Friday, 15 November 2013

A little Deja Vu for the neo con lawyer Arty Baby Hamilton and his pal Tricky Dicky Dearden whom I heard on CBC @ AIH ce soir and my message for Michael Sona's lawyer Boxal about Harper, Elections Canada and Sun Media on April 9th

From: Terrence O'Sullivan <>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 07:13:43 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: A little Deja Vu for the neo con lawyer Arty
Baby Hamilton and his pal Tricky Dicky Dearden whom I heard on CBC @
AIH ce soir and my message for Michael Sona's lawyer Boxal about
Harper, Elections Canada and Sun Media on April 9th
To: David Amos <>

I am away on vacation and will return to the office on Friday,
November 22nd. I will have only limited access to voicemail and
email. If your message is urgent, please call 416.598.1744 and ask
to speak to my assistant.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 03:13:26 -0400
Subject: A little Deja Vu for the neo con lawyer Arty Baby Hamilton
and his pal Tricky Dicky Dearden whom I heard on CBC @ AIH ce soir and
my message for Michael Sona's lawyer Boxal about Harper, Elections
Canada and Sun Media on April 9th
To:,,, "<>"
<>, ahamilton
<>,,, "joshua.skurnik"
Cc: David Amos <>, aih <>,,


Clearly the lawyer Boxal and the crooked Sun Media dudes ignored me
for obvious reasons. However now I am confused to hear Tricky Dicky
Dearden speak of Elections Canada and the doings of his old buddy Arty
Baby Hamilton on CBC tonight. Whereas he now represents the Ottawa
Citizen instead of Harper ya think Dearden and his clients within the
Ottawa Citizen would recall the old file I called "Upper Canadians" in
2004 while he worked for Shiela Fraser?

How can Dearden ethically dig into the doings of his old neo con
clients for journalists particularly when legions of people he know
their secrets? I can't be the only guy paying attention. I would be
willing to lay odds that it was Arty Baby Hamilton who enlisted
Dearden to speak to defend the Boyz in Blue when the lawyer Allan
Riddell sued Stevey Boy Harper and Donny Plett (Now theres another
very interesting Senator to mean old me So many and so little time

Methinks the very unethical bureaucrats, polititicians, journalists
and lawyers have got a lot of a conflicts of interests to consider but
my fellow Canadian citizens certianly don't It is our common interests
that are being abused. Some people are getting fairly disgusted that
the cops and politicians don't even pretend to give a damn about
anything other than their own reputation anymore. However the number
of people who truly care number too few to bring about true change in
any election.

The fact that the mindless Trudeau the Younger and Mayor Ford are high
in the polls and always in the news affirms to me that most folks
don't give a good god damn about politicians anymore. Folks know you
are all as crooked as hell so most would rather watch a circus instead
of paying attention to more malicious nonsense. I bet most folks
didn't even notice Harper and Baird supporting Obama in September as
he threatened to bomb the hell out of another country that did not
attack the USA EH?

History should record the Russians being the peace keepers while
Canadians acted like war mongers.

I hope an interesting part of this email for the history buffs someday
should be the fact that the newly created Conservative Party, the
Bloc, the NDP and even the Green Meanies knew the awful truth of what
went on between the Libranos, the RCMP and I BEFORE the War in Iraq
began. I made certian of it before the writ was ever dropped for
election of the 38th Parliament. Hell after Harper and I crossed paths
in Sussex NB
in June of 2004 the dummy announced that he knew something about
Arar's matters. (That was Harper's big understatement of the year
while trying to be Prime Minister EH?) I made certain everybody and
his dog knew that I called Arty Hamilton and the sneaky lawyer Veena
Verma in a heartbeat as soon as it was known that Waldman wanted
Harper to testify. Thats why Verma and Arty got the same letter and
documents etc.

In case folks are afraid of attachments here is a few links to the
same letters uploaded in Scribd

YOU MUST remember the letter entitled "Upper Canadains". Amongst the
people I addressed was you and I obviously sent it to YOUR lawyer Arty
Baby Hamilton. Clearly Elections Canada did answer me with their
usual bullshit. Its a small wonder to me why the crooks in Elections
Canada are working hard to frame a 22 year old kid in order to cover
up the truth about you people. They did the same for the Libranos when
they had
the keys to the PMO/PCO offices. N'esy Pas Mr Minister of Justice
Petey Baby MacKay????

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369

P.S. Try denying the existence of the emails below or the pdf files
hereto attached I Double Dog Dare Ya. It is rather well known that I
publish a lot of my emails (Including this one) in various blogs etc
However I also make copies of many emails in a Pdf file form to use as
evidence in court. The fact that several of my email accounts were
maliciously deleted by my foes is quite simply irrelevant. The RCMP
and the CSE etc
no doubt know why I back up a save everything important many times and
in many places. The funny part is they can't seem to figure out why I
send so much documentation to so many seemingly unrelated people at
the same time. Anyway after all is said and done the latest Boss of J
Division Roger Brown must admit that his fellow Newfy Byron Prior
provided my documents relating to him to the crooked Newfy lawyers
Rob Moore and Andrew House for Vic Toews to study and ignore when he
was the Minister of Justice in 2006 when Harper was compelled to

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <>
To: <>; <>;
<>; <>;
<>; <>;
<>; <>;
<>; <>;
<>; <>; <>;
<>; <>; <>;
<>; <>; <>;
<>; <>;
<>; <>
Cc: <>; <>;
<>; <>;
<>; <>;
<>; <>;
<>; <>;
<>; <>;
<>; <>;
<>; <>
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 5:23 PM
Subject: Hey Tricky Dicky Dearden say hey to your client Stevey Boy
Harper for me will ya?

Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 4,926
Domain Name ? (Canada)
IP Address 137.122.142.# (University of Ottawa)
ISP University of Ottawa
Location Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Firefox
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:
Gecko/20080623 Firefox/
Javascript version 1.5
Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Jul 16 2008 11:36:48 am
Last Page View Jul 16 2008 11:36:48 am
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL
Search Engine
Search Words "jean-pierre kingsley" and "university of ottawa"
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo.../03/me-and-bush.html
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo.../03/me-and-bush.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Jul 16 2008 10:36:48 am
Visit Number 4,926

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <>
To: <>
Cc: <>; <>
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 12:43 PM
Subject: The RCMP stormed Harpers HQ years after they stormed Juliet
O'Neil's house right after I sent her Landslide Annie's answer to me.

Remember me Tricky Dicky former lawyer for Sheila Fraser, Juliet
O'Neil and now Stevey Boy Harper?'Neill

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:56:28 -0300
Subject: The RCMP stormed Harpers HQ the Commissioner of Election
Canada understands the importance of emails do you?

the digital world is a wonderful; place. However signed documents are a
hell of thing. Are they not?

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: ; ; ; ;
Cc: ; ; ;
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 4:31 PM
Subject: Say hey to Arthur Hamilton and Peter Mackay for me will ya?

I remember you Mr Deardon. Remember me? You were the Auditor General,
Sheila Fraser's lawyer in the Gomery matter. The last thing you are is
ethical EH? I also remember quite a crowd of you dudes from McCarthy
over the years as well. Need a I say you are all less honourable than
"AL" If you think I am a liar sue me, will ya. One thing I know for
certain Stevey Boy Harper won't have Parliamentry immunity when I sue

PM invokes immunity to avoid testifying at ex-candidate's libel trial
Tim Naumetz, The Ottawa Citizen
Published: Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Prime Minister Stephen Harper is claiming parliamentary immunity to
avoid giving evidence in a libel lawsuit launched by a prominent
Ottawa lawyer who stepped aside as an election candidate to make way
for sponsorship whistleblower Allan Cutler.

Mr. Harper's lawyer, Richard Dearden, told court yesterday sections of
the Constitution and the Parliament of Canada Act prevent the prime
minister from being compelled to testify in the legal action by lawyer
Alan Riddell as long as Parliament is in session.

Mr. Dearden served notice of the immunity claim in legal documents he
filed before he and a lawyer for the Conservative party, Robert
Houston, convinced a judge yesterday to postpone a trial that was to
begin this week on a claim related to the libel action.

"It's absolute," Mr. Dearden said after presenting his arguments to
Justice Monique Metivier.

"Any member of Parliament can invoke parliamentary privilege when
Parliament is in session. No reasons need be given."

Allan Riddell has sued Mr. Harper and Don Plett, the president of the
Conservative party, over their claims in November 2005 there was no
agreement between Mr. Riddell and the party for him to step aside to
let Mr. Cutler run in the campaign that fall.

The agreement, which a Superior Court judge ruled last year had been
reached between Mr. Riddell and the Conservatives, included a promise
that Mr. Riddell would be compensated for expenses he incurred while
campaigning for the Conservative nomination in Ottawa South.

But the Conservative party claims the agreement also included an
unstated term of confidentiality, which it says Mr. Riddell breached
when he publicly disclosed its existence.

The trial Judge Metivier postponed to an unscheduled date was to have
decided whether the agreement included a clause of confidentiality.

