Friday, 20 September 2013

The DND/RCMP's favourite pervert Mr Baconfat is wrong against this does not violate Section 319 this is Treason Methinks he broke his oath N'esy Pas Bob Lt Col Errington and Mr Minister of Attack Nicholson?

From: "Copp, Danny" <>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 05:04:29 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: The DND/RCMP's favourite pervert Mr Baconfat
is wrong against this does not violate Section 319 this is Treason
Methinks he broke his oath N'esy Pas Bob Lt Col Errington and Mr
Minister of Attack Nicholson?
To: motomaniac333 <>

I am presently away from the office, on leave, returning September 25,
2013. Please contact A/S/Sgt. Hudson for any Primary Response Team
matters requiring immediate attention.

A/Insp. Danny Copp


This electronic mail, including any attachments, is confidential and
is for the sole use of the intended recipient and may be privileged.
Any unauthorized distribution, copying, disclosure or review is
prohibited. Neither communication over the Internet nor disclosure to
anyone other than the intended recipient constitutes waiver of
privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately
notify the sender and then delete this communication and any
attachments from your computer system and records without saving or
forwarding it. Thank you.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Office of the Mayor <>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 23:04:29 -0600
Subject: Thank You For Your Email
To: motomaniac333 <>

Thank you for contacting Mayor Nenshi.

We read every email received at the Office of the Mayor and direct
them to the right people for response-including Mayor Nenshi. Due to
the overwhelming amount of correspondence we receive, you may not
receive a response from us for a few days. Please feel free to email
us again if you have not heard from us in over a week.

Please be advised that while we do our best to respond to everything
in a timely manner, if your situation requires immediate attention,
you should call 3-1-1 for assistance. Further inquiries can also be
directed through our receptionist at (403) 268-5622.

If you are inviting Mayor Nenshi to an event, would like a meeting
with Mayor Nenshi, or would like to request a letter or message,
please fill out the appropriate form on our website,<>. The Mayor carefully
considers every invitation he receives. You should expect to hear
from our office regarding his attendance approximately 4-6 weeks prior
to the event.

Once again, we appreciate your email and look forward to corresponding
with you in the future.

The Office of the Mayor
Historic City Hall
700 MacLeod Trail South
Calgary, AB T2P 2M5
(403) 268-5622

This communication is intended ONLY for the use of the person or
entity named above and may contain information that is confidential or
legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient named above
or a person responsible for delivering messages or communications to
the intended recipient, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that any use,
distribution, or copying of this communication or any of the
information contained in it is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
telephone and then destroy or delete this communication, or return it
to us by mail if requested by us. The City of Calgary thanks you for
your attention and co-operation.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: motomaniac333 <>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 02:04:24 -0300
Subject: The DND/RCMP's favourite pervert Mr Baconfat is wrong against
this does not violate Section 319 this is Treason Methinks he broke
his oath N'esy Pas Bob Lt Col Errington and Mr Minister of Attack
To: "Randy.McGinnis" <>, "rod.knecht"
<>, "Dale.McGowan"
<>, Glen Canning <>,
dexterdyne <>, police <>,
"" <>, PREMIER
<>, justmin <>, "calgary.acadia"
<>, "calgary.northwest"
<>, Calgarynews <>,
calgarynewstips <>, themayor
<>, pol7163 <>, deanr0032
<>, mclellana <>,
premier <>, "Ken.Zielke" <>,
"jeff.kasbrick" <>, "hugh.flemming"
<>, "danny.copp" <>,
"Stephen.Stafford" <>, sallybrooks25
<>, austin <>,
dfildebrandt <>, "stephen.mandel"
<>,,,, bourdap
Cc: "Errington.john" <>, "rob.nicholson"
<>, PCC Complaints <>,
"bob.paulson" <>, "Ian.McPhail"
<>, "steven.blaney"
<>, David Amos <>,
oldmaison <>, law <>,
"peter.dauphinee" <>, andre

Friday, September 20, 2013
Little Davey will be pissed....again

I wrote this some time ago, and little David Amos has taken umbrage
over this little epistle several times in several ways. First he said
it was all bullshit. Then he complained to the military police
civilian complaints officials because David said it was treason. Now
our "little friend" says this contravenes sec 319 of the CC of C.

So here it is again.

