Saturday, 8 March 2014

YO Ian McPhail how much longer are the RCMP gonna protect their sick shills in Alberta such as Mr Baconfat, Patty Baby Doran and Dirty Dicky Dean????

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aq5Z8HWaHFM

http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/false-rape-culture/prove-your-allegations-glenn-canning/

http://www.mensrightsedmonton.com/support-your-allegations-glen-canning/

http://www.mensrightsedmonton.com/a-response-from-mr-vengeance-glen-cannings-dark-alter-ego/

http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2014/02/for-glen-cannings-lawyer.html

Monday, February 24, 2014
For Glen Canning's Lawyer

I preface these comments with a question. How in the name of whatever
Deity that may or might exist, can "Mother" Leah Parsons, and "Father"
Glen Canning can claim, or go to bed at night thinking they did all
they could do to prevent Rehtaeh's suicide? That they are not morally
culpable. Do these people have a complete lack of moral fibre?

Glen Canning wrote recently. "If he writes anything more about
Rehtaeh, I'm going to talk to a civil lawyer." That is a fact, its on
facebook." But it is also a fact I am not writing about Rehtaeh
Parsons, nor ever have. Notwithstanding Mr. Canning's
misrepresentations to his sycophants, my humble comments have nothing
to do with "Saint" Rehtaeh of Parsons," but her parents whom I and
many thousands of other Canadians feel were morally culpable, if not
criminally negligent in their stewardship of young Rehtaeh's life.

That's a fact, "the truth is a complete defense."

Mr. Canning has personally committed frauds and committed crimes in
the name of "Saint Rehtaeh of Parsons," including myself. Those
crimes have just been reported to the RCMP K Division. Glen Canning
armed with my wife's name he got from one David Amos. There upon he
got pictures of myself from Mr.Amos' posts and created a Face Book
page as Barry Winters. Mr, Canning there upon impersonated my myself
to my wife to become "Face Book friends" with her, and gain access so
her friends and family to threaten, harass and cajole them. but most
just try to threaten me. It didn't work. As it didn't work when David
Amos tried it, because I stand by every word I write.

A number of his sycophants including Anonymous have threatened,
harassed, and have committed frauds upon a very large number of
people in Halifax and Canada whose only "offense" was they don't buy
the clearly self serving "party line" spewed by Mr. Canning and Ms.
Parsons. And they think it very bad parenting, if not insane, to
permit a fourteen year old girl to engage in promiscuous behavior, and
the abuse of drugs and alcohol. Mr. Canning et al, have abused anyone
that had the "temerity" to speak out the truths, they find
uncomfortable, including prominent national news columnists.

Notwithstanding the platitudes he tells his sycophants on Face Book,
how he is having difficulty in "letting go of" Rehtaeh, these have
nothing to do with his years of mischief, but everything to do with
harassing, and deliberately silencing a large number of people that
feel Rehtaeh's parents' failure was a very large component in her
suicide.

Mr. Canning has threatened me with violence. I don't know if he has
done that others, but Vengeance / Mr. Canning e mailed me that,"he had
friends at CFB Edmonton looking for me and where I live to get me on
his behalf."
Interesting behavior from a "man" that has "reported" to the media
multiple "death threats" against himself.

So when Mr. Canning walks into a lawyer's office for his initial
consultation it will have nothing to do with "litigation" but with
the defense of himself against criminal charges. Not just from the
criminal complaints of myself but a number of others, and Mr. Canning
knows precisely who they are.

Mr. Canning, I was over twenty years an infantry officer. Your "
imaginary friends from CFB Edmonton"" or yourself couldn't harm me on
the best day you louts ever had. Tell your lawyer that!

Posted by Seren at 4:24 AM

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/glen-canning/rehtaeh-parsons-glen-canning_b_4846765.html

Men Should Stand Up to Rapists, Not Befriend Them
Posted: 02/25/2014 12:12 pm

Shame is a powerful weapon.

Shame is what sexual predators rely on. Next to alcohol it's their
preferred WMD. What were you thinking, after all, being alone,
dressing like that, drinking too much, trusting too much? You should
have known better. You should have known what would happen. It's the
same approach pedophiles use when they tell their victims "we're only
doing what you want."

I was invited to speak in Ottawa recently and share my thoughts on
violence against women and the role men play. There are two things
I've learned since my daughter, Rehtaeh Parsons, died last April and I
began to speak at conferences and meetings. One, the audience will be
almost all women, as it was in this case, and two, attempts to hurt
and silence me suddenly appear when there's anything mentioned about
Rehtaeh online or in social media. She's worm food because I'm a
failure, according to one person's post. If I don't shut up I'll join
her, says another. Some choose words so disgusting I can't bring
myself to repeat them.

You see, according to them, Rehtaeh didn't die from being raped and
bullied, she died because I'm a bad father. I knowingly let her smoke
pot, drink vodka, and raised her to be flirtatious and promiscuous.
Rehtaeh wasn't raped because someone raised their sons to be a
rapists, she was raped because her father raised her to be raped.

Almost every time her name is mentioned in the news or in an article
those anonymous posters show up with their fake usernames and post all
sorts of nonsense, innuendo, lies, misinformation and outright victim
blaming. Rarely do they use real names and rarely are they women.

I'm not sure why some people feel a need to weigh in on issues they
know little or nothing about. I reply if I can even though it's almost
always futile. Some people just have the wrong information while
others are so out to lunch. I'm left wondering if they've read
anything about this story at all. Patrick Doran of the Edmonton Men's
Movement thinks I've been using a "victim-card" to silence critics in
the "...years since Rehtaeh's death." It hasn't been a year yet,
Patrick.

I try to not to get hooked. I honestly have bigger issues to deal with
than a handful of forgettable trolls. It's the people who say nothing
I want to reach, the people who are shocked by this story and don't
know, or don't realize, they have a part to play. Men mainly. Not the
ones trolling rape stories; I'm talking about the good ones. Men with
hearts, families, compassion, decency and a sense of virtue.

Rapists rely on other men to excuse and justify their crimes against
women. Other men who'll laugh at their jokes, invite them to parties,
play sports with them, introduce them to other women. Men who'll give
them jobs, feed them, and help them blame their victims even if it's
by indifference.

Men, good men, need to stand up and do to rapists and their supporters
what we do to child molesters. Imagine the difference it would make if
a man who jokes about rape and always doubts victims entered a room to
silence, whispers, stares, and looks of disgust from other men. That
is what we need to do as men.

We need to take an honest hard look at why we befriend rapists, why we
believe them, allow them, tolerate them, and help them get away with
the crimes they commit. We should be confronting them, exposing them,
shunning them from our homes, families, teams, and places of
employment. We need to use our voices to be a part of the solution and
not let our silence continue to be part of the problem.

There is a stigma attached to rape. A stigma centuries old, created by
devils, used against their victims to hide awful deeds. It's time to
put that stigma where it belongs. There is no difference between a man
who rapes and a man who befriends and defends him.

I tried to end my talk in Ottawa on a big note but couldn't find the
right words. The message has been said many times already. It's time
to stop talking and start doing. We're still in a place where a
16-year-old will write on Rehtaeh's Facebook page and wonder how she
couldn't have known what happens to girls when they drink around boys.
A place where young women ask what they can do to make sure they don't
get raped.

Truth is there's nothing they can do. Women who don't smoke pot get
raped as do women who don't drink vodka and women with amazing
fathers. I hate to think what some of those posters will say to
themselves if someone they love ever gets raped because according to
their logic it wasn't the rapists fault, it's the fault of the people
who love the victim.

https://mobile.twitter.com/PatrickJohnDora/status/442470608551424000?screen_name=PatrickJohnDora

Glen Canning @GlenfordCanning 22 Feb
The ethics of outing your rapist | Jill Filipovic
ln.is/gu.com/p/3byne... via @guardian
View details ·

The Mad Shangi @PatrickJohnDora 22 Feb
@GlenfordCanning @guardian What's the ethics behind outing your
critics? mensrightsedmonton.com/support-your-a...
View conversation ·

Glen Canning @GlenfordCanning 22 Feb
@PatrickJohnDora why are they hiding?
View conversation ·

The Mad Shangi @PatrickJohnDora 22 Feb
@GlenfordCanning So you don't even deny you been using Anonymous to
hack people's blogs for criticizing you?
View conversation ·

Glen Canning @GlenfordCanning 22 Feb
@PatrickJohnDora whose blog was hacked?
View conversation ·

The Mad Shangi @PatrickJohnDora 23 Feb
@GlenfordCanning You went to David Amos and claimed you were trying to
get Anonymous to hack MrBaconFat53's blog.
View conversation ·

David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos 28m
@PatrickJohnDora @GlenfordCanning @DaviRayAmos NONE of you know how to
even act ethical huffingtonpost.ca/glen-canning/r...
View conversation ·

The Mad Shangi
@PatrickJohnDora
@DavidRayAmos @GlenfordCanning Oh did you just show up for the circle jerk?
10:23 p.m. Sat, Mar 8


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: BARRY WINTERS <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 22:45:36 -0700 (MST)
Subject: Re: YO Ian McPhail Remember Complaint # 2013-2824 with The
Commission for Public Complaints against RCMP????
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, RBauer
<RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, "james.dinkins" <james.dinkins@dhs.gov>,
"james.dinkins" <james.dinkins@ice.dhs.gov>, "craig.callens"
<craig.callens@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Barry.Kennedy"
<Barry.Kennedy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Todd Learning
<Todd.Learning@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, nathan fox
<nathan.fox@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Rod.Booth" <Rod.Booth@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
richard dejong <richard.dejong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, lesley smith
<lesley.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, "roger.l.brown"
<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan"
<Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Birgit@thevalleysentinel.com,
donalda@thevalleysentinel.com, The Disinfector
<thedisinfector@hotmail.com>, goatnewspaper <goatnewspaper@gmail.com>,
"Darren.Woroshelo" <Darren.Woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "brad.anderson"
<brad.anderson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Glen Canning <grcanning@me.com>, Brady
Knezacek <Brady.Knezacek@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Shawn <Shawn@nfa.ca>,
lgunter <lgunter@shaw.ca>, "joshua.skurnik"
<joshua.skurnik@hotmail.com>, "Pete.Berndsen"
<Pete.Berndsen@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "jennifer.johnston"
<jennifer.johnston@gov.bc.ca>, "Ian.McPhail"
<Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, editor@pgfreepress.com, radical
<radical@radicalpress.com>, "Geoffrey.McDonald"
<Geoffrey.McDonald@gov.bc.ca>, yuri <yuri@unb.ca>, "Kent.Kryzanowski"
<Kent.Kryzanowski@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Paul.Collister"
<Paul.Collister@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>

David Amos is delighted to fuck each and everyone of you up the ass!

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: "craig.callens" <craig.callens@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Barry.Kennedy"
<Barry.Kennedy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Todd Learning"
<Todd.Learning@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "nathan fox"
<nathan.fox@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Rod.Booth" <Rod.Booth@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"richard dejong" <richard.dejong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "lesley smith"
<lesley.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, "roger.l.brown"
<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan"
<Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Birgit@thevalleysentinel.com,
donalda@thevalleysentinel.com, "The Disinfector"
<thedisinfector@hotmail.com>, "goatnewspaper"
<goatnewspaper@gmail.com>, "Darren.Woroshelo"
<Darren.Woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "brad.anderson"
<brad.anderson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "sunrayzulu" <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>,
"Glen Canning" <grcanning@me.com>, "Brady Knezacek"
<Brady.Knezacek@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Shawn" <Shawn@nfa.ca>, "lgunter"
<lgunter@shaw.ca>, "joshua.skurnik" <joshua.skurnik@hotmail.com>,
"Pete.Berndsen" <Pete.Berndsen@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "jennifer.johnston"
<jennifer.johnston@gov.bc.ca>, "Ian.McPhail"
<Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, editor@pgfreepress.com, "radical"
<radical@radicalpress.com>, "Geoffrey.McDonald"
<Geoffrey.McDonald@gov.bc.ca>, "yuri" <yuri@unb.ca>,
"Kent.Kryzanowski" <Kent.Kryzanowski@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Paul.Collister"
<Paul.Collister@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "RBauer"
<RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, "james.dinkins" <james.dinkins@dhs.gov>,
"james.dinkins" <james.dinkins@ice.dhs.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 8:42:28 PM
Subject: YO Ian McPhail Remember Complaint # 2013-2824 with The
Commission for Public Complaints against RCMP????

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:39:26 -0400
Subject: YO Ian McPhail Re: The Commission for Public Complaints
against RCMP - #2013-2824
To: Sheldon <Sheldon@nfa.ca>, Blair <Blair@nfa.ca>, "steve.graham"
<steve.graham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 03:44:52 -0300
Subject: YO Ian McPhail Re: The Commission for Public Complaints
against RCMP - #2013-2824
To: PCC Complaints <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "Ian.McPhail"
<Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "roger.l.brown"
<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, warren <warren@daisygroup.ca>, jacques
boucher <jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
Gunther.Schonfeldt@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, rusun@un.int,
john.adams@queensu.ca, John.Forster@cse-cst.gc.ca,
td.ombudsman@td.com, christopher.montague@td.com,
Frank.McKenna@td.com, Glenn.Greenwald@guardian.co.uk,
info@praxisfilms.org, birgittaj@althingi.is
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>,
enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk, sarah.chapman@fsa.gov.uk,
ambassador@brasilemb.org, slrc@itamaraty.gov.br

WOW Ya think somebody within the "Five Eyes" would finally do their
job now EH Glen Greenwald and the President Rousseff'?

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html

---------- Original message ----------
From: PCC Complaints <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:59:52 +0000
Subject: The Commission for Public Complaints against RCMP - #2013-2824
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Dear Mr. Amos:

This is further to your recent communications with the Commission.
From September 18, 2013 to the present, our office has received 6
electronic messages from you. Many of these e-mails are not related to
RCMP conduct.

On October 1, 2013, you called our office and spoke with an Intake
Officer. You wished to enquire about three complaint files. When the
Intake Officer attempted to inform you that you have three enquiry
files with the Commission, you became agitated and insisted otherwise.
You raised your voice and spoke over the Intake Officer. You then
demanded the name of the Intake Officer, and subsequently yelled "see
you in federal court" and hung up the telephone line.

As a reminder, we request that all future correspondence with our
office must be courteous in tone and that you are respectful of the
requests that are made of you. While it is clearly not the intention
of the Commission to prevent you from making complaints against
members of the RCMP, your recent emails and telephone call have been
unproductive for both you and for Commission staff. In the future, we
request that all communication with our office be respectful in
language and related to our mandate. In the event that this request
is not respected, the Commission will consider imposing restrictions
on how you may communicate with our office.

Should you have a complaint about a specific RCMP member surrounding a
specific incident, I invite you to visit the Commission's website
(www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca<http://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca>) to submit an online
complaint, rather than to send an email that is difficult to follow or
a copy of a letter you have sent to many others. The complaint form
will guide you through the information required that will enable the
Commission to process your complaint. Should you have difficulty in
accessing the complaint form and wish to have one sent to you, you may
provide your mailing address and a form will be mailed to you via
Canada Post.

I would also invite you to send your correspondence regarding any new
or existing complaints (quoting the appropriate Commission file
number) by letter mail to:

Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP
National Intake Office
PO Box 88689
Surrey, BC V3W 0X1

Yours truly,

Günther Schönfeldt
Intake Officer / Agent d'information de liaison
Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP /
Commission des plaintes du public contre la Gendarmerie royale du Canada
Tel/Tél : 1-800-665-6878 | Fax/Téléc : (604) 501-4095
complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca<mailto:complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>



[Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CCF6DA.65AE7FE0]


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: !enquiries <enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:56:26 +0100
Subject: IPCC Reference: 2013/015918
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Dear Mr Amos

I acknowledge receipt of 4 emails at the Independent Police Complaints
Commission (IPCC) earlier today.

I note from our records that you have been advised on the IPCC remit,
as well as spoken with one of my colleagues in the customer contact
team. It remains unclear from your emails what your complaint against
the police is. This may be because you refer to a number of other
organisations, or matters outside of the IPCC's remit.

If you wish to make a complaint against the police you should provide
these details to either the IPCC or the relevant police force's
professional standards department (PSD).

The IPCC does not investigate allegations of crime(s) committed by
members of the public, nor can we direct a police force to commence an
investigation into such.

If you have any queries about the IPCC's remit or the complaints
process please contact us. However, emails to the IPCC that fall
outside of our remit will be read and filed, but may not be responded
to.

Kind regards

Elly Goodman
Customer Contact Adviser
Independent Police Complaints Commission
Tel: 0300 020 0096
Email: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk


The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in
partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On
leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes.






Talk about pissing a guy off. EH Ian McPhail? What planet do CROWN's
bureaucrats come from anyway?

Need I say BULLSHIT once again??? The other CROWN Corp commonly know
as the CBC often puts that word over our airwaves so that can't be
offensive. That said I bet the call was recorded If so I demand a copy
ASAP. Next time I call I will record the call myself.

I must ask did the oh so silent boss Ian MacPhail and his buddy Bob
Paulson about the Yankee wiretap tapes being evidence of MURDER?
Better check the Canadian Ciminal Code about assisting in the cover up
of such crimes EH?

As for the call I remember it like it was yesterday. Howcome it took
Günther Schönfeldt three weeks to dream up the same sort of response I
got in 2007??? The first thing I did was ask for him and the woman
claimed he was not avaible and offered to help. She started out quite
nice but as soon as she admited that there was only a faxed complaint
in November of 2003 and that it did not warrant an answer I told her
to look some more. She got fairly argumentive and did not wish to
discuss the complaint I sent in August of 2005 (It appeared to me that
she read something in my file) I gave up and asked her name when she
got to snarky and she refused to give other than "Nora" So I said Cya
in Federal Court and hung up. The I sent your buddy Bob Paulson and
YOU Ian McPhail a Motherload of emails but I did only sent your
mindless bureaucrats six that were largely unrelated if they did not
know how to read deep.

However your Commission should not deny that I argued with its former
lawyer/boss Shirley Heafey about the aforesaid compliant in 2005
within emails sent to many Parliamentarians months for a I ran for a
sent Parliament again and she was replaced by the lawyer Paul Kennedy.
(The lawyer Heafey and your Commission always denied that complaint
existed until your office sent me a similar bullshit email after Mike
Murphy a former Minister of Health and later another former Attorney
General asked Deputy Commissioner Steve Graham to investigate my
concerns.

In return the Graham got transferred to Nova Scotia and RCMP falsely
arrested REMEMBER Stevey Boy Harper?

As I said Cya'll in Federal Court

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
1 902 800 0369

http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139

http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc

http://davidamos.blogspot.com/

FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
Senator Arlen Specter
United States Senate
Committee on the Judiciary
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Mr. Specter:

I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
contact with you about this previously.

Very truly yours,
Barry A. Bachrach
Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lisa Porteous <lporteous@kleinlyons.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 14:46:22 +0000
Subject: RCMP
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

David,

Thank you for your email inquiring about our class action against the
RCMP. As you may know, the Notice of Claim was filed in the British
Columbia Supreme Court on March 27, 2012. The lawsuit has been
brought by former RCMP constable Janet Merlo on behalf of female RCMP
members. Unfortunately, we cannot assist you with your claim.

We recommend that you contact Mr. Barry Carter of Mair Jensen Blair
LLP to discuss any claim you may have against the RCMP for harassment.
His contact information is as follows:

Mr. Barry Carter
Mair Jensen Blair LLP
1380-885 W. Georgia Street
Vancouver, BC V6C 3E8
Phone: 604-682-6299
Fax 1-604-374-6992

This is not intended to be an opinion concerning the merits of your
case. In declining to represent you, we are not expressing an opinion
as to whether you should take further action in this matter.

You should be aware that there may be strict time limitations within
which you must act in order to protect your rights. Failure to begin
your lawsuit by filing an action within the required time may mean
that you could be barred forever from pursuing a claim. Therefore, you
should immediately contact another lawyer ( as indicated above) to
obtain legal advice/representation.

Thank you again for considering our firm.

Yours truly,

Lisa Porteous
Case Manager/Paralegal

lporteous@kleinlyons.com
www.kleinlyons.com

KLEIN * LYONS
Suite 400-1385 West 8th Avenue
Vancouver BC V6H 3V9 Canada
Office 604.874.7171
Fax 604.874.7180
Direct 604.714.6533

This email is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
privilege. It is intended only for the use of the person to whom it is
addressed. Any distribution, copying or other use by anyone else is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
telephone us immediately and destroy this e-mail.

üPlease consider the environment before printing this email.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
To: <Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>; <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>; "toewsv1"
<toewsv1@mts.net>; "danfour" <danfour@myginch.com>
Cc: <nelson.kalil@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>; "rmordenassoc"
<rmordenassoc@rogers.com>; <warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "warren"
<warren@daisygroup.ca>; "warren.dosko" <warren.dosko@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
"Paulette. Delaney-Smith" <Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
"WaterWarCrimes" <waterwarcrimes@gmail.com>; "robin reid"
<zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>; "tony" <tony@peoplestandup.ca>;
"Ken.Zielke" <Ken.Zielke@gov.ab.ca>
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:18 PM
Subject: Attn Commissioner Ian McPhail QC I called again and tried to
speak to you twice today my number is 902 800 0369


http://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/nrm/nr/2010/20100126-eng.aspx

As I said I am very serious and have no wish to speak to the likes of
Ms Leduc EVER again FYI I see that the gossip about my concerns is
leaking out here there an everywhere following this note is just
couple of the reasons why I called an tried hard to speak to you again
today

Please don't try to tell me that your office does not know what
happened between the RCMP and I within weeks of my sending the email
immedialy below this note.

If perhaps you people should read some blogs an watch some YOUTUBES ASAP?

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

http://davidamos.blogspot.com/

http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2008/07/david-amos-picked-up-by-rcmp.html

http://govinjustice.blogspot.com/2008/07/david-amos-picked-up-by-rcmp.html

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/07/feds-institutionalize-determined-nb.html

http://www.leadershipdirectories.com/images/promo/FTC.pdf

QSLS Politics
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 15,116
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 164.62.7.# (Federal Trade Commission)
ISP Federal Trade Commission
Location Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : District of Columbia
City : Washington
Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 7.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727;
.NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1920 x 1200
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Aug 18 2010 1:50:29 pm
Last Page View Aug 18 2010 2:01:49 pm
Visit Length 11 minutes 20 seconds
Page Views 2
Referring URL http://www.google.co...i=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
Search Engine google.com
Search Words "david amos" canada parliament
Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....eblower-part-1b.html
Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....eblower-part-1b.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Aug 18 2010 7:50:29 am
Visit Number 15,116


Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 11,630
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 199.212.215.# (DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE)
ISP DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Location Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language English (Canada)en-ca
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 12:50:37 pm
Last Page View Aug 13 2010 12:52:15 pm
Visit Length 1 minute 38 seconds
Page Views 7
Referring URL
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...3/ides-of-march.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-8:00
Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 8:50:37 am
Visit Number 11,630


Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 11,638
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 199.212.150.# (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)
ISP Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Location Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 6.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1;
INFOWEB-APPROVED; INFOWEB-APPROVED-IE6-FR; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR
2.0.50727; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 5:52:40 pm
Last Page View Aug 13 2010 5:52:40 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.blogger.c...15428735081915360609
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 4:52:40 pm
Visit Number 11,638

Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 11,639
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 199.212.215.# (DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE)
ISP DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Location Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language English (Canada) en-ca
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1466 x 916
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 5:52:51 pm
Last Page View Aug 13 2010 5:52:51 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-8:00
Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 1:52:51 pm
Visit Number 11,639



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:34:30 -0300
Subject: Attn PAULINE PHILIBERT and ARNOLD HADLEY of the New Brunswick
Police Commission
To: nbpc@gnb.ca, arnold.hadley@gnb.ca, john.foran@gnb.ca,
premier@gnb.ca, Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca
Cc: webo@xplornet.com

New Brunswick Police Commission
435 King Street
Fredericton, New Brunswick
E3B 1E5

A letter to support my complaint about various police forces in New
Brunswick will follow these emails just as I promised on the phone to
you people today.

I have no understanding as to why the Police Commission nor anyone
else holding a governmental mandate in the Province of New Brunswick
has never called me back or answered one email in nearly four years.
Shawn Graham should at least recognize his own documents to my framer
friend, Werner Bock from the time when he sat in opposition and was
the agricutural critic at the same time .

It appears to me that I am not the only one to get mad at the
malicious incompetence of John Foran and the cops of New Brunswick.
What is even more interesting though is the fact that John Foran was
once mad at the Police Commission and they way they investigated
things so secretly against the public's best interests. EH Mr. Volpe?
Rest assured that I ain't holding my breath for the police to continue
to harass me anymore after their nonsense yesterday. Nor will I wait
to see Wayne Steeves say or do the right thing after he has covered up
my concerns about the severe lack of police integrity for his politcal
party's benefit for four god damned years.

http://www.canlii.org/eliisa/highlight.do?text=JOHN+FORAN+WILSON+MacINTOSH&language=en&searchTitle=Search+all+CanLII+Databases&path=/en/nb/nbqb/doc/1995/1995canlii3862/1995canlii3862.html

For the recod these Youtubes that are this arseholes favoutites were
created by the RCMP and I have no doubt whatsoever the people
slandering me are cops as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0NdNtvC-YI#GU5U2spHI_4

http://www.youtube.com/user/bigolcanoworms

At least his ID is correct. This is a big old can of worms. N'est Pas?

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:17:05 -0300
Subject: Perhaps Paul Kennedy the current Commissioner of Public
Complaints Against the RCMP will call us back now EH?
To: Hermenegilde.Chiasson@gnb.ca, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca,
scotta@parl.gc.ca, Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca, Holland.M@parl.gc.ca,
Hubbard.C@parl.gc.ca, jonesr@cbc.ca, nbombud@gnb.ca,
Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca, T.J.Burke@gnb.ca, roly.macintyre@gnb.ca,
aleblanc.mla@nb.aibn.com, eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca, brian.kenny@gnb.ca,
roy.boudreau@gnb.ca, donald.arseneault@gnb.ca, danf@danf.net,
injusticecoalition@hotmail.com, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
stuart.jamieson@gnb.ca, Margaret-Ann.BLANEY@gnb.ca,
victor.boudreau@gnb.ca, rick.brewer@gnb.ca,
John.Ferguson@saintjohn.ca, Ivan.Court@saintjohn.ca
Cc: complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com,
newsroom@nbpub.com, carl.davies@gnb.ca, janet.trail@gnb.ca,
Akoschany@ctv.ca, jtravers@thestar.ca, alan_white@cbc.ca,
Tim.Porter@gnb.ca, Trevor.HOLDER@gnb.ca, bev.harrison@gnb.ca,
Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca, Jody.CARR@gnb.ca, Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca,
David.ALWARD@gnb.ca, bruce.noble@fredericton.ca,
lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca

Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 13:36:41 -0400
From: "PCC Complaints" complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

May 23, 2007

File No. PC-2005-1291

Mr. David R Amos
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

Dear Mr. Amos:

On a number of occasions you have called or sent e-mails our office to
raise matters which are of pressing concern to you.

Each time we have tried to respond by explaining to you the relatively
narrow mandate of this Commission and the limits of our powers to deal
with the matters which are of concern to you. I must stress, once
again, that the purpose of this Commission is to provide the public
with an opportunity to make complaints concerning the conduct of
members of the RCMP in the performance of their duties. We have
neither the expertise nor the legal authority to permit us to become
involved in issues beyond the scope of this mandate.

While it is clearly not the intention of the Commission to prevent you
from making complaints against members of the RCMP, an analysis of
your numerous contacts with the Commission indicates that your
concerns fall well outside the confines of our mandate. Further, your
frequent e-mails have been disruptive and unproductive for both you
and for the staff of this office.

Should you determine that some point in the future you have a
complaint concerning the conduct of a member of the RCMP in the
performance of his or her duties, please submit it to the Commission
by Canada Post only. As of now, your e-mails will be deleted unread.

Yours truly,

Andrée Leduc
Enquiries and Complaints Analyst

Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Say hey to Shawn Murphy for me will ya Brian?
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 15:25:45 -0400
From: "REVIEWS" reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

The Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP has received
your e-mail message and will be responding in due course.

La Commission des plaintes du public contre la GRC a reçu votre
courriel et vous rendra une réponse au moment opportun.

Subject:
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com


January 30, 2007


WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Mr. David Amos


Dear Mr. Amos:

This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.

Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
Graham of the RCMP "J" Division in Fredericton.

Sincerely,

Honourable Michael B. Murphy
Minister of Health

CM/cb

Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:

Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,
John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
"Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n

Dear Mr. Amos,

Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off over
the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I was not
ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.

As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.

As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear that
Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and the
US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment policing in
Petitcodiac, NB.

It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.

Sincerely,

Warren McBeath, Cpl.
GRC Caledonia RCMP
Traffic Services NCO
Ph: (506) 387-2222
Fax: (506) 387-4622
E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca


Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: Just so you know
To: HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, gemerson@tor.fasken.com, jgrant@baseconsulting.ca,
rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca, mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca, csae@csae.com,
kim.keith@rci.rogers.com, jduncan@tor.fasken.com, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca,
ahamilton@casselsbrock.com, jm@jmellon.com, treasurer@casis.ca,
jbronskill@cp.org, RTRiley6@cs.com, pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca,
linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca, janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca,
robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca, Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca,
arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca, nancy.taillon@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
CC: info.com@chrc-ccdp.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, Scott.A@parl.gc.ca,
radionews@mpbc.org, publisher@whatsup.nb.ca, kjamerson@wagmtv.com,
kbabin@globaltv.ca, jfoster@globaltv.ca, atvnews@ctv.ca, cmorris@cp.org,
info@ccna.ca, kbissett@broadcastnews.ca, bdnmail@bangordailynews.net,
ehutton@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, argosy@mta.ca,
sylvain.martel@csn.qc.ca, events@cpac.ca, mmacdonald@cp.org,
crgeditor@yahoo.com, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca

No need to Bitch.
I am about to sue ya anyway but you did receive the same material
that everybody else got by email anyway. However now I will now
forward the other emails that various silly servants got after I had
had many talks with your incompetant and malicious assistants within
the Commission over the past two years. It seems that I had to insult
you and bust you in front of your friends to finally get a response
from you.
Furthermore on August 2nd I sent you your material byway of the
US Mail which was received and signed for. It was hard copy of my
concerns and allegations about you being in bed with the corrupt old
bastard Zack of the RCMP. I also sent a copy of wiretap tape # 139.
Instead of you acting within the scope of your employment you go on
vacation and bury your head in the sand while the RCMP assisted the
Yankees in throwing my wife and kids into the street without due
process of law?
Well your head may be in still the sand but you just stuck your
arse high up in the air. It is high time for me to give it a boot
before you stick it up Zack's ass in a vain effort to appear that you
have integrity after all. The following is the text of that letter and
after that is the US Mail's confirmation of when it was sent and
received by you.
Say hey to McLachlin for me will ya? Tell her I will be suing her
too. She has been covering up for the crooked Newfy Judge Dereck Green
for way past too long. To hell with lawyers appointed as commissioners
and other lawyers appointed as judges. From my point of view they were
only appointed to cover up public corruption. I look forward to
meeting the likes of you in court and arguing you on the public
record. You just proved for me that most lawyers ain't that smart. You
should have continued to play dumb Bitch. At least then you could have
blamed your assistants for not telling you what you obviously know.
however if you had done so, I would have pointed to the fact that you
are their supervisor and therefore ultimatly responsible. Everybody
else knows that the RCMP are as crooked as hell, so do you. call me a
liar now. I double dog dare ya.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos



July 31st, 2005

Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin,
C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and
Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay
Canadian Judicial Council
150 Metcalfe Street,
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8

Shirley Heafey
Chair of Commission
for Public Complaints against the RCMP
P.O. Box 3423
Station &quo t;D"
Ottawa,
ON K1P 6L4


RE: Rampant Public Corruption

Hey,
Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and
various underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public
Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and
emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by
every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a
copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as
officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest
Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little
trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the
ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to
answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.

I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending
to you byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving
identical material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell
them I gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter.
All that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes.
However I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material
than what Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact
the same material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky
Boy McKenna in particular received, while I was up home running for
Parliament last year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so
I have also included a few recent items to spice thing up for you.

I am tired of trying to convince people employed in law enforcement
to uphold the law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience
and be careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse to
the law or me.

Veritas Vincit

David R. Amos

153 Alvin Ave

Milton, MA. 02186

Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 484U S
Detailed Results:


[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Bullet
Delivered Abroad, August 11, 2005, 6:49 am, CANADA
Bullet
Out of Foreign Customs, August 08, 2005, 2:37 pm, CANADA
Bullet
Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
Bullet
Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
Bullet
International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 8:32 am, KENNEDY AMC
Bullet
Enroute, August 03, 2005, 8:30 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
Bullet
Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:40 am, QUINCY, MA 02169

"Heafey, Shirley" <HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca> wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: "Heafey, Shirley"<HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
Sent: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:10:00 -0400
To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Just so you know

Just so you know, there was no message attached to the e-mail sent to
me. SO, in fact, I don't know what you think I should now know.

Try again.

SH

-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 1:24 PM
>To: gemerson@tor.fasken.com; jgrant@baseconsulting.ca;
rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca; mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca;
csae@csae.com; kim.keith@rci.rogers.com; jduncan@tor.fasken.com;
Moore.R@parl.gc.ca; ahamilton@casselsbrock.com
Cc: Zeman, Arnold; jm@jmellon.com; Taillon, Nancy; treasurer@casis.ca;
jbronskill@cp.org; RTRiley6@cs.com; pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca;
dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca; Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca;
linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca; janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca;
robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca; Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca; Heafey, Shirley
Subject: Just so you know

CSIS can never say they didn't know. This should put Shirley Heafey's
panties in a knot when she get back from her vacation. I can only
wonder what Ms. Longo of the RCMP is saying about now.

"Zeman, Arnold" <Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca> wrote:

Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: For the record Joan I did talk to
your boss Abrahamson yesterday and more people you know today
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:16:11 -0400
From: "Zeman, Arnold" <Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca>
To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
This is an automatic reply. I'm away froom the office and will return
on Monday September 26,2005. If you need information before then,
please contact Marie-France Kingsley at 990-6306.
************************************
Ceci est une réponse automatique. Je serai de retour au bureau le
lundi 26 septembre 2005. Si vous avez besoin d'aide, veuillez
communiquer avec Marie-France Kingsley au 990-6306.
*******************************
A. W. Zeman
Assistant Inspector General of CSIS /
Inspecteur général adjoint du SCRS
340 Laurier Avenue West / 340, avenue Laurier ouest
Ottawa ON K1A 0P8
phone / tél : (613) 990-8274
fax / télécopieur : (613) 990-8303
email / courriel : arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
********************************




http://voices-voix.ca/en/facts/profile/paul-kennedy

Paul Kennedy

What Happened
Paul Kennedy was removed as head of the Commission for Public
Complaints (CPC) regarding the RCMP after he advocated a more powerful
and independent Commission. He sought adequate funding for
investigations, increased accountability and improved service
standards. The Harper government appointed a Conservative Party ally
to replace him.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paul Kennedy was appointed Chair of the Commission for Public
Complaints (CPC) Against the RCMP in 2005. He was re-appointed for
three more one-year terms in 2006, 2007 and 2008.

Throughout his tenure, Kennedy was known as a relentless advocate for
a more independent CPC. He believed that the CPC relied too heavily on
the cooperation of senior RCMP officials, and was too limited in
independent power to probe the RCMP's activities, or to inquire into
witnesses' testimonials and to demand the production of documents as
evidence.

Kennedy also advocated for better funding to oversee the RCMP so that
the CPC could investigate more cases and investigate them thoroughly.
He argued that the CPC's budget of $5.2 million paled in comparison to
the RCMP's $4.1 billion budget.

Public Safety Minister Peter Van Loan cut Kennedy's budget by $600,000
in 2009, seriously limiting the scope of the CPC's investigations.

Kennedy did get funding for the high-profile investigation into RCMP
involvement in the tasering death of Polish immigrant Robert
Dzienkanski at the Vancouver International Airpoirt in 2007, and his
work to reform RCMP policies on taser use. But that funding was only
made available temporary. Similar investigations in future might not
get the funding they need given the small size of the CPC's budget.

Media sources have reported clashes between Kennedy and the
Conservative government during Kennedy's time as head of CPC. He was
ridiculed by Conservative officials for his stance that Mounties' work
requires proper review and that access to evidence and witnesses was
necessary in order to ensure accountability. Although the government
has promised reform monitoring of the RCMP, this promise was not kept
during Kennedy's tenure.

Kennedy had other successes: during his tenure, the RCMP was under
public pressure to modify training and operational procedures. The
commission now regularly conducts reviews of RCMP activities and their
policies in self-investigation. Kennedy also addressed investigations
of death and verbal abuse involving RCMP officers, and proposed
legislative and policy changes to avoid conflicts of interest.

Kennedy's final weeks in office were marked by the release of a report
strongly critical of the conduct of the RCMP officers involved in the
death of Robert Dziekanski. The RCMP would go on to accept all but one
of the findings in Kennedy's CPC report, and address the report's
recommendations, eventually creating an Office of Professional
Integrity, as well as a new policy to ensure independent and impartial
investigation of RCMP employees.

However, in November 2009, Public Safety Minister Peter Van Loan's
office notified Kennedy that he would not be re-appointed after his
contract terminated that December. Kennedy had been prepared to serve
another term.

In January 2010, Ian McPhail, a long-time contributor to the
Conservative Party, was appointed interim chair of the CPC. McPhail
was a real-estate lawyer with some limited experience on other
commissions. Observers felt McPhail lacked the experience required
head the CPC. McPhail's appointment was seen by Paul Kennedy and
others as a wholly partisan move, that placed a strong Conservative
ally in an important watchdog position. The replacement of Kennedy
with McPhail has been criticized as an attempt to silence Kennedy's
criticism of the RCMP, thereby reducing accountability of the RCMP to
the government and the public.

In January 2010, Kennedy made an appearance on Parliament Hill to
express concerns about the fate of civilian oversight bodies under the
Harper government. He was joined by two other watchdogs who the
government had removed for dubious reasons: Peter Tinsley, who had
been the Military Police Complaints Commissioner; and Linda Keen,
former President of Canada's nuclear safety regulator.

Kennedy has said the government was not willing to let the CPC fulfill
its intended purpose. He has also called on the government to
institute a fixed term for which a commissioner is appointed, so that
people who have a job to do on behalf of the public don't end up
essentially working for the governing party.

In 2011 the new Minister of Public Safety, Vic Toews, re-appointed
McPhail as head of the CPC for another year.

Relevant Dates:
October 2005: Paul Kennedy is appointed Chair of the Commission for
Public Complaints (CPC) against the RCMP.
October 2007: Robert Dziekanski dies after being tasered by an RCMP
officer at the Vancouver International airport; Kennedy strongly
criticizes the way the situation was handled.
December 2008: Paul Kennedy is reappointed for another 1-year term as
Chair of the CPC, until December 31, 2009
August 11, 2009: Kennedy calls for policy changes to enhance
accountability of the RCMP.
November 18 2009: The government tells Kennedy his contract will not
be renewed.
December 8, 2009: Kennedy publishes a report criticizing some of the
RCMP's actions.
January 24, 2010: The government appoints Ian McPhail as interim Chair
of the CPC.
January 26, 2010: Paul Kennedy, Peter Tinsley and Linda Keen hold a
press conference, expressing their concern over the government's
silencing of watchdogs.
February 4, 2010: The RCMP announces a new policy to ensure
independent and impartial investigations of its employees.
Role or Position
Paul Kennedy was Chair of the Commission for Public Complaints (CPC)
Against the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) from 2005 to 2009.

Implications and Consequences
Transparency: The removal of Kennedy means the loss of a qualified
civil servant with over thirty five years experience in public
service, with a proven track record of creating change for increased
accountability.
Democracy: The effectiveness and independence of watchdog
organizations are compromised when leaders are appointed to short
one-years terms and removed at will by politicians. The slashing of
the CPC budget means in practice that there will be minimal oversight
of the RCMP.
Democracy: If public officials are removed and replaced whenever they
threaten to hold the government to account, the strength of our
democracy is diminished.
Photo: CTV News

Sources
"CPC Chair responds to the RCMP Commissioner's letter...," Paul
Kennedy, CPC against the RCMP, 16 December 2009
"CPC Report on the death of Mr. Dziekanski," William Elliott, RCMP, 10
February 2011
"Former RCMP watchdog warns commission heads liable to sway," Janice
Tibbests, CanWest News Services, 4 January 2010
"Former watchdogs speak out on Harper government," Susan Delacourt,
The Star, 26 January 2010
"Harper Government Names Realtor as RCMP Watchdog," Nathan Griffiths,
InformedVote.ca, 1 February 2010
"Ottawa names interim RCMP watchdog," Colin Freeze, The Globe and
Mail, 24 January 2010
"Minister Toews announces re-appointment of Ian McPhail as Interim
Chair of the CPC," Public Safety Canada, 14 January 2011
"New civilian watchdog agency will oversee RCMP," RCMP Watch, 4 February 2010
"Police Oblivious to pain Tasers inflict: RCMP Complaints
Commissioner," CBC News, 25 June 2008
"RCMP response to CPC regarding its report into Robert Dziekanski's
in-custody death," William Elliott, RCMP, 7 December 2009
"RCMP should limit self-investigations," CBC News, 11 August 2009
"RCMP to implement all watchdog recommendations on Robert Dziekanski
case," CPC against the RCMP, 10 February 2011
"RCMP watchdog won't be reappointed," CBC News, 27 November 2009
Report on death of Robert Dziekanski (PDF), CPC, 8 December 2009
"Report slams RCMP in airport Taser death," CBC News, 8 December 2009
"Tories drop RCMP complaints commissioner," Tonda MacCharles, The
Star, 27 November 2009
Français


DEMAND IMMEDIATE APOLOGY FROM CANADIAN ALLIANCE MP
Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:00 pm
John Cummins' office replies 'Get a life' when invited to Maher Arar vigil

Ottawa, Canada - 17/12/02) - CAIR-CAN is calling on Canadians to demand
that John Cummins, member of Parliament of Delta-South Richmond, B.C.,
offer a public apology for recent remarks made by his office when Cummins
was invited to a silent vigil for Maher Arar. In response to the
invitation, Cummins' office replied by email, "Get a life."

Maher Arar is the Canadian citizen who was detained illegally in the United
States en route to Canada and deported to Jordan and then to Syria. Arar
was denied access to Canadian officials, prevented from calling his family,
tried through a non-transparent process without a lawyer present, and
deported to his country of birth in violation of international law. He is
currently being held in a Syrian jail.

The statement follows recent comments by Stephen Harper, Diane Ablonczy,
and Stockwell Day of the Canadian Alliance which condemn Arar without any
regard to his illegal deportation, the lack of a fair trial process, and in
the absence of any definitive evidence linking him to terrorism.

(See CAIR-CAN action alert # 84:
http://www.caircan.ca/cgi-bin/actionalerts/viewnews.cgi?newsid1038072766,60770,)

The remark made by John Cummins' office is deeply insulting and a clear
breach of his duties as a public official," said CAIR-CAN Executive
Director Riad Saloojee.

He should immediately offer an unqualified apology to the Arar family and
to all Canadians," he added.

ACTION REQUESTED (Be firm, but polite):

CONTACT Steven Harper and John Cummins.

E-mail: Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Cummins.J@parl.gc.ca

Telephone or Fax:

Stephen Harper
Tel: (613) 996-6740
Fax: (613) 947-0310

John Cummins
Tel: (613) 992-2957
Fax: (613) 992-3589

DEMAND an immediate apology from John Cummins for the remarks made by his
office yesterday.

INFORM Canadian Alliance leader Steven Harper that his party has failed in
its duty as the official opposition to defend the rights of a Canadian
citizen. Recent comments by his party indicate a troubling trend of
treating Maher Arar, a Canadian Muslim and Arab, as a second class citizen.

COPY Canada@cair-net.org on all correspondence.

Colin Mayes, Conservative

This rookie B.C. MP made headlines this year after he defended the PM's new
restrictions on media access in a column to his local paper. Mayes went
further and suggested journalists would be more responsible if they faced
jail terms for professional misconduct. "Boy, would the public get accurate
and true information if a few reporters were hauled away to jail! Maybe it
is time that we hauled off in handcuffs reporters that fabricate stories,
or twist information and even falsely accuse citizens." Mayes quickly
retracted his comments.


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>; <deb@debgrey.com>; <debgrey@gmail.com>;
<valerielmeredith@aol.com>; <RathgB0@parl.gc.ca>; "MulcaT"
<MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>; "Heather Martin" <martinhea39@gmail.com>;
"bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "kevin.violot"
<kevin.violot@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "Wayne.Lang"
<Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "toewsv1" <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>; "bob.rae"
<bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net>; "Bob.Kerr" <Bob.Kerr@cbc.ca>;
"terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>; "mckeen.randy"
<mckeen.randy@gmail.com>; "mcknight.gisele"
<mcknight.gisele@dailygleaner.com>; "mclellana"
<mclellana@bennettjones.com>
Cc: <Whistleblower@ctv.ca>; <martine.turcotte@bell.ca>; "oldmaison"
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>; "stop_codex" <stop_codex@hotmail.com>; "josh
steffler" <canuckfanjosh@yahoo.com>; <webmasterlawrence@gmail.com>;
"xtofury" <xtofury@gmail.com>; "grenouf" <grenouf@genuinewitty.com>;
"hiddenfromhistory1" <hiddenfromhistory1@gmail.com>; "J Bowman"
<canada.acp@gmail.com>; "leader" <leader@greenparty.ca>;
"maryann4peace" <maryann4peace@gmail.com>; "john.green"
<john.green@gnb.ca>; "police" <police@fredericton.ca>; "David Amos"
<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>;
<Billa.MEDHURST@vpd.ca>; "mark.lord" <mark.lord@fredericton.ca>;
"Leanne.Fitch" <Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 12:17 AM
Subject: So Debby Baby Grey "Famous Amos" would like to know if Harper
and the RCMP in BC are paying attention YET???


Some Deja Vu for you and Val

http://deanrays.blogspot.com/2009/07/vals-minority-report.html

http://www.debgrey.com/contact.html

VAls minority report!

Heritage Front Affair Val's Minority Reports

THE HERITAGE FRONT AFFAIR: OUR VIEW DISSENTING OPINION of the REFORM
PARTY of CANADA

Presented by Val Meredith, M.P.

THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE

It was nineteen months ago when the Sub-Committee on National Security
began its consideration of the Security Intelligence Review
Committee's Heritage Front Affair report. Finally, after a long and
often arduous effort, the Sub-Committee has tabled its report.

At this point in time, it is important to clarify a couple of
significant issues: The delays in producing the Sub-Committee report
have nothing to do with the activities of the opposition parties, but
rather are due solely to delays caused by membership changes and
disagreements among the government members.

Secondly, the so-called report of this Sub-Committee has little input
from the opposition members. The joint dissenting opinion of the Bloc
Quebecois and the Reform Party more accurately reflects the
multi-party consensus of the majority of members of this Sub-Committee
who actually participated in most of the Sub-Committee's hearings.
While the joint dissenting opinion does not fully reflect the Reform
Party's position on this issue, it is included to illustrate the
changes to the report imposed by the government members.

It must be noted that the major changes to this report did not occur
during a Sub-Committee meeting, and neither opposition member was
present. It is clear that the Liberal government was not prepared for
the Sub-Committee to table the more critical report that is now the
joint dissenting opinion. With regard to the official report of the
Sub-Committee, the current government members of the Sub-Committee
have produced an extremely emasculated version of the original report.

Their report is just an extension of SIRC's Heritage Front Affair
report which did not provide a sufficiently critical review of the
Canadian Security Intelligence Service's investigation.

THE SIRC REPORT SIRC claims to be the "eyes and ears of the public and
Parliament on the Canadian Security Intelligence Service." Yet after
months of consideration of the Heritage Front Affair report, it is
clear that SIRC has been not only negligent in this role, but
deliberately dishonest as well. Instead of providing Parliament with a
thorough and objective review of CSIS' use of a human source in its
investigation of the Heritage Front, SIRC's report exonerates CSIS and
the Source of any wrongdoing.

In its exoneration of CSIS, SIRC ignored or suppressed any evidence
that was inconsistent with their conclusion that the Service did no
wrong. SIRC has wilfully mislead Parliament and the Canadian people.
The exoneration of CSIS by SIRC is a betrayal of SIRC's role as a
review committee. While the Reform Party is deeply concerned with the
wrongdoings of CSIS, SIRC's refusal to address these transgressions in
an open and honest manner is cause for even greater concern.

After nineteen months of reviewing the SIRC report and obtaining
additional information, it is clear that SIRC is not fulfilling the
function that Parliament intended. Originally the Reform Party had
planned to do a thorough and critical review of the SIRC report,
pointing out numerous inaccuracies and omissions. However, because the
original version would have been too lengthy, we have chosen to focus
on two main issues: Grant Bristow - CSIS Source, and the CSIS
investigation concerning Preston Manning, that formed Chapter VIII of
the Heritage Front Affair. ; GRANT BRISTOW - CSIS HUMAN SOURCE Unlike
the government members of the Sub- Committee, I have no hesitancy in
identifying Grant Bristow as the CSIS Source who infiltrated the
Heritage Front.

This position is not an assumption, nor speculation. In August 1994, I
was contacted by an individual who had first-hand knowledge of Grant
Bristow as a CSIS Source. A former police source, this individual was
approached by Bristow, who offered to introduce him to a CSIS
investigator.

In September 1994 I accompanied this individual to a SIRC interview.
The information this individual provided is faithfully recorded in the
SIRC report at section 3.1.3, although it does not identify Bristow as
the Source.

In addition, at his appearance before the Sub- Committee on May 27,
1996, the Director of CSIS, Mr. Ward Elcock, inadvertently confirmed
that Bristow was indeed the CSIS Source. In his opening statement,
which was also provided in writing, the Director made the following
comment: "What about our source's arrest in Toronto, along with
American white supremacist Sean Maguire? That was a co-ordinated
operation with law enforcement agencies. Mr. Maguire was expelled from
Canada. Our source was released. No criminal offence was committed."

Now contrast the Director's above comments with the relevant passage
in SIRC's Heritage Front Affair report: "On September 20, 1991, Sean
Maguire and Grant Bristow were travelling in the latter's car, when
they were stopped at gunpoint by the heavily armed Metro Toronto
Emergency Task Force. Sean Maguire was arrested on an Immigration
warrant. RCMP and Immigration officials were on hand for the arrest,
as was a CSIS investigator from Toronto Region.

Grant Bristow, when he was stopped, had guns in the trunk of his car.
Both men were taken to police station 41." (emphasis added) It is
obvious from the above-mentioned information that Bristow is the CSIS
Source in question. It is an issue, because the way that SIRC wrote
their report, many of the questionable activities were committed by
Bristow, as opposed to the Source. So it is important to acknowledge
that Bristow was indeed the Source.

As expressed in paragraph 28 of the joint dissenting opinion ("Having
concluded that the placement of a human source was acceptable,
although for a shorter time than this Source was actually in place,
the opposition members of the Sub-Committee then asked themselves
whether the Service should have recruited and put in place this
particular Source?"), there were serious questions about using Bristow
as the Source. While SIRC made all efforts to downplay Bristow's role
in the creation and operation of the Heritage Front, clearly he was
responsible for much of the success of the organization.

The best indication of Bristow's role in the Heritage Front was the
video that the Front put out with excerpts of Bristow's speeches, that
had been edited out of the previously released videos. The excerpts
from this video show that Bristow was the main administrator of the
Heritage Front. He was responsible for the raising of money, for
selling memberships, literature and paraphernalia, and for getting
people out to Heritage Front rallies and demonstrations. His
questionable contributions can be best summarized from the one video
where he bragged that the Heritage Front in Toronto raised more money
to assist incarcerated members of the white supremacist terrorist
organization, The Order, than any other group in North America. ;
Bristow under police investigation.

There is one other aspect of Bristow's history that SIRC chose to
ignore, despite the fact that this incident was in the original
newspaper story that spawned their investigation. In 1993, the Metro
Toronto Police Force investigated Heritage Front members Carl Fischer,
Elkar Fischer and Andrew Maynard, for the kidnapping and assault of
Tyrone Mason, another Heritage Front member. During the course of
their investigation the police began to actively investigate Grant
Bristow.

The police investigators were so convinced that Bristow was involved
in witness tampering, that they applied to the courts and obtained a
Criminal Code Part VI warrant to intercept his communications. When
the Mason case finally made its way to trial in the fall of 1995, a
plea bargain was arranged. As a result of plea bargaining all charges
were dropped against Maynard, and though convicted, the Fischer
brothers received only a thirty day sentence to be served
intermittently.

Interestingly, a lawyer representing the federal government was
involved in the negotiations. It would appear that Bristow's role in
the incident prevented the Crown from aggressively prosecuting the
case. Despite frequently referring to this case in their testimony as
an example of the heinous activities that Heritage Front members were
capable of committing,

SIRC completely ignored the police investigation of Bristow's role in
the case. ; Bristow and the Reform Party. The Reform Party is also
deeply concerned about Bristow's activities within the Reform Party.

As reported in the SIRC report, CSIS was aware that Heritage Front
leader Wolfgang Droege "wanted to discredit Preston Manning and the
Reform Party before the general election in 1993. This idea would be
accomplished by the Movement publicly identifying itself and its
security relationship with the Reform Party's senior executive level.

Among those who allegedly knew of the Droege plan were Gerry Lincoln,
James Dawson, Ernst Zundel, Terry Long, Jurgen Neumann, Peter
Mitrevski, and Grant Bristow (emphasis added)." Not only was Bristow
aware of this plan to discredit the Reform Party, but he was one of
the major players in it. Bristow, along with Alan Overfield, were the
two individuals who made all the security arrangements.

While it was Overfield who originally offered the services of his
bailiff company to the Reform Party, he was not aware of Droege's plan
to discredit the party. Thus it was left to Bristow, a CSIS source, to
create the relationship.

According to the representative for the Reform Party, Andrew Flint,
Grant Bristow did a very effective job in creating the security
relationship between the Reform Party and the Heritage Front. In an
affidavit sworn on May 1, 1995, Flint described the June 1991 meeting
with Bristow and Overfield in the following manner: "The meeting was
dominated by Grant Bristow who did most of the talking regarding the
security for the event. I was certainly very impressed by his
immaculate dress which included an elegant suit and highly polished
shoes. This was the only meeting I attended involving security for the
up-coming rally."

Flint also mentioned that "at the meeting of the security team for the
June 1991 event at the International Centre, Grant Bristow requested a
letter from me stating that he and Al Overfield were authorized to
handle the security for this event. I was told he needed it to present
to the Regional Police which operated a sub-station on the premises of
the International Centre."

This letter is also mentioned in the SIRC report. However, the report
stated "Overfield asked for the letter in order to receive recognition
and to show that he was appointed. Grant Bristow's name was included
in the letter because he said: #145;Unless we have a letter of
understanding, there could be legal liabilities if there was a
confrontation with protesters at a Reform Party event.'

" Naturally, Bristow is the source of this information. It is
interesting that Bristow claimed that Overfield asked for the letter
to receive recognition, and that his own name appeared only for
liability purposes. If Bristow's name was necessary for liability
purposes, then why were the names of the other individuals who were
providing security not included as well?

In reality, the most useful application of this letter would have been
to prove a security arrangement between the Heritage Front and the
Reform Party. Yet, according to the SIRC report, Overfield was unaware
of the plan to discredit the Reform Party, so there is little reason
for him to request the letter. Bristow on the other hand, would
certainly have pleased Droege by providing him with a letter to
demonstrate that the security arrangement between the Reform Party and
the Heritage Front actually existed. SIRC's willingness to accept
Bristow's version of events is typical of their report.

Much of the report is based on the evidence of Bristow. He is cited as
the source of information 135 times; 96 times as the Source and a
further 39 times as Grant Bristow. In addition, the source handler is
cited 20 times as the basis of information.

SIRC has basically provided the public with Grant Bristow's version of
events, while contradictory information was generally dismissed. While
SIRC denied any wrongdoing by Bristow or CSIS, they failed to address
a very important issue - the entire operation was conducted in
violation of a 1989 Ministerial Direction.

On October 30, 1989 then Solicitor General Pierre Blais issued the
following Ministerial Direction on #145;CSIS' Use of Human Sources' to
the Director of CSIS. The Direction states in part: "that special care
is required in regard to investigations which impact on, or which
appear to impact on, the most sensitive institutions of our society. I
am primarily thinking in this regard of institutions in the academic,
political, religious, media or trade union fields.... I am writing
that you personally, or a Deputy Director designated by you in
writing, approve the use by the Service of confidential sources in
such investigation."

It is obvious that Bristow's role as one of two individuals who was
"jointly responsible for the security of all present and future Reform
Party Events that are planned for this region," would be part of a
human source operation that "impacted, or appeared to impact on a
political institution."

According to the Ministerial Direction, this would have required that
either the Director or the Deputy Director (Operations) approve
Bristow's role as part of the security team. In reality, Toronto
Region only sought out CSIS Headquarters' advice in August, two months
after the Mississauga rally, and even then the file did not go to the
Director or the Deputy Director.

SIRC goes on to great lengths to point out that CSIS was careful that
only Droege's activities as they related to the Reform Party were
investigated, not the Reform Party itself. But they do not address the
issue of a CSIS source operation that impacted on, or at least
appeared to impact upon a sensitive political institution, namely the
Reform Party. SIRC's refusal to address this issue is somewhat
mystifying, considering that was one of the questions that the Reform
Party specifically wanted answered when we put forth a series of
questions to SIRC in a letter, presented to them at the September 13,
1994 Sub-Committee meeting:

Question 73: Given the 1989 Ministerial Directive by then Solicitor
General Pierre Blais, concerning CSIS utilizing sources in sensitive
institutions such as political parties, religious groups and the
media, was the Director's approval required prior to Bristow's
attendance at the Reform Party meeting?;

Question 74: If yes, did the Director approve of this operation?
Bristow's role in the security group was indeed crucial in forming the
link between the Heritage Front and the Reform Party. As Andrew Flint
stated, he was impressed with Bristow's "knowledge of security
procedures and technical terminology...", as well as his "elegant suit
and highly polished shoes." Grant Bristow was the one member of the
Heritage Front who had the respectability and the expertise to make
Flint believe that he was dealing with a legitimate group of
individuals. It is extremely unlikely that Flint would have ever used
this group if he had met with skinheads or other Heritage Front
members.

In the final analysis, Wolfgang Droege had a plot to discredit the
Reform Party by linking the party to the Heritage Front through its
security arrangement.

Grant Bristow played a pivotal role in this conspiracy, if in no other
way than by providing the security group with the respectability and
expertise they could not have gotten elsewhere within the Heritage
Front.

When the story broke in 1992 the Reform Party was indeed discredited,
although there are no objective means to measure to what extent. It is
bad enough that Droege, an individual deemed to be a threat to the
security of Canada, devised a plot to discredit a legitimate political
party and CSIS did nothing about it. It is much worse when Grant
Bristow, a CSIS source, played an integral role in accomplishing this
task, in violation of a Ministerial Direction. But it is a complete
travesty when SIRC, the body that Parliament established to monitor
CSIS, fails to even address the issue. CSIS INVESTIGATION OF PRESTON
MANNING While compiling its report on the Heritage Front Affair, SIRC
included a chapter that had nothing to do with the Heritage Front. It
was about the Reform Party and a foreign government, subsequently
identified as South Africa. SIRC wanted us to believe that by
including this chapter they could allay any fears amongst Reformers
that CSIS had investigated the party, or the leadership.

In the SIRC report, the CSIS investigation is portrayed as a
by-the-book, straight-forward operation. Upon closer inspection this
investigation proved to be anything but straight- forward. Rather than
allaying any of our concerns about CSIS investigations, SIRC's
willingness to lie about the facts has made the Reform Party even more
suspicious.

Through a Privacy Act request by Preston Manning, CSIS released its
documents on this investigation. Although they are heavily censored,
the documents show that SIRC withheld information and misrepresented
the facts in their report, so that they could demonstrate that CSIS
conducted a proper investigation. Any evidence that was contradictory
to their conclusion was suppressed.

In the following pages, we will review the actual investigation,
SIRC's version of the investigation, and the bizarre fallout from this
chapter of their report. In exchanges of correspondence and testimony
that occurred after the tabling of the report, we learned that CSIS
documents were altered and misdated.

We observed SIRC make admissions, and then subsequently retract these
admissions, completely contradicting their earlier statements and
testimony. The Director of CSIS also provided a version of events that
not only contradicted his earlier testimony, but also required him to
admit that almost everyone who touched this file made mistakes.

In the final analysis, the Reform Party is convinced that CSIS
launched an insupportable investigation of Preston Manning in 1989,
and tried to cover it up five months later. Both the current
management at CSIS and SIRC have continued that cover-up, frequently
changing their story when confronted with facts that did not fit their
version of the events. ;

A dubious source sparks an investigation. As SIRC reported, and the
CSIS documents confirm, this investigation began with a tip from a
source who was described by the CSIS investigator as "self-serving and
very opportunistic, particularly if it benefited himself." This
dubious source informed CSIS about a conversation that he had with a
board member of an association that promoted links between South
Africa and Canada. This source then stated that the board member said
that his group was giving money to Preston Manning's campaign, as
Manning was running against External Affairs Minister Joe Clark.

This information by itself should not have been of interest to CSIS.
In democracies, citizens can financially support whoever they want in
an election, for whatever reason. For CSIS to investigate they needed
information that South Africa was actually providing the money. During
the first meeting between CSIS and this dubious source, the source
stated that he thought the board member meant that the money was
coming from South Africa. When the source realized that he did not
have the key piece of evidence that CSIS required, he miraculously
obtained it less than three weeks later. The source stated that he had
been talking to an unidentified, close associate of the board member,
who supposedly told him that the South Africans may have contributed
as much as $45,000 to Preston Manning and the Reform Party in trying
to defeat Joe Clark in his riding of Yellowhead. This is the extent of
CSIS' information about the Manning campaign receiving money from a
foreign government.

Third-hand information from a source who is not only of unknown
reliability, but who had been identified by the CSIS investigator as
"self-serving and opportunistic", should not be the basis of a CSIS
investigation of any Canadian citizen, much less the leader of a
legitimate political party. ; CSIS analyst stated, basis for
investigation "difficult to support"! We are not the only ones to
question the validity of this investigation.

After the regional investigator sent two reports to CSIS Headquarters
in November 1988, a response from the HQ analyst on the South Africa
desk was sent to the region in January 1989. As the SIRC report
acknowledged, the analyst stated that in HQ's opinion, the source of
the alleged funding was most likely the group of Canadian businessmen
who belonged to the association. But when the analyst addressed the
possibility of foreign funding, SIRC did not accurately portray the
analyst's comments. The analyst did state that, "if it were shown that
South Africa indeed contributed as much as $45,000 to Manning's
campaign, HQ could in time attempt to make the argument that South
Africa is unduly influencing Canadian politics." However, SIRC chose
not to include the following sentence by the analyst in their report:
"To say the least, this kind of argument would be difficult to
support."

Since the analyst had stated that there was no basis for a CSIS
investigation, contradicting SIRC's conclusion that it was a
legitimate investigation, SIRC chose to suppress this line. It is the
only line in that section of the report that SIRC did not include in
the Heritage Front Affair report. The HQ analyst concluded this
January 10, 1989 message by requesting that the region keep "HQ
apprised of any forthcoming information which you may obtain in light
of the above."

There was no further information forwarded by the region. Rather, the
next document that appears in Manning's file is an authorization of a
TARC Level 1 investigation, dated October 17, 1989. ; Lead up to the
TARC Level 1 investigation - January 10, 1989 to October 17, 1989.
While there is a great deal of controversy over what happened between
October 17, 1989 and March 30, 1990, we are equally perplexed about
what happened between January 10, 1989 and October 17, 1989.

The Reform Party has never received a logical answer to why an analyst
on the South African desk in CSIS HQ stated that there was no basis
for an investigation into the alleged contribution to Preston Manning
on January 10, 1989, and yet without any additional, or new,
information, an analyst on the South African desk in CSIS HQ submitted
a request for a TARC Level 1 investigation on October 17, 1989? SIRC
attempted to provide the following as an answer: A reliable source
provided CSIS with information that a foreign country (read South
Africa) had transferred over a quarter of a million dollars to Canada,
to try to influence 24 Members of Parliament from other political
parties (read Progressive Conservatives and Liberals).

When asked, SIRC stated that CSIS did not take any steps to
investigate these M.P.s. If the information about South Africa funding
these 24 M.P.s did indeed inspire the investigation, why was there no
mention of this on the form (REQUEST FOR AND APPROVAL OF COLLECTION
LEVELS 1, 2 AND CATEGORY A aka 4002) authorizing the investigation?

It is therefore unlikely that this information played any role in the
investigation. SIRC would still have us believe that CSIS received
information from a reliable source that the South African Government
was using over a quarter of million dollars to influence 24
Conservative and Liberal M.P.s, but did not investigate them. Instead,
CSIS proceeded to launch an investigation of Preston Manning, who was
neither an M.P., nor a Progressive Conservative nor a Liberal.

We find SIRC's logic to be less than satisfying. ; The Actual
Investigation: Who, What, When, Why? >From the moment the Solicitor
General tabled the Heritage Front Affair report, one particular
passage has caused a great deal of grief for the Sub-Committee, SIRC
and CSIS. This passage resulted in a number of admissions,
explanations, contradictions, retractions and accusations.

The Reform Party believes that the best way to present this complex
subject is in the following chronological manner:

December 15, 1994 The Solicitor General tabled SIRC's report, the
Heritage Front Affair, in the House of Commons. Included in section
VIII, at paragraph 8.3 is the following passage: "On October 17, 1989,
the Service decided to formally investigate the alleged $45,000
contribution. CSIS said that they could not go back to the informant
as all contacts had ended on December 31, 1988.

The Service authorized a three-month Level 1 investigation entitled:
#145;LNU FNU (Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
Campaign)'. The Service cited section 12 and paragraph 2 (b) of the
CSIS Act as the legal basis for the investigation." ;

December 16, 1994 ;SIRC appeared before the Sub-Committee on National
Security. Having been advised that the above-mentioned passage was
inaccurate, the Reform Party made the following request:

Ms. Meredith: "Can you have your officials go back to CSIS and have
them examine the hard copy of the original authorization of the Level
one investigation on the Reform Party and a foreign government, not
just the corrected copies? Specifically, can your employees examine
the caption on the file?"

Summary - After the meeting, the Reform Party was approached by SIRC
research officials. They asked what they should be looking for
specifically. This led the Reform Party to believe that SIRC was not
aware of a changed caption. ;

January 27, 1995 In a letter from Maurice Archdeacon, the Executive
Director of SIRC, to Derek Lee, M.P., the Chairman of the
Sub-Committee on National Security, Val Meredith's request was
answered in the following manner:

"Ms. Meredith, M.P. requested that SIRC have its officials re-examine
the original authorization of the Level I investigation on the Reform
Party and a foreign government. Specifically, Ms. Meredith asked to be
told what the caption was on the file.

The nature of Ms. Meredith's question suggests that the answer may
well already be known to her. Nevertheless, the caption she referred
to for the targeting authority dated October 17, 1989 was #145;Preston
Manning.' The caption was revised on March 30, 1990 to state,
#145;LNU/FNU (Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
Campaign).'

I would be remiss if I did not point out that, aside from the amended
caption, there were no other changes to the text of the targeting
requests/authorizations. That is, the text in each of the documents
was identical, and clearly stated that the investigation was to
determine whether a #145;foreign influence' threat existed. CSIS did
not suspect Mr. Manning of complicity..."

Summary - Mr. Archdeacon admitted that the name on the targeting
authority dated October 17, 1989 was #145;Preston Manning.' He also
mentioned that "there were no other changes to the text of the
targeting request/authorizations. That is, the text in each of the
documents was identical." It is quite apparent that Mr. Archdeacon is
stating that there were two versions of the same document, with the
only change being to the caption. From his choice of words being the
#145;targeting request/authorizations', there is no doubt that Mr.
Archdeacon is referring to the form 4002. ;

March 30, 1995 The Solicitor General appears before the Standing
Committee on Justice and Legal Affairs, for the Main Estimates. He is
accompanied by his Deputy Minister and the heads of the various
agencies under his control, including Mr. Ward Elcock, Director of
CSIS. The Reform Party asked Mr. Elcock a number of questions about
this particular investigation.

The following excerpts are from the transcript of this meeting: (Page 15)

Ms. Meredith: "Can you explain then why Mr. Manning's name was used
for a TARC level one investigation and why that investigation was not
conducted under the foreign government?"

Mr. Elcock: "I don't know why that name was used. I suspect that, as
much as anything else, it may have been just used as a convenient tag.
I don't know the precise reason why it was used, but there is no
question from the file that at any time the subject of the
investigation was ever Mr. Manning himself."

Ms. Meredith: "Why was that file named under Mr. Manning, then, and
not under #145;unknown contributor?'"

Mr. Elcock: "I said, Mr. Chairman, that I didn't know the reason why
that name was used. It clearly was in error, because in substance, the
investigation at all times was an investigation of the actions of a
foreign government, not an investigation of Mr. Manning."

(Page 17) Ms. Meredith: "So Mr. Manning's name never came up under a
requisition or a request for a TARC Level One investigation?"

Mr. Elcock: "It was in the sense, Mr. Chairman, that the title of the
TARC was initially in Mr. Manning's name. His name was there. Was
there an investigation of Mr. Manning? Absolutely not."

