.html
>
> On 8/18/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <Glenn.Greenwald@guardian.co.uk>; <info@praxisfilms.org>;
> "birgittaj" <birgittaj@althingi.is>; "ed.pilkington"
> <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>; "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>; "roger.l.brown"
> <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>;
> <DANIEL.POULIN@CHRC-CCDP.CA>; <abromberg@bnaibrith.ca>;
> <habrams@pacificcoast.net>; "ndesrosiers" <ndesrosiers@ccla.org>
> Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 10:54 PM
> Subject: Snowden ain't got nothing on mean old me when it comes to
> dealing with corrupt Feds and keeping one's Integrity as well
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:40:18 -0300
> Subject: YO FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers I just called your
> office and the nasty Yankee played dumb as usual
> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"
> <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov,
> us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney
> <jcarney@carneybassil.com>, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, birgittaj
> <birgittaj@althingi.is>, shmurphy@globe.com, Red Ice Creations
> <redicecreations@gmail.com>
>
> Clearly I am not joking
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 19,571
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 153.31.113.# (FBI Criminal Justice Information Systems)
> ISP FBI Criminal Justice Information Systems
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : West Virginia
> City : Clarksburg
> Lat/Long : 39.2664, -80.3097 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; InfoPath.2;
> .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; MS-RTC
> LM 8; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 800 x 600
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Jun 12 2013 5:00:01 pm
> Last Page View Jun 12 2013 5:00:01 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...YIZDuTIWsfuPUhflswCk
> Search Engine google.com
> Search Words jp morgan and "andrew kosloff"
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...-stewart-and-me.html
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...-stewart-and-me.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Jun 12 2013 4:00:01 pm
> Visit Number 19,571
>
> On 6/15/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> FBI Boston
>> One Center Plaza
>> Suite 600
>> Boston, MA 02108
>> Phone: (617) 742-5533
>> Fax: (617) 223-6327
>> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>>
>> Hours
>> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
>> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
>> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
>> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
>> office at (617) 742-5533.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
>> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
>> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
>> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
>> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
>> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney <jcarney@carneybassil.com>,
>> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, michael wolfheart
>> <wolfheartlodge@live.com>, jonathan.albano@bingham.com,
>> shmurphy@globe.com, mvalencia@globe.com
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, oldmaison
>> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>>
>> http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/06/05/james-whitey-bulger-jury-selection-process-enters-second-day/KjS80ofyMMM5IkByK74bkK/story.html
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> To: "Fred.Wyshak" <Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov>; "jcarney"
>> <jcarney@carneybassil.com>; <Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov>;
>> <us.marshals@usdoj.gov>
>> Cc: <edit@thr.com>; "maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>;
>> "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 11:50 AM
>> Subject: So Fred Wyshak has Brian Kelly and the rest of the corrupt
>> Feds practiced the spirit of fill disclosure with Jay Carney??
>>
>> If so then why didn't Mr Carney return my phone calls last July???
>>
>> http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2012/01/09/bulger_lawyers_due_in_court_for_update_on_evidence/
>>
>> http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/lawyer_known_as_patron_saint_of_hopeless_cases_is_representing_whitey_bulge/
>>
>> http://bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/2011_0625lawyer_tab_is_in_billys_court_feds_believe_brother_should_shell_out_for_defense
>>
>> http://articles.boston.com/2011-07-01/news/29726987_1_jay-carney-bulger-brookline-clinics
>>
>> http://carneybassil.com/team/carney/
>>
>> Truth is stranger than fiction. Perhaps Ben Affleck and Matt Damon a
>> couple of boyz from Beantown who done good will pay attention to mean
>> old me someday EH?
>>
>> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/ben-affleck-matt-damon-whitey-bulger-254994
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> SOMEBODY SHOULD ASK THE CBC AND THE COPS A VERY SIMPLE QUESTION.
>>
>> WHY was Byron Prior and I banned from parliamentry properties while I
>> running for a seat in parliament in 2004 2 whole YEARS before the
>> mindless nasty French Bastard Chucky Leblanc was barred in NB and yet
>> the CBC, the Fat Fred City Finest and the RCMP still deny anything
>> ever happened to this very day even though Chucky and his pals have
>> blogged about it???
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2006/06/20/nb-bloggerbanned20060620.html
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-fat-fred-citys-finest.html
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/04/david-amos-nb-nwo-whistleblower-part-3.html
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/07/feds-institutionalize-determined-nb.html
>>
>> Did anybody bother to listen to me explain things to the Police
>> Commissioners in 2004?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/NewBrunswickPoliceCommission
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 21:56:57 -0300
>> Subject: Re Yankee Feds Please allow me to be brief with the crooks in
>> Wikileaks and the Guardian EH Birgitta and Ed Pilkington?
>> To: "Fred.Wyshak" <Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov>, "john.warr"
>> <john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, redicecreations@gmail.com, birgittaj
>> <birgittaj@althingi.is>, Piratar <piratar@pirateparty.is>,
>> "ed.pilkington" <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>, janice.smith@cbc.ca,
>> camilla.inderberg@cbc.ca, "david.akin" <david.akin@sunmedia.ca>,
>> Alan.Dark@cbc.ca, newsonline <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>, "John.Williamson"
>> <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, aih <aih@cbc.ca>,
>> news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>, "bob.paulson"
>> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
>> <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>
>> http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/09/edward-snowden-nsa-whistleblower-surveillance
>>
>> "Snowden will go down in history as one of America's most
>> consequential whistleblowers, alongside Daniel Ellsberg and Bradley
>> Manning. He is responsible for handing over material from one of the
>> world's most secretive organisations - the NSA."
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 4:04 PM
>> Subject: Ed Here is your ticket to keep you out of hot water Just send
>> this to Hugh Grant and he can raise hell for you
>>
>> Byway of the US FTC the Feds in many countries can never deny that
>> they did not know the truth long ago
>>
>> From: Ed Pilkington <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>
>> Subject: GUARDIAN
>> To: myson333@yahoo.com
>> Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 11:42 AM
>>
>> hi
>>
>> here's my email and my cell number is below
>>
>> all best
>>
>> Ed
>>
>> --
>> Ed Pilkington
>> New York bureau chief
>> The Guardian
>> www.guardian.co.uk
>> twitter.com/Edpilkington
>>
>> Cell: 646 704 1264
>>
>> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Visit guardian.co.uk - newspaper of the year
>> www.guardian.co.uk www.observer.co.uk
>>
>> On your mobile, visit m.guardian.co.uk or download the Guardian
>> iPhone app www.guardian.co.uk/iphone
>>
>> To save up to 30% when you subscribe to the Guardian and the Observer
>> visit www.guardian.co.uk/subscriber
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This e-mail and all attachments are confidential and may also
>> be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify
>> the sender and delete the e-mail and all attachments immediately.
>> Do not disclose the contents to another person. You may not use
>> the information for any purpose, or store, or copy, it in any way.
>>
>> Guardian News & Media Limited is not liable for any computer
>> viruses or other material transmitted with or as part of this
>> e-mail. You should employ virus checking software.
>>
>> Guardian News & Media Limited
>>
>> A member of Guardian Media Group plc
>> Registered Office
>> PO Box 68164
>> Kings Place
>> 90 York Way
>> London
>> N1P 2AP
>>
>> Registered in England Number 908396
>>
>> THE GUARDIAN MUST REMEMBER ME EH EDDY BABY???
>>
>> Click on this link
>>
>> http://50states.ning.com/video/rcmp-sussex-new-brunswick
>>
>> OR SCROLL DOWN TO ASSURE YOURSELF THAT WIKILEAKS OR THE CROWN CORPS
>> KNOWN AS THE CBC AND THE RCMP TO NAME ONLY THREE CAN NEVER DENY THAT
>> THEY DON'T KNOW ALL ABOUT MEAN OLD ME AND MY CONCERNS
>>
>> HOWCOME FOR 10 YEARS PUBLIC OFFICIALS IN THE USA CANADA ICELAND
>> ENGLAND AND ALL THE OTHERS WITHIN "COALITION OF THE WILLING" ETC
>> IGNORED THE FACT THAT I HAVE HAD MANY YANKEE WIRETAP TAPES THAT COULD
>> HAVE IMPEACHED GEORGEY BOY BUSH AND HIS COHORTS LONG BEFORE THE
>> PATRIOT ACT OR THE WAR ON IRAQ BEGAN???
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>> http://joyb.blogspot.ca/2010/11/my-statement-from-nato-parliamentary.html
>>
>> http://50states.ning.com/video/rcmp-sussex-new-brunswick
>>
>> http://www.nycga.net/members/davidraymondamos/
>>
>>> From: David Amos
>>> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 23:22:00 -0300
>>> Subject: i just called from 902 800 0369 (Nova Scotia)
>>> To: 9.17occupywallstreet@gmail.com
>>>
>>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-...
>>>
>>> I am the guy the SEC would not name that is the link to Madoff and
>>> Putnam Investments
>>>
>>> http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hear...
>>>
>>> Notice the transcript and webcast of the hearing of the US Senate
>>> banking Commitee is missing? please notice Eliot Spitzer and the Dates
>>> around November 20th, 2003 in te following file
>>>
>>> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-righ...
>>>
>>> From: "Julian Assange)"
>>> Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 18:15:46 +0000 (GMT)
>>> Subject: Al Jazeera on Iceland's plan for a press safe haven
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> FYI: Al-Jazeera's take on Iceland's proposed media safe haven
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbGiPjIE1pE
>>>
>>> More info http://immi.is/
>>>
>>> Julian Assange
>>> Editor
>>> WikiLeaks
>>> http://wikileaks.org/
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Birgitta Jonsdottir
>>> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:14:02 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: Bon Soir Birgitta according to my records this is the
>>> first email I ever sent you
>>> To: David Amos
>>>
>>> dear Dave
>>> i have got your email and will read through the links as soon as i
>>> find some time
>>> keep up the good fight in the meantime
>>>
>>> thank you for bearing with me
>>> i am literary drowning in requests to look into all sorts of matters
>>> and at the same time working 150% work at the parliament and
>>> the creation of a political movement and being a responsible parent:)
>>> plus all the matters in relation to immi
>>>
>>> with oceans of joy
>>> birgitta
>>>
>>> Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are
>>> not.
>>>
>>> Andre Gide
>>>
>>> Birgitta Jonsdottir
>>> Birkimelur 8, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland, tel: 354 692 8884
>>> http://this.is/birgitta - http://joyb.blogspot.com -
>>> http://www.facebook.com/birgitta.jonsdottir
>>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Henrik Palmgren <redicecreations@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:46:26 +0200
>> Subject: Re: Oh my my I guess we know the score on you EH?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Oh my. Don't send me your spam. It's not good for anything.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 17:27:53 -0300
>> Subject: Re Teddy Baby Olson was on Fox News today yapping about
>> Presidential enemies list as he represents the crooks in Koch
>> Industries??? If anyone should know about such things it is Olson
>> after all he assisted Ashcroft and Bush against me
>> To: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Office@tigta.treas.gov, RBauer@perkinscoie.com,
>> mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov, "Gilles.Moreau"
>> <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, ron.klain@revolution.com,
>> dboies@bsfllp.com, tolson@gibsondunn.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com,
>> "ed.pilkington" <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>, news
>> <news@thetelegraph.com.au>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
>> rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com, gregory.craig@skadden.com,
>> Patrick.Fitzgerald@skadden.com
>>
>> Hey
>>
>> As Harper sits and bullshits his cohorts in the Council of Foreign
>> Relations in the Big Apple today I bet he was listening to what was
>> happening with Obama and the IRS and Holder and his DOJ minions
>> in Washington.
>>
>> Notice the Inspector General of the IRS Dudes within this old file?
>>
>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/9092510/Chicago
>>
>> Everybody and his dog knows Harper knew about my battles with the US
>> Treasury and Justice Depts way back when he was the boss of the
>> opposition in Canada's Parliament. Two simple files easily found on
>> the Internet cannot be argued.
>>
>> Notice how old the letter and Form 211 are?
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/5-years-waiting-on-bank-fraud-payout.html
>>
>> Here the Inspector Generals calling me 7 years ago?
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
>>
>> FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Office of Chief Counsel, Treasury.
>> Inspector General for Tax Administration, (202) 622-4068.
>>
>> When Teddy bitches about polticians using the IRS to attack their
>> enemies because he knows it true because he helped Bush the IRS
>> against me when Obama was just a State Senator .
>>
>> The proof was when I sent him the documents that came along with the
>> letter
>> found on page 13 of this old file Teddy Baby Olson quit as Solicitor
>> General.
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>>
>> Harper and every body else knows It was no coincidence that I sent the
>> lawyers Olson as Solicitior General, Ferguson as the co chair of the
>> Federal Reserve Bank, and J Strom Thurmond Jr the youngest US
>> Attorney the same pile of documents on April Fools Day 2004.
>>
>> The sad but terrible truth is that legions of cops, lawyers polticians
>> and bureaucrats in Canada and the USA knew about the US Secret Service
>> coming to my home after dark on April Fools Day 2003 bearing false
>> allegations of a presidential threat and threatening to use their
>> implied right to use exta ordinary rendition against me as a non
>> citizen less than two weeks after the needless War in Iraq began and
>> no WMD were ever found.
>>
>> You can bet dimes to dollars i called some Yankee Inspector Generals
>> (starting with 202 622 4068) and reminded them that I am still alive
>> and kicking and reminding the world of their malicious incompetence
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> PS Below you can review some emails I sent you and your Yankee cohorts
>> such asTeddy Baby Olson before Obama was reelected EH Harper? In truth
>> I would rather settle in confidence with Obama then sue the Hell out
>> of the CROWN and the Holy See Trust that the evil old Judge Bastarache
>> has known why for a very long time.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> To: "Rob Talach" <rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
>> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
>> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>>
>> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
>> a lot to you
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400
>> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW
>> Bernadine Chapman??
>> To: Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, phil.giles@statcan.ca,
>> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca,
>> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca,
>> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca, webo
>> <webo@xplornet.com>, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
>> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1
>> <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>, "Nycole.Turmel" <Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca>,
>> Clemet1 <Clemet1@parl.gc.ca>, maritime_malaise
>> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, oig <oig@sec.gov>, whistleblower
>> <whistleblower@finra.org>, whistle <whistle@fsa.gov.uk>, david
>> <david@fairwhistleblower.ca>
>> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
>> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "justin.trudeau.a1"
>> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "Juanita.Peddle"
>> <Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
>> "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Robert.Trevors"
>> <Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca>, "ian.fahie" <ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>
>> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/news-nouvelles/media-medias-eng.htm
>>
>> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/Newsletters/VetsReview/nlnov06.pdf
>>
>> From: Gilles Moreau <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500
>> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy
>> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH
>> Constable Peddle???
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails.
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC
>> Director General
>> HR Transformation
>> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
>>
>> Tel 613-843-6039
>> Cel 613-818-6947
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC
>> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines
>> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
>>
>> tél 613-843-6039
>> cel 613-818-6947
>> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>>>> David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> 2012-11-21 00:01 >>>
>>
>> Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its
>> because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it
>> yet
>>
>> Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the
>> link to Madoff and Putnam Investments
>>
>> Here is why
>>
>> http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2
>>
>> Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate
>> Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice
>> Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the
>> following file
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf
>>
>> NONE of you should have assisted in the cover up of MURDER CORRECT???
>>
>> http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2011/2011-06-22/html/sor-dors122-eng.html
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> To: <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>; <Rob.Renaud@cbc.ca>
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:45 PM
>> Subject: Question # 1 who the hell is Rob Renaus and di Robert Jone
>> and Jaques Poitra and Alan white etc forward you my latest emails
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Edith Cody-Rice <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:53:07 -0500
>> Subject: Calls and E-mails to CBC
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> Cc: Rob Renaud <Rob.Renaud@cbc.ca>
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> CBC personnel have contacted me concerning your calls and e-mails to
>> them. As you are threatening legal action, would you kindly direct any
>> further calls or correspondence to me. Other CBC personnel will not
>> respond further to your correspondence or calls.
>>
>>
>> Edith Cody-Rice
>> Senior Legal Counsel
>> Premier Conseiller juridique
>> CBC/Radio-Canada
>> 181 Queen Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1K9
>> Postal Address: P.O. Box 3220, Station C, Ottawa K1Y 1E4
>> Tel: (613) 288-6164
>> Cell: (613) 720-5185
>> Fax/ Télécopieur (613) 288-6279
>>
>> IMPORTANT NOTICE
>> This communication is subject to solicitor/client privilege and
>> contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) to
>> whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, other
>> distribution of this communication
>> or taking any action on its contents is strictly prohibited. If you
>> have received this message in error, please notify us immediately and
>> delete this message without reading, copying or forwarding it to
>> anyone.
>>
>> AVIS IMPORTANT
>> La présente communication est assujettie au privilège du secret
>> professionnel de l'avocat et renferme des renseignements confidentiels
>> intéressant uniquement leur destinataire. Il est interdit de
>> divulguer, de copier ou de distribuer cette communication par quelque
>> moyen que ce soit ou de donner suite à son contenu sans y être
>> autorisé. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez nous en
>> avertir immédiatement et le supprimer en évitant de le lire, de le
>> copier ou de le transmettre à qui que ce soit.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400
>> Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
>> the USDOJ for me will ya?
>> To: RBauer <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
>> cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith <msmith@svlaw.com>, bginsberg
>> <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>, "gregory.craig"
>> <gregory.craig@skadden.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
>> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.rae"
>> <bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, leader
>> <leader@greenparty.ca>
>> Cc: alevine@cooley.com, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
>> michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
>>
>> QSLS Politics
>> By Location Visit Detail
>> Visit 29,419
>> Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
>> IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
>> ISP US Dept of Justice
>> Location Continent : North America
>> Country : United States (Facts)
>> State : District of Columbia
>> City : Washington
>> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
>> Language English (U.S.) en-us
>> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
>> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
>> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
>> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
>> DI60SP1001)
>> Javascript version 1.3
>> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
>> Color Depth : 32 bits
>> Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
>> Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
>> Visit Length 0 seconds
>> Page Views 1
>> Referring URL http://www.google.co...wwWJrm94lCEqRmovPXJg
>> Search Engine google.com
>> Search Words david amos bernie madoff
>> Visit Entry Page
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
>> Visit Exit Page
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
>> Out Click
>> Time Zone UTC-5:00
>> Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm
>> Visit Number 29,419
>>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> To: <eachtem@hotmail.com>; <alltrue@nl.rogers.com>;
> <deanr0032@hotmail.com>; <dean@law.ualberta.ca>; <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>;
> <injusticecoalition@hotmail.com>; "Edith. Cody-Rice"
> <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>; "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>;
> "kelly. lamrock" <kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca>; <oldmaison@yahoo.com>;
> "Duane.Rousselle" <Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca>; "john.adams"
> <john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca>; <mackay01@canada.com>;
> <IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>; <deanray98@yahoo.ca>; "Dean.Buzza"
> <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <ahunter100@shaw.ca>; <t.j.burke@gnb.ca>;
> "jackblood" <jackblood@hotmail.com>; "jack. keir" <jack.keir@gnb.ca>;
> <David.ALWARD@gnb.ca>; "drywallrocker" <drywallrocker@hotmail.com>;
> "shawn. graham" <shawn.graham@gnb.ca>; "shawn.howard"
> <shawn.howard@wildrosealliance.ca>
> Cc: <td.ombudsman@td.com>; "christopher. montague"
> <christopher.montague@td.com>; "Frank. McKenna"
> <Frank.McKenna@td.com>; "John.DeWinter" <John.DeWinter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 2:07 PM
> Subject: Lets see if John Adams the current the CSE is clever enough
> to put two and two together about the TD EH Franky Boy McKenna
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ombudsman, Td
> To: 'david.raymond.amos@gmail.com'
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 6:11 PM
> Subject: your e-mails dated November 3, 2008
>
> November 4, 2008
>
> David Amos
> P.O. Box 234
> Apohaqui, NB
> E5P 3G2
>
> ----------------------
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> We acknowledge receipt of your e-mails dated November 3, 2008, which
> we received in our office on November 4, 2008.
>
> We would like to thank you for providing our office with your feedback
> surrounding the various issues. We have reviewed the numerous pieces
> of correspondence that you e-mailed to us. It is our understanding
> that you have a number of concerns surrounding politics and the
> actions of the government within North America.
>
> We appreciate the effort you have taken to express your views
> surrounding these issues, however we do not believe we can be of any
> assistance as this falls outside the mandate of this office.
>
> Thank you for taking the time to bring your concerns to our attention.
>
> Yours truly,
>
> Paul W. Huyer
>
> Ombudsman
>
>
> *********************
> NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY
> This communication including any information transmitted with it is
> intended only for the use of the addressees and is confidential.
> If you are not an intended recipient or responsible for delivering
> the message to an intended recipient, any review, disclosure,
> conversion to hard copy, dissemination, reproduction or other use
> of any part of this communication is strictly prohibited, as is the
> taking or omitting of any action in reliance upon this communication.
> If you receive this communication in error or without authorization
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail or otherwise and
> permanently delete the entire communication from any computer,
> disk drive, or other storage medium.
>
> If the above disclaimer is not properly readable, it can be found at
> www.td.com/legal
>
> AVERTISSEMENT DE CONFIDENTIALITE
> Ce courriel, ainsi que tout renseignement ci-inclus, destiné uniquement
> aux destinataires susmentionnés, est confidentiel. Si vous
> n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu ou un agent responsable de la
> livraison de ce courriel, tout examen, divulgation, copie, impression,
> reproduction, distribution, ou autre utilisation d'une partie de ce
> courriel est strictement interdit de même que toute intervention ou
> abstraction à cet égard. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur ou
> sans autorisation, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par
> retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen et supprimer immédiatement
> cette communication entière de tout système électronique.
>
> Si l'avis de non-responsabilité ci-dessus n'est pas lisible, vous
> pouvez le consulter à www.td.com/francais/legale
>
> Mr Bush thanked the Netherlands for its cooperation during his time in
> office and particularly praised the Dutch presence in Afghanistan.
> After the meeting, Mr Balkenende said he had spoken freely about
> matters on which the two countries disagree, including climate policy
> and the US detention facility for terrorist suspects at Guantánamo
> Bay.
>
> Mr Verhagen will also hold meetings with US Secretary of State
> Condoleezza Rice and close aides of presidential candidates John
> McCain and Barack Obama. Mr Balkenende is attending the Bilderberg
> Conference, the highly secretive annual meeting of the world's most
> influential people, which is this year being held in Chantilly outside
> Washington DC.
> Article Continues
> ----------------
> (Source: Infowars):
> BILDERBERG MEETING - "Chantilly, Virginia, USA" - 5-8 June 2008 - LIST
> OF PARTICIPANTS
>
> Honorary Chairman
> BEL "Davignon, Etienne" "Vice Chairman, Suez-Tractebel"
>
> DEU "Ackermann, Josef" "Chairman of the Management Board and the Group
> Executive Committee, Deutsche Bank AG"
> CAN "Adams, John" Associate Deputy Minister of National Defence and
> Chief of the Communications Security Establishment Canada
> USA "Ajami, Fouad" "Director, Middle East Studies Program, The Paul H.
> Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, The Johns Hopkins
> University"
> USA "Alexander, Keith B." "Director, National Security Agency"
> INT "Almunia, Joaquín " "Commissioner, European Commission"
> GRC "Alogoskoufis, George" Minister of Economy and Finance
> USA "Altman, Roger C." "Chairman, Evercore Partners Inc."
> TUR "Babacan, Ali " Minister of Foreign Affairs
> NLD "Balkenende, Jan Peter" Prime Minister
> PRT "Balsemão, Francisco Pinto" "Chairman and CEO, IMPRESA, S.G.P.S.;
> Former Prime Minister"
> FRA "Baverez, Nicolas" "Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP"
> ITA "Bernabè, Franco" "CEO, Telecom Italia Spa"
> USA "Bernanke, Ben S." "Chairman, Board of Governors, Federal Reserve
> System"
> SWE "Bildt, Carl" Minister of Foreign Affairs
> FIN "Blåfield, Antti " "Senior Editorial Writer, Helsingin Sanomat"
> DNK "Bosse, Stine" "CEO, TrygVesta"
> CAN "Brodie, Ian " "Chief of Staff, Prime Minister's Office"
> AUT "Bronner, Oscar" "Publisher and Editor, Der Standard"
> FRA "Castries, Henri de " "Chairman of the Management Board and CEO, AXA"
> ESP "Cebrián, Juan Luis" "CEO, PRISA"
> CAN "Clark, Edmund" "President and CEO, TD Bank Financial Group"
> GBR "Clarke, Kenneth" Member of Parliament
> NOR "Clemet, Kristin" "Managing Director, Civita"
> USA "Collins, Timothy C." "Senior Managing Director and CEO,
> Ripplewood Holdings, LLC"
> FRA "Collomb, Bertrand" "Honorary Chairman, Lafarge"
> PRT "Costa, António" Mayor of Lisbon
> USA "Crocker, Chester A." James R. Schlesinger Professor of Strategic
> Studies
> USA "Daschle, Thomas A." Former US Senator and Senate Majority Leader
> CAN "Desmarais, Jr., Paul" "Chairman and co-CEO, Power Corporation of
> Canada"
> GRC "Diamantopoulou, Anna" Member of Parliament
> USA "Donilon, Thomas E." "Partner, O'Melveny & Myers"
> ITA "Draghi, Mario" "Governor, Banca d'Italia"
> AUT "Ederer, Brigitte" "CEO, Siemens AG Österreich"
> CAN "Edwards, N. Murray" "Vice Chairman, Candian Natural Resources Limited"
> DNK "Eldrup, Anders " "President, DONG A/S"
> ITA "Elkann, John" "Vice Chairman, Fiat S.p.A."
> USA "Farah, Martha J." "Director, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience;
> Walter H. Annenberg Professor in the Natural Sciences, University of
> Pennsylvania"
> USA "Feldstein, Martin S." "President and CEO, National Bureau of
> Economic Research"
> DEU "Fischer, Joschka" Former Minister of Foreign Affairs
> USA "Ford, Jr., Harold E." "Vice Chairman, Merill Lynch & Co., Inc."
> CHE "Forstmoser, Peter" "Professor for Civil, Corporation and Capital
> Markets Law, University of Zürich"
> IRL "Gallagher, Paul " Attorney General
> USA "Geithner, Timothy F. " "President and CEO, Federal Reserve Bank
> of New York"
> USA "Gigot, Paul " "Editorial Page Editor, The Wall Street Journal"
> IRL "Gleeson, Dermot " "Chairman, AIB Group"
> NLD "Goddijn, Harold" "CEO, TomTom"
> TUR "Gögüs, Zeynep " "Journalist; Founder, EurActiv.com.tr"
> USA "Graham, Donald E." "Chairman and CEO, The Washington Post Company"
> NLD "Halberstadt, Victor" "Professor of Economics, Leiden University;
> Former Honorary Secretary General of Bilderberg Meetings"
> USA "Holbrooke, Richard C. " "Vice Chairman, Perseus, LLC"
> FIN "Honkapohja, Seppo" "Member of the Board, Bank of Finland"
> INT "Hoop Scheffer, Jaap G. de" "Secretary General, NATO"
> USA "Hubbard, Allan B." "Chairman, E & A Industries, Inc."
> BEL "Huyghebaert, Jan" "Chairman of the Board of Directors, KBC Group"
> DEU "Ischinger, Wolfgang" Former Ambassador to the UK and US
> USA "Jacobs, Kenneth" "Deputy Chairman, Head of Lazard U.S., Lazard
> Frères & Co. LLC"
> USA "Johnson, James A." "Vice Chairman, Perseus, LLC" (Obama's man
> tasked with selecting his running mate)
> SWE "Johnstone, Tom " "President and CEO, AB SKF"
> USA "Jordan, Jr., Vernon E." "Senior Managing Director, Lazard Frères & Co.
> LLC"
> FRA "Jouyet, Jean-Pierre " Minister of European Affairs
> GBR "Kerr, John " "Member, House of Lords; Deputy Chairman, Royal
> Dutch Shell plc."
> USA "Kissinger, Henry A." "Chairman, Kissinger Associates, Inc."
> DEU "Klaeden, Eckart von" "Foreign Policy Spokesman, CDU/CSU"
> USA "Kleinfeld, Klaus" "President and COO, Alcoa"
> TUR "Koç, Mustafa " "Chairman, Koç Holding A.S."
> FRA "Kodmani, Bassma" "Director, Arab Reform Initiative"
> USA "Kravis, Henry R." "Founding Partner, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co."
> USA "Kravis, Marie-Josée" "Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute, Inc."
> INT "Kroes, Neelie " "Commissioner, European Commission"
> POL "Kwasniewski, Aleksander " Former President
> AUT "Leitner, Wolfgang" "CEO, Andritz AG"
> ESP "León Gross, Bernardino" "Secretary General, Office of the Prime
> Minister"
> INT "Mandelson, Peter" "Commissioner, European Commission"
> FRA "Margerie, Christophe de" "CEO, Total"
> CAN "Martin, Roger" "Dean, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management,
> University of Toronto"
> HUN "Martonyi, J
> Yo Mr Baconfat
>
> Your cop buddies in Edmonton Marianne Ryan and Chief Knecht know this
> is the aforesaid email
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/04/re-corrupt-cops-ignoring-sections-300.html
>
> We all know the only truth coming from your family came from your two
> REAL sons that you abused long ago as children and have not seen them
> since because you are afraid of them wanting to get even. CORRECT
> PERVERT?
>
> Furthermore everybody in the know knows that it was no coincidence
> that the RCMP finally arrested the punk the very next day. Like Hell
> did Google delay the corrupt cops for a year. That just more pure
> bullshit spun by the CROWN Glen Canning and many others knew who that
> particular stalker was last August. at the same time I informed them
> who you were.
>
>
> The RCMP have yet to fess up about their favourite shills who have
> been cyber stalking my family for many years.
>
> For the Public Record YOUR Grande Faux Pas Mr Baconfat was harassing
> rhe whimp Glenny Baby Canning. YOUR blog has become a big
> embarrassment to your old pals in the RCMP and even Chief Knecht.
>
>
> If you are oh so concerned about the truth all of a sudden perhaps you
> should ask the RCMP or Google to finally translate the Motto of the
> Keith Clan for you EH PERVERT?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> PS. This was blog of yours was interesting to Mean Old Me No doubt
> Chief Knecht loved it to N'esy Pas?
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2014/05/police-protocol-war-crimes-union-shills.html
>
> A very current truth is a serious question that the CROWN and Glen
> Canning should wonder about. It is do my children have lawyers yet and
> if so who?
>
>
> https://www.facebook.com/glenfordcanning/posts/589614877746571
>
> Glen Canning
> BARRY WINTERS IP 24.71.223.10 sunrayzulu@shaw.ca from Edmonton AB
> claiming he has Rehtaeh Parsons rape photo. Please stop this
> pedophile!
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2013/08/oh-dear-outed-by-glen-canning.html
>
> Glen Canning The police spoke to him tonight. Guys just a loser
> looking for his 15 minutes.August 27, 2013 at 7:49pm · 2
>
> Walter McCulloch Walter Winters, is Barry Winters' late father.... Or
> me, once upon a time, before my mother changed my name after the
> divorce. what a vomit inducing why to find one's father. I'm glad I
> never new him. I'm going to be sick nowMarch 23 at 11:25am
>
>
> Walter McCulloch oh. I should mention by every account I have heard
> about him....He is a compulsive and pathological liar, and a wife and
> child beater.March 23 at 11:32am
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/re-anatomy-of-bad-dad-that.html
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/06/yo-mr-baconfat-your-pals-such-as-lt-col.html
>
> http://snipernco.blogspot.ca/2007/01/its-all-about-me.html
>
> Saturday, January 27, 2007
>
> "Its all about me"
>
> Mr. Paul N McCulloch once wrote this about Remembrance Day:
>
>
> Posted by snipernco at 11:50 AM
>
> 1 comment:
>
> P. McCulloch said...
> Ah Mr. Winters, you are a total fool.
>
> I still hate Remembrance Day, go on and hate me for that. But your
> remarks are nothing but rhetorical flourish, straw man, and ad hominem
> "arguments."
>
> One thing IS certain though, I certainly don't have any idea as to the
> stories of my grandfather and great-uncle. That is because YOU sir,
> refuse to tell them to me. You refuse to speak to your own children
> solely because they took until their mid 20s to start trying to look
> you up.
>
> Everything I see from you proves just one thing: that you are lying,
> racist, ignorant, trash.
>
> My comments refer to the useless and tired ceremonial of a bad
> holiday. This does not mean, as you seem to think, that I do not
> support Canadian military personnel.
>
> Lets not forget that you do not even know a thing about me beyond the
> text of my blog entry. Yet you dismiss my comments as nothing but
> ignorant stoner speak.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: BARRY WINTERS <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
> Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 15:15:17 -0600 (MDT)
> Subject: Re: Yo Stevey Boy Harper and Jamie Baby Baille Perhaps your
> blogging buddy Glen Canning should hire a lawyer and sue somebody ASAP
> EH ?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
> MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, jamiebaillie
> <jamiebaillie@gov.ns.ca>, Mackap <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, "scott.macrae"
> <scott.macrae@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Grant.Fiander"
> <Grant.Fiander@halifax.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, glen
> <glen@glencanning.com>, Glen Canning <grcanning@me.com>, deanr0032
> <deanr0032@hotmail.com>, "Gary.Rhodes" <Gary.Rhodes@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "gary.forward" <gary.forward@fredericton.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan"
> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "rod.knecht"
> <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>, justmin <justmin@gov.ns.ca>, info
> <info@gg.ca>, "Tim.RICHARDSON" <Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>, oldmaison
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, msegal
> <msegal@murraysegal.com>, merricra <merricra@gov.ns.ca>
>
> It is a legal axiom numbnuts: "The truth is a complete defense." I
> have already whupped you bastards several times over.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "jamiebaillie" <jamiebaillie@gov.ns.ca>,
> "Mackap" <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, "scott.macrae"
> <scott.macrae@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Grant.Fiander"
> <Grant.Fiander@halifax.ca>, "PREMIER" <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, "glen"
> <glen@glencanning.com>, "Glen Canning" <grcanning@me.com>,
> "sunrayzulu" <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "deanr0032"
> <deanr0032@hotmail.com>, "Gary.Rhodes" <Gary.Rhodes@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "gary.forward" <gary.forward@fredericton.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan"
> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "rod.knecht"
> <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>, "justmin" <justmin@gov.ns.ca>, "info"
> <info@gg.ca>, "Tim.RICHARDSON" <Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>, "oldmaison"
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "andre" <andre@jafaust.com>, "msegal"
> <msegal@murraysegal.com>, "merricra" <merricra@gov.ns.ca>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
> "MulcaT" <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 6:47:58 AM
> Subject: Yo Stevey Boy Harper and Jamie Baby Baille Perhaps your
> blogging buddy Glen Canning should hire a lawyer and sue somebody ASAP
> EH ?
>
> What if somebody mentions these blogs to the Queen's strange son
> Chucky while he and his old paramour are planting a tree in Halifax
> and then having some Celtic fun in Pictou?
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2014/05/only-in-amerka.html
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/05/yo-birgitta-who-is-more-of-crook-julian.html
>
> http://glencanning.com/2014/05/judge-upholds-ban-in-child-pornography-case/
>
> http://glencanning.com/2014/03/rehtaeh-parsons-tragedy-interview-father-glen-canning/
>
> http://glencanning.com/2013/08/anatomy-of-a-troll/
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2014/05/glen-and-leahs-revenge-criminals-and.html
>
> Wednesday, May 7, 2014
>
> Glen And Leah's Revenge, Criminals And Fake Guns!
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 02:36:54 -0300
> Subject: RE Corrupt cops ignoring Sections 300 and 319 Sexual
> Harassment and Death threats and of course Glen Canning;s concern
> about Barry Winter and butt Buddy Patrick Doran
> To: "Ian.McPhail" <Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, premier
> <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, PREMIER
> <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, eachtem <eachtem@hotmail.com>, sunrayzulu
> <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, deanr0032 <deanr0032@hotmail.com>,
> windwalker838@gmail.com, msegal <msegal@murraysegal.com>, merricra
> <merricra@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.sk.ca>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, "steve.graham"
> <steve.graham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "roger.l.brown"
> <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bernadine.chapman"
> <bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, David Amos
> <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, frankffrost <frankffrost@hotmail.com>,
> grcanning@me.com, glen <glen@glencanning.com>, "david.fraser"
> <david.fraser@mcinnescooper.com>, sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca, oldmaison
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "rod.knecht" <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>,
> pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan"
> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: patrick_doran1@hotmail.com, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, leader
> <leader@greenparty.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>,
> "justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/03/yo-ian-mcphail-how-much-longer-are-rcmp.html
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/11/here-is-why-glen-canning-retheah.html
>
> Glen Canning and his RCMP pals know that even Mr Baconfat makes his
> real children puke in disgust and still they do NOTHING???
>
> https://www.facebook.com/glenfordcanning/posts/589614877746571
> Glen Canning
> BARRY WINTERS IP 24.71.223.10 sunrayzulu@shaw.ca from Edmonton AB
> claiming he has Rehtaeh Parsons rape photo. Please stop this
> pedophile!
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2013/08/oh-dear-outed-by-glen-canning.html
>
>
> Glen Canning The police spoke to him tonight. Guys just a loser
> looking for his 15 minutes.August 27, 2013 at 7:49pm · 2
>
> Walter McCulloch Walter Winters, is Barry Winters' late father.... Or
> me, once upon a time, before my mother changed my name after the
> divorce. what a vomit inducing why to find one's father. I'm glad I
> never new him. I'm going to be sick nowMarch 23 at 11:25am
>
>
> Walter McCulloch oh. I should mention by every account I have heard
> about him....He is a compulsive and pathological liar, and a wife and
> child beater.March 23 at 11:32am
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 23:43:08 -0300
> Subject: Re Suck it up buttercup! Yo Rod Knecht Methinks I will call
> your client Brent a manager of a Shoppers Drug Mart and inform him of
> Sections 200 and 319 of the CCof C
> To: sunrayzulu <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "rod.knecht"
> <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>, "David.Veitch"
> <David.Veitch@edmontonpolice.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> Tuesday, August 27, 2013
> "Suck it up buttercup!"
>
> Yo Amos, got phone call from cops. It seems they aren't too impressed
> with Mr. Canning or his complaint.
>
> Sorry to annoy but all happed here was a phone call.
>
> Suck it up butter cup
> Posted by Seren at 7:23 PM No comments:
>
> Hell you all know his REAL son Paul agrees with me about the PERVERT
> CORRECT?
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/re-anatomy-of-bad-dad-that.html
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/06/yo-mr-baconfat-your-pals-such-as-lt-col.html
>
> http://snipernco.blogspot.ca/2007/01/its-all-about-me.html
>
> Saturday, January 27, 2007
>
>
> "Its all about me"
>
> Mr. Paul N McCulloch once wrote this about Remembrance Day:
>
>
> Posted by snipernco at 11:50 AM
>
> 1 comment:
>
> P. McCulloch said...
> Ah Mr. Winters, you are a total fool.
>
> I still hate Remembrance Day, go on and hate me for that. But your
> remarks are nothing but rhetorical flourish, straw man, and ad hominem
> "arguments."
>
> One thing IS certain though, I certainly don't have any idea as to the
> stories of my grandfather and great-uncle. That is because YOU sir,
> refuse to tell them to me. You refuse to speak to your own children
> solely because they took until their mid 20s to start trying to look
> you up.
>
> Everything I see from you proves just one thing: that you are lying,
> racist, ignorant, trash.
>
> My comments refer to the useless and tired ceremonial of a bad
> holiday. This does not mean, as you seem to think, that I do not
> support Canadian military personnel.
>
> Lets not forget that you do not even know a thing about me beyond the
> text of my blog entry. Yet you dismiss my comments as nothing but
> ignorant stoner speak.
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/09/ms-blatchford-premier-dexter-ex-cop.html
>
> Clearly Mr Baconfat LOVES his blogging butt buddy Patty Baby Doran
> more than Lori Ink after he did not publish a Valentine to that racist
> bitch EH?
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2014/02/best-birthday-wishes.html
>
> Friday, February 14, 2014
> Best Birthday Wishes
> Mr. Patrick Doran
>
> It appears you and I share a birthday and both our birthdays are on
> flag day. Even though it is few hours short of this "stupendous"
> day...please accept my very best birthday wishes!
>
> Warm regards
>
> Barry
> Posted by Seren at 4:17 PM
>
> Need I say I have had enough of these nasty bastards?
>
> http://themadshangiblog.blogspot.ca/
>
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OFE2ucH8bs#aid=P-BxF7l-Lq8
> Published on Apr 11, 2013
>
> A Nova Scotia teen kills herself after an alleged rape/bullying
> scandal? Apparently, four boys raped her and posted pictures of the
> alleged rape online and spread them around to all her friends at
> school. According to RCMP, there wasn't enough evidence to make a
> case. What's really going on here?
>
> Follow me on TWITTER: TheMadShangi1
> E-mail: patrick_doran1@hotmail.com
> Skype: madshangi
> Facebook: Patrick John Doran
>
> http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/false-rape-culture/prove-your-allegations-glenn-canning/
>
> http://themadshangiblog.blogspot.ca/
>
> Monday, 24 February 2014How Glen Canning Can Help End His Bullshit
> Glen Canning is full of shit. I have no respect for a man who
> shamelessly exploited his own step-daughter's tragic suicide to serve
> his own twisted agenda. Yes, both Leah Parsons and Glen Canning had no
> qualms about using Rehtaeh Parsons' death for their 15 minutes of
> dubious fame. Canning has responded to my post on Men's Rights
> Edmonton's site.
>
> The title of this new post, is of course, called "How Men Can Help End
> Rape." It's not an original title, Feminists have been using that
> slogan since the first Toronto Slutwalks. Of course, it's only men
> that can help end rape, because as we all know - all men are rapists.
> It's a little too much to ask in this day and age, for women to take
> responsibility for their own safety. Why expect any accountability
> from the so-called "gentle sex" when men are too much of a convenient
> scapegoat for modern women's failures and insecurities. Glen writes:
>
> Shame is what sexual predators rely on. Next to alcohol it's their
> preferred WMD. What were you thinking, after all, being alone,
> dressing like that, drinking to much, trusting too much? You should
> have known better. You should have known what would happen. It's the
> same approach pedophiles use when they tell their victims "we're only
> doing what you want."
> I was invited to speak in Ottawa recently and share my thoughts on
> violence against women and the role men play. There are two things
> I've learned since my daughter, Rehtaeh Parsons, died last April and I
> began to speak at conferences and meetings. One, the audience will be
> almost all women, as it was in this case, and two, attempts to hurt
> and silence me suddenly appear when there's anything mentioned about
> Rehtaeh online or in social media. She's worm food because I'm a
> failure, according to one person's post. If I don't shut up I'll join
> her, says another. Some choose words so disgusting I can't bring
> myself to repeat them."
> So here right off the bat, Glen is setting the tone for the rest of
> his post. He's a victim. People are trying to silence and threaten
> him. The truth, as I already outlined in my previous post "A Response
> From Mr. Vengeance: Glen Canning's Dark Alter-Ego " Mr. Canning has a
> habit of seeking out critics that are skeptical of the official story
> the public was sold about his daughter's alleged "gang-rape." From
> changing stories, lack of evidence, and the dubious involvement of the
> group "Anonymous." There are plenty of solid reasons to doubt what we
> were being told. I remind the public, once again, that even though we
> were told matter-of-factly that Rehtaeh Parsons was "gang-raped,"
> there have been two investigations by the RCMP. There still wasn't
> sufficient evidence to proceed with criminal rape charges. In the
> interest of charging the alleged rapists with something. The best the
> crown could do was charge two boys with making and distributing child
> pornography.
>
> Glen continues:
>
>
> You see, according to them, Rehtaeh didn't die from being raped and
> bullied, she died because I'm a bad father. I knowingly let her smoke
> pot, drink vodka, and raised her to be flirtatious and promiscuous.
> Rehtaeh wasn't raped because someone raised their sons to be a
> rapists, she was raped because her father raised her to be raped.
>
> That's not what anybody claimed, you fucking scumbag. What was claimed
> was, due to the lack of evidence, there's reasonable doubt as to
> whether she was even raped at all. Remember, there had been two
> investigations. The reason why charges weren't laid the first time
> around was due to lack of evidence, Rehtaeh's changing stories, etc.
> There was even an eyewitness statement from a girl, who claimed
> Rehtaeh refused to leave the party, and was naked, flirting with the
> two boys (and not FOUR as we were constantly told). In fact, one of
> the boys that was previously identified by Anonymous as one of the
> "rapists," WASN'T EVEN AT THE FUCKING PARTY!
>
> Glen continues:
>
>
> Almost every time her name is mentioned in the news or in an article
> those anonymous posters show up with their fake usernames and who post
> all sorts of nonsense, innuendo, lies, misinformation and outright
> victim blaming. Rarely do they use real names and rarely are they
> women.
> I'm not sure why some people feel a need to weight in on issues they
> know little or nothing about.
> As members of the public that were being fed the misinformation coming
> directly from you and Leah Parsons, they have every right to speculate
> and ask questions.
>
>
> I reply if I can even though it's almost always futile. Some people
> just have the wrong information while others are so out to lunch I'm
> left wondering if they've read anything about this story at all.
> Patrick Doran of the Edmonton Men's Movement thinks I've been using a
> "victim-card" to silence critics in the "…years since Rehtaeh's
> death." It hasn't been a year yet Patrick.
> I try to not to get hooked. I honestly have bigger issues to deal with
> than a hand full of forgettable trolls. It's the people who say
> nothing I want to reach, the people who are shocked by this story and
> don't know, or don't realize, they have a part to play. Men mainly.
> Not the ones trolling rape stories; I'm talking about the good ones.
> Men with hearts, families, compassion, decency, and a sense of virtue.
> You are so full of shit, Glen. It is you who seeks these critics out,
> and when you don't get your way, that's when "Mr. Vengeance" your dark
> alter-ego shows up to threaten and harass. The fact you threaten to
> use Anonymous, the fact you conspire with others to have their blogs
> hacked - all for expressing their opinions on a story that has been
> made public, due to the heavy-handed propaganda coming directly from
> you and Leah Parsons. We wouldn't be talking about this story if it
> wasn't for the fact you used social media to hype up your claims that
> your daughter was gang-raped and that the RCMP just wanted to cover it
> up... because they're mean? Even after a second investigation and all
> the public scrutiny, there's still no rape charges. What does THAT
> tell you, Glen?