Superior Court Justice Denis Power ruled last year that, even if there
was a confidentiality clause, the agreement continued to exist even
though Mr. Riddell disclosed its existence. The trial of Mr. Riddell's
libel claims against Mr. Harper and Mr. Plett is not scheduled to
begin until February.

But the acrimonious atmosphere of the legal proceedings that have
taken place behind close doors so far, primarily in examinations of
discovery to gather evidence, surfaced as Mr. Houston, Mr. Dearden and
Tom Conway, Mr. Riddell's lawyer, exchanged barbs before the judge.

Mr. Dearden told Judge Metivier he had been "ambushed" by Mr. Conway
with last-minute information.

Meanwhile, Mr. Houston reacted angrily to statements Mr. Conway made
about the Conservative party's wish to keep the agreement with Riddell
"a secret."

Mr. Conway claimed the Conservatives wanted to delay the trial over
the confidentiality clause because they had "painted themselves in a

The claim of secrecy creates an unwholesome image of "cigar-smoking
backroom boys" cutting a political deal behind closed doors, Mr.
Conway said.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <>
To: <>
Cc: <>; <>;
<>; <>; <>;
<>; <>;
<>; <>; <>
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:34 AM
Subject: RE: Response from the OAG Communications I just called your
old lawyer Ms. Fraser he played dumb as usual

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Communications <>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 09:34:14 -0400
Subject: Response from the OAG Communications / Réponse du BVG Communications
To: David Amos <>


Thank you for the email that you sent to the Office of the Auditor
General of Canada.

This response has been automatically generated to let you know that we
have received your email and that it will be actioned in one of the
following ways:

* If you are requesting a copy of a report, your request will be
processed by our distribution centre.

* If you are sending us comments about a federal government department
program or activity, your message will be forwarded to the appropriate
audit team.

* If you are sending us a complimentary message about the work of our
Office, your message will be forwarded to the Auditor General and her

We will respond to your message as soon as possible. However, due to
the large volume of mail that we receive, the time that it takes us to
respond will vary. Certain enquiries may require research and
consultation with our subject-matter specialists. Therefore, it may
take us up to 20 working days to respond to your query.

The Office of the Auditor General offers services in both Canadian
official languages, and we will reply in the language used in your

Please note: We will not forward messages on your behalf to any
Government of Canada organization, program, service, or
representative, and we do not respond to correspondence that contains
offensive language.

Office of the Auditor General of Canada



Le Bureau du vérificateur général du Canada vous remercie de votre courriel.

Cet accusé de réception vous est envoyé automatiquement pour vous
informer que nous donnerons suite à votre courriel en fonction de sa
nature. Ainsi :

* si vous demandez un rapport, votre demande sera traitée par notre
centre de distribution;

* si vous nous envoyez des commentaires au sujet d'un programme ou
d'une activité du gouvernement fédéral, votre courriel sera transmis à
l'équipe de vérification compétente;

* si vous nous transmettez des félicitations relativement aux travaux
du Bureau, votre message sera transmis à la vérificatrice générale et
à son équipe.

Nous vous répondrons dès que possible. Cependant, en raison du fort
volume de correspondance que nous recevons, le délai pourrait être
plus ou moins long. Dans certains cas, nous devons mener des
recherches ou des consultations auprès de nos spécialistes en la
matière. Par conséquent, il pourrait s'écouler jusqu'à 20 jours
ouvrables avant que nous soyons en mesure de vous répondre.

Le Bureau du vérificateur général offre des services dans les deux
langues officielles du Canada. Par conséquent, nous vous répondrons
dans la langue officielle utilisée dans votre message électronique.

Remarque : Veuillez prendre note que nous ne transmettrons pas de
messages en votre nom aux organisations, programmes, services ou
représentants du gouvernement du Canada, et que nous ne répondons pas
à la correspondance contenant des propos grossiers.

Direction des communications
Bureau du vérificateur général du Canada

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <>
To: <>; <>
Cc: "David Amos" <>
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 5:42 PM
Subject: I just called and left a message for Michael Sona's lawyer
about Harper, Elections Canada and Sun Media

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Phone: 613-604-2188

Fax: 613-236-6958


Mr. Boxall is a founding partner of Bayne Sellar Boxall.

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:21:11 -0300
Subject: Mikey Duffy and the lawyers Petey MacKay and Arty Hamilton
should remember the file called "Upper Canadians" quite well EH Mr
To: MulcaT <>,,
"justin.trudeau.a1" <>, "Kory.Teneycke"
<>, byline <>, ahamilton
<>, mikeduffy <>,
Mackap <>, pm <>,,
Cc: David Amos <>, acampbell
<>, "steve.murphy" <>, wallinp
<>, mbastarache <>,
"steve.graham" <>, "greg.horton"

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <>
To: <>; <>;
<>; <>; <>;
<>; <>; <>;
<>; <>; <>;
Cc: "pm" <>; <>; <>;
"maritime_malaise" <>
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2011 12:48 AM
Subject: RE: Catch 22 Here are some documents that can embarass the hell out
of Harper etc

Anyone can down load these documents

Trust that I have LOTS more.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <>
To: <>; <>;
<>; <>; <>;
<>; <>;
<>; <>;
<>; <>;
<>; <>;
<>; <>;
<>; <>;
<>; <>;
<>; <>;
<>; <>; <>;
<>; <>
Cc: <>
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 7:05 PM
Subject: Harper claimed in Question Period today that Nigel Wright is
the only person responsible??? Well ALL the unethical politicians and
the RCMP must recall that Michel Bastarache is the former LIBERAL
Senator Harb's lawyer and he knows it all Correct Alward?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:22:27 -0300
Subject: Harper claimed in Question Period today that Nigel Wright is
the only person responsible??? Well ALL the unethical politicians and
the RCMP must recall that Michel Bastarache is the former LIBERAL
Senator Harb's lawyer and he knows it all Correct Alward?
To: premier <>, "david.alward" <>,

Hoka Hey Mr Alward

After question period was over to day I heard the Speaker say the
local Minister of Indian Affairs (for one more year) was in the
gallery watchiing the circus.

Anyway do you or the RCMP or the lawyer Mulcair or Trudeau the Younger or
Sun TV or or your blogging butt buddy Chucky Leblanc or anyone else remember
my email to Duffy, Harper and their cohorts last night? I posted it
in a blog as soon as I sent it Correct? If so what was with all the
dumb questions to Harper today?

You know as well as I that I made certain since 2002 that all the
smiling bastards have known the awful truth of my concerns about
the severe lack of integrity of lawyers, cops, bureaucrats, the media
and parliamentarians etc. I have recieved too many answers for you
bastards to deny the obvious. Anyway the attachments I sent with
the email below were wickedly wonderful for a crook such as Duffy
to get EH?

At least the evil old French lawyer's computer was honest N'esy Pas Mr Alward?

After that check this out.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <>
To: <>; <>
Cc: "Duceppe. G" <>; "layton. j" <>;
"MichaelB. Murphy" <>; <>
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 1:00 PM
Subject: It was a pleasure talking to you Mr Bastarache see you all in court.

I wonder if Harper amd Mac Harb's lawyer Bastarache remember that
wicked email from early 2009 and recall the sound files that were
attached to it.

Trust that Duffy got them too a long time ago just like Layton,
Murphy, Ducceppe and YOU did EH Rob Moore?.

(Trust that I will be forwarding this email to many others in a heartbeat)

FYI below is the last email I ever sent Mac Harb and Harper before
Harb supposedly paid what he owed and snuck out the back door of
parliament to collect a big pension just like the very crooked liberal
lawyer Davey Dingwall did (Did ya see the sneaky bastard talking to
the equally sneaky David Akin on Sun TV on election night in Nova
Scotia?) Does anyone rember when and why I pounced on his lawyer Ivan
Whitehall when he was a partner at Heenan Blaikie in 2005? (Heres you
clue check the Gomery Inquiry) Liberals love being entitled to their
entitlements and they make sure they get them when they hire the well
connected lawyers hanging their hats at your law firm EH Mr Chretien?

On Jun 12, 2013 CBC posted the following words.
"Harb resigned from the Liberal caucus in the wake of the May 13 Senate
report, saying he would fight the findings in court. He is now sitting as an
Independent and has retained Michel Bastarache, a retired Supreme
Court justice, as his lawyer."

I have no doubt whatsoever that Harb quit bullshitting about his
willingness to litigate and quit while he was ahead on the advice of the
evil bastard Bastarache because I have been keeping Bastarche and
his partners in Heenan Blaikie constantly updated as to what I was up to
since early 2004. Furthermore not long after I sent the email below I
called Harb's office again and asked to speak to him personally. The lady
who answered his phone said he was not there as usual. So I asked her
if she was the one receiving my emails. She said yes. I asked her if Harb
and his lawyer were aware of them. She said she printed every one of
them and put the Hard Copy on Harb's desk to review. She had no idea
if Bastarche knew anything. I thanked her for her honesty and told her to
tell Harb to call me before I talked to his lawyer again. I did not bother
calling Bastarche once I heard Harb quit. However clearly I keep the
evil old bastard informed particularly when I am talking about him.