Ms. Meredith: "I didn't ask if there was an investigation of Mr.
Manning. I asked if a TARC Level was ever instituted under Mr.
Manning's name?"

Mr. Elcock: "The answer, Mr. Chairman, was that there was a TARC Level
in Mr. Manning's name. But as I have said, the subject of that TARC
was not Mr. Manning at any time, ever."

(Page 34) Ms. Meredith: "I have your policy manual here, the
declassified version of the CSIS Operational Manual. For a TARC Level
one authority, an investigator must submit a request for an approval
form, CSIS form 4002. There's a space for the name of the individual
to be investigated. Can you tell me whose name was in that spot on the
form 4002 in question, signed on October 17, 1989?"

Mr. Elcock: "As I think I said earlier, there was in the TARC title
Mr. Manning's name. However, as I said quite clearly, the subject of
that file was at all times an investigation of contributions in terms
of the possibility of contributions having been made by a foreign
government to a Canadian political party. It was at no time an
investigation of Mr. Manning himself, notwithstanding the title. I
would that (sic) the title had been otherwise, but it wasn't. That's
the fact."

Summary - During this meeting, the Director of CSIS made it quite
clear that on October 17, 1989 the TARC Level 1 authorization, the
form 4002, was on Preston Manning. Mr. Elcock did not once suggest
that the caption was "Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's
Electoral Campaign." (Nor did Mr. Elcock suggest that the error
occurred with a different document known as a FILE OPENING REQUEST -
PEOPLE FILES form.) At this same meeting the Reform Party also
questioned the Director as to why SIRC was not made aware that the
original 4002 was in the name of #145;Preston Manning'.

That led to the following exchange: (Page 17)

Ms. Meredith: "Can you explain to me why that information wasn't
provided to SIRC? In their report, they reported very thoroughly on
that investigation, with the exception of the original TARC level?"

Mr. Elcock: "Why what information?"

Ms. Meredith: "That the TARC level on Mr. Manning was excluded from
the SIRC report, that SIRC was unaware of that having happened?"

Mr. Elcock: "I don't know that in fact SIRC was unaware. I don't know
why they would not have put it in their report or would have chosen
not to do that. That's SIRC's business, and you would have to address
that question to SIRC."

Ms. Meredith: "When we brought it to SIRC's attention, they were
unaware of that fact. It was only by it being brought to their
attention that they were able to go back and find out the information.
So I assumed from that they did not know that information was not
provided to them, and I would like to know why it wasn't?"

Mr. Elcock: "I don't know that that assumption is correct; I would
have to check. In fact, my belief is that they did have that
information, but I'll certainly check that for the hon. member."

Summary - This was the first information that the Reform Party
received that SIRC was aware that the original TARC Level was on
Preston Manning. ;

March 31, 1995 In response to Mr. Elcock's testimony, Val Meredith
wrote to SIRC, seeking clarification of what SIRC knew and when. "Was
any member or employee of SIRC aware that the original TARC
investigation launched on October 17, 1989 (was) in the name of
Preston Manning and not "LNU FNU (Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston
Manning's Electoral Campaign), when the Heritage Front Affair report
was tabled on December 9, 1994?" Summary - The Reform Party
specifically asked SIRC if they knew prior to the tabling of their
report that the TARC investigation was in the name of #145;Preston
Manning.' ;

April 7, 1995 In a letter, under the name of Jacques Courtois, P.C.,
Q.C., but signed by Maurice Archdeacon, Val Meredith's letter was
responded to in the following fashion: "You asked whether any member
or employee of SIRC was aware of the TARC investigation launched on
October 17, 1989 in the name of Preston Manning and not the corrected
title. SIRC staff saw the original title of the targeting
authorization, as well as the corrected title and all other documents
pertaining to the investigation. As I mentioned in my letter dated
January 27, 1995 to Mr. Derek Lee, M.P. Chairperson of the
Sub-Committee on National Security, the description (narrative text)
of the authorization never changed... The original caption was seen
for what it was - an error, and the Service corrected that error five
years ago."

Summary - Once again SIRC admitted that the caption on the TARC on
October 17, 1989 was in the name of Preston Manning. They also
admitted that they knew this prior to tabling their report. Although
Mr. Archdeacon does not specifically state why SIRC chose to exclude
this information from their report, the only possible explanation they
offer for its exclusion is that the original caption was seen as an
error, and that CSIS corrected that error in 1990. ;

June 20, 1995 SIRC appeared before the National Security Sub-Committee
for the Main Estimates. The Reform Party asked SIRC a number of
questions about this particular investigation.

The following excerpts are from the transcript of this meeting: (Page 7)

Ms. Meredith: "Are you trying to tell this committee that there was
not a TARC Level one investigation opened on Preston Manning?"

Mr. Archdeacon: "No, I'm not, obviously, because we're repeating
discussions we had over several hours earlier. You know very well that
I'm not doing so. Someone - and we admitted it was sloppy work, and
I'm sure the Director of CSIS would admit that - instead of taking the
trouble to write on the TARC title #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston
Manning's campaign' just wrote #145;Preston Manning.' The text,
however, in the TARC report makes it absolutely clear - and you read
the text - that Mr. Manning was not being investigated. We can't say
it any more than this. It's question asked and answered."

(Page 20)

Mr. Archdeacon: "The fact is at the moment you're looking at the form
- I understand your point - and saying the form of that 4002 gave the
impression, because the name Preston Manning was there, that the TARC
was on Preston Manning. That is the form of it."

Summary - SIRC once again confirmed that the 4002 was in the name of
Preston Manning. Mr. Archdeacon went so far as to state that he
obviously wasn't denying that there was a TARC Level one investigation
opened on Preston Manning. ;

June 21, 1995 to November 7, 1995 During this time period, the
Sub-Committee on National Security considered its report on the
Heritage Front Affair. During these meetings, the Sub-Committee was
operating on the understanding that the original 4002 was in the name
of "Preston Manning" and this was altered to "LNU/FNU (Unknown
Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign" on March 30,
1990. ; November 9, 1995 To clarify questions about alterations to
4002, and who knew about the caption "Preston Manning", the
Sub-Committee sent a letter to the Director of CSIS. The following are
the key excerpts from this letter: "On January 27, 1995, SIRC advised
the Subcommittee, in response to its questions, that the caption on
the October 17, 1989 targeting authority dealt with in Chapter VIII of
the SIRC Report was originally #145;Preston Manning.' The Review
Committee went on in the same letter to advise us that the caption was
changed on March 30, 1990 to read #145;LNU-FNU (Unknown Contributor(s)
to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign).' How was the caption change
made on the Form 4002 - was the original form altered or was the
original form destroyed and a new, back-dated, re-signed or
re-initialled form created? Another of the documents contained in the
file obtained by Mr. Manning is a November 10, 1989 Transit Slip (Form
3040) from the Chief of Counter Intelligence - General Desk to the
Director General of Counter Intelligence. I would like to draw your
attention to item 5 on this document where it is asserted #145;caption
is considered appropriate under policy provision.' Can you provide the
Subcommittee with an explanation of this assertion in light of the
fact that at the time the caption read #145;Preston Manning' and was
not changed until March 30, 1990? If the caption was appropriate as it
was on November 10, 1989, what made it unacceptable on March 30,
1990?" Summary - These questions challenged SIRC's and CSIS'
contention that #145;Preston Manning's' name appearing in caption was
just a #145;clerical error.' It would be difficult for CSIS to
maintain the #145;clerical error' excuse if the Director General of
Counterintelligence was aware of the caption, and agreed with it. ;

March 29, 1996 According to CSIS, they did not receive the November 9,
1995 letter from the Sub-Committee until this date. There is no
explanation as to what happened to the letter during the intervening 4
1/2 months. ;

April 15, 1996 The Director of CSIS responded to the Sub-Committee's
letter of November 9, 1995. In a complete departure from previous
statements and testimony from CSIS and SIRC, the Director contended
that the Form 4002 never read #145;Preston Manning', but the original
caption was #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
Campaign.' Key excerpts from his letter are as follows: "In response
to your query regarding the #145;REQUEST FOR AND APPROVAL OF
COLLECTION LEVELS 1, 2 AND CATEGORY A' form, dated October 17, 1989, I
am satisfied that this is the original document associated with this
file. As is shown on this form, the original caption was #145;Unknown
Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign'. The
collection authority and a second form, #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST -
PEOPLE FILES', is required by the Service's Information Management
branch, in order to create a file. It was at this stage in the process
that the clerical error occurred regarding this file caption. In an
effort to facilitate the electronic opening and future retrieval of
this file and the relevant documents, the caption that was erroneously
entered on the #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES' form was
#145;Preston Manning'. This error caused the creation of an automated
hard copy file under this incorrect caption. It was during the latter
part of March, 1990, while preparing this assessment report, that the
file caption error was corrected. Item 5 on the #145;TRANSIT SLIP'
(Form 3040), dated November 10, 1989, discusses the appropriateness of
the caption as presented originally - #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to
Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign' and the comments indicate that
the author believed the caption to be appropriate."

Summary - This was an astounding development. The Director totally
contradicted 15 months of statements and testimony from both SIRC and
himself. According to the January 27, 1995 letter from Maurice
Archdeacon to Derek Lee, M.P., the targeting authority (form 4002)
read #145;Preston Manning' on October 17, 1989 and was changed on
March 30, 1990. Mr. Elcock made no reference to this fact in his
letter. Nor does the Director address his own testimony before the
Standing Committee on Justice and Legal Affairs on March 30, 1995,
where the following exchange took place:

Ms. Meredith: "So Mr. Manning's name never came up under a requisition
or a request for a TARC Level One investigation?"

Mr. Elcock: "It was in the sense, Mr. Chairman, that the title of TARC
was initially in Mr. Manning's name. His name was there. Was there an
investigation of Mr. Manning? Absolutely not."

Ms. Meredith: "I didn't ask if there was an investigation of Mr.
Manning. I asked if a TARC Level was instituted under Mr. Manning's
name?"

Mr. Elcock: "The answer Mr. Chairman, was that there was a TARC Level
in Mr. Manning's name."

There is no explanation of why Mr. Elcock would state on March 30,
1995 that "the title of the TARC was initially in Mr. Manning's name,"
and then on April 15, 1996 he would write that "the original caption
was #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
Campaign.'"

It must also be noted that in none of the correspondence or testimony
from CSIS or SIRC, between December 16, 1994 and April 14, 1996, was
there even a single mention of a "FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES"
form. This particular form was certainly known to CSIS, as it was
included in Preston Manning's Privacy Act request. However, subsequent
investigation and testimony would show that Mr. Elcock was not
completely forthcoming in this letter. ;

May 15, 1996 SIRC appeared before the Sub-Committee on National
Security for the Main Estimates. While there was little discussion
about this issue at this meeting, the following exchanges occurred:
(page 30)

Mr. Discepola: "I'd like to know, then, in your opinion why in the
world Preston Manning's name was used at all in any of the
documentation that related to the investigation of the suspected third
country contribution to the election campaign."

Mr. Archdeacon: "I've forgotten the exact date but the original title
was #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning's Election Campaign.'
It should of had more on it then that, but that was the exact title.
It was not titled #145;Preston Manning', and Mrs. Meredith has a copy
of the sheets of paper. Here it is, and the title on it is
#145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign.'
Then there's the text of what is to be looked at, which is whether
somebody, some country, was going to contribute money to Preston
Manning's electoral campaign. When you have a TARC like that you must
open a file, and this TARC was sent down to the management information
section in CSIS. Because it didn't have LNU/FNU in front of the
#145;Unknown Contributor(s)', which means last name unknown, first
name unknown, the only name the clerk down there could see was Preston
Manning, and you have to have a name on a file. So he didn't write
#145;Unknown Contributor(s)' , he wrote #145;Preston Manning'. That
was an error. He shouldn't have done that. That error remained like
that for at least three months without being corrected. It wasn't
corrected until about March, when the assessment was being done. There
have been allegations that the title on the TARC was changed. Written
in ink was #145;LNU/FNU' ahead of what had always been there and had
never been changed. Because Mrs. Meredith was so sure of this, and
because we knew she had our information from somewhere else, we
decided to have the original TARC X-rayed. We have exact evidence that
everything Mrs. Meredith has said about this - about it having been
titled #145;Preston Manning', about things having been typed around
it, and about all those sorts of things - is completely and totally
incorrect. The file was mistitled and the file does not give anybody
any reason to investigate anybody. A file title does not authorize
anybody to investigate anybody. There was never any time when every
CSIS agent across the country could have investigated Mr. Manning.
That is a figment of someone's imagination." (page 32)

Ms. Meredith: "Then I would like to put something on the record, Mr.
Chair. I'd like to put on the record, Mr. Archdeacon, that the
comments you just made are in complete contradiction to a letter on
January 27, 1995, addressed to Mr. Derek Lee, and in testimony you've
given before this committee. It's a complete contradiction."

The Chairman: "I'm sure SIRC would want to address that. Perhaps this
is something that can be clarified later. Can I take it, Mr.
Archdeacon, Mr. Courtois, that you would differ?"

Mr. Archdeacon: "We would differ with that characterization." ;

Summary - Mr. Archdeacon's comments are a complete departure from
SIRC's previous correspondence and testimony.

First of all, it was not Ms. Meredith who stated that the original
TARC was captioned #145;Preston Manning', it was Mr. Archdeacon
himself who first made this statement in his letter of January 27,
1995, when he stated:; "The caption she referred to for the targeting
authority dated October 17, 1989 was #145;Preston Manning'.

The caption was revised on March 30, 1990 to state, #145;LNU/FNU
(Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign).'"

Then there is the letter that Mr. Archdeacon signed on April 7, 1995,
in which he stated:; "You asked whether any member or employee of SIRC
was aware of the TARC investigation launched on October 17, 1989 in
the name of Preston Manning and not the corrected title. SIRC staff
saw the original title of the targeting authorization, as well as the
corrected title and all other documents pertaining to the
investigation."

Once again Mr. Archdeacon confirmed that the original title was
"Preston Manning", and admitted that SIRC staff saw both the original
title of the targeting authorization, as well as the corrected title.
If, as Mr. Archdeacon maintained on May 15, 1996, the original title
was "Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign",
why would he state in two pieces of correspondence that the caption
was "Preston Manning".

Furthermore, during SIRC's appearance before the National Security
Sub-Committee meeting on June 20, 1995, there was this exchange:;

Ms. Meredith: "Are you trying to tell this committee that there was
not a TARC Level one investigation opened on Preston Manning?"

Mr. Archdeacon: "No, I'm not obviously, because we're repeating
discussions we had over several hours earlier. You know very well that
I'm not doing so. Someone - and we admitted it was sloppy work, and
I'm sure the Director of CSIS would admit that - instead of taking the
trouble to write on the TARC title #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston
Manning's Campaign' just wrote #145;Preston Manning.'"

Mr. Archdeacon made no effort to explain why, on May 15, 1996, he told
the Sub-Committee that there was not a TARC Level one investigation
opened on Preston Manning, when on June 20, 1995 he stated the exact
opposite.

Clearly, Mr. Archdeacon and SIRC have fully endorsed the April 15,
1996 letter from the Director of CSIS. Like Mr. Elcock, they make no
effort to explain the contradictions.

There is one comment of Mr. Archdeacon that would be contradicted by
the CSIS Director two weeks later. Mr. Archdeacon made a definitive
statement that the error was caused by a clerk in the Management
Information Section, who wrote "Preston Manning." As we will see in
the next section, this statement has no basis in fact, but is rather a
figment of Mr. Archdeacon's imagination. ;

May 27, 1996 Mr. Elcock appeared before the Sub-Committee to answer
questions about the Heritage Front Affair. During his appearance the
Reform Party asked him about a number of discrepancies contained in
his letter of April 15, 1996.

Four of the specific subjects that were broached, included:

I) The Altered #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES' Form. In his
letter, Mr. Elcock stated, "the caption that was erroneously entered
on the #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES' form was #145;Preston
Manning.'" However, the copy of that form that Mr. Manning received in
his Privacy Act request did not read #145;Preston Manning', but rather
#145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign'.
It is obvious that the section of the form for the subject's name has
been altered, as have the sections for #145;Present Address' and
#145;Occupation'.

The following exchange took place in relation to this form:

Ms. Meredith: "Mr. Elcock, your letter clearly states that it was on
this file, this PEOPLE FILES form here, and if people look carefully
you can see where there has been alterations made to this document.
The alterations have been made not only on the subject line, but on
the #145;Occupation' line and the #145;Present Address' line. Your
letter states that it was this form that Preston Manning's name was
put on by mistake. I'm asking you why does this form not have Preston
Manning's name on it? It has #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston
Manning's Electoral Campaign."

Mr. Elcock: "Mr. Chairman, Mr. Sundstrom reminds me that although it
doesn't show here underneath, it was just Preston Manning when the
form was first completed."

Ms. Meredith: "So, if you agree, or if you read Mr. Archdeacon's
comments where he noted it had been a clerk and it was a clerk in the
Management Information Section that changed the document from
#145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning' and put Preston Manning's
name in it. It's obvious that #145;Occupation' and #145;Present
Address' have also been altered, changed, whited-out. Did this clerk
also put Preston Manning's address and his occupation in there? Do
they have the right to just add that in as they saw fit?"

Mr. Elcock: "Mr. Chairman, it compounded the clerical error, but
there's nothing that prevents them from adding those details."

Summary - While Mr. Elcock confirmed that the #145;Subject Name',
#145;Occupation' and #145;Present Address' sections were all altered,
he maintained that it was a "clerical error". Well it might be
possible that a CSIS clerk would not use the proper caption in this
case, it is ludicrous to suggest that the clerk would, on his or her
own initiative, add Mr. Manning's address and occupation. Besides, if
as CSIS and SIRC maintain, Mr. Manning was never investigated, how did
CSIS even know his present address. In any event, as we shall see in
section #145;IV', the story of the clerk making a mistake is soon
retracted. ;

II) Citing a document two weeks before it existed. In the form 4002,
which authorized the TARC Level 1 investigation on October 17, 1989,
there is a reference to a proposed meeting between Mr. Manning and an
unidentified Ambassador. The reference goes on to state that the
meeting was canceled at the last minute by the Embassy. Only one
N.S.R. (CSIS database) message in the package obtained by Mr. Manning
in his Privacy Act request contained this information. It was dated
November 1, 1989, two weeks after the form 4002 was supposedly
completed.

Questions about this discrepancy went as follows:

Ms. Meredith: "Can I get you to go to tab #145;L' in the documents
that we've provided for you? This document is the only document that
was received under the access, under the Privacy Act, to Mr. Manning,
that makes any reference to an Ambassador and Preston Manning meeting,
and the meeting being canceled by the Embassy. Can you give me the
date of that message?"

Mr. Elcock: "The date at the top is 89- 11-01."

Ms. Meredith: "What does that equate to... November 1, 1989?"

Mr. Elcock: "Yes, it should do."

Ms. Meredith: "How is it possible that this message number and this
date can be an additional background on a document that is dated
October 17, 1989? How is it possible that this information is on a
document when it didn't exist at the time?"

Mr. Elcock: "The honourable member is concluding that it's the same
reference; I don't know that it is."

Ms. Meredith: "If that is not the report, then why was the report not
included in the Privacy request by Mr. Manning? This is the only
document that was in the information provided to him."

Mr. Elcock: "I will check and see what the date is and advise the
committee what the date of the document was."

Summary - The Reform Party did ask, in writing, for CSIS to confirm
the date of this message. At the time this dissenting opinion was
written, CSIS had not responded to our request. If this is the report
in question, then it lends credence to the suggestion that this form
4002 was re-written some time after October 17, 1989. It also suggests
that someone believed that the original justification for the
investigation was so weak, that additional information had to be
provided. If, on the other hand, there was documentation withheld from
Mr. Manning's Privacy request, one wonders what else has been
withheld. ;

III) The Altered Form 4002. If the inclusion of information from a
message that was not yet reported suggested that the form 4002 had
been re-written, another fact that supported this suggestion was that
the date on the top right corner of the document had been altered. The
Reform Party employed the services of forensic consultant, an expert
in the examination of questioned documents, who stated "as a matter of
information it should be noted that within the questioned handwritten
digital date #145;1989-10-17' on exhibit A1 (a), partially within and
immediately above the handwritten numbers there exist undecipherable
fragmentary markings foreign to the handwritten #145;1989-10-17'
numbers."

This information led to the following exchange:

Ms. Meredith: "Mr. Elcock, I want to bring your attention back to the
first page of form 4002 and I want you to look at the handwritten date
at the top, right-hand corner. That handwritten date was altered,
wasn't it? Tab #145;B'."

Mr. Elcock: "And it goes back, I think, to the piece that you had
asked... I noted that Mr. Archdeacon had indicated the piece had been
X-rayed and in fact there was another date underneath."

Ms. Meredith: "Can you tell the committee what the date was that was
underneath?"

Mr. Elcock: "The date was 1990...March 29, 1990."

Ms. Meredith: "Thank you, Mr. Elcock. I think that just proves what I
have considered, that this document was typed up in full with a
changed subject-matter on March 29, 1990; that this document did not
originate on October 17, 1989."

Mr. Elcock: "No, Mr. Chairman, I don't agree that it does."

Ms. Meredith: "Can you explain how the date March 29, 1990 would be at
the top of that file if that was not the case?"

Mr. Elcock: "At the time, often the dates on those files, on those
documents are left open and completed later when the documents are
first issued because they don't have a file number either when they're
first issued."

Ms. Meredith: "Mr. Elcock, so you want me to believe, you want this
committee to believe that they filled in the form, that the effective
date was put in at the bottom, the expiry date was put in at bottom,
that it was signed off and the date was put in at the bottom, but that
at the top it wasn't. Is that what you want this committee to
believe?"

Mr. Elcock: "I believe there was a mistake made. We believed that at
the time the typist entered the date and subsequently crossed out
because she had mistakenly entered it and they put back in the
appropriate date."

Summary - Although Mr. Elcock admitted that the form 4002 carried the
date March 29, 1990, he maintained that this was the original 4002
filled out on October 17, 1989. His argument that the date wasn't put
in because the document did not have a file number is extremely weak,
since the FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form that was signed on
October 17, 1989 was filled out specifically to obtain a file number.

In the documents obtained by Mr. Manning under his Privacy Act
request, we know that the first N.S.R. message that was sent on this
file was dated October 17, 1989, and since a message can not be sent
without a file number, a file number was obviously assigned on this
date. It is highly unlikely that CSIS would wait an additional five
months to fill in the rest of this form. This admission also calls
into question the testimony of Mr. Archdeacon from May 15, 1996, who
first brought up the subject of having the form X-rayed, and then
stated the form was never changed. ;

IV) Both Documents filled out by the Same Individual. The last area of
questioning concerned the contention put forth by CSIS and SIRC, that
the error in captions occurred not with the form 4002, but when a
clerk made an error in filling out a second form, a FILE OPENING
REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form. Mr. Elcock called this a "clerical
error".

In his May 15, 1996 testimony, Mr. Archdeacon went even further when
he stated, "this TARC was sent down to the Management Information
Section in CSIS... The clerk down there thought that the only name
that he had, and you've got to have a name on a file, the only name he
could see was Preston Manning. So he didn't write #145;Unknown
Contributor', he wrote #145;Preston Manning'. That was an error. He
shouldn't have done that." Again these sound like plausible
explanations. Plausible that is until one examines the forms.

The Reform Party and the Sub- Committee were somewhat hampered because
of the censoring of the documents, which deleted the names of the CSIS
employees who filled out these forms. We were instead forced to
examine the handwritten dates on both the form 4002 and the FILE
OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form. It is apparent that they were
written by the same person. The Forensic Consultant, an expert in the
examination of questioned documents confirmed the similarities.

While it may have been plausible that a clerk put in the wrong caption
on the second form, it is absolutely ludicrous to suggest that an
intelligence officer in CSIS HQ would fill out a form 4002 to
authorize an investigation in one name, and then on the very same day
he would fill out a second form to obtain a file number, and use a
different caption. As absurd as that sounds, that is what the Director
of CSIS wanted us to believe.

Witness the following exchange:

Ms. Meredith: "And that this unit head authorized a TARC Level
investigation on #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning's
Electoral Campaign?' Is that right? That is in essence what this is
all about, right, is that they authorized a TARC one on an
#145;Unknown Contributor.'"

Mr. Elcock: "An Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning's Electoral
Campaign, yes."

Ms. Meredith: "And that the problem originated or the problem was
picked up when somebody filled out the FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE
FILES, and then wrote in #145;Preston Manning.'"

Mr. Elcock: "Yes." Ms. Meredith: "It wasn't a clerk who filled out
those forms, was it?"

Mr. Elcock: "No, Mr. Chairman. I'm not sure what the honourable
member's point is."

Ms. Meredith: "My point is that if you look at the date in the top
right- hand corner of the FILE OPENING REQUEST and you look at the
date under the authority section on the same form, the PEOPLE FILE,
FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES, and then you look at the date
which is hand-written in at the top of the form 4002, I would suggest,
Sir, that it's the same person that wrote these two documents, that
worked with these two documents. How is it possible that the same
person on one file can put #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston
Manning's Electoral Campaign' and on the other file, the very same
day, put #145;Preston Manning.' And that his unit head, in reviewing
these on the same day, wouldn't pick up the mistake."

Mr. Elcock: "I'm not -- the honourable ...."

Ms. Meredith: "These are things that, I'm sorry, how is it possible
that a Counterintelligence officer can mistakenly, this is who filled
out this form, is an intelligence officer in Counterintelligence. How
could he look at a TARC form that he also filled in and filled it in
with #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning' and on the very same
day on another form put Preston Manning's name down?"

Mr. Elcock: "These things happen. Names are sometimes left in
documents when they ought not to be." Ms. Meredith: "And his unit
chief who is authorizing and okaying these didn't notice that one of
the forms was under Preston Manning's name?" Mr. Elcock: "I'm sure as
the honourable member will know, these things happen from time to
time."

Summary - Mr. Elcock's defence, given this information is simply that
these things happen. That is even more frightening than a planned
investigation of Mr. Manning. The Director of CSIS stated that he
wanted to re-assure the Reform Party that nothing untoward happened
with this file. Yet, the only explanation Mr. Elcock offers for the
conduct of his department, is that the employees who were involved in
this investigation were grossly incompetent?

However, the Reform Party has more faith in the ability of working
level staff at CSIS than the Director does. However, the Director did
confirm that the FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form was never
filled out by a clerk in the Information Management Section of CSIS.
That begs the question: Why did the Executive Director of SIRC, Mr.
Archdeacon, make up his story to mislead the Sub-Committee? ;

CONCLUSIONS The Reform Party regrets having to present such a
painstakingly, detailed review of the Preston Manning investigation,
but it was necessary to demonstrate the extreme lengths that we have
had to go to in our attempts to find the truth in this matter.

The documents obtained by Mr. Manning through his Privacy Act request
afforded us the opportunity to challenge SIRC's version of events
directly. SIRC has demonstrated that their word cannot be accepted at
face value. But what does this all mean in the final analysis?

Two issues need to be resolved. The first is what initiated the
October 17, 1989 TARC Level 1 investigation. Since the South African
desk in CSIS HQ wrote off any investigation on January 10, 1989, what
suddenly spawned interest nine months later. One would think that it
would be logical for someone to have something in writing suggesting
that an investigation be opened. But that didn't happen.

The questions that remains unanswered, are:

Who ordered this matter re-opened, and why? The other issue that must
be answered is: Why are CSIS and SIRC going to such extreme lengths to
mislead the Sub-Committee, Parliament, and Canadians? If they had
maintained their original explanation that the file caption was
inappropriately opened in the name of #145;Preston Manning', and
subsequently changed, the Reform Party would have little to complain
about. But for CSIS and SIRC to retract all their previous admissions
without explanations, and to out-and-out lie to a Parliamentary
Sub-Committee, it is clear that there is something important they are
hiding.

The question is: What? Contrary to the assurances from SIRC and CSIS,
the Reform Party has learned that from October 17, 1989 to January 17,
1990, it was recorded in CSIS' main database, N.S.R., that there was a
TARC Level 1 on Preston Manning. There was no restricted security on
this file, so this information was available to any CSIS employee who
had access to N.S.R.

Any employee who came across this information would have believed that
there was a legal TARC Level on Manning, and could have legitimately
carried out a Level 1 investigation. If the government members of the
Sub-Committee weren't so intent on burying this report, the Sub-
Committee itself may have been able to produce some of its own
answers.

However, it became apparent, especially after the Liberals changed the
membership of the Sub-Committee, that government members are just as
interested in covering up the truth, as are CSIS and SIRC. This is
typified by the member from Windsor - St. Clair's vociferous objection
to the Bloc Quebecois attempting to give their time to question the
Director of CSIS to the Reform Party at the May 27, 1996 meeting. Why
else would they object to the Reform Party having a few extra minutes
to ask questions?

It is clear to the Reform Party that SIRC's Heritage Front Affair
report is a complete whitewash. SIRC was able to divert what should
have been a review of the activities of a CSIS Source into a review of
the Heritage Front itself. Both SIRC and CSIS champion this case as a
great success for the Service, but the mere fact that the Source's own
actions made this case public, should suggest it was a failure. But
what this case has done is to show that the review system established
by the CSIS Act does not work.

The government has joined with CSIS and SIRC in covering up the truth.
Why? What are they afraid of? This government has expressed no concern
that the leader of a legitimate political party had his name on a
document authorizing a CSIS investigation on him. They have expressed
no concern that all the original documents authorizing that
investigation were altered in one manner or another. They have shown
no concern that both CSIS and SIRC admitted that originally the TARC
level was on Preston Manning, then fifteen months later proceeded to
deny it, with absolutely no explanation.

It would appear that this government is not interested in holding the
bureaucracy accountable. How is it possible that the government is not
concerned that one of its agencies operates without accountability.
Was that not why a civilian intelligence agency was formed? Did not a
previous Liberal administration pass the CSIS Act, to make Canada's
intelligence community accountable to Parliament?

Those Canadians who care about the truth will have to wait until this
country has a government committed to Parliamentary accountability,
before the true version comes out. In the meantime, the Reform Party
hopes that those journalists, researchers or academics who are
interested in pursuing security issues continue their search for the
real story. The truth is out there!

RECOMMENDATIONS In light of the negligent performance of the Security
Intelligence Review Committee in reviewing this investigation, it is
clear that there is no place in the review process for a group of
patronage appointees who believe that they do not have to answer to
Parliament.

To find an alternative we need look no further than to our neighbours
to the south. The Americans utilize not only a House Select Committee
on Intelligence, but a Senate Committee as well. Given the immense
Intelligence network in the United States with the CIA, the NSA and
the Intelligence Division of the FBI, the Americans have demonstrated
that review by elected representatives is not only workable, but in
the Reform Party's opinion is preferable. ;

Reform Party Recommendation The Reform Party recommends that this
government introduce legislation in Parliament that would amend the
Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act, deleting all references to
the Security Intelligence Review Committee. All references to the
Security Intelligence Review Committee should be replaced by the
Standing Committee on National Security. ;

; Created by Maurice Murphy Revised: December 01, 1996

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 04:02:33 -0300
Subject: RE Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the
mindless lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???
To: ABrander@highriver.ca, highwood <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, mclellana <mclellana@bennettjones.com>,
"Ian.Shardlow" <Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Ian.McPhail"
<Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Dale.McGowan"
<Dale.McGowan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "calgary.acadia"
<calgary.acadia@assembly.ab.ca>, "calgary.northwest"
<calgary.northwest@assembly.ab.ca>, Calgarynews <Calgarynews@ctv.ca>,
calgarynewstips <calgarynewstips@cbc.ca>, cal-news
<cal-news@sunmedia.ca>, eblokland <eblokland@highriver.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, gunfighter@fritze.com, Sheldon@nfa.ca

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: PCC Complaints <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:14:53 +0000
Subject: RE: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me
off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the
Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya...
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Hello Mr. Amos:

This e-mail is to acknowledge your recent communication with our
office about the RCMP.

If you wish to submit a complaint regarding the on-duty conduct of a
member(s) of the RCMP, you can do so through our online complaint form
located at:

https://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/cnt/srv/mac/index-eng.aspx

Alternatively, we can also be reached by:

Telephone : 1-800-665-6878
E-mail: complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
Fax : 604-501-4095

Sincerely,


Günther Schönfeldt
Intake Officer / Agent d'information de liaison
Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP /
Commission des plaintes du public contre la Gendarmerie royale du Canada
Tel/Tél : 1-800-665-6878 | Fax/Téléc : (604) 501-4095
complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca



-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
Sent: September-07-13 11:38 PM
To: gunfighter@fritze.com; Sheldon@nfa.ca; bob.paulson; ORG; McPhail, Ian
Cc: David Amos; Cogan, Tim
Subject: Fwd: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me
off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shard low? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the
Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya

http://nfa.ca/news/video-analysis-reveals-rcmp-targeting-houses-firearms

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Al Brander <ABrander@highriver.ca>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 07:36:10 -0600
Subject: RE: Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the
mindless lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

For the record, these current missive are the only ones I have seen.

Please delete my from your address book since it appears you only want
a platform to rant from.

Al Brander

-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 9:46 PM
To: Al Brander; Ian.Shardlow; bob.paulson; mclellana; premier; Ian.McPhail
Cc: David Amos; highwood
Subject: Re: Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the
mindless lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???

My question would obviously be:

Why did you and Ian Shardlow your new local top cop ignore me for
nearly a month?

Obviously I am the guy who answered Greg Kvisle's quandry about why
the RCMP ignored the Charter and felt free to invade his home three
time in order to find and take his old 303 and shotgun but he did not
believe me. I suspect you know as wel as I Correct?

As far as who I am scroll down this is lots of info that you had a
month to check out. If you don't believe it ask Ian Sharlow or his
bosses Dale McGowan and Bob Paulson or the lawyers Landslide Annie
McLellan or Alison Redford if I am a liar or not.

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369

On 9/8/13, Al Brander <ABrander@highriver.ca> wrote:

> Mr. Amos: Is there a question for me here?? If so please present it and
> will you then also identify who you are please.
>
> Thank you;
>
> Al Brander

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2013 9:45 PM
> To: Emile Blokland; christopher@diarmani.com; brian.topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
> bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca; Josee.Valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Dale.McGowan;
> bob.paulson; steven.blaney; Sylvain.Roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; bloke@shaw.ca;
> premier; highwood; airdrie; mclellana; finditherefirst@gmail.com;
> Doug.Potts@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; ppalmater; xchief;
> gunfighter
> Cc: Ian.McPhail; David Amos; James Thackray; kevin.rushworth@sunmedia.ca; Al
> Brander; Jessica Hume; greg.weston; pm; MulcaT; justin.trudeau.a1
> Subject: Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the mindless
> lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???
>
> http://nfa.ca/news/video-analysis-reveals-rcmp-targeting-houses-firearms
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: ORG <ORG@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
> Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 03:38:08 +0000
> Subject: CPC AutoResponse / Réponse préenregistrée de la CPP
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for contacting the Commission for Public Complaints Against
> the RCMP. Your message has been received and if necessary, we shall
> respond as soon as possible.
>
> Thank you for your interest and comments.
>
> Nous vous remercions d'avoir communiqué avec la Commission des
> plaintes du public contre la GRC. Nous avons reçu votre message et y
> donnerons suite, si nécessaire, dans les plus brefs délais.
>
> Nous vous remercions de l'intérêt que vous manifestez à l'égard de la
> Commission et de vos commentaires.
>
>


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Emile Blokland <eblokland@highriver.ca>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:38:46 -0600
Subject: Out of Office: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High
River piss me off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith
at the Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email.

I am away from the office August 30, until September 16, 2013
inclusive. In my abscence please contact Deputy Mayor Al Brander at
abrander@highriver.ca

Mayor Emile Blokland



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Josee VALIQUETTE <josee.valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 20:38:36 -0400
Subject: Re: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me
off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the
Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya (Sgt. Valiquette is Away on
September 5th, 2013)
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Hello, I am away today. For any inquiries in regards to "K"
Division Media Relations, please contact S/Sgt. Ron Campbell at
780-412-5268.

Thank you

On 9/5/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <eblokland@highriver.ca>; <christopher@diarmani.com>;
<brian.topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca>;
<Josee.Valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "Dale.McGowan"
<Dale.McGowan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>; <Sylvain.Roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
<bloke@shaw.ca>; "premier" <premier@gov.ab.ca>; "highwood"
<highwood@assembly.ab.ca>; "airdrie" <airdrie@assembly.ab.ca>;
"mclellana" <mclellana@bennettjones.com>; <finditherefirst@gmail.com>;
<Doug.Potts@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
"ppalmater" <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca>; "xchief"
<xchief@bell.blackberry.net>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>;
<jthackray@highriver.ca>; <kevin.rushworth@sunmedia.ca>;
<abrander@highriver.ca>; "Jessica Hume" <jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>;
"greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>; "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>; "MulcaT"
<MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>; "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 9:38 PM
Subject: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me off
today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the Townhall
Meeting tonight for me will ya


http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Tories+Wildrose+exchange+fire+over+High+River+seizures/8866170/story.html

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 02:51:37 -0300
Subject: The latest top cop in High River Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow and
his boss Bob Paulson should be able to explain this email to Greg
Kvisle and the other pissed off folks
To: eblokland@highriver.ca, christopher@diarmani.com,
brian.topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca,
Josee.Valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "Dale.McGowan"
<Dale.McGowan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, Sylvain.Roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
bloke@shaw.ca, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, highwood
<highwood@assembly.ab.ca>, airdrie <airdrie@assembly.ab.ca>, mclellana
<mclellana@bennettjones.com>, finditherefirst@gmail.com,
Doug.Potts@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, ppalmater
<ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca>, xchief <xchief@bell.blackberry.net>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, jthackray@highriver.ca,
kevin.rushworth@sunmedia.ca, abrander@highriver.ca, Jessica Hume
<jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>, "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>

FYI I called Greg Kvisle after I saw him on Sun TV he said he didn't
need any help but he wanted to know who took his guns I told him I
knew but he didn't believe me. Clearly Ken Braat knows Greg Kvisle and
the cops very well. He should be able to tell Kvisle who took his
guns.

http://www.highrivertimes.com/2013/07/29/new-staff-sergeant-to-run-high-river-rcmp

I bet Harper and the RCMP remembers what this Maritimer said about his
old 303s and shoguns when I ran for seat Parliament the first time
after the Maritimers Landslide Annie Mclellan Wayne Easter and a
boatload of corrupt cops pissed me off. If a don't feel free to scroll
down N'esy Pas?

I bet Danielle Smith, Bobby Baby Paulson remembers Robin Reid. Clearly
Insp Dougy Potts and Sgt Ian Shardlow pissed her and a bunch of
Indians off bigtime last year EH?

----- Original Message -----
From: robin reid
To: bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; pm@pm.gc.ca ; people stand up ;
david.raymond.amos@gmail.com ; dominic ; calgary.west@assembly.ab.ca ;
toewsv1@mts.net ; jspottedbear@yahoo.com ; jimsisson@inac.gc.ca ;
hiddenfromhistory1@gmail.com ; admin@turnervalley.ca ;
aimggc@worldnet.att.net ; alex@globalmedicaltourism.com.mx ;
amyrae4@hotmail.com ; archbishop@archtoronto.org ;
barry.shaw@forces.gc.ca ; bewerbung@rothschild.com ;
bishopfh@rcdiocese-calgary.ab.ca ; calgary@jasonkenney.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 11:44 PM
Subject: I SEE NOTHING HAS CHANGED WITHIN YOUR CORRUPT FEDERAL ORGANIZATION

Bob Paulson,
Commissioner of RCMP
Canada.

Mr. Paulson,

I write once again after the disappointing bullshit letter I received
from Inspector Potts, and then my discussion with Sgt. Shardlow
yesterday in Okotoks over assaults, false arrest, murder, all kinds of
nasty things you are responsible for setting people up using your "
interception of private communication ".
You people neglect doing your duty here and as I see what is coming
out in the media, makes one wonder just how much death you have
covered up over the years.
Afraid the truth is coming out is what it seems,hmmmm. And as far as
your arresting officer Degroot goes he seems to have a lot of contact
with Juiliann Barna Reid, as I
asked Shardlow - does this abusing woman work for you????????? Perhaps
you could look into this and get back to me.

Honestly for men you have no balls, just like Harper - has god got
your balls also??????? And then you have your women godly agents who I
am thinking took your balls cuz they are as cruel as you men. Now is
that not shameful.?????? Just as Alison Redford ignored me when she
was justice minister.

You people do not care about children, woman or men in your game of
human abuse for
profit. You always have the same excuse.

Now Mr. Paulson, since you are at the top, do you condone these lies
and abuse of children, woman and men ???????

I do have some other concerns from many years ago involving the
okotoks RCMP putting the blame on 1 officer, an Indian, are you racist
Mr. Paulson, do you condone white supremacy and genocide upon the
Indian people and then every other race by thair own ????? Just as the
security guard who assaulted me - thair excuse was he just got out of
security school.

Also Mr. Paulson do you carry the dead peasant insurance upon your
workers???????? how does one find out if this type of insurance is on
people and who has used it?????????

And let's not forget the abuse on human life by religion, sit's at the
top on the abuse game for profit, would you not say???????

Now Mr. Paulson, do you feel this is right what has been done, the
medical abuse, assaults, false arrests and so much more I would like
to discuss in person.????????????

REMEMBER IT'S ALL INDIAN LAND THAT YOU PERSONS UNDER THE SUPREMACY OF
GOD, KILLED CHILDREN, WOMAN AND MEN FOR WHAT YOU HAVE, AND REMEMBER
INDIANS OF THE LANDS COME IN ALL RACES. SHAME ON YOU ALL CORRUPT
CHIEFS KILLING CHILDREN IN SO MANY WAYS, ESPECIALLY YOU CONDONED
PEDOPHILE LAIR.


Thank you
Robin Reid
Red Nations
PPOF


http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/politics/archives/2013/06/20130628-151342.html

http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/alberta/Hell+Residents+angry+RCMP+sieze+guns+from+High+River+homes/8588851/story.html

RCMP revealed Thursday that officers have seized a "substantial ...
that we control, simply because of what they are," said Sgt. Brian
Topham

http://www.canada.com/story_print.html?id=29c1b59c-694d-4d33-9fdc-d5a57f14ec39&sponsor=

Some Alberta RCMP Disciplinary Cases in 2005-06 (Year to Date)

- Sgt. Brian Topham -- reprimand and forfeiture of 10 days' pay.

Topham, who served at the Fox Creek detachment between 2002 and 2004,
made insensitive and degrading comments about women in the presence of
a female civilian employee.

On another occasion, Topham said "1974 was the worst year in the RCMP
because that is when the RCMP let women in the force."

The allegations also involved stereotypical comments about aboriginals
and people from Newfoundland made in the presence of officers who had
those backgrounds.


http://christopherdiarmani.com/10532/police/abuse-of-police-authority/high-river-rcmp-looters-criminals-treated-immediately/

http://www.calgarysun.com/2013/08/09/high-river-homeowner-upset-police-entered-his-home-three-times-after-flood-hit-and-seized-antique-firearms

Greg Kvisle. CENTURY 21 Foothills Real Estate. Bldg. F, 1103 18 Street
SE. High River, ABT1V 2A9. Office: 403-652-2121. Cell: 403-601-3533

Ken Braat Associate,Realtor. Century 21 Foothills Real Estate 1103 F
18 Street SE, T1V 2A9 High River, Alberta 403-601-2070.

High River homeowner upset police entered his home three times after
flood hit and seized antique firearms
205

By Bill Kaufmann ,Calgary Sun

First posted: Friday, August 09, 2013 03:42 PM MDT | Updated: Friday,
August 09, 2013 04:59 PM MDT


The RCMP's post-flood seizure of two family heirloom firearms that
were hidden in his home is an outrageous trespass, says a High River
man.

The Mounties made three trips into the home of Greg Kvisle before
seizing the guns, a 1912 Winchester long-barreled shotgun and a
50-year-old .303 rifle in the days following June's deluge.

"My grandfather passed them down to my dad and when he passed away we
brought them here for safekeeping," said Kvisle, adding neither weapon
has been fired in decades.

"It's a sentimental thing for me."

He said both guns were stashed in a corner of his basement in a
storage area beneath boxes and far from any ammunition.

"They weren't visible and were secure as far as I saw it," said Kvisle.

His street wasn't impacted by the flooding and hadn't been evacuated,
but Kvisle said he was in Calgary when the water hit its height, and
was barred from returning home for nine days.

Once home, his suspicions that the two weapons might have been seized
were quickly confirmed.

About half of his neighbours had remained home, including those next
door who kept an eye on his property and helped Mounties enter his
home three times, said Kvisle.

"I just don't understand why they were searching for them," he said.

"They're supposed to be protecting our home, not looting it."

Kvisle said he had no trouble getting back his weapons from RCMP
officers, whom he called courteous and professional.

But the fact Mounties had taken hidden guns from his home on a
partly-populated street police were patrolling rankles him.

"What's next?" he said.

The Mounties said they seized firearms to prevent them from falling
into the hands of burglars in vacated, unsecured areas.

Kvisle's guns were situated in open view because it would have taken
very little to uncover them, said RCMP Sgt. Josee Valiquette.

"It could be in plain view under a bed, in a closet -- somewhere
somebody could hide," said Valiquette.

"If they happened to open a closet, it is in plain sight...these
firearms were inappropriately secured."

Kvisle said he's been told a civilian group that oversees the RCMP is
reviewing his case.

"I hope we get some answers," he said.

bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca

Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd

By Erin Hatfield

"If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
world is all screwed up, rearrange it."

The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
unofficial, theme song for the debate.

The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.

The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.

Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
other on their answers and criticizing eachothers' party leaders.
Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."

Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.

The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
abiding citizens."

The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.

Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You're out of touch," Armstrong
yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
anyplace," Armstrong responded.

As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
process for the June 28 vote.

Cutline - David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
favourite possessions--motorcycles.

McKnight/KCR

The Unconventional Candidate

David Amos Isn't Campaigning For Your Vote, But....

By Gisele McKnight

FUNDY--He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."

Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot--David Amos.

The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
running for office in Canada.

One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
to meet Elections Canada requirements.

When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
favourite place to do so--Fundy.

Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
dissatisfaction with politicians.

"I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."

The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
needed to change his life.

"I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
sometimes in midlife."

So Amos, who'd lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
Panhead motorcycle.

"Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
renew your faith in mankind - you help anyone you can, you never ask
for anything, but you take what they offer."

For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
and conversation all over North America.

Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
and a daughter and become a house-husband - Mr. Mom, as he calls
himself.

He also describes himself in far more colourful terms--a motorcyclist
rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."

Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.

"But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
"It's alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"

Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.

"I didn't appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
call me. I'm not going to drive my opinions down their throats."

And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.

"I won't take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It's
not about money. It goes against what I'm fighting about."

What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues - tainted blood,
the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
name a few.

"The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs - fishing,
farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm
death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
(NAFTA) out the window.

NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.

Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.

"There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
Don't necessarily vote for me, but vote."

Although...if you're going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
your X by his name.

"I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
say, 'what the hell.'"

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: rmordenassoc@rogers.com ; info@gg.ca ; brian.macdonald@bellaliant.net ;
James.Spurr ; Randy.McGinnis ; rob.lafrance@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ;
Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; Gilles. Blinn ;
gilles.moreau ; danfour ; JAF@UNB.ca ; oldmaison@yahoo.com ; mcappe@irpp.org
Cc: Mackap ; david.alward@gnb.ca ; DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca ; pm ; robin reid
; tim. porter ; tony ; infomorning ; treasurer@do.treas.gov ;
madd_professor@cox.net
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 7:33 PM
Subject: I bet the GG David Johnston and his RCMP members remember this
email EH Reid M

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:48:06 -0400
Subject: Professor Johnston I suspect I will be suing the Crown before
you can advise Mr Harper to finally act ethically
To: president@uwaterloo.ca

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Nov 7, 2007 11:10 PM
Subject: Fwd: Brian My cell # is 506 434 1379 feel free to use it ASAP
or say Hoka Hey to Petey Mackay for me will ya?
To: damian.brooks@gmail.com


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Nov 7, 2007 6:56 PM
Subject: Brian My cell # is 506 434 1379 feel free to use it ASAP or
say Hoka Hey to Petey Mackay for me will ya?
To: brian@brian-macdonald.ca


Contact Brian
http://www.brian-macdonald.com/contact/
Cellular: 440-5566

Office: 472-4894, 472-7426 (140 King St, Fredericton)

Email: brian@brian-macdonald.ca

For information:
Fredericton: 472-4894
Minto: 327-3996
Oromocto: 357-8878

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos < david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Oct 17, 2007 7:30 PM
Subject: I tried to talked to you today lady before you were well paid
to preach to Canadian kids
To: info@helencaldicott.com

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos < david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:05:11 -0500
Subject: This just a small portion of one wiretap tape Ralph my
matters are pretty serious eh?
To: racarr@nbnet.nb.ca

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 19:59:52 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Welcome to the Big Big Game Det. Louie LaFleur of Fat
Fred City Finest Do ya think Mr. Dion and his pal Dizzy Lizzie May are
paying attention yet?
To: impolitic@rogers.com, wgilmour@pdclawyers.ca ,
lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca, william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca , days1@parl.gc.ca, day.s@parl.gc.ca,
warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, derek.strong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Raymond Amos < davidramos333@yahoo.ca>
Date: Jun 16, 2007 2:40 AM
Subject: Welcome to the Big Big Game Det. Louie LaFleur of Fat Fred City
Finest Do ya think Mr. Dion and his pal Dizzy Lizzie May are paying
attention yet?
To: fbinhct@leo.gov, Easter.W@parl.gc.ca, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca,
bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com, bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, days1@parl.gc.ca ,
day.s@parl.gc.ca, jonesr@cbc.ca, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca, Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca ,
Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca, Casey.B@parl.gc.ca,
Comuzzi.J@parl.gc.ca, Thibault.L@parl.gc.ca, Arthur.A@parl.gc.ca,
Sandra.Conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca , complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca,
wgilmour@pdclawyers.ca, moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca, kennyco@sen.parl.gc.ca,
gautht@sen.parl.gc.ca, zimmer@sen.parl.gc.ca, louiselorefice@ndp.ca ,
leader@greenparty.ca, defence@sen.parl.gc.ca, atkinn@sen.parl.gc.ca,
dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca, Clabchuk@greenparty.ca, maychair@dal.ca,
kmcgowan@greenparty.ns.ca , juan.behrend@europeangreens.org
Cc: whistleblower@ctv.ca, tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com ,
John.Ferguson@saintjohn.ca, wrscott@nbpower.com, dhay@nbpower.com,
arsenault_chris@hotmail.com, bill.corby@gnb.ca, lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca,
Kathy.Alchorn@fredericton.ca , Kim.Quartermain@fredericton.ca,
Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca, Danny.Copp@fredericton.ca ,
forest@conservationcouncil.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca,
abel.leblanc@gnb.ca, jonesr@cbc.ca

I am not within your jurisdiction nor do I plan to come back until it is
time to argue mr harper and his cohorts in Federal Court however I may drag
some of you dudes or your lawyers back down to the USA with me to answer me
in the Second Circuit of the USA as to your involvement in the cover up of
many Yankee crimes.

I do not have to answer any questions put to me by Fat Fred Fity 's
Finest about whatever it is you may wish to know about my doings with the
RCMP but you corrupt city cops must certainly answer someday to your support
and cover up of my false imprisonment in the USA years ago.

Louie tell me honestly if you can find it in your soul to do so, why
did you laugh and make fun of my plight? I gave you a fair and square chance
to act ethically. i sent you a lot of material byway of this email address
and i sent it only to you just in case you would act ethically. Now I must
ask were you born an arsehole or did you work at it your whole life? What if
this shit had happened to you? What would you think of you if you were I?
Do you and Chucky Leblanc and the crook Alan MacFee have that sinking
feeling that you pissed off the wrong Maritimer yet or do you think i am the
ultimate loser? If i do lose bigtime I will you sleep at night knowing the
part you played in my demise? If a sudden fit of integrity overcomes you
say hey to your bosses Barry MacKnight, Insp Kelly and S/Sgt Copp for me
will ya and have them provide you with the file that the Police Commission
gave your god damned police force three years ago and start doing some
serious work for a change, will ya? Rest assured a lot has happened since.

The chickenshit S/Sgt Kathy Alchorn can say hey to the not so scary
spooks Norm Plourde and Kevin Jackson and Mikey Guitar and the Louie
Lefebvre character (his name sounds like yours Louie) for me as well. The
very shy S/Sgt. Kim Quartermain can tell the crook MacPhee that I will send
a buddy around to pick up my bike. I will look forward to meeting all you
bastards
in court someday but I must remain true to my word and sue Harper first.

Whereas Herménégilde Chiasson, Lieutenant Governor of New
Brunswick, just appointed Acting S/Sgt. Kim Quartermain, S/Sgt. Kathy
Alchorn, S\Sgt. Brian Ford and D/Chief Leanne Fitch of the Fredericton
Police
Force, as Honorary Aides-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick
to guard him and the mean old Maison from the likes of me and Chucky
Leblanc,
they should have no trouble locating all the documents and CDs that I have
been
serving upon all the crooks in and around that house for years.

If you don't believe me just scroll down and find the words of
the former Governor General. While you are reading and listening to this
crap consider what "Al" may do next. As you listen again to the portion of
just one police surveilance tape know that I will him and a couple of his
friends a complete copy of 139 and a few more even if I am falsely
imprisoned again A buddy or two jusst has to drop my material into the mail.
Never forget the nutbag blogger Chucky Leblanc has a complete set of
documents and a CD from 2004 that he did not give to Brad Green as he
promised. Depupty Dog in one of his rants has already informed me that "Al"
is pissed off. It is likely just his usual bullshit but if it were true I
would say Good. Shame on you all and Cya'll in Court.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

Whereas Mr Scott the spin doctor for NB Power and John Ferguson of Saint
John both commented that they enjoyed what I said on the dumb Tom Young's
talk radio show over a year ago on Ground Hog Day I will send it again.
Maybe Andre Arthur will enjoy it too. N'est Pas?


*David Raymond Amos <davidramos333@yahoo.ca>* wrote:

Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 23:37:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Raymond Amos <davidramos333@yahoo.ca>
Subject: Fwd: I called you again today Gilmour. Who is more of a chickenshit
you or your new cop client Ken Smith? Sprout some balls will ya and call me
back
To: Christopherson.D@parl.gc.ca , Williams.J@parl.gc.ca,
Wrzesnewskyj.B@parl.gc.ca , Doyle.N@parl.gc.ca, Jennings.M@parl.gc.ca



*David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com >* wrote:

Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 22:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: I called you again today Gilmour. Who is more of a chickenshit you
or your new cop client Ken Smith? Sprout some balls will ya and call me back
To: wGilmour@ProuseDash.ca, dohertylaw@rogers.com, premier@gnb.ca,
abel.leblanc@gnb.ca, t.j.burke@gnb.ca, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca ,
pierre_nollet@cbc.ca, susan_king@cbc.ca, dan_goodyear@cbc.ca,
allan_white@cbc.ca, mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com,
execdir@nblib.nb.ca, mleger@stu.ca , jwalker@stu.ca, plee@stu.ca,
carleton@stu.ca, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca , oldmaison@yahoo.com,
John.Foran@gnb.ca, kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca, Byron < alltrue@nl.rogers.com>,
samperrier@hotmail.com
CC: bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, days1@parl.gc.ca , day.s@parl.gc.ca,
warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, derek.strong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Aurele.Daigle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Roger.Gillies@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, John.DeWinter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
samperrier@hotmail.com, lorraineroche@gov.nl.ca, deanr0032@hotmail.com ,
bill.corby@gnb.ca, police@fredericton.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca,
fbinhct@leo.gov, Easter.W@parl.gc.ca

506 434 1379

Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 20:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: So much for the Integrity of the RCMP EH Bevy Baby Busson?
To: bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, days1@parl.gc.ca, day.s@parl.gc.ca,
warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ,
Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, derek.strong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Aurele.Daigle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Roger.Gillies@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, John.DeWinter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
samperrier@hotmail.com, lorraineroche@gov.nl.ca, alltrue@nl.rogers.com ,
kmdickson0308@yahoo.com, deanr0032@hotmail.com, bill.corby@gnb.ca,
police@fredericton.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, t.j.burke@gnb.ca,
John.Foran@gnb.ca, fbinhct@leo.gov, Easter.W@parl.gc.ca,
alan_white@cbc.ca, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
John.Ferguson@saintjohn.ca, Ivan.Court@saintjohn.ca,
Christopher.Titus@saintjohn.ca, thespur@hotmail.com, lisah@whooshnet.com,
dougchristie@shaw.ca , lawald@web.net
CC: xzone@xzone-radio.com, brinson6@telus.net, wespenre@illuminati.ca,
choose2reason@yahoo.com, rwnicholson@rwnicholson.com,
starchamber@sasktel.net, JDHOOK@cox.net, Tim.Porter@gnb.ca,
news@politicswatch.com, investor@dundeebancorp.com,
webadmin@justice.gc.ca, info@tbs-sct.gc.ca, dtennant@mccarthy.ca ,
2026@gnb.ca, Brendan.Langille@gnb.ca, Martin.Paul@parl.gc.ca,
Owen.S@parl.gc.ca, Steckle.P@parl.gc.ca, steckp@parl.gc.ca,
McGuire.J@parl.gc.ca, Peterson.J@parl.gc.ca, Bonin.R@parl.gc.ca,
Karetak-Lindell.N@parl.gc.ca, Chamberlain.B@parl.gc.ca , dbrown@dwpv.com,
BCarr-Harris@blgcanada.com, McTeague.D@parl.gc.ca,
info@politicswatch.com, Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca, Baird.J@parl.gc.ca,
Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca, McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca, Dhalla.R@parl.gc.ca,
Casey.B@parl.gc.ca, Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca, Holland.M@parl.gc.ca,
wickedwanda3@adelphia.net, madd_professor@cox.net, Iolmisha@cs.com ,
derrickcrobinson@gmail.com, khr909@hotmail.com, erniemusic2@yahoo.com,
kevin_annett@hotmail.com, radical@radicalpress.com

Just Dave <http://davidamos.blogspot.com/>
By Location *Visit Detail**
Visit 1,079
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 199.212.150.# (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)
ISP Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Location
Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language unknown
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 6.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0;
Windows NT 5.1; INFOWEB-APPROVED; INFOWEB-APPROVED-IE6-EN; .
NET CLR 1.1.4322)
Javascript disabled
Time of Visit May 30 2007 11:49:18 am
Last Page View May 30 2007 11:54:27 am
Visit Length 5 minutes 9 seconds
Page Views 3
Referring URL unknown
Visit Entry Page http://www.davidamos.blogspot.com/
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Out Click
Time Zone unknown
Visitor's Time Unknown
Visit Number 1,079

Just Dave <http://davidamos.blogspot.com/>
By Location *Visit Detail**
Visit 1,078
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 199.212.150.# (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)
ISP Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Location
Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language unknown
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 6.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0;
Windows NT 5.1; INFOWEB-APPROVED; INFOWEB-APPROVED-IE6-EN; .
NET CLR 1.1.4322)
Javascript disabled
Time of Visit May 30 2007 9:29:25 am
Last Page View May 30 2007 9:29:25 am
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL unknown
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Out Click
Time Zone unknown
Visitor's Time Unknown
Visit Number 1,078

Just Dave http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 1,032
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 159.33.10.#(Canadian Broadcasting Corporation)
ISP Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Location
Continent : North America
Country :Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 6.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 16 bits
Time of Visit May 25 2007 8:06:36 am
Last Page View
May 25 2007 8:06:36 am
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.blogger.com/profile/7645241
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Out Click
Time Zone
UTC-4:00
>
Visitor's Time May 25 2007 8:06:36 am
Visit Number 1,032

N.B. government to await federal probe into possible RCMP wrongdoing May 30,
2007 - 19:47

By: KEVIN BISSETT
FREDERICTON (CP) - New Brunswick Attorney General T.J. Burke declined
comment Wednesday on allegations of wrongdoing within the provincial RCMP.
At least two current and former Mounties in the province are among more than
a dozen officers across the country who have alleged wrongdoing within the
force, including abuse of power, harassment and the coverup of evidence.
One of the published allegations was made by Daniel Bernier, a former RCMP
corporal who lives near Fredericton. He claims he was removed from an
investigation in which he said he found evidence of the misuse of federal
funds by New Brunswick government officials in 1999.
He alleges grants were wrongly approved to farmers.
Once he was removed from the case, Bernier said an internal investigation by
the RCMP was called into his conduct.
"Our government doesn't respond to allegations," Burke said Wednesday when
asked by reporters about the claims published this week.
"We respond to factual information that is provided to us, information that
we need to investigate and look at."
William Gilmour, an Ontario lawyer representing some of the Mounties who
made the allegations, said the current and former members are anxious to
tell their stories, but there must be protection from reprisal.
"We're actively seeking the government to afford a venue in the nature of a
parliamentary committee, where there's some protection for these people,
where they have agreed to come forward and tell their stories," he said
Wednesday.
Gilmour, who is an ex-Mountie, said he has been trying to get the federal
government to call his clients before such a committee for a year, but so
far nothing has happened.
In the Commons on Wednesday, Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day was
accused by the opposition of ignoring the turmoil.
"The Conservative public safety minister's response is to shrug his
shoulders, plug his ears and see no evil, hear no evil," said Liberal Sue
Barnes.
"Is this wilful blindness or gross negligence? When it comes to protecting
the integrity of Canada's national police, why is the public safety minister
thwarting real action?"
Day responded by saying the government is "taking action to get to the
bottom of some of the concerns that have been raised."
Another New Brunswick Mountie, Staff Sgt. Ken Smith, is suing senior
officers at J Division in Fredericton for alleged harassment, but the New
Brunswick government has stepped in and stayed proceedings.
The province has asked the Fredericton police force to fully investigate the
Smith case, which includes allegations of unauthorized use of tracking
devices on his police vehicle.
"For the 30 years that I have had with the police force, my job has been to
go out and investigate crime," Smith said. "To find that we have just as
much crime happening within our organization, which is stopping us from
doing our job, is very troubling for me and for the individuals who have
come forward."
Bernier said he's not surprised to hear that as many as 30 current and
former Mounties would be willing to testify before a parliamentary
committee.
"The country of Canada is quite vast and the RCMP is all over the place, and
I'm sure I'm not the only one who has been treated like a piece of shit,"
Bernier said.
Gilmour said the appointment of a new RCMP commissioner with the mandate to
fix the problems in the force could prevent having to launch an inquiry or
royal commission.
In the meantime, he said, the reputation of the force is taking a beating.
"That's really quite unfair to the members on the street who are performing
such a valuable function and putting their lives at risk every day," said
Gilmour. "They don't deserve that and it needs to be dealt with far sooner
than later."

Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 16:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: Dirty Dickie Dean hates us all for one reason Sam. Methinks it is
because he is the FED. What say you Bev Busson?
To: samperrier@hotmail.com , alltrue@nl.rogers.com, kmdickson0308@yahoo.com,
deanr0032@hotmail.com, bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, derek.strong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, bill.corby@gnb.ca, police@fredericton.ca,
carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, t.j.burke@gnb.ca, John.Foran@gnb.ca,
Aurele.Daigle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Roger.Gillies@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
John.DeWinter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, fbinhct@leo.gov, Easter.W@parl.gc.ca,
days1@parl.gc.ca, day.s@parl.gc.ca, alan_white@cbc.ca,
jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
John.Ferguson@saintjohn.ca, Ivan.Court@saintjohn.ca,
Christopher.Titus@saintjohn.ca , lorraineroche@gov.nl.ca
CC: xzone@xzone-radio.com, brinson6@telus.net, wespenre@illuminati.ca,
choose2reason@yahoo.com, rwnicholson@rwnicholson.com,
starchamber@sasktel.net, JDHOOK@cox.net, Tim.Porter@gnb.ca,
news@politicswatch.com, investor@dundeebancorp.com,
webadmin@justice.gc.ca, info@tbs-sct.gc.ca, dtennant@mccarthy.ca ,
2026@gnb.ca, Brendan.Langille@gnb.ca, Martin.Paul@parl.gc.ca,
Owen.S@parl.gc.ca, Steckle.P@parl.gc.ca, steckp@parl.gc.ca,
McGuire.J@parl.gc.ca, Peterson.J@parl.gc.ca, Bonin.R@parl.gc.ca,
Karetak-Lindell.N@parl.gc.ca, Chamberlain.B@parl.gc.ca , dbrown@dwpv.com,
BCarr-Harris@blgcanada.com, McTeague.D@parl.gc.ca,
info@politicswatch.com, Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca, Baird.J@parl.gc.ca,
Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca, McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca, Dhalla.R@parl.gc.ca,
Casey.B@parl.gc.ca, Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca, Holland.M@parl.gc.ca,
wickedwanda3@adelphia.net, madd_professor@cox.net, Iolmisha@cs.com ,
derrickcrobinson@gmail.com, khr909@hotmail.com, erniemusic2@yahoo.com,
kevin_annett@hotmail.com, radical@radicalpress.com, thespur@hotmail.com,
lisah@whooshnet.com , dougchristie@shaw.ca, lawald@web.net

I must say your silence has been deafening for a lady acting as the
Commissioner for the Crown Corp commonly know as the RCMP. It has been six
months since you took over from the mean nasty old Zack and you are not one
bit more ethical. How else can you be so quiet particularly with all the
scandals breaking out daily about the RCMP?

I hear that the crook Rod Smith who was supposed to advise everyone
how to be ethical retired just in a nick of time after he and I had a little
pow wow on the phone. I was not surprised that you shitcanned Zack's old
assistant Mikey MacDonald in your office and that you replaced him with your
own nomind assistant Pierre Leduc. It was too funny that he has the same
last name as the nasty dude that finally answered me from the Commission of
Public Complaints Against the RCMP after five long years of pure hell for my
little Clan. Why don't one of you just tell the truth, the whole truth and
nothing but the truth just like you are supposed to do and let the political
cards fall where they may? Qiut the false allegation game will ya? It is
getting a little redundant, don't ya think?

I sure hope some cop blows the whistle bigtime real soon but I ain't
betting on it. However I will lays odds that the only ones to respond to
this email will be the nasty Yankee Depupty Dog and his little buddy Dirty
Dickie Dean with more of their Bullshit. That said I have no doubt you
crooks are just wondering who I send this email to next and when i will Blog
it. Right? (Its already done scroll down to the bottom do ya think the new
Accountability Commissioner will find it first?

Say hey to the crooked NSIS agents Norm Plourde, (AKA "Porcupine
Prique" ) and his pals, Cpl Jackson and Sean Lowe for me will ya Dirty
Dickie Dean?

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
506 434 1379

Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 13:36:41 -0400
From: "PCC Complaints" < complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
To: <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com >

May 23, 2007
File No. PC-2005-1291

Mr. David R Amos

motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

Dear Mr. Amos:

On a number of occasions you have called or sent e-mails our office to raise
matters which are of pressing concern to you.

Each time we have tried to respond by explaining to you the relatively
narrow mandate of this Commission and the limits of our powers to deal with
the matters which are of concern to you. I must stress, once again, that
the purpose of this Commission is to provide the public with an opportunity
to make complaints concerning the conduct of members of the RCMP in the
performance of their duties. We have neither the expertise nor the legal
authority to permit us to become involved in issues beyond the scope of this
mandate.

While it is clearly not the intention of the Commission to prevent you from
making complaints against members of the RCMP, an analysis of your numerous
contacts with the Commission indicates that your concerns fall well outside
the confines of our mandate. Further, your frequent e-mails have been
disruptive and unproductive for both you and for the staff of this office.

Should you determine that some point in the future you have a complaint
concerning the conduct of a member of the RCMP in the performance of his or
her duties, please submit it to the Commission *by Canada Post only*. As of
now, your e-mails will be deleted unread.

Yours truly,

Andrée Leduc
Enquiries and Complaints Analyst

Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Say hey to Shawn Murphy for me will ya
Brian?
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 15:25:45 -0400
From: "REVIEWS" <reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com<

The Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP has received your
e-mail message and will be responding in due course.