>
>
> We need to take an honest hard look at why we befriend rapists, why we
> believe them, allow them, tolerate them, and help them get away with
> the crimes they commit. We should be confronting them, exposing them,
> shunning them from our homes, families, teams, and places of
> employment. We need to use our voices to be a part of the solution and
> not let our silence continue to be part of the problem.
>
> We need to take an honest look at why the public so easily accepts
> whatever they are told without any fact-checking. How much longer will
> we tolerate media whores like Glen Canning, who openly threaten people
> and have the nerve to play the victim? Who use self-important jerkoff
> moralfags like Anonymous as their personal troll army? Quit saying
> things I don't like, or I'll get Anonymous to hack your blog. How much
> longer will we tolerate Anonymous naming people as "rapists" who
> weren't even involved at all?
>
> Posted by Patrick Doran at 09:44
>
>
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/03/yo-ian-mcphail-how-much-longer-are-rcmp.html
>
> Saturday, 8 March 2014
> YO Ian McPhail how much longer are the RCMP gonna protect their sick
> shills in Alberta such as Mr Baconfat, Patty Baby Doran and Dirty
> Dicky Dean????
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aq5Z8HWaHFM
>
> http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/false-rape-culture/prove-your-allegations-glenn-canning/
>
> http://www.mensrightsedmonton.com/support-your-allegations-glen-canning/
>
> http://www.mensrightsedmonton.com/a-response-from-mr-vengeance-glen-cannings-dark-alter-ego/
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2014/02/for-glen-cannings-lawyer.html
>
> Monday, February 24, 2014
> For Glen Canning's Lawyer
>
> I preface these comments with a question. How in the name of whatever
> Deity that may or might exist, can "Mother" Leah Parsons, and "Father"
> Glen Canning can claim, or go to bed at night thinking they did all
> they could do to prevent Rehtaeh's suicide? That they are not morally
> culpable. Do these people have a complete lack of moral fibre?
>
> Glen Canning wrote recently. "If he writes anything more about
> Rehtaeh, I'm going to talk to a civil lawyer." That is a fact, its on
> facebook." But it is also a fact I am not writing about Rehtaeh
> Parsons, nor ever have. Notwithstanding Mr. Canning's
> misrepresentations to his sycophants, my humble comments have nothing
> to do with "Saint" Rehtaeh of Parsons," but her parents whom I and
> many thousands of other Canadians feel were morally culpable, if not
> criminally negligent in their stewardship of young Rehtaeh's life.
>
> That's a fact, "the truth is a complete defense."
>
> Mr. Canning has personally committed frauds and committed crimes in
> the name of "Saint Rehtaeh of Parsons," including myself. Those
> crimes have just been reported to the RCMP K Division. Glen Canning
> armed with my wife's name he got from one David Amos. There upon he
> got pictures of myself from Mr.Amos' posts and created a Face Book
> page as Barry Winters. Mr, Canning there upon impersonated my myself
> to my wife to become "Face Book friends" with her, and gain access so
> her friends and family to threaten, harass and cajole them. but most
> just try to threaten me. It didn't work. As it didn't work when David
> Amos tried it, because I stand by every word I write.
>
> A number of his sycophants including Anonymous have threatened,
> harassed, and have committed frauds upon a very large number of
> people in Halifax and Canada whose only "offense" was they don't buy
> the clearly self serving "party line" spewed by Mr. Canning and Ms.
> Parsons. And they think it very bad parenting, if not insane, to
> permit a fourteen year old girl to engage in promiscuous behavior, and
> the abuse of drugs and alcohol. Mr. Canning et al, have abused anyone
> that had the "temerity" to speak out the truths, they find
> uncomfortable, including prominent national news columnists.
>
> Notwithstanding the platitudes he tells his sycophants on Face Book,
> how he is having difficulty in "letting go of" Rehtaeh, these have
> nothing to do with his years of mischief, but everything to do with
> harassing, and deliberately silencing a large number of people that
> feel Rehtaeh's parents' failure was a very large component in her
> suicide.
>
> Mr. Canning has threatened me with violence. I don't know if he has
> done that others, but Vengeance / Mr. Canning e mailed me that,"he had
> friends at CFB Edmonton looking for me and where I live to get me on
> his behalf."
> Interesting behavior from a "man" that has "reported" to the media
> multiple "death threats" against himself.
>
> So when Mr. Canning walks into a lawyer's office for his initial
> consultation it will have nothing to do with "litigation" but with
> the defense of himself against criminal charges. Not just from the
> criminal complaints of myself but a number of others, and Mr. Canning
> knows precisely who they are.
>
> Mr. Canning, I was over twenty years an infantry officer. Your "
> imaginary friends from CFB Edmonton"" or yourself couldn't harm me on
> the best day you louts ever had. Tell your lawyer that!
>
> Posted by Seren at 4:24 AM
>
> http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/glen-canning/rehtaeh-parsons-glen-canning_b_4846765.html
>
> Men Should Stand Up to Rapists, Not Befriend Them
> Posted: 02/25/2014 12:12 pm
>
> Shame is a powerful weapon.
>
> Shame is what sexual predators rely on. Next to alcohol it's their
> preferred WMD. What were you thinking, after all, being alone,
> dressing like that, drinking too much, trusting too much? You should
> have known better. You should have known what would happen. It's the
> same approach pedophiles use when they tell their victims "we're only
> doing what you want."
>
> I was invited to speak in Ottawa recently and share my thoughts on
> violence against women and the role men play. There are two things
> I've learned since my daughter, Rehtaeh Parsons, died last April and I
> began to speak at conferences and meetings. One, the audience will be
> almost all women, as it was in this case, and two, attempts to hurt
> and silence me suddenly appear when there's anything mentioned about
> Rehtaeh online or in social media. She's worm food because I'm a
> failure, according to one person's post. If I don't shut up I'll join
> her, says another. Some choose words so disgusting I can't bring
> myself to repeat them.
>
> You see, according to them, Rehtaeh didn't die from being raped and
> bullied, she died because I'm a bad father. I knowingly let her smoke
> pot, drink vodka, and raised her to be flirtatious and promiscuous.
> Rehtaeh wasn't raped because someone raised their sons to be a
> rapists, she was raped because her father raised her to be raped.
>
> Almost every time her name is mentioned in the news or in an article
> those anonymous posters show up with their fake usernames and post all
> sorts of nonsense, innuendo, lies, misinformation and outright victim
> blaming. Rarely do they use real names and rarely are they women.
>
> I'm not sure why some people feel a need to weigh in on issues they
> know little or nothing about. I reply if I can even though it's almost
> always futile. Some people just have the wrong information while
> others are so out to lunch. I'm left wondering if they've read
> anything about this story at all. Patrick Doran of the Edmonton Men's
> Movement thinks I've been using a "victim-card" to silence critics in
> the "...years since Rehtaeh's death." It hasn't been a year yet,
> Patrick.
>
> I try to not to get hooked. I honestly have bigger issues to deal with
> than a handful of forgettable trolls. It's the people who say nothing
> I want to reach, the people who are shocked by this story and don't
> know, or don't realize, they have a part to play. Men mainly. Not the
> ones trolling rape stories; I'm talking about the good ones. Men with
> hearts, families, compassion, decency and a sense of virtue.
>
> Rapists rely on other men to excuse and justify their crimes against
> women. Other men who'll laugh at their jokes, invite them to parties,
> play sports with them, introduce them to other women. Men who'll give
> them jobs, feed them, and help them blame their victims even if it's
> by indifference.
>
> Men, good men, need to stand up and do to rapists and their supporters
> what we do to child molesters. Imagine the difference it would make if
> a man who jokes about rape and always doubts victims entered a room to
> silence, whispers, stares, and looks of disgust from other men. That
> is what we need to do as men.
>
> We need to take an honest hard look at why we befriend rapists, why we
> believe them, allow them, tolerate them, and help them get away with
> the crimes they commit. We should be confronting them, exposing them,
> shunning them from our homes, families, teams, and places of
> employment. We need to use our voices to be a part of the solution and
> not let our silence continue to be part of the problem.
>
> There is a stigma attached to rape. A stigma centuries old, created by
> devils, used against their victims to hide awful deeds. It's time to
> put that stigma where it belongs. There is no difference between a man
> who rapes and a man who befriends and defends him.
>
> I tried to end my talk in Ottawa on a big note but couldn't find the
> right words. The message has been said many times already. It's time
> to stop talking and start doing. We're still in a place where a
> 16-year-old will write on Rehtaeh's Facebook page and wonder how she
> couldn't have known what happens to girls when they drink around boys.
> A place where young women ask what they can do to make sure they don't
> get raped.
>
> Truth is there's nothing they can do. Women who don't smoke pot get
> raped as do women who don't drink vodka and women with amazing
> fathers. I hate to think what some of those posters will say to
> themselves if someone they love ever gets raped because according to
> their logic it wasn't the rapists fault, it's the fault of the people
> who love the victim.
>
> https://mobile.twitter.com/PatrickJohnDora/status/442470608551424000?screen_name=PatrickJohnDora
>
> Glen Canning @GlenfordCanning 22 Feb
> The ethics of outing your rapist | Jill Filipovic
> ln.is/gu.com/p/3byne... via @guardian
> View details ·
>
> The Mad Shangi @PatrickJohnDora 22 Feb
> @GlenfordCanning @guardian What's the ethics behind outing your
> critics? mensrightsedmonton.com/support-your-a...
> View conversation ·
>
> Glen Canning @GlenfordCanning 22 Feb
> @PatrickJohnDora why are they hiding?
> View conversation ·
>
> The Mad Shangi @PatrickJohnDora 22 Feb
> @GlenfordCanning So you don't even deny you been using Anonymous to
> hack people's blogs for criticizing you?
> View conversation ·
>
> Glen Canning @GlenfordCanning 22 Feb
> @PatrickJohnDora whose blog was hacked?
> View conversation ·
>
> The Mad Shangi @PatrickJohnDora 23 Feb
> @GlenfordCanning You went to David Amos and claimed you were trying to
> get Anonymous to hack MrBaconFat53's blog.
> View conversation ·
>
> David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos 28m
> @PatrickJohnDora @GlenfordCanning @DaviRayAmos NONE of you know how to
> even act ethical huffingtonpost.ca/glen-canning/r...
> View conversation ·
>
> The Mad Shangi
> @PatrickJohnDora
> @DavidRayAmos @GlenfordCanning Oh did you just show up for the circle jerk?
> 10:23 p.m. Sat, Mar 8
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: BARRY WINTERS <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 22:45:36 -0700 (MST)
> Subject: Re: YO Ian McPhail Remember Complaint # 2013-2824 with The
> Commission for Public Complaints against RCMP????
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, RBauer
> <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, "james.dinkins" <james.dinkins@dhs.gov>,
> "james.dinkins" <james.dinkins@ice.dhs.gov>, "craig.callens"
> <craig.callens@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Barry.Kennedy"
> <Barry.Kennedy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Todd Learning
> <Todd.Learning@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, nathan fox
> <nathan.fox@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Rod.Booth" <Rod.Booth@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> richard dejong <richard.dejong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, lesley smith
> <lesley.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, "roger.l.brown"
> <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan"
> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Birgit@thevalleysentinel.com,
> donalda@thevalleysentinel.com, The Disinfector
> <thedisinfector@hotmail.com>, goatnewspaper <goatnewspaper@gmail.com>,
> "Darren.Woroshelo" <Darren.Woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "brad.anderson"
> <brad.anderson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Glen Canning <grcanning@me.com>, Brady
> Knezacek <Brady.Knezacek@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Shawn <Shawn@nfa.ca>,
> lgunter <lgunter@shaw.ca>, "joshua.skurnik"
> <joshua.skurnik@hotmail.com>, "Pete.Berndsen"
> <Pete.Berndsen@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "jennifer.johnston"
> <jennifer.johnston@gov.bc.ca>, "Ian.McPhail"
> <Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, editor@pgfreepress.com, radical
> <radical@radicalpress.com>, "Geoffrey.McDonald"
> <Geoffrey.McDonald@gov.bc.ca>, yuri <yuri@unb.ca>, "Kent.Kryzanowski"
> <Kent.Kryzanowski@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Paul.Collister"
> <Paul.Collister@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
> David Amos is delighted to fuck each and everyone of you up the ass!
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: "craig.callens" <craig.callens@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Barry.Kennedy"
> <Barry.Kennedy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Todd Learning"
> <Todd.Learning@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "nathan fox"
> <nathan.fox@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Rod.Booth" <Rod.Booth@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "richard dejong" <richard.dejong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "lesley smith"
> <lesley.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, "roger.l.brown"
> <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan"
> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Birgit@thevalleysentinel.com,
> donalda@thevalleysentinel.com, "The Disinfector"
> <thedisinfector@hotmail.com>, "goatnewspaper"
> <goatnewspaper@gmail.com>, "Darren.Woroshelo"
> <Darren.Woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "brad.anderson"
> <brad.anderson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "sunrayzulu" <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>,
> "Glen Canning" <grcanning@me.com>, "Brady Knezacek"
> <Brady.Knezacek@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Shawn" <Shawn@nfa.ca>, "lgunter"
> <lgunter@shaw.ca>, "joshua.skurnik" <joshua.skurnik@hotmail.com>,
> "Pete.Berndsen" <Pete.Berndsen@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "jennifer.johnston"
> <jennifer.johnston@gov.bc.ca>, "Ian.McPhail"
> <Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, editor@pgfreepress.com, "radical"
> <radical@radicalpress.com>, "Geoffrey.McDonald"
> <Geoffrey.McDonald@gov.bc.ca>, "yuri" <yuri@unb.ca>,
> "Kent.Kryzanowski" <Kent.Kryzanowski@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Paul.Collister"
> <Paul.Collister@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "RBauer"
> <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, "james.dinkins" <james.dinkins@dhs.gov>,
> "james.dinkins" <james.dinkins@ice.dhs.gov>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 8:42:28 PM
> Subject: YO Ian McPhail Remember Complaint # 2013-2824 with The
> Commission for Public Complaints against RCMP????
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:39:26 -0400
> Subject: YO Ian McPhail Re: The Commission for Public Complaints
> against RCMP - #2013-2824
> To: Sheldon <Sheldon@nfa.ca>, Blair <Blair@nfa.ca>, "steve.graham"
> <steve.graham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
> <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "steve.murphy"
> <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 03:44:52 -0300
> Subject: YO Ian McPhail Re: The Commission for Public Complaints
> against RCMP - #2013-2824
> To: PCC Complaints <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "Ian.McPhail"
> <Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
> <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "roger.l.brown"
> <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, warren <warren@daisygroup.ca>, jacques
> boucher <jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> Gunther.Schonfeldt@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, rusun@un.int,
> john.adams@queensu.ca, John.Forster@cse-cst.gc.ca,
> td.ombudsman@td.com, christopher.montague@td.com,
> Frank.McKenna@td.com, Glenn.Greenwald@guardian.co.uk,
> info@praxisfilms.org, birgittaj@althingi.is
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>,
> enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk, sarah.chapman@fsa.gov.uk,
> ambassador@brasilemb.org, slrc@itamaraty.gov.br
>
> WOW Ya think somebody within the "Five Eyes" would finally do their
> job now EH Glen Greenwald and the President Rousseff'?
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: PCC Complaints <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:59:52 +0000
> Subject: The Commission for Public Complaints against RCMP - #2013-2824
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This is further to your recent communications with the Commission.
> From September 18, 2013 to the present, our office has received 6
> electronic messages from you. Many of these e-mails are not related to
> RCMP conduct.
>
> On October 1, 2013, you called our office and spoke with an Intake
> Officer. You wished to enquire about three complaint files. When the
> Intake Officer attempted to inform you that you have three enquiry
> files with the Commission, you became agitated and insisted otherwise.
> You raised your voice and spoke over the Intake Officer. You then
> demanded the name of the Intake Officer, and subsequently yelled "see
> you in federal court" and hung up the telephone line.
>
> As a reminder, we request that all future correspondence with our
> office must be courteous in tone and that you are respectful of the
> requests that are made of you. While it is clearly not the intention
> of the Commission to prevent you from making complaints against
> members of the RCMP, your recent emails and telephone call have been
> unproductive for both you and for Commission staff. In the future, we
> request that all communication with our office be respectful in
> language and related to our mandate. In the event that this request
> is not respected, the Commission will consider imposing restrictions
> on how you may communicate with our office.
>
> Should you have a complaint about a specific RCMP member surrounding a
> specific incident, I invite you to visit the Commission's website
> (www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca<http://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca>) to submit an online
> complaint, rather than to send an email that is difficult to follow or
> a copy of a letter you have sent to many others. The complaint form
> will guide you through the information required that will enable the
> Commission to process your complaint. Should you have difficulty in
> accessing the complaint form and wish to have one sent to you, you may
> provide your mailing address and a form will be mailed to you via
> Canada Post.
>
> I would also invite you to send your correspondence regarding any new
> or existing complaints (quoting the appropriate Commission file
> number) by letter mail to:
>
> Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP
> National Intake Office
> PO Box 88689
> Surrey, BC V3W 0X1
>
> Yours truly,
>
> Günther Schönfeldt
> Intake Officer / Agent d'information de liaison
> Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP /
> Commission des plaintes du public contre la Gendarmerie royale du Canada
> Tel/Tél : 1-800-665-6878 | Fax/Téléc : (604) 501-4095
> complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca<mailto:complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
>
>
>
> [Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CCF6DA.65AE7FE0]
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: !enquiries <enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:56:26 +0100
> Subject: IPCC Reference: 2013/015918
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Dear Mr Amos
>
> I acknowledge receipt of 4 emails at the Independent Police Complaints
> Commission (IPCC) earlier today.
>
> I note from our records that you have been advised on the IPCC remit,
> as well as spoken with one of my colleagues in the customer contact
> team. It remains unclear from your emails what your complaint against
> the police is. This may be because you refer to a number of other
> organisations, or matters outside of the IPCC's remit.
>
> If you wish to make a complaint against the police you should provide
> these details to either the IPCC or the relevant police force's
> professional standards department (PSD).
>
> The IPCC does not investigate allegations of crime(s) committed by
> members of the public, nor can we direct a police force to commence an
> investigation into such.
>
> If you have any queries about the IPCC's remit or the complaints
> process please contact us. However, emails to the IPCC that fall
> outside of our remit will be read and filed, but may not be responded
> to.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Elly Goodman
> Customer Contact Adviser
> Independent Police Complaints Commission
> Tel: 0300 020 0096
> Email: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
>
>
> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in
> partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On
> leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
> and/or recorded for legal purposes.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Talk about pissing a guy off. EH Ian McPhail? What planet do CROWN's
> bureaucrats come from anyway?
>
> Need I say BULLSHIT once again??? The other CROWN Corp commonly know
> as the CBC often puts that word over our airwaves so that can't be
> offensive. That said I bet the call was recorded If so I demand a copy
> ASAP. Next time I call I will record the call myself.
>
> I must ask did the oh so silent boss Ian MacPhail and his buddy Bob
> Paulson about the Yankee wiretap tapes being evidence of MURDER?
> Better check the Canadian Ciminal Code about assisting in the cover up
> of such crimes EH?
>
> As for the call I remember it like it was yesterday. Howcome it took
> Günther Schönfeldt three weeks to dream up the same sort of response I
> got in 2007??? The first thing I did was ask for him and the woman
> claimed he was not avaible and offered to help. She started out quite
> nice but as soon as she admited that there was only a faxed complaint
> in November of 2003 and that it did not warrant an answer I told her
> to look some more. She got fairly argumentive and did not wish to
> discuss the complaint I sent in August of 2005 (It appeared to me that
> she read something in my file) I gave up and asked her name when she
> got to snarky and she refused to give other than "Nora" So I said Cya
> in Federal Court and hung up. The I sent your buddy Bob Paulson and
> YOU Ian McPhail a Motherload of emails but I did only sent your
> mindless bureaucrats six that were largely unrelated if they did not
> know how to read deep.
>
> However your Commission should not deny that I argued with its former
> lawyer/boss Shirley Heafey about the aforesaid compliant in 2005
> within emails sent to many Parliamentarians months for a I ran for a
> sent Parliament again and she was replaced by the lawyer Paul Kennedy.
> (The lawyer Heafey and your Commission always denied that complaint
> existed until your office sent me a similar bullshit email after Mike
> Murphy a former Minister of Health and later another former Attorney
> General asked Deputy Commissioner Steve Graham to investigate my
> concerns.
>
> In return the Graham got transferred to Nova Scotia and RCMP falsely
> arrested REMEMBER Stevey Boy Harper?
>
> As I said Cya'll in Federal Court
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 1 902 800 0369
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>
> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
> Senator Arlen Specter
> United States Senate
> Committee on the Judiciary
> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
> Washington, DC 20510
>
> Dear Mr. Specter:
>
> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
> raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
> these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
> contact with you about this previously.
>
> Very truly yours,
> Barry A. Bachrach
> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Lisa Porteous <lporteous@kleinlyons.com>
> Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 14:46:22 +0000
> Subject: RCMP
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> David,
>
> Thank you for your email inquiring about our class action against the
> RCMP. As you may know, the Notice of Claim was filed in the British
> Columbia Supreme Court on March 27, 2012. The lawsuit has been
> brought by former RCMP constable Janet Merlo on behalf of female RCMP
> members. Unfortunately, we cannot assist you with your claim.
>
> We recommend that you contact Mr. Barry Carter of Mair Jensen Blair
> LLP to discuss any claim you may have against the RCMP for harassment.
> His contact information is as follows:
>
> Mr. Barry Carter
> Mair Jensen Blair LLP
> 1380-885 W. Georgia Street
> Vancouver, BC V6C 3E8
> Phone: 604-682-6299
> Fax 1-604-374-6992
>
> This is not intended to be an opinion concerning the merits of your
> case. In declining to represent you, we are not expressing an opinion
> as to whether you should take further action in this matter.
>
> You should be aware that there may be strict time limitations within
> which you must act in order to protect your rights. Failure to begin
> your lawsuit by filing an action within the required time may mean
> that you could be barred forever from pursuing a claim. Therefore, you
> should immediately contact another lawyer ( as indicated above) to
> obtain legal advice/representation.
>
> Thank you again for considering our firm.
>
> Yours truly,
>
> Lisa Porteous
> Case Manager/Paralegal
>
> lporteous@kleinlyons.com
> www.kleinlyons.com
>
> KLEIN * LYONS
> Suite 400-1385 West 8th Avenue
> Vancouver BC V6H 3V9 Canada
> Office 604.874.7171
> Fax 604.874.7180
> Direct 604.714.6533
>
> This email is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
> privilege. It is intended only for the use of the person to whom it is
> addressed. Any distribution, copying or other use by anyone else is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
> telephone us immediately and destroy this e-mail.
>
> üPlease consider the environment before printing this email.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> To: <Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>; <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>; "toewsv1"
> <toewsv1@mts.net>; "danfour" <danfour@myginch.com>
> Cc: <nelson.kalil@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>; "rmordenassoc"
> <rmordenassoc@rogers.com>; <warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "warren"
> <warren@daisygroup.ca>; "warren.dosko" <warren.dosko@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
> "Paulette. Delaney-Smith" <Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
> "WaterWarCrimes" <waterwarcrimes@gmail.com>; "robin reid"
> <zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>; "tony" <tony@peoplestandup.ca>;
> "Ken.Zielke" <Ken.Zielke@gov.ab.ca>
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:18 PM
> Subject: Attn Commissioner Ian McPhail QC I called again and tried to
> speak to you twice today my number is 902 800 0369
>
>
> http://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/nrm/nr/2010/20100126-eng.aspx
>
> As I said I am very serious and have no wish to speak to the likes of
> Ms Leduc EVER again FYI I see that the gossip about my concerns is
> leaking out here there an everywhere following this note is just
> couple of the reasons why I called an tried hard to speak to you again
> today
>
> Please don't try to tell me that your office does not know what
> happened between the RCMP and I within weeks of my sending the email
> immedialy below this note.
>
> If perhaps you people should read some blogs an watch some YOUTUBES ASAP?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>
> http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2008/07/david-amos-picked-up-by-rcmp.html
>
> http://govinjustice.blogspot.com/2008/07/david-amos-picked-up-by-rcmp.html
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/07/feds-institutionalize-determined-nb.html
>
> http://www.leadershipdirectories.com/images/promo/FTC.pdf
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 15,116
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 164.62.7.# (Federal Trade Commission)
> ISP Federal Trade Commission
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : District of Columbia
> City : Washington
> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 7.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727;
> .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1920 x 1200
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Aug 18 2010 1:50:29 pm
> Last Page View Aug 18 2010 2:01:49 pm
> Visit Length 11 minutes 20 seconds
> Page Views 2
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...i=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
> Search Engine google.com
> Search Words "david amos" canada parliament
> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....eblower-part-1b.html
> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....eblower-part-1b.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Aug 18 2010 7:50:29 am
> Visit Number 15,116
>
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 11,630
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 199.212.215.# (DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE)
> ISP DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Ontario
> City : Ottawa
> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> Language English (Canada)en-ca
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 12:50:37 pm
> Last Page View Aug 13 2010 12:52:15 pm
> Visit Length 1 minute 38 seconds
> Page Views 7
> Referring URL
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...3/ides-of-march.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-8:00
> Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 8:50:37 am
> Visit Number 11,630
>
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 11,638
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 199.212.150.# (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)
> ISP Royal Canadian Mounted Police
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Ontario
> City : Ottawa
> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 6.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1;
> INFOWEB-APPROVED; INFOWEB-APPROVED-IE6-FR; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR
> 2.0.50727; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 5:52:40 pm
> Last Page View Aug 13 2010 5:52:40 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.blogger.c...15428735081915360609
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 4:52:40 pm
> Visit Number 11,638
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 11,639
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 199.212.215.# (DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE)
> ISP DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Ontario
> City : Ottawa
> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> Language English (Canada) en-ca
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1466 x 916
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 5:52:51 pm
> Last Page View Aug 13 2010 5:52:51 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-8:00
> Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 1:52:51 pm
> Visit Number 11,639
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:34:30 -0300
> Subject: Attn PAULINE PHILIBERT and ARNOLD HADLEY of the New Brunswick
> Police Commission
> To: nbpc@gnb.ca, arnold.hadley@gnb.ca, john.foran@gnb.ca,
> premier@gnb.ca, Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
> Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca
> Cc: webo@xplornet.com
>
> New Brunswick Police Commission
> 435 King Street
> Fredericton, New Brunswick
> E3B 1E5
>
> A letter to support my complaint about various police forces in New
> Brunswick will follow these emails just as I promised on the phone to
> you people today.
>
> I have no understanding as to why the Police Commission nor anyone
> else holding a governmental mandate in the Province of New Brunswick
> has never called me back or answered one email in nearly four years.
> Shawn Graham should at least recognize his own documents to my framer
> friend, Werner Bock from the time when he sat in opposition and was
> the agricutural critic at the same time .
>
> It appears to me that I am not the only one to get mad at the
> malicious incompetence of John Foran and the cops of New Brunswick.
> What is even more interesting though is the fact that John Foran was
> once mad at the Police Commission and they way they investigated
> things so secretly against the public's best interests. EH Mr. Volpe?
> Rest assured that I ain't holding my breath for the police to continue
> to harass me anymore after their nonsense yesterday. Nor will I wait
> to see Wayne Steeves say or do the right thing after he has covered up
> my concerns about the severe lack of police integrity for his politcal
> party's benefit for four god damned years.
>
> http://www.canlii.org/eliisa/highlight.do?text=JOHN+FORAN+WILSON+MacINTOSH&language=en&searchTitle=Search+all+CanLII+Databases&path=/en/nb/nbqb/doc/1995/1995canlii3862/1995canlii3862.html
>
> For the recod these Youtubes that are this arseholes favoutites were
> created by the RCMP and I have no doubt whatsoever the people
> slandering me are cops as well.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0NdNtvC-YI#GU5U2spHI_4
>
> http://www.youtube.com/user/bigolcanoworms
>
> At least his ID is correct. This is a big old can of worms. N'est Pas?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:17:05 -0300
> Subject: Perhaps Paul Kennedy the current Commissioner of Public
> Complaints Against the RCMP will call us back now EH?
> To: Hermenegilde.Chiasson@gnb.ca, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca,
> scotta@parl.gc.ca, Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca, Holland.M@parl.gc.ca,
> Hubbard.C@parl.gc.ca, jonesr@cbc.ca, nbombud@gnb.ca,
> Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca, T.J.Burke@gnb.ca, roly.macintyre@gnb.ca,
> aleblanc.mla@nb.aibn.com, eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca, brian.kenny@gnb.ca,
> roy.boudreau@gnb.ca, donald.arseneault@gnb.ca, danf@danf.net,
> injusticecoalition@hotmail.com, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> stuart.jamieson@gnb.ca, Margaret-Ann.BLANEY@gnb.ca,
> victor.boudreau@gnb.ca, rick.brewer@gnb.ca,
> John.Ferguson@saintjohn.ca, Ivan.Court@saintjohn.ca
> Cc: complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com,
> newsroom@nbpub.com, carl.davies@gnb.ca, janet.trail@gnb.ca,
> Akoschany@ctv.ca, jtravers@thestar.ca, alan_white@cbc.ca,
> Tim.Porter@gnb.ca, Trevor.HOLDER@gnb.ca, bev.harrison@gnb.ca,
> Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca, Jody.CARR@gnb.ca, Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca,
> David.ALWARD@gnb.ca, bruce.noble@fredericton.ca,
> lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca
>
> Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 13:36:41 -0400
> From: "PCC Complaints" complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> May 23, 2007
>
> File No. PC-2005-1291
>
> Mr. David R Amos
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> On a number of occasions you have called or sent e-mails our office to
> raise matters which are of pressing concern to you.
>
> Each time we have tried to respond by explaining to you the relatively
> narrow mandate of this Commission and the limits of our powers to deal
> with the matters which are of concern to you. I must stress, once
> again, that the purpose of this Commission is to provide the public
> with an opportunity to make complaints concerning the conduct of
> members of the RCMP in the performance of their duties. We have
> neither the expertise nor the legal authority to permit us to become
> involved in issues beyond the scope of this mandate.
>
> While it is clearly not the intention of the Commission to prevent you
> from making complaints against members of the RCMP, an analysis of
> your numerous contacts with the Commission indicates that your
> concerns fall well outside the confines of our mandate. Further, your
> frequent e-mails have been disruptive and unproductive for both you
> and for the staff of this office.
>
> Should you determine that some point in the future you have a
> complaint concerning the conduct of a member of the RCMP in the
> performance of his or her duties, please submit it to the Commission
> by Canada Post only. As of now, your e-mails will be deleted unread.
>
> Yours truly,
>
> Andrée Leduc
> Enquiries and Complaints Analyst
>
> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Say hey to Shawn Murphy for me will ya
> Brian?
> Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 15:25:45 -0400
> From: "REVIEWS" reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
> To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> The Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP has received
> your e-mail message and will be responding in due course.
>
> La Commission des plaintes du public contre la GRC a reçu votre
> courriel et vous rendra une réponse au moment opportun.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
>
> January 30, 2007
>
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP "J" Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,
> John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
> "Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off over
> the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I was not
> ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear that
> Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and the
> US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment policing in
> Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
> From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> Subject: RE: Just so you know
> To: HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, gemerson@tor.fasken.com,
> jgrant@baseconsulting.ca,
> rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca, mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca, csae@csae.com,
> kim.keith@rci.rogers.com, jduncan@tor.fasken.com, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca,
> ahamilton@casselsbrock.com, jm@jmellon.com, treasurer@casis.ca,
> jbronskill@cp.org, RTRiley6@cs.com, pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
> dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca,
> linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca, janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca,
> robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca, Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca,
> arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca, nancy.taillon@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
> CC: info.com@chrc-ccdp.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, Scott.A@parl.gc.ca,
> radionews@mpbc.org, publisher@whatsup.nb.ca, kjamerson@wagmtv.com,
> kbabin@globaltv.ca, jfoster@globaltv.ca, atvnews@ctv.ca, cmorris@cp.org,
> info@ccna.ca, kbissett@broadcastnews.ca, bdnmail@bangordailynews.net,
> ehutton@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, argosy@mta.ca,
> sylvain.martel@csn.qc.ca, events@cpac.ca, mmacdonald@cp.org,
> crgeditor@yahoo.com, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca
>
> No need to Bitch.
> I am about to sue ya anyway but you did receive the same material
> that everybody else got by email anyway. However now I will now
> forward the other emails that various silly servants got after I had
> had many talks with your incompetant and malicious assistants within
> the Commission over the past two years. It seems that I had to insult
> you and bust you in front of your friends to finally get a response
> from you.
> Furthermore on August 2nd I sent you your material byway of the
> US Mail which was received and signed for. It was hard copy of my
> concerns and allegations about you being in bed with the corrupt old
> bastard Zack of the RCMP. I also sent a copy of wiretap tape # 139.
> Instead of you acting within the scope of your employment you go on
> vacation and bury your head in the sand while the RCMP assisted the
> Yankees in throwing my wife and kids into the street without due
> process of law?
> Well your head may be in still the sand but you just stuck your
> arse high up in the air. It is high time for me to give it a boot
> before you stick it up Zack's ass in a vain effort to appear that you
> have integrity after all. The following is the text of that letter and
> after that is the US Mail's confirmation of when it was sent and
> received by you.
> Say hey to McLachlin for me will ya? Tell her I will be suing her
> too. She has been covering up for the crooked Newfy Judge Dereck Green
> for way past too long. To hell with lawyers appointed as commissioners
> and other lawyers appointed as judges. From my point of view they were
> only appointed to cover up public corruption. I look forward to
> meeting the likes of you in court and arguing you on the public
> record. You just proved for me that most lawyers ain't that smart. You
> should have continued to play dumb Bitch. At least then you could have
> blamed your assistants for not telling you what you obviously know.
> however if you had done so, I would have pointed to the fact that you
> are their supervisor and therefore ultimatly responsible. Everybody
> else knows that the RCMP are as crooked as hell, so do you. call me a
> liar now. I double dog dare ya.
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
>
> July 31st, 2005
>
> Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin,
> C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and
> Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay
> Canadian Judicial Council
> 150 Metcalfe Street,
> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8
>
> Shirley Heafey
> Chair of Commission
> for Public Complaints against the RCMP
> P.O. Box 3423
> Station &quo t;D"
> Ottawa,
> ON K1P 6L4
>
>
> RE: Rampant Public Corruption
>
> Hey,
> Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and
> various underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public
> Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and
> emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by
> every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a
> copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as
> officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
> As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest
> Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little
> trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the
> ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to
> answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.
>
> I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending
> to you byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving
> identical material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell
> them I gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter.
> All that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
> mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes.
> However I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material
> than what Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact
> the same material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky
> Boy McKenna in particular received, while I was up home running for
> Parliament last year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so
> I have also included a few recent items to spice thing up for you.
>
> I am tired of trying to convince people employed in law enforcement
> to uphold the law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own
> conscience
> and be careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
> assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse to
> the law or me.
>
> Veritas Vincit
>
> David R. Amos
>
> 153 Alvin Ave
>
> Milton, MA. 02186
>
> Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 484U S
> Detailed Results:
>
>
> [IMAGE]
> [IMAGE]
> Bullet
> Delivered Abroad, August 11, 2005, 6:49 am, CANADA
> Bullet
> Out of Foreign Customs, August 08, 2005, 2:37 pm, CANADA
> Bullet
> Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
> Bullet
> Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
> Bullet
> International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 8:32 am, KENNEDY AMC
> Bullet
> Enroute, August 03, 2005, 8:30 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
> Bullet
> Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:40 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
>
> "Heafey, Shirley" <HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca> wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Heafey, Shirley"<HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
> Sent: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:10:00 -0400
> To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: Just so you know
>
> Just so you know, there was no message attached to the e-mail sent to
> me. SO, in fact, I don't know what you think I should now know.
>
> Try again.
>
> SH
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 1:24 PM
>>To: gemerson@tor.fasken.com; jgrant@baseconsulting.ca;
> rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca; mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca;
> csae@csae.com; kim.keith@rci.rogers.com; jduncan@tor.fasken.com;
> Moore.R@parl.gc.ca; ahamilton@casselsbrock.com
> Cc: Zeman, Arnold; jm@jmellon.com; Taillon, Nancy; treasurer@casis.ca;
> jbronskill@cp.org; RTRiley6@cs.com; pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca;
> dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca; Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca;
> linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca; janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
> barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca;
> robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca; Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca; Heafey, Shirley
> Subject: Just so you know
>
> CSIS can never say they didn't know. This should put Shirley Heafey's
> panties in a knot when she get back from her vacation. I can only
> wonder what Ms. Longo of the RCMP is saying about now.
>
> "Zeman, Arnold" <Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca> wrote:
>
> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: For the record Joan I did talk to
> your boss Abrahamson yesterday and more people you know today
> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:16:11 -0400
> From: "Zeman, Arnold" <Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca>
> To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> This is an automatic reply. I'm away froom the office and will return
> on Monday September 26,2005. If you need information before then,
> please contact Marie-France Kingsley at 990-6306.
> ************************************
> Ceci est une réponse automatique. Je serai de retour au bureau le
> lundi 26 septembre 2005. Si vous avez besoin d'aide, veuillez
> communiquer avec Marie-France Kingsley au 990-6306.
> *******************************
> A. W. Zeman
> Assistant Inspector General of CSIS /
> Inspecteur général adjoint du SCRS
> 340 Laurier Avenue West / 340, avenue Laurier ouest
> Ottawa ON K1A 0P8
> phone / tél : (613) 990-8274
> fax / télécopieur : (613) 990-8303
> email / courriel : arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
> ********************************
>
>
>
>
> http://voices-voix.ca/en/facts/profile/paul-kennedy
>
> Paul Kennedy
>
> What Happened
> Paul Kennedy was removed as head of the Commission for Public
> Complaints (CPC) regarding the RCMP after he advocated a more powerful
> and independent Commission. He sought adequate funding for
> investigations, increased accountability and improved service
> standards. The Harper government appointed a Conservative Party ally
> to replace him.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Paul Kennedy was appointed Chair of the Commission for Public
> Complaints (CPC) Against the RCMP in 2005. He was re-appointed for
> three more one-year terms in 2006, 2007 and 2008.
>
> Throughout his tenure, Kennedy was known as a relentless advocate for
> a more independent CPC. He believed that the CPC relied too heavily on
> the cooperation of senior RCMP officials, and was too limited in
> independent power to probe the RCMP's activities, or to inquire into
> witnesses' testimonials and to demand the production of documents as
> evidence.
>
> Kennedy also advocated for better funding to oversee the RCMP so that
> the CPC could investigate more cases and investigate them thoroughly.
> He argued that the CPC's budget of $5.2 million paled in comparison to
> the RCMP's $4.1 billion budget.
>
> Public Safety Minister Peter Van Loan cut Kennedy's budget by $600,000
> in 2009, seriously limiting the scope of the CPC's investigations.
>
> Kennedy did get funding for the high-profile investigation into RCMP
> involvement in the tasering death of Polish immigrant Robert
> Dzienkanski at the Vancouver International Airpoirt in 2007, and his
> work to reform RCMP policies on taser use. But that funding was only
> made available temporary. Similar investigations in future might not
> get the funding they need given the small size of the CPC's budget.
>
> Media sources have reported clashes between Kennedy and the
> Conservative government during Kennedy's time as head of CPC. He was
> ridiculed by Conservative officials for his stance that Mounties' work
> requires proper review and that access to evidence and witnesses was
> necessary in order to ensure accountability. Although the government
> has promised reform monitoring of the RCMP, this promise was not kept
> during Kennedy's tenure.
>
> Kennedy had other successes: during his tenure, the RCMP was under
> public pressure to modify training and operational procedures. The
> commission now regularly conducts reviews of RCMP activities and their
> policies in self-investigation. Kennedy also addressed investigations
> of death and verbal abuse involving RCMP officers, and proposed
> legislative and policy changes to avoid conflicts of interest.
>
> Kennedy's final weeks in office were marked by the release of a report
> strongly critical of the conduct of the RCMP officers involved in the
> death of Robert Dziekanski. The RCMP would go on to accept all but one
> of the findings in Kennedy's CPC report, and address the report's
> recommendations, eventually creating an Office of Professional
> Integrity, as well as a new policy to ensure independent and impartial
> investigation of RCMP employees.
>
> However, in November 2009, Public Safety Minister Peter Van Loan's
> office notified Kennedy that he would not be re-appointed after his
> contract terminated that December. Kennedy had been prepared to serve
> another term.
>
> In January 2010, Ian McPhail, a long-time contributor to the
> Conservative Party, was appointed interim chair of the CPC. McPhail
> was a real-estate lawyer with some limited experience on other
> commissions. Observers felt McPhail lacked the experience required
> head the CPC. McPhail's appointment was seen by Paul Kennedy and
> others as a wholly partisan move, that placed a strong Conservative
> ally in an important watchdog position. The replacement of Kennedy
> with McPhail has been criticized as an attempt to silence Kennedy's
> criticism of the RCMP, thereby reducing accountability of the RCMP to
> the government and the public.
>
> In January 2010, Kennedy made an appearance on Parliament Hill to
> express concerns about the fate of civilian oversight bodies under the
> Harper government. He was joined by two other watchdogs who the
> government had removed for dubious reasons: Peter Tinsley, who had
> been the Military Police Complaints Commissioner; and Linda Keen,
> former President of Canada's nuclear safety regulator.
>
> Kennedy has said the government was not willing to let the CPC fulfill
> its intended purpose. He has also called on the government to
> institute a fixed term for which a commissioner is appointed, so that
> people who have a job to do on behalf of the public don't end up
> essentially working for the governing party.
>
> In 2011 the new Minister of Public Safety, Vic Toews, re-appointed
> McPhail as head of the CPC for another year.
>
> Relevant Dates:
> October 2005: Paul Kennedy is appointed Chair of the Commission for
> Public Complaints (CPC) against the RCMP.
> October 2007: Robert Dziekanski dies after being tasered by an RCMP
> officer at the Vancouver International airport; Kennedy strongly
> criticizes the way the situation was handled.
> December 2008: Paul Kennedy is reappointed for another 1-year term as
> Chair of the CPC, until December 31, 2009
> August 11, 2009: Kennedy calls for policy changes to enhance
> accountability of the RCMP.
> November 18 2009: The government tells Kennedy his contract will not
> be renewed.
> December 8, 2009: Kennedy publishes a report criticizing some of the
> RCMP's actions.
> January 24, 2010: The government appoints Ian McPhail as interim Chair
> of the CPC.
> January 26, 2010: Paul Kennedy, Peter Tinsley and Linda Keen hold a
> press conference, expressing their concern over the government's
> silencing of watchdogs.
> February 4, 2010: The RCMP announces a new policy to ensure
> independent and impartial investigations of its employees.
> Role or Position
> Paul Kennedy was Chair of the Commission for Public Complaints (CPC)
> Against the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) from 2005 to 2009.
>
> Implications and Consequences
> Transparency: The removal of Kennedy means the loss of a qualified
> civil servant with over thirty five years experience in public
> service, with a proven track record of creating change for increased
> accountability.
> Democracy: The effectiveness and independence of watchdog
> organizations are compromised when leaders are appointed to short
> one-years terms and removed at will by politicians. The slashing of
> the CPC budget means in practice that there will be minimal oversight
> of the RCMP.
> Democracy: If public officials are removed and replaced whenever they
> threaten to hold the government to account, the strength of our
> democracy is diminished.
> Photo: CTV News
>
> Sources
> "CPC Chair responds to the RCMP Commissioner's letter...," Paul
> Kennedy, CPC against the RCMP, 16 December 2009
> "CPC Report on the death of Mr. Dziekanski," William Elliott, RCMP, 10
> February 2011
> "Former RCMP watchdog warns commission heads liable to sway," Janice
> Tibbests, CanWest News Services, 4 January 2010
> "Former watchdogs speak out on Harper government," Susan Delacourt,
> The Star, 26 January 2010
> "Harper Government Names Realtor as RCMP Watchdog," Nathan Griffiths,
> InformedVote.ca, 1 February 2010
> "Ottawa names interim RCMP watchdog," Colin Freeze, The Globe and
> Mail, 24 January 2010
> "Minister Toews announces re-appointment of Ian McPhail as Interim
> Chair of the CPC," Public Safety Canada, 14 January 2011
> "New civilian watchdog agency will oversee RCMP," RCMP Watch, 4 February
> 2010
> "Police Oblivious to pain Tasers inflict: RCMP Complaints
> Commissioner," CBC News, 25 June 2008
> "RCMP response to CPC regarding its report into Robert Dziekanski's
> in-custody death," William Elliott, RCMP, 7 December 2009
> "RCMP should limit self-investigations," CBC News, 11 August 2009
> "RCMP to implement all watchdog recommendations on Robert Dziekanski
> case," CPC against the RCMP, 10 February 2011
> "RCMP watchdog won't be reappointed," CBC News, 27 November 2009
> Report on death of Robert Dziekanski (PDF), CPC, 8 December 2009
> "Report slams RCMP in airport Taser death," CBC News, 8 December 2009
> "Tories drop RCMP complaints commissioner," Tonda MacCharles, The
> Star, 27 November 2009
> Français
>
>
> DEMAND IMMEDIATE APOLOGY FROM CANADIAN ALLIANCE MP
> Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:00 pm
> John Cummins' office replies 'Get a life' when invited to Maher Arar vigil
>
> Ottawa, Canada - 17/12/02) - CAIR-CAN is calling on Canadians to demand
> that John Cummins, member of Parliament of Delta-South Richmond, B.C.,
> offer a public apology for recent remarks made by his office when Cummins
> was invited to a silent vigil for Maher Arar. In response to the
> invitation, Cummins' office replied by email, "Get a life."
>
> Maher Arar is the Canadian citizen who was detained illegally in the United
> States en route to Canada and deported to Jordan and then to Syria. Arar
> was denied access to Canadian officials, prevented from calling his family,
> tried through a non-transparent process without a lawyer present, and
> deported to his country of birth in violation of international law. He is
> currently being held in a Syrian jail.
>
> The statement follows recent comments by Stephen Harper, Diane Ablonczy,
> and Stockwell Day of the Canadian Alliance which condemn Arar without any
> regard to his illegal deportation, the lack of a fair trial process, and in
> the absence of any definitive evidence linking him to terrorism.
>
> (See CAIR-CAN action alert # 84:
> http://www.caircan.ca/cgi-bin/actionalerts/viewnews.cgi?newsid1038072766,60770,)
>
> The remark made by John Cummins' office is deeply insulting and a clear
> breach of his duties as a public official," said CAIR-CAN Executive
> Director Riad Saloojee.
