Wednesday, 21 August 2013

RE Evil Librano Lawyers such as Clayton Ruby and Senator Joe Day

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:57:24 -0300
Subject: RE Evil Librano Lawyers such as Clayton Ruby and Senator Joe Day
To: mayor_ford <mayor_ford@toronto.ca>, ruby <ruby@rubyshiller.com>,
pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "joe.oliver.c1" <joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca>, todd
<todd@forestethics.org>, josh <josh@bccla.org>,
sk@kaurcommunications.ca, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
"ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca" <ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca>, Jessica Hume
<jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>, "david.akin" <david.akin@sunmedia.ca>,
mikeduffy <mikeduffy@sen.parl.gc.ca>, RBauer <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>,
jmark@earthisland.org, edith.lilly@nspower.ca,
monique.reade@nspower.ca, marie.camba@emera.com, "rob.moore.a1"
<rob.moore.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "rob.nicholson" <rob.nicholson@parl.gc.ca>,
Mackap <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, scoop <scoop@huffingtonpost.com>, scoop
<scoop@motherjones.com>, scoop <scoop@theage.com.au>,
"fortmcmurray.woodbuffalo" <fortmcmurray.woodbuffalo@assembly.ab.ca>,
johnc <johnc@district.yarmouth.ns.ca>, glen <glen@glencanning.com>,
briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, "Bill.Fraser"
<Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca>, linkejul <linkejul@gmail.com>,
patricia.luck@gov.bc.ca, "adrian.dix.mla" <adrian.dix.mla@leg.bc.ca>,
jane.carlson@gov.bc.ca, merv <merv@northwebpress.com>, radical
<radical@radicalpress.com>, Deanna.Storey@gov.bc.ca, premier
<premier@gov.bc.ca>, david.eby.mla@leg.bc.ca, "kris.sims"
<kris.sims@sunmedia.ca>, "michael.coren" <michael.coren@sunmedia.ca>,
thiscrazytime@gmail.com, thegreenchain@me.com, Horst Sauerteig
<sauertwo@nb.sympatico.ca>, chris.huskilson@emera.com,
dave.eby@gmail.com, "Dina.Bartolacci" <Dina.Bartolacci@emera.com>,
stephen.aftanas@emera.com, Scott.Balfour@emera.com, "rob.bennett"
<rob.bennett@emera.com>, mel.norton@saintjohn.ca,
Kevin.Clifford@saintjohn.ca
Cc: "daniel.conley" <daniel.conley@suf.state.ma.us>, bbachrach
<bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, ppalmater
<ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca>, "Davidc.Coon"
<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>, MulcaT
<MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>

Hey

The mindless Yankee District Attorney and an evil judge in Beantown
tried to prosecute me and imprison me because of emails and documents
I had sent to Canadian politicians, the FEDS in Canada nd the USA and
Evil Librano Lawyers such as Clayton Ruby and Senator Joe Day about
the Arar Inquiry.. How the hell did these nasty people get through law
school let alone grade school without being able to read?

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369


----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; alltrue@nl.rogers.com
Cc: diane.bourque@flsc.ca ; jcrosbie@pattersonpalmer.ca ;
gbyrne@pattersonpalmer.ca ; corp.website@sunlife.com ;
martine.turcotte@bell.ca ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ;
shickman@pattersonpalmer.ca ; lrikleen@Bowditch.com ;
John.Conyers@mail.house.gov ; smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ;
bmosher@mosherchedore.ca ; carterweb@emory.edu ;
Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ;
david@lutz.nb.ca ; parkhill@stu.ca ; plee@stu.ca ; kentlib@nbnet.nb.ca
; police@fredericton.ca
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 10:32 AM
Subject: Hey

Hey Ron, Byron, Kathyrn and Mr. Conley,

I figure that today may go three ways. The Disrtict attorney will drop
the charges now that the federal election is over or he will go
forward and attempt tp prosecute me or he and the court will come up
with some new charges in an attempt to put me away again. This email
should off set all three actions. Feel free to surprise me Mr. Conley
with a sudden fit of ethical behavior. However I ain't betting on it.

Whereas you, Mr. Conley have chosen to not only ignore my legitimate
concerns for months but have maliciously prosecuted me and have even
had me sent to jail over false allegations of threatening a judge, I
look forward to arguing you about just one email with this email
alone. However since you and the clerks office have a very bad habit
of making documents disappear, I have decided to record this contact
with you electronically but give it to your Assistant in hand. I ask
my friends to send it around the world so that it is never lost. I
have also sent the other emails mentioned by the Boston Police Dept.
and your Assistants in their complaint against me. I will print hard
copy and present this and the following emails Cynthia A. Robinson as
the legal counsel to the Chief Justice of the Boston Municipal Court.
She has some serious thinking to do after she had chosen to ignore my
call about my concerns with the court that she speaks for. I knew she
knew a lot the instant she called me David rather than Mr. Amos as
most othe lawyers do.

On November 19th I will demand that Judge Hanlon recuse herself and
ask the First Justice Charles R. Johnson to review the matter. I
sincerely hope that he practices brevity, common sense, practicality
accepts the court's limitations as well as his own. I do not think it
wise for him to support Judge Hanlon's actions against me She had no
right whatsoever to declare that I very likely have a prior history of
mental illness and deny the fact that I had ran for Parliament and
have very valid concerns about the Public Trust being upheld.

I will file a personal injury lawsuit against Judge Hanlon and anyone
who stands with her. I already have the documents proving her malice
Why the wiretap tapes were denied as evidence by Judge Hanlon and your
office without examination by any law enforcement authority will
forever prove my point about corruption in Canada and the USA. Chief
Justice Mulligan, the Attorney General of New Brunswick, the Solicitor
General of Canada, Governor General of Canada and a great many others
suggested that I give the god damned tapes to you and return I am
called mental ill and dangerous? I am not the one that needs his head
examined in fact you Mr. Conley are in great need of having your
Professional Conduct examined. You are not crazy. You are corrupt.
I will be demanding that the matter be sent to Congress and Parliament
in order to be properly investigated and that counter charges be laid
against you and many other employees of the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts the City of Boston, the federal government and other
States that failed to uphold the law and act within the scope of their
employment. The fact that I as a Canadian Citizen was summoned out of
Canada by an unsigned complaint by a Clerk Magistrate who had no
authority to do so anyway forever makes this a federal matter. That it
was done under the warrant of the Boston Police Dept whose very own
Police Commissioner Kathleen O'Toole had been made aware of many
crimes before even the first email was ever sent to Angela Troccoli's
boss, Mr. Schulman makes this matter particularly offensive. The fact
that I was sent to jail on unnamed charges that were labeled "other"
should cause me to seek a great amount of relief in punitive damages
so this does not happen again to others. The fact that I was sent into
the custody of the very Sheriff that had practiced Fraud and Perjury
against me for the benefit of the US Attorney Michael Sullivan two
years ago just served to furthe piss me off. Clearly Judge Hanlon has
no understanding of the Eighth Amendment and the Clerk Owens has done
his best to try to cover his malicious tracks and destroy the Pulbic
Record in a effort to stop me from properly removing the matter to
federal court. I watch you alicious Assistant District Attorney laugh
as she over heard me saying that I would be suing her six ways to
Sunday. Not only does she not understand me she does not understand
how ot uphold the law. Now she should suffer the pains and penalties
for her malice. Following are a few law and prior matters we will be
arguing in the near future.

CHAPTER 265. CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON
Chapter 265: Section 43A Criminal harassment; punishment
Section 43A. (a) Whoever willfully and maliciously engages in a
knowing pattern of conduct or series of acts over a period of time
directed at a specific person, which seriously alarms that person and
would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional
distress, shall be guilty of the crime of criminal harassment and
shall be punished by imprisonment in a house of correction for not
more than two and one-half years or by a fine of not more than $1,000,
or by both such fine and imprisonment. Such conduct or acts described
in this paragraph shall include, but not be limited to, conduct or
acts conducted by mail or by use of a telephonic or telecommunication
device including, but not limited to, electronic mail, internet
communications or facsimile communications.

Commonwealth v. Clerk-Magistrate of the West Roxbury Division of the
District Court
439 Mass. 352(2003)

** Important case regarding clerk-magistrate hearings **

A clerk-magistrate has no authority to conduct a show cause hearing
prior to acting on an application for the issuance of a felony
complaint where the person charged is not under arrest.

The Clerk-Magistrate of the West Roxbury District Court scheduled show
cause hearings on two separate felony complaint applications. In both
instances, the person charged had not been arrested for the alleged
offenses. The Commonwealth filed a c. 211, § 3 petition, requesting
that the single justice vacate the show cause hearing and issue an
order directing the clerk-magistrate to halt such hearings in the
future. The Commonwealth's petition was granted and the
Clerk-Magistrate appealed.

In reviewing the opinion of the single justice, the SJC looked to the
statutes that both define and limit the clerk-magistrate's authority -
G.L. c.218, §§33 and 35A. The SJC found no authority for a clerk
magistrate to hold a show cause hearing with respect to felony
complaints - in fact, §35 specifically limits such hearings to
misdemeanors for which there is no arrest. Additionally, §33 contains
no provision for an adversary hearing with regard to the issuance of a
felony complaint. Finding no statutory authority for such a hearing,
the SJC affirmed the decision of the single justice, vacating the
hearing and ordering all future hearings to cease. "To the extent that
a clerk-magistrate declines to act on an application for the issuance
of process on a felony complaint until a show cause hearing is held,
the clerk-magistrate improperly interferes with the prosecutorial
discretion of the executive branch."

Commonwealth v. Clemens
Appeals Court

September 2, 2004

In a rescript opinion, the Appeals Court addressed for the first time
the criminal harassment statute (c. 265, § 43A) enacted in 2000. The
Court suggested that, similar to the stalking statute, criminal
harassment will require a showing of at least three separate incidents
of willful and malicious conduct to support a conviction.
Jurisdiction:

Criminal jurisdiction of the Boston Municipal Court includes most
criminal offenses which do not require the imposition of a state
prison sentence. If a prison sentence is mandated, the Court may
conduct probable cause hearings to determine whether offenses will be
bound over to the Superior Court. The Court has original jurisdiction
over a number of serious felonies, concurrent with the Superior Court.
The Court's civil jurisdiction includes contract and tort actions;
cases remanded from the Superior Court; small claims, small claims
jury appeals; mental health commitments; summary process;
supplementary proceedings; unemployment compensation appeals;
paternity and support actions; and domestic abuse actions. The Court
also has jurisdiction for review of findings of the State Police Trial
Board and equitable jurisdiction in lead poisoning prevention;
landlord interference with quiet enjoyment or failure to provide
utilities; family abuse prevention; sanitary code; and residential
nuisances.

Wagenmann v. Pozzi, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30752, District of
Massachusetts, 1986 decision, upheld the potential liability of
prosecutors who convey false information to the bail magistrate which
resulted in the setting of excessively high bail which precluded the
plaintiff from obtaining release from jail, and further that such
prosecutorial statements to the judge significantly contributed to the
judge's decision to commit the plaintiff to a mental hospital, citing
the next case below

Bretz v. Kelman, 773 F.2d 1026, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23482 (9th Cir.
1985)(en banc), in which a unanimous 9th Circuit upheld a Section 1983
civil rights claim for similar prosecutorial misconduct (alleged
perjury, threatening and coercing witnesses, concealing and falsifying
evidence), citing Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 68 L. Ed. 420, 101
S. Ct. 1908 (1981)

Richards v. City of New York, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13675, Southern
District of New York, Judge Michael B. Mukasey, opinion dated
September 2, 1998, explaining how prosecuting attorneys can be liable
(i.e., lose their full or partial immunity) when getting involved in
the investigative area

Mr. Conley I am well aware that you have many political friends that
you are protecting from my very valid allegations of crimes. After I
had properly disclosed to you many crimes practiced against me, you
attacked me with great malice, You should inform your fellow District
Attorneys Paul F. Walsh, Jr. Timothy J. Cruz, John J. Conte and many
other elected officials that I am going to sue you all after I argue
you in Dorchester District Court.

I am just a layman. It was not my job to inform the Clerk Magistrate,
Mr. Owens of the law but I truly did try to byway of his clerks F.
Dennis Sullivan and Robert Sullivan beginning in June while I was
running for Parliament. I also fully disclosed everything to you in
july and you even answered me. In return you attack and Owens and
assistants like Mr Buckley and all the other clerks practiced fraud
and perjury against me. I am also aware of the federal political
connection of the Dorchester District Court byway of Judge Sidney
Hanlon and the former Attorney General Janet Reno and federal funding
sent to that court to support the torture of men in malicious actions
such as this. I suspect it was to support the actions of the political
far left in their endeavors to make inroads in the justice system to
suit their own ends. Feel free to argue me.

Cya'll in Court

David R. Amos

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: pcavalluzzo@cavalluzzo.com
Cc: vverma@cavalluzzo.com ; Martin.P@parl.gc.ca ;
Broadbent.E@parl.gc.ca ; Harper.S@parl.gc.ca ; dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
Moore.R@parl.gc.ca ; Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ;
inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 11:32 AM
Subject: Fw: Text of letter to Joe Day

Hey Paul

It has been almost two months since I talked to Veena Verma and
almost one month since I gave the material to Senator Joe Day. Other
than have Clayton Ruby and his associate threaten to charge me with
criminal harrassment, I have heard nothing from the Arar Commission.
Obviously you are conspiring with Ashcroft against me.

On September 3rd I served upon the District Attorney of Suffolk
County many original wiretap tapes and spoke of the Arar Commission in
court and on the public record. Now I will send you and Mr. David the
same stuff the DA in the USA got in July when I was first introduced
to Ms. Verma. I invite you alll to the hearing in Dorchester District
Court on October 1st. However first I will have lots to say about the
Arar Commission in a couple of other courts in two countries. Please
explain to me real slow why I don't sue you too?

Shame on all of you. Do you really think that Ashcroft and his
buddies in the DHS are more ethical than I am? I will wager you are
all shocked that I manged to return to the USA legally and stand in
court to defend myself from the false criminal charges without any
ethical assistance from a public servant. If the bastards kill me in
order to cover up how crooked lawyers really are my blood will be on
your hands.

David R. Amos

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca
Cc: vverma@cavalluzzo.com ; Martin.P@parl.gc.ca ;
Broadbent.E@parl.gc.ca ; Harper.S@parl.gc.ca ; dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
Moore.R@parl.gc.ca ; Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Friday, January 04, 1980 3:55 AM
Subject: Text of letter to Joe Day

He can never say that he didn't get it. This is an email is
sent as triple check as proof that it was done when and where I swear
I did it. That is his front door and although no one came to it
because I didn't bother knocking I did bring witnesses and obviously
took pictures

I can easily prove that I was in contact with Wayne Easter's
office on November 19th/03 the same day Arar's lawyers from the CCR in
the USA were. Apparently the Canadian government and Mr. Ashcroft must
have had a different plan as to what to do about me. Doesn't anyone
think that Anne McLellan, Wayne Easter and I have lots to argue about
within the Arar Commission. My evidence certainly supports Arar's.

If anyone whois now seated as a Member of Parliament considers
themselves worthy of the public trust perhaps they should speak up
andask a few questions and consider asking for a non confidence vote.
May I suggest that some member of the NDP who is not a lawyer contact
me before I return to the USA. I would prefer to talk to Ed Broadbent.
If he chooses to recall, I did wish him luck.

Veena tell Geoff Regan to give a call when he gets back from
golfing with Clinton and McKenna's buddies will ya?

Just so everybody knows I am sending this email to many folks all
around the world.

What do ya thing should I hang around home long enough to see if
Premier Lord calls an election for a Senator in the Federal government
or wait until he calls a by-election to fill Bernard Richard's vacate
seat at the provincial level? I know the Yankees are sick and tired of
me. But i did make lots of folks uphome laugh and think about things.
Everybody calls me a rebel or a fool. Both labels I take as my own
with a smile. However I must ask why am I so rebelious to expect
lawyers to uphold the law or demand that politicians uphold the Public
Trust? Why am I so foolish not to trust the law enforcement community?
Never forget it was the US Secret Service that came to my door with a
town cop that is paid to protect and serve me. They did not mind
investigating false allegations made against me as a by lawyers to
protect politicians but refused to accept hard evidence of Bank Fraud,
Securities Faud and Tax Fraud which is well within the scope oftheir
employment. The well paid governent officials within my own nativeland
are more than willing to throw me back to the wolves in the USA
claiming that they don't have jurisdiction over me. Why? Are they
pissed I ran for Parliament and had too much fun telling the truth in
the process? Maybe I should hang around and have some fun and piss
them off some more. Pat Hannraty did suggest that in one of the CBC
debates that I was excluded from. Joe Day ran for many positions in
government and never succeeded. However once he became a top dog
lawyer for the Irving Clan he wasn't long finding a seat. I say the
first order of business for any elected Member of Parliament would be
to inspire and act that makes all Senators be elected as well. What
say you oh ye honourable members of the NDP? Why not put that on Mr.
Martin'.s table to chew on.


Friday the 13th of August, 2004

Senator Joseph A. Day

Ethics Counselor, Howard Wilson

etc etc etc

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
To: <cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca>
Cc: <ottawacomments@state.gov>; <McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca>;
<vverma@cavalluzzo.com>; "Marlys" <edwardh@ruby-edwardh.com>;
<motomaniac_02186@yahoo>
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 12:11 PM
Subject: Fw: Out of Office AutoReply: I just called your office

Attn Josie Maguire
Senior Consular Officer

I did receive your call but apparently I was on the phone to some other
folks including the US Embassy in Canada. When I did return your call I was
shunted to voicemail once more. I give up. I want hard copy or to talk to
real people in front of many witnesses. Talking to lawyer's machines or
sending emails just won't do anymore. At least after Sept 3rd I will be
finally allowed to speak to a jury of my peers in the USA. I will remove the
matter to a Federal Court and call Ms. McLellan to testify. She is the
Solicitor General of Canada and should be concerned about my safety.
Correct? I know that Argeo P. cellucci doesn't give a damn about me but you
should. Correct? Argeo's tour of duty in Canada for Mr. Bush is nearly at
an end . I look forward to suing the bastard in the USA. did i mention that
I was very glad that Argeo could not talk Canadians into following Bush off
to war? Does anyone remember how long the USA ignored World War Two?

David R. Amos

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ottawa - Comments" <ottawacomments@state.gov>
To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 11:20 AM
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: I just called your office

Dear Sir/Madam,

On behalf of United States Ambassador Paul Cellucci, I would like to
acknowledge receipt of your e-mail message. The Ambassador appreciates
your comments. Please be assured that they have been carefully reviewed.
If your message included an inquiry, our Information Resource Center will
reply separately within the next few days.

Thank you for taking the time to write.

Office of Public Affairs
United States Embassy, Ottawa

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca
Cc: ottawacomments@state.gov ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ;
vverma@cavalluzzo.com ; Marlys ; motomaniac_02186@yahoo
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 10:58 AM
Subject: I just called your office

Hey

My name is David R. Amos I am a Canadian citizen and a permenant
resident of the USA.

I am returning to the USA on my own free will to answer false
allegations supporting criminal charges placed against me by
Dorchester District Court in Boston. Docket # 0407CR004623.

No one will speak to me about this matter including the Police, the DA
or the Clerk.

I suspect foul play and the false charges have been laid in order to
compel me to return to the USA before my actions within the Arar
Commission have an effect.

I suspect that agents of the DHS will pounce on me as soon as I enter
the USA just as they have done in the past.

In an effort to protect myself, my rights, my interests and my freedom
I must answer the malicious summons but not before making many people
aware of my plight and demanding that Ronald A. Irwin finally do
something to defend the rights of a fellow Canadian.

Many people will be watching to see if I can make it to court on
September 3rd. I am the most curious of all.

In the past I have explained my concerns to your office in great
detail but to no avail but at least I have Anne McLellan's signature.

Although I cannot call the Ambassador to court in the USA, I certainly
can in Canada.

The same holds true for Argeo P. Cellucci in the USA.

Both Ambassadors are lawyers and all I have to say about that is shame
on you sirs
Honourable is a word you do not even understand, you certainly do not
deserve it for a title. Check my word before you call me a liar or
worse.

I did run for Parliament and told many people about the state of our
democracies. If my adversaries kill me now it will be a political
reason that caused my demise. I want everyone to know my blood will be
on your hands.

Perhaps the RCMP should send someone to watch over me rather than
wasting our precious resources teaching a Yankee Carpetbagger like
Argeo how to ride a horse.

Cellucci appointed most of the corrupt judges I have encountered and
Ashcroft directed Michael Sullivan to remove our matters to federal
court within weeks of my serving Cellucci in Canada. Even Cellucci
admited that Sullivan was too dumb to be Governor so they appointed
him US Attorney and that gave an old buddy of Cellucci's Tim Cruz a
chance at Sullivan's old job.

What say you Cynthia Merlini? Should you wake that old lawyer Mr.
Irwin up and send him out and about Beantown to ask a few questions on
my behalf? If I make it back to Boston I will have many questions for
you.

At good place to start would be the Suffolk County DA's office. I have
a letter from his Assistant Gerald P. Stewart dated July 29th that
contains no information or answer to the letter I sent him. However he
does admit to receiving much material for you to review. His number is
617 619-4000.

As I said I just called your office and got the usual voicemail that
is usually never returned. I will now call back and try to talk a
person rather than a machine. I have a record and witnesses to my
calls because I don't trust lawyers to do the right thing.

Some of the lawyers within the Arar Commission are attempting to
charge me with criminal harrassment as well for simply emailing them
proof of the truth. What planet are lawyers from?

Ms. Verma, I have heard nothing from you. Has Senator Joe Day
forwarded the material I gave him to the Arar Commission yet?

I will be giving more to the RCMP tomorrow.

When will some lawyer or other public servant begin acting within the
scope of their employment?

The fact that the dumb bastard, Michael J. Sullivan certifies that it
was so don't mean that it is a true statement.

A true statement is that desperate men do desperate things. If you
don't think that I have many a low man in highs places cornered by
their own lack of ethics and integrity you should go view the material
I sent the DA and many others.

My work is done. I have proved my point and protected my family's
interests. Now it is my turn to employ lawyers.


Cya'll in Court:)


David R. Amos

153 Alvin Ave.

Milton MA. 02186



----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Ruby-Edwardh.com
Cc: martine.turcotte@bell.ca ; harbourmla@nb.aibn.com ;
Brad.Green@gnb.ca ; nbombud@gnb.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ;
brian.keirstead@gnb.ca ; wayne.steeves@gnb.ca ; bev.harrison@gnb.ca ;
comail@lsuc.on.ca ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; vverma@cavalluzzo.com ;
Marlys ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 7:09 AM
Subject: Clayton meet Angie

As you can see I have nothing further to say to her because we have
lots to argue in several courts in a couple of weeks.

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: atroccoli@lodms.com
Cc: nshulman@lodms.com ; Bachrach, Barry A. ; Mayor@ci.boston.ma.us ;
FoleyK.bpd@ci.boston.ma.us ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ;
Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ; irc@usembassycanada.gov
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 3:46 PM
Subject: What was the outcome of your false allegations

Hey Angie and the rest of the Shulman crowd.

The Boston Police Dept and the Suffolk County District Attorney
refused to discuss it with me. August 13th has come and gone and I
have received no word. Now that Barry has withdrawn for our matters, I
will return to the USA to defend our interests. I will look forward to
meeting your law firm in court in September to protect my entire
family's interests. But first I must make my problems with you and
your associates well known in Canada before I return to the USA and be
subject to further harassment by the police and the DHS. The last time
I appeared in that Court Judge Virginia Ward attempted to have me
arrested bythe Canton Police Dept. for no reason whatsoever.

The first question I will ask Norfolk Probate Court is how come
my wife has not been notified of the death of Uncle Franky in June.
She is an heir to his estate as well as your clients. Have they been
notified? I think the reason my wife has not been notified is because
of the fact that neither he nor anyone else has assented to any of the
accountings now on file in that court. What say you? The first
question I will ask you in court is why did you wait until I was out
of the country and running for Parliament to make false allegations of
criminal harrassment? You know as well as I that it was my wife that
came to your office on June 1st to serve you documents to answer
whatever it was that you had her summoned to court for on that day.
According to Barry something happened in Plymouth Probate Court in
July but we have not been informed as to what it was. All of us were
in Canada and you knew it. I did receive a copy of a letter from Barry
to you where he informed you of that fact and we waited for the
conference call that never came. When my wife appeared in Norfolk
Probat Court on July 20th you refused to take her documents and after
the court received and stamped their copy, they read it and gave it
back. Why? You should go find your stuff because your law firm is
going to have to argue every word of it with me. If you want an exact
copy of it perhaps you should contact the Suffolk County District
Attorney he received an exact copy and did acknowledge the receipt of
it. Either he is with me and against you or he stands with you. There
is no middle ground for any lawyer in Public Service in particular to
stand on.

Perhaps your crooked clients should have informed you that
Uncle William J. Kickham is an ex FBI agent therefore he was an
untouchable in the USA. I know I informed Special Agent in Charge Ken
Kaiser and his present and past bosses Mr. Mueller and Mr. Freeh that
their Uncle Willy was a crook and they didn't seem to care. Maybe
someday in the future an ethical Canadian Government will eventualy
look into the reason that is.

The text of the following email clearly states my opinion as to
why you did what you did and when you did it. Did you not think I
would remember the fact that the first day I ever met you in court was
the same day the Secret Service and the Milton Police Deptment came to
my door investigating false allegations made aganst me by the
Massachsetts Trial Court? Obviously the unnamed source of the
allegations did so to cover up the foul play of you and your clients
for the benefit of the FBI and their reputation. I will find out who
that person was under the Freedom of Information Act. The Inspector
General of the DHS has refused to tell me. It should not affect
National Security to be informed of the name someone that made false
allegations against me.

The Honourable Ronald A. Irwin, C.M., LL.B., Q.C., P.C. should
wake up and pay attention he is a lawyer. I just left voicmail to his
assistant. It is time that he act in a fellow Canadian's best
interests. That is his job. Wayne Easter directed me to him.


David R. Amos

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: atroccoli@lodms.com
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 12:16 PM
Subject: RE You and me and Mr. Shulman

Hey Angie

I got your chickenshit message. Barry is not my lawyer. He speaks
only for my wife. He has told you this before. What part of this do
you not understand? It was you and your clients that have attacked my
interests and that of my children and friends as well as my wife's.
Get it? I repeat Barry only speaks for my wife. Get it?

Your clients sent me these letters. Did you advise them to do so? In
the police report from Plymouth when your client Robert O'Meara stole
our belongings the Police clearly stated that he was acting on your
advice. Is that not your client that is knocking down our home and
stealing or destroying our personal property and that of several of
our friends without exercising due process? Can you think of any
reason why my friends and kids should not sue you too? I saw that you
billed him for talking to the housing court. Did they not inform you
of the law? I listened to Livingstone explain it to you and Whiting
once again on Mar 22rd after the fraudulent sale and did you not
bother to read his backdated court order to the same date. Even he now
admits there appears to be other interested parties. Maybe your new
boss can explain it to you before May 28th.

I did file an appearance in Norfolk Probate Court on April 1st
and served it upon your clients because you once again failed to
notify us of your actions. I did not know Shulman was involved until I
finally saw the docket. You must address your concerns to me and
notify me of your actions as well as Barry. Why do you think you are
entitled to a restraining order because of my reactions to your
actions? You do speak for the bastards that sent me these letters.
Correct? In the photo is that not one of the properties that you wish
to avoid arguing with me about? Nothing you or the court has done is
legal and you know it. It was you who filed my Notice of Appearance in
Plymouth dated January 3rd, 2003 after McCarthy had destroyed the
original because you were the only person to receive a copy of it. You
know as well as I that your clients forged my wife's signature on the
first purchase and sale agreement as does Mr. Schulman. I do not have
to explain to you your practice of fraud against me and the court. I
am suing you and Shulman etc because of it.

Say hey to Mr. Shulman for me and tell him I will wait to argue
him in court since he has chosen to stand with you and ignore the
rules of conduct that allow him to practice law for a fee. I have
never practiced law, nor do I wish to be a lawyer. I have only
defended our interests in my own name and as my wife's attorney in
fact and pursuant to MGL 201b. If Shulman wishes to file a complaint
against me so be it. I welcome it in fact. That will save me the costs
of filing against him. However may I suggest that you quit bothering
my wife's lawyer about my matters. You have far more important matters
to consider like Wiretap tapes and crooked Feds don't you? You sent
Mr. Bachrach the proof that Schulman received a copy of wiretap tape
number 139 without my authorization and now you have sent him the
proof of your own malice towards me. Why did you choose to involve Mr.
Bachrach in my matters? I am sending him a copy of this email and your
pissed off boss as well. Trust me Shulman is no less angry than I and
you know the reason why. We are both upset by your stupidity and
severe lack of ethics and the fact that he is now in bed with a bunch
of crooks because he listened to you and ignored me.

I will bring this email to court and the related documents
already sent to Mr. Shulman if he wishes to file a malicious
restraining order to stop a person from legally defending his
interests and asking his associate to stop her clients from harassing
me. Otherwise I will save them as evidence against him and you in
federal court. The reason Shulman received my email was because you
listed his email on your contact page. Clearly you are tied at the hip
in your actions against me against me. I only knew of this email
address after Mr. Bachrach forwarded me your email to him.


Cya'll in Court:)

David R. Amos


----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: atroccoli@lodms.com
Cc: martine.turcotte@bell.ca ; nshulman@lodms.com ;
harbourmla@nb.aibn.com ; info@gg.ca ; comail@lsuc.on.ca ;
McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; vverma@cavalluzzo.com ; Marlys ;
Ruby-Edwardh.com ; : BBACHRACH@bowditch.com ; brian.keirstead@gnb.ca ;
wayne.steeves@gnb.ca ; bev.harrison@gnb.ca ; Brad.Green@gnb.ca ;
nbombud@gnb.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ;
Mayor@ci.boston.ma.us
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 7:07 AM
Subject: Angie please allow me to introduce you to Clayton

Mr. Ruby

Lets ignore Angie for a minute the following email should fill
you in on my perspective of her. I just received word that The Boston
Police Dept. made good on their threat to file criminal harassment
charges against me on behalf of Angie and I must return to the USA on
Sept 3rd to answer the charges or a warrant will be sent out for my
arrest. Now isn't that special? Should I wait for Ashcroft to
extradite me? Or Perhaps Jack Hooper will send some of his fellas
around to take me away for him and his buddies in DHS. I find it
interesting that they have already appointed me a Probation Officer
and I am yet to be found a felon. So much for being innocent until
being proven guilty. I will return to the USA as ordered after I meet
the Police Commission in Fredericton next week. I will send an email
to you proving to you what I say is true. But I think you may already
know it. My phone has relayed some interesting information and the
cops are avoiding me like the plague.

Upon my return to the USA I will remove the matter to Federal
Court according to its Local Rules and demanding a judge and jury. To
start the circus in a proper fashion, I have already notified many
fancy folks to get ready to be called to testify. Do you think
Cardinal Law will come? How about Bush and Kerry? In the USA I am
looking forward to the argument because at long last I will be
afforded a jury of my peers to tell a very interesting tale to with an
amazing number witnesses to call and a rather astounding amount of
supporting evidence. If you wish Clayton, you can add your name to
Angie's charges against me. I will name you in my personal injury
lawsuits. I will give you first swing before I pounce on you in my
best effort to bankrupt all of you and see your license to practice
law revoked. Joe day should have provided my material to the Arar
Commission by now. the fact that you and your partner now threaten me
will criminal harassment only proves your malice towards me.

The email from your partner Marlys it affirmed to me my
suspicions from last night. I had called Mr. Arar's lawyers and
managed to speak to Karen Spector she claimed to have never heard my
name but I quit talking to her the instant she also claimed not to
have an email address. Whereas I have never met a lawyer that didn't
have one, I immediately checked and left voicemail to a lawyer that I
believe is her and who certainly had an email address. I have elected
to send to her the same stuff I gave the Customs and Immigration
agents the instant I returned to Canadian soil and a copy of a letter
the CCR lawyers received a long time ago well before they filed a
complaint against Ashcroft. I believe that Karen Spector and Michael
Ratner but perhaps she will give the material to the Arar Commission
if Joe Day won't.