La Commission des plaintes du public contre la GRC a reçu votre courriel et
vous rendra une réponse au moment opportun.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 03:29:59 -0300
Subject: Re Glen Greenwald and the Brazilian President Rousseff's
indignant tweets So Stevey Boy Harper your CSEC dudes and their NSA
pals no doubt know all about my conversation with the dudes from
Brazil last month Wheras the CBC and the Guardian etc want to know it
all we should share EH?
To: pm@pm.gc.ca, dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, rusun@un.int,
john.adams@queensu.ca, John.Forster@cse-cst.gc.ca,
td.ombudsman@td.com, christopher.montague@td.com,
Frank.McKenna@td.com, Glenn.Greenwald@guardian.co.uk,
info@praxisfilms.org, birgittaj@althingi.is,
ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk, steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca,
roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, ambassador@brasilemb.org,
slrc@itamaraty.gov.br, cuba@un.int, protocol@dn.mofa.go.jp,
japan.mission@dn.mofa.go.jp, protocol@s1.mofa.go.jp,
j.kroes@interpol.int, craig.dalton@forces.gc.ca, bairdj@parl.gc.ca,
MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca,
shy.winkfield@guardiannews.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca, justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca,
bginsberg@pattonboggs.com, RBauer@perkinscoie.com, justmin@gov.ns.ca,
rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca, rmordenassoc@rogers.com, merricra@gov.ns.ca,
stephen.m.cutler@jpmorgan.com, boston@ic.fbi.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, prenquiries@eiu.com,
mailbox@brasembottawa.org, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca,
newsroom@theguardian.pe.ca, criminal.division@usdoj.gov,
lachapelle.edith@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Janet.MacLean@international.gc.ca,
dfildebrandt@taxpayer.com, ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca,
themayor@calgary.ca, atlantic.director@taxpayer.com,
premier@gov.ab.ca, premier@gnb.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
jamiebaillie@gov.ns.ca, bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net,
nichor@parl.gc.ca, greg.weston@cbc.ca, Manon.Hardy@priv.gc.ca,
Dion.Mario@psic-ispc.gc.ca, csu@jesuits.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, Julian.Borger@guardian.co.uk

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/31/greece-imf-brazil-idUSL6N0G05GI20130731

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/24/brazil-president-un-speech-nsa-surveillance

http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/politics/story/1.1928147

https://mobile.twitter.com/dilmabr

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 03:14:34 -0300
Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

Hey

The sneaky ex CSIS dude Michelle Juneau-Katsuya was not wise to call
the President of Brazil a Prima Donna but what he said is true about
her merely playing politcs Everybody who wants to know can know what
happened between Brazil and I since early 2005. All they have to do is
ask me. If they don't believe me they can call the Boys from Brazil
and ask them if what I said in the video hereto attached or the
documents I to them and many other UN dudes long ago is true or false.
Trust that Stevey Harper, Franky McKenna and the rest of the
IMF/Bilderberger crowd ain't gonna tell anyone anything. EH Bobby
Bauer and Stevey Cutler?

The video is just a clip from a longer conversation with a good friend
weeks ago. Perhaps your snoopy minions in the RCMP/DND should be wise
to listen to it all if they haven't already EH?

Anyone can find that chat saved here

http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/index.php?dir=DavidAmos/

It is entitled as follows

2013-09-21 time 16_34_08 Incoming Peer-to-Peer Call david.raymond.amos


http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/index.php?dir=DavidAmos/


These are the cover letters for the documents I sent to the UN Dudes

http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/UN%20DUDES-txt.pdf

BTW Perhaps the times are a changing now that the stock market is
falling bigtime once again. Believe or not I am kinda sorta impressed
by the words of the latest Pope. I can'tbelieve a Jesuit would say
such things. Amazing things never cease.

The Dec 12th,2002 date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of
mine and the name of Cardinal Bernard Francis Law should mean a lot to
him if he truly has an ethical soul and is wise enough to ignore his
many lawyers.

http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Francis_Law

Law resigned as Archbishop of Boston on December 13, 2002, in response
to the Roman Catholic Church sex abuse scandal after church documents
were revealed which suggested he had covered up sexual abuse committed
by priests in his archdiocese.

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
1 902 800 0369

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <ambassador@brasilemb.org>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 7:04 PM
Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <slrc@itamaraty.gov.br>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 1:06 AM
Subject: Re A call back from the Embassy for Brazil in Washington from
(202 238 2770)


I just got your message now and called back I know it is off hours so
I left a voicemail attempting to explain my concerns. I am kinda hard
to get ahold of ask the NSA people listening to your Embassy and
reading this why that is necessary

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: magicJack <voicemail@notify.magicjack.com>
To: DAVID AMOS
Sent: Friday, September 6, 2013 10:07 AM
Subject: New VM (2) - 0:23 minutes in your magicJack mailbox from 2022382770

Dear magicJack User:

You received a new 0:23 minutes voicemail message, on Friday,
September 06, 2013 at 09:07:46 AM in mailbox 9028000369 from
2022382770.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:52:55 -0300
Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
To: slrc@itamaraty.gov.br
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <braun@delbrasonu.org>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 6:39 PM
Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <cuba@un.int>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 6:32 PM
Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <protocol@dn.mofa.go.jp>; <japan.mission@dn.mofa.go.jp>;
<protocol@s1.mofa.go.jp>; "j.kroes" <j.kroes@interpol.int>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 6:31 PM
Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?


The Permanent Mission of Japan to the United Nations
866 U.N. Plaza, 2nd Floor
New York, NY 10017
E-mail : japan.mission@dn.mofa.go.jp

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:11:03 -0300
Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
To: jicc@ws.mofa.go.jp
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:06:03 -0300
Subject: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the Boss
of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
To: rusun@un.int, bairdj <bairdj@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, MulcaT
<MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>,
"justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, bginsberg
<bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>, RBauer <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "craig.dalton"
<craig.dalton@forces.gc.ca>, dnd_mdn <dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca>

The document hereto attached is very real and I made certain that the
Russians remember what I sent all the G20 people in the UN within
August of 2005 Ask the warmongers John McCain if and his buddy Obama
or their lawyers Mr Bauer and Mr Ginsberg I am a liar or not

Address: 136 East 67 Street,
New York, N.Y. 10065
Phone: 1(212)861-4900;
1(212)861-4901;
FAX: 1(212)628-0252;

E-mail: rusun@un.int


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <ambassador@brasilemb.org>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 8:07 PM
Subject: Brazil and I just got cut off again here is what I was trying
to tell you folks

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <Glenn.Greenwald@guardian.co.uk>; <info@praxisfilms.org>;
"birgittaj" <birgittaj@althingi.is>; "ed.pilkington"
<ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>; "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>; "roger.l.brown"
<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "shy.winkfield"
<shy.winkfield@guardiannews.com>; "oldmaison" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>;
"sallybrooks25" <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>; "Mordaith"
<Mordaith@gmail.com>; <wayne.lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>; <david.alward@gnb.ca>; <nancy.forbes@gnb.ca>;
<judith.keating@gnb.ca>; <luc.labonte@gnb.ca>;
<marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>; <wishart.john@dailygleaner.com>;
"macpherson.don" <macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>; "ian.fahie"
<ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <david.eidt@gnb.ca>;
<Richard.Williams@gnb.ca>; <ddelaquis@cldglaw.com>;
<cfawcett@lawsoncreamer.com>; "Mackap" <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>; "premier"
<premier@gnb.ca>; "bernadine.chapman"
<bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "john.warr"
<john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "jennifer.johnston"
<jennifer.johnston@gov.bc.ca>; "t.wilson" <t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
"radical" <radical@radicalpress.com>; "maryann4peace"
<maryann4peace@gmail.com>; "police" <police@fredericton.ca>;
<kselick@canadianconstitutionfoundation.ca>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "glen"
<glen@glencanning.com>; "ddexter" <ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca>; "justmin"
<justmin@gov.ns.ca>; "rmellish" <rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca>;
"rmordenassoc" <rmordenassoc@rogers.com>; "merricra"
<merricra@gov.ns.ca>; "stephen.m.cutler"
<stephen.m.cutler@jpmorgan.com>; "StephenMcNeil"
<StephenMcNeil@ns.aliantzinc.ca>; "jamiebaillie"
<jamiebaillie@gov.ns.ca>; <Brian.Topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
"Ian.Shardlow" <Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "msegal" <msegal@murraysegal.com>;
<DANIEL.POULIN@chrc-ccdp.ca>; <abromberg@bnaibrith.ca>;
<habrams@pacificcoast.net>; "ndesrosiers" <ndesrosiers@ccla.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 11:17 PM
Subject: Re: Snowden ain't got nothing on mean old me when it comes to
dealing with corrupt Feds and keeping one's Integrity as well


http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/fwd-snowden-aint-got-nothing-on-mean.html

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/fwd-if-murray-segal-were-to-conduct.html

On 8/18/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <Glenn.Greenwald@guardian.co.uk>; <info@praxisfilms.org>;
"birgittaj" <birgittaj@althingi.is>; "ed.pilkington"
<ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>; "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>; "roger.l.brown"
<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>;
<DANIEL.POULIN@CHRC-CCDP.CA>; <abromberg@bnaibrith.ca>;
<habrams@pacificcoast.net>; "ndesrosiers" <ndesrosiers@ccla.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 10:54 PM
Subject: Snowden ain't got nothing on mean old me when it comes to
dealing with corrupt Feds and keeping one's Integrity as well


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:40:18 -0300
Subject: YO FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers I just called your
office and the nasty Yankee played dumb as usual
To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"
<Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov,
us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney
<jcarney@carneybassil.com>, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, birgittaj
<birgittaj@althingi.is>, shmurphy@globe.com, Red Ice Creations
<redicecreations@gmail.com>

Clearly I am not joking

Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 19,571
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 153.31.113.# (FBI Criminal Justice Information Systems)
ISP FBI Criminal Justice Information Systems
Location Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : West Virginia
City : Clarksburg
Lat/Long : 39.2664, -80.3097 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; InfoPath.2;
.NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; MS-RTC
LM 8; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 800 x 600
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Jun 12 2013 5:00:01 pm
Last Page View Jun 12 2013 5:00:01 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.google.co...YIZDuTIWsfuPUhflswCk
Search Engine google.com
Search Words jp morgan and "andrew kosloff"
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...-stewart-and-me.html
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...-stewart-and-me.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Jun 12 2013 4:00:01 pm
Visit Number 19,571

On 6/15/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> FBI Boston
> One Center Plaza
> Suite 600
> Boston, MA 02108
> Phone: (617) 742-5533
> Fax: (617) 223-6327
> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>
> Hours
> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
> office at (617) 742-5533.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney <jcarney@carneybassil.com>,
> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, michael wolfheart
> <wolfheartlodge@live.com>, jonathan.albano@bingham.com,
> shmurphy@globe.com, mvalencia@globe.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, oldmaison
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>
> http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/06/05/james-whitey-bulger-jury-selection-process-enters-second-day/KjS80ofyMMM5IkByK74bkK/story.html
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>
> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>
> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
> cards?
>
> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>
> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>
> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
> Senator Arlen Specter
> United States Senate
> Committee on the Judiciary
> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
> Washington, DC 20510
>
> Dear Mr. Specter:
>
> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
> raised in the attached letter.
>
> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>
> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>
> Very truly yours,
> Barry A. Bachrach
> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> To: "Fred.Wyshak" <Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov>; "jcarney"
> <jcarney@carneybassil.com>; <Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov>;
> <us.marshals@usdoj.gov>
> Cc: <edit@thr.com>; "maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>;
> "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 11:50 AM
> Subject: So Fred Wyshak has Brian Kelly and the rest of the corrupt
> Feds practiced the spirit of fill disclosure with Jay Carney??
>
> If so then why didn't Mr Carney return my phone calls last July???
>
> http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2012/01/09/bulger_lawyers_due_in_court_for_update_on_evidence/
>
> http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/lawyer_known_as_patron_saint_of_hopeless_cases_is_representing_whitey_bulge/
>
> http://bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/2011_0625lawyer_tab_is_in_billys_court_feds_believe_brother_should_shell_out_for_defense
>
> http://articles.boston.com/2011-07-01/news/29726987_1_jay-carney-bulger-brookline-clinics
>
> http://carneybassil.com/team/carney/
>
> Truth is stranger than fiction. Perhaps Ben Affleck and Matt Damon a
> couple of boyz from Beantown who done good will pay attention to mean
> old me someday EH?
>
> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/ben-affleck-matt-damon-whitey-bulger-254994
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> SOMEBODY SHOULD ASK THE CBC AND THE COPS A VERY SIMPLE QUESTION.
>
> WHY was Byron Prior and I banned from parliamentry properties while I
> running for a seat in parliament in 2004 2 whole YEARS before the
> mindless nasty French Bastard Chucky Leblanc was barred in NB and yet
> the CBC, the Fat Fred City Finest and the RCMP still deny anything
> ever happened to this very day even though Chucky and his pals have
> blogged about it???
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2006/06/20/nb-bloggerbanned20060620.html
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-fat-fred-citys-finest.html
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/04/david-amos-nb-nwo-whistleblower-part-3.html
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/07/feds-institutionalize-determined-nb.html
>
> Did anybody bother to listen to me explain things to the Police
> Commissioners in 2004?
>
> http://archive.org/details/NewBrunswickPoliceCommission
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 21:56:57 -0300
> Subject: Re Yankee Feds Please allow me to be brief with the crooks in
> Wikileaks and the Guardian EH Birgitta and Ed Pilkington?
> To: "Fred.Wyshak" <Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov>, "john.warr"
> <john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, redicecreations@gmail.com, birgittaj
> <birgittaj@althingi.is>, Piratar <piratar@pirateparty.is>,
> "ed.pilkington" <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>, janice.smith@cbc.ca,
> camilla.inderberg@cbc.ca, "david.akin" <david.akin@sunmedia.ca>,
> Alan.Dark@cbc.ca, newsonline <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>, "John.Williamson"
> <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, aih <aih@cbc.ca>,
> news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
> <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/09/edward-snowden-nsa-whistleblower-surveillance
>
> "Snowden will go down in history as one of America's most
> consequential whistleblowers, alongside Daniel Ellsberg and Bradley
> Manning. He is responsible for handing over material from one of the
> world's most secretive organisations - the NSA."
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 4:04 PM
> Subject: Ed Here is your ticket to keep you out of hot water Just send
> this to Hugh Grant and he can raise hell for you
>
> Byway of the US FTC the Feds in many countries can never deny that
> they did not know the truth long ago
>
> From: Ed Pilkington <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>
> Subject: GUARDIAN
> To: myson333@yahoo.com
> Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 11:42 AM
>
> hi
>
> here's my email and my cell number is below
>
> all best
>
> Ed
>
> --
> Ed Pilkington
> New York bureau chief
> The Guardian
> www.guardian.co.uk
> twitter.com/Edpilkington
>
> Cell: 646 704 1264
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Visit guardian.co.uk - newspaper of the year
> www.guardian.co.uk www.observer.co.uk
>
> On your mobile, visit m.guardian.co.uk or download the Guardian
> iPhone app www.guardian.co.uk/iphone
>
> To save up to 30% when you subscribe to the Guardian and the Observer
> visit www.guardian.co.uk/subscriber
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This e-mail and all attachments are confidential and may also
> be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify
> the sender and delete the e-mail and all attachments immediately.
> Do not disclose the contents to another person. You may not use
> the information for any purpose, or store, or copy, it in any way.
>
> Guardian News & Media Limited is not liable for any computer
> viruses or other material transmitted with or as part of this
> e-mail. You should employ virus checking software.
>
> Guardian News & Media Limited
>
> A member of Guardian Media Group plc
> Registered Office
> PO Box 68164
> Kings Place
> 90 York Way
> London
> N1P 2AP
>
> Registered in England Number 908396
>
> THE GUARDIAN MUST REMEMBER ME EH EDDY BABY???
>
> Click on this link
>
> http://50states.ning.com/video/rcmp-sussex-new-brunswick
>
> OR SCROLL DOWN TO ASSURE YOURSELF THAT WIKILEAKS OR THE CROWN CORPS
> KNOWN AS THE CBC AND THE RCMP TO NAME ONLY THREE CAN NEVER DENY THAT
> THEY DON'T KNOW ALL ABOUT MEAN OLD ME AND MY CONCERNS
>
> HOWCOME FOR 10 YEARS PUBLIC OFFICIALS IN THE USA CANADA ICELAND
> ENGLAND AND ALL THE OTHERS WITHIN "COALITION OF THE WILLING" ETC
> IGNORED THE FACT THAT I HAVE HAD MANY YANKEE WIRETAP TAPES THAT COULD
> HAVE IMPEACHED GEORGEY BOY BUSH AND HIS COHORTS LONG BEFORE THE
> PATRIOT ACT OR THE WAR ON IRAQ BEGAN???
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>
>
> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
> Senator Arlen Specter
> United States Senate
> Committee on the Judiciary
> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
> Washington, DC 20510
>
> Dear Mr. Specter:
>
> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
> raised in the attached letter.
>
> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>
> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>
> Very truly yours,
> Barry A. Bachrach
> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>
> http://joyb.blogspot.ca/2010/11/my-statement-from-nato-parliamentary.html
>
> http://50states.ning.com/video/rcmp-sussex-new-brunswick
>
> http://www.nycga.net/members/davidraymondamos/
>
>> From: David Amos
>> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 23:22:00 -0300
>> Subject: i just called from 902 800 0369 (Nova Scotia)
>> To: 9.17occupywallstreet@gmail.com
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-...
>>
>> I am the guy the SEC would not name that is the link to Madoff and
>> Putnam Investments
>>
>> http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hear...
>>
>> Notice the transcript and webcast of the hearing of the US Senate
>> banking Commitee is missing? please notice Eliot Spitzer and the Dates
>> around November 20th, 2003 in te following file
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-righ...
>>
>> From: "Julian Assange)"
>> Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 18:15:46 +0000 (GMT)
>> Subject: Al Jazeera on Iceland's plan for a press safe haven
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> FYI: Al-Jazeera's take on Iceland's proposed media safe haven
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbGiPjIE1pE
>>
>> More info http://immi.is/
>>
>> Julian Assange
>> Editor
>> WikiLeaks
>> http://wikileaks.org/
>>
>>
>> From: Birgitta Jonsdottir
>> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:14:02 +0000
>> Subject: Re: Bon Soir Birgitta according to my records this is the
>> first email I ever sent you
>> To: David Amos
>>
>> dear Dave
>> i have got your email and will read through the links as soon as i
>> find some time
>> keep up the good fight in the meantime
>>
>> thank you for bearing with me
>> i am literary drowning in requests to look into all sorts of matters
>> and at the same time working 150% work at the parliament and
>> the creation of a political movement and being a responsible parent:)
>> plus all the matters in relation to immi
>>
>> with oceans of joy
>> birgitta
>>
>> Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are
>> not.
>>
>> Andre Gide
>>
>> Birgitta Jonsdottir
>> Birkimelur 8, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland, tel: 354 692 8884
>> http://this.is/birgitta - http://joyb.blogspot.com -
>> http://www.facebook.com/birgitta.jonsdottir
>>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Henrik Palmgren <redicecreations@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:46:26 +0200
> Subject: Re: Oh my my I guess we know the score on you EH?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Oh my. Don't send me your spam. It's not good for anything.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 17:27:53 -0300
> Subject: Re Teddy Baby Olson was on Fox News today yapping about
> Presidential enemies list as he represents the crooks in Koch
> Industries??? If anyone should know about such things it is Olson
> after all he assisted Ashcroft and Bush against me
> To: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Office@tigta.treas.gov, RBauer@perkinscoie.com,
> mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov, "Gilles.Moreau"
> <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, ron.klain@revolution.com,
> dboies@bsfllp.com, tolson@gibsondunn.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com,
> "ed.pilkington" <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>, news
> <news@thetelegraph.com.au>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
> rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com, gregory.craig@skadden.com,
> Patrick.Fitzgerald@skadden.com
>
> Hey
>
> As Harper sits and bullshits his cohorts in the Council of Foreign
> Relations in the Big Apple today I bet he was listening to what was
> happening with Obama and the IRS and Holder and his DOJ minions
> in Washington.
>
> Notice the Inspector General of the IRS Dudes within this old file?
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/9092510/Chicago
>
> Everybody and his dog knows Harper knew about my battles with the US
> Treasury and Justice Depts way back when he was the boss of the
> opposition in Canada's Parliament. Two simple files easily found on
> the Internet cannot be argued.
>
> Notice how old the letter and Form 211 are?
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/5-years-waiting-on-bank-fraud-payout.html
>
> Here the Inspector Generals calling me 7 years ago?
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
>
> FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Office of Chief Counsel, Treasury.
> Inspector General for Tax Administration, (202) 622-4068.
>
> When Teddy bitches about polticians using the IRS to attack their
> enemies because he knows it true because he helped Bush the IRS
> against me when Obama was just a State Senator .
>
> The proof was when I sent him the documents that came along with the letter
> found on page 13 of this old file Teddy Baby Olson quit as Solicitor General.
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>
> Harper and every body else knows It was no coincidence that I sent the
> lawyers Olson as Solicitior General, Ferguson as the co chair of the
> Federal Reserve Bank, and J Strom Thurmond Jr the youngest US
> Attorney the same pile of documents on April Fools Day 2004.
>
> The sad but terrible truth is that legions of cops, lawyers polticians
> and bureaucrats in Canada and the USA knew about the US Secret Service
> coming to my home after dark on April Fools Day 2003 bearing false
> allegations of a presidential threat and threatening to use their
> implied right to use exta ordinary rendition against me as a non
> citizen less than two weeks after the needless War in Iraq began and
> no WMD were ever found.
>
> You can bet dimes to dollars i called some Yankee Inspector Generals
> (starting with 202 622 4068) and reminded them that I am still alive
> and kicking and reminding the world of their malicious incompetence
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> PS Below you can review some emails I sent you and your Yankee cohorts
> such asTeddy Baby Olson before Obama was reelected EH Harper? In truth
> I would rather settle in confidence with Obama then sue the Hell out
> of the CROWN and the Holy See Trust that the evil old Judge Bastarache
> has known why for a very long time.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> To: "Rob Talach" <rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>
> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
> a lot to you
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400
> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW
> Bernadine Chapman??
> To: Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, phil.giles@statcan.ca,
> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca,
> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca,
> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca, webo
> <webo@xplornet.com>, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1
> <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>, "Nycole.Turmel" <Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca>,
> Clemet1 <Clemet1@parl.gc.ca>, maritime_malaise
> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, oig <oig@sec.gov>, whistleblower
> <whistleblower@finra.org>, whistle <whistle@fsa.gov.uk>, david
> <david@fairwhistleblower.ca>
> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "justin.trudeau.a1"
> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "Juanita.Peddle"
> <Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
> "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Robert.Trevors"
> <Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca>, "ian.fahie" <ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/news-nouvelles/media-medias-eng.htm
>
> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/Newsletters/VetsReview/nlnov06.pdf
>
> From: Gilles Moreau <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500
> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy
> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH
> Constable Peddle???
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails.
>
> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC
> Director General
> HR Transformation
> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502
> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
>
> Tel 613-843-6039
> Cel 613-818-6947
>
> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC
> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines
> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502
> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
>
> tél 613-843-6039
> cel 613-818-6947
> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>>>> David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> 2012-11-21 00:01 >>>
>
> Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its
> because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it
> yet
>
> Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the
> link to Madoff and Putnam Investments
>
> Here is why
>
> http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2
>
> Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate
> Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice
> Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the
> following file
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf
>
> NONE of you should have assisted in the cover up of MURDER CORRECT???
>
> http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2011/2011-06-22/html/sor-dors122-eng.html
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> To: <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>; <Rob.Renaud@cbc.ca>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:45 PM
> Subject: Question # 1 who the hell is Rob Renaus and di Robert Jone
> and Jaques Poitra and Alan white etc forward you my latest emails
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Edith Cody-Rice <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>
> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:53:07 -0500
> Subject: Calls and E-mails to CBC
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> Cc: Rob Renaud <Rob.Renaud@cbc.ca>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> CBC personnel have contacted me concerning your calls and e-mails to
> them. As you are threatening legal action, would you kindly direct any
> further calls or correspondence to me. Other CBC personnel will not
> respond further to your correspondence or calls.
>
>
> Edith Cody-Rice
> Senior Legal Counsel
> Premier Conseiller juridique
> CBC/Radio-Canada
> 181 Queen Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1K9
> Postal Address: P.O. Box 3220, Station C, Ottawa K1Y 1E4
> Tel: (613) 288-6164
> Cell: (613) 720-5185
> Fax/ Télécopieur (613) 288-6279
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE
> This communication is subject to solicitor/client privilege and
> contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) to
> whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, other
> distribution of this communication
> or taking any action on its contents is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this message in error, please notify us immediately and
> delete this message without reading, copying or forwarding it to
> anyone.
>
> AVIS IMPORTANT
> La présente communication est assujettie au privilège du secret
> professionnel de l'avocat et renferme des renseignements confidentiels
> intéressant uniquement leur destinataire. Il est interdit de
> divulguer, de copier ou de distribuer cette communication par quelque
> moyen que ce soit ou de donner suite à son contenu sans y être
> autorisé. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez nous en
> avertir immédiatement et le supprimer en évitant de le lire, de le
> copier ou de le transmettre à qui que ce soit.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400
> Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
> the USDOJ for me will ya?
> To: RBauer <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
> cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith <msmith@svlaw.com>, bginsberg
> <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>, "gregory.craig"
> <gregory.craig@skadden.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.rae"
> <bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, leader
> <leader@greenparty.ca>
> Cc: alevine@cooley.com, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
> michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 29,419
> Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
> IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
> ISP US Dept of Justice
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : District of Columbia
> City : Washington
> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
> DI60SP1001)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
> Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...wwWJrm94lCEqRmovPXJg
> Search Engine google.com
> Search Words david amos bernie madoff
> Visit Entry Page
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Visit Exit Page
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm
> Visit Number 29,419
>

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
To: <eachtem@hotmail.com>; <alltrue@nl.rogers.com>;
<deanr0032@hotmail.com>; <dean@law.ualberta.ca>; <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>;
<injusticecoalition@hotmail.com>; "Edith. Cody-Rice"
<Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>; "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>;
"kelly. lamrock" <kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca>; <oldmaison@yahoo.com>;
"Duane.Rousselle" <Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca>; "john.adams"
<john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca>; <mackay01@canada.com>;
<IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>; <deanray98@yahoo.ca>; "Dean.Buzza"
<Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <ahunter100@shaw.ca>; <t.j.burke@gnb.ca>;
"jackblood" <jackblood@hotmail.com>; "jack. keir" <jack.keir@gnb.ca>;
<David.ALWARD@gnb.ca>; "drywallrocker" <drywallrocker@hotmail.com>;
"shawn. graham" <shawn.graham@gnb.ca>; "shawn.howard"
<shawn.howard@wildrosealliance.ca>
Cc: <td.ombudsman@td.com>; "christopher. montague"
<christopher.montague@td.com>; "Frank. McKenna"
<Frank.McKenna@td.com>; "John.DeWinter" <John.DeWinter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 2:07 PM
Subject: Lets see if John Adams the current the CSE is clever enough
to put two and two together about the TD EH Franky Boy McKenna


----- Original Message -----
From: Ombudsman, Td
To: 'david.raymond.amos@gmail.com'
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 6:11 PM
Subject: your e-mails dated November 3, 2008

November 4, 2008

David Amos
P.O. Box 234
Apohaqui, NB
E5P 3G2

----------------------

Dear Mr. Amos:

We acknowledge receipt of your e-mails dated November 3, 2008, which
we received in our office on November 4, 2008.

We would like to thank you for providing our office with your feedback
surrounding the various issues. We have reviewed the numerous pieces
of correspondence that you e-mailed to us. It is our understanding
that you have a number of concerns surrounding politics and the
actions of the government within North America.

We appreciate the effort you have taken to express your views
surrounding these issues, however we do not believe we can be of any
assistance as this falls outside the mandate of this office.

Thank you for taking the time to bring your concerns to our attention.

Yours truly,

Paul W. Huyer

Ombudsman


*********************
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY
This communication including any information transmitted with it is
intended only for the use of the addressees and is confidential.
If you are not an intended recipient or responsible for delivering
the message to an intended recipient, any review, disclosure,
conversion to hard copy, dissemination, reproduction or other use
of any part of this communication is strictly prohibited, as is the
taking or omitting of any action in reliance upon this communication.
If you receive this communication in error or without authorization
please notify us immediately by return e-mail or otherwise and
permanently delete the entire communication from any computer,
disk drive, or other storage medium.

If the above disclaimer is not properly readable, it can be found at
www.td.com/legal

AVERTISSEMENT DE CONFIDENTIALITE
Ce courriel, ainsi que tout renseignement ci-inclus, destiné uniquement
aux destinataires susmentionnés, est confidentiel. Si vous
n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu ou un agent responsable de la
livraison de ce courriel, tout examen, divulgation, copie, impression,
reproduction, distribution, ou autre utilisation d'une partie de ce
courriel est strictement interdit de même que toute intervention ou
abstraction à cet égard. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur ou
sans autorisation, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par
retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen et supprimer immédiatement
cette communication entière de tout système électronique.

Si l'avis de non-responsabilité ci-dessus n'est pas lisible, vous
pouvez le consulter à www.td.com/francais/legale

Mr Bush thanked the Netherlands for its cooperation during his time in
office and particularly praised the Dutch presence in Afghanistan.
After the meeting, Mr Balkenende said he had spoken freely about
matters on which the two countries disagree, including climate policy
and the US detention facility for terrorist suspects at Guantánamo
Bay.

Mr Verhagen will also hold meetings with US Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice and close aides of presidential candidates John
McCain and Barack Obama. Mr Balkenende is attending the Bilderberg
Conference, the highly secretive annual meeting of the world's most
influential people, which is this year being held in Chantilly outside
Washington DC.
Article Continues
----------------
(Source: Infowars):
BILDERBERG MEETING - "Chantilly, Virginia, USA" - 5-8 June 2008 - LIST
OF PARTICIPANTS

Honorary Chairman
BEL "Davignon, Etienne" "Vice Chairman, Suez-Tractebel"

DEU "Ackermann, Josef" "Chairman of the Management Board and the Group
Executive Committee, Deutsche Bank AG"
CAN "Adams, John" Associate Deputy Minister of National Defence and
Chief of the Communications Security Establishment Canada
USA "Ajami, Fouad" "Director, Middle East Studies Program, The Paul H.
Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, The Johns Hopkins
University"
USA "Alexander, Keith B." "Director, National Security Agency"
INT "Almunia, Joaquín " "Commissioner, European Commission"
GRC "Alogoskoufis, George" Minister of Economy and Finance
USA "Altman, Roger C." "Chairman, Evercore Partners Inc."
TUR "Babacan, Ali " Minister of Foreign Affairs
NLD "Balkenende, Jan Peter" Prime Minister
PRT "Balsemão, Francisco Pinto" "Chairman and CEO, IMPRESA, S.G.P.S.;
Former Prime Minister"
FRA "Baverez, Nicolas" "Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP"
ITA "Bernabè, Franco" "CEO, Telecom Italia Spa"
USA "Bernanke, Ben S." "Chairman, Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System"
SWE "Bildt, Carl" Minister of Foreign Affairs
FIN "Blåfield, Antti " "Senior Editorial Writer, Helsingin Sanomat"
DNK "Bosse, Stine" "CEO, TrygVesta"
CAN "Brodie, Ian " "Chief of Staff, Prime Minister's Office"
AUT "Bronner, Oscar" "Publisher and Editor, Der Standard"
FRA "Castries, Henri de " "Chairman of the Management Board and CEO, AXA"
ESP "Cebrián, Juan Luis" "CEO, PRISA"
CAN "Clark, Edmund" "President and CEO, TD Bank Financial Group"
GBR "Clarke, Kenneth" Member of Parliament
NOR "Clemet, Kristin" "Managing Director, Civita"
USA "Collins, Timothy C." "Senior Managing Director and CEO,
Ripplewood Holdings, LLC"
FRA "Collomb, Bertrand" "Honorary Chairman, Lafarge"
PRT "Costa, António" Mayor of Lisbon
USA "Crocker, Chester A." James R. Schlesinger Professor of Strategic Studies
USA "Daschle, Thomas A." Former US Senator and Senate Majority Leader
CAN "Desmarais, Jr., Paul" "Chairman and co-CEO, Power Corporation of Canada"
GRC "Diamantopoulou, Anna" Member of Parliament
USA "Donilon, Thomas E." "Partner, O'Melveny & Myers"
ITA "Draghi, Mario" "Governor, Banca d'Italia"
AUT "Ederer, Brigitte" "CEO, Siemens AG Österreich"
CAN "Edwards, N. Murray" "Vice Chairman, Candian Natural Resources Limited"
DNK "Eldrup, Anders " "President, DONG A/S"
ITA "Elkann, John" "Vice Chairman, Fiat S.p.A."
USA "Farah, Martha J." "Director, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience;
Walter H. Annenberg Professor in the Natural Sciences, University of
Pennsylvania"
USA "Feldstein, Martin S." "President and CEO, National Bureau of
Economic Research"
DEU "Fischer, Joschka" Former Minister of Foreign Affairs
USA "Ford, Jr., Harold E." "Vice Chairman, Merill Lynch & Co., Inc."
CHE "Forstmoser, Peter" "Professor for Civil, Corporation and Capital
Markets Law, University of Zürich"
IRL "Gallagher, Paul " Attorney General
USA "Geithner, Timothy F. " "President and CEO, Federal Reserve Bank
of New York"
USA "Gigot, Paul " "Editorial Page Editor, The Wall Street Journal"
IRL "Gleeson, Dermot " "Chairman, AIB Group"
NLD "Goddijn, Harold" "CEO, TomTom"
TUR "Gögüs, Zeynep " "Journalist; Founder, EurActiv.com.tr"
USA "Graham, Donald E." "Chairman and CEO, The Washington Post Company"
NLD "Halberstadt, Victor" "Professor of Economics, Leiden University;
Former Honorary Secretary General of Bilderberg Meetings"
USA "Holbrooke, Richard C. " "Vice Chairman, Perseus, LLC"
FIN "Honkapohja, Seppo" "Member of the Board, Bank of Finland"
INT "Hoop Scheffer, Jaap G. de" "Secretary General, NATO"
USA "Hubbard, Allan B." "Chairman, E & A Industries, Inc."
BEL "Huyghebaert, Jan" "Chairman of the Board of Directors, KBC Group"
DEU "Ischinger, Wolfgang" Former Ambassador to the UK and US
USA "Jacobs, Kenneth" "Deputy Chairman, Head of Lazard U.S., Lazard
Frères & Co. LLC"
USA "Johnson, James A." "Vice Chairman, Perseus, LLC" (Obama's man
tasked with selecting his running mate)
SWE "Johnstone, Tom " "President and CEO, AB SKF"
USA "Jordan, Jr., Vernon E." "Senior Managing Director, Lazard Frères & Co. LLC"
FRA "Jouyet, Jean-Pierre " Minister of European Affairs
GBR "Kerr, John " "Member, House of Lords; Deputy Chairman, Royal
Dutch Shell plc."
USA "Kissinger, Henry A." "Chairman, Kissinger Associates, Inc."
DEU "Klaeden, Eckart von" "Foreign Policy Spokesman, CDU/CSU"
USA "Kleinfeld, Klaus" "President and COO, Alcoa"
TUR "Koç, Mustafa " "Chairman, Koç Holding A.S."
FRA "Kodmani, Bassma" "Director, Arab Reform Initiative"
USA "Kravis, Henry R." "Founding Partner, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co."
USA "Kravis, Marie-Josée" "Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute, Inc."
INT "Kroes, Neelie " "Commissioner, European Commission"
POL "Kwasniewski, Aleksander " Former President
AUT "Leitner, Wolfgang" "CEO, Andritz AG"
ESP "León Gross, Bernardino" "Secretary General, Office of the Prime Minister"
INT "Mandelson, Peter" "Commissioner, European Commission"
FRA "Margerie, Christophe de" "CEO, Total"
CAN "Martin, Roger" "Dean, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management,
University of Toronto"
HUN "Martonyi, János" "Professor of International Trade Law; Partner,
Baker & McKenzie; Former Minister of Foreign Affairs"
USA "Mathews, Jessica T. " "President, Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace"
INT "McCreevy, Charlie " "Commissioner, European Commission"
USA "McDonough, William J." "Vice Chairman and Special Advisor to the
Chairman, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc."
CAN "McKenna, Frank" "Deputy Chair, TD Bank Financial Group"
GBR "McKillop, Tom " "Chairman, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group"
FRA "Montbrial, Thierry de" "President, French Institute for
International Relations"
ITA "Monti, Mario" "President, Universita Commerciale Luigi Bocconi"
USA "Mundie, Craig J. " "Chief Research and Strategy Officer,
Microsoft Corporation"
NOR "Myklebust, Egil" "Former Chairman of the Board of Directors SAS,
Norsk Hydro ASA"
DEU "Nass, Matthias" "Deputy Editor, Die Zeit"
NLD "Netherlands, H.M. the Queen of the"
FRA "Ockrent, Christine" "CEO, French television and radio world service"
FIN "Ollila, Jorma" "Chairman, Royal Dutch Shell plc"
SWE "Olofsson, Maud " Minister of Enterprise and Energy; Deputy Prime Minister
NLD "Orange, H.R.H. the Prince of"
GBR "Osborne, George" Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer
TUR "Öztrak, Faik" Member of Parliament
ITA "Padoa-Schioppa, Tommaso " Former Minister of Finance; President
of Notre Europe
GRC "Papahelas, Alexis" "Journalist, Kathimerini"
GRC "Papalexopoulos, Dimitris" "CEO, Titan Cement Co. S.A."
USA "Paulson, Jr., Henry M." Secretary of the Treasury
USA "Pearl, Frank H." "Chairman and CEO, Perseus, LLC"
USA "Perle, Richard N." "Resident Fellow, American Enterprise
Institute for Public Policy Research"
FRA "Pérol, François" Deputy General Secretary in charge of Economic Affairs
DEU "Perthes, Volker" "Director, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik"
BEL "Philippe, H.R.H. Prince"
CAN "Prichard, J. Robert S." "President and CEO, Torstar Corporation"
CAN "Reisman, Heather M." "Chair and CEO, Indigo Books & Music Inc."
USA "Rice, Condoleezza" Secretary of State
PRT "Rio, Rui " Mayor of Porto
USA "Rockefeller, David " "Former Chairman, Chase Manhattan Bank"
ESP "Rodriguez Inciarte, Matias" "Executive Vice Chairman, Grupo Santander"
USA "Rose, Charlie" "Producer, Rose Communications"
DNK "Rose, Flemming" "Editor, Jyllands Posten"
USA "Ross, Dennis B." "Counselor and Ziegler Distinguished Fellow, The
Washington Institute for Near East Policy"
USA "Rubin, Barnett R." "Director of Studies and Senior Fellow, Center
for International Cooperation, New York University"
TUR "Sahenk, Ferit " "Chairman, Dogus Holding A.S."
USA "Sanford, Mark" Governor of South Carolina
USA "Schmidt, Eric" "Chairman of the Executive Committee and CEO, Google"
AUT "Scholten, Rudolf " "Member of the Board of Executive Directors,
Oesterreichische Kontrollbank AG"
DNK "Schur, Fritz H. " Fritz Schur Gruppen
CZE "Schwarzenberg, Karel " Minister of Foreign Affairs
USA "Sebelius, Kathleen" Governor of Kansas
USA "Shultz, George P." "Thomas W. and Susan B. Ford Distinguished
Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University"
ESP "Spain, H.M. the Queen of"
CHE "Spillmann, Markus" "Editor-in-Chief and Head Managing Board, Neue
Zürcher Zeitung AG"
USA "Summers, Lawrence H." "Charles W. Eliot Professor, Harvard University"
GBR "Taylor, J. Martin" "Chairman, Syngenta International AG"
USA "Thiel, Peter A." "President, Clarium Capital Management, LLC"
NLD "Timmermans, Frans" Minister of European Affairs
RUS "Trenin, Dmitri V." "Deputy Director and Senior Associate,
Carnegie Moscow Center"
INT "Trichet, Jean-Claude" "President, European Central Bank"
USA "Vakil, Sanam" "Assistant Professor of Middle East Studies, The
Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins
University"
FRA "Valls, Manuel " Member of Parliament
GRC "Varvitsiotis, Thomas" "Co-Founder and President, V + O Communication"
CHE "Vasella, Daniel L." "Chairman and CEO, Novartis AG"
FIN "Väyrynen, Raimo" "Director, The Finnish Institute of International Affairs"
FRA "Védrine, Hubert" Hubert Védrine Conseil
NOR "Vollebaek, Knut" "High Commissioner on National Minorities, OSCE"
SWE "Wallenberg, Jacob" "Chairman, Investor AB"
USA "Weber, J. Vin" "CEO, Clark & Weinstock"
USA "Wolfensohn, James D. " "Chairman, Wolfensohn & Company, LLC"
USA "Wolfowitz, Paul" "Visiting Scholar, American Enterprise Institute
for Public Policy Research"
INT "Zoellick, Robert B. " "President, The World Bank Group"

Rapporteurs
GBR "Bredow, Vendeline von" "Business Correspondent, The Economist"
GBR "Wooldridge, Adrian D." "Foreign Correspondent, The Economist"

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
To: <aefa@sen.parl.gc.ca>; "bairdj" <bairdj@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: <db26@queensu.ca>; "maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2011 12:08 AM
Subject: Fwd: Brazil understands the Global Economy far better than PM
Harper or Robert Wood of the EIU does


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 23:33:48 -0300
Subject: Brazil understands the Global Economy far better than PM
Harper or Robert Wood of the EIU does
To: prenquiries@eiu.com, mailbox@brasembottawa.org,
"flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca" <flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca>, "Harris. J"
<Harris.J@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>
Cc: newsroom <newsroom@theguardian.pe.ca>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, maritime_malaise
<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>

http://eiumedia.com/index.php/component/comprofiler/userprofile/RobertWood

http://www.cpac.ca/forms/index.asp?dsp=template&act=view3&template_id=181&Lang=e

Foreign Affairs (September 29, 2011)

The committee continued its study of political and economic
developments in Brazil and the implications for Canada.

Robert Wood, senior editor and economist of the Economist Intelligence
Unit, and Douglas Bland, former chair of Defence Management Studies at
Queen's University, testified.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:34:59 -0300
Subject: For the record the so callled "expert" Kevin O'Leary yapping
on CBC right now is pretending that he has no clue about this
To: exchange@cbc.ca, tonis.saar@riigikontroll.ee,
sarah.chapman@fsa.gov.uk, W-Five@ctv.ca,
bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net, nichor@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1@parl.gc.ca,
greg.weston@cbc.ca, thepurplevioletpress@gmail.com,
Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca, jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com,
Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, chiefape@gmail.com, nbpc@gnb.ca

It looks Estonia is gonna suffer like Iceland did because its
political bosses were too dumb to read or worse

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=8353833

"The EFSF doesn't solve problems, it only takes money," lawyer and
member of parliament Legal Affairs Committee Igor Grazin from the
ruling Reform Party told parliament.

Mailis Reps, of the left-leaning opposition Centre Party, said it was
unfair for Estonia to have to dip into its coffers.

"When we look at the salaries of teachers, the state support for
children and so on, it's all many times smaller here than in the
countries Estonia is now going to support financially," she said.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:06:31 -0300
Subject: Thanks again Mr Kruuv I see the folks in Estonia are still
debating Thats good
To: Riho Kruuv <riho.kruuv@mfa.ee>
Cc: maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca, tonis.saar@riigikontroll.ee, "Saatkond
Ottawas üldaadress (e-mail)" <embassy.ottawa@mfa.ee>

http://news.ph.msn.com/business/article.aspx?cp-documentid=5329588

In answer to your question you will find the following words within
the email you responded to. For the benetit of the taxpayers in
Estonia your government and I should discuss them ASAP.

I tried hrd to explain my concerns on the phone to you but you wanted
me to prove that my IP connection was ok for some reason. FYI I
already knew that it was because I was calling you through the Inernet

Please read and click on the links

I am the unamed Whistleblower that Mr Nester of the SEC mentioned
in 2009 who is the link from Putnam investments and Madoff matter
To support , my allegations first and foremost Eric Schneiderman
should see that Eliot Spitzer testified on the very day he thanked me
for the info in November of 2003.

Please notice the transcripts and webcasts went of th Senate hearings
"poof' not long after I made the congressman Ron Paul and legions of
others well aware of their existence as he bitched about such things
whilst running for the GOP endorsement to run for president in 2007.
The records of the hearings were deleted in late fall 2007 just as all
the subprime mortgages began to smell bad.

http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2

Now check the dates on the letters in this file page 13 in particular

http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf


A portion of the email below can be found within the following link or
simply Google Amos and Madoff and anyone can find it
This is not my blog

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html

Notice Mr Nestor of the SEC?

These are more informative blogs of his about me

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/06/5-years-waiting-on-bank-fraud-payout.html

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/04/david-amos-nb-nwo-whistleblower-part-3.html



On 9/29/11, Riho Kruuv <riho.kruuv@mfa.ee> wrote:
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Now that we have made sure that your e-mails aren't blocked by Estonian mail
> servers, please specify, where do you see an issue or problem or what do you
> expect Estonian authorities to do (differently)?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Riho Kruuv
> Chargé d'Affaires
> Embassy of Estonia
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
> Sent: 29. september 2011. a. 12:07
> To: Riho Kruuv; Saatkond Ottawas üldaadress (e-mail);
> tonis.saar@riigikontroll.ee
> Cc: maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca
> Subject: Thanks Mr Kruuv As far as I know Austria, Estonia, Malta, the
> Netherlands and Slovakia have yet to vote to support Greece
>
> Thus there maybe some time yet
>
> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2011/09/29/bloomberg_articlesLSAF5V0UQVI9.DTL
>
> "Estonia votes on the measures later today followed by Austria tomorrow."
>
> Estonian Embassy
> 260 Dalhousie Street,
> Suite 210 Ottawa,
> Ontario K1N 7E4
> Canada
> tel. (1 613) 789 42 22
> fax: (1 613) 789 95 55
> embassy.ottawa@mfa.ee
>
> Read more:
> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2011/09/29/bloomberg_articlesLSAF5V0UQVI9.DTL#ixzz1ZMCF6S77
> From: Riho Kruuv <riho.kruuv@mfa.ee>
> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:45:04 -0500
> Subject: Communication check
> To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> I hope that you received this e-mail and can pass the information you
> spoke about to me.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Riho Kruuv
>
> Chargé d'Affaires
>
> Embassy of Estonia in Canada
>
> www.estemb.ca <http://www.estemb.ca/>
>
>
> From: "OSBORNE, George" <george.osborne.mp@parliament.uk>
> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:56:26 +0100
> Subject: Thank you for your e-mail
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
>
> Thank you very much for your e-mail to George Osborne.
>
> If you are contacting George in his capacity as Chancellor of the
> Exchequer, please re-send your e-mail to:
> public.enquiries@hm-treasury.gov.uk<mailto:public.enquiries@hm-treasury.gov.uk>.
> Alternatively, write to The Correspondence & Enquiry Unit, HM
> Treasury, 1 Horseguards Road, London, SW1A 2HQ or telephone 020 7270
> 4558.
>
> If you are one of George's Tatton constituents, please ensure that you
> have included your full postal address and postcode, so that we can
> identify you as a constituent. The Tatton office, which is for
> constituent enquiries only, can be reached on 01565 873037.
>
> If you are a personal contact of George's, your e-mail will be
> forwarded accordingly.
>
> With kind regards,
>
> Office of Rt Hon George Osborne MP
> Chancellor of the Exchequer
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:46:12 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: ISS10441377
> To: public.enquiries@hm-treasury.gov.uk, ministers@hm-treasury.gov.uk
> Cc: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "j.kroes" <j.kroes@interpol.int>, maritime_malaise
> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:17:07 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: ISS10441377
> To: complaint.info@financial-ombudsman.org.uk
> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, "Dean.Buzza"
> <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:03:32 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: ISS10441377
> To: info@hermitagefund.com, "flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca"
> <flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "bert. hudon"
> <bert.hudon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, michael.geller@rbs.com,
> Barbara.Cottam@citizensbank.com, "shahtx(gmail)" <shahtx@gmail.com>,
> "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca" <william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "j.kroes" <j.kroes@interpol.int>, oig <oig@sec.gov>
> Cc: "alfred.smithers" <alfred.smithers@fco.gov.uk>,
> MIMEsweeper@fsa.gov.uk, maritme_malaise <maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca>
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:53:14 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: Re: ISS10441377 Perhaps You or your Ambassador in Ottawa
> or Halifax should call me back? 902 800 0369
> To: info@hermitagefund.com
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: MIMEsweeper@fsa.gov.uk
> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:34:51 +0100 (BST)
> Subject: RE: Re: ISS10441377 Perhaps You or your Ambassador in Ottawa
> or Halifax should call me back? 902 800 0369
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Dear customer,
>
> Thank you for your email. If your query is urgent, or you think you
> have been contacted by a SCAM do not wait for a reply. Instead, please
> call our Consumer Helpline on 0845 606 1234, and we will help with
> your query immediately. Please advise the agent who takes your call
> that you have emailed us previously. If your query is not urgent,
> please be aware that we work to a service level of 12 working days,
> and it is likely that it will take this long to respond to you.
>
> PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL ADDRESS
>
> This communication and any attachments contains information which is
> confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. It is for intended
> recipients only. If you are not the intended recipient you must not
> copy, distribute, publish, rely on or otherwise use it without our
> consent. Some of our communications may contain confidential
> information which it could be a criminal offence for you to disclose
> or use without authority. If you have received this email in error
> please notify postmaster@fsa.gov.uk immediately and delete the email
> from your computer.
> The FSA reserves the right to monitor all email communications for
> compliance with legal, regulatory and professional standards.
> This email is not intended to nor should it be taken to create any
> legal relations or contractual relationships. This email has
> originated from
>
> The Financial Services Authority (FSA)
> 25 The North Colonnade,
> Canary Wharf,
> London
> E14 5HS
> United Kingdom
>
> Registered as a Limited Company in England and Wales No.1920623.
> Registered Office as above
> Switchboard: 020 7066 1000
> Web Site: http://www.fsa.gov.uk
> *****************************************************************
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: FCC <Consumer.Queries@fsa.gov.uk>
> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:44:47 +0100 (BST)
> Subject: RE: ISS10441377
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Our Ref: PC41073. ISS10441377
>
> In order that we can deal with this matter as quickly as possible
> please do not delete the Subject line of this email when you reply.
> You can add further wording to it but please do not remove
> "ISS10441377".
>
> Dear Sir or Madam,
>
> Please accept this acknowledgement of the receipt of your email dated
> 31 August 2011, the contents of which have been noted for our records.
>
> I have not responded to your email, as you have not addressed this to
> us directly, nor have you asked us any questions.
>
> However, I feel it would be of use if I explain our role. We are the
> UK's financial watchdog set up by the government to regulate financial
> services. We protect consumers by setting standards that FSA-regulated
> firms must meet and taking action if they don't. We regulate most
> types of financial services firms, such as banks, building societies,
> credit unions, insurance companies, financial advisers, stockbrokers,
> and mortgage and insurance sellers.
>
> If you have any future questions on financial services and products,
> you may find it easier to call our Consumer Helpline on 0845 606 1234
> (call rates may vary).
>
> You can also access relevant information online at
> www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation and via the Money Advice
> Service website: www.moneyadviceservice.org.uk/.
>
> I trust this is of assistance, and welcome any further feedback you
> may have in relation to this matter.
>
> Yours faithfully
>
> Victoria Warren (Miss)
> Customer Contact Centre
> Financial Services Authority
> Consumer Helpline: 0845 606 1234 (call rates may vary)
> www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation
>
> We are interested in finding out about people's views and experiences
> of the services offered by the Customer Contact Centre. As a result,
> we employ a research agency to help us, and they may contact you, via
> the telephone, to see if you would be prepared to take part in a short
> telephone interview. If you do receive a phone call you are under no
> obligation to complete the survey. Please rest assured that your
> details will remain confidential and will not be used for any other
> purposes; we are not trying to sell you any financial products or
> service, and no sales call will result from this.
>
> If you do not wish to take part in any of our surveys, please call the
> Customer Contact Centre on 0845 606 1234 (call rates may vary), or
> email consumer.queries@fsa.gov.uk and we will ensure that your details
> are not passed on to the research agency.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sarah.chapman@fsa.gov.uk
> Date Sent: 31/08/2011 16:54:39
> To: Consumer.Queries@fsa.gov.uk
> Subject: RE: ISS10441377
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
> Sent: 28 August 2011 01:40
> To: michael.geller@rbs.com; Barbara.Cottam@citizensbank.com; oig;
> whistleblower; Whistle
> Cc: Dean.Buzza; maritime_malaise
> Subject: Do your people at RBS think I am joking?
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 14:08:24 -0300
> Subject: i just called you again Mr O'Donnell perhaps you should review
> the Homestead Act and check your work
> To: registerodonnell@norfolkdeeds.org
> Cc: "Fred.Wyshak" <Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov>, maritime_malaise
> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 13:57:12 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: I just called and tried to reason with you people whilst
> the Stock Markets tumble AGAIN Correct JIM?
> To: Jim.Hughes@citizensbank.com
> Cc: D.Jones@citizensbank.com, oig <oig@sec.gov>, OIG <OIG@ftc.gov>, ir
> <ir@landsbanki.is>, ir <ir@statestreet.com>, jrogers <jrogers@nhpr.org>
>
> I saw you checking my work on the web now check your bank's malicious
> work in the attachment
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 14,733
> Domain Name citizensbank.com ? (Commercial)
> IP Address 12.46.106.# (CITIZENS BANK)
> ISP AT&T WorldNet Services
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : Rhode Island
> City : Pawtucket
> Lat/Long : 41.8735, -71.3734 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Macintosh WinXP
> Browser Safari 1.3
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko)
> Chrome/13.0.782.107 Safari/535.1
> Javascript version 1.5
> Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 1024
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Aug 5 2011 1:38:08 pm
> Last Page View Aug 5 2011 1:38:08 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...d amos citizens bank Search Engine
> google.com Search Words david amos citizens bank
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Aug 5 2011 12:38:08 pm
> Visit Number 14,733
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 22,067
> Domain Name citizensbank.com ? (Commercial)
> IP Address 12.154.167.# (CITIZENS BANK)
> ISP AT&T WorldNet Services
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : Massachusetts
> City : Dover
> Lat/Long : 42.2417, -71.2874 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.)
> en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 6.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR
> 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR
> 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 1024
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Aug 5 2011 6:39:44 pm
> Last Page View Aug 5 2011 6:39:44 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...=f&aqi=g-b1&aql=&oq=
> Search Engine google.com
> Search Words amos david madoff
> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-6:00
> Visitor's Time Aug 5 2011 11:39:44 am
> Visit Number 22,067
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 09:59:29 -0300
> Subject: i just called and tried to reason with you people whilst the
> Stock Markets tumble AGAIN Correct?
> To: david.barry@nbsc-cvmnb.ca, kptummon@gov.pe.ca, obrienhl@gov.ns.ca,
> slattejw@gov.ns.ca, atkinssj@gov.ns.ca, gsinfo@gov.nl.ca,
> harryharding@gov.nl.ca, "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>,
> "jonesr@cbc.ca" <jonesr@cbc.ca>
> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, oig <oig@sec.gov>,
> ministerofstate <ministerofstate@acoa-aperca.gc.ca>, "Dean.Buzza"
> <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, newsroom <newsroom@telegraphjournal.com>,
> "Barry.MacKnight" <Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca>,
> "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>
>
> Since you won't speak to me, why not talk about your deliberate
> incompetence to the foreign newsmen contacting me?
>
> csa-acvm-secretariat@acvm-csa.ca
>
> http://www.nbsc-cvmnb.ca/nbsc/LanguageRH.do?type=english
>
> http://www.gov.pe.ca/securities/index.php3?number=48628&lang=E
>
> http://www.gov.ns.ca/nssc/contactnssc.htm
>
> http://www.gs.gov.nl.ca/
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <myson333@yahoo.com>
> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 12:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: Ed Here is your ticket to keep you out of hot water Just send
> this to Hugh Grant and he can raise hell for you
> To: ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Byway of the US FTC the Feds in many countries can never deny that they
> did not know the truth long ago
>
> From: Ed Pilkington <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>
> Subject: GUARDIAN
> To: myson333@yahoo.com
> Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 11:42 AM
>
> hi
>
> here's my email and my cell number is below
>
> all best
>
> Ed
>
> --
> Ed Pilkington
> New York bureau chief
> The Guardian
> www.guardian.co.uk
> twitter.com/Edpilkington
>
> Cell: 646 704 1264
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Visit guardian.co.uk - newspaper of the year www.guardian.co.uk
> www.observer.co.uk
>
> On your mobile, visit m.guardian.co.uk or download the Guardian iPhone
> app www.guardian.co.uk/iphone
>
> To save up to 30% when you subscribe to the Guardian and the Observer
> visit www.guardian.co.uk/subscriber
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This e-mail and all attachments are confidential and may also be
> privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender
> and delete the e-mail and all attachments immediately.
> Do not disclose the contents to another person. You may not use the
> information for any purpose, or store, or copy, it in any way.
>
> Guardian News & Media Limited is not liable for any computer viruses or
> other material transmitted with or as part of this e-mail. You should
> employ virus checking software.
>
> Guardian News & Media Limited
>
> A member of Guardian Media Group plc
> Registered Office
> PO Box 68164
> Kings Place
> 90 York Way
> London
> N1P 2AP
>
> Registered in England Number 908396
>
>
> --- On Tue, 8/2/11, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re Rupert Murdoch and his associates Perhaps Ms Curtis should
> show this email to the actor Hugh Grant
> To: polly.curtis@guardian.co.uk
> Cc: jhenderson@newscorp.com, rnolte@newscorp.com, jdorrego@newscorp.com,
> "maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2011, 2:21 PM
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jul/12/hugh-grant-phone-hacking-inquiry
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: OIG <OIG@ftc.gov>
> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:29:48 -0400
> Subject: RE: I just called again and tried to speak with John Seeba and
> Cynthia Hogue of the FTC
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> Mr Amos. I just talked to you. Our office only has jurisdiction over
> internal matters like if an FTC employee is involved in fraud. We also
> report to congress to notify them how the FTC utilizes funds.
>
> What can we do for you?
>
> Thanks. Zisa Walton
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 4:23 PM
> To: OIG; maritime_malaise
> Cc: Fred. Pretorius; Fred.Wyshak
> Subject: I just called again and tried to speak with John Seeba and
> Cynthia Hogue of the FTC
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:56:13 -0300
> Subject: RE BSkyB and News Corp I am on the phone to you right now
> To: jhorner@newscorp.com, teverett@newscorp.com,
> jhenderson@newscorp.com, rnolte@newscorp.com, jdorrego@newscorp.com,
> "Marc.Litt" <Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov>
> Cc: oig <oig@sec.gov>, maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
> "Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
> http://www.newscorp.com/management/newscor.html
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:05:59 -0300
> Subject: RE BSkyB and News Corp
> To: aarti.maharaj@thecrossbordergroup.com, bpollack@milchev.com,
> emma.gilpin-jacobs@ft.com, saltschuller@foleyhoag.com
> Cc: newsroom <newsroom@wnyc.org>
>
> http://www.corporatesecretary.com/articles/11949/newscorp-searches-legal
> -help-help-combat-us-lawsuits/
>
> http://www.corporatesecretary.com/articles/11928/corporate-social-respon
> sibility-and-role-board-directors/
>
> http://www.csrandthelaw.com/sarah-a-altschuller.html
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 02:45:11 -0300
> Subject: RE BSkyB and News Corp Opps ol Rupert would be pissed that I
> forgot to send the oh so important attachments
> To: jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com, clerks@oeclaw.co.uk,
> asiskind@newscorp.com, investor-relations@bskyb.com,
> investor@newscorp.com, "Rupert.Murdoch@fox.com"
> <Rupert.Murdoch@fox.com>, "James.Murdoch@fox.com"
> <James.Murdoch@fox.com>, Edith Cody-Rice <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>,
> Jacques Poitras <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, Robert Jones
> <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, Terry Seguin <Terry.Seguin@cbc.ca>, "richard.
> dearden" <richard.dearden@gowlings.com>, maritime_malaise
> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, "Carol.Coristine@cbc.ca"
> <Carol.Coristine@cbc.ca>, "Bob.Kerr@CBC.CA" <danfour@myginch.com>
> Cc: newsdesk@theage.com.au, jbrowning9@bloomberg.net,
> athomson6@bloomberg.net, kwong11@bloomberg.net,
> frank.pingue@thomsonreuters.com, editor <editor@newsday.com>, news-tips
> <news-tips@nytimes.com>, newsonline <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>, newshour
> <newshour@pbs.org>, newsroom <newsroom@theguardian.pe.ca>, Newsroom
> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, foreigneditor
> <foreigneditor@independent.co.uk>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Grant.McCool@thomsonreuters.com
> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:23:36 -0400
> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: RE BSkyB and News Corp Hey Jac Nasser
> Howcome or the trusted lawyers Arty Siskind and Lony Jacobs did not tell
> the Murdochs I was still alive and kicking like hell?
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> I am out of the office until Monday, August 8. I will not be reading
> email until then. Regards
>
> This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and
> information company. Any views expressed in this message are those of
> the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them
> to be the views of Thomson Reuters.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 02:23:30 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: RE BSkyB and News Corp Hey Jac Nasser Howcome or the
> trusted lawyers Arty Siskind and Lony Jacobs did not tell the Murdochs I
> was still alive and kicking like hell?
> To: jbrowning9@bloomberg.net, athomson6@bloomberg.net,
> kwong11@bloomberg.net, frank.pingue@thomsonreuters.com,
> grant.mccool@thomsonreuters.com, juan.lagorio@thomsonreuters.com,
> vasilescua@sec.gov, friedmani@sec.gov, krishnamurthyp@sec.gov,
> "Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
> newsdesk@theage.com.au, bruce.alec@gmail.com
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:41:59 -0300
> Subject: RE BSkyB and News Corp Hey Jac Nasser Howcome or the trusted
> lawyers Arty Siskind and Lony Jacobs did not tell the Murdochs I was
> still alive and kicking like hell?
> To: jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com, clerks@oeclaw.co.uk,
> asiskind@newscorp.com, investor-relations@bskyb.com,
> investor@newscorp.com, "Rupert.Murdoch@fox.com"
> <Rupert.Murdoch@fox.com>, "James.Murdoch@fox.com"
> <James.Murdoch@fox.com>, Edith Cody-Rice <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>,
> Jacques Poitras <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, Robert Jones
> <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, Terry Seguin <Terry.Seguin@cbc.ca>, "richard.
> dearden" <richard.dearden@gowlings.com>, maritime_malaise
> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, "Carol.Coristine@cbc.ca"
> <Carol.Coristine@cbc.ca>, "Bob.Kerr@CBC.CA" <Bob.Kerr@cbc.ca>
> Cc: pm@pm.gc.ca, LaytoJ <LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca>, info <info@bobrae.ca>,
> oldmaison@yahoo.com, danfour <danfour@myginch.com>
>
> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-25/bskyb-directors-face-4-2-billio
> n-quandary.html
>
> Interesting quandary you bskyb dudes have. Seems it just got worse EH Jac?
>
> Clearly you and I crossed paths bigtime before TWO IMPORTANT elections
> in Canada last year and obviously News Corp and Bloomberg's pal Joel
> Klein's old buddies in the US Justice Dept and the SEC etc pissed me off
> way back in 2002 EH?
>
> Need I say iIdid not like it when and heard of corrupt cops in seven
> cars pounced on my son and I at 2;30 in the morning about two weeks
> after i received this email from you with the attached letter. Small
> wonder Stevey Boy Harper stopped the BHP take over bid of Potash when he
> could not get th RCMP to shut me up EH?
>
> BTW the pdf file hereto attached that should refresh Siskind's and
> Jacobs memories can be found here as well the letter you sent to me last
> September
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/60818237/FCC-News-Corp
>
> Altough my contempt towards greedy publicly held companies is well known
> my desire to expose corrupt law enfocement people is far higher on my
> list of offensive things. If old Rupert were wise and his son is clever
> perhaps they should have somebody finally call me back ASAP.
> Perhap Ruper Murdoch can figure how to deal with an honest man ethically
> for the benefit of many shareholders and the chagrin of the SEC and
> Barack Obama EH?
>
> News Corp has the media and I have the evidence. Why not pretend I am
> Monte Hall and lets make a deal for the benefit of all. Try leaving the
> dark side and ignoring your crooked lawyers for a change. What say you
> Rupert? Dickens wrote books about such things.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> The links to newsrags etc at the bottom of this email prove that
> obviously I have been reading many things lately. Your lawyers should
> study some of my work within this one email alone As you well know i
> will be forwarding this email to many people in short order.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:39:26 -0400
Subject: YO Ian McPhail Re: The Commission for Public Complaints
against RCMP - #2013-2824
To: Sheldon <Sheldon@nfa.ca>, Blair <Blair@nfa.ca>, "steve.graham"
<steve.graham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 03:44:52 -0300
Subject: YO Ian McPhail Re: The Commission for Public Complaints
against RCMP - #2013-2824
To: PCC Complaints <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "Ian.McPhail"
<Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "roger.l.brown"
<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, warren <warren@daisygroup.ca>, jacques
boucher <jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
Gunther.Schonfeldt@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, rusun@un.int,
john.adams@queensu.ca, John.Forster@cse-cst.gc.ca,
td.ombudsman@td.com, christopher.montague@td.com,
Frank.McKenna@td.com, Glenn.Greenwald@guardian.co.uk,
info@praxisfilms.org, birgittaj@althingi.is
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>,
enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk, sarah.chapman@fsa.gov.uk,
ambassador@brasilemb.org, slrc@itamaraty.gov.br

WOW Ya think somebody within the "Five Eyes" would finally do their
job now EH Glen Greenwald and the President Rousseff'?

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html

---------- Original message ----------
From: PCC Complaints <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:59:52 +0000
Subject: The Commission for Public Complaints against RCMP - #2013-2824
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Dear Mr. Amos:

This is further to your recent communications with the Commission.
From September 18, 2013 to the present, our office has received 6
electronic messages from you. Many of these e-mails are not related to
RCMP conduct.

On October 1, 2013, you called our office and spoke with an Intake
Officer. You wished to enquire about three complaint files. When the
Intake Officer attempted to inform you that you have three enquiry
files with the Commission, you became agitated and insisted otherwise.
You raised your voice and spoke over the Intake Officer. You then
demanded the name of the Intake Officer, and subsequently yelled "see
you in federal court" and hung up the telephone line.

As a reminder, we request that all future correspondence with our
office must be courteous in tone and that you are respectful of the
requests that are made of you. While it is clearly not the intention
of the Commission to prevent you from making complaints against
members of the RCMP, your recent emails and telephone call have been
unproductive for both you and for Commission staff. In the future, we
request that all communication with our office be respectful in
language and related to our mandate. In the event that this request
is not respected, the Commission will consider imposing restrictions
on how you may communicate with our office.

Should you have a complaint about a specific RCMP member surrounding a
specific incident, I invite you to visit the Commission's website
(www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca<http://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca>) to submit an online
complaint, rather than to send an email that is difficult to follow or
a copy of a letter you have sent to many others. The complaint form
will guide you through the information required that will enable the
Commission to process your complaint. Should you have difficulty in
accessing the complaint form and wish to have one sent to you, you may
provide your mailing address and a form will be mailed to you via
Canada Post.

I would also invite you to send your correspondence regarding any new
or existing complaints (quoting the appropriate Commission file
number) by letter mail to:

Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP
National Intake Office
PO Box 88689
Surrey, BC V3W 0X1

Yours truly,

Günther Schönfeldt
Intake Officer / Agent d'information de liaison
Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP /
Commission des plaintes du public contre la Gendarmerie royale du Canada
Tel/Tél : 1-800-665-6878 | Fax/Téléc : (604) 501-4095
complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca<mailto:complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>



[Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CCF6DA.65AE7FE0]


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: !enquiries <enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:56:26 +0100
Subject: IPCC Reference: 2013/015918
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Dear Mr Amos

I acknowledge receipt of 4 emails at the Independent Police Complaints
Commission (IPCC) earlier today.

I note from our records that you have been advised on the IPCC remit,
as well as spoken with one of my colleagues in the customer contact
team. It remains unclear from your emails what your complaint against
the police is. This may be because you refer to a number of other
organisations, or matters outside of the IPCC's remit.

If you wish to make a complaint against the police you should provide
these details to either the IPCC or the relevant police force's
professional standards department (PSD).

The IPCC does not investigate allegations of crime(s) committed by
members of the public, nor can we direct a police force to commence an
investigation into such.

If you have any queries about the IPCC's remit or the complaints
process please contact us. However, emails to the IPCC that fall
outside of our remit will be read and filed, but may not be responded
to.

Kind regards

Elly Goodman
Customer Contact Adviser
Independent Police Complaints Commission
Tel: 0300 020 0096
Email: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk


The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in
partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On
leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes.






Talk about pissing a guy off. EH Ian McPhail? What planet do CROWN's
bureaucrats come from anyway?

Need I say BULLSHIT once again??? The other CROWN Corp commonly know
as the CBC often puts that word over our airwaves so that can't be
offensive. That said I bet the call was recorded If so I demand a copy
ASAP. Next time I call I will record the call myself.

I must ask did the oh so silent boss Ian MacPhail and his buddy Bob
Paulson about the Yankee wiretap tapes being evidence of MURDER?
Better check the Canadian Ciminal Code about assisting in the cover up
of such crimes EH?

As for the call I remember it like it was yesterday. Howcome it took
Günther Schönfeldt three weeks to dream up the same sort of response I
got in 2007??? The first thing I did was ask for him and the woman
claimed he was not avaible and offered to help. She started out quite
nice but as soon as she admited that there was only a faxed complaint
in November of 2003 and that it did not warrant an answer I told her
to look some more. She got fairly argumentive and did not wish to
discuss the complaint I sent in August of 2005 (It appeared to me that
she read something in my file) I gave up and asked her name when she
got to snarky and she refused to give other than "Nora" So I said Cya
in Federal Court and hung up. The I sent your buddy Bob Paulson and
YOU Ian McPhail a Motherload of emails but I did only sent your
mindless bureaucrats six that were largely unrelated if they did not
know how to read deep.

However your Commission should not deny that I argued with its former
lawyer/boss Shirley Heafey about the aforesaid compliant in 2005
within emails sent to many Parliamentarians months for a I ran for a
sent Parliament again and she was replaced by the lawyer Paul Kennedy.
(The lawyer Heafey and your Commission always denied that complaint
existed until your office sent me a similar bullshit email after Mike
Murphy a former Minister of Health and later another former Attorney
General asked Deputy Commissioner Steve Graham to investigate my
concerns.