>
> He should immediately offer an unqualified apology to the Arar family and
> to all Canadians," he added.
>
> ACTION REQUESTED (Be firm, but polite):
>
> CONTACT Steven Harper and John Cummins.
>
> E-mail: Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Cummins.J@parl.gc.ca
>
> Telephone or Fax:
>
> Stephen Harper
> Tel: (613) 996-6740
> Fax: (613) 947-0310
>
> John Cummins
> Tel: (613) 992-2957
> Fax: (613) 992-3589
>
> DEMAND an immediate apology from John Cummins for the remarks made by his
> office yesterday.
>
> INFORM Canadian Alliance leader Steven Harper that his party has failed in
> its duty as the official opposition to defend the rights of a Canadian
> citizen. Recent comments by his party indicate a troubling trend of
> treating Maher Arar, a Canadian Muslim and Arab, as a second class citizen.
>
> COPY Canada@cair-net.org on all correspondence.
>
> Colin Mayes, Conservative
>
> This rookie B.C. MP made headlines this year after he defended the PM's new
> restrictions on media access in a column to his local paper. Mayes went
> further and suggested journalists would be more responsible if they faced
> jail terms for professional misconduct. "Boy, would the public get accurate
> and true information if a few reporters were hauled away to jail! Maybe it
> is time that we hauled off in handcuffs reporters that fabricate stories,
> or twist information and even falsely accuse citizens." Mayes quickly
> retracted his comments.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>; <deb@debgrey.com>; <debgrey@gmail.com>;
> <valerielmeredith@aol.com>; <RathgB0@parl.gc.ca>; "MulcaT"
> <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>; "Heather Martin" <martinhea39@gmail.com>;
> "bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "kevin.violot"
> <kevin.violot@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "Wayne.Lang"
> <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "toewsv1" <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>; "bob.rae"
> <bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net>; "Bob.Kerr" <Bob.Kerr@cbc.ca>;
> "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>; "mckeen.randy"
> <mckeen.randy@gmail.com>; "mcknight.gisele"
> <mcknight.gisele@dailygleaner.com>; "mclellana"
> <mclellana@bennettjones.com>
> Cc: <Whistleblower@ctv.ca>; <martine.turcotte@bell.ca>; "oldmaison"
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>; "stop_codex" <stop_codex@hotmail.com>; "josh
> steffler" <canuckfanjosh@yahoo.com>; <webmasterlawrence@gmail.com>;
> "xtofury" <xtofury@gmail.com>; "grenouf" <grenouf@genuinewitty.com>;
> "hiddenfromhistory1" <hiddenfromhistory1@gmail.com>; "J Bowman"
> <canada.acp@gmail.com>; "leader" <leader@greenparty.ca>;
> "maryann4peace" <maryann4peace@gmail.com>; "john.green"
> <john.green@gnb.ca>; "police" <police@fredericton.ca>; "David Amos"
> <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>;
> <Billa.MEDHURST@vpd.ca>; "mark.lord" <mark.lord@fredericton.ca>;
> "Leanne.Fitch" <Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>
> Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 12:17 AM
> Subject: So Debby Baby Grey "Famous Amos" would like to know if Harper
> and the RCMP in BC are paying attention YET???
>
>
> Some Deja Vu for you and Val
>
> http://deanrays.blogspot.com/2009/07/vals-minority-report.html
>
> http://www.debgrey.com/contact.html
>
> VAls minority report!
>
> Heritage Front Affair Val's Minority Reports
>
> THE HERITAGE FRONT AFFAIR: OUR VIEW DISSENTING OPINION of the REFORM
> PARTY of CANADA
>
> Presented by Val Meredith, M.P.
>
> THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE
>
> It was nineteen months ago when the Sub-Committee on National Security
> began its consideration of the Security Intelligence Review
> Committee's Heritage Front Affair report. Finally, after a long and
> often arduous effort, the Sub-Committee has tabled its report.
>
> At this point in time, it is important to clarify a couple of
> significant issues: The delays in producing the Sub-Committee report
> have nothing to do with the activities of the opposition parties, but
> rather are due solely to delays caused by membership changes and
> disagreements among the government members.
>
> Secondly, the so-called report of this Sub-Committee has little input
> from the opposition members. The joint dissenting opinion of the Bloc
> Quebecois and the Reform Party more accurately reflects the
> multi-party consensus of the majority of members of this Sub-Committee
> who actually participated in most of the Sub-Committee's hearings.
> While the joint dissenting opinion does not fully reflect the Reform
> Party's position on this issue, it is included to illustrate the
> changes to the report imposed by the government members.
>
> It must be noted that the major changes to this report did not occur
> during a Sub-Committee meeting, and neither opposition member was
> present. It is clear that the Liberal government was not prepared for
> the Sub-Committee to table the more critical report that is now the
> joint dissenting opinion. With regard to the official report of the
> Sub-Committee, the current government members of the Sub-Committee
> have produced an extremely emasculated version of the original report.
>
> Their report is just an extension of SIRC's Heritage Front Affair
> report which did not provide a sufficiently critical review of the
> Canadian Security Intelligence Service's investigation.
>
> THE SIRC REPORT SIRC claims to be the "eyes and ears of the public and
> Parliament on the Canadian Security Intelligence Service." Yet after
> months of consideration of the Heritage Front Affair report, it is
> clear that SIRC has been not only negligent in this role, but
> deliberately dishonest as well. Instead of providing Parliament with a
> thorough and objective review of CSIS' use of a human source in its
> investigation of the Heritage Front, SIRC's report exonerates CSIS and
> the Source of any wrongdoing.
>
> In its exoneration of CSIS, SIRC ignored or suppressed any evidence
> that was inconsistent with their conclusion that the Service did no
> wrong. SIRC has wilfully mislead Parliament and the Canadian people.
> The exoneration of CSIS by SIRC is a betrayal of SIRC's role as a
> review committee. While the Reform Party is deeply concerned with the
> wrongdoings of CSIS, SIRC's refusal to address these transgressions in
> an open and honest manner is cause for even greater concern.
>
> After nineteen months of reviewing the SIRC report and obtaining
> additional information, it is clear that SIRC is not fulfilling the
> function that Parliament intended. Originally the Reform Party had
> planned to do a thorough and critical review of the SIRC report,
> pointing out numerous inaccuracies and omissions. However, because the
> original version would have been too lengthy, we have chosen to focus
> on two main issues: Grant Bristow - CSIS Source, and the CSIS
> investigation concerning Preston Manning, that formed Chapter VIII of
> the Heritage Front Affair. ; GRANT BRISTOW - CSIS HUMAN SOURCE Unlike
> the government members of the Sub- Committee, I have no hesitancy in
> identifying Grant Bristow as the CSIS Source who infiltrated the
> Heritage Front.
>
> This position is not an assumption, nor speculation. In August 1994, I
> was contacted by an individual who had first-hand knowledge of Grant
> Bristow as a CSIS Source. A former police source, this individual was
> approached by Bristow, who offered to introduce him to a CSIS
> investigator.
>
> In September 1994 I accompanied this individual to a SIRC interview.
> The information this individual provided is faithfully recorded in the
> SIRC report at section 3.1.3, although it does not identify Bristow as
> the Source.
>
> In addition, at his appearance before the Sub- Committee on May 27,
> 1996, the Director of CSIS, Mr. Ward Elcock, inadvertently confirmed
> that Bristow was indeed the CSIS Source. In his opening statement,
> which was also provided in writing, the Director made the following
> comment: "What about our source's arrest in Toronto, along with
> American white supremacist Sean Maguire? That was a co-ordinated
> operation with law enforcement agencies. Mr. Maguire was expelled from
> Canada. Our source was released. No criminal offence was committed."
>
> Now contrast the Director's above comments with the relevant passage
> in SIRC's Heritage Front Affair report: "On September 20, 1991, Sean
> Maguire and Grant Bristow were travelling in the latter's car, when
> they were stopped at gunpoint by the heavily armed Metro Toronto
> Emergency Task Force. Sean Maguire was arrested on an Immigration
> warrant. RCMP and Immigration officials were on hand for the arrest,
> as was a CSIS investigator from Toronto Region.
>
> Grant Bristow, when he was stopped, had guns in the trunk of his car.
> Both men were taken to police station 41." (emphasis added) It is
> obvious from the above-mentioned information that Bristow is the CSIS
> Source in question. It is an issue, because the way that SIRC wrote
> their report, many of the questionable activities were committed by
> Bristow, as opposed to the Source. So it is important to acknowledge
> that Bristow was indeed the Source.
>
> As expressed in paragraph 28 of the joint dissenting opinion ("Having
> concluded that the placement of a human source was acceptable,
> although for a shorter time than this Source was actually in place,
> the opposition members of the Sub-Committee then asked themselves
> whether the Service should have recruited and put in place this
> particular Source?"), there were serious questions about using Bristow
> as the Source. While SIRC made all efforts to downplay Bristow's role
> in the creation and operation of the Heritage Front, clearly he was
> responsible for much of the success of the organization.
>
> The best indication of Bristow's role in the Heritage Front was the
> video that the Front put out with excerpts of Bristow's speeches, that
> had been edited out of the previously released videos. The excerpts
> from this video show that Bristow was the main administrator of the
> Heritage Front. He was responsible for the raising of money, for
> selling memberships, literature and paraphernalia, and for getting
> people out to Heritage Front rallies and demonstrations. His
> questionable contributions can be best summarized from the one video
> where he bragged that the Heritage Front in Toronto raised more money
> to assist incarcerated members of the white supremacist terrorist
> organization, The Order, than any other group in North America. ;
> Bristow under police investigation.
>
> There is one other aspect of Bristow's history that SIRC chose to
> ignore, despite the fact that this incident was in the original
> newspaper story that spawned their investigation. In 1993, the Metro
> Toronto Police Force investigated Heritage Front members Carl Fischer,
> Elkar Fischer and Andrew Maynard, for the kidnapping and assault of
> Tyrone Mason, another Heritage Front member. During the course of
> their investigation the police began to actively investigate Grant
> Bristow.
>
> The police investigators were so convinced that Bristow was involved
> in witness tampering, that they applied to the courts and obtained a
> Criminal Code Part VI warrant to intercept his communications. When
> the Mason case finally made its way to trial in the fall of 1995, a
> plea bargain was arranged. As a result of plea bargaining all charges
> were dropped against Maynard, and though convicted, the Fischer
> brothers received only a thirty day sentence to be served
> intermittently.
>
> Interestingly, a lawyer representing the federal government was
> involved in the negotiations. It would appear that Bristow's role in
> the incident prevented the Crown from aggressively prosecuting the
> case. Despite frequently referring to this case in their testimony as
> an example of the heinous activities that Heritage Front members were
> capable of committing,
>
> SIRC completely ignored the police investigation of Bristow's role in
> the case. ; Bristow and the Reform Party. The Reform Party is also
> deeply concerned about Bristow's activities within the Reform Party.
>
> As reported in the SIRC report, CSIS was aware that Heritage Front
> leader Wolfgang Droege "wanted to discredit Preston Manning and the
> Reform Party before the general election in 1993. This idea would be
> accomplished by the Movement publicly identifying itself and its
> security relationship with the Reform Party's senior executive level.
>
> Among those who allegedly knew of the Droege plan were Gerry Lincoln,
> James Dawson, Ernst Zundel, Terry Long, Jurgen Neumann, Peter
> Mitrevski, and Grant Bristow (emphasis added)." Not only was Bristow
> aware of this plan to discredit the Reform Party, but he was one of
> the major players in it. Bristow, along with Alan Overfield, were the
> two individuals who made all the security arrangements.
>
> While it was Overfield who originally offered the services of his
> bailiff company to the Reform Party, he was not aware of Droege's plan
> to discredit the party. Thus it was left to Bristow, a CSIS source, to
> create the relationship.
>
> According to the representative for the Reform Party, Andrew Flint,
> Grant Bristow did a very effective job in creating the security
> relationship between the Reform Party and the Heritage Front. In an
> affidavit sworn on May 1, 1995, Flint described the June 1991 meeting
> with Bristow and Overfield in the following manner: "The meeting was
> dominated by Grant Bristow who did most of the talking regarding the
> security for the event. I was certainly very impressed by his
> immaculate dress which included an elegant suit and highly polished
> shoes. This was the only meeting I attended involving security for the
> up-coming rally."
>
> Flint also mentioned that "at the meeting of the security team for the
> June 1991 event at the International Centre, Grant Bristow requested a
> letter from me stating that he and Al Overfield were authorized to
> handle the security for this event. I was told he needed it to present
> to the Regional Police which operated a sub-station on the premises of
> the International Centre."
>
> This letter is also mentioned in the SIRC report. However, the report
> stated "Overfield asked for the letter in order to receive recognition
> and to show that he was appointed. Grant Bristow's name was included
> in the letter because he said: #145;Unless we have a letter of
> understanding, there could be legal liabilities if there was a
> confrontation with protesters at a Reform Party event.'
>
> " Naturally, Bristow is the source of this information. It is
> interesting that Bristow claimed that Overfield asked for the letter
> to receive recognition, and that his own name appeared only for
> liability purposes. If Bristow's name was necessary for liability
> purposes, then why were the names of the other individuals who were
> providing security not included as well?
>
> In reality, the most useful application of this letter would have been
> to prove a security arrangement between the Heritage Front and the
> Reform Party. Yet, according to the SIRC report, Overfield was unaware
> of the plan to discredit the Reform Party, so there is little reason
> for him to request the letter. Bristow on the other hand, would
> certainly have pleased Droege by providing him with a letter to
> demonstrate that the security arrangement between the Reform Party and
> the Heritage Front actually existed. SIRC's willingness to accept
> Bristow's version of events is typical of their report.
>
> Much of the report is based on the evidence of Bristow. He is cited as
> the source of information 135 times; 96 times as the Source and a
> further 39 times as Grant Bristow. In addition, the source handler is
> cited 20 times as the basis of information.
>
> SIRC has basically provided the public with Grant Bristow's version of
> events, while contradictory information was generally dismissed. While
> SIRC denied any wrongdoing by Bristow or CSIS, they failed to address
> a very important issue - the entire operation was conducted in
> violation of a 1989 Ministerial Direction.
>
> On October 30, 1989 then Solicitor General Pierre Blais issued the
> following Ministerial Direction on #145;CSIS' Use of Human Sources' to
> the Director of CSIS. The Direction states in part: "that special care
> is required in regard to investigations which impact on, or which
> appear to impact on, the most sensitive institutions of our society. I
> am primarily thinking in this regard of institutions in the academic,
> political, religious, media or trade union fields.... I am writing
> that you personally, or a Deputy Director designated by you in
> writing, approve the use by the Service of confidential sources in
> such investigation."
>
> It is obvious that Bristow's role as one of two individuals who was
> "jointly responsible for the security of all present and future Reform
> Party Events that are planned for this region," would be part of a
> human source operation that "impacted, or appeared to impact on a
> political institution."
>
> According to the Ministerial Direction, this would have required that
> either the Director or the Deputy Director (Operations) approve
> Bristow's role as part of the security team. In reality, Toronto
> Region only sought out CSIS Headquarters' advice in August, two months
> after the Mississauga rally, and even then the file did not go to the
> Director or the Deputy Director.
>
> SIRC goes on to great lengths to point out that CSIS was careful that
> only Droege's activities as they related to the Reform Party were
> investigated, not the Reform Party itself. But they do not address the
> issue of a CSIS source operation that impacted on, or at least
> appeared to impact upon a sensitive political institution, namely the
> Reform Party. SIRC's refusal to address this issue is somewhat
> mystifying, considering that was one of the questions that the Reform
> Party specifically wanted answered when we put forth a series of
> questions to SIRC in a letter, presented to them at the September 13,
> 1994 Sub-Committee meeting:
>
> Question 73: Given the 1989 Ministerial Directive by then Solicitor
> General Pierre Blais, concerning CSIS utilizing sources in sensitive
> institutions such as political parties, religious groups and the
> media, was the Director's approval required prior to Bristow's
> attendance at the Reform Party meeting?;
>
> Question 74: If yes, did the Director approve of this operation?
> Bristow's role in the security group was indeed crucial in forming the
> link between the Heritage Front and the Reform Party. As Andrew Flint
> stated, he was impressed with Bristow's "knowledge of security
> procedures and technical terminology...", as well as his "elegant suit
> and highly polished shoes." Grant Bristow was the one member of the
> Heritage Front who had the respectability and the expertise to make
> Flint believe that he was dealing with a legitimate group of
> individuals. It is extremely unlikely that Flint would have ever used
> this group if he had met with skinheads or other Heritage Front
> members.
>
> In the final analysis, Wolfgang Droege had a plot to discredit the
> Reform Party by linking the party to the Heritage Front through its
> security arrangement.
>
> Grant Bristow played a pivotal role in this conspiracy, if in no other
> way than by providing the security group with the respectability and
> expertise they could not have gotten elsewhere within the Heritage
> Front.
>
> When the story broke in 1992 the Reform Party was indeed discredited,
> although there are no objective means to measure to what extent. It is
> bad enough that Droege, an individual deemed to be a threat to the
> security of Canada, devised a plot to discredit a legitimate political
> party and CSIS did nothing about it. It is much worse when Grant
> Bristow, a CSIS source, played an integral role in accomplishing this
> task, in violation of a Ministerial Direction. But it is a complete
> travesty when SIRC, the body that Parliament established to monitor
> CSIS, fails to even address the issue. CSIS INVESTIGATION OF PRESTON
> MANNING While compiling its report on the Heritage Front Affair, SIRC
> included a chapter that had nothing to do with the Heritage Front. It
> was about the Reform Party and a foreign government, subsequently
> identified as South Africa. SIRC wanted us to believe that by
> including this chapter they could allay any fears amongst Reformers
> that CSIS had investigated the party, or the leadership.
>
> In the SIRC report, the CSIS investigation is portrayed as a
> by-the-book, straight-forward operation. Upon closer inspection this
> investigation proved to be anything but straight- forward. Rather than
> allaying any of our concerns about CSIS investigations, SIRC's
> willingness to lie about the facts has made the Reform Party even more
> suspicious.
>
> Through a Privacy Act request by Preston Manning, CSIS released its
> documents on this investigation. Although they are heavily censored,
> the documents show that SIRC withheld information and misrepresented
> the facts in their report, so that they could demonstrate that CSIS
> conducted a proper investigation. Any evidence that was contradictory
> to their conclusion was suppressed.
>
> In the following pages, we will review the actual investigation,
> SIRC's version of the investigation, and the bizarre fallout from this
> chapter of their report. In exchanges of correspondence and testimony
> that occurred after the tabling of the report, we learned that CSIS
> documents were altered and misdated.
>
> We observed SIRC make admissions, and then subsequently retract these
> admissions, completely contradicting their earlier statements and
> testimony. The Director of CSIS also provided a version of events that
> not only contradicted his earlier testimony, but also required him to
> admit that almost everyone who touched this file made mistakes.
>
> In the final analysis, the Reform Party is convinced that CSIS
> launched an insupportable investigation of Preston Manning in 1989,
> and tried to cover it up five months later. Both the current
> management at CSIS and SIRC have continued that cover-up, frequently
> changing their story when confronted with facts that did not fit their
> version of the events. ;
>
> A dubious source sparks an investigation. As SIRC reported, and the
> CSIS documents confirm, this investigation began with a tip from a
> source who was described by the CSIS investigator as "self-serving and
> very opportunistic, particularly if it benefited himself." This
> dubious source informed CSIS about a conversation that he had with a
> board member of an association that promoted links between South
> Africa and Canada. This source then stated that the board member said
> that his group was giving money to Preston Manning's campaign, as
> Manning was running against External Affairs Minister Joe Clark.
>
> This information by itself should not have been of interest to CSIS.
> In democracies, citizens can financially support whoever they want in
> an election, for whatever reason. For CSIS to investigate they needed
> information that South Africa was actually providing the money. During
> the first meeting between CSIS and this dubious source, the source
> stated that he thought the board member meant that the money was
> coming from South Africa. When the source realized that he did not
> have the key piece of evidence that CSIS required, he miraculously
> obtained it less than three weeks later. The source stated that he had
> been talking to an unidentified, close associate of the board member,
> who supposedly told him that the South Africans may have contributed
> as much as $45,000 to Preston Manning and the Reform Party in trying
> to defeat Joe Clark in his riding of Yellowhead. This is the extent of
> CSIS' information about the Manning campaign receiving money from a
> foreign government.
>
> Third-hand information from a source who is not only of unknown
> reliability, but who had been identified by the CSIS investigator as
> "self-serving and opportunistic", should not be the basis of a CSIS
> investigation of any Canadian citizen, much less the leader of a
> legitimate political party. ; CSIS analyst stated, basis for
> investigation "difficult to support"! We are not the only ones to
> question the validity of this investigation.
>
> After the regional investigator sent two reports to CSIS Headquarters
> in November 1988, a response from the HQ analyst on the South Africa
> desk was sent to the region in January 1989. As the SIRC report
> acknowledged, the analyst stated that in HQ's opinion, the source of
> the alleged funding was most likely the group of Canadian businessmen
> who belonged to the association. But when the analyst addressed the
> possibility of foreign funding, SIRC did not accurately portray the
> analyst's comments. The analyst did state that, "if it were shown that
> South Africa indeed contributed as much as $45,000 to Manning's
> campaign, HQ could in time attempt to make the argument that South
> Africa is unduly influencing Canadian politics." However, SIRC chose
> not to include the following sentence by the analyst in their report:
> "To say the least, this kind of argument would be difficult to
> support."
>
> Since the analyst had stated that there was no basis for a CSIS
> investigation, contradicting SIRC's conclusion that it was a
> legitimate investigation, SIRC chose to suppress this line. It is the
> only line in that section of the report that SIRC did not include in
> the Heritage Front Affair report. The HQ analyst concluded this
> January 10, 1989 message by requesting that the region keep "HQ
> apprised of any forthcoming information which you may obtain in light
> of the above."
>
> There was no further information forwarded by the region. Rather, the
> next document that appears in Manning's file is an authorization of a
> TARC Level 1 investigation, dated October 17, 1989. ; Lead up to the
> TARC Level 1 investigation - January 10, 1989 to October 17, 1989.
> While there is a great deal of controversy over what happened between
> October 17, 1989 and March 30, 1990, we are equally perplexed about
> what happened between January 10, 1989 and October 17, 1989.
>
> The Reform Party has never received a logical answer to why an analyst
> on the South African desk in CSIS HQ stated that there was no basis
> for an investigation into the alleged contribution to Preston Manning
> on January 10, 1989, and yet without any additional, or new,
> information, an analyst on the South African desk in CSIS HQ submitted
> a request for a TARC Level 1 investigation on October 17, 1989? SIRC
> attempted to provide the following as an answer: A reliable source
> provided CSIS with information that a foreign country (read South
> Africa) had transferred over a quarter of a million dollars to Canada,
> to try to influence 24 Members of Parliament from other political
> parties (read Progressive Conservatives and Liberals).
>
> When asked, SIRC stated that CSIS did not take any steps to
> investigate these M.P.s. If the information about South Africa funding
> these 24 M.P.s did indeed inspire the investigation, why was there no
> mention of this on the form (REQUEST FOR AND APPROVAL OF COLLECTION
> LEVELS 1, 2 AND CATEGORY A aka 4002) authorizing the investigation?
>
> It is therefore unlikely that this information played any role in the
> investigation. SIRC would still have us believe that CSIS received
> information from a reliable source that the South African Government
> was using over a quarter of million dollars to influence 24
> Conservative and Liberal M.P.s, but did not investigate them. Instead,
> CSIS proceeded to launch an investigation of Preston Manning, who was
> neither an M.P., nor a Progressive Conservative nor a Liberal.
>
> We find SIRC's logic to be less than satisfying. ; The Actual
> Investigation: Who, What, When, Why? >From the moment the Solicitor
> General tabled the Heritage Front Affair report, one particular
> passage has caused a great deal of grief for the Sub-Committee, SIRC
> and CSIS. This passage resulted in a number of admissions,
> explanations, contradictions, retractions and accusations.
>
> The Reform Party believes that the best way to present this complex
> subject is in the following chronological manner:
>
> December 15, 1994 The Solicitor General tabled SIRC's report, the
> Heritage Front Affair, in the House of Commons. Included in section
> VIII, at paragraph 8.3 is the following passage: "On October 17, 1989,
> the Service decided to formally investigate the alleged $45,000
> contribution. CSIS said that they could not go back to the informant
> as all contacts had ended on December 31, 1988.
>
> The Service authorized a three-month Level 1 investigation entitled:
> #145;LNU FNU (Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
> Campaign)'. The Service cited section 12 and paragraph 2 (b) of the
> CSIS Act as the legal basis for the investigation." ;
>
> December 16, 1994 ;SIRC appeared before the Sub-Committee on National
> Security. Having been advised that the above-mentioned passage was
> inaccurate, the Reform Party made the following request:
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Can you have your officials go back to CSIS and have
> them examine the hard copy of the original authorization of the Level
> one investigation on the Reform Party and a foreign government, not
> just the corrected copies? Specifically, can your employees examine
> the caption on the file?"
>
> Summary - After the meeting, the Reform Party was approached by SIRC
> research officials. They asked what they should be looking for
> specifically. This led the Reform Party to believe that SIRC was not
> aware of a changed caption. ;
>
> January 27, 1995 In a letter from Maurice Archdeacon, the Executive
> Director of SIRC, to Derek Lee, M.P., the Chairman of the
> Sub-Committee on National Security, Val Meredith's request was
> answered in the following manner:
>
> "Ms. Meredith, M.P. requested that SIRC have its officials re-examine
> the original authorization of the Level I investigation on the Reform
> Party and a foreign government. Specifically, Ms. Meredith asked to be
> told what the caption was on the file.
>
> The nature of Ms. Meredith's question suggests that the answer may
> well already be known to her. Nevertheless, the caption she referred
> to for the targeting authority dated October 17, 1989 was #145;Preston
> Manning.' The caption was revised on March 30, 1990 to state,
> #145;LNU/FNU (Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
> Campaign).'
>
> I would be remiss if I did not point out that, aside from the amended
> caption, there were no other changes to the text of the targeting
> requests/authorizations. That is, the text in each of the documents
> was identical, and clearly stated that the investigation was to
> determine whether a #145;foreign influence' threat existed. CSIS did
> not suspect Mr. Manning of complicity..."
>
> Summary - Mr. Archdeacon admitted that the name on the targeting
> authority dated October 17, 1989 was #145;Preston Manning.' He also
> mentioned that "there were no other changes to the text of the
> targeting request/authorizations. That is, the text in each of the
> documents was identical." It is quite apparent that Mr. Archdeacon is
> stating that there were two versions of the same document, with the
> only change being to the caption. From his choice of words being the
> #145;targeting request/authorizations', there is no doubt that Mr.
> Archdeacon is referring to the form 4002. ;
>
> March 30, 1995 The Solicitor General appears before the Standing
> Committee on Justice and Legal Affairs, for the Main Estimates. He is
> accompanied by his Deputy Minister and the heads of the various
> agencies under his control, including Mr. Ward Elcock, Director of
> CSIS. The Reform Party asked Mr. Elcock a number of questions about
> this particular investigation.
>
> The following excerpts are from the transcript of this meeting: (Page 15)
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Can you explain then why Mr. Manning's name was used
> for a TARC level one investigation and why that investigation was not
> conducted under the foreign government?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "I don't know why that name was used. I suspect that, as
> much as anything else, it may have been just used as a convenient tag.
> I don't know the precise reason why it was used, but there is no
> question from the file that at any time the subject of the
> investigation was ever Mr. Manning himself."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Why was that file named under Mr. Manning, then, and
> not under #145;unknown contributor?'"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "I said, Mr. Chairman, that I didn't know the reason why
> that name was used. It clearly was in error, because in substance, the
> investigation at all times was an investigation of the actions of a
> foreign government, not an investigation of Mr. Manning."
>
> (Page 17) Ms. Meredith: "So Mr. Manning's name never came up under a
> requisition or a request for a TARC Level One investigation?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "It was in the sense, Mr. Chairman, that the title of the
> TARC was initially in Mr. Manning's name. His name was there. Was
> there an investigation of Mr. Manning? Absolutely not."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "I didn't ask if there was an investigation of Mr.
> Manning. I asked if a TARC Level was ever instituted under Mr.
> Manning's name?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "The answer, Mr. Chairman, was that there was a TARC Level
> in Mr. Manning's name. But as I have said, the subject of that TARC
> was not Mr. Manning at any time, ever."
>
> (Page 34) Ms. Meredith: "I have your policy manual here, the
> declassified version of the CSIS Operational Manual. For a TARC Level
> one authority, an investigator must submit a request for an approval
> form, CSIS form 4002. There's a space for the name of the individual
> to be investigated. Can you tell me whose name was in that spot on the
> form 4002 in question, signed on October 17, 1989?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "As I think I said earlier, there was in the TARC title
> Mr. Manning's name. However, as I said quite clearly, the subject of
> that file was at all times an investigation of contributions in terms
> of the possibility of contributions having been made by a foreign
> government to a Canadian political party. It was at no time an
> investigation of Mr. Manning himself, notwithstanding the title. I
> would that (sic) the title had been otherwise, but it wasn't. That's
> the fact."
>
> Summary - During this meeting, the Director of CSIS made it quite
> clear that on October 17, 1989 the TARC Level 1 authorization, the
> form 4002, was on Preston Manning. Mr. Elcock did not once suggest
> that the caption was "Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's
> Electoral Campaign." (Nor did Mr. Elcock suggest that the error
> occurred with a different document known as a FILE OPENING REQUEST -
> PEOPLE FILES form.) At this same meeting the Reform Party also
> questioned the Director as to why SIRC was not made aware that the
> original 4002 was in the name of #145;Preston Manning'.
>
> That led to the following exchange: (Page 17)
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Can you explain to me why that information wasn't
> provided to SIRC? In their report, they reported very thoroughly on
> that investigation, with the exception of the original TARC level?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "Why what information?"
>
> Ms. Meredith: "That the TARC level on Mr. Manning was excluded from
> the SIRC report, that SIRC was unaware of that having happened?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "I don't know that in fact SIRC was unaware. I don't know
> why they would not have put it in their report or would have chosen
> not to do that. That's SIRC's business, and you would have to address
> that question to SIRC."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "When we brought it to SIRC's attention, they were
> unaware of that fact. It was only by it being brought to their
> attention that they were able to go back and find out the information.
> So I assumed from that they did not know that information was not
> provided to them, and I would like to know why it wasn't?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "I don't know that that assumption is correct; I would
> have to check. In fact, my belief is that they did have that
> information, but I'll certainly check that for the hon. member."
>
> Summary - This was the first information that the Reform Party
> received that SIRC was aware that the original TARC Level was on
> Preston Manning. ;
>
> March 31, 1995 In response to Mr. Elcock's testimony, Val Meredith
> wrote to SIRC, seeking clarification of what SIRC knew and when. "Was
> any member or employee of SIRC aware that the original TARC
> investigation launched on October 17, 1989 (was) in the name of
> Preston Manning and not "LNU FNU (Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston
> Manning's Electoral Campaign), when the Heritage Front Affair report
> was tabled on December 9, 1994?" Summary - The Reform Party
> specifically asked SIRC if they knew prior to the tabling of their
> report that the TARC investigation was in the name of #145;Preston
> Manning.' ;
>
> April 7, 1995 In a letter, under the name of Jacques Courtois, P.C.,
> Q.C., but signed by Maurice Archdeacon, Val Meredith's letter was
> responded to in the following fashion: "You asked whether any member
> or employee of SIRC was aware of the TARC investigation launched on
> October 17, 1989 in the name of Preston Manning and not the corrected
> title. SIRC staff saw the original title of the targeting
> authorization, as well as the corrected title and all other documents
> pertaining to the investigation. As I mentioned in my letter dated
> January 27, 1995 to Mr. Derek Lee, M.P. Chairperson of the
> Sub-Committee on National Security, the description (narrative text)
> of the authorization never changed... The original caption was seen
> for what it was - an error, and the Service corrected that error five
> years ago."
>
> Summary - Once again SIRC admitted that the caption on the TARC on
> October 17, 1989 was in the name of Preston Manning. They also
> admitted that they knew this prior to tabling their report. Although
> Mr. Archdeacon does not specifically state why SIRC chose to exclude
> this information from their report, the only possible explanation they
> offer for its exclusion is that the original caption was seen as an
> error, and that CSIS corrected that error in 1990. ;
>
> June 20, 1995 SIRC appeared before the National Security Sub-Committee
> for the Main Estimates. The Reform Party asked SIRC a number of
> questions about this particular investigation.
>
> The following excerpts are from the transcript of this meeting: (Page 7)
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Are you trying to tell this committee that there was
> not a TARC Level one investigation opened on Preston Manning?"
>
> Mr. Archdeacon: "No, I'm not, obviously, because we're repeating
> discussions we had over several hours earlier. You know very well that
> I'm not doing so. Someone - and we admitted it was sloppy work, and
> I'm sure the Director of CSIS would admit that - instead of taking the
> trouble to write on the TARC title #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston
> Manning's campaign' just wrote #145;Preston Manning.' The text,
> however, in the TARC report makes it absolutely clear - and you read
> the text - that Mr. Manning was not being investigated. We can't say
> it any more than this. It's question asked and answered."
>
> (Page 20)
>
> Mr. Archdeacon: "The fact is at the moment you're looking at the form
> - I understand your point - and saying the form of that 4002 gave the
> impression, because the name Preston Manning was there, that the TARC
> was on Preston Manning. That is the form of it."
>
> Summary - SIRC once again confirmed that the 4002 was in the name of
> Preston Manning. Mr. Archdeacon went so far as to state that he
> obviously wasn't denying that there was a TARC Level one investigation
> opened on Preston Manning. ;
>
> June 21, 1995 to November 7, 1995 During this time period, the
> Sub-Committee on National Security considered its report on the
> Heritage Front Affair. During these meetings, the Sub-Committee was
> operating on the understanding that the original 4002 was in the name
> of "Preston Manning" and this was altered to "LNU/FNU (Unknown
> Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign" on March 30,
> 1990. ; November 9, 1995 To clarify questions about alterations to
> 4002, and who knew about the caption "Preston Manning", the
> Sub-Committee sent a letter to the Director of CSIS. The following are
> the key excerpts from this letter: "On January 27, 1995, SIRC advised
> the Subcommittee, in response to its questions, that the caption on
> the October 17, 1989 targeting authority dealt with in Chapter VIII of
> the SIRC Report was originally #145;Preston Manning.' The Review
> Committee went on in the same letter to advise us that the caption was
> changed on March 30, 1990 to read #145;LNU-FNU (Unknown Contributor(s)
> to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign).' How was the caption change
> made on the Form 4002 - was the original form altered or was the
> original form destroyed and a new, back-dated, re-signed or
> re-initialled form created? Another of the documents contained in the
> file obtained by Mr. Manning is a November 10, 1989 Transit Slip (Form
> 3040) from the Chief of Counter Intelligence - General Desk to the
> Director General of Counter Intelligence. I would like to draw your
> attention to item 5 on this document where it is asserted #145;caption
> is considered appropriate under policy provision.' Can you provide the
> Subcommittee with an explanation of this assertion in light of the
> fact that at the time the caption read #145;Preston Manning' and was
> not changed until March 30, 1990? If the caption was appropriate as it
> was on November 10, 1989, what made it unacceptable on March 30,
> 1990?" Summary - These questions challenged SIRC's and CSIS'
> contention that #145;Preston Manning's' name appearing in caption was
> just a #145;clerical error.' It would be difficult for CSIS to
> maintain the #145;clerical error' excuse if the Director General of
> Counterintelligence was aware of the caption, and agreed with it. ;
>
> March 29, 1996 According to CSIS, they did not receive the November 9,
> 1995 letter from the Sub-Committee until this date. There is no
> explanation as to what happened to the letter during the intervening 4
> 1/2 months. ;
>
> April 15, 1996 The Director of CSIS responded to the Sub-Committee's
> letter of November 9, 1995. In a complete departure from previous
> statements and testimony from CSIS and SIRC, the Director contended
> that the Form 4002 never read #145;Preston Manning', but the original
> caption was #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
> Campaign.' Key excerpts from his letter are as follows: "In response
> to your query regarding the #145;REQUEST FOR AND APPROVAL OF
> COLLECTION LEVELS 1, 2 AND CATEGORY A' form, dated October 17, 1989, I
> am satisfied that this is the original document associated with this
> file. As is shown on this form, the original caption was #145;Unknown
> Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign'. The
> collection authority and a second form, #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST -
> PEOPLE FILES', is required by the Service's Information Management
> branch, in order to create a file. It was at this stage in the process
> that the clerical error occurred regarding this file caption. In an
> effort to facilitate the electronic opening and future retrieval of
> this file and the relevant documents, the caption that was erroneously
> entered on the #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES' form was
> #145;Preston Manning'. This error caused the creation of an automated
> hard copy file under this incorrect caption. It was during the latter
> part of March, 1990, while preparing this assessment report, that the
> file caption error was corrected. Item 5 on the #145;TRANSIT SLIP'
> (Form 3040), dated November 10, 1989, discusses the appropriateness of
> the caption as presented originally - #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to
> Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign' and the comments indicate that
> the author believed the caption to be appropriate."
>
> Summary - This was an astounding development. The Director totally
> contradicted 15 months of statements and testimony from both SIRC and
> himself. According to the January 27, 1995 letter from Maurice
> Archdeacon to Derek Lee, M.P., the targeting authority (form 4002)
> read #145;Preston Manning' on October 17, 1989 and was changed on
> March 30, 1990. Mr. Elcock made no reference to this fact in his
> letter. Nor does the Director address his own testimony before the
> Standing Committee on Justice and Legal Affairs on March 30, 1995,
> where the following exchange took place:
>
> Ms. Meredith: "So Mr. Manning's name never came up under a requisition
> or a request for a TARC Level One investigation?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "It was in the sense, Mr. Chairman, that the title of TARC
> was initially in Mr. Manning's name. His name was there. Was there an
> investigation of Mr. Manning? Absolutely not."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "I didn't ask if there was an investigation of Mr.
> Manning. I asked if a TARC Level was instituted under Mr. Manning's
> name?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "The answer Mr. Chairman, was that there was a TARC Level
> in Mr. Manning's name."
>
> There is no explanation of why Mr. Elcock would state on March 30,
> 1995 that "the title of the TARC was initially in Mr. Manning's name,"
> and then on April 15, 1996 he would write that "the original caption
> was #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
> Campaign.'"
>
> It must also be noted that in none of the correspondence or testimony
> from CSIS or SIRC, between December 16, 1994 and April 14, 1996, was
> there even a single mention of a "FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES"
> form. This particular form was certainly known to CSIS, as it was
> included in Preston Manning's Privacy Act request. However, subsequent
> investigation and testimony would show that Mr. Elcock was not
> completely forthcoming in this letter. ;
>
> May 15, 1996 SIRC appeared before the Sub-Committee on National
> Security for the Main Estimates. While there was little discussion
> about this issue at this meeting, the following exchanges occurred:
> (page 30)
>
> Mr. Discepola: "I'd like to know, then, in your opinion why in the
> world Preston Manning's name was used at all in any of the
> documentation that related to the investigation of the suspected third
> country contribution to the election campaign."
>
> Mr. Archdeacon: "I've forgotten the exact date but the original title
> was #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning's Election Campaign.'
> It should of had more on it then that, but that was the exact title.
> It was not titled #145;Preston Manning', and Mrs. Meredith has a copy
> of the sheets of paper. Here it is, and the title on it is
> #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign.'
> Then there's the text of what is to be looked at, which is whether
> somebody, some country, was going to contribute money to Preston
> Manning's electoral campaign. When you have a TARC like that you must
> open a file, and this TARC was sent down to the management information
> section in CSIS. Because it didn't have LNU/FNU in front of the
> #145;Unknown Contributor(s)', which means last name unknown, first
> name unknown, the only name the clerk down there could see was Preston
> Manning, and you have to have a name on a file. So he didn't write
> #145;Unknown Contributor(s)' , he wrote #145;Preston Manning'. That
> was an error. He shouldn't have done that. That error remained like
> that for at least three months without being corrected. It wasn't
> corrected until about March, when the assessment was being done. There
> have been allegations that the title on the TARC was changed. Written
> in ink was #145;LNU/FNU' ahead of what had always been there and had
> never been changed. Because Mrs. Meredith was so sure of this, and
> because we knew she had our information from somewhere else, we
> decided to have the original TARC X-rayed. We have exact evidence that
> everything Mrs. Meredith has said about this - about it having been
> titled #145;Preston Manning', about things having been typed around
> it, and about all those sorts of things - is completely and totally
> incorrect. The file was mistitled and the file does not give anybody
> any reason to investigate anybody. A file title does not authorize
> anybody to investigate anybody. There was never any time when every
> CSIS agent across the country could have investigated Mr. Manning.
> That is a figment of someone's imagination." (page 32)
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Then I would like to put something on the record, Mr.
> Chair. I'd like to put on the record, Mr. Archdeacon, that the
> comments you just made are in complete contradiction to a letter on
> January 27, 1995, addressed to Mr. Derek Lee, and in testimony you've
> given before this committee. It's a complete contradiction."
>
> The Chairman: "I'm sure SIRC would want to address that. Perhaps this
> is something that can be clarified later. Can I take it, Mr.
> Archdeacon, Mr. Courtois, that you would differ?"
>
> Mr. Archdeacon: "We would differ with that characterization." ;
>
> Summary - Mr. Archdeacon's comments are a complete departure from
> SIRC's previous correspondence and testimony.
>
> First of all, it was not Ms. Meredith who stated that the original
> TARC was captioned #145;Preston Manning', it was Mr. Archdeacon
> himself who first made this statement in his letter of January 27,
> 1995, when he stated:; "The caption she referred to for the targeting
> authority dated October 17, 1989 was #145;Preston Manning'.
>
> The caption was revised on March 30, 1990 to state, #145;LNU/FNU
> (Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign).'"
>
> Then there is the letter that Mr. Archdeacon signed on April 7, 1995,
> in which he stated:; "You asked whether any member or employee of SIRC
> was aware of the TARC investigation launched on October 17, 1989 in
> the name of Preston Manning and not the corrected title. SIRC staff
> saw the original title of the targeting authorization, as well as the
> corrected title and all other documents pertaining to the
> investigation."
>
> Once again Mr. Archdeacon confirmed that the original title was
> "Preston Manning", and admitted that SIRC staff saw both the original
> title of the targeting authorization, as well as the corrected title.
> If, as Mr. Archdeacon maintained on May 15, 1996, the original title
> was "Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign",
> why would he state in two pieces of correspondence that the caption
> was "Preston Manning".
>
> Furthermore, during SIRC's appearance before the National Security
> Sub-Committee meeting on June 20, 1995, there was this exchange:;
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Are you trying to tell this committee that there was
> not a TARC Level one investigation opened on Preston Manning?"
>
> Mr. Archdeacon: "No, I'm not obviously, because we're repeating
> discussions we had over several hours earlier. You know very well that
> I'm not doing so. Someone - and we admitted it was sloppy work, and
> I'm sure the Director of CSIS would admit that - instead of taking the
> trouble to write on the TARC title #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston
> Manning's Campaign' just wrote #145;Preston Manning.'"
>
> Mr. Archdeacon made no effort to explain why, on May 15, 1996, he told
> the Sub-Committee that there was not a TARC Level one investigation
> opened on Preston Manning, when on June 20, 1995 he stated the exact
> opposite.
>
> Clearly, Mr. Archdeacon and SIRC have fully endorsed the April 15,
> 1996 letter from the Director of CSIS. Like Mr. Elcock, they make no
> effort to explain the contradictions.
>
> There is one comment of Mr. Archdeacon that would be contradicted by
> the CSIS Director two weeks later. Mr. Archdeacon made a definitive
> statement that the error was caused by a clerk in the Management
> Information Section, who wrote "Preston Manning." As we will see in
> the next section, this statement has no basis in fact, but is rather a
> figment of Mr. Archdeacon's imagination. ;
>
> May 27, 1996 Mr. Elcock appeared before the Sub-Committee to answer
> questions about the Heritage Front Affair. During his appearance the
> Reform Party asked him about a number of discrepancies contained in
> his letter of April 15, 1996.
>
> Four of the specific subjects that were broached, included:
>
> I) The Altered #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES' Form. In his
> letter, Mr. Elcock stated, "the caption that was erroneously entered
> on the #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES' form was #145;Preston
> Manning.'" However, the copy of that form that Mr. Manning received in
> his Privacy Act request did not read #145;Preston Manning', but rather
> #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign'.
> It is obvious that the section of the form for the subject's name has
> been altered, as have the sections for #145;Present Address' and
> #145;Occupation'.
>
> The following exchange took place in relation to this form:
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Mr. Elcock, your letter clearly states that it was on
> this file, this PEOPLE FILES form here, and if people look carefully
> you can see where there has been alterations made to this document.
> The alterations have been made not only on the subject line, but on
> the #145;Occupation' line and the #145;Present Address' line. Your
> letter states that it was this form that Preston Manning's name was
> put on by mistake. I'm asking you why does this form not have Preston
> Manning's name on it? It has #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston
> Manning's Electoral Campaign."
>
> Mr. Elcock: "Mr. Chairman, Mr. Sundstrom reminds me that although it
> doesn't show here underneath, it was just Preston Manning when the
> form was first completed."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "So, if you agree, or if you read Mr. Archdeacon's
> comments where he noted it had been a clerk and it was a clerk in the
> Management Information Section that changed the document from
> #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning' and put Preston Manning's
> name in it. It's obvious that #145;Occupation' and #145;Present
> Address' have also been altered, changed, whited-out. Did this clerk
> also put Preston Manning's address and his occupation in there? Do
> they have the right to just add that in as they saw fit?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "Mr. Chairman, it compounded the clerical error, but
> there's nothing that prevents them from adding those details."
>
> Summary - While Mr. Elcock confirmed that the #145;Subject Name',
> #145;Occupation' and #145;Present Address' sections were all altered,
> he maintained that it was a "clerical error". Well it might be
> possible that a CSIS clerk would not use the proper caption in this
> case, it is ludicrous to suggest that the clerk would, on his or her
> own initiative, add Mr. Manning's address and occupation. Besides, if
> as CSIS and SIRC maintain, Mr. Manning was never investigated, how did
> CSIS even know his present address. In any event, as we shall see in
> section #145;IV', the story of the clerk making a mistake is soon
> retracted. ;
>
> II) Citing a document two weeks before it existed. In the form 4002,
> which authorized the TARC Level 1 investigation on October 17, 1989,
> there is a reference to a proposed meeting between Mr. Manning and an
> unidentified Ambassador. The reference goes on to state that the
> meeting was canceled at the last minute by the Embassy. Only one
> N.S.R. (CSIS database) message in the package obtained by Mr. Manning
> in his Privacy Act request contained this information. It was dated
> November 1, 1989, two weeks after the form 4002 was supposedly
> completed.