I suspect that the crook Harb wanted the taxpayer dimes to pay for
Hard Copy of all my emails and whatever else he wished to take with
him when he left his office on the hill in far away Upper Canada.
I bet mean Mikey Duffy has done the same thing N'esy Pas?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369

P.S After Question period was over I heard Ted Hsu yap as the 68th speaker
and the next to the last to comment before a vote on Harper's latest omnibus
budget bill. This was all said to a deaf ear to a sneaky NDP deputy speaker.
When the Green Meany Dizzy Lizzy May chimed in with her two bits about the
worried crooked bureaucrats within the NRC. I shook my head and
laughed at the true nonsense of it all. Well they can all cry me a
river. I know for a fact that the May and Hsu do not mean a single
word they say. Furthermore the bloggers and Internet research dudes
within the NRC based on the UNB campus Fat Fred City should be laid
off and the office shut down in its entirety ASAP. They are all just
over paid bureaucratic spin doctors for Harper or whomever wins the
next federal mandate.


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <>
To: "mikeduffy" <>; "greg.horton"
<>; "Biage.Carrese"
<>; "brazep" <>; "harbm"
<>; "pm" <>; "justin.trudeau.a1"
<>; "justmin" <>; "leader"
<>; "MulcaT" <>; <>;
<>; "bob.paulson" <>;
"Kevin.leahy" <>; <>;
<>; <>; "jcarney"
<>; <>
Cc: "David Amos" <>; "Dale.McGowan"
<>; "bernadine.chapman"
<>; "Leanne.Fitch"
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 7:21 PM
Subject: While your mindless boss Biage Carrese is away perhaps YOU should
finally respond to me EH Cpl Greg Horton?

----- Original Message -----
From: Biage Carrese <>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 18:00:31 -0400
Subject: Re: What a joke the mindless lawyer Mulcair is EH Mikey Duffy
and Cpl Greg Horton? (OUT OF OFFICE/ABSENT )
To: David Amos <>

I will be away from the office August 8th to and including August
23rd. Plse contact Insp. Costa Dimopoulos if you require assistance

Je serai absent et à l'extérieur du pays du 8 au 23 aout. Si vous
avez besoin d'assistance, SVP communiquez avec l'insp. Costa
Dimopoulos. (613-993-6912).

From: "Bastarache, Michel (Heenan Blaikie)" <>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 23:21:32 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Mikey Duffy and the lawyers Petey
MacKay and Arty Hamilton should remember the file called "Upper
Canadians" quite well EH Mr Harper
To: David Amos <>

Je serai absent jusqu`au 1er novembre 2013. Vous pouvez communiquez
avec mon adjointe Louise Belleau au 613-236-1668.

I will be away from the office until November 1st, 2013. If you
require assistance, please contact my assistant Louise Belleau at

Merci / Thank you
M Bastarache


Michel Bastarache
Avocat-Conseil / Counsel
T 613 236.3488
F 866 441.2699
55, rue Metcalfe, bureau 300, Ottawa (Ontario) Canada K1P 6L5
55 Metcalfe Street, Suite 300, Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1P 6L5

Ce courriel pourrait contenir des renseignements confidentiels ou
privilégiés. Si vous n'êtes pas le véritable destinataire, veuillez
nous en aviser immédiatement. Merci.

This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately. Thank

Wright's $90K offer to Mike Duffy had conditions, RCMP say
Duffy told not to talk to media in exchange for money
By Meagan Fitzpatrick, CBC News
Posted: Jul 5, 2013 12:21 PM ET
Related Stories
Who's who in the Senate expense controversy
Duffy expense saga still riles readers
Senator Mac Harb repays $51K in expenses
Brazeau's Senate salary to be docked 20% to repay expenses
Senator Brazeau unlikely to repay expenses by deadline
Nigel Wright's $90,000 payment to cover Senator Mike Duffy's expenses was
offered only with certain conditions, according to court documents that also
show several people in the Prime Minister's Office knew about the offer.

New details about the payment and the circumstances around it are contained
in an application to the court by the RCMP seeking documents from the Senate
and other material for its investigation of Duffy's expense claims.

RCMP investigator Cpl. Greg Horton wrote he has reasonable grounds to
believe Duffy committed breach of trust and fraud on the government because
of inappropriate expense claims and because he accepted the money from

a.. Who's who in the Senate expense controversy
Wright was Prime Minister Stephen Harper's chief of staff who resigned over
the matter once it was reported in the media in May.

The RCMP met with Wright's two lawyers on June 19, and they revealed that
while there was no written contract between Wright and Duffy, Wright asked
for two conditions to be met in return for the $90,000: that Duffy stop
talking to the media and that he reimburse the government immediately with
the money.

The lawyers, Patrick McCann and Peter Mantas, said Wright was not directed
by anyone to make the offer, that he believed it was the ethical thing to do
so that taxpayers weren't on the hook, and that he and Duffy were not

But the decision came only after the Conservative Party of Canada considered
paying the bill for Duffy's inappropriately claimed expenses when it was
thought he owed $32,000. The party has a fund controlled by Duffy's
colleague in the upper chamber, Senator Irving Gerstein.

When the amount owed jumped to $90,000, the party decided it was too much to
cover. Duffy was concerned he didn't have the money to cover the
reimbursement, the lawyers told the RCMP, and he was also worried that if he
didn't claim a primary residence in Prince Edward Island, his eligibility
for a Senate seat would be at risk.

Some PMO staff knew
Senators Patrick Brazeau and Mac Harb have been asked to pay taxpayers back
for housing and travel allowance claims. Harb paid $51,000 back on Friday.

a.. Read about Harb's repayment
Wright didn't offer to cover their expenses, the lawyers said. He got a bank
draft from CIBC on March 25 that went to Duffy's lawyer, then Duffy wrote a
personal cheque to pay the government.

Harper says he didn't know about Wright giving the money to Duffy until it
was revealed in the media and in question period on May 28. The prime
minister said Wright made the decision on his own and kept the matter to
himself until May 15.

But the court documents say Wright let the RCMP know on June 21 that he told
Gerstein and three people in Harper's office that he was going to write
Duffy a cheque: David van Hemmen, Chris Woodcock, and Benjamin Perrin.

Perrin worked in the Prime Minister's Office as Harper's legal adviser and
some media reports have said he was involved in arranging the Duffy deal, a
claim he denies. Perrin issued a statement on May 21 saying he "was not
consulted on, and did not participate in" Wright's decision and that he
never talked to Harper about the matter. He recently left his job in the PMO
and is employed by the University of British Columbia.

Conditions attached
Van Hemmen worked as Wright's assistant and Woodcock is director of issues
management in the PMO.

The RCMP investigator says in the court document that he believes the
conditions attached to the payment offer back up the idea that there was an
agreement between Wright and Duffy involving the $90,000 and the Senate
report that ended up not being critical of the Prince Edward Island senator.

It has been reported in the media that Duffy agreed to say publicly he made
a mistake and was paying the money back in exchange for Wright actually
paying the money and a Senate report that would go easy on him.

This would amount to fraud on Duffy's part, according to the RCMP, and his
per diems and his housing allowance that he should not have claimed would be
breach of trust.

The documents lay out details of how the Senate report on Duffy's expenses
was amended by Conservative senators David Tkachuk and Carolyn
Stewart-Olsen. Stewart-Olsen was interviewed by the RCMP and said the report
removed the critical portions about Duffy because he had paid the money
back, she didn't know Wright actually paid the money, and that no one told
her and Tkachuk to change the report from its draft versions.

Duffy was reached by CBC News on Friday and said he had no comment. Wright's
lawyer said he is co-operating with the RCMP and has no further comment.

Harper's spokesman, Andrew MacDougall, was asked by CBC News to respond to a
long list of questions Friday including what role, if any, van Hemmen,
Woodcock, Perrin played and whether Harper knew his party was willing to pay
for Duffy.

"This file was handled by Nigel Wright and he has taken sole responsibility
for his decision to provide his personal funds to Duffy," MacDougall
responded, adding that the court document states Harper was not aware of the
offer and found out about it on May 15.

CBC News also asked Conservative party president John Walsh a series of
questions. Party spokesman Fred DeLorey responded instead by saying only
that the Conservative Fund did not pay for Duffy's expenses.

NDP MP Alexandre Boulerice said the details revealed by the court document
are "troubling." He said in an interview that Harper's version of events "is
just not true."

"It's not a personal issue between Mr. Wright and Mr. Duffy because there
was a first attempt to cover up this scandal by the Conservative Party," he

Boulerice said he wants to know if Harper knew the party was going to pay
for Duffy and whether he asked his staff who was involved once the news
about Wright's payment broke.

"There's a lot of questions to answer now and Mr. Harper should do the right
thing and tell the truth," he said.

Heritage Minister James Moore said Friday that anyone who abuses the system
should be held accountable and should "leave public office with their head
hung in shame."