In return the Graham got transferred to Nova Scotia and RCMP falsely
arrested REMEMBER Stevey Boy Harper?

As I said Cya'll in Federal Court

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
1 902 800 0369

http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139

http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc

http://davidamos.blogspot.com/

FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
Senator Arlen Specter
United States Senate
Committee on the Judiciary
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Mr. Specter:

I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
contact with you about this previously.

Very truly yours,
Barry A. Bachrach
Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lisa Porteous <lporteous@kleinlyons.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 14:46:22 +0000
Subject: RCMP
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

David,

Thank you for your email inquiring about our class action against the
RCMP. As you may know, the Notice of Claim was filed in the British
Columbia Supreme Court on March 27, 2012. The lawsuit has been
brought by former RCMP constable Janet Merlo on behalf of female RCMP
members. Unfortunately, we cannot assist you with your claim.

We recommend that you contact Mr. Barry Carter of Mair Jensen Blair
LLP to discuss any claim you may have against the RCMP for harassment.
His contact information is as follows:

Mr. Barry Carter
Mair Jensen Blair LLP
1380-885 W. Georgia Street
Vancouver, BC V6C 3E8
Phone: 604-682-6299
Fax 1-604-374-6992

This is not intended to be an opinion concerning the merits of your
case. In declining to represent you, we are not expressing an opinion
as to whether you should take further action in this matter.

You should be aware that there may be strict time limitations within
which you must act in order to protect your rights. Failure to begin
your lawsuit by filing an action within the required time may mean
that you could be barred forever from pursuing a claim. Therefore, you
should immediately contact another lawyer ( as indicated above) to
obtain legal advice/representation.

Thank you again for considering our firm.

Yours truly,

Lisa Porteous
Case Manager/Paralegal

lporteous@kleinlyons.com
www.kleinlyons.com

KLEIN * LYONS
Suite 400-1385 West 8th Avenue
Vancouver BC V6H 3V9 Canada
Office 604.874.7171
Fax 604.874.7180
Direct 604.714.6533

This email is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
privilege. It is intended only for the use of the person to whom it is
addressed. Any distribution, copying or other use by anyone else is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
telephone us immediately and destroy this e-mail.

üPlease consider the environment before printing this email.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
To: <Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>; <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>; "toewsv1"
<toewsv1@mts.net>; "danfour" <danfour@myginch.com>
Cc: <nelson.kalil@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>; "rmordenassoc"
<rmordenassoc@rogers.com>; <warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "warren"
<warren@daisygroup.ca>; "warren.dosko" <warren.dosko@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
"Paulette. Delaney-Smith" <Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
"WaterWarCrimes" <waterwarcrimes@gmail.com>; "robin reid"
<zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>; "tony" <tony@peoplestandup.ca>;
"Ken.Zielke" <Ken.Zielke@gov.ab.ca>
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:18 PM
Subject: Attn Commissioner Ian McPhail QC I called again and tried to
speak to you twice today my number is 902 800 0369


http://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/nrm/nr/2010/20100126-eng.aspx

As I said I am very serious and have no wish to speak to the likes of
Ms Leduc EVER again FYI I see that the gossip about my concerns is
leaking out here there an everywhere following this note is just
couple of the reasons why I called an tried hard to speak to you again
today

Please don't try to tell me that your office does not know what
happened between the RCMP and I within weeks of my sending the email
immedialy below this note.

If perhaps you people should read some blogs an watch some YOUTUBES ASAP?

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

http://davidamos.blogspot.com/

http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2008/07/david-amos-picked-up-by-rcmp.html

http://govinjustice.blogspot.com/2008/07/david-amos-picked-up-by-rcmp.html

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/07/feds-institutionalize-determined-nb.html

http://www.leadershipdirectories.com/images/promo/FTC.pdf

QSLS Politics
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 15,116
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 164.62.7.# (Federal Trade Commission)
ISP Federal Trade Commission
Location Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : District of Columbia
City : Washington
Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 7.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727;
.NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1920 x 1200
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Aug 18 2010 1:50:29 pm
Last Page View Aug 18 2010 2:01:49 pm
Visit Length 11 minutes 20 seconds
Page Views 2
Referring URL http://www.google.co...i=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
Search Engine google.com
Search Words "david amos" canada parliament
Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....eblower-part-1b.html
Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....eblower-part-1b.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Aug 18 2010 7:50:29 am
Visit Number 15,116


Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 11,630
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 199.212.215.# (DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE)
ISP DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Location Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language English (Canada)en-ca
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 12:50:37 pm
Last Page View Aug 13 2010 12:52:15 pm
Visit Length 1 minute 38 seconds
Page Views 7
Referring URL
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...3/ides-of-march.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-8:00
Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 8:50:37 am
Visit Number 11,630


Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 11,638
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 199.212.150.# (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)
ISP Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Location Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 6.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1;
INFOWEB-APPROVED; INFOWEB-APPROVED-IE6-FR; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR
2.0.50727; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 5:52:40 pm
Last Page View Aug 13 2010 5:52:40 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.blogger.c...15428735081915360609
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 4:52:40 pm
Visit Number 11,638

Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 11,639
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 199.212.215.# (DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE)
ISP DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Location Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language English (Canada) en-ca
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1466 x 916
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 5:52:51 pm
Last Page View Aug 13 2010 5:52:51 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-8:00
Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 1:52:51 pm
Visit Number 11,639



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:34:30 -0300
Subject: Attn PAULINE PHILIBERT and ARNOLD HADLEY of the New Brunswick
Police Commission
To: nbpc@gnb.ca, arnold.hadley@gnb.ca, john.foran@gnb.ca,
premier@gnb.ca, Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca
Cc: webo@xplornet.com

New Brunswick Police Commission
435 King Street
Fredericton, New Brunswick
E3B 1E5

A letter to support my complaint about various police forces in New
Brunswick will follow these emails just as I promised on the phone to
you people today.

I have no understanding as to why the Police Commission nor anyone
else holding a governmental mandate in the Province of New Brunswick
has never called me back or answered one email in nearly four years.
Shawn Graham should at least recognize his own documents to my framer
friend, Werner Bock from the time when he sat in opposition and was
the agricutural critic at the same time .

It appears to me that I am not the only one to get mad at the
malicious incompetence of John Foran and the cops of New Brunswick.
What is even more interesting though is the fact that John Foran was
once mad at the Police Commission and they way they investigated
things so secretly against the public's best interests. EH Mr. Volpe?
Rest assured that I ain't holding my breath for the police to continue
to harass me anymore after their nonsense yesterday. Nor will I wait
to see Wayne Steeves say or do the right thing after he has covered up
my concerns about the severe lack of police integrity for his politcal
party's benefit for four god damned years.

http://www.canlii.org/eliisa/highlight.do?text=JOHN+FORAN+WILSON+MacINTOSH&language=en&searchTitle=Search+all+CanLII+Databases&path=/en/nb/nbqb/doc/1995/1995canlii3862/1995canlii3862.html

For the recod these Youtubes that are this arseholes favoutites were
created by the RCMP and I have no doubt whatsoever the people
slandering me are cops as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0NdNtvC-YI#GU5U2spHI_4

http://www.youtube.com/user/bigolcanoworms

At least his ID is correct. This is a big old can of worms. N'est Pas?

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:17:05 -0300
Subject: Perhaps Paul Kennedy the current Commissioner of Public
Complaints Against the RCMP will call us back now EH?
To: Hermenegilde.Chiasson@gnb.ca, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca,
scotta@parl.gc.ca, Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca, Holland.M@parl.gc.ca,
Hubbard.C@parl.gc.ca, jonesr@cbc.ca, nbombud@gnb.ca,
Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca, T.J.Burke@gnb.ca, roly.macintyre@gnb.ca,
aleblanc.mla@nb.aibn.com, eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca, brian.kenny@gnb.ca,
roy.boudreau@gnb.ca, donald.arseneault@gnb.ca, danf@danf.net,
injusticecoalition@hotmail.com, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
stuart.jamieson@gnb.ca, Margaret-Ann.BLANEY@gnb.ca,
victor.boudreau@gnb.ca, rick.brewer@gnb.ca,
John.Ferguson@saintjohn.ca, Ivan.Court@saintjohn.ca
Cc: complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com,
newsroom@nbpub.com, carl.davies@gnb.ca, janet.trail@gnb.ca,
Akoschany@ctv.ca, jtravers@thestar.ca, alan_white@cbc.ca,
Tim.Porter@gnb.ca, Trevor.HOLDER@gnb.ca, bev.harrison@gnb.ca,
Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca, Jody.CARR@gnb.ca, Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca,
David.ALWARD@gnb.ca, bruce.noble@fredericton.ca,
lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca

Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 13:36:41 -0400
From: "PCC Complaints" complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

May 23, 2007

File No. PC-2005-1291

Mr. David R Amos
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

Dear Mr. Amos:

On a number of occasions you have called or sent e-mails our office to
raise matters which are of pressing concern to you.

Each time we have tried to respond by explaining to you the relatively
narrow mandate of this Commission and the limits of our powers to deal
with the matters which are of concern to you. I must stress, once
again, that the purpose of this Commission is to provide the public
with an opportunity to make complaints concerning the conduct of
members of the RCMP in the performance of their duties. We have
neither the expertise nor the legal authority to permit us to become
involved in issues beyond the scope of this mandate.

While it is clearly not the intention of the Commission to prevent you
from making complaints against members of the RCMP, an analysis of
your numerous contacts with the Commission indicates that your
concerns fall well outside the confines of our mandate. Further, your
frequent e-mails have been disruptive and unproductive for both you
and for the staff of this office.

Should you determine that some point in the future you have a
complaint concerning the conduct of a member of the RCMP in the
performance of his or her duties, please submit it to the Commission
by Canada Post only. As of now, your e-mails will be deleted unread.

Yours truly,

Andrée Leduc
Enquiries and Complaints Analyst

Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Say hey to Shawn Murphy for me will ya Brian?
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 15:25:45 -0400
From: "REVIEWS" reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

The Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP has received
your e-mail message and will be responding in due course.

La Commission des plaintes du public contre la GRC a reçu votre
courriel et vous rendra une réponse au moment opportun.

Subject:
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com


January 30, 2007


WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Mr. David Amos


Dear Mr. Amos:

This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.

Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
Graham of the RCMP "J" Division in Fredericton.

Sincerely,

Honourable Michael B. Murphy
Minister of Health

CM/cb

Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:

Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,
John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
"Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n

Dear Mr. Amos,

Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off over
the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I was not
ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.

As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.

As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear that
Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and the
US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment policing in
Petitcodiac, NB.

It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.

Sincerely,

Warren McBeath, Cpl.
GRC Caledonia RCMP
Traffic Services NCO
Ph: (506) 387-2222
Fax: (506) 387-4622
E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca


Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: Just so you know
To: HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, gemerson@tor.fasken.com, jgrant@baseconsulting.ca,
rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca, mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca, csae@csae.com,
kim.keith@rci.rogers.com, jduncan@tor.fasken.com, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca,
ahamilton@casselsbrock.com, jm@jmellon.com, treasurer@casis.ca,
jbronskill@cp.org, RTRiley6@cs.com, pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca,
linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca, janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca,
robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca, Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca,
arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca, nancy.taillon@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
CC: info.com@chrc-ccdp.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, Scott.A@parl.gc.ca,
radionews@mpbc.org, publisher@whatsup.nb.ca, kjamerson@wagmtv.com,
kbabin@globaltv.ca, jfoster@globaltv.ca, atvnews@ctv.ca, cmorris@cp.org,
info@ccna.ca, kbissett@broadcastnews.ca, bdnmail@bangordailynews.net,
ehutton@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, argosy@mta.ca,
sylvain.martel@csn.qc.ca, events@cpac.ca, mmacdonald@cp.org,
crgeditor@yahoo.com, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca

No need to Bitch.
I am about to sue ya anyway but you did receive the same material
that everybody else got by email anyway. However now I will now
forward the other emails that various silly servants got after I had
had many talks with your incompetant and malicious assistants within
the Commission over the past two years. It seems that I had to insult
you and bust you in front of your friends to finally get a response
from you.
Furthermore on August 2nd I sent you your material byway of the
US Mail which was received and signed for. It was hard copy of my
concerns and allegations about you being in bed with the corrupt old
bastard Zack of the RCMP. I also sent a copy of wiretap tape # 139.
Instead of you acting within the scope of your employment you go on
vacation and bury your head in the sand while the RCMP assisted the
Yankees in throwing my wife and kids into the street without due
process of law?
Well your head may be in still the sand but you just stuck your
arse high up in the air. It is high time for me to give it a boot
before you stick it up Zack's ass in a vain effort to appear that you
have integrity after all. The following is the text of that letter and
after that is the US Mail's confirmation of when it was sent and
received by you.
Say hey to McLachlin for me will ya? Tell her I will be suing her
too. She has been covering up for the crooked Newfy Judge Dereck Green
for way past too long. To hell with lawyers appointed as commissioners
and other lawyers appointed as judges. From my point of view they were
only appointed to cover up public corruption. I look forward to
meeting the likes of you in court and arguing you on the public
record. You just proved for me that most lawyers ain't that smart. You
should have continued to play dumb Bitch. At least then you could have
blamed your assistants for not telling you what you obviously know.
however if you had done so, I would have pointed to the fact that you
are their supervisor and therefore ultimatly responsible. Everybody
else knows that the RCMP are as crooked as hell, so do you. call me a
liar now. I double dog dare ya.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos



July 31st, 2005

Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin,
C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and
Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay
Canadian Judicial Council
150 Metcalfe Street,
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8

Shirley Heafey
Chair of Commission
for Public Complaints against the RCMP
P.O. Box 3423
Station &quo t;D"
Ottawa,
ON K1P 6L4


RE: Rampant Public Corruption

Hey,
Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and
various underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public
Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and
emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by
every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a
copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as
officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest
Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little
trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the
ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to
answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.

I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending
to you byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving
identical material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell
them I gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter.
All that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes.
However I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material
than what Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact
the same material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky
Boy McKenna in particular received, while I was up home running for
Parliament last year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so
I have also included a few recent items to spice thing up for you.

I am tired of trying to convince people employed in law enforcement
to uphold the law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience
and be careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse to
the law or me.

Veritas Vincit

David R. Amos

153 Alvin Ave

Milton, MA. 02186

Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 484U S
Detailed Results:


[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Bullet
Delivered Abroad, August 11, 2005, 6:49 am, CANADA
Bullet
Out of Foreign Customs, August 08, 2005, 2:37 pm, CANADA
Bullet
Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
Bullet
Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
Bullet
International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 8:32 am, KENNEDY AMC
Bullet
Enroute, August 03, 2005, 8:30 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
Bullet
Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:40 am, QUINCY, MA 02169

"Heafey, Shirley" <HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca> wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: "Heafey, Shirley"<HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
Sent: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:10:00 -0400
To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Just so you know

Just so you know, there was no message attached to the e-mail sent to
me. SO, in fact, I don't know what you think I should now know.

Try again.

SH

-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 1:24 PM
>To: gemerson@tor.fasken.com; jgrant@baseconsulting.ca;
rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca; mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca;
csae@csae.com; kim.keith@rci.rogers.com; jduncan@tor.fasken.com;
Moore.R@parl.gc.ca; ahamilton@casselsbrock.com
Cc: Zeman, Arnold; jm@jmellon.com; Taillon, Nancy; treasurer@casis.ca;
jbronskill@cp.org; RTRiley6@cs.com; pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca;
dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca; Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca;
linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca; janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca;
robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca; Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca; Heafey, Shirley
Subject: Just so you know

CSIS can never say they didn't know. This should put Shirley Heafey's
panties in a knot when she get back from her vacation. I can only
wonder what Ms. Longo of the RCMP is saying about now.

"Zeman, Arnold" <Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca> wrote:

Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: For the record Joan I did talk to
your boss Abrahamson yesterday and more people you know today
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:16:11 -0400
From: "Zeman, Arnold" <Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca>
To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
This is an automatic reply. I'm away froom the office and will return
on Monday September 26,2005. If you need information before then,
please contact Marie-France Kingsley at 990-6306.
************************************
Ceci est une réponse automatique. Je serai de retour au bureau le
lundi 26 septembre 2005. Si vous avez besoin d'aide, veuillez
communiquer avec Marie-France Kingsley au 990-6306.
*******************************
A. W. Zeman
Assistant Inspector General of CSIS /
Inspecteur général adjoint du SCRS
340 Laurier Avenue West / 340, avenue Laurier ouest
Ottawa ON K1A 0P8
phone / tél : (613) 990-8274
fax / télécopieur : (613) 990-8303
email / courriel : arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
********************************




http://voices-voix.ca/en/facts/profile/paul-kennedy

Paul Kennedy

What Happened
Paul Kennedy was removed as head of the Commission for Public
Complaints (CPC) regarding the RCMP after he advocated a more powerful
and independent Commission. He sought adequate funding for
investigations, increased accountability and improved service
standards. The Harper government appointed a Conservative Party ally
to replace him.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paul Kennedy was appointed Chair of the Commission for Public
Complaints (CPC) Against the RCMP in 2005. He was re-appointed for
three more one-year terms in 2006, 2007 and 2008.

Throughout his tenure, Kennedy was known as a relentless advocate for
a more independent CPC. He believed that the CPC relied too heavily on
the cooperation of senior RCMP officials, and was too limited in
independent power to probe the RCMP's activities, or to inquire into
witnesses' testimonials and to demand the production of documents as
evidence.

Kennedy also advocated for better funding to oversee the RCMP so that
the CPC could investigate more cases and investigate them thoroughly.
He argued that the CPC's budget of $5.2 million paled in comparison to
the RCMP's $4.1 billion budget.

Public Safety Minister Peter Van Loan cut Kennedy's budget by $600,000
in 2009, seriously limiting the scope of the CPC's investigations.

Kennedy did get funding for the high-profile investigation into RCMP
involvement in the tasering death of Polish immigrant Robert
Dzienkanski at the Vancouver International Airpoirt in 2007, and his
work to reform RCMP policies on taser use. But that funding was only
made available temporary. Similar investigations in future might not
get the funding they need given the small size of the CPC's budget.

Media sources have reported clashes between Kennedy and the
Conservative government during Kennedy's time as head of CPC. He was
ridiculed by Conservative officials for his stance that Mounties' work
requires proper review and that access to evidence and witnesses was
necessary in order to ensure accountability. Although the government
has promised reform monitoring of the RCMP, this promise was not kept
during Kennedy's tenure.

Kennedy had other successes: during his tenure, the RCMP was under
public pressure to modify training and operational procedures. The
commission now regularly conducts reviews of RCMP activities and their
policies in self-investigation. Kennedy also addressed investigations
of death and verbal abuse involving RCMP officers, and proposed
legislative and policy changes to avoid conflicts of interest.

Kennedy's final weeks in office were marked by the release of a report
strongly critical of the conduct of the RCMP officers involved in the
death of Robert Dziekanski. The RCMP would go on to accept all but one
of the findings in Kennedy's CPC report, and address the report's
recommendations, eventually creating an Office of Professional
Integrity, as well as a new policy to ensure independent and impartial
investigation of RCMP employees.

However, in November 2009, Public Safety Minister Peter Van Loan's
office notified Kennedy that he would not be re-appointed after his
contract terminated that December. Kennedy had been prepared to serve
another term.

In January 2010, Ian McPhail, a long-time contributor to the
Conservative Party, was appointed interim chair of the CPC. McPhail
was a real-estate lawyer with some limited experience on other
commissions. Observers felt McPhail lacked the experience required
head the CPC. McPhail's appointment was seen by Paul Kennedy and
others as a wholly partisan move, that placed a strong Conservative
ally in an important watchdog position. The replacement of Kennedy
with McPhail has been criticized as an attempt to silence Kennedy's
criticism of the RCMP, thereby reducing accountability of the RCMP to
the government and the public.

In January 2010, Kennedy made an appearance on Parliament Hill to
express concerns about the fate of civilian oversight bodies under the
Harper government. He was joined by two other watchdogs who the
government had removed for dubious reasons: Peter Tinsley, who had
been the Military Police Complaints Commissioner; and Linda Keen,
former President of Canada's nuclear safety regulator.

Kennedy has said the government was not willing to let the CPC fulfill
its intended purpose. He has also called on the government to
institute a fixed term for which a commissioner is appointed, so that
people who have a job to do on behalf of the public don't end up
essentially working for the governing party.

In 2011 the new Minister of Public Safety, Vic Toews, re-appointed
McPhail as head of the CPC for another year.

Relevant Dates:
October 2005: Paul Kennedy is appointed Chair of the Commission for
Public Complaints (CPC) against the RCMP.
October 2007: Robert Dziekanski dies after being tasered by an RCMP
officer at the Vancouver International airport; Kennedy strongly
criticizes the way the situation was handled.
December 2008: Paul Kennedy is reappointed for another 1-year term as
Chair of the CPC, until December 31, 2009
August 11, 2009: Kennedy calls for policy changes to enhance
accountability of the RCMP.
November 18 2009: The government tells Kennedy his contract will not
be renewed.
December 8, 2009: Kennedy publishes a report criticizing some of the
RCMP's actions.
January 24, 2010: The government appoints Ian McPhail as interim Chair
of the CPC.
January 26, 2010: Paul Kennedy, Peter Tinsley and Linda Keen hold a
press conference, expressing their concern over the government's
silencing of watchdogs.
February 4, 2010: The RCMP announces a new policy to ensure
independent and impartial investigations of its employees.
Role or Position
Paul Kennedy was Chair of the Commission for Public Complaints (CPC)
Against the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) from 2005 to 2009.

Implications and Consequences
Transparency: The removal of Kennedy means the loss of a qualified
civil servant with over thirty five years experience in public
service, with a proven track record of creating change for increased
accountability.
Democracy: The effectiveness and independence of watchdog
organizations are compromised when leaders are appointed to short
one-years terms and removed at will by politicians. The slashing of
the CPC budget means in practice that there will be minimal oversight
of the RCMP.
Democracy: If public officials are removed and replaced whenever they
threaten to hold the government to account, the strength of our
democracy is diminished.
Photo: CTV News

Sources
"CPC Chair responds to the RCMP Commissioner's letter...," Paul
Kennedy, CPC against the RCMP, 16 December 2009
"CPC Report on the death of Mr. Dziekanski," William Elliott, RCMP, 10
February 2011
"Former RCMP watchdog warns commission heads liable to sway," Janice
Tibbests, CanWest News Services, 4 January 2010
"Former watchdogs speak out on Harper government," Susan Delacourt,
The Star, 26 January 2010
"Harper Government Names Realtor as RCMP Watchdog," Nathan Griffiths,
InformedVote.ca, 1 February 2010
"Ottawa names interim RCMP watchdog," Colin Freeze, The Globe and
Mail, 24 January 2010
"Minister Toews announces re-appointment of Ian McPhail as Interim
Chair of the CPC," Public Safety Canada, 14 January 2011
"New civilian watchdog agency will oversee RCMP," RCMP Watch, 4 February 2010
"Police Oblivious to pain Tasers inflict: RCMP Complaints
Commissioner," CBC News, 25 June 2008
"RCMP response to CPC regarding its report into Robert Dziekanski's
in-custody death," William Elliott, RCMP, 7 December 2009
"RCMP should limit self-investigations," CBC News, 11 August 2009
"RCMP to implement all watchdog recommendations on Robert Dziekanski
case," CPC against the RCMP, 10 February 2011
"RCMP watchdog won't be reappointed," CBC News, 27 November 2009
Report on death of Robert Dziekanski (PDF), CPC, 8 December 2009
"Report slams RCMP in airport Taser death," CBC News, 8 December 2009
"Tories drop RCMP complaints commissioner," Tonda MacCharles, The
Star, 27 November 2009
Français


DEMAND IMMEDIATE APOLOGY FROM CANADIAN ALLIANCE MP
Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:00 pm
John Cummins' office replies 'Get a life' when invited to Maher Arar vigil

Ottawa, Canada - 17/12/02) - CAIR-CAN is calling on Canadians to demand
that John Cummins, member of Parliament of Delta-South Richmond, B.C.,
offer a public apology for recent remarks made by his office when Cummins
was invited to a silent vigil for Maher Arar. In response to the
invitation, Cummins' office replied by email, "Get a life."

Maher Arar is the Canadian citizen who was detained illegally in the United
States en route to Canada and deported to Jordan and then to Syria. Arar
was denied access to Canadian officials, prevented from calling his family,
tried through a non-transparent process without a lawyer present, and
deported to his country of birth in violation of international law. He is
currently being held in a Syrian jail.

The statement follows recent comments by Stephen Harper, Diane Ablonczy,
and Stockwell Day of the Canadian Alliance which condemn Arar without any
regard to his illegal deportation, the lack of a fair trial process, and in
the absence of any definitive evidence linking him to terrorism.

(See CAIR-CAN action alert # 84:
http://www.caircan.ca/cgi-bin/actionalerts/viewnews.cgi?newsid1038072766,60770,)

The remark made by John Cummins' office is deeply insulting and a clear
breach of his duties as a public official," said CAIR-CAN Executive
Director Riad Saloojee.

He should immediately offer an unqualified apology to the Arar family and
to all Canadians," he added.

ACTION REQUESTED (Be firm, but polite):

CONTACT Steven Harper and John Cummins.

E-mail: Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Cummins.J@parl.gc.ca

Telephone or Fax:

Stephen Harper
Tel: (613) 996-6740
Fax: (613) 947-0310

John Cummins
Tel: (613) 992-2957
Fax: (613) 992-3589

DEMAND an immediate apology from John Cummins for the remarks made by his
office yesterday.

INFORM Canadian Alliance leader Steven Harper that his party has failed in
its duty as the official opposition to defend the rights of a Canadian
citizen. Recent comments by his party indicate a troubling trend of
treating Maher Arar, a Canadian Muslim and Arab, as a second class citizen.

COPY Canada@cair-net.org on all correspondence.

Colin Mayes, Conservative

This rookie B.C. MP made headlines this year after he defended the PM's new
restrictions on media access in a column to his local paper. Mayes went
further and suggested journalists would be more responsible if they faced
jail terms for professional misconduct. "Boy, would the public get accurate
and true information if a few reporters were hauled away to jail! Maybe it
is time that we hauled off in handcuffs reporters that fabricate stories,
or twist information and even falsely accuse citizens." Mayes quickly
retracted his comments.


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>; <deb@debgrey.com>; <debgrey@gmail.com>;
<valerielmeredith@aol.com>; <RathgB0@parl.gc.ca>; "MulcaT"
<MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>; "Heather Martin" <martinhea39@gmail.com>;
"bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "kevin.violot"
<kevin.violot@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "Wayne.Lang"
<Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "toewsv1" <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>; "bob.rae"
<bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net>; "Bob.Kerr" <Bob.Kerr@cbc.ca>;
"terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>; "mckeen.randy"
<mckeen.randy@gmail.com>; "mcknight.gisele"
<mcknight.gisele@dailygleaner.com>; "mclellana"
<mclellana@bennettjones.com>
Cc: <Whistleblower@ctv.ca>; <martine.turcotte@bell.ca>; "oldmaison"
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>; "stop_codex" <stop_codex@hotmail.com>; "josh
steffler" <canuckfanjosh@yahoo.com>; <webmasterlawrence@gmail.com>;
"xtofury" <xtofury@gmail.com>; "grenouf" <grenouf@genuinewitty.com>;
"hiddenfromhistory1" <hiddenfromhistory1@gmail.com>; "J Bowman"
<canada.acp@gmail.com>; "leader" <leader@greenparty.ca>;
"maryann4peace" <maryann4peace@gmail.com>; "john.green"
<john.green@gnb.ca>; "police" <police@fredericton.ca>; "David Amos"
<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>;
<Billa.MEDHURST@vpd.ca>; "mark.lord" <mark.lord@fredericton.ca>;
"Leanne.Fitch" <Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 12:17 AM
Subject: So Debby Baby Grey "Famous Amos" would like to know if Harper
and the RCMP in BC are paying attention YET???


Some Deja Vu for you and Val

http://deanrays.blogspot.com/2009/07/vals-minority-report.html

http://www.debgrey.com/contact.html

VAls minority report!

Heritage Front Affair Val's Minority Reports

THE HERITAGE FRONT AFFAIR: OUR VIEW DISSENTING OPINION of the REFORM
PARTY of CANADA

Presented by Val Meredith, M.P.

THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE

It was nineteen months ago when the Sub-Committee on National Security
began its consideration of the Security Intelligence Review
Committee's Heritage Front Affair report. Finally, after a long and
often arduous effort, the Sub-Committee has tabled its report.

At this point in time, it is important to clarify a couple of
significant issues: The delays in producing the Sub-Committee report
have nothing to do with the activities of the opposition parties, but
rather are due solely to delays caused by membership changes and
disagreements among the government members.

Secondly, the so-called report of this Sub-Committee has little input
from the opposition members. The joint dissenting opinion of the Bloc
Quebecois and the Reform Party more accurately reflects the
multi-party consensus of the majority of members of this Sub-Committee
who actually participated in most of the Sub-Committee's hearings.
While the joint dissenting opinion does not fully reflect the Reform
Party's position on this issue, it is included to illustrate the
changes to the report imposed by the government members.

It must be noted that the major changes to this report did not occur
during a Sub-Committee meeting, and neither opposition member was
present. It is clear that the Liberal government was not prepared for
the Sub-Committee to table the more critical report that is now the
joint dissenting opinion. With regard to the official report of the
Sub-Committee, the current government members of the Sub-Committee
have produced an extremely emasculated version of the original report.

Their report is just an extension of SIRC's Heritage Front Affair
report which did not provide a sufficiently critical review of the
Canadian Security Intelligence Service's investigation.

THE SIRC REPORT SIRC claims to be the "eyes and ears of the public and
Parliament on the Canadian Security Intelligence Service." Yet after
months of consideration of the Heritage Front Affair report, it is
clear that SIRC has been not only negligent in this role, but
deliberately dishonest as well. Instead of providing Parliament with a
thorough and objective review of CSIS' use of a human source in its
investigation of the Heritage Front, SIRC's report exonerates CSIS and
the Source of any wrongdoing.

In its exoneration of CSIS, SIRC ignored or suppressed any evidence
that was inconsistent with their conclusion that the Service did no
wrong. SIRC has wilfully mislead Parliament and the Canadian people.
The exoneration of CSIS by SIRC is a betrayal of SIRC's role as a
review committee. While the Reform Party is deeply concerned with the
wrongdoings of CSIS, SIRC's refusal to address these transgressions in
an open and honest manner is cause for even greater concern.

After nineteen months of reviewing the SIRC report and obtaining
additional information, it is clear that SIRC is not fulfilling the
function that Parliament intended. Originally the Reform Party had
planned to do a thorough and critical review of the SIRC report,
pointing out numerous inaccuracies and omissions. However, because the
original version would have been too lengthy, we have chosen to focus
on two main issues: Grant Bristow - CSIS Source, and the CSIS
investigation concerning Preston Manning, that formed Chapter VIII of
the Heritage Front Affair. ; GRANT BRISTOW - CSIS HUMAN SOURCE Unlike
the government members of the Sub- Committee, I have no hesitancy in
identifying Grant Bristow as the CSIS Source who infiltrated the
Heritage Front.

This position is not an assumption, nor speculation. In August 1994, I
was contacted by an individual who had first-hand knowledge of Grant
Bristow as a CSIS Source. A former police source, this individual was
approached by Bristow, who offered to introduce him to a CSIS
investigator.

In September 1994 I accompanied this individual to a SIRC interview.
The information this individual provided is faithfully recorded in the
SIRC report at section 3.1.3, although it does not identify Bristow as
the Source.

In addition, at his appearance before the Sub- Committee on May 27,
1996, the Director of CSIS, Mr. Ward Elcock, inadvertently confirmed
that Bristow was indeed the CSIS Source. In his opening statement,
which was also provided in writing, the Director made the following
comment: "What about our source's arrest in Toronto, along with
American white supremacist Sean Maguire? That was a co-ordinated
operation with law enforcement agencies. Mr. Maguire was expelled from
Canada. Our source was released. No criminal offence was committed."

Now contrast the Director's above comments with the relevant passage
in SIRC's Heritage Front Affair report: "On September 20, 1991, Sean
Maguire and Grant Bristow were travelling in the latter's car, when
they were stopped at gunpoint by the heavily armed Metro Toronto
Emergency Task Force. Sean Maguire was arrested on an Immigration
warrant. RCMP and Immigration officials were on hand for the arrest,
as was a CSIS investigator from Toronto Region.

Grant Bristow, when he was stopped, had guns in the trunk of his car.
Both men were taken to police station 41." (emphasis added) It is
obvious from the above-mentioned information that Bristow is the CSIS
Source in question. It is an issue, because the way that SIRC wrote
their report, many of the questionable activities were committed by
Bristow, as opposed to the Source. So it is important to acknowledge
that Bristow was indeed the Source.

As expressed in paragraph 28 of the joint dissenting opinion ("Having
concluded that the placement of a human source was acceptable,
although for a shorter time than this Source was actually in place,
the opposition members of the Sub-Committee then asked themselves
whether the Service should have recruited and put in place this
particular Source?"), there were serious questions about using Bristow
as the Source. While SIRC made all efforts to downplay Bristow's role
in the creation and operation of the Heritage Front, clearly he was
responsible for much of the success of the organization.

The best indication of Bristow's role in the Heritage Front was the
video that the Front put out with excerpts of Bristow's speeches, that
had been edited out of the previously released videos. The excerpts
from this video show that Bristow was the main administrator of the
Heritage Front. He was responsible for the raising of money, for
selling memberships, literature and paraphernalia, and for getting
people out to Heritage Front rallies and demonstrations. His
questionable contributions can be best summarized from the one video
where he bragged that the Heritage Front in Toronto raised more money
to assist incarcerated members of the white supremacist terrorist
organization, The Order, than any other group in North America. ;
Bristow under police investigation.

There is one other aspect of Bristow's history that SIRC chose to
ignore, despite the fact that this incident was in the original
newspaper story that spawned their investigation. In 1993, the Metro
Toronto Police Force investigated Heritage Front members Carl Fischer,
Elkar Fischer and Andrew Maynard, for the kidnapping and assault of
Tyrone Mason, another Heritage Front member. During the course of
their investigation the police began to actively investigate Grant
Bristow.

The police investigators were so convinced that Bristow was involved
in witness tampering, that they applied to the courts and obtained a
Criminal Code Part VI warrant to intercept his communications. When
the Mason case finally made its way to trial in the fall of 1995, a
plea bargain was arranged. As a result of plea bargaining all charges
were dropped against Maynard, and though convicted, the Fischer
brothers received only a thirty day sentence to be served
intermittently.

Interestingly, a lawyer representing the federal government was
involved in the negotiations. It would appear that Bristow's role in
the incident prevented the Crown from aggressively prosecuting the
case. Despite frequently referring to this case in their testimony as
an example of the heinous activities that Heritage Front members were
capable of committing,

SIRC completely ignored the police investigation of Bristow's role in
the case. ; Bristow and the Reform Party. The Reform Party is also
deeply concerned about Bristow's activities within the Reform Party.

As reported in the SIRC report, CSIS was aware that Heritage Front
leader Wolfgang Droege "wanted to discredit Preston Manning and the
Reform Party before the general election in 1993. This idea would be
accomplished by the Movement publicly identifying itself and its
security relationship with the Reform Party's senior executive level.

Among those who allegedly knew of the Droege plan were Gerry Lincoln,
James Dawson, Ernst Zundel, Terry Long, Jurgen Neumann, Peter
Mitrevski, and Grant Bristow (emphasis added)." Not only was Bristow
aware of this plan to discredit the Reform Party, but he was one of
the major players in it. Bristow, along with Alan Overfield, were the
two individuals who made all the security arrangements.

While it was Overfield who originally offered the services of his
bailiff company to the Reform Party, he was not aware of Droege's plan
to discredit the party. Thus it was left to Bristow, a CSIS source, to
create the relationship.

According to the representative for the Reform Party, Andrew Flint,
Grant Bristow did a very effective job in creating the security
relationship between the Reform Party and the Heritage Front. In an
affidavit sworn on May 1, 1995, Flint described the June 1991 meeting
with Bristow and Overfield in the following manner: "The meeting was
dominated by Grant Bristow who did most of the talking regarding the
security for the event. I was certainly very impressed by his
immaculate dress which included an elegant suit and highly polished
shoes. This was the only meeting I attended involving security for the
up-coming rally."

Flint also mentioned that "at the meeting of the security team for the
June 1991 event at the International Centre, Grant Bristow requested a
letter from me stating that he and Al Overfield were authorized to
handle the security for this event. I was told he needed it to present
to the Regional Police which operated a sub-station on the premises of
the International Centre."

This letter is also mentioned in the SIRC report. However, the report
stated "Overfield asked for the letter in order to receive recognition
and to show that he was appointed. Grant Bristow's name was included
in the letter because he said: #145;Unless we have a letter of
understanding, there could be legal liabilities if there was a
confrontation with protesters at a Reform Party event.'

" Naturally, Bristow is the source of this information. It is
interesting that Bristow claimed that Overfield asked for the letter
to receive recognition, and that his own name appeared only for
liability purposes. If Bristow's name was necessary for liability
purposes, then why were the names of the other individuals who were
providing security not included as well?

In reality, the most useful application of this letter would have been
to prove a security arrangement between the Heritage Front and the
Reform Party. Yet, according to the SIRC report, Overfield was unaware
of the plan to discredit the Reform Party, so there is little reason
for him to request the letter. Bristow on the other hand, would
certainly have pleased Droege by providing him with a letter to
demonstrate that the security arrangement between the Reform Party and
the Heritage Front actually existed. SIRC's willingness to accept
Bristow's version of events is typical of their report.

Much of the report is based on the evidence of Bristow. He is cited as
the source of information 135 times; 96 times as the Source and a
further 39 times as Grant Bristow. In addition, the source handler is
cited 20 times as the basis of information.

SIRC has basically provided the public with Grant Bristow's version of
events, while contradictory information was generally dismissed. While
SIRC denied any wrongdoing by Bristow or CSIS, they failed to address
a very important issue - the entire operation was conducted in
violation of a 1989 Ministerial Direction.

On October 30, 1989 then Solicitor General Pierre Blais issued the
following Ministerial Direction on #145;CSIS' Use of Human Sources' to
the Director of CSIS. The Direction states in part: "that special care
is required in regard to investigations which impact on, or which
appear to impact on, the most sensitive institutions of our society. I
am primarily thinking in this regard of institutions in the academic,
political, religious, media or trade union fields.... I am writing
that you personally, or a Deputy Director designated by you in
writing, approve the use by the Service of confidential sources in
such investigation."

It is obvious that Bristow's role as one of two individuals who was
"jointly responsible for the security of all present and future Reform
Party Events that are planned for this region," would be part of a
human source operation that "impacted, or appeared to impact on a
political institution."

According to the Ministerial Direction, this would have required that
either the Director or the Deputy Director (Operations) approve
Bristow's role as part of the security team. In reality, Toronto
Region only sought out CSIS Headquarters' advice in August, two months
after the Mississauga rally, and even then the file did not go to the
Director or the Deputy Director.

SIRC goes on to great lengths to point out that CSIS was careful that
only Droege's activities as they related to the Reform Party were
investigated, not the Reform Party itself. But they do not address the
issue of a CSIS source operation that impacted on, or at least
appeared to impact upon a sensitive political institution, namely the
Reform Party. SIRC's refusal to address this issue is somewhat
mystifying, considering that was one of the questions that the Reform
Party specifically wanted answered when we put forth a series of
questions to SIRC in a letter, presented to them at the September 13,
1994 Sub-Committee meeting:

Question 73: Given the 1989 Ministerial Directive by then Solicitor
General Pierre Blais, concerning CSIS utilizing sources in sensitive
institutions such as political parties, religious groups and the
media, was the Director's approval required prior to Bristow's
attendance at the Reform Party meeting?;

Question 74: If yes, did the Director approve of this operation?
Bristow's role in the security group was indeed crucial in forming the
link between the Heritage Front and the Reform Party. As Andrew Flint
stated, he was impressed with Bristow's "knowledge of security
procedures and technical terminology...", as well as his "elegant suit
and highly polished shoes." Grant Bristow was the one member of the
Heritage Front who had the respectability and the expertise to make
Flint believe that he was dealing with a legitimate group of
individuals. It is extremely unlikely that Flint would have ever used
this group if he had met with skinheads or other Heritage Front
members.

In the final analysis, Wolfgang Droege had a plot to discredit the
Reform Party by linking the party to the Heritage Front through its
security arrangement.

Grant Bristow played a pivotal role in this conspiracy, if in no other
way than by providing the security group with the respectability and
expertise they could not have gotten elsewhere within the Heritage
Front.

When the story broke in 1992 the Reform Party was indeed discredited,
although there are no objective means to measure to what extent. It is
bad enough that Droege, an individual deemed to be a threat to the
security of Canada, devised a plot to discredit a legitimate political
party and CSIS did nothing about it. It is much worse when Grant
Bristow, a CSIS source, played an integral role in accomplishing this
task, in violation of a Ministerial Direction. But it is a complete
travesty when SIRC, the body that Parliament established to monitor
CSIS, fails to even address the issue. CSIS INVESTIGATION OF PRESTON
MANNING While compiling its report on the Heritage Front Affair, SIRC
included a chapter that had nothing to do with the Heritage Front. It
was about the Reform Party and a foreign government, subsequently
identified as South Africa. SIRC wanted us to believe that by
including this chapter they could allay any fears amongst Reformers
that CSIS had investigated the party, or the leadership.

In the SIRC report, the CSIS investigation is portrayed as a
by-the-book, straight-forward operation. Upon closer inspection this
investigation proved to be anything but straight- forward. Rather than
allaying any of our concerns about CSIS investigations, SIRC's
willingness to lie about the facts has made the Reform Party even more
suspicious.

Through a Privacy Act request by Preston Manning, CSIS released its
documents on this investigation. Although they are heavily censored,
the documents show that SIRC withheld information and misrepresented
the facts in their report, so that they could demonstrate that CSIS
conducted a proper investigation. Any evidence that was contradictory
to their conclusion was suppressed.

In the following pages, we will review the actual investigation,
SIRC's version of the investigation, and the bizarre fallout from this
chapter of their report. In exchanges of correspondence and testimony
that occurred after the tabling of the report, we learned that CSIS
documents were altered and misdated.

We observed SIRC make admissions, and then subsequently retract these
admissions, completely contradicting their earlier statements and
testimony. The Director of CSIS also provided a version of events that
not only contradicted his earlier testimony, but also required him to
admit that almost everyone who touched this file made mistakes.

In the final analysis, the Reform Party is convinced that CSIS
launched an insupportable investigation of Preston Manning in 1989,
and tried to cover it up five months later. Both the current
management at CSIS and SIRC have continued that cover-up, frequently
changing their story when confronted with facts that did not fit their
version of the events. ;

A dubious source sparks an investigation. As SIRC reported, and the
CSIS documents confirm, this investigation began with a tip from a
source who was described by the CSIS investigator as "self-serving and
very opportunistic, particularly if it benefited himself." This
dubious source informed CSIS about a conversation that he had with a
board member of an association that promoted links between South
Africa and Canada. This source then stated that the board member said
that his group was giving money to Preston Manning's campaign, as
Manning was running against External Affairs Minister Joe Clark.

This information by itself should not have been of interest to CSIS.
In democracies, citizens can financially support whoever they want in
an election, for whatever reason. For CSIS to investigate they needed
information that South Africa was actually providing the money. During
the first meeting between CSIS and this dubious source, the source
stated that he thought the board member meant that the money was
coming from South Africa. When the source realized that he did not
have the key piece of evidence that CSIS required, he miraculously
obtained it less than three weeks later. The source stated that he had
been talking to an unidentified, close associate of the board member,
who supposedly told him that the South Africans may have contributed
as much as $45,000 to Preston Manning and the Reform Party in trying
to defeat Joe Clark in his riding of Yellowhead. This is the extent of
CSIS' information about the Manning campaign receiving money from a
foreign government.

Third-hand information from a source who is not only of unknown
reliability, but who had been identified by the CSIS investigator as
"self-serving and opportunistic", should not be the basis of a CSIS
investigation of any Canadian citizen, much less the leader of a
legitimate political party. ; CSIS analyst stated, basis for
investigation "difficult to support"! We are not the only ones to
question the validity of this investigation.

After the regional investigator sent two reports to CSIS Headquarters
in November 1988, a response from the HQ analyst on the South Africa
desk was sent to the region in January 1989. As the SIRC report
acknowledged, the analyst stated that in HQ's opinion, the source of
the alleged funding was most likely the group of Canadian businessmen
who belonged to the association. But when the analyst addressed the
possibility of foreign funding, SIRC did not accurately portray the
analyst's comments. The analyst did state that, "if it were shown that
South Africa indeed contributed as much as $45,000 to Manning's
campaign, HQ could in time attempt to make the argument that South
Africa is unduly influencing Canadian politics." However, SIRC chose
not to include the following sentence by the analyst in their report:
"To say the least, this kind of argument would be difficult to
support."

Since the analyst had stated that there was no basis for a CSIS
investigation, contradicting SIRC's conclusion that it was a
legitimate investigation, SIRC chose to suppress this line. It is the
only line in that section of the report that SIRC did not include in
the Heritage Front Affair report. The HQ analyst concluded this
January 10, 1989 message by requesting that the region keep "HQ
apprised of any forthcoming information which you may obtain in light
of the above."

There was no further information forwarded by the region. Rather, the
next document that appears in Manning's file is an authorization of a
TARC Level 1 investigation, dated October 17, 1989. ; Lead up to the
TARC Level 1 investigation - January 10, 1989 to October 17, 1989.
While there is a great deal of controversy over what happened between
October 17, 1989 and March 30, 1990, we are equally perplexed about
what happened between January 10, 1989 and October 17, 1989.

The Reform Party has never received a logical answer to why an analyst
on the South African desk in CSIS HQ stated that there was no basis
for an investigation into the alleged contribution to Preston Manning
on January 10, 1989, and yet without any additional, or new,
information, an analyst on the South African desk in CSIS HQ submitted
a request for a TARC Level 1 investigation on October 17, 1989? SIRC
attempted to provide the following as an answer: A reliable source
provided CSIS with information that a foreign country (read South
Africa) had transferred over a quarter of a million dollars to Canada,
to try to influence 24 Members of Parliament from other political
parties (read Progressive Conservatives and Liberals).

When asked, SIRC stated that CSIS did not take any steps to
investigate these M.P.s. If the information about South Africa funding
these 24 M.P.s did indeed inspire the investigation, why was there no
mention of this on the form (REQUEST FOR AND APPROVAL OF COLLECTION
LEVELS 1, 2 AND CATEGORY A aka 4002) authorizing the investigation?

It is therefore unlikely that this information played any role in the
investigation. SIRC would still have us believe that CSIS received
information from a reliable source that the South African Government
was using over a quarter of million dollars to influence 24
Conservative and Liberal M.P.s, but did not investigate them. Instead,
CSIS proceeded to launch an investigation of Preston Manning, who was
neither an M.P., nor a Progressive Conservative nor a Liberal.

We find SIRC's logic to be less than satisfying. ; The Actual
Investigation: Who, What, When, Why? >From the moment the Solicitor
General tabled the Heritage Front Affair report, one particular
passage has caused a great deal of grief for the Sub-Committee, SIRC
and CSIS. This passage resulted in a number of admissions,
explanations, contradictions, retractions and accusations.

The Reform Party believes that the best way to present this complex
subject is in the following chronological manner:

December 15, 1994 The Solicitor General tabled SIRC's report, the
Heritage Front Affair, in the House of Commons. Included in section
VIII, at paragraph 8.3 is the following passage: "On October 17, 1989,
the Service decided to formally investigate the alleged $45,000
contribution. CSIS said that they could not go back to the informant
as all contacts had ended on December 31, 1988.

The Service authorized a three-month Level 1 investigation entitled:
#145;LNU FNU (Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
Campaign)'. The Service cited section 12 and paragraph 2 (b) of the
CSIS Act as the legal basis for the investigation." ;

December 16, 1994 ;SIRC appeared before the Sub-Committee on National
Security. Having been advised that the above-mentioned passage was
inaccurate, the Reform Party made the following request:

Ms. Meredith: "Can you have your officials go back to CSIS and have
them examine the hard copy of the original authorization of the Level
one investigation on the Reform Party and a foreign government, not
just the corrected copies? Specifically, can your employees examine
the caption on the file?"

Summary - After the meeting, the Reform Party was approached by SIRC
research officials. They asked what they should be looking for
specifically. This led the Reform Party to believe that SIRC was not
aware of a changed caption. ;

January 27, 1995 In a letter from Maurice Archdeacon, the Executive
Director of SIRC, to Derek Lee, M.P., the Chairman of the
Sub-Committee on National Security, Val Meredith's request was
answered in the following manner:

"Ms. Meredith, M.P. requested that SIRC have its officials re-examine
the original authorization of the Level I investigation on the Reform
Party and a foreign government. Specifically, Ms. Meredith asked to be
told what the caption was on the file.

The nature of Ms. Meredith's question suggests that the answer may
well already be known to her. Nevertheless, the caption she referred
to for the targeting authority dated October 17, 1989 was #145;Preston
Manning.' The caption was revised on March 30, 1990 to state,
#145;LNU/FNU (Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
Campaign).'

I would be remiss if I did not point out that, aside from the amended
caption, there were no other changes to the text of the targeting
requests/authorizations. That is, the text in each of the documents
was identical, and clearly stated that the investigation was to
determine whether a #145;foreign influence' threat existed. CSIS did
not suspect Mr. Manning of complicity..."

Summary - Mr. Archdeacon admitted that the name on the targeting
authority dated October 17, 1989 was #145;Preston Manning.' He also
mentioned that "there were no other changes to the text of the
targeting request/authorizations. That is, the text in each of the
documents was identical." It is quite apparent that Mr. Archdeacon is
stating that there were two versions of the same document, with the
only change being to the caption. From his choice of words being the
#145;targeting request/authorizations', there is no doubt that Mr.
Archdeacon is referring to the form 4002. ;

March 30, 1995 The Solicitor General appears before the Standing
Committee on Justice and Legal Affairs, for the Main Estimates. He is
accompanied by his Deputy Minister and the heads of the various
agencies under his control, including Mr. Ward Elcock, Director of
CSIS. The Reform Party asked Mr. Elcock a number of questions about
this particular investigation.

The following excerpts are from the transcript of this meeting: (Page 15)

Ms. Meredith: "Can you explain then why Mr. Manning's name was used
for a TARC level one investigation and why that investigation was not
conducted under the foreign government?"

Mr. Elcock: "I don't know why that name was used. I suspect that, as
much as anything else, it may have been just used as a convenient tag.
I don't know the precise reason why it was used, but there is no
question from the file that at any time the subject of the
investigation was ever Mr. Manning himself."

Ms. Meredith: "Why was that file named under Mr. Manning, then, and
not under #145;unknown contributor?'"

Mr. Elcock: "I said, Mr. Chairman, that I didn't know the reason why
that name was used. It clearly was in error, because in substance, the
investigation at all times was an investigation of the actions of a
foreign government, not an investigation of Mr. Manning."

(Page 17) Ms. Meredith: "So Mr. Manning's name never came up under a
requisition or a request for a TARC Level One investigation?"

Mr. Elcock: "It was in the sense, Mr. Chairman, that the title of the
TARC was initially in Mr. Manning's name. His name was there. Was
there an investigation of Mr. Manning? Absolutely not."

Ms. Meredith: "I didn't ask if there was an investigation of Mr.
Manning. I asked if a TARC Level was ever instituted under Mr.
Manning's name?"

Mr. Elcock: "The answer, Mr. Chairman, was that there was a TARC Level
in Mr. Manning's name. But as I have said, the subject of that TARC
was not Mr. Manning at any time, ever."

(Page 34) Ms. Meredith: "I have your policy manual here, the
declassified version of the CSIS Operational Manual. For a TARC Level
one authority, an investigator must submit a request for an approval
form, CSIS form 4002. There's a space for the name of the individual
to be investigated. Can you tell me whose name was in that spot on the
form 4002 in question, signed on October 17, 1989?"

Mr. Elcock: "As I think I said earlier, there was in the TARC title
Mr. Manning's name. However, as I said quite clearly, the subject of
that file was at all times an investigation of contributions in terms
of the possibility of contributions having been made by a foreign
government to a Canadian political party. It was at no time an
investigation of Mr. Manning himself, notwithstanding the title. I
would that (sic) the title had been otherwise, but it wasn't. That's
the fact."

Summary - During this meeting, the Director of CSIS made it quite
clear that on October 17, 1989 the TARC Level 1 authorization, the
form 4002, was on Preston Manning. Mr. Elcock did not once suggest
that the caption was "Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's
Electoral Campaign." (Nor did Mr. Elcock suggest that the error
occurred with a different document known as a FILE OPENING REQUEST -
PEOPLE FILES form.) At this same meeting the Reform Party also
questioned the Director as to why SIRC was not made aware that the
original 4002 was in the name of #145;Preston Manning'.

That led to the following exchange: (Page 17)

Ms. Meredith: "Can you explain to me why that information wasn't
provided to SIRC? In their report, they reported very thoroughly on
that investigation, with the exception of the original TARC level?"

Mr. Elcock: "Why what information?"

Ms. Meredith: "That the TARC level on Mr. Manning was excluded from
the SIRC report, that SIRC was unaware of that having happened?"

Mr. Elcock: "I don't know that in fact SIRC was unaware. I don't know
why they would not have put it in their report or would have chosen
not to do that. That's SIRC's business, and you would have to address
that question to SIRC."

Ms. Meredith: "When we brought it to SIRC's attention, they were
unaware of that fact. It was only by it being brought to their
attention that they were able to go back and find out the information.
So I assumed from that they did not know that information was not
provided to them, and I would like to know why it wasn't?"

Mr. Elcock: "I don't know that that assumption is correct; I would
have to check. In fact, my belief is that they did have that
information, but I'll certainly check that for the hon. member."

Summary - This was the first information that the Reform Party
received that SIRC was aware that the original TARC Level was on
Preston Manning. ;

March 31, 1995 In response to Mr. Elcock's testimony, Val Meredith
wrote to SIRC, seeking clarification of what SIRC knew and when. "Was
any member or employee of SIRC aware that the original TARC
investigation launched on October 17, 1989 (was) in the name of
Preston Manning and not "LNU FNU (Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston
Manning's Electoral Campaign), when the Heritage Front Affair report
was tabled on December 9, 1994?" Summary - The Reform Party
specifically asked SIRC if they knew prior to the tabling of their
report that the TARC investigation was in the name of #145;Preston
Manning.' ;

April 7, 1995 In a letter, under the name of Jacques Courtois, P.C.,
Q.C., but signed by Maurice Archdeacon, Val Meredith's letter was
responded to in the following fashion: "You asked whether any member
or employee of SIRC was aware of the TARC investigation launched on
October 17, 1989 in the name of Preston Manning and not the corrected
title. SIRC staff saw the original title of the targeting
authorization, as well as the corrected title and all other documents
pertaining to the investigation. As I mentioned in my letter dated
January 27, 1995 to Mr. Derek Lee, M.P. Chairperson of the
Sub-Committee on National Security, the description (narrative text)
of the authorization never changed... The original caption was seen
for what it was - an error, and the Service corrected that error five
years ago."

Summary - Once again SIRC admitted that the caption on the TARC on
October 17, 1989 was in the name of Preston Manning. They also
admitted that they knew this prior to tabling their report. Although
Mr. Archdeacon does not specifically state why SIRC chose to exclude
this information from their report, the only possible explanation they
offer for its exclusion is that the original caption was seen as an
error, and that CSIS corrected that error in 1990. ;

June 20, 1995 SIRC appeared before the National Security Sub-Committee
for the Main Estimates. The Reform Party asked SIRC a number of
questions about this particular investigation.

The following excerpts are from the transcript of this meeting: (Page 7)

Ms. Meredith: "Are you trying to tell this committee that there was
not a TARC Level one investigation opened on Preston Manning?"

Mr. Archdeacon: "No, I'm not, obviously, because we're repeating
discussions we had over several hours earlier. You know very well that
I'm not doing so. Someone - and we admitted it was sloppy work, and
I'm sure the Director of CSIS would admit that - instead of taking the
trouble to write on the TARC title #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston
Manning's campaign' just wrote #145;Preston Manning.' The text,
however, in the TARC report makes it absolutely clear - and you read
the text - that Mr. Manning was not being investigated. We can't say
it any more than this. It's question asked and answered."

(Page 20)

Mr. Archdeacon: "The fact is at the moment you're looking at the form
- I understand your point - and saying the form of that 4002 gave the
impression, because the name Preston Manning was there, that the TARC
was on Preston Manning. That is the form of it."

Summary - SIRC once again confirmed that the 4002 was in the name of
Preston Manning. Mr. Archdeacon went so far as to state that he
obviously wasn't denying that there was a TARC Level one investigation
opened on Preston Manning. ;

June 21, 1995 to November 7, 1995 During this time period, the
Sub-Committee on National Security considered its report on the
Heritage Front Affair. During these meetings, the Sub-Committee was
operating on the understanding that the original 4002 was in the name
of "Preston Manning" and this was altered to "LNU/FNU (Unknown
Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign" on March 30,
1990. ; November 9, 1995 To clarify questions about alterations to
4002, and who knew about the caption "Preston Manning", the
Sub-Committee sent a letter to the Director of CSIS. The following are
the key excerpts from this letter: "On January 27, 1995, SIRC advised
the Subcommittee, in response to its questions, that the caption on
the October 17, 1989 targeting authority dealt with in Chapter VIII of
the SIRC Report was originally #145;Preston Manning.' The Review
Committee went on in the same letter to advise us that the caption was
changed on March 30, 1990 to read #145;LNU-FNU (Unknown Contributor(s)
to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign).' How was the caption change
made on the Form 4002 - was the original form altered or was the
original form destroyed and a new, back-dated, re-signed or
re-initialled form created? Another of the documents contained in the
file obtained by Mr. Manning is a November 10, 1989 Transit Slip (Form
3040) from the Chief of Counter Intelligence - General Desk to the
Director General of Counter Intelligence. I would like to draw your
attention to item 5 on this document where it is asserted #145;caption
is considered appropriate under policy provision.' Can you provide the
Subcommittee with an explanation of this assertion in light of the
fact that at the time the caption read #145;Preston Manning' and was
not changed until March 30, 1990? If the caption was appropriate as it
was on November 10, 1989, what made it unacceptable on March 30,
1990?" Summary - These questions challenged SIRC's and CSIS'
contention that #145;Preston Manning's' name appearing in caption was
just a #145;clerical error.' It would be difficult for CSIS to
maintain the #145;clerical error' excuse if the Director General of
Counterintelligence was aware of the caption, and agreed with it. ;

March 29, 1996 According to CSIS, they did not receive the November 9,
1995 letter from the Sub-Committee until this date. There is no
explanation as to what happened to the letter during the intervening 4
1/2 months. ;

April 15, 1996 The Director of CSIS responded to the Sub-Committee's
letter of November 9, 1995. In a complete departure from previous
statements and testimony from CSIS and SIRC, the Director contended
that the Form 4002 never read #145;Preston Manning', but the original
caption was #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
Campaign.' Key excerpts from his letter are as follows: "In response
to your query regarding the #145;REQUEST FOR AND APPROVAL OF
COLLECTION LEVELS 1, 2 AND CATEGORY A' form, dated October 17, 1989, I
am satisfied that this is the original document associated with this
file. As is shown on this form, the original caption was #145;Unknown
Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign'. The
collection authority and a second form, #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST -
PEOPLE FILES', is required by the Service's Information Management
branch, in order to create a file. It was at this stage in the process
that the clerical error occurred regarding this file caption. In an
effort to facilitate the electronic opening and future retrieval of
this file and the relevant documents, the caption that was erroneously
entered on the #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES' form was
#145;Preston Manning'. This error caused the creation of an automated
hard copy file under this incorrect caption. It was during the latter
part of March, 1990, while preparing this assessment report, that the
file caption error was corrected. Item 5 on the #145;TRANSIT SLIP'
(Form 3040), dated November 10, 1989, discusses the appropriateness of
the caption as presented originally - #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to
Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign' and the comments indicate that
the author believed the caption to be appropriate."

Summary - This was an astounding development. The Director totally
contradicted 15 months of statements and testimony from both SIRC and
himself. According to the January 27, 1995 letter from Maurice
Archdeacon to Derek Lee, M.P., the targeting authority (form 4002)
read #145;Preston Manning' on October 17, 1989 and was changed on
March 30, 1990. Mr. Elcock made no reference to this fact in his
letter. Nor does the Director address his own testimony before the
Standing Committee on Justice and Legal Affairs on March 30, 1995,
where the following exchange took place:

Ms. Meredith: "So Mr. Manning's name never came up under a requisition
or a request for a TARC Level One investigation?"

Mr. Elcock: "It was in the sense, Mr. Chairman, that the title of TARC
was initially in Mr. Manning's name. His name was there. Was there an
investigation of Mr. Manning? Absolutely not."

Ms. Meredith: "I didn't ask if there was an investigation of Mr.
Manning. I asked if a TARC Level was instituted under Mr. Manning's
name?"

Mr. Elcock: "The answer Mr. Chairman, was that there was a TARC Level
in Mr. Manning's name."

There is no explanation of why Mr. Elcock would state on March 30,
1995 that "the title of the TARC was initially in Mr. Manning's name,"
and then on April 15, 1996 he would write that "the original caption
was #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
Campaign.'"

It must also be noted that in none of the correspondence or testimony
from CSIS or SIRC, between December 16, 1994 and April 14, 1996, was
there even a single mention of a "FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES"
form. This particular form was certainly known to CSIS, as it was
included in Preston Manning's Privacy Act request. However, subsequent
investigation and testimony would show that Mr. Elcock was not
completely forthcoming in this letter. ;

May 15, 1996 SIRC appeared before the Sub-Committee on National
Security for the Main Estimates. While there was little discussion
about this issue at this meeting, the following exchanges occurred:
(page 30)

Mr. Discepola: "I'd like to know, then, in your opinion why in the
world Preston Manning's name was used at all in any of the
documentation that related to the investigation of the suspected third
country contribution to the election campaign."

Mr. Archdeacon: "I've forgotten the exact date but the original title
was #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning's Election Campaign.'
It should of had more on it then that, but that was the exact title.
It was not titled #145;Preston Manning', and Mrs. Meredith has a copy
of the sheets of paper. Here it is, and the title on it is
#145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign.'
Then there's the text of what is to be looked at, which is whether
somebody, some country, was going to contribute money to Preston
Manning's electoral campaign. When you have a TARC like that you must
open a file, and this TARC was sent down to the management information
section in CSIS. Because it didn't have LNU/FNU in front of the
#145;Unknown Contributor(s)', which means last name unknown, first
name unknown, the only name the clerk down there could see was Preston
Manning, and you have to have a name on a file. So he didn't write
#145;Unknown Contributor(s)' , he wrote #145;Preston Manning'. That
was an error. He shouldn't have done that. That error remained like
that for at least three months without being corrected. It wasn't
corrected until about March, when the assessment was being done. There
have been allegations that the title on the TARC was changed. Written
in ink was #145;LNU/FNU' ahead of what had always been there and had
never been changed. Because Mrs. Meredith was so sure of this, and
because we knew she had our information from somewhere else, we
decided to have the original TARC X-rayed. We have exact evidence that
everything Mrs. Meredith has said about this - about it having been
titled #145;Preston Manning', about things having been typed around
it, and about all those sorts of things - is completely and totally
incorrect. The file was mistitled and the file does not give anybody
any reason to investigate anybody. A file title does not authorize
anybody to investigate anybody. There was never any time when every
CSIS agent across the country could have investigated Mr. Manning.
That is a figment of someone's imagination." (page 32)

Ms. Meredith: "Then I would like to put something on the record, Mr.
Chair. I'd like to put on the record, Mr. Archdeacon, that the
comments you just made are in complete contradiction to a letter on
January 27, 1995, addressed to Mr. Derek Lee, and in testimony you've
given before this committee. It's a complete contradiction."

The Chairman: "I'm sure SIRC would want to address that. Perhaps this
is something that can be clarified later. Can I take it, Mr.
Archdeacon, Mr. Courtois, that you would differ?"

Mr. Archdeacon: "We would differ with that characterization." ;

Summary - Mr. Archdeacon's comments are a complete departure from
SIRC's previous correspondence and testimony.

First of all, it was not Ms. Meredith who stated that the original
TARC was captioned #145;Preston Manning', it was Mr. Archdeacon
himself who first made this statement in his letter of January 27,
1995, when he stated:; "The caption she referred to for the targeting
authority dated October 17, 1989 was #145;Preston Manning'.

The caption was revised on March 30, 1990 to state, #145;LNU/FNU
(Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign).'"

Then there is the letter that Mr. Archdeacon signed on April 7, 1995,
in which he stated:; "You asked whether any member or employee of SIRC
was aware of the TARC investigation launched on October 17, 1989 in
the name of Preston Manning and not the corrected title. SIRC staff
saw the original title of the targeting authorization, as well as the
corrected title and all other documents pertaining to the
investigation."

Once again Mr. Archdeacon confirmed that the original title was
"Preston Manning", and admitted that SIRC staff saw both the original
title of the targeting authorization, as well as the corrected title.
If, as Mr. Archdeacon maintained on May 15, 1996, the original title
was "Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign",
why would he state in two pieces of correspondence that the caption
was "Preston Manning".

Furthermore, during SIRC's appearance before the National Security
Sub-Committee meeting on June 20, 1995, there was this exchange:;

Ms. Meredith: "Are you trying to tell this committee that there was
not a TARC Level one investigation opened on Preston Manning?"

Mr. Archdeacon: "No, I'm not obviously, because we're repeating
discussions we had over several hours earlier. You know very well that
I'm not doing so. Someone - and we admitted it was sloppy work, and
I'm sure the Director of CSIS would admit that - instead of taking the
trouble to write on the TARC title #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston
Manning's Campaign' just wrote #145;Preston Manning.'"

Mr. Archdeacon made no effort to explain why, on May 15, 1996, he told
the Sub-Committee that there was not a TARC Level one investigation
opened on Preston Manning, when on June 20, 1995 he stated the exact
opposite.

Clearly, Mr. Archdeacon and SIRC have fully endorsed the April 15,
1996 letter from the Director of CSIS. Like Mr. Elcock, they make no
effort to explain the contradictions.

There is one comment of Mr. Archdeacon that would be contradicted by
the CSIS Director two weeks later. Mr. Archdeacon made a definitive
statement that the error was caused by a clerk in the Management
Information Section, who wrote "Preston Manning." As we will see in
the next section, this statement has no basis in fact, but is rather a
figment of Mr. Archdeacon's imagination. ;

May 27, 1996 Mr. Elcock appeared before the Sub-Committee to answer
questions about the Heritage Front Affair. During his appearance the
Reform Party asked him about a number of discrepancies contained in
his letter of April 15, 1996.

Four of the specific subjects that were broached, included:

I) The Altered #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES' Form. In his
letter, Mr. Elcock stated, "the caption that was erroneously entered
on the #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES' form was #145;Preston
Manning.'" However, the copy of that form that Mr. Manning received in
his Privacy Act request did not read #145;Preston Manning', but rather
#145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign'.
It is obvious that the section of the form for the subject's name has
been altered, as have the sections for #145;Present Address' and
#145;Occupation'.

The following exchange took place in relation to this form:

Ms. Meredith: "Mr. Elcock, your letter clearly states that it was on
this file, this PEOPLE FILES form here, and if people look carefully
you can see where there has been alterations made to this document.
The alterations have been made not only on the subject line, but on
the #145;Occupation' line and the #145;Present Address' line. Your
letter states that it was this form that Preston Manning's name was
put on by mistake. I'm asking you why does this form not have Preston
Manning's name on it? It has #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston
Manning's Electoral Campaign."

Mr. Elcock: "Mr. Chairman, Mr. Sundstrom reminds me that although it
doesn't show here underneath, it was just Preston Manning when the
form was first completed."

Ms. Meredith: "So, if you agree, or if you read Mr. Archdeacon's
comments where he noted it had been a clerk and it was a clerk in the
Management Information Section that changed the document from
#145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning' and put Preston Manning's
name in it. It's obvious that #145;Occupation' and #145;Present
Address' have also been altered, changed, whited-out. Did this clerk
also put Preston Manning's address and his occupation in there? Do
they have the right to just add that in as they saw fit?"

Mr. Elcock: "Mr. Chairman, it compounded the clerical error, but
there's nothing that prevents them from adding those details."

Summary - While Mr. Elcock confirmed that the #145;Subject Name',
#145;Occupation' and #145;Present Address' sections were all altered,
he maintained that it was a "clerical error". Well it might be
possible that a CSIS clerk would not use the proper caption in this
case, it is ludicrous to suggest that the clerk would, on his or her
own initiative, add Mr. Manning's address and occupation. Besides, if
as CSIS and SIRC maintain, Mr. Manning was never investigated, how did
CSIS even know his present address. In any event, as we shall see in
section #145;IV', the story of the clerk making a mistake is soon
retracted. ;

II) Citing a document two weeks before it existed. In the form 4002,
which authorized the TARC Level 1 investigation on October 17, 1989,
there is a reference to a proposed meeting between Mr. Manning and an
unidentified Ambassador. The reference goes on to state that the
meeting was canceled at the last minute by the Embassy. Only one
N.S.R. (CSIS database) message in the package obtained by Mr. Manning
in his Privacy Act request contained this information. It was dated
November 1, 1989, two weeks after the form 4002 was supposedly
completed.