>
> Questions about this discrepancy went as follows:
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Can I get you to go to tab #145;L' in the documents
> that we've provided for you? This document is the only document that
> was received under the access, under the Privacy Act, to Mr. Manning,
> that makes any reference to an Ambassador and Preston Manning meeting,
> and the meeting being canceled by the Embassy. Can you give me the
> date of that message?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "The date at the top is 89- 11-01."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "What does that equate to... November 1, 1989?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "Yes, it should do."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "How is it possible that this message number and this
> date can be an additional background on a document that is dated
> October 17, 1989? How is it possible that this information is on a
> document when it didn't exist at the time?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "The honourable member is concluding that it's the same
> reference; I don't know that it is."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "If that is not the report, then why was the report not
> included in the Privacy request by Mr. Manning? This is the only
> document that was in the information provided to him."
>
> Mr. Elcock: "I will check and see what the date is and advise the
> committee what the date of the document was."
>
> Summary - The Reform Party did ask, in writing, for CSIS to confirm
> the date of this message. At the time this dissenting opinion was
> written, CSIS had not responded to our request. If this is the report
> in question, then it lends credence to the suggestion that this form
> 4002 was re-written some time after October 17, 1989. It also suggests
> that someone believed that the original justification for the
> investigation was so weak, that additional information had to be
> provided. If, on the other hand, there was documentation withheld from
> Mr. Manning's Privacy request, one wonders what else has been
> withheld. ;
>
> III) The Altered Form 4002. If the inclusion of information from a
> message that was not yet reported suggested that the form 4002 had
> been re-written, another fact that supported this suggestion was that
> the date on the top right corner of the document had been altered. The
> Reform Party employed the services of forensic consultant, an expert
> in the examination of questioned documents, who stated "as a matter of
> information it should be noted that within the questioned handwritten
> digital date #145;1989-10-17' on exhibit A1 (a), partially within and
> immediately above the handwritten numbers there exist undecipherable
> fragmentary markings foreign to the handwritten #145;1989-10-17'
> numbers."
>
> This information led to the following exchange:
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Mr. Elcock, I want to bring your attention back to the
> first page of form 4002 and I want you to look at the handwritten date
> at the top, right-hand corner. That handwritten date was altered,
> wasn't it? Tab #145;B'."
>
> Mr. Elcock: "And it goes back, I think, to the piece that you had
> asked... I noted that Mr. Archdeacon had indicated the piece had been
> X-rayed and in fact there was another date underneath."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Can you tell the committee what the date was that was
> underneath?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "The date was 1990...March 29, 1990."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Thank you, Mr. Elcock. I think that just proves what I
> have considered, that this document was typed up in full with a
> changed subject-matter on March 29, 1990; that this document did not
> originate on October 17, 1989."
>
> Mr. Elcock: "No, Mr. Chairman, I don't agree that it does."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Can you explain how the date March 29, 1990 would be at
> the top of that file if that was not the case?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "At the time, often the dates on those files, on those
> documents are left open and completed later when the documents are
> first issued because they don't have a file number either when they're
> first issued."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Mr. Elcock, so you want me to believe, you want this
> committee to believe that they filled in the form, that the effective
> date was put in at the bottom, the expiry date was put in at bottom,
> that it was signed off and the date was put in at the bottom, but that
> at the top it wasn't. Is that what you want this committee to
> believe?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "I believe there was a mistake made. We believed that at
> the time the typist entered the date and subsequently crossed out
> because she had mistakenly entered it and they put back in the
> appropriate date."
>
> Summary - Although Mr. Elcock admitted that the form 4002 carried the
> date March 29, 1990, he maintained that this was the original 4002
> filled out on October 17, 1989. His argument that the date wasn't put
> in because the document did not have a file number is extremely weak,
> since the FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form that was signed on
> October 17, 1989 was filled out specifically to obtain a file number.
>
> In the documents obtained by Mr. Manning under his Privacy Act
> request, we know that the first N.S.R. message that was sent on this
> file was dated October 17, 1989, and since a message can not be sent
> without a file number, a file number was obviously assigned on this
> date. It is highly unlikely that CSIS would wait an additional five
> months to fill in the rest of this form. This admission also calls
> into question the testimony of Mr. Archdeacon from May 15, 1996, who
> first brought up the subject of having the form X-rayed, and then
> stated the form was never changed. ;
>
> IV) Both Documents filled out by the Same Individual. The last area of
> questioning concerned the contention put forth by CSIS and SIRC, that
> the error in captions occurred not with the form 4002, but when a
> clerk made an error in filling out a second form, a FILE OPENING
> REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form. Mr. Elcock called this a "clerical
> error".
>
> In his May 15, 1996 testimony, Mr. Archdeacon went even further when
> he stated, "this TARC was sent down to the Management Information
> Section in CSIS... The clerk down there thought that the only name
> that he had, and you've got to have a name on a file, the only name he
> could see was Preston Manning. So he didn't write #145;Unknown
> Contributor', he wrote #145;Preston Manning'. That was an error. He
> shouldn't have done that." Again these sound like plausible
> explanations. Plausible that is until one examines the forms.
>
> The Reform Party and the Sub- Committee were somewhat hampered because
> of the censoring of the documents, which deleted the names of the CSIS
> employees who filled out these forms. We were instead forced to
> examine the handwritten dates on both the form 4002 and the FILE
> OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form. It is apparent that they were
> written by the same person. The Forensic Consultant, an expert in the
> examination of questioned documents confirmed the similarities.
>
> While it may have been plausible that a clerk put in the wrong caption
> on the second form, it is absolutely ludicrous to suggest that an
> intelligence officer in CSIS HQ would fill out a form 4002 to
> authorize an investigation in one name, and then on the very same day
> he would fill out a second form to obtain a file number, and use a
> different caption. As absurd as that sounds, that is what the Director
> of CSIS wanted us to believe.
>
> Witness the following exchange:
>
> Ms. Meredith: "And that this unit head authorized a TARC Level
> investigation on #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning's
> Electoral Campaign?' Is that right? That is in essence what this is
> all about, right, is that they authorized a TARC one on an
> #145;Unknown Contributor.'"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "An Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning's Electoral
> Campaign, yes."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "And that the problem originated or the problem was
> picked up when somebody filled out the FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE
> FILES, and then wrote in #145;Preston Manning.'"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "Yes." Ms. Meredith: "It wasn't a clerk who filled out
> those forms, was it?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "No, Mr. Chairman. I'm not sure what the honourable
> member's point is."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "My point is that if you look at the date in the top
> right- hand corner of the FILE OPENING REQUEST and you look at the
> date under the authority section on the same form, the PEOPLE FILE,
> FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES, and then you look at the date
> which is hand-written in at the top of the form 4002, I would suggest,
> Sir, that it's the same person that wrote these two documents, that
> worked with these two documents. How is it possible that the same
> person on one file can put #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston
> Manning's Electoral Campaign' and on the other file, the very same
> day, put #145;Preston Manning.' And that his unit head, in reviewing
> these on the same day, wouldn't pick up the mistake."
>
> Mr. Elcock: "I'm not -- the honourable ...."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "These are things that, I'm sorry, how is it possible
> that a Counterintelligence officer can mistakenly, this is who filled
> out this form, is an intelligence officer in Counterintelligence. How
> could he look at a TARC form that he also filled in and filled it in
> with #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning' and on the very same
> day on another form put Preston Manning's name down?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "These things happen. Names are sometimes left in
> documents when they ought not to be." Ms. Meredith: "And his unit
> chief who is authorizing and okaying these didn't notice that one of
> the forms was under Preston Manning's name?" Mr. Elcock: "I'm sure as
> the honourable member will know, these things happen from time to
> time."
>
> Summary - Mr. Elcock's defence, given this information is simply that
> these things happen. That is even more frightening than a planned
> investigation of Mr. Manning. The Director of CSIS stated that he
> wanted to re-assure the Reform Party that nothing untoward happened
> with this file. Yet, the only explanation Mr. Elcock offers for the
> conduct of his department, is that the employees who were involved in
> this investigation were grossly incompetent?
>
> However, the Reform Party has more faith in the ability of working
> level staff at CSIS than the Director does. However, the Director did
> confirm that the FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form was never
> filled out by a clerk in the Information Management Section of CSIS.
> That begs the question: Why did the Executive Director of SIRC, Mr.
> Archdeacon, make up his story to mislead the Sub-Committee? ;
>
> CONCLUSIONS The Reform Party regrets having to present such a
> painstakingly, detailed review of the Preston Manning investigation,
> but it was necessary to demonstrate the extreme lengths that we have
> had to go to in our attempts to find the truth in this matter.
>
> The documents obtained by Mr. Manning through his Privacy Act request
> afforded us the opportunity to challenge SIRC's version of events
> directly. SIRC has demonstrated that their word cannot be accepted at
> face value. But what does this all mean in the final analysis?
>
> Two issues need to be resolved. The first is what initiated the
> October 17, 1989 TARC Level 1 investigation. Since the South African
> desk in CSIS HQ wrote off any investigation on January 10, 1989, what
> suddenly spawned interest nine months later. One would think that it
> would be logical for someone to have something in writing suggesting
> that an investigation be opened. But that didn't happen.
>
> The questions that remains unanswered, are:
>
> Who ordered this matter re-opened, and why? The other issue that must
> be answered is: Why are CSIS and SIRC going to such extreme lengths to
> mislead the Sub-Committee, Parliament, and Canadians? If they had
> maintained their original explanation that the file caption was
> inappropriately opened in the name of #145;Preston Manning', and
> subsequently changed, the Reform Party would have little to complain
> about. But for CSIS and SIRC to retract all their previous admissions
> without explanations, and to out-and-out lie to a Parliamentary
> Sub-Committee, it is clear that there is something important they are
> hiding.
>
> The question is: What? Contrary to the assurances from SIRC and CSIS,
> the Reform Party has learned that from October 17, 1989 to January 17,
> 1990, it was recorded in CSIS' main database, N.S.R., that there was a
> TARC Level 1 on Preston Manning. There was no restricted security on
> this file, so this information was available to any CSIS employee who
> had access to N.S.R.
>
> Any employee who came across this information would have believed that
> there was a legal TARC Level on Manning, and could have legitimately
> carried out a Level 1 investigation. If the government members of the
> Sub-Committee weren't so intent on burying this report, the Sub-
> Committee itself may have been able to produce some of its own
> answers.
>
> However, it became apparent, especially after the Liberals changed the
> membership of the Sub-Committee, that government members are just as
> interested in covering up the truth, as are CSIS and SIRC. This is
> typified by the member from Windsor - St. Clair's vociferous objection
> to the Bloc Quebecois attempting to give their time to question the
> Director of CSIS to the Reform Party at the May 27, 1996 meeting. Why
> else would they object to the Reform Party having a few extra minutes
> to ask questions?
>
> It is clear to the Reform Party that SIRC's Heritage Front Affair
> report is a complete whitewash. SIRC was able to divert what should
> have been a review of the activities of a CSIS Source into a review of
> the Heritage Front itself. Both SIRC and CSIS champion this case as a
> great success for the Service, but the mere fact that the Source's own
> actions made this case public, should suggest it was a failure. But
> what this case has done is to show that the review system established
> by the CSIS Act does not work.
>
> The government has joined with CSIS and SIRC in covering up the truth.
> Why? What are they afraid of? This government has expressed no concern
> that the leader of a legitimate political party had his name on a
> document authorizing a CSIS investigation on him. They have expressed
> no concern that all the original documents authorizing that
> investigation were altered in one manner or another. They have shown
> no concern that both CSIS and SIRC admitted that originally the TARC
> level was on Preston Manning, then fifteen months later proceeded to
> deny it, with absolutely no explanation.
>
> It would appear that this government is not interested in holding the
> bureaucracy accountable. How is it possible that the government is not
> concerned that one of its agencies operates without accountability.
> Was that not why a civilian intelligence agency was formed? Did not a
> previous Liberal administration pass the CSIS Act, to make Canada's
> intelligence community accountable to Parliament?
>
> Those Canadians who care about the truth will have to wait until this
> country has a government committed to Parliamentary accountability,
> before the true version comes out. In the meantime, the Reform Party
> hopes that those journalists, researchers or academics who are
> interested in pursuing security issues continue their search for the
> real story. The truth is out there!
>
> RECOMMENDATIONS In light of the negligent performance of the Security
> Intelligence Review Committee in reviewing this investigation, it is
> clear that there is no place in the review process for a group of
> patronage appointees who believe that they do not have to answer to
> Parliament.
>
> To find an alternative we need look no further than to our neighbours
> to the south. The Americans utilize not only a House Select Committee
> on Intelligence, but a Senate Committee as well. Given the immense
> Intelligence network in the United States with the CIA, the NSA and
> the Intelligence Division of the FBI, the Americans have demonstrated
> that review by elected representatives is not only workable, but in
> the Reform Party's opinion is preferable. ;
>
> Reform Party Recommendation The Reform Party recommends that this
> government introduce legislation in Parliament that would amend the
> Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act, deleting all references to
> the Security Intelligence Review Committee. All references to the
> Security Intelligence Review Committee should be replaced by the
> Standing Committee on National Security. ;
>
> ; Created by Maurice Murphy Revised: December 01, 1996
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 04:02:33 -0300
> Subject: RE Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the
> mindless lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???
> To: ABrander@highriver.ca, highwood <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>, premier
> <premier@gov.ab.ca>, mclellana <mclellana@bennettjones.com>,
> "Ian.Shardlow" <Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Ian.McPhail"
> <Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Dale.McGowan"
> <Dale.McGowan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "calgary.acadia"
> <calgary.acadia@assembly.ab.ca>, "calgary.northwest"
> <calgary.northwest@assembly.ab.ca>, Calgarynews <Calgarynews@ctv.ca>,
> calgarynewstips <calgarynewstips@cbc.ca>, cal-news
> <cal-news@sunmedia.ca>, eblokland <eblokland@highriver.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, gunfighter@fritze.com, Sheldon@nfa.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: PCC Complaints <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:14:53 +0000
> Subject: RE: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me
> off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the
> Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya...
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Hello Mr. Amos:
>
> This e-mail is to acknowledge your recent communication with our
> office about the RCMP.
>
> If you wish to submit a complaint regarding the on-duty conduct of a
> member(s) of the RCMP, you can do so through our online complaint form
> located at:
>
> https://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/cnt/srv/mac/index-eng.aspx
>
> Alternatively, we can also be reached by:
>
> Telephone : 1-800-665-6878
> E-mail: complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
> Fax : 604-501-4095
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> Günther Schönfeldt
> Intake Officer / Agent d'information de liaison
> Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP /
> Commission des plaintes du public contre la Gendarmerie royale du Canada
> Tel/Tél : 1-800-665-6878 | Fax/Téléc : (604) 501-4095
> complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
> Sent: September-07-13 11:38 PM
> To: gunfighter@fritze.com; Sheldon@nfa.ca; bob.paulson; ORG; McPhail, Ian
> Cc: David Amos; Cogan, Tim
> Subject: Fwd: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me
> off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shard low? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the
> Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya
>
> http://nfa.ca/news/video-analysis-reveals-rcmp-targeting-houses-firearms
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Al Brander <ABrander@highriver.ca>
> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 07:36:10 -0600
> Subject: RE: Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the
> mindless lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> For the record, these current missive are the only ones I have seen.
>
> Please delete my from your address book since it appears you only want
> a platform to rant from.
>
> Al Brander
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 9:46 PM
> To: Al Brander; Ian.Shardlow; bob.paulson; mclellana; premier; Ian.McPhail
> Cc: David Amos; highwood
> Subject: Re: Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the
> mindless lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???
>
> My question would obviously be:
>
> Why did you and Ian Shardlow your new local top cop ignore me for
> nearly a month?
>
> Obviously I am the guy who answered Greg Kvisle's quandry about why
> the RCMP ignored the Charter and felt free to invade his home three
> time in order to find and take his old 303 and shotgun but he did not
> believe me. I suspect you know as wel as I Correct?
>
> As far as who I am scroll down this is lots of info that you had a
> month to check out. If you don't believe it ask Ian Sharlow or his
> bosses Dale McGowan and Bob Paulson or the lawyers Landslide Annie
> McLellan or Alison Redford if I am a liar or not.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> On 9/8/13, Al Brander <ABrander@highriver.ca> wrote:
>
>> Mr. Amos: Is there a question for me here?? If so please present it and
>> will you then also identify who you are please.
>>
>> Thank you;
>>
>> Al Brander
>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2013 9:45 PM
>> To: Emile Blokland; christopher@diarmani.com;
>> brian.topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
>> bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca; Josee.Valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Dale.McGowan;
>> bob.paulson; steven.blaney; Sylvain.Roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
>> bloke@shaw.ca;
>> premier; highwood; airdrie; mclellana; finditherefirst@gmail.com;
>> Doug.Potts@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; ppalmater;
>> xchief;
>> gunfighter
>> Cc: Ian.McPhail; David Amos; James Thackray; kevin.rushworth@sunmedia.ca;
>> Al
>> Brander; Jessica Hume; greg.weston; pm; MulcaT; justin.trudeau.a1
>> Subject: Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the
>> mindless
>> lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???
>>
>> http://nfa.ca/news/video-analysis-reveals-rcmp-targeting-houses-firearms
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: ORG <ORG@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
>> Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 03:38:08 +0000
>> Subject: CPC AutoResponse / Réponse préenregistrée de la CPP
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for contacting the Commission for Public Complaints Against
>> the RCMP. Your message has been received and if necessary, we shall
>> respond as soon as possible.
>>
>> Thank you for your interest and comments.
>>
>> Nous vous remercions d'avoir communiqué avec la Commission des
>> plaintes du public contre la GRC. Nous avons reçu votre message et y
>> donnerons suite, si nécessaire, dans les plus brefs délais.
>>
>> Nous vous remercions de l'intérêt que vous manifestez à l'égard de la
>> Commission et de vos commentaires.
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Emile Blokland <eblokland@highriver.ca>
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:38:46 -0600
> Subject: Out of Office: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High
> River piss me off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith
> at the Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> I am away from the office August 30, until September 16, 2013
> inclusive. In my abscence please contact Deputy Mayor Al Brander at
> abrander@highriver.ca
>
> Mayor Emile Blokland
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Josee VALIQUETTE <josee.valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 20:38:36 -0400
> Subject: Re: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me
> off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the
> Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya (Sgt. Valiquette is Away on
> September 5th, 2013)
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Hello, I am away today. For any inquiries in regards to "K"
> Division Media Relations, please contact S/Sgt. Ron Campbell at
> 780-412-5268.
>
> Thank you
>
> On 9/5/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <eblokland@highriver.ca>; <christopher@diarmani.com>;
> <brian.topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca>;
> <Josee.Valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "Dale.McGowan"
> <Dale.McGowan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>; <Sylvain.Roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
> <bloke@shaw.ca>; "premier" <premier@gov.ab.ca>; "highwood"
> <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>; "airdrie" <airdrie@assembly.ab.ca>;
> "mclellana" <mclellana@bennettjones.com>; <finditherefirst@gmail.com>;
> <Doug.Potts@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
> "ppalmater" <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca>; "xchief"
> <xchief@bell.blackberry.net>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>;
> <jthackray@highriver.ca>; <kevin.rushworth@sunmedia.ca>;
> <abrander@highriver.ca>; "Jessica Hume" <jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>;
> "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>; "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>; "MulcaT"
> <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>; "justin.trudeau.a1"
> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 9:38 PM
> Subject: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me off
> today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the Townhall
> Meeting tonight for me will ya
>
>
> http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Tories+Wildrose+exchange+fire+over+High+River+seizures/8866170/story.html
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 02:51:37 -0300
> Subject: The latest top cop in High River Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow and
> his boss Bob Paulson should be able to explain this email to Greg
> Kvisle and the other pissed off folks
> To: eblokland@highriver.ca, christopher@diarmani.com,
> brian.topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca,
> Josee.Valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "Dale.McGowan"
> <Dale.McGowan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, Sylvain.Roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> bloke@shaw.ca, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, highwood
> <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>, airdrie <airdrie@assembly.ab.ca>, mclellana
> <mclellana@bennettjones.com>, finditherefirst@gmail.com,
> Doug.Potts@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, ppalmater
> <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca>, xchief <xchief@bell.blackberry.net>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, jthackray@highriver.ca,
> kevin.rushworth@sunmedia.ca, abrander@highriver.ca, Jessica Hume
> <jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>, "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>, pm
> <pm@pm.gc.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
>
> FYI I called Greg Kvisle after I saw him on Sun TV he said he didn't
> need any help but he wanted to know who took his guns I told him I
> knew but he didn't believe me. Clearly Ken Braat knows Greg Kvisle and
> the cops very well. He should be able to tell Kvisle who took his
> guns.
>
> http://www.highrivertimes.com/2013/07/29/new-staff-sergeant-to-run-high-river-rcmp
>
> I bet Harper and the RCMP remembers what this Maritimer said about his
> old 303s and shoguns when I ran for seat Parliament the first time
> after the Maritimers Landslide Annie Mclellan Wayne Easter and a
> boatload of corrupt cops pissed me off. If a don't feel free to scroll
> down N'esy Pas?
>
> I bet Danielle Smith, Bobby Baby Paulson remembers Robin Reid. Clearly
> Insp Dougy Potts and Sgt Ian Shardlow pissed her and a bunch of
> Indians off bigtime last year EH?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: robin reid
> To: bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; pm@pm.gc.ca ; people stand up ;
> david.raymond.amos@gmail.com ; dominic ; calgary.west@assembly.ab.ca ;
> toewsv1@mts.net ; jspottedbear@yahoo.com ; jimsisson@inac.gc.ca ;
> hiddenfromhistory1@gmail.com ; admin@turnervalley.ca ;
> aimggc@worldnet.att.net ; alex@globalmedicaltourism.com.mx ;
> amyrae4@hotmail.com ; archbishop@archtoronto.org ;
> barry.shaw@forces.gc.ca ; bewerbung@rothschild.com ;
> bishopfh@rcdiocese-calgary.ab.ca ; calgary@jasonkenney.com
> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 11:44 PM
> Subject: I SEE NOTHING HAS CHANGED WITHIN YOUR CORRUPT FEDERAL ORGANIZATION
>
> Bob Paulson,
> Commissioner of RCMP
> Canada.
>
> Mr. Paulson,
>
> I write once again after the disappointing bullshit letter I received
> from Inspector Potts, and then my discussion with Sgt. Shardlow
> yesterday in Okotoks over assaults, false arrest, murder, all kinds of
> nasty things you are responsible for setting people up using your "
> interception of private communication ".
> You people neglect doing your duty here and as I see what is coming
> out in the media, makes one wonder just how much death you have
> covered up over the years.
> Afraid the truth is coming out is what it seems,hmmmm. And as far as
> your arresting officer Degroot goes he seems to have a lot of contact
> with Juiliann Barna Reid, as I
> asked Shardlow - does this abusing woman work for you????????? Perhaps
> you could look into this and get back to me.
>
> Honestly for men you have no balls, just like Harper - has god got
> your balls also??????? And then you have your women godly agents who I
> am thinking took your balls cuz they are as cruel as you men. Now is
> that not shameful.?????? Just as Alison Redford ignored me when she
> was justice minister.
>
> You people do not care about children, woman or men in your game of
> human abuse for
> profit. You always have the same excuse.
>
> Now Mr. Paulson, since you are at the top, do you condone these lies
> and abuse of children, woman and men ???????
>
> I do have some other concerns from many years ago involving the
> okotoks RCMP putting the blame on 1 officer, an Indian, are you racist
> Mr. Paulson, do you condone white supremacy and genocide upon the
> Indian people and then every other race by thair own ????? Just as the
> security guard who assaulted me - thair excuse was he just got out of
> security school.
>
> Also Mr. Paulson do you carry the dead peasant insurance upon your
> workers???????? how does one find out if this type of insurance is on
> people and who has used it?????????
>
> And let's not forget the abuse on human life by religion, sit's at the
> top on the abuse game for profit, would you not say???????
>
> Now Mr. Paulson, do you feel this is right what has been done, the
> medical abuse, assaults, false arrests and so much more I would like
> to discuss in person.????????????
>
> REMEMBER IT'S ALL INDIAN LAND THAT YOU PERSONS UNDER THE SUPREMACY OF
> GOD, KILLED CHILDREN, WOMAN AND MEN FOR WHAT YOU HAVE, AND REMEMBER
> INDIANS OF THE LANDS COME IN ALL RACES. SHAME ON YOU ALL CORRUPT
> CHIEFS KILLING CHILDREN IN SO MANY WAYS, ESPECIALLY YOU CONDONED
> PEDOPHILE LAIR.
>
>
> Thank you
> Robin Reid
> Red Nations
> PPOF
>
>
> http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/politics/archives/2013/06/20130628-151342.html
>
> http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/alberta/Hell+Residents+angry+RCMP+sieze+guns+from+High+River+homes/8588851/story.html
>
> RCMP revealed Thursday that officers have seized a "substantial ...
> that we control, simply because of what they are," said Sgt. Brian
> Topham
>
> http://www.canada.com/story_print.html?id=29c1b59c-694d-4d33-9fdc-d5a57f14ec39&sponsor=
>
> Some Alberta RCMP Disciplinary Cases in 2005-06 (Year to Date)
>
> - Sgt. Brian Topham -- reprimand and forfeiture of 10 days' pay.
>
> Topham, who served at the Fox Creek detachment between 2002 and 2004,
> made insensitive and degrading comments about women in the presence of
> a female civilian employee.
>
> On another occasion, Topham said "1974 was the worst year in the RCMP
> because that is when the RCMP let women in the force."
>
> The allegations also involved stereotypical comments about aboriginals
> and people from Newfoundland made in the presence of officers who had
> those backgrounds.
>
>
> http://christopherdiarmani.com/10532/police/abuse-of-police-authority/high-river-rcmp-looters-criminals-treated-immediately/
>
> http://www.calgarysun.com/2013/08/09/high-river-homeowner-upset-police-entered-his-home-three-times-after-flood-hit-and-seized-antique-firearms
>
> Greg Kvisle. CENTURY 21 Foothills Real Estate. Bldg. F, 1103 18 Street
> SE. High River, ABT1V 2A9. Office: 403-652-2121. Cell: 403-601-3533
>
> Ken Braat Associate,Realtor. Century 21 Foothills Real Estate 1103 F
> 18 Street SE, T1V 2A9 High River, Alberta 403-601-2070.
>
> High River homeowner upset police entered his home three times after
> flood hit and seized antique firearms
> 205
>
> By Bill Kaufmann ,Calgary Sun
>
> First posted: Friday, August 09, 2013 03:42 PM MDT | Updated: Friday,
> August 09, 2013 04:59 PM MDT
>
>
> The RCMP's post-flood seizure of two family heirloom firearms that
> were hidden in his home is an outrageous trespass, says a High River
> man.
>
> The Mounties made three trips into the home of Greg Kvisle before
> seizing the guns, a 1912 Winchester long-barreled shotgun and a
> 50-year-old .303 rifle in the days following June's deluge.
>
> "My grandfather passed them down to my dad and when he passed away we
> brought them here for safekeeping," said Kvisle, adding neither weapon
> has been fired in decades.
>
> "It's a sentimental thing for me."
>
> He said both guns were stashed in a corner of his basement in a
> storage area beneath boxes and far from any ammunition.
>
> "They weren't visible and were secure as far as I saw it," said Kvisle.
>
> His street wasn't impacted by the flooding and hadn't been evacuated,
> but Kvisle said he was in Calgary when the water hit its height, and
> was barred from returning home for nine days.
>
> Once home, his suspicions that the two weapons might have been seized
> were quickly confirmed.
>
> About half of his neighbours had remained home, including those next
> door who kept an eye on his property and helped Mounties enter his
> home three times, said Kvisle.
>
> "I just don't understand why they were searching for them," he said.
>
> "They're supposed to be protecting our home, not looting it."
>
> Kvisle said he had no trouble getting back his weapons from RCMP
> officers, whom he called courteous and professional.
>
> But the fact Mounties had taken hidden guns from his home on a
> partly-populated street police were patrolling rankles him.
>
> "What's next?" he said.
>
> The Mounties said they seized firearms to prevent them from falling
> into the hands of burglars in vacated, unsecured areas.
>
> Kvisle's guns were situated in open view because it would have taken
> very little to uncover them, said RCMP Sgt. Josee Valiquette.
>
> "It could be in plain view under a bed, in a closet -- somewhere
> somebody could hide," said Valiquette.
>
> "If they happened to open a closet, it is in plain sight...these
> firearms were inappropriately secured."
>
> Kvisle said he's been told a civilian group that oversees the RCMP is
> reviewing his case.
>
> "I hope we get some answers," he said.
>
> bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca
>
> Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
>
> By Erin Hatfield
>
> "If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
> world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
>
> The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
> the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
> watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
> unofficial, theme song for the debate.
>
> The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
> they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
> Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
> chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
> left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
> mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
> the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
>
> The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
> organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
> of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
> and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
>
> Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
> responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
> exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
> Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
> other on their answers and criticizing eachothers' party leaders.
> Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
> questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
> relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
> response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
> getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
>
> Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
> party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
> well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
> on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
> places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
> shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
>
> The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
> one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
> front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
> voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
> Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
> readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
> final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
> register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
> abiding citizens."
>
> The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
> women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
> yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
> spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
>
> Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
> Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You're out of touch," Armstrong
> yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
> post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
> Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
> anyplace," Armstrong responded.
>
> As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
> candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
> fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
> process for the June 28 vote.
>
> Cutline - David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
> favourite possessions--motorcycles.
>
> McKnight/KCR
>
> The Unconventional Candidate
>
> David Amos Isn't Campaigning For Your Vote, But....
>
> By Gisele McKnight
>
> FUNDY--He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
> wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
> that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
>
> Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot--David Amos.
>
> The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
> and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
> running for office in Canada.
>
> One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
> to meet Elections Canada requirements.
>
> When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
> favourite place to do so--Fundy.
>
> Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
> dissatisfaction with politicians.
>
> "I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
> said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
>
> The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
> 1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
> needed to change his life.
>
> "I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
> sometimes in midlife."
>
> So Amos, who'd lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
> motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
> Panhead motorcycle.
>
> "Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
> experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
> renew your faith in mankind - you help anyone you can, you never ask
> for anything, but you take what they offer."
>
> For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
> and conversation all over North America.
>
> Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
> and a daughter and become a house-husband - Mr. Mom, as he calls
> himself.
>
> He also describes himself in far more colourful terms--a motorcyclist
> rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
> individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
> Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
>
> Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.
>
> "But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
> "It's alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
>
> Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
>
> "I didn't appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
> interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
> call me. I'm not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
>
> And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
>
> "I won't take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It's
> not about money. It goes against what I'm fighting about."
>
> What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues - tainted blood,
> the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
> name a few.
>
> "The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs - fishing,
> farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm
> death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
> (NAFTA) out the window.
>
> NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
> easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
>
> Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
>
> "There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
> especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
> Don't necessarily vote for me, but vote."
>
> Although...if you're going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
> your X by his name.
>
> "I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
> say, 'what the hell.'"
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: rmordenassoc@rogers.com ; info@gg.ca ; brian.macdonald@bellaliant.net ;
> James.Spurr ; Randy.McGinnis ; rob.lafrance@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ;
> Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; Gilles. Blinn ;
> gilles.moreau ; danfour ; JAF@UNB.ca ; oldmaison@yahoo.com ;
> mcappe@irpp.org
> Cc: Mackap ; david.alward@gnb.ca ; DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca ; pm ; robin
> reid
> ; tim. porter ; tony ; infomorning ; treasurer@do.treas.gov ;
> madd_professor@cox.net
> Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 7:33 PM
> Subject: I bet the GG David Johnston and his RCMP members remember this
> email EH Reid M
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:48:06 -0400
> Subject: Professor Johnston I suspect I will be suing the Crown before
> you can advise Mr Harper to finally act ethically
> To: president@uwaterloo.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Nov 7, 2007 11:10 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Brian My cell # is 506 434 1379 feel free to use it ASAP
> or say Hoka Hey to Petey Mackay for me will ya?
> To: damian.brooks@gmail.com
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Nov 7, 2007 6:56 PM
> Subject: Brian My cell # is 506 434 1379 feel free to use it ASAP or
> say Hoka Hey to Petey Mackay for me will ya?
> To: brian@brian-macdonald.ca
>
>
> Contact Brian
> http://www.brian-macdonald.com/contact/
> Cellular: 440-5566
>
> Office: 472-4894, 472-7426 (140 King St, Fredericton)
>
> Email: brian@brian-macdonald.ca
>
> For information:
> Fredericton: 472-4894
> Minto: 327-3996
> Oromocto: 357-8878
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos < david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Oct 17, 2007 7:30 PM
> Subject: I tried to talked to you today lady before you were well paid
> to preach to Canadian kids
> To: info@helencaldicott.com
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos < david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >
> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:05:11 -0500
> Subject: This just a small portion of one wiretap tape Ralph my
> matters are pretty serious eh?
> To: racarr@nbnet.nb.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >
> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 19:59:52 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: Welcome to the Big Big Game Det. Louie LaFleur of Fat
> Fred City Finest Do ya think Mr. Dion and his pal Dizzy Lizzie May are
> paying attention yet?
> To: impolitic@rogers.com, wgilmour@pdclawyers.ca ,
> lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca, william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca , days1@parl.gc.ca, day.s@parl.gc.ca,
> warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, derek.strong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Raymond Amos < davidramos333@yahoo.ca>
> Date: Jun 16, 2007 2:40 AM
> Subject: Welcome to the Big Big Game Det. Louie LaFleur of Fat Fred City
> Finest Do ya think Mr. Dion and his pal Dizzy Lizzie May are paying
> attention yet?
> To: fbinhct@leo.gov, Easter.W@parl.gc.ca, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca,
> bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com, bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, days1@parl.gc.ca ,
> day.s@parl.gc.ca, jonesr@cbc.ca, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca, Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca ,
> Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca, Casey.B@parl.gc.ca,
> Comuzzi.J@parl.gc.ca, Thibault.L@parl.gc.ca, Arthur.A@parl.gc.ca,
> Sandra.Conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca , complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca,
> wgilmour@pdclawyers.ca, moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca, kennyco@sen.parl.gc.ca,
> gautht@sen.parl.gc.ca, zimmer@sen.parl.gc.ca, louiselorefice@ndp.ca ,
> leader@greenparty.ca, defence@sen.parl.gc.ca, atkinn@sen.parl.gc.ca,
> dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca, Clabchuk@greenparty.ca, maychair@dal.ca,
> kmcgowan@greenparty.ns.ca , juan.behrend@europeangreens.org
> Cc: whistleblower@ctv.ca, tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com ,
> John.Ferguson@saintjohn.ca, wrscott@nbpower.com, dhay@nbpower.com,
> arsenault_chris@hotmail.com, bill.corby@gnb.ca, lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca,
> Kathy.Alchorn@fredericton.ca , Kim.Quartermain@fredericton.ca,
> Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca, Danny.Copp@fredericton.ca ,
> forest@conservationcouncil.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca,
> abel.leblanc@gnb.ca, jonesr@cbc.ca
>
> I am not within your jurisdiction nor do I plan to come back until it is
> time to argue mr harper and his cohorts in Federal Court however I may drag
> some of you dudes or your lawyers back down to the USA with me to answer me
> in the Second Circuit of the USA as to your involvement in the cover up of
> many Yankee crimes.
>
> I do not have to answer any questions put to me by Fat Fred Fity 's
> Finest about whatever it is you may wish to know about my doings with the
> RCMP but you corrupt city cops must certainly answer someday to your
> support
> and cover up of my false imprisonment in the USA years ago.
>
> Louie tell me honestly if you can find it in your soul to do so, why
> did you laugh and make fun of my plight? I gave you a fair and square
> chance
> to act ethically. i sent you a lot of material byway of this email address
> and i sent it only to you just in case you would act ethically. Now I must
> ask were you born an arsehole or did you work at it your whole life? What
> if
> this shit had happened to you? What would you think of you if you were I?
> Do you and Chucky Leblanc and the crook Alan MacFee have that sinking
> feeling that you pissed off the wrong Maritimer yet or do you think i am
> the
> ultimate loser? If i do lose bigtime I will you sleep at night knowing the
> part you played in my demise? If a sudden fit of integrity overcomes you
> say hey to your bosses Barry MacKnight, Insp Kelly and S/Sgt Copp for me
> will ya and have them provide you with the file that the Police Commission
> gave your god damned police force three years ago and start doing some
> serious work for a change, will ya? Rest assured a lot has happened since.
>
> The chickenshit S/Sgt Kathy Alchorn can say hey to the not so scary
> spooks Norm Plourde and Kevin Jackson and Mikey Guitar and the Louie
> Lefebvre character (his name sounds like yours Louie) for me as well. The
> very shy S/Sgt. Kim Quartermain can tell the crook MacPhee that I will send
> a buddy around to pick up my bike. I will look forward to meeting all you
> bastards
> in court someday but I must remain true to my word and sue Harper first.
>
> Whereas Herménégilde Chiasson, Lieutenant Governor of New
> Brunswick, just appointed Acting S/Sgt. Kim Quartermain, S/Sgt. Kathy
> Alchorn, S\Sgt. Brian Ford and D/Chief Leanne Fitch of the Fredericton
> Police
> Force, as Honorary Aides-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor of New
> Brunswick
> to guard him and the mean old Maison from the likes of me and Chucky
> Leblanc,
> they should have no trouble locating all the documents and CDs that I have
> been
> serving upon all the crooks in and around that house for years.
>
> If you don't believe me just scroll down and find the words of
> the former Governor General. While you are reading and listening to this
> crap consider what "Al" may do next. As you listen again to the portion of
> just one police surveilance tape know that I will him and a couple of his
> friends a complete copy of 139 and a few more even if I am falsely
> imprisoned again A buddy or two jusst has to drop my material into the
> mail.
> Never forget the nutbag blogger Chucky Leblanc has a complete set of
> documents and a CD from 2004 that he did not give to Brad Green as he
> promised. Depupty Dog in one of his rants has already informed me that "Al"
> is pissed off. It is likely just his usual bullshit but if it were true I
> would say Good. Shame on you all and Cya'll in Court.
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> Whereas Mr Scott the spin doctor for NB Power and John Ferguson of Saint
> John both commented that they enjoyed what I said on the dumb Tom Young's
> talk radio show over a year ago on Ground Hog Day I will send it again.
> Maybe Andre Arthur will enjoy it too. N'est Pas?
>
>
> *David Raymond Amos <davidramos333@yahoo.ca>* wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 23:37:32 -0400 (EDT)
> From: David Raymond Amos <davidramos333@yahoo.ca>
> Subject: Fwd: I called you again today Gilmour. Who is more of a
> chickenshit
> you or your new cop client Ken Smith? Sprout some balls will ya and call me
> back
> To: Christopherson.D@parl.gc.ca , Williams.J@parl.gc.ca,
> Wrzesnewskyj.B@parl.gc.ca , Doyle.N@parl.gc.ca, Jennings.M@parl.gc.ca
>
>
>
> *David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com >* wrote:
>
> Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 22:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
> From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> Subject: I called you again today Gilmour. Who is more of a chickenshit you
> or your new cop client Ken Smith? Sprout some balls will ya and call me
> back
> To: wGilmour@ProuseDash.ca, dohertylaw@rogers.com, premier@gnb.ca,
> abel.leblanc@gnb.ca, t.j.burke@gnb.ca, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca ,
> pierre_nollet@cbc.ca, susan_king@cbc.ca, dan_goodyear@cbc.ca,
> allan_white@cbc.ca, mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com,
> execdir@nblib.nb.ca, mleger@stu.ca , jwalker@stu.ca, plee@stu.ca,
> carleton@stu.ca, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca , oldmaison@yahoo.com,
> John.Foran@gnb.ca, kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca, Byron < alltrue@nl.rogers.com>,
> samperrier@hotmail.com
> CC: bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, days1@parl.gc.ca , day.s@parl.gc.ca,
> warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, derek.strong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Aurele.Daigle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Roger.Gillies@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, John.DeWinter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> samperrier@hotmail.com, lorraineroche@gov.nl.ca, deanr0032@hotmail.com ,
> bill.corby@gnb.ca, police@fredericton.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca,
> fbinhct@leo.gov, Easter.W@parl.gc.ca
>
> 506 434 1379
>
> Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 20:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
> From: David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> Subject: So much for the Integrity of the RCMP EH Bevy Baby Busson?
> To: bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, days1@parl.gc.ca, day.s@parl.gc.ca,
> warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ,
> Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, derek.strong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Aurele.Daigle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Roger.Gillies@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, John.DeWinter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> samperrier@hotmail.com, lorraineroche@gov.nl.ca, alltrue@nl.rogers.com ,
> kmdickson0308@yahoo.com, deanr0032@hotmail.com, bill.corby@gnb.ca,
> police@fredericton.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, t.j.burke@gnb.ca,
> John.Foran@gnb.ca, fbinhct@leo.gov, Easter.W@parl.gc.ca,
> alan_white@cbc.ca, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> John.Ferguson@saintjohn.ca, Ivan.Court@saintjohn.ca,
> Christopher.Titus@saintjohn.ca, thespur@hotmail.com, lisah@whooshnet.com,
> dougchristie@shaw.ca , lawald@web.net
> CC: xzone@xzone-radio.com, brinson6@telus.net, wespenre@illuminati.ca,
> choose2reason@yahoo.com, rwnicholson@rwnicholson.com,
> starchamber@sasktel.net, JDHOOK@cox.net, Tim.Porter@gnb.ca,
> news@politicswatch.com, investor@dundeebancorp.com,
> webadmin@justice.gc.ca, info@tbs-sct.gc.ca, dtennant@mccarthy.ca ,
> 2026@gnb.ca, Brendan.Langille@gnb.ca, Martin.Paul@parl.gc.ca,
> Owen.S@parl.gc.ca, Steckle.P@parl.gc.ca, steckp@parl.gc.ca,
> McGuire.J@parl.gc.ca, Peterson.J@parl.gc.ca, Bonin.R@parl.gc.ca,
> Karetak-Lindell.N@parl.gc.ca, Chamberlain.B@parl.gc.ca , dbrown@dwpv.com,
> BCarr-Harris@blgcanada.com, McTeague.D@parl.gc.ca,
> info@politicswatch.com, Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca, Baird.J@parl.gc.ca,
> Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca, McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca, Dhalla.R@parl.gc.ca,
> Casey.B@parl.gc.ca, Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca, Holland.M@parl.gc.ca,
> wickedwanda3@adelphia.net, madd_professor@cox.net, Iolmisha@cs.com ,
> derrickcrobinson@gmail.com, khr909@hotmail.com, erniemusic2@yahoo.com,
> kevin_annett@hotmail.com, radical@radicalpress.com
>
> Just Dave <http://davidamos.blogspot.com/>
> By Location *Visit Detail**
> Visit 1,079
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 199.212.150.# (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)
> ISP Royal Canadian Mounted Police
> Location
> Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts
> State/Region : Ontario
> City : Ottawa
> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> Language unknown
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 6.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0;
> Windows NT 5.1; INFOWEB-APPROVED; INFOWEB-APPROVED-IE6-EN; .
> NET CLR 1.1.4322)
> Javascript disabled
> Time of Visit May 30 2007 11:49:18 am
> Last Page View May 30 2007 11:54:27 am
> Visit Length 5 minutes 9 seconds
> Page Views 3
> Referring URL unknown
> Visit Entry Page http://www.davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Out Click
> Time Zone unknown
> Visitor's Time Unknown
> Visit Number 1,079
>
> Just Dave <http://davidamos.blogspot.com/>
> By Location *Visit Detail**
> Visit 1,078
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 199.212.150.# (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)
> ISP Royal Canadian Mounted Police
> Location
> Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts
> State/Region : Ontario
> City : Ottawa
> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> Language unknown
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 6.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0;
> Windows NT 5.1; INFOWEB-APPROVED; INFOWEB-APPROVED-IE6-EN; .
> NET CLR 1.1.4322)
> Javascript disabled
> Time of Visit May 30 2007 9:29:25 am
> Last Page View May 30 2007 9:29:25 am
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL unknown
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Out Click
> Time Zone unknown
> Visitor's Time Unknown
> Visit Number 1,078
>
> Just Dave http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 1,032
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 159.33.10.#(Canadian Broadcasting Corporation)
> ISP Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
> Location
> Continent : North America
> Country :Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Ontario
> City : Ottawa
> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 6.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 16 bits
> Time of Visit May 25 2007 8:06:36 am
> Last Page View
> May 25 2007 8:06:36 am
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.blogger.com/profile/7645241
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Out Click
> Time Zone
> UTC-4:00
>>
> Visitor's Time May 25 2007 8:06:36 am
> Visit Number 1,032
>
> N.B. government to await federal probe into possible RCMP wrongdoing May
> 30,
> 2007 - 19:47
>
> By: KEVIN BISSETT
> FREDERICTON (CP) - New Brunswick Attorney General T.J. Burke declined
> comment Wednesday on allegations of wrongdoing within the provincial RCMP.
> At least two current and former Mounties in the province are among more
> than
> a dozen officers across the country who have alleged wrongdoing within the
> force, including abuse of power, harassment and the coverup of evidence.
> One of the published allegations was made by Daniel Bernier, a former RCMP
> corporal who lives near Fredericton. He claims he was removed from an
> investigation in which he said he found evidence of the misuse of federal
> funds by New Brunswick government officials in 1999.
> He alleges grants were wrongly approved to farmers.
> Once he was removed from the case, Bernier said an internal investigation
> by
> the RCMP was called into his conduct.
> "Our government doesn't respond to allegations," Burke said Wednesday when
> asked by reporters about the claims published this week.
> "We respond to factual information that is provided to us, information that
> we need to investigate and look at."
> William Gilmour, an Ontario lawyer representing some of the Mounties who
> made the allegations, said the current and former members are anxious to
> tell their stories, but there must be protection from reprisal.
> "We're actively seeking the government to afford a venue in the nature of a
> parliamentary committee, where there's some protection for these people,
> where they have agreed to come forward and tell their stories," he said
> Wednesday.