August 14, 2009

What does Amerika, the "Truther" movment, "God" and retards have to do
with Canada
We do not have to worry about comment from Little Dean and Dave...they
are too uneducated to understand most posts

So have you seen them, been annoyed or insulted by them, have you
smelled their disease? Have you ever crossed the "medicine line" and
seen some Yank being taken into custody because he just has..."this
constitutional right to bear arms" Canada. I remember years ago
when the debate was on in Canada, about there being weapons of mass
destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends" demanded that Canada join
into "the Coalition of the Willing.

American "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT
buying into the US policy. At the time I was serving as a planner at
NDHQ and with 24 other of my colleagues we went to Tampa SOCOM HQ to
be involved in the planning in the planning stages of the op....and to
report to NDHQ, that would report to the PMO upon the merits of the
proposed operation.

There was never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites
where there were deployed WMD. Coalition assets were more than
sufficient for the initial strike and invasion phase but even at that
point in the planning, we were concerned about the number of "boots on
the ground" for the occupation (and end game) stage of an operation in

We were also concerned about the American plans for occupation plans
of Iraq because they at that stage included no contingency for a
handing over of civil authority to a vetted Iraqi government and
bureaucracy. There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and
returned to its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan.

This was contrary to the lessons of Vietnam but also to the military
thought, that folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others
elucidated upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what
conditions are to met before US troop can redeploy?

Prime Minister Jean Chretien and the PMO were even at the very
preliminary planning stages wary of Canadian involvement in an Iraq
operation....History would prove them correct. The political pressure
being applied on the PMO from the George W Bush administration was

American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi operation....

The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian lives and liberal
political capital.. and the priority of which ....not necessarily in
that order. Essentially Canada determined to stay out of Iraq, paid
the price, of a larger role in Afghanistan to enable US military
assets to redeploy to Iraq.

The US op in Afghanistan evolved from a US op, to a UN op, to a NATO /
ISAF op. NATO countries other than Canada and the UK shun combat
operations in Afghanistan..their rules of deployment and engagement
mitigate against NATO troops engaging the Taliban. By design I am
quite sure.

But now the American Iraq op, is a great success. The "surge" worked.
But alas now 127 Canadian soldiers are dead. The 2011 deadline is
coming nigh....and President Barak Obama and NATO want Canada to
consider extending the deployment of Canadian troops. The motives are
different. The US wants to... needs to, as matter of national
security, to defeat insurgency in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Our
European allies want Canada to remain and continue to "punch above its
weight" so European soldiers do not have to actually fight or die.

That begs a few questions: "Nations do not have friends, nations have
interests" -Henry Kissinger. Is American national security re
terrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan compatible with Canadian
national interests? If this country, Canada is going to be a
continuing ally in "the war against terror"....should not our "friends
and neighbours across the medicine line be more amenable in matters of
trade, or just living up to their free trade agreements. If our
"friends and neighbours" to the south want Canadians to fight side by
side...maybe that 7 % Softwood lumber tariff was a mistake...or the
buy American provision in the currant stimulus plan ought to be re

Our American "friends" give Israel roughly 3 billion dollars a year to
be spent buying weapons systems from US defense
survive (both Israel and US defense industries) Perhaps US dollars
should flow to Canada to buy weapons systems and patrol aircraft and
naval platforms...after all, aren't we your "friends and allies"?

There is nothing similar with American culture, and politics between
Canada and the US. Canada evolved into nation status and the US,
revolted violently. This difference in the means we became
nations...has greatly defined who and what we are.

Our American "friends" look upon Canada as cultural, economic and
political satrap.... Now to their great consternation they are finding
out... that is NOT the case . Nothing good came to Canada by way of
America. The military "schewirpunct" should be defense of our
continental shelf and the arctic.

Canada does need to stop shipping unrefined bitumen to the US and
totally refine it here and start building a pipeline for bitumen to
Canada's west coast to sell to Asian and the Chinese market. It is
more than past time to understand ..our American "friends" are not our
friends at all.

Or else it is: Bend over here it comes again.....KY anyone?
Posted by Seren at 11:27 AM

I wrote this some years ago. It is just as correct and relevant now
as it was then. It also "offends" David Amos' sensibilities as much
now as them. Oh dear Sec 319 of the CC of C, what shite!

Posted by Seren at 9:53 PM No comments:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please Leave Comments here