I will be naming many people in a personal injury complaint
including you, Marlys, Angie and Anne McLellan. I believe that may be
the malevolent reason for the Boston Police Dept assisting Angie with
her ridiculous charges. They merely want to make me a felon so I can't
sue them. Are they really that dumb or has the government truly gone
past the point of abandoning all hope? Is this necessary or will all
of you have a sudden fit of ethical behavior? Why on earth would
Canada wish to back up Bush and Ashcroft at this point in time? As you
can see byway of the following email it is Angie and her clients who
have in fact been harassing my Clan. I would be careful not to
associate yourself with her if I were you. You can never say that I
didn't try to inform you all of the truth. I must say that it is true
that I am angry and disappointed in the Canadian Justice System but I
would be a liar just like a lawyer if I were to say I was surprised.
Thus I have not lost my sense of reason or humour. I will never
understand why I was ignored and persecuted in the USA but am very
angry to receive the same treatment in Canada.

I sincerely hope that the NDP party listens to my suggestion
for the benefit of all Canadians. What say you Ms. Weir. For months
you have tried hard to pretend that I didn't exist. Perhaps now you
should come clean with the Upper Canadian Law Society and inform Mr.
Layton that you all should consider what I have suggested after you
study what I have given you.

I got really pissed off when Lorne Waldman admitted to me that
he knew the Inspector General of the DHS and then laughed at my
concerns. Mr. Waldman should know I ain't no immigrant and I was named
after men that died fighting Nazi's for the King and this country. One
of them was my fathers friend. his name was David and he was a fine
man from Upper Canada. He won the Victoria Cross. After you read the
following, ask me why I want to sue the Queen in the USA. I dare ya.
As you can see Governor General Clarkson has been informed and I will
make certain that a couple of her Lieutenant Governors get the same
stuff Anne McLellan got. The following words were from the CBC web
site last year at the same time the DHS was persecuting me.

"Zundel has been behind bars since February, when he was deported to
Canada from the United States for overstaying a visitor's visa. Zundel
immediately applied for refugee status in Canada, claiming he'd be
persecuted if he was deported to Germany.

The Solicitor General and Immigration Department responded by slapping
him with a security certificate declaring him a threat to national
security.

A Federal Court judge is in the process of deciding whether the
certificate is reasonable based on secret evidence from the Canadian
Security and Intelligence Service.

Immigration lawyer Lorne Waldman said he would find it very troubling
if Ottawa were to use the security certificate process as leverage in
immigration matters.

"What they were trying to do by using the security process was to
prevent him from having a refugee claim," said Waldman, who was quick
to add he holds "no sympathy at all" for Zundel personally. He
believes Zundel's refugee claim was frivolous and could have been
easily rejected.

"It causes me some concern that the government would be issuing the
certificate and then negotiating with Mr. Zundel," Waldman added.

"If they have the evidence in the certificate, they should proceed
with the process."

"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a
revolutionary act." --George Orwell

What say you all you ethical Members of the Bar?

David R. Amos

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
To: "Marlys" <edwardh@ruby-edwardh.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 12:17 AM
Subject: Re: Please allow me to tell the police for you

So you say. I will have alot to say about that in a few minutes when I call
the Arar Commission.

Look for a couple of forwards you should read real slow. I am naming you in
a complaint or two in the USA. Let me know if you wish to settle first. i
was not surprised last night when I was informed by Arar's lawyers of the
fact that they never heard my name.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Marlys" <edwardh@ruby-edwardh.com>
To: "moto maniac" <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: Please allow me to tell the police for you

Please do not e-mail me, my office or Mr. Ruby. Any further contact will be
criminal harassment.


----- Original Message -----
From: <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
To: <Stroutman@ccr-ny.org>
Cc: <mratner@igc.org>; <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 6:45 PM
Subject: Mr, Ratner I just called 212-243-3805 and left voicemail

Perhaps you should read what this person won't.

I know you are the one telling her to bounce this stuff back.

You can't fool me I am too stupid.

She knows I can read and so do you. Her adding insult to injury
by asking me for donations. Makes me want to add her name to
my complaint against you.

What say you Mr. Ratner?

Say hey to your buddy Mr. Ashcroft for me.

Tell him I will be back in the USA soon.

From: Suelee Troutman <Stroutman@ccr-ny.org>
To: 'David Amos' <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: Text of letter to Joe Day
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 10:07:08 -0400
not sure what that was but it was too long to read so i deleted it. but
since i work in the development department, i'd be happy to accept any
donation you'd like to make to ccr. otherwise, you may wish to direct your
emails elsewhere.


----- Original Message -----
From: "moto maniac" <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
To: <ruby@ruby-edwardh.com>
Cc: <comail@lsuc.on.ca>; <McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca>; <vverma@cavalluzzo.com>;
<edwardh@ruby-edwardh.com>; <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 5:35 PM
Subject: Please allow me to tell the police for you

Hey Mr Ruby

I will enjoy arguing how you feel emails informing you of your
partner's obligations are criminal acts. I will wager I will be complaining
of you first. The first question I will ask any court is whether or not
what you just informed me is true and can be found in law. If not has an
officer of the court just dillberately misreprsented the law to protect his own
interests? If that is true then perhaps your are the one that broke the Rules.
What say you Mr. Ruby?

The interesting part of this is that a lawyer in the USA just tried to
file a criminal harrassment charge against me down there for sending her
partner an email similiar to this. To date no one will inform me as to the
outcome of the first attempt to charge me with harrassment.

This is definitely not spam. Nor is it unsolicited. You are a solicitor
and this is your business. You would have no qualms about attacking me on
behalf of any client willing to pay your fees. Would it be crimminal
harassment if I warned you away from me and you didn't go? The email does
come from a Yankee web site.Why not add your complaint to the Yankee
lawyer's and we can make it a rather interesting cross border complaint. You
do understand that although I am a Canadian Citizen, I am also a permenant
American resident thus two different federal codes must be obeyed. Ashcroft
had no trouble giving me a hard time with Canada's blessings. Why can't I
register my indignation about it to lawyers hired by the Canadian government
to investigate a similiar matter at the same time? I think I need a Yankee
judge and jury don't you? After all no would in Canada claims jurisdiction
over me.

I am meeting a bunch of folks that answer for police actions next week. I
will show them this email and explain to them how you are associated to
Ms. Edwardh and that if a lawyer refuses to uphold the law it not harrassment
to remind them of the law before you sue the bastards. You are a big wig in the
Upper Canadian Law society. Correct? Don't you think it is time to check the
work of your partner and her understanding of the meaning of the word
integrity. Better yet ask landslide Annie. She taught law a long time ago
down here in New Brunswick. Ask her how fearless and pigheaded some
Martimers are and how little respect they have for liars or lawyers. If she
won't tell you ask Joe Day or Rob Moore they are both lawyers that were
appointed or elected to speak for us in Ottawa amongst the upper Canadian
snobs.

Cya'll in Court Mr. Clayton Ruby

David R. Amos

----- Original Message -----
From: <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
To: <vverma@cavalluzzo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 5:27 PM
Subject: I just called these folks

Ask me why I am not surprised that they have never heard my name.

Karen Spector, Julian Roy, Julian Falconer
8 Prince Arthur Ave.
Toronto Ontario M5R 1A9
Canada
Telephone: (416) 964-3408
Fax: (416) 929-8179

----- Original Message -----
From: <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
To: <comail@lsuc.on.ca>
Cc: <info@canlaw.com>; <information@lsbc.org>; <mcarrier@brunnet.net>;
<pringrose@thezone.net>; <communications@barreau.qc.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 4:33 PM
Subject: Mr. Ruby and the others speak volumes about your law societies

My number is 506-434-1379 I am calling your office right now.
From: "Ruby-Edwardh.com" <ruby@ruby-edwardh.com>
To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
CC: "mandy machin" <mandy@ruby-edwardh.com>
Subject: Re: Text of letter to Joe Day
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:34:37 -0400

To continue now is criminal harassment under the Criminal Code. You must
stop. clayton ruby


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bachrach, Barry A." <BBACHRACH@bowditch.com>
To: "'moto maniac'" <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 3:58 PM
Subject: RE: Thanks for the response I would be happy to meet you next week.

Keep safe

-----Original Message-----
From: moto maniac [mailto:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 2:56 PM
To: Grant.GARNEAU@gnb.ca
Cc: Bachrach, Barry A.; brian.keirstead@gnb.ca; wayne.steeves@gnb.ca;
bev.harrison@gnb.ca; Brad.Green@gnb.ca; nbombud@gnb.ca;
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca; cei@nbnet.nb.ca
Subject: Thanks for the response I would be happy to meet you next week.

Attn
Bolduc Clement, Executive Director
Chairman / New Brunswick Police Commission
435 King Street
Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 1E5
Canada
Phone: (506) 453-2069
Fax: (506) 457-3542

Sir,

I will call before I send this email so that we can set a date. (The
time is Wednesday at ten thirty in the morning and I plan to bring two
witnesses and it was agreed to) As you can see by the nature of my
complaints, I cannot afford to trust anyone and the police in particular. I
must bring a couple of witnesses to attest to everything I say and do. I
have no idea as to why Wayne Steeves or his assistant have not responded to
me. But I have just called his office and asked that his Assistant Paul
Keirsted attend the meeting as well. I request that Mr. Keirstead ask for
the material that Brad Green has acknowledged the receipt of in a letter to
me dated August 3rd. and in which he claims that he has no jurisdiction over

me. Obviously i have notified Brad Green of this request. I also ask that he
send someone to speak with me as well. I also notified Bev Harrison of my
concerns about the actions of the Sergeant of Arms and he has yet to
respond. I have no understanding as to why that is perhaps he should send
someone to the meeting as well. i think it would behove the City of
Frederiction to send Bruce Noble as well.

I will bring my own copies for your review and I will be bringing
several original wiretap tapes for you to make copies of if you wish.
However I require them as evidence to give to the Arar Commission if they
ever get around to asking me any questions. You can see I have notified them
of my willingness to meet with the Police Commission. If they do not notify
me soon of any interest, I will return to the USA to defend my family's
interests and allow the material that i have already given them stand on its
own merit. My family is called to court in early September to defend our
home from the most malicous complaint imaginable in likely one of the most
corrupted courts in America. The last time i sat in that court a judge
atempted to have me arrested for merely waiting for my motion to be heard.
After I deal with the crooks in that matter, I must file a complaint in
South Carolina ASAP, therefore I can no longer afford anymore time with
unethical Canadian lawyers that are willing to assist the CCR lawyers and
Ashcroft's cohorts in the USA

Mr. Arar and I will have to find justice separately and the best way we
each know how. I simply don't trust his lawyers particularly after the
emails I have received from them in the past day. Perhaps it may work out
for the best for all if Arar employs lawyers in Canada and I act Pro se in
the USA. The results of both actions will be well worth comparing to check
the ethical work of public service of two governments.

Obviously I have notified a lawyer in the USA of where I am am going and
why. I wish to make Barry aware that Attorney General Brad Green is also the

Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and the former Soliciitor General of Canada
Andy Scott who is also from Fredericton now speaks for all the Indians in
Canada. Methinks these would be intersting characters to address your
concerns with.

I trully see no need to explain to any of you the reason why I must
answer a voicemail from the Police Commisssion in such a fashion. Never
forget it is the police that I am complaining of. It is them that I am very
wary of. It is this email that I will print and take with me as I leave the
house. I did not like it yesterday when CISNB was more interested in my
whereabouts than the whereabouts of the evidence of the so called story that

I was telling them. That did not help my paranoia. I am part of the public
as well whereas they are employed to protect the public safety they should
act within the scope of their employment and go get the evidence that I am
willing to argue on the public record in front of many witnesses. I do not
wish to become part of another unsolved crime. Poor old John Felsing and his

wife suffered enough for us all and only his dog could tell the tale. I
heard the gossip about that too and would love to invesitgate that crime
myself someday if I had the time. I know for a fact the last thing one could

call cops is diligent. Sgt. Huff from Tulsa proved that to me long ago. Ask
the ghost of H. Paul Rico when and why I predicted his demise. I will show
you the proof next week.

David R. Amos

From: "Bachrach, Barry A." <BBACHRACH@bowditch.com>
To: "'conniefogal@telus.net'" <conniefogal@telus.net>
CC: 'David Amos' <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
Subject: FW: Take a deep breath and relax.
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:53:30 -0400

Connie, if you are interested you may call me at 508-926-3403 or
508-735-9398

-----Original Message-----
From: moto maniac [mailto:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 12:49 PM
To: ender@hegemon.ca
Cc: brian.keirstead@gnb.ca; spongebob@hegemon.ca; sales@hegemon.ca;
conniefogal@telus.net; Bachrach, Barry A.
Subject: RE: Take a deep breath and relax.

David

You are too late I already called CISNB and asked them why they did
not come see you. You should learn to listen and read before you write
shit about a man that has the same concerns as you about the political
scene. We should have been friends not foes. Now you are just another
witness to me. It is your lawyer that I wish to argue with. Because
obviously he has no understanding of the meaning of the word integrity.
That is well explained in Chapter one of the Rules of Professional
Conduct within the New Brunswick Law Society. If he does not obey
those rules then he should not be allowed to practice law for a fee.

If you had bothered to read anything of mine, you would have seen that
I do not pick fights with ordinary folks such as you and I. It is officers
of the court and law enforcement officers that do not uphold the law that
I find contemptable.

However it is you who must apologize to my wife in person or
discuss the matter with her former lawyer. (I have just asked him to
witdraw from our matters for now at least until he is better paid) His
name is Barry Bachrach and as you can see i just notified him because
some of this stuff may interest him for the benefit of another client
of his. Type Barry's name in the web. Then ask your friend Connie if
she agrees with Barry about the circumstances surrounding the upcoming
hearings in BC about John Graham. Perhaps Barry and Connie should
talk for the benefit of all. Maybe my friend Jack will introduce you to
some Indians that may agree with me and have no respect for the FBI
as well.

I just stuck my hand out, don't bite it.

Dave

P.S. Hey Barry perhaps you can explain me to Ms. Fogal she is in
British Columbia perhaps you may be of assistance to each other.

From: "David Szemerda" <ender@hegemon.ca>
To: "'moto maniac'" <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
CC: <spongebob@hegemon.ca>, <sales@hegemon.ca>
Subject: Take a deep breath and relax.
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 13:20:27 -0300

David;

Thank you for directly contacting me. As I said in my second letter today, I
did not intend for you or your wife to get the impression you did from my
statement. I apologize for not writing more carefully. The two statements
were meant to be taken separately upon re-reading it I can see how you
misinterpreted.

I did not involve Jack in anything, as I said in my first letter to
you. Whether or not you realize it, you came across as a dangerous
lunatic to myself and the few others who have read your letters. My
sole intention was to determine if I should fear for my life. And as
I said the only things I were told are (i) you aren't that bad of a guy,
when you get to know you,(ii) you met a woman, moved to the states
about 10 years ago, (iii) you don't really have a job. That is it!

All I wanted was for you to explain to me, what you want from me.
Would it not at least be polite to tell me what you are doing and why
you are giving me this stuff? I don't know you, I don't know Connie
that well. I ran for CAP because I could not vote for any of the
other parties. Simple as that. I liked the platform about getting rid
of NAFTA.

You seem to imply that Connie and I go way back and that we are good
buddies. Like I said several times.... She came down, I got to spend
a very nice day talking to her about the party, and other stuff. She
seemed to be nice enough to me.

If you just would take a bit of your time and tell me what you want,
all this could be avoided. Can you just relax, and tell me what is
going on in a nutshell? I read two or three letters; I have no idea
who most of the people are, I have know idea what you trying to
accomplish. Why can you not understand that I am completely unaware
of what you want?

I like to live a relatively low key life, raise my chickens, cut down
some trees, drink a few beer. I have an interest in politics, but it
is not my life. You appear to know many people and have issues with
many, I don't know any of them. Why are you involving me? Who do you
think I am? That is all I want to know.

David Szemerda

-----Original Message-----
From: moto maniac [mailto:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 12:17 PM
To: ender@hegemon.ca
Cc: wayne.steeves@gnb.ca; conniefogal@telus.net
Subject: RE: Joe Day got the stuff

What is your lawyer's name. I will deal with him. I have some more stuff for
him to laugh about. Has the CISNB been around to pick up the stuff you
threatened to destroy? Has Jack Eldridge been around to see you yet? My
wife will be here in a week or so She will have a few questions for you about
your statements about our marriage. Watch you manners in front of her. If
you offend her in front of me, asshole I will make you stand accountable as
a man and try to tear you a new one. I did come to your door on the
day I stated I did. I am not shy to come again. Particularly after you invited
me in writing. It was you who was not there the first time I came and I
did tell you I would be coming your way. I did not involve Jack in my
matters. You did. Nor did I try to serve him anything. I did show him a pile
of FBI tapes and documents but only so he could affirm he saw them. He did
not listen to or read anything. You are a witness to the crimes not him.

Quite simply I demand that you tell the truth when questioned. I am done
with you because I truly have no time for a fool such as you. Perhaps you
should review what i said on the phone and read the letter I brought to you.
There was no need to attack me and insult my wife.

I do have a bone to pick with your lawyer friend.It was your lawyer friend
Connie that implied to Kevin Peck that I was a Fed and I was to be ignored.
I saved her email just in case she wants to call me a liar. I forwarded a
copy of it to Mary Sue Haliburton long ago after she figured I had powerful
help as well. I am who I say I am. No more no less. Ask Jack. I will prove
it to your lawyer.

From: "David Szemerda" <ender@hegemon.ca>
To: "'David Amos'" <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
CC: <spongebob@hegemon.ca>, <sales@hegemon.ca>,
<conniefogal@telus.net>
Subject: RE: Joe Day got the stuff
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:36:14 -0300

David;

Connie Fogal would have no idea regarding my lawyer, as I have
never included her in any of the discussions about you. I am sure she has
better things to concern herself with. My lawyer is someone who happens
to be a friend of mine and has no concern regarding your letters other
than recreational reading.

In my last reply, I asked that you clarify, directly to me,exactly what it
is that you wanted from me. It appears that you are not capable of directly
answering any of my queries without dragging me into some paranoiac
battle you have against the world.

David should have informed you that the last thing I am is a FED"

I have not informed anyone about you, I have never met you, the closest
we came, was you (I assume) stuffing envelopes under my door. I have
no idea who you are or anything about you, although FED would be
much lower on the list than escaped mental patient.

I am unsure as to your desire obtain credibility in whatever your
endeavours may be, however your presentation comes far short of
indicating any degree of competency.

Once again.... I extend an invitation to you, to address me
directly, not in some third party reference, and discuss exactly
what you desire from me. Please refrain from making the assumption
that I care, in any way, what you are doing. I have yet to read the junk
you forward me, and very soon I shall simply put a delete filter on my
email to eliminate your email before I have to see them. I have given you
every opportunity to speak to me rationally, but you have not availed
yourself of those opportunities.

I sincerely hope the next message from you will address me directly
with reasons as to why have involved me in correspondence, and what
exactly you hope to gain in the process. I have little time for your folly
and wish you would at least have enough courtesy to discuss the usage
of my name with me BEFORE you use it to indicate some sort of
relationship between us.

With diminished patience;

David Szemerda

-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 1980 3:50 AM
To: conniefogal@telus.net
Cc: Mary-Sue Haliburton; ender@hegemon.ca;
kpeck@canadianactionparty.ca
Subject: Fw: Joe Day got the stuff

Ms. Fogal

I demand to know the name of David Szmerda's lawyer who finds
my material so funny. I have some more stuff to give him and you to
laugh about. I also want to know whether or not CISBN has picked up
the stuff yet. I will forward to all of you the emails in which you
are discussed with serveral authorities. By now David should have
informed you that the last thing I am is a FED. but the FEDS are
getting copies of these emails.

David R. Amos

----- Original Message -----
From: "moto maniac" <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
To: <brian.keirstead@gnb.ca>
Cc: <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 10:12 AM
Subject: FW: RE: David I have not heard from your lawyer buddy Connie

Hey Brian

I am sending this email to you as a double check before I call your
office.(506) 453-7414 I am well aware that you tried to be my Conservative
opponent in the recent federal election in Fundy rather than Rob Moore.
However what you may not be aware of is that my secretary, David Mollins
knows of your boss, Wayne Steeves because your boss knows his family very
well. So we are doing you the courtesy of calling you directly in order to
explain my allegations and concerns in a personal manner. With any luck
there maybe a by election in Fundy in the near future after I begin my
litigation process against our new MP Rob Moore. He was a lawyer before the
election and his obligations towards the Public Trust have now increased by
tenfold. I know he has failed me and left me to the wolves and their lack of
mercy or ethics.

Perhaps you should get Mike Connolly of the CISNB(506-452-2048)
when he gets off vacation to go find this dumb bastard's lawyer and
get the stuff
I gave him before it is destroyed. I will be demanding to know that lawyer's
name. Apparently that lawyer is not aware of the the Rules of Professional
Conduct that allow him to practice law for a fee. They did go into effect on
January 1st of this year didn't they? Bruce Noble and I will be arguing
about them alot in the near future.

The lawyer David Lutz who help John Herron in his campaign told me in
Provincial Court on July 29th that he had given this same stuff to law
enforment but he would not tell me whom. Every cop in the court that day
just looked away and ignored me. Now i am demanding to knowthey were
and when it was given.

As for Connie Fogal I will send her the stuff myself. Mr. Szemerda is
simply a village idiot. It is Ms. Fogal that I wish to argue. David Szemerda's
address is as follows:

1 main st. Unit 4
St. George, NB
E5C 3H9
phone 506 755-2799.

I don't care if I ever speak to him again outside of court but my wife may
want to tear him a new asshole. He did call our marriage some sort of a
swinging deal.

Best Regards
David R. Amos

From: "David Szemerda" <ender@hegemon.ca>
To: "'moto maniac'" <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
CC: <spongebob@hegemon.ca>, <sales@hegemon.ca>, <szemerda@hegemon.ca>
Subject: RE: David I have not heard from your lawyer buddy Connie
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 17:43:01 -0300

David.

No I did not send her anything. I really have no idea what you are talking
about. I did not listen to the CD, I did not read anything beyond the letter
addressed to me. That only occurring AFTER I removed your package to a
remote location; after throwing large rocks at it from a distance (check for
explosive devices), and then standing downwind in an unpopulated area with
gloves and mask (in case of toxic substance) did I even attempt to open it.
The CD is probably damaged and I probably couldn't play it if I wanted to.
I promptly gave the pile of stuff to a lawyer friend who is entertained by
reading stuff like that.

I also checked with Jack Eldridge, who related that you also showed up at
his house that day with a similar pile of stuff for him. My main purpose was
to determine if you were some psychotic deranged killer. I was informed
that you probably would not kill me or harm my family, I hope that is accurate.

During the campaign I was concerned with many other things beyond trying to
decipher the meaning of your reams of literature. At this point I still have
a business to keep afloat. Perhaps if I was retired with nothing better to
do, I would sift through it, but I doubt it.

When you contacted me I have no idea what you expected of me. You gave
me no indication of what your issues were. As I re-read your letter which
specifically mentions me... I am even more confused. How would I hear of
your efforts at debating in Sussex? I was in my own battle with CBC and
Rogers in regards to being left out of the debates they put on. The volunteers
working on my campaign totalled 1... me. Excuse me if I was a bit
pre-occupied. Of course I believe Connie Fogal more than I believe you. You
made one nonsensical telephone call to me, and stuffed a wad of legal mumbo
jumbo under my door. At least Connie made the effort to come see me and
discuss things in person. "However I do resent the words to the very same
lawyer he admires, Ms. Fogal." What the hell does that mean? Accounting for
grammatical incorrectness, what words do you resent? To whom were they
made? Who admires what, and how did you form that onion?

The second paragraph starts, "As I clearly stated to Mr. Szemerda..." Now I
must say I almost choked on my beer when I read that. "Clearly stated"????
There has been nothing that you have said, or written, that was clearly
stated. About the time I got to you stating something about proving that
you were exactly who you said you were, I tossed the pile aside after
briefly scanning through a few pages. As a future note... Your "Certificate of
Service" enclosed is almost laughable in a legal sense. You could have had
anyone shove the package under my door, and frankly it is a miracle that I
actually received it. Some retarded street thug could have easily snatched
it thinking there might be money in it. (Sort of wish they had.) You
certainly did not deliver it to my office in any form of secure delivery.

Now that being said, I found out a bit about how you found yourself a nice
american woman in Laconia some 10 years ago or so, and managed to swing
adeal so you don't have to work anymore. I also heard that you are not a bad
guy once you get to know you. However, I don't know you, and thus far you
present yourself to me a raving lunatic. If you wish to discuss your views, and
or concerns with me, please do so without the legal threats and innuendos.

I am more than happy to listen to the concerns of any person, but I don't the
cloak and dagger shit. You want to tell me what you want, and what the hell
you are talking about straight up... fine. Otherwise, leave me the
hell out of it.

Sincerely;
David Szemerda

-----Original Message-----
From: moto maniac [mailto:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2004 5:17 PM
To: ender@hegemon.ca
Cc: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: David I have not heard from your lawyer buddy Connie

David did you send that stuff to her? You can never say that you didn't get
it. Please view attached photos. . If I don't get an answer from her I will
presume that you did not send it on to Fogal T hus I must name you as a co
conspirator against me. I had fun playing politics but I am serious as a
heart attack about the legal matters. If you don't believe contact David
Lutz, the Arar Commission or Jack Hooper of the CSIS and mention my name.
Better yet call the guy recorded on the CD I dare ya.

This e-mail message is generated from the law firm of
Bowditch & Dewey, LLP and contains information that is
confidential and may be privileged as an attorney/client
communication or as attorney work product. The information
is intended to be disclosed solely to the addressee(s). If
you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of
this email information is prohibited. If you have received
this email in error, please notify the sender by return email
and delete it from your computer system. For more information
about Bowditch & Dewey, please visit our web site at
www.bowditch.com


-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 5:32 PM
To: edwardth@ruby-edwardh.com
Cc: info ccr
Subject: Fw: Text of letter to Joe Day

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos <mailto:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
To: Ruby-Edwardh.com <mailto:ruby@ruby-edwardh.com>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: Text of letter to Joe Day

The very second you act ethically I will

----- Original Message -----
From: Ruby-Edwardh.com <mailto:ruby@ruby-edwardh.com>
To: David Amos <mailto:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: Text of letter to Joe Day

Please remove me from your list. clayton ruby

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: ruby@ruby-edwardh.com
Cc: info@ccr-ny.org ; edwardth@ruby-edwardh.com
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 7:31 PM
Subject: Fw: Text of letter to Joe Day

Hey Ms. Edwardth

I talked to Lorne Waldman in person and he acted just like the dude
at CCR when I talked to him. Talk about an ignorant bunch of snotty
lawyers Mr. Arar is tangled up with. Well you fancy Upper Canadians
can never say that I didn't tell you about your sneaky Yankee friends.
Do I seem angry? Well tell Ratner and Waldman to go to hell for me
will ya and then send me their best lawyers to argue. If Michael
Ratner at the Center for Constitutional Rights 666 Broadway, 7th Floor
New York, NY 10012 Phone: (212) 614-6464 Fax: (212) 614-6499 don't
think email can get him in trouble then he should have a long talk
with Frank Quatrone or Martha Stewart and then check the US Mail I
sent him a long long time ago. That is what is in the Tif file hereto
attached.

David R. Amos

----- Original Message -----
From: Davies, Carl (Telegraph)
To: 'David Amos'
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 9:55 AM
Subject: RE: Text of letter to Joe Day
I remember the call in 2002. I didn't make the connection when you
were at Bill's that time. I'm not sure what exactly it is you're
asking though.

-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 1980 3:37 AM
To: oldmaison@yahoo.com
Cc: davies.carl@nbpub.com; news@timestranscript.com;
advocacycollective@yahoo.com; nbombud@gnb.ca
Subject: Fw: Text of letter to Joe Day

Yes Frenchy I did get your silly slam about comparing me to to a dog.
The thing is it is no insult. I compare myself to a mangy old guard
dog. Ask Brad Green and maybe he will show you the letter I sent him.
I am not impressed that you made an Irving paper. I have had far
better coverage than you and trust me they hate me more than they do
you. Ask Frank McKenna. Have you got around to asking your favorite
priest where Cardinal Law went after I filed my affidavit on Dec.
12th/02? Watch the priest's eyes when he answers you. Never mind
laughing at my plight Frenchy. Did you ever think the confession booth
is built the way it is so that you could not see the priests laughing
at you?

If you really want to get the scoop on things ask Carl why he is
no longer with CBC and why he don't say shit about me long ago.
Remember when I called you from the camp Carl in November of 2002 and
asked you to get Henrik to call me? Don't deny it because I had a
witnesses there who had suggested that I call you and I have my cell
phone records as well. How does it feel to be a part of an interesting
story Carl?

As for you Carl you can just say hey to our friends Henrik Tonning
and Bill Dalton for me and tell them I am still pissed off at them.
All of you smiling bastards know I ain't no bullshitter because it
takes one to know one.

As for you Mr. Vaughn and Mr. Richard perhaps you should get to
gether and share the material that Charles Leblanc gave you before the
shit hits the fan. Do you understnd the meaning of the word
Conspiracy. If not call the US Attorney Michael J. Sullivan in Boston
and ask him to explain. He is such a good Catholic boy that he edited
out Cardinal Law from my complaint about religious freedom.

Now thats funny because after he did so Charles J. Kickham Jr. did it again.

Are you still laughing fellas? Watch out for my next complaint.

----- Original Message -----
From: Bachrach, Barry A.
To: 'David Amos'
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 6:08 PM
Subject: RE: Text of letter to Joe Day

the dr. dean stuff is a riot. i'll talk to her.

-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 4:41 PM
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Subject: Re: Text of letter to Joe Day
Hey Barry

Now that there is no conflict of interest perhaps you should talk to
your partner Lauren Stiller about the beef I have with her. The Title
V inspection was clearly fraudulent and I gave her the proof long ago.

Maybe you would like to Call Jim Sokolove and have some fun with him.
Don't you find his double talk rather comical. Did you check the Dr.
Dean stuff?
Dave


----- Original Message -----
From: Bachrach, Barry A.
To: 'David Amos'
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 5:08 PM
Subject: RE: Text of letter to Joe Day

good to see you are up and running. sent withdrawals friday but you
know i am still here to help and want to keep abreat of what i can do.


----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: atroccoli@lodms.com
Cc: nshulman@lodms.com ; Bachrach, Barry A. ; Mayor@ci.boston.ma.us ;
FoleyK.bpd@ci.boston.ma.us ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ;
irc@usembassycanada.gov
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 3:49 PM
Subject: Fw: Text of letter to Joe Day


----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: conniefogal@telus.net
Cc: Mary-Sue Haliburton ; ender@hegemon.ca ; KevinDPeck@yahoo.com
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 1:34 PM
Subject: Here is proof of my word

----- Original Message -----
From: "Anderson, Scott (ott)" <sanderson@thecitizen.canwest.com>
To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 12:01 PM
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Text of letter to Joe Day

I am out of the office until Tuesday, August 17, but I will get your
message when I return. If you need immediate assistance please contact Pat
Hyndman Pathyndman@thecitizen.canwest.com. Pat's number is 613-596-3787.

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: kmalloy@hilltimes.com
Cc: dwatch@web.net ; sanderson@thecitizen.canwest.com ;
lettertoed@thestar.ca ; editor@guardianunlimited.co.uk ;
foreigneditor@independent.co.uk ; injusticebusters@shaw.ca
Sent: Friday, January 04, 1980 11:50 PM
Subject: Fw: Text of letter to Joe Day

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca
Cc: Crowder.J@parl.gc.ca ; Cullen.N@parl.gc.ca ; Davies.L@parl.gc.ca ;
Julian.P@parl.gc.ca ; Siksay.B@parl.gc.ca ; Blaikie.B@parl.gc.ca ;
Desjarlais.B@parl.gc.ca ; Wasylycia-Leis.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Martin.Pd@parl.gc.ca ; Angus.C@parl.gc.ca ;
Christopherson.D@parl.gc.ca ; Martin.T@parl.gc.ca ; Masse.B@parl.gc.ca
; Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 4:52 PM
Subject: Fw: Text of letter to Joe Day

Howdy folks within the NDP caucus.

Please notice that I did not bother sending your leader, Mr
Layton this email. I figured the lawyer amongst you, Mr. Comartin had
informed him of my doings by now but I figured they may not have told
the rest of you anything. The thing I like the most about your party
is the fact that so few lawyers can be found amongst your numbers. In
my opinion that speaks well of all of you. I doubt that I will ever
understand why your party was not interested in me as a member. That
said we are all Canadians and as such we should act according to our
conscience no matter our religion, politics or employment if we wish
to be proud and true to ourselves and our country. As ol Skakespeare
once wrote it will follow as surely as the night the day we will be
true to all others. In that light I did inform the leader of the Bloc
Quebecers of what I am up to so he can tell his friends even though I
don't consider them to be a federal party since they only stand in one
province and their mandate is to break apart our country. However I
must admit I am curious as to what he will do with his Newfound
knowledge of much more corruption. Will he use it to oust the crooked
Martin minority government or use it to his own political ends as Mr.
Harper did here and as Barack Obama did in the USA? Duceppe can call
and ask me anything he likes but it best be in English. I think it
would have been far easier for my fellow taxpayers to teach the French
folks English rather than the other way around. Plus we would all have
a fair chance at so many great jobs.