> Gilmour, who is an ex-Mountie, said he has been trying to get the federal
> government to call his clients before such a committee for a year, but so
> far nothing has happened.
> In the Commons on Wednesday, Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day was
> accused by the opposition of ignoring the turmoil.
> "The Conservative public safety minister's response is to shrug his
> shoulders, plug his ears and see no evil, hear no evil," said Liberal Sue
> Barnes.
> "Is this wilful blindness or gross negligence? When it comes to protecting
> the integrity of Canada's national police, why is the public safety
> minister
> thwarting real action?"
> Day responded by saying the government is "taking action to get to the
> bottom of some of the concerns that have been raised."
> Another New Brunswick Mountie, Staff Sgt. Ken Smith, is suing senior
> officers at J Division in Fredericton for alleged harassment, but the New
> Brunswick government has stepped in and stayed proceedings.
> The province has asked the Fredericton police force to fully investigate
> the
> Smith case, which includes allegations of unauthorized use of tracking
> devices on his police vehicle.
> "For the 30 years that I have had with the police force, my job has been to
> go out and investigate crime," Smith said. "To find that we have just as
> much crime happening within our organization, which is stopping us from
> doing our job, is very troubling for me and for the individuals who have
> come forward."
> Bernier said he's not surprised to hear that as many as 30 current and
> former Mounties would be willing to testify before a parliamentary
> committee.
> "The country of Canada is quite vast and the RCMP is all over the place,
> and
> I'm sure I'm not the only one who has been treated like a piece of shit,"
> Bernier said.
> Gilmour said the appointment of a new RCMP commissioner with the mandate to
> fix the problems in the force could prevent having to launch an inquiry or
> royal commission.
> In the meantime, he said, the reputation of the force is taking a beating.
> "That's really quite unfair to the members on the street who are performing
> such a valuable function and putting their lives at risk every day," said
> Gilmour. "They don't deserve that and it needs to be dealt with far sooner
> than later."
>
> Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 16:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
> From: David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Dirty Dickie Dean hates us all for one reason Sam. Methinks it is
> because he is the FED. What say you Bev Busson?
> To: samperrier@hotmail.com , alltrue@nl.rogers.com,
> kmdickson0308@yahoo.com,
> deanr0032@hotmail.com, bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, derek.strong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, bill.corby@gnb.ca, police@fredericton.ca,
> carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, t.j.burke@gnb.ca, John.Foran@gnb.ca,
> Aurele.Daigle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Roger.Gillies@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> John.DeWinter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, fbinhct@leo.gov, Easter.W@parl.gc.ca,
> days1@parl.gc.ca, day.s@parl.gc.ca, alan_white@cbc.ca,
> jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> John.Ferguson@saintjohn.ca, Ivan.Court@saintjohn.ca,
> Christopher.Titus@saintjohn.ca , lorraineroche@gov.nl.ca
> CC: xzone@xzone-radio.com, brinson6@telus.net, wespenre@illuminati.ca,
> choose2reason@yahoo.com, rwnicholson@rwnicholson.com,
> starchamber@sasktel.net, JDHOOK@cox.net, Tim.Porter@gnb.ca,
> news@politicswatch.com, investor@dundeebancorp.com,
> webadmin@justice.gc.ca, info@tbs-sct.gc.ca, dtennant@mccarthy.ca ,
> 2026@gnb.ca, Brendan.Langille@gnb.ca, Martin.Paul@parl.gc.ca,
> Owen.S@parl.gc.ca, Steckle.P@parl.gc.ca, steckp@parl.gc.ca,
> McGuire.J@parl.gc.ca, Peterson.J@parl.gc.ca, Bonin.R@parl.gc.ca,
> Karetak-Lindell.N@parl.gc.ca, Chamberlain.B@parl.gc.ca , dbrown@dwpv.com,
> BCarr-Harris@blgcanada.com, McTeague.D@parl.gc.ca,
> info@politicswatch.com, Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca, Baird.J@parl.gc.ca,
> Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca, McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca, Dhalla.R@parl.gc.ca,
> Casey.B@parl.gc.ca, Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca, Holland.M@parl.gc.ca,
> wickedwanda3@adelphia.net, madd_professor@cox.net, Iolmisha@cs.com ,
> derrickcrobinson@gmail.com, khr909@hotmail.com, erniemusic2@yahoo.com,
> kevin_annett@hotmail.com, radical@radicalpress.com, thespur@hotmail.com,
> lisah@whooshnet.com , dougchristie@shaw.ca, lawald@web.net
>
> I must say your silence has been deafening for a lady acting as the
> Commissioner for the Crown Corp commonly know as the RCMP. It has been six
> months since you took over from the mean nasty old Zack and you are not one
> bit more ethical. How else can you be so quiet particularly with all the
> scandals breaking out daily about the RCMP?
>
> I hear that the crook Rod Smith who was supposed to advise everyone
> how to be ethical retired just in a nick of time after he and I had a
> little
> pow wow on the phone. I was not surprised that you shitcanned Zack's old
> assistant Mikey MacDonald in your office and that you replaced him with
> your
> own nomind assistant Pierre Leduc. It was too funny that he has the same
> last name as the nasty dude that finally answered me from the Commission of
> Public Complaints Against the RCMP after five long years of pure hell for
> my
> little Clan. Why don't one of you just tell the truth, the whole truth and
> nothing but the truth just like you are supposed to do and let the
> political
> cards fall where they may? Qiut the false allegation game will ya? It is
> getting a little redundant, don't ya think?
>
> I sure hope some cop blows the whistle bigtime real soon but I ain't
> betting on it. However I will lays odds that the only ones to respond to
> this email will be the nasty Yankee Depupty Dog and his little buddy Dirty
> Dickie Dean with more of their Bullshit. That said I have no doubt you
> crooks are just wondering who I send this email to next and when i will
> Blog
> it. Right? (Its already done scroll down to the bottom do ya think the new
> Accountability Commissioner will find it first?
>
> Say hey to the crooked NSIS agents Norm Plourde, (AKA "Porcupine
> Prique" ) and his pals, Cpl Jackson and Sean Lowe for me will ya Dirty
> Dickie Dean?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 506 434 1379
>
> Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 13:36:41 -0400
> From: "PCC Complaints" < complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
> To: <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com >
>
> May 23, 2007
> File No. PC-2005-1291
>
> Mr. David R Amos
>
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> On a number of occasions you have called or sent e-mails our office to
> raise
> matters which are of pressing concern to you.
>
> Each time we have tried to respond by explaining to you the relatively
> narrow mandate of this Commission and the limits of our powers to deal with
> the matters which are of concern to you. I must stress, once again, that
> the purpose of this Commission is to provide the public with an opportunity
> to make complaints concerning the conduct of members of the RCMP in the
> performance of their duties. We have neither the expertise nor the legal
> authority to permit us to become involved in issues beyond the scope of
> this
> mandate.
>
> While it is clearly not the intention of the Commission to prevent you from
> making complaints against members of the RCMP, an analysis of your numerous
> contacts with the Commission indicates that your concerns fall well outside
> the confines of our mandate. Further, your frequent e-mails have been
> disruptive and unproductive for both you and for the staff of this office.
>
> Should you determine that some point in the future you have a complaint
> concerning the conduct of a member of the RCMP in the performance of his or
> her duties, please submit it to the Commission *by Canada Post only*. As
> of
> now, your e-mails will be deleted unread.
>
> Yours truly,
>
> Andrée Leduc
> Enquiries and Complaints Analyst
>
> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Say hey to Shawn Murphy for me will ya
> Brian?
> Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 15:25:45 -0400
> From: "REVIEWS" <reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
> To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com<
>
> The Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP has received your
> e-mail message and will be responding in due course.
>
> La Commission des plaintes du public contre la GRC a reçu votre courriel et
> vous rendra une réponse au moment opportun.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 03:29:59 -0300
> Subject: Re Glen Greenwald and the Brazilian President Rousseff's
> indignant tweets So Stevey Boy Harper your CSEC dudes and their NSA
> pals no doubt know all about my conversation with the dudes from
> Brazil last month Wheras the CBC and the Guardian etc want to know it
> all we should share EH?
> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, rusun@un.int,
> john.adams@queensu.ca, John.Forster@cse-cst.gc.ca,
> td.ombudsman@td.com, christopher.montague@td.com,
> Frank.McKenna@td.com, Glenn.Greenwald@guardian.co.uk,
> info@praxisfilms.org, birgittaj@althingi.is,
> ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk, steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca,
> roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, ambassador@brasilemb.org,
> slrc@itamaraty.gov.br, cuba@un.int, protocol@dn.mofa.go.jp,
> japan.mission@dn.mofa.go.jp, protocol@s1.mofa.go.jp,
> j.kroes@interpol.int, craig.dalton@forces.gc.ca, bairdj@parl.gc.ca,
> MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca,
> shy.winkfield@guardiannews.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
> sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca, justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca,
> bginsberg@pattonboggs.com, RBauer@perkinscoie.com, justmin@gov.ns.ca,
> rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca, rmordenassoc@rogers.com, merricra@gov.ns.ca,
> stephen.m.cutler@jpmorgan.com, boston@ic.fbi.gov,
> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, prenquiries@eiu.com,
> mailbox@brasembottawa.org, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca,
> newsroom@theguardian.pe.ca, criminal.division@usdoj.gov,
> lachapelle.edith@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Janet.MacLean@international.gc.ca,
> dfildebrandt@taxpayer.com, ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca,
> themayor@calgary.ca, atlantic.director@taxpayer.com,
> premier@gov.ab.ca, premier@gnb.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
> jamiebaillie@gov.ns.ca, bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net,
> nichor@parl.gc.ca, greg.weston@cbc.ca, Manon.Hardy@priv.gc.ca,
> Dion.Mario@psic-ispc.gc.ca, csu@jesuits.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, Julian.Borger@guardian.co.uk
>
> http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/31/greece-imf-brazil-idUSL6N0G05GI20130731
>
> http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/24/brazil-president-un-speech-nsa-surveillance
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/politics/story/1.1928147
>
> https://mobile.twitter.com/dilmabr
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 03:14:34 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
> Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> Hey
>
> The sneaky ex CSIS dude Michelle Juneau-Katsuya was not wise to call
> the President of Brazil a Prima Donna but what he said is true about
> her merely playing politcs Everybody who wants to know can know what
> happened between Brazil and I since early 2005. All they have to do is
> ask me. If they don't believe me they can call the Boys from Brazil
> and ask them if what I said in the video hereto attached or the
> documents I to them and many other UN dudes long ago is true or false.
> Trust that Stevey Harper, Franky McKenna and the rest of the
> IMF/Bilderberger crowd ain't gonna tell anyone anything. EH Bobby
> Bauer and Stevey Cutler?
>
> The video is just a clip from a longer conversation with a good friend
> weeks ago. Perhaps your snoopy minions in the RCMP/DND should be wise
> to listen to it all if they haven't already EH?
>
> Anyone can find that chat saved here
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/index.php?dir=DavidAmos/
>
> It is entitled as follows
>
> 2013-09-21 time 16_34_08 Incoming Peer-to-Peer Call david.raymond.amos
>
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/index.php?dir=DavidAmos/
>
>
> These are the cover letters for the documents I sent to the UN Dudes
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/UN%20DUDES-txt.pdf
>
> BTW Perhaps the times are a changing now that the stock market is
> falling bigtime once again. Believe or not I am kinda sorta impressed
> by the words of the latest Pope. I can'tbelieve a Jesuit would say
> such things. Amazing things never cease.
>
> The Dec 12th,2002 date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of
> mine and the name of Cardinal Bernard Francis Law should mean a lot to
> him if he truly has an ethical soul and is wise enough to ignore his
> many lawyers.
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Francis_Law
>
> Law resigned as Archbishop of Boston on December 13, 2002, in response
> to the Roman Catholic Church sex abuse scandal after church documents
> were revealed which suggested he had covered up sexual abuse committed
> by priests in his archdiocese.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 1 902 800 0369
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <ambassador@brasilemb.org>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 7:04 PM
> Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
> Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <slrc@itamaraty.gov.br>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 1:06 AM
> Subject: Re A call back from the Embassy for Brazil in Washington from
> (202 238 2770)
>
>
> I just got your message now and called back I know it is off hours so
> I left a voicemail attempting to explain my concerns. I am kinda hard
> to get ahold of ask the NSA people listening to your Embassy and
> reading this why that is necessary
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> ----- Forwarded Message -----
> From: magicJack <voicemail@notify.magicjack.com>
> To: DAVID AMOS
> Sent: Friday, September 6, 2013 10:07 AM
> Subject: New VM (2) - 0:23 minutes in your magicJack mailbox from
> 2022382770
>
> Dear magicJack User:
>
> You received a new 0:23 minutes voicemail message, on Friday,
> September 06, 2013 at 09:07:46 AM in mailbox 9028000369 from
> 2022382770.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:52:55 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
> Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
> To: slrc@itamaraty.gov.br
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <braun@delbrasonu.org>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 6:39 PM
> Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
> Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <cuba@un.int>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 6:32 PM
> Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
> Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <protocol@dn.mofa.go.jp>; <japan.mission@dn.mofa.go.jp>;
> <protocol@s1.mofa.go.jp>; "j.kroes" <j.kroes@interpol.int>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 6:31 PM
> Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
> Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
>
>
> The Permanent Mission of Japan to the United Nations
> 866 U.N. Plaza, 2nd Floor
> New York, NY 10017
> E-mail : japan.mission@dn.mofa.go.jp
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:11:03 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
> Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
> To: jicc@ws.mofa.go.jp
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:06:03 -0300
> Subject: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the Boss
> of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
> To: rusun@un.int, bairdj <bairdj@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, MulcaT
> <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>,
> "justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, bginsberg
> <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>, RBauer <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "craig.dalton"
> <craig.dalton@forces.gc.ca>, dnd_mdn <dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca>
>
> The document hereto attached is very real and I made certain that the
> Russians remember what I sent all the G20 people in the UN within
> August of 2005 Ask the warmongers John McCain if and his buddy Obama
> or their lawyers Mr Bauer and Mr Ginsberg I am a liar or not
>
> Address: 136 East 67 Street,
> New York, N.Y. 10065
> Phone: 1(212)861-4900;
> 1(212)861-4901;
> FAX: 1(212)628-0252;
>
> E-mail: rusun@un.int
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <ambassador@brasilemb.org>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 8:07 PM
> Subject: Brazil and I just got cut off again here is what I was trying
> to tell you folks
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <Glenn.Greenwald@guardian.co.uk>; <info@praxisfilms.org>;
> "birgittaj" <birgittaj@althingi.is>; "ed.pilkington"
> <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>; "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>; "roger.l.brown"
> <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "shy.winkfield"
> <shy.winkfield@guardiannews.com>; "oldmaison" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>;
> "sallybrooks25" <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>; "Mordaith"
> <Mordaith@gmail.com>; <wayne.lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
> <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>; <david.alward@gnb.ca>; <nancy.forbes@gnb.ca>;
> <judith.keating@gnb.ca>; <luc.labonte@gnb.ca>;
> <marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>; <wishart.john@dailygleaner.com>;
> "macpherson.don" <macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>; "ian.fahie"
> <ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <david.eidt@gnb.ca>;
> <Richard.Williams@gnb.ca>; <ddelaquis@cldglaw.com>;
> <cfawcett@lawsoncreamer.com>; "Mackap" <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>; "premier"
> <premier@gnb.ca>; "bernadine.chapman"
> <bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "john.warr"
> <john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "jennifer.johnston"
> <jennifer.johnston@gov.bc.ca>; "t.wilson" <t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
> "radical" <radical@radicalpress.com>; "maryann4peace"
> <maryann4peace@gmail.com>; "police" <police@fredericton.ca>;
> <kselick@canadianconstitutionfoundation.ca>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "glen"
> <glen@glencanning.com>; "ddexter" <ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca>; "justmin"
> <justmin@gov.ns.ca>; "rmellish" <rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca>;
> "rmordenassoc" <rmordenassoc@rogers.com>; "merricra"
> <merricra@gov.ns.ca>; "stephen.m.cutler"
> <stephen.m.cutler@jpmorgan.com>; "StephenMcNeil"
> <StephenMcNeil@ns.aliantzinc.ca>; "jamiebaillie"
> <jamiebaillie@gov.ns.ca>; <Brian.Topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
> "Ian.Shardlow" <Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "Gilles.Moreau"
> <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "msegal" <msegal@murraysegal.com>;
> <DANIEL.POULIN@chrc-ccdp.ca>; <abromberg@bnaibrith.ca>;
> <habrams@pacificcoast.net>; "ndesrosiers" <ndesrosiers@ccla.org>
> Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 11:17 PM
> Subject: Re: Snowden ain't got nothing on mean old me when it comes to
> dealing with corrupt Feds and keeping one's Integrity as well
>
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/fwd-snowden-aint-got-nothing-on-mean.html
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/fwd-if-murray-segal-were-to-conduct.html
>
> On 8/18/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <Glenn.Greenwald@guardian.co.uk>; <info@praxisfilms.org>;
> "birgittaj" <birgittaj@althingi.is>; "ed.pilkington"
> <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>; "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>; "roger.l.brown"
> <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>;
> <DANIEL.POULIN@CHRC-CCDP.CA>; <abromberg@bnaibrith.ca>;
> <habrams@pacificcoast.net>; "ndesrosiers" <ndesrosiers@ccla.org>
> Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 10:54 PM
> Subject: Snowden ain't got nothing on mean old me when it comes to
> dealing with corrupt Feds and keeping one's Integrity as well
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:40:18 -0300
> Subject: YO FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers I just called your
> office and the nasty Yankee played dumb as usual
> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"
> <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov,
> us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney
> <jcarney@carneybassil.com>, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, birgittaj
> <birgittaj@althingi.is>, shmurphy@globe.com, Red Ice Creations
> <redicecreations@gmail.com>
>
> Clearly I am not joking
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 19,571
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 153.31.113.# (FBI Criminal Justice Information Systems)
> ISP FBI Criminal Justice Information Systems
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : West Virginia
> City : Clarksburg
> Lat/Long : 39.2664, -80.3097 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; InfoPath.2;
> .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; MS-RTC
> LM 8; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 800 x 600
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Jun 12 2013 5:00:01 pm
> Last Page View Jun 12 2013 5:00:01 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...YIZDuTIWsfuPUhflswCk
> Search Engine google.com
> Search Words jp morgan and "andrew kosloff"
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...-stewart-and-me.html
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...-stewart-and-me.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Jun 12 2013 4:00:01 pm
> Visit Number 19,571
>
> On 6/15/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> FBI Boston
>> One Center Plaza
>> Suite 600
>> Boston, MA 02108
>> Phone: (617) 742-5533
>> Fax: (617) 223-6327
>> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>>
>> Hours
>> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
>> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
>> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
>> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
>> office at (617) 742-5533.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
>> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
>> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
>> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
>> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
>> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney <jcarney@carneybassil.com>,
>> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, michael wolfheart
>> <wolfheartlodge@live.com>, jonathan.albano@bingham.com,
>> shmurphy@globe.com, mvalencia@globe.com
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, oldmaison
>> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>>
>> http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/06/05/james-whitey-bulger-jury-selection-process-enters-second-day/KjS80ofyMMM5IkByK74bkK/story.html
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> To: "Fred.Wyshak" <Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov>; "jcarney"
>> <jcarney@carneybassil.com>; <Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov>;
>> <us.marshals@usdoj.gov>
>> Cc: <edit@thr.com>; "maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>;
>> "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 11:50 AM
>> Subject: So Fred Wyshak has Brian Kelly and the rest of the corrupt
>> Feds practiced the spirit of fill disclosure with Jay Carney??
>>
>> If so then why didn't Mr Carney return my phone calls last July???
>>
>> http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2012/01/09/bulger_lawyers_due_in_court_for_update_on_evidence/
>>
>> http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/lawyer_known_as_patron_saint_of_hopeless_cases_is_representing_whitey_bulge/
>>
>> http://bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/2011_0625lawyer_tab_is_in_billys_court_feds_believe_brother_should_shell_out_for_defense
>>
>> http://articles.boston.com/2011-07-01/news/29726987_1_jay-carney-bulger-brookline-clinics
>>
>> http://carneybassil.com/team/carney/
>>
>> Truth is stranger than fiction. Perhaps Ben Affleck and Matt Damon a
>> couple of boyz from Beantown who done good will pay attention to mean
>> old me someday EH?
>>
>> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/ben-affleck-matt-damon-whitey-bulger-254994
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> SOMEBODY SHOULD ASK THE CBC AND THE COPS A VERY SIMPLE QUESTION.
>>
>> WHY was Byron Prior and I banned from parliamentry properties while I
>> running for a seat in parliament in 2004 2 whole YEARS before the
>> mindless nasty French Bastard Chucky Leblanc was barred in NB and yet
>> the CBC, the Fat Fred City Finest and the RCMP still deny anything
>> ever happened to this very day even though Chucky and his pals have
>> blogged about it???
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2006/06/20/nb-bloggerbanned20060620.html
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-fat-fred-citys-finest.html
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/04/david-amos-nb-nwo-whistleblower-part-3.html
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/07/feds-institutionalize-determined-nb.html
>>
>> Did anybody bother to listen to me explain things to the Police
>> Commissioners in 2004?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/NewBrunswickPoliceCommission
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 21:56:57 -0300
>> Subject: Re Yankee Feds Please allow me to be brief with the crooks in
>> Wikileaks and the Guardian EH Birgitta and Ed Pilkington?
>> To: "Fred.Wyshak" <Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov>, "john.warr"
>> <john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, redicecreations@gmail.com, birgittaj
>> <birgittaj@althingi.is>, Piratar <piratar@pirateparty.is>,
>> "ed.pilkington" <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>, janice.smith@cbc.ca,
>> camilla.inderberg@cbc.ca, "david.akin" <david.akin@sunmedia.ca>,
>> Alan.Dark@cbc.ca, newsonline <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>, "John.Williamson"
>> <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, aih <aih@cbc.ca>,
>> news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>, "bob.paulson"
>> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
>> <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>
>> http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/09/edward-snowden-nsa-whistleblower-surveillance
>>
>> "Snowden will go down in history as one of America's most
>> consequential whistleblowers, alongside Daniel Ellsberg and Bradley
>> Manning. He is responsible for handing over material from one of the
>> world's most secretive organisations - the NSA."
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 4:04 PM
>> Subject: Ed Here is your ticket to keep you out of hot water Just send
>> this to Hugh Grant and he can raise hell for you
>>
>> Byway of the US FTC the Feds in many countries can never deny that
>> they did not know the truth long ago
>>
>> From: Ed Pilkington <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>
>> Subject: GUARDIAN
>> To: myson333@yahoo.com
>> Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 11:42 AM
>>
>> hi
>>
>> here's my email and my cell number is below
>>
>> all best
>>
>> Ed
>>
>> --
>> Ed Pilkington
>> New York bureau chief
>> The Guardian
>> www.guardian.co.uk
>> twitter.com/Edpilkington
>>
>> Cell: 646 704 1264
>>
>> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Visit guardian.co.uk - newspaper of the year
>> www.guardian.co.uk www.observer.co.uk
>>
>> On your mobile, visit m.guardian.co.uk or download the Guardian
>> iPhone app www.guardian.co.uk/iphone
>>
>> To save up to 30% when you subscribe to the Guardian and the Observer
>> visit www.guardian.co.uk/subscriber
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This e-mail and all attachments are confidential and may also
>> be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify
>> the sender and delete the e-mail and all attachments immediately.
>> Do not disclose the contents to another person. You may not use
>> the information for any purpose, or store, or copy, it in any way.
>>
>> Guardian News & Media Limited is not liable for any computer
>> viruses or other material transmitted with or as part of this
>> e-mail. You should employ virus checking software.
>>
>> Guardian News & Media Limited
>>
>> A member of Guardian Media Group plc
>> Registered Office
>> PO Box 68164
>> Kings Place
>> 90 York Way
>> London
>> N1P 2AP
>>
>> Registered in England Number 908396
>>
>> THE GUARDIAN MUST REMEMBER ME EH EDDY BABY???
>>
>> Click on this link
>>
>> http://50states.ning.com/video/rcmp-sussex-new-brunswick
>>
>> OR SCROLL DOWN TO ASSURE YOURSELF THAT WIKILEAKS OR THE CROWN CORPS
>> KNOWN AS THE CBC AND THE RCMP TO NAME ONLY THREE CAN NEVER DENY THAT
>> THEY DON'T KNOW ALL ABOUT MEAN OLD ME AND MY CONCERNS
>>
>> HOWCOME FOR 10 YEARS PUBLIC OFFICIALS IN THE USA CANADA ICELAND
>> ENGLAND AND ALL THE OTHERS WITHIN "COALITION OF THE WILLING" ETC
>> IGNORED THE FACT THAT I HAVE HAD MANY YANKEE WIRETAP TAPES THAT COULD
>> HAVE IMPEACHED GEORGEY BOY BUSH AND HIS COHORTS LONG BEFORE THE
>> PATRIOT ACT OR THE WAR ON IRAQ BEGAN???
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>> http://joyb.blogspot.ca/2010/11/my-statement-from-nato-parliamentary.html
>>
>> http://50states.ning.com/video/rcmp-sussex-new-brunswick
>>
>> http://www.nycga.net/members/davidraymondamos/
>>
>>> From: David Amos
>>> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 23:22:00 -0300
>>> Subject: i just called from 902 800 0369 (Nova Scotia)
>>> To: 9.17occupywallstreet@gmail.com
>>>
>>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-...
>>>
>>> I am the guy the SEC would not name that is the link to Madoff and
>>> Putnam Investments
>>>
>>> http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hear...
>>>
>>> Notice the transcript and webcast of the hearing of the US Senate
>>> banking Commitee is missing? please notice Eliot Spitzer and the Dates
>>> around November 20th, 2003 in te following file
>>>
>>> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-righ...
>>>
>>> From: "Julian Assange)"
>>> Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 18:15:46 +0000 (GMT)
>>> Subject: Al Jazeera on Iceland's plan for a press safe haven
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> FYI: Al-Jazeera's take on Iceland's proposed media safe haven
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbGiPjIE1pE
>>>
>>> More info http://immi.is/
>>>
>>> Julian Assange
>>> Editor
>>> WikiLeaks
>>> http://wikileaks.org/
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Birgitta Jonsdottir
>>> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:14:02 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: Bon Soir Birgitta according to my records this is the
>>> first email I ever sent you
>>> To: David Amos
>>>
>>> dear Dave
>>> i have got your email and will read through the links as soon as i
>>> find some time
>>> keep up the good fight in the meantime
>>>
>>> thank you for bearing with me
>>> i am literary drowning in requests to look into all sorts of matters
>>> and at the same time working 150% work at the parliament and
>>> the creation of a political movement and being a responsible parent:)
>>> plus all the matters in relation to immi
>>>
>>> with oceans of joy
>>> birgitta
>>>
>>> Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are
>>> not.
>>>
>>> Andre Gide
>>>
>>> Birgitta Jonsdottir
>>> Birkimelur 8, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland, tel: 354 692 8884
>>> http://this.is/birgitta - http://joyb.blogspot.com -
>>> http://www.facebook.com/birgitta.jonsdottir
>>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Henrik Palmgren <redicecreations@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:46:26 +0200
>> Subject: Re: Oh my my I guess we know the score on you EH?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Oh my. Don't send me your spam. It's not good for anything.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 17:27:53 -0300
>> Subject: Re Teddy Baby Olson was on Fox News today yapping about
>> Presidential enemies list as he represents the crooks in Koch
>> Industries??? If anyone should know about such things it is Olson
>> after all he assisted Ashcroft and Bush against me
>> To: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Office@tigta.treas.gov, RBauer@perkinscoie.com,
>> mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov, "Gilles.Moreau"
>> <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, ron.klain@revolution.com,
>> dboies@bsfllp.com, tolson@gibsondunn.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com,
>> "ed.pilkington" <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>, news
>> <news@thetelegraph.com.au>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
>> rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com, gregory.craig@skadden.com,
>> Patrick.Fitzgerald@skadden.com
>>
>> Hey
>>
>> As Harper sits and bullshits his cohorts in the Council of Foreign
>> Relations in the Big Apple today I bet he was listening to what was
>> happening with Obama and the IRS and Holder and his DOJ minions
>> in Washington.
>>
>> Notice the Inspector General of the IRS Dudes within this old file?
>>
>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/9092510/Chicago
>>
>> Everybody and his dog knows Harper knew about my battles with the US
>> Treasury and Justice Depts way back when he was the boss of the
>> opposition in Canada's Parliament. Two simple files easily found on
>> the Internet cannot be argued.
>>
>> Notice how old the letter and Form 211 are?
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/5-years-waiting-on-bank-fraud-payout.html
>>
>> Here the Inspector Generals calling me 7 years ago?
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
>>
>> FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Office of Chief Counsel, Treasury.
>> Inspector General for Tax Administration, (202) 622-4068.
>>
>> When Teddy bitches about polticians using the IRS to attack their
>> enemies because he knows it true because he helped Bush the IRS
>> against me when Obama was just a State Senator .
>>
>> The proof was when I sent him the documents that came along with the
>> letter
>> found on page 13 of this old file Teddy Baby Olson quit as Solicitor
>> General.
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>>
>> Harper and every body else knows It was no coincidence that I sent the
>> lawyers Olson as Solicitior General, Ferguson as the co chair of the
>> Federal Reserve Bank, and J Strom Thurmond Jr the youngest US
>> Attorney the same pile of documents on April Fools Day 2004.
>>
>> The sad but terrible truth is that legions of cops, lawyers polticians
>> and bureaucrats in Canada and the USA knew about the US Secret Service
>> coming to my home after dark on April Fools Day 2003 bearing false
>> allegations of a presidential threat and threatening to use their
>> implied right to use exta ordinary rendition against me as a non
>> citizen less than two weeks after the needless War in Iraq began and
>> no WMD were ever found.
>>
>> You can bet dimes to dollars i called some Yankee Inspector Generals
>> (starting with 202 622 4068) and reminded them that I am still alive
>> and kicking and reminding the world of their malicious incompetence
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> PS Below you can review some emails I sent you and your Yankee cohorts
>> such asTeddy Baby Olson before Obama was reelected EH Harper? In truth
>> I would rather settle in confidence with Obama then sue the Hell out
>> of the CROWN and the Holy See Trust that the evil old Judge Bastarache
>> has known why for a very long time.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> To: "Rob Talach" <rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
>> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
>> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>>
>> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
>> a lot to you
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400
>> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW
>> Bernadine Chapman??
>> To: Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, phil.giles@statcan.ca,
>> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca,
>> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca,
>> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca, webo
>> <webo@xplornet.com>, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
>> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1
>> <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>, "Nycole.Turmel" <Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca>,
>> Clemet1 <Clemet1@parl.gc.ca>, maritime_malaise
>> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, oig <oig@sec.gov>, whistleblower
>> <whistleblower@finra.org>, whistle <whistle@fsa.gov.uk>, david
>> <david@fairwhistleblower.ca>
>> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
>> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "justin.trudeau.a1"
>> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "Juanita.Peddle"
>> <Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
>> "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Robert.Trevors"
>> <Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca>, "ian.fahie" <ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>
>> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/news-nouvelles/media-medias-eng.htm
>>
>> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/Newsletters/VetsReview/nlnov06.pdf
>>
>> From: Gilles Moreau <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500
>> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy
>> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH
>> Constable Peddle???
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails.
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC
>> Director General
>> HR Transformation
>> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
>>
>> Tel 613-843-6039
>> Cel 613-818-6947
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC
>> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines
>> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
>>
>> tél 613-843-6039
>> cel 613-818-6947
>> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>>>> David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> 2012-11-21 00:01 >>>
>>
>> Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its
>> because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it
>> yet
>>
>> Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the
>> link to Madoff and Putnam Investments
>>
>> Here is why
>>
>> http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2
>>
>> Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate
>> Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice
>> Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the
>> following file
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf
>>
>> NONE of you should have assisted in the cover up of MURDER CORRECT???
>>
>> http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2011/2011-06-22/html/sor-dors122-eng.html
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> To: <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>; <Rob.Renaud@cbc.ca>
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:45 PM
>> Subject: Question # 1 who the hell is Rob Renaus and di Robert Jone
>> and Jaques Poitra and Alan white etc forward you my latest emails
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Edith Cody-Rice <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:53:07 -0500
>> Subject: Calls and E-mails to CBC
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> Cc: Rob Renaud <Rob.Renaud@cbc.ca>
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> CBC personnel have contacted me concerning your calls and e-mails to
>> them. As you are threatening legal action, would you kindly direct any
>> further calls or correspondence to me. Other CBC personnel will not
>> respond further to your correspondence or calls.
>>
>>
>> Edith Cody-Rice
>> Senior Legal Counsel
>> Premier Conseiller juridique
>> CBC/Radio-Canada
>> 181 Queen Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1K9
>> Postal Address: P.O. Box 3220, Station C, Ottawa K1Y 1E4
>> Tel: (613) 288-6164
>> Cell: (613) 720-5185
>> Fax/ Télécopieur (613) 288-6279
>>
>> IMPORTANT NOTICE
>> This communication is subject to solicitor/client privilege and
>> contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) to
>> whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, other
>> distribution of this communication
>> or taking any action on its contents is strictly prohibited. If you
>> have received this message in error, please notify us immediately and
>> delete this message without reading, copying or forwarding it to
>> anyone.
>>
>> AVIS IMPORTANT
>> La présente communication est assujettie au privilège du secret
>> professionnel de l'avocat et renferme des renseignements confidentiels
>> intéressant uniquement leur destinataire. Il est interdit de
>> divulguer, de copier ou de distribuer cette communication par quelque
>> moyen que ce soit ou de donner suite à son contenu sans y être
>> autorisé. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez nous en
>> avertir immédiatement et le supprimer en évitant de le lire, de le
>> copier ou de le transmettre à qui que ce soit.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400
>> Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
>> the USDOJ for me will ya?
>> To: RBauer <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
>> cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith <msmith@svlaw.com>, bginsberg
>> <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>, "gregory.craig"
>> <gregory.craig@skadden.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
>> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.rae"
>> <bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, leader
>> <leader@greenparty.ca>
>> Cc: alevine@cooley.com, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
>> michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
>>
>> QSLS Politics
>> By Location Visit Detail
>> Visit 29,419
>> Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
>> IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
>> ISP US Dept of Justice
>> Location Continent : North America
>> Country : United States (Facts)
>> State : District of Columbia
>> City : Washington
>> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
>> Language English (U.S.) en-us
>> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
>> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
>> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
>> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
>> DI60SP1001)
>> Javascript version 1.3
>> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
>> Color Depth : 32 bits
>> Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
>> Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
>> Visit Length 0 seconds
>> Page Views 1
>> Referring URL http://www.google.co...wwWJrm94lCEqRmovPXJg
>> Search Engine google.com
>> Search Words david amos bernie madoff
>> Visit Entry Page
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
>> Visit Exit Page
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
>> Out Click
>> Time Zone UTC-5:00
>> Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm
>> Visit Number 29,419
>>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> To: <eachtem@hotmail.com>; <alltrue@nl.rogers.com>;
> <deanr0032@hotmail.com>; <dean@law.ualberta.ca>; <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>;
> <injusticecoalition@hotmail.com>; "Edith. Cody-Rice"
> <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>; "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>;
> "kelly. lamrock" <kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca>; <oldmaison@yahoo.com>;
> "Duane.Rousselle" <Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca>; "john.adams"
> <john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca>; <mackay01@canada.com>;
> <IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>; <deanray98@yahoo.ca>; "Dean.Buzza"
> <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <ahunter100@shaw.ca>; <t.j.burke@gnb.ca>;
> "jackblood" <jackblood@hotmail.com>; "jack. keir" <jack.keir@gnb.ca>;
> <David.ALWARD@gnb.ca>; "drywallrocker" <drywallrocker@hotmail.com>;
> "shawn. graham" <shawn.graham@gnb.ca>; "shawn.howard"
> <shawn.howard@wildrosealliance.ca>
> Cc: <td.ombudsman@td.com>; "christopher. montague"
> <christopher.montague@td.com>; "Frank. McKenna"
> <Frank.McKenna@td.com>; "John.DeWinter" <John.DeWinter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 2:07 PM
> Subject: Lets see if John Adams the current the CSE is clever enough
> to put two and two together about the TD EH Franky Boy McKenna
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ombudsman, Td
> To: 'david.raymond.amos@gmail.com'
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 6:11 PM
> Subject: your e-mails dated November 3, 2008
>
> November 4, 2008
>
> David Amos
> P.O. Box 234
> Apohaqui, NB
> E5P 3G2
>
> ----------------------
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> We acknowledge receipt of your e-mails dated November 3, 2008, which
> we received in our office on November 4, 2008.
>
> We would like to thank you for providing our office with your feedback
> surrounding the various issues. We have reviewed the numerous pieces
> of correspondence that you e-mailed to us. It is our understanding
> that you have a number of concerns surrounding politics and the
> actions of the government within North America.
>
> We appreciate the effort you have taken to express your views
> surrounding these issues, however we do not believe we can be of any
> assistance as this falls outside the mandate of this office.
>
> Thank you for taking the time to bring your concerns to our attention.
>
> Yours truly,
>
> Paul W. Huyer
>
> Ombudsman
>
>
> *********************
> NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY
> This communication including any information transmitted with it is
> intended only for the use of the addressees and is confidential.
> If you are not an intended recipient or responsible for delivering
> the message to an intended recipient, any review, disclosure,
> conversion to hard copy, dissemination, reproduction or other use
> of any part of this communication is strictly prohibited, as is the
> taking or omitting of any action in reliance upon this communication.
> If you receive this communication in error or without authorization
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail or otherwise and
> permanently delete the entire communication from any computer,
> disk drive, or other storage medium.
>
> If the above disclaimer is not properly readable, it can be found at
> www.td.com/legal
>
> AVERTISSEMENT DE CONFIDENTIALITE
> Ce courriel, ainsi que tout renseignement ci-inclus, destiné uniquement
> aux destinataires susmentionnés, est confidentiel. Si vous
> n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu ou un agent responsable de la
> livraison de ce courriel, tout examen, divulgation, copie, impression,
> reproduction, distribution, ou autre utilisation d'une partie de ce
> courriel est strictement interdit de même que toute intervention ou
> abstraction à cet égard. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur ou
> sans autorisation, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par
> retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen et supprimer immédiatement
> cette communication entière de tout système électronique.
>
> Si l'avis de non-responsabilité ci-dessus n'est pas lisible, vous
> pouvez le consulter à www.td.com/francais/legale
>
> Mr Bush thanked the Netherlands for its cooperation during his time in
> office and particularly praised the Dutch presence in Afghanistan.
> After the meeting, Mr Balkenende said he had spoken freely about
> matters on which the two countries disagree, including climate policy
> and the US detention facility for terrorist suspects at Guantánamo
> Bay.
>
> Mr Verhagen will also hold meetings with US Secretary of State
> Condoleezza Rice and close aides of presidential candidates John
> McCain and Barack Obama. Mr Balkenende is attending the Bilderberg
> Conference, the highly secretive annual meeting of the world's most
> influential people, which is this year being held in Chantilly outside
> Washington DC.
> Article Continues
> ----------------
> (Source: Infowars):
> BILDERBERG MEETING - "Chantilly, Virginia, USA" - 5-8 June 2008 - LIST
> OF PARTICIPANTS
>
> Honorary Chairman
> BEL "Davignon, Etienne" "Vice Chairman, Suez-Tractebel"
>
> DEU "Ackermann, Josef" "Chairman of the Management Board and the Group
> Executive Committee, Deutsche Bank AG"
> CAN "Adams, John" Associate Deputy Minister of National Defence and
> Chief of the Communications Security Establishment Canada
> USA "Ajami, Fouad" "Director, Middle East Studies Program, The Paul H.
> Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, The Johns Hopkins
> University"
> USA "Alexander, Keith B." "Director, National Security Agency"
> INT "Almunia, Joaquín " "Commissioner, European Commission"
> GRC "Alogoskoufis, George" Minister of Economy and Finance
> USA "Altman, Roger C." "Chairman, Evercore Partners Inc."
> TUR "Babacan, Ali " Minister of Foreign Affairs
> NLD "Balkenende, Jan Peter" Prime Minister
> PRT "Balsemão, Francisco Pinto" "Chairman and CEO, IMPRESA, S.G.P.S.;
> Former Prime Minister"
> FRA "Baverez, Nicolas" "Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP"
> ITA "Bernabè, Franco" "CEO, Telecom Italia Spa"
> USA "Bernanke, Ben S." "Chairman, Board of Governors, Federal Reserve
> System"
> SWE "Bildt, Carl" Minister of Foreign Affairs
> FIN "Blåfield, Antti " "Senior Editorial Writer, Helsingin Sanomat"
> DNK "Bosse, Stine" "CEO, TrygVesta"
> CAN "Brodie, Ian " "Chief of Staff, Prime Minister's Office"
> AUT "Bronner, Oscar" "Publisher and Editor, Der Standard"
> FRA "Castries, Henri de " "Chairman of the Management Board and CEO, AXA"
> ESP "Cebrián, Juan Luis" "CEO, PRISA"
> CAN "Clark, Edmund" "President and CEO, TD Bank Financial Group"
> GBR "Clarke, Kenneth" Member of Parliament
> NOR "Clemet, Kristin" "Managing Director, Civita"
> USA "Collins, Timothy C." "Senior Managing Director and CEO,
> Ripplewood Holdings, LLC"
> FRA "Collomb, Bertrand" "Honorary Chairman, Lafarge"
> PRT "Costa, António" Mayor of Lisbon
> USA "Crocker, Chester A." James R. Schlesinger Professor of Strategic
> Studies
> USA "Daschle, Thomas A." Former US Senator and Senate Majority Leader
> CAN "Desmarais, Jr., Paul" "Chairman and co-CEO, Power Corporation of
> Canada"
> GRC "Diamantopoulou, Anna" Member of Parliament
> USA "Donilon, Thomas E." "Partner, O'Melveny & Myers"
> ITA "Draghi, Mario" "Governor, Banca d'Italia"
> AUT "Ederer, Brigitte" "CEO, Siemens AG Österreich"
> CAN "Edwards, N. Murray" "Vice Chairman, Candian Natural Resources Limited"
> DNK "Eldrup, Anders " "President, DONG A/S"
> ITA "Elkann, John" "Vice Chairman, Fiat S.p.A."
> USA "Farah, Martha J." "Director, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience;
> Walter H. Annenberg Professor in the Natural Sciences, University of
> Pennsylvania"
> USA "Feldstein, Martin S." "President and CEO, National Bureau of
> Economic Research"
> DEU "Fischer, Joschka" Former Minister of Foreign Affairs
> USA "Ford, Jr., Harold E." "Vice Chairman, Merill Lynch & Co., Inc."
> CHE "Forstmoser, Peter" "Professor for Civil, Corporation and Capital
> Markets Law, University of Zürich"
> IRL "Gallagher, Paul " Attorney General
> USA "Geithner, Timothy F. " "President and CEO, Federal Reserve Bank
> of New York"
> USA "Gigot, Paul " "Editorial Page Editor, The Wall Street Journal"
> IRL "Gleeson, Dermot " "Chairman, AIB Group"
> NLD "Goddijn, Harold" "CEO, TomTom"
> TUR "Gögüs, Zeynep " "Journalist; Founder, EurActiv.com.tr"
> USA "Graham, Donald E." "Chairman and CEO, The Washington Post Company"
> NLD "Halberstadt, Victor" "Professor of Economics, Leiden University;
> Former Honorary Secretary General of Bilderberg Meetings"
> USA "Holbrooke, Richard C. " "Vice Chairman, Perseus, LLC"
> FIN "Honkapohja, Seppo" "Member of the Board, Bank of Finland"
> INT "Hoop Scheffer, Jaap G. de" "Secretary General, NATO"
> USA "Hubbard, Allan B." "Chairman, E & A Industries, Inc."
> BEL "Huyghebaert, Jan" "Chairman of the Board of Directors, KBC Group"
> DEU "Ischinger, Wolfgang" Former Ambassador to the UK and US
> USA "Jacobs, Kenneth" "Deputy Chairman, Head of Lazard U.S., Lazard
> Frères & Co. LLC"
> USA "Johnson, James A." "Vice Chairman, Perseus, LLC" (Obama's man
> tasked with selecting his running mate)
> SWE "Johnstone, Tom " "President and CEO, AB SKF"
> USA "Jordan, Jr., Vernon E." "Senior Managing Director, Lazard Frères & Co.
> LLC"
> FRA "Jouyet, Jean-Pierre " Minister of European Affairs
> GBR "Kerr, John " "Member, House of Lords; Deputy Chairman, Royal
> Dutch Shell plc."
> USA "Kissinger, Henry A." "Chairman, Kissinger Associates, Inc."
> DEU "Klaeden, Eckart von" "Foreign Policy Spokesman, CDU/CSU"
> USA "Kleinfeld, Klaus" "President and COO, Alcoa"
> TUR "Koç, Mustafa " "Chairman, Koç Holding A.S."
> FRA "Kodmani, Bassma" "Director, Arab Reform Initiative"
> USA "Kravis, Henry R." "Founding Partner, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co."
> USA "Kravis, Marie-Josée" "Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute, Inc."
> INT "Kroes, Neelie " "Commissioner, European Commission"
> POL "Kwasniewski, Aleksander " Former President
> AUT "Leitner, Wolfgang" "CEO, Andritz AG"
> ESP "León Gross, Bernardino" "Secretary General, Office of the Prime
> Minister"
> INT "Mandelson, Peter" "Commissioner, European Commission"
> FRA "Margerie, Christophe de" "CEO, Total"
> CAN "Martin, Roger" "Dean, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management,
> University of Toronto"
> HUN "Martonyi, János" "Professor of International Trade Law; Partner,
> Baker & McKenzie; Former Minister of Foreign Affairs"
> USA "Mathews, Jessica T. " "President, Carnegie Endowment for
> International Peace"
> INT "McCreevy, Charlie " "Commissioner, European Commission"
> USA "McDonough, William J." "Vice Chairman and Special Advisor to the
> Chairman, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc."