Questions about this discrepancy went as follows:

Ms. Meredith: "Can I get you to go to tab #145;L' in the documents
that we've provided for you? This document is the only document that
was received under the access, under the Privacy Act, to Mr. Manning,
that makes any reference to an Ambassador and Preston Manning meeting,
and the meeting being canceled by the Embassy. Can you give me the
date of that message?"

Mr. Elcock: "The date at the top is 89- 11-01."

Ms. Meredith: "What does that equate to... November 1, 1989?"

Mr. Elcock: "Yes, it should do."

Ms. Meredith: "How is it possible that this message number and this
date can be an additional background on a document that is dated
October 17, 1989? How is it possible that this information is on a
document when it didn't exist at the time?"

Mr. Elcock: "The honourable member is concluding that it's the same
reference; I don't know that it is."

Ms. Meredith: "If that is not the report, then why was the report not
included in the Privacy request by Mr. Manning? This is the only
document that was in the information provided to him."

Mr. Elcock: "I will check and see what the date is and advise the
committee what the date of the document was."

Summary - The Reform Party did ask, in writing, for CSIS to confirm
the date of this message. At the time this dissenting opinion was
written, CSIS had not responded to our request. If this is the report
in question, then it lends credence to the suggestion that this form
4002 was re-written some time after October 17, 1989. It also suggests
that someone believed that the original justification for the
investigation was so weak, that additional information had to be
provided. If, on the other hand, there was documentation withheld from
Mr. Manning's Privacy request, one wonders what else has been
withheld. ;

III) The Altered Form 4002. If the inclusion of information from a
message that was not yet reported suggested that the form 4002 had
been re-written, another fact that supported this suggestion was that
the date on the top right corner of the document had been altered. The
Reform Party employed the services of forensic consultant, an expert
in the examination of questioned documents, who stated "as a matter of
information it should be noted that within the questioned handwritten
digital date #145;1989-10-17' on exhibit A1 (a), partially within and
immediately above the handwritten numbers there exist undecipherable
fragmentary markings foreign to the handwritten #145;1989-10-17'
numbers."

This information led to the following exchange:

Ms. Meredith: "Mr. Elcock, I want to bring your attention back to the
first page of form 4002 and I want you to look at the handwritten date
at the top, right-hand corner. That handwritten date was altered,
wasn't it? Tab #145;B'."

Mr. Elcock: "And it goes back, I think, to the piece that you had
asked... I noted that Mr. Archdeacon had indicated the piece had been
X-rayed and in fact there was another date underneath."

Ms. Meredith: "Can you tell the committee what the date was that was
underneath?"

Mr. Elcock: "The date was 1990...March 29, 1990."

Ms. Meredith: "Thank you, Mr. Elcock. I think that just proves what I
have considered, that this document was typed up in full with a
changed subject-matter on March 29, 1990; that this document did not
originate on October 17, 1989."

Mr. Elcock: "No, Mr. Chairman, I don't agree that it does."

Ms. Meredith: "Can you explain how the date March 29, 1990 would be at
the top of that file if that was not the case?"

Mr. Elcock: "At the time, often the dates on those files, on those
documents are left open and completed later when the documents are
first issued because they don't have a file number either when they're
first issued."

Ms. Meredith: "Mr. Elcock, so you want me to believe, you want this
committee to believe that they filled in the form, that the effective
date was put in at the bottom, the expiry date was put in at bottom,
that it was signed off and the date was put in at the bottom, but that
at the top it wasn't. Is that what you want this committee to
believe?"

Mr. Elcock: "I believe there was a mistake made. We believed that at
the time the typist entered the date and subsequently crossed out
because she had mistakenly entered it and they put back in the
appropriate date."

Summary - Although Mr. Elcock admitted that the form 4002 carried the
date March 29, 1990, he maintained that this was the original 4002
filled out on October 17, 1989. His argument that the date wasn't put
in because the document did not have a file number is extremely weak,
since the FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form that was signed on
October 17, 1989 was filled out specifically to obtain a file number.

In the documents obtained by Mr. Manning under his Privacy Act
request, we know that the first N.S.R. message that was sent on this
file was dated October 17, 1989, and since a message can not be sent
without a file number, a file number was obviously assigned on this
date. It is highly unlikely that CSIS would wait an additional five
months to fill in the rest of this form. This admission also calls
into question the testimony of Mr. Archdeacon from May 15, 1996, who
first brought up the subject of having the form X-rayed, and then
stated the form was never changed. ;

IV) Both Documents filled out by the Same Individual. The last area of
questioning concerned the contention put forth by CSIS and SIRC, that
the error in captions occurred not with the form 4002, but when a
clerk made an error in filling out a second form, a FILE OPENING
REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form. Mr. Elcock called this a "clerical
error".

In his May 15, 1996 testimony, Mr. Archdeacon went even further when
he stated, "this TARC was sent down to the Management Information
Section in CSIS... The clerk down there thought that the only name
that he had, and you've got to have a name on a file, the only name he
could see was Preston Manning. So he didn't write #145;Unknown
Contributor', he wrote #145;Preston Manning'. That was an error. He
shouldn't have done that." Again these sound like plausible
explanations. Plausible that is until one examines the forms.

The Reform Party and the Sub- Committee were somewhat hampered because
of the censoring of the documents, which deleted the names of the CSIS
employees who filled out these forms. We were instead forced to
examine the handwritten dates on both the form 4002 and the FILE
OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form. It is apparent that they were
written by the same person. The Forensic Consultant, an expert in the
examination of questioned documents confirmed the similarities.

While it may have been plausible that a clerk put in the wrong caption
on the second form, it is absolutely ludicrous to suggest that an
intelligence officer in CSIS HQ would fill out a form 4002 to
authorize an investigation in one name, and then on the very same day
he would fill out a second form to obtain a file number, and use a
different caption. As absurd as that sounds, that is what the Director
of CSIS wanted us to believe.

Witness the following exchange:

Ms. Meredith: "And that this unit head authorized a TARC Level
investigation on #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning's
Electoral Campaign?' Is that right? That is in essence what this is
all about, right, is that they authorized a TARC one on an
#145;Unknown Contributor.'"

Mr. Elcock: "An Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning's Electoral
Campaign, yes."

Ms. Meredith: "And that the problem originated or the problem was
picked up when somebody filled out the FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE
FILES, and then wrote in #145;Preston Manning.'"

Mr. Elcock: "Yes." Ms. Meredith: "It wasn't a clerk who filled out
those forms, was it?"

Mr. Elcock: "No, Mr. Chairman. I'm not sure what the honourable
member's point is."

Ms. Meredith: "My point is that if you look at the date in the top
right- hand corner of the FILE OPENING REQUEST and you look at the
date under the authority section on the same form, the PEOPLE FILE,
FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES, and then you look at the date
which is hand-written in at the top of the form 4002, I would suggest,
Sir, that it's the same person that wrote these two documents, that
worked with these two documents. How is it possible that the same
person on one file can put #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston
Manning's Electoral Campaign' and on the other file, the very same
day, put #145;Preston Manning.' And that his unit head, in reviewing
these on the same day, wouldn't pick up the mistake."

Mr. Elcock: "I'm not -- the honourable ...."

Ms. Meredith: "These are things that, I'm sorry, how is it possible
that a Counterintelligence officer can mistakenly, this is who filled
out this form, is an intelligence officer in Counterintelligence. How
could he look at a TARC form that he also filled in and filled it in
with #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning' and on the very same
day on another form put Preston Manning's name down?"

Mr. Elcock: "These things happen. Names are sometimes left in
documents when they ought not to be." Ms. Meredith: "And his unit
chief who is authorizing and okaying these didn't notice that one of
the forms was under Preston Manning's name?" Mr. Elcock: "I'm sure as
the honourable member will know, these things happen from time to
time."

Summary - Mr. Elcock's defence, given this information is simply that
these things happen. That is even more frightening than a planned
investigation of Mr. Manning. The Director of CSIS stated that he
wanted to re-assure the Reform Party that nothing untoward happened
with this file. Yet, the only explanation Mr. Elcock offers for the
conduct of his department, is that the employees who were involved in
this investigation were grossly incompetent?

However, the Reform Party has more faith in the ability of working
level staff at CSIS than the Director does. However, the Director did
confirm that the FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form was never
filled out by a clerk in the Information Management Section of CSIS.
That begs the question: Why did the Executive Director of SIRC, Mr.
Archdeacon, make up his story to mislead the Sub-Committee? ;

CONCLUSIONS The Reform Party regrets having to present such a
painstakingly, detailed review of the Preston Manning investigation,
but it was necessary to demonstrate the extreme lengths that we have
had to go to in our attempts to find the truth in this matter.

The documents obtained by Mr. Manning through his Privacy Act request
afforded us the opportunity to challenge SIRC's version of events
directly. SIRC has demonstrated that their word cannot be accepted at
face value. But what does this all mean in the final analysis?

Two issues need to be resolved. The first is what initiated the
October 17, 1989 TARC Level 1 investigation. Since the South African
desk in CSIS HQ wrote off any investigation on January 10, 1989, what
suddenly spawned interest nine months later. One would think that it
would be logical for someone to have something in writing suggesting
that an investigation be opened. But that didn't happen.

The questions that remains unanswered, are:

Who ordered this matter re-opened, and why? The other issue that must
be answered is: Why are CSIS and SIRC going to such extreme lengths to
mislead the Sub-Committee, Parliament, and Canadians? If they had
maintained their original explanation that the file caption was
inappropriately opened in the name of #145;Preston Manning', and
subsequently changed, the Reform Party would have little to complain
about. But for CSIS and SIRC to retract all their previous admissions
without explanations, and to out-and-out lie to a Parliamentary
Sub-Committee, it is clear that there is something important they are
hiding.

The question is: What? Contrary to the assurances from SIRC and CSIS,
the Reform Party has learned that from October 17, 1989 to January 17,
1990, it was recorded in CSIS' main database, N.S.R., that there was a
TARC Level 1 on Preston Manning. There was no restricted security on
this file, so this information was available to any CSIS employee who
had access to N.S.R.

Any employee who came across this information would have believed that
there was a legal TARC Level on Manning, and could have legitimately
carried out a Level 1 investigation. If the government members of the
Sub-Committee weren't so intent on burying this report, the Sub-
Committee itself may have been able to produce some of its own
answers.

However, it became apparent, especially after the Liberals changed the
membership of the Sub-Committee, that government members are just as
interested in covering up the truth, as are CSIS and SIRC. This is
typified by the member from Windsor - St. Clair's vociferous objection
to the Bloc Quebecois attempting to give their time to question the
Director of CSIS to the Reform Party at the May 27, 1996 meeting. Why
else would they object to the Reform Party having a few extra minutes
to ask questions?

It is clear to the Reform Party that SIRC's Heritage Front Affair
report is a complete whitewash. SIRC was able to divert what should
have been a review of the activities of a CSIS Source into a review of
the Heritage Front itself. Both SIRC and CSIS champion this case as a
great success for the Service, but the mere fact that the Source's own
actions made this case public, should suggest it was a failure. But
what this case has done is to show that the review system established
by the CSIS Act does not work.

The government has joined with CSIS and SIRC in covering up the truth.
Why? What are they afraid of? This government has expressed no concern
that the leader of a legitimate political party had his name on a
document authorizing a CSIS investigation on him. They have expressed
no concern that all the original documents authorizing that
investigation were altered in one manner or another. They have shown
no concern that both CSIS and SIRC admitted that originally the TARC
level was on Preston Manning, then fifteen months later proceeded to
deny it, with absolutely no explanation.

It would appear that this government is not interested in holding the
bureaucracy accountable. How is it possible that the government is not
concerned that one of its agencies operates without accountability.
Was that not why a civilian intelligence agency was formed? Did not a
previous Liberal administration pass the CSIS Act, to make Canada's
intelligence community accountable to Parliament?

Those Canadians who care about the truth will have to wait until this
country has a government committed to Parliamentary accountability,
before the true version comes out. In the meantime, the Reform Party
hopes that those journalists, researchers or academics who are
interested in pursuing security issues continue their search for the
real story. The truth is out there!

RECOMMENDATIONS In light of the negligent performance of the Security
Intelligence Review Committee in reviewing this investigation, it is
clear that there is no place in the review process for a group of
patronage appointees who believe that they do not have to answer to
Parliament.

To find an alternative we need look no further than to our neighbours
to the south. The Americans utilize not only a House Select Committee
on Intelligence, but a Senate Committee as well. Given the immense
Intelligence network in the United States with the CIA, the NSA and
the Intelligence Division of the FBI, the Americans have demonstrated
that review by elected representatives is not only workable, but in
the Reform Party's opinion is preferable. ;

Reform Party Recommendation The Reform Party recommends that this
government introduce legislation in Parliament that would amend the
Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act, deleting all references to
the Security Intelligence Review Committee. All references to the
Security Intelligence Review Committee should be replaced by the
Standing Committee on National Security. ;

; Created by Maurice Murphy Revised: December 01, 1996

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 04:02:33 -0300
Subject: RE Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the
mindless lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???
To: ABrander@highriver.ca, highwood <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, mclellana <mclellana@bennettjones.com>,
"Ian.Shardlow" <Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Ian.McPhail"
<Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Dale.McGowan"
<Dale.McGowan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "calgary.acadia"
<calgary.acadia@assembly.ab.ca>, "calgary.northwest"
<calgary.northwest@assembly.ab.ca>, Calgarynews <Calgarynews@ctv.ca>,
calgarynewstips <calgarynewstips@cbc.ca>, cal-news
<cal-news@sunmedia.ca>, eblokland <eblokland@highriver.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, gunfighter@fritze.com, Sheldon@nfa.ca

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: PCC Complaints <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:14:53 +0000
Subject: RE: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me
off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the
Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya...
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Hello Mr. Amos:

This e-mail is to acknowledge your recent communication with our
office about the RCMP.

If you wish to submit a complaint regarding the on-duty conduct of a
member(s) of the RCMP, you can do so through our online complaint form
located at:

https://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/cnt/srv/mac/index-eng.aspx

Alternatively, we can also be reached by:

Telephone : 1-800-665-6878
E-mail: complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
Fax : 604-501-4095

Sincerely,


Günther Schönfeldt
Intake Officer / Agent d'information de liaison
Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP /
Commission des plaintes du public contre la Gendarmerie royale du Canada
Tel/Tél : 1-800-665-6878 | Fax/Téléc : (604) 501-4095
complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca



-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
Sent: September-07-13 11:38 PM
To: gunfighter@fritze.com; Sheldon@nfa.ca; bob.paulson; ORG; McPhail, Ian
Cc: David Amos; Cogan, Tim
Subject: Fwd: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me
off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shard low? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the
Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya

http://nfa.ca/news/video-analysis-reveals-rcmp-targeting-houses-firearms

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Al Brander <ABrander@highriver.ca>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 07:36:10 -0600
Subject: RE: Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the
mindless lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

For the record, these current missive are the only ones I have seen.

Please delete my from your address book since it appears you only want
a platform to rant from.

Al Brander

-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 9:46 PM
To: Al Brander; Ian.Shardlow; bob.paulson; mclellana; premier; Ian.McPhail
Cc: David Amos; highwood
Subject: Re: Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the
mindless lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???

My question would obviously be:

Why did you and Ian Shardlow your new local top cop ignore me for
nearly a month?

Obviously I am the guy who answered Greg Kvisle's quandry about why
the RCMP ignored the Charter and felt free to invade his home three
time in order to find and take his old 303 and shotgun but he did not
believe me. I suspect you know as wel as I Correct?

As far as who I am scroll down this is lots of info that you had a
month to check out. If you don't believe it ask Ian Sharlow or his
bosses Dale McGowan and Bob Paulson or the lawyers Landslide Annie
McLellan or Alison Redford if I am a liar or not.

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369

On 9/8/13, Al Brander <ABrander@highriver.ca> wrote:

> Mr. Amos: Is there a question for me here?? If so please present it and
> will you then also identify who you are please.
>
> Thank you;
>
> Al Brander

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2013 9:45 PM
> To: Emile Blokland; christopher@diarmani.com; brian.topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
> bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca; Josee.Valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Dale.McGowan;
> bob.paulson; steven.blaney; Sylvain.Roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; bloke@shaw.ca;
> premier; highwood; airdrie; mclellana; finditherefirst@gmail.com;
> Doug.Potts@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; ppalmater; xchief;
> gunfighter
> Cc: Ian.McPhail; David Amos; James Thackray; kevin.rushworth@sunmedia.ca; Al
> Brander; Jessica Hume; greg.weston; pm; MulcaT; justin.trudeau.a1
> Subject: Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the mindless
> lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???
>
> http://nfa.ca/news/video-analysis-reveals-rcmp-targeting-houses-firearms
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: ORG <ORG@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
> Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 03:38:08 +0000
> Subject: CPC AutoResponse / Réponse préenregistrée de la CPP
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for contacting the Commission for Public Complaints Against
> the RCMP. Your message has been received and if necessary, we shall
> respond as soon as possible.
>
> Thank you for your interest and comments.
>
> Nous vous remercions d'avoir communiqué avec la Commission des
> plaintes du public contre la GRC. Nous avons reçu votre message et y
> donnerons suite, si nécessaire, dans les plus brefs délais.
>
> Nous vous remercions de l'intérêt que vous manifestez à l'égard de la
> Commission et de vos commentaires.
>
>


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Emile Blokland <eblokland@highriver.ca>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:38:46 -0600
Subject: Out of Office: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High
River piss me off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith
at the Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email.

I am away from the office August 30, until September 16, 2013
inclusive. In my abscence please contact Deputy Mayor Al Brander at
abrander@highriver.ca

Mayor Emile Blokland



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Josee VALIQUETTE <josee.valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 20:38:36 -0400
Subject: Re: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me
off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the
Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya (Sgt. Valiquette is Away on
September 5th, 2013)
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Hello, I am away today. For any inquiries in regards to "K"
Division Media Relations, please contact S/Sgt. Ron Campbell at
780-412-5268.

Thank you

On 9/5/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <eblokland@highriver.ca>; <christopher@diarmani.com>;
<brian.topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca>;
<Josee.Valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "Dale.McGowan"
<Dale.McGowan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>; <Sylvain.Roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
<bloke@shaw.ca>; "premier" <premier@gov.ab.ca>; "highwood"
<highwood@assembly.ab.ca>; "airdrie" <airdrie@assembly.ab.ca>;
"mclellana" <mclellana@bennettjones.com>; <finditherefirst@gmail.com>;
<Doug.Potts@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
"ppalmater" <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca>; "xchief"
<xchief@bell.blackberry.net>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>;
<jthackray@highriver.ca>; <kevin.rushworth@sunmedia.ca>;
<abrander@highriver.ca>; "Jessica Hume" <jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>;
"greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>; "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>; "MulcaT"
<MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>; "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 9:38 PM
Subject: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me off
today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the Townhall
Meeting tonight for me will ya


http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Tories+Wildrose+exchange+fire+over+High+River+seizures/8866170/story.html

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 02:51:37 -0300
Subject: The latest top cop in High River Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow and
his boss Bob Paulson should be able to explain this email to Greg
Kvisle and the other pissed off folks
To: eblokland@highriver.ca, christopher@diarmani.com,
brian.topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca,
Josee.Valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "Dale.McGowan"
<Dale.McGowan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, Sylvain.Roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
bloke@shaw.ca, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, highwood
<highwood@assembly.ab.ca>, airdrie <airdrie@assembly.ab.ca>, mclellana
<mclellana@bennettjones.com>, finditherefirst@gmail.com,
Doug.Potts@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, ppalmater
<ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca>, xchief <xchief@bell.blackberry.net>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, jthackray@highriver.ca,
kevin.rushworth@sunmedia.ca, abrander@highriver.ca, Jessica Hume
<jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>, "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>

FYI I called Greg Kvisle after I saw him on Sun TV he said he didn't
need any help but he wanted to know who took his guns I told him I
knew but he didn't believe me. Clearly Ken Braat knows Greg Kvisle and
the cops very well. He should be able to tell Kvisle who took his
guns.

http://www.highrivertimes.com/2013/07/29/new-staff-sergeant-to-run-high-river-rcmp

I bet Harper and the RCMP remembers what this Maritimer said about his
old 303s and shoguns when I ran for seat Parliament the first time
after the Maritimers Landslide Annie Mclellan Wayne Easter and a
boatload of corrupt cops pissed me off. If a don't feel free to scroll
down N'esy Pas?

I bet Danielle Smith, Bobby Baby Paulson remembers Robin Reid. Clearly
Insp Dougy Potts and Sgt Ian Shardlow pissed her and a bunch of
Indians off bigtime last year EH?

----- Original Message -----
From: robin reid
To: bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; pm@pm.gc.ca ; people stand up ;
david.raymond.amos@gmail.com ; dominic ; calgary.west@assembly.ab.ca ;
toewsv1@mts.net ; jspottedbear@yahoo.com ; jimsisson@inac.gc.ca ;
hiddenfromhistory1@gmail.com ; admin@turnervalley.ca ;
aimggc@worldnet.att.net ; alex@globalmedicaltourism.com.mx ;
amyrae4@hotmail.com ; archbishop@archtoronto.org ;
barry.shaw@forces.gc.ca ; bewerbung@rothschild.com ;
bishopfh@rcdiocese-calgary.ab.ca ; calgary@jasonkenney.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 11:44 PM
Subject: I SEE NOTHING HAS CHANGED WITHIN YOUR CORRUPT FEDERAL ORGANIZATION

Bob Paulson,
Commissioner of RCMP
Canada.

Mr. Paulson,

I write once again after the disappointing bullshit letter I received
from Inspector Potts, and then my discussion with Sgt. Shardlow
yesterday in Okotoks over assaults, false arrest, murder, all kinds of
nasty things you are responsible for setting people up using your "
interception of private communication ".
You people neglect doing your duty here and as I see what is coming
out in the media, makes one wonder just how much death you have
covered up over the years.
Afraid the truth is coming out is what it seems,hmmmm. And as far as
your arresting officer Degroot goes he seems to have a lot of contact
with Juiliann Barna Reid, as I
asked Shardlow - does this abusing woman work for you????????? Perhaps
you could look into this and get back to me.

Honestly for men you have no balls, just like Harper - has god got
your balls also??????? And then you have your women godly agents who I
am thinking took your balls cuz they are as cruel as you men. Now is
that not shameful.?????? Just as Alison Redford ignored me when she
was justice minister.

You people do not care about children, woman or men in your game of
human abuse for
profit. You always have the same excuse.

Now Mr. Paulson, since you are at the top, do you condone these lies
and abuse of children, woman and men ???????

I do have some other concerns from many years ago involving the
okotoks RCMP putting the blame on 1 officer, an Indian, are you racist
Mr. Paulson, do you condone white supremacy and genocide upon the
Indian people and then every other race by thair own ????? Just as the
security guard who assaulted me - thair excuse was he just got out of
security school.

Also Mr. Paulson do you carry the dead peasant insurance upon your
workers???????? how does one find out if this type of insurance is on
people and who has used it?????????

And let's not forget the abuse on human life by religion, sit's at the
top on the abuse game for profit, would you not say???????

Now Mr. Paulson, do you feel this is right what has been done, the
medical abuse, assaults, false arrests and so much more I would like
to discuss in person.????????????

REMEMBER IT'S ALL INDIAN LAND THAT YOU PERSONS UNDER THE SUPREMACY OF
GOD, KILLED CHILDREN, WOMAN AND MEN FOR WHAT YOU HAVE, AND REMEMBER
INDIANS OF THE LANDS COME IN ALL RACES. SHAME ON YOU ALL CORRUPT
CHIEFS KILLING CHILDREN IN SO MANY WAYS, ESPECIALLY YOU CONDONED
PEDOPHILE LAIR.


Thank you
Robin Reid
Red Nations
PPOF


http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/politics/archives/2013/06/20130628-151342.html

http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/alberta/Hell+Residents+angry+RCMP+sieze+guns+from+High+River+homes/8588851/story.html

RCMP revealed Thursday that officers have seized a "substantial ...
that we control, simply because of what they are," said Sgt. Brian
Topham

http://www.canada.com/story_print.html?id=29c1b59c-694d-4d33-9fdc-d5a57f14ec39&sponsor=

Some Alberta RCMP Disciplinary Cases in 2005-06 (Year to Date)

- Sgt. Brian Topham -- reprimand and forfeiture of 10 days' pay.

Topham, who served at the Fox Creek detachment between 2002 and 2004,
made insensitive and degrading comments about women in the presence of
a female civilian employee.

On another occasion, Topham said "1974 was the worst year in the RCMP
because that is when the RCMP let women in the force."

The allegations also involved stereotypical comments about aboriginals
and people from Newfoundland made in the presence of officers who had
those backgrounds.


http://christopherdiarmani.com/10532/police/abuse-of-police-authority/high-river-rcmp-looters-criminals-treated-immediately/

http://www.calgarysun.com/2013/08/09/high-river-homeowner-upset-police-entered-his-home-three-times-after-flood-hit-and-seized-antique-firearms

Greg Kvisle. CENTURY 21 Foothills Real Estate. Bldg. F, 1103 18 Street
SE. High River, ABT1V 2A9. Office: 403-652-2121. Cell: 403-601-3533

Ken Braat Associate,Realtor. Century 21 Foothills Real Estate 1103 F
18 Street SE, T1V 2A9 High River, Alberta 403-601-2070.

High River homeowner upset police entered his home three times after
flood hit and seized antique firearms
205

By Bill Kaufmann ,Calgary Sun

First posted: Friday, August 09, 2013 03:42 PM MDT | Updated: Friday,
August 09, 2013 04:59 PM MDT


The RCMP's post-flood seizure of two family heirloom firearms that
were hidden in his home is an outrageous trespass, says a High River
man.

The Mounties made three trips into the home of Greg Kvisle before
seizing the guns, a 1912 Winchester long-barreled shotgun and a
50-year-old .303 rifle in the days following June's deluge.

"My grandfather passed them down to my dad and when he passed away we
brought them here for safekeeping," said Kvisle, adding neither weapon
has been fired in decades.

"It's a sentimental thing for me."

He said both guns were stashed in a corner of his basement in a
storage area beneath boxes and far from any ammunition.

"They weren't visible and were secure as far as I saw it," said Kvisle.

His street wasn't impacted by the flooding and hadn't been evacuated,
but Kvisle said he was in Calgary when the water hit its height, and
was barred from returning home for nine days.

Once home, his suspicions that the two weapons might have been seized
were quickly confirmed.

About half of his neighbours had remained home, including those next
door who kept an eye on his property and helped Mounties enter his
home three times, said Kvisle.

"I just don't understand why they were searching for them," he said.

"They're supposed to be protecting our home, not looting it."

Kvisle said he had no trouble getting back his weapons from RCMP
officers, whom he called courteous and professional.

But the fact Mounties had taken hidden guns from his home on a
partly-populated street police were patrolling rankles him.

"What's next?" he said.

The Mounties said they seized firearms to prevent them from falling
into the hands of burglars in vacated, unsecured areas.

Kvisle's guns were situated in open view because it would have taken
very little to uncover them, said RCMP Sgt. Josee Valiquette.

"It could be in plain view under a bed, in a closet -- somewhere
somebody could hide," said Valiquette.

"If they happened to open a closet, it is in plain sight...these
firearms were inappropriately secured."

Kvisle said he's been told a civilian group that oversees the RCMP is
reviewing his case.

"I hope we get some answers," he said.

bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca

Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd

By Erin Hatfield

"If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
world is all screwed up, rearrange it."

The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
unofficial, theme song for the debate.

The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.

The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.

Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
other on their answers and criticizing eachothers' party leaders.
Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."

Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.

The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
abiding citizens."

The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.

Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You're out of touch," Armstrong
yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
anyplace," Armstrong responded.

As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
process for the June 28 vote.

Cutline - David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
favourite possessions--motorcycles.

McKnight/KCR

The Unconventional Candidate

David Amos Isn't Campaigning For Your Vote, But....

By Gisele McKnight

FUNDY--He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."

Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot--David Amos.

The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
running for office in Canada.

One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
to meet Elections Canada requirements.

When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
favourite place to do so--Fundy.

Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
dissatisfaction with politicians.

"I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."

The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
needed to change his life.

"I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
sometimes in midlife."

So Amos, who'd lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
Panhead motorcycle.

"Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
renew your faith in mankind - you help anyone you can, you never ask
for anything, but you take what they offer."

For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
and conversation all over North America.

Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
and a daughter and become a house-husband - Mr. Mom, as he calls
himself.

He also describes himself in far more colourful terms--a motorcyclist
rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."

Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.

"But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
"It's alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"

Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.

"I didn't appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
call me. I'm not going to drive my opinions down their throats."

And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.

"I won't take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It's
not about money. It goes against what I'm fighting about."

What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues - tainted blood,
the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
name a few.

"The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs - fishing,
farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm
death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
(NAFTA) out the window.

NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.

Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.

"There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
Don't necessarily vote for me, but vote."

Although...if you're going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
your X by his name.

"I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
say, 'what the hell.'"

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: rmordenassoc@rogers.com ; info@gg.ca ; brian.macdonald@bellaliant.net ;
James.Spurr ; Randy.McGinnis ; rob.lafrance@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ;
Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; Gilles. Blinn ;
gilles.moreau ; danfour ; JAF@UNB.ca ; oldmaison@yahoo.com ; mcappe@irpp.org
Cc: Mackap ; david.alward@gnb.ca ; DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca ; pm ; robin reid
; tim. porter ; tony ; infomorning ; treasurer@do.treas.gov ;
madd_professor@cox.net
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 7:33 PM
Subject: I bet the GG David Johnston and his RCMP members remember this
email EH Reid M

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:48:06 -0400
Subject: Professor Johnston I suspect I will be suing the Crown before
you can advise Mr Harper to finally act ethically
To: president@uwaterloo.ca

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Nov 7, 2007 11:10 PM
Subject: Fwd: Brian My cell # is 506 434 1379 feel free to use it ASAP
or say Hoka Hey to Petey Mackay for me will ya?
To: damian.brooks@gmail.com


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Nov 7, 2007 6:56 PM
Subject: Brian My cell # is 506 434 1379 feel free to use it ASAP or
say Hoka Hey to Petey Mackay for me will ya?
To: brian@brian-macdonald.ca


Contact Brian
http://www.brian-macdonald.com/contact/
Cellular: 440-5566

Office: 472-4894, 472-7426 (140 King St, Fredericton)

Email: brian@brian-macdonald.ca

For information:
Fredericton: 472-4894
Minto: 327-3996
Oromocto: 357-8878

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos < david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Oct 17, 2007 7:30 PM
Subject: I tried to talked to you today lady before you were well paid
to preach to Canadian kids
To: info@helencaldicott.com

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos < david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:05:11 -0500
Subject: This just a small portion of one wiretap tape Ralph my
matters are pretty serious eh?
To: racarr@nbnet.nb.ca

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 19:59:52 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Welcome to the Big Big Game Det. Louie LaFleur of Fat
Fred City Finest Do ya think Mr. Dion and his pal Dizzy Lizzie May are
paying attention yet?
To: impolitic@rogers.com, wgilmour@pdclawyers.ca ,
lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca, william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca , days1@parl.gc.ca, day.s@parl.gc.ca,
warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, derek.strong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Raymond Amos < davidramos333@yahoo.ca>
Date: Jun 16, 2007 2:40 AM
Subject: Welcome to the Big Big Game Det. Louie LaFleur of Fat Fred City
Finest Do ya think Mr. Dion and his pal Dizzy Lizzie May are paying
attention yet?
To: fbinhct@leo.gov, Easter.W@parl.gc.ca, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca,
bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com, bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, days1@parl.gc.ca ,
day.s@parl.gc.ca, jonesr@cbc.ca, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca, Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca ,
Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca, Casey.B@parl.gc.ca,
Comuzzi.J@parl.gc.ca, Thibault.L@parl.gc.ca, Arthur.A@parl.gc.ca,
Sandra.Conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca , complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca,
wgilmour@pdclawyers.ca, moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca, kennyco@sen.parl.gc.ca,
gautht@sen.parl.gc.ca, zimmer@sen.parl.gc.ca, louiselorefice@ndp.ca ,
leader@greenparty.ca, defence@sen.parl.gc.ca, atkinn@sen.parl.gc.ca,
dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca, Clabchuk@greenparty.ca, maychair@dal.ca,
kmcgowan@greenparty.ns.ca , juan.behrend@europeangreens.org
Cc: whistleblower@ctv.ca, tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com ,
John.Ferguson@saintjohn.ca, wrscott@nbpower.com, dhay@nbpower.com,
arsenault_chris@hotmail.com, bill.corby@gnb.ca, lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca,
Kathy.Alchorn@fredericton.ca , Kim.Quartermain@fredericton.ca,
Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca, Danny.Copp@fredericton.ca ,
forest@conservationcouncil.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca,
abel.leblanc@gnb.ca, jonesr@cbc.ca

I am not within your jurisdiction nor do I plan to come back until it is
time to argue mr harper and his cohorts in Federal Court however I may drag
some of you dudes or your lawyers back down to the USA with me to answer me
in the Second Circuit of the USA as to your involvement in the cover up of
many Yankee crimes.

I do not have to answer any questions put to me by Fat Fred Fity 's
Finest about whatever it is you may wish to know about my doings with the
RCMP but you corrupt city cops must certainly answer someday to your support
and cover up of my false imprisonment in the USA years ago.

Louie tell me honestly if you can find it in your soul to do so, why
did you laugh and make fun of my plight? I gave you a fair and square chance
to act ethically. i sent you a lot of material byway of this email address
and i sent it only to you just in case you would act ethically. Now I must
ask were you born an arsehole or did you work at it your whole life? What if
this shit had happened to you? What would you think of you if you were I?
Do you and Chucky Leblanc and the crook Alan MacFee have that sinking
feeling that you pissed off the wrong Maritimer yet or do you think i am the
ultimate loser? If i do lose bigtime I will you sleep at night knowing the
part you played in my demise? If a sudden fit of integrity overcomes you
say hey to your bosses Barry MacKnight, Insp Kelly and S/Sgt Copp for me
will ya and have them provide you with the file that the Police Commission
gave your god damned police force three years ago and start doing some
serious work for a change, will ya? Rest assured a lot has happened since.

The chickenshit S/Sgt Kathy Alchorn can say hey to the not so scary
spooks Norm Plourde and Kevin Jackson and Mikey Guitar and the Louie
Lefebvre character (his name sounds like yours Louie) for me as well. The
very shy S/Sgt. Kim Quartermain can tell the crook MacPhee that I will send
a buddy around to pick up my bike. I will look forward to meeting all you
bastards
in court someday but I must remain true to my word and sue Harper first.

Whereas Herménégilde Chiasson, Lieutenant Governor of New
Brunswick, just appointed Acting S/Sgt. Kim Quartermain, S/Sgt. Kathy
Alchorn, S\Sgt. Brian Ford and D/Chief Leanne Fitch of the Fredericton
Police
Force, as Honorary Aides-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick
to guard him and the mean old Maison from the likes of me and Chucky
Leblanc,
they should have no trouble locating all the documents and CDs that I have
been
serving upon all the crooks in and around that house for years.

If you don't believe me just scroll down and find the words of
the former Governor General. While you are reading and listening to this
crap consider what "Al" may do next. As you listen again to the portion of
just one police surveilance tape know that I will him and a couple of his
friends a complete copy of 139 and a few more even if I am falsely
imprisoned again A buddy or two jusst has to drop my material into the mail.
Never forget the nutbag blogger Chucky Leblanc has a complete set of
documents and a CD from 2004 that he did not give to Brad Green as he
promised. Depupty Dog in one of his rants has already informed me that "Al"
is pissed off. It is likely just his usual bullshit but if it were true I
would say Good. Shame on you all and Cya'll in Court.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

Whereas Mr Scott the spin doctor for NB Power and John Ferguson of Saint
John both commented that they enjoyed what I said on the dumb Tom Young's
talk radio show over a year ago on Ground Hog Day I will send it again.
Maybe Andre Arthur will enjoy it too. N'est Pas?


*David Raymond Amos <davidramos333@yahoo.ca>* wrote:

Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 23:37:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Raymond Amos <davidramos333@yahoo.ca>
Subject: Fwd: I called you again today Gilmour. Who is more of a chickenshit
you or your new cop client Ken Smith? Sprout some balls will ya and call me
back
To: Christopherson.D@parl.gc.ca , Williams.J@parl.gc.ca,
Wrzesnewskyj.B@parl.gc.ca , Doyle.N@parl.gc.ca, Jennings.M@parl.gc.ca



*David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com >* wrote:

Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 22:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: I called you again today Gilmour. Who is more of a chickenshit you
or your new cop client Ken Smith? Sprout some balls will ya and call me back
To: wGilmour@ProuseDash.ca, dohertylaw@rogers.com, premier@gnb.ca,
abel.leblanc@gnb.ca, t.j.burke@gnb.ca, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca ,
pierre_nollet@cbc.ca, susan_king@cbc.ca, dan_goodyear@cbc.ca,
allan_white@cbc.ca, mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com,
execdir@nblib.nb.ca, mleger@stu.ca , jwalker@stu.ca, plee@stu.ca,
carleton@stu.ca, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca , oldmaison@yahoo.com,
John.Foran@gnb.ca, kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca, Byron < alltrue@nl.rogers.com>,
samperrier@hotmail.com
CC: bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, days1@parl.gc.ca , day.s@parl.gc.ca,
warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, derek.strong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Aurele.Daigle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Roger.Gillies@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, John.DeWinter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
samperrier@hotmail.com, lorraineroche@gov.nl.ca, deanr0032@hotmail.com ,
bill.corby@gnb.ca, police@fredericton.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca,
fbinhct@leo.gov, Easter.W@parl.gc.ca

506 434 1379

Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 20:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: So much for the Integrity of the RCMP EH Bevy Baby Busson?
To: bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, days1@parl.gc.ca, day.s@parl.gc.ca,
warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ,
Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, derek.strong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Aurele.Daigle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Roger.Gillies@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, John.DeWinter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
samperrier@hotmail.com, lorraineroche@gov.nl.ca, alltrue@nl.rogers.com ,
kmdickson0308@yahoo.com, deanr0032@hotmail.com, bill.corby@gnb.ca,
police@fredericton.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, t.j.burke@gnb.ca,
John.Foran@gnb.ca, fbinhct@leo.gov, Easter.W@parl.gc.ca,
alan_white@cbc.ca, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
John.Ferguson@saintjohn.ca, Ivan.Court@saintjohn.ca,
Christopher.Titus@saintjohn.ca, thespur@hotmail.com, lisah@whooshnet.com,
dougchristie@shaw.ca , lawald@web.net
CC: xzone@xzone-radio.com, brinson6@telus.net, wespenre@illuminati.ca,
choose2reason@yahoo.com, rwnicholson@rwnicholson.com,
starchamber@sasktel.net, JDHOOK@cox.net, Tim.Porter@gnb.ca,
news@politicswatch.com, investor@dundeebancorp.com,
webadmin@justice.gc.ca, info@tbs-sct.gc.ca, dtennant@mccarthy.ca ,
2026@gnb.ca, Brendan.Langille@gnb.ca, Martin.Paul@parl.gc.ca,
Owen.S@parl.gc.ca, Steckle.P@parl.gc.ca, steckp@parl.gc.ca,
McGuire.J@parl.gc.ca, Peterson.J@parl.gc.ca, Bonin.R@parl.gc.ca,
Karetak-Lindell.N@parl.gc.ca, Chamberlain.B@parl.gc.ca , dbrown@dwpv.com,
BCarr-Harris@blgcanada.com, McTeague.D@parl.gc.ca,
info@politicswatch.com, Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca, Baird.J@parl.gc.ca,
Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca, McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca, Dhalla.R@parl.gc.ca,
Casey.B@parl.gc.ca, Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca, Holland.M@parl.gc.ca,
wickedwanda3@adelphia.net, madd_professor@cox.net, Iolmisha@cs.com ,
derrickcrobinson@gmail.com, khr909@hotmail.com, erniemusic2@yahoo.com,
kevin_annett@hotmail.com, radical@radicalpress.com

Just Dave <http://davidamos.blogspot.com/>
By Location *Visit Detail**
Visit 1,079
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 199.212.150.# (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)
ISP Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Location
Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language unknown
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 6.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0;
Windows NT 5.1; INFOWEB-APPROVED; INFOWEB-APPROVED-IE6-EN; .
NET CLR 1.1.4322)
Javascript disabled
Time of Visit May 30 2007 11:49:18 am
Last Page View May 30 2007 11:54:27 am
Visit Length 5 minutes 9 seconds
Page Views 3
Referring URL unknown
Visit Entry Page http://www.davidamos.blogspot.com/
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Out Click
Time Zone unknown
Visitor's Time Unknown
Visit Number 1,079

Just Dave <http://davidamos.blogspot.com/>
By Location *Visit Detail**
Visit 1,078
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 199.212.150.# (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)
ISP Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Location
Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language unknown
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 6.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0;
Windows NT 5.1; INFOWEB-APPROVED; INFOWEB-APPROVED-IE6-EN; .
NET CLR 1.1.4322)
Javascript disabled
Time of Visit May 30 2007 9:29:25 am
Last Page View May 30 2007 9:29:25 am
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL unknown
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Out Click
Time Zone unknown
Visitor's Time Unknown
Visit Number 1,078

Just Dave http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 1,032
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 159.33.10.#(Canadian Broadcasting Corporation)
ISP Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Location
Continent : North America
Country :Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 6.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 16 bits
Time of Visit May 25 2007 8:06:36 am
Last Page View
May 25 2007 8:06:36 am
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.blogger.com/profile/7645241
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Out Click
Time Zone
UTC-4:00
>
Visitor's Time May 25 2007 8:06:36 am
Visit Number 1,032

N.B. government to await federal probe into possible RCMP wrongdoing May 30,
2007 - 19:47

By: KEVIN BISSETT
FREDERICTON (CP) - New Brunswick Attorney General T.J. Burke declined
comment Wednesday on allegations of wrongdoing within the provincial RCMP.
At least two current and former Mounties in the province are among more than
a dozen officers across the country who have alleged wrongdoing within the
force, including abuse of power, harassment and the coverup of evidence.
One of the published allegations was made by Daniel Bernier, a former RCMP
corporal who lives near Fredericton. He claims he was removed from an
investigation in which he said he found evidence of the misuse of federal
funds by New Brunswick government officials in 1999.
He alleges grants were wrongly approved to farmers.
Once he was removed from the case, Bernier said an internal investigation by
the RCMP was called into his conduct.
"Our government doesn't respond to allegations," Burke said Wednesday when
asked by reporters about the claims published this week.
"We respond to factual information that is provided to us, information that
we need to investigate and look at."
William Gilmour, an Ontario lawyer representing some of the Mounties who
made the allegations, said the current and former members are anxious to
tell their stories, but there must be protection from reprisal.
"We're actively seeking the government to afford a venue in the nature of a
parliamentary committee, where there's some protection for these people,
where they have agreed to come forward and tell their stories," he said
Wednesday.
Gilmour, who is an ex-Mountie, said he has been trying to get the federal
government to call his clients before such a committee for a year, but so
far nothing has happened.
In the Commons on Wednesday, Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day was
accused by the opposition of ignoring the turmoil.
"The Conservative public safety minister's response is to shrug his
shoulders, plug his ears and see no evil, hear no evil," said Liberal Sue
Barnes.
"Is this wilful blindness or gross negligence? When it comes to protecting
the integrity of Canada's national police, why is the public safety minister
thwarting real action?"
Day responded by saying the government is "taking action to get to the
bottom of some of the concerns that have been raised."
Another New Brunswick Mountie, Staff Sgt. Ken Smith, is suing senior
officers at J Division in Fredericton for alleged harassment, but the New
Brunswick government has stepped in and stayed proceedings.
The province has asked the Fredericton police force to fully investigate the
Smith case, which includes allegations of unauthorized use of tracking
devices on his police vehicle.
"For the 30 years that I have had with the police force, my job has been to
go out and investigate crime," Smith said. "To find that we have just as
much crime happening within our organization, which is stopping us from
doing our job, is very troubling for me and for the individuals who have
come forward."
Bernier said he's not surprised to hear that as many as 30 current and
former Mounties would be willing to testify before a parliamentary
committee.
"The country of Canada is quite vast and the RCMP is all over the place, and
I'm sure I'm not the only one who has been treated like a piece of shit,"
Bernier said.
Gilmour said the appointment of a new RCMP commissioner with the mandate to
fix the problems in the force could prevent having to launch an inquiry or
royal commission.
In the meantime, he said, the reputation of the force is taking a beating.
"That's really quite unfair to the members on the street who are performing
such a valuable function and putting their lives at risk every day," said
Gilmour. "They don't deserve that and it needs to be dealt with far sooner
than later."

Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 16:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: Dirty Dickie Dean hates us all for one reason Sam. Methinks it is
because he is the FED. What say you Bev Busson?
To: samperrier@hotmail.com , alltrue@nl.rogers.com, kmdickson0308@yahoo.com,
deanr0032@hotmail.com, bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, derek.strong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, bill.corby@gnb.ca, police@fredericton.ca,
carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, t.j.burke@gnb.ca, John.Foran@gnb.ca,
Aurele.Daigle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Roger.Gillies@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
John.DeWinter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, fbinhct@leo.gov, Easter.W@parl.gc.ca,
days1@parl.gc.ca, day.s@parl.gc.ca, alan_white@cbc.ca,
jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
John.Ferguson@saintjohn.ca, Ivan.Court@saintjohn.ca,
Christopher.Titus@saintjohn.ca , lorraineroche@gov.nl.ca
CC: xzone@xzone-radio.com, brinson6@telus.net, wespenre@illuminati.ca,
choose2reason@yahoo.com, rwnicholson@rwnicholson.com,
starchamber@sasktel.net, JDHOOK@cox.net, Tim.Porter@gnb.ca,
news@politicswatch.com, investor@dundeebancorp.com,
webadmin@justice.gc.ca, info@tbs-sct.gc.ca, dtennant@mccarthy.ca ,
2026@gnb.ca, Brendan.Langille@gnb.ca, Martin.Paul@parl.gc.ca,
Owen.S@parl.gc.ca, Steckle.P@parl.gc.ca, steckp@parl.gc.ca,
McGuire.J@parl.gc.ca, Peterson.J@parl.gc.ca, Bonin.R@parl.gc.ca,
Karetak-Lindell.N@parl.gc.ca, Chamberlain.B@parl.gc.ca , dbrown@dwpv.com,
BCarr-Harris@blgcanada.com, McTeague.D@parl.gc.ca,
info@politicswatch.com, Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca, Baird.J@parl.gc.ca,
Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca, McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca, Dhalla.R@parl.gc.ca,
Casey.B@parl.gc.ca, Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca, Holland.M@parl.gc.ca,
wickedwanda3@adelphia.net, madd_professor@cox.net, Iolmisha@cs.com ,
derrickcrobinson@gmail.com, khr909@hotmail.com, erniemusic2@yahoo.com,
kevin_annett@hotmail.com, radical@radicalpress.com, thespur@hotmail.com,
lisah@whooshnet.com , dougchristie@shaw.ca, lawald@web.net

I must say your silence has been deafening for a lady acting as the
Commissioner for the Crown Corp commonly know as the RCMP. It has been six
months since you took over from the mean nasty old Zack and you are not one
bit more ethical. How else can you be so quiet particularly with all the
scandals breaking out daily about the RCMP?

I hear that the crook Rod Smith who was supposed to advise everyone
how to be ethical retired just in a nick of time after he and I had a little
pow wow on the phone. I was not surprised that you shitcanned Zack's old
assistant Mikey MacDonald in your office and that you replaced him with your
own nomind assistant Pierre Leduc. It was too funny that he has the same
last name as the nasty dude that finally answered me from the Commission of
Public Complaints Against the RCMP after five long years of pure hell for my
little Clan. Why don't one of you just tell the truth, the whole truth and
nothing but the truth just like you are supposed to do and let the political
cards fall where they may? Qiut the false allegation game will ya? It is
getting a little redundant, don't ya think?

I sure hope some cop blows the whistle bigtime real soon but I ain't
betting on it. However I will lays odds that the only ones to respond to
this email will be the nasty Yankee Depupty Dog and his little buddy Dirty
Dickie Dean with more of their Bullshit. That said I have no doubt you
crooks are just wondering who I send this email to next and when i will Blog
it. Right? (Its already done scroll down to the bottom do ya think the new
Accountability Commissioner will find it first?

Say hey to the crooked NSIS agents Norm Plourde, (AKA "Porcupine
Prique" ) and his pals, Cpl Jackson and Sean Lowe for me will ya Dirty
Dickie Dean?

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
506 434 1379

Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 13:36:41 -0400
From: "PCC Complaints" < complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
To: <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com >

May 23, 2007
File No. PC-2005-1291

Mr. David R Amos

motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

Dear Mr. Amos:

On a number of occasions you have called or sent e-mails our office to raise
matters which are of pressing concern to you.

Each time we have tried to respond by explaining to you the relatively
narrow mandate of this Commission and the limits of our powers to deal with
the matters which are of concern to you. I must stress, once again, that
the purpose of this Commission is to provide the public with an opportunity
to make complaints concerning the conduct of members of the RCMP in the
performance of their duties. We have neither the expertise nor the legal
authority to permit us to become involved in issues beyond the scope of this
mandate.

While it is clearly not the intention of the Commission to prevent you from
making complaints against members of the RCMP, an analysis of your numerous
contacts with the Commission indicates that your concerns fall well outside
the confines of our mandate. Further, your frequent e-mails have been
disruptive and unproductive for both you and for the staff of this office.

Should you determine that some point in the future you have a complaint
concerning the conduct of a member of the RCMP in the performance of his or
her duties, please submit it to the Commission *by Canada Post only*. As of
now, your e-mails will be deleted unread.

Yours truly,

Andrée Leduc
Enquiries and Complaints Analyst

Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Say hey to Shawn Murphy for me will ya
Brian?
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 15:25:45 -0400
From: "REVIEWS" <reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com<

The Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP has received your
e-mail message and will be responding in due course.

La Commission des plaintes du public contre la GRC a reçu votre courriel et
vous rendra une réponse au moment opportun.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 03:29:59 -0300
Subject: Re Glen Greenwald and the Brazilian President Rousseff's
indignant tweets So Stevey Boy Harper your CSEC dudes and their NSA
pals no doubt know all about my conversation with the dudes from
Brazil last month Wheras the CBC and the Guardian etc want to know it
all we should share EH?
To: pm@pm.gc.ca, dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, rusun@un.int,
john.adams@queensu.ca, John.Forster@cse-cst.gc.ca,
td.ombudsman@td.com, christopher.montague@td.com,
Frank.McKenna@td.com, Glenn.Greenwald@guardian.co.uk,
info@praxisfilms.org, birgittaj@althingi.is,
ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk, steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca,
roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, ambassador@brasilemb.org,
slrc@itamaraty.gov.br, cuba@un.int, protocol@dn.mofa.go.jp,
japan.mission@dn.mofa.go.jp, protocol@s1.mofa.go.jp,
j.kroes@interpol.int, craig.dalton@forces.gc.ca, bairdj@parl.gc.ca,
MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca,
shy.winkfield@guardiannews.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca, justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca,
bginsberg@pattonboggs.com, RBauer@perkinscoie.com, justmin@gov.ns.ca,
rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca, rmordenassoc@rogers.com, merricra@gov.ns.ca,
stephen.m.cutler@jpmorgan.com, boston@ic.fbi.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, prenquiries@eiu.com,
mailbox@brasembottawa.org, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca,
newsroom@theguardian.pe.ca, criminal.division@usdoj.gov,
lachapelle.edith@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Janet.MacLean@international.gc.ca,
dfildebrandt@taxpayer.com, ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca,
themayor@calgary.ca, atlantic.director@taxpayer.com,
premier@gov.ab.ca, premier@gnb.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
jamiebaillie@gov.ns.ca, bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net,
nichor@parl.gc.ca, greg.weston@cbc.ca, Manon.Hardy@priv.gc.ca,
Dion.Mario@psic-ispc.gc.ca, csu@jesuits.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, Julian.Borger@guardian.co.uk

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/31/greece-imf-brazil-idUSL6N0G05GI20130731

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/24/brazil-president-un-speech-nsa-surveillance

http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/politics/story/1.1928147

https://mobile.twitter.com/dilmabr

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 03:14:34 -0300
Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

Hey

The sneaky ex CSIS dude Michelle Juneau-Katsuya was not wise to call
the President of Brazil a Prima Donna but what he said is true about
her merely playing politcs Everybody who wants to know can know what
happened between Brazil and I since early 2005. All they have to do is
ask me. If they don't believe me they can call the Boys from Brazil
and ask them if what I said in the video hereto attached or the
documents I to them and many other UN dudes long ago is true or false.
Trust that Stevey Harper, Franky McKenna and the rest of the
IMF/Bilderberger crowd ain't gonna tell anyone anything. EH Bobby
Bauer and Stevey Cutler?

The video is just a clip from a longer conversation with a good friend
weeks ago. Perhaps your snoopy minions in the RCMP/DND should be wise
to listen to it all if they haven't already EH?

Anyone can find that chat saved here

http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/index.php?dir=DavidAmos/

It is entitled as follows

2013-09-21 time 16_34_08 Incoming Peer-to-Peer Call david.raymond.amos


http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/index.php?dir=DavidAmos/


These are the cover letters for the documents I sent to the UN Dudes

http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/UN%20DUDES-txt.pdf

BTW Perhaps the times are a changing now that the stock market is
falling bigtime once again. Believe or not I am kinda sorta impressed
by the words of the latest Pope. I can'tbelieve a Jesuit would say
such things. Amazing things never cease.

The Dec 12th,2002 date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of
mine and the name of Cardinal Bernard Francis Law should mean a lot to
him if he truly has an ethical soul and is wise enough to ignore his
many lawyers.

http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Francis_Law

Law resigned as Archbishop of Boston on December 13, 2002, in response
to the Roman Catholic Church sex abuse scandal after church documents
were revealed which suggested he had covered up sexual abuse committed
by priests in his archdiocese.

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
1 902 800 0369

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <ambassador@brasilemb.org>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 7:04 PM
Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <slrc@itamaraty.gov.br>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 1:06 AM
Subject: Re A call back from the Embassy for Brazil in Washington from
(202 238 2770)


I just got your message now and called back I know it is off hours so
I left a voicemail attempting to explain my concerns. I am kinda hard
to get ahold of ask the NSA people listening to your Embassy and
reading this why that is necessary

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: magicJack <voicemail@notify.magicjack.com>
To: DAVID AMOS
Sent: Friday, September 6, 2013 10:07 AM
Subject: New VM (2) - 0:23 minutes in your magicJack mailbox from 2022382770

Dear magicJack User:

You received a new 0:23 minutes voicemail message, on Friday,
September 06, 2013 at 09:07:46 AM in mailbox 9028000369 from
2022382770.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:52:55 -0300
Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
To: slrc@itamaraty.gov.br
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <braun@delbrasonu.org>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 6:39 PM
Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <cuba@un.int>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 6:32 PM
Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <protocol@dn.mofa.go.jp>; <japan.mission@dn.mofa.go.jp>;
<protocol@s1.mofa.go.jp>; "j.kroes" <j.kroes@interpol.int>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 6:31 PM
Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?


The Permanent Mission of Japan to the United Nations
866 U.N. Plaza, 2nd Floor
New York, NY 10017
E-mail : japan.mission@dn.mofa.go.jp

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:11:03 -0300
Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
To: jicc@ws.mofa.go.jp
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:06:03 -0300
Subject: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the Boss
of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
To: rusun@un.int, bairdj <bairdj@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, MulcaT
<MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>,
"justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, bginsberg
<bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>, RBauer <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "craig.dalton"
<craig.dalton@forces.gc.ca>, dnd_mdn <dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca>

The document hereto attached is very real and I made certain that the
Russians remember what I sent all the G20 people in the UN within
August of 2005 Ask the warmongers John McCain if and his buddy Obama
or their lawyers Mr Bauer and Mr Ginsberg I am a liar or not

Address: 136 East 67 Street,
New York, N.Y. 10065
Phone: 1(212)861-4900;
1(212)861-4901;
FAX: 1(212)628-0252;

E-mail: rusun@un.int


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <ambassador@brasilemb.org>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 8:07 PM
Subject: Brazil and I just got cut off again here is what I was trying
to tell you folks

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <Glenn.Greenwald@guardian.co.uk>; <info@praxisfilms.org>;
"birgittaj" <birgittaj@althingi.is>; "ed.pilkington"
<ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>; "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>; "roger.l.brown"
<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "shy.winkfield"
<shy.winkfield@guardiannews.com>; "oldmaison" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>;
"sallybrooks25" <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>; "Mordaith"
<Mordaith@gmail.com>; <wayne.lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>; <david.alward@gnb.ca>; <nancy.forbes@gnb.ca>;
<judith.keating@gnb.ca>; <luc.labonte@gnb.ca>;
<marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>; <wishart.john@dailygleaner.com>;
"macpherson.don" <macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>; "ian.fahie"
<ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <david.eidt@gnb.ca>;
<Richard.Williams@gnb.ca>; <ddelaquis@cldglaw.com>;
<cfawcett@lawsoncreamer.com>; "Mackap" <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>; "premier"
<premier@gnb.ca>; "bernadine.chapman"
<bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "john.warr"
<john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "jennifer.johnston"
<jennifer.johnston@gov.bc.ca>; "t.wilson" <t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
"radical" <radical@radicalpress.com>; "maryann4peace"
<maryann4peace@gmail.com>; "police" <police@fredericton.ca>;
<kselick@canadianconstitutionfoundation.ca>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "glen"
<glen@glencanning.com>; "ddexter" <ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca>; "justmin"
<justmin@gov.ns.ca>; "rmellish" <rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca>;
"rmordenassoc" <rmordenassoc@rogers.com>; "merricra"
<merricra@gov.ns.ca>; "stephen.m.cutler"
<stephen.m.cutler@jpmorgan.com>; "StephenMcNeil"
<StephenMcNeil@ns.aliantzinc.ca>; "jamiebaillie"
<jamiebaillie@gov.ns.ca>; <Brian.Topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
"Ian.Shardlow" <Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "msegal" <msegal@murraysegal.com>;
<DANIEL.POULIN@chrc-ccdp.ca>; <abromberg@bnaibrith.ca>;
<habrams@pacificcoast.net>; "ndesrosiers" <ndesrosiers@ccla.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 11:17 PM
Subject: Re: Snowden ain't got nothing on mean old me when it comes to
dealing with corrupt Feds and keeping one's Integrity as well


http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/fwd-snowden-aint-got-nothing-on-mean.html

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/fwd-if-murray-segal-were-to-conduct.html

On 8/18/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <Glenn.Greenwald@guardian.co.uk>; <info@praxisfilms.org>;
"birgittaj" <birgittaj@althingi.is>; "ed.pilkington"
<ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>; "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>; "roger.l.brown"
<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>;
<DANIEL.POULIN@CHRC-CCDP.CA>; <abromberg@bnaibrith.ca>;
<habrams@pacificcoast.net>; "ndesrosiers" <ndesrosiers@ccla.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 10:54 PM
Subject: Snowden ain't got nothing on mean old me when it comes to
dealing with corrupt Feds and keeping one's Integrity as well


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:40:18 -0300
Subject: YO FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers I just called your
office and the nasty Yankee played dumb as usual
To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"
<Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov,
us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney
<jcarney@carneybassil.com>, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, birgittaj
<birgittaj@althingi.is>, shmurphy@globe.com, Red Ice Creations
<redicecreations@gmail.com>

Clearly I am not joking

Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 19,571
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 153.31.113.# (FBI Criminal Justice Information Systems)
ISP FBI Criminal Justice Information Systems
Location Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : West Virginia
City : Clarksburg
Lat/Long : 39.2664, -80.3097 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; InfoPath.2;
.NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; MS-RTC
LM 8; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 800 x 600
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Jun 12 2013 5:00:01 pm
Last Page View Jun 12 2013 5:00:01 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.google.co...YIZDuTIWsfuPUhflswCk
Search Engine google.com
Search Words jp morgan and "andrew kosloff"
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...-stewart-and-me.html
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...-stewart-and-me.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Jun 12 2013 4:00:01 pm
Visit Number 19,571

On 6/15/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> FBI Boston
> One Center Plaza
> Suite 600
> Boston, MA 02108
> Phone: (617) 742-5533
> Fax: (617) 223-6327
> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>
> Hours
> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
> office at (617) 742-5533.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney <jcarney@carneybassil.com>,
> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, michael wolfheart
> <wolfheartlodge@live.com>, jonathan.albano@bingham.com,
> shmurphy@globe.com, mvalencia@globe.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, oldmaison
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>
> http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/06/05/james-whitey-bulger-jury-selection-process-enters-second-day/KjS80ofyMMM5IkByK74bkK/story.html
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>
> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>
> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
> cards?
>
> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>
> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>
> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
> Senator Arlen Specter
> United States Senate
> Committee on the Judiciary
> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
> Washington, DC 20510
>
> Dear Mr. Specter:
>
> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
> raised in the attached letter.
>
> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>
> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>
> Very truly yours,
> Barry A. Bachrach
> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> To: "Fred.Wyshak" <Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov>; "jcarney"
> <jcarney@carneybassil.com>; <Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov>;
> <us.marshals@usdoj.gov>
> Cc: <edit@thr.com>; "maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>;
> "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 11:50 AM
> Subject: So Fred Wyshak has Brian Kelly and the rest of the corrupt
> Feds practiced the spirit of fill disclosure with Jay Carney??
>
> If so then why didn't Mr Carney return my phone calls last July???
>
> http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2012/01/09/bulger_lawyers_due_in_court_for_update_on_evidence/
>
> http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/lawyer_known_as_patron_saint_of_hopeless_cases_is_representing_whitey_bulge/
>
> http://bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/2011_0625lawyer_tab_is_in_billys_court_feds_believe_brother_should_shell_out_for_defense
>
> http://articles.boston.com/2011-07-01/news/29726987_1_jay-carney-bulger-brookline-clinics
>
> http://carneybassil.com/team/carney/
>
> Truth is stranger than fiction. Perhaps Ben Affleck and Matt Damon a
> couple of boyz from Beantown who done good will pay attention to mean
> old me someday EH?
>
> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/ben-affleck-matt-damon-whitey-bulger-254994
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> SOMEBODY SHOULD ASK THE CBC AND THE COPS A VERY SIMPLE QUESTION.
>
> WHY was Byron Prior and I banned from parliamentry properties while I
> running for a seat in parliament in 2004 2 whole YEARS before the
> mindless nasty French Bastard Chucky Leblanc was barred in NB and yet
> the CBC, the Fat Fred City Finest and the RCMP still deny anything
> ever happened to this very day even though Chucky and his pals have
> blogged about it???
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2006/06/20/nb-bloggerbanned20060620.html
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-fat-fred-citys-finest.html
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/04/david-amos-nb-nwo-whistleblower-part-3.html
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/07/feds-institutionalize-determined-nb.html
>
> Did anybody bother to listen to me explain things to the Police
> Commissioners in 2004?
>
> http://archive.org/details/NewBrunswickPoliceCommission
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 21:56:57 -0300
> Subject: Re Yankee Feds Please allow me to be brief with the crooks in
> Wikileaks and the Guardian EH Birgitta and Ed Pilkington?
> To: "Fred.Wyshak" <Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov>, "john.warr"
> <john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, redicecreations@gmail.com, birgittaj
> <birgittaj@althingi.is>, Piratar <piratar@pirateparty.is>,
> "ed.pilkington" <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>, janice.smith@cbc.ca,
> camilla.inderberg@cbc.ca, "david.akin" <david.akin@sunmedia.ca>,
> Alan.Dark@cbc.ca, newsonline <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>, "John.Williamson"
> <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, aih <aih@cbc.ca>,
> news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
> <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/09/edward-snowden-nsa-whistleblower-surveillance
>
> "Snowden will go down in history as one of America's most
> consequential whistleblowers, alongside Daniel Ellsberg and Bradley
> Manning. He is responsible for handing over material from one of the
> world's most secretive organisations - the NSA."
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 4:04 PM
> Subject: Ed Here is your ticket to keep you out of hot water Just send
> this to Hugh Grant and he can raise hell for you
>
> Byway of the US FTC the Feds in many countries can never deny that
> they did not know the truth long ago
>
> From: Ed Pilkington <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>
> Subject: GUARDIAN
> To: myson333@yahoo.com
> Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 11:42 AM
>
> hi
>
> here's my email and my cell number is below
>
> all best
>
> Ed
>
> --
> Ed Pilkington
> New York bureau chief
> The Guardian
> www.guardian.co.uk
> twitter.com/Edpilkington
>
> Cell: 646 704 1264
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Visit guardian.co.uk - newspaper of the year
> www.guardian.co.uk www.observer.co.uk
>
> On your mobile, visit m.guardian.co.uk or download the Guardian
> iPhone app www.guardian.co.uk/iphone
>
> To save up to 30% when you subscribe to the Guardian and the Observer
> visit www.guardian.co.uk/subscriber
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This e-mail and all attachments are confidential and may also
> be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify
> the sender and delete the e-mail and all attachments immediately.
> Do not disclose the contents to another person. You may not use
> the information for any purpose, or store, or copy, it in any way.
>
> Guardian News & Media Limited is not liable for any computer
> viruses or other material transmitted with or as part of this
> e-mail. You should employ virus checking software.
>
> Guardian News & Media Limited
>
> A member of Guardian Media Group plc
> Registered Office
> PO Box 68164
> Kings Place
> 90 York Way
> London
> N1P 2AP
>
> Registered in England Number 908396
>
> THE GUARDIAN MUST REMEMBER ME EH EDDY BABY???
>
> Click on this link
>
> http://50states.ning.com/video/rcmp-sussex-new-brunswick
>
> OR SCROLL DOWN TO ASSURE YOURSELF THAT WIKILEAKS OR THE CROWN CORPS
> KNOWN AS THE CBC AND THE RCMP TO NAME ONLY THREE CAN NEVER DENY THAT
> THEY DON'T KNOW ALL ABOUT MEAN OLD ME AND MY CONCERNS
>
> HOWCOME FOR 10 YEARS PUBLIC OFFICIALS IN THE USA CANADA ICELAND
> ENGLAND AND ALL THE OTHERS WITHIN "COALITION OF THE WILLING" ETC
> IGNORED THE FACT THAT I HAVE HAD MANY YANKEE WIRETAP TAPES THAT COULD
> HAVE IMPEACHED GEORGEY BOY BUSH AND HIS COHORTS LONG BEFORE THE
> PATRIOT ACT OR THE WAR ON IRAQ BEGAN???
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>
>
> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
> Senator Arlen Specter
> United States Senate
> Committee on the Judiciary
> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
> Washington, DC 20510
>
> Dear Mr. Specter:
>
> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
> raised in the attached letter.
>
> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>
> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>
> Very truly yours,
> Barry A. Bachrach
> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>
> http://joyb.blogspot.ca/2010/11/my-statement-from-nato-parliamentary.html
>
> http://50states.ning.com/video/rcmp-sussex-new-brunswick
>
> http://www.nycga.net/members/davidraymondamos/
>
>> From: David Amos
>> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 23:22:00 -0300
>> Subject: i just called from 902 800 0369 (Nova Scotia)
>> To: 9.17occupywallstreet@gmail.com
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-...
>>
>> I am the guy the SEC would not name that is the link to Madoff and
>> Putnam Investments
>>
>> http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hear...
>>
>> Notice the transcript and webcast of the hearing of the US Senate
>> banking Commitee is missing? please notice Eliot Spitzer and the Dates
>> around November 20th, 2003 in te following file
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-righ...
>>
>> From: "Julian Assange)"
>> Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 18:15:46 +0000 (GMT)
>> Subject: Al Jazeera on Iceland's plan for a press safe haven
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> FYI: Al-Jazeera's take on Iceland's proposed media safe haven
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbGiPjIE1pE
>>
>> More info http://immi.is/
>>
>> Julian Assange
>> Editor
>> WikiLeaks
>> http://wikileaks.org/
>>
>>
>> From: Birgitta Jonsdottir
>> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:14:02 +0000
>> Subject: Re: Bon Soir Birgitta according to my records this is the
>> first email I ever sent you
>> To: David Amos
>>
>> dear Dave
>> i have got your email and will read through the links as soon as i
>> find some time
>> keep up the good fight in the meantime
>>
>> thank you for bearing with me
>> i am literary drowning in requests to look into all sorts of matters
>> and at the same time working 150% work at the parliament and
>> the creation of a political movement and being a responsible parent:)
>> plus all the matters in relation to immi
>>
>> with oceans of joy
>> birgitta
>>
>> Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are
>> not.
>>
>> Andre Gide
>>
>> Birgitta Jonsdottir
>> Birkimelur 8, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland, tel: 354 692 8884
>> http://this.is/birgitta - http://joyb.blogspot.com -
>> http://www.facebook.com/birgitta.jonsdottir
>>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Henrik Palmgren <redicecreations@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:46:26 +0200
> Subject: Re: Oh my my I guess we know the score on you EH?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Oh my. Don't send me your spam. It's not good for anything.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 17:27:53 -0300
> Subject: Re Teddy Baby Olson was on Fox News today yapping about
> Presidential enemies list as he represents the crooks in Koch
> Industries??? If anyone should know about such things it is Olson
> after all he assisted Ashcroft and Bush against me
> To: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Office@tigta.treas.gov, RBauer@perkinscoie.com,
> mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov, "Gilles.Moreau"
> <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, ron.klain@revolution.com,
> dboies@bsfllp.com, tolson@gibsondunn.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com,
> "ed.pilkington" <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>, news
> <news@thetelegraph.com.au>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
> rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com, gregory.craig@skadden.com,
> Patrick.Fitzgerald@skadden.com
>
> Hey
>
> As Harper sits and bullshits his cohorts in the Council of Foreign
> Relations in the Big Apple today I bet he was listening to what was
> happening with Obama and the IRS and Holder and his DOJ minions
> in Washington.
>
> Notice the Inspector General of the IRS Dudes within this old file?
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/9092510/Chicago
>
> Everybody and his dog knows Harper knew about my battles with the US
> Treasury and Justice Depts way back when he was the boss of the
> opposition in Canada's Parliament. Two simple files easily found on
> the Internet cannot be argued.
>
> Notice how old the letter and Form 211 are?
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/5-years-waiting-on-bank-fraud-payout.html
>
> Here the Inspector Generals calling me 7 years ago?
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
>
> FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Office of Chief Counsel, Treasury.
> Inspector General for Tax Administration, (202) 622-4068.
>
> When Teddy bitches about polticians using the IRS to attack their
> enemies because he knows it true because he helped Bush the IRS
> against me when Obama was just a State Senator .
>
> The proof was when I sent him the documents that came along with the letter
> found on page 13 of this old file Teddy Baby Olson quit as Solicitor General.
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>
> Harper and every body else knows It was no coincidence that I sent the
> lawyers Olson as Solicitior General, Ferguson as the co chair of the
> Federal Reserve Bank, and J Strom Thurmond Jr the youngest US
> Attorney the same pile of documents on April Fools Day 2004.
>
> The sad but terrible truth is that legions of cops, lawyers polticians
> and bureaucrats in Canada and the USA knew about the US Secret Service
> coming to my home after dark on April Fools Day 2003 bearing false
> allegations of a presidential threat and threatening to use their
> implied right to use exta ordinary rendition against me as a non
> citizen less than two weeks after the needless War in Iraq began and
> no WMD were ever found.
>
> You can bet dimes to dollars i called some Yankee Inspector Generals
> (starting with 202 622 4068) and reminded them that I am still alive
> and kicking and reminding the world of their malicious incompetence
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> PS Below you can review some emails I sent you and your Yankee cohorts
> such asTeddy Baby Olson before Obama was reelected EH Harper? In truth
> I would rather settle in confidence with Obama then sue the Hell out
> of the CROWN and the Holy See Trust that the evil old Judge Bastarache
> has known why for a very long time.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> To: "Rob Talach" <rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>
> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
> a lot to you
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400
> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW
> Bernadine Chapman??
> To: Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, phil.giles@statcan.ca,
> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca,
> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca,
> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca, webo
> <webo@xplornet.com>, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1
> <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>, "Nycole.Turmel" <Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca>,
> Clemet1 <Clemet1@parl.gc.ca>, maritime_malaise
> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, oig <oig@sec.gov>, whistleblower
> <whistleblower@finra.org>, whistle <whistle@fsa.gov.uk>, david
> <david@fairwhistleblower.ca>
> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "justin.trudeau.a1"
> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "Juanita.Peddle"
> <Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
> "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Robert.Trevors"
> <Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca>, "ian.fahie" <ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/news-nouvelles/media-medias-eng.htm
>
> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/Newsletters/VetsReview/nlnov06.pdf
>
> From: Gilles Moreau <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500
> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy
> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH
> Constable Peddle???
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails.
>
> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC
> Director General
> HR Transformation
> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502
> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
>
> Tel 613-843-6039
> Cel 613-818-6947
>
> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC
> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines
> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502
> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
>
> tél 613-843-6039
> cel 613-818-6947
> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>>>> David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> 2012-11-21 00:01 >>>
>
> Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its
> because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it
> yet
>
> Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the
> link to Madoff and Putnam Investments
>
> Here is why
>
> http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2
>
> Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate
> Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice
> Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the
> following file
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf
>
> NONE of you should have assisted in the cover up of MURDER CORRECT???
>
> http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2011/2011-06-22/html/sor-dors122-eng.html
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> To: <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>; <Rob.Renaud@cbc.ca>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:45 PM
> Subject: Question # 1 who the hell is Rob Renaus and di Robert Jone
> and Jaques Poitra and Alan white etc forward you my latest emails
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Edith Cody-Rice <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>
> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:53:07 -0500
> Subject: Calls and E-mails to CBC
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> Cc: Rob Renaud <Rob.Renaud@cbc.ca>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> CBC personnel have contacted me concerning your calls and e-mails to
> them. As you are threatening legal action, would you kindly direct any
> further calls or correspondence to me. Other CBC personnel will not
> respond further to your correspondence or calls.
>
>
> Edith Cody-Rice
> Senior Legal Counsel
> Premier Conseiller juridique
> CBC/Radio-Canada
> 181 Queen Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1K9
> Postal Address: P.O. Box 3220, Station C, Ottawa K1Y 1E4
> Tel: (613) 288-6164
> Cell: (613) 720-5185
> Fax/ Télécopieur (613) 288-6279
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE
> This communication is subject to solicitor/client privilege and
> contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) to
> whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, other
> distribution of this communication
> or taking any action on its contents is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this message in error, please notify us immediately and
> delete this message without reading, copying or forwarding it to
> anyone.
>
> AVIS IMPORTANT
> La présente communication est assujettie au privilège du secret
> professionnel de l'avocat et renferme des renseignements confidentiels
> intéressant uniquement leur destinataire. Il est interdit de
> divulguer, de copier ou de distribuer cette communication par quelque
> moyen que ce soit ou de donner suite à son contenu sans y être
> autorisé. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez nous en
> avertir immédiatement et le supprimer en évitant de le lire, de le
> copier ou de le transmettre à qui que ce soit.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400
> Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
> the USDOJ for me will ya?
> To: RBauer <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
> cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith <msmith@svlaw.com>, bginsberg
> <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>, "gregory.craig"
> <gregory.craig@skadden.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.rae"
> <bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, leader
> <leader@greenparty.ca>
> Cc: alevine@cooley.com, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
> michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 29,419
> Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
> IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
> ISP US Dept of Justice
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : District of Columbia
> City : Washington
> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
> DI60SP1001)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
> Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...wwWJrm94lCEqRmovPXJg
> Search Engine google.com
> Search Words david amos bernie madoff
> Visit Entry Page
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Visit Exit Page
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm
> Visit Number 29,419
>

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
To: <eachtem@hotmail.com>; <alltrue@nl.rogers.com>;
<deanr0032@hotmail.com>; <dean@law.ualberta.ca>; <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>;
<injusticecoalition@hotmail.com>; "Edith. Cody-Rice"
<Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>; "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>;
"kelly. lamrock" <kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca>; <oldmaison@yahoo.com>;
"Duane.Rousselle" <Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca>; "john.adams"
<john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca>; <mackay01@canada.com>;
<IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>; <deanray98@yahoo.ca>; "Dean.Buzza"
<Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <ahunter100@shaw.ca>; <t.j.burke@gnb.ca>;
"jackblood" <jackblood@hotmail.com>; "jack. keir" <jack.keir@gnb.ca>;
<David.ALWARD@gnb.ca>; "drywallrocker" <drywallrocker@hotmail.com>;
"shawn. graham" <shawn.graham@gnb.ca>; "shawn.howard"
<shawn.howard@wildrosealliance.ca>
Cc: <td.ombudsman@td.com>; "christopher. montague"
<christopher.montague@td.com>; "Frank. McKenna"
<Frank.McKenna@td.com>; "John.DeWinter" <John.DeWinter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 2:07 PM
Subject: Lets see if John Adams the current the CSE is clever enough
to put two and two together about the TD EH Franky Boy McKenna


----- Original Message -----
From: Ombudsman, Td
To: 'david.raymond.amos@gmail.com'
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 6:11 PM
Subject: your e-mails dated November 3, 2008

November 4, 2008

David Amos
P.O. Box 234
Apohaqui, NB
E5P 3G2

----------------------

Dear Mr. Amos:

We acknowledge receipt of your e-mails dated November 3, 2008, which
we received in our office on November 4, 2008.