I have called some of you to convey through my voice that I am
a simple, sincere and serious man. Perhaps maybe some of you will at
least read and consider what I have written within the emails I have
forwarded you this weekend. I am not playing games with you although I
have had fun torturing the other politicians within the wicked game.
Call Mr. Hanratty, your party member in Fundy I met and talked and
debated him. Ask him what he thinks of me. I only wish to promote talk
amongst you in order that some of you may speak up and the truth will
take care of itself.

Best Regards


David R. Amos (506) 434-1379

Feel free to call and ask me anything you wish before
I return to the USA after that I will fall silent for awhile but I
will be listening.

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca
Cc: Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca ; McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca ; Regan.G@parl.gc.ca
; Brison.S@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Friday, January 04, 1980 5:03 AM
Subject: Fw: Text of letter to Joe Day

Hey Scott how do you like your new party so far? I understand
why you would run from the Alliance dudes. But Peter Makay should know
I would not bother talking if he or some alliance dude asked me to
step outside. I appreciate the four Fs like any proper Maritimer. Any
fat guy that went to Harvard would be slim pickenings for a proper
brawl. I have asked a few of the them to settle with me in such a
fashion and they thought I was a Hillbilly to even consider such
things. I was quick to inform them I was no Hillybilly but Maritimers
do like their style.

Peter you can tell the fancy parliamentry singer, John Crosbie
that I will be sending him something to crow about.

As for you Alexa and Peter you can continue to play the see no
evil, hear no evil, speak no evil game all you wish. I don't trust you
and don't want to talk to you anymore. If some honest NDP Member of
Parliament manage to do what I hope they do, I hope you two lose the
next election. I think you have become too fat dumb and happy playing
the wicked game. However Geoff Regan and I must discuss many things in
the near future. He does speak for the Attorney General in the Arar
matter. Must I sue him to get his attention? Methinks it wise for him
to call Joe Day today.

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca
Cc: vverma@cavalluzzo.com ; Martin.P@parl.gc.ca ;
Broadbent.E@parl.gc.ca ; Harper.S@parl.gc.ca ; dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
Moore.R@parl.gc.ca ; Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Friday, January 04, 1980 3:55 AM
Subject: Text of letter to Joe Day

He can never say that he didn't get it. This is an email is
sent as triple check as proof that it was done when and where I swear
I did it. That is his front door and although no one came to it
because I didn't bother knocking I did bring witnesses and obviously
took pictures

I can easily prove that I was in contact with Wayne Easter's
office on November 19th/03 the same day Arar's lawyers from the CCR in
the USA were. Apparently the Canadian government and Mr. Ashcroft must
have had a different plan as to what to do about me. Doesn't anyone
think that Anne McLellan, Wayne Easter and I have lots to argue about
within the Arar Commission. My evidence certainly supports Arar's.

If anyone whois now seated as a Member of Parliament considers
themselves worthy of the public trust perhaps they should speak up
andask a few questions and consider asking for a non confidence vote.
May I suggest that some member of the NDP who is not a lawyer contact
me before I return to the USA. I would prefer to talk to Ed Broadbent.
If he chooses to recall, I did wish him luck.

Veena tell Geoff Regan to give a call when he gets back from
golfing with Clinton and McKenna's buddies will ya?

Just so everybody knows I am sending this email to many folks all
around the world.

What do ya thing should I hang around home long enough to see if
Premier Lord calls an election for a Senator in the Federal government
or wait until he calls a by-election to fill Bernard Richard's vacate
seat at the provincial level? I know the Yankees are sick and tired of
me. But i did make lots of folks uphome laugh and think about things.
Everybody calls me a rebel or a fool. Both labels I take as my own
with a smile. However I must ask why am I so rebelious to expect
lawyers to uphold the law or demand that politicians uphold the Public
Trust? Why am I so foolish not to trust the law enforcement community?
Never forget it was the US Secret Service that came to my door with a
town cop that is paid to protect and serve me. They did not mind
investigating false allegations made against me as a by lawyers to
protect politicians but refused to accept hard evidence of Bank Fraud,
Securities Faud and Tax Fraud which is well within the scope oftheir
employment. The well paid governent officials within my own nativeland
are more than willing to throw me back to the wolves in the USA
claiming that they don't have jurisdiction over me. Why? Are they
pissed I ran for Parliament and had too much fun telling the truth in
the process? Maybe I should hang around and have some fun and piss
them off some more. Pat Hannraty did suggest that in one of the CBC
debates that I was excluded from. Joe Day ran for many positions in
government and never succeeded. However once he became a top dog
lawyer for the Irving Clan he wasn't long finding a seat. I say the
first order of business for any elected Member of Parliament would be
to inspire and act that makes all Senators be elected as well. What
say you oh ye honourable members of the NDP? Why not put that on Mr.
Martin'.s table to chew on.


Friday the 13th of August, 2004
Senator Joseph A. Day
Ethics Counselor, Howard Wilson
14 Everett St.
66 Slater St., 22nd Floor
Hampton, NB
Ottawa, ON. K1A 0C9
Prime Minister, Paul Martin
Geoff Reagan c/o Irwin Cotler,
80 Wellington Street
900 Justice Building
Ottawa, ON. K1A 0A2
Ottawa, ON. K1A 0A6
Eva Plunkett Inspector General (CSIS)
Philippe Rabot

340 Laurier Avenue West
RCMP External Review Committee
Ottawa, ON. K1A 0P8
P.O. Box 1159, Station B

Ottawa, ON. K1P 5R2

RE: Corruption

Hey Joe,

The fact that you said I was not worth voting for is no matter
to me. I just wish my fellow Canadians had the right to vote you out
of your job. That is one thing I agree with Mr. Lord about. To me you
are just another lawyer who couldn't get elected so you were
politically appointed to a high government position for the benefit of
Irving interests. Now that you are in public service not only must you
obey the Code of Conduct of your chosen profession, you must act
ethically as a well paid federal employee and speak for the public
good. Forget your former employer's interests and do your job.

It is time to check the work of many high officials and mine as
well. I demand that you study of the enclosed material then forward it
all to the Prime Minister Paul Martin. Ask him to forward copies of it
all to the other above named government employees and to the Arar
Commission in particular. I can easily prove prior contact to all the
above named persons or their offices and I believe they should be
expecting to see this stuff. The CD of the copy of wiretap tape
numbered 139 is served upon you as an officer of the court in
confidence in order that it may be properly investigated. I have given
you many more documents than the ones I will mention in the following
paragraphs. I will send a copy of this letter to many people as a
double check on your ethics.

One of the documents of foremost importance to me is a recent
letter Attorney General Brad Green sent to me dated August 3rd. It is
attached to the letter and all the other material I had delivered to
Bernard Lord and Frank McKenna just after Canada Day. I deem the
aforesaid letter to be so important because he is the first Canadian
public servant in any office to even admit knowledge my concerns and
allegations in two months of waiting for a proper response. His
position in public service and his answer forever prove just how bad
things really are in Canada and the USA. I am not sorry for the delay
in providing you with this material as I planned and stated within the
enclosed email. If you had wanted it, you would have returned my calls
or answered my email.

I had spoken to many people about my concerns as I ran for
Parliament. I made certain that the proper authorities knew of my
allegations the instant I was on Canadian soil. If our government was
on the up and up, someone should have sent the cops around to pick
this stuff up or at least ask me a few questions a long time ago. I
cannot wait any longer for my country to act properly in my defense.
The Yankees now want me in court.

The recent letter from Brad Green and the actions of some other
bad actors in Fredericton and the USA gave me cause to pause, rethink
and rewrite a bunch of stuff. One would think that Henrick Tonning,
the first judge that Green had ever appointed or the unnamed duty
counsel in court on the first day of Brad's new plan to defend the
rights of the people would have informed him that I was very pissed
off and still in New Brunswick. The Sheriff who refused to identify
himself in Henrik's court that day was more than willing to take me
away and under his jurisdiction. What province writes the Sheriff's
paycheck? Even the local rumormill had enough time to generate enough
gossip from July 29th to August 3rd for Brad Green to be adequately
informed before he wrote such a ridiculous letter to me. Clearly Brad
paid no heed my fair warning to lawyers about making one false move.
Maybe he should call the former Attorney General in New Hampshire and
ask Peter Heed why he paid no heed to me. Now I will prove to both Mr
Heed and Brad Green that I wasn't joking and that I am well within the
jurisdiction of law enforcement in both New Brunswick and New
Hampshire.

If the Fredericton City Police arrest me as I approach the
legislature one day very soon, Brad Green, Bruce Noble and I will have
lots to argue about in years to come in many courts. I will be filing
a complaint against them and several others with the Law Society
anyway. I am looking to hire an ethical lawyer to sue the bastards
long before the Law Society gets around to figuring out how to ignore
my allegations. What would you do if you were I? Do you know an
ethical lawyer that I can discuss this with? Or would I fare better if
I acted ethically in a Pro Se fashion?

My encounter with the Ombudsman, Bernard Richard proved much to
me about NB politicians. I didn't believe what he said about Wayne
Steeves the second he mentioned Connie Fogal. He tried so hard to
argue about jurisdiction that he maintained Rule One of the Code of
Professional Conduct of the New Brunswick Law Society is not about
integrity but jurisdiction. No lawyer is that dumb and the last thing
I would want is such a man to speak for me. So I promptly told him I
would see him in court and ended our conversation. He was obviously
arguing against me for the benefit of Brad Green rather than making a
sincere and ethical effort to listen to me and address my concerns to
the powers that be on my behalf. Richard likely has few Liberal
friends to chum with. For all I know he may have just got back from
Larry's Gulch so I allowed him to continue on the fishing expedition
byway of email. For his information just in case he is that dumb, I
brought up the subject of integrity so he would stop arguing
jurisdiction and act more ethically and diligently as a lawyer. When
he continued, I quit talking and sought proof of contact. Lawyers must
maintain their integrity no matter the jurisdiction or issue.

I can easily refute the jurisdictional argument of both Mr.
Richard and Brad Green. I am used to that legal dodge. Thirty-three
years ago a RCMP officer charged me with speeding by within the city
limits of Fredericton. When I questioned his jurisdiction the Crown
was quick to inform me that the RCMP have jurisdiction over everyone
everywhere in Canada. If I were to unbuckle my seat belt in defiance
of a NB law as I drove to Hampton to serve this material upon a lawyer
employed as a Senator in the federal government, in what court would I
appear? What if I served this material upon the cop that had the
authority stop me? If the matter was heard in Hampton or Sussex
Provincial Court shouldn't Judge Henrik Tonning immediately recuse
himself because of his words to me in court on July 29th. Would I not
have the right to make a federal case out of what began as a seat belt
offense and change the jurisdiction to the USA?

A far better example is what happened on June 24th. A man who
claimed represent the Crown as the Sergeant at Arms in the New
Brunswick legislature claimed that he and the Fredericton PD had
jurisdiction over me and the right to throw me out of the public
building. However when I tried to give them this stuff as the Deputy
Prime Minister Anne McLellan and Attorney General Brad Green have both
suggested, they refused. What right did they have to do so? Should I
file a complaint against the Crown in the USA? I was thrown out of a
building in NB. Who defends the Crown if not Green?

Senator Day, make certain that Jack Hooper of CSIS sends
someone to see the priest, Bill Elliott and get the stuff I gave to
him the night of his debate on June 21st. Everybody in the churchyard
watched that old man holler at me as I gave it to him. Now Mr. Waldman
can listen to what Mr. Harper was harping about on June 22nd on the
CBC, As I told the priest there were three original wiretap tapes
within that envelope I gave him. The tapes are important evidence for
the Arar Commission. If nothing else their mere existence proves how
far the FEDS in two countries will go to cover things up. Let me know
if the priest denies he got them or Hooper won't give them up, I have
several more hidden in Canada that the Arar Commission can have.
Hooper can hoop and holler about National Security all he wants. I
must protect my ass if he won't, If you look at the photo I have
provided, you will see me talking to a RCMP officer that was guarding
Harper in Sussex on June 19th. Now you know what I was talking about
to him. What I want to know is that cop's name. Harper wasn't long
spilling the beans to his political advantage on CBC but his lawyers
weren't long shutting him up on June 24th after Waldman demanded that
he testify at the Inquiry. Why is that?

Waldman should have known of me if Arar's lawyers at CCR in the
USA had kept him properly informed. Rest assured that I did as soon as
I became aware of him. During our conversation I know I said enough
for him to check my words. His silence spoke volumes.

Mr. Arar's lawyers had no fear of filing a complaint against
Ashcroft and the others in the USA after they received my stuff last
November. I see no further progress with that suit since it was filed
last January. Why have they ignored me? Did they make a deal and
settle? Why have they fallen so silent within the inquiry in Canada?

If you don't believe me about what Mr. Harper knows, call
Arthur Hamilton and ask him about the little talk we had about this a
little while ago. Mr. Hamilton can never say he doesn't know because I
saved his voicemail to me. I have no doubt that he has had a long talk
with our new MP Rob Moore by now. Why are they so silent?

I have many questions to ask Geoff Regan and Anne McLellan
about the Arar Commission. Geoff has no time to return my call but
lots of time to golf with Clinton and McKenna. I demand to know if the
many documents that caused the delay in the inquiry were mine. If not,
why not? I did do as Anne McLellan suggested and gave this stuff to
both Customs and Immigration the instant I landed in Canadian
jurisdiction. If I am not called to testify, I will never understand.
I did manage to talk to Veena Verma and she had no answers for me only
arguments about jurisdiction as usual.

Your friend, Mr. Zed can never say he don't know because as
you can see I served his law office this stuff on June 25th the day
before he and John Herron greeted Paul Martin at the airport. After
your review of this stuff you must confess it is obvious to all why
Paul Zed and his friend Frank McKenna have been struck so dumb. Paul
Zed was elected to speak for that politically minded priest amongst
others, correct? Perhaps after they voted according to their
conscience they should act according to it as well.
I know that I have proved what everybody knows. The word of a
lawyer is

worthless. Peter MacKay also proved that to all the true Progressive
Conservatives in Canada. The fact that another lawyer, John Crosbie
advised the former Alliance party on what to say is too funny and sad
for the words of this letter. One reason I came home and ran for
Parliament is to sooth my own soul because I found Mr. Harper and his
buddies to be a truly dangerous bunch of characters. Crosbie did too
for awhile anyway. Ain't it funny how he now sings a different tune?
There is no doubt that the old lawyer Paul Martin is a monumental a
crook. The boat in Sidney proved that to me two days after the
election. He can play well within Mulroney's league. It was truly sad
that so many Canadians were compelled to vote for Martin simply
because they were too scared that Harper may lead our country down a
garden path and under an evil Bush.

Perhaps the NDP should check my work closely and then help
me expose all the crooks in both the Liberal and Conservative camps. I
will give this stuff to their local lawyer leader Ms. Weir. Maybe it
is time for the NDP to shine for the benefit of all Canadians. Even
though the NDP have only 19 seats in Parliament I believe they have
the power to inspire a non-confidence vote and cause another election.
I think the NDP politicians should think about the following statement
a long time then review how they made out in the last election. I did
say at the Moss Glen debate that the NDP party was the best spot to
place a vote. However NDP people I know argued with me saying that if
they did that their vote would be wasted and Harper might get in, so
they must vote out of fear for a Liberal. Therefore I fall back on
what I had said during the Hampton debate in that every ballot should
have one more line on it "None of the above" then I am certain many
more Canadians would exercise their right to vote. Many did agree.

Senator Day I did come across your wife in the Canada
Elections office as she worked in support of Herron. Please don't deny
the fact that the person seated beside your wife in Hampton laughed
and applauded at many of my remarks, Everybody heard what I said to
Herron in front of Rob Moore about suing him. Herron is foolish if he
thought I was kidding. Herron is a layman with few political friends.
I spoke to him very openly and honestly after the debate in Moss Glen.
It should be interesting to see whom he and Rob Moore manage to hire
for lawyers to defend them from my actions. I look forward to meeting
a judge but I am not certain I would be allowed a jury of my peers.
Lawyers do have an unfair stranglehold on Canadian justice. As you
check my work, you should see that I am out to shame all lawyers and
the political ones in particular. None of this would have been
necessary if just one lawyer had upheld their oath or one public
servant had blown the whistle. Why is not the question. The answer is
Filthy Lucre.

Today is Friday the 13th. I am expected to stand in court in
Boston and argue allegations of criminal harassment made against me by
a lawyer who has practiced crimes against me. Clearly I am not making
an appearance. My kids and I will remain in this jurisdiction. I
suspect foul play and that it is a ploy to make me return to the USA.
I have little doubt that agents of the DHS would never allow me to
appear in that court. I notified everyone down in Boston that I look
forward to trial. Monday will tell the tale.

In closing I must say I considered myself a raging success to
finally break surface in the media and in an Irving owned newspaper of
all places. A former Irving lawyer needs no explanation as to the
reason for my joy. That said, let's see if I can make the Internet
work for me in a grassroots sort of way. The Irvings are a little
behind the times in that regard. Although I do not wear a blue coat, I
did give the folks in Fundy one last chance to vote for a PC (Pissed
off Candidate) and I tried to do it in a fun fashion so that my
efforts would be remembered. Read the Kings County Record again to
check my words. As I watch the boob tube, I find the most honest
reporting of the political circus in America can be found on the
Canadian comedy shows. The stuff on Barack Obama, Ralph Nader, Melanie
Sloan and the Clintons should be pretty funny to you as well as you
read the documents I have provided. Now all I can say is Hooray for
Canada and thanks to the folks in Fundy that did vote for me. I am
glad that at least one percent understood and agreed with me. Quite
likely not one of them was a lawyer. Now I only need one lawyer in the
right place in government to do the right thing and things will change
for the better. Until that happens I will continue torturing lawyers
with dilemmas that a simple application of ethics could easily solve.
It is just a matter of time before one will break rank with the crooks
and become a truly honourable hero for the common man. As I said in my
first political speech I am a son of the Keith Clan whose roots can be
found in Fundy. Although I have separated myself from that Clan and
founded my own in order to declare a Blood Feud in my own name, I will
always honour from whence I came. I simply don't care what lawyers or
politicians think of me Although I have no religion, I have faith in
my forefather's motto "Veritas Vincit".

So what say you now, Senator Joe Day? Are you with me or
against me? Ignoring me just won't do. Please send your answer to the
following address just as Brad Green did. I don't know where I will be
from day to day these days. Like it or not you are all now witnesses
to my sad complaints. I demand an answer from you in writing even if
it is to refuse this demand to do your job. Your friend the Yankee
lawyer, David Lutz can turn his back on me then sneak away and try to
hide but you are a Canadian public servant now. You must answer me in
a timely fashion. I am part of the Canadian Public and a citizen that
came to your office in the constituency that I have been hanging my
hat for over two months. I demand assistance from the Senator
appointed to watch over us and expect you to act with the integrity
that is mandated by your license to practice law for a fee. Trust me,
I am wise to the delaying and denying game. Forget trying to argue
jurisdiction. I am here. What do you think? Should I run for Senator
if Lord manages to call an election for one? I can be reached by local
phone # 506 434-1379 but everything I say from here on out I want
recorded in the Public Record because it appears that lawyers think I
must sue the Queen in the USA. Do you think she will get pissed? The
reason question is can she afford the relief. Check the bottom line of
my first two complaints. Anne McLellan has made the Crown a
conspirator against me. Methinks she owes me three times the loss. Now
we all know the reason for the cover up. Too many lawyer/politicians
in Boston assisted the lawyer, Charles J. Kickham Jr. assist the ex
FBI agent William J. Kickham in his crimes against my Clan. If any of
the above named parties don't like anything

I have stated, Please sue me. I dare ya. I promise I will not
file any sort of motion to dismiss the matter but I will demand a
jury. I will call many witnesses in my defense. I think the first one
would be Mr. Harper. Wouldn't it be fun if he was a hostile one?

Cya'll in Court
David R. Amos
153 AlvinAve
Milton, MA. 02186

Certificate of Service

I, David R. Amos, a Canadian citizen presently within the
jurisdiction of the Province of New Brunswick in the County of Kings
on Friday the 13th of August, 2004 delivered the above named material
to the office of Senator Joseph A. Day at 14 Everett St. Hampton, NB.
I will also email many people in many places the proof that this was
done on this day. Check into my beefs with the USPS and look at the
news about the Canadian Postal Service's political issues with Paul
Martin today and it should be obvious why this is necessary for me to
do in person.

David R. Amos

----- Original Message -----
From: moto maniac
To: dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca
Cc: org@erc-cee.gc.ca
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 2:42 PM
Subject: David Amos is merely proving I just called

Attention
Philippe Rabot
RCMP External Review Committee
P.O. Box 1159, Station B
Ottawa, ON K1P 5R2
Tel: (613) 998-2134
Fax: (613) 990-8969

and

Senator Joseph A. Day
14 Evertt St.
Hampton, NB.
506 832-5880

Sirs,

I just called both of your offices this morning and tried to
speak to each of you in private about my concerns. Neither of you
called and I expect you never will. Now I will go public with all of
them. The first people I will approach will be the lawyers within the
Arar Commission. The enclosed documents should prove to Mr. Day why
that is necessary. But do not discount my concerns with Securities
Fraud, the FBI and everything else. I am providing in person today to
Mr. Day's local office exactly the same documents that I served
Premeir Lord and Frank McKenna over one month ago. They both have
chosen to ignore my concerns and allegations and would rather take
many of my adversaries either golfing or fishing today.

I am also providing Mr. Day with some other material that I
have not given to others in Canada. But I have no doubt the CSIS has
seen them all and many more. Eva Plunkett when she worked under Wayne
Easter attended a big government meeting last year about how and why
our government would share such information. Now as Inspector General
of the CSIS she could view everything of mine at a glance. Trust me
Mr. Day you are looking at the tip of the iceberg. Even you would have
to admit that the FBI have some very bad actors within their ranks and
I was justifibly paranoid when I heard one of their agents was in
Sussex the same day as I was debating your friend John Herron. I have
shown others what I have given to you Mr. Day before I sealed the
envelope. Please act ethically on my behalf. you are the last
politician representing the Fundy area that I will contact before I
return to the USA. If something bad happens to me upon my return, I
want the world to know that Canada has good reason to stop appointing
Senators and start electing them.

After waiting for over a year for the RCMP and the various
Solicitors Generals to act in defense of my Rights as a Canadian
Citizen I gave up. I only wished the Yankee law enforcement community
to stop the harassment of me and begin acting within the scope of
their employment. After all avenues of assistance to me in two
countries had failed to provide anyone ethical enough to stand with
me, I came home to run for Parliament and to act in defense of my own
Civil Rights. You are now looking at the beginning of part two of my
plan to defend my interests and rights.

I did see you, Mr. Day and your wife, Georgie laugh and seem to
agree with many of my statements during the debate in Hampton. I also
read in the paper that you thought that John Herron was the only
person worth voting for. I affirm that you have the right to that
opinion and the irrefuttable right to to back it up with your right to
vote. On the other hand, I wish my fellow Canadians had the same right
to vote you out of office and place someone else in your position that
would be more concerned about our interests and not that of the Irving
empire. I would love to see his newspapers put that in print.
Yesterday they had lots to say about Lord going fishing with his
buddies but little about McKenna and his friends golfing. You know
full well why the same newpapers said nothing of me and my campaign to
get elected. If not ask Carl Davies he had a great chuckle at my
expense when I met him at a private party on June 26th in St. Andrews.
The same day Mr. Zed and Mr. Herron greated Mr. Martin at the airport
and he likened them to sons. Wow am I ever glad that that mean old
lawyer does not look at me in that light. I would start singing to
Sheila to pass the Tequila as well. (Guess who gets a copy of this?)

If anyone were to ask me Mr. Joyce is the smartest businessman
of the bunch this week.. He makes a bundle renting his place to one
crowd and gets a great holiday for free at our expense with the
others. Plus he gets the scoop on what they are all up to. I don't
know if you were invited to either event Mr. Day but I will lay odds
you are invited to Henrik's party tonight along with Mr. Lutz, Mr. Zed
and possibly Carl Davies. Say hey to them for me will ya. Tell them I
won't bother them. Me and my boy are going way back in the woods away
from all the smiling bastards after I forward some emails arouind the
world.. This email is one of them that will be attached to the one I
sending Lutz tonight. Maybe Mr. Lutz should look for it on his
Blackberry tonite. I may give you all a few laughs but I doubt it.

I am sending this email and attaching it to the documents I am
providing you Mr. Day just in case the cops that have been ghosting me
decide to hassle me before I can deliver the material to you. They
will have something to chew on. They should not open the envelope
addressed to you because it does bear a US Postage and I am not
certain if US code can reach up here but rest assured I will ask.

I must state that it is me that delivered this pile of documents
to you. However I may bring serveral witnesses in order to prove that
I am doing nothing wrong. you may rest assured thereis nothing life
threatening within this envelope. If there were I am certain the US
Code would make me suffer many penalties.The copy of the CD of wiretap
tape numbered 139 is served upon you, Senator Joe Day in confidence as
an officer of the court in order that it maybe properly investigated.
I will also have several wiretap tapes in my posession so if the cops
decide to take me in for some reason, the tapes come too. Everybody
knows the reason why I want to give them to the RCMP officer Keith
Livingstone, a former town cop in Sussex. However any port in a storm
will do.

I am well aware that Mr. Rabot reports to Anne McLellan and that
she should have done him the courtesy of making him aware of my
allegations against the RCMP and the Commisioner in particular. There
should be no need for me to provide one document more to any office
that claims Anne Mclellan as their boss but I did make it a point to
call Eva Plunkett and Marget Bloodworth yesterday to register my
indignation towards their deliberate lack of diligence in their
present and former positions within the government of Canada. If you
fellas don't think that I would be a very important witness for the
Arar Commission then you simply do not know how to read.

It has now been over one week since Mr. Lutz claimed that he had
sent the material that I had provided to John Herron to law
enforcement. He did this in front of many witnesses in Provincial
Court on July 29th. When I asked him who he gave it to, he refused to
say. I looked at all the RCMP officers in court and they all just
looked away. Obviously byway of the atached email you can see that
yesterday after nobody had contacted me I notified CISNB and Wayne
Steeves myself. Thus far no word has come from them as well. Need I
say I will not hold my breath and wait for a response from you fellas?
May I suggest to Joe Day that he forward the enclosed materials to the
Federal Minister of Justice and inform Howard Wilson that I have many
questions about the ethical conduct of many high placed Government
officials beginning with Wayne Easter and Anne McLellan. I will make
it widely known that you are undenialble witnesses to my pursuit of
justice. It is for you to decide whether you stand with me or against
me.
Cya'll in Court
David R. Amos
----- Original Message -----
From: moto maniac
To: nbombud@gnb.ca
Cc: dan.bussieres@gnb.ca
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 8:26 PM
Subject: Perhaps we should talk before I begin litigation

Sirs,

Attached is a copy of an email sent to the office of Wayne Steeves
this morning. I did call and all Mary Lou MacGregor wanted to know is
who my lawyer is. I gave up on the New Brunswick legislature and began
registering my complaints in Ottawa and elsewhere mentioning their
names. Mr. Richard if you wish to view some of my concerns tomorrow,
T. J. Burke, Leroy Armstrong or Premier Lord and Brad Green should
provide you with lots of stuff for you to review. I can be reached at
506 434 1379. What I would like to know for certain is what is the
true and complete names of the persons that threw me out of the
Legislature on June 24th, 2004. At the time the man who claimed to be
the Sergeant at Arms said his name was Jean Claude something or
other(he slurred it so I could not understand) it does not appear to
be the name I find on roster as the Sergeant at Arms. Everyone from
Charles Leblanc to Carl Davies does not seem to know who i am talking
about. So I must ask you Bussieres was that you using a fake name or
someone pretending to be you? One of the Fredericton Police Officers
claimed that he was CST. Leblanc and the other did not state his name.
I will not approach the building again as ordered until i have
resolved this matter to my satisfaction. Thus i may have to call Mr.
Bussieres into court and hear under oath just who is who and who has
the right to do what and who claims that I did something wrong. If i
am barred from the legislature for a supposed criminal act, I should
have the right to face and argue my accuser. What would Elizabeth Weir
do? do you think i will do any less. Trust me i am more jealous and
guarded with my Civil Rights than any ten lawyers including Elizabeth
Weir. She was one of the first politicians in New Brunswick that I
sought assistance from after Leroy Armstrong and Elsie Wayne ignored
me.

If you don't think I am serious perhaps you should contact Fran
McKenna, Rob Moore, Bruce Noble and David Lutz amongst others. I am
about to file a formal complaint against them with Shirley McLean of
the Law Society but I am not waiting for her answer like I did in
Boston before beginning my own litigation process in the pursuit of
justice. Someone must be ethical and at least keep his word if the
ones that swore to uphold the law and the public trust placed in them
won't do so. I know you are a lawyer Mr. Richard so I should not have
to explain the Code of Professional Conduct I am just letting you know
I have studied it as well. All though a layman can ignore it without
suffering the pains and penalties a lawyer should, the advice holds
true for us all. what say you Mr. Bussieres?

David R. Amos
Note: forwarded message attached.

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Mary-Sue Haliburton
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: The following I think are your words long ago

It was your family name that prompted my contact. Perhaps you should
study your foe.

----- Original Message -----
From: Mary-Sue Haliburton
To: David Amos
Cc: Connie Fogal
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: The following I think are your words long ago

On 17-May-04, at 10:47, David Amos wrote:
Thanks for your response. Your words are of no surprise to me. I
will simply show yours and mine to my fellow Maritimers and let them
judge us. I do seek their vote.


Indeed let Maritimers be the judge for themselves! But unless you show
them both my whole statement as well as your whole statement, not just
your out-of-context selections from what I said, they will be not be
judging for themselves, but will have only your opinions to assess,
not mine.

Having Maritime roots myself, I know that the region abounds with
intelligent, fair-minded, caring people. BTW, Stan Rogers was also
from Ontario, though he sounded as if his familial roots in the
eastern seacoast was his actual whole life. Did you know that he was
one of us "upper Canadians" himself?
Whereas upper Canadians usually ignore us until it comes time to ask
for our vote, your words should prove valuable to me. You proved my
point for me about your party and you. .

While you are at it, you will undoubtedly "forget" to mention that I
and my siblings gave a substantial endowment in memory of our late
father to his Alma Mater, University of New Brunswick. The William
Haliburton Memorial Scholarship was as of last check the largest award
they offer, and will help annually help two meritorious students
complete their training in forestry. Is that the act of a
much-maligned "upper canadian" alleged to despise the eastern
provinces?

If you omit this fact -- which can be easily confirmed by contacting
UNB in Fredericton -- then you are not as good a representative of
Maritimers as you claim to be, and we can quite easily challenge your
views of us. Indeed Maritimers be the judge, based on the whole truth.
"Either you are well funded and have a good researcher working for
you, or you're a cultural pack rat who habitually saves emails about
all kinds of topics for no apparent reason. "

It's just odd that you would have retained emails -- from a decade ago
which would have had to be carried forward all from an older computer
-- and cross-referenced by author as well as title. Or else you
expended a lot of effort to dig up something you could use as dirt,
regardless of how or whether I replied.

BTW, it was clear when he said in an interview, "I worship competence"
in any field, that the late, great Stan Rogers valued the exercise in
skill that he manifested in songwriting. No one who puts great effort
into something despises appreciation of that skill. Therefore,
recognizing the structure, word choice, and poetic quality of Stan's
work only strengthens our love of the wonderful legacy he left us
celebrating Canada and working Canadians from coast to coast.

May the most truthful candidate win.

Mary-Sue Haliburton

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Mary-Sue Haliburton
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 11:47 AM
Subject: Re: The following I think are your words long ago

Howdy Maam ( Is that better?)
Thanks for your response. Your words are of no surprise to me. I
will simply show yours and mine to my fellow Maritimers and let them
judge us. I do seek their vote. Whereas upper Canadians usually ignore
us until it comes time to ask for our vote, your words should prove
valuable to me. You proved my point for me about your party and you.
."Either you are well funded and have a good researcher working for
you, or you're a cultural pack rat who habitually saves emails about
all kinds of topics for no apparent reason. "
Dave

By the way I try hard to put things in a fun way and to the ladies in
particular. Say hey to Paul Hellyer for me. I do respect his words.
The best men often lose but that does negate the fact that they did
the best they could.