> CAN "McKenna, Frank" "Deputy Chair, TD Bank Financial Group"
> GBR "McKillop, Tom " "Chairman, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group"
> FRA "Montbrial, Thierry de" "President, French Institute for
> International Relations"
> ITA "Monti, Mario" "President, Universita Commerciale Luigi Bocconi"
> USA "Mundie, Craig J. " "Chief Research and Strategy Officer,
> Microsoft Corporation"
> NOR "Myklebust, Egil" "Former Chairman of the Board of Directors SAS,
> Norsk Hydro ASA"
> DEU "Nass, Matthias" "Deputy Editor, Die Zeit"
> NLD "Netherlands, H.M. the Queen of the"
> FRA "Ockrent, Christine" "CEO, French television and radio world service"
> FIN "Ollila, Jorma" "Chairman, Royal Dutch Shell plc"
> SWE "Olofsson, Maud " Minister of Enterprise and Energy; Deputy Prime
> Minister
> NLD "Orange, H.R.H. the Prince of"
> GBR "Osborne, George" Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer
> TUR "Öztrak, Faik" Member of Parliament
> ITA "Padoa-Schioppa, Tommaso " Former Minister of Finance; President
> of Notre Europe
> GRC "Papahelas, Alexis" "Journalist, Kathimerini"
> GRC "Papalexopoulos, Dimitris" "CEO, Titan Cement Co. S.A."
> USA "Paulson, Jr., Henry M." Secretary of the Treasury
> USA "Pearl, Frank H." "Chairman and CEO, Perseus, LLC"
> USA "Perle, Richard N." "Resident Fellow, American Enterprise
> Institute for Public Policy Research"
> FRA "Pérol, François" Deputy General Secretary in charge of Economic
> Affairs
> DEU "Perthes, Volker" "Director, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik"
> BEL "Philippe, H.R.H. Prince"
> CAN "Prichard, J. Robert S." "President and CEO, Torstar Corporation"
> CAN "Reisman, Heather M." "Chair and CEO, Indigo Books & Music Inc."
> USA "Rice, Condoleezza" Secretary of State
> PRT "Rio, Rui " Mayor of Porto
> USA "Rockefeller, David " "Former Chairman, Chase Manhattan Bank"
> ESP "Rodriguez Inciarte, Matias" "Executive Vice Chairman, Grupo Santander"
> USA "Rose, Charlie" "Producer, Rose Communications"
> DNK "Rose, Flemming" "Editor, Jyllands Posten"
> USA "Ross, Dennis B." "Counselor and Ziegler Distinguished Fellow, The
> Washington Institute for Near East Policy"
> USA "Rubin, Barnett R." "Director of Studies and Senior Fellow, Center
> for International Cooperation, New York University"
> TUR "Sahenk, Ferit " "Chairman, Dogus Holding A.S."
> USA "Sanford, Mark" Governor of South Carolina
> USA "Schmidt, Eric" "Chairman of the Executive Committee and CEO, Google"
> AUT "Scholten, Rudolf " "Member of the Board of Executive Directors,
> Oesterreichische Kontrollbank AG"
> DNK "Schur, Fritz H. " Fritz Schur Gruppen
> CZE "Schwarzenberg, Karel " Minister of Foreign Affairs
> USA "Sebelius, Kathleen" Governor of Kansas
> USA "Shultz, George P." "Thomas W. and Susan B. Ford Distinguished
> Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University"
> ESP "Spain, H.M. the Queen of"
> CHE "Spillmann, Markus" "Editor-in-Chief and Head Managing Board, Neue
> Zürcher Zeitung AG"
> USA "Summers, Lawrence H." "Charles W. Eliot Professor, Harvard University"
> GBR "Taylor, J. Martin" "Chairman, Syngenta International AG"
> USA "Thiel, Peter A." "President, Clarium Capital Management, LLC"
> NLD "Timmermans, Frans" Minister of European Affairs
> RUS "Trenin, Dmitri V." "Deputy Director and Senior Associate,
> Carnegie Moscow Center"
> INT "Trichet, Jean-Claude" "President, European Central Bank"
> USA "Vakil, Sanam" "Assistant Professor of Middle East Studies, The
> Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins
> University"
> FRA "Valls, Manuel " Member of Parliament
> GRC "Varvitsiotis, Thomas" "Co-Founder and President, V + O Communication"
> CHE "Vasella, Daniel L." "Chairman and CEO, Novartis AG"
> FIN "Väyrynen, Raimo" "Director, The Finnish Institute of International
> Affairs"
> FRA "Védrine, Hubert" Hubert Védrine Conseil
> NOR "Vollebaek, Knut" "High Commissioner on National Minorities, OSCE"
> SWE "Wallenberg, Jacob" "Chairman, Investor AB"
> USA "Weber, J. Vin" "CEO, Clark & Weinstock"
> USA "Wolfensohn, James D. " "Chairman, Wolfensohn & Company, LLC"
> USA "Wolfowitz, Paul" "Visiting Scholar, American Enterprise Institute
> for Public Policy Research"
> INT "Zoellick, Robert B. " "President, The World Bank Group"
>
> Rapporteurs
> GBR "Bredow, Vendeline von" "Business Correspondent, The Economist"
> GBR "Wooldridge, Adrian D." "Foreign Correspondent, The Economist"
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> To: <aefa@sen.parl.gc.ca>; "bairdj" <bairdj@parl.gc.ca>
> Cc: <db26@queensu.ca>; "maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2011 12:08 AM
> Subject: Fwd: Brazil understands the Global Economy far better than PM
> Harper or Robert Wood of the EIU does
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 23:33:48 -0300
> Subject: Brazil understands the Global Economy far better than PM
> Harper or Robert Wood of the EIU does
> To: prenquiries@eiu.com, mailbox@brasembottawa.org,
> "flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca" <flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca>, "Harris. J"
> <Harris.J@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>
> Cc: newsroom <newsroom@theguardian.pe.ca>, Newsroom
> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, maritime_malaise
> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
>
> http://eiumedia.com/index.php/component/comprofiler/userprofile/RobertWood
>
> http://www.cpac.ca/forms/index.asp?dsp=template&act=view3&template_id=181&Lang=e
>
> Foreign Affairs (September 29, 2011)
>
> The committee continued its study of political and economic
> developments in Brazil and the implications for Canada.
>
> Robert Wood, senior editor and economist of the Economist Intelligence
> Unit, and Douglas Bland, former chair of Defence Management Studies at
> Queen's University, testified.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:34:59 -0300
> Subject: For the record the so callled "expert" Kevin O'Leary yapping
> on CBC right now is pretending that he has no clue about this
> To: exchange@cbc.ca, tonis.saar@riigikontroll.ee,
> sarah.chapman@fsa.gov.uk, W-Five@ctv.ca,
> bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net, nichor@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1@parl.gc.ca,
> greg.weston@cbc.ca, thepurplevioletpress@gmail.com,
> Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Cc: maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca, jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com,
> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, chiefape@gmail.com, nbpc@gnb.ca
>
> It looks Estonia is gonna suffer like Iceland did because its
> political bosses were too dumb to read or worse
>
> http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=8353833
>
> "The EFSF doesn't solve problems, it only takes money," lawyer and
> member of parliament Legal Affairs Committee Igor Grazin from the
> ruling Reform Party told parliament.
>
> Mailis Reps, of the left-leaning opposition Centre Party, said it was
> unfair for Estonia to have to dip into its coffers.
>
> "When we look at the salaries of teachers, the state support for
> children and so on, it's all many times smaller here than in the
> countries Estonia is now going to support financially," she said.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:06:31 -0300
> Subject: Thanks again Mr Kruuv I see the folks in Estonia are still
> debating Thats good
> To: Riho Kruuv <riho.kruuv@mfa.ee>
> Cc: maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca, tonis.saar@riigikontroll.ee, "Saatkond
> Ottawas üldaadress (e-mail)" <embassy.ottawa@mfa.ee>
>
> http://news.ph.msn.com/business/article.aspx?cp-documentid=5329588
>
> In answer to your question you will find the following words within
> the email you responded to. For the benetit of the taxpayers in
> Estonia your government and I should discuss them ASAP.
>
> I tried hrd to explain my concerns on the phone to you but you wanted
> me to prove that my IP connection was ok for some reason. FYI I
> already knew that it was because I was calling you through the Inernet
>
> Please read and click on the links
>
> I am the unamed Whistleblower that Mr Nester of the SEC mentioned
> in 2009 who is the link from Putnam investments and Madoff matter
> To support , my allegations first and foremost Eric Schneiderman
> should see that Eliot Spitzer testified on the very day he thanked me
> for the info in November of 2003.
>
> Please notice the transcripts and webcasts went of th Senate hearings
> "poof' not long after I made the congressman Ron Paul and legions of
> others well aware of their existence as he bitched about such things
> whilst running for the GOP endorsement to run for president in 2007.
> The records of the hearings were deleted in late fall 2007 just as all
> the subprime mortgages began to smell bad.
>
> http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2
>
> Now check the dates on the letters in this file page 13 in particular
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf
>
>
> A portion of the email below can be found within the following link or
> simply Google Amos and Madoff and anyone can find it
> This is not my blog
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
>
> Notice Mr Nestor of the SEC?
>
> These are more informative blogs of his about me
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/06/5-years-waiting-on-bank-fraud-payout.html
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/04/david-amos-nb-nwo-whistleblower-part-3.html
>
>
>
> On 9/29/11, Riho Kruuv <riho.kruuv@mfa.ee> wrote:
>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>
>> Now that we have made sure that your e-mails aren't blocked by Estonian
>> mail
>> servers, please specify, where do you see an issue or problem or what do
>> you
>> expect Estonian authorities to do (differently)?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Riho Kruuv
>> Chargé d'Affaires
>> Embassy of Estonia
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 29. september 2011. a. 12:07
>> To: Riho Kruuv; Saatkond Ottawas üldaadress (e-mail);
>> tonis.saar@riigikontroll.ee
>> Cc: maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca
>> Subject: Thanks Mr Kruuv As far as I know Austria, Estonia, Malta, the
>> Netherlands and Slovakia have yet to vote to support Greece
>>
>> Thus there maybe some time yet
>>
>> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2011/09/29/bloomberg_articlesLSAF5V0UQVI9.DTL
>>
>> "Estonia votes on the measures later today followed by Austria tomorrow."
>>
>> Estonian Embassy
>> 260 Dalhousie Street,
>> Suite 210 Ottawa,
>> Ontario K1N 7E4
>> Canada
>> tel. (1 613) 789 42 22
>> fax: (1 613) 789 95 55
>> embassy.ottawa@mfa.ee
>>
>> Read more:
>> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2011/09/29/bloomberg_articlesLSAF5V0UQVI9.DTL#ixzz1ZMCF6S77
>> From: Riho Kruuv <riho.kruuv@mfa.ee>
>> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:45:04 -0500
>> Subject: Communication check
>> To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>
>> I hope that you received this e-mail and can pass the information you
>> spoke about to me.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Riho Kruuv
>>
>> Chargé d'Affaires
>>
>> Embassy of Estonia in Canada
>>
>> www.estemb.ca <http://www.estemb.ca/>
>>
>>
>> From: "OSBORNE, George" <george.osborne.mp@parliament.uk>
>> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:56:26 +0100
>> Subject: Thank you for your e-mail
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much for your e-mail to George Osborne.
>>
>> If you are contacting George in his capacity as Chancellor of the
>> Exchequer, please re-send your e-mail to:
>> public.enquiries@hm-treasury.gov.uk<mailto:public.enquiries@hm-treasury.gov.uk>.
>> Alternatively, write to The Correspondence & Enquiry Unit, HM
>> Treasury, 1 Horseguards Road, London, SW1A 2HQ or telephone 020 7270
>> 4558.
>>
>> If you are one of George's Tatton constituents, please ensure that you
>> have included your full postal address and postcode, so that we can
>> identify you as a constituent. The Tatton office, which is for
>> constituent enquiries only, can be reached on 01565 873037.
>>
>> If you are a personal contact of George's, your e-mail will be
>> forwarded accordingly.
>>
>> With kind regards,
>>
>> Office of Rt Hon George Osborne MP
>> Chancellor of the Exchequer
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:46:12 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: ISS10441377
>> To: public.enquiries@hm-treasury.gov.uk, ministers@hm-treasury.gov.uk
>> Cc: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
>> "j.kroes" <j.kroes@interpol.int>, maritime_malaise
>> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:17:07 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: ISS10441377
>> To: complaint.info@financial-ombudsman.org.uk
>> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, "Dean.Buzza"
>> <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:03:32 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: ISS10441377
>> To: info@hermitagefund.com, "flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca"
>> <flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "bert. hudon"
>> <bert.hudon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, michael.geller@rbs.com,
>> Barbara.Cottam@citizensbank.com, "shahtx(gmail)" <shahtx@gmail.com>,
>> "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca" <william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
>> "j.kroes" <j.kroes@interpol.int>, oig <oig@sec.gov>
>> Cc: "alfred.smithers" <alfred.smithers@fco.gov.uk>,
>> MIMEsweeper@fsa.gov.uk, maritme_malaise <maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca>
>>
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:53:14 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: Re: ISS10441377 Perhaps You or your Ambassador in Ottawa
>> or Halifax should call me back? 902 800 0369
>> To: info@hermitagefund.com
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: MIMEsweeper@fsa.gov.uk
>> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:34:51 +0100 (BST)
>> Subject: RE: Re: ISS10441377 Perhaps You or your Ambassador in Ottawa
>> or Halifax should call me back? 902 800 0369
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Dear customer,
>>
>> Thank you for your email. If your query is urgent, or you think you
>> have been contacted by a SCAM do not wait for a reply. Instead, please
>> call our Consumer Helpline on 0845 606 1234, and we will help with
>> your query immediately. Please advise the agent who takes your call
>> that you have emailed us previously. If your query is not urgent,
>> please be aware that we work to a service level of 12 working days,
>> and it is likely that it will take this long to respond to you.
>>
>> PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL ADDRESS
>>
>> This communication and any attachments contains information which is
>> confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. It is for intended
>> recipients only. If you are not the intended recipient you must not
>> copy, distribute, publish, rely on or otherwise use it without our
>> consent. Some of our communications may contain confidential
>> information which it could be a criminal offence for you to disclose
>> or use without authority. If you have received this email in error
>> please notify postmaster@fsa.gov.uk immediately and delete the email
>> from your computer.
>> The FSA reserves the right to monitor all email communications for
>> compliance with legal, regulatory and professional standards.
>> This email is not intended to nor should it be taken to create any
>> legal relations or contractual relationships. This email has
>> originated from
>>
>> The Financial Services Authority (FSA)
>> 25 The North Colonnade,
>> Canary Wharf,
>> London
>> E14 5HS
>> United Kingdom
>>
>> Registered as a Limited Company in England and Wales No.1920623.
>> Registered Office as above
>> Switchboard: 020 7066 1000
>> Web Site: http://www.fsa.gov.uk
>> *****************************************************************
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: FCC <Consumer.Queries@fsa.gov.uk>
>> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:44:47 +0100 (BST)
>> Subject: RE: ISS10441377
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Our Ref: PC41073. ISS10441377
>>
>> In order that we can deal with this matter as quickly as possible
>> please do not delete the Subject line of this email when you reply.
>> You can add further wording to it but please do not remove
>> "ISS10441377".
>>
>> Dear Sir or Madam,
>>
>> Please accept this acknowledgement of the receipt of your email dated
>> 31 August 2011, the contents of which have been noted for our records.
>>
>> I have not responded to your email, as you have not addressed this to
>> us directly, nor have you asked us any questions.
>>
>> However, I feel it would be of use if I explain our role. We are the
>> UK's financial watchdog set up by the government to regulate financial
>> services. We protect consumers by setting standards that FSA-regulated
>> firms must meet and taking action if they don't. We regulate most
>> types of financial services firms, such as banks, building societies,
>> credit unions, insurance companies, financial advisers, stockbrokers,
>> and mortgage and insurance sellers.
>>
>> If you have any future questions on financial services and products,
>> you may find it easier to call our Consumer Helpline on 0845 606 1234
>> (call rates may vary).
>>
>> You can also access relevant information online at
>> www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation and via the Money Advice
>> Service website: www.moneyadviceservice.org.uk/.
>>
>> I trust this is of assistance, and welcome any further feedback you
>> may have in relation to this matter.
>>
>> Yours faithfully
>>
>> Victoria Warren (Miss)
>> Customer Contact Centre
>> Financial Services Authority
>> Consumer Helpline: 0845 606 1234 (call rates may vary)
>> www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation
>>
>> We are interested in finding out about people's views and experiences
>> of the services offered by the Customer Contact Centre. As a result,
>> we employ a research agency to help us, and they may contact you, via
>> the telephone, to see if you would be prepared to take part in a short
>> telephone interview. If you do receive a phone call you are under no
>> obligation to complete the survey. Please rest assured that your
>> details will remain confidential and will not be used for any other
>> purposes; we are not trying to sell you any financial products or
>> service, and no sales call will result from this.
>>
>> If you do not wish to take part in any of our surveys, please call the
>> Customer Contact Centre on 0845 606 1234 (call rates may vary), or
>> email consumer.queries@fsa.gov.uk and we will ensure that your details
>> are not passed on to the research agency.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: sarah.chapman@fsa.gov.uk
>> Date Sent: 31/08/2011 16:54:39
>> To: Consumer.Queries@fsa.gov.uk
>> Subject: RE: ISS10441377
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 28 August 2011 01:40
>> To: michael.geller@rbs.com; Barbara.Cottam@citizensbank.com; oig;
>> whistleblower; Whistle
>> Cc: Dean.Buzza; maritime_malaise
>> Subject: Do your people at RBS think I am joking?
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 14:08:24 -0300
>> Subject: i just called you again Mr O'Donnell perhaps you should review
>> the Homestead Act and check your work
>> To: registerodonnell@norfolkdeeds.org
>> Cc: "Fred.Wyshak" <Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov>, maritime_malaise
>> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 13:57:12 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: I just called and tried to reason with you people whilst
>> the Stock Markets tumble AGAIN Correct JIM?
>> To: Jim.Hughes@citizensbank.com
>> Cc: D.Jones@citizensbank.com, oig <oig@sec.gov>, OIG <OIG@ftc.gov>, ir
>> <ir@landsbanki.is>, ir <ir@statestreet.com>, jrogers <jrogers@nhpr.org>
>>
>> I saw you checking my work on the web now check your bank's malicious
>> work in the attachment
>>
>> Just Dave
>> By Location Visit Detail
>> Visit 14,733
>> Domain Name citizensbank.com ? (Commercial)
>> IP Address 12.46.106.# (CITIZENS BANK)
>> ISP AT&T WorldNet Services
>> Location Continent : North America
>> Country : United States (Facts)
>> State : Rhode Island
>> City : Pawtucket
>> Lat/Long : 41.8735, -71.3734 (Map)
>> Language English (U.S.) en-us
>> Operating System Macintosh WinXP
>> Browser Safari 1.3
>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko)
>> Chrome/13.0.782.107 Safari/535.1
>> Javascript version 1.5
>> Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 1024
>> Color Depth : 32 bits
>> Time of Visit Aug 5 2011 1:38:08 pm
>> Last Page View Aug 5 2011 1:38:08 pm
>> Visit Length 0 seconds
>> Page Views 1
>> Referring URL http://www.google.co...d amos citizens bank Search Engine
>> google.com Search Words david amos citizens bank
>> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>> Out Click
>> Time Zone UTC-5:00
>> Visitor's Time Aug 5 2011 12:38:08 pm
>> Visit Number 14,733
>>
>> QSLS Politics
>> By Location Visit Detail
>> Visit 22,067
>> Domain Name citizensbank.com ? (Commercial)
>> IP Address 12.154.167.# (CITIZENS BANK)
>> ISP AT&T WorldNet Services
>> Location Continent : North America
>> Country : United States (Facts)
>> State : Massachusetts
>> City : Dover
>> Lat/Long : 42.2417, -71.2874 (Map)
>> Language English (U.S.)
>> en-us
>> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
>> Browser Internet Explorer 6.0
>> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR
>> 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR
>> 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)
>> Javascript version 1.3
>> Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 1024
>> Color Depth : 32 bits
>> Time of Visit Aug 5 2011 6:39:44 pm
>> Last Page View Aug 5 2011 6:39:44 pm
>> Visit Length 0 seconds
>> Page Views 1
>> Referring URL http://www.google.co...=f&aqi=g-b1&aql=&oq=
>> Search Engine google.com
>> Search Words amos david madoff
>> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
>> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
>> Out Click
>> Time Zone UTC-6:00
>> Visitor's Time Aug 5 2011 11:39:44 am
>> Visit Number 22,067
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 09:59:29 -0300
>> Subject: i just called and tried to reason with you people whilst the
>> Stock Markets tumble AGAIN Correct?
>> To: david.barry@nbsc-cvmnb.ca, kptummon@gov.pe.ca, obrienhl@gov.ns.ca,
>> slattejw@gov.ns.ca, atkinssj@gov.ns.ca, gsinfo@gov.nl.ca,
>> harryharding@gov.nl.ca, "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>,
>> "jonesr@cbc.ca" <jonesr@cbc.ca>
>> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, oig <oig@sec.gov>,
>> ministerofstate <ministerofstate@acoa-aperca.gc.ca>, "Dean.Buzza"
>> <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, newsroom <newsroom@telegraphjournal.com>,
>> "Barry.MacKnight" <Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca>,
>> "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>
>>
>> Since you won't speak to me, why not talk about your deliberate
>> incompetence to the foreign newsmen contacting me?
>>
>> csa-acvm-secretariat@acvm-csa.ca
>>
>> http://www.nbsc-cvmnb.ca/nbsc/LanguageRH.do?type=english
>>
>> http://www.gov.pe.ca/securities/index.php3?number=48628&lang=E
>>
>> http://www.gov.ns.ca/nssc/contactnssc.htm
>>
>> http://www.gs.gov.nl.ca/
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <myson333@yahoo.com>
>> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 12:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
>> Subject: Ed Here is your ticket to keep you out of hot water Just send
>> this to Hugh Grant and he can raise hell for you
>> To: ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Byway of the US FTC the Feds in many countries can never deny that they
>> did not know the truth long ago
>>
>> From: Ed Pilkington <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>
>> Subject: GUARDIAN
>> To: myson333@yahoo.com
>> Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 11:42 AM
>>
>> hi
>>
>> here's my email and my cell number is below
>>
>> all best
>>
>> Ed
>>
>> --
>> Ed Pilkington
>> New York bureau chief
>> The Guardian
>> www.guardian.co.uk
>> twitter.com/Edpilkington
>>
>> Cell: 646 704 1264
>> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Visit guardian.co.uk - newspaper of the year www.guardian.co.uk
>> www.observer.co.uk
>>
>> On your mobile, visit m.guardian.co.uk or download the Guardian iPhone
>> app www.guardian.co.uk/iphone
>>
>> To save up to 30% when you subscribe to the Guardian and the Observer
>> visit www.guardian.co.uk/subscriber
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This e-mail and all attachments are confidential and may also be
>> privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender
>> and delete the e-mail and all attachments immediately.
>> Do not disclose the contents to another person. You may not use the
>> information for any purpose, or store, or copy, it in any way.
>>
>> Guardian News & Media Limited is not liable for any computer viruses or
>> other material transmitted with or as part of this e-mail. You should
>> employ virus checking software.
>>
>> Guardian News & Media Limited
>>
>> A member of Guardian Media Group plc
>> Registered Office
>> PO Box 68164
>> Kings Place
>> 90 York Way
>> London
>> N1P 2AP
>>
>> Registered in England Number 908396
>>
>>
>> --- On Tue, 8/2/11, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re Rupert Murdoch and his associates Perhaps Ms Curtis should
>> show this email to the actor Hugh Grant
>> To: polly.curtis@guardian.co.uk
>> Cc: jhenderson@newscorp.com, rnolte@newscorp.com, jdorrego@newscorp.com,
>> "maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
>> Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2011, 2:21 PM
>>
>> http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jul/12/hugh-grant-phone-hacking-inquiry
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: OIG <OIG@ftc.gov>
>> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:29:48 -0400
>> Subject: RE: I just called again and tried to speak with John Seeba and
>> Cynthia Hogue of the FTC
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>> Mr Amos. I just talked to you. Our office only has jurisdiction over
>> internal matters like if an FTC employee is involved in fraud. We also
>> report to congress to notify them how the FTC utilizes funds.
>>
>> What can we do for you?
>>
>> Thanks. Zisa Walton
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 4:23 PM
>> To: OIG; maritime_malaise
>> Cc: Fred. Pretorius; Fred.Wyshak
>> Subject: I just called again and tried to speak with John Seeba and
>> Cynthia Hogue of the FTC
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:56:13 -0300
>> Subject: RE BSkyB and News Corp I am on the phone to you right now
>> To: jhorner@newscorp.com, teverett@newscorp.com,
>> jhenderson@newscorp.com, rnolte@newscorp.com, jdorrego@newscorp.com,
>> "Marc.Litt" <Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov>
>> Cc: oig <oig@sec.gov>, maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
>> "Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>
>> http://www.newscorp.com/management/newscor.html
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:05:59 -0300
>> Subject: RE BSkyB and News Corp
>> To: aarti.maharaj@thecrossbordergroup.com, bpollack@milchev.com,
>> emma.gilpin-jacobs@ft.com, saltschuller@foleyhoag.com
>> Cc: newsroom <newsroom@wnyc.org>
>>
>> http://www.corporatesecretary.com/articles/11949/newscorp-searches-legal
>> -help-help-combat-us-lawsuits/
>>
>> http://www.corporatesecretary.com/articles/11928/corporate-social-respon
>> sibility-and-role-board-directors/
>>
>> http://www.csrandthelaw.com/sarah-a-altschuller.html
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 02:45:11 -0300
>> Subject: RE BSkyB and News Corp Opps ol Rupert would be pissed that I
>> forgot to send the oh so important attachments
>> To: jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com, clerks@oeclaw.co.uk,
>> asiskind@newscorp.com, investor-relations@bskyb.com,
>> investor@newscorp.com, "Rupert.Murdoch@fox.com"
>> <Rupert.Murdoch@fox.com>, "James.Murdoch@fox.com"
>> <James.Murdoch@fox.com>, Edith Cody-Rice <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>,
>> Jacques Poitras <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, Robert Jones
>> <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, Terry Seguin <Terry.Seguin@cbc.ca>, "richard.
>> dearden" <richard.dearden@gowlings.com>, maritime_malaise
>> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, "Carol.Coristine@cbc.ca"
>> <Carol.Coristine@cbc.ca>, "Bob.Kerr@CBC.CA" <danfour@myginch.com>
>> Cc: newsdesk@theage.com.au, jbrowning9@bloomberg.net,
>> athomson6@bloomberg.net, kwong11@bloomberg.net,
>> frank.pingue@thomsonreuters.com, editor <editor@newsday.com>, news-tips
>> <news-tips@nytimes.com>, newsonline <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>, newshour
>> <newshour@pbs.org>, newsroom <newsroom@theguardian.pe.ca>, Newsroom
>> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, foreigneditor
>> <foreigneditor@independent.co.uk>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Grant.McCool@thomsonreuters.com
>> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:23:36 -0400
>> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: RE BSkyB and News Corp Hey Jac Nasser
>> Howcome or the trusted lawyers Arty Siskind and Lony Jacobs did not tell
>> the Murdochs I was still alive and kicking like hell?
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> I am out of the office until Monday, August 8. I will not be reading
>> email until then. Regards
>>
>> This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and
>> information company. Any views expressed in this message are those of
>> the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them
>> to be the views of Thomson Reuters.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 02:23:30 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: RE BSkyB and News Corp Hey Jac Nasser Howcome or the
>> trusted lawyers Arty Siskind and Lony Jacobs did not tell the Murdochs I
>> was still alive and kicking like hell?
>> To: jbrowning9@bloomberg.net, athomson6@bloomberg.net,
>> kwong11@bloomberg.net, frank.pingue@thomsonreuters.com,
>> grant.mccool@thomsonreuters.com, juan.lagorio@thomsonreuters.com,
>> vasilescua@sec.gov, friedmani@sec.gov, krishnamurthyp@sec.gov,
>> "Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
>> newsdesk@theage.com.au, bruce.alec@gmail.com
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:41:59 -0300
>> Subject: RE BSkyB and News Corp Hey Jac Nasser Howcome or the trusted
>> lawyers Arty Siskind and Lony Jacobs did not tell the Murdochs I was
>> still alive and kicking like hell?
>> To: jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com, clerks@oeclaw.co.uk,
>> asiskind@newscorp.com, investor-relations@bskyb.com,
>> investor@newscorp.com, "Rupert.Murdoch@fox.com"
>> <Rupert.Murdoch@fox.com>, "James.Murdoch@fox.com"
>> <James.Murdoch@fox.com>, Edith Cody-Rice <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>,
>> Jacques Poitras <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, Robert Jones
>> <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, Terry Seguin <Terry.Seguin@cbc.ca>, "richard.
>> dearden" <richard.dearden@gowlings.com>, maritime_malaise
>> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, "Carol.Coristine@cbc.ca"
>> <Carol.Coristine@cbc.ca>, "Bob.Kerr@CBC.CA" <Bob.Kerr@cbc.ca>
>> Cc: pm@pm.gc.ca, LaytoJ <LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca>, info <info@bobrae.ca>,
>> oldmaison@yahoo.com, danfour <danfour@myginch.com>
>>
>> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-25/bskyb-directors-face-4-2-billio
>> n-quandary.html
>>
>> Interesting quandary you bskyb dudes have. Seems it just got worse EH
>> Jac?
>>
>> Clearly you and I crossed paths bigtime before TWO IMPORTANT elections
>> in Canada last year and obviously News Corp and Bloomberg's pal Joel
>> Klein's old buddies in the US Justice Dept and the SEC etc pissed me off
>> way back in 2002 EH?
>>
>> Need I say iIdid not like it when and heard of corrupt cops in seven
>> cars pounced on my son and I at 2;30 in the morning about two weeks
>> after i received this email from you with the attached letter. Small
>> wonder Stevey Boy Harper stopped the BHP take over bid of Potash when he
>> could not get th RCMP to shut me up EH?
>>
>> BTW the pdf file hereto attached that should refresh Siskind's and
>> Jacobs memories can be found here as well the letter you sent to me last
>> September
>>
>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/60818237/FCC-News-Corp
>>
>> Altough my contempt towards greedy publicly held companies is well known
>> my desire to expose corrupt law enfocement people is far higher on my
>> list of offensive things. If old Rupert were wise and his son is clever
>> perhaps they should have somebody finally call me back ASAP.
>> Perhap Ruper Murdoch can figure how to deal with an honest man ethically
>> for the benefit of many shareholders and the chagrin of the SEC and
>> Barack Obama EH?
>>
>> News Corp has the media and I have the evidence. Why not pretend I am
>> Monte Hall and lets make a deal for the benefit of all. Try leaving the
>> dark side and ignoring your crooked lawyers for a change. What say you
>> Rupert? Dickens wrote books about such things.
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> The links to newsrags etc at the bottom of this email prove that
>> obviously I have been reading many things lately. Your lawyers should
>> study some of my work within this one email alone As you well know i
>> will be forwarding this email to many people in short order.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:39:26 -0400
> Subject: YO Ian McPhail Re: The Commission for Public Complaints
> against RCMP - #2013-2824
> To: Sheldon <Sheldon@nfa.ca>, Blair <Blair@nfa.ca>, "steve.graham"
> <steve.graham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
> <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "steve.murphy"
> <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 03:44:52 -0300
> Subject: YO Ian McPhail Re: The Commission for Public Complaints
> against RCMP - #2013-2824
> To: PCC Complaints <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "Ian.McPhail"
> <Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
> <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "roger.l.brown"
> <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, warren <warren@daisygroup.ca>, jacques
> boucher <jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> Gunther.Schonfeldt@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, rusun@un.int,
> john.adams@queensu.ca, John.Forster@cse-cst.gc.ca,
> td.ombudsman@td.com, christopher.montague@td.com,
> Frank.McKenna@td.com, Glenn.Greenwald@guardian.co.uk,
> info@praxisfilms.org, birgittaj@althingi.is
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>,
> enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk, sarah.chapman@fsa.gov.uk,
> ambassador@brasilemb.org, slrc@itamaraty.gov.br
>
> WOW Ya think somebody within the "Five Eyes" would finally do their
> job now EH Glen Greenwald and the President Rousseff'?
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: PCC Complaints <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:59:52 +0000
> Subject: The Commission for Public Complaints against RCMP - #2013-2824
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This is further to your recent communications with the Commission.
> From September 18, 2013 to the present, our office has received 6
> electronic messages from you. Many of these e-mails are not related to
> RCMP conduct.
>
> On October 1, 2013, you called our office and spoke with an Intake
> Officer. You wished to enquire about three complaint files. When the
> Intake Officer attempted to inform you that you have three enquiry
> files with the Commission, you became agitated and insisted otherwise.
> You raised your voice and spoke over the Intake Officer. You then
> demanded the name of the Intake Officer, and subsequently yelled "see
> you in federal court" and hung up the telephone line.
>
> As a reminder, we request that all future correspondence with our
> office must be courteous in tone and that you are respectful of the
> requests that are made of you. While it is clearly not the intention
> of the Commission to prevent you from making complaints against
> members of the RCMP, your recent emails and telephone call have been
> unproductive for both you and for Commission staff. In the future, we
> request that all communication with our office be respectful in
> language and related to our mandate. In the event that this request
> is not respected, the Commission will consider imposing restrictions
> on how you may communicate with our office.
>
> Should you have a complaint about a specific RCMP member surrounding a
> specific incident, I invite you to visit the Commission's website
> (www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca<http://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca>) to submit an online
> complaint, rather than to send an email that is difficult to follow or
> a copy of a letter you have sent to many others. The complaint form
> will guide you through the information required that will enable the
> Commission to process your complaint. Should you have difficulty in
> accessing the complaint form and wish to have one sent to you, you may
> provide your mailing address and a form will be mailed to you via
> Canada Post.
>
> I would also invite you to send your correspondence regarding any new
> or existing complaints (quoting the appropriate Commission file
> number) by letter mail to:
>
> Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP
> National Intake Office
> PO Box 88689
> Surrey, BC V3W 0X1
>
> Yours truly,
>
> Günther Schönfeldt
> Intake Officer / Agent d'information de liaison
> Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP /
> Commission des plaintes du public contre la Gendarmerie royale du Canada
> Tel/Tél : 1-800-665-6878 | Fax/Téléc : (604) 501-4095
> complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca<mailto:complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
>
>
>
> [Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CCF6DA.65AE7FE0]
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: !enquiries <enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:56:26 +0100
> Subject: IPCC Reference: 2013/015918
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Dear Mr Amos
>
> I acknowledge receipt of 4 emails at the Independent Police Complaints
> Commission (IPCC) earlier today.
>
> I note from our records that you have been advised on the IPCC remit,
> as well as spoken with one of my colleagues in the customer contact
> team. It remains unclear from your emails what your complaint against
> the police is. This may be because you refer to a number of other
> organisations, or matters outside of the IPCC's remit.
>
> If you wish to make a complaint against the police you should provide
> these details to either the IPCC or the relevant police force's
> professional standards department (PSD).
>
> The IPCC does not investigate allegations of crime(s) committed by
> members of the public, nor can we direct a police force to commence an
> investigation into such.
>
> If you have any queries about the IPCC's remit or the complaints
> process please contact us. However, emails to the IPCC that fall
> outside of our remit will be read and filed, but may not be responded
> to.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Elly Goodman
> Customer Contact Adviser
> Independent Police Complaints Commission
> Tel: 0300 020 0096
> Email: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
>
>
> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in
> partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On
> leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
> and/or recorded for legal purposes.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Talk about pissing a guy off. EH Ian McPhail? What planet do CROWN's
> bureaucrats come from anyway?
>
> Need I say BULLSHIT once again??? The other CROWN Corp commonly know
> as the CBC often puts that word over our airwaves so that can't be
> offensive. That said I bet the call was recorded If so I demand a copy
> ASAP. Next time I call I will record the call myself.
>
> I must ask did the oh so silent boss Ian MacPhail and his buddy Bob
> Paulson about the Yankee wiretap tapes being evidence of MURDER?
> Better check the Canadian Ciminal Code about assisting in the cover up
> of such crimes EH?
>
> As for the call I remember it like it was yesterday. Howcome it took
> Günther Schönfeldt three weeks to dream up the same sort of response I
> got in 2007??? The first thing I did was ask for him and the woman
> claimed he was not avaible and offered to help. She started out quite
> nice but as soon as she admited that there was only a faxed complaint
> in November of 2003 and that it did not warrant an answer I told her
> to look some more. She got fairly argumentive and did not wish to
> discuss the complaint I sent in August of 2005 (It appeared to me that
> she read something in my file) I gave up and asked her name when she
> got to snarky and she refused to give other than "Nora" So I said Cya
> in Federal Court and hung up. The I sent your buddy Bob Paulson and
> YOU Ian McPhail a Motherload of emails but I did only sent your
> mindless bureaucrats six that were largely unrelated if they did not
> know how to read deep.
>
> However your Commission should not deny that I argued with its former
> lawyer/boss Shirley Heafey about the aforesaid compliant in 2005
> within emails sent to many Parliamentarians months for a I ran for a
> sent Parliament again and she was replaced by the lawyer Paul Kennedy.
> (The lawyer Heafey and your Commission always denied that complaint
> existed until your office sent me a similar bullshit email after Mike
> Murphy a former Minister of Health and later another former Attorney
> General asked Deputy Commissioner Steve Graham to investigate my
> concerns.
>
> In return the Graham got transferred to Nova Scotia and RCMP falsely
> arrested REMEMBER Stevey Boy Harper?
>
> As I said Cya'll in Federal Court
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 1 902 800 0369
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>
> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
> Senator Arlen Specter
> United States Senate
> Committee on the Judiciary
> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
> Washington, DC 20510
>
> Dear Mr. Specter:
>
> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
> raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
> these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
> contact with you about this previously.
>
> Very truly yours,
> Barry A. Bachrach
> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Lisa Porteous <lporteous@kleinlyons.com>
> Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 14:46:22 +0000
> Subject: RCMP
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> David,
>
> Thank you for your email inquiring about our class action against the
> RCMP. As you may know, the Notice of Claim was filed in the British
> Columbia Supreme Court on March 27, 2012. The lawsuit has been
> brought by former RCMP constable Janet Merlo on behalf of female RCMP
> members. Unfortunately, we cannot assist you with your claim.
>
> We recommend that you contact Mr. Barry Carter of Mair Jensen Blair
> LLP to discuss any claim you may have against the RCMP for harassment.
> His contact information is as follows:
>
> Mr. Barry Carter
> Mair Jensen Blair LLP
> 1380-885 W. Georgia Street
> Vancouver, BC V6C 3E8
> Phone: 604-682-6299
> Fax 1-604-374-6992
>
> This is not intended to be an opinion concerning the merits of your
> case. In declining to represent you, we are not expressing an opinion
> as to whether you should take further action in this matter.
>
> You should be aware that there may be strict time limitations within
> which you must act in order to protect your rights. Failure to begin
> your lawsuit by filing an action within the required time may mean
> that you could be barred forever from pursuing a claim. Therefore, you
> should immediately contact another lawyer ( as indicated above) to
> obtain legal advice/representation.
>
> Thank you again for considering our firm.
>
> Yours truly,
>
> Lisa Porteous
> Case Manager/Paralegal
>
> lporteous@kleinlyons.com
> www.kleinlyons.com
>
> KLEIN * LYONS
> Suite 400-1385 West 8th Avenue
> Vancouver BC V6H 3V9 Canada
> Office 604.874.7171
> Fax 604.874.7180
> Direct 604.714.6533
>
> This email is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
> privilege. It is intended only for the use of the person to whom it is
> addressed. Any distribution, copying or other use by anyone else is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
> telephone us immediately and destroy this e-mail.
>
> üPlease consider the environment before printing this email.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> To: <Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>; <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>; "toewsv1"
> <toewsv1@mts.net>; "danfour" <danfour@myginch.com>
> Cc: <nelson.kalil@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>; "rmordenassoc"
> <rmordenassoc@rogers.com>; <warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "warren"
> <warren@daisygroup.ca>; "warren.dosko" <warren.dosko@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
> "Paulette. Delaney-Smith" <Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
> "WaterWarCrimes" <waterwarcrimes@gmail.com>; "robin reid"
> <zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>; "tony" <tony@peoplestandup.ca>;
> "Ken.Zielke" <Ken.Zielke@gov.ab.ca>
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:18 PM
> Subject: Attn Commissioner Ian McPhail QC I called again and tried to
> speak to you twice today my number is 902 800 0369
>
>
> http://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/nrm/nr/2010/20100126-eng.aspx
>
> As I said I am very serious and have no wish to speak to the likes of
> Ms Leduc EVER again FYI I see that the gossip about my concerns is
> leaking out here there an everywhere following this note is just
> couple of the reasons why I called an tried hard to speak to you again
> today
>
> Please don't try to tell me that your office does not know what
> happened between the RCMP and I within weeks of my sending the email
> immedialy below this note.
>
> If perhaps you people should read some blogs an watch some YOUTUBES ASAP?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>
> http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2008/07/david-amos-picked-up-by-rcmp.html
>
> http://govinjustice.blogspot.com/2008/07/david-amos-picked-up-by-rcmp.html
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/07/feds-institutionalize-determined-nb.html
>
> http://www.leadershipdirectories.com/images/promo/FTC.pdf
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 15,116
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 164.62.7.# (Federal Trade Commission)
> ISP Federal Trade Commission
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : District of Columbia
> City : Washington
> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 7.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727;
> .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1920 x 1200
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Aug 18 2010 1:50:29 pm
> Last Page View Aug 18 2010 2:01:49 pm
> Visit Length 11 minutes 20 seconds
> Page Views 2
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...i=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
> Search Engine google.com
> Search Words "david amos" canada parliament
> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....eblower-part-1b.html
> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....eblower-part-1b.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Aug 18 2010 7:50:29 am
> Visit Number 15,116
>
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 11,630
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 199.212.215.# (DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE)
> ISP DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Ontario
> City : Ottawa
> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> Language English (Canada)en-ca
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 12:50:37 pm
> Last Page View Aug 13 2010 12:52:15 pm
> Visit Length 1 minute 38 seconds
> Page Views 7
> Referring URL
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...3/ides-of-march.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-8:00
> Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 8:50:37 am
> Visit Number 11,630
>
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 11,638
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 199.212.150.# (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)
> ISP Royal Canadian Mounted Police
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Ontario
> City : Ottawa
> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 6.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1;
> INFOWEB-APPROVED; INFOWEB-APPROVED-IE6-FR; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR
> 2.0.50727; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 5:52:40 pm
> Last Page View Aug 13 2010 5:52:40 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.blogger.c...15428735081915360609
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 4:52:40 pm
> Visit Number 11,638
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 11,639
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 199.212.215.# (DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE)
> ISP DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Ontario
> City : Ottawa
> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> Language English (Canada) en-ca
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1466 x 916
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 5:52:51 pm
> Last Page View Aug 13 2010 5:52:51 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-8:00
> Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 1:52:51 pm
> Visit Number 11,639
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:34:30 -0300
> Subject: Attn PAULINE PHILIBERT and ARNOLD HADLEY of the New Brunswick
> Police Commission
> To: nbpc@gnb.ca, arnold.hadley@gnb.ca, john.foran@gnb.ca,
> premier@gnb.ca, Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
> Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca
> Cc: webo@xplornet.com
>
> New Brunswick Police Commission
> 435 King Street
> Fredericton, New Brunswick
> E3B 1E5
>
> A letter to support my complaint about various police forces in New
> Brunswick will follow these emails just as I promised on the phone to
> you people today.
>
> I have no understanding as to why the Police Commission nor anyone
> else holding a governmental mandate in the Province of New Brunswick
> has never called me back or answered one email in nearly four years.
> Shawn Graham should at least recognize his own documents to my framer
> friend, Werner Bock from the time when he sat in opposition and was
> the agricutural critic at the same time .
>
> It appears to me that I am not the only one to get mad at the
> malicious incompetence of John Foran and the cops of New Brunswick.
> What is even more interesting though is the fact that John Foran was
> once mad at the Police Commission and they way they investigated
> things so secretly against the public's best interests. EH Mr. Volpe?
> Rest assured that I ain't holding my breath for the police to continue
> to harass me anymore after their nonsense yesterday. Nor will I wait
> to see Wayne Steeves say or do the right thing after he has covered up
> my concerns about the severe lack of police integrity for his politcal
> party's benefit for four god damned years.
>
> http://www.canlii.org/eliisa/highlight.do?text=JOHN+FORAN+WILSON+MacINTOSH&language=en&searchTitle=Search+all+CanLII+Databases&path=/en/nb/nbqb/doc/1995/1995canlii3862/1995canlii3862.html
>
> For the recod these Youtubes that are this arseholes favoutites were
> created by the RCMP and I have no doubt whatsoever the people
> slandering me are cops as well.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0NdNtvC-YI#GU5U2spHI_4
>
> http://www.youtube.com/user/bigolcanoworms
>
> At least his ID is correct. This is a big old can of worms. N'est Pas?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:17:05 -0300
> Subject: Perhaps Paul Kennedy the current Commissioner of Public
> Complaints Against the RCMP will call us back now EH?
> To: Hermenegilde.Chiasson@gnb.ca, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca,
> scotta@parl.gc.ca, Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca, Holland.M@parl.gc.ca,
> Hubbard.C@parl.gc.ca, jonesr@cbc.ca, nbombud@gnb.ca,
> Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca, T.J.Burke@gnb.ca, roly.macintyre@gnb.ca,
> aleblanc.mla@nb.aibn.com, eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca, brian.kenny@gnb.ca,
> roy.boudreau@gnb.ca, donald.arseneault@gnb.ca, danf@danf.net,
> injusticecoalition@hotmail.com, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> stuart.jamieson@gnb.ca, Margaret-Ann.BLANEY@gnb.ca,
> victor.boudreau@gnb.ca, rick.brewer@gnb.ca,
> John.Ferguson@saintjohn.ca, Ivan.Court@saintjohn.ca
> Cc: complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com,
> newsroom@nbpub.com, carl.davies@gnb.ca, janet.trail@gnb.ca,
> Akoschany@ctv.ca, jtravers@thestar.ca, alan_white@cbc.ca,
> Tim.Porter@gnb.ca, Trevor.HOLDER@gnb.ca, bev.harrison@gnb.ca,
> Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca, Jody.CARR@gnb.ca, Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca,
> David.ALWARD@gnb.ca, bruce.noble@fredericton.ca,
> lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca
>
> Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 13:36:41 -0400
> From: "PCC Complaints" complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> May 23, 2007
>
> File No. PC-2005-1291
>
> Mr. David R Amos
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> On a number of occasions you have called or sent e-mails our office to
> raise matters which are of pressing concern to you.