We would like to thank you for providing our office with your feedback
surrounding the various issues. We have reviewed the numerous pieces
of correspondence that you e-mailed to us. It is our understanding
that you have a number of concerns surrounding politics and the
actions of the government within North America.

We appreciate the effort you have taken to express your views
surrounding these issues, however we do not believe we can be of any
assistance as this falls outside the mandate of this office.

Thank you for taking the time to bring your concerns to our attention.

Yours truly,

Paul W. Huyer

Ombudsman


*********************
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY
This communication including any information transmitted with it is
intended only for the use of the addressees and is confidential.
If you are not an intended recipient or responsible for delivering
the message to an intended recipient, any review, disclosure,
conversion to hard copy, dissemination, reproduction or other use
of any part of this communication is strictly prohibited, as is the
taking or omitting of any action in reliance upon this communication.
If you receive this communication in error or without authorization
please notify us immediately by return e-mail or otherwise and
permanently delete the entire communication from any computer,
disk drive, or other storage medium.

If the above disclaimer is not properly readable, it can be found at
www.td.com/legal

AVERTISSEMENT DE CONFIDENTIALITE
Ce courriel, ainsi que tout renseignement ci-inclus, destiné uniquement
aux destinataires susmentionnés, est confidentiel. Si vous
n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu ou un agent responsable de la
livraison de ce courriel, tout examen, divulgation, copie, impression,
reproduction, distribution, ou autre utilisation d'une partie de ce
courriel est strictement interdit de même que toute intervention ou
abstraction à cet égard. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur ou
sans autorisation, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par
retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen et supprimer immédiatement
cette communication entière de tout système électronique.

Si l'avis de non-responsabilité ci-dessus n'est pas lisible, vous
pouvez le consulter à www.td.com/francais/legale

Mr Bush thanked the Netherlands for its cooperation during his time in
office and particularly praised the Dutch presence in Afghanistan.
After the meeting, Mr Balkenende said he had spoken freely about
matters on which the two countries disagree, including climate policy
and the US detention facility for terrorist suspects at Guantánamo
Bay.

Mr Verhagen will also hold meetings with US Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice and close aides of presidential candidates John
McCain and Barack Obama. Mr Balkenende is attending the Bilderberg
Conference, the highly secretive annual meeting of the world's most
influential people, which is this year being held in Chantilly outside
Washington DC.
Article Continues
----------------
(Source: Infowars):
BILDERBERG MEETING - "Chantilly, Virginia, USA" - 5-8 June 2008 - LIST
OF PARTICIPANTS

Honorary Chairman
BEL "Davignon, Etienne" "Vice Chairman, Suez-Tractebel"

DEU "Ackermann, Josef" "Chairman of the Management Board and the Group
Executive Committee, Deutsche Bank AG"
CAN "Adams, John" Associate Deputy Minister of National Defence and
Chief of the Communications Security Establishment Canada
USA "Ajami, Fouad" "Director, Middle East Studies Program, The Paul H.
Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, The Johns Hopkins
University"
USA "Alexander, Keith B." "Director, National Security Agency"
INT "Almunia, Joaquín " "Commissioner, European Commission"
GRC "Alogoskoufis, George" Minister of Economy and Finance
USA "Altman, Roger C." "Chairman, Evercore Partners Inc."
TUR "Babacan, Ali " Minister of Foreign Affairs
NLD "Balkenende, Jan Peter" Prime Minister
PRT "Balsemão, Francisco Pinto" "Chairman and CEO, IMPRESA, S.G.P.S.;
Former Prime Minister"
FRA "Baverez, Nicolas" "Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP"
ITA "Bernabè, Franco" "CEO, Telecom Italia Spa"
USA "Bernanke, Ben S." "Chairman, Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System"
SWE "Bildt, Carl" Minister of Foreign Affairs
FIN "Blåfield, Antti " "Senior Editorial Writer, Helsingin Sanomat"
DNK "Bosse, Stine" "CEO, TrygVesta"
CAN "Brodie, Ian " "Chief of Staff, Prime Minister's Office"
AUT "Bronner, Oscar" "Publisher and Editor, Der Standard"
FRA "Castries, Henri de " "Chairman of the Management Board and CEO, AXA"
ESP "Cebrián, Juan Luis" "CEO, PRISA"
CAN "Clark, Edmund" "President and CEO, TD Bank Financial Group"
GBR "Clarke, Kenneth" Member of Parliament
NOR "Clemet, Kristin" "Managing Director, Civita"
USA "Collins, Timothy C." "Senior Managing Director and CEO,
Ripplewood Holdings, LLC"
FRA "Collomb, Bertrand" "Honorary Chairman, Lafarge"
PRT "Costa, António" Mayor of Lisbon
USA "Crocker, Chester A." James R. Schlesinger Professor of Strategic Studies
USA "Daschle, Thomas A." Former US Senator and Senate Majority Leader
CAN "Desmarais, Jr., Paul" "Chairman and co-CEO, Power Corporation of Canada"
GRC "Diamantopoulou, Anna" Member of Parliament
USA "Donilon, Thomas E." "Partner, O'Melveny & Myers"
ITA "Draghi, Mario" "Governor, Banca d'Italia"
AUT "Ederer, Brigitte" "CEO, Siemens AG Österreich"
CAN "Edwards, N. Murray" "Vice Chairman, Candian Natural Resources Limited"
DNK "Eldrup, Anders " "President, DONG A/S"
ITA "Elkann, John" "Vice Chairman, Fiat S.p.A."
USA "Farah, Martha J." "Director, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience;
Walter H. Annenberg Professor in the Natural Sciences, University of
Pennsylvania"
USA "Feldstein, Martin S." "President and CEO, National Bureau of
Economic Research"
DEU "Fischer, Joschka" Former Minister of Foreign Affairs
USA "Ford, Jr., Harold E." "Vice Chairman, Merill Lynch & Co., Inc."
CHE "Forstmoser, Peter" "Professor for Civil, Corporation and Capital
Markets Law, University of Zürich"
IRL "Gallagher, Paul " Attorney General
USA "Geithner, Timothy F. " "President and CEO, Federal Reserve Bank
of New York"
USA "Gigot, Paul " "Editorial Page Editor, The Wall Street Journal"
IRL "Gleeson, Dermot " "Chairman, AIB Group"
NLD "Goddijn, Harold" "CEO, TomTom"
TUR "Gögüs, Zeynep " "Journalist; Founder, EurActiv.com.tr"
USA "Graham, Donald E." "Chairman and CEO, The Washington Post Company"
NLD "Halberstadt, Victor" "Professor of Economics, Leiden University;
Former Honorary Secretary General of Bilderberg Meetings"
USA "Holbrooke, Richard C. " "Vice Chairman, Perseus, LLC"
FIN "Honkapohja, Seppo" "Member of the Board, Bank of Finland"
INT "Hoop Scheffer, Jaap G. de" "Secretary General, NATO"
USA "Hubbard, Allan B." "Chairman, E & A Industries, Inc."
BEL "Huyghebaert, Jan" "Chairman of the Board of Directors, KBC Group"
DEU "Ischinger, Wolfgang" Former Ambassador to the UK and US
USA "Jacobs, Kenneth" "Deputy Chairman, Head of Lazard U.S., Lazard
Frères & Co. LLC"
USA "Johnson, James A." "Vice Chairman, Perseus, LLC" (Obama's man
tasked with selecting his running mate)
SWE "Johnstone, Tom " "President and CEO, AB SKF"
USA "Jordan, Jr., Vernon E." "Senior Managing Director, Lazard Frères & Co. LLC"
FRA "Jouyet, Jean-Pierre " Minister of European Affairs
GBR "Kerr, John " "Member, House of Lords; Deputy Chairman, Royal
Dutch Shell plc."
USA "Kissinger, Henry A." "Chairman, Kissinger Associates, Inc."
DEU "Klaeden, Eckart von" "Foreign Policy Spokesman, CDU/CSU"
USA "Kleinfeld, Klaus" "President and COO, Alcoa"
TUR "Koç, Mustafa " "Chairman, Koç Holding A.S."
FRA "Kodmani, Bassma" "Director, Arab Reform Initiative"
USA "Kravis, Henry R." "Founding Partner, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co."
USA "Kravis, Marie-Josée" "Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute, Inc."
INT "Kroes, Neelie " "Commissioner, European Commission"
POL "Kwasniewski, Aleksander " Former President
AUT "Leitner, Wolfgang" "CEO, Andritz AG"
ESP "León Gross, Bernardino" "Secretary General, Office of the Prime Minister"
INT "Mandelson, Peter" "Commissioner, European Commission"
FRA "Margerie, Christophe de" "CEO, Total"
CAN "Martin, Roger" "Dean, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management,
University of Toronto"
HUN "Martonyi, János" "Professor of International Trade Law; Partner,
Baker & McKenzie; Former Minister of Foreign Affairs"
USA "Mathews, Jessica T. " "President, Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace"
INT "McCreevy, Charlie " "Commissioner, European Commission"
USA "McDonough, William J." "Vice Chairman and Special Advisor to the
Chairman, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc."
CAN "McKenna, Frank" "Deputy Chair, TD Bank Financial Group"
GBR "McKillop, Tom " "Chairman, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group"
FRA "Montbrial, Thierry de" "President, French Institute for
International Relations"
ITA "Monti, Mario" "President, Universita Commerciale Luigi Bocconi"
USA "Mundie, Craig J. " "Chief Research and Strategy Officer,
Microsoft Corporation"
NOR "Myklebust, Egil" "Former Chairman of the Board of Directors SAS,
Norsk Hydro ASA"
DEU "Nass, Matthias" "Deputy Editor, Die Zeit"
NLD "Netherlands, H.M. the Queen of the"
FRA "Ockrent, Christine" "CEO, French television and radio world service"
FIN "Ollila, Jorma" "Chairman, Royal Dutch Shell plc"
SWE "Olofsson, Maud " Minister of Enterprise and Energy; Deputy Prime Minister
NLD "Orange, H.R.H. the Prince of"
GBR "Osborne, George" Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer
TUR "Öztrak, Faik" Member of Parliament
ITA "Padoa-Schioppa, Tommaso " Former Minister of Finance; President
of Notre Europe
GRC "Papahelas, Alexis" "Journalist, Kathimerini"
GRC "Papalexopoulos, Dimitris" "CEO, Titan Cement Co. S.A."
USA "Paulson, Jr., Henry M." Secretary of the Treasury
USA "Pearl, Frank H." "Chairman and CEO, Perseus, LLC"
USA "Perle, Richard N." "Resident Fellow, American Enterprise
Institute for Public Policy Research"
FRA "Pérol, François" Deputy General Secretary in charge of Economic Affairs
DEU "Perthes, Volker" "Director, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik"
BEL "Philippe, H.R.H. Prince"
CAN "Prichard, J. Robert S." "President and CEO, Torstar Corporation"
CAN "Reisman, Heather M." "Chair and CEO, Indigo Books & Music Inc."
USA "Rice, Condoleezza" Secretary of State
PRT "Rio, Rui " Mayor of Porto
USA "Rockefeller, David " "Former Chairman, Chase Manhattan Bank"
ESP "Rodriguez Inciarte, Matias" "Executive Vice Chairman, Grupo Santander"
USA "Rose, Charlie" "Producer, Rose Communications"
DNK "Rose, Flemming" "Editor, Jyllands Posten"
USA "Ross, Dennis B." "Counselor and Ziegler Distinguished Fellow, The
Washington Institute for Near East Policy"
USA "Rubin, Barnett R." "Director of Studies and Senior Fellow, Center
for International Cooperation, New York University"
TUR "Sahenk, Ferit " "Chairman, Dogus Holding A.S."
USA "Sanford, Mark" Governor of South Carolina
USA "Schmidt, Eric" "Chairman of the Executive Committee and CEO, Google"
AUT "Scholten, Rudolf " "Member of the Board of Executive Directors,
Oesterreichische Kontrollbank AG"
DNK "Schur, Fritz H. " Fritz Schur Gruppen
CZE "Schwarzenberg, Karel " Minister of Foreign Affairs
USA "Sebelius, Kathleen" Governor of Kansas
USA "Shultz, George P." "Thomas W. and Susan B. Ford Distinguished
Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University"
ESP "Spain, H.M. the Queen of"
CHE "Spillmann, Markus" "Editor-in-Chief and Head Managing Board, Neue
Zürcher Zeitung AG"
USA "Summers, Lawrence H." "Charles W. Eliot Professor, Harvard University"
GBR "Taylor, J. Martin" "Chairman, Syngenta International AG"
USA "Thiel, Peter A." "President, Clarium Capital Management, LLC"
NLD "Timmermans, Frans" Minister of European Affairs
RUS "Trenin, Dmitri V." "Deputy Director and Senior Associate,
Carnegie Moscow Center"
INT "Trichet, Jean-Claude" "President, European Central Bank"
USA "Vakil, Sanam" "Assistant Professor of Middle East Studies, The
Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins
University"
FRA "Valls, Manuel " Member of Parliament
GRC "Varvitsiotis, Thomas" "Co-Founder and President, V + O Communication"
CHE "Vasella, Daniel L." "Chairman and CEO, Novartis AG"
FIN "Väyrynen, Raimo" "Director, The Finnish Institute of International Affairs"
FRA "Védrine, Hubert" Hubert Védrine Conseil
NOR "Vollebaek, Knut" "High Commissioner on National Minorities, OSCE"
SWE "Wallenberg, Jacob" "Chairman, Investor AB"
USA "Weber, J. Vin" "CEO, Clark & Weinstock"
USA "Wolfensohn, James D. " "Chairman, Wolfensohn & Company, LLC"
USA "Wolfowitz, Paul" "Visiting Scholar, American Enterprise Institute
for Public Policy Research"
INT "Zoellick, Robert B. " "President, The World Bank Group"

Rapporteurs
GBR "Bredow, Vendeline von" "Business Correspondent, The Economist"
GBR "Wooldridge, Adrian D." "Foreign Correspondent, The Economist"

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
To: <aefa@sen.parl.gc.ca>; "bairdj" <bairdj@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: <db26@queensu.ca>; "maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2011 12:08 AM
Subject: Fwd: Brazil understands the Global Economy far better than PM
Harper or Robert Wood of the EIU does


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 23:33:48 -0300
Subject: Brazil understands the Global Economy far better than PM
Harper or Robert Wood of the EIU does
To: prenquiries@eiu.com, mailbox@brasembottawa.org,
"flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca" <flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca>, "Harris. J"
<Harris.J@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>
Cc: newsroom <newsroom@theguardian.pe.ca>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, maritime_malaise
<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>

http://eiumedia.com/index.php/component/comprofiler/userprofile/RobertWood

http://www.cpac.ca/forms/index.asp?dsp=template&act=view3&template_id=181&Lang=e

Foreign Affairs (September 29, 2011)

The committee continued its study of political and economic
developments in Brazil and the implications for Canada.

Robert Wood, senior editor and economist of the Economist Intelligence
Unit, and Douglas Bland, former chair of Defence Management Studies at
Queen's University, testified.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:34:59 -0300
Subject: For the record the so callled "expert" Kevin O'Leary yapping
on CBC right now is pretending that he has no clue about this
To: exchange@cbc.ca, tonis.saar@riigikontroll.ee,
sarah.chapman@fsa.gov.uk, W-Five@ctv.ca,
bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net, nichor@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1@parl.gc.ca,
greg.weston@cbc.ca, thepurplevioletpress@gmail.com,
Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca, jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com,
Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, chiefape@gmail.com, nbpc@gnb.ca

It looks Estonia is gonna suffer like Iceland did because its
political bosses were too dumb to read or worse

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=8353833

"The EFSF doesn't solve problems, it only takes money," lawyer and
member of parliament Legal Affairs Committee Igor Grazin from the
ruling Reform Party told parliament.

Mailis Reps, of the left-leaning opposition Centre Party, said it was
unfair for Estonia to have to dip into its coffers.

"When we look at the salaries of teachers, the state support for
children and so on, it's all many times smaller here than in the
countries Estonia is now going to support financially," she said.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:06:31 -0300
Subject: Thanks again Mr Kruuv I see the folks in Estonia are still
debating Thats good
To: Riho Kruuv <riho.kruuv@mfa.ee>
Cc: maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca, tonis.saar@riigikontroll.ee, "Saatkond
Ottawas üldaadress (e-mail)" <embassy.ottawa@mfa.ee>

http://news.ph.msn.com/business/article.aspx?cp-documentid=5329588

In answer to your question you will find the following words within
the email you responded to. For the benetit of the taxpayers in
Estonia your government and I should discuss them ASAP.

I tried hrd to explain my concerns on the phone to you but you wanted
me to prove that my IP connection was ok for some reason. FYI I
already knew that it was because I was calling you through the Inernet

Please read and click on the links

I am the unamed Whistleblower that Mr Nester of the SEC mentioned
in 2009 who is the link from Putnam investments and Madoff matter
To support , my allegations first and foremost Eric Schneiderman
should see that Eliot Spitzer testified on the very day he thanked me
for the info in November of 2003.

Please notice the transcripts and webcasts went of th Senate hearings
"poof' not long after I made the congressman Ron Paul and legions of
others well aware of their existence as he bitched about such things
whilst running for the GOP endorsement to run for president in 2007.
The records of the hearings were deleted in late fall 2007 just as all
the subprime mortgages began to smell bad.

http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2

Now check the dates on the letters in this file page 13 in particular

http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf


A portion of the email below can be found within the following link or
simply Google Amos and Madoff and anyone can find it
This is not my blog

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html

Notice Mr Nestor of the SEC?

These are more informative blogs of his about me

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/06/5-years-waiting-on-bank-fraud-payout.html

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/04/david-amos-nb-nwo-whistleblower-part-3.html



On 9/29/11, Riho Kruuv <riho.kruuv@mfa.ee> wrote:
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Now that we have made sure that your e-mails aren't blocked by Estonian mail
> servers, please specify, where do you see an issue or problem or what do you
> expect Estonian authorities to do (differently)?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Riho Kruuv
> Chargé d'Affaires
> Embassy of Estonia
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
> Sent: 29. september 2011. a. 12:07
> To: Riho Kruuv; Saatkond Ottawas üldaadress (e-mail);
> tonis.saar@riigikontroll.ee
> Cc: maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca
> Subject: Thanks Mr Kruuv As far as I know Austria, Estonia, Malta, the
> Netherlands and Slovakia have yet to vote to support Greece
>
> Thus there maybe some time yet
>
> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2011/09/29/bloomberg_articlesLSAF5V0UQVI9.DTL
>
> "Estonia votes on the measures later today followed by Austria tomorrow."
>
> Estonian Embassy
> 260 Dalhousie Street,
> Suite 210 Ottawa,
> Ontario K1N 7E4
> Canada
> tel. (1 613) 789 42 22
> fax: (1 613) 789 95 55
> embassy.ottawa@mfa.ee
>
> Read more:
> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2011/09/29/bloomberg_articlesLSAF5V0UQVI9.DTL#ixzz1ZMCF6S77
> From: Riho Kruuv <riho.kruuv@mfa.ee>
> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:45:04 -0500
> Subject: Communication check
> To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> I hope that you received this e-mail and can pass the information you
> spoke about to me.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Riho Kruuv
>
> Chargé d'Affaires
>
> Embassy of Estonia in Canada
>
> www.estemb.ca <http://www.estemb.ca/>
>
>
> From: "OSBORNE, George" <george.osborne.mp@parliament.uk>
> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:56:26 +0100
> Subject: Thank you for your e-mail
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
>
> Thank you very much for your e-mail to George Osborne.
>
> If you are contacting George in his capacity as Chancellor of the
> Exchequer, please re-send your e-mail to:
> public.enquiries@hm-treasury.gov.uk<mailto:public.enquiries@hm-treasury.gov.uk>.
> Alternatively, write to The Correspondence & Enquiry Unit, HM
> Treasury, 1 Horseguards Road, London, SW1A 2HQ or telephone 020 7270
> 4558.
>
> If you are one of George's Tatton constituents, please ensure that you
> have included your full postal address and postcode, so that we can
> identify you as a constituent. The Tatton office, which is for
> constituent enquiries only, can be reached on 01565 873037.
>
> If you are a personal contact of George's, your e-mail will be
> forwarded accordingly.
>
> With kind regards,
>
> Office of Rt Hon George Osborne MP
> Chancellor of the Exchequer
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:46:12 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: ISS10441377
> To: public.enquiries@hm-treasury.gov.uk, ministers@hm-treasury.gov.uk
> Cc: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "j.kroes" <j.kroes@interpol.int>, maritime_malaise
> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:17:07 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: ISS10441377
> To: complaint.info@financial-ombudsman.org.uk
> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, "Dean.Buzza"
> <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:03:32 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: ISS10441377
> To: info@hermitagefund.com, "flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca"
> <flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "bert. hudon"
> <bert.hudon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, michael.geller@rbs.com,
> Barbara.Cottam@citizensbank.com, "shahtx(gmail)" <shahtx@gmail.com>,
> "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca" <william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "j.kroes" <j.kroes@interpol.int>, oig <oig@sec.gov>
> Cc: "alfred.smithers" <alfred.smithers@fco.gov.uk>,
> MIMEsweeper@fsa.gov.uk, maritme_malaise <maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca>
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:53:14 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: Re: ISS10441377 Perhaps You or your Ambassador in Ottawa
> or Halifax should call me back? 902 800 0369
> To: info@hermitagefund.com
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: MIMEsweeper@fsa.gov.uk
> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:34:51 +0100 (BST)
> Subject: RE: Re: ISS10441377 Perhaps You or your Ambassador in Ottawa
> or Halifax should call me back? 902 800 0369
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Dear customer,
>
> Thank you for your email. If your query is urgent, or you think you
> have been contacted by a SCAM do not wait for a reply. Instead, please
> call our Consumer Helpline on 0845 606 1234, and we will help with
> your query immediately. Please advise the agent who takes your call
> that you have emailed us previously. If your query is not urgent,
> please be aware that we work to a service level of 12 working days,
> and it is likely that it will take this long to respond to you.
>
> PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL ADDRESS
>
> This communication and any attachments contains information which is
> confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. It is for intended
> recipients only. If you are not the intended recipient you must not
> copy, distribute, publish, rely on or otherwise use it without our
> consent. Some of our communications may contain confidential
> information which it could be a criminal offence for you to disclose
> or use without authority. If you have received this email in error
> please notify postmaster@fsa.gov.uk immediately and delete the email
> from your computer.
> The FSA reserves the right to monitor all email communications for
> compliance with legal, regulatory and professional standards.
> This email is not intended to nor should it be taken to create any
> legal relations or contractual relationships. This email has
> originated from
>
> The Financial Services Authority (FSA)
> 25 The North Colonnade,
> Canary Wharf,
> London
> E14 5HS
> United Kingdom
>
> Registered as a Limited Company in England and Wales No.1920623.
> Registered Office as above
> Switchboard: 020 7066 1000
> Web Site: http://www.fsa.gov.uk
> *****************************************************************
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: FCC <Consumer.Queries@fsa.gov.uk>
> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:44:47 +0100 (BST)
> Subject: RE: ISS10441377
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Our Ref: PC41073. ISS10441377
>
> In order that we can deal with this matter as quickly as possible
> please do not delete the Subject line of this email when you reply.
> You can add further wording to it but please do not remove
> "ISS10441377".
>
> Dear Sir or Madam,
>
> Please accept this acknowledgement of the receipt of your email dated
> 31 August 2011, the contents of which have been noted for our records.
>
> I have not responded to your email, as you have not addressed this to
> us directly, nor have you asked us any questions.
>
> However, I feel it would be of use if I explain our role. We are the
> UK's financial watchdog set up by the government to regulate financial
> services. We protect consumers by setting standards that FSA-regulated
> firms must meet and taking action if they don't. We regulate most
> types of financial services firms, such as banks, building societies,
> credit unions, insurance companies, financial advisers, stockbrokers,
> and mortgage and insurance sellers.
>
> If you have any future questions on financial services and products,
> you may find it easier to call our Consumer Helpline on 0845 606 1234
> (call rates may vary).
>
> You can also access relevant information online at
> www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation and via the Money Advice
> Service website: www.moneyadviceservice.org.uk/.
>
> I trust this is of assistance, and welcome any further feedback you
> may have in relation to this matter.
>
> Yours faithfully
>
> Victoria Warren (Miss)
> Customer Contact Centre
> Financial Services Authority
> Consumer Helpline: 0845 606 1234 (call rates may vary)
> www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation
>
> We are interested in finding out about people's views and experiences
> of the services offered by the Customer Contact Centre. As a result,
> we employ a research agency to help us, and they may contact you, via
> the telephone, to see if you would be prepared to take part in a short
> telephone interview. If you do receive a phone call you are under no
> obligation to complete the survey. Please rest assured that your
> details will remain confidential and will not be used for any other
> purposes; we are not trying to sell you any financial products or
> service, and no sales call will result from this.
>
> If you do not wish to take part in any of our surveys, please call the
> Customer Contact Centre on 0845 606 1234 (call rates may vary), or
> email consumer.queries@fsa.gov.uk and we will ensure that your details
> are not passed on to the research agency.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sarah.chapman@fsa.gov.uk
> Date Sent: 31/08/2011 16:54:39
> To: Consumer.Queries@fsa.gov.uk
> Subject: RE: ISS10441377
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
> Sent: 28 August 2011 01:40
> To: michael.geller@rbs.com; Barbara.Cottam@citizensbank.com; oig;
> whistleblower; Whistle
> Cc: Dean.Buzza; maritime_malaise
> Subject: Do your people at RBS think I am joking?
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 14:08:24 -0300
> Subject: i just called you again Mr O'Donnell perhaps you should review
> the Homestead Act and check your work
> To: registerodonnell@norfolkdeeds.org
> Cc: "Fred.Wyshak" <Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov>, maritime_malaise
> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 13:57:12 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: I just called and tried to reason with you people whilst
> the Stock Markets tumble AGAIN Correct JIM?
> To: Jim.Hughes@citizensbank.com
> Cc: D.Jones@citizensbank.com, oig <oig@sec.gov>, OIG <OIG@ftc.gov>, ir
> <ir@landsbanki.is>, ir <ir@statestreet.com>, jrogers <jrogers@nhpr.org>
>
> I saw you checking my work on the web now check your bank's malicious
> work in the attachment
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 14,733
> Domain Name citizensbank.com ? (Commercial)
> IP Address 12.46.106.# (CITIZENS BANK)
> ISP AT&T WorldNet Services
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : Rhode Island
> City : Pawtucket
> Lat/Long : 41.8735, -71.3734 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Macintosh WinXP
> Browser Safari 1.3
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko)
> Chrome/13.0.782.107 Safari/535.1
> Javascript version 1.5
> Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 1024
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Aug 5 2011 1:38:08 pm
> Last Page View Aug 5 2011 1:38:08 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...d amos citizens bank Search Engine
> google.com Search Words david amos citizens bank
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Aug 5 2011 12:38:08 pm
> Visit Number 14,733
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 22,067
> Domain Name citizensbank.com ? (Commercial)
> IP Address 12.154.167.# (CITIZENS BANK)
> ISP AT&T WorldNet Services
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : Massachusetts
> City : Dover
> Lat/Long : 42.2417, -71.2874 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.)
> en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 6.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR
> 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR
> 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 1024
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Aug 5 2011 6:39:44 pm
> Last Page View Aug 5 2011 6:39:44 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...=f&aqi=g-b1&aql=&oq=
> Search Engine google.com
> Search Words amos david madoff
> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-6:00
> Visitor's Time Aug 5 2011 11:39:44 am
> Visit Number 22,067
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 09:59:29 -0300
> Subject: i just called and tried to reason with you people whilst the
> Stock Markets tumble AGAIN Correct?
> To: david.barry@nbsc-cvmnb.ca, kptummon@gov.pe.ca, obrienhl@gov.ns.ca,
> slattejw@gov.ns.ca, atkinssj@gov.ns.ca, gsinfo@gov.nl.ca,
> harryharding@gov.nl.ca, "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>,
> "jonesr@cbc.ca" <jonesr@cbc.ca>
> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, oig <oig@sec.gov>,
> ministerofstate <ministerofstate@acoa-aperca.gc.ca>, "Dean.Buzza"
> <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, newsroom <newsroom@telegraphjournal.com>,
> "Barry.MacKnight" <Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca>,
> "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>
>
> Since you won't speak to me, why not talk about your deliberate
> incompetence to the foreign newsmen contacting me?
>
> csa-acvm-secretariat@acvm-csa.ca
>
> http://www.nbsc-cvmnb.ca/nbsc/LanguageRH.do?type=english
>
> http://www.gov.pe.ca/securities/index.php3?number=48628&lang=E
>
> http://www.gov.ns.ca/nssc/contactnssc.htm
>
> http://www.gs.gov.nl.ca/
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <myson333@yahoo.com>
> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 12:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: Ed Here is your ticket to keep you out of hot water Just send
> this to Hugh Grant and he can raise hell for you
> To: ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Byway of the US FTC the Feds in many countries can never deny that they
> did not know the truth long ago
>
> From: Ed Pilkington <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>
> Subject: GUARDIAN
> To: myson333@yahoo.com
> Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 11:42 AM
>
> hi
>
> here's my email and my cell number is below
>
> all best
>
> Ed
>
> --
> Ed Pilkington
> New York bureau chief
> The Guardian
> www.guardian.co.uk
> twitter.com/Edpilkington
>
> Cell: 646 704 1264
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Visit guardian.co.uk - newspaper of the year www.guardian.co.uk
> www.observer.co.uk
>
> On your mobile, visit m.guardian.co.uk or download the Guardian iPhone
> app www.guardian.co.uk/iphone
>
> To save up to 30% when you subscribe to the Guardian and the Observer
> visit www.guardian.co.uk/subscriber
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This e-mail and all attachments are confidential and may also be
> privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender
> and delete the e-mail and all attachments immediately.
> Do not disclose the contents to another person. You may not use the
> information for any purpose, or store, or copy, it in any way.
>
> Guardian News & Media Limited is not liable for any computer viruses or
> other material transmitted with or as part of this e-mail. You should
> employ virus checking software.
>
> Guardian News & Media Limited
>
> A member of Guardian Media Group plc
> Registered Office
> PO Box 68164
> Kings Place
> 90 York Way
> London
> N1P 2AP
>
> Registered in England Number 908396
>
>
> --- On Tue, 8/2/11, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re Rupert Murdoch and his associates Perhaps Ms Curtis should
> show this email to the actor Hugh Grant
> To: polly.curtis@guardian.co.uk
> Cc: jhenderson@newscorp.com, rnolte@newscorp.com, jdorrego@newscorp.com,
> "maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2011, 2:21 PM
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jul/12/hugh-grant-phone-hacking-inquiry
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: OIG <OIG@ftc.gov>
> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:29:48 -0400
> Subject: RE: I just called again and tried to speak with John Seeba and
> Cynthia Hogue of the FTC
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> Mr Amos. I just talked to you. Our office only has jurisdiction over
> internal matters like if an FTC employee is involved in fraud. We also
> report to congress to notify them how the FTC utilizes funds.
>
> What can we do for you?
>
> Thanks. Zisa Walton
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 4:23 PM
> To: OIG; maritime_malaise
> Cc: Fred. Pretorius; Fred.Wyshak
> Subject: I just called again and tried to speak with John Seeba and
> Cynthia Hogue of the FTC
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:56:13 -0300
> Subject: RE BSkyB and News Corp I am on the phone to you right now
> To: jhorner@newscorp.com, teverett@newscorp.com,
> jhenderson@newscorp.com, rnolte@newscorp.com, jdorrego@newscorp.com,
> "Marc.Litt" <Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov>
> Cc: oig <oig@sec.gov>, maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
> "Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
> http://www.newscorp.com/management/newscor.html
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:05:59 -0300
> Subject: RE BSkyB and News Corp
> To: aarti.maharaj@thecrossbordergroup.com, bpollack@milchev.com,
> emma.gilpin-jacobs@ft.com, saltschuller@foleyhoag.com
> Cc: newsroom <newsroom@wnyc.org>
>
> http://www.corporatesecretary.com/articles/11949/newscorp-searches-legal
> -help-help-combat-us-lawsuits/
>
> http://www.corporatesecretary.com/articles/11928/corporate-social-respon
> sibility-and-role-board-directors/
>
> http://www.csrandthelaw.com/sarah-a-altschuller.html
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 02:45:11 -0300
> Subject: RE BSkyB and News Corp Opps ol Rupert would be pissed that I
> forgot to send the oh so important attachments
> To: jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com, clerks@oeclaw.co.uk,
> asiskind@newscorp.com, investor-relations@bskyb.com,
> investor@newscorp.com, "Rupert.Murdoch@fox.com"
> <Rupert.Murdoch@fox.com>, "James.Murdoch@fox.com"
> <James.Murdoch@fox.com>, Edith Cody-Rice <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>,
> Jacques Poitras <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, Robert Jones
> <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, Terry Seguin <Terry.Seguin@cbc.ca>, "richard.
> dearden" <richard.dearden@gowlings.com>, maritime_malaise
> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, "Carol.Coristine@cbc.ca"
> <Carol.Coristine@cbc.ca>, "Bob.Kerr@CBC.CA" <danfour@myginch.com>
> Cc: newsdesk@theage.com.au, jbrowning9@bloomberg.net,
> athomson6@bloomberg.net, kwong11@bloomberg.net,
> frank.pingue@thomsonreuters.com, editor <editor@newsday.com>, news-tips
> <news-tips@nytimes.com>, newsonline <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>, newshour
> <newshour@pbs.org>, newsroom <newsroom@theguardian.pe.ca>, Newsroom
> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, foreigneditor
> <foreigneditor@independent.co.uk>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Grant.McCool@thomsonreuters.com
> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:23:36 -0400
> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: RE BSkyB and News Corp Hey Jac Nasser
> Howcome or the trusted lawyers Arty Siskind and Lony Jacobs did not tell
> the Murdochs I was still alive and kicking like hell?
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> I am out of the office until Monday, August 8. I will not be reading
> email until then. Regards
>
> This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and
> information company. Any views expressed in this message are those of
> the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them
> to be the views of Thomson Reuters.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 02:23:30 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: RE BSkyB and News Corp Hey Jac Nasser Howcome or the
> trusted lawyers Arty Siskind and Lony Jacobs did not tell the Murdochs I
> was still alive and kicking like hell?
> To: jbrowning9@bloomberg.net, athomson6@bloomberg.net,
> kwong11@bloomberg.net, frank.pingue@thomsonreuters.com,
> grant.mccool@thomsonreuters.com, juan.lagorio@thomsonreuters.com,
> vasilescua@sec.gov, friedmani@sec.gov, krishnamurthyp@sec.gov,
> "Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
> newsdesk@theage.com.au, bruce.alec@gmail.com
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:41:59 -0300
> Subject: RE BSkyB and News Corp Hey Jac Nasser Howcome or the trusted
> lawyers Arty Siskind and Lony Jacobs did not tell the Murdochs I was
> still alive and kicking like hell?
> To: jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com, clerks@oeclaw.co.uk,
> asiskind@newscorp.com, investor-relations@bskyb.com,
> investor@newscorp.com, "Rupert.Murdoch@fox.com"
> <Rupert.Murdoch@fox.com>, "James.Murdoch@fox.com"
> <James.Murdoch@fox.com>, Edith Cody-Rice <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>,
> Jacques Poitras <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, Robert Jones
> <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, Terry Seguin <Terry.Seguin@cbc.ca>, "richard.
> dearden" <richard.dearden@gowlings.com>, maritime_malaise
> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, "Carol.Coristine@cbc.ca"
> <Carol.Coristine@cbc.ca>, "Bob.Kerr@CBC.CA" <Bob.Kerr@cbc.ca>
> Cc: pm@pm.gc.ca, LaytoJ <LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca>, info <info@bobrae.ca>,
> oldmaison@yahoo.com, danfour <danfour@myginch.com>
>
> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-25/bskyb-directors-face-4-2-billio
> n-quandary.html
>
> Interesting quandary you bskyb dudes have. Seems it just got worse EH Jac?
>
> Clearly you and I crossed paths bigtime before TWO IMPORTANT elections
> in Canada last year and obviously News Corp and Bloomberg's pal Joel
> Klein's old buddies in the US Justice Dept and the SEC etc pissed me off
> way back in 2002 EH?
>
> Need I say iIdid not like it when and heard of corrupt cops in seven
> cars pounced on my son and I at 2;30 in the morning about two weeks
> after i received this email from you with the attached letter. Small
> wonder Stevey Boy Harper stopped the BHP take over bid of Potash when he
> could not get th RCMP to shut me up EH?
>
> BTW the pdf file hereto attached that should refresh Siskind's and
> Jacobs memories can be found here as well the letter you sent to me last
> September
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/60818237/FCC-News-Corp
>
> Altough my contempt towards greedy publicly held companies is well known
> my desire to expose corrupt law enfocement people is far higher on my
> list of offensive things. If old Rupert were wise and his son is clever
> perhaps they should have somebody finally call me back ASAP.
> Perhap Ruper Murdoch can figure how to deal with an honest man ethically
> for the benefit of many shareholders and the chagrin of the SEC and
> Barack Obama EH?
>
> News Corp has the media and I have the evidence. Why not pretend I am
> Monte Hall and lets make a deal for the benefit of all. Try leaving the
> dark side and ignoring your crooked lawyers for a change. What say you
> Rupert? Dickens wrote books about such things.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> The links to newsrags etc at the bottom of this email prove that
> obviously I have been reading many things lately. Your lawyers should
> study some of my work within this one email alone As you well know i
> will be forwarding this email to many people in short order.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 23:36:47 -0300
> Subject: RE the Email from BHP Billiton's Chairman Perhaps your lawyers
> and I should talk ASAP? 902 800 0369
> To: Jane.McAloon@bhpbilliton.com
> Cc: jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com
>
> Jane McAloon (Group Company Secretary) BEc (Hons), LLB, GDipGov, FCIS
> Term of office: Jane McAloon was appointed Group Company Secretary in
> July 2007 and joined the BHP Billiton Group in September 2006 as Company
> Secretary for BHP Billiton Limited.
> Skills and experience: Prior to joining BHP Billiton, Jane McAloon held
> the position of Company Secretary and Group Manager External and
> Regulatory Services in the Australian Gas Light Company. She previously
> held various State and Commonwealth government positions, including
> Director General of the NSW Ministry of Energy and Utilities and Deputy
> Director General for the NSW Cabinet Office, as well as working in
> private legal practice. She is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered
> Secretaries.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Collins, Susan J (COSEC)" <Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.com>
> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:23:12 +1000
> Subject: Email to BHP Billiton Chairman's
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Please find attached a letter from Mr Jac Nasser, Chairman of BHP
> Billiton
>
> Susan Collins
> Company Secretariat
> BHP Billiton | 180 Lonsdale St | Melbourne Vic 3000 |Australia
> T: +61 3 9609 2654 | M: +61 427 713 994 | F: +61 3 9609 3290
> E: susan.j.collins@bhpbilliton.com <mailto:jane.mcaloon@bhpbilliton.com>
>
> <<Amos D 2010 09 14.pdf>>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:36 AM
>> To: pr@potashcorp.com; Podwika@potashcorp.com;
>> fosterd@bennettjones.ca; corporate.relations@potashcorp.com;
>> lgold.blcanada@b-l.com; shawn. graham; David.ALWARD@gnb.ca;
>> krisaustin; jacques_poitras@cbc.ca; cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca;
>> tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com; nmiller@corridor.ca;
>> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca; atlbf@nb.aibn.com; akapoor@globeandmail.com;
>> nmacadam@globeandmail.com; vepp@globeandmail.com;
>> potash@mackenziepartners.com; contactus@kingsdaleshareholder.com;
>> rick.hancox; Bernard.LeBlanc; Liebenberg, Andre;
>> mclellana@bennettjones.com; MooreR; danfour; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
>> Harris, Brendan; Dean.Buzza; Gilles. Blinn
>> Cc: wcoady; michel.desneiges@sade-els.org; producers@stu.ca;
>> WaterWarCrimes; Penny Bright; tony; Nasser, Jacques
>> Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
>> of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
>> you people buy much stock in their stock eh?
>>
>> With ANOTHER election in the near future I see no need to explain my
>> issues again about the exploitation of our natural resources to a
>> bunch of sneaky lawyers.(everyboy shoul checkout the pdf hereto
>> attache) especially our former Deputy Prime Minister Lanslide Annie
>> McLelllan an the RCMP thought they knew everything seven years ago and
>
>> did nothing let alone call me back just like you an your many
>> conservative cohorts NEVER did EH Brucy Baby Northrup? (902 800 0369
>> Notice my new contact number? You an the RCMP can forget Werner Bock's
>> now)
>>
>> Clearly there is no need for politicians to try to be confidential
>> with mean old me when the Globe and Mail loves spilling the beans
>> sometimes ou woul think those unethical journlists woul know that
>> simple truths spoken amongst common folk about corrupt politicians
>> have a good habit of coming to the surface sooner or later anyway EH?
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>
> This message and any attached files may contain information that is
> confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by
> the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the
> person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient,
> be advised that you have received this message in error and that any
> dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly
> forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein. If you have
> received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and
> delete the message.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:05:02 -0300
> Subject: Mr Lee I just called you from 902 800 0369 after listening to
> you on CAPAC last night perhaps we should talk ASAP
> To: ian_lee@carleton.ca
> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
>
> First and foremost do you see Eliot Spitzer testified on the very day he
> thanked me for the info? I ask again where did the transcripts and
> webcasts go not long after I made the congressman Ron Paul and legions
> of others well aware of their existence as he bitched about such things
> whle running for the GOP endorcement to run for president in 2007? For
> the PUBLIC Record the records of the hearings were deleted in late fall
> 2007 just as all the subprime morigages began to smell bad.
>
> http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&H
> earing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2
>
> Now check the dates on the letters in this file page 13 in particular
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-tx
> t.pdf
>
> Then read ths old email exchange
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.ht
> ml
>
> Get it? If not call me will ya?
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 22:56:05 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: Wheras ol Whitey Bulger is now in custody Perhaps the FEDS
> should review this old file ASAP EH Assange?
> To: jcarney@carneybassil.com, "jacques.boucher"
> <jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
> "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca" <william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, dean <dean@law.ualberta.ca>,
> Daniel.Conley@massmail.state.ma.us, dboeri@wbur.bu.edu,
> wburnews@wbmur.org, birgittajoy <birgittajoy@gmail.com>, "Julian
> Assange)" <editor@wikileaks.org>, "Bathurst, News Max"
> <maxnews@astral.com>, "mckeen.randy" <mckeen.randy@gmail.com>, "Frank.
> McKenna" <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, "mclaughlin.heather"
> <mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com>
> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, danfour
> <danfour@myginch.com>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
> editorial <editorial@thedailybeast.com>, "terry.seguin"
> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, nickysbirdy <nickysbirdy@yahoo.ca>, webo
> <webo@xplornet.com>, "Loiseau, Frederic"
> <frederic.loiseau@fredericton.ca>, "Barry.MacKnight"
> <Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca>
>
> http://www.wbur.org/2011/07/06/bulger-arraignment
>
> http://carneybassil.com/team/carney/
>
> From: magicJack <voicemail@notify.magicjack.com>
> Subject: New VM (16) - 0:47 minutes in your magicJack mailbox from
> 7097728272
> To: "DAVID AMOS"
> Date: Monday, July 4, 2011, 6:16 AM
>
> Dear magicJack User:
>
> You received a new 0:47 minutes voicemail message, on Monday, July 04,
> 2011 at 09:16:24 AM in mailbox 902 800 0369 from 709 772 8272.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 20:02:45 -0300
> Subject: Wheras ol Whitey Bulger is now in custody Perhaps the FEDS
> should review this file ASAP?
> To: "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca" <william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, dean <dean@law.ualberta.ca>,
> maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
> "greg.preston" <greg.preston@police.edmonton.ab.ca>, acampbell
> <acampbell@ctv.ca>, LaytoJ <LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca>, godiny
> <godiny@parl.gc.ca>, Ashfik1a <Ashfik1a@parl.gc.ca>
> Cc: "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, danfour <danfour@myginch.com>,
> "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "richard. dearden"
> <richard.dearden@gowlings.com>
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>
> Beginning on page 56 All of Whitey's lawyers will get the jitters
>
> Notice Andrew Bulger?
>
> http://www.bostonmagazine.com/articles/the_martyrdom_of_john_connolly/pa
> ge4
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:18:17 -0300
> Subject: Thanx for the call back
> To: dboeri@wbur.bu.edu
> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:35:19 -0300
> Subject: "He looks forward to facing the charges against him," said
> Bulger lawyer Peter Krupp
> To: pkrupp@luriekrupp.com
> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, "Daniel.Conley"
> <Daniel.Conley@massmail.state.ma.us>, "Daniel.Conley"
> <Daniel.Conley@state.ma.us>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:43:17 -0300
> Subject: Thanx for listening to me I will call WBUR's David Boeri in
> short order (617 353 1059)
> To: wburnews@wbur.org, maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Cc: Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, oldmaison@yahoo.com, danfour
> <danfour@myginch.com>, "jonesr@cbc.ca" <jonesr@cbc.ca>
>
> I called and tried to talk to David Boeri because of what he said
> recently within this video and what he wrote about Whitey na the Feds
> over the years
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8mQTMZts0U
>
> http://www.wbur.org/contact
>
> FYI After I called a lot of parliamentarians, the RCMP and the FBI I
> noticed this hit on a blog about me this morning. I have no doubt the
> following emails is what they were reading so I called Fred Wyshak and
> read him the riot act once again byway of his voicemail within the US
> Attorney's Office and then called the WBUR newsroom
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/04/david-amos-nb-nwo-whistleblower
> -part-3.html
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 21,300
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 98.27.50.# (Unknown Organization)
> ISP Unknown ISP
> Location Continent : Unknown
> Country : Unknown
> Lat/Long : unknown
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Macintosh MacOSX
> Browser Safari 1.3
> Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; U; CPU OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us)
> AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148
> Safari/6533.18.5
> Javascript version 1.5
> Monitor Resolution : 768 x 1024
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Jun 26 2011 4:45:39 am
> Last Page View Jun 26 2011 4:45:39 am
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...1xsTVXbAU1_dhPR2fb0w
> Search Engine google.com
> Search Words fred wyshak
> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....leblower-part-3.html
> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....leblower-part-3.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Jun 25 2011 10:45:39 pm
> Visit Number 21,300
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 2:09 PM
> Subject: Attn Fred Wyshak and Stockwell Day Here is some proof that I
> was not joking with you last week
> To: Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, USAMA.MEDIA@usdoj.gov, W-Five@ctv.ca,
> day.s@parl.gc.ca, "Harper.S@parl.gc.ca" Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, "Duceppe.
> G" Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca, dions1@parl.gc.ca, "layton. j"
> Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca, "lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca"
> lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca, "fbinhct@leo.gov" fbinhct@leo.gov,
> webo@xplornet.com, "wally.stiles@gnb.ca" wally.stiles@gnb.ca
> Cc: josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, "moore.r@parl.gc.ca"
> moore.r@parl.gc.ca, kmearn@townofmilton.org, kmunro@yahoo-inc.com, Ryan
> Johnson nelsonresisters@gmail.com, Alfonso Carcamo
> alfonso@canucklinks.com, robin reid zorroboy@live.com, Byron Prior
> alltrue@nl.rogers.com, "t.j.burke@gnb.ca" t.j.burke@gnb.ca,
> thompson.g@parl.gc.ca, townhall@town.woodstock.nb.ca,
> ted.tax@justice.gc.ca, townofsussex@sussex.ca, "thibault.
> r"Thibault.R@parl.gc.ca, "oldmaison@yahoo.com" oldmaison@yahoo.com,
> "bruce.noble@fredericton.ca" bruce.noble@fredericton.ca,
> "faye.rammage@pcnb.org" faye.rammage@pcnb.org, Dan Fitzgerald
> danf@danf.net, "danny.copp@fredericton.ca" danny.copp@fredericton.ca>
>
> Some of the docments within this file are signed by your boss the US
> Attorney Michael Sullivan and it was me he was trying to argue about a
> great deal of money as he covered up for the actions of corrupt US
> Treasury Agents Correct?
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2619437/CROSS-BORDER-
>
> And this is a true copy of one of many American Polce surveilance
> wiretap tapes that I have in my pssession many law enforcement
> authorities in Canada and the USA have received and acknowledged
> Correct?
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>
> Who the Hell do you think chucked them in the garbage in Boston many
> years ago? Here is your clue.
>
> http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/09/16/conno
> lly_portrayed_as_corrupt_agent/?page=full
>
> Furthermore Didn't Connoly tell the bartender's daughter Whitey Bulger
> buried some of his victims just outsife Yarmouth in the crooked
> politician Robert Thibault's riding in Nova Scotia?
>
> Must I sue you too Fred???
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 4:20 PM
> Subject: Hey Fred Wyshak Say hey to your boss the US Attorney Michael J.
> Sullivan for me will ya? In return I will say hey to Callahan's family
> for you, Deal?
> To: Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, USAMA.MEDIA@usdoj.gov, w-five W-Five@ctv.ca,
> "
> t.j.burke@gnb.ca" t.j.burke@gnb.ca, oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com, "
> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca" bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, "bev.harrison@gnb.ca"
> bev.harrison@gnb.ca, "bruce.noble@fredericton.ca"
> bruce.noble@fredericton.ca, bmosher@mosherchedore.ca
> Cc: "moore.r@parl.gc.ca" moore.r@parl.gc.ca, "
> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca" william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "
> ken.cook@fredericton.ca" ken.cook@fredericton.ca, "
> Kathy.Alchorn@fredericton.ca" Kathy.Alchorn@fredericton.ca,
> kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca, kmearn@townofmilton.org, kmunro@yahoo-inc.com, "
> wayne.steeves@gnb.ca" wayne.steeves@gnb.ca, "wally.stiles@gnb.ca"
> wally.stiles@gnb.ca, josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, Ryan Johnson
> nelsonresisters@gmail.com
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Raymond Amos noreply-comment@blogger.com
> Date: Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 3:49 PMy Hey to
> Subject: [Just Dave] New comment on Just Dave.
> To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
>
> David Raymond Amos http://www.blogger.com/profile/06553336660119659315
> has left a new comment on the post "Just Dave
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/2006/04/just-dave.html?ext-ref=comm-sub-email":
>
> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 3:47 PM
> Subject: Attn Willi Burgess perhaps you should read what i just posted
> in my blog or other people's wesites
> To: j.ford@shaw.ca, newbobjoy@shaw.ca, donna.clarkson@shaw.ca,
> edphclarke@shaw.ca, tkiers@shaw.ca, kristiansen@shaw.ca,
> chalko@liberalalberta.ca, info@timuppal.ca, info@voterona.ca,
> RajotJ1@parl.gc.ca, info@mikelake.ca, info@brentrathgeber.com,
> info@voterahimjaffer.com, info@lauriehawn.ca, info@petergoldring.com,
> info@votejasonkenney.ca, info@jimprentice.ca, info@votedianeablonczy.ca,
> info@votelee.ca, info@reelectdeepakobhrai.com, info@devindershory.com,
> info@robanders.com, info@robmerrifield.ca, info@kevinsorenson.ca,
> blake@voteblake.ca, info@blainecalkins.ca, info@brianstorseth.ca,
> info@voteleonbenoit.ca, earl.dreeshen@shaw.ca,
> vote4warkentin@canada.com, vote4ted@tedmenzies.ca, casson@rickcasson.ca,
> info@brianjean.ca
> Cc: lindaduncan@ndp.ca, daveburkhart@ndp.ca, chughes@albertandp.ca,
> barbphillips@ndp.ca, nevc@shaw.ca, anand47@yahoo.com, hanarazga@ndp.ca,
> pricerg@telus.net, raymartin@ndp.ca, braunmw@telusplanet.net,
> donnamartyn@shaw.ca, cameronwakefield@shaw.ca, marie.read@greenparty.ca
>
> My concerns are far from confidential never mind what I know about
> BANKERS and the US Treasury Dept etc
>
> MURDER is a capital crime CORRECT? Connoly the ex FBI Agent's long
> delayed trial started today and I am the guy with the wiretap tapes that
> he threw out long ago. Why the Hell do you think I took such a chance
> with the corrupt RCMP last week and recorded me serving a copy of one
> wiretap tape upon them in Youtube before your boss Stevey Boy Harper had
> his buddy the Governor General drop the writ?
>
> Scroll down you will see that I am no liar. I posted this email there as
> well.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> Just Dave By Location
> *Visit Detail**
> Visit 5,486*
> Domain Name verizon.net
> IP Address 71.184.227.# (Verizon Internet Services)
> ISP Verizon Internet Services
> Location
> Continent : North America
> Country : United States
> State : Massachusetts
> City : Winchester Lat/Long : 42.4547, -71.1502 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinNT
> Browser Internet Explorer 7.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows
> NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR
> 3.0.04506)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor
> Resolution : 1152 x 864
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Sep 15 2008 3:06:40 pm
> Last Page View Sep 15 2008 3:06:40 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...ess winchester%2C ma
> Search Engine google.com
> Search Words "john b. callahan" address winchester, ma
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo.../03/me-and-bush.html
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo.../03/me-and-bush.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Sep 15 2008 2:06:40 pm
> Visit Number 5,486
>
> FEDERAL EXPRESS February 7, 2006
>
> Senator Arlen Specter
> United States Senate
> Committee on the Judiciary
> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
> Washington, DC 20510
>
> Dear Mr. Specter:
>
> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man named,
> David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters raised in
> the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are
> illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with
> you about this previously.
>
> Very truly yours,
> Barry A. Bachrach
> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/60818237/FCC-News-Corp
>
> http://www.newscorp.com/news/news_499.html
>
> http://www.oeclaw.co.uk/contact.asp
>
> http://corporate.sky.com/about_sky/our_board_and_management/board.htm
>
> http://www.businessinsider.com/newscorp-loses-general-counsel-when-ruper
> t-murdoch-needs-legal-help-the-most-2011-7
>
> http://www.corporatesecretary.com/articles/11943/governance-issue-may-lo
> om-newscorp/
>
> http://www.corporatesecretary.com/articles/11949/newscorp-searches-legal
> -help-help-combat-us-lawsuits/
>
> http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/politics/66-want-murdoch-to-sell-bsky
> b-shares-1.1113963
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/09/business/media/09newscorp.html
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/24/business/media/joel-klein-ex-schools-c
> hief-leads-internal-news-corp-inquiry.html
>
> http://www.newscorp.com/news/news_499.html
>
> http://corporate.sky.com/about_sky/our_board_and_management/board.htm#9d
> 3732f5b0f343aaab547a63163df246
>
> http://www.newscorp.com/corp_gov/bod.html
>
> http://www.newscorp.com/news/news_228.html
>
> http://www.deadline.com/2011/06/surprise-at-news-corp-general-counsel-la
> wrence-jacobs-leaves/
>
> http://www.thesoaprevolution.com/documents/SOSFOXCONTACTS.pdf
> We would ask you to treat any communication from us as confidentially
> as you would want us to treat communication from you. If you are not
> an intended recipient, please notify postmaster@fsa.gov.uk
> immediately. You should know that some of our communications may
> contain confidential information which it could be a criminal offence
> for you to disclose or use without authority. This e-mail is not
> intended nor should it be taken to create any legal relations,
> contractual or otherwise. The Financial Services Authority
> 25 The North Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London E14 5HS United Kingdom
> Registered as a Limited Company in England and Wales No.1920623.
> Registered Office as above
> Switchboard: 020 7066 1000
> Web Site: http://www.fsa.gov.uk
>
>
> This communication and any attachments contains information which is
> confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. It is for intended
> recipients only. If you are not the intended recipient you must not
> copy, distribute, publish, rely on or otherwise use it without our
> consent. Some of our communications may contain confidential
> information which it could be a criminal offence for you to disclose
> or use without authority. If you have received this email in error
> please notify postmaster@fsa.gov.uk immediately and delete the email
> from your computer.
>
> The FSA reserves the right to monitor all email communications for
> compliance with legal, regulatory and professional standards.
> This email is not intended to nor should it be taken to create any
> legal relations or contractual relationships. This email has
> originated from
>
> The Financial Services Authority (FSA)
> 25 The North Colonnade,
> Canary Wharf,
> London
> E14 5HS
> United Kingdom
>
> Registered as a Limited Company in England and Wales No.1920623.
> Registered Office as above
>
> Switchboard: 020 7066 1000
> Web Site: http://www.fsa.gov.uk
> *****************************************************************
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <myson333@yahoo.com>
> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 07:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: Lets see if the folks in Estonia receive this email
> To: tonis.saar@riigikontroll.ee, David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, davidc.coon@gmail.com,
> leader@greenparty.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:19:52 -0300
> Subject: I am calling Environmental Auditing In Estonia right now
> To: tonis.saar@riigikontroll.ee, kaire.keskula@riigikontroll.ee,
> tuuli.rasso@riigikontroll.ee, margit.lassi@riigikontroll.ee
> Cc: maritme_malaise <maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> http://www.environmental-auditing.org/Default.aspx?tabid=198
> http://www.environmental-auditing.org/tabid/127/CountryId/406/Default.aspx
> QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 23,153
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 161.203.19.# (U.S. General Accounting Office)
> ISP U.S. General Accounting Office
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : District of Columbia
> City : Washington
> Lat/Long : 38.8981, -77.0177 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 7.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727;
> .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 1024
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Sep 27 2011 6:42:04 pm
> Last Page View Sep 27 2011 6:42:04 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...rtIndex=&startPage=1
> Search Engine google.com
> Search Words david raymond amos, madhoff
> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Sep 27 2011 12:42:04 pm
> Visit Number 23,153
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:07:03 -0300
> Subject: Mr Baconfat I am not surprised that Shaw and and the RCMP
> support your malice
> To: maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca, danfour <danfour@myginch.com>,
> gretchenf@sierraclub.ca, tracy@jatam.org, todd@forestethics.com,
> raffej0@parl.gc.ca, dodarog@gao.gov, elsteins@gao.gov,
> daltonp@gao.gov, "davidc.coon" <davidc.coon@gmail.com>, we
> <leader@greenparty.ca>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
> thepurplevioletpress <thepurplevioletpress@gmail.com>,
> "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, info@wgea.org
> Cc: investor.relations@sjrb.ca, "Gilles. Blinn"
> <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Raf.Souccar"
> <Raf.Souccar@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca"
> <william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Wayne.Lang"
> <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, chiefape <chiefape@gmail.com>,
> "Barry.MacKnight" <Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca>, "Loiseau,
> Frederic" <frederic.loiseau@fredericton.ca>,
> freddybeachsleuth@gmail.com, porcupine007 <porcupine007@gmail.com>
> Nothing much surprises me anymore and you can always expect a lawyer
> or a cop to ignore the law. Hell everybody knows the Shaws can be
> every bit as nasty and greedy as you are. The fact that their Fat
> Daddy is on the board of directors of Suncor is a very telling thing
> to me. Harper and everybody else wants to shut me up before ethical
> enviromentalists start checking my work EH? Thats why i contacted the
> people based in Estonia
> http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/rob-magazine/jim-shaws-16000-a-day-pension/article1913638/
> Hell I watched Shaw's legal dept check me out on the web before they
> called me then the weasels played as dumb as post on their speaker
> phone I got tired of their nonsense and hung up. I will explain your
> death threats etc real slow to the Publicly Held Company and the CROWN
> in a couple of courts ( I suspect that many people will want to sue
> Shaw and the RCMP and You because of your Blog)I bet this happens long
> before you quit boozing to much and sending mindless threats and
> writing incredible slander
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 23,152
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 204.209.209.# (Shaw Communications)
> ISP Shaw Communications
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Alberta
> City : Calgary
> Lat/Long : 51.0833, -114.0833 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0;
> chromeframe/14.0.835.186; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET
> CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.1)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1440 x 900
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Sep 27 2011 4:47:02 pm
> Last Page View Sep 27 2011 4:47:02 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.ca...NEJ2IL7cj1xsTVXbAU1_
> Search Engine google.ca
> Search Words david amos new brunswick
> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....leblower-part-3.html
> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....leblower-part-3.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-7:00
> Visitor's Time Sep 27 2011 8:47:02 am
> Visit Number 23,152
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: BARRY WINTERS <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 04:59:05 -0600
> Subject: Re: BTW Mr Baconfat the RCMP, Shaw and LOTS of other folks
> know of your evil blog and your IP address 10.0.141.110
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> save the world....kill your kids and then blow your brains out! bang!
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:47 pm
> Subject: BTW Mr Baconfat the RCMP, Shaw and LOTS of other folks know
> of your evil blog and your IP address 10.0.141.110
> To: sunrayzulu@shaw.ca, "Barry.MacKnight"
> <Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca>, Dean Ray <deanray98@yahoo.ca>, dean
> Ray <deanr0032@hotmail.com>, "Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "dean.law" <dean.law@mcgill.ca>, dean <dean@law.ualberta.ca>,
> thepurplevioletpress <thepurplevioletpress@gmail.com>,
> "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, danfour
> <danfour@myginch.com>, webo <webo@xplonet.com>, tracy
> <tracy@jatam.org>, tony <tony@peoplestandup.ca>, "Wayne.Lang"
> <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, chiefape@gmail.com, "oldmaison@yahoo.com"
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>
> Cc: "Gilles. Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, maritime_malaise
> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, "jacques.boucher"
> <jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
>> Proof of the pudding N'esy Pas Gilles Blinn and Jacques Boucher?
>>
>> http://mindprod.com/jgloss/spam.html
>>
>> Obvious Shaw knows where to send their bills and the RCMP know
>> how to get a warrant. What you must ponder is whether or not they do
>> their do I know where you live as well EH pervert?
>>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:35:21 -0300
> Subject: Attn Mr JR Shaw and Mr Gene Dodaro I am on the phone to your
> offices right now
> To: dodarog@gao.gov, elsteins@gao.gov, daltonp@gao.gov,
> maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, danfour
> <danfour@myginch.com>, gretchenf <gretchenf@sierraclub.ca>, tracy
> <tracy@jatam.org>, todd <todd@forestethics.com>
> Cc: investor.relations@sjrb.ca, raffej0 <raffej0@parl.gc.ca>,
> "Raf.Souccar" <Raf.Souccar@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
> If nothing else this email should prove that it is not a crank call
> even though I have every right to be very cranky.
>
> http://www.shaw.ca/Corporate/Investors/Senior-Leadership/
>
> http://www.environmental-auditing.org/tabid/127/CountryId/406/Default.aspx
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> Perhaps the U.S. Government Accountability Office should check this
> email exchange first before they atempt to dismiss my concerns.
>
> From: Gary Aguirre <gary@aguirrelawfirm.com>
> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 07:18:07 +0200
> Subject: RE: Mr Aguirre I just called from 902 800 0369
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> I will be back in the US after Labor Day and will look over the
> material you forwarded at that time.
>
> Regards,
> Gary Aguirre
>
> The Aguirre Law Firm
> 501 W. Broadway, Suite 800
> San Diego, CA 92101
> Tel: 619-400-4960
> Fax: 619-501-7072
> www.aguirrelawfirm.com
>
> This E-Mail is intended only for the use of the individuals to which
> it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
> Unintended transmission shall not constitute waiver of the
> attorney-client or any other privilege. If you have received this
> communication in error, please do not distribute it and notify us
> immediately by email to maria@aguirrelawfirm.com
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 21:14:11 -0300
> Subject: Mr Aguirre I just called from 902 800 0369
> To: Gary@aguirrelawfirm.com
> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
> NYAG.Pressoffice@oag.state.ny.us, "matt.taibbi"
> <matt.taibbi@rollingstone.com>
>
> FYI I am the unamed Whistleblower that Mr Nester of the SEC mentioned
> in 2009 who is the link from Putnam investments and Madoff matter
> To support , my allegations first and foremost Eric Schneiderman
> should see that Eliot Spitzer testified on the very day he thanked me
> for the info in November of 2003.
>
> Please notice the transcripts and webcasts went of th Senate hearings
> "poof' not long after I made the congressman Ron Paul and legions of
> others well aware of their existence as he bitched about such things
> whilst running for the GOP endorsement to run for president in 2007.
> The records of the hearings were deleted in late fall 2007 just as all
> the subprime mortgages began to smell bad.
>
> http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2
>
> Now check the dates on the letters in this file page 13 in particular
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf
>
> BTW I just discovered you and your client Darcy Flynn byway of these
> news reports
>
> http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/nyts-dealbook-comes-to-the-secs-defense-20110823
>
> "My first clue came when I called the SEC before the story came out
> and asked them about the allegations by SEC attorney/whistleblower
> Darcy Flynn. I sent them a detailed questionnaire, both about the
> document disposal and the mini cover-up among SEC higher-ups like
> former Goldman executive Adam Storch (who was not sure he should "take
> on this exposure voluntarily," because the SEC FOIA officer told him
> there "might be criminal liability"). Then, when I called back, I
> expected them to deny the whole thing and trash Flynn as an unreliable
> disgruntled employee.
>
> They did none of that. Instead, to my amazement, SEC spokesperson John
> Nester copped to the document destruction right away when I got him on
> the phone. When I asked him how long it had been going on, Nester not
> only offered that it had been "at least the early nineties," but
> volunteered, without my even asking about it, that he couldn't be sure
> it hadn't "always been the policy." He didn't deny any of Flynn's
> allegations at all. It was a very weird call - I kept waiting for the
> other shoe to drop, and it never did."
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/18/business/sec-illegally-destroyed-documents-whistle-blower-alleges.html
>
> http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/is-the-sec-covering-up-wall-street-crimes-20110817
>
> http://aguirrelawfirm.com/lawyer/Gary-Aguirre_cp3221.htm
>
> I can be found all over the web as well but I am latgely mentioned by
> people trying hard to impeach my character. However it is the
> docmentation that is truly important not the malicious spin on them.
> A portion of the email below can be found within the following link or
> simply Google Amos and Madoff and anyone can find it
>
> This is not my blog
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
>
> Notice Mr Nestor of the SEC?
> These are more informative blogs of his about me
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/06/5-years-waiting-on-bank-fraud-payout.html
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/04/david-amos-nb-nwo-whistleblower-part-3.html
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:38:13 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: Does John JcCallum read anything or does he just write
> letters to the Interim Auditor General?
> To: stuetzgg@oag-bvg.gc.ca, kimberley.leach@oag-bvg.gc.ca,
> "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>
> Cc: info@wgea.org, maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
> birgittajoy <birgittajoy@gmail.com>, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>
> http://www.environmental-auditing.org/tabid/127/CountryId/405/Default.aspx
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:31:34 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: Does John JcCallum read anything or does he just write
> letters to the Interim Auditor General?
> To: wiersej@oag-bvg.gc.ca
> Cc: "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca" <william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> Clemet1 <Clemet1@parl.gc.ca>, maritime_malaise
> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:14:40 -0300
> Subject: Does John mcCallum read anything or does he just right
> letters to the Interim Auditor General?
> To: John@johnmccallum.ca, John.McCallum@parl.gc.ca
> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, stoffp1
> <stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:01:31 -0300
> Subject: Yo Mr Baconfat you and Kenny Baby Zielke should call Shaw
> (888 262 1484) mention Complaint # 1857598
> To: Barry Winters <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "Ken.Zielke"
> <Ken.Zielke@gov.ab.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "bob.rae"
> <bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net>, nichor <nichor@parl.gc.ca>, toewsv1
> <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>, "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>
> Cc: investor.relations@sjrb.ca, maritime_malaise
> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, chiefape <chiefape@gmail.com>, danfour
> <danfour@myginch.com>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
> "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Barry.MacKnight"
> <Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca>, thepurplevioletpress
> <thepurplevioletpress@gmail.com>, "Jacques.Poitras"
> <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, raffej0 <raffej0@parl.gc.ca>,
> "Nycole.Turmel" <Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca>
>
> BTW Mr Baconfat Harper and everybody else knows for a fact YOU are the Joke.
> Methinks you should review your own work when yo sober up sometime.
> Clearly in June of 2004 whilst I was running as an Independent against
> the corrupt liberals and the evil consevatives you admitted in the
> Edmonton Journal that you were mad at Martin and his fellow crooks but
> terrified of Stevey Boy Harper and his Fanboyz in Blue because they
> wanted in on the War on Iraq amongst other things. Seems that if you
> were even remotely sincere we may have agreed about a few things at
> one time CORRECT?
>
> http://ensign.ftlcomm.com/editorials/LTE/thornton/thorntonlist/thornton_200/thornton215/LTEwinters.pdf
>
> However five years later while you were threatening to kill my kids
> and I you were even bragging that you were one of the 24 Canadian
> Officers who went from the DND HQ to SOCOM in Tampa to plan the War on
> Iraq in 2002??? If you were ever a soldier you should know the job
> title of the people you purportedly answered to over the years is
> Minister of Defense NOT ATTACK. SO Who attacked us and when?
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2009/08/what-does-amerika-truther-movment-god.html
>
> in 2010 after I had proved to many that I had taken up your Obvious
> Treason with the DND and the Military Police etc you republish your
> malice and then raise the stakes about Israel etc while Layton and his
> mindless minions ignore everything including what you published about
> them for years.
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010/06/canada-and-united-states.html
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010_06_01_archive.html
>
> All the politicians played as dumb as posts until 2011 then they
> suddenly find Harper in contempt of parliament. After the wicked
> election was history I reminded the CBC that I am still alive and
> paying attention not long after they started writng about what my
> former friends in Wikileaks had released about the exact same thing
> then everybody and his dog shuts up and the RCMP attack me bigtime
> once again. (Scroll down before you attempt to call me a liar again)
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/2011/05/15/weston-iraq-invasion-wikileaks.html
>
> All that said Mr Baconfat you certainly cannot deny that I made you
> quit blogging last Xmass. I just busted you in front of your Zionist
> Butt Buddies and forever proved you to be the plagarist that you truly
> are and you immediately deleted some of the stolen work and quit
> blogging while falsely claiming you flew off to the Zionist's so call
> "Promised Land"
>
> Shaw, the RCMP and their pals in Cybertip have been fully informed of
> your wrongful actions against my family and friends and many others
> since you began in 2009. Instead of them acting within the scope of
> their employment and having you prosecuted they allowed you to
> continue and attacked me instead. They all deserve to be sued ASAP
> particularly after my conversation with a lot of mindless dudes
> yesterday. The dude in Shaw thought your work and that of your buddy
> Dean Roger Ray was appaulling and clearly illegal but they were not
> going to do a thing about it anyway. So I CALLED THEIR LAWYERS AND
> MANY COPS AGAIN.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> From: magicJack <voicemail@notify.magicjack.com>
> Subject: New VM (9) - 0:32 minutes in your magicJack mailbox from 4037504500
> To: "DAVID AMOS"
> Date: Monday, September 26, 2011, 2:39 PM
>
> Dear magicJack User:
> You received a new 0:32 minutes voicemail message, on Monday,
> September 26, 2011 at 05:39:28 PM in mailbox 9028000369 from
> 4037504500.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: BARRY WINTERS <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:29:08 -0600
> Subject: Re: Fwd: BTW Mr Baconfat the RCMP, Shaw and LOTS of other
> folks know of your evil blog and your IP address 10.0.141.110
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> "Harper knows" and I know YOU ARE A JOKE
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:56 pm
> Subject: Fwd: BTW Mr Baconfat the RCMP, Shaw and LOTS of other folks
> know of your evil blog and your IP address 10.0.141.110
> To: investor.relations@sjrb.ca, Barry Winters <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>,
> ezra <ezra@westernstandard.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Nycole.Turmel"
> <Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca>, danfour <danfour@myginch.com>, chiefape
> <chiefape@gmail.com>, nichor <nichor@parl.gc.ca>
> Cc: "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, toewsv1
> <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>, maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
>> Mtr Harper knows that I am not joking
>>
>> Just Dave
>> By Location Visit Detail
>> Visit 15,091
>> Domain Name (Unknown)
>> IP Address 199.212.215.# (DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE)
>> ISP DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
>> Location Continent : North America
>> Country : Canada (Facts)
>> State/Region : Ontario
>> City : Ottawa
>> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
>> Language English (Canada)en-ca
>> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
>> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
>> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
>> CLR 2.0.50727)
>> Javascript version 1.3
>> Monitor Resolution : 1344 x 840
>> Color Depth : 32 bits
>> Time of Visit Sep 22 2011 2:55:16 pm
>> Last Page View Sep 22 2011 2:55:16 pm
>> Visit Length 0 seconds
>> Page Views 1
>> Referring URL http://www.bing.com/...earchBox&Form=IE8SRC
>> Search Engine bing.com
>> Search Words harper retains consultant 90 000
>> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...per-and-
>> bankers.htmlVisit Exit Page
>> http://davidamos.blo...per-and-bankers.html
>> Out Click
>> Time Zone UTC-5:00
>> Visitor's Time Sep 22 2011 1:55:16 pm
>> Visit Number 15,091
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:47:16 -0300
>> Subject: BTW Mr Baconfat the RCMP, Shaw and LOTS of other folks know
>> of your evil blog and your IP address 10.0.141.110
>> To: sunrayzulu@shaw.ca, "Barry.MacKnight"
>> <Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca>, Dean Ray
>> <deanray98@yahoo.ca>, dean
>> Ray <deanr0032@hotmail.com>, "Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-
>> grc.gc.ca>,"dean.law" <dean.law@mcgill.ca>, dean
>> <dean@law.ualberta.ca>,thepurplevioletpress
>> <thepurplevioletpress@gmail.com>,"Jacques.Poitras"
>> <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, danfour
>> <danfour@myginch.com>, webo <webo@xplonet.com>, tracy
>> <tracy@jatam.org>, tony <tony@peoplestandup.ca>, "Wayne.Lang"
>> <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, chiefape@gmail.com,
>> "CAGCpcuqVQiXGgiBzLS7HyE+tyyPaVjPsR+ZhC3P7N7Kjc4mZ4g@mail.gmail.com>Content-type:
>> multipart/alternative; boundary=--6277dcec1a1b555c74063
>>
>> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>>
>> ----6277dcec1a1b555c74063
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>> Content-Disposition: inline
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>
>> See you next week ....wave to me bang
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:06 am
>> Subject: Yo Mr Ruby just how dumb are your fans such as the Mad Apes
>> (anarchists) lurking in the alleys around Fat Fred City?
>> To: chiefape <chiefape@gmail.com>, "ruby@ruby-edwardh.com,
>> SGTreport@gmail.com. abuse@bankofamerica.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com"
>> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
>> "Barry.MacKnight" <Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca>, nbpolitico
>> <nbpolitico@gmail.com>, nbpc <nbpc@gnb.ca>,
>> "
>