From: CAP Info <info@canadianactionparty.ca>
To: Mail List <info@canadianactionparty.ca>
Subject: [CAP] Update and Thanks
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:25:10 -0400

David Amos

Just want to offer a hearty round of thanks to the rewarding number of
people that quickly sent in donations to get Connie Fogal across the
country 2 weeks ago -- expenses were covered plus a bit.

She came to Toronto for an interview that will be broadcast another 12
times in Ontario before the election -- a great help to our Ontario
candidates. She went out to Alex Kreider's riding of Oxford
(in semi-rural Ontario) for a quick presentation and good media coverage
there for the party.

In Fredericton, New Brunswick there was a good spot with english CBC
for the 6 o'clock news, with additional coverage in The Daily Gleaner and
another paper I haven't got the name of. As you can see below, it helped
out David's campaign.

Since then I'm aware of Connie having a 1-1/2 hour interview in French
on a Quebec radio station, a live one-time spot on Canada AM, and there
are various forms of coverage for many candidates across the country.

Not bad for a 'little party.' Keep it up and keep smiling! Only nine
days left.

Sincerely,
Kevin Peck

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Campaign hello
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:51:53 -0300
From: "David Szemerda" <ender@hegemon.ca>

Just thought I would say hello and good luck to all fellow candidates. I
am having a great time and getting fairly good media coverage. After
making comments on the CBC lack of coverage of smaller parties during an
all candidates debate, I managed to be given a 3 minutes sound byte,
INCLUDING my statement about the CBC. Quite humourous I thought.

Although they still did not ask me to participate in this mornings issue
debate, I at least was given a quote regarding the issue. (Gun Control)
In which I stated that the gun registry should not only be eliminated,
but the liberal party, not the government, should have to repay the tax
payers for implementing such a stupid project. (Got a big round of
applause on that one.)

Thanks to Connie for all her support during her visit here; and I hope
to be able to have the time to get to everyone better during the
upcoming campaign year after we get our minority government. :)

And I just had to share today's CBC political cartoon with everyone.

David Szemerda
CAP representative for St. Croix-Belleisle, NB


----- Original Message -----
From: Mary-Sue Haliburton
To: David Amos
Cc: Connie Fogal
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 10:28 AM
Subject: Re: The following I think are your words long ago

To see this Stan Rogers comment dredged up is a surprise since it was
years ago that I wrote those comments. Either you are well funded and
have a good researcher working for you, or you're a cultural pack rat
who habitually saves emails about all kinds of topics for no apparent
reason.

On 14-May-04, at 13:09, David Amos wrote:
Hey Lady
I sent this email to you because I just received another email
from your party that contains your words as well. As you run for the
Action Party and I run alone you should always understand that I seek
friends not foes and that I do appreciate women.


Addressing me as "hey lady" is a funny way of showing it...
I agree with your Party platform however not with some of its people.
Being the uneducated but argumentitive Maritimer that I am, I have a
different take on Stan's songs as well. I think it is about Stan's
life not his work. I don't think he put hidden meanings in his work.
Although he did have some fun playing with words, I believe that he
always ment exactly what he said with no hidden agenda. I can't say
the same for your Party. It appears to be selling something about its
distain of money. It laments about lack of funding from the very purse
it finds offensive.


It's a bit hard to make sense of a paragraph that starts out "I agree
with" then reverses itself. We don't hate money and we don't hate free
enterprise. We're against the massive ripoff of taxpayers' money given
away hand over fist to foreign banks and investors, which began in
earnest in 1974. I think you have failed to understand that this is
about Canadian sovereignty, something which I believe Stan would have
wanted to defend.
It reminds me of a rebelious teenager demanding his allowance from a
malicious stepfather. To hell with him and stick to the advice of your
forefathers. Speak you own mind using your own resources and you will
owe no one nothing in the form of lucre.


I certainly agree on that. This election will cost me quite a bit.
If enough people agree with your standing, then you must repay them
with faithful service and then you will have earned your allowance.
Any person's vote should not be considered in monetary terms and by
your party in particular.

It's not us that made up that rule; it came from the government that
each vote will result in a tiny party contribution. Since so many have
felt that votes were wasted, I was merely suggesting that in this
election, they have been assigned a dollar value! Personally I think
that's weird, but that's the rule the Liberals came up with.
I see no need to get High Brow about Stan's songs as one looks
into his fine art of creative writing.


To each his own. I appreciate songwriting by taking the words
seriously; others just want to emote about them. We both respect Stan
in our own way.
He was just saying what he thought and felt. By putting it into words
and tunes that he hoped would cause others to take the time to listen
to, it satisfied his personal pursuit of happiness in making a living
doing something he loved to do. He was a simple, sincere and serious
man who wore his heart on his sleeve for all the world to see. In his
all too short life he was a success and even more so after his demise.
Too many great artists have suffered from the same plight simply
because the money people don't think some artists are marketable until
it is too late to do them any good. Stan was not like the smiling
bastards that we all know run the show in Ottawa and everywhere else.
Stan knew a fine way to sing of the sad and simple truth in a way we
loved to hear. If he had asked it of me, I would have voted for him to
speak for me on any day in any way because of the man he was. No
amount of false advertising can change the look in a man's eye. Take a
hard look at both the senior and junior George Bush dudes then I
challenge you to disagree with me and my son.

No argument there.
Men I respect know me at a glance. They always say Good Day and
there is seldom need to say much more. It has to do with wavelength
rather than lenghty words. The beast in us all understands that simple
statement. The others can just stay out of my way because I consider
that listening to them would be just a waste of my precious precious
time. I have never been a lady's man and I always have trouble with
even the one's I respect understanding my motives.


This is another contradiction to your alleged "respect for women".
That said, I could only laugh when Connie Fogal expressed that she
thought I was a Fed. That lady/lawyer/politician will have lots to
review and rethink. I do not respect her because of her insult. I want
to argue with her because as a lawyer she must uphold the law. As a
leader of a political party she must prove she is worthy of the Public
Trust. What say you, Mary Sue?

I respect Connie for her commitment to take on this David vs. Goliath
struggle to save Canada. So far, all I see in you is someone who
contradicts himself a lot. I hope your down-to-earth types who don't
use many words know what your platform actually is by osmosis because
it's far from clear in this email.

Beyond this brief comment I don't care to enter into a lengthy debate
with you because you are not in this riding; I will have to focus
here, with my limited resources, if I expect to make myself heard over
the din at all.

Farewell. I wish I could say "may the best man win", but all too often
it's only the richest who wins by crooked means, a Stan-Rogers type
feeling...

MSH

Subj: Re: Song of the Candle
Date: Mon, May 6, 1996 3:45 PM EDT
From: mshaliburton@genesis.achilles.net
X-From: mshaliburton@genesis.achilles.net (Mary-Sue Haliburton)
Reply-to: mshaliburton@genesis.achilles.net
To: GwenFoss@aol.com
CC: cdnfolk@io.org

Song of the Candle is very evocative of the struggle to concentrate on
creative writing. Everything is a distraction, even the cold coffee he drinks
to keep himself awake in order to write. "As empty as this page" is a cri de
coeur for having failed to write. I don't know but what that is the most
powerful statement about the real work involved in originality.

But of course the "I" in the song has created his own writer's block by
concentrating on and isolating himself. The words will come almost unbidden
as soon as you shift the focus and start doing something else. But in his
pride he wants to do it by sheer bull-headedness. The struggling writer is
fixated on images of candles burning down, like the candle he is burning at
both ends.

"Coffee houses bother me...". This verse expresses a lot of dissatisfaction
with a perceived insincerity in other people. Hello is not as sweet as
good-bye, as if they are glad to be rid of him and his brooding attitude. His
feeling that they only want his money as he gulps down coffee shows that he's
got a bad case of creative frustration.

"Is some happiness my right?" This is probably one of the most profound
questions we can all ask ourselves. Are we indeed entitled to happiness? It
is not one of the rights guaranteed under the Canadian constitution. Should
we pursue it? Even those who have it in their constitution should still take
a look at the question. Seek spiritual joy in the blessings of God, he is
told. But the priest finishes by telling him to go through rituals of prayer.
The author doesn't want to hear this at all. Light another candle? This time
doesn't smile before he walks away. To light a candle to pray seems as empty
a gesture to him as buying a candles from a vendor, especially an unformed
candle that never hardened properly in the mould. This is another powerful
image, and makes me think of his other song about being alone from birth. He
feels somehow like this unformed candle, unable to keep himself from the cold
by writing effectively.

And yet, and yet! Stan apparently did break through the creative barrier, if
one of his late-night wrestling sessions with his own inner self resulted not
only in this introspective and poetic song but also in the powerful and much
admired "North West Passage". Knowing this should make us value his
successfully-completed songs all the more.

I know there is so much more that could be said in appreciation of Stan's
tight and circular structure of this song with repeated variations and
echoes. But I will let others take a turn.

Mary-Sue in Ottawa

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: areilly@phx.com
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 10:22 AM
Subject: Thanks for the call Adam

Lets see how good of an investigative reporter you are. Here is your
clue. You really should have asked what was so funny about Richard
Egbert becoming involved with Finneran. Here is where to go to find
the answer. I didn't waste much time with you because I knew that your
paper won't print a thing. I am just proving one last time before I
leave Beantown and head for home that the Yankees knew the truth and
said nothing. In your defense though I must say that the politicians
and the newsmen are no better up there.

http://briefcase.yahoo.com/motomaniac_02186

Here is a little proof that I am no liar.

----- Original Message -----
From: INFO7,
To: davidamos@comcast.net
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 10:28 AM
Subject: Request for Nomination Paper


Dear Mr. Amos,

We thank you for your telephone call of May 11, 2004.

Please find attached, as requested, a copy of the Nomination Paper.

Should you need additional information about the Canadian federal
electoral system, please contact us via our Web site
(www.elections.ca) or by calling our toll-free number 1 800 463-6868.
Our hours of operation are Monday to Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
(Eastern time).

Yours truly,

Diane Guimond
Enquiries Officer

<<ec20010_e.pdf>>

----- Original Message -----
From: <robmoore@atrueconservative.ca>
To: <davidamos@comcast.net>
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Regarding your e-mail

David,

Thanks for the e-mails. I will read them all and hear what you have to say.

All the best.

Rob
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 5:08 PM
> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> > Elsie, I like you more and more. If anyone understands about
> > being forced to be away from his family its me. Give my mom a
> > call. Her laugh alone will make your day. To hell with the
> > smiling bastards in Ottawa their grins ain't genuine. Maritimers
> > can still find some fun in a long hard day :) Come to think of
> > it, maybe thats why the Upper Canadians think we are crazy. By
> > the way I have managed to get a rather famous lawyer to speak on
> > my wife's behalf down here while I run for Parliament uphome. But
> > before I go I have been invited to go fishing with Martha
> > Stewart's brother Frank in the Gulf of Mexico. My matters are
> > about to bust wide open down here. That is why I have chosen this
> > time to make appearance uphome. Once I make the news down here I
> > will step on the stump uphome.
> > Best Regards
> > Dave
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > To: David Amos
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 3:42 PM
> > Subject: RE: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > Dear Dave,
> >
> > I try to respond to as many people as I can. We do get a lot of email
> > around here.... I decided to retire because I truly miss my family.
> > It's hard being on the road back and forth by yourself. It gets very
> > lonely.
> >
> > God Bless,
> > Elsie
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos [mailto:davidamos@comcast.net]
> > Sent: March 22, 2004 3:28 PM
> > To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> > No problem, Elsie. By the way my mom is a fan of yours. She told
> > me you were quitting. Too bad if it is true.You are the first
> > politician to respond to me. That fact alone wins my respect. Ask
> > around Saint John about me in certain circles I am fairly well
> > known. You may even know my sister, Nancy and her husband, Reid
> > Chedore. Perhaps you crossed paths with my dad C. Max Amos he was
> > a tax Supervisor for the Province years ago. And maybe even my
> > mom's second husband, Lloyd Nickerson, from Fredericton. He was
> > somewhat of a political person whereas my dad was not. (Lloyd was
> > chief electoral officer for about twelve years and did run as a
> > Conservative) If you wish to warm my mom's heart please give her
> > a call and simply say that you appreciate her good words about
> > you to her wild child Dalevid. She will get the joke. She is
> > always confusing me with another brother. Her name is Anna and
> > her number is 506 455 3600. Do with it what you will. Trust me I
> > would love to see another out spoken Maritimer step up to the
> > plate and speak of rights and wrongs. The sooner that I can go
> > back to being just Papa the happier my little Clan will be. I
> > would truly appreciate if someone would let my mom know that they
> > are at least aware of my concerns whether they agree with me or not.
> > Best Regards
> > Dave
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > To: David Amos
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:15 PM
> > Subject: RE: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> > Thank you for the notice.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos [mailto:davidamos@comcast.net]
> > Sent: March 16, 2004 2:07 PM
> > To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: ethics@harvard.edu
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:06 PM
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: tedcardwell@mail.gov.nf.ca
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:05 PM
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: alltrue@roadrunner.nf.net
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:03 PM
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier ministre
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:57 PM
> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> > I already received Anne's response. Can't you people read what
> > you wrote to me? Why else would I be so pissed off?
> > I am who I say I am and that is as follows:
> > David R. Amos
> > 153 Alvin Ave,
> > Milton, MA. 02186
> > Phone 617 240-6698
> >
> > Now just exactly who are you Mr. Correspondence Deputy Prime
> > Minister and are you a lawyer?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier
> > ministre" <dpm@pm.gc.ca> To: <davidamos@comcast.net>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:34 PM
> > Subject: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > > If you wish to receive a response to your comments addressed
> > to the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety and
> > Emergency Preparedness, please include your return mailing
> > address along with your original e-mail message. All official
> > responses will be sent by regular mail.
> > >
> > > If you wish to send correspondence addressed to the Minister
> > through the regular mail, please use the following mailing
> > address:
> > >
> > > The Honourable A. Anne McLellan
> > > Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety
> > > and Emergency Preparedness
> > > 340 Laurier Avenue West
> > > Ottawa, Ontario
> > > K1A 0P8
> > >
> > > From: David Amos <mailto:davidamos@comcast.net>
> > > To: dwatch@web.net
> > > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 11:32 PM
> > > Subject: Read real slow then forget what is politically
> > correct.
> > >
> > > Deal with your own conscience. After that try to think of
> > a good
> > > reason why I should not run for Parliament and at least speak
> > my mind about the sad state of our affairs. You know who I am.
> > If you don't, trust me, you are way behind the eight ball.
> > > Once I make my mark in the American Justice System and
> > political
> > > process, I am coming home to stress test the ethics of many a
> > lawyer/politician in my nativeland during the course of the
> > next federal election. My question to all of you will be why
> > did you wait for me to say something? Am I the only one paying
> > any attention. Even Jesus got mad a time or two and tore up a
> > temple when he saw all the money changing hands in a place
> > that should not be concerned about such things. But forget
> > about the money for a minute. What did he have to say about
> > anyone that harmed a child? Rest assured I will remind you.
> > Although I ain't religious, I must say that Jesus had more of
> > sand than most men and he made some very good points about
> > what is right and what is wrong. Can any of you even hold a
> > candle to Byron? He has at least one friend that will back him
> > up all the way down the line. I don't mind dying it is what I
> > didn't do while I was living that will haunt me in in my
> > grave. What is the golden rule these days? Is it truly a fact
> > that he with the gold makes the rules. Do you think voters
> > agree with that fact? What say you?
> > > Canadian Corruption
> > >
> > > Sexual Abuse & Political & Legal Conspiracy.
> > >
> > > RCMP Incompetence & Cover up.
> > >
> > > Priors Of Grand Bank NFLD Canada
> > >
> > > How do I get a corrupt legal system to investigate, charge and
> > convict itself? After years of asking the Canadian Legal
> > System to do its job, it's long past time to inform the public
> > myself about this lack of action or justice.
> > > If T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, 1966 to 1979 also Health
> > Minister 1968 to 1969 and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
> > of Newfoundland 1979 to 2000, 34 YEARS OF COMPLETE LEGAL
> > SYSTEMS CONTROL,at 41 years of age, rapes and impregnates your
> > younger sister Susan, at 12 years old, and in grade 8, what
> > would you do?At 12 years old she was the youngest child
> > ever,in Grand Bank,to have a baby. I am willing to take any
> > tests and answer all questions regarding my entire life. All
> > he has to do is take one blood test. It's time for him to stop
> > manipulating our legal system and face the truth which I have
> > been telling the legal System,and anyone else who would
> > listen, all of my life.I didn't just awake one morning and
> > decide to accuse the most powerful and most corrupt legal
> > animal in this province. I have had, no childhood, no
> > education, no family, no hometown, no self- esteem or
> > self-respect and no past, present or future as a contributing
> > person.
> > >
> > > By the time I was 14 years old I was responsible for 9 younger
> > children, all of us abused and molested while our hometown
> > either joined in, bothered us about our situation, or looked
> > the other way and said we were all trouble.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: jim.sikora@nbfinancial.com
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 9:39 AM
Subject: Call me a Liar. I dare ya.

If you are the same man mentioned in the following statement, then you
should read real slow the letter sent to Accenture and Providian then
get back to me real soon. I am very tired of lawyers ignoring me at
the same time people from the far east are harassing me through a
blocked phone line. It appears to me you may be the person that
enlisted them. If not, you should be very wary of me and of my actions
anyway. You do advise people on what Stocks to buy. Correct? Trust me
you will not like what I have to say about Bankers and Stockbrokers
etc when I stump for Parliament.

08/08/2003 Accenture, Providian sign IT outsourcing agreement
Accenture and Providian Bancorp Services, a subsidiary of Providian
Financial Corporation, have signed an agreement under which Accenture
will provide Providian with technology application development and
maintenance services.

The arrangement, which is part of Providian's strategy to enhance
operational efficiency and IT flexibility, calls for the two
organizations to work together to increase the service levels and
performance of Providian's IT operations. The agreement builds on
Providian's existing relationship with Accenture, which has previously
assisted Providian in upgrading its credit card technology platform,
among other initiatives. Providian plans to administer the
relationship through its Enterprise Technology group. The financial
terms of the agreement were not disclosed.

"This outsourcing agreement with Accenture marks another important
step toward streamlining our operations infrastructure. With this
agreement in place, we anticipate reduced costs, more efficient
operations, access to an expanded pool of talent, and more flexibility
than ever in how we deploy our resources," said Jim Saber, executive
vice president and chief information officer.

"Outsourcing through Accenture is the logical choice to execute
Providian's strategy," said Jim Sikora, the Accenture partner leading
the applications outsourcing strategy. "We aim for Providian to
benefit from an experienced outsourcing operation, lower costs and
leading technology, as well as the further development of a strong
relationship with Accenture."


May 3, 2004

Ellen Richey Douglas G. Scrivner,

Providian Financial Corp c/o William D. Green Accenture

P.O. Box 192605 100 William Street

San Francisco, CA 94119 Wellesley, MA 02481-9151

RE: Bad acting Bankers
Sir and Madam,

Please find enclosed an exact copy of all materials sent to Roger W.
Ferguson Jr and letters sent to Brad Smith, Louis Freeh, Caroline M.
Gilroy-Brown, George C. Caner Jr., John H. Huffstutler, Michael S.
Helfer, Derek Bok, Tom Finneran's law firm, John Keker and Robert
Fiske. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon Ellen
Richey in confidence as an officer of the court in order that it may
be properly investigated. I cannot serve it upon William D. Green
without violating the Fourth Amendment.

Lately we had been constantly plagued by many phone calls from India
at all hours on the behalf of Accenture. My wife was a few days late
in making payments last month on Providian's credit cards. To avoid
high service charges she does not write a cheque until the money is in
the bank. After my viewing the fact that Steven Ballmer is a Director
of the company harassing us, I wish to litigate and dispute our debt
in front of a jury of our peers. If Mr. Balmer had acted ethically
months ago, we would not owe a dime. As you can see we had forewarned
many banks that this was about to happen because of their own malice
towards us we had run out of money defending our interests. Thus far
not one of them has contacted us in an attempt to refute my
allegations.

I called William D. Green's office for the second time last week in an
effort to get Accenture to stop the harassment and have someone
responsible call me. A fella by the name of Tim called me from
Washington claiming that anything that I said to him would be referred
to Mr. Scriver. I told him he had best talk to Steven A. Ballmer.
Whereas he is also the CEO of Microsoft, he has at least two sets of
ethical rules to obey. It should not be necessary for me to inform
Accenture of anything that I had sent Brad Smith months ago. When Tim
asked me who Brad Smith was, I shook my head and asked for a lawyer to
call me. I knew he would have no idea who Roger W. Ferguson and Ms.
Nazareth were. He was just some guy without a whole name who was sent
fishing and to pick my brain for the big boys who consult banks on how
to play the global game. I did tell him I understood the game. I know
that Andersen went public in New York to get some money and yet base
their operations in Bermuda to avoid taxation. I know that Accenture
advises bankers how to avoid taxation and how to profit from the
American public with higher service charges and higher interest rates
byway of credit cards etc. and then employ poor folks in far away
lands to collect the minute they stumble under the debit load. When I
looked deeper into Accenture's history, I saw that Mr. Scrivner had
testified before Congress and had made the following statement. "The
audit profession has been granted a unique franchise through the
securities laws and auditors are entrusted to act as the "gatekeepers"
for the securities markets." Now I want to meet him in court or
Congress. Now you know why.


Need I say I was not surprised when I have not heard anything further
from Accenture or their friends from the Far East? So I have sent this
letter to the up and coming CEO of Accenture to further shake the
tree. Lets just say that a wild colonial boy is at the gate and has a
few questions for Mr. Scrivner and many other "gatekeepers".

Today Keith Gomes of Dallas TX ( 1 800- 280-944) called my wife at her
work on the behalf of Providian. Now that really pissed us off. It
seemed like an obvious effort to get around me after I had told
someone from Providian that I had her Durable Power of Attorney and
that she has her own lawyer anyway. I had requested that if Providian
wished to discuss this, to have a lawyer contact me. I was tired of
trying to talk to people that could either barely speak English or
pretended to have no idea of what I was telling them. When either of
your companies begins your threatened litigation against us, I will
bring these documents and many more to court and demand a jury trial.

Thus far Providian has not offended me. I am in fact grateful that
they extended me credit. However I do wonder about the company they
keep. Although it was not proper for Providian to have attempted to
involve my wife in matters that most lawyers pretend to not understand
nor do I think it legal for Providian to bother my wife at work, I
won't hold it against them unless they do it again. I would like to
know how they got her number at work and why they found it necessary
to act in such a fashion. In my opinion Ellen Richey should ask the
bill collectors to quite calling us for a bit and then ask Mr.
Scrivner and several of Providian's Directors many questions before
she responds to this letter. Robert J Higgins formerly of FleetBoston
Financial Corporation and F. Warren McFarlan of Harvard University
should easily explain to Providian my concerns in Boston with the
fraudulent actions of bankers. John L. Douglas of Alston & Bird LLP
should know Joe D. Whitley and Bob Barr well enough to explain my
concerns with DHS and the failure of the Secret Service to investigate
Bank Fraud. If I do not receive a response to this letter within two
weeks or if I do not agree with your standing in these matters, I will
consider you and your companies to be litigants against me in federal
court.


If Ellen Richey is wise, she will act ethically immediately to keep
Providian out of this battle. Perhaps it may climb the ladder in the
world of big bank mergers because of her professional conduct. I know
it is the right move for a small bank but a hard decision for a lawyer
to make. She must know the rules that allow her to practice law for a
fee. I see no ethical dilemma whatsoever. I will leave her to decide
her standing with the Kickhams and the Brookline Savings Bank or me.
It did not make sense that the Feds would act so badly to protect one
crooked law firm. When the Secret Service came to my door on April 1st
of last year, I knew that they were sent to protect the interests of
bankers not politician's butts. One year later to the day I am
prepared to prove it. Check my work and prepare to argue. Trust me, I
ain't bluffing and I don't know how to back up. Ask the Kickhams.

Cya'll in CourtJ

David R. Amos

153 Alvin Ave.

Milton, MA. 02186

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Connie Fogal
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: Ignore these types Methinks you have a yo yo working for you.

Hey Connie
Now that's funny and just in time to insert into a letter going
out to Lou Reigel and David Price as I speak up against the
extradition of John Graham. I will enclose a copy of this email with
that correspondence and forward the same stuff to you so you can
prepare your argument against me. You just proved for me what I have
been suspecting about your Party and many others. Whereas you, as
lawyer and the leader of your party, have just insulted the type of
fella that hates lawyers in an effort to further your own agenda
against some people whom you deem to be of some import without regard
of the Public Trust or me, it appears you wish to litigate. Rest
assured I will accommodate you and stress test your ethics to the max.
You can only ignore me until you receive a summons. I will name you as
an individual and your Political Party as a whole in a complaint in a
Federal Court in the USA. I don't know what lawyers swear to uphome
when they are called to the bar, but down here the Yankees swear to
delay or deny no man for lucre or malice. You just did both. Please
never forget it was you who contacted me and sang your lament for my
support byway of Spamming the Internet after you have chosen to ignore
my concerns and allegations in order support my adversaries and
promote your own interests. I only responded with the appropriate
indignation. Now you insinuate that I am a FED and tell others to
ignore me? Lawyer prepare to defend thyself. I will make you swear to
tell the truth, the whole truth and noting but the truth. You can ask
for your god's help if you wish as I lead you straight to the hell of
the witness stand where lawyers fear to tread.

Cya'll in Court:)

David R. Amos
----- Original Message -----
From: "Connie Fogal" <conniefogal@telus.net>
To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 4:51 PM
Subject: Ignore these types Methinks you have a yo yo working for you.

Kevin spend no more tome on these guys. THE flack we are getting form some
places is good because it means we are bothering some people as being of
some import and influence that they do not want