"I think when you see people like Senator Duffy or others taking taxpayers'
money, using it in an arrogant, irresponsible and perhaps illegal way, I
think taxpayers are rightfully upset, rightfully mad and they should be," he
told reporters at an event.

Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau said it's curious that the Conservative party
would be willing to pay for Duffy to "make his problems go away" and that
Harper has not been transparent with Canadians.

"It's been a real disappointment and it's frustrating, quite frankly, to
have to be learning about what happened in the Prime Minister's Office
through a very serious police investigation, and this Prime Minister has
completely lost any credibility with the Canadian people because of his
mishandling of this scandal," Trudeau told reporters.

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: ; ; ;
Pelletier, Raymond F. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; Brian
Mulcahy ; ; ; ; ;
Cc: Governor Office ; ; ; ; ; ;
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; Byron
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 12:52 PM
Subject: Small wonder the lady speaking for Bernard Shapiro believed me

. Senator Joe Day should have given him my material a long long time
ago. I thought Howie Wilson still had the job because everything was
kinda murky within Strategis at the time and nobody would respond to
me. Since my affairs in the USA are beginning to develop in a positive
direction, now Joe Day and the others are just starting to pretend
that they are ethical? Not on my watch. I have yet to find out who the
hell the Ethics Counselor is for the Senate but rest assured I will
find out and forward him all that I will send to you. Good luck with
your conscience folks. Perhaps someone should call me soon. 506

Friday the 13th of August, 2004

Senator Joseph A. Day
14 Everett St.
Hampton, NB

Prime Minister, Paul Martin
80 Wellington Street
Ottawa, ON. K1A 0A2

Eva Plunkett Inspector General (CSIS)
340 Laurier Avenue West
Ottawa, ON. K1A 0P8

Ethics Counselor, Howard Wilson
66 Slater St., 22nd Floor
Ottawa, ON. K1A 0C9

Geoff Reagan c/o Irwin Cotler,
900 Justice Building
Ottawa, ON. K1A 0A6

Philippe Rabot
RCMP External Review Committee
P.O. Box 1159, Station B
Ottawa, ON. K1P 5R2

RE: Corruption

Hey Joe,

The fact that you said I was not worth voting for is no matter to me.
I just wish my fellow Canadians had the right to vote you out of your
job. That is one thing I agree with Mr. Lord about. To me you are just
another lawyer who couldn't get elected so you were politically
appointed to a high government position for the benefit of Irving
interests. Now that you are in public service not only must you obey
the Code of Conduct of your chosen profession, you must act ethically
as a well paid federal employee and speak for the public good. Forget
your former employer's interests and do your job.

It is time to check the work of many high officials and mine as well.
I demand that you study of the enclosed material then forward it all
to the Prime Minister Paul Martin. Ask him to forward copies of it all
to the other above named government employees and to the Arar
Commission in particular. I can easily prove prior contact to all the
above named persons or their offices and I believe they should be
expecting to see this stuff. The CD of the copy of wiretap tape
numbered 139 is served upon you as an officer of the court in
confidence in order that it may be properly investigated. I have given
you many more documents than the ones I will mention in the following
paragraphs. I will send a copy of this letter to many people as a
double check on your ethics.

One of the documents of foremost importance to me is a recent letter
Attorney General Brad Green sent to me dated August 3rd. It is
attached to the letter and all the other material I had delivered to
Bernard Lord and Frank McKenna just after Canada Day. I deem the
aforesaid letter to be so important because he is the first Canadian
public servant in any office to even admit knowledge my concerns and
allegations in two months of waiting for a proper response. His
position in public service and his answer forever prove just how bad
things really are in Canada and the USA. I am not sorry for the delay
in providing you with this material as I planned and stated within the
enclosed email. If you had wanted it, you would have returned my calls
or answered my email.

I had spoken to many people about my concerns as I ran for Parliament.
I made certain that the proper authorities knew of my allegations the
instant I was on Canadian soil. If our government was on the up and
up, someone should have sent the cops around to pick this stuff up or
at least ask me a few questions a long time ago. I cannot wait any
longer for my country to act properly in my defense. The Yankees now
want me in court.

The recent letter from Brad Green and the actions of some other bad
actors in Fredericton and the USA gave me cause to pause, rethink and
rewrite a bunch of stuff. One would think that Henrick Tonning, the
first judge that Green had ever appointed or the unnamed duty counsel
in court on the first day of Brad's new plan to defend the rights of
the people would have informed him that I was very pissed off and
still in New Brunswick. The Sheriff who refused to identify himself in
Henrik's court that day was more than willing to take me away and
under his jurisdiction. What province writes the Sheriff's paycheck?
Even the local rumormill had enough time to generate enough gossip
from July 29th to August 3rd for Brad Green to be adequately informed
before he wrote such a ridiculous letter to me. Clearly Brad paid no
heed my fair warning to lawyers about making one false move. Maybe he
should call the former Attorney General in New Hampshire and ask Peter
Heed why he paid no heed to me. Now I will prove to both Mr Heed and
Brad Green that I wasn't joking and that I am well within the
jurisdiction of law enforcement in both New Brunswick and New

If the Fredericton City Police arrest me as I approach the legislature
one day very soon, Brad Green, Bruce Noble and I will have lots to
argue about in years to come in many courts. I will be filing a
complaint against them and several others with the Law Society anyway.
I am looking to hire an ethical lawyer to sue the bastards long before
the Law Society gets around to figuring out how to ignore my
allegations. What would you do if you were I? Do you know an ethical
lawyer that I can discuss this with? Or would I fare better if I acted
ethically in a Pro Se fashion?

My encounter with the Ombudsman, Bernard Richard proved much to me
about NB politicians. I didn't believe what he said about Wayne
Steeves the second he mentioned Connie Fogal. He tried so hard to
argue about jurisdiction that he maintained Rule One of the Code of
Professional Conduct of the New Brunswick Law Society is not about
integrity but jurisdiction. No lawyer is that dumb and the last thing
I would want is such a man to speak for me. So I promptly told him I
would see him in court and ended our conversation. He was obviously
arguing against me for the benefit of Brad Green rather than making a
sincere and ethical effort to listen to me and address my concerns to
the powers that be on my behalf. Richard likely has few Liberal
friends to chum with. For all I know he may have just got back from
Larry's Gulch so I allowed him to continue on the fishing expedition
byway of email. For his information just in case he is that dumb, I
brought up the subject of integrity so he would stop arguing
jurisdiction and act more ethically and diligently as a lawyer. When
he continued, I quit talking and sought proof of contact. Lawyers must
maintain their integrity no matter the jurisdiction or issue.

I can easily refute the jurisdictional argument of both Mr. Richard
and Brad Green. I am used to that legal dodge. Thirty-three years ago
a RCMP officer charged me with speeding by within the city limits of
Fredericton. When I questioned his jurisdiction the Crown was quick to
inform me that the RCMP have jurisdiction over everyone everywhere in
Canada. If I were to unbuckle my seat belt in defiance of a NB law as
I drove to Hampton to serve this material upon a lawyer employed as a
Senator in the federal government, in what court would I appear? What
if I served this material upon the cop that had the authority stop me?
If the matter was heard in Hampton or Sussex Provincial Court
shouldn't Judge Henrik Tonning immediately recuse himself because of
his words to me in court on July 29th. Would I not have the right to
make a federal case out of what began as a seat belt offense and
change the jurisdiction to the USA?

A far better example is what happened on June 24th. A man who claimed
represent the Crown as the Sergeant at Arms in the New Brunswick
legislature claimed that he and the Fredericton PD had jurisdiction
over me and the right to throw me out of the public building. However
when I tried to give them this stuff as the Deputy Prime Minister Anne
McLellan and Attorney General Brad Green have both suggested, they
refused. What right did they have to do so? Should I file a complaint
against the Crown in the USA? I was thrown out of a building in NB.
Who defends the Crown if not Green?

Senator Day, make certain that Jack Hooper of CSIS sends someone to
see the priest, Bill Elliott and get the stuff I gave to him the night
of his debate on June 21st. Everybody in the churchyard watched that
old man holler at me as I gave it to him. Now Mr. Waldman can listen
to what Mr. Harper was harping about on June 22nd on the CBC, As I
told the priest there were three original wiretap tapes within that
envelope I gave him. The tapes are important evidence for the Arar
Commission. If nothing else their mere existence proves how far the
FEDS in two countries will go to cover things up. Let me know if the
priest denies he got them or Hooper won't give them up, I have several
more hidden in Canada that the Arar Commission can have. Hooper can
hoop and holler about National Security all he wants. I must protect
my ass if he won't, If you look at the photo I have provided, you will
see me talking to a RCMP officer that was guarding Harper in Sussex on
June 19th. Now you know what I was talking about to him. What I want
to know is that cop's name. Harper wasn't long spilling the beans to
his political advantage on CBC but his lawyers weren't long shutting
him up on June 24th after Waldman demanded that he testify at the
Inquiry. Why is that?

Waldman should have known of me if Arar's lawyers at CCR in the USA
had kept him properly informed. Rest assured that I did as soon as I
became aware of him. During our conversation I know I said enough for
him to check my words. His silence spoke volumes.