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
To: <Ruth.Ross@christianlegalfellowship.org>;
<thannigan@ropesgray.com>; <csu@jesuits.ca>; <plocatelli@scu.edu>;
<elliottx@nb.sympatico.ca>; <bishop@dioceseofsaintjohn.org>;
<nenprvsj@bc.edu>; <curia@sjcuria.org>; <tsmolich@calprov.org>;
<noprovsj@norprov.org>; <moprov@jesuits-mis.org>; <nykprov@nysj.org>;
<oregonprov@nwjesuits.org>; <wisprov@jesuitswisprov.org>;
<sjdet@aol.com>; <chgprov@jesuits-chi.org>; <joseph.herlihy.1@bc.edu>;
<tsmolich@jesuit.org>
Cc: "IgnatM" <IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>; "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>;
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>; "danfour" <danfour@myginch.com>; "Richard
Harris" <injusticecoalition@hotmail.com>; "advocacycollective"
<advocacycollective@yahoo.com>; "krisaustin" <krisaustin@panb.org>;
"tracy" <tracy@jatam.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 10:49 PM
Subject: "From a little spark may burst a mighty flame." Dante from
The Divine Comedy


----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Ruth.Ross@christianlegalfellowship.org
Cc: thannigan@ropesgray.com ; csu@jesuits.ca ;
robmoore@atrueconservative.ca ; Correspondance Deputy Prime
Minister/Vice premier ministre ; plocatelli@scu.edu ;
elliottx@nb.sympatico.ca ; bishop@dioceseofsaintjohn.org ;
nenprvsj@bc.edu ; curia@sjcuria.org ; tsmolich@calprov.org ;
noprovsj@norprov.org ; moprov@jesuits-mis.org ; nykprov@nysj.org ;
oregonprov@nwjesuits.org ; wisprov@jesuitswisprov.org ; sjdet@aol.com
; chgprov@jesuits-chi.org ; joseph.herlihy.1@bc.edu
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 8:24 PM
Subject: one hell of an Email

"From a little spark may burst a mighty flame." Dante from The Divine Comedy

Heres hoping but I ain't praying I am doing something about it.

Sent after Midnight December 25th, 2004 in Rome

David McMath and Walter Kubitz

Ruth Ross Executive Director

Christian Legal Fellowship

790 Franklinway Crescent,

London, ON, Canada. N6G 5C8

RE: Corruption of the Church State and Justice System


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:35:54 -0300
Subject: One more thing Mr Brame this is the one dude who has the
legal power to arrest Obama ask yourself why he and the Jesuits are
checking my work today
To: paulzed@zed.ca, Keith_Thompson09@hotmail.com,
eric.brame@knights.ucf.edu, bcc@rcav.bc.ca, editor@tribunenb.ca,
moniteur@rogers.com, tnf@nbnet.nb.ca, editor@catholicregister.org,
drcarley <drcarley@gmail.com>, Sheldon Day <gem3intucson@q.com>
Cc: Barry Winters <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, dean Ray
<deanr0032@hotmail.com>, "Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
dean <dean@law.ualberta.ca>, robin reid <zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>,
tony <tony@peoplestandup.ca>

Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 11,739
Domain Name senate.gov ? (U.S. Government)
IP Address 156.33.90.# (U.S. Senate Sergeant at Arms)
ISP U.S. Senate Sergeant at Arms
Location Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : Maryland
City : Annapolis
Lat/Long : 38.9861, -76.5137 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinNT
Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/4.0; SLCC1;
.NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR
3.0.30729)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1680 x 1050
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Aug 24 2010 1:07:36 pm
Last Page View Aug 24 2010 1:18:15 pm
Visit Length 10 minutes 39 seconds
Page Views 4
Referring URL http://www.google.co...i=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
Search Engine google.com
Search Words "nobody will say my name"
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...-stewart-and-me.html
Out Click View my complete profile
http://www.blogger.c...15428735081915360609
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Aug 24 2010 12:07:36 pm
Visit Number 11,739

Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 11,741
Domain Name i95.net ? (Network)
IP Address 208.118.160.# (Allied Telecom Group, LLC)
ISP Allied Telecom Group, LLC
Location Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : District of Columbia
City : Washington
Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinNT
Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/4.0;
GTB6.5; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 3.5.30729;
.NET CLR 3.0.30729; OfficeLiveConnector.1.5; OfficeLivePatch.1.3;
.NET4.0C)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1680 x 1050
Color Depth : 16 bits
Time of Visit Aug 24 2010 3:12:56 pm
Last Page View Aug 24 2010 3:12:56 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.google.co...m1&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
Search Engine google.com
Search Words "tsmolich@jesuit.org"
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...3/ides-of-march.html
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...3/ides-of-march.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Aug 24 2010 2:12:56 pm
Visit Number 11,741


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:25:38 -0300
Subject: Re: I just called all of you here is the email as promised to
those who picked up the phone
To: Eric Brame <eric.brame@knights.ucf.edu>

Check your own history. I did succeed in the american courts against
such opponents as Cardinal Bernard Francis Law before crazy Yankees
tried to take me to Cuba in 2003 just before your second religious war
in this century started. Now I will take on the Protector of the Faith
of the Church of England in her court in my nativeland while running
for public office for the fifth time

On 8/24/10, Eric Brame <eric.brame@knights.ucf.edu> wrote:
>
> Greetings Mr. Amos,
>
> I have read through some of your material. At this time I regret to inform
> you that I am not a scholar of Law and less so of International law. My
> specialty is Occult Literary History. I don't know what you desire from me
> at this time. Hopefully, if your argument is righteous, that you fully
> succeed in the courts if that is what the documents entail. If you need a
> lawyer, check out the Christian Lawyer's Union which should assist you.
>
> At this time I am extremly busy in the academic field and working on four
> major documents. If you need help in the realm of Literary History in
> relation to the area of Christian and Judaic literature, I will be able to
> help you greatly. I apologize for not being of any more help.
>
> God Bless!
>
>
> Eric M. Brame, A.A.
> University of Central Florida
> English Literature Major
> Judaic Studies Minor
> History Researcher
>
>
>
>
>> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:06:13 -0300
>> Subject: I just called all of you here is the email as promised to those
>> who picked up the phone
>> From: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> To: paulzed@zed.ca; Keith_Thompson09@hotmail.com;
>> eric.brame@knights.ucf.edu
>> CC: bcc@rcav.bc.ca; editor@tribunenb.ca; moniteur@rogers.com;
>> tnf@nbnet.nb.ca; editor@catholicregister.org
>>
>> Perhaps Keith Thompson or Eric Brame should call me (902 800 0369) or
>> send me their phone numbers?
>>
>>
>> All the Catholics are trying to ignore me as usual so say Hoka Hey to
>> Cardinal Bernard Francis Law, the nasty old priest Bill Elliot in
>> Saint John and Henrik Tonning for me sometime will ya Paul Zed?
>> Clearly your blogger buddy Chucky's Leblanc's rumours of my demise are
>> not true EH? Everybody and his dog knows I am to mean to die N'esy
>> Pas Franky Boy McKenna?
>>
>> Jim O'Leary, publisher and editor
>> The Catholic Register
>> 416-934-3410
>> editor@catholicregister.org
>>
>> Paul Schratz, editor
>> The B.C. Catholic
>> 604-683-0281
>> bcc@rcav.bc.ca
>>
>>
>>
>> New Freeman
>> 1 Bayard Drive
>> Saint John New Brunswick E2L 3L5
>> Phone (506) 653-6806
>> E-mail tnf@nbnet.nb.ca
>> Language English
>> Contact Margie Trafton
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:58:32 -0300
>> Subject: I just called Acadie Nouvelle AGAIN and asked them about my
>> right to privacy and why they do not respond to my emails while I run
>> for public office
>> To: "philippe.murat" <philippe.murat@acadienouvelle.com>,
>> nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com, danfour <danfour@myginch.com>,
>> advocacycollective <advocacycollective@yahoo.com>
>> Cc: "Byrne. G" <Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca>, "Bernard.Richard"
>> <Bernard.Richard@gnb.ca>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
>> "Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca" <Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca>
>>
>> This nonsense about secretive pension money with Greggy Byrne whining
>> and crying is truly funny. That corrupt lawyer should know that the
>> public are entitled to know such things. Jeannot Volpe on the other
>> hand was one of the secretive MLAs who illegally banished me from the
>> the LEG while i was ruing in the election of the 38th Parliament and
>> LONG BEFORE that liberal lawyer was ever reeelected the sick part is
>> the mindless Ombudsman and his blogging buddy Chucky Leblanc knew
>> everthing two years before that nasty french man was banished from the
>> Old Maison as well
>>
>> FREDERICTON - Finance Minister Greg Byrne asked the Ombudsman to
>> investigate an "apparent violation of the Act on the Protection of
>> Personal Information in connection with documents submitted Tuesday to
>> the media about the pension paid to Jacqueline Robichaud, the widow of
>> former Prime Minister Louis J. Robichaud. Robichaud.
>>
>> C'est par lettre que le ministre a répondu, hier, à l'ultimatum de
>> Jeannot Volpé qui sommait le gouvernement Graham de s'expliquer dans
>> ce dossier avant la fin de la journée de mercredi. That by letter that
>> the Minister responded yesterday to the ultimatum that Volpé summoned
>> the Graham government to explain in this issue before the end of the
>> day Wednesday. La missive n'y va pas par quatre chemins pour signifier
>> à l'ancien ministre conservateur qu'il aurait dû faire ses devoirs
>> avant de convoquer la presse parlementaire au sujet de la pension en
>> question. The letter does not beat around the bush to serve on the
>> former Conservative cabinet minister he should have done his homework
>> before calling parliamentary press about the pension.
>>
>> Le document explique les raisons et la façon dont on a résolu
>> l'impasse qui empêchait le versement d'une prestation de conjoint
>> survivant à Mme Robichaud. The document explains why and how you
>> resolved the deadlock that prevented the payment of a survivor's
>> benefit to Ms. Robichaud. Il précise qu'il a été décidé de donner au
>> Conseil de gestion le pouvoir d'étudier au cas par cas les demandes de
>> pension. He said it was decided to give the Board of Management the
>> authority to consider on a case by case pension claims. Les détails de
>> ces décisions ne sont pas rendus publics afin de protéger la vie
>> privée des Néo-Brunswickois. The details of these decisions are not
>> made public to protect the privacy of New Brunswickers.
>>
>> M. Byrne termine en écrivant qu'il demandera à l'ombudsman Bernard
>> Richard d'enquêter, puisqu'il croit que M. Volpé aurait divulgué
>> illégalement de l'information confidentielle. Mr. Byrne concluded by
>> saying that he will ask the ombudsman Bernard Richard to investigate,
>> since he believes that Mr. Volpe had illegally disclosed confidential
>> information.
>>
>> De son côté, Jeannot Volpé persiste que les choses n'ont pas été
>> faites selon les règles. For its part, Jeannot Volpe persists that
>> things were not done according to the rules. Il soutient que même si
>> le Conseil de gestion pouvait décider d'accorder une dérogation à Mme
>> Robichaud, il fallait tout de même que cette décision fasse l'objet
>> d'un arrêté en Conseil (des ministres). He argues that even if the
>> Management Board could decide to grant a waiver to Ms. Robichaud, it
>> was still that this decision be an Order in Council (Cabinet).
>>
>>
>> http://translate.google.ca/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://www.capacadie.com/actualites-regionales/2010/8/19/les-liberaux-ripostent&ei=MuJzTLubLsL6lwf52fzHCA&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBcQ7gEwAA&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dphilippe.murat%2540acadienouvelle.com%26hl%3Den%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-ca:IE-SearchBox%26rlz%3D1I7GFRE_en
>>
>> But are you still laughing at me Chucky Leblanc
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/07/feds-institutionalize-determined-nb.html
>>
>> http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2008/07/david-amos-picked-up-by-rcmp.html
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 20:56:25 -0300
>> Subject: Hey Jennifer Warren of the CIBC formerly of Rogers say Hoka
>> Hey for me to PANB and their pal David Hay formerly of Merrill Lynch
>> and NBPOWER will ya?
>> To: "philippe.murat" <philippe.murat@acadienouvelle.com>, "jennifer.
>> warren" <jennifer.warren@cibc.com>, fundytides <fundytides@gmail.com>,
>> "scott. agnew" <scott.agnew@canadaeast.com>, h.davies@lse.ac.uk,
>> "George. Bentley" <George.Bentley@fin.gc.ca>,
>> desautels@telfer.uottawa.ca, phogg@osgoode.yorku.ca,
>> joan.monahan@fin.gc.ca, g.tree@lse.ac.uk, info@telfer.uottawa.ca,
>> adam.dodek@uottawa.ca, mbehiel@uottawa.ca, mjackman@uottawa.ca,
>> president@uottawa.ca, bmiazga@uottawa.ca, dawn.russell@dal.ca,
>> DAmirault@bankofcanada.ca, MCarney@bankofcanada.ca,
>> tsalman@salmanpartners.com, ZLalani@bankofcanada.ca, "victor.
>> boudreau2" <victor.boudreau2@gnb.ca>, editor
>> <editor@sylvanlakenews.com>, dean Ray <deanr0032@hotmail.com>, dean
>> <dean@law.ualberta.ca>, "john. conyers" <John.Conyers@mail.house.gov>,
>> carlbainbridge <carlbainbridge@panb.org>, "carl. davies"
>> <carl.davies@gnb.ca>, krisaustin <krisaustin@panb.org>,
>> "Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca" <Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca>, Jason Keenan
>> <jason.keenan@icann.org>, "jack. keir" <jack.keir@gnb.ca>,
>> "Jody.CARR@gnb.ca" <Jody.CARR@gnb.ca>
>> Cc: jacqueline.meere@jpmorgan.com, JPMCinvestorrelations@jpmchase.com,
>> joseph.evangelisti@jpmchase.com, paul.hartwick@chase.com,
>> lauren.m.francis@jpmorgan.com, brian.j.marchiony@jpmorgan.com,
>> stephen.m.cutler@jpmorgan.com
>>
>> I bet you Bankters and Stevey Boy Harper rmember the document that
>> came with this letter long before th economy took a nosedive EH lady?
>> Sdo ya care to recall why I am pissed at Merrill Lynch, David Hay and
>> all the media people you used to work with? The pdf files hereto
>> attached should jog any crooked lawyer's memory particularly when
>> their name is on them. N'esy Pas Arty Baby MacKay and Carl Bainbridge?
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/2006/05/harper-and-bankers.html
>>
>> Former New Brunswick Power boss joins CIBC
>> .Barry Critchley August 19, 2010 - 1:03 pm
>>
>> David Hay, the former president and chief executive at New Brunswick
>> Power Holding Corp, is joining CIBC World Markets as a vice-chairman
>> in the firm's investment banking group.
>> Hay starts after Labour Day and will have senior coverage
>> responsibilities for the bank's major corporate clients in Canada.
>> Hay spent about six years at NB Power. Prior to that he spent about a
>> decade working with Merrill Lynch in both London and Canada.
>>
>>
>> Read more:
>> http://business.financialpost.com/2010/08/19/former-new-brunswick-power-boss-joins-cibc/#ixzz0xHo04Wf9
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:55:36 -0300
>> Subject: The unethical reporters within Acadie Nouvelle and their pals
>> in the Irving media are just as funny as the CBC are sometimes N'esy
>> Pas Kelly Lamrock?
>> To: philippe.murat@acadienouvelle.com.com, "kelly. lamrock"
>> <kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca>, llewellyn.stephen@dailygleaner.com,
>> "oldmaison. wcie" <oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com>, mail@ccla.org,
>> office@fairvote.ca, dwatch@web.net
>> Cc: artmackay <artmackay@savenbpower.org>, SterlingWright
>> <SterlingWright@panb.org>, "David.ALWARD@gnb.ca"
>> <David.ALWARD@gnb.ca>, sophia@themanproductions.com
>>
>> http://www.democracyfornb.com/en/
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:18:04 -0300
>> Subject: Attn Commissioner Ian McPhail QC I called again and tried to
>> speak to you twice today my number is 902 800 0369
>> To: Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, toewsv1
>> <toewsv1@mts.net>, danfour <danfour@myginch.com>
>> Cc: nelson.kalil@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, rmordenassoc
>> <rmordenassoc@rogers.com>, "warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca"
>> <warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, warren <warren@daisygroup.ca>,
>> "warren.dosko" <warren.dosko@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Paulette.
>> Delaney-Smith" <Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, WaterWarCrimes
>> <waterwarcrimes@gmail.com>, robin reid <zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>,
>> tony <tony@peoplestandup.ca>, "Ken.Zielke" <Ken.Zielke@gov.ab.ca>
>>
>> http://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/nrm/nr/2010/20100126-eng.aspx
>>
>> As I said I am very serious and have no wish to speak to the likes of
>> Ms Leduc EVER again FYI I see that the gossip about my concerns is
>> leaking out here there an everywhere following this note is just
>> couple of the reasons why I called an tried hard to speak to you again
>> today
>>
>> Please don't try to tell me that your office does not know what
>> happened between the RCMP and I within weeks of my sending the email
>> immedialy below this note.
>>
>> If perhaps you people should read some blogs an watch some YOUTUBES ASAP?
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>>
>> http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2008/07/david-amos-picked-up-by-rcmp.html
>>
>> http://govinjustice.blogspot.com/2008/07/david-amos-picked-up-by-rcmp.html
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/07/feds-institutionalize-determined-nb.html
>>
>> http://www.leadershipdirectories.com/images/promo/FTC.pdf
>> QSLS Politics
>> By Location Visit Detail
>> Visit 15,116
>> Domain Name (Unknown)
>> IP Address 164.62.7.# (Federal Trade Commission)
>> ISP Federal Trade Commission
>> Location Continent : North America
>> Country : United States (Facts)
>> State : District of Columbia
>> City : Washington
>> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
>> Language English (U.S.) en-us
>> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
>> Browser Internet Explorer 7.0
>> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727;
>> .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
>> Javascript version 1.3
>> Monitor Resolution : 1920 x 1200
>> Color Depth : 32 bits
>> Time of Visit Aug 18 2010 1:50:29 pm
>> Last Page View Aug 18 2010 2:01:49 pm
>> Visit Length 11 minutes 20 seconds
>> Page Views 2
>> Referring URL http://www.google.co...i=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
>> Search Engine google.com
>> Search Words "david amos" canada parliament
>> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....eblower-part-1b.html
>> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....eblower-part-1b.html
>> Out Click
>> Time Zone UTC-5:00
>> Visitor's Time Aug 18 2010 7:50:29 am
>> Visit Number 15,116
>>
>>
>> Just Dave
>> By Location Visit Detail
>> Visit 11,630
>> Domain Name (Unknown)
>> IP Address 199.212.215.# (DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE)
>> ISP DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
>> Location Continent : North America
>> Country : Canada (Facts)
>> State/Region : Ontario
>> City : Ottawa
>> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
>> Language English (Canada)en-ca
>> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
>> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
>> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
>> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
>> Javascript version 1.3
>> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
>> Color Depth : 32 bits
>> Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 12:50:37 pm
>> Last Page View Aug 13 2010 12:52:15 pm
>> Visit Length 1 minute 38 seconds
>> Page Views 7
>> Referring URL
>> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
>> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...3/ides-of-march.html
>> Out Click
>> Time Zone UTC-8:00
>> Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 8:50:37 am
>> Visit Number 11,630
>>
>>
>> Just Dave
>> By Location Visit Detail
>> Visit 11,638
>> Domain Name (Unknown)
>> IP Address 199.212.150.# (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)
>> ISP Royal Canadian Mounted Police
>> Location Continent : North America
>> Country : Canada (Facts)
>> State/Region : Ontario
>> City : Ottawa
>> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
>> Language English (U.S.) en-us
>> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
>> Browser Internet Explorer 6.0
>> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1;
>> INFOWEB-APPROVED; INFOWEB-APPROVED-IE6-FR; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR
>> 2.0.50727; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
>> Javascript version 1.3
>> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
>> Color Depth : 32 bits
>> Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 5:52:40 pm
>> Last Page View Aug 13 2010 5:52:40 pm
>> Visit Length 0 seconds
>> Page Views 1
>> Referring URL http://www.blogger.c...15428735081915360609
>> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>> Out Click
>> Time Zone UTC-5:00
>> Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 4:52:40 pm
>> Visit Number 11,638
>>
>> Just Dave
>> By Location Visit Detail
>> Visit 11,639
>> Domain Name (Unknown)
>> IP Address 199.212.215.# (DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE)
>> ISP DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
>> Location Continent : North America
>> Country : Canada (Facts)
>> State/Region : Ontario
>> City : Ottawa
>> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
>> Language English (Canada) en-ca
>> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
>> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
>> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
>> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
>> Javascript version 1.3
>> Monitor Resolution : 1466 x 916
>> Color Depth : 32 bits
>> Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 5:52:51 pm
>> Last Page View Aug 13 2010 5:52:51 pm
>> Visit Length 0 seconds
>> Page Views 1
>> Referring URL
>> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
>> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
>> Out Click
>> Time Zone UTC-8:00
>> Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 1:52:51 pm
>> Visit Number 11,639
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:34:30 -0300
>> Subject: Attn PAULINE PHILIBERT and ARNOLD HADLEY of the New Brunswick
>> Police Commission
>> To: nbpc@gnb.ca, arnold.hadley@gnb.ca, john.foran@gnb.ca,
>> premier@gnb.ca, Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>> Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca
>> Cc: webo@xplornet.com
>>
>> New Brunswick Police Commission
>> 435 King Street
>> Fredericton, New Brunswick
>> E3B 1E5
>>
>> A letter to support my complaint about various police forces in New
>> Brunswick will follow these emails just as I promised on the phone to
>> you people today.
>>
>> I have no understanding as to why the Police Commission nor anyone
>> else holding a governmental mandate in the Province of New Brunswick
>> has never called me back or answered one email in nearly four years.
>> Shawn Graham should at least recognize his own documents to my framer
>> friend, Werner Bock from the time when he sat in opposition and was
>> the agricutural critic at the same time .
>>
>> It appears to me that I am not the only one to get mad at the
>> malicious incompetence of John Foran and the cops of New Brunswick.
>> What is even more interesting though is the fact that John Foran was
>> once mad at the Police Commission and they way they investigated
>> things so secretly against the public's best interests. EH Mr. Volpe?
>> Rest assured that I ain't holding my breath for the police to continue
>> to harass me anymore after their nonsense yesterday. Nor will I wait
>> to see Wayne Steeves say or do the right thing after he has covered up
>> my concerns about the severe lack of police integrity for his politcal
>> party's benefit for four god damned years.
>>
>> http://www.canlii.org/eliisa/highlight.do?text=JOHN+FORAN+WILSON+MacINTOSH&language=en&searchTitle=Search+all+CanLII+Databases&path=/en/nb/nbqb/doc/1995/1995canlii3862/1995canlii3862.html
>>
>> For the recod these Youtubes that are this arseholes favoutites were
>> created by the RCMP and I have no doubt whatsoever the people
>> slandering me are cops as well.
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0NdNtvC-YI#GU5U2spHI_4
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/user/bigolcanoworms
>>
>> At least his ID is correct. This is a big old can of worms. N'est Pas?
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:26:28 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: Perhaps Paul Kennedy the current Commissioner of Public
>> Complaints Against the RCMP will call us back now EH?
>> To: info.legal@moncton.ca
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:17:05 -0300
>> Subject: Perhaps Paul Kennedy the current Commissioner of Public
>> Complaints Against the RCMP will call us back now EH?
>> To: Hermenegilde.Chiasson@gnb.ca, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca,
>> scotta@parl.gc.ca, Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca, Holland.M@parl.gc.ca,
>> Hubbard.C@parl.gc.ca, jonesr@cbc.ca, nbombud@gnb.ca,
>> Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca, T.J.Burke@gnb.ca, roly.macintyre@gnb.ca,
>> aleblanc.mla@nb.aibn.com, eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca, brian.kenny@gnb.ca,
>> roy.boudreau@gnb.ca, donald.arseneault@gnb.ca, danf@danf.net,
>> injusticecoalition@hotmail.com, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>> stuart.jamieson@gnb.ca, Margaret-Ann.BLANEY@gnb.ca,
>> victor.boudreau@gnb.ca, rick.brewer@gnb.ca,
>> John.Ferguson@saintjohn.ca, Ivan.Court@saintjohn.ca
>> Cc: complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com,
>> newsroom@nbpub.com, carl.davies@gnb.ca, janet.trail@gnb.ca,
>> Akoschany@ctv.ca, jtravers@thestar.ca, alan_white@cbc.ca,
>> Tim.Porter@gnb.ca, Trevor.HOLDER@gnb.ca, bev.harrison@gnb.ca,
>> Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca, Jody.CARR@gnb.ca, Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca,
>> David.ALWARD@gnb.ca, bruce.noble@fredericton.ca,
>> lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca
>>
>> Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 13:36:41 -0400
>> From: "PCC Complaints" complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>
>> May 23, 2007
>>
>> File No. PC-2005-1291
>>
>> Mr. David R Amos
>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> On a number of occasions you have called or sent e-mails our office to
>> raise matters which are of pressing concern to you.
>>
>> Each time we have tried to respond by explaining to you the relatively
>> narrow mandate of this Commission and the limits of our powers to deal
>> with the matters which are of concern to you. I must stress, once
>> again, that the purpose of this Commission is to provide the public
>> with an opportunity to make complaints concerning the conduct of
>> members of the RCMP in the performance of their duties. We have
>> neither the expertise nor the legal authority to permit us to become
>> involved in issues beyond the scope of this mandate.
>>
>> While it is clearly not the intention of the Commission to prevent you
>> from making complaints against members of the RCMP, an analysis of
>> your numerous contacts with the Commission indicates that your
>> concerns fall well outside the confines of our mandate. Further, your
>> frequent e-mails have been disruptive and unproductive for both you
>> and for the staff of this office.
>>
>> Should you determine that some point in the future you have a
>> complaint concerning the conduct of a member of the RCMP in the
>> performance of his or her duties, please submit it to the Commission
>> by Canada Post only. As of now, your e-mails will be deleted unread.
>>
>> Yours truly,
>>
>> Andrée Leduc
>> Enquiries and Complaints Analyst
>>
>> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Say hey to Shawn Murphy for me will ya
>> Brian?
>> Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 15:25:45 -0400
>> From: "REVIEWS" reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
>> To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>
>> The Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP has received
>> your e-mail message and will be responding in due course.
>>
>> La Commission des plaintes du public contre la GRC a reçu votre
>> courriel et vous rendra une réponse au moment opportun.
>>
>> Subject:
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>
>>
>> January 30, 2007
>>
>>
>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>
>> Mr. David Amos
>>
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>
>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>> Graham of the RCMP "J" Division in Fredericton.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>> Minister of Health
>>
>> CM/cb
>>
>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>
>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,
>> John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
>> "Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>
>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off over
>> the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I was not
>> ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>
>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>
>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear that
>> Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and the
>> US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment policing in
>> Petitcodiac, NB.
>>
>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>> Traffic Services NCO
>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:39:26 -0400
Subject: YO Ian McPhail Re: The Commission for Public Complaints
against RCMP - #2013-2824
To: Sheldon <Sheldon@nfa.ca>, Blair <Blair@nfa.ca>, "steve.graham"
<steve.graham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 03:44:52 -0300
Subject: YO Ian McPhail Re: The Commission for Public Complaints
against RCMP - #2013-2824
To: PCC Complaints <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "Ian.McPhail"
<Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "roger.l.brown"
<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, warren <warren@daisygroup.ca>, jacques
boucher <jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
Gunther.Schonfeldt@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, rusun@un.int,
john.adams@queensu.ca, John.Forster@cse-cst.gc.ca,
td.ombudsman@td.com, christopher.montague@td.com,
Frank.McKenna@td.com, Glenn.Greenwald@guardian.co.uk,
info@praxisfilms.org, birgittaj@althingi.is
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>,
enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk, sarah.chapman@fsa.gov.uk,
ambassador@brasilemb.org, slrc@itamaraty.gov.br

WOW Ya think somebody within the "Five Eyes" would finally do their
job now EH Glen Greenwald and the President Rousseff'?

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html

---------- Original message ----------
From: PCC Complaints <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:59:52 +0000
Subject: The Commission for Public Complaints against RCMP - #2013-2824
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Dear Mr. Amos:

This is further to your recent communications with the Commission.
From September 18, 2013 to the present, our office has received 6
electronic messages from you. Many of these e-mails are not related to
RCMP conduct.

On October 1, 2013, you called our office and spoke with an Intake
Officer. You wished to enquire about three complaint files. When the
Intake Officer attempted to inform you that you have three enquiry
files with the Commission, you became agitated and insisted otherwise.
You raised your voice and spoke over the Intake Officer. You then
demanded the name of the Intake Officer, and subsequently yelled "see
you in federal court" and hung up the telephone line.

As a reminder, we request that all future correspondence with our
office must be courteous in tone and that you are respectful of the
requests that are made of you. While it is clearly not the intention
of the Commission to prevent you from making complaints against
members of the RCMP, your recent emails and telephone call have been
unproductive for both you and for Commission staff. In the future, we
request that all communication with our office be respectful in
language and related to our mandate. In the event that this request
is not respected, the Commission will consider imposing restrictions
on how you may communicate with our office.

Should you have a complaint about a specific RCMP member surrounding a
specific incident, I invite you to visit the Commission's website
(www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca<http://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca>) to submit an online
complaint, rather than to send an email that is difficult to follow or
a copy of a letter you have sent to many others. The complaint form
will guide you through the information required that will enable the
Commission to process your complaint. Should you have difficulty in
accessing the complaint form and wish to have one sent to you, you may
provide your mailing address and a form will be mailed to you via
Canada Post.

I would also invite you to send your correspondence regarding any new
or existing complaints (quoting the appropriate Commission file
number) by letter mail to:

Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP
National Intake Office
PO Box 88689
Surrey, BC V3W 0X1

Yours truly,

Günther Schönfeldt
Intake Officer / Agent d'information de liaison
Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP /
Commission des plaintes du public contre la Gendarmerie royale du Canada
Tel/Tél : 1-800-665-6878 | Fax/Téléc : (604) 501-4095
complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca<mailto:complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>



[Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CCF6DA.65AE7FE0]


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: !enquiries <enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:56:26 +0100
Subject: IPCC Reference: 2013/015918
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Dear Mr Amos

I acknowledge receipt of 4 emails at the Independent Police Complaints
Commission (IPCC) earlier today.

I note from our records that you have been advised on the IPCC remit,
as well as spoken with one of my colleagues in the customer contact
team. It remains unclear from your emails what your complaint against
the police is. This may be because you refer to a number of other
organisations, or matters outside of the IPCC's remit.

If you wish to make a complaint against the police you should provide
these details to either the IPCC or the relevant police force's
professional standards department (PSD).

The IPCC does not investigate allegations of crime(s) committed by
members of the public, nor can we direct a police force to commence an
investigation into such.

If you have any queries about the IPCC's remit or the complaints
process please contact us. However, emails to the IPCC that fall
outside of our remit will be read and filed, but may not be responded
to.

Kind regards

Elly Goodman
Customer Contact Adviser
Independent Police Complaints Commission
Tel: 0300 020 0096
Email: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk


The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in
partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On
leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes.






Talk about pissing a guy off. EH Ian McPhail? What planet do CROWN's
bureaucrats come from anyway?

Need I say BULLSHIT once again??? The other CROWN Corp commonly know
as the CBC often puts that word over our airwaves so that can't be
offensive. That said I bet the call was recorded If so I demand a copy
ASAP. Next time I call I will record the call myself.

I must ask did the oh so silent boss Ian MacPhail and his buddy Bob
Paulson about the Yankee wiretap tapes being evidence of MURDER?
Better check the Canadian Ciminal Code about assisting in the cover up
of such crimes EH?

As for the call I remember it like it was yesterday. Howcome it took
Günther Schönfeldt three weeks to dream up the same sort of response I
got in 2007??? The first thing I did was ask for him and the woman
claimed he was not avaible and offered to help. She started out quite
nice but as soon as she admited that there was only a faxed complaint
in November of 2003 and that it did not warrant an answer I told her
to look some more. She got fairly argumentive and did not wish to
discuss the complaint I sent in August of 2005 (It appeared to me that
she read something in my file) I gave up and asked her name when she
got to snarky and she refused to give other than "Nora" So I said Cya
in Federal Court and hung up. The I sent your buddy Bob Paulson and
YOU Ian McPhail a Motherload of emails but I did only sent your
mindless bureaucrats six that were largely unrelated if they did not
know how to read deep.

However your Commission should not deny that I argued with its former
lawyer/boss Shirley Heafey about the aforesaid compliant in 2005
within emails sent to many Parliamentarians months for a I ran for a
sent Parliament again and she was replaced by the lawyer Paul Kennedy.
(The lawyer Heafey and your Commission always denied that complaint
existed until your office sent me a similar bullshit email after Mike
Murphy a former Minister of Health and later another former Attorney
General asked Deputy Commissioner Steve Graham to investigate my
concerns.

In return the Graham got transferred to Nova Scotia and RCMP falsely
arrested REMEMBER Stevey Boy Harper?

As I said Cya'll in Federal Court

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
1 902 800 0369

http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139

http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc

http://davidamos.blogspot.com/

FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
Senator Arlen Specter
United States Senate
Committee on the Judiciary
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Mr. Specter:

I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
contact with you about this previously.

Very truly yours,
Barry A. Bachrach
Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lisa Porteous <lporteous@kleinlyons.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 14:46:22 +0000
Subject: RCMP
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

David,

Thank you for your email inquiring about our class action against the
RCMP. As you may know, the Notice of Claim was filed in the British
Columbia Supreme Court on March 27, 2012. The lawsuit has been
brought by former RCMP constable Janet Merlo on behalf of female RCMP
members. Unfortunately, we cannot assist you with your claim.

We recommend that you contact Mr. Barry Carter of Mair Jensen Blair
LLP to discuss any claim you may have against the RCMP for harassment.
His contact information is as follows:

Mr. Barry Carter
Mair Jensen Blair LLP
1380-885 W. Georgia Street
Vancouver, BC V6C 3E8
Phone: 604-682-6299
Fax 1-604-374-6992

This is not intended to be an opinion concerning the merits of your
case. In declining to represent you, we are not expressing an opinion
as to whether you should take further action in this matter.

You should be aware that there may be strict time limitations within
which you must act in order to protect your rights. Failure to begin
your lawsuit by filing an action within the required time may mean
that you could be barred forever from pursuing a claim. Therefore, you
should immediately contact another lawyer ( as indicated above) to
obtain legal advice/representation.

Thank you again for considering our firm.

Yours truly,

Lisa Porteous
Case Manager/Paralegal

lporteous@kleinlyons.com
www.kleinlyons.com

KLEIN * LYONS
Suite 400-1385 West 8th Avenue
Vancouver BC V6H 3V9 Canada
Office 604.874.7171
Fax 604.874.7180
Direct 604.714.6533

This email is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
privilege. It is intended only for the use of the person to whom it is
addressed. Any distribution, copying or other use by anyone else is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
telephone us immediately and destroy this e-mail.

üPlease consider the environment before printing this email.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
To: <Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>; <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>; "toewsv1"
<toewsv1@mts.net>; "danfour" <danfour@myginch.com>
Cc: <nelson.kalil@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>; "rmordenassoc"
<rmordenassoc@rogers.com>; <warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "warren"
<warren@daisygroup.ca>; "warren.dosko" <warren.dosko@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
"Paulette. Delaney-Smith" <Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
"WaterWarCrimes" <waterwarcrimes@gmail.com>; "robin reid"
<zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>; "tony" <tony@peoplestandup.ca>;
"Ken.Zielke" <Ken.Zielke@gov.ab.ca>
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:18 PM
Subject: Attn Commissioner Ian McPhail QC I called again and tried to
speak to you twice today my number is 902 800 0369


http://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/nrm/nr/2010/20100126-eng.aspx

As I said I am very serious and have no wish to speak to the likes of
Ms Leduc EVER again FYI I see that the gossip about my concerns is
leaking out here there an everywhere following this note is just
couple of the reasons why I called an tried hard to speak to you again
today

Please don't try to tell me that your office does not know what
happened between the RCMP and I within weeks of my sending the email
immedialy below this note.

If perhaps you people should read some blogs an watch some YOUTUBES ASAP?

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

http://davidamos.blogspot.com/

http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2008/07/david-amos-picked-up-by-rcmp.html

http://govinjustice.blogspot.com/2008/07/david-amos-picked-up-by-rcmp.html

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/07/feds-institutionalize-determined-nb.html

http://www.leadershipdirectories.com/images/promo/FTC.pdf

QSLS Politics
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 15,116
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 164.62.7.# (Federal Trade Commission)
ISP Federal Trade Commission
Location Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : District of Columbia
City : Washington
Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 7.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727;
.NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1920 x 1200
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Aug 18 2010 1:50:29 pm
Last Page View Aug 18 2010 2:01:49 pm
Visit Length 11 minutes 20 seconds
Page Views 2
Referring URL http://www.google.co...i=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
Search Engine google.com
Search Words "david amos" canada parliament
Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....eblower-part-1b.html
Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....eblower-part-1b.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Aug 18 2010 7:50:29 am
Visit Number 15,116


Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 11,630
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 199.212.215.# (DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE)
ISP DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Location Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language English (Canada)en-ca
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 12:50:37 pm
Last Page View Aug 13 2010 12:52:15 pm
Visit Length 1 minute 38 seconds
Page Views 7
Referring URL
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...3/ides-of-march.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-8:00
Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 8:50:37 am
Visit Number 11,630


Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 11,638
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 199.212.150.# (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)
ISP Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Location Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 6.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1;
INFOWEB-APPROVED; INFOWEB-APPROVED-IE6-FR; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR
2.0.50727; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 5:52:40 pm
Last Page View Aug 13 2010 5:52:40 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.blogger.c...15428735081915360609
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 4:52:40 pm
Visit Number 11,638

Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 11,639
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 199.212.215.# (DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE)
ISP DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Location Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language English (Canada) en-ca
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1466 x 916
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 5:52:51 pm
Last Page View Aug 13 2010 5:52:51 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-8:00
Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 1:52:51 pm
Visit Number 11,639



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:34:30 -0300
Subject: Attn PAULINE PHILIBERT and ARNOLD HADLEY of the New Brunswick
Police Commission
To: nbpc@gnb.ca, arnold.hadley@gnb.ca, john.foran@gnb.ca,
premier@gnb.ca, Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca
Cc: webo@xplornet.com

New Brunswick Police Commission
435 King Street
Fredericton, New Brunswick
E3B 1E5

A letter to support my complaint about various police forces in New
Brunswick will follow these emails just as I promised on the phone to
you people today.

I have no understanding as to why the Police Commission nor anyone
else holding a governmental mandate in the Province of New Brunswick
has never called me back or answered one email in nearly four years.
Shawn Graham should at least recognize his own documents to my framer
friend, Werner Bock from the time when he sat in opposition and was
the agricutural critic at the same time .

It appears to me that I am not the only one to get mad at the
malicious incompetence of John Foran and the cops of New Brunswick.
What is even more interesting though is the fact that John Foran was
once mad at the Police Commission and they way they investigated
things so secretly against the public's best interests. EH Mr. Volpe?
Rest assured that I ain't holding my breath for the police to continue
to harass me anymore after their nonsense yesterday. Nor will I wait
to see Wayne Steeves say or do the right thing after he has covered up
my concerns about the severe lack of police integrity for his politcal
party's benefit for four god damned years.

http://www.canlii.org/eliisa/highlight.do?text=JOHN+FORAN+WILSON+MacINTOSH&language=en&searchTitle=Search+all+CanLII+Databases&path=/en/nb/nbqb/doc/1995/1995canlii3862/1995canlii3862.html

For the recod these Youtubes that are this arseholes favoutites were
created by the RCMP and I have no doubt whatsoever the people
slandering me are cops as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0NdNtvC-YI#GU5U2spHI_4

http://www.youtube.com/user/bigolcanoworms

At least his ID is correct. This is a big old can of worms. N'est Pas?

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:17:05 -0300
Subject: Perhaps Paul Kennedy the current Commissioner of Public
Complaints Against the RCMP will call us back now EH?
To: Hermenegilde.Chiasson@gnb.ca, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca,
scotta@parl.gc.ca, Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca, Holland.M@parl.gc.ca,
Hubbard.C@parl.gc.ca, jonesr@cbc.ca, nbombud@gnb.ca,
Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca, T.J.Burke@gnb.ca, roly.macintyre@gnb.ca,
aleblanc.mla@nb.aibn.com, eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca, brian.kenny@gnb.ca,
roy.boudreau@gnb.ca, donald.arseneault@gnb.ca, danf@danf.net,
injusticecoalition@hotmail.com, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
stuart.jamieson@gnb.ca, Margaret-Ann.BLANEY@gnb.ca,
victor.boudreau@gnb.ca, rick.brewer@gnb.ca,
John.Ferguson@saintjohn.ca, Ivan.Court@saintjohn.ca
Cc: complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com,
newsroom@nbpub.com, carl.davies@gnb.ca, janet.trail@gnb.ca,
Akoschany@ctv.ca, jtravers@thestar.ca, alan_white@cbc.ca,
Tim.Porter@gnb.ca, Trevor.HOLDER@gnb.ca, bev.harrison@gnb.ca,
Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca, Jody.CARR@gnb.ca, Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca,
David.ALWARD@gnb.ca, bruce.noble@fredericton.ca,
lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca

Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 13:36:41 -0400
From: "PCC Complaints" complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

May 23, 2007

File No. PC-2005-1291

Mr. David R Amos
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

Dear Mr. Amos:

On a number of occasions you have called or sent e-mails our office to
raise matters which are of pressing concern to you.

Each time we have tried to respond by explaining to you the relatively
narrow mandate of this Commission and the limits of our powers to deal
with the matters which are of concern to you. I must stress, once
again, that the purpose of this Commission is to provide the public
with an opportunity to make complaints concerning the conduct of
members of the RCMP in the performance of their duties. We have
neither the expertise nor the legal authority to permit us to become
involved in issues beyond the scope of this mandate.

While it is clearly not the intention of the Commission to prevent you
from making complaints against members of the RCMP, an analysis of
your numerous contacts with the Commission indicates that your
concerns fall well outside the confines of our mandate. Further, your
frequent e-mails have been disruptive and unproductive for both you
and for the staff of this office.

Should you determine that some point in the future you have a
complaint concerning the conduct of a member of the RCMP in the
performance of his or her duties, please submit it to the Commission
by Canada Post only. As of now, your e-mails will be deleted unread.

Yours truly,

Andrée Leduc
Enquiries and Complaints Analyst

Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Say hey to Shawn Murphy for me will ya Brian?
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 15:25:45 -0400
From: "REVIEWS" reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

The Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP has received
your e-mail message and will be responding in due course.

La Commission des plaintes du public contre la GRC a reçu votre
courriel et vous rendra une réponse au moment opportun.

Subject:
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com


January 30, 2007


WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Mr. David Amos


Dear Mr. Amos:

This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.

Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
Graham of the RCMP "J" Division in Fredericton.

Sincerely,

Honourable Michael B. Murphy
Minister of Health

CM/cb

Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:

Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,
John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
"Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n

Dear Mr. Amos,

Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off over
the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I was not
ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.

As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.

As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear that
Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and the
US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment policing in
Petitcodiac, NB.

It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.

Sincerely,

Warren McBeath, Cpl.
GRC Caledonia RCMP
Traffic Services NCO
Ph: (506) 387-2222
Fax: (506) 387-4622
E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca


Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 04:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: Just so you know
To: HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, gemerson@tor.fasken.com, jgrant@baseconsulting.ca,
rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca, mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca, csae@csae.com,
kim.keith@rci.rogers.com, jduncan@tor.fasken.com, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca,
ahamilton@casselsbrock.com, jm@jmellon.com, treasurer@casis.ca,
jbronskill@cp.org, RTRiley6@cs.com, pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca,
linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca, janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca,
robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca, Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca,
arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca, nancy.taillon@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
CC: info.com@chrc-ccdp.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, Scott.A@parl.gc.ca,
radionews@mpbc.org, publisher@whatsup.nb.ca, kjamerson@wagmtv.com,
kbabin@globaltv.ca, jfoster@globaltv.ca, atvnews@ctv.ca, cmorris@cp.org,
info@ccna.ca, kbissett@broadcastnews.ca, bdnmail@bangordailynews.net,
ehutton@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, argosy@mta.ca,
sylvain.martel@csn.qc.ca, events@cpac.ca, mmacdonald@cp.org,
crgeditor@yahoo.com, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca

No need to Bitch.
I am about to sue ya anyway but you did receive the same material
that everybody else got by email anyway. However now I will now
forward the other emails that various silly servants got after I had
had many talks with your incompetant and malicious assistants within
the Commission over the past two years. It seems that I had to insult
you and bust you in front of your friends to finally get a response
from you.
Furthermore on August 2nd I sent you your material byway of the
US Mail which was received and signed for. It was hard copy of my
concerns and allegations about you being in bed with the corrupt old
bastard Zack of the RCMP. I also sent a copy of wiretap tape # 139.
Instead of you acting within the scope of your employment you go on
vacation and bury your head in the sand while the RCMP assisted the
Yankees in throwing my wife and kids into the street without due
process of law?
Well your head may be in still the sand but you just stuck your
arse high up in the air. It is high time for me to give it a boot
before you stick it up Zack's ass in a vain effort to appear that you
have integrity after all. The following is the text of that letter and
after that is the US Mail's confirmation of when it was sent and
received by you.
Say hey to McLachlin for me will ya? Tell her I will be suing her
too. She has been covering up for the crooked Newfy Judge Dereck Green
for way past too long. To hell with lawyers appointed as commissioners
and other lawyers appointed as judges. From my point of view they were
only appointed to cover up public corruption. I look forward to
meeting the likes of you in court and arguing you on the public
record. You just proved for me that most lawyers ain't that smart. You
should have continued to play dumb Bitch. At least then you could have
blamed your assistants for not telling you what you obviously know.
however if you had done so, I would have pointed to the fact that you
are their supervisor and therefore ultimatly responsible. Everybody
else knows that the RCMP are as crooked as hell, so do you. call me a
liar now. I double dog dare ya.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos



July 31st, 2005

Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin,
C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and
Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay
Canadian Judicial Council
150 Metcalfe Street,
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8

Shirley Heafey
Chair of Commission
for Public Complaints against the RCMP
P.O. Box 3423
Station &quo t;D"
Ottawa,
ON K1P 6L4


RE: Rampant Public Corruption

Hey,
Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and
various underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public
Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and
emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by
every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a
copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as
officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest
Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little
trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the
ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to
answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.

I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending
to you byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving
identical material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell
them I gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter.
All that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes.
However I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material
than what Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact
the same material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky
Boy McKenna in particular received, while I was up home running for
Parliament last year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so
I have also included a few recent items to spice thing up for you.

I am tired of trying to convince people employed in law enforcement
to uphold the law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience
and be careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse to
the law or me.

Veritas Vincit

David R. Amos

153 Alvin Ave

Milton, MA. 02186

Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 484U S
Detailed Results:


[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Bullet
Delivered Abroad, August 11, 2005, 6:49 am, CANADA
Bullet
Out of Foreign Customs, August 08, 2005, 2:37 pm, CANADA
Bullet
Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
Bullet
Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
Bullet
International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 8:32 am, KENNEDY AMC
Bullet
Enroute, August 03, 2005, 8:30 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
Bullet
Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:40 am, QUINCY, MA 02169

"Heafey, Shirley" <HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca> wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: "Heafey, Shirley"<HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
Sent: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:10:00 -0400
To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Just so you know

Just so you know, there was no message attached to the e-mail sent to
me. SO, in fact, I don't know what you think I should now know.

Try again.

SH

-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 1:24 PM
>To: gemerson@tor.fasken.com; jgrant@baseconsulting.ca;
rabrahamson@baseconsulting.ca; mdesouza@baseconsulting.ca;
csae@csae.com; kim.keith@rci.rogers.com; jduncan@tor.fasken.com;
Moore.R@parl.gc.ca; ahamilton@casselsbrock.com
Cc: Zeman, Arnold; jm@jmellon.com; Taillon, Nancy; treasurer@casis.ca;
jbronskill@cp.org; RTRiley6@cs.com; pborbey@pco-bcp.gc.ca;
dlepage@pco-bcp.gc.ca; Allan.Kimpton@psc-cfp.gc.ca;
linda.gobeil@psc-cfp.gc.ca; janette.hamilton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
barbara.george@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; danielle.brunet-paquin@tpsgc.gc.ca;
robert.brule@cse-cst.gc.ca; Julie.Birch@cse-cst.gc.ca; Heafey, Shirley
Subject: Just so you know

CSIS can never say they didn't know. This should put Shirley Heafey's
panties in a knot when she get back from her vacation. I can only
wonder what Ms. Longo of the RCMP is saying about now.

"Zeman, Arnold" <Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca> wrote:

Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: For the record Joan I did talk to
your boss Abrahamson yesterday and more people you know today
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:16:11 -0400
From: "Zeman, Arnold" <Arnold.Zeman@PSEPC-SPPCC.gc.ca>
To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
This is an automatic reply. I'm away froom the office and will return
on Monday September 26,2005. If you need information before then,
please contact Marie-France Kingsley at 990-6306.
************************************
Ceci est une réponse automatique. Je serai de retour au bureau le
lundi 26 septembre 2005. Si vous avez besoin d'aide, veuillez
communiquer avec Marie-France Kingsley au 990-6306.
*******************************
A. W. Zeman
Assistant Inspector General of CSIS /
Inspecteur général adjoint du SCRS
340 Laurier Avenue West / 340, avenue Laurier ouest
Ottawa ON K1A 0P8
phone / tél : (613) 990-8274
fax / télécopieur : (613) 990-8303
email / courriel : arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca
********************************




http://voices-voix.ca/en/facts/profile/paul-kennedy

Paul Kennedy

What Happened
Paul Kennedy was removed as head of the Commission for Public
Complaints (CPC) regarding the RCMP after he advocated a more powerful
and independent Commission. He sought adequate funding for
investigations, increased accountability and improved service
standards. The Harper government appointed a Conservative Party ally
to replace him.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paul Kennedy was appointed Chair of the Commission for Public
Complaints (CPC) Against the RCMP in 2005. He was re-appointed for
three more one-year terms in 2006, 2007 and 2008.

Throughout his tenure, Kennedy was known as a relentless advocate for
a more independent CPC. He believed that the CPC relied too heavily on
the cooperation of senior RCMP officials, and was too limited in
independent power to probe the RCMP's activities, or to inquire into
witnesses' testimonials and to demand the production of documents as
evidence.

Kennedy also advocated for better funding to oversee the RCMP so that
the CPC could investigate more cases and investigate them thoroughly.
He argued that the CPC's budget of $5.2 million paled in comparison to
the RCMP's $4.1 billion budget.

Public Safety Minister Peter Van Loan cut Kennedy's budget by $600,000
in 2009, seriously limiting the scope of the CPC's investigations.

Kennedy did get funding for the high-profile investigation into RCMP
involvement in the tasering death of Polish immigrant Robert
Dzienkanski at the Vancouver International Airpoirt in 2007, and his
work to reform RCMP policies on taser use. But that funding was only
made available temporary. Similar investigations in future might not
get the funding they need given the small size of the CPC's budget.

Media sources have reported clashes between Kennedy and the
Conservative government during Kennedy's time as head of CPC. He was
ridiculed by Conservative officials for his stance that Mounties' work
requires proper review and that access to evidence and witnesses was
necessary in order to ensure accountability. Although the government
has promised reform monitoring of the RCMP, this promise was not kept
during Kennedy's tenure.

Kennedy had other successes: during his tenure, the RCMP was under
public pressure to modify training and operational procedures. The
commission now regularly conducts reviews of RCMP activities and their
policies in self-investigation. Kennedy also addressed investigations
of death and verbal abuse involving RCMP officers, and proposed
legislative and policy changes to avoid conflicts of interest.

Kennedy's final weeks in office were marked by the release of a report
strongly critical of the conduct of the RCMP officers involved in the
death of Robert Dziekanski. The RCMP would go on to accept all but one
of the findings in Kennedy's CPC report, and address the report's
recommendations, eventually creating an Office of Professional
Integrity, as well as a new policy to ensure independent and impartial
investigation of RCMP employees.

However, in November 2009, Public Safety Minister Peter Van Loan's
office notified Kennedy that he would not be re-appointed after his
contract terminated that December. Kennedy had been prepared to serve
another term.

In January 2010, Ian McPhail, a long-time contributor to the
Conservative Party, was appointed interim chair of the CPC. McPhail
was a real-estate lawyer with some limited experience on other
commissions. Observers felt McPhail lacked the experience required
head the CPC. McPhail's appointment was seen by Paul Kennedy and
others as a wholly partisan move, that placed a strong Conservative
ally in an important watchdog position. The replacement of Kennedy
with McPhail has been criticized as an attempt to silence Kennedy's
criticism of the RCMP, thereby reducing accountability of the RCMP to
the government and the public.

In January 2010, Kennedy made an appearance on Parliament Hill to
express concerns about the fate of civilian oversight bodies under the
Harper government. He was joined by two other watchdogs who the
government had removed for dubious reasons: Peter Tinsley, who had
been the Military Police Complaints Commissioner; and Linda Keen,
former President of Canada's nuclear safety regulator.

Kennedy has said the government was not willing to let the CPC fulfill
its intended purpose. He has also called on the government to
institute a fixed term for which a commissioner is appointed, so that
people who have a job to do on behalf of the public don't end up
essentially working for the governing party.

In 2011 the new Minister of Public Safety, Vic Toews, re-appointed
McPhail as head of the CPC for another year.

Relevant Dates:
October 2005: Paul Kennedy is appointed Chair of the Commission for
Public Complaints (CPC) against the RCMP.
October 2007: Robert Dziekanski dies after being tasered by an RCMP
officer at the Vancouver International airport; Kennedy strongly
criticizes the way the situation was handled.
December 2008: Paul Kennedy is reappointed for another 1-year term as
Chair of the CPC, until December 31, 2009
August 11, 2009: Kennedy calls for policy changes to enhance
accountability of the RCMP.
November 18 2009: The government tells Kennedy his contract will not
be renewed.
December 8, 2009: Kennedy publishes a report criticizing some of the
RCMP's actions.
January 24, 2010: The government appoints Ian McPhail as interim Chair
of the CPC.
January 26, 2010: Paul Kennedy, Peter Tinsley and Linda Keen hold a
press conference, expressing their concern over the government's
silencing of watchdogs.
February 4, 2010: The RCMP announces a new policy to ensure
independent and impartial investigations of its employees.
Role or Position
Paul Kennedy was Chair of the Commission for Public Complaints (CPC)
Against the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) from 2005 to 2009.

Implications and Consequences
Transparency: The removal of Kennedy means the loss of a qualified
civil servant with over thirty five years experience in public
service, with a proven track record of creating change for increased
accountability.
Democracy: The effectiveness and independence of watchdog
organizations are compromised when leaders are appointed to short
one-years terms and removed at will by politicians. The slashing of
the CPC budget means in practice that there will be minimal oversight
of the RCMP.
Democracy: If public officials are removed and replaced whenever they
threaten to hold the government to account, the strength of our
democracy is diminished.
Photo: CTV News

Sources
"CPC Chair responds to the RCMP Commissioner's letter...," Paul
Kennedy, CPC against the RCMP, 16 December 2009
"CPC Report on the death of Mr. Dziekanski," William Elliott, RCMP, 10
February 2011
"Former RCMP watchdog warns commission heads liable to sway," Janice
Tibbests, CanWest News Services, 4 January 2010
"Former watchdogs speak out on Harper government," Susan Delacourt,
The Star, 26 January 2010
"Harper Government Names Realtor as RCMP Watchdog," Nathan Griffiths,
InformedVote.ca, 1 February 2010
"Ottawa names interim RCMP watchdog," Colin Freeze, The Globe and
Mail, 24 January 2010
"Minister Toews announces re-appointment of Ian McPhail as Interim
Chair of the CPC," Public Safety Canada, 14 January 2011
"New civilian watchdog agency will oversee RCMP," RCMP Watch, 4 February 2010
"Police Oblivious to pain Tasers inflict: RCMP Complaints
Commissioner," CBC News, 25 June 2008
"RCMP response to CPC regarding its report into Robert Dziekanski's
in-custody death," William Elliott, RCMP, 7 December 2009
"RCMP should limit self-investigations," CBC News, 11 August 2009
"RCMP to implement all watchdog recommendations on Robert Dziekanski
case," CPC against the RCMP, 10 February 2011
"RCMP watchdog won't be reappointed," CBC News, 27 November 2009
Report on death of Robert Dziekanski (PDF), CPC, 8 December 2009
"Report slams RCMP in airport Taser death," CBC News, 8 December 2009
"Tories drop RCMP complaints commissioner," Tonda MacCharles, The
Star, 27 November 2009
Français


DEMAND IMMEDIATE APOLOGY FROM CANADIAN ALLIANCE MP
Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:00 pm
John Cummins' office replies 'Get a life' when invited to Maher Arar vigil

Ottawa, Canada - 17/12/02) - CAIR-CAN is calling on Canadians to demand
that John Cummins, member of Parliament of Delta-South Richmond, B.C.,
offer a public apology for recent remarks made by his office when Cummins
was invited to a silent vigil for Maher Arar. In response to the
invitation, Cummins' office replied by email, "Get a life."