connie
At 01:32 PM 5/6/2004 -0400, you wrote:
> For some reason I can receive his email but I can't respond Thus I am
> trying to send it to you to see if you have me blocked as well.
>
>Hey Kevin
>If I had taken advice from the likes of you I wouldn't gotten as far as I
>have. Who gives a shit if the books sells. All I care is that the story is
>told. Much to your chagrin you are in it and not portrayed in a good
>light. Please sue me if you hate the part you played. In fact I double dog
>dare ya.
> Dave
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <mailto:info@canadianactionparty.ca>CAP Info
>To: <mailto:davidamos@comcast.net>David Amos
>Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 1:11 PM
>Subject: Re: [CAP] Why CAP and Canada Needs You
>
>Dear David,
>
>Advise: For your first book you should really work through a
>publisher. They will give good advise to help with the success of your book.
>
>When your first book is published, we would love to receive a copy.
>
>Sincerely,
>Kevin Peck
>
>David Amos wrote:
>>Hey
>>Let me see if I understand you. After you ignore me for six months and I
>>announce that I will be running against you as an independent because
>>although you talk the talk you don't walk the walk, you now seen me an
>>email whining about the fact that your party loses $1.75 for every person
>>that votes for me and not your Party because too many people have lost
>>faith in you and you do not have enough people running in your party
>>name. Therefore you now want me to join you and yet you have yet to ask
>>me the first question about my concerns. It appears to me by the gist of
>>your letter that your only concern is about money and that kinda goes
>>against everything Paul Hellyer has said in the past. So you can
>>understand me. I will simply say that I don't give a damn about the money
>>and nor should you after all that your Party has said over the years. I
>>am running in order to speak my mind of the truth. I don't care how many
>>folks vote for me just as long as the people I hold dear to me understand
>>that I did my best, said my piece and spoke the truth on their behalf.
>>May I suggest that the Action Party wait for my book. I will better
>>explain my opinion of it in it. I will give you a signed copy for free I
>>will giving it to the whole world for free byway of the internet anyway.
>>I don't think an honest man should make a business out of telling the
>>truth. Too many media types and newspapermen have proven to me that is no
>>way to go. Many folks lose their ethics and forget their original task
>>once money enters the picture.The Green Party wanted me to run for them
>>if I ran a criminal records check on myself first. I laughed because I am
>>the one trying to send most politicians to jail when I tried to give them
>>the proof they ran away. Ask Anne McLellan and Ralph Nader if you don't
>>believe me.
>>
>>Better yet why not just read the text of one of my letters last month and
>>then a couple of more sent out yesterday try to find the ones I sent out
>>today.In closing I must say I do wish your Party luck in the next
>>Election as long anyone that is elected is not an incumbent. Tis time for
>>new blood or we will get the same old song and dance as they pick our
>>pockets. Why don't you forget about the money and just speak your mind?
>>Trust me, it is good for the soul but hell on the pocket book. Ask me
>>wife. She shook her head when I told them to shove $32 million up their
>>ass and refused to oppose a motions to remove a judgments of default. I
>>want a jury to tell the truth before not a quick settlement to bury it
>>with. Come Hell or High water I will get an audience and the last things
>>you can call me is shy or a liar. Watch out that I don't embarrass your
>>Party just for shits and giggles. It is one of those things nobody seems
>>to appreciate about me. Ask my Mama or the politician she likes why that
>>is. (Elsie E. Wayne MP for Saint John New Brunswick.) Ask Zed and the
>>fella up the road that just switched sides why they are nervous about my
>>homecoming.
>>Roger W. Ferguson, Jr. Vice Chairman April 1st, 2004
>>Federal Reserve Board
>>20th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW
>>Washington, DC 20551
>>RE; Corruption
>>Sir,
>>Please find enclosed exact copies of all documents etc that I sent to
>>Solicitor General Ted Olson. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is
>>served upon you in confidence as an officer of the court in order that it
>>may be properly investigated. I have also included some other more recent
>>letters and responses for your review. The most interesting to you should
>>be my recent letter to Senator John Edwards and the responses from the
>>Solicitor General of Canada and the Special Counsel.
>>As a well paid ($157,000) federal employee who happens to be a banker, a
>>lawyer and a father of two children, you of all people should understand
>>these documents and the reason I have contacted you. If you have any
>>doubts about my SEC allegations maybe you should seek Annette L. Nazareth
>>s counsel. If she does not know who I am then maybe she should call Louis
>>Randazzo, Francis Galvin or Elliot Spitzer or a host of others. You
>>should be able trust your wife s opinion as to whether or not to call
>>Jeffery Bloch and blow the whistle yourself before the bell tolls on the
>>time for every US Attorney in the country to provide me with an answer
>>that I am satisfied with.
>>Trust that I will be filing a complaint against the USA before I run for
>>Parliament in Canada and I will name you as a witness to my allegations.
>>Quite frankly, I am certain that you are already well aware of my actions
>>and me. I will wager that you know many people that I have encountered
>>very personally. Check the roster of names within these documents and say
>>hey to them for me will ya? Like most lawyers they are trying hard to
>>ignore me but know many realize that the jig is up. All they can do now
>>is sweat and pray that I ain t as good a dancer. Whereas it is I that
>>must pay the fiddler, I will pick the tune, the ground to tap on and the
>>people to perform for.
>>The simple fact that you received your education as a lawyer while under
>>the watch of my wife s evil cousin Chucky Kickham speaks volumes to me.
>>The fact that you are a member of the Board of Overseers of Harvard
>>University proves to me that you are either very dumb or very evil.
>>Whereas both you and your wife are bigtime Washington insiders I know for
>>certain that you know more about the corruption within the Capital than I
>>do. Rest assured that I will be asking you many questions in the future
>>and will welcome any argument from you.
>>Cya ll in CourtJ
>>David R. Amos
>>153 Alvin Ave.
>>Milton, MA. 02186
>>Attorney General M. Jane Brady May 4, 2004
>>820 N. French St.
>>Carvel State Building
>>Wilmington, DE 19801
>>RE: Corruption
>>Madam,
>>Please find enclosed an exact copy of all materials sent to Roger W.
>>Ferguson Jr and letters sent to Brad Smith, Louis Freeh, Ellen Richey,
>>Caroline M. Gilroy-Brown, George C. Caner Jr., John H. Huffstutler,
>>Michael S. Helfer, Derek Bok, Randall D. Young, Tom Finneran s law firm,
>>John Keker and Robert Fiske. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is
>>served upon you in confidence as an officer of the court in order that it
>>may be properly investigated. Methinks that you should ask many bankers
>>many questions ASAP.
>>I saw that you recently welcomed CNBC s Business Center anchor, Ron
>>Insana, as the keynote speaker at the Investor Education seminar in
>>Wilmington. I doubt that you folks warned investors to be wary of
>>bankers. The State of Delaware has such laws on the books that it
>>promotes most bankers to funnel their credit card business through your
>>State byway of such a company as MBNA Corporation. This company is
>>watched over in legal matters by none other than Louis Freeh, the former
>>Director of the FBI. He was the one who failed to catch my wife s Uncle
>>Willy Kickham, an ex FBI agent, laundering money from Merrill Lynch and
>>other Bank trust accounts through an ATM and into other banks.
>>I have the evidence and have proven the facts many times to many state
>>and federal agents and lawyers as well as the courts. Although Attorney
>>General Elliot Spitzer remains diligent in prosecuting banks over lesser
>>issues, he ignores my far greater concerns with the SEC and the Secret
>>Service about Bank Fraud issues within the Brookline Bancorp.
>>I am the man from Massachusetts that Senator Shelby from Alabama
>>mentioned last November who is calling everybody names and this is all
>>about Public Trust. I am the reason that the SEC settled with Putnam
>>Investments so quickly. It was to cover up much wrongful action by many
>>employees and politicians at state and federal level to assist the
>>crooked lawyer, Chucky Kickham, in his crimes against my Clan. If you
>>doubt me, call Philip Koski or Louis Randazo of the SEC and ask them of
>>my conversation with them. I wouldn t bother with Louis Freeh everybody
>>knows that they are grooming him to be the next Judge Webster, the old
>>bastard snoozing in the chair of the DHS. I am just wondering who they
>>will get to fill Michael E. Shaheen s boots. If anyone were to ask me, I
>>would have to say that H. Marshall Jarrett is as dumb as a post and ain t
>>got a prayer in following Shaheen s tracks. Please study this stuff
>>closely. I do not know if you have enough time to respond to me in
>>writing before I name you as a witness to my sad complaint against the
>>USA. This is no act. I must ask are you a Patriot or a Pawn in upholding
>>the Public Trust?
>>Cya ll in CourtJ
>>David R. Amos
>>153 Alvin Ave.
>>Milton, MA. 02186
>>
>>May 3, 2004
>>
>>Louis J. Freeh Donald G Kempf, Jr.
>>
>>MBNA Morgan Stanley
>>
>>1100 North King Street 1585 Broadway
>>Wilmington, DE 19884 New York, NY, 10036
>>
>>William H McDavid Joan Guggenheimer
>>J.P. Morgan Chase & Co BANK ONE Card Services
>>
>>270 Park Ave. 1 Bank One Plaza
>>New York, NY 10017 Chicago, IL 60670
>>
>>RE: Corruption
>>
>>Sirs and Madam,
>>
>>Please find enclosed an copy of all materials sent to Roger W. Ferguson
>>Jr and letters sent to Brad Smith, Ellen Richey, Caroline M.
>>Gilroy-Brown, George C. Caner Jr., John H. Huffstutler, Michael S.
>>Helfer, Derek Bok, Tom Finneran s law firm, Mr. Mueller s former
>>partners, John Keker and Robert Fiske. The copy of wiretap tape numbered
>>139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court in order
>>that it may be properly investigated.
>>As you can see byway of the enclosed documents my wife and I have been
>>trying diligently for years to make lawyers act ethically. As I told
>>Caroline M. Gilroy-Brown last month, we have been paying all of our
>>debits incurred by these necessary actions in good faith that justice
>>would prevail. With the last of our credit with Bank One or anyone else I
>>send this material to you. I must inform Joan Guggenheimer and William H
>>McDavid that we can no longer make the minimum payments owed to your
>>credit card companies until these matters are resolved. I do thank them
>>for their faith in us to meet our obligations which we have always done
>>to date. I ask that they act equally as ethically on our behalf. It is
>>not our fault that we have fallen into arrears.
>>Perhaps Ms. Guggenheimer should ask Michael S. Helfer, the man who got
>>her job at Citigroup why that is and see if he can explain to the AT&T
>>dudes why we can no longer pay our AT&T credit card. Perhaps Donald G
>>Kempf, Jr. should ask the AT&T dudes why a lady that has been dead for
>>twenty five years can still trade on the stock market and not pay taxes.
>>Last year she traded with Comcast and this year apparently she is trading
>>with Cingular. I don t know but perhaps Mr. Helfer already told Ms.
>>Guggenheimer about the Kickhams but didn t bother to tell anyone else.
>>Everybody should ask Louis J. Freeh why the FBI failed to catch my wife s
>>Uncle William J. Kickham. Don t you think it kinda strange how an alien
>>layman can catch an ex FBI agent stealing large sums of money out of
>>Merrill Lynch and several Banks, wash it through an ATM machine and then
>>deposit in another bank? Then when I report the crimes to every law
>>enforcement authority I can think of, I am ignored and harassed? When I
>>sue, the matters are dismissed ex parte?
>>After I prove Tax Fraud etc. in court myself without speaking a word then
>>start asking bankers some questions the Secret Service appears at my door
>>and tries to take me to Cuba rather than investigate Bank Fraud? Many of
>>my filings have disappeared from the public record. I am likely the most
>>stricken man in recent history. All courts claim that I have no standing
>>to speak of my own interests or even that of my own children and yet have
>>appointed a GAL who helped to write the Probate manual to speak on behalf
>>of my unborn children and bill us to conspire against us. To top it all
>>off I introduce the fact to so many law enforcement officers and officers
>>of the court that I have had in my possession for years many wiretap
>>tapes only to be ignored some more. I figured someone would start acting
>>ethically once that word got out but nay not so. Don t tell me I am not
>>offended and I dare you to call me a liar. What would you do if you were
>>I? Something smells very rotten in the USA. Within the enclosed documents
>>I very clearly tell all what I am about to do. I am going to sue the USA
>>as the Resolution Unit suggests I do. I ask you to answer this letter
>>within two weeks and answer this simple question. Do you or do you not
>>stand with me in my allegations mentioned within the enclosed documents?
>>If you ignore me I will sue you and your companies.
>>Mr. Freeh, please do not even try to pretend that you do not know who I
>>am. I have contacted many people around you that you know very well and
>>saved you for last. Everybody knows that you are being groomed by the
>>politicians to be the next Judge Webster. I think one Judge Webster is
>>all that the USA should have to suffer through. What say you? What side
>>of the political fence are you on now? Say hey to the old man Webster,
>>Michael E. Shaheen and Mr. Mueller for me will ya? They are all too
>>chicken to answer my letters. However they must answer a summons. Do you
>>wish for me to name you in the same complaint against them? As a lawyer
>>now in private practice I don t have to wait six months for an answer
>>from you. You have about as long as Clark Kent Irwin does to seek Truth,
>>Justice and the American Way.
>>Welcome to the circus. It is a small world after all. EH? This letter is
>>already on the World Wide Web before the snail mail gets to you. I know
>>some things I am willing to bet on. I wager that because of this letter
>>Mr. McDavid and Ms. Guggenheimer are going to have a long talk about
>>Citigroup before they answer this letter. Mr. Kempf may Discover some
>>reservations trusting in Accenture s consulting and review his company s
>>advice to Comcast Corporation. Feel free to impress me with a fine
>>display of Ethical Professional Conduct as you try to think of some
>>lawyer you can trust and think of some way to convince me that I should
>>trust you. It would not be hard for you to embarrass Eliot Spitzer,
>>Francis Galvin and the SEC. You know they have it coming and deserve to
>>be properly shamed. I know not all Bankers are bad. My brother was a good
>>fella.
>>Cya ll in CourtJ
>>David R. Amos
>>153 Alvin Ave.
>>Milton, MA. 02186
>>May 3, 2004
>>Ellen Richey Douglas G. Scrivner,
>>Providian Financial Corp c/o William D. Green Accenture
>>P.O. Box 192605 100 William Street
>>San Francisco, CA 94119 Wellesley, MA 02481-9151
>>RE: Bad acting Bankers
>>Sir and Madam,
>>Please find enclosed an exact copy of all materials sent to Roger W.
>>Ferguson Jr and letters sent to Brad Smith, Louis Freeh, Caroline M.
>>Gilroy-Brown, George C. Caner Jr., John H. Huffstutler, Michael S.
>>Helfer, Derek Bok, Tom Finneran s law firm, John Keker and Robert Fiske.
>>The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon Ellen Richey in
>>confidence as an officer of the court in order that it may be properly
>>investigated. I cannot serve it upon William D. Green without violating
>>the Fourth Amendment.
>>Lately we had been constantly plagued by many phone calls from India at
>>all hours on the behalf of Accenture. My wife was a few days late in
>>making payments last month on Providian s credit cards. To avoid high
>>service charges she does not write a cheque until the money is in the
>>bank. After my viewing the fact that Steven Ballmer is a Director of the
>>company harassing us, I wish to litigate and dispute our debt in front of
>>a jury of our peers. If Mr. Balmer had acted ethically months ago, we
>>would not owe a dime. As you can see we had forewarned many banks that
>>this was about to happen because of their own malice towards us we had
>>run out of money defending our interests. Thus far not one of them has
>>contacted us in an attempt to refute my allegations.
>>I called William D. Green s office for the second time last week in an
>>effort to get Accenture to stop the harassment and have someone
>>responsible call me. A fella by the name of Tim called me from Washington
>>claiming that anything that I said to him would be referred to Mr.
>>Scriver. I told him he had best talk to Steven A. Ballmer. Whereas he is
>>also the CEO of Microsoft, he has at least two sets of ethical rules to
>>obey. It should not be necessary for me to inform Accenture of anything
>>that I had sent Brad Smith months ago. When Tim asked me who Brad Smith
>>was, I shook my head and asked for a lawyer to call me. I knew he would
>>have no idea who Roger W. Ferguson and Ms. Nazareth were. He was just
>>some guy without a whole name who was sent fishing and to pick my brain
>>for the big boys who consult banks on how to play the global game. I did
>>tell him I understood the game. I know that Andersen went public in New
>>York to get some money and yet base their operations in Bermuda to avoid
>>taxation. I know that Accenture advises bankers how to avoid taxation and
>>how to profit from the American public with higher service charges and
>>higher interest rates byway of credit cards etc. and then employ poor
>>folks in far away lands to collect the minute they stumble under the
>>debit load. When I looked deeper into Accenture s history, I saw that Mr.
>>Scrivner had testified before Congress and had made the following
>>statement. "The audit profession has been granted a unique franchise
>>through the securities laws and auditors are entrusted to act as the
>>"gatekeepers" for the securities markets." Now I want to meet him in
>>court or Congress. Now you know why.
>>Need I say I was not surprised when I have not heard anything further
>>from Accenture or their friends from the Far East? So I have sent this
>>letter to the up and coming CEO of Accenture to further shake the tree.
>>Lets just say that a wild colonial boy is at the gate and has a few
>>questions for Mr. Scrivner and many other "gatekeepers".
>>Today Keith Gomes of Dallas TX ( 1 800- 280-944) called my wife at her
>>work on the behalf of Providian. Now that really pissed us off. It seemed
>>like an obvious effort to get around me after I had told someone from
>>Providian that I had her Durable Power of Attorney and that she has her
>>own lawyer anyway. I had requested that if Providian wished to discuss
>>this, to have a lawyer contact me. I was tired of trying to talk to
>>people that could either barely speak English or pretended to have no
>>idea of what I was telling them. When either of your companies begins
>>your threatened litigation against us, I will bring these documents and
>>many more to court and demand a jury trial.
>>Thus far Providian has not offended me. I am in fact grateful that they
>>extended me credit. However I do wonder about the company they keep.
>>Although it was not proper for Providian to have attempted to involve my
>>wife in matters that most lawyers pretend to not understand nor do I
>>think it legal for Providian to bother my wife at work, I won t hold it
>>against them unless they do it again. I would like to know how they got
>>her number at work and why they found it necessary to act in such a
>>fashion. In my opinion Ellen Richey should ask the bill collectors to
>>quite calling us for a bit and then ask Mr. Scrivner and several of
>>Providian s Directors many questions before she responds to this letter.
>>Robert J Higgins formerly of FleetBoston Financial Corporation and F.
>>Warren McFarlan of Harvard University should easily explain to Providian
>>my concerns in Boston with the fraudulent actions of bankers. John L.
>>Douglas of Alston & Bird LLP should know Joe D. Whitley and Bob Barr well
>>enough to explain my concerns with DHS and the failure of the Secret
>>Service to investigate Bank Fraud. If I do not receive a response to this
>>letter within two weeks or if I do not agree with your standing in these
>>matters, I will consider you and your companies to be litigants against
>>me in federal court.
>>If Ellen Richey is wise, she will act ethically immediately to keep
>>Providian out of this battle. Perhaps it may climb the ladder in the
>>world of big bank mergers because of her professional conduct. I know it
>>is the right move for a small bank but a hard decision for a lawyer to
>>make. She must know the rules that allow her to practice law for a fee. I
>>see no ethical dilemma whatsoever. I will leave her to decide her
>>standing with the Kickhams and the Brookline Savings Bank or me. It did
>>not make sense that the Feds would act so badly to protect one crooked
>>law firm. When the Secret Service came to my door on April 1st of last
>>year, I knew that they were sent to protect the interests of bankers not
>>politician s butts. One year later to the day I am prepared to prove it.
>>Check my work and prepare to argue. Trust me, I ain t bluffing and I don
>>t know how to back up. Ask the Kickhams.
>>Cya ll in CourtJ
>>David R. Amos
>>153 Alvin Ave.
>>Milton, MA. 02186
>>Good Friday April 9th, 2004
>>Paul G. Pustorino Dennis F. Walsh
>>Grant Thornton KPMG LLP
>>226 Causeway Street 99 High Street
>>Boston MA 02114-2155 Boston MA 02110
>>Mike Emmert and Rhea Kemble Dignam George C Caner Jr Secretary
>>C/o Harrison E. Holbrook, III, Partner Brookline Bancorp, Inc.
>>Ernst & Young LLP C/o Ropes & Gray
>>200 Clarendon Street One International Place
>>Boston MA 02116-5072 Boston MA 02110
>>
>>RE: Notice of my intent to file complaints against the above named
>>individuals,
>>their associates and their companies as per federal court rules.
>>Sirs and Madam,
>>Please find enclosed exactly the same documents that were sent to the
>>Solicitor General Ted Olson. I have also enclosed many other documents
>>that were sent to the IRS, SEC, FBI, DHS, the Federal Reserve Bank and
>>many others a long time ago. These should prove to you that I am as
>>serious as a heart attack. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is
>>served only upon George C. Caner Jr. as he is the only person amongst you
>>who is an officer of the court. If Mike Emmert and Rhea Kemble Dignam
>>want to have their own copies in order that it may be properly
>>investigated, please have them notify me of their wishes before I sue
>>them. However after they review the enclosed documents they can easily
>>see that many others in New York are already well aware of the facts and
>>evidence. Maybe they should confer with Mr. Spitzer s office first.
>>I have no doubt that Ernst & Young LLP is well are of my actions because
>>I have already crossed paths with some of their other clients both in the
>>USA and Canada. Although KPMG LLP. is an association of many firms, the
>>local outfit does claim the Brookline Savings Bank and Holy Cross College
>>amongst their own clientele. Chucky Kickham and his cohorts hide their
>>money in one place and try to buy modern day dispensation at the other.
>>The fact that KPMG LLP as a whole is deeply in bed with such people as
>>David J. Lesar, Chairman, President and CEO of Halliburton enough to
>>organize events in Houston in order to have him preach at only proves to
>>me that you are all crooks. Mr, Pustorino should never deny that we have
>>talked. I saved his voicemail to me last February as well as proof that I
>>Faxed him much evidence before I appeared at the Annual Meeting of the
>>Shareholders of the Brookline Savings Bank. I knew he had lost the Bank
>>as a client. I made contact with him was because I was attempting to
>>inform him and many others of my concerns and allegations after being
>>ignored by Mr. Chapman.
>>I was not surprised that the Secret Service came to my door with the
>>Milton Cops and tried to take me away to Cuba before I made that
>>appearance. If you don t believe me, call George Putnam or the Wall
>>Street Journal dudes. I can prove I notified them all before going to the
>>meeting as a shareholder to confront the Directors of the bank.
>>To me most of you folks are merely a few of many bean-counters in a town
>>so full of beans that it is aptly nicknamed as such. My war of words is
>>with bad acting lawyers, bankers, politicians and priests. Although you
>>willingly audit such people s work and swear that their word is true, I
>>have no doubt that you know as well as I when someone is a liar. Check
>>their work more closely after you have looked at mine and then decide
>>with whom do you wish to stand. This is my fair warning of many impending
>>lawsuits. I will settle with you for a very minor amount, if you act
>>ethically and promise to tell the truth. I fully realize that with the
>>exceptions of Mr. Pustorino and Mr. Caner that you may not be aware of my
>>actions and have been keep in the dark by my adversaries. I have extended
>>this offer to settle in good faith. Please don t offend me further.
>>I have enclosed the work of the only honest man to pick up a pen in our
>>matters. His name is Pope. He is no priest but he charged a just a
>>pittance for honest ethical work in checking Aunt Elaine s books. Compare
>>his figures to that of the following year by an accountant for Chucky
>>Kickham who had a brother that was a big-assed priest.
>>In light of all that has transpired in the past few years, I could only
>>laugh as I read the following words I gleaned from the Annual Report:
>>"SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION"
>>Washington, DC 20549
>>FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
>>SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
>>BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC. For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2003
>>The USA Patriot Act
>>In October 2001, the USA PATRIOT Act became effective. Title III of that
>>Act represents a major expansion of the U.S. anti-money laundering laws
>>granting broad new anti-money laundering powers to the Secretary of the
>>Treasury and imposing a variety of new compliance obligations on banks
>>and broker dealers. The Act also requires a bank s regulator to
>>specifically consider a bank s past record of compliance with the bank
>>Secrecy Act (anti-money laundering requirements) when acting on any
>>applications filed by such bank.
>>Federal Taxation
>>General. The Company and the Bank are subject to federal income taxation
>>in the same general manner as other corporations, with some exceptions
>>discussed below. The following discussion of federal taxation is intended
>>only to summarize certain pertinent federal income tax matters and is not
>>a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to the Company or
>>the Bank.
>>The Company and the Bank have not had their federal income tax returns
>>audited by the Internal Revenue Service during the past five years.
>>Item 3. Legal Proceedings
>>The Company is not involved in any pending legal proceedings other than
>>routine legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business
>>which, in the aggregate, involve amounts which are believed by management
>>to be immaterial to the financial condition and results of operations of
>>the Company.
>>Item 9. Changes In And Disagreements With Accountants On Accounting And
>>Financial Disclosures
>>On January 17, 2003, the Registrant elected to change its outside
>>accounting firm, Grant Thornton LLP ("Grant Thornton"). The Registrant
>>engaged KPMG LLP ("KPMG") as its new accounting firm. The decision to
>>change accounting firms was recommended by the audit committee of the
>>Board of Directors and approved by the Board of Directors.
>>Grant Thornton s report on the consolidated financial statements of the
>>Registrant for each of the two years in the period ended December 31,
>>2002 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and
>>was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or
>>accounting principles. During the two years ended December 31, 2002, the
>>Registrant had no disagreement with Grant Thornton on any matter of
>>accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or
>>auditing scope or procedure which disagreement, if not resolved to the
>>satisfaction of Grant Thornton, would have caused it to make reference to
>>the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its report.
>>None of the reportable events described by Item 304(a)(1)(v) of
>>Regulation S-K has occurred.
>>Grant Thornton has furnished the Registrant with a letter in response to
>>Item 304(a) of Regulation S-K. Such letter is included in this report as
>>Exhibit 16.1.
>>KPMG was engaged by the Registrant on January 17, 2003 to audit the
>>consolidated financial statements of the Registrant as of and for the
>>year ended December 31, 2003. During the two years ended December 31,
>>2002, the Registrant did not consult with KPMG regarding any of the
>>matters set forth in Item 304(a)(2)(i) or (ii) of Regulation S-K."
>>Read the documents I have provided and you should laugh as well, Neither
>>the courts, nor the bank, nor the IRS can explain Aunt Elaine s bank
>>account. However I saw red when the lawyer, Jan Whiting, acting as a
>>court appointed fiduciary for us had charged us for his time to scheme
>>against our interests with lawyers of the Sovereign Bank and the Coldwell
>>Bankers. That act gave me a very legitimate reason to drag my former
>>Prime Minister Brian Mulroney into court. Many Canadians would agree
>>that, that day has been a long time coming. The only one that may
>>disagree is Belinda Stronach a client of Ernst & Young and very good
>>buddy of Bill Clinton and Brian Mulroney.
>>Welcome to my Blood Feud. I must inform you that my blood is now boiling.
>>The same bunch of crooked Yankee Carpetbaggers are now trying to have my
>>little Clan thrown out of their home and into the streets of Beantown to
>>assist the very same criminals in their actions against us. The crooks
>>are going to get some hard lessons about the fury of a patient man. Have
>>no fear for your person. It is your pocketbook and reputation that are in
>>jeopardy. My War Will be Waged with the Word not the sword and byway of
>>the World Wide Web. Look for your own names forever linked to mine. Win
>>or lose I want this battle long remembered by many. Howard Dean taught me
>>a thing or two about grassroots campaigns. It is small wonder to me why I
>>must go home and run for Parliament. Truth and Justice is not part of the
>>American Way in the USA and most Canadian politicians are playing their
>>part of the Yankee s evil scheme for New World Order. I am just one
>>pigheaded Martimer that will not stand for it without registering my
>>complaints. Perhaps someone from Ernst & Young should go to a racetrack
>>down here and ask old Frank Stronach if he is willing to bet against me.
>>He knows what kind of man I am. You make your own judgement of me. I have
>>already done so of you. Need I say that thus far I am not impressed? Rest
>>assured that Mr. Caner s Trials and Tribulations are far from over. I
>>plan to go the distance with him and every other lawyer or banker etc
>>that crosses my path in the pursuit of justice for all.
>>Please study closely my wife s latest filing in Plymouth Probate court
>>that the clerks have refused to put into the docket and Judge Livingstone
>>s backdated court order. I will be sending you all a summons to federal
>>court very soon if you don t act honestly very quickly. It is for you to
>>decide what should be said before the Brookline Savings Bank s Annual
>>Shareholders Meeting in a couple of days. I said my piece last year and
>>they laughed at me. We shall see who laughs this year.
>>Please respond to me as soon as possible. I will tell you that May 28th,
>>2004 you will be way past too late to talk to me. After that, I argue
>>with your lawyers. I am heading south shortly but I can be reached byway
>>of cell phone # 617 240-6698. Give me a call and you soon will realize
>>that I am not a bit like the sort of person that lawyers claim I am. Bear
>>in mind that you can t fool me though because I am too stupid to believe
>>a lawyer or trust a banker or respect a priest. Also you should know I
>>have no tolerance for anyone that calls me a liar. I don t mind if you
>>call me crazy but that insult just pisses me off and I get really quiet.
>>As your review these documents please ask your conscience what you would
>>do if you were I. Then please inform me what you think is the golden
>>rule. Is it do onto others as the pious priests preach? Or is it he with
>>the gold makes the rules? What say you? I may already know your answer.
>>Your silence will speak volumes in affirming it to me.
>>Cya ll in CourtJ
>>David R. Amos
>>PO Box 2
>>South Acworth NH 03607
>>
>>

>>Certificate of Service
>>I, David A. Woodman, of South Acworth NH on April 13th, 2004 served the
>>attached document etc. in hand to the offices of Paul G. Pustorino at 226
>>Causeway St. Boston MA 02114-2155, Dennis F. Walsh at 99 High Street,
>>Boston MA 02110,
>>Harrison E. Holbrook at 200 Clarendon St, Boston MA 02116-5072 and
>>George C Caner Jr. at One International Place Boston MA 02110
>>
>>
>>David A. Woodman
>>PO Box 2
>>South Acworth NH 03607
>>

>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "CAP Info"
>><<mailto:info@canadianactionparty.ca>info@canadianactionparty.ca>
>>To: "Mail List"
>><<mailto:info@canadianactionparty.ca>info@canadianactionparty.ca>
>>Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 3:45 PM
>>Subject: [CAP] Why CAP and Canada Needs You
>> > Dear CAP Friends,
>> >
>> > A message from Connie Fogal:
>> > ---
>> >
>> > ** Plea for Candidates for the Canadian Action Party. **
>> >
>> > Canada's federal election will be launched very soon. The Canadian
>> > Action Party is a registered party on the political scene since 1997
>> > fielding candidates in the past two elections, 1997, and 2002. We had 52
>> > candidates in '97, and 70 in '00. We need 50 to retain our status as a
>> > registered party. Being a registered party is vital because it gives us
>> > benefits not available if we are not registered, like tax benefits for
>> > contributions, party name on ballot, T.V. time.
>> >
>> > There are new election financing rules that give $1.75 per vote each
>> > year to the party per year. This means millions of dollars of funding
>> > support, but is obviously related to the votes cast. There can be no
>> > votes cast for CAP nor any money coming back to finance us if there is
>> > no candidate in the riding. The Greens are fielding candidates in all
>> > ridings precisely because of the financial advantage. They already
>> > benefit from the number of votes they received in the last election
>> > because they had over 2% of votes across the nation. CAP did not. The 2%
>> > threshold, now on challenge by small parties, is a requirement under the
>> > legislation. It is 5% for individual candidates. Under the leadership of
>> > the Greens, many small parties have joined a legal challenge to the 2%
>> > rule as unconstitutional.
>> >
>> > In other words, every vote is valuable. No longer do voters have to
>> > worry that if they vote for a small party, their vote will not count
>> > just because that party does not win the election, or because the
>> > candidate does not win. Now, there is a concrete expression validating
>> > their vote-- $1.75 per year per vote for the party they voted for. This
>> > can translate into thousands and thousands of dollars for a party.
>> >
>> > Why is CAP in this unfortunate position of insufficient candidates
>> > facing an imminent election??? The reason is because we put the interest
>> > of Canada first. Under the principled leadership of Paul Hellyer, the
>> > Canadian Action Party spent the last two years trying to bring together
>> > an alliance of all those people disaffected with and alienated from the
>> > mainstream parties who are disemboweling Canada. We firmly believed that
>> > the only sufficient electoral power to save Canada from its
>> > "americanizers" and "continentalists" (to use Mel Hurtig's words) was
>> > electoral unity of one force. We believed such a coalition could
>> > electrify the voters and propel sufficient new strength into a
>> > "Canadian" Parliament.
>> >
>> > In the best interest of Canada for Canadians and the world we sought
>> > unity on sovereignty. The key issue was joint recognition that the
>> > globalization process imposing international agreements on us prevent us
>> > from controlling our destiny via made in Canada decisions over our
>> > financing, our environment, our energy resources, our industry, our
>> > trade and development, our work force, our social safety net (like
>> > medicare), our foreign policy, etc. We sought three points of unity:
>> > abrogation of NAFTA; use of the Bank of Canada as part of a
>> > financial/economic program; proportional representation in electoral
>> > reform.
>> >
>> > We negotiated and waited for response as long as possible delaying our
>> > own convention before the impending federal election, but to no avail
>> > regarding unity. In the process we had encouraged our people to go to
>> > the NDP, the Greens, the David Orchard Conservatives, etc., in efforts
>> > to promote unity. In the process, many of them have been picked up by
>> > those other parties to run as candidates, and to work. The overall
>> > result was that our own organizational work for ourselves was greatly
>> > jeopardized. Such are the vagaries of politics!
>> >
>> > It was not my first choice to take on the role and responsibilities of
>> > Leader of the Canadian Action Party. My choice was to succeed in unity
>> > described aforesaid under the ultimate leadership of a new person of
>> > distinction.
>> >
>> > I have always been a passionate defender of Canadian sovereignty and
>> > civil liberties. A major threat to Canadians now is the same threat
>> > facing the whole world. That is the environmental destruction of the
>> > globe arising out of the military destruction imposed by the United
>> > States on countries of its choice, including the permanent, deadly
>> > contamination of the soil, water, and air by the use of depleted uranium
>> > in its munitions. In the best interest of Canadians first, and in the
>> > best interest of all the world, it is essential that Canada remain a
>> > powerfully sovereign state opposed to Canadian integration with the
>> > United States. Canada needs to remain a peacekeeping model to the world.
>> > We need to be able to say "No" to all those initiatives of the United
>> > States that contravene and deny Canadian values, interests and rights.
>> > We need to be able to say "No" to the U.S. militarization of space. We
>> > need a Parliament that refuses to impose liberty-stripping laws on
>> > Canadians in lock-step with the U.S. We need a Parliament that will
>> > preserve and protect the liberty and security of Canadians as is
>> > entrenched in our Constitution, not a Parliament that grants dictatorial
>> > liberty-stripping power to four or five federal Ministers of the Crown,
>> > as in Bill C-7 currently before the Senate.
>> >
>> > The Canadian Action Party's convention in March 2004 unanimously
>> > endorsed the continuation of the party and fielding as many candidates
>> > as possible given our time constraints and set-back due to unity efforts
>> > as set out above. We believe it is imperative our voice remain as a
>> > strong contender on the campaign trail. We know we have been a primary
>> > voice to express the issues we see as crucial for Canada. We know our
>> > presence has influenced other parties to deal with our issues. We know
>> > if we are not on the scene, our issues will not get the airing that is
>> > necessary. We know that our issues are the issues of many Canadians
>> > because they have told us so. A big hurdle for many voters was their
>> > worry that a vote for a small party was a wasted vote. Now their vote
>> > does count. We know that many voters felt that without the Canadian
>> > Action Party, they would not have a political home.
>> >
>> > Accordingly, I am appealing to you to put your country first by putting
>> > yourself on the line for about one and one-half (1-1/2) months and run
>> > as a candidate for CAP in this election.
>> >
>> > To give you a sense of my political history and direction, here are some
>> > of the things I have done in the last ten years:
>> >
>> > * Led the campaign against gambling expansion since 1994. Since 1998,
>> > Fogal-Rankin spearheaded three lawsuits on behalf of Canadian citizens
>> > through the Defence of Canadian Liberty Committee to protect our
>> > constitutional sovereignty. The MAI lawsuit attacked the power asserted
>> > by federal government officials and Ministers that commit Canadians to
>> > international agreements destroying citizen rights. The Nanoose Bay
>> > lawsuit attacked the expropriation of an environmentally sensitive
>> > waterway by the federal government to permit the U.S. to test their
>> > weapons. That lawsuit was stayed pending the pursuit by the province of
>> > their lawsuit on the issue. The third challenged the federal
>> > government's destruction of our civil liberties and rights to free
>> > speech and lawful assembly by the erection of a fence in Quebec City to
>> > keep protestors away from the Summit of the Americas. The Supreme Court
>> > of Canada refused to deal with issues raised in the MAI and Quebec
>> > lawsuits, but the issues remain alive.
>> >
>> > * Promoted public education by bringing to Vancouver notable speakers
>> > including: Michel Chossudovsky, economist, University of Ottawa on
>> > globalization of poverty, and the impacts of the IMF and the World Bank;
>> > Guy Bertrand, Pawyer; and Max and Monique Nemni, editors of Cité Libre,
>> > on Quebec issues; Dr.Richard Wolfson on genetically modified foods;
>> > Robert Goodman, Professor, University of Massachusetts, and Dr Earl
>> > Grinols, Economist, University of Chicago on the damage of gambling as a
>> > mechanism for running the economy; Paul Hellyer, Leader, Canadian Action
>> > Party, on globalization's effects on Canada; Michael Rowbotham, England,
>> > professor and researcher on the origins and effect of money and debt.
>> >
>> > * Critiqued Canada's heavy-handed new laws implemented by our federal
>> > government under the guise of antiterrorism legislation since 9/11 and
>> > disseminated the information by e mail and website.
>> >
>> > Please join us.
>> >
>> > Contact Kevin Peck, organizer and communications director at 1 877 629
>> > 0841 or fax 1 416 535 6325 or
>> >
>> <mailto:info@canadianactionparty.ca>info@canadianactionparty.ca or
>> <mailto:info@partiactioncanadienne.ca>info@partiactioncanadienne.ca and
>> > visit our website
>> at <http://www.canadianationparty.ca>www.canadianationparty.ca
>> >
>> > Yours truly,
>> >
>> > Connie Fogal, 604 872
>> 2128 <mailto:conniefogal@telus.net>conniefogal@telus.net
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------
>> > Connie Fogal, Leader ,Canadian Action Party/ parti action Canadienne
>> > Tel: (604)872 2128; fax: (604) 872 -1504
>> > E-MAIL <mailto:conniefogal@telus.net>conniefogal@telus.net
>> > Head office : 99 Atlantic Ave, Suite 302, Toronto, Ont, M6K3J8, tel: 1
>> > 877 629 0841, e mail:
>> <mailto:info@canadianactionparty.ca>info@canadianactionparty.ca
>> > .................................
>> > "The world is not, in fact, ruled by global corporations. It is ruled by
>> > the global financial system." David Korten
>> > .................................
>> > "The ability of a party to make a valuable contribution is not dependent
>> > upon its capacity to offer the electorate a genuine government option.
>> > Political parties... act as a vehicle for the participation of
>> > individual citizens in the political life of the country. ...Marginal or
>> > regional parties tend to raise issues not adopted by national parties.
>> > Political parties provide individual citizens with an opportunity to
>> > express an opinion on the policy and functioning of government. Each
>> > vote in support of a party increases the likelihood that its platform
>> > will be taken into account by those who implement policy, and votes for
>> > parties with fewer than 50 candidates are an integral component of a
>> > vital and dynamic democracy. " Figueroa v Canada (Attorney General)
>> > 2003 SCC 37
>> > -----------------------------------
>> > "Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor
>> > security"...Benjamin Franklin
>> > ..................................
>> > "The constitution of Canada does not belong either to Parliament, or to
>> > the Legislatures; it belongs to the country and it is there that the
>> > citizens of the country will find the protection of the rights to which
>> > they are entitled" Supreme Court of Canada A.G. of Nova Scotia and A.G.
>> > of Canada, S.C.R. 1951 pp 32
>> >
>> >

---------------------------------
Connie Fogal, Leader ,Canadian Action Party/ parti action Canadienne
Tel: (604)872 2128; fax: (604) 872 -1504
E-MAIL conniefogal@telus.net
Head office : 99 Atlantic Ave, Suite 302, Toronto, Ont, M6K3J8, tel: 1 877
629 0841, e mail: info@canadianactionparty.ca
.................................
"The world is not, in fact, ruled by global corporations. It is ruled by
the global financial system." David Korten
.................................
"The ability of a party to make a valuable contribution is not dependent
upon its capacity to offer the electorate a genuine government option.
Political parties... act as a vehicle for the participation of individual
citizens in the political life of the country. ...Marginal or regional
parties tend to raise issues not adopted by national parties. Political
parties provide individual citizens with an opportunity to express an
opinion on the policy and functioning of government. Each vote in support
of a party increases the likelihood that its platform will be taken into
account by those who implement policy, and votes for parties with fewer
than 50 candidates are an integral component of a vital and dynamic
democracy. " Figueroa v Canada (Attorney General) 2003 SCC 37
-----------------------------------
"Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor
security"...Benjamin Franklin
..................................
"The constitution of Canada does not belong either to Parliament, or to the
Legislatures; it belongs to the country and it is there that the citizens
of the country will find the protection of the rights to which they are
entitled" Supreme Court of Canada A.G. of Nova Scotia and A.G. of Canada,
S.C.R. 1951 pp 32



----- Original Message -----
From: CAP Info
To: Mail List
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 5:06 PM
Subject: [CAP] New Election Cash-Register (Real Beavers Fight Back)


Dear CAP Friends,

A super article from one of our to be candidates in Ottawa, Mary-Sue
Haliburton, follows.