Mr. Arar's lawyers had no fear of filing a complaint against Ashcroft
and the others in the USA after they received my stuff last November.
I see no further progress with that suit since it was filed last
January. Why have they ignored me? Did they make a deal and settle?
Why have they fallen so silent within the inquiry in Canada?

If you don't believe me about what Mr. Harper knows, call Arthur
Hamilton and ask him about the little talk we had about this a little
while ago. Mr. Hamilton can never say he doesn't know because I saved
his voicemail to me. I have no doubt that he has had a long talk with
our new MP Rob Moore by now. Why are they so silent?

I have many questions to ask Geoff Regan and Anne McLellan about the
Arar Commission. Geoff has no time to return my call but lots of time
to golf with Clinton and McKenna. I demand to know if the many
documents that caused the delay in the inquiry were mine. If not, why
not? I did do as Anne McLellan suggested and gave this stuff to both
Customs and Immigration the instant I landed in Canadian jurisdiction.
If I am not called to testify, I will never understand. I did manage
to talk to Veena Verma and she had no answers for me only arguments
about jurisdiction as usual.

Your friend, Mr. Zed can never say he don't know because as you can
see I served his law office this stuff on June 25th the day before he
and John Herron greeted Paul Martin at the airport. After your review
of this stuff you must confess it is obvious to all why Paul Zed and
his friend Frank McKenna have been struck so dumb. Paul Zed was
elected to speak for that politically minded priest amongst others,
correct? Perhaps after they voted according to their conscience they
should act according to it as well.

I know that I have proved what everybody knows. The word of a lawyer
is worthless. Peter MacKay also proved that to all the true
Progressive Conservatives in Canada. The fact that another lawyer,
John Crosbie advised the former Alliance party on what to say is too
funny and sad for the words of this letter. One reason I came home and
ran for Parliament is to sooth my own soul because I found Mr. Harper
and his buddies to be a truly dangerous bunch of characters. Crosbie
did too for awhile anyway. Ain't it funny how he now sings a different
tune? There is no doubt that the old lawyer Paul Martin is a
monumental a crook. The boat in Sidney proved that to me two days
after the election. He can play well within Mulroney's league. It was
truly sad that so many Canadians were compelled to vote for Martin
simply because they were too scared that Harper may lead our country
down a garden path and under an evil Bush.

Perhaps the NDP should check my work closely and then help me expose
all the crooks in both the Liberal and Conservative camps. I will give
this stuff to their local lawyer leader Ms. Weir. Maybe it is time for
the NDP to shine for the benefit of all Canadians. Even though the NDP
have only 19 seats in Parliament I believe they have the power to
inspire a non-confidence vote and cause another election. I think the
NDP politicians should think about the following statement a long time
then review how they made out in the last election. I did say at the
Moss Glen debate that the NDP party was the best spot to place a vote.
However NDP people I know argued with me saying that if they did that
their vote would be wasted and Harper might get in, so they must vote
out of fear for a Liberal. Therefore I fall back on what I had said
during the Hampton debate in that every ballot should have one more
line on it "None of the above" then I am certain many more Canadians
would exercise their right to vote. Many did agree.

Senator Day I did come across your wife in the Canada Elections office
as she worked in support of Herron. Please don't deny the fact that
the person seated beside your wife in Hampton laughed and applauded at
many of my remarks, Everybody heard what I said to Herron in front of
Rob Moore about suing him. Herron is foolish if he thought I was
kidding. Herron is a layman with few political friends. I spoke to him
very openly and honestly after the debate in Moss Glen. It should be
interesting to see whom he and Rob Moore manage to hire for lawyers to
defend them from my actions. I look forward to meeting a judge but I
am not certain I would be allowed a jury of my peers. Lawyers do have
an unfair stranglehold on Canadian justice. As you check my work, you
should see that I am out to shame all lawyers and the political ones
in particular. None of this would have been necessary if just one
lawyer had upheld their oath or one public servant had blown the
whistle. Why is not the question. The answer is Filthy Lucre.

Today is Friday the 13th. I am expected to stand in court in Boston
and argue allegations of criminal harassment made against me by a
lawyer who has practiced crimes against me. Clearly I am not making an
appearance. My kids and I will remain in this jurisdiction. I suspect
foul play and that it is a ploy to make me return to the USA. I have
little doubt that agents of the DHS would never allow me to appear in
that court. I notified everyone down in Boston that I look forward to
trial. Monday will tell the tale.

In closing I must say I considered myself a raging success to finally
break surface in the media and in an Irving owned newspaper of all
places. A former Irving lawyer needs no explanation as to the reason
for my joy. That said, let's see if I can make the Internet work for
me in a grassroots sort of way. The Irvings are a little behind the
times in that regard. Although I do not wear a blue coat, I did give
the folks in Fundy one last chance to vote for a PC (Pissed off
Candidate) and I tried to do it in a fun fashion so that my efforts
would be remembered. Read the Kings County Record again to check my
words. As I watch the boob tube, I find the most honest reporting of
the political circus in America can be found on the Canadian comedy
shows. The stuff on Barack Obama, Ralph Nader, Melanie Sloan and the
Clintons should be pretty funny to you as well as you read the
documents I have provided. Now all I can say is Hooray for Canada and
thanks to the folks in Fundy that did vote for me. I am glad that at
least one percent understood and agreed with me. Quite likely not one
of them was a lawyer. Now I only need one lawyer in the right place in
government to do the right thing and things will change for the
better. Until that happens I will continue torturing lawyers with
dilemmas that a simple application of ethics could easily solve. It is
just a matter of time before one will break rank with the crooks and
become a truly honourable hero for the common man. As I said in my
first political speech I am a son of the Keith Clan whose roots can be
found in Fundy. Although I have separated myself from that Clan and
founded my own in order to declare a Blood Feud in my own name, I will
always honour from whence I came. I simply don't care what lawyers or
politicians think of me Although I have no religion, I have faith in
my forefather's motto "Veritas Vincit".

So what say you now, Senator Joe Day? Are you with me or against me?
Ignoring me just won't do. Please send your answer to the following
address just as Brad Green did. I don't know where I will be from day
to day these days. Like it or not you are all now witnesses to my sad
complaints. I demand an answer from you in writing even if it is to
refuse this demand to do your job. Your friend the Yankee lawyer,
David Lutz can turn his back on me then sneak away and try to hide but
you are a Canadian public servant now. You must answer me in a timely
fashion. I am part of the Canadian Public and a citizen that came to
your office in the constituency that I have been hanging my hat for
over two months. I demand assistance from the Senator appointed to
watch over us and expect you to act with the integrity that is
mandated by your license to practice law for a fee. Trust me, I am
wise to the delaying and denying game. Forget trying to argue
jurisdiction. I am here. What do you think? Should I run for Senator
if Lord manages to call an election for one? I can be reached by local
phone # 506 434-1379 but everything I say from here on out I want
recorded in the Public Record because it appears that lawyers think I
must sue the Queen in the USA. Do you think she will get pissed? The
reason question is can she afford the relief. Check the bottom line of
my first two complaints. Anne McLellan has made the Crown a
conspirator against me. Methinks she owes me three times the loss. Now
we all know the reason for the cover up. Too many lawyer/politicians
in Boston assisted the lawyer, Charles J. Kickham Jr. assist the ex
FBI agent William J. Kickham in his crimes against my Clan.

If any of the above named parties don't like anything I have stated,
Please sue me. I dare ya. I promise I will not file any sort of motion
to dismiss the matter but I will demand a jury. I will call many
witnesses in my defense. I think the first one would be Mr. Harper.
Wouldn't it be fun if he was a hostile one?

Cya'll in CourtJ

David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
Certificate of Service

I, David R. Amos, a Canadian citizen presently within the jurisdiction
of the Province of New Brunswick in the County of Kings on Friday the
13th of August, 2004 delivered the above named material to the office
of Senator Joseph A. Day at 14 Everett St. Hampton, NB. I will also
email many people in many places the proof that this was done on this
day. Check into my beefs with the USPS and look at the news about the
Canadian Postal Service's political issues with Paul Martin today and
it should be obvious why this is necessary for me to do in person.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <>
To: <>; "greg.horton" <>;
<>; <>; <>;
<>; <>; "mayor_ford"
<>; "themayor" <>; "radical"
<>; "hjk" <>; "Kory.Teneycke"
<>; "michael.coren" <>;
"bob.paulson" <>; "bob.rae"
<>; "Bob.Kerr" <>; "acampbell"
<>; "Newsroom" <>; "newsroom"
<>; "merv" <>; "cullen1"
<>; "john.warr" <>; "mikeduffy"
<>; "wallinp" <>;
<>; "msegal" <>;
"PREMIER" <>; "Mackap" <>; "mbastarache"
Cc: "David Amos" <>
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 4:17 AM
Subject: A possilble Ollie North of the North? Good Evening Mr Bayne and Cpl
Horton how are your consiences doing? I don't think Mean Mikey Duffy or
Nigel Wright wish to Harper' fall guy do you?