>
> Each time we have tried to respond by explaining to you the relatively
> narrow mandate of this Commission and the limits of our powers to deal
> with the matters which are of concern to you. I must stress, once
> again, that the purpose of this Commission is to provide the public
> with an opportunity to make complaints concerning the conduct of
> members of the RCMP in the performance of their duties. We have
> neither the expertise nor the legal authority to permit us to become
> involved in issues beyond the scope of this mandate.
>
> While it is clearly not the intention of the Commission to prevent you
> from making complaints against members of the RCMP, an analysis of
> your numerous contacts with the Commission indicates that your
> concerns fall well outside the confines of our mandate. Further, your
> frequent e-mails have been disruptive and unproductive for both you
> and for the staff of this office.
>
> Should you determine that some point in the future you have a
> complaint concerning the conduct of a member of the RCMP in the
> performance of his or her duties, please submit it to the Commission
> by Canada Post only. As of now, your e-mails will be deleted unread.
>
> Yours truly,
>
> Andrée Leduc
> Enquiries and Complaints Analyst
>
> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Say hey to Shawn Murphy for me will ya
> Brian?
> Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 15:25:45 -0400
> From: "REVIEWS" reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
> To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> The Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP has received
> your e-mail message and will be responding in due course.
>
> La Commission des plaintes du public contre la GRC a reçu votre
> courriel et vous rendra une réponse au moment opportun.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
>
> January 30, 2007
>
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP "J" Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,
> John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
> "Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off over
> the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I was not
> ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear that
> Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and the
> US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment policing in
> Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
> From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> Subject: RE: Just so you know
> To: HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, gemerson@tor.fasken.com,
> jgrant@baseconsulting.ca,
> rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca, mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca, csae@csae.com,
> kim.keith@rci.rogers.com, jduncan@tor.fasken.com, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca,
> ahamilton@casselsbrock.com, jm@jmellon.com, treasurer@casis.ca,
> jbronskill@cp.org, RTRiley6@cs.com, pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
> dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca,
> linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca, janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca,
> robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca, Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca,
> arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca, nancy.taillon@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
> CC: info.com@chrc-ccdp.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, Scott.A@parl.gc.ca,
> radionews@mpbc.org, publisher@whatsup.nb.ca, kjamerson@wagmtv.com,
> kbabin@globaltv.ca, jfoster@globaltv.ca, atvnews@ctv.ca, cmorris@cp.org,
> info@ccna.ca, kbissett@broadcastnews.ca, bdnmail@bangordailynews.net,
> ehutton@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, argosy@mta.ca,
> sylvain.martel@csn.qc.ca, events@cpac.ca, mmacdonald@cp.org,
> crgeditor@yahoo.com, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca
>
> No need to Bitch.
> I am about to sue ya anyway but you did receive the same material
> that everybody else got by email anyway. However now I will now
> forward the other emails that various silly servants got after I had
> had many talks with your incompetant and malicious assistants within
> the Commission over the past two years. It seems that I had to insult
> you and bust you in front of your friends to finally get a response
> from you.
> Furthermore on August 2nd I sent you your material byway of the
> US Mail which was received and signed for. It was hard copy of my
> concerns and allegations about you being in bed with the corrupt old
> bastard Zack of the RCMP. I also sent a copy of wiretap tape # 139.
> Instead of you acting within the scope of your employment you go on
> vacation and bury your head in the sand while the RCMP assisted the
> Yankees in throwing my wife and kids into the street without due
> process of law?
> Well your head may be in still the sand but you just stuck your
> arse high up in the air. It is high time for me to give it a boot
> before you stick it up Zack's ass in a vain effort to appear that you
> have integrity after all. The following is the text of that letter and
> after that is the US Mail's confirmation of when it was sent and
> received by you.
> Say hey to McLachlin for me will ya? Tell her I will be suing her
> too. She has been covering up for the crooked Newfy Judge Dereck Green
> for way past too long. To hell with lawyers appointed as commissioners
> and other lawyers appointed as judges. From my point of view they were
> only appointed to cover up public corruption. I look forward to
> meeting the likes of you in court and arguing you on the public
> record. You just proved for me that most lawyers ain't that smart. You
> should have continued to play dumb Bitch. At least then you could have
> blamed your assistants for not telling you what you obviously know.
> however if you had done so, I would have pointed to the fact that you
> are their supervisor and therefore ultimatly responsible. Everybody
> else knows that the RCMP are as crooked as hell, so do you. call me a
> liar now. I double dog dare ya.
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
>
> July 31st, 2005
>
> Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin,
> C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and
> Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay
> Canadian Judicial Council
> 150 Metcalfe Street,
> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8
>
> Shirley Heafey
> Chair of Commission
> for Public Complaints against the RCMP
> P.O. Box 3423
> Station &quo t;D"
> Ottawa,
> ON K1P 6L4
>
>
> RE: Rampant Public Corruption
>
> Hey,
> Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and
> various underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public
> Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and
> emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by
> every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a
> copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as
> officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
> As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest
> Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little
> trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the
> ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to
> answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.
>
> I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending
> to you byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving
> identical material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell
> them I gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter.
> All that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
> mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes.
> However I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material
> than what Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact
> the same material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky
> Boy McKenna in particular received, while I was up home running for
> Parliament last year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so
> I have also included a few recent items to spice thing up for you.
>
> I am tired of trying to convince people employed in law enforcement
> to uphold the law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own
> conscience
> and be careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
> assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse to
> the law or me.
>
> Veritas Vincit
>
> David R. Amos
>
> 153 Alvin Ave
>
> Milton, MA. 02186
>
> Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 484U S
> Detailed Results:
>
>
> [IMAGE]
> [IMAGE]
> Bullet
> Delivered Abroad, August 11, 2005, 6:49 am, CANADA
> Bullet
> Out of Foreign Customs, August 08, 2005, 2:37 pm, CANADA
> Bullet
> Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
> Bullet
> Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
> Bullet
> International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 8:32 am, KENNEDY AMC
> Bullet
> Enroute, August 03, 2005, 8:30 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
> Bullet
> Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:40 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
>
> "Heafey, Shirley" <HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca> wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Heafey, Shirley"<HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
> Sent: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:10:00 -0400
> To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: Just so you know
>
> Just so you know, there was no message attached to the e-mail sent to
> me. SO, in fact, I don't know what you think I should now know.
>
> Try again.
>
> SH
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 1:24 PM
>>To: gemerson@tor.fasken.com; jgrant@baseconsulting.ca;
> rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca; mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca;
> csae@csae.com; kim.keith@rci.rogers.com; jduncan@tor.fasken.com;
> Moore.R@parl.gc.ca; ahamilton@casselsbrock.com
> Cc: Zeman, Arnold; jm@jmellon.com; Taillon, Nancy; treasurer@casis.ca;
> jbronskill@cp.org; RTRiley6@cs.com; pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca;
> dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca; Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca;
> linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca; janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
> barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca;
> robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca; Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca; Heafey, Shirley
> Subject: Just so you know
>
> CSIS can never say they didn't know. This should put Shirley Heafey's
> panties in a knot when she get back from her vacation. I can only
> wonder what Ms. Longo of the RCMP is saying about now.
>
> "Zeman, Arnold" <Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca> wrote:
>
> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: For the record Joan I did talk to
> your boss Abrahamson yesterday and more people you know today
> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:16:11 -0400
> From: "Zeman, Arnold" <Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca>
> To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> This is an automatic reply. I'm away froom the office and will return
> on Monday September 26,2005. If you need information before then,
> please contact Marie-France Kingsley at 990-6306.
> ************************************
> Ceci est une réponse automatique. Je serai de retour au bureau le
> lundi 26 septembre 2005. Si vous avez besoin d'aide, veuillez
> communiquer avec Marie-France Kingsley au 990-6306.
> *******************************
> A. W. Zeman
> Assistant Inspector General of CSIS /
> Inspecteur général adjoint du SCRS
> 340 Laurier Avenue West / 340, avenue Laurier ouest
> Ottawa ON K1A 0P8
> phone / tél : (613) 990-8274
> fax / télécopieur : (613) 990-8303
> email / courriel : arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
> ********************************
>
>
>
>
> http://voices-voix.ca/en/facts/profile/paul-kennedy
>
> Paul Kennedy
>
> What Happened
> Paul Kennedy was removed as head of the Commission for Public
> Complaints (CPC) regarding the RCMP after he advocated a more powerful
> and independent Commission. He sought adequate funding for
> investigations, increased accountability and improved service
> standards. The Harper government appointed a Conservative Party ally
> to replace him.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Paul Kennedy was appointed Chair of the Commission for Public
> Complaints (CPC) Against the RCMP in 2005. He was re-appointed for
> three more one-year terms in 2006, 2007 and 2008.
>
> Throughout his tenure, Kennedy was known as a relentless advocate for
> a more independent CPC. He believed that the CPC relied too heavily on
> the cooperation of senior RCMP officials, and was too limited in
> independent power to probe the RCMP's activities, or to inquire into
> witnesses' testimonials and to demand the production of documents as
> evidence.
>
> Kennedy also advocated for better funding to oversee the RCMP so that
> the CPC could investigate more cases and investigate them thoroughly.
> He argued that the CPC's budget of $5.2 million paled in comparison to
> the RCMP's $4.1 billion budget.
>
> Public Safety Minister Peter Van Loan cut Kennedy's budget by $600,000
> in 2009, seriously limiting the scope of the CPC's investigations.
>
> Kennedy did get funding for the high-profile investigation into RCMP
> involvement in the tasering death of Polish immigrant Robert
> Dzienkanski at the Vancouver International Airpoirt in 2007, and his
> work to reform RCMP policies on taser use. But that funding was only
> made available temporary. Similar investigations in future might not
> get the funding they need given the small size of the CPC's budget.
>
> Media sources have reported clashes between Kennedy and the
> Conservative government during Kennedy's time as head of CPC. He was
> ridiculed by Conservative officials for his stance that Mounties' work
> requires proper review and that access to evidence and witnesses was
> necessary in order to ensure accountability. Although the government
> has promised reform monitoring of the RCMP, this promise was not kept
> during Kennedy's tenure.
>
> Kennedy had other successes: during his tenure, the RCMP was under
> public pressure to modify training and operational procedures. The
> commission now regularly conducts reviews of RCMP activities and their
> policies in self-investigation. Kennedy also addressed investigations
> of death and verbal abuse involving RCMP officers, and proposed
> legislative and policy changes to avoid conflicts of interest.
>
> Kennedy's final weeks in office were marked by the release of a report
> strongly critical of the conduct of the RCMP officers involved in the
> death of Robert Dziekanski. The RCMP would go on to accept all but one
> of the findings in Kennedy's CPC report, and address the report's
> recommendations, eventually creating an Office of Professional
> Integrity, as well as a new policy to ensure independent and impartial
> investigation of RCMP employees.
>
> However, in November 2009, Public Safety Minister Peter Van Loan's
> office notified Kennedy that he would not be re-appointed after his
> contract terminated that December. Kennedy had been prepared to serve
> another term.
>
> In January 2010, Ian McPhail, a long-time contributor to the
> Conservative Party, was appointed interim chair of the CPC. McPhail
> was a real-estate lawyer with some limited experience on other
> commissions. Observers felt McPhail lacked the experience required
> head the CPC. McPhail's appointment was seen by Paul Kennedy and
> others as a wholly partisan move, that placed a strong Conservative
> ally in an important watchdog position. The replacement of Kennedy
> with McPhail has been criticized as an attempt to silence Kennedy's
> criticism of the RCMP, thereby reducing accountability of the RCMP to
> the government and the public.
>
> In January 2010, Kennedy made an appearance on Parliament Hill to
> express concerns about the fate of civilian oversight bodies under the
> Harper government. He was joined by two other watchdogs who the
> government had removed for dubious reasons: Peter Tinsley, who had
> been the Military Police Complaints Commissioner; and Linda Keen,
> former President of Canada's nuclear safety regulator.
>
> Kennedy has said the government was not willing to let the CPC fulfill
> its intended purpose. He has also called on the government to
> institute a fixed term for which a commissioner is appointed, so that
> people who have a job to do on behalf of the public don't end up
> essentially working for the governing party.
>
> In 2011 the new Minister of Public Safety, Vic Toews, re-appointed
> McPhail as head of the CPC for another year.
>
> Relevant Dates:
> October 2005: Paul Kennedy is appointed Chair of the Commission for
> Public Complaints (CPC) against the RCMP.
> October 2007: Robert Dziekanski dies after being tasered by an RCMP
> officer at the Vancouver International airport; Kennedy strongly
> criticizes the way the situation was handled.
> December 2008: Paul Kennedy is reappointed for another 1-year term as
> Chair of the CPC, until December 31, 2009
> August 11, 2009: Kennedy calls for policy changes to enhance
> accountability of the RCMP.
> November 18 2009: The government tells Kennedy his contract will not
> be renewed.
> December 8, 2009: Kennedy publishes a report criticizing some of the
> RCMP's actions.
> January 24, 2010: The government appoints Ian McPhail as interim Chair
> of the CPC.
> January 26, 2010: Paul Kennedy, Peter Tinsley and Linda Keen hold a
> press conference, expressing their concern over the government's
> silencing of watchdogs.
> February 4, 2010: The RCMP announces a new policy to ensure
> independent and impartial investigations of its employees.
> Role or Position
> Paul Kennedy was Chair of the Commission for Public Complaints (CPC)
> Against the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) from 2005 to 2009.
>
> Implications and Consequences
> Transparency: The removal of Kennedy means the loss of a qualified
> civil servant with over thirty five years experience in public
> service, with a proven track record of creating change for increased
> accountability.
> Democracy: The effectiveness and independence of watchdog
> organizations are compromised when leaders are appointed to short
> one-years terms and removed at will by politicians. The slashing of
> the CPC budget means in practice that there will be minimal oversight
> of the RCMP.
> Democracy: If public officials are removed and replaced whenever they
> threaten to hold the government to account, the strength of our
> democracy is diminished.
> Photo: CTV News
>
> Sources
> "CPC Chair responds to the RCMP Commissioner's letter...," Paul
> Kennedy, CPC against the RCMP, 16 December 2009
> "CPC Report on the death of Mr. Dziekanski," William Elliott, RCMP, 10
> February 2011
> "Former RCMP watchdog warns commission heads liable to sway," Janice
> Tibbests, CanWest News Services, 4 January 2010
> "Former watchdogs speak out on Harper government," Susan Delacourt,
> The Star, 26 January 2010
> "Harper Government Names Realtor as RCMP Watchdog," Nathan Griffiths,
> InformedVote.ca, 1 February 2010
> "Ottawa names interim RCMP watchdog," Colin Freeze, The Globe and
> Mail, 24 January 2010
> "Minister Toews announces re-appointment of Ian McPhail as Interim
> Chair of the CPC," Public Safety Canada, 14 January 2011
> "New civilian watchdog agency will oversee RCMP," RCMP Watch, 4 February
> 2010
> "Police Oblivious to pain Tasers inflict: RCMP Complaints
> Commissioner," CBC News, 25 June 2008
> "RCMP response to CPC regarding its report into Robert Dziekanski's
> in-custody death," William Elliott, RCMP, 7 December 2009
> "RCMP should limit self-investigations," CBC News, 11 August 2009
> "RCMP to implement all watchdog recommendations on Robert Dziekanski
> case," CPC against the RCMP, 10 February 2011
> "RCMP watchdog won't be reappointed," CBC News, 27 November 2009
> Report on death of Robert Dziekanski (PDF), CPC, 8 December 2009
> "Report slams RCMP in airport Taser death," CBC News, 8 December 2009
> "Tories drop RCMP complaints commissioner," Tonda MacCharles, The
> Star, 27 November 2009
> Français
>
>
> DEMAND IMMEDIATE APOLOGY FROM CANADIAN ALLIANCE MP
> Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:00 pm
> John Cummins' office replies 'Get a life' when invited to Maher Arar vigil
>
> Ottawa, Canada - 17/12/02) - CAIR-CAN is calling on Canadians to demand
> that John Cummins, member of Parliament of Delta-South Richmond, B.C.,
> offer a public apology for recent remarks made by his office when Cummins
> was invited to a silent vigil for Maher Arar. In response to the
> invitation, Cummins' office replied by email, "Get a life."
>
> Maher Arar is the Canadian citizen who was detained illegally in the United
> States en route to Canada and deported to Jordan and then to Syria. Arar
> was denied access to Canadian officials, prevented from calling his family,
> tried through a non-transparent process without a lawyer present, and
> deported to his country of birth in violation of international law. He is
> currently being held in a Syrian jail.
>
> The statement follows recent comments by Stephen Harper, Diane Ablonczy,
> and Stockwell Day of the Canadian Alliance which condemn Arar without any
> regard to his illegal deportation, the lack of a fair trial process, and in
> the absence of any definitive evidence linking him to terrorism.
>
> (See CAIR-CAN action alert # 84:
> http://www.caircan.ca/cgi-bin/actionalerts/viewnews.cgi?newsid1038072766,60770,)
>
> The remark made by John Cummins' office is deeply insulting and a clear
> breach of his duties as a public official," said CAIR-CAN Executive
> Director Riad Saloojee.
>
> He should immediately offer an unqualified apology to the Arar family and
> to all Canadians," he added.
>
> ACTION REQUESTED (Be firm, but polite):
>
> CONTACT Steven Harper and John Cummins.
>
> E-mail: Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Cummins.J@parl.gc.ca
>
> Telephone or Fax:
>
> Stephen Harper
> Tel: (613) 996-6740
> Fax: (613) 947-0310
>
> John Cummins
> Tel: (613) 992-2957
> Fax: (613) 992-3589
>
> DEMAND an immediate apology from John Cummins for the remarks made by his
> office yesterday.
>
> INFORM Canadian Alliance leader Steven Harper that his party has failed in
> its duty as the official opposition to defend the rights of a Canadian
> citizen. Recent comments by his party indicate a troubling trend of
> treating Maher Arar, a Canadian Muslim and Arab, as a second class citizen.
>
> COPY Canada@cair-net.org on all correspondence.
>
> Colin Mayes, Conservative
>
> This rookie B.C. MP made headlines this year after he defended the PM's new
> restrictions on media access in a column to his local paper. Mayes went
> further and suggested journalists would be more responsible if they faced
> jail terms for professional misconduct. "Boy, would the public get accurate
> and true information if a few reporters were hauled away to jail! Maybe it
> is time that we hauled off in handcuffs reporters that fabricate stories,
> or twist information and even falsely accuse citizens." Mayes quickly
> retracted his comments.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>; <deb@debgrey.com>; <debgrey@gmail.com>;
> <valerielmeredith@aol.com>; <RathgB0@parl.gc.ca>; "MulcaT"
> <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>; "Heather Martin" <martinhea39@gmail.com>;
> "bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "kevin.violot"
> <kevin.violot@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "Wayne.Lang"
> <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "toewsv1" <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>; "bob.rae"
> <bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net>; "Bob.Kerr" <Bob.Kerr@cbc.ca>;
> "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>; "mckeen.randy"
> <mckeen.randy@gmail.com>; "mcknight.gisele"
> <mcknight.gisele@dailygleaner.com>; "mclellana"
> <mclellana@bennettjones.com>
> Cc: <Whistleblower@ctv.ca>; <martine.turcotte@bell.ca>; "oldmaison"
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>; "stop_codex" <stop_codex@hotmail.com>; "josh
> steffler" <canuckfanjosh@yahoo.com>; <webmasterlawrence@gmail.com>;
> "xtofury" <xtofury@gmail.com>; "grenouf" <grenouf@genuinewitty.com>;
> "hiddenfromhistory1" <hiddenfromhistory1@gmail.com>; "J Bowman"
> <canada.acp@gmail.com>; "leader" <leader@greenparty.ca>;
> "maryann4peace" <maryann4peace@gmail.com>; "john.green"
> <john.green@gnb.ca>; "police" <police@fredericton.ca>; "David Amos"
> <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>;
> <Billa.MEDHURST@vpd.ca>; "mark.lord" <mark.lord@fredericton.ca>;
> "Leanne.Fitch" <Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>
> Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 12:17 AM
> Subject: So Debby Baby Grey "Famous Amos" would like to know if Harper
> and the RCMP in BC are paying attention YET???
>
>
> Some Deja Vu for you and Val
>
> http://deanrays.blogspot.com/2009/07/vals-minority-report.html
>
> http://www.debgrey.com/contact.html
>
> VAls minority report!
>
> Heritage Front Affair Val's Minority Reports
>
> THE HERITAGE FRONT AFFAIR: OUR VIEW DISSENTING OPINION of the REFORM
> PARTY of CANADA
>
> Presented by Val Meredith, M.P.
>
> THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE
>
> It was nineteen months ago when the Sub-Committee on National Security
> began its consideration of the Security Intelligence Review
> Committee's Heritage Front Affair report. Finally, after a long and
> often arduous effort, the Sub-Committee has tabled its report.
>
> At this point in time, it is important to clarify a couple of
> significant issues: The delays in producing the Sub-Committee report
> have nothing to do with the activities of the opposition parties, but
> rather are due solely to delays caused by membership changes and
> disagreements among the government members.
>
> Secondly, the so-called report of this Sub-Committee has little input
> from the opposition members. The joint dissenting opinion of the Bloc
> Quebecois and the Reform Party more accurately reflects the
> multi-party consensus of the majority of members of this Sub-Committee
> who actually participated in most of the Sub-Committee's hearings.
> While the joint dissenting opinion does not fully reflect the Reform
> Party's position on this issue, it is included to illustrate the
> changes to the report imposed by the government members.
>
> It must be noted that the major changes to this report did not occur
> during a Sub-Committee meeting, and neither opposition member was
> present. It is clear that the Liberal government was not prepared for
> the Sub-Committee to table the more critical report that is now the
> joint dissenting opinion. With regard to the official report of the
> Sub-Committee, the current government members of the Sub-Committee
> have produced an extremely emasculated version of the original report.
>
> Their report is just an extension of SIRC's Heritage Front Affair
> report which did not provide a sufficiently critical review of the
> Canadian Security Intelligence Service's investigation.
>
> THE SIRC REPORT SIRC claims to be the "eyes and ears of the public and
> Parliament on the Canadian Security Intelligence Service." Yet after
> months of consideration of the Heritage Front Affair report, it is
> clear that SIRC has been not only negligent in this role, but
> deliberately dishonest as well. Instead of providing Parliament with a
> thorough and objective review of CSIS' use of a human source in its
> investigation of the Heritage Front, SIRC's report exonerates CSIS and
> the Source of any wrongdoing.
>
> In its exoneration of CSIS, SIRC ignored or suppressed any evidence
> that was inconsistent with their conclusion that the Service did no
> wrong. SIRC has wilfully mislead Parliament and the Canadian people.
> The exoneration of CSIS by SIRC is a betrayal of SIRC's role as a
> review committee. While the Reform Party is deeply concerned with the
> wrongdoings of CSIS, SIRC's refusal to address these transgressions in
> an open and honest manner is cause for even greater concern.
>
> After nineteen months of reviewing the SIRC report and obtaining
> additional information, it is clear that SIRC is not fulfilling the
> function that Parliament intended. Originally the Reform Party had
> planned to do a thorough and critical review of the SIRC report,
> pointing out numerous inaccuracies and omissions. However, because the
> original version would have been too lengthy, we have chosen to focus
> on two main issues: Grant Bristow - CSIS Source, and the CSIS
> investigation concerning Preston Manning, that formed Chapter VIII of
> the Heritage Front Affair. ; GRANT BRISTOW - CSIS HUMAN SOURCE Unlike
> the government members of the Sub- Committee, I have no hesitancy in
> identifying Grant Bristow as the CSIS Source who infiltrated the
> Heritage Front.
>
> This position is not an assumption, nor speculation. In August 1994, I
> was contacted by an individual who had first-hand knowledge of Grant
> Bristow as a CSIS Source. A former police source, this individual was
> approached by Bristow, who offered to introduce him to a CSIS
> investigator.
>
> In September 1994 I accompanied this individual to a SIRC interview.
> The information this individual provided is faithfully recorded in the
> SIRC report at section 3.1.3, although it does not identify Bristow as
> the Source.
>
> In addition, at his appearance before the Sub- Committee on May 27,
> 1996, the Director of CSIS, Mr. Ward Elcock, inadvertently confirmed
> that Bristow was indeed the CSIS Source. In his opening statement,
> which was also provided in writing, the Director made the following
> comment: "What about our source's arrest in Toronto, along with
> American white supremacist Sean Maguire? That was a co-ordinated
> operation with law enforcement agencies. Mr. Maguire was expelled from
> Canada. Our source was released. No criminal offence was committed."
>
> Now contrast the Director's above comments with the relevant passage
> in SIRC's Heritage Front Affair report: "On September 20, 1991, Sean
> Maguire and Grant Bristow were travelling in the latter's car, when
> they were stopped at gunpoint by the heavily armed Metro Toronto
> Emergency Task Force. Sean Maguire was arrested on an Immigration
> warrant. RCMP and Immigration officials were on hand for the arrest,
> as was a CSIS investigator from Toronto Region.
>
> Grant Bristow, when he was stopped, had guns in the trunk of his car.
> Both men were taken to police station 41." (emphasis added) It is
> obvious from the above-mentioned information that Bristow is the CSIS
> Source in question. It is an issue, because the way that SIRC wrote
> their report, many of the questionable activities were committed by
> Bristow, as opposed to the Source. So it is important to acknowledge
> that Bristow was indeed the Source.
>
> As expressed in paragraph 28 of the joint dissenting opinion ("Having
> concluded that the placement of a human source was acceptable,
> although for a shorter time than this Source was actually in place,
> the opposition members of the Sub-Committee then asked themselves
> whether the Service should have recruited and put in place this
> particular Source?"), there were serious questions about using Bristow
> as the Source. While SIRC made all efforts to downplay Bristow's role
> in the creation and operation of the Heritage Front, clearly he was
> responsible for much of the success of the organization.
>
> The best indication of Bristow's role in the Heritage Front was the
> video that the Front put out with excerpts of Bristow's speeches, that
> had been edited out of the previously released videos. The excerpts
> from this video show that Bristow was the main administrator of the
> Heritage Front. He was responsible for the raising of money, for
> selling memberships, literature and paraphernalia, and for getting
> people out to Heritage Front rallies and demonstrations. His
> questionable contributions can be best summarized from the one video
> where he bragged that the Heritage Front in Toronto raised more money
> to assist incarcerated members of the white supremacist terrorist
> organization, The Order, than any other group in North America. ;
> Bristow under police investigation.
>
> There is one other aspect of Bristow's history that SIRC chose to
> ignore, despite the fact that this incident was in the original
> newspaper story that spawned their investigation. In 1993, the Metro
> Toronto Police Force investigated Heritage Front members Carl Fischer,
> Elkar Fischer and Andrew Maynard, for the kidnapping and assault of
> Tyrone Mason, another Heritage Front member. During the course of
> their investigation the police began to actively investigate Grant
> Bristow.
>
> The police investigators were so convinced that Bristow was involved
> in witness tampering, that they applied to the courts and obtained a
> Criminal Code Part VI warrant to intercept his communications. When
> the Mason case finally made its way to trial in the fall of 1995, a
> plea bargain was arranged. As a result of plea bargaining all charges
> were dropped against Maynard, and though convicted, the Fischer
> brothers received only a thirty day sentence to be served
> intermittently.
>
> Interestingly, a lawyer representing the federal government was
> involved in the negotiations. It would appear that Bristow's role in
> the incident prevented the Crown from aggressively prosecuting the
> case. Despite frequently referring to this case in their testimony as
> an example of the heinous activities that Heritage Front members were
> capable of committing,
>
> SIRC completely ignored the police investigation of Bristow's role in
> the case. ; Bristow and the Reform Party. The Reform Party is also
> deeply concerned about Bristow's activities within the Reform Party.
>
> As reported in the SIRC report, CSIS was aware that Heritage Front
> leader Wolfgang Droege "wanted to discredit Preston Manning and the
> Reform Party before the general election in 1993. This idea would be
> accomplished by the Movement publicly identifying itself and its
> security relationship with the Reform Party's senior executive level.
>
> Among those who allegedly knew of the Droege plan were Gerry Lincoln,
> James Dawson, Ernst Zundel, Terry Long, Jurgen Neumann, Peter
> Mitrevski, and Grant Bristow (emphasis added)." Not only was Bristow
> aware of this plan to discredit the Reform Party, but he was one of
> the major players in it. Bristow, along with Alan Overfield, were the
> two individuals who made all the security arrangements.
>
> While it was Overfield who originally offered the services of his
> bailiff company to the Reform Party, he was not aware of Droege's plan
> to discredit the party. Thus it was left to Bristow, a CSIS source, to
> create the relationship.
>
> According to the representative for the Reform Party, Andrew Flint,
> Grant Bristow did a very effective job in creating the security
> relationship between the Reform Party and the Heritage Front. In an
> affidavit sworn on May 1, 1995, Flint described the June 1991 meeting
> with Bristow and Overfield in the following manner: "The meeting was
> dominated by Grant Bristow who did most of the talking regarding the
> security for the event. I was certainly very impressed by his
> immaculate dress which included an elegant suit and highly polished
> shoes. This was the only meeting I attended involving security for the
> up-coming rally."
>
> Flint also mentioned that "at the meeting of the security team for the
> June 1991 event at the International Centre, Grant Bristow requested a
> letter from me stating that he and Al Overfield were authorized to
> handle the security for this event. I was told he needed it to present
> to the Regional Police which operated a sub-station on the premises of
> the International Centre."
>
> This letter is also mentioned in the SIRC report. However, the report
> stated "Overfield asked for the letter in order to receive recognition
> and to show that he was appointed. Grant Bristow's name was included
> in the letter because he said: #145;Unless we have a letter of
> understanding, there could be legal liabilities if there was a
> confrontation with protesters at a Reform Party event.'
>
> " Naturally, Bristow is the source of this information. It is
> interesting that Bristow claimed that Overfield asked for the letter
> to receive recognition, and that his own name appeared only for
> liability purposes. If Bristow's name was necessary for liability
> purposes, then why were the names of the other individuals who were
> providing security not included as well?
>
> In reality, the most useful application of this letter would have been
> to prove a security arrangement between the Heritage Front and the
> Reform Party. Yet, according to the SIRC report, Overfield was unaware
> of the plan to discredit the Reform Party, so there is little reason
> for him to request the letter. Bristow on the other hand, would
> certainly have pleased Droege by providing him with a letter to
> demonstrate that the security arrangement between the Reform Party and
> the Heritage Front actually existed. SIRC's willingness to accept
> Bristow's version of events is typical of their report.
>
> Much of the report is based on the evidence of Bristow. He is cited as
> the source of information 135 times; 96 times as the Source and a
> further 39 times as Grant Bristow. In addition, the source handler is
> cited 20 times as the basis of information.
>
> SIRC has basically provided the public with Grant Bristow's version of
> events, while contradictory information was generally dismissed. While
> SIRC denied any wrongdoing by Bristow or CSIS, they failed to address
> a very important issue - the entire operation was conducted in
> violation of a 1989 Ministerial Direction.
>
> On October 30, 1989 then Solicitor General Pierre Blais issued the
> following Ministerial Direction on #145;CSIS' Use of Human Sources' to
> the Director of CSIS. The Direction states in part: "that special care
> is required in regard to investigations which impact on, or which
> appear to impact on, the most sensitive institutions of our society. I
> am primarily thinking in this regard of institutions in the academic,
> political, religious, media or trade union fields.... I am writing
> that you personally, or a Deputy Director designated by you in
> writing, approve the use by the Service of confidential sources in
> such investigation."
>
> It is obvious that Bristow's role as one of two individuals who was
> "jointly responsible for the security of all present and future Reform
> Party Events that are planned for this region," would be part of a
> human source operation that "impacted, or appeared to impact on a
> political institution."
>
> According to the Ministerial Direction, this would have required that
> either the Director or the Deputy Director (Operations) approve
> Bristow's role as part of the security team. In reality, Toronto
> Region only sought out CSIS Headquarters' advice in August, two months
> after the Mississauga rally, and even then the file did not go to the
> Director or the Deputy Director.
>
> SIRC goes on to great lengths to point out that CSIS was careful that
> only Droege's activities as they related to the Reform Party were
> investigated, not the Reform Party itself. But they do not address the
> issue of a CSIS source operation that impacted on, or at least
> appeared to impact upon a sensitive political institution, namely the
> Reform Party. SIRC's refusal to address this issue is somewhat
> mystifying, considering that was one of the questions that the Reform
> Party specifically wanted answered when we put forth a series of
> questions to SIRC in a letter, presented to them at the September 13,
> 1994 Sub-Committee meeting:
>
> Question 73: Given the 1989 Ministerial Directive by then Solicitor
> General Pierre Blais, concerning CSIS utilizing sources in sensitive
> institutions such as political parties, religious groups and the
> media, was the Director's approval required prior to Bristow's
> attendance at the Reform Party meeting?;
>
> Question 74: If yes, did the Director approve of this operation?
> Bristow's role in the security group was indeed crucial in forming the
> link between the Heritage Front and the Reform Party. As Andrew Flint
> stated, he was impressed with Bristow's "knowledge of security
> procedures and technical terminology...", as well as his "elegant suit
> and highly polished shoes." Grant Bristow was the one member of the
> Heritage Front who had the respectability and the expertise to make
> Flint believe that he was dealing with a legitimate group of
> individuals. It is extremely unlikely that Flint would have ever used
> this group if he had met with skinheads or other Heritage Front
> members.
>
> In the final analysis, Wolfgang Droege had a plot to discredit the
> Reform Party by linking the party to the Heritage Front through its
> security arrangement.
>
> Grant Bristow played a pivotal role in this conspiracy, if in no other
> way than by providing the security group with the respectability and
> expertise they could not have gotten elsewhere within the Heritage
> Front.
>
> When the story broke in 1992 the Reform Party was indeed discredited,
> although there are no objective means to measure to what extent. It is
> bad enough that Droege, an individual deemed to be a threat to the
> security of Canada, devised a plot to discredit a legitimate political
> party and CSIS did nothing about it. It is much worse when Grant
> Bristow, a CSIS source, played an integral role in accomplishing this
> task, in violation of a Ministerial Direction. But it is a complete
> travesty when SIRC, the body that Parliament established to monitor
> CSIS, fails to even address the issue. CSIS INVESTIGATION OF PRESTON
> MANNING While compiling its report on the Heritage Front Affair, SIRC
> included a chapter that had nothing to do with the Heritage Front. It
> was about the Reform Party and a foreign government, subsequently
> identified as South Africa. SIRC wanted us to believe that by
> including this chapter they could allay any fears amongst Reformers
> that CSIS had investigated the party, or the leadership.
>
> In the SIRC report, the CSIS investigation is portrayed as a
> by-the-book, straight-forward operation. Upon closer inspection this
> investigation proved to be anything but straight- forward. Rather than
> allaying any of our concerns about CSIS investigations, SIRC's
> willingness to lie about the facts has made the Reform Party even more
> suspicious.
>
> Through a Privacy Act request by Preston Manning, CSIS released its
> documents on this investigation. Although they are heavily censored,
> the documents show that SIRC withheld information and misrepresented
> the facts in their report, so that they could demonstrate that CSIS
> conducted a proper investigation. Any evidence that was contradictory
> to their conclusion was suppressed.
>
> In the following pages, we will review the actual investigation,
> SIRC's version of the investigation, and the bizarre fallout from this
> chapter of their report. In exchanges of correspondence and testimony
> that occurred after the tabling of the report, we learned that CSIS
> documents were altered and misdated.
>
> We observed SIRC make admissions, and then subsequently retract these
> admissions, completely contradicting their earlier statements and
> testimony. The Director of CSIS also provided a version of events that
> not only contradicted his earlier testimony, but also required him to
> admit that almost everyone who touched this file made mistakes.
>
> In the final analysis, the Reform Party is convinced that CSIS
> launched an insupportable investigation of Preston Manning in 1989,
> and tried to cover it up five months later. Both the current
> management at CSIS and SIRC have continued that cover-up, frequently
> changing their story when confronted with facts that did not fit their
> version of the events. ;
>
> A dubious source sparks an investigation. As SIRC reported, and the
> CSIS documents confirm, this investigation began with a tip from a
> source who was described by the CSIS investigator as "self-serving and
> very opportunistic, particularly if it benefited himself." This
> dubious source informed CSIS about a conversation that he had with a
> board member of an association that promoted links between South
> Africa and Canada. This source then stated that the board member said
> that his group was giving money to Preston Manning's campaign, as
> Manning was running against External Affairs Minister Joe Clark.
>
> This information by itself should not have been of interest to CSIS.
> In democracies, citizens can financially support whoever they want in
> an election, for whatever reason. For CSIS to investigate they needed
> information that South Africa was actually providing the money. During
> the first meeting between CSIS and this dubious source, the source
> stated that he thought the board member meant that the money was
> coming from South Africa. When the source realized that he did not
> have the key piece of evidence that CSIS required, he miraculously
> obtained it less than three weeks later. The source stated that he had
> been talking to an unidentified, close associate of the board member,
> who supposedly told him that the South Africans may have contributed
> as much as $45,000 to Preston Manning and the Reform Party in trying
> to defeat Joe Clark in his riding of Yellowhead. This is the extent of
> CSIS' information about the Manning campaign receiving money from a
> foreign government.
>
> Third-hand information from a source who is not only of unknown
> reliability, but who had been identified by the CSIS investigator as
> "self-serving and opportunistic", should not be the basis of a CSIS
> investigation of any Canadian citizen, much less the leader of a
> legitimate political party. ; CSIS analyst stated, basis for
> investigation "difficult to support"! We are not the only ones to
> question the validity of this investigation.
>
> After the regional investigator sent two reports to CSIS Headquarters
> in November 1988, a response from the HQ analyst on the South Africa
> desk was sent to the region in January 1989. As the SIRC report
> acknowledged, the analyst stated that in HQ's opinion, the source of
> the alleged funding was most likely the group of Canadian businessmen
> who belonged to the association. But when the analyst addressed the
> possibility of foreign funding, SIRC did not accurately portray the
> analyst's comments. The analyst did state that, "if it were shown that
> South Africa indeed contributed as much as $45,000 to Manning's
> campaign, HQ could in time attempt to make the argument that South
> Africa is unduly influencing Canadian politics." However, SIRC chose
> not to include the following sentence by the analyst in their report:
> "To say the least, this kind of argument would be difficult to
> support."
>
> Since the analyst had stated that there was no basis for a CSIS
> investigation, contradicting SIRC's conclusion that it was a
> legitimate investigation, SIRC chose to suppress this line. It is the
> only line in that section of the report that SIRC did not include in
> the Heritage Front Affair report. The HQ analyst concluded this
> January 10, 1989 message by requesting that the region keep "HQ
> apprised of any forthcoming information which you may obtain in light
> of the above."
>
> There was no further information forwarded by the region. Rather, the
> next document that appears in Manning's file is an authorization of a
> TARC Level 1 investigation, dated October 17, 1989. ; Lead up to the
> TARC Level 1 investigation - January 10, 1989 to October 17, 1989.
> While there is a great deal of controversy over what happened between
> October 17, 1989 and March 30, 1990, we are equally perplexed about
> what happened between January 10, 1989 and October 17, 1989.
>
> The Reform Party has never received a logical answer to why an analyst
> on the South African desk in CSIS HQ stated that there was no basis
> for an investigation into the alleged contribution to Preston Manning
> on January 10, 1989, and yet without any additional, or new,
> information, an analyst on the South African desk in CSIS HQ submitted
> a request for a TARC Level 1 investigation on October 17, 1989? SIRC
> attempted to provide the following as an answer: A reliable source
> provided CSIS with information that a foreign country (read South
> Africa) had transferred over a quarter of a million dollars to Canada,
> to try to influence 24 Members of Parliament from other political
> parties (read Progressive Conservatives and Liberals).
>
> When asked, SIRC stated that CSIS did not take any steps to
> investigate these M.P.s. If the information about South Africa funding
> these 24 M.P.s did indeed inspire the investigation, why was there no
> mention of this on the form (REQUEST FOR AND APPROVAL OF COLLECTION
> LEVELS 1, 2 AND CATEGORY A aka 4002) authorizing the investigation?
>
> It is therefore unlikely that this information played any role in the
> investigation. SIRC would still have us believe that CSIS received
> information from a reliable source that the South African Government
> was using over a quarter of million dollars to influence 24
> Conservative and Liberal M.P.s, but did not investigate them. Instead,
> CSIS proceeded to launch an investigation of Preston Manning, who was
> neither an M.P., nor a Progressive Conservative nor a Liberal.
>
> We find SIRC's logic to be less than satisfying. ; The Actual
> Investigation: Who, What, When, Why? >From the moment the Solicitor
> General tabled the Heritage Front Affair report, one particular
> passage has caused a great deal of grief for the Sub-Committee, SIRC
> and CSIS. This passage resulted in a number of admissions,
> explanations, contradictions, retractions and accusations.
>
> The Reform Party believes that the best way to present this complex
> subject is in the following chronological manner:
>
> December 15, 1994 The Solicitor General tabled SIRC's report, the
> Heritage Front Affair, in the House of Commons. Included in section
> VIII, at paragraph 8.3 is the following passage: "On October 17, 1989,
> the Service decided to formally investigate the alleged $45,000
> contribution. CSIS said that they could not go back to the informant
> as all contacts had ended on December 31, 1988.
>
> The Service authorized a three-month Level 1 investigation entitled:
> #145;LNU FNU (Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
> Campaign)'. The Service cited section 12 and paragraph 2 (b) of the
> CSIS Act as the legal basis for the investigation." ;
>
> December 16, 1994 ;SIRC appeared before the Sub-Committee on National
> Security. Having been advised that the above-mentioned passage was
> inaccurate, the Reform Party made the following request:
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Can you have your officials go back to CSIS and have
> them examine the hard copy of the original authorization of the Level
> one investigation on the Reform Party and a foreign government, not
> just the corrected copies? Specifically, can your employees examine
> the caption on the file?"
>
> Summary - After the meeting, the Reform Party was approached by SIRC
> research officials. They asked what they should be looking for
> specifically. This led the Reform Party to believe that SIRC was not
> aware of a changed caption. ;
>
> January 27, 1995 In a letter from Maurice Archdeacon, the Executive
> Director of SIRC, to Derek Lee, M.P., the Chairman of the
> Sub-Committee on National Security, Val Meredith's request was
> answered in the following manner:
>
> "Ms. Meredith, M.P. requested that SIRC have its officials re-examine
> the original authorization of the Level I investigation on the Reform
> Party and a foreign government. Specifically, Ms. Meredith asked to be
> told what the caption was on the file.
>
> The nature of Ms. Meredith's question suggests that the answer may
> well already be known to her. Nevertheless, the caption she referred
> to for the targeting authority dated October 17, 1989 was #145;Preston
> Manning.' The caption was revised on March 30, 1990 to state,
> #145;LNU/FNU (Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
> Campaign).'
>
> I would be remiss if I did not point out that, aside from the amended
> caption, there were no other changes to the text of the targeting
> requests/authorizations. That is, the text in each of the documents
> was identical, and clearly stated that the investigation was to
> determine whether a #145;foreign influence' threat existed. CSIS did
> not suspect Mr. Manning of complicity..."
>
> Summary - Mr. Archdeacon admitted that the name on the targeting
> authority dated October 17, 1989 was #145;Preston Manning.' He also
> mentioned that "there were no other changes to the text of the
> targeting request/authorizations. That is, the text in each of the
> documents was identical." It is quite apparent that Mr. Archdeacon is
> stating that there were two versions of the same document, with the
> only change being to the caption. From his choice of words being the
> #145;targeting request/authorizations', there is no doubt that Mr.
> Archdeacon is referring to the form 4002. ;
>
> March 30, 1995 The Solicitor General appears before the Standing
> Committee on Justice and Legal Affairs, for the Main Estimates. He is
> accompanied by his Deputy Minister and the heads of the various
> agencies under his control, including Mr. Ward Elcock, Director of
> CSIS. The Reform Party asked Mr. Elcock a number of questions about
> this particular investigation.
>
> The following excerpts are from the transcript of this meeting: (Page 15)
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Can you explain then why Mr. Manning's name was used
> for a TARC level one investigation and why that investigation was not
> conducted under the foreign government?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "I don't know why that name was used. I suspect that, as
> much as anything else, it may have been just used as a convenient tag.
> I don't know the precise reason why it was used, but there is no
> question from the file that at any time the subject of the
> investigation was ever Mr. Manning himself."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Why was that file named under Mr. Manning, then, and
> not under #145;unknown contributor?'"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "I said, Mr. Chairman, that I didn't know the reason why
> that name was used. It clearly was in error, because in substance, the
> investigation at all times was an investigation of the actions of a
> foreign government, not an investigation of Mr. Manning."
>
> (Page 17) Ms. Meredith: "So Mr. Manning's name never came up under a
> requisition or a request for a TARC Level One investigation?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "It was in the sense, Mr. Chairman, that the title of the
> TARC was initially in Mr. Manning's name. His name was there. Was
> there an investigation of Mr. Manning? Absolutely not."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "I didn't ask if there was an investigation of Mr.
> Manning. I asked if a TARC Level was ever instituted under Mr.
> Manning's name?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "The answer, Mr. Chairman, was that there was a TARC Level
> in Mr. Manning's name. But as I have said, the subject of that TARC
> was not Mr. Manning at any time, ever."
>
> (Page 34) Ms. Meredith: "I have your policy manual here, the
> declassified version of the CSIS Operational Manual. For a TARC Level
> one authority, an investigator must submit a request for an approval
> form, CSIS form 4002. There's a space for the name of the individual
> to be investigated. Can you tell me whose name was in that spot on the
> form 4002 in question, signed on October 17, 1989?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "As I think I said earlier, there was in the TARC title
> Mr. Manning's name. However, as I said quite clearly, the subject of
> that file was at all times an investigation of contributions in terms
> of the possibility of contributions having been made by a foreign
> government to a Canadian political party. It was at no time an
> investigation of Mr. Manning himself, notwithstanding the title. I
> would that (sic) the title had been otherwise, but it wasn't. That's
> the fact."
>
> Summary - During this meeting, the Director of CSIS made it quite
> clear that on October 17, 1989 the TARC Level 1 authorization, the
> form 4002, was on Preston Manning. Mr. Elcock did not once suggest
> that the caption was "Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's
> Electoral Campaign." (Nor did Mr. Elcock suggest that the error
> occurred with a different document known as a FILE OPENING REQUEST -
> PEOPLE FILES form.) At this same meeting the Reform Party also
> questioned the Director as to why SIRC was not made aware that the
> original 4002 was in the name of #145;Preston Manning'.