Take note that we are now at 46 candidates! Not bad but we need
another 10 or so to feel comfortable for this election. (On the web
site you will notice that only 5 candidates are up so far. This is
because not all of the candidates have sent in their necessary
documentation. I hope I'll be able to post the rest of them soon to
justify a press release!)

Sincerely,
Kevin Peck

---


<Flag.gif>
News and Events > May 9, 2004

Article: New Election Cash-Register (Real Beavers Fight Back)



Date:
May 9, 2004

Location:
Ottawa


From: Mary-Sue Haliburton, Ottawa West - Nepean e:bihal_sm007@rogers.com

Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 22:03:05 -0400

Margaret Atwood challenged Canadians by saying that we were like the
mythical beaver which cuts off its own testicles and hands them over
to the predator in hopes of delaying execution. She was satirizing the
drive toward Deep Integration, Continentalism, and Assimilation into
the United States. However, our major political parties -- Liberals,
new Conservatives -- appear to be acting like this very unwise rodent
species. Such an animal would quickly become extinct, of course. And
Canadians who vote Liberal or Conservative in the next election are
acquiescing to our extinction as a nation.

However, Real Beavers are effective and dangerous. Industrious and
powerful, they fell trees, store food, build safe refuges, and raise
families. Far from surrendering to enemies, they kill them by
drowning. A dog or other predator that actually ventures into beaver
pond will not come out alive.

The Canadian Action Party calls upon citizens of Canada to be Real
Beavers in our concept of ourselves and in our political philosophy.
To ensure the survival of our country and its people we must adopt
effective means of building up Canadian sovereignty and ensuring our
survival as the world's trade and monetary systems totter under
overwhelming and intolerable Debt. Even the United States' economy,
now reeling and unable to pay trillions of dollars owed to private
banks, is in danger of a collapse more thorough, sudden, and shocking
than that of the Twin Towers.

Our platform includes:
1. Logical monetary policy to counteract the compounding interest of
the national debt. In 1998, the Auditor General cited 600 billion
owing in interest payments -- which is 600% to 700% more than the 87
billion in actual overspending. Since then, the Auditor General's
reports have excluded debt figures -- apparently to prevent national
panic -- or to prevent Canadians from being aware of the need for
change. Liberals and Conservatives alike would continue business as
usual until the bottom falls out, and millions lose livelihoods,
homes, and hope to service these interest charges. The Canadian Action
Party would reinstate borrowing interest-free from the Bank of Canada,
a practice that served us well between 1938 and 1974 when it was
stopped at the demand of private bank lobbyists.
2. Preservation of the logical lower-cost system of public education
and health insurance. The cost of health care is much lower in Canada
than the US due to our single-payer system of insurance; it could be
lower still if we institute 21st Century medicine, taking advantage of
new discoveries in physics and correcting the underlying causes of
disease rather than just controlling symptoms. Submitting to the
higher costs proven to occur in for-profit medicine and P3 hospitals
will only further raise the debt and prevent lower-income Canadians
from receiving any coverage. Allowing privatization of these vital
systems will further solidify governance by un-elected corporations,
instead of maintaining democracy.
3. Support for free enterprise including the development and marketing
of new inventions, with priority to those which reduce pollution, and
encouragement of entrepreneurship in small business. At present we
have a self-destroying monopolistic corporate system in which bigger
and bigger businesses actually shoot themselves and the economy in the
foot. By forcing down wages and exporting jobs to be done for
starvation wages, these giant corporations ultimately destroy the
consumer base. In the end, few people remain who can afford to buy
manufactured products. Under the corporate version of globalism, most
people are reduced to subsistence and even destitution. Therefore, if
you aspire to be more than a menial employee or to live in a home
instead of on the street, voting for the Liberals or Conservatives is
not an option. Both are committed to the corporate rule through
ideological privatization.
4. Rebuilding Canada's independent role on the international stage,
respecting the UN and international law. As a priority, we will oppose
the obsolete missile-defence system. The Liberal Minister of Defence
actually believes that an attacking enemy will limit its arsenal to
older technology that can be shot down by a missile! This is
illogical, short-sighted and self-emasculating-beaver thinking; any
hostile power will of course seek out the newest and/or stealthiest
approach that will accomplish their aims. As we learned on 9/11, more
damage can be done from within a nation's borders than from outside.
Further, missile defence is the first stage of the planned weapons in
space system, which will further destabilize the world and lead to a
more abusive empire than we have yet seen. Canada would be better
defended by helping to establish fair, balanced trade, and by seeking
ways to undo the damage and mistrust generated by these latest wars.
The days of "hold your nose and vote" are over! We must not fall again
into the trap of "strategic" voting against someone. This time, vote
with your heart and mind for what you truly believe in. Due to changes
in electoral law, this election will be different from all that went
before. This time, every vote cast rings a cash register and $1.75
will be contributed to the party chosen by that voter. That amount can
add up. Please don't throw your vote-change away into the coffers of a
party that does not value the survival of Canada or of Canadian social
values.

Therefore please consider launching and/or supporting a candidacy for
the Canadian Action Party in your riding. This is not that big a deal:
you need 100 signatures and a refundable deposit. (Contact the Kevin
Peck, e: kpeck@canadianactionparty.ca, p: 1-877-629-0841, for
instructions or to obtain the candidates' package of forms, etc.)