Perhaps Cpl Horton and Duffy should remind Mr Bayne how many emails I
sent them AND HARPER and many others as well EH?

What you see below was just the latest to Duffy. As you well I
published it EH Pam?

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <>
To: <>; <>; "kevin.violot"
<>; "janice.murray" <>
Cc: "David Amos" <>
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 4:27 PM
Subject: Fwd: While your mindless boss Biage Carrese is away perhaps YOU
should finally respond to me EH Cpl Greg Horton?

Benjamin Perrin
Associate Professor
Tel: 604.822.1208
Fax: 604.822.8108
Office Location: Allard Hall, 363

Benjamin Perrin is an Associate Professor at the University of British
Columbia, Faculty of Law and a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier
Institute for Public Policy. He recently returned from a leave of
absence in Ottawa where he served as special advisor and legal counsel
to Prime Minister Stephen Harper, and was lead policy advisor on all
matters related to the Department of Justice, Public Safety Canada
(including the RCMP, Canada Border Services Agency, Canadian Security
Intelligence Service, Correctional Service of Canada, and Parole Board
of Canada), and Citizenship and Immigration Canada.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 16:08:35 -0300
Subject: Fwd: While your mindless boss Biage Carrese is away perhaps
YOU should finally respond to me EH Cpl Greg Horton?
To:, "rod.knecht"
<>,,, "marc.garneau.a1" <>,
"greg.horton" <>, Jessica Hume
Cc: David Amos <>, "steven.blaney"

Patrick F.D. McCann
phone: 613.236.1410
Peter N. Mantas
+1 613 696 6886
+1 613 230 6423 (fax)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 19:21:11 -0300
Subject: While your mindless boss Biage Carrese is away perhaps YOU
should finally respond to me EH Cpl Greg Horton?
To: mikeduffy <>, "greg.horton"
<>, "Biage.Carrese"
<>, brazep <>, harbm
<>, pm <>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<>, justmin <>, leader
<>, MulcaT <>,,, "bob.paulson"
<>, "Kevin.leahy"
<>,,,, jcarney
Cc: David Amos <>, "Dale.McGowan"
<>, "bernadine.chapman"
<>, "Leanne.Fitch"

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Biage Carrese <>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 18:00:31 -0400
Subject: Re: What a joke the mindless lawyer Mulcair is EH Mikey Duffy
and Cpl Greg Horton? (OUT OF OFFICE/ABSENT )
To: David Amos <>

I will be away from the office August 8th to and including August
23rd. Plse contact Insp. Costa Dimopoulos if you require assistance

Je serai absent et à l'extérieur du pays du 8 au 23 aout. Si vous
avez besoin d'assistance, SVP communiquez avec l'insp. Costa
Dimopoulos. (613-993-6912).

On 8/8/13, David Amos <> wrote:

FYI The letter to Petey MacKay and his party's lawyer Arty Hamilton and
others was

posted here a long long time ago.

I also reminded Duffy Harper, Mulcair, Trudeau, May, the RCMP, Indians, Ezzy
Levant and many other people of it and prodived the text of it once
again on July
15th of this year Correct John Wiliamson?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 07:44:23 -0300
Subject: Too Too Funny on Sun Media I saw Petey Rosenthal David
Orchard's & Shawn Brant's former lawyer talk of Oaths to the Queen
after reruns of the lawyer Ezzy Baby Levant and associates yapping
about liberals, Clayton Ruby, Shawn Brant and Eco Terrorists
To: pm <>, "jason.kenney.c1" <>,
ruby <>,,
"" <>, MulcaT
<>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<>, leader <>,
"Stephane.vaillancourt" <>,
mikeduffy <>, dions1 <>
Cc: David Amos <>, creeclayton77
<>, ppalmater <>,
jrebick <>, oldmaison
<>, andre <>, "bob.paulson"
<>, "john.warr" <>,
"John.Williamson" <>, wendallnicholas
<>, xchief <>

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: orakwa ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
; ;
Cc: ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 12:38 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [IPSM] TIME: Shawn Brant's Bail Review say Hoka hey
to Peter Rosenthal for me will ya?

Just so ya know Rosenthal was too chicken to answer this letter and
the related material that was sent along with it but the long
Jean-Pierre Kingsley's lawyers certainly did. Press print on the tiff
file that I sent you people long ago that was entitled "Upper
Canadians" and you will have hard copy of the proof of what I say is

On a more comical note, what do ya think the lawyer Dizzzie
Lizzie May will do with her newfound knowledge of Petey Bay MacKay's
malice towards me? Nothing? Methinks it is so. She has claimed on the
boob tube and elsewhere that she is sick of all the lies about this
and that. In my humble opinion she has made herself ill from her own

Ask your old Minister of Indian Affairs about why I ran against
him in the next election or better yet ask me sometime if ya dare how
easily I can prove that the Election of the 39th Parliament was not
legal. I Double Dog Dare You To.

Veritas Vincit

David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369

FYI this letter was posted here a long long time ago.

It is as follows

September 10th 2004

Paul J.J. Cavalluzzo
C/o Veena Verma
Cavalluzzo, Hayes, Shilton, McIntyre & Cornish
PO Box 507, Station B
Ottawa, ON K1P 5P6

David Orchard
C/o Peter Rosenthal
Roach, Schwartz and Associates
688 St. Clair Avenue West
Toronto, ON M6C 1B1

Jean-Pierre Kingsley
C/o Diane R. Davidson
Elections Canada
257 Slater Street
Ottawa, ON K1P 5G4

Peter MacKay
C/o Arthur Hamilton
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
2100 Scotia Plaza, 40 King St. W.
Toronto, ON M5H 3C2

RE: Corruption


It has been over three months since I returned to Canada and contacted
you all. Now that I have returned to the USA I will wait only three
more weeks for you to act ethically and uphold the Public Trust. CTV
or whatever said Fundy was a riding to watch but nobody mentioned me.
I answered openly and honestly to every question put to me in every
debate that I was allowed to attend. I had lots to say and now my work
speaks for itself as I fall silent. Now I have a few questions. I
would appreciate honest answers.

Pursuant to my many contacts and various conversations to you folks or
those of your offices, please find enclosed an exact copy of all
material sent to Jean Chretien and Brian Mulroney. The copy of wiretap
tape numbered 139 is served upon Diane R. Davidson, Veena Verma, Peter
Rosenthal, Arthur Hamilton and Peter MacKay in confidence as officers
of the court in order that it may be properly investigated by the Arar
Commission. May I suggest that Veena Verma solicit the Arar Commisson
to demand CSIS to provide them with the six original tapes given to
the priest, Bill Elliot and the Sussex Detachment of the RCMP in order
that they may be investigated as well.

By the time you read this letter and study the contents hopefully I
will have returned to the USA and stood in court once more in order to
defend my Clan's rights and interests. I will be inserting this letter
to you folks in the Public Record of many courts in the USA. If you
act ethically and quickly I will see no reason to sue you. However I
will be calling you all to testify to what you know to be true. Shame
on all of you for allowing my country to throw me back into the
clutches of Attorney General Ashcroft without any regard for my
safety. If I die my blood will be on your hands.

Too many mobsters and crooked FEDS want these god-damned tapes for me
to think otherwise. As you can see I have signed statements from both
a US Attorney and a District Attorney claiming for over one year now
that these tapes are part of our Probate Actions. I will prove that
they are not two more times before I complain of every lawyer and law
enforcement authority that I have contacted in two countries.

Oct 3rd, 2004, I will count you all amongst the conspirators against
me if I do not receive an answer from you that I agree with by that
date. Now you know I ain't joking.

Mr. Rosenthal, I have no doubt that you are a clever fellow. Teaching
Math is clean work. I admire that you only choose to practice law when
you consider a matter to be of great social importance. After my
speaking with David Orchard and studying his actions since that time.
I believe David Orchard is all about David Orchard and the Public
Trust only interests him when it affects his interests. The minor spit
and chew about the demise of his former party is somewhat petty
considering the far more important issues that are afoot these days.
Would not your services be better placed in assisting me in compelling
the governments to uphold the law and the Public Trust? I ask that you
study the material I have provided closely and then think about your
own words and that of your friends. They are hereto attached for your
review. My question is don't you think it would benefit all Canadians
if I complained of Anne McLellan and Wayne Easter in order to make
them accountable for their lack of diligence in protecting my dumb
ass? Just because I am a pigheaded Canadian layman, it does not follow
that Anne or Wayne should allow Ashcroft and his cohorts to try to
send me to Cuba without counsel. Many lawyers wish for me to simply
disappear or quit so that they could continue to practice law for
lucre or malice. I have no doubt many lawyers like Alan Dershowitz and
even his adversary Bob Barr would like to see me tortured or beat to
death by like H. Pail Rico was. Do you see how easily I predicted his
demise. That was a nobrainer. What say you? Do you wish to assist me
or not? If not give my friend, Byron Prior a call. Now there is man in
great need of a good lawyer with a sense of social conscience and a
bit of integrity to boot. Every Canadian should feel offended by T
Alex Hickman.