Maher Arar is the Canadian citizen who was detained illegally in the United
States en route to Canada and deported to Jordan and then to Syria. Arar
was denied access to Canadian officials, prevented from calling his family,
tried through a non-transparent process without a lawyer present, and
deported to his country of birth in violation of international law. He is
currently being held in a Syrian jail.

The statement follows recent comments by Stephen Harper, Diane Ablonczy,
and Stockwell Day of the Canadian Alliance which condemn Arar without any
regard to his illegal deportation, the lack of a fair trial process, and in
the absence of any definitive evidence linking him to terrorism.

(See CAIR-CAN action alert # 84:
http://www.caircan.ca/cgi-bin/actionalerts/viewnews.cgi?newsid1038072766,60770,)

The remark made by John Cummins' office is deeply insulting and a clear
breach of his duties as a public official," said CAIR-CAN Executive
Director Riad Saloojee.

He should immediately offer an unqualified apology to the Arar family and
to all Canadians," he added.

ACTION REQUESTED (Be firm, but polite):

CONTACT Steven Harper and John Cummins.

E-mail: Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Cummins.J@parl.gc.ca

Telephone or Fax:

Stephen Harper
Tel: (613) 996-6740
Fax: (613) 947-0310

John Cummins
Tel: (613) 992-2957
Fax: (613) 992-3589

DEMAND an immediate apology from John Cummins for the remarks made by his
office yesterday.

INFORM Canadian Alliance leader Steven Harper that his party has failed in
its duty as the official opposition to defend the rights of a Canadian
citizen. Recent comments by his party indicate a troubling trend of
treating Maher Arar, a Canadian Muslim and Arab, as a second class citizen.

COPY Canada@cair-net.org on all correspondence.

Colin Mayes, Conservative

This rookie B.C. MP made headlines this year after he defended the PM's new
restrictions on media access in a column to his local paper. Mayes went
further and suggested journalists would be more responsible if they faced
jail terms for professional misconduct. "Boy, would the public get accurate
and true information if a few reporters were hauled away to jail! Maybe it
is time that we hauled off in handcuffs reporters that fabricate stories,
or twist information and even falsely accuse citizens." Mayes quickly
retracted his comments.


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>; <deb@debgrey.com>; <debgrey@gmail.com>;
<valerielmeredith@aol.com>; <RathgB0@parl.gc.ca>; "MulcaT"
<MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>; "Heather Martin" <martinhea39@gmail.com>;
"bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "kevin.violot"
<kevin.violot@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "Wayne.Lang"
<Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "toewsv1" <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>; "bob.rae"
<bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net>; "Bob.Kerr" <Bob.Kerr@cbc.ca>;
"terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>; "mckeen.randy"
<mckeen.randy@gmail.com>; "mcknight.gisele"
<mcknight.gisele@dailygleaner.com>; "mclellana"
<mclellana@bennettjones.com>
Cc: <Whistleblower@ctv.ca>; <martine.turcotte@bell.ca>; "oldmaison"
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>; "stop_codex" <stop_codex@hotmail.com>; "josh
steffler" <canuckfanjosh@yahoo.com>; <webmasterlawrence@gmail.com>;
"xtofury" <xtofury@gmail.com>; "grenouf" <grenouf@genuinewitty.com>;
"hiddenfromhistory1" <hiddenfromhistory1@gmail.com>; "J Bowman"
<canada.acp@gmail.com>; "leader" <leader@greenparty.ca>;
"maryann4peace" <maryann4peace@gmail.com>; "john.green"
<john.green@gnb.ca>; "police" <police@fredericton.ca>; "David Amos"
<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>;
<Billa.MEDHURST@vpd.ca>; "mark.lord" <mark.lord@fredericton.ca>;
"Leanne.Fitch" <Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 12:17 AM
Subject: So Debby Baby Grey "Famous Amos" would like to know if Harper
and the RCMP in BC are paying attention YET???


Some Deja Vu for you and Val

http://deanrays.blogspot.com/2009/07/vals-minority-report.html

http://www.debgrey.com/contact.html

VAls minority report!

Heritage Front Affair Val's Minority Reports

THE HERITAGE FRONT AFFAIR: OUR VIEW DISSENTING OPINION of the REFORM
PARTY of CANADA

Presented by Val Meredith, M.P.

THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE

It was nineteen months ago when the Sub-Committee on National Security
began its consideration of the Security Intelligence Review
Committee's Heritage Front Affair report. Finally, after a long and
often arduous effort, the Sub-Committee has tabled its report.

At this point in time, it is important to clarify a couple of
significant issues: The delays in producing the Sub-Committee report
have nothing to do with the activities of the opposition parties, but
rather are due solely to delays caused by membership changes and
disagreements among the government members.

Secondly, the so-called report of this Sub-Committee has little input
from the opposition members. The joint dissenting opinion of the Bloc
Quebecois and the Reform Party more accurately reflects the
multi-party consensus of the majority of members of this Sub-Committee
who actually participated in most of the Sub-Committee's hearings.
While the joint dissenting opinion does not fully reflect the Reform
Party's position on this issue, it is included to illustrate the
changes to the report imposed by the government members.

It must be noted that the major changes to this report did not occur
during a Sub-Committee meeting, and neither opposition member was
present. It is clear that the Liberal government was not prepared for
the Sub-Committee to table the more critical report that is now the
joint dissenting opinion. With regard to the official report of the
Sub-Committee, the current government members of the Sub-Committee
have produced an extremely emasculated version of the original report.

Their report is just an extension of SIRC's Heritage Front Affair
report which did not provide a sufficiently critical review of the
Canadian Security Intelligence Service's investigation.

THE SIRC REPORT SIRC claims to be the "eyes and ears of the public and
Parliament on the Canadian Security Intelligence Service." Yet after
months of consideration of the Heritage Front Affair report, it is
clear that SIRC has been not only negligent in this role, but
deliberately dishonest as well. Instead of providing Parliament with a
thorough and objective review of CSIS' use of a human source in its
investigation of the Heritage Front, SIRC's report exonerates CSIS and
the Source of any wrongdoing.

In its exoneration of CSIS, SIRC ignored or suppressed any evidence
that was inconsistent with their conclusion that the Service did no
wrong. SIRC has wilfully mislead Parliament and the Canadian people.
The exoneration of CSIS by SIRC is a betrayal of SIRC's role as a
review committee. While the Reform Party is deeply concerned with the
wrongdoings of CSIS, SIRC's refusal to address these transgressions in
an open and honest manner is cause for even greater concern.

After nineteen months of reviewing the SIRC report and obtaining
additional information, it is clear that SIRC is not fulfilling the
function that Parliament intended. Originally the Reform Party had
planned to do a thorough and critical review of the SIRC report,
pointing out numerous inaccuracies and omissions. However, because the
original version would have been too lengthy, we have chosen to focus
on two main issues: Grant Bristow - CSIS Source, and the CSIS
investigation concerning Preston Manning, that formed Chapter VIII of
the Heritage Front Affair. ; GRANT BRISTOW - CSIS HUMAN SOURCE Unlike
the government members of the Sub- Committee, I have no hesitancy in
identifying Grant Bristow as the CSIS Source who infiltrated the
Heritage Front.

This position is not an assumption, nor speculation. In August 1994, I
was contacted by an individual who had first-hand knowledge of Grant
Bristow as a CSIS Source. A former police source, this individual was
approached by Bristow, who offered to introduce him to a CSIS
investigator.

In September 1994 I accompanied this individual to a SIRC interview.
The information this individual provided is faithfully recorded in the
SIRC report at section 3.1.3, although it does not identify Bristow as
the Source.

In addition, at his appearance before the Sub- Committee on May 27,
1996, the Director of CSIS, Mr. Ward Elcock, inadvertently confirmed
that Bristow was indeed the CSIS Source. In his opening statement,
which was also provided in writing, the Director made the following
comment: "What about our source's arrest in Toronto, along with
American white supremacist Sean Maguire? That was a co-ordinated
operation with law enforcement agencies. Mr. Maguire was expelled from
Canada. Our source was released. No criminal offence was committed."

Now contrast the Director's above comments with the relevant passage
in SIRC's Heritage Front Affair report: "On September 20, 1991, Sean
Maguire and Grant Bristow were travelling in the latter's car, when
they were stopped at gunpoint by the heavily armed Metro Toronto
Emergency Task Force. Sean Maguire was arrested on an Immigration
warrant. RCMP and Immigration officials were on hand for the arrest,
as was a CSIS investigator from Toronto Region.

Grant Bristow, when he was stopped, had guns in the trunk of his car.
Both men were taken to police station 41." (emphasis added) It is
obvious from the above-mentioned information that Bristow is the CSIS
Source in question. It is an issue, because the way that SIRC wrote
their report, many of the questionable activities were committed by
Bristow, as opposed to the Source. So it is important to acknowledge
that Bristow was indeed the Source.

As expressed in paragraph 28 of the joint dissenting opinion ("Having
concluded that the placement of a human source was acceptable,
although for a shorter time than this Source was actually in place,
the opposition members of the Sub-Committee then asked themselves
whether the Service should have recruited and put in place this
particular Source?"), there were serious questions about using Bristow
as the Source. While SIRC made all efforts to downplay Bristow's role
in the creation and operation of the Heritage Front, clearly he was
responsible for much of the success of the organization.

The best indication of Bristow's role in the Heritage Front was the
video that the Front put out with excerpts of Bristow's speeches, that
had been edited out of the previously released videos. The excerpts
from this video show that Bristow was the main administrator of the
Heritage Front. He was responsible for the raising of money, for
selling memberships, literature and paraphernalia, and for getting
people out to Heritage Front rallies and demonstrations. His
questionable contributions can be best summarized from the one video
where he bragged that the Heritage Front in Toronto raised more money
to assist incarcerated members of the white supremacist terrorist
organization, The Order, than any other group in North America. ;
Bristow under police investigation.

There is one other aspect of Bristow's history that SIRC chose to
ignore, despite the fact that this incident was in the original
newspaper story that spawned their investigation. In 1993, the Metro
Toronto Police Force investigated Heritage Front members Carl Fischer,
Elkar Fischer and Andrew Maynard, for the kidnapping and assault of
Tyrone Mason, another Heritage Front member. During the course of
their investigation the police began to actively investigate Grant
Bristow.

The police investigators were so convinced that Bristow was involved
in witness tampering, that they applied to the courts and obtained a
Criminal Code Part VI warrant to intercept his communications. When
the Mason case finally made its way to trial in the fall of 1995, a
plea bargain was arranged. As a result of plea bargaining all charges
were dropped against Maynard, and though convicted, the Fischer
brothers received only a thirty day sentence to be served
intermittently.

Interestingly, a lawyer representing the federal government was
involved in the negotiations. It would appear that Bristow's role in
the incident prevented the Crown from aggressively prosecuting the
case. Despite frequently referring to this case in their testimony as
an example of the heinous activities that Heritage Front members were
capable of committing,

SIRC completely ignored the police investigation of Bristow's role in
the case. ; Bristow and the Reform Party. The Reform Party is also
deeply concerned about Bristow's activities within the Reform Party.

As reported in the SIRC report, CSIS was aware that Heritage Front
leader Wolfgang Droege "wanted to discredit Preston Manning and the
Reform Party before the general election in 1993. This idea would be
accomplished by the Movement publicly identifying itself and its
security relationship with the Reform Party's senior executive level.

Among those who allegedly knew of the Droege plan were Gerry Lincoln,
James Dawson, Ernst Zundel, Terry Long, Jurgen Neumann, Peter
Mitrevski, and Grant Bristow (emphasis added)." Not only was Bristow
aware of this plan to discredit the Reform Party, but he was one of
the major players in it. Bristow, along with Alan Overfield, were the
two individuals who made all the security arrangements.

While it was Overfield who originally offered the services of his
bailiff company to the Reform Party, he was not aware of Droege's plan
to discredit the party. Thus it was left to Bristow, a CSIS source, to
create the relationship.

According to the representative for the Reform Party, Andrew Flint,
Grant Bristow did a very effective job in creating the security
relationship between the Reform Party and the Heritage Front. In an
affidavit sworn on May 1, 1995, Flint described the June 1991 meeting
with Bristow and Overfield in the following manner: "The meeting was
dominated by Grant Bristow who did most of the talking regarding the
security for the event. I was certainly very impressed by his
immaculate dress which included an elegant suit and highly polished
shoes. This was the only meeting I attended involving security for the
up-coming rally."

Flint also mentioned that "at the meeting of the security team for the
June 1991 event at the International Centre, Grant Bristow requested a
letter from me stating that he and Al Overfield were authorized to
handle the security for this event. I was told he needed it to present
to the Regional Police which operated a sub-station on the premises of
the International Centre."

This letter is also mentioned in the SIRC report. However, the report
stated "Overfield asked for the letter in order to receive recognition
and to show that he was appointed. Grant Bristow's name was included
in the letter because he said: #145;Unless we have a letter of
understanding, there could be legal liabilities if there was a
confrontation with protesters at a Reform Party event.'

" Naturally, Bristow is the source of this information. It is
interesting that Bristow claimed that Overfield asked for the letter
to receive recognition, and that his own name appeared only for
liability purposes. If Bristow's name was necessary for liability
purposes, then why were the names of the other individuals who were
providing security not included as well?

In reality, the most useful application of this letter would have been
to prove a security arrangement between the Heritage Front and the
Reform Party. Yet, according to the SIRC report, Overfield was unaware
of the plan to discredit the Reform Party, so there is little reason
for him to request the letter. Bristow on the other hand, would
certainly have pleased Droege by providing him with a letter to
demonstrate that the security arrangement between the Reform Party and
the Heritage Front actually existed. SIRC's willingness to accept
Bristow's version of events is typical of their report.

Much of the report is based on the evidence of Bristow. He is cited as
the source of information 135 times; 96 times as the Source and a
further 39 times as Grant Bristow. In addition, the source handler is
cited 20 times as the basis of information.

SIRC has basically provided the public with Grant Bristow's version of
events, while contradictory information was generally dismissed. While
SIRC denied any wrongdoing by Bristow or CSIS, they failed to address
a very important issue - the entire operation was conducted in
violation of a 1989 Ministerial Direction.

On October 30, 1989 then Solicitor General Pierre Blais issued the
following Ministerial Direction on #145;CSIS' Use of Human Sources' to
the Director of CSIS. The Direction states in part: "that special care
is required in regard to investigations which impact on, or which
appear to impact on, the most sensitive institutions of our society. I
am primarily thinking in this regard of institutions in the academic,
political, religious, media or trade union fields.... I am writing
that you personally, or a Deputy Director designated by you in
writing, approve the use by the Service of confidential sources in
such investigation."

It is obvious that Bristow's role as one of two individuals who was
"jointly responsible for the security of all present and future Reform
Party Events that are planned for this region," would be part of a
human source operation that "impacted, or appeared to impact on a
political institution."

According to the Ministerial Direction, this would have required that
either the Director or the Deputy Director (Operations) approve
Bristow's role as part of the security team. In reality, Toronto
Region only sought out CSIS Headquarters' advice in August, two months
after the Mississauga rally, and even then the file did not go to the
Director or the Deputy Director.

SIRC goes on to great lengths to point out that CSIS was careful that
only Droege's activities as they related to the Reform Party were
investigated, not the Reform Party itself. But they do not address the
issue of a CSIS source operation that impacted on, or at least
appeared to impact upon a sensitive political institution, namely the
Reform Party. SIRC's refusal to address this issue is somewhat
mystifying, considering that was one of the questions that the Reform
Party specifically wanted answered when we put forth a series of
questions to SIRC in a letter, presented to them at the September 13,
1994 Sub-Committee meeting:

Question 73: Given the 1989 Ministerial Directive by then Solicitor
General Pierre Blais, concerning CSIS utilizing sources in sensitive
institutions such as political parties, religious groups and the
media, was the Director's approval required prior to Bristow's
attendance at the Reform Party meeting?;

Question 74: If yes, did the Director approve of this operation?
Bristow's role in the security group was indeed crucial in forming the
link between the Heritage Front and the Reform Party. As Andrew Flint
stated, he was impressed with Bristow's "knowledge of security
procedures and technical terminology...", as well as his "elegant suit
and highly polished shoes." Grant Bristow was the one member of the
Heritage Front who had the respectability and the expertise to make
Flint believe that he was dealing with a legitimate group of
individuals. It is extremely unlikely that Flint would have ever used
this group if he had met with skinheads or other Heritage Front
members.

In the final analysis, Wolfgang Droege had a plot to discredit the
Reform Party by linking the party to the Heritage Front through its
security arrangement.

Grant Bristow played a pivotal role in this conspiracy, if in no other
way than by providing the security group with the respectability and
expertise they could not have gotten elsewhere within the Heritage
Front.

When the story broke in 1992 the Reform Party was indeed discredited,
although there are no objective means to measure to what extent. It is
bad enough that Droege, an individual deemed to be a threat to the
security of Canada, devised a plot to discredit a legitimate political
party and CSIS did nothing about it. It is much worse when Grant
Bristow, a CSIS source, played an integral role in accomplishing this
task, in violation of a Ministerial Direction. But it is a complete
travesty when SIRC, the body that Parliament established to monitor
CSIS, fails to even address the issue. CSIS INVESTIGATION OF PRESTON
MANNING While compiling its report on the Heritage Front Affair, SIRC
included a chapter that had nothing to do with the Heritage Front. It
was about the Reform Party and a foreign government, subsequently
identified as South Africa. SIRC wanted us to believe that by
including this chapter they could allay any fears amongst Reformers
that CSIS had investigated the party, or the leadership.

In the SIRC report, the CSIS investigation is portrayed as a
by-the-book, straight-forward operation. Upon closer inspection this
investigation proved to be anything but straight- forward. Rather than
allaying any of our concerns about CSIS investigations, SIRC's
willingness to lie about the facts has made the Reform Party even more
suspicious.

Through a Privacy Act request by Preston Manning, CSIS released its
documents on this investigation. Although they are heavily censored,
the documents show that SIRC withheld information and misrepresented
the facts in their report, so that they could demonstrate that CSIS
conducted a proper investigation. Any evidence that was contradictory
to their conclusion was suppressed.

In the following pages, we will review the actual investigation,
SIRC's version of the investigation, and the bizarre fallout from this
chapter of their report. In exchanges of correspondence and testimony
that occurred after the tabling of the report, we learned that CSIS
documents were altered and misdated.

We observed SIRC make admissions, and then subsequently retract these
admissions, completely contradicting their earlier statements and
testimony. The Director of CSIS also provided a version of events that
not only contradicted his earlier testimony, but also required him to
admit that almost everyone who touched this file made mistakes.

In the final analysis, the Reform Party is convinced that CSIS
launched an insupportable investigation of Preston Manning in 1989,
and tried to cover it up five months later. Both the current
management at CSIS and SIRC have continued that cover-up, frequently
changing their story when confronted with facts that did not fit their
version of the events. ;

A dubious source sparks an investigation. As SIRC reported, and the
CSIS documents confirm, this investigation began with a tip from a
source who was described by the CSIS investigator as "self-serving and
very opportunistic, particularly if it benefited himself." This
dubious source informed CSIS about a conversation that he had with a
board member of an association that promoted links between South
Africa and Canada. This source then stated that the board member said
that his group was giving money to Preston Manning's campaign, as
Manning was running against External Affairs Minister Joe Clark.

This information by itself should not have been of interest to CSIS.
In democracies, citizens can financially support whoever they want in
an election, for whatever reason. For CSIS to investigate they needed
information that South Africa was actually providing the money. During
the first meeting between CSIS and this dubious source, the source
stated that he thought the board member meant that the money was
coming from South Africa. When the source realized that he did not
have the key piece of evidence that CSIS required, he miraculously
obtained it less than three weeks later. The source stated that he had
been talking to an unidentified, close associate of the board member,
who supposedly told him that the South Africans may have contributed
as much as $45,000 to Preston Manning and the Reform Party in trying
to defeat Joe Clark in his riding of Yellowhead. This is the extent of
CSIS' information about the Manning campaign receiving money from a
foreign government.

Third-hand information from a source who is not only of unknown
reliability, but who had been identified by the CSIS investigator as
"self-serving and opportunistic", should not be the basis of a CSIS
investigation of any Canadian citizen, much less the leader of a
legitimate political party. ; CSIS analyst stated, basis for
investigation "difficult to support"! We are not the only ones to
question the validity of this investigation.

After the regional investigator sent two reports to CSIS Headquarters
in November 1988, a response from the HQ analyst on the South Africa
desk was sent to the region in January 1989. As the SIRC report
acknowledged, the analyst stated that in HQ's opinion, the source of
the alleged funding was most likely the group of Canadian businessmen
who belonged to the association. But when the analyst addressed the
possibility of foreign funding, SIRC did not accurately portray the
analyst's comments. The analyst did state that, "if it were shown that
South Africa indeed contributed as much as $45,000 to Manning's
campaign, HQ could in time attempt to make the argument that South
Africa is unduly influencing Canadian politics." However, SIRC chose
not to include the following sentence by the analyst in their report:
"To say the least, this kind of argument would be difficult to
support."

Since the analyst had stated that there was no basis for a CSIS
investigation, contradicting SIRC's conclusion that it was a
legitimate investigation, SIRC chose to suppress this line. It is the
only line in that section of the report that SIRC did not include in
the Heritage Front Affair report. The HQ analyst concluded this
January 10, 1989 message by requesting that the region keep "HQ
apprised of any forthcoming information which you may obtain in light
of the above."

There was no further information forwarded by the region. Rather, the
next document that appears in Manning's file is an authorization of a
TARC Level 1 investigation, dated October 17, 1989. ; Lead up to the
TARC Level 1 investigation - January 10, 1989 to October 17, 1989.
While there is a great deal of controversy over what happened between
October 17, 1989 and March 30, 1990, we are equally perplexed about
what happened between January 10, 1989 and October 17, 1989.

The Reform Party has never received a logical answer to why an analyst
on the South African desk in CSIS HQ stated that there was no basis
for an investigation into the alleged contribution to Preston Manning
on January 10, 1989, and yet without any additional, or new,
information, an analyst on the South African desk in CSIS HQ submitted
a request for a TARC Level 1 investigation on October 17, 1989? SIRC
attempted to provide the following as an answer: A reliable source
provided CSIS with information that a foreign country (read South
Africa) had transferred over a quarter of a million dollars to Canada,
to try to influence 24 Members of Parliament from other political
parties (read Progressive Conservatives and Liberals).

When asked, SIRC stated that CSIS did not take any steps to
investigate these M.P.s. If the information about South Africa funding
these 24 M.P.s did indeed inspire the investigation, why was there no
mention of this on the form (REQUEST FOR AND APPROVAL OF COLLECTION
LEVELS 1, 2 AND CATEGORY A aka 4002) authorizing the investigation?

It is therefore unlikely that this information played any role in the
investigation. SIRC would still have us believe that CSIS received
information from a reliable source that the South African Government
was using over a quarter of million dollars to influence 24
Conservative and Liberal M.P.s, but did not investigate them. Instead,
CSIS proceeded to launch an investigation of Preston Manning, who was
neither an M.P., nor a Progressive Conservative nor a Liberal.

We find SIRC's logic to be less than satisfying. ; The Actual
Investigation: Who, What, When, Why? >From the moment the Solicitor
General tabled the Heritage Front Affair report, one particular
passage has caused a great deal of grief for the Sub-Committee, SIRC
and CSIS. This passage resulted in a number of admissions,
explanations, contradictions, retractions and accusations.

The Reform Party believes that the best way to present this complex
subject is in the following chronological manner:

December 15, 1994 The Solicitor General tabled SIRC's report, the
Heritage Front Affair, in the House of Commons. Included in section
VIII, at paragraph 8.3 is the following passage: "On October 17, 1989,
the Service decided to formally investigate the alleged $45,000
contribution. CSIS said that they could not go back to the informant
as all contacts had ended on December 31, 1988.

The Service authorized a three-month Level 1 investigation entitled:
#145;LNU FNU (Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
Campaign)'. The Service cited section 12 and paragraph 2 (b) of the
CSIS Act as the legal basis for the investigation." ;

December 16, 1994 ;SIRC appeared before the Sub-Committee on National
Security. Having been advised that the above-mentioned passage was
inaccurate, the Reform Party made the following request:

Ms. Meredith: "Can you have your officials go back to CSIS and have
them examine the hard copy of the original authorization of the Level
one investigation on the Reform Party and a foreign government, not
just the corrected copies? Specifically, can your employees examine
the caption on the file?"

Summary - After the meeting, the Reform Party was approached by SIRC
research officials. They asked what they should be looking for
specifically. This led the Reform Party to believe that SIRC was not
aware of a changed caption. ;

January 27, 1995 In a letter from Maurice Archdeacon, the Executive
Director of SIRC, to Derek Lee, M.P., the Chairman of the
Sub-Committee on National Security, Val Meredith's request was
answered in the following manner:

"Ms. Meredith, M.P. requested that SIRC have its officials re-examine
the original authorization of the Level I investigation on the Reform
Party and a foreign government. Specifically, Ms. Meredith asked to be
told what the caption was on the file.

The nature of Ms. Meredith's question suggests that the answer may
well already be known to her. Nevertheless, the caption she referred
to for the targeting authority dated October 17, 1989 was #145;Preston
Manning.' The caption was revised on March 30, 1990 to state,
#145;LNU/FNU (Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
Campaign).'

I would be remiss if I did not point out that, aside from the amended
caption, there were no other changes to the text of the targeting
requests/authorizations. That is, the text in each of the documents
was identical, and clearly stated that the investigation was to
determine whether a #145;foreign influence' threat existed. CSIS did
not suspect Mr. Manning of complicity..."

Summary - Mr. Archdeacon admitted that the name on the targeting
authority dated October 17, 1989 was #145;Preston Manning.' He also
mentioned that "there were no other changes to the text of the
targeting request/authorizations. That is, the text in each of the
documents was identical." It is quite apparent that Mr. Archdeacon is
stating that there were two versions of the same document, with the
only change being to the caption. From his choice of words being the
#145;targeting request/authorizations', there is no doubt that Mr.
Archdeacon is referring to the form 4002. ;

March 30, 1995 The Solicitor General appears before the Standing
Committee on Justice and Legal Affairs, for the Main Estimates. He is
accompanied by his Deputy Minister and the heads of the various
agencies under his control, including Mr. Ward Elcock, Director of
CSIS. The Reform Party asked Mr. Elcock a number of questions about
this particular investigation.

The following excerpts are from the transcript of this meeting: (Page 15)

Ms. Meredith: "Can you explain then why Mr. Manning's name was used
for a TARC level one investigation and why that investigation was not
conducted under the foreign government?"

Mr. Elcock: "I don't know why that name was used. I suspect that, as
much as anything else, it may have been just used as a convenient tag.
I don't know the precise reason why it was used, but there is no
question from the file that at any time the subject of the
investigation was ever Mr. Manning himself."

Ms. Meredith: "Why was that file named under Mr. Manning, then, and
not under #145;unknown contributor?'"

Mr. Elcock: "I said, Mr. Chairman, that I didn't know the reason why
that name was used. It clearly was in error, because in substance, the
investigation at all times was an investigation of the actions of a
foreign government, not an investigation of Mr. Manning."

(Page 17) Ms. Meredith: "So Mr. Manning's name never came up under a
requisition or a request for a TARC Level One investigation?"

Mr. Elcock: "It was in the sense, Mr. Chairman, that the title of the
TARC was initially in Mr. Manning's name. His name was there. Was
there an investigation of Mr. Manning? Absolutely not."

Ms. Meredith: "I didn't ask if there was an investigation of Mr.
Manning. I asked if a TARC Level was ever instituted under Mr.
Manning's name?"

Mr. Elcock: "The answer, Mr. Chairman, was that there was a TARC Level
in Mr. Manning's name. But as I have said, the subject of that TARC
was not Mr. Manning at any time, ever."

(Page 34) Ms. Meredith: "I have your policy manual here, the
declassified version of the CSIS Operational Manual. For a TARC Level
one authority, an investigator must submit a request for an approval
form, CSIS form 4002. There's a space for the name of the individual
to be investigated. Can you tell me whose name was in that spot on the
form 4002 in question, signed on October 17, 1989?"

Mr. Elcock: "As I think I said earlier, there was in the TARC title
Mr. Manning's name. However, as I said quite clearly, the subject of
that file was at all times an investigation of contributions in terms
of the possibility of contributions having been made by a foreign
government to a Canadian political party. It was at no time an
investigation of Mr. Manning himself, notwithstanding the title. I
would that (sic) the title had been otherwise, but it wasn't. That's
the fact."

Summary - During this meeting, the Director of CSIS made it quite
clear that on October 17, 1989 the TARC Level 1 authorization, the
form 4002, was on Preston Manning. Mr. Elcock did not once suggest
that the caption was "Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's
Electoral Campaign." (Nor did Mr. Elcock suggest that the error
occurred with a different document known as a FILE OPENING REQUEST -
PEOPLE FILES form.) At this same meeting the Reform Party also
questioned the Director as to why SIRC was not made aware that the
original 4002 was in the name of #145;Preston Manning'.

That led to the following exchange: (Page 17)

Ms. Meredith: "Can you explain to me why that information wasn't
provided to SIRC? In their report, they reported very thoroughly on
that investigation, with the exception of the original TARC level?"

Mr. Elcock: "Why what information?"

Ms. Meredith: "That the TARC level on Mr. Manning was excluded from
the SIRC report, that SIRC was unaware of that having happened?"

Mr. Elcock: "I don't know that in fact SIRC was unaware. I don't know
why they would not have put it in their report or would have chosen
not to do that. That's SIRC's business, and you would have to address
that question to SIRC."

Ms. Meredith: "When we brought it to SIRC's attention, they were
unaware of that fact. It was only by it being brought to their
attention that they were able to go back and find out the information.
So I assumed from that they did not know that information was not
provided to them, and I would like to know why it wasn't?"

Mr. Elcock: "I don't know that that assumption is correct; I would
have to check. In fact, my belief is that they did have that
information, but I'll certainly check that for the hon. member."

Summary - This was the first information that the Reform Party
received that SIRC was aware that the original TARC Level was on
Preston Manning. ;

March 31, 1995 In response to Mr. Elcock's testimony, Val Meredith
wrote to SIRC, seeking clarification of what SIRC knew and when. "Was
any member or employee of SIRC aware that the original TARC
investigation launched on October 17, 1989 (was) in the name of
Preston Manning and not "LNU FNU (Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston
Manning's Electoral Campaign), when the Heritage Front Affair report
was tabled on December 9, 1994?" Summary - The Reform Party
specifically asked SIRC if they knew prior to the tabling of their
report that the TARC investigation was in the name of #145;Preston
Manning.' ;

April 7, 1995 In a letter, under the name of Jacques Courtois, P.C.,
Q.C., but signed by Maurice Archdeacon, Val Meredith's letter was
responded to in the following fashion: "You asked whether any member
or employee of SIRC was aware of the TARC investigation launched on
October 17, 1989 in the name of Preston Manning and not the corrected
title. SIRC staff saw the original title of the targeting
authorization, as well as the corrected title and all other documents
pertaining to the investigation. As I mentioned in my letter dated
January 27, 1995 to Mr. Derek Lee, M.P. Chairperson of the
Sub-Committee on National Security, the description (narrative text)
of the authorization never changed... The original caption was seen
for what it was - an error, and the Service corrected that error five
years ago."

Summary - Once again SIRC admitted that the caption on the TARC on
October 17, 1989 was in the name of Preston Manning. They also
admitted that they knew this prior to tabling their report. Although
Mr. Archdeacon does not specifically state why SIRC chose to exclude
this information from their report, the only possible explanation they
offer for its exclusion is that the original caption was seen as an
error, and that CSIS corrected that error in 1990. ;

June 20, 1995 SIRC appeared before the National Security Sub-Committee
for the Main Estimates. The Reform Party asked SIRC a number of
questions about this particular investigation.

The following excerpts are from the transcript of this meeting: (Page 7)

Ms. Meredith: "Are you trying to tell this committee that there was
not a TARC Level one investigation opened on Preston Manning?"

Mr. Archdeacon: "No, I'm not, obviously, because we're repeating
discussions we had over several hours earlier. You know very well that
I'm not doing so. Someone - and we admitted it was sloppy work, and
I'm sure the Director of CSIS would admit that - instead of taking the
trouble to write on the TARC title #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston
Manning's campaign' just wrote #145;Preston Manning.' The text,
however, in the TARC report makes it absolutely clear - and you read
the text - that Mr. Manning was not being investigated. We can't say
it any more than this. It's question asked and answered."

(Page 20)

Mr. Archdeacon: "The fact is at the moment you're looking at the form
- I understand your point - and saying the form of that 4002 gave the
impression, because the name Preston Manning was there, that the TARC
was on Preston Manning. That is the form of it."

Summary - SIRC once again confirmed that the 4002 was in the name of
Preston Manning. Mr. Archdeacon went so far as to state that he
obviously wasn't denying that there was a TARC Level one investigation
opened on Preston Manning. ;

June 21, 1995 to November 7, 1995 During this time period, the
Sub-Committee on National Security considered its report on the
Heritage Front Affair. During these meetings, the Sub-Committee was
operating on the understanding that the original 4002 was in the name
of "Preston Manning" and this was altered to "LNU/FNU (Unknown
Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign" on March 30,
1990. ; November 9, 1995 To clarify questions about alterations to
4002, and who knew about the caption "Preston Manning", the
Sub-Committee sent a letter to the Director of CSIS. The following are
the key excerpts from this letter: "On January 27, 1995, SIRC advised
the Subcommittee, in response to its questions, that the caption on
the October 17, 1989 targeting authority dealt with in Chapter VIII of
the SIRC Report was originally #145;Preston Manning.' The Review
Committee went on in the same letter to advise us that the caption was
changed on March 30, 1990 to read #145;LNU-FNU (Unknown Contributor(s)
to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign).' How was the caption change
made on the Form 4002 - was the original form altered or was the
original form destroyed and a new, back-dated, re-signed or
re-initialled form created? Another of the documents contained in the
file obtained by Mr. Manning is a November 10, 1989 Transit Slip (Form
3040) from the Chief of Counter Intelligence - General Desk to the
Director General of Counter Intelligence. I would like to draw your
attention to item 5 on this document where it is asserted #145;caption
is considered appropriate under policy provision.' Can you provide the
Subcommittee with an explanation of this assertion in light of the
fact that at the time the caption read #145;Preston Manning' and was
not changed until March 30, 1990? If the caption was appropriate as it
was on November 10, 1989, what made it unacceptable on March 30,
1990?" Summary - These questions challenged SIRC's and CSIS'
contention that #145;Preston Manning's' name appearing in caption was
just a #145;clerical error.' It would be difficult for CSIS to
maintain the #145;clerical error' excuse if the Director General of
Counterintelligence was aware of the caption, and agreed with it. ;

March 29, 1996 According to CSIS, they did not receive the November 9,
1995 letter from the Sub-Committee until this date. There is no
explanation as to what happened to the letter during the intervening 4
1/2 months. ;

April 15, 1996 The Director of CSIS responded to the Sub-Committee's
letter of November 9, 1995. In a complete departure from previous
statements and testimony from CSIS and SIRC, the Director contended
that the Form 4002 never read #145;Preston Manning', but the original
caption was #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
Campaign.' Key excerpts from his letter are as follows: "In response
to your query regarding the #145;REQUEST FOR AND APPROVAL OF
COLLECTION LEVELS 1, 2 AND CATEGORY A' form, dated October 17, 1989, I
am satisfied that this is the original document associated with this
file. As is shown on this form, the original caption was #145;Unknown
Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign'. The
collection authority and a second form, #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST -
PEOPLE FILES', is required by the Service's Information Management
branch, in order to create a file. It was at this stage in the process
that the clerical error occurred regarding this file caption. In an
effort to facilitate the electronic opening and future retrieval of
this file and the relevant documents, the caption that was erroneously
entered on the #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES' form was
#145;Preston Manning'. This error caused the creation of an automated
hard copy file under this incorrect caption. It was during the latter
part of March, 1990, while preparing this assessment report, that the
file caption error was corrected. Item 5 on the #145;TRANSIT SLIP'
(Form 3040), dated November 10, 1989, discusses the appropriateness of
the caption as presented originally - #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to
Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign' and the comments indicate that
the author believed the caption to be appropriate."

Summary - This was an astounding development. The Director totally
contradicted 15 months of statements and testimony from both SIRC and
himself. According to the January 27, 1995 letter from Maurice
Archdeacon to Derek Lee, M.P., the targeting authority (form 4002)
read #145;Preston Manning' on October 17, 1989 and was changed on
March 30, 1990. Mr. Elcock made no reference to this fact in his
letter. Nor does the Director address his own testimony before the
Standing Committee on Justice and Legal Affairs on March 30, 1995,
where the following exchange took place:

Ms. Meredith: "So Mr. Manning's name never came up under a requisition
or a request for a TARC Level One investigation?"

Mr. Elcock: "It was in the sense, Mr. Chairman, that the title of TARC
was initially in Mr. Manning's name. His name was there. Was there an
investigation of Mr. Manning? Absolutely not."

Ms. Meredith: "I didn't ask if there was an investigation of Mr.
Manning. I asked if a TARC Level was instituted under Mr. Manning's
name?"

Mr. Elcock: "The answer Mr. Chairman, was that there was a TARC Level
in Mr. Manning's name."

There is no explanation of why Mr. Elcock would state on March 30,
1995 that "the title of the TARC was initially in Mr. Manning's name,"
and then on April 15, 1996 he would write that "the original caption
was #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral
Campaign.'"

It must also be noted that in none of the correspondence or testimony
from CSIS or SIRC, between December 16, 1994 and April 14, 1996, was
there even a single mention of a "FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES"
form. This particular form was certainly known to CSIS, as it was
included in Preston Manning's Privacy Act request. However, subsequent
investigation and testimony would show that Mr. Elcock was not
completely forthcoming in this letter. ;

May 15, 1996 SIRC appeared before the Sub-Committee on National
Security for the Main Estimates. While there was little discussion
about this issue at this meeting, the following exchanges occurred:
(page 30)

Mr. Discepola: "I'd like to know, then, in your opinion why in the
world Preston Manning's name was used at all in any of the
documentation that related to the investigation of the suspected third
country contribution to the election campaign."

Mr. Archdeacon: "I've forgotten the exact date but the original title
was #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning's Election Campaign.'
It should of had more on it then that, but that was the exact title.
It was not titled #145;Preston Manning', and Mrs. Meredith has a copy
of the sheets of paper. Here it is, and the title on it is
#145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign.'
Then there's the text of what is to be looked at, which is whether
somebody, some country, was going to contribute money to Preston
Manning's electoral campaign. When you have a TARC like that you must
open a file, and this TARC was sent down to the management information
section in CSIS. Because it didn't have LNU/FNU in front of the
#145;Unknown Contributor(s)', which means last name unknown, first
name unknown, the only name the clerk down there could see was Preston
Manning, and you have to have a name on a file. So he didn't write
#145;Unknown Contributor(s)' , he wrote #145;Preston Manning'. That
was an error. He shouldn't have done that. That error remained like
that for at least three months without being corrected. It wasn't
corrected until about March, when the assessment was being done. There
have been allegations that the title on the TARC was changed. Written
in ink was #145;LNU/FNU' ahead of what had always been there and had
never been changed. Because Mrs. Meredith was so sure of this, and
because we knew she had our information from somewhere else, we
decided to have the original TARC X-rayed. We have exact evidence that
everything Mrs. Meredith has said about this - about it having been
titled #145;Preston Manning', about things having been typed around
it, and about all those sorts of things - is completely and totally
incorrect. The file was mistitled and the file does not give anybody
any reason to investigate anybody. A file title does not authorize
anybody to investigate anybody. There was never any time when every
CSIS agent across the country could have investigated Mr. Manning.
That is a figment of someone's imagination." (page 32)

Ms. Meredith: "Then I would like to put something on the record, Mr.
Chair. I'd like to put on the record, Mr. Archdeacon, that the
comments you just made are in complete contradiction to a letter on
January 27, 1995, addressed to Mr. Derek Lee, and in testimony you've
given before this committee. It's a complete contradiction."

The Chairman: "I'm sure SIRC would want to address that. Perhaps this
is something that can be clarified later. Can I take it, Mr.
Archdeacon, Mr. Courtois, that you would differ?"

Mr. Archdeacon: "We would differ with that characterization." ;

Summary - Mr. Archdeacon's comments are a complete departure from
SIRC's previous correspondence and testimony.

First of all, it was not Ms. Meredith who stated that the original
TARC was captioned #145;Preston Manning', it was Mr. Archdeacon
himself who first made this statement in his letter of January 27,
1995, when he stated:; "The caption she referred to for the targeting
authority dated October 17, 1989 was #145;Preston Manning'.

The caption was revised on March 30, 1990 to state, #145;LNU/FNU
(Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign).'"

Then there is the letter that Mr. Archdeacon signed on April 7, 1995,
in which he stated:; "You asked whether any member or employee of SIRC
was aware of the TARC investigation launched on October 17, 1989 in
the name of Preston Manning and not the corrected title. SIRC staff
saw the original title of the targeting authorization, as well as the
corrected title and all other documents pertaining to the
investigation."

Once again Mr. Archdeacon confirmed that the original title was
"Preston Manning", and admitted that SIRC staff saw both the original
title of the targeting authorization, as well as the corrected title.
If, as Mr. Archdeacon maintained on May 15, 1996, the original title
was "Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign",
why would he state in two pieces of correspondence that the caption
was "Preston Manning".

Furthermore, during SIRC's appearance before the National Security
Sub-Committee meeting on June 20, 1995, there was this exchange:;

Ms. Meredith: "Are you trying to tell this committee that there was
not a TARC Level one investigation opened on Preston Manning?"

Mr. Archdeacon: "No, I'm not obviously, because we're repeating
discussions we had over several hours earlier. You know very well that
I'm not doing so. Someone - and we admitted it was sloppy work, and
I'm sure the Director of CSIS would admit that - instead of taking the
trouble to write on the TARC title #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston
Manning's Campaign' just wrote #145;Preston Manning.'"

Mr. Archdeacon made no effort to explain why, on May 15, 1996, he told
the Sub-Committee that there was not a TARC Level one investigation
opened on Preston Manning, when on June 20, 1995 he stated the exact
opposite.

Clearly, Mr. Archdeacon and SIRC have fully endorsed the April 15,
1996 letter from the Director of CSIS. Like Mr. Elcock, they make no
effort to explain the contradictions.

There is one comment of Mr. Archdeacon that would be contradicted by
the CSIS Director two weeks later. Mr. Archdeacon made a definitive
statement that the error was caused by a clerk in the Management
Information Section, who wrote "Preston Manning." As we will see in
the next section, this statement has no basis in fact, but is rather a
figment of Mr. Archdeacon's imagination. ;

May 27, 1996 Mr. Elcock appeared before the Sub-Committee to answer
questions about the Heritage Front Affair. During his appearance the
Reform Party asked him about a number of discrepancies contained in
his letter of April 15, 1996.

Four of the specific subjects that were broached, included:

I) The Altered #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES' Form. In his
letter, Mr. Elcock stated, "the caption that was erroneously entered
on the #145;FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES' form was #145;Preston
Manning.'" However, the copy of that form that Mr. Manning received in
his Privacy Act request did not read #145;Preston Manning', but rather
#145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston Manning's Electoral Campaign'.
It is obvious that the section of the form for the subject's name has
been altered, as have the sections for #145;Present Address' and
#145;Occupation'.

The following exchange took place in relation to this form:

Ms. Meredith: "Mr. Elcock, your letter clearly states that it was on
this file, this PEOPLE FILES form here, and if people look carefully
you can see where there has been alterations made to this document.
The alterations have been made not only on the subject line, but on
the #145;Occupation' line and the #145;Present Address' line. Your
letter states that it was this form that Preston Manning's name was
put on by mistake. I'm asking you why does this form not have Preston
Manning's name on it? It has #145;Unknown Contributor(s) to Preston
Manning's Electoral Campaign."

Mr. Elcock: "Mr. Chairman, Mr. Sundstrom reminds me that although it
doesn't show here underneath, it was just Preston Manning when the
form was first completed."

Ms. Meredith: "So, if you agree, or if you read Mr. Archdeacon's
comments where he noted it had been a clerk and it was a clerk in the
Management Information Section that changed the document from
#145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning' and put Preston Manning's
name in it. It's obvious that #145;Occupation' and #145;Present
Address' have also been altered, changed, whited-out. Did this clerk
also put Preston Manning's address and his occupation in there? Do
they have the right to just add that in as they saw fit?"

Mr. Elcock: "Mr. Chairman, it compounded the clerical error, but
there's nothing that prevents them from adding those details."

Summary - While Mr. Elcock confirmed that the #145;Subject Name',
#145;Occupation' and #145;Present Address' sections were all altered,
he maintained that it was a "clerical error". Well it might be
possible that a CSIS clerk would not use the proper caption in this
case, it is ludicrous to suggest that the clerk would, on his or her
own initiative, add Mr. Manning's address and occupation. Besides, if
as CSIS and SIRC maintain, Mr. Manning was never investigated, how did
CSIS even know his present address. In any event, as we shall see in
section #145;IV', the story of the clerk making a mistake is soon
retracted. ;

II) Citing a document two weeks before it existed. In the form 4002,
which authorized the TARC Level 1 investigation on October 17, 1989,
there is a reference to a proposed meeting between Mr. Manning and an
unidentified Ambassador. The reference goes on to state that the
meeting was canceled at the last minute by the Embassy. Only one
N.S.R. (CSIS database) message in the package obtained by Mr. Manning
in his Privacy Act request contained this information. It was dated
November 1, 1989, two weeks after the form 4002 was supposedly
completed.

Questions about this discrepancy went as follows:

Ms. Meredith: "Can I get you to go to tab #145;L' in the documents
that we've provided for you? This document is the only document that
was received under the access, under the Privacy Act, to Mr. Manning,
that makes any reference to an Ambassador and Preston Manning meeting,
and the meeting being canceled by the Embassy. Can you give me the
date of that message?"

Mr. Elcock: "The date at the top is 89- 11-01."

Ms. Meredith: "What does that equate to... November 1, 1989?"

Mr. Elcock: "Yes, it should do."

Ms. Meredith: "How is it possible that this message number and this
date can be an additional background on a document that is dated
October 17, 1989? How is it possible that this information is on a
document when it didn't exist at the time?"

Mr. Elcock: "The honourable member is concluding that it's the same
reference; I don't know that it is."

Ms. Meredith: "If that is not the report, then why was the report not
included in the Privacy request by Mr. Manning? This is the only
document that was in the information provided to him."

Mr. Elcock: "I will check and see what the date is and advise the
committee what the date of the document was."

Summary - The Reform Party did ask, in writing, for CSIS to confirm
the date of this message. At the time this dissenting opinion was
written, CSIS had not responded to our request. If this is the report
in question, then it lends credence to the suggestion that this form
4002 was re-written some time after October 17, 1989. It also suggests
that someone believed that the original justification for the
investigation was so weak, that additional information had to be
provided. If, on the other hand, there was documentation withheld from
Mr. Manning's Privacy request, one wonders what else has been
withheld. ;

III) The Altered Form 4002. If the inclusion of information from a
message that was not yet reported suggested that the form 4002 had
been re-written, another fact that supported this suggestion was that
the date on the top right corner of the document had been altered. The
Reform Party employed the services of forensic consultant, an expert
in the examination of questioned documents, who stated "as a matter of
information it should be noted that within the questioned handwritten
digital date #145;1989-10-17' on exhibit A1 (a), partially within and
immediately above the handwritten numbers there exist undecipherable
fragmentary markings foreign to the handwritten #145;1989-10-17'
numbers."

This information led to the following exchange:

Ms. Meredith: "Mr. Elcock, I want to bring your attention back to the
first page of form 4002 and I want you to look at the handwritten date
at the top, right-hand corner. That handwritten date was altered,
wasn't it? Tab #145;B'."

Mr. Elcock: "And it goes back, I think, to the piece that you had
asked... I noted that Mr. Archdeacon had indicated the piece had been
X-rayed and in fact there was another date underneath."

Ms. Meredith: "Can you tell the committee what the date was that was
underneath?"

Mr. Elcock: "The date was 1990...March 29, 1990."

Ms. Meredith: "Thank you, Mr. Elcock. I think that just proves what I
have considered, that this document was typed up in full with a
changed subject-matter on March 29, 1990; that this document did not
originate on October 17, 1989."

Mr. Elcock: "No, Mr. Chairman, I don't agree that it does."

Ms. Meredith: "Can you explain how the date March 29, 1990 would be at
the top of that file if that was not the case?"

Mr. Elcock: "At the time, often the dates on those files, on those
documents are left open and completed later when the documents are
first issued because they don't have a file number either when they're
first issued."

Ms. Meredith: "Mr. Elcock, so you want me to believe, you want this
committee to believe that they filled in the form, that the effective
date was put in at the bottom, the expiry date was put in at bottom,
that it was signed off and the date was put in at the bottom, but that
at the top it wasn't. Is that what you want this committee to
believe?"

Mr. Elcock: "I believe there was a mistake made. We believed that at
the time the typist entered the date and subsequently crossed out
because she had mistakenly entered it and they put back in the
appropriate date."

Summary - Although Mr. Elcock admitted that the form 4002 carried the
date March 29, 1990, he maintained that this was the original 4002
filled out on October 17, 1989. His argument that the date wasn't put
in because the document did not have a file number is extremely weak,
since the FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form that was signed on
October 17, 1989 was filled out specifically to obtain a file number.

In the documents obtained by Mr. Manning under his Privacy Act
request, we know that the first N.S.R. message that was sent on this
file was dated October 17, 1989, and since a message can not be sent
without a file number, a file number was obviously assigned on this
date. It is highly unlikely that CSIS would wait an additional five
months to fill in the rest of this form. This admission also calls
into question the testimony of Mr. Archdeacon from May 15, 1996, who
first brought up the subject of having the form X-rayed, and then
stated the form was never changed. ;

IV) Both Documents filled out by the Same Individual. The last area of
questioning concerned the contention put forth by CSIS and SIRC, that
the error in captions occurred not with the form 4002, but when a
clerk made an error in filling out a second form, a FILE OPENING
REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form. Mr. Elcock called this a "clerical
error".

In his May 15, 1996 testimony, Mr. Archdeacon went even further when
he stated, "this TARC was sent down to the Management Information
Section in CSIS... The clerk down there thought that the only name
that he had, and you've got to have a name on a file, the only name he
could see was Preston Manning. So he didn't write #145;Unknown
Contributor', he wrote #145;Preston Manning'. That was an error. He
shouldn't have done that." Again these sound like plausible
explanations. Plausible that is until one examines the forms.

The Reform Party and the Sub- Committee were somewhat hampered because
of the censoring of the documents, which deleted the names of the CSIS
employees who filled out these forms. We were instead forced to
examine the handwritten dates on both the form 4002 and the FILE
OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form. It is apparent that they were
written by the same person. The Forensic Consultant, an expert in the
examination of questioned documents confirmed the similarities.

While it may have been plausible that a clerk put in the wrong caption
on the second form, it is absolutely ludicrous to suggest that an
intelligence officer in CSIS HQ would fill out a form 4002 to
authorize an investigation in one name, and then on the very same day
he would fill out a second form to obtain a file number, and use a
different caption. As absurd as that sounds, that is what the Director
of CSIS wanted us to believe.

Witness the following exchange:

Ms. Meredith: "And that this unit head authorized a TARC Level
investigation on #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning's
Electoral Campaign?' Is that right? That is in essence what this is
all about, right, is that they authorized a TARC one on an
#145;Unknown Contributor.'"

Mr. Elcock: "An Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning's Electoral
Campaign, yes."

Ms. Meredith: "And that the problem originated or the problem was
picked up when somebody filled out the FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE
FILES, and then wrote in #145;Preston Manning.'"

Mr. Elcock: "Yes." Ms. Meredith: "It wasn't a clerk who filled out
those forms, was it?"

Mr. Elcock: "No, Mr. Chairman. I'm not sure what the honourable
member's point is."

Ms. Meredith: "My point is that if you look at the date in the top
right- hand corner of the FILE OPENING REQUEST and you look at the
date under the authority section on the same form, the PEOPLE FILE,
FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES, and then you look at the date
which is hand-written in at the top of the form 4002, I would suggest,
Sir, that it's the same person that wrote these two documents, that
worked with these two documents. How is it possible that the same
person on one file can put #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston
Manning's Electoral Campaign' and on the other file, the very same
day, put #145;Preston Manning.' And that his unit head, in reviewing
these on the same day, wouldn't pick up the mistake."

Mr. Elcock: "I'm not -- the honourable ...."

Ms. Meredith: "These are things that, I'm sorry, how is it possible
that a Counterintelligence officer can mistakenly, this is who filled
out this form, is an intelligence officer in Counterintelligence. How
could he look at a TARC form that he also filled in and filled it in
with #145;Unknown Contributor to Preston Manning' and on the very same
day on another form put Preston Manning's name down?"

Mr. Elcock: "These things happen. Names are sometimes left in
documents when they ought not to be." Ms. Meredith: "And his unit
chief who is authorizing and okaying these didn't notice that one of
the forms was under Preston Manning's name?" Mr. Elcock: "I'm sure as
the honourable member will know, these things happen from time to
time."

Summary - Mr. Elcock's defence, given this information is simply that
these things happen. That is even more frightening than a planned
investigation of Mr. Manning. The Director of CSIS stated that he
wanted to re-assure the Reform Party that nothing untoward happened
with this file. Yet, the only explanation Mr. Elcock offers for the
conduct of his department, is that the employees who were involved in
this investigation were grossly incompetent?

However, the Reform Party has more faith in the ability of working
level staff at CSIS than the Director does. However, the Director did
confirm that the FILE OPENING REQUEST - PEOPLE FILES form was never
filled out by a clerk in the Information Management Section of CSIS.
That begs the question: Why did the Executive Director of SIRC, Mr.
Archdeacon, make up his story to mislead the Sub-Committee? ;

CONCLUSIONS The Reform Party regrets having to present such a
painstakingly, detailed review of the Preston Manning investigation,
but it was necessary to demonstrate the extreme lengths that we have
had to go to in our attempts to find the truth in this matter.

The documents obtained by Mr. Manning through his Privacy Act request
afforded us the opportunity to challenge SIRC's version of events
directly. SIRC has demonstrated that their word cannot be accepted at
face value. But what does this all mean in the final analysis?

Two issues need to be resolved. The first is what initiated the
October 17, 1989 TARC Level 1 investigation. Since the South African
desk in CSIS HQ wrote off any investigation on January 10, 1989, what
suddenly spawned interest nine months later. One would think that it
would be logical for someone to have something in writing suggesting
that an investigation be opened. But that didn't happen.

The questions that remains unanswered, are:

Who ordered this matter re-opened, and why? The other issue that must
be answered is: Why are CSIS and SIRC going to such extreme lengths to
mislead the Sub-Committee, Parliament, and Canadians? If they had
maintained their original explanation that the file caption was
inappropriately opened in the name of #145;Preston Manning', and
subsequently changed, the Reform Party would have little to complain
about. But for CSIS and SIRC to retract all their previous admissions
without explanations, and to out-and-out lie to a Parliamentary
Sub-Committee, it is clear that there is something important they are
hiding.

The question is: What? Contrary to the assurances from SIRC and CSIS,
the Reform Party has learned that from October 17, 1989 to January 17,
1990, it was recorded in CSIS' main database, N.S.R., that there was a
TARC Level 1 on Preston Manning. There was no restricted security on
this file, so this information was available to any CSIS employee who
had access to N.S.R.

Any employee who came across this information would have believed that
there was a legal TARC Level on Manning, and could have legitimately
carried out a Level 1 investigation. If the government members of the
Sub-Committee weren't so intent on burying this report, the Sub-
Committee itself may have been able to produce some of its own
answers.

However, it became apparent, especially after the Liberals changed the
membership of the Sub-Committee, that government members are just as
interested in covering up the truth, as are CSIS and SIRC. This is
typified by the member from Windsor - St. Clair's vociferous objection
to the Bloc Quebecois attempting to give their time to question the
Director of CSIS to the Reform Party at the May 27, 1996 meeting. Why
else would they object to the Reform Party having a few extra minutes
to ask questions?

It is clear to the Reform Party that SIRC's Heritage Front Affair
report is a complete whitewash. SIRC was able to divert what should
have been a review of the activities of a CSIS Source into a review of
the Heritage Front itself. Both SIRC and CSIS champion this case as a
great success for the Service, but the mere fact that the Source's own
actions made this case public, should suggest it was a failure. But
what this case has done is to show that the review system established
by the CSIS Act does not work.

The government has joined with CSIS and SIRC in covering up the truth.
Why? What are they afraid of? This government has expressed no concern
that the leader of a legitimate political party had his name on a
document authorizing a CSIS investigation on him. They have expressed
no concern that all the original documents authorizing that
investigation were altered in one manner or another. They have shown
no concern that both CSIS and SIRC admitted that originally the TARC
level was on Preston Manning, then fifteen months later proceeded to
deny it, with absolutely no explanation.

It would appear that this government is not interested in holding the
bureaucracy accountable. How is it possible that the government is not
concerned that one of its agencies operates without accountability.
Was that not why a civilian intelligence agency was formed? Did not a
previous Liberal administration pass the CSIS Act, to make Canada's
intelligence community accountable to Parliament?

Those Canadians who care about the truth will have to wait until this
country has a government committed to Parliamentary accountability,
before the true version comes out. In the meantime, the Reform Party
hopes that those journalists, researchers or academics who are
interested in pursuing security issues continue their search for the
real story. The truth is out there!

RECOMMENDATIONS In light of the negligent performance of the Security
Intelligence Review Committee in reviewing this investigation, it is
clear that there is no place in the review process for a group of
patronage appointees who believe that they do not have to answer to
Parliament.

To find an alternative we need look no further than to our neighbours
to the south. The Americans utilize not only a House Select Committee
on Intelligence, but a Senate Committee as well. Given the immense
Intelligence network in the United States with the CIA, the NSA and
the Intelligence Division of the FBI, the Americans have demonstrated
that review by elected representatives is not only workable, but in
the Reform Party's opinion is preferable. ;

Reform Party Recommendation The Reform Party recommends that this
government introduce legislation in Parliament that would amend the
Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act, deleting all references to
the Security Intelligence Review Committee. All references to the
Security Intelligence Review Committee should be replaced by the
Standing Committee on National Security. ;

; Created by Maurice Murphy Revised: December 01, 1996

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 04:02:33 -0300
Subject: RE Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the
mindless lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???
To: ABrander@highriver.ca, highwood <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, mclellana <mclellana@bennettjones.com>,
"Ian.Shardlow" <Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Ian.McPhail"
<Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Dale.McGowan"
<Dale.McGowan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "calgary.acadia"
<calgary.acadia@assembly.ab.ca>, "calgary.northwest"
<calgary.northwest@assembly.ab.ca>, Calgarynews <Calgarynews@ctv.ca>,
calgarynewstips <calgarynewstips@cbc.ca>, cal-news
<cal-news@sunmedia.ca>, eblokland <eblokland@highriver.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, gunfighter@fritze.com, Sheldon@nfa.ca

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: PCC Complaints <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:14:53 +0000
Subject: RE: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me
off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the
Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya...
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Hello Mr. Amos:

This e-mail is to acknowledge your recent communication with our
office about the RCMP.

If you wish to submit a complaint regarding the on-duty conduct of a
member(s) of the RCMP, you can do so through our online complaint form
located at:

https://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/cnt/srv/mac/index-eng.aspx

Alternatively, we can also be reached by:

Telephone : 1-800-665-6878
E-mail: complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
Fax : 604-501-4095

Sincerely,


Günther Schönfeldt
Intake Officer / Agent d'information de liaison
Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP /
Commission des plaintes du public contre la Gendarmerie royale du Canada
Tel/Tél : 1-800-665-6878 | Fax/Téléc : (604) 501-4095
complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca



-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
Sent: September-07-13 11:38 PM
To: gunfighter@fritze.com; Sheldon@nfa.ca; bob.paulson; ORG; McPhail, Ian
Cc: David Amos; Cogan, Tim
Subject: Fwd: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me
off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shard low? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the
Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya

http://nfa.ca/news/video-analysis-reveals-rcmp-targeting-houses-firearms

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Al Brander <ABrander@highriver.ca>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 07:36:10 -0600
Subject: RE: Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the
mindless lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

For the record, these current missive are the only ones I have seen.

Please delete my from your address book since it appears you only want
a platform to rant from.

Al Brander

-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 9:46 PM
To: Al Brander; Ian.Shardlow; bob.paulson; mclellana; premier; Ian.McPhail
Cc: David Amos; highwood
Subject: Re: Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the
mindless lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???

My question would obviously be:

Why did you and Ian Shardlow your new local top cop ignore me for
nearly a month?

Obviously I am the guy who answered Greg Kvisle's quandry about why
the RCMP ignored the Charter and felt free to invade his home three
time in order to find and take his old 303 and shotgun but he did not
believe me. I suspect you know as wel as I Correct?

As far as who I am scroll down this is lots of info that you had a
month to check out. If you don't believe it ask Ian Sharlow or his
bosses Dale McGowan and Bob Paulson or the lawyers Landslide Annie
McLellan or Alison Redford if I am a liar or not.

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369

On 9/8/13, Al Brander <ABrander@highriver.ca> wrote:

> Mr. Amos: Is there a question for me here?? If so please present it and
> will you then also identify who you are please.
>
> Thank you;
>
> Al Brander

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2013 9:45 PM
> To: Emile Blokland; christopher@diarmani.com; brian.topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
> bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca; Josee.Valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Dale.McGowan;
> bob.paulson; steven.blaney; Sylvain.Roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; bloke@shaw.ca;
> premier; highwood; airdrie; mclellana; finditherefirst@gmail.com;
> Doug.Potts@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; ppalmater; xchief;
> gunfighter
> Cc: Ian.McPhail; David Amos; James Thackray; kevin.rushworth@sunmedia.ca; Al
> Brander; Jessica Hume; greg.weston; pm; MulcaT; justin.trudeau.a1
> Subject: Yo Bobby Paulson how long should I wait this time for the mindless
> lawyer Ian McPhail to get back to me???
>
> http://nfa.ca/news/video-analysis-reveals-rcmp-targeting-houses-firearms
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: ORG <ORG@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
> Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 03:38:08 +0000
> Subject: CPC AutoResponse / Réponse préenregistrée de la CPP
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for contacting the Commission for Public Complaints Against
> the RCMP. Your message has been received and if necessary, we shall
> respond as soon as possible.
>
> Thank you for your interest and comments.
>
> Nous vous remercions d'avoir communiqué avec la Commission des
> plaintes du public contre la GRC. Nous avons reçu votre message et y
> donnerons suite, si nécessaire, dans les plus brefs délais.
>
> Nous vous remercions de l'intérêt que vous manifestez à l'égard de la
> Commission et de vos commentaires.
>
>


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Emile Blokland <eblokland@highriver.ca>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:38:46 -0600
Subject: Out of Office: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High
River piss me off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith
at the Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email.

I am away from the office August 30, until September 16, 2013
inclusive. In my abscence please contact Deputy Mayor Al Brander at
abrander@highriver.ca

Mayor Emile Blokland



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Josee VALIQUETTE <josee.valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 20:38:36 -0400
Subject: Re: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me
off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the
Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya (Sgt. Valiquette is Away on
September 5th, 2013)
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Hello, I am away today. For any inquiries in regards to "K"
Division Media Relations, please contact S/Sgt. Ron Campbell at
780-412-5268.

Thank you

On 9/5/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <eblokland@highriver.ca>; <christopher@diarmani.com>;
<brian.topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca>;
<Josee.Valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "Dale.McGowan"
<Dale.McGowan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>; <Sylvain.Roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
<bloke@shaw.ca>; "premier" <premier@gov.ab.ca>; "highwood"
<highwood@assembly.ab.ca>; "airdrie" <airdrie@assembly.ab.ca>;
"mclellana" <mclellana@bennettjones.com>; <finditherefirst@gmail.com>;
<Doug.Potts@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
"ppalmater" <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca>; "xchief"
<xchief@bell.blackberry.net>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>;
<jthackray@highriver.ca>; <kevin.rushworth@sunmedia.ca>;
<abrander@highriver.ca>; "Jessica Hume" <jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>;
"greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>; "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>; "MulcaT"
<MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>; "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 9:38 PM
Subject: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me off
today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the Townhall
Meeting tonight for me will ya


http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Tories+Wildrose+exchange+fire+over+High+River+seizures/8866170/story.html

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 02:51:37 -0300
Subject: The latest top cop in High River Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow and
his boss Bob Paulson should be able to explain this email to Greg
Kvisle and the other pissed off folks
To: eblokland@highriver.ca, christopher@diarmani.com,
brian.topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca,
Josee.Valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "Dale.McGowan"
<Dale.McGowan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, Sylvain.Roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
bloke@shaw.ca, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, highwood
<highwood@assembly.ab.ca>, airdrie <airdrie@assembly.ab.ca>, mclellana
<mclellana@bennettjones.com>, finditherefirst@gmail.com,
Doug.Potts@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, ppalmater
<ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca>, xchief <xchief@bell.blackberry.net>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, jthackray@highriver.ca,
kevin.rushworth@sunmedia.ca, abrander@highriver.ca, Jessica Hume
<jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>, "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>

FYI I called Greg Kvisle after I saw him on Sun TV he said he didn't
need any help but he wanted to know who took his guns I told him I
knew but he didn't believe me. Clearly Ken Braat knows Greg Kvisle and
the cops very well. He should be able to tell Kvisle who took his
guns.

http://www.highrivertimes.com/2013/07/29/new-staff-sergeant-to-run-high-river-rcmp

I bet Harper and the RCMP remembers what this Maritimer said about his
old 303s and shoguns when I ran for seat Parliament the first time
after the Maritimers Landslide Annie Mclellan Wayne Easter and a
boatload of corrupt cops pissed me off. If a don't feel free to scroll
down N'esy Pas?

I bet Danielle Smith, Bobby Baby Paulson remembers Robin Reid. Clearly
Insp Dougy Potts and Sgt Ian Shardlow pissed her and a bunch of
Indians off bigtime last year EH?

----- Original Message -----
From: robin reid
To: bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; pm@pm.gc.ca ; people stand up ;
david.raymond.amos@gmail.com ; dominic ; calgary.west@assembly.ab.ca ;
toewsv1@mts.net ; jspottedbear@yahoo.com ; jimsisson@inac.gc.ca ;
hiddenfromhistory1@gmail.com ; admin@turnervalley.ca ;
aimggc@worldnet.att.net ; alex@globalmedicaltourism.com.mx ;
amyrae4@hotmail.com ; archbishop@archtoronto.org ;
barry.shaw@forces.gc.ca ; bewerbung@rothschild.com ;
bishopfh@rcdiocese-calgary.ab.ca ; calgary@jasonkenney.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 11:44 PM
Subject: I SEE NOTHING HAS CHANGED WITHIN YOUR CORRUPT FEDERAL ORGANIZATION

Bob Paulson,
Commissioner of RCMP
Canada.

Mr. Paulson,

I write once again after the disappointing bullshit letter I received
from Inspector Potts, and then my discussion with Sgt. Shardlow
yesterday in Okotoks over assaults, false arrest, murder, all kinds of
nasty things you are responsible for setting people up using your "
interception of private communication ".
You people neglect doing your duty here and as I see what is coming
out in the media, makes one wonder just how much death you have
covered up over the years.
Afraid the truth is coming out is what it seems,hmmmm. And as far as
your arresting officer Degroot goes he seems to have a lot of contact
with Juiliann Barna Reid, as I
asked Shardlow - does this abusing woman work for you????????? Perhaps
you could look into this and get back to me.

Honestly for men you have no balls, just like Harper - has god got
your balls also??????? And then you have your women godly agents who I
am thinking took your balls cuz they are as cruel as you men. Now is
that not shameful.?????? Just as Alison Redford ignored me when she
was justice minister.

You people do not care about children, woman or men in your game of
human abuse for
profit. You always have the same excuse.

Now Mr. Paulson, since you are at the top, do you condone these lies
and abuse of children, woman and men ???????

I do have some other concerns from many years ago involving the
okotoks RCMP putting the blame on 1 officer, an Indian, are you racist
Mr. Paulson, do you condone white supremacy and genocide upon the
Indian people and then every other race by thair own ????? Just as the
security guard who assaulted me - thair excuse was he just got out of
security school.

Also Mr. Paulson do you carry the dead peasant insurance upon your
workers???????? how does one find out if this type of insurance is on
people and who has used