Mary-Sue Haliburton, Ottawa West - Nepean, e: bihal_sm007@rogers.com






On 8/20/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> Now that is truly funny. Trust that nobody will breath a word about
> checking out this email EH Mayor Ford?
>
> http://forestethicsadvocacy.ca/federal-lawsuit-press-release
>
> http://forestethics.org/author/donna-sinclair
>
> http://www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/elist/eListRead/green_group_sues_canadian_govt_for_restricting_public_input_on_energy_proje/
>
> http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/industry-news/energy-and-resources/activists-launch-suit-in-federal-court-over-ability-to-oppose-proposed-pipeline-projects/article13721850/
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 22:47:13 -0300
> Subject: EMERA is in constant contact with the regulator the National
> Energy Board???? Gee who the hell has the Green Meanie Horst Sauerteig
> talked to that I did not?
> To: oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "mckeen.randy"
> <mckeen.randy@gmail.com>, news@959sunfm.com, xchief
> <xchief@bell.blackberry.net>, minister <minister@aadnc-aandc.gc.ca>,
> premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, "marie-claude.blais"
> <marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>, "john.warr" <john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "bernadine.chapman" <bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> mjs837@nyu.edu, hmc <hmc@mediacoop.ca>, wendallnicholas
> <wendallnicholas@gmail.com>, ppalmater
> <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca>, jrebick <jrebick@politics.ryerson.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Gary.Rhodes"
> <Gary.Rhodes@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "gary.forward"
> <gary.forward@fredericton.ca>, "Michelle.Boutin"
> <Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, highwood <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>,
> "fortmcmurray.woodbuffalo" <fortmcmurray.woodbuffalo@assembly.ab.ca>,
> deanr0032 <deanr0032@hotmail.com>, eachtem <eachtem@hotmail.com>,
> gplant <gplant@heenan.ca>
>
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 20:29:46 -0300
> Subject: Re: EMERA is in constant contact with the regulator the
> National Energy Board???? Gee who the hell has the Green Meanies Horst
> Sauerteig talked to that I did not?
> To: Horst Sauerteig <sauertwo@nb.sympatico.ca>
> Cc: sheila.leggett@neb-one.gc.ca, "chris.huskilson"
> <chris.huskilson@emera.com>, "dave.eby@gmail.com \"joe.oliver.c1\""
> <joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca>, "Dina.Bartolacci"
> <Dina.Bartolacci@emera.com>, "Robert.Trevors" <Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca>,
> "bruce.northrup" <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, musoviczl@repsol.com,
> pribbeck@repsol.com, vcmorrissettem@repsol.com, ottawa@mofa.gov.qa,
> premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>,
> elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca, gplant <gplant@heenan.ca>,
> ngodbout@lawsoncreamer.com, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>,
> david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, stephen.aftanas@emera.com,
> Scott.Balfour@emera.com, "rob.bennett" <rob.bennett@emera.com>,
> mel.norton@saintjohn.ca, Kevin.Clifford@saintjohn.ca
>
> FUCK YOU Sauerteig I don't need your consent
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Horst Sauerteig <sauertwo@nb.sympatico.ca>
> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:49:45 -0400
> Subject: Re: EMERA is in constant contact with the regulator the
> National Energy Board???? Gee who the hell has the Green Meanies Horst
> Sauerteig talked to that I did not?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
> sheila.leggett@neb-one.gc.ca, "chris.huskilson"
> <chris.huskilson@emera.com>, "dave.eby@gmail.com \"joe.oliver.c1\""
> <joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca>, "Dina.Bartolacci"
> <Dina.Bartolacci@emera.com>, "Robert.Trevors" <Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca>,
> "bruce.northrup" <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, musoviczl@repsol.com,
> pribbeck@repsol.com, vcmorrissettem@repsol.com, ottawa@mofa.gov.qa,
> premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>,
> elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca, gplant <gplant@heenan.ca>,
> ngodbout@lawsoncreamer.com, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, stephen.aftanas@emera.com,
> Scott.Balfour@emera.com, "rob.bennett" <rob.bennett@emera.com>,
> mel.norton@saintjohn.ca, Kevin.Clifford@saintjohn.ca
>
> Please note that Mr. Amos sent this e-mail without my knowledge and/or
> consent.
> Horst Sauerteig, Wednesday, July 17, 2013
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/informationmorningfredericton/2013/07/17/mining-interests-blamed/
>
> http://www.nashwaakwatershed.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Communique-classification-des-eaux.pdf
>
> Lawrence Wuest 367 2280
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 05:21:38 -0300
> Subject: Do you people want my help YET???
> To: CHenschel@cpaws.org, media@cpaws.org, cpawsnb@nb.sympatico.ca,
> rclowater@cpaws.org
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/informationmorningfredericton/2013/07/15/protected-areas/
>
> http://cpaws.org/news/chapter/nb
>
> Media contact:
>
> Ellen Adelberg
> Director of Communications
> (613)569-7226 ext. 234
> media@cpaws.org
>
> http://www.nben.ca/en/collaborative-action/news-from-groups/itemlist/user/212-Contact:
>
> Roberta Clowater, 506-452-9902;
> cpawsnb@nb.sympatico.ca
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 04:45:05 -0300
> Subject: EMERA is in constant contact with the regulator the National
> Energy Board???? Gee who the hell has the Green Meanies Horst
> Sauerteig talked to that I did not?
> To: sheila.leggett@neb-one.gc.ca, sauertwo@nb.sympatico.ca,
> "chris.huskilson" <chris.huskilson@emera.com>, "dave.eby@gmail.com
> \"joe.oliver.c1\"" <joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca>, "Dina.Bartolacci"
> <Dina.Bartolacci@emera.com>, "Robert.Trevors" <Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca>,
> "bruce.northrup" <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, musoviczl@repsol.com,
> pribbeck@repsol.com, vcmorrissettem@repsol.com, ottawa@mofa.gov.qa,
> premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>,
> elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca, gplant <gplant@heenan.ca>,
> ngodbout@lawsoncreamer.com, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, stephen.aftanas@emera.com,
> Scott.Balfour@emera.com, "rob.bennett" <rob.bennett@emera.com>,
> mel.norton@saintjohn.ca, Kevin.Clifford@saintjohn.ca
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=op2bmd-XXHc
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/informationmorningsaintjohn/2013/07/15/city-not-prepared-for-oil-disaster-possibilites/
>
> Horst Sauerteig
> 88 Bedell Avenue
> Saint John, NB E2K 2C4
> Telephone .(506) 658-1326
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2013/07/15/nb-emera-brunswick-pipeline-safety-717.html
>
> http://brunswickpipeline.com/en/home/ourbusiness/boardofdirectors.aspx
>
> http://lawsoncreamer.com/lawyers/nathalie-godbout/
>
> http://www.zoominfo.com/#!search/profile/person?personId=1413397560&targetid=profile
>
> http://www.conservationcouncil.ca/about-us/eco-heroes/
>
> http://brunswickpipeline.com/en/home/community/saintjohncommunityliaisoncommittee/2008/agendawednesdayfebruary272008.aspx
>
> http://www.canaportlng.com/pdfs/ccelc_minutes_june92008.pdf
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 04:24:21 -0300
> Subject: Imagine if David Eby beats Christy Clark this time around I
> suspect he will become BC's next Attorney General then Cummins decides
> to finally to act ethically and embarasses the hell out the NDP, the
> Liberals, Harper, and you EH Mr Plant?
> To: "gplant@heenan.ca" <gplant@heenan.ca>, "dave.eby@gmail.com"
> <dave.eby@gmail.com>, "elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca"
> <elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca>, "jchretien@heenan.ca"
> <jchretien@heenan.ca>, "rheenan@heenan.ca" <rheenan@heenan.ca>,
> "bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com" <bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com>,
> "broy@ogilvyrenault.com" <broy@ogilvyrenault.com>,
> "media@cumminsforbc.ca" <media@cumminsforbc.ca>, "weststar@telus.net"
> <weststar@telus.net>, "t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca"
> <t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "premier@gov.bc.ca" <premier@gov.bc.ca>,
> "francoise.raunet@greenparty.bc.ca"
> <francoise.raunet@greenparty.bc.ca>, duane <duane@nickull.net>,
> "premier@gov.ab.ca" <premier@gov.ab.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
> "derek.burney@nortonrose.com" <derek.burney@nortonrose.com>,
> "vhuntington@dccnet.com" <vhuntington@dccnet.com>, RBauer
> <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, rtalach@beckettinjurylawyers.com,
> mbastarache@heenan.ca, ddexter <ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca>, premier
> <premier@gnb.ca>
>
> Hey Mr Plant
>
> Please notice that I added two more pdf files to this email that all our
> surving past and present Prime Ministers and Governor Generals are
> well aware of but you may not have seen them.
>
> Remember our conversation and the four emails I sent you one month before
> the writ was dropped? It was at about the same time a couple of my enemies
> in BC Splitting the Sky and Dougy Baby Christie dropped dead. They were
> followed up not long afterwards by none other than Rotten Ralphy Klein?
> Does it make me an evil person to be happy that I out lived some of my
> foes?
> You should not deny that Rotten Ralphy's Attorney General got the same
> letter and the same a pile of documents and a CD that all the Canadian
> Attorney General's received except the Quebecers who turned the Registered
> US Mail back 10 times but it was NEVER returned to the USA. Methinks the
> RCMP or their pals in CSIS stole my mail just like they have done before
> and
> since. Its rough being a whistleblower. N'esy Pas Mr. Chretien and Mr.
> Cutler?
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-bcs-liberal-premier.html
>
> http://www.integritybc.ca/?page_id=276
>
> http://blogs.vancouversun.com/2013/04/23/the-candidate-chronicles-a-friendly-election/
>
> Now to be fair here is one all the lawyers working for the Yankees Al Gore,
> Prez Obama and George Soros should review before Birgitta Jonsdotter and
> her
> Wikileaks buddies finally read it..
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/5051668/Al-Gore-and-the-boys
>
> Yea I know I am pipe dreaming. I doubt things will change in my lifetime
> but
> what is life with fine dreams? History has proven the Sheeple always get
> the
> governments they deserve when apathy rules the day. However once they start
> losing their shirts and have no cake to eat there is always hell to pay and
> do roll on occasion. Anyone paying attention can see that the stock
> market is at an artificial high created by the greedy Banksters NOT the
> economy. Obviously it has nowhere to go but down. Look out when it does.
> Even old folks who support Harper and Cummins get pissed when they lose
> another big chunk of their precious pensions. But to hell with us old folks
> our days
> taking advantage of this wonderful old old are winding down anyway. What is
> far worse to me is that methinks the "Powers that Be" may let loose the
> Dogs
> of War once again at about the same time the economy crashes. I am not the
> only soul predicting this but I have been rather outspoken about this since
> 2002 when the greedy Yankees attacked my little Clan. Te public record
> of my affairs speaks for itself. If my reasoning is correct all of our
> children's future will become truly dire indeed. Shame on all you greedy
> smiling
> bastards if what I believe comes true. Trust that I will hate being correct
> but to deny the obvious would make me as foolish as you people.
>
> Pipedream or not the rest of this email is a nightmare for any unethical
> lawyer or cop to read or ignore.
>
> Unlike a lawyer or a poltiician I have always trusted my conscience, my
> logic and my strange gut feelings.just like the honest cops in the movies
> do.
> Thus far the senses I was born with have not failed me. So I must confess
> the
> I have not lost my faith in my fellow common man yet even though I hold
> much
> contempt towarss many low men in high places. My doubts are justifiable but
> I
> still have hope especially after watching the black guy named Charles talk
> about
> taking a break from munching on his MacDonald's and playing his part help
> to
> save three long lost girls in the USA It is guys like him that assure me
> that we
> common folk are not all evil people like the wealthy ones amongst us
> usually
> are.
> Charles should run for Congress I suspect he would win by a landslide if a
> self
> serving Independent can beat BC's Attorney General in the last election/ If
> the
> sneaky lawyer David Eby beats Christy Clark in her own riding it will only
> serve to further prove my point. Need I say I love how the political
> parties
> in BC are creating their own Independent opponents? Too too funny. Seems
> that they are bringing about "change" byway of their malicious
> incompetence.
>
> History as I said earlier has proven the worm always turns on the smiling
> bastards. With any luck at all it may happen soon in BC. I know I have done
> my part to try to bring about change in BC since 2004. I still have so
> many
> irons in the fire in so many places to singe some fancy political arses
> with
> that it is quite simply unbelievable. For instance with regards to this
> email pipelines in your neck of the woods I know everyone of you checked
> out
> the letters hereto attached but did nothing . Curipusity is a hell of a
> thing but you are all afraid of Harper Correct? I doubt many of you greedy
> people know about Lenny Hoyt, Emera and Enbridge or Mr. Jones, his Director
> Derek Burney within TransCanada versus Mean Old Me. Trust
> that it would take me only minutes to explain it to anyone with two clues
> between their ears. In fact I have done so to quite few and still they say
> and do nothing. Hell the dumb Green Meanies in Canada have understood me
> since 2004 and still don't care about the shit that went down between Danny
> Boy Williams and I even after he sues some of them. Go figure?
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2013/05/07/nb-enbridge-appeal-rates-leonard.html
>
> http://www.transcanada.com/612.html
>
> http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/193845.pdf
>
> Methinks folks should stop listening to greedy lawyers EH? What say you Mr.
> Plant? If you recall our conversation on March 15th you demanded I wrap
> things up in a couple of minutes and I promptly did so within 30 seconds or
> so then I called your friend Elisabeth Graff and her bosses as well. After
> all your Law Firm has had Hard Copy of my material for nearly a year before
> you quit politicking as an Attorney General Then Wall Eyed Wally Opal
> gladly
> took your job and in turn got his arse kicked out of office by an
> incredibly
> stupid Independent whom I talked to as well CORRECT Ms Huntington a former
> RCMP
> Security person and Acting-Chief of Staff to the Solicitor General of
> Canada?
> What I did not bother telling you Mr. Plant was the the reason I called on
> lots
> of people the Ides of March. Scroll down and you will see I caught Harper's
> minions checking my work that day. Plus I know for a fact the CSE and the
> RCMP listen to all my calls so why not give them an earful then prove to
> many
> others I am paying attention too?
>
> Believe it or not not everybody is a afraid of Mr. Harper and many are
> tired of his antics. I heard through the grapevine that I have
> gotten some fans amongst the Feds and that maybe someone may use my
> documents to blow the whistle. Heres hoping that is true. The sooner I get
> my old Harley back and return to being "Just Dave" I am sure many
> politicians
> and lawyers will breath a sigh of relief. Methinks the CROWN and I should
> write an MOU ASAP and then assist me in asking the the Yankees to settle
> with as well. What say Mr. Plant? Do you know an old liberal lawyer in YOUR
> law firm capable of writing a letter to the Prime Minister and making a
> deal
> with fellow devil on behalf of a Canadian citizen that they purportedly
> serve? I do they got this email too and my letter hereto attached. Four of
> the
> documents are from the Canadian government one is from a very big cheese
> and only one is mine Correct?
>
> If no no lawyer takes my side rest assured the Green Meanies South of the
> 49th heavily financed by George Soros/Swartz are about to be enlightened
> much to the chagrin of Harper and Prez Obama and of course my wife's evil
> Catholic cousins and their old Yankee buddy John Kerry the current
> Secretary
> of the Sad State of Affairs in the US of A.
>
> http://www.theinquiry.ca/wordpress/settlements/bastarache-conciliation-deals/moncton-dioceses-money-woes-will-worsen-lawyer-says/
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>
> Such is the way of the world and the life and times of a fierce but
> ethical
> political animal. As long as I maintain my Integrity I and tell the truth
> all day long
> to anyone I choose to then sit back and watch the "Powers That Be" squirm.
> Sooner or later somebody will grow some balls and simply say my name in a
> Parliament or a Congress or in the corporate media. The love of money
> dictates it.
> Of that I have no doubt.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <kristyf@bcconservative2013.ca>; <media@cumminsforbc.ca>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:24 PM
> Subject: Fwd: RE Potash Corp, The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines and political spats
>
>
> Media contact:
> Andrea Smith
> 604.897.8478
> media@cumminsforbc.ca
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-bcs-liberal-premier.html
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2011/09/16/bc-cummins-attack-ads.html
>
> http://library.constantcontact.com/download/get/file/1107310278688-34/Campaign+Briefing+Notes-+Volume+1+Issue+2.pdf
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Dix.MLA, Adrian" <Adrian.Dix.MLA@leg.bc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:03:21 +0000
> Subject: Thank you for your email
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email. This response is to assure you that your
> message has been received.
>
> All of my e-mail messages are reviewed on a regular basis. However,
> due to the high volume of e-mails received, I may not be able to
> respond personally to each one. To help me serve you better, please
> ensure that your e-mail includes your full name, phone number and
> street address with your postal code.
>
> To ensure your email is sent to the most appropriate office, a
> database of all MLAs, searchable by postal code, is available at the
> BC Legislature website: http://www.leg.bc.ca/mla/3-1-1.htm
>
> Thank you again for taking the time to share your ideas, concerns, and
> insight with me. If you require an immediate response or your email is
> urgent, please call our office directly at 604-660-0314
>
> Adrian Dix
>
> MLA, Vancouver-Kingsway
>
> Leader, New Democrat Official Opposition
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: "elisabeth.graff" <elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca>; "weststar"
> <weststar@telus.net>; "premier" <premier@gov.bc.ca>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "t.wilson"
> <t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "radical" <radical@radicalpress.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 9:35 PM
> Subject: Fwd: RE The Media the VERY Corrupt Justice Depts in the USA and
> Canada, the EX PCO Prez Peter Penashue, greedy little politicians lawyers
> Indians and Metis such as John Boncore, Pam Palmater, Todd Russell and
> Claude Aubin versus Mean old me
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:03:04 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: RE The Media the VERY Corrupt Justice Depts in the USA
> and Canada, the EX PCO Prez Peter Penashue, greedy little politicians
> lawyers Indians and Metis such as John Boncore, Pam Palmater, Todd
> Russell and Claude Aubin versus Mean old me
> To: premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, gplant <gplant@heenan.ca>,
> lmcgrady@mbwlaw.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "adrian.dix.mla"
> <adrian.dix.mla@leg.bc.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:08:49 -0300
> Subject: RE The Media the VERY Corrupt Justice Depts in the USA and
> Canada, the EX PCO Prez Peter Penashue, greedy little politicians
> lawyers Indians and Metis such as John Boncore, Pam Palmater, Todd
> Russell and Claude Aubin versus Mean old me
> To: yvonnejones@gov.nl.ca, "MulcaT@parl.gc.ca" <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>,
> "aubinc@cactuscom.com" <aubinc@cactuscom.com>,
> "justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>,
> "policy.karenforcanada@gmail.com" <policy.karenforcanada@gmail.com>,
> "media.karenforcanada@gmail.com" <media.karenforcanada@gmail.com>,
> "Marjory.LeBreton@pco-bcp.gc.ca" <Marjory.LeBreton@pco-bcp.gc.ca>,
> brycefequet@metisnationofcanada.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, trussell
> <trussell@nunatukavut.ca>, ppalmater <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca>,
> Darcey@metisonline.ca, merv <merv@northwebpress.com>, radical
> <radical@radicalpress.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
> "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, jacques boucher
> <jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, andre
> <andre@jafaust.com>
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2013/03/15/nl-peter-penashue-political-reaction-315.html
>
> http://nlliberals.ca/caucus/cartwright-lanse-au-clair-yvonne-jones-mha/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: "Claude Aubin" <aubinc@cactuscom.com>; "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>;
> "marc.garneau.a1" <marc.garneau.a1@parl.gc.ca>; "justin.trudeau.a1"
> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>; "MulcaT" <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>;
> <presse@philippecouillard.com>; <montreal@philippecouillard.com>;
> <meerang.rb@gmail.com>; <media@georgetakach.ca>; <info@georgetakach.ca>;
> <info@martincauchon.ca>; <media@martincauchon.ca>;
> <policy.karenforcanada@gmail.com>; <media.karenforcanada@gmail.com>;
> <media@davidbertschi.ca>; <info@pierremoreau.ca>
> Cc: <peter.penashue@parl.gc.ca>; <Darcey@metisonline.ca>; <jriche@innu.ca>;
> <trussell@nunatukavut.ca>; <minister@aadnc-aandc.gc.ca>;
> <ministre@ec.gc.ca>; <Marjory.LeBreton@pco-bcp.gc.ca>;
> <DuaneM@metisnation.ca>; <info@pco-bcp.gc.ca>;
> <peter.penashue@pco-bcp.gc.ca>; <info@metisnation.ca>;
> <brycefequet@metisnationofcanada.com>; <info@claudeaubinmetis.com>; "David
> Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "ppalmater"
> <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca>; <news@northwebpress.com>;
> <appa@sen.parl.gc.ca>; <bcm@international.gc.ca>; "RBauer"
> <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>; "bginsberg" <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 7:57 PM
> Subject: Yo Harper Just exactly how dumb is your French buddy Claude
> Aubin????
>
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 18,799
> Domain Name gc.ca ? (Canada)
> IP Address 198.103.111.# (Privy Council Office)
> ISP GTIS
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Ontario
> City : Ottawa
> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Firefox
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:18.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/18.0
> Javascript version 1.5
> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 24 bits
> Time of Visit Jan 23 2013 5:10:21 pm
> Last Page View Jan 23 2013 5:12:20 pm
> Visit Length 1 minute 59 seconds
> Page Views 2
> Referring URL http://www.google.ca...248874,d.aWc&cad=rja
> Search Engine google.ca
> Search Words david amos
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...per-and-bankers.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Jan 23 2013 4:10:21 pm
> Visit Number 18,799
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: "elisabeth.graff" <elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca>; "weststar"
> <weststar@telus.net>; "premier" <premier@gov.bc.ca>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "david.akin"
> <david.akin@sunmedia.ca>
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 9:33 PM
> Subject: Fwd: DOD Auditor General and alan.white@cbc.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: DOD Auditor General and alan.white@cbc.ca
> To: "alan.white@cbc.ca" <alan.white@cbc.ca>, oldmaison
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>
>
> Just Dave
> By Location > Visit Detail
> Visit 19,128
> Domain Name dnd.ca ? (Canada)
> IP Address 131.137.247.# (Defence Research Establishment-Ottawa)
> ISP Defense Research Establishment
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Ontario
> City : Ottawa
> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 7.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727;
> InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR
> 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 800
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Mar 15 2013 3:16:44 pm
> Last Page View Mar 15 2013 3:16:44 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL
> http://www.bing.com/search?q=alan.white@cbc.ca&src=IE-SearchBox
> Search Engine bing.com
> Search Words alan.white@cbc.ca
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/10/for-record.html
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/10/for-record.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-4:00
> Visitor's Time Mar 15 2013 3:16:44 pm
> Visit Number 19,128
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location > Visit Detail
> Visit 30,501
> Domain Name gc.ca ? (Canada)
> IP Address 192.197.72.# (Office of the Auditor General of Canada)
> ISP Office of the Auditor General of Canada
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Quebec
> City : Gatineau
> Lat/Long : 45.4833, -75.65 (Map)
> Language English (Canada) en-ca
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR
> 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1613 x 1008
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Mar 15 2013 7:10:33 pm
> Last Page View Mar 15 2013 7:15:45 pm
> Visit Length 5 minutes 12 seconds
> Page Views 3
> Referring URL
> Visit Entry Page
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-bcs-liberal-premier.html
> Visit Exit Page
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-bcs-liberal-premier.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-4:00
> Visitor's Time Mar 15 2013 2:10:33 pm
> Visit Number 30,501
>
> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 13:08:42 -0800 (PST)
> From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> Subject: So do ya think Harper ordered CBC to ignore me or Heenan? (: Or
> could it be Dick Cheney :)
> To: Ombudsman@cbc.ca, ombudsman@radio-canada.ca,
> newsroom@allheadlinenews.com, jromanelli@hfxnews.ca, cfleming@hfxnews.ca,
> pramsay@amherstdaily.com, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca, Martin.Paul@parl.gc.ca,
> Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca, Volpe.J@parl.gc.ca, Brison.S@parl.gc.ca,
> Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca, egarris2@antiwar.com, btaylor@nbnet.nb.ca,
> Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca, oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com,
> martine.turcotte@bell.ca, premier@gov.ns.ca, McCallum.J@parl.gc.ca
> CC: tjconnel@gannett.com, jchretien@heenan.ca, rheenan@heenan.ca,
> bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com, broy@ogilvyrenault.com,
> kmearn@mpdmilton.org, governorlynch@nh.gov, mayor@ci.boston.ma.us,
> kinsella@stu.ca, mcomeau@stu.ca, ruby@ruby-edwardh.com,
> Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca, McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca, Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca,
> atlantic@ctv.ca, smurphy@ctv.ca, Eyking.M@parl.gc.ca, Keddy.G@parl.gc.ca,
> Regan.G@parl.gc.ca, Savage.M@parl.gc.ca, Thibault.R@parl.gc.ca,
> news-tips@nytimes.com, foreign@nytimes.com, dinoratt@telus.net,
> editor@thetyee.ca
>
> It has been a couple of days since the one honest lady and from CBC emailed
> me and
> nobody calls while the Feds kill my email account?
>
> Don't that just piss me off when I see you checking my work to beat the
> the
> band?
>
> What are you doing in Upper Canada?
>
> Are ya waiting for me to blog your nonsense or just sue ya?
>
> David Raymond Amos <davidramos@xplornet.com> wrote:
>
> From: "David Raymond Amos" <davidramos@xplornet.com>
> To: <nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com>, <newsroom@nbpub.com>,
> <carl.davies@gnb.ca>,
> <janet.trail@gnb.ca>, <Akoschany@ctv.ca>, <jtravers@thestar.ca>,
> <warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <cumby.meghan@dailygleaner.com>,
> <Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "Spinks Spinks" <spinks08@hotmail.com>, <seanoshaughnessy@rogers.com>,
> <jonesr@cbc.ca>, <mleger@stu.ca>, <jwalker@stu.ca>, <plee@stu.ca>,
> <dwatch@web.net>, <Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca>, <oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com>,
> <btaylor@nbnet.nb.ca>, <trenchcoatblog@yahoo.ca>, <Jack.Keir2@gnb.ca>,
> <advocacycollective@yahoo.com>, <MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca>,
> <collins.moncton-east@hotmail.com>, <wally.stiles@gnb.ca>,
> <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, <kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca>, <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>,
> <Grant.GARNEAU@gnb.ca>, <Bernard.Richard@gnb.ca>,
> <abel.leblanc@gnb.ca>, <eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca>, <Scott.A@parl.gc.ca>,
> <John.Foran@gnb.ca>, <premier@gnb.ca>, <Hermenegilde.Chiasson@gnb.ca>,
> <dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> <chris.goodwin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <info@cisnb-srcnb.ca>,
> <bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> CC: <bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <Oda.B@parl.gc.ca>,
> <paul.dube@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Henry McCandless" <hemccand@shaw.ca>,
> <dwatch@web.net>, <president@utoronto.ca>, <rbrant@mccarthy.ca>,
> <bsullivan@wc.com>, <jimwilson@telus.net>, <info@lymedisease.org>,
> <lbj1@pacbell.net>, <ottawa@chuckstrahl.com>, <riding@chuckstrahl.com>,
> <chris.cunningham@utoronto>, <bpel@mccarthy.ca>, <Catboat15@aol.com>,
> <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>, <Dykstra.R@parl.gc.ca>,
> <solberg.m@parl.gc.ca>, <thompson.g@parl.gc.ca>, <toews.v@parl.gc.ca>,
> <Daniel.Conley@state.ma.us>, <ruby@ruby-edwardh.com>,
> <fbinhct@leo.gov>, <patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov>,
> <Russell_Feingold@feingold.senate.gov>,
> <stephen.cutler@wilmerhale.com>, <olived@sen.parl.gc.ca>,
> <bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com>, <broy@ogilvyrenault.com>,
> <cumby.meghan@dailygleaner.com>, <stronach.b@parl.gc.ca>,
> <day.s@parl.gc.ca>, <duffy@ctv.ca>,
> <tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com>, <mikemurphymla@hotmail.com>,
> <dykstrafarms@hotmail.com>
> Subject: Fw: Gotcha now watch me embarass the Crown Corp known as CBC
> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 13:22:27 -0400
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Raymond Amos
> To: office@AJAs.ca
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 9:38 AM
> Subject: Fw: Gotcha now watch me embarass the Crown Corp known as CBC
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ombudsman de Radio-Canada" <ombudsman@radio-canada.ca>
> To: "David Raymond Amos" <davidramos@xplornet.com>
> Cc: "CBC Ombudsman" <Ombudsman@cbc.ca>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 12:00 PM
> Subject: {Spam?} Rép. : Fw: Gotcha now watch me embarass the Crown Corp
> known as CBC
>
>
> Dear Sir:
>
> I write to acknowledge receipt of your e-mail and your voice mail, which I
> have shared with the office of the Ombudsman of the English network. It
> will
> follow up with your request.
> For more information, you can consult CBC Ombudsman's web site:
> http://www.cbc.ca/ombudsman/
>
> Best regards,
>
> Laure Simonet
> Assistant of the Ombudsman, French Services
> Société Radio-Canada
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:47:29 -0400
> Subject: RE Potash Corp, The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines and political spats
> To: andrew.weaver@greenparty.bc.ca, leader@greenparty.bc.ca,
> weaver@ocean.seos.uvic.ca, ida.chong.mla@leg.bc.ca,
> michael.byers@ubc.ca, colivier@theprovince.com, leader
> <leader@greenparty.ca>, leader <leader@actionparty.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, editor@desmogblog.com,
> judy@yesbc.ca, mhager@postmedia.com
>
> http://www.theprovince.com/news/Green+Party+candidate+pressured+election/7691565/story.html#axzz2Eyjd6DI9
>
> http://www.vancouversun.com/technology/Star+Green+party+candidate+Andrew+Weaver+says+Democrat+asked/7691247/story.html
>
> http://www.theprovince.com/news/Green+Party+candidate+pressured+election/7691565/story.html#axzz2Eyjd6DI9
>
> http://www.desmogblog.com/weaver-sues-tim-ball-libel
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <josh@bccla.org>; <Carmen@bccla.org>; <sheila.leggett@neb-one.gc.ca>;
> <gaetan.caron@neb-one.gc.ca>; <ted@tedhsu.ca>; <Ted.Hsu@parl.gc.ca>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; <gplant@heenan.ca>;
> <elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca>; "joe.oliver.c1" <joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:56 PM
> Subject: Perhap somebody should ask Joe Oliver some serious questions ASAP
> EH Ted Hsu?
>
>
> http://bccla.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/20130114-NEB-Letter.pdf
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <gplant@heenan.ca>; <james@jameskeller.ca>; <dbennett@cp.org>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>;
> <sheila.leggett@neb-one.gc.ca>; <elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca>
> Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 4:35 PM
> Subject: The lawyer Leggett and her legal cohorts are too too funny
> sometimes EH Mr Plant?
>
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2012/09/06/bc-geoff-plant-enbridge-hearings.html?cmp=rss
>
> http://www.heenanblaikie.com/en/ourTeam/bio?id=5119
>
> Geoff Plant, Q.C.bPartner
> Vancouver 604 891.1186
> Victoria 250 381.9321
> gplant@heenan.ca
>
>
> http://www.canadianlawlist.com/listingdetail/contact/elisabeth-graff-654409/
>
> Elisabeth Graff
> Solicitor
> Called to the bar: 2008 (BC)
> Justice (BC), Min. of
> Abor. Law - Environ., Resource & Abor. Law Group
> PO Box 9220, Stn. Prov. Govt
> Victoria, British Columbia V8W 9J1
> Phone: 250-356-1155 Ext:
> Fax: 250-356-8939
> Email: elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca
>
> http://www.ipe.ualberta.ca/en/EventsandSeminars/ChinaandIndiaGlobalPowerShiftO/SpeakerProfiles/JohnCarruthers.aspx
>
> http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Former+Attorney+General+Geoff+Plant+represent+Northern+Gateway+hearings/7199978/story.html
>
> http://www.thecanadianpress.com/english/marketing/contacts/CPContactsEnglish.pdf
>
> http://www.jameskeller.ca/contact/
>
> http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/bc-lawyer-grills-northern-gateway-president-on-enbridges-liability/article4526907/
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:07:18 -0300
> Subject: BTW Heather Remember when Harper stopped the BHP Potash deal?
> To: martinhea39@gmail.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:44:45 -0300
> Subject: I just called from 902 800 0369 Perhaps the Qatari Embassy
> should study the attachments closely EH Mr Alward?
> To: musoviczl@repsol.com, pribbeck@repsol.com, vcmorrissettem@repsol.com
> Cc: ottawa@mofa.gov.qa, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, David Amos
> <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>,
> leader <leader@greenparty.ca>
>
> Qatari Embassy in Ottawa, Canada
> 800-150 Metcalfe Street
> Ottawa Ontario K2P 1P1
> Telephone (+1) 613 241 4917
> E-mail ottawa@mofa.gov.qa
> http://www.repsolenergy.com/rena_team/rena_team.html
>
> http://www.repsolenergy.com/press_room/press_room.html
>
> http://www.canadainternational.gc.ca/kuwait-koweit/bilateral_relations_bilaterales/fs-qatar-fd.aspx?lang=eng&view=d
>
> http://www.nccar.ca/statements/news-releases/establishment-of-the-embassy-of-qatar-in-canadaune-ambassade-du-qatar-a-ottawa/
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 01:07:11 -0400
> Subject: YO Nathan Cullen WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN REPORTING,
> JOURNALISM AND PROPAGANDA???
> To: cullen1 <cullen1@parl.gc.ca>, gsmith@classicrockcfnr.ca,
> dquan@postmedia.com, merv@northwebpress.com, charlie@straight.com, pm
> <pm@pm.gc.ca>, president@ubcic.bc.ca,
> palmater@indigenousnationhood.com, ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca,
> radical <radical@radicalpress.com>, hjk <hjk@quesnelbc.com>,
> "macpherson.don" <macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>,
> "mclaughlin.heather" <mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com>, acampbell
> <acampbell@ctv.ca>, "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, Jessica Hume
> <jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, vivian.krause@mac.com,
> Joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca, ross.mcmillan@tidescanada.org
>
> I believe that only propaganda exists these days. The other two terms
> are merely myths that bullshitters use to jusify greedy wordsmiths who
> try to wax poetic for whomever will pay them the most. If all else
> fails the corporations hire the cheapest help they can get for local
> events and just cut and paste and print and pay some other dude for
> the fancy words to elp sell their newsrag. Original thought and common
> sense evaporated with veritical intigration or whatever the evil
> corporate bastards wish to call these days.
>
> http://www.ubcic.bc.ca/about/executive.htm#axzz2Gn4tlS9t
>
> Perhaps some clever Indian in BC will ask me why I ran against Andy
> Scott when he was the Minister of Indian Affairs EH John Duncan? I see
> folks in your neck of the woods checking my work alot lately. No doubt
> some of it is because of the upcoming election and the doings between
> me and the Wally Opal and the RCMP back in 2005. However there is the
> doings between the NEB and I in 2006 but that bullshit only involves
> mere matters of money and the environment. YOU cannot deny that the
> Minister of Indian Affairs has had Hard Copy of my concerns since 2004
> and THAT involves the Captial Crime known and MURDER. YOUR head office
> is in Amherst Nova Scotia which well within MY stomping gounds. Thus
> that is where I will serve you the summons in order to bring the RCMP
> and your lawyers to Federal Court CORRECT Minister Duncan? Perhaps you
> should call the RCMP in Amherst Nova Scotia and ask them about the
> documents and CD I served on them with a witness who has my Durable
> Power of Attorney in August of 2012 in order to bring everything up to
> date.
>
> FYI its mostly the same materail that Wally Opal and the lawyer
> Shirley Heafey as the Commissioer of Public Complaints Against the
> RCMP received byway of registered US Mail (signature required) in 2005
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-bcs-liberal-premier.html
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/7625653/Indian-Affairs
>
> http://www.straight.com/news/grand-chief-stewart-phillip-stephen-harper-attacked-first-nations-rights-2012
>
> http://www.terracedaily.ca/show10549a0x300y1z/THE_DIFFERENCE_BETWEEN_REPORTING_JOURNALISM_AND_PROPAGANDA_
>
> http://www.classicrockcfnr.ca/index.php/on-air/nationview-journeys-archives/
>
> Air Date: December 14, 2012
> The Union of BC Indian Chiefs has announced they are ready and willing
> to take legal action against the Federal Government over concerns of
> the potential Canada-China Foreign Investment Promotion & Protection
> Agreement (FIPPA). President of the UBCIC Grand Chief Stewart Phillip
> explains what a potential international free-trade agreement would
> mean for the environment and country. Meanwhile Reporter Jon Brown
> speaks with BC Conservative Leader John Cummins who's making a
> northern tour.
>
> Interview Segment: Grand Chief Stewart Phillip & Conservative Leader
> John Cummins
>
> http://www.ic.gc.ca/app/ccc/srch/nvgt.do?lang=eng&prtl=1&sbPrtl=&estblmntNo=123456126441&profile=cmpltPrfl&profileId=501&app=sold
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 29,838
> Domain Name shawcable.net ? (Network)
> IP Address 70.67.22.# (Shaw Communications)
> ISP Shaw Communications
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : British Columbia
> City : Comox
> Lat/Long : 49.6833, -124.9333 (Map)
> Language English (U.K.) en-gb
> Operating System Microsoft WinNT
> Browser Firefox
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0
> Javascript version 1.5
> Monitor Resolution : 1366 x 768
> Color Depth : 24 bits
> Time of Visit Dec 26 2012 10:28:18 pm
> Last Page View Dec 26 2012 10:28:18 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.ca...LAqq-gLgM&usg=AFQjCN
> Search Engine google.ca
> Search Words whistle blower charged with defamation bc
> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....es-libel-charge.html
> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....es-libel-charge.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-8:00
> Visitor's Time Dec 26 2012 1:28:18 pm
> Visit Number 29,838
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 02:00:26 -0400
> Subject: RE Potash Corp, The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines and MP Nathan Cullen
> To: vivian.krause@mac.com, joel@renewalpartners.com, "ross.mcmillan"
> <ross.mcmillan@tidescanada.org>, charlie@straight.com,
> "gregor.robertson" <gregor.robertson@vancouver.ca>,
> info@forestethics.org, Joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca,
> harvey@harveylocke.com, donn.lovett@gmail.com,
> enquiries@josipapetrunic.ca
> Cc: cullen1@parl.gc.ca, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, oig
> <oig@sec.gov>, oig <oig@ftc.gov>, todd@forestethics.org
>
> http://forestethics.org/todd-paglia-executive-director-responds-lastest-news-canada
>
> Cullen to question Enbridge, government at JRP in February
> FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
> DECEMBER 12, 2012
>
> Prince Rupert – MP Nathan Cullen will next appear before the National
> Energy Board's Enbridge Joint Review Panel (JRP) in February.
>
> Cullen will question witnesses from Enbridge on emergency preparedness
> and response mechanisms that would be established to deal with oil
> spills.
>
> Later in the spring, Cullen will also cross-examine Department of
> Fisheries and Oceans officials about federal assessments of the
> project's environmental impacts.
>
> JRP hearings continue in Prince Rupert this week and are set to resume
> there on February 4. The panel will sit for two-week rotations until
> early spring and must issue its recommendation by the end of 2013.
>
>
> - 30 -
>
> Contact: Shelley Browne, cullen1@parl.gc.ca 250-877-4140
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 19:31:34 -0300
> Subject: RE The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines, the by elections of the left
> versus Harper & cohorts Anyone remember me?
> To: kcryderman@calgaryherald.com, tips@660news.com,
> david.cournoyer@gmail.com, Lee.Richardson@gov.ab.ca,
> jason.kenney.c1@parl.gc.ca, Elizabeth.May.C1@parl.gc.ca,
> Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca, leader
> <leader@actionparty.ca>, donn@petroxcapital.ca,
> albertadiary@gmail.com, support@erinotoole.ca, editor@oakbaynews.com,
> info@joancrockatt.ca
> Cc: vin@vincentstpierre.com, rahim@tedxcalgary.ca,
> harvey@harveylocke.com, donn.lovett@gmail.com,
> datkins@oceancapitalpartners.com, galloway@uvic.ca,
> paulsummerville@shaw.ca, mrankin@murrayrankin.ca,
> murray@murrayrankinndp.ca, elizabeth@elizabethcull.ca,
> charleyberesford@gmail.com, loriacreative@yahoo.com,
> info@innermusica.com, rscollis@gmail.com
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/By-elections_to_the_41st_Canadian_Parliament#cite_note-Kady-20
>
> http://victoriavision.blogspot.ca/
>
> http://alberta.ca/albertafiles/includes/directorysearch/goaBrowse.cfm?txtSearch=Executive%20Branch&Ministry=EXC&LevelID=17734&userid=106619
>
> http://www.calgaryliberal.com/2012/09/14/liberal-nomination-12-the-race-for-calgary-centre/
>
> http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/politics/Liberals+choose+candidate+Calgary+Centre/7277510/story.html
>
> http://beaconnews.ca/calgary/2012/09/strikebreaker-condemns-joan-crockatt-for-role-in-calgary-herald-strike/
>
> http://daveberta.ca/2012/08/calgary-centre-nomination-update/
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 19:31:34 -0300
> Subject: RE The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines, the by elections of the left
> versus Harper & cohorts Anyone remember me?
> To: kcryderman@calgaryherald.com, tips@660news.com,
> david.cournoyer@gmail.com, Lee.Richardson@gov.ab.ca,
> jason.kenney.c1@parl.gc.ca, Elizabeth.May.C1@parl.gc.ca,
> Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca, leader
> <leader@actionparty.ca>, donn@petroxcapital.ca,
> albertadiary@gmail.com, support@erinotoole.ca, editor@oakbaynews.com,
> info@joancrockatt.ca
> Cc: vin@vincentstpierre.com, rahim@tedxcalgary.ca,
> harvey@harveylocke.com, donn.lovett@gmail.com,
> datkins@oceancapitalpartners.com, galloway@uvic.ca,
> paulsummerville@shaw.ca, mrankin@murrayrankin.ca,
> murray@murrayrankinndp.ca, elizabeth@elizabethcull.ca,
> charleyberesford@gmail.com, loriacreative@yahoo.com,
> info@innermusica.com, rscollis@gmail.com
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/By-elections_to_the_41st_Canadian_Parliament#cite_note-Kady-20
>
> http://victoriavision.blogspot.ca/
>
> http://alberta.ca/albertafiles/includes/directorysearch/goaBrowse.cfm?txtSearch=Executive%20Branch&Ministry=EXC&LevelID=17734&userid=106619
>
> http://www.calgaryliberal.com/2012/09/14/liberal-nomination-12-the-race-for-calgary-centre/
>
> http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/politics/Liberals+choose+candidate+Calgary+Centre/7277510/story.html
>
> http://beaconnews.ca/calgary/2012/09/strikebreaker-condemns-joan-crockatt-for-role-in-calgary-herald-strike/
>
> http://daveberta.ca/2012/08/calgary-centre-nomination-update/
>
> From: Josipa Petrunic <enquiries@josipapetrunic.ca>
> Subject: Follow up
> To: "David Amos" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Received: Sunday, June 5, 2011, 8:45 PM
>
> Dear David,
>
> Apologies for the delay in my response. This week was jammed with
> board meetings for our riding and a massive volunteer appreciation BBQ
> that we held yesterday. I'm just catching up on messages now.
>
> Apropos the information you sent to me, I found it very interesting.
> In fact, here in Calgary East, I'm planning a series of
> workshops/public lectures that look at "Corruption in Canada". My
> policy team and I are meeting this week to discuss the items you sent
> to me and your case in particular to see what we can do in terms of,
> at least, bringing some public awareness to this case and other cases
> of corruption and questionable practices in Canadian governance and
> government relations with businesses.
>
> Do make sure to send us a follow up on what you decide to do, apropos
> your proposed law suit. I will share the information with my team.
>
> As my own follow up question, though, why have you sent me this
> material as opposed to approaching your local MP and/or Liberal
> candidate? Surely others would be interested too.
>
> I know Ted. He's a great person and he'll be a wonderful MP. Do let me
> know what transpires on that front.
>
> Best of luck in your efforts. We'll chat soon,
>
> Josipa
> --
> Josipa Petrunic
> Liberal Party Candidate
> Federal constituency of Calgary East
> www.josipapetrunic.ca
> www.facebook.com/votejosipa
> Phone: 403-719-6253
>
> From: David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Subject: Josipa I will try calling you again (902 800 0369) BTW I am
> not a local nor am I a liberal
> To: enquiries@josipapetrunic.ca
> Cc: ted@tedhsu.ca, David Amos
> Received: Monday, May 23, 2011, 10:38 PM
>
> Say hey to Ted Hsu
>
> I explained myself to your sister Ana ( who was quite nice) She
> obviously told you I had called after you responded to my first emaiI.
> She told me you were heading out to debate that night so I sent you
> the email with the attachemnt about BHP and Potash Corp so you could
> embarass some Conservatives as to why Harper stopped the hostile
> takeover last year but clearly you did not read it in time for the
> election but there is still a bit of time to stir the pot before the
> Speech from the Throne in June
>
> Anyway to answer your question I am the whistleblower that inspired
> this hearing in Washington DC before I came home and ran for public
> office 4 times in Canada between 2004 and 2006 then got stuck here
> without my wife and kids
>
> http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=102e41a1-f540-4ce5-a701-b6d09b7606b1
>
> http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2
>
> The first email I sent you had this pdf file attached and Ted got it too.
>
> www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.pdf
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> P.S. The rest of this email and its attachment contains just one of
> the reasons Stockwell Day quit.
>
> From: Josipa Petrunic <enquiries@josipapetrunic.ca>
> Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 17:26:34 -0400
> Subject: Reading your message
> To: David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Hi David -
>
> I just heard your message (sort of) on the telephone.
> Unfortunately the line is garbled and all I could hear was your name and
> a mention of a Senate website site. The rest is mostly garbled for some
> reason and I can't make out your phone number or the website you were
> trying to direct me towards. Were you on a cell phone, by chance? It
> sounds like digital interference on the phone.
>
> That said, I have indeed scanned through the emails you sent to me,
> but I have a number of questions, as the order of the emails is all
> over the place and it's