Mr. MacKay thanks for proving to the world what a lawyer's word is
worth even when he signs his hand to it. Your little back stabbing
trick with David Orchard proved my point in spades. I really don't
know what Orchard is whining about. Hasn't he heard a few lawyer jokes
in his time on the planet? Much truth is told in jest. Check my work
before you call me a liar. From one Maritmer to another if you asked
me to step outside I would smile and quit talking and start swinging
immediately. I am a much better man than that fat bastard that went to
Harvard and you can tell him I said so. My question to you sir, is do
you wish to call me a liar and then step outside to settle it or argue
me in Court? Better yet, do you and the fat bastard wish to tag team
against me or go at me one on one in court or out of it? All that I
have said is true. I read where the fat bastard lost a hundred pounds
in order to help get reelected. If I did that I would be half the man
I am now but I would still have enough sand left to take you both on.
The MacKay Clan should be ashamed of you. How is that for picking a
fight? EH?

Ms. Davidson, please find enclosed the documents proving I did what
was required of me on July 6th in order to get my deposit back. When
may I expect the money? Why would your help call me about this stuff
without checking with Ms. Chappell first? You always referred me to
her. It is not my fault if you lose the records. Right?

Ms. Davidson, I have another couple of very important questions as
well. When I appeared at the local Canada Elections Office with my
secretary and a witness as required, Ms Chappell would not allow me to
begin the process of registering as a Canidate until she received a
call from some unnamed lawyer from Ottawa. I know that person must
have been you or someone who spoke for you.

Ms. Chappell was waiting for you, Ms. Davidson to decide as to whether
or not I could run for Parliament. I can easily prove byway of phone
records and emails that I had resolved these issues months ago with
the top dogs in your office long before an election was ever called. I
then did it once again after the election was called and then again
with Ms. Chappell before I returned to Canada and then the day before
coming to her office. The deliberate delay was obvious to all and very
offensive. What would have Rob Moore or John Herron's friend David
Lutz have done if you had tried such a trick with them, Sue you? Why
should I be any different? I do have the same Rights. If you don't
think I would be just as diligent as any lawyer when protecting my
rights, you have seriously underestimated me. Call my bluff. I dare

Ms Davidson, you are not a judge nor are you a Member of Parliament.
You have no right to make a law or decide on it. If there was some
sort of legal question why did you not address it months ago with me?
It was my opinion that you were simply delaying me until the clock
tolled two o'clock and then I would not be allowed to have my name on
the ballot. I truly believe you were acting in the best interest of
other lawyers rather that upholding the Public Trust placed in you.
When I kept demanding to just know your name or to talk to you, I was
denied that right. However I did manage to become a candidate by
exactly two o'clock because you knew as sure as I am typing this that
I would have complained of you in a heartbeat after two o'clock. What
say you Ms. Davidson? Do you disagree with my opinion of what happened
on June 7th? If you were not the lawyer attempting to illegally delay
me then that person was acting under your authority. Correct? You are
the Deputy Chief Electoral Officer and Chief Legal Counsel. I am just
the self appointed Chief of my little Clan but as you can see I have
no fear of arguing with fancy upper Canadian lawyers. Do you wish to
explain or should I summons you to court to get an answer? Again I ask
when do I get my money back? My accountant has filed his work quite a
while ago as well. What is the reason for the delay now? Ain't it
kinda funny how the Queen would not take my check but I must accept

Ms. Verma, I recall our conversation vividly and can easily prove my
following contacts with you. I already know the answer but my only
question to you is WHY?

As I continue my legal battles in the USA, I want you all to know that
win or lose I was trying to protect your rights too against the
bastards that created the DHS etc.

Cya'll in Court:)

David R. Amos

153 Alvin Ave.

Milton, MA. 02186

More laws won't mean less terror
Experts warn of 'giving the devil the benefit of the law'
Law Times By David Gambrill

Expanding the power of criminal law will not stop terrorism, say legal
academics, and may instead lead to the permanent imposition of
extraordinary emergency measures and concentrated state power.

Quoting a character in the Robert Bolt play, A Man for All Seasons,
Oren Gross, a Benjamin Cardoso School of Law professor, issued a
general warning against "giving the devil the benefit of the law" in
order to make the public feel more secure.

"Extravagent terrorist attacks such as those on Sept. 11 tend to bring
about a rush to legislate," Gross told a legal scholars' conference
convened to discuss the federal government's new antiterrorism
legislation, bill C-36. "The preventative relief [is thought to] be,
'If only we add new powers to police, if only we add to the Criminal
Code, if only we revamp and reinvigorate existing offences, then our
nation is going to be secure.'"

But such logic tends to lead to a concentration of power at the level
of government, he says. Citizens may relinquish their civil liberties
out of fear, encouraging the state "do whatever it takes" to make
terrorism stop, he says.

"Governments tend to overreact," says Gross. "Terrorism from below
may, to some extent, be replaced with terrorism from above." Legal
scholars who spoke at the conference echoed Gross' caution. Some
worried that Canada is permanently entrenching the temporary emergency
powers found in the 1988 Emergencies Act.

"My answer to the question, 'Can emergency powers be normalized?' is
yes, they can be," says U of T law professor David Dyzenhais, a South
African studying the emergency powers employed by the South African
government under apartheid. "But when they are normalized, what we
have is a violation of the spirit of the rule of law."

U of T math professor Peter Rosenthal, a lawyer at Roach Schwartz and
Associates in Toronto, suggested the federal government should have
used its powers under the 1988 Emergencies Act instead of drafting new
anti-terrorist legislation.

Enacted by the Mulroney government, the Emergencies Act gives the
federal government limited exceptional powers to deal with four types
of emergencies: threats to public welfare, threats to public order,
international emergencies, and war.

International emergencies, says the act, arise "from acts of
intimidation or coercion, or the real or imminent threat of serious
force or violence."

For an international emergency, the act can be put into affect for 60
days and must be reviewed by Parliament before the deadline can be
extended. It includes powers to limit or restrict travel, ban public
assemblies, remove non-citizens from the country, and enter and search
premises without a warrant. The powers in the act are explicitly
subject to the Charter.

The Emergencies Act replaced the War Measures Act, which the Trudeau
government used to arrest and detain 465 Quebeckers in 1970. The
federal government invoked the War Measures Act after the FLQ
kidnapped Quebec provincial cabinet minister Pierre Laporte, who was
found assassinated one day after the act was declared.

The so-called "October Crisis," when the War Measures Act was
implemented, started a debate in Canada about when it is appropriate
to suspend civil liberties. The Trudeau government came under heavy
criticism for employing the act.

U of T constitutional law professor Lorraine Weinrib noted the federal
government has studiously avoided using the language of "emergency
measures," even though it has incorporated such emergency powers into
its anti-terrorist legislation. The same emergency powers are
available under the Emergencies Act, she says, albeit for limited
periods of time and under strict supervision of Parliament.

"I would say the government did not use the Emergencies Act here in
response to the problem of terrorism because it did not want to engage
in this type of review process," says Weinrib. "It preferred to
continue what has been highly discredited under the War Measures Act
experience - namely, the concentration of power in the executive."

For this reason, many scholars at the conference encouraged the courts
to review the legislation carefully. Federal government lawyers have
called the proposed anti-terrorist legislation"Charter-proof." But
that doesn't mean the anti-terrorism legislation should be enacted,
says U of T law professor Kent Roach.

"We may too quick to accept . . . what the government's lawyers — or
indeed any lawyers — conclude it is permissible to do," he says.

Roach listed several extraordinary police powers found in bill C-36.
Most notably, the bill allows police to arrest and detain a person
without a warrant, on suspicion the suspect may be carrying out a
terrorist activity. It also creates "investigative hearings," in which
suspects are compelled to give testimony that might incriminate them.

Roach was particularly critical of the hearing process, the powers of
which, he insisted, haven't been around since the English 'Star
Chamber' in 1641.

"Compelling a person to talk to the police in an investigation in
which he or she may well be implicated offends our traditions of
respect for the right of silence during police investigations," he
says. "These traditions date back to the abolition of the Star Chamber
in 1641."

The Star Chamber, associated with the English Courts, was reviled for
its use of torture. As late as 1614, a Somerset clergyman, Edmond
Peacham, was interrogated on the rack before the Star Chamber in the
presence of the attorney general at the time, Sir Edward Coke.

Roach acknowledged the bill gives detained individuals the right to
counsel at such hearings, but such representation provides cold
comfort. "It gives people subject to investigative hearing the right
to counsel — even though, in many cases, the lawyer will simply have
to inform the target that he or she must talk or else face prosecution
or continued detention," he says. One danger in forcing people to talk
is that they might lie, says Roach. A combination of perjury and
prosecutorial zeal could may lead to the kind of wrongful convictions
associated with the "Birmingham Six" and "Guilford Four" in England,
he says.

In the early 1970s, the IRA bombed pubs in Birmingham and Guilford,
England, killing more than 21 people. Under pressure to convict the
terrorists, police arrested 10 people in connection with the attacks.