>
> That led to the following exchange: (Page 17)
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Can you explain to me why that information wasn't
> provided to SIRC? In their report, they reported very thoroughly on
> that investigation, with the exception of the original TARC level?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "Why what information?"
>
> Ms. Meredith: "That the TARC level on Mr. Manning was excluded from
> the SIRC report, that SIRC was unaware of that having happened?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "I don't know that in fact SIRC was unaware. I don't know
> why they would not have put it in their report or would have chosen
> not to do that. That's SIRC's business, and you would have to address
> that question to SIRC."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "When we brought it to SIRC's attention, they were
> unaware of that fact. It was only by it being brought to their
> attention that they were able to go back and find out the information.
> So I assumed from that they did not know that information was not
> provided to them, and I would like to know why it wasn't?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "I don't know that that assumption is correct; I would
> have to check. In fact, my belief is that they did have that
> information, but I'll certainly check that for the hon. member."
>
> Summary - This was the first information that the Reform Party
> received that SIRC was aware that the original TARC Level was on
> Preston Manning. ;
>
> March 31, 1995 In response to Mr. Elcock's testimony, Val Meredith
> wrote to SIRC, seeking clarification of what SIRC knew and when. "Was
> any member or employee of SIRC aware that the original TARC
> investigation launched on October 17, 1989 (was) in the name of
> Preston Manning and not "LNU FNU (Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston
> Manning's Electoral Campaign), when the Heritage Front Affair report
> was tabled on December 9, 1994?" Summary - The Reform Party
> specifically asked SIRC if they knew prior to the tabling of their
> report that the TARC investigation was in the name of #145;Preston
> Manning.' ;
>
> April 7, 1995 In a letter, under the name of Jacques Courtois, P.C.,
> Q.C., but signed by Maurice Archdeacon, Val Meredith's letter was
> responded to in the following fashion: "You asked whether any member
> or employee of SIRC was aware of the TARC investigation launched on
> October 17, 1989 in the name of Preston Manning and not the corrected
> title. SIRC staff saw the original title of the targeting
> authorization, as well as the corrected title and all other documents
> pertaining to the investigation. As I mentioned in my letter dated
> January 27, 1995 to Mr. Derek Lee, M.P. Chairperson of the
> Sub-Committee on National Security, the description (narrative text)
> of the authorization never changed... The original caption was seen
> for what it was - an error, and the Service corrected that error five
> years ago."
>
> Summary - Once again SIRC admitted that the caption on the TARC on
> October 17, 1989 was in the name of Preston Manning. They also
> admitted that they knew this prior to tabling their report. Although
> Mr. Archdeacon does not specifically state why SIRC chose to exclude
> this information from their report, the only possible explanation they
> offer for its exclusion is that the original caption was seen as an
> error, and that CSIS corrected that error in 1990. ;
>
> June 20, 1995 SIRC appeared before the National Security Sub-Committee
> for the Main Estimates. The Reform Party asked SIRC a number of
> questions about this particular investigation.
>
> The following excerpts are from the transcript of this meeting: (Page 7)
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Are you trying to tell this committee that there was
> not a TARC Level one investigation opened on Preston Manning?"
>
> Mr. Archdeacon: "No, I'm not, obviously, because we're repeating
> discussions we had over several hours earlier. You know very well that
> I'm not doing so. Someone - and we admitted it was sloppy work, and
> I'm sure the Director of CSIS would admit that - instead of taking the
> trouble to write on the TARC title #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston
> Manning's campaign' just wrote #145;Preston Manning.' The text,
> however, in the TARC report makes it absolutely clear - and you read
> the text - that Mr. Manning was not being investigated. We can't say
> it any more than this. It's question asked and answered."
>
> (Page 20)
>
> Mr. Archdeacon: "The fact is at the moment you're looking at the form
> - I understand your point - and saying the form of that 4002 gave the
> impression, because the name Preston Manning was there, that the TARC
> was on Preston Manning. That is the form of it."
>
> Summary - SIRC once again confirmed that the 4002 was in the name of
> Preston Manning. Mr. Archdeacon went so far as to state that he
> obviously wasn't denying that there was a TARC Level one investigation
> opened on Preston Manning. ;
>
> June 21, 1995 to November 7, 1995 During this time period, the
> Sub-Committee on National Security considered its report on the
> Heritage Front Affair. During these meetings, the Sub-Committee was
> operating on the understanding that the original 4002 was in the name
> of "Preston Manning" and this was altered to "LNU/FNU (Unknown
> Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign" on March 30,
> 1990. ; November 9, 1995 To clarify questions about alterations to
> 4002, and who knew about the caption "Preston Manning", the
> Sub-Committee sent a letter to the Director of CSIS. The following are
> the key excerpts from this letter: "On January 27, 1995, SIRC advised
> the Subcommittee, in response to its questions, that the caption on
> the October 17, 1989 targeting authority dealt with in Chapter VIII of
> the SIRC Report was originally #145;Preston Manning.' The Review
> Committee went on in the same letter to advise us that the caption was
> changed on March 30, 1990 to read #145;LNU-FNU (Unknown Contributor(s)
> to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign).' How was the caption change
> made on the Form 4002 - was the original form altered or was the
> original form destroyed and a new, back-dated, re-signed or
> re-initialled form created? Another of the documents contained in the
> file obtained by Mr. Manning is a November 10, 1989 Transit Slip (Form
> 3040) from the Chief of Counter Intelligence - General Desk to the
> Director General of Counter Intelligence. I would like to draw your
> attention to item 5 on this document where it is asserted #145;caption
> is considered appropriate under policy provision.' Can you provide the
> Subcommittee with an explanation of this assertion in light of the
> fact that at the time the caption read #145;Preston Manning' and was
> not changed until March 30, 1990? If the caption was appropriate as it
> was on November 10, 1989, what made it unacceptable on March 30,
> 1990?" Summary - These questions challenged SIRC's and CSIS'
> contention that #145;Preston Manning's' name appearing in caption was
> just a #145;clerical error.' It would be difficult for CSIS to
> maintain the #145;clerical error' excuse if the Director General of
> Counterintelligence was aware of the caption, and agreed with it. ;
>
> March 29, 1996 According to CSIS, they did not receive the November 9,
> 1995 letter from the Sub-Committee until this date. There is no
> explanation as to what happened to the letter during the intervening 4
> 1/2 months. ;
>
> April 15, 1996 The Director of CSIS responded to the Sub-Committee's
> letter of November 9, 1995. In a complete departure from previous
> statements and testimony from CSIS and SIRC, the Director contended
> that the Form 4002 never read #145;Preston Manning', but the original
> caption was #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
> Campaign.' Key excerpts from his letter are as follows: "In response
> to your query regarding the #145;REQUEST FOR AND APPROVAL OF
> COLLECTION LEVELS 1, 2 AND CATEGORY A' form, dated October 17, 1989, I
> am satisfied that this is the original document associated with this
> file. As is shown on this form, the original caption was #145;Unknown
> Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign'. The
> collection authority and a second form, #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST -
> PEOPLE FILES', is required by the Service's Information Management
> branch, in order to create a file. It was at this stage in the process
> that the clerical error occurred regarding this file caption. In an
> effort to facilitate the electronic opening and future retrieval of
> this file and the relevant documents, the caption that was erroneously
> entered on the #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES' form was
> #145;Preston Manning'. This error caused the creation of an automated
> hard copy file under this incorrect caption. It was during the latter
> part of March, 1990, while preparing this assessment report, that the
> file caption error was corrected. Item 5 on the #145;TRANSIT SLIP'
> (Form 3040), dated November 10, 1989, discusses the appropriateness of
> the caption as presented originally - #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to
> Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign' and the comments indicate that
> the author believed the caption to be appropriate."
>
> Summary - This was an astounding development. The Director totally
> contradicted 15 months of statements and testimony from both SIRC and
> himself. According to the January 27, 1995 letter from Maurice
> Archdeacon to Derek Lee, M.P., the targeting authority (form 4002)
> read #145;Preston Manning' on October 17, 1989 and was changed on
> March 30, 1990. Mr. Elcock made no reference to this fact in his
> letter. Nor does the Director address his own testimony before the
> Standing Committee on Justice and Legal Affairs on March 30, 1995,
> where the following exchange took place:
>
> Ms. Meredith: "So Mr. Manning's name never came up under a requisition
> or a request for a TARC Level One investigation?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "It was in the sense, Mr. Chairman, that the title of TARC
> was initially in Mr. Manning's name. His name was there. Was there an
> investigation of Mr. Manning? Absolutely not."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "I didn't ask if there was an investigation of Mr.
> Manning. I asked if a TARC Level was instituted under Mr. Manning's
> name?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "The answer Mr. Chairman, was that there was a TARC Level
> in Mr. Manning's name."
>
> There is no explanation of why Mr. Elcock would state on March 30,
> 1995 that "the title of the TARC was initially in Mr. Manning's name,"
> and then on April 15, 1996 he would write that "the original caption
> was #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
> Campaign.'"
>
> It must also be noted that in none of the correspondence or testimony
> from CSIS or SIRC, between December 16, 1994 and April 14, 1996, was
> there even a single mention of a "FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES"
> form. This particular form was certainly known to CSIS, as it was
> included in Preston Manning's Privacy Act request. However, subsequent
> investigation and testimony would show that Mr. Elcock was not
> completely forthcoming in this letter. ;
>
> May 15, 1996 SIRC appeared before the Sub-Committee on National
> Security for the Main Estimates. While there was little discussion
> about this issue at this meeting, the following exchanges occurred:
> (page 30)
>
> Mr. Discepola: "I'd like to know, then, in your opinion why in the
> world Preston Manning's name was used at all in any of the
> documentation that related to the investigation of the suspected third
> country contribution to the election campaign."
>
> Mr. Archdeacon: "I've forgotten the exact date but the original title
> was #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning's Election Campaign.'
> It should of had more on it then that, but that was the exact title.
> It was not titled #145;Preston Manning', and Mrs. Meredith has a copy
> of the sheets of paper. Here it is, and the title on it is
> #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign.'
> Then there's the text of what is to be looked at, which is whether
> somebody, some country, was going to contribute money to Preston
> Manning's electoral campaign. When you have a TARC like that you must
> open a file, and this TARC was sent down to the management information
> section in CSIS. Because it didn't have LNU/FNU in front of the
> #145;Unknown Contributor(s)', which means last name unknown, first
> name unknown, the only name the clerk down there could see was Preston
> Manning, and you have to have a name on a file. So he didn't write
> #145;Unknown Contributor(s)' , he wrote #145;Preston Manning'. That
> was an error. He shouldn't have done that. That error remained like
> that for at least three months without being corrected. It wasn't
> corrected until about March, when the assessment was being done. There
> have been allegations that the title on the TARC was changed. Written
> in ink was #145;LNU/FNU' ahead of what had always been there and had
> never been changed. Because Mrs. Meredith was so sure of this, and
> because we knew she had our information from somewhere else, we
> decided to have the original TARC X-rayed. We have exact evidence that
> everything Mrs. Meredith has said about this - about it having been
> titled #145;Preston Manning', about things having been typed around
> it, and about all those sorts of things - is completely and totally
> incorrect. The file was mistitled and the file does not give anybody
> any reason to investigate anybody. A file title does not authorize
> anybody to investigate anybody. There was never any time when every
> CSIS agent across the country could have investigated Mr. Manning.
> That is a figment of someone's imagination." (page 32)
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Then I would like to put something on the record, Mr.
> Chair. I'd like to put on the record, Mr. Archdeacon, that the
> comments you just made are in complete contradiction to a letter on
> January 27, 1995, addressed to Mr. Derek Lee, and in testimony you've
> given before this committee. It's a complete contradiction."
>
> The Chairman: "I'm sure SIRC would want to address that. Perhaps this
> is something that can be clarified later. Can I take it, Mr.
> Archdeacon, Mr. Courtois, that you would differ?"
>
> Mr. Archdeacon: "We would differ with that characterization." ;
>
> Summary - Mr. Archdeacon's comments are a complete departure from
> SIRC's previous correspondence and testimony.
>
> First of all, it was not Ms. Meredith who stated that the original
> TARC was captioned #145;Preston Manning', it was Mr. Archdeacon
> himself who first made this statement in his letter of January 27,
> 1995, when he stated:; "The caption she referred to for the targeting
> authority dated October 17, 1989 was #145;Preston Manning'.
>
> The caption was revised on March 30, 1990 to state, #145;LNU/FNU
> (Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign).'"
>
> Then there is the letter that Mr. Archdeacon signed on April 7, 1995,
> in which he stated:; "You asked whether any member or employee of SIRC
> was aware of the TARC investigation launched on October 17, 1989 in
> the name of Preston Manning and not the corrected title. SIRC staff
> saw the original title of the targeting authorization, as well as the
> corrected title and all other documents pertaining to the
> investigation."
>
> Once again Mr. Archdeacon confirmed that the original title was
> "Preston Manning", and admitted that SIRC staff saw both the original
> title of the targeting authorization, as well as the corrected title.
> If, as Mr. Archdeacon maintained on May 15, 1996, the original title
> was "Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign",
> why would he state in two pieces of correspondence that the caption
> was "Preston Manning".
>
> Furthermore, during SIRC's appearance before the National Security
> Sub-Committee meeting on June 20, 1995, there was this exchange:;
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Are you trying to tell this committee that there was
> not a TARC Level one investigation opened on Preston Manning?"
>
> Mr. Archdeacon: "No, I'm not obviously, because we're repeating
> discussions we had over several hours earlier. You know very well that
> I'm not doing so. Someone - and we admitted it was sloppy work, and
> I'm sure the Director of CSIS would admit that - instead of taking the
> trouble to write on the TARC title #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston
> Manning's Campaign' just wrote #145;Preston Manning.'"
>
> Mr. Archdeacon made no effort to explain why, on May 15, 1996, he told
> the Sub-Committee that there was not a TARC Level one investigation
> opened on Preston Manning, when on June 20, 1995 he stated the exact
> opposite.
>
> Clearly, Mr. Archdeacon and SIRC have fully endorsed the April 15,
> 1996 letter from the Director of CSIS. Like Mr. Elcock, they make no
> effort to explain the contradictions.
>
> There is one comment of Mr. Archdeacon that would be contradicted by
> the CSIS Director two weeks later. Mr. Archdeacon made a definitive
> statement that the error was caused by a clerk in the Management
> Information Section, who wrote "Preston Manning." As we will see in
> the next section, this statement has no basis in fact, but is rather a
> figment of Mr. Archdeacon's imagination. ;
>
> May 27, 1996 Mr. Elcock appeared before the Sub-Committee to answer
> questions about the Heritage Front Affair. During his appearance the
> Reform Party asked him about a number of discrepancies contained in
> his letter of April 15, 1996.
>
> Four of the specific subjects that were broached, included:
>
> I) The Altered #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES' Form. In his
> letter, Mr. Elcock stated, "the caption that was erroneously entered
> on the #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES' form was #145;Preston
> Manning.'" However, the copy of that form that Mr. Manning received in
> his Privacy Act request did not read #145;Preston Manning', but rather
> #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign'.
> It is obvious that the section of the form for the subject's name has
> been altered, as have the sections for #145;Present Address' and
> #145;Occupation'.
>
> The following exchange took place in relation to this form:
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Mr. Elcock, your letter clearly states that it was on
> this file, this PEOPLE FILES form here, and if people look carefully
> you can see where there has been alterations made to this document.
> The alterations have been made not only on the subject line, but on
> the #145;Occupation' line and the #145;Present Address' line. Your
> letter states that it was this form that Preston Manning's name was
> put on by mistake. I'm asking you why does this form not have Preston
> Manning's name on it? It has #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston
> Manning's Electoral Campaign."
>
> Mr. Elcock: "Mr. Chairman, Mr. Sundstrom reminds me that although it
> doesn't show here underneath, it was just Preston Manning when the
> form was first completed."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "So, if you agree, or if you read Mr. Archdeacon's
> comments where he noted it had been a clerk and it was a clerk in the
> Management Information Section that changed the document from
> #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning' and put Preston Manning's
> name in it. It's obvious that #145;Occupation' and #145;Present
> Address' have also been altered, changed, whited-out. Did this clerk
> also put Preston Manning's address and his occupation in there? Do
> they have the right to just add that in as they saw fit?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "Mr. Chairman, it compounded the clerical error, but
> there's nothing that prevents them from adding those details."
>
> Summary - While Mr. Elcock confirmed that the #145;Subject Name',
> #145;Occupation' and #145;Present Address' sections were all altered,
> he maintained that it was a "clerical error". Well it might be
> possible that a CSIS clerk would not use the proper caption in this
> case, it is ludicrous to suggest that the clerk would, on his or her
> own initiative, add Mr. Manning's address and occupation. Besides, if
> as CSIS and SIRC maintain, Mr. Manning was never investigated, how did
> CSIS even know his present address. In any event, as we shall see in
> section #145;IV', the story of the clerk making a mistake is soon
> retracted. ;
>
> II) Citing a document two weeks before it existed. In the form 4002,
> which authorized the TARC Level 1 investigation on October 17, 1989,
> there is a reference to a proposed meeting between Mr. Manning and an
> unidentified Ambassador. The reference goes on to state that the
> meeting was canceled at the last minute by the Embassy. Only one
> N.S.R. (CSIS database) message in the package obtained by Mr. Manning
> in his Privacy Act request contained this information. It was dated
> November 1, 1989, two weeks after the form 4002 was supposedly
> completed.
>
> Questions about this discrepancy went as follows:
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Can I get you to go to tab #145;L' in the documents
> that we've provided for you? This document is the only document that
> was received under the access, under the Privacy Act, to Mr. Manning,
> that makes any reference to an Ambassador and Preston Manning meeting,
> and the meeting being canceled by the Embassy. Can you give me the
> date of that message?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "The date at the top is 89- 11-01."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "What does that equate to... November 1, 1989?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "Yes, it should do."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "How is it possible that this message number and this
> date can be an additional background on a document that is dated
> October 17, 1989? How is it possible that this information is on a
> document when it didn't exist at the time?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "The honourable member is concluding that it's the same
> reference; I don't know that it is."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "If that is not the report, then why was the report not
> included in the Privacy request by Mr. Manning? This is the only
> document that was in the information provided to him."
>
> Mr. Elcock: "I will check and see what the date is and advise the
> committee what the date of the document was."
>
> Summary - The Reform Party did ask, in writing, for CSIS to confirm
> the date of this message. At the time this dissenting opinion was
> written, CSIS had not responded to our request. If this is the report
> in question, then it lends credence to the suggestion that this form
> 4002 was re-written some time after October 17, 1989. It also suggests
> that someone believed that the original justification for the
> investigation was so weak, that additional information had to be
> provided. If, on the other hand, there was documentation withheld from
> Mr. Manning's Privacy request, one wonders what else has been
> withheld. ;
>
> III) The Altered Form 4002. If the inclusion of information from a
> message that was not yet reported suggested that the form 4002 had
> been re-written, another fact that supported this suggestion was that
> the date on the top right corner of the document had been altered. The
> Reform Party employed the services of forensic consultant, an expert
> in the examination of questioned documents, who stated "as a matter of
> information it should be noted that within the questioned handwritten
> digital date #145;1989-10-17' on exhibit A1 (a), partially within and
> immediately above the handwritten numbers there exist undecipherable
> fragmentary markings foreign to the handwritten #145;1989-10-17'
> numbers."
>
> This information led to the following exchange:
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Mr. Elcock, I want to bring your attention back to the
> first page of form 4002 and I want you to look at the handwritten date
> at the top, right-hand corner. That handwritten date was altered,
> wasn't it? Tab #145;B'."
>
> Mr. Elcock: "And it goes back, I think, to the piece that you had
> asked... I noted that Mr. Archdeacon had indicated the piece had been
> X-rayed and in fact there was another date underneath."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Can you tell the committee what the date was that was
> underneath?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "The date was 1990...March 29, 1990."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Thank you, Mr. Elcock. I think that just proves what I
> have considered, that this document was typed up in full with a
> changed subject-matter on March 29, 1990; that this document did not
> originate on October 17, 1989."
>
> Mr. Elcock: "No, Mr. Chairman, I don't agree that it does."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Can you explain how the date March 29, 1990 would be at
> the top of that file if that was not the case?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "At the time, often the dates on those files, on those
> documents are left open and completed later when the documents are
> first issued because they don't have a file number either when they're
> first issued."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "Mr. Elcock, so you want me to believe, you want this
> committee to believe that they filled in the form, that the effective
> date was put in at the bottom, the expiry date was put in at bottom,
> that it was signed off and the date was put in at the bottom, but that
> at the top it wasn't. Is that what you want this committee to
> believe?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "I believe there was a mistake made. We believed that at
> the time the typist entered the date and subsequently crossed out
> because she had mistakenly entered it and they put back in the
> appropriate date."
>
> Summary - Although Mr. Elcock admitted that the form 4002 carried the
> date March 29, 1990, he maintained that this was the original 4002
> filled out on October 17, 1989. His argument that the date wasn't put
> in because the document did not have a file number is extremely weak,
> since the FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form that was signed on
> October 17, 1989 was filled out specifically to obtain a file number.
>
> In the documents obtained by Mr. Manning under his Privacy Act
> request, we know that the first N.S.R. message that was sent on this
> file was dated October 17, 1989, and since a message can not be sent
> without a file number, a file number was obviously assigned on this
> date. It is highly unlikely that CSIS would wait an additional five
> months to fill in the rest of this form. This admission also calls
> into question the testimony of Mr. Archdeacon from May 15, 1996, who
> first brought up the subject of having the form X-rayed, and then
> stated the form was never changed. ;
>
> IV) Both Documents filled out by the Same Individual. The last area of
> questioning concerned the contention put forth by CSIS and SIRC, that
> the error in captions occurred not with the form 4002, but when a
> clerk made an error in filling out a second form, a FILE OPENING
> REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form. Mr. Elcock called this a "clerical
> error".
>
> In his May 15, 1996 testimony, Mr. Archdeacon went even further when
> he stated, "this TARC was sent down to the Management Information
> Section in CSIS... The clerk down there thought that the only name
> that he had, and you've got to have a name on a file, the only name he
> could see was Preston Manning. So he didn't write #145;Unknown
> Contributor', he wrote #145;Preston Manning'. That was an error. He
> shouldn't have done that." Again these sound like plausible
> explanations. Plausible that is until one examines the forms.
>
> The Reform Party and the Sub- Committee were somewhat hampered because
> of the censoring of the documents, which deleted the names of the CSIS
> employees who filled out these forms. We were instead forced to
> examine the handwritten dates on both the form 4002 and the FILE
> OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form. It is apparent that they were
> written by the same person. The Forensic Consultant, an expert in the
> examination of questioned documents confirmed the similarities.
>
> While it may have been plausible that a clerk put in the wrong caption
> on the second form, it is absolutely ludicrous to suggest that an
> intelligence officer in CSIS HQ would fill out a form 4002 to
> authorize an investigation in one name, and then on the very same day
> he would fill out a second form to obtain a file number, and use a
> different caption. As absurd as that sounds, that is what the Director
> of CSIS wanted us to believe.
>
> Witness the following exchange:
>
> Ms. Meredith: "And that this unit head authorized a TARC Level
> investigation on #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning's
> Electoral Campaign?' Is that right? That is in essence what this is
> all about, right, is that they authorized a TARC one on an
> #145;Unknown Contributor.'"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "An Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning's Electoral
> Campaign, yes."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "And that the problem originated or the problem was
> picked up when somebody filled out the FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE
> FILES, and then wrote in #145;Preston Manning.'"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "Yes." Ms. Meredith: "It wasn't a clerk who filled out
> those forms, was it?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "No, Mr. Chairman. I'm not sure what the honourable
> member's point is."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "My point is that if you look at the date in the top
> right- hand corner of the FILE OPENING REQUEST and you look at the
> date under the authority section on the same form, the PEOPLE FILE,
> FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES, and then you look at the date
> which is hand-written in at the top of the form 4002, I would suggest,
> Sir, that it's the same person that wrote these two documents, that
> worked with these two documents. How is it possible that the same
> person on one file can put #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston
> Manning's Electoral Campaign' and on the other file, the very same
> day, put #145;Preston Manning.' And that his unit head, in reviewing
> these on the same day, wouldn't pick up the mistake."
>
> Mr. Elcock: "I'm not -- the honourable ...."
>
> Ms. Meredith: "These are things that, I'm sorry, how is it possible
> that a Counterintelligence officer can mistakenly, this is who filled
> out this form, is an intelligence officer in Counterintelligence. How
> could he look at a TARC form that he also filled in and filled it in
> with #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning' and on the very same
> day on another form put Preston Manning's name down?"
>
> Mr. Elcock: "These things happen. Names are sometimes left in
> documents when they ought not to be." Ms. Meredith: "And his unit
> chief who is authorizing and okaying these didn't notice that one of
> the forms was under Preston Manning's name?" Mr. Elcock: "I'm sure as
> the honourable member will know, these things happen from time to
> time."
>
> Summary - Mr. Elcock's defence, given this information is simply that
> these things happen. That is even more frightening than a planned
> investigation of Mr. Manning. The Director of CSIS stated that he
> wanted to re-assure the Reform Party that nothing untoward happened
> with this file. Yet, the only explanation Mr. Elcock offers for the
> conduct of his department, is that the employees who were involved in
> this investigation were grossly incompetent?
>
> However, the Reform Party has more faith in the ability of working
> level staff at CSIS than the Director does. However, the Director did
> confirm that the FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form was never
> filled out by a clerk in the Information Management Section of CSIS.
> That begs the question: Why did the Executive Director of SIRC, Mr.
> Archdeacon, make up his story to mislead the Sub-Committee? ;
>
> CONCLUSIONS The Reform Party regrets having to present such a
> painstakingly, detailed review of the Preston Manning investigation,
> but it was necessary to demonstrate the extreme lengths that we have
> had to go to in our attempts to find the truth in this matter.
>
> The documents obtained by Mr. Manning through his Privacy Act request
> afforded us the opportunity to challenge SIRC's version of events
> directly. SIRC has demonstrated that their word cannot be accepted at
> face value. But what does this all mean in the final analysis?
>
> Two issues need to be resolved. The first is what initiated the
> October 17, 1989 TARC Level 1 investigation. Since the South African
> desk in CSIS HQ wrote off any investigation on January 10, 1989, what
> suddenly spawned interest nine months later. One would think that it
> would be logical for someone to have something in writing suggesting
> that an investigation be opened. But that didn't happen.
>
> The questions that remains unanswered, are:
>
> Who ordered this matter re-opened, and why? The other issue that must
> be answered is: Why are CSIS and SIRC going to such extreme lengths to
> mislead the Sub-Committee, Parliament, and Canadians? If they had
> maintained their original explanation that the file caption was
> inappropriately opened in the name of #145;Preston Manning', and
> subsequently changed, the Reform Party would have little to complain
> about. But for CSIS and SIRC to retract all their previous admissions
> without explanations, and to out-and-out lie to a Parliamentary
> Sub-Committee, it is clear that there is something important they are
> hiding.
>
> The question is: What? Contrary to the assurances from SIRC and CSIS,
> the Reform Party has learned that from October 17, 1989 to January 17,
> 1990, it was recorded in CSIS' main database, N.S.R., that there was a
> TARC Level 1 on Preston Manning. There was no restricted security on
> this file, so this information was available to any CSIS employee who
> had access to N.S.R.
>
> Any employee who came across this information would have believed that
> there was a legal TARC Level on Manning, and could have legitimately
> carried out a Level 1 investigation. If the government members of the
> Sub-Committee weren't so intent on burying this report, the Sub-
> Committee itself may have been able to produce some of its own
> answers.
>
> However, it became apparent, especially after the Liberals changed the
> membership of the Sub-Committee, that government members are just as
> interested in covering up the truth, as are CSIS and SIRC. This is
> typified by the member from Windsor - St. Clair's vociferous objection
> to the Bloc Quebecois attempting to give their time to question the
> Director of CSIS to the Reform Party at the May 27, 1996 meeting. Why
> else would they object to the Reform Party having a few extra minutes
> to ask questions?
>
> It is clear to the Reform Party that SIRC's Heritage Front Affair
> report is a complete whitewash. SIRC was able to divert what should
> have been a review of the activities of a CSIS Source into a review of
> the Heritage Front itself. Both SIRC and CSIS champion this case as a
> great success for the Service, but the mere fact that the Source's own
> actions made this case public, should suggest it was a failure. But
> what this case has done is to show that the review system established
> by the CSIS Act does not work.
>
> The government has joined with CSIS and SIRC in covering up the truth.
> Why? What are they afraid of? This government has expressed no concern
> that the leader of a legitimate political party had his name on a
> document authorizing a CSIS investigation on him. They have expressed
> no concern that all the original documents authorizing that
> investigation were altered in one manner or another. They have shown
> no concern that both CSIS and SIRC admitted that originally the TARC
> level was on Preston Manning, then fifteen months later proceeded to
> deny it, with absolutely no explanation.
>
> It would appear that this government is not interested in holding the
> bureaucracy accountable. How is it possible that the government is not
> concerned that one of its agencies operates without accountability.
> Was that not why a civilian intelligence agency was formed? Did not a
> previous Liberal administration pass the CSIS Act, to make Canada's
> intelligence community accountable to Parliament?
>
> Those Canadians who care about the truth will have to wait until this
> country has a government committed to Parliamentary accountability,
> before the true version comes out. In the meantime, the Reform Party
> hopes that those journalists, researchers or academics who are
> interested in pursuing security issues continue their search for the
> real story. The truth is out there!
>
> RECOMMENDATIONS In light of the negligent performance of the Security
> Intelligence Review Committee in reviewing this investigation, it is
> clear that there is no place in the review process for a group of
> patronage appointees who believe that they do not have to answer to
> Parliament.
>
> To find an alternative we need look no further than to our neighbours
> to the south. The Americans utilize not only a House Select Committee
> on Intelligence, but a Senate Committee as well. Given the immense
> Intelligence network in the United States with the CIA, the NSA and
> the Intelligence Division of the FBI, the Americans have demonstrated
> that review by elected representatives is not only workable, but in
> the Reform Party's opinion is preferable. ;
>
> Reform Party Recommendation The Reform Party recommends that this
> government introduce legislation in Parliament that would amend the
> Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act, deleting all references to
> the Security Intelligence Review Committee. All references to the
> Security Intelligence Review Committee should be replaced by the
> Standing Committee on National Security. ;
>
> ; Created by Maurice Murphy Revised: December 01, 1996
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 04:02:33 -0300
> Subject: RE Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the
> mindless lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???
> To: ABrander@highriver.ca, highwood <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>, premier
> <premier@gov.ab.ca>, mclellana <mclellana@bennettjones.com>,
> "Ian.Shardlow" <Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Ian.McPhail"
> <Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Dale.McGowan"
> <Dale.McGowan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "calgary.acadia"
> <calgary.acadia@assembly.ab.ca>, "calgary.northwest"
> <calgary.northwest@assembly.ab.ca>, Calgarynews <Calgarynews@ctv.ca>,
> calgarynewstips <calgarynewstips@cbc.ca>, cal-news
> <cal-news@sunmedia.ca>, eblokland <eblokland@highriver.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, gunfighter@fritze.com, Sheldon@nfa.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: PCC Complaints <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:14:53 +0000
> Subject: RE: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me
> off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the
> Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya...
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Hello Mr. Amos:
>
> This e-mail is to acknowledge your recent communication with our
> office about the RCMP.
>
> If you wish to submit a complaint regarding the on-duty conduct of a
> member(s) of the RCMP, you can do so through our online complaint form
> located at:
>
> https://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/cnt/srv/mac/index-eng.aspx
>
> Alternatively, we can also be reached by:
>
> Telephone : 1-800-665-6878
> E-mail: complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
> Fax : 604-501-4095
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> Günther Schönfeldt
> Intake Officer / Agent d'information de liaison
> Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP /
> Commission des plaintes du public contre la Gendarmerie royale du Canada
> Tel/Tél : 1-800-665-6878 | Fax/Téléc : (604) 501-4095
> complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
> Sent: September-07-13 11:38 PM
> To: gunfighter@fritze.com; Sheldon@nfa.ca; bob.paulson; ORG; McPhail, Ian
> Cc: David Amos; Cogan, Tim
> Subject: Fwd: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me
> off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shard low? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the
> Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya
>
> http://nfa.ca/news/video-analysis-reveals-rcmp-targeting-houses-firearms
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Al Brander <ABrander@highriver.ca>
> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 07:36:10 -0600
> Subject: RE: Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the
> mindless lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> For the record, these current missive are the only ones I have seen.
>
> Please delete my from your address book since it appears you only want
> a platform to rant from.
>
> Al Brander
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 9:46 PM
> To: Al Brander; Ian.Shardlow; bob.paulson; mclellana; premier; Ian.McPhail
> Cc: David Amos; highwood
> Subject: Re: Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the
> mindless lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???
>
> My question would obviously be:
>
> Why did you and Ian Shardlow your new local top cop ignore me for
> nearly a month?
>
> Obviously I am the guy who answered Greg Kvisle's quandry about why
> the RCMP ignored the Charter and felt free to invade his home three
> time in order to find and take his old 303 and shotgun but he did not
> believe me. I suspect you know as wel as I Correct?
>
> As far as who I am scroll down this is lots of info that you had a
> month to check out. If you don't believe it ask Ian Sharlow or his
> bosses Dale McGowan and Bob Paulson or the lawyers Landslide Annie
> McLellan or Alison Redford if I am a liar or not.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> On 9/8/13, Al Brander <ABrander@highriver.ca> wrote:
>
>> Mr. Amos: Is there a question for me here?? If so please present it and
>> will you then also identify who you are please.
>>
>> Thank you;
>>
>> Al Brander
>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2013 9:45 PM
>> To: Emile Blokland; christopher@diarmani.com;
>> brian.topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
>> bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca; Josee.Valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Dale.McGowan;
>> bob.paulson; steven.blaney; Sylvain.Roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
>> bloke@shaw.ca;
>> premier; highwood; airdrie; mclellana; finditherefirst@gmail.com;
>> Doug.Potts@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; ppalmater;
>> xchief;
>> gunfighter
>> Cc: Ian.McPhail; David Amos; James Thackray; kevin.rushworth@sunmedia.ca;
>> Al
>> Brander; Jessica Hume; greg.weston; pm; MulcaT; justin.trudeau.a1
>> Subject: Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the
>> mindless
>> lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???
>>
>> http://nfa.ca/news/video-analysis-reveals-rcmp-targeting-houses-firearms
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: ORG <ORG@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
>> Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 03:38:08 +0000
>> Subject: CPC AutoResponse / Réponse préenregistrée de la CPP
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for contacting the Commission for Public Complaints Against
>> the RCMP. Your message has been received and if necessary, we shall
>> respond as soon as possible.
>>
>> Thank you for your interest and comments.
>>
>> Nous vous remercions d'avoir communiqué avec la Commission des
>> plaintes du public contre la GRC. Nous avons reçu votre message et y
>> donnerons suite, si nécessaire, dans les plus brefs délais.
>>
>> Nous vous remercions de l'intérêt que vous manifestez à l'égard de la
>> Commission et de vos commentaires.
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Emile Blokland <eblokland@highriver.ca>
> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:38:46 -0600
> Subject: Out of Office: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High
> River piss me off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith
> at the Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> I am away from the office August 30, until September 16, 2013
> inclusive. In my abscence please contact Deputy Mayor Al Brander at
> abrander@highriver.ca
>
> Mayor Emile Blokland
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Josee VALIQUETTE <josee.valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 20:38:36 -0400
> Subject: Re: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me
> off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the
> Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya (Sgt. Valiquette is Away on
> September 5th, 2013)
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Hello, I am away today. For any inquiries in regards to "K"
> Division Media Relations, please contact S/Sgt. Ron Campbell at
> 780-412-5268.
>
> Thank you
>
> On 9/5/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <eblokland@highriver.ca>; <christopher@diarmani.com>;
> <brian.topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca>;
> <Josee.Valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "Dale.McGowan"
> <Dale.McGowan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>; <Sylvain.Roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
> <bloke@shaw.ca>; "premier" <premier@gov.ab.ca>; "highwood"
> <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>; "airdrie" <airdrie@assembly.ab.ca>;
> "mclellana" <mclellana@bennettjones.com>; <finditherefirst@gmail.com>;
> <Doug.Potts@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
> "ppalmater" <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca>; "xchief"
> <xchief@bell.blackberry.net>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>;
> <jthackray@highriver.ca>; <kevin.rushworth@sunmedia.ca>;
> <abrander@highriver.ca>; "Jessica Hume" <jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>;
> "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>; "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>; "MulcaT"
> <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>; "justin.trudeau.a1"
> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 9:38 PM
> Subject: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me off
> today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the Townhall
> Meeting tonight for me will ya
>
>
> http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Tories+Wildrose+exchange+fire+over+High+River+seizures/8866170/story.html
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 02:51:37 -0300
> Subject: The latest top cop in High River Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow and
> his boss Bob Paulson should be able to explain this email to Greg
> Kvisle and the other pissed off folks
> To: eblokland@highriver.ca, christopher@diarmani.com,
> brian.topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca,
> Josee.Valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "Dale.McGowan"
> <Dale.McGowan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, Sylvain.Roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> bloke@shaw.ca, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, highwood
> <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>, airdrie <airdrie@assembly.ab.ca>, mclellana
> <mclellana@bennettjones.com>, finditherefirst@gmail.com,
> Doug.Potts@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, ppalmater
> <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca>, xchief <xchief@bell.blackberry.net>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, jthackray@highriver.ca,
> kevin.rushworth@sunmedia.ca, abrander@highriver.ca, Jessica Hume
> <jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>, "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>, pm
> <pm@pm.gc.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
>
> FYI I called Greg Kvisle after I saw him on Sun TV he said he didn't
> need any help but he wanted to know who took his guns I told him I
> knew but he didn't believe me. Clearly Ken Braat knows Greg Kvisle and
> the cops very well. He should be able to tell Kvisle who took his
> guns.
>
> http://www.highrivertimes.com/2013/07/29/new-staff-sergeant-to-run-high-river-rcmp
>
> I bet Harper and the RCMP remembers what this Maritimer said about his
> old 303s and shoguns when I ran for seat Parliament the first time
> after the Maritimers Landslide Annie Mclellan Wayne Easter and a
> boatload of corrupt cops pissed me off. If a don't feel free to scroll
> down N'esy Pas?
>
> I bet Danielle Smith, Bobby Baby Paulson remembers Robin Reid. Clearly
> Insp Dougy Potts and Sgt Ian Shardlow pissed her and a bunch of
> Indians off bigtime last year EH?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: robin reid
> To: bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; pm@pm.gc.ca ; people stand up ;
> david.raymond.amos@gmail.com ; dominic ; calgary.west@assembly.ab.ca ;
> toewsv1@mts.net ; jspottedbear@yahoo.com ; jimsisson@inac.gc.ca ;
> hiddenfromhistory1@gmail.com ; admin@turnervalley.ca ;
> aimggc@worldnet.att.net ; alex@globalmedicaltourism.com.mx ;
> amyrae4@hotmail.com ; archbishop@archtoronto.org ;
> barry.shaw@forces.gc.ca ; bewerbung@rothschild.com ;
> bishopfh@rcdiocese-calgary.ab.ca ; calgary@jasonkenney.com
> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 11:44 PM
> Subject: I SEE NOTHING HAS CHANGED WITHIN YOUR CORRUPT FEDERAL ORGANIZATION
>
> Bob Paulson,
> Commissioner of RCMP
> Canada.
>
> Mr. Paulson,
>
> I write once again after the disappointing bullshit letter I received
> from Inspector Potts, and then my discussion with Sgt. Shardlow
> yesterday in Okotoks over assaults, false arrest, murder, all kinds of
> nasty things you are responsible for setting people up using your "
> interception of private communication ".
> You people neglect doing your duty here and as I see what is coming
> out in the media, makes one wonder just how much death you have
> covered up over the years.
> Afraid the truth is coming out is what it seems,hmmmm. And as far as
> your arresting officer Degroot goes he seems to have a lot of contact
> with Juiliann Barna Reid, as I
> asked Shardlow - does this abusing woman work for you????????? Perhaps
> you could look into this and get back to me.
>
> Honestly for men you have no balls, just like Harper - has god got
> your balls also??????? And then you have your women godly agents who I
> am thinking took your balls cuz they are as cruel as you men. Now is
> that not shameful.?????? Just as Alison Redford ignored me when she
> was justice minister.
>
> You people do not care about children, woman or men in your game of
> human abuse for
> profit. You always have the same excuse.
>
> Now Mr. Paulson, since you are at the top, do you condone these lies
> and abuse of children, woman and men ???????
>
> I do have some other concerns from many years ago involving the
> okotoks RCMP putting the blame on 1 officer, an Indian, are you racist
> Mr. Paulson, do you condone white supremacy and genocide upon the
> Indian people and then every other race by thair own ????? Just as the
> security guard who assaulted me - thair excuse was he just got out of
> security school.
>
> Also Mr. Paulson do you carry the dead peasant insurance upon your
> workers???????? how does one find out if this type of insurance is on
> people and who has used it?????????
>
> And let's not forget the abuse on human life by religion, sit's at the
> top on the abuse game for profit, would you not say???????
>
> Now Mr. Paulson, do you feel this is right what has been done, the
> medical abuse, assaults, false arrests and so much more I would like
> to discuss in person.????????????
>
> REMEMBER IT'S ALL INDIAN LAND THAT YOU PERSONS UNDER THE SUPREMACY OF
> GOD, KILLED CHILDREN, WOMAN AND MEN FOR WHAT YOU HAVE, AND REMEMBER
> INDIANS OF THE LANDS COME IN ALL RACES. SHAME ON YOU ALL CORRUPT
> CHIEFS KILLING CHILDREN IN SO MANY WAYS, ESPECIALLY YOU CONDONED
> PEDOPHILE LAIR.
>
>
> Thank you
> Robin Reid
> Red Nations
> PPOF
>
>
> http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/politics/archives/2013/06/20130628-151342.html
>
> http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/alberta/Hell+Residents+angry+RCMP+sieze+guns+from+High+River+homes/8588851/story.html
>
> RCMP revealed Thursday that officers have seized a "substantial ...
> that we control, simply because of what they are," said Sgt. Brian
> Topham
>
> http://www.canada.com/story_print.html?id=29c1b59c-694d-4d33-9fdc-d5a57f14ec39&sponsor=
>
> Some Alberta RCMP Disciplinary Cases in 2005-06 (Year to Date)
>
> - Sgt. Brian Topham -- reprimand and forfeiture of 10 days' pay.
>
> Topham, who served at the Fox Creek detachment between 2002 and 2004,
> made insensitive and degrading comments about women in the presence of
> a female civilian employee.
>
> On another occasion, Topham said "1974 was the worst year in the RCMP
> because that is when the RCMP let women in the force."
>
> The allegations also involved stereotypical comments about aboriginals
> and people from Newfoundland made in the presence of officers who had
> those backgrounds.
>
>
> http://christopherdiarmani.com/10532/police/abuse-of-police-authority/high-river-rcmp-looters-criminals-treated-immediately/
>
> http://www.calgarysun.com/2013/08/09/high-river-homeowner-upset-police-entered-his-home-three-times-after-flood-hit-and-seized-antique-firearms
>
> Greg Kvisle. CENTURY 21 Foothills Real Estate. Bldg. F, 1103 18 Street
> SE. High River, ABT1V 2A9. Office: 403-652-2121. Cell: 403-601-3533
>
> Ken Braat Associate,Realtor. Century 21 Foothills Real Estate 1103 F
> 18 Street SE, T1V 2A9 High River, Alberta 403-601-2070.
>
> High River homeowner upset police entered his home three times after
> flood hit and seized antique firearms
> 205
>
> By Bill Kaufmann ,Calgary Sun
>
> First posted: Friday, August 09, 2013 03:42 PM MDT | Updated: Friday,
> August 09, 2013 04:59 PM MDT
>
>
> The RCMP's post-flood seizure of two family heirloom firearms that
> were hidden in his home is an outrageous trespass, says a High River
> man.
>
> The Mounties made three trips into the home of Greg Kvisle before
> seizing the guns, a 1912 Winchester long-barreled shotgun and a
> 50-year-old .303 rifle in the days following June's deluge.
>
> "My grandfather passed them down to my dad and when he passed away we
> brought them here for safekeeping," said Kvisle, adding neither weapon
> has been fired in decades.
>
> "It's a sentimental thing for me."
>
> He said both guns were stashed in a corner of his basement in a
> storage area beneath boxes and far from any ammunition.
>
> "They weren't visible and were secure as far as I saw it," said Kvisle.
>
> His street wasn't impacted by the flooding and hadn't been evacuated,
> but Kvisle said he was in Calgary when the water hit its height, and
> was barred from returning home for nine days.
>
> Once home, his suspicions that the two weapons might have been seized
> were quickly confirmed.
>
> About half of his neighbours had remained home, including those next
> door who kept an eye on his property and helped Mounties enter his
> home three times, said Kvisle.
>
> "I just don't understand why they were searching for them," he said.
>
> "They're supposed to be protecting our home, not looting it."
>
> Kvisle said he had no trouble getting back his weapons from RCMP
> officers, whom he called courteous and professional.
>
> But the fact Mounties had taken hidden guns from his home on a
> partly-populated street police were patrolling rankles him.
>
> "What's next?" he said.
>
> The Mounties said they seized firearms to prevent them from falling
> into the hands of burglars in vacated, unsecured areas.
>
> Kvisle's guns were situated in open view because it would have taken
> very little to uncover them, said RCMP Sgt. Josee Valiquette.
>
> "It could be in plain view under a bed, in a closet -- somewhere
> somebody could hide," said Valiquette.
>
> "If they happened to open a closet, it is in plain sight...these
> firearms were inappropriately secured."
>
> Kvisle said he's been told a civilian group that oversees the RCMP is
> reviewing his case.
>
> "I hope we get some answers," he said.
>
> bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca
>
> Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
>
> By Erin Hatfield
>
> "If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
> world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
>
> The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
> the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
> watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
> unofficial, theme song for the debate.
>
> The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
> they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
> Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
> chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
> left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
> mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
> the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
>
> The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
> organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
> of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
> and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
>
> Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
> responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
> exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
> Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
> other on their answers and criticizing eachothers' party leaders.
> Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
> questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
> relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
> response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
> getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
>
> Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
> party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
> well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
> on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
> places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
> shouldn't have been penalized by this gu