> hard for me to track what happened when and who you were responding to
> at certain times.
>
> I thought that it might be easier for you to come to
> one of our meetings (i.e. our board meeting on June 1st). We always
> leave a slot of time for people from the community, like yourself, to
> talk about issues thought to be important and which we, as Liberals, can
> talk about.
>
> Indeed, as I'm developing a lecture series for Calgary
> East right now, it might be worthwhile having you succinctly explain the
> situation and your role in whistleblowing, so that I can grasp the
> issues at hand.
>
> In the meantime, could you email me your number and a
> link to the website you mentioned. I can start by looking at the site.
>
> Cheers, Josipa
> ---
> Josipa Petrunic
> Liberal Party Candidate
> Federal
> constituency of Calgary East
> www.josipapetrunic.ca [1]
> www.facebook.com/votejosipa [2]
> Phone: 403-719-6253
>
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Subject: Fwd: Ted perhaps you should mention this email to the lawyers
> Sean Casey, Dominic Leblanc, Bob Rae and Ralph Goodale ASAP
> To: ted@tedhsu.ca
> Cc: maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca
> Received: Friday, May 20, 2011, 2:33 PM
>
> When you responded once again to the earlier email I figured it was
> not you who blocked the email I was calling about. Ask yourself who
> blocked this email to you and why. BTW after I called you and left a
> message about this I did as I promised and called Bob Rae's office as
> well. He did ot call me back but i saw his help checking my work on
> the web while we talked.
>
> Best Regards
> Dave
>
> --- On Thu, 5/19/11, Ted Hsu <ted@tedhsu.ca> wrote:
>
>
> From: Ted Hsu <ted@tedhsu.ca>
> Subject: Re: Ted I figured out it was you who called me back (613 544 8450)
> To: "David Amos" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Received: Thursday, May 19, 2011, 8:18 PM
>
>
> Hello David,
>
>
> I'm going to go over the contents of your email.
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Ted Hsu
>
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:30 PM, David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> wrote:
>
> Congrats on two fronts.
>
> One for getting elected
>
> Two and more importantly to me is the fact that you are the only
> elected politician to returm a call to me this year. No joke.
>
> That fact alone proves to me that you are the only person who should
> be the liberal leader and our next Prime Minister No joking again.
>
> because you acted ethiclly with me I will keep this email in
> confidence until we get a chance to talk.
>
> Best Regards
> Dave
>
> Please study the text of the email when you get the time but checkout
> the pdf files attached ASAP before the 41st Parliament sits would be
> wise
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 00:34:44 -0300
> Subject: never-mind-northern-gateway-keystone-xl
> To: albertadiary <albertadiary@gmail.com>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> http://albertadiary.ca/2012/01/never-mind-northern-gateway-keystone-xl_17.html
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 16:35:46 -0300
> Subject: The lawyer Leggett and her legal cohorts are too too funny
> sometimes EH Mr Plant?
> To: gplant@heenan.ca, james@jameskeller.ca, dbennett@cp.org
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
> sheila.leggett@neb-one.gc.ca, elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2012/09/06/bc-geoff-plant-enbridge-hearings.html?cmp=rss
>
> http://www.heenanblaikie.com/en/ourTeam/bio?id=5119
>
> Geoff Plant, Q.C.bPartner
> Vancouver 604 891.1186
> Victoria 250 381.9321
> gplant@heenan.ca
>
>
> http://www.canadianlawlist.com/listingdetail/contact/elisabeth-graff-654409/
>
> Elisabeth Graff
> Solicitor
> Called to the bar: 2008 (BC)
> Justice (BC), Min. of
> Abor. Law - Environ., Resource & Abor. Law Group
> PO Box 9220, Stn. Prov. Govt
> Victoria, British Columbia V8W 9J1
> Phone: 250-356-1155 Ext:
> Fax: 250-356-8939
> Email: elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca
>
> http://www.ipe.ualberta.ca/en/EventsandSeminars/ChinaandIndiaGlobalPowerShiftO/SpeakerProfiles/JohnCarruthers.aspx
>
> http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Former+Attorney+General+Geoff+Plant+represent+Northern+Gateway+hearings/7199978/story.html
>
> http://www.thecanadianpress.com/english/marketing/contacts/CPContactsEnglish.pdf
>
> http://www.jameskeller.ca/contact/
>
> http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/bc-lawyer-grills-northern-gateway-president-on-enbridges-liability/article4526907/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> To: <sheila.leggett@neb-one.gc.ca>; <gaetan.caron@neb-one.gc.ca>;
> <rowland.harrison@neb-one.gc.ca>; <john.bulger@neb-one.gc.ca>;
> <kenneth.bateman@neb-one.gc.ca>; <roland.george@neb-one.gc.ca>;
> <georgette.habib@neb-one.gc.ca>; <david.hamilton@neb-one.gc.ca>;
> <kenneth.vollman@neb-one.gc.ca>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 1:02 PM
> Subject: We just talked Ms. Legget I must say you picked a bad day to
> play dumb EH?
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:07:18 -0300
> Subject: BTW Heather Remember when Harper stopped the BHP Potash deal?
> To: martinhea39@gmail.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:44:45 -0300
> Subject: I just called from 902 800 0369 Perhaps the Qatari Embassy
> should study the attachments closely EH Mr Alward?
> To: musoviczl@repsol.com, pribbeck@repsol.com, vcmorrissettem@repsol.com
> Cc: ottawa@mofa.gov.qa, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, David Amos
> <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>,
> leader <leader@greenparty.ca>
>
> Qatari Embassy in Ottawa, Canada
> 800-150 Metcalfe Street
> Ottawa Ontario K2P 1P1
> Telephone (+1) 613 241 4917
> E-mail ottawa@mofa.gov.qa
> http://www.repsolenergy.com/rena_team/rena_team.html
>
> http://www.repsolenergy.com/press_room/press_room.html
>
> http://www.canadainternational.gc.ca/kuwait-koweit/bilateral_relations_bilaterales/fs-qatar-fd.aspx?lang=eng&view=d
>
> http://www.nccar.ca/statements/news-releases/establishment-of-the-embassy-of-qatar-in-canadaune-ambassade-du-qatar-a-ottawa/
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Alan Dark <Alan.Dark@cbc.ca>
> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:57:14 -0400
> Subject: Re: I just called from 902 800 0369 and tried to talk to you
> Mr Tomick (Out of office)
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email. Please be advised that I am currently out of
> the office; returning Monday Agust 27th.
>
> If your matter is urgent, please contact Camilla Inderberg at
> 416-205-5545 or by email camilla.inderberg@cbc.ca or Janice Smith
> 416-205-2940 or janice.smith@cbc.ca
>
> Best regards,
> Al
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:03:50 -0300
> Subject: Ask yourself why CBC would report none of this
> To: kim_woima@nexeninc.com, "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>,
> jack.tomik@cbc.ca, alan.dark@cbc.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, jacques_poitras
> <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>
>
> You do know Landslide Annie is on the Board of Directors of Nexen I hope
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2012/08/20/f-scott-peterson-cnooc-nexen.html
>
>
> http://www.nexeninc.com/en/Governance/BoardofDirectors/BoardBios.aspx
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:17:20 -0300
> Subject: Re Danny Williams Vs the Sierra Club Very Interesting lawsuit
> and counterclaim EH Mr Bennnett
> To: jb@sierraclub.ca, lgue@davidsuzuki.org, grenouf
> <grenouf@genuinewitty.com>, editor@theindependent.ca
> Cc: jbaker@ottenheimerbaker.com, info@alderonironore.com,
> ktsakumis@alderonironore.com, "pgleeson@alderonironore.com \"David
> Amos\"" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, jvettese@casselsbrock.com
>
> http://thechronicleherald.ca/canada/125139-muskrat-falls-critic-countersues-williams
>
> http://atlantic.sierraclub.ca/node/4542
>
> FYI I just call Bruno Marcocchio @ 902-567-1132 and he had no clue as
> to what I was talking about However trust that just like Gretchen
> Fitzgerald, Danny Williams and his corporate pals know EXACTLY who I
> am and why I was calling.
>
> http://www.tmx.com/en/news_events/exchange_bulletins/bulletins/10-7-2011_TSX-NewListingADV.html
>
> http://alderonironore.com/corporate/board_directors/
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/05/nfld-whistleblower-dodges-libel-charge.html
>
> 2005 01 T 0010
>
> IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
> TRIAL DIVISION
> BETWEEN:
>
> WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF
> AND:
> BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT
>
> AND BETWEEN:
> BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFF
> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>
> AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT
> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>
> AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN SECOND DEFENDANT
> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>
> AND: THOMAS MARSHALL THIRD DEFENDANT
> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>
> AND: DANNY WILLIAMS FOURTH DEFENDANT
> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>
> AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS FIFTH DEFENDANT
> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>
> AND: JOHN CROSBIE SIXTH DEFENDANT
> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>
> AND: PATTERSON PALMER SEVENTH DEFENDANT
> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>
> SUMMARY OF CURRENT DOCUMENT
>
> Court File Number(s):2005 01 T 0010
>
> Date of Filing of Document: 25 January 2005
>
> Name of Filing Party or Person: Stephen J. May
>
> Application to which Document being filed relates: Amended Application
> of the Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim to maintain an Order
> restricting publication, to strike portions of the Statement of
> Defence, strike the Counterclaim in it's entirety, and to refer this
> proceeding to case management.
>
> Statement of purpose in filing: To maintain an Order restricting
> publication, to strike portions of the Statement of Defence, strike
> the Counterclaim in its entirety and refer this proceeding to case
> management.
>
> A F F I D A V I T
>
> I, Stephen J. May, of the City of St. John's, in the Province of
> Newfoundland and Labrador, Barrister and Solicitor, make oath and say
> as follows:
>
> THAT I am a Partner in the St. John's office of PATTERSON PALMER
> solicitors for William Matthews, the Member of Parliament for
> Random-Burin-St. George's in the Parliament of Canada.
>
> THAT Mr. Matthews originally retained Mr. Edward Roberts, Q.C. on or
> about 30 April 2002 after Mr. Byron Prior, the Defendant/Plaintiff by
> Counterclaim, had made allegations against Mr. Matthews in a
> publication called "My Inheritance - The truth - Not Fiction: A Town
> with a Secret". In that publication, the allegation was made that Mr.
> Matthews had had sex with a girl who had been prostituted by her
> mother. That girl was alleged to have been Mr. Prior's sister.
>
> THAT upon being retained, Mr. Edward Roberts wrote a letter to Mr.
> Prior. That letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit "1" to my
> Affidavit.
>
> THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts' letter to Mr. Prior, Mr. Roberts
> received a 1 May 2002 e-mail from Mr. Prior. That e-mail is attached
> as Exhibit "2".
>
> THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts receipt of the e-mail, Mr. Prior swore
> an Affidavit acknowledging that what had been said in that publication
> was false. That Affidavit is attached as Exhibit "3" to my Affidavit.
> Following Mr. Roberts' receipt of that Affidavit, Mr. Matthews advised
> that he was satisfied not to pursue the matter any further and our
> firm closed our file.
>
> THAT on or about 25 October 2004, I was retained by Mr. Matthews
> following his gaining knowledge that a web site, made a series of
> allegations against him relating to my having sex with a girl of
> approximately 12 years old through to an approximate age of 15 years
> old. It also accused him of being a father of one of her children and
> accused him of having raped that girl. Upon checking the web site I
> saw that Byron Prior, the Defendant, had been identified as the author
> of the material on the site.
>
> THAT Mr. Matthews instructed me to write Mr. Prior, to remind him of
> the fact that the allegations had been admitted to being false through
> a 16 May 2002 Affidavit to advise him of Mr. Matthews' intentions to
> commence legal proceedings if the comments were not removed from the
> web site. A copy of my letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit "4"
> to this Affidavit.
>
> THAT I attach as Exhibit "5" a transcript from a 5 November 2004
> voicemail left by David Amos, identified in the voicemail as a friend
> of Mr. Prior.
>
> THAT I attach as Exhibit "6" a portion of a 6 November 2004 e-mail
> from Mr. Amos.
>
> THAT until I received his voicemail and e-mail, I had never heard of Mr.
> Amos.
>
> THAT Mr. Amos has continued to send me e-mail since his 5 November
> e-mail. Including his 6 November 2004 e-mail, I have received a total
> of 15 e-mails as of 23 January 2005. All do not address Mr. Matthews'
> claim or my involvement as Mr. Matthews' solicitor. I attach as
> Exhibit "7" a portion of a 12 January 2005 e-mail that Mr. Amos sent
> to me but originally came to my attention through Ms. Lois Skanes
> whose firm had received a copy. This e-mail followed the service of
> the Statement of Claim on 11 January 2005 on Mr. Prior. I also attach
> as Exhibit "8" a copy of a 19 January 2005 e-mail from Mr. Amos.
>
> THAT I attach as Exhibit "9" a copy of a 22 November 2004 letter
> addressed to me from Edward Roberts, the Lieutenant Governor of
> Newfoundland and Labrador covering a 2 September 2004 letter from Mr.
> Amos addressed to John Crosbie, Edward Roberts, in his capacity as
> Lieutenant Governor, Danny Williams, in his capacity as Premier of
> Newfoundland and Labrador, and Brian F. Furey, President of the Law
> Society of Newfoundland and Labrador. I requested a copy of this
> letter from Government House after asking Mr. Roberts if he had
> received any correspondence from Mr. Amos during his previous
> representation of Mr. Matthews. He advised me that he received a
> letter since becoming Lieutenant Governor, portions of which involved
> his representation of Mr. Matthews. Mr. Roberts' letter also covered
> his reply to Mr. Amos.
>
> THAT I attach as Exhibit "10" an e-mail from Mr. Amos received on
> Sunday, 23 January 2005.
>
> THAT I swear this Affidavit in support of the Application to strike
> Mr. Prior's counterclaim.
>
> SWORN to before me at
> St. John's, Province of Newfoundland and Labrador this 24th day of
> January, 2005.
>
> Signed by Della Hart
> STEPHEN J. MAY
> Signature STAMP
> DELLA HART
> A Commissioner for Oaths in and for
> the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador. My commission expires on
> December 31, 2009
>
>
>
> ---- Original Message -----
> From: "McKnight, Gisele" McKnight.Gisele@kingscorecord.com
> To: lcampenella@ledger.com
> Cc:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
> Subject: David Amos
>
> Hello Lisa,
>
> David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he became
> an independent (not representing any political party) candidate in our
> federal
> election that was held June 28. He was a candidate in our constituency of
> Fundy (now called Fundy-Royal).
>
> I wrote a profile story about him, as I did all other candidates. That
> story appeared in the Kings County Record June 22. A second story, written
> by one of my reporters, appeared on the same date, which was a report on
> the candidates' debate held June 18.
>
> As I recall David Amos came last of four candidates in the election.
> The winner got 14,997 votes, while Amos got 358.
>
> I have attached the two stories that appeared, as well as a photo
> taken by reporter Erin Hatfield during the debate. I couldn't find the
> photo
> that ran, but this one is very similar.
>
>
> A1-debate A1-amos,David for MP 24.doc debate 2.JPG
>
> Gisele McKnight editor
> Kings County Record
> Sussex, New Brunswick
> Canada
> 506-433-1070
>
>
> Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
>
> By Erin Hatfield
>
> "If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
> world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
>
> The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
> the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
> watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
> unofficial, theme song for the debate.
>
> The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
> they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
> Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
> chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
> left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
> mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
> the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
>
> The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
> organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
> of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
> and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
>
> Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
> responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
> exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
> Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
> other on their answers and criticizing eachothers' party leaders.
> Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
> questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
> relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
> response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
> getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
>
> Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
> party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
> well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
> on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
> places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
> shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
>
> The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
> one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
> front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
> voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
> Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
> readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
> final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
> register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
> abiding citizens."
>
> The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
> women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
> yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
> spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
>
> Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
> Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You're out of touch," Armstrong
> yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
> post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
> Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
> anyplace," Armstrong responded.
>
> As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
> candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
> fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
> process for the June 28 vote.
>
> Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
> favourite possessions—motorcycles.
>
> McKnight/KCR
>
> The Unconventional Candidate
>
> David Amos Isn't Campaigning For Your Vote, But….
>
> By Gisele McKnight
>
> FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
> wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
> that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
>
> Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.
>
> The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
> and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
> running for office in Canada.
>
> One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
> to meet Elections Canada requirements.
>
> When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
> favourite place to do so—Fundy.
>
> Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
> dissatisfaction with politicians.
>
> "I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
> said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
>
> The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
> 1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
> needed to change his life.
>
> "I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
> sometimes in midlife."
>
> So Amos, who'd lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
> motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
> Panhead motorcycle.
>
> "Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
> experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
> renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask
> for anything, but you take what they offer."
>
> For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
> and conversation all over North America.
>
> Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
> and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls
> himself.
>
> He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist
> rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
> individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
> Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
>
> Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.
>
> "But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
> "It's alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
>
> Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
>
> "I didn't appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
> interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
> call me. I'm not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
>
> And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
>
> "I won't take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It's
> not about money. It goes against what I'm fighting about."
>
> What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
> the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
> name a few.
>
> "The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing,
> farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm
> death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
> (NAFTA) out the window.
>
> NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
> easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
>
> Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
>
> "There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
> especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
> Don't necessarily vote for me, but vote."
>
> Although…if you're going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
> your X by his name.
>
> "I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
> say, 'what the hell.'"
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:01:00 -0300
> Subject: RE John Conway of the University of Regina and his published
> opinion of the demise of the NDP In SK
> To: John.Conway@uregina.ca, voices@operationmaple.com, bwall
> <bwall@mla.legassembly.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.sk.ca>,
> bboyd@mla.legassembly.sk.ca, pr@potashcorp.com,
> Podwika@potashcorp.com, fosterd@bennettjones.ca,
> corporate.relations@potashcorp.com
> Cc: dwain@saskndp.ca, maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
> Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.com, jane.mcaloon@bhpbilliton.com,
> "jacques.nasser" <jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com>, occupyfredericton
> <occupyfredericton@gmail.com>, "9.17occupywallstreet"
> <9.17occupywallstreet@gmail.com>, occupyottawa
> <occupyottawa@gmail.com>
>
> http://www.operationmaple.com/home/173-saskatchewan-ndp-faces-electoral-disaster
>
> http://www.arts.uregina.ca/john-conway
>
> I don't believe John Conway knows as much as he thinks he does so he
> deserved to be somewhat more enlightened EH Brad Wall? Rest assured
> that I called him and told him as much as he wanted to know while
> Lingenfelter's campain manager played as dumb as a post about my
> concerns.
>
> However as dumb as Lingenfelter and his cohorts may pretend to be if
> the NDP boss in SK truly practiced old style, right wing "take no
> prisoners" politicking he who have embarassed the hell out of Brad
> Wall last year with the letter from Jac Nasser to mean old me that is
> hereto attached.
>
> Anyone with two clues between their ears or even a dumb NDP dude would
> know that BHP Billiton's Marius Kloppers visiting Brad Wall during an
> election campaign is just no coincidence at all. Something smells
> truly rotten indeed. However the only way to resolve my concerns is
> byway of litigation CORRECT MR WALL?
>
> http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/business/breakingnews/bhp-billiton-ceo-meets-with-saskatchewan-premier-during-election-campaign-131894618.html
>
> Have your lawyers review the emials below and tell your Attorney
> General to find the documents I sent his office byway REGISTERED US
> MAIL in 2005 and tell them to give me a call if they have more BALLS
> than you EH MR WALL?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: Fw: RE BHP's game I just called Bill Boyd and the NDP In SK
> they played dumb as usual
> To: bwall@mla.legassembly.sk.ca, dlingenfelter@mla.legassembly.sk.ca,
> bboyd@mla.legassembly.sk.ca, pr@potashcorp.com,
> Podwika@potashcorp.com, fosterd@bennettjones.ca,
> corporate.relations@potashcorp.com
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Subject: Yo Shawny Baby interestng trick your pal Carl Urquhart and
> his buddies in the RCMP and Fat Fred City's Finest tried to pull on my
> son and I last night EH?
> To: "MLA" <MLA@carlurquhart.com>, "kelly. lamrock"
> <kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca>, "jack. keir" <jack.keir@gnb.ca>,
> "jack.macdougall" <jack.macdougall@greenparty.ca>, "Ed. Doherty"
> <Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca>, "wally.stiles@gnb.ca" <wally.stiles@gnb.ca>,
> "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "danfour"
> <danfour@myginch.com>, "Richard Harris"
> <injusticecoalition@hotmail.com>, "tracy" <tracy@jatam.org>, "nb.
> premier" <nb.premier@gmail.com>, "nbpolitico" <nbpolitico@gmail.com>,
> "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>
> Cc: "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "rob.lafrance"
> <rob.lafrance@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "shawn. graham" <shawn.graham@gnb.ca>,
> "John. Foran" <John.Foran@gnb.ca>, "john"
> <john@johncampbellsaintjohnharbour.ca>, "krisaustin"
> <krisaustin@panb.org>, "robin reid" <zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>, "tony"
> <tony@peoplestandup.ca>, fortsaskatchewan.vegreville@assembly.ab.ca,
> "Barry.MacKnight" <Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca>, "Barry Winters"
> <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
> Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 6:25 PM
>
> How dumb was that? I must ask did he expect the cops to arrest both of
> us and then call us both crazy? Hell Urquhart even bragged in front of
> the cops that he did the same shit on July 4th, 2008 That malicious
> nonsense didn't work out too well for the long gone lawyer and former
> Minister of Health Mikey Murphy partcularly after the nasty French
> bastard Chucky Lebanc and hs pals violated my privacy and blogged
> about N'esy Pas? I told the cops last nght to simply Google my name and
> the dumb bastards laughed.
>
> FYI type in Davd Amos to see that I wa not jokng with the smiling dumb
> bastards last nght Google will offer Chucky Leblanc's bullshit about
> mean old me at the top of the hit list DUHHH?
>
> Davd Amos plus Google equals
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/07/feds-institutionalize-determined-nb.html
>
> Do tell does Carl Baby really think I won't sue his nasty arse
> someday? Ya think the corrupt ex cop of Fat Fred City's Finest would
> at least wait until he and his cohorts got sworn in to take over your
> jobs EH?
>
> --- On Mon, 9/13/10, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Subject: How is your conscience and sense of ethical conduct doing now
> ladies?
> To: Jane.McAloon@bhpbilliton.com, Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.com
> Cc: "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca" <william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Monday, September 13, 2010, 7:57 PM
>
>
> Jane McAloon (Group Company Secretary) BEc (Hons), LLB, GDipGov, FCIS
> Term of office: Jane McAloon was appointed Group Company Secretary in
> July 2007 and joined the BHP Billiton Group in September 2006 as
> Company Secretary for BHP Billiton Limited.
> Skills and experience: Prior to joining BHP Billiton, Jane McAloon
> held the position of Company Secretary and Group Manager External and
> Regulatory Services in the Australian Gas Light Company. She
> previously held various State and Commonwealth government positions,
> including Director General of the NSW Ministry of Energy and Utilities
> and Deputy Director General for the NSW Cabinet Office, as well as
> working in private legal practice. She is a Fellow of the Institute of
> Chartered Secretaries.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Collins, Susan J (COSEC)" <Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.com>
> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:23:12 +1000
> Subject: Email to BHP Billiton Chairman's
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
>
> Please find attached a letter from Mr Jac Nasser, Chairman of BHP
> Billiton
>
> Susan Collins
> Company Secretariat
> BHP Billiton | 180 Lonsdale St | Melbourne Vic 3000 |Australia
> T: +61 3 9609 2654 | M: +61 427 713 994 | F: +61 3 9609 3290
> E: susan.j.collins@bhpbilliton.com <mailto:jane.mcaloon@bhpbilliton.com>
>
> <<Amos D 2010 09 14.pdf>>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:36 AM
> To: pr@potashcorp.com; Podwika@potashcorp.com;
> fosterd@bennettjones.ca; corporate.relations@potashcorp.com;
> lgold.blcanada@b-l.com; shawn. graham; David.ALWARD@gnb.ca;
> krisaustin; jacques_poitras@cbc.ca; cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca;
> tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com; nmiller@corridor.ca;
> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca; atlbf@nb.aibn.com; akapoor@globeandmail.com;
> nmacadam@globeandmail.com; vepp@globeandmail.com;
> potash@mackenziepartners.com; contactus@kingsdaleshareholder.com;
> rick.hancox; Bernard.LeBlanc; Liebenberg, Andre;
> mclellana@bennettjones.com; MooreR; danfour; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
> Harris, Brendan; Dean.Buzza; Gilles. Blinn
> Cc: wcoady; michel.desneiges@sade-els.org; producers@stu.ca;
> WaterWarCrimes; Penny Bright; tony; Nasser, Jacques
> Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
> of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
> you people buy much stock in their stock eh?
>
> With ANOTHER election in the near future I see no need to explain my
> issues again about theexploitation of our natural resources to a
> bunch of sneaky lawyers.(everyboy shoul checkout the pdf hereto
> attache) especially our former Deputy Prime Minister Lanslide Annie
> McLelllan an the RCMP thought they knew everything seven years ago and
> did nothing let alone call me back just like you an your many
> conservative cohorts NEVER did EH Brucy Baby Northrup? (902 800 0369
> Notice my new contact number? You an the RCMP can forget Werner Bock's
> now)
>
> Clearly there is no need for politicians to try to be confidential
> with mean old me when the Globe and Mail loves spiling the beans
> sometimes ou woul think those unethical journlists woul know that
> simple truths spoken amongst common folk about corrupt politicians
> have a good habit of coming to the surface sooner or later anyway EH?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
> This message and any attached files may contain information that is
> confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use
> by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or
> the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended
> recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and
> that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment
> is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information
> therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the
> sender immediately and delete the message.
>
>
>
> http://www.bennettjones.com/people_item.aspx?person=821
>
> http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/potash-corp-soars-bhp-bid-rejected/article1675353/
>
> http://beta.images.theglobeandmail.com/archive/00828/BHPrelease_828561a.pdf
>
> http://www.potashcorp.com/media/POT_2010_Letter_from_BHP_Billiton's_Chairman.pdf
>
> http://www.bhpbilliton.com/bb/aboutUs/companyOverview/ourBoard.jsp
>
> http://www.potashcorp.com/about/management_board/senior_management/podwika/
>
> http://www.corridor.ca/media/2010-press-releases/20100510.html
>
> http://www.bennettjones.com/people_item.aspx?person=712&name=foster&pg=&office=
>
> http://www.robmooremp.com/081908.htm
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-brunswick/story/2009/05/07/nb-penobsquis-water-lawyer-1056.html?ref=rss
>
> http://www.newbrunswickbeacon.ca/2010/03/risk-and-reward-when-rural-life-meets-economic-development/5666
>
> http://www.vancouverislandwaterwatchcoalition.ca/go456a/FRACKING
>
> http://www.elements.nb.ca/theme/ecojustice/JeanPaul/JeanPaul.htm
>
> http://www.nbmediacoop.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1133:penobsquis-residents-seek-compensation-for-damages&catid=82:environment&Itemid=197
>
>
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Subject: Yo Mr Harper What part of this email did the many Green
> Meanies fail to understand last year?
> To: "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "davidc.coon" <davidc.coon@gmail.com>,
> leader@greenparty.ca, "campaign" <campaign@briantopp.ca>,
> "Nycole.Turmel" <Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca>, "bob.rae"
> <bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net>, "briangallant10"
> <briangallant10@gmail.com>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com"
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "gregory.graham"
> <gregory.graham@tidescanada.org>, "ross" <ross@tidescanada.org>,
> "ross.mcmillan" <ross.mcmillan@tidescanada.org>,
> info@blackriver.ns.ca, "maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
> darce@nsrighttoknow.ca, timb@thecoast.ca, "counsel"
> <counsel@barackobama.com>, "newt" <newt@newt.org>, "info"
> <info@mittromney.com>
> Cc: jb@sierraclub.ca, "premier@gov.ns.ca" <premier@gov.ns.ca>,
> "premier.ministre" <premier.ministre@cex.gouv.qc.ca>,
> "OfficeofthePremier, Office PREM:EX" <premier@gov.bc.ca>, "premier"
> <premier@gnb.ca>
> Date: Friday, January 27, 2012, 8:46 AM
>
>
> You and lawyers such as Joey Oliver, Gary Lunn and Dizzy Lizzy May are
> well aware of why I have "Issues" with the Greasy Gassy Oily Guys, the
> National Energy Board and all the Green Meanies EH?
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:26:17 -0300
> Subject: I just called
> To: timb@thecoast.ca
> Cc: info@greenbelt.ca, taxworthy@gordonfn.org, tim@gordonfn.org,
> tbrodhead@mcconnellfoundation.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Lisa Gue <lgue@davidsuzuki.org>
> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:37:02 -0400
> Subject: RE: i just called some of you again. Instead of calling me
> back Suzuki's people just surf the net and play dumb Correct?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Cc: Jean-Patrick Toussaint <jptoussaint@davidsuzuki.org>, Sutton Eaves
> <seaves@davidsuzuki.org>, Ian Bruce <ibruce@davidsuzuki.org>
>
> Mr. Amos,
>
> When you called my cell phone earlier, as I was on my way into a
> meeting, you offered to send me an e-mail outline the information you
> are looking for from the David Suzuki Foundation. Is this it??
>
> Lisa Gue
>
> From: Sutton Eaves <seaves@davidsuzuki.org>
> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: The greedy pople on the Fake Left
> say nasty things about mean old me as well EH Stevey Boy Harper?
> To: "David Amos" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Received: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 2:55 PM
>
>
> Thanks for your message. I am out of the office until Tuesday, April 19.
>
> If this is a media request, please contact Ian Hanington at
> ihanington@davidsuzuki.org, or Leanne Clare at lclare@davidsuzuki.org.
>
> Otherwise, I'll return your message when I return.
>
> Have a great day!
>
>
> From: David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Subject: The greedy pople on the Fake Left say nasty things about mean
> old me as well EH Stevey Boy Harper?
> To: action@ecologyaction.ca, gretchenf@sierraclub.ca, tracy@jatam.org,
> dgiroux@tlb.sympatico.ca, mjgorman@ns.sympatico.ca,
> nmiller@corridor.ca, coalitionstlaurent@me.com,
> jeanpatrick.toussaint@adelaide.edu.au, info@climateprojectcanada.org,
> lgue@davidsuzuki.org, ibruce@davidsuzuki.org, seaves@davidsuzuki.org,
> "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "IgnatM" <IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>, "danfour"
> <danfour@myginch.com>, "bruce.northrup@gnb.ca"
> <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, "charlieparkermla"
> <charlieparkermla@ns.aliantzinc.ca>, "ducepg" <ducepg@parl.gc.ca>,
> "LaytoJ" <LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca>, leader@greenparty.ca
> Cc: "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>, ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca
> Received: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 2:54 PM
>
>
> From: John Bennett <jb@sierraclub.ca>
> Subject: Re: i just called some of you again. Instead of calling me
> back Suzuki's people just surf the net and play dumb Correct?
> To: "Paula Boutis" <pboutis@ilercampbell.com>,
> "JeanPaulBourque@gmail.com" <JeanPaulBourque@gmail.com>, "Wayne
> Gallant" <Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "webo@xplornet.com"
> <webo@xplornet.com>, "Gretchen Fitzgerald" <gretchenf@sierraclub.ca>,
> "maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Cc: "pfalvo@yellowknife.ca" <pfalvo@yellowknife.ca>
> Received: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 2:26 PM
>
>
> He is known to Gretchen as not quiet rational.
>
> John Bennett Executive Director Sierra Club Canada 613 291 6888
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Paula Boutis" <pboutis@ilercampbell.com>
> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:18:46
> To: JeanPaulBourque@gmail.com<JeanPaulBourque@gmail.com>; Wayne
> Gallant<Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
> webo@xplornet.com<webo@xplornet.com>;
> jb@sierraclub.ca<jb@sierraclub.ca>;
> gretchenf@sierraclub.ca<gretchenf@sierraclub.ca>;
> maritime_malaise<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Cc: pfalvo@yellowknife.ca<pfalvo@yellowknife.ca>
> Subject: RE: i just called some of you again. Instead of calling me back
> Suzuki's people just surf the net and play dumb Correct?
>
> I am not responding to Dave Amos' emails, but I believe I have heard
> he has some "issues". I have no sense of what his involvement is with
> the organization or why he is threatening law suits (my receptionist
> just intercepted a call and he told her he didn't want to leave a
> message and to just tell her that he would "see me in court").
>
> Does anyone have any idea what to do about this guy? Should we just
> ignore him?
>
> Paula
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:01:31 -0300
> Subject: i just called some of you again. Instead of calling me back
> Suzuki's people just surf the net and play dumb Correct?
> To: action@ecologyaction.ca, gretchenf@sierraclub.ca, tracy@jatam.org,
> dgiroux@tlb.sympatico.ca, mjgorman@ns.sympatico.ca,
> nmiller@corridor.ca, coalitionstlaurent@me.com,
> jeanpatrick.toussaint@adelaide.edu.au, info@climateprojectcanada.org,
> lgue@davidsuzuki.org, ibruce@davidsuzuki.org, seaves@davidsuzuki.org,
> pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, IgnatM <IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>
> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
> "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, danfour
> <danfour@myginch.com>, "bruce.northrup@gnb.ca"
> <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, charlieparkermla
> <charlieparkermla@ns.aliantzinc.ca>, ducepg <ducepg@parl.gc.ca>,
> LaytoJ <LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca>, leader@greenparty.ca
>
> http://www.coalitionsaintlaurent.ca/en/contact
>
> Jean-Patrick Toussaint
> Spokesperson (english), St-Lawrence Coalition
> (David Suzuki Foundation)
> 514-316-4646
>
> http://www.davidsuzuki.org/fr/
>
> http://www.climateprojectcanada.org/.profile/jtoussaint3
>
> http://www.adelaide.edu.au/directory/jeanpatrick.toussaint
>
> http://www.climateprojectcanada.org/about/board
>
> Did that lots of people have an opinion of bugets not just David
> Suzuki and the greasy gassy oily guys such as Emera, Corridor
> Resources and irving Oil
>
> http://www.davidsuzuki.org/media/
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 13,581
> Domain Name videotron.ca ? (Canada)
> IP Address 69.70.160.# (Videotron Ltee)
> ISP Videotron Ltee
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Quebec
> City : Boucherville
> Lat/Long : 45.6, -73.45 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Firefox
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8)
> Gecko/20100722 Firefox/3.6.8 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C)
> Javascript version 1.5
> Monitor Resolution : 1680 x 1050
> Color Depth : 24 bits
> Time of Visit Apr 6 2011 2:01:04 pm
> Last Page View Apr 6 2011 2:01:04 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.ca...0yufbeXCuJf0WH_kccBw
> Search Engine google.ca
> Search Words david amos corridor resources
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Apr 6 2011 1:01:04 pm
> Visit Number 13,581
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:04:12 -0300
> Subject: FYI here is a litte Deju Vu from Saint John Harbour for Dr Ed
> to review EH Shawny Baby?
> To: john <john@johncampbellsaintjohnharbour.ca>,
> "carlkillen@gmail.com" <carlkillen@gmail.com>, "Ed. Doherty"
> <Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca>, sharon_christian@transcanada.com, Aaron Kennedy
> <sjmpabk@nb.sympatico.ca>, alison.gayton@unb.ca,
> Allison_denning@hc-sc.gc.ca, amcallis@nrcan.gc.ca,
> mcnan@reg2.health.nb.ca, info@irishhouseoftara.com,
> ohallowe@gov.ns.ca, caring@rogers.com, cstpierre@nbpower.com, "Charles
> L. Debly" <charlesdebly56@yahoo.com>, dannyrobichaud@nb.aibn.com,
> deg@nb.aibn.com, darrell@unbi.org, dawnc@nbnet.nb.ca,
> ddavies@mccarthy.ca, "Dorothy C. Dawson" <lawbrodc@hotmail.com>,
> erik.denis@gnb.ca, FollowFran@yahoo.ca, fjames@gmail.com,
> wattadil@nbnet.nb.ca, gnemecr@repsolypf.com, macgriff@nbnet.nb.ca,
> saurtwo@nb.sympatico.ca, ileadley@duke-energy.com,
> horse97@nb.sympatico.ca, Jake.Harms@justice.gc.ca, jsmellie@osler.com,
> pearcer@nbnet.nb.ca, joel_forrest@transcanada.com,
> pappas.john@jdirving.com, smithl@bennettjones.ca,
> len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com, lratelle@gazmetro.com,
> Brunswick.Pipeline@ec.gc.ca, mbrown@heritagegas.com,
> mosher.mark@jdirving.com, matthew_wharton@transcanada.com,
> burgess@nbnet.nb.ca, christiemike@rogers.com,
> Muratte.Graves@irvingoil.com, murray99@nbnet.nb.ca,
> gretenern@bennettjones.ca, nmiller@corridor.ns.ca,
> longsure@nbnet.nb.ca, peggyjames@rogers.com, Paul.Vanderlaan@gnb.ca,
> zedpl@parl.gc.ca, pthompson@blgcanada.com, Pcblaney@rogers.com,
> rjpelletier@duke-energy.com, rene.gallant@nspower.ca,
> richard.neufeld@fmc-law.com, Rinde.Powell@encana.com,
> fairbairn@capp.ca, Robert.Gall@shell.com, robmoirndp@gmail.com,
> ronald.moore@esso.ca, ron@unitedway.aibn.nb.com,
> shelley.black@enbridge.com, mcgratst@gov.ns.ca,
> sweilcox@nb.sympatico.ca, curriet@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca,
> ted_semadeni@anadarko.com, tdalgleish@mccarthy.ca,
> edterry@nbnet.nb.ca, tinkpen@gmail.com, William.Gould@gnb.ca
> Cc: "kelly. lamrock" <kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca>, "shawn. graham"
> <shawn.graham@gnb.ca>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
> danfour <danfour@myginch.com>, robin reid <zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>,
> "tomp. young" <tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com>, tony
> <tony@peoplestandup.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:59:59 -0300
> Subject: I called you all and tried to explain how I can help with
> your concerns I repeat just say my name
> To: action@ecologyaction.ca, gretchenf@sierraclub.ca, tracy
> <tracy@jatam.org>, dgiroux@tlb.sympatico.ca, mjgorman@ns.sympatico.ca
> Cc: nmiller <nmiller@corridor.ca>, "wally.stiles@gnb.ca"
> <wally.stiles@gnb.ca>
>
> If nothing else listen to this and get pissed off lIke mean old me. At
> least that emotion is honest.
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/Corridor1
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
>
> http://www.sierraclub.ca/en/in-the-news
>
> http://atlantic.sierraclub.ca/en/media/release/coalition-calls-leaders-act-immediately-stop-oil-and-gas-exploration-gulf-st-lawrence
>
> COALITION CALLS ON LEADERS TO ACT IMMEDIATELY TO STOP OIL AND GAS
> EXPLORATION IN GULF OF ST. LAWRENCE
> For Immediate Release - October 4, 2010
> PICTOU, NS – Today's decision by the Canada Newfoundland and Labrador
> Offshore Petroleum Board (CNLOPB) to allow seismic blasting in the
> Gulf of St. Lawrence was met with shock and concern by a coalition
> calling for a moratorium on oil and gas development in the Gulf of St.
> Lawrence. The coalition - made of aboriginal, fishing, and
> environmental organizations - is calling on municipal, provincial,
> federal, and aboriginal leaders to act swiftly to halt the testing.
>
> "With this decision, the CNLOPB has approved an activity that could
> damage this entire precious ecosystem," according to Mary Gorman of
> the Save Our Seas and Shores, "We want this decision reversed
> immediately, and action taken to allow jurisdictions bordering on the
> Gulf to have a say in its future."
>
> "Seismic testing could start in the next 48 hours, potentially
> damaging marine mammals like blue whales, and disrupting fish and
> fisheries. This approval has given oil and gas as a toehold in the
> Gulf that could lead to full scale drilling," according to Danielle
> Giroux of the. "Fishermen I work for need more say over protecting the
> Gulf. We want the CNLOPB's decision reversed immediately."
>
> "An oil spill in the Gulf of St. Lawrence would impact fish stocks and
> coastal communities in Quebec, PEI, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and
> Newfoundland. Moreover, the national importance of this ecosystem must
> be upheld." says Gretchen Fitzgerald, of the Sierra Club Canada. "
> Federal laws to protect endangered species and fish habitat recognize
> the importance of protecting our shared biodiversity and resources.
> This decision is not reflecting this shared responsibility or concerns
> expressed by groups around the Gulf."
>
> -30-
>
>
>
> For more information, please contact:
>
> Mary Gorman, Save our Seas and Shores,
> 902-926-2128/mjgorman@ns.sympatico.ca
>
> Danielle Giroux (Francais), Attention Fragile (Magdalen Islands)
> 418-969-9440/dgiroux@tlb.sympatico.ca
>
> Gretchen Fitzgerald, Director, Sierra Club Atlantic, 902-444-3113/
> gretchenf@sierraclub.ca
>
> Mark Butler, Policy Director, Ecology Action Centre,
> 902-429-5287/action@ecologyaction.ca
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Subject: Say Hoka Hey to the very sneaky lawyer Dizzy Lizzy May for me will
> ya?
> To: JeanPaulBourque@gmail.com, "Wayne.Gallant"
> <Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, webo@xplornet.com,
> board@sierraclub.ca, jb@sierraclub.ca, gretchenf@sierraclub.ca,
> maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca
> Cc: pfalvo@yellowknife.ca, pboutis@ilercampbell.com, leader@greenparty.ca
> Received: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 2:28 PM
>
>
> http://www.sierraclub.ca/en/john-bennet-bio
>
> Bennett was assisting Cape Bretoners opposing a coal-fired power plant
> at Point Aconi in Nova Scotia when he first caught the attention
> Elizabeth May, then Sierra Club Canada's executive-director. May liked
> his approach – among other things, he'd brought his wife and two
> daughters to a potluck supper meeting and assured the group he was
> there to hear from them, not issue orders. Several years – and, after
> an interview on a train ride from Toronto to Ottawa -- later, she
> hired him as the Club's director of atmosphere and energy.
>
> He managed environmental education campaigns; was the Club's main
> spokesperson on air, energy, automotive and climate change issues;
> prepared fundraising proposals; and wrote position papers and research
> articles.
>
> During this period, Bennett also headed the Climate Action Network, an
> association of up to 100 environmental, health, labour and faith
> organizations from 10 provinces and two territories. There, he was
> also the chief spokesperson, wrote releases and papers, and acted as
> liaison with government officials, ministers, MPs, their staffs and
> industry leaders. He did similar work with a successor organization,
> ClimateforChange.ca.
>
> It was then that he was involved in preparing reporters for the
> federal Conservative government's climate plan. "I figured we had to
> talk to the media. We had to meet the government head-on, and say what
> they were doing was going backward. We were very effective."
>
> The work "succeeded to the extent that when Stéphane Dion became
> Liberal leader, the party thought the climate and environment were
> where they should campaign. They were right; they just did it very
> badly."
>
> A spirit of collaboration
>
> Most recently, Bennett was communications director for the Green Party
> of Canada, including the 2008 campaign in which the Greens, led by
> May, won nearly a million votes and was the only party to increase its
> total.
>
> "It's a well-rounded background, ranging from activist events to
> negotiating in the halls of power," Bennett says. "My knowledge covers
> the spectrum of issues across the country."
>
> Bennett's experience has demonstrated