In 1989 and 1991, respectively, a British court of appeal released the
Guilford Four and Birmingham Six after finding they had been wrongly

This article does not constitute legal or other professional advice
and no responsibility for any loss occasioned to any person acting or
refraining from action in reliance upon material contained in this
article is accepted by the author or Canada Law Book Inc.

(c)Law Times Inc. 2004. All rights reserved.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sarvis CampaignTeam <>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:36:32 -0700
Subject: Thank you for your message! Re: Fwd: Attn U.S. Senator Ted
Cruz (R-TX) Re Obama and the Boyz I just called (202 228-7561) and
left a message about this email

Thanks so much for your interest in Sarvis for Governor 2013. We're
happy to report that we've had a flood of requests from supporters and
voters across the commonwealth! So, thanks for bearing with us!

If you are looking to volunteer for the campaign, obtain Sarvis for
Governor stuff or invite Robert Sarvis to an event in your area,
please email

For media requests, please email

If you are looking to find out more about Sarvis' stand on the issues,
please visit the issues page on our website:

For any other inquires, email

We sincerely appreciate your support and look forward to earning your
vote this November!

Authorized by Sarvis for Governor 2013

----- Original Message -----
From: Ellen Qualls
To: David Amos
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 9:49 PM
Subject: I had to write my first email after tonight

David, I really hoped Ken Cuccinelli would relax and be himself tonight.

I hoped he'd stand on the debate stage, look straight into the
television cameras, and repeat all the anti-gay, anti-women's health,
anti-science things he's said over the years — straight to Virginia

Instead, he mostly stuck to talking points about jobs and the economy,
as if saying them now means he has entirely new priorities after a
decade-long obsession with imposing his personal ideology on

If we let him get away with that — if we let voters believe they met
the real Ken Cuccinelli tonight — we could lose this election.

Donate $5 right now to make sure Terry hits his Get Out The Vote Fund
goal — and to make sure our team can deliver the truth about Ken
Cuccinelli to voters.

I've worked in Virginia politics for a long time. I've lived in the
Commonwealth for even longer, and I know Terry McAuliffe is going to
be a great governor. But part of why I signed on to help Terry's
campaign this year was that Ken Cuccinelli's closed-minded social
agenda feels really out of step with my home of almost 40 years.

Since he wasn't willing to be up front about that agenda and his
record tonight, I'd like to remind you of a few things he's said about

Ken Cuccinelli has said being gay leads to "self-destruction." And so
he's opposed policies that would protect gay Virginians from
Ken Cuccinelli has said "God does judge nations" for safe and legal
abortion and that his "ultimate goal" is to make it illegal. And so
he's pushed policies that could close women's health clinics and ban
the birth control pill.
Ken Cuccinelli has said that the social safety net was created by "bad
politicians" trying to make people "dependent on government." And now
he opposes providing health care to hundreds of thousands of
Virginians by expanding Medicaid.
Cuccinelli's agenda is extreme and his record is clear. But voters who
just tuned in to the debate tonight to make their decision wouldn't
know any of this.

We're spending every minute of the next 11 days making sure they know
the truth. Chip in $5 right now to help Terry hit his GOTV fundraising

Thanks for fighting back. I know you won't let voters forget what Ken
Cuccinelli has said about us — and what that would mean for Virginia's
future if he's elected.

- Ellen

Ellen Qualls
Senior Advisor

Paid for by Terry McAuliffe for GovernorYou're receiving this because
you signed up for emails from Terry McAuliffe for Governor.
Unsubscribe PO Box 13881
Arlington, VA 22219
(703) 822-7604

On 10/23/13, David Amos <> wrote:
> John LaBeaume at or (202) 352-8335.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <>
> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 15:11:08 -0300
> Subject: Attn U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) Re Obama and the Boyz I
> just called (202 228-7561) and left a message about this email
> To:,, rheard
> <>, "michael.coren" <>,
>, pandrews <>,
> newsonline <>
> Cc: David Amos <>
> FYI this email has been posted on the Internet for awhile
> Chrystia Freeland Campaign Office
> 81 King Street East (King & Church)
> Toronto, Ontario M5C 1G3
> phone: 647-725-2071
> email:
> Facebook: FreelandChrystia
> Twitter: @cafreeland
> For media inquiries please contact Rebecca MacKenzie at 416-992-9580
> Linda's Campaign Office
> Come visit us at:
> 878 Yonge Street
> Toronto, ON, M4W 2J1
> Phone: 416-900-7493
> Contact: / (202) 228-7561. Monday, September 30,
> 2013. WASHINGTON, DC -- U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) released the
> following

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <>
To: <>; <>; "kevin.violot"
<>; "janice.murray" <>
Cc: "David Amos" <>
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 4:27 PM
Subject: Fwd: While your mindless boss Biage Carrese is away perhaps YOU
should finally respond to me EH Cpl Greg Horton?

Benjamin Perrin
Associate Professor
Tel: 604.822.1208
Fax: 604.822.8108
Office Location: Allard Hall, 363

Benjamin Perrin is an Associate Professor at the University of British
Columbia, Faculty of Law and a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier
Institute for Public Policy. He recently returned from a leave of
absence in Ottawa where he served as special advisor and legal counsel
to Prime Minister Stephen Harper, and was lead policy advisor on all
matters related to the Department of Justice, Public Safety Canada
(including the RCMP, Canada Border Services Agency, Canadian Security
Intelligence Service, Correctional Service of Canada, and Parole Board
of Canada), and Citizenship and Immigration Canada.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 16:08:35 -0300
Subject: Fwd: While your mindless boss Biage Carrese is away perhaps
YOU should finally respond to me EH Cpl Greg Horton?
To:, "rod.knecht"
<>,,, "marc.garneau.a1" <>,
"greg.horton" <>, Jessica Hume
Cc: David Amos <>, "steven.blaney"

Patrick F.D. McCann
phone: 613.236.1410
Peter N. Mantas
+1 613 696 6886
+1 613 230 6423 (fax)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 19:21:11 -0300
Subject: While your mindless boss Biage Carrese is away perhaps YOU
should finally respond to me EH Cpl Greg Horton?
To: mikeduffy <>, "greg.horton"
<>, "Biage.Carrese"
<>, brazep <>, harbm
<>, pm <>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<>, justmin <>, leader
<>, MulcaT <>,,, "bob.paulson"
<>, "Kevin.leahy"
<>,,,, jcarney
Cc: David Amos <>, "Dale.McGowan"
<>, "bernadine.chapman"
<>, "Leanne.Fitch"

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Biage Carrese <>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 18:00:31 -0400
Subject: Re: What a joke the mindless lawyer Mulcair is EH Mikey Duffy
and Cpl Greg Horton? (OUT OF OFFICE/ABSENT )
To: David Amos <>

I will be away from the office August 8th to and including August
23rd. Plse contact Insp. Costa Dimopoulos if you require assistance

Je serai absent et à l'extérieur du pays du 8 au 23 aout. Si vous
avez besoin d'assistance, SVP communiquez avec l'insp. Costa
Dimopoulos. (613-993-6912).

On 8/8/13, David Amos <> wrote:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 03:29:59 -0300
Subject: Re Glen Greenwald and the Brazilian President Rousseff's
indignant tweets So Stevey Boy Harper your CSEC dudes and their NSA
pals no doubt know all about my conversation with the dudes from
Brazil last month Wheras the CBC and the Guardian etc want to know it
all we should share EH?
Cc: David Amos <>,

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 03:14:34 -0300
Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
To: David Amos <>


The sneaky ex CSIS dude Michelle Juneau-Katsuya was not wise to call
the President of Brazil a Prima Donna but what he said is true about
her merely playing politcs Everybody who wants to know can know what
happened between Brazil and I since early 2005. All they have to do is
ask me. If they don't believe me they can call the Boys from Brazil
and ask them if what I said in the video hereto attached or the
documents I to them and many other UN dudes long ago is true or false.
Trust that Stevey Harper, Franky McKenna and the rest of the
IMF/Bilderberger crowd ain't gonna tell anyone anything. EH Bobby
Bauer and Stevey Cutler?

The video is just a clip from a longer conversation with a good friend
weeks ago. Perhaps your snoopy minions in the RCMP/DND should be wise
to listen to it all if they haven't already EH?

Anyone can find that chat saved here

It is entitled as follows

2013-09-21 time 16_34_08 Incoming Peer-to-Peer Call david.raymond.amos

These are the cover letters for the documents I sent to the UN Dudes

BTW Perhaps the times are a changing now that the stock market is
falling bigtime once again. Believe or not I am kinda sorta impressed
by the words of the latest Pope. I can'tbelieve a Jesuit would say
such things. Amazing things never cease.

The Dec 12th,2002 date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of
mine and the name of Cardinal Bernard Francis Law should mean a lot to
him if he truly has an ethical soul and is wise enough to ignore his
many lawyers.

Law resigned as Archbishop of Boston on December 13, 2002, in response
to the Roman Catholic Church sex abuse scandal after church documents
were revea

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please Leave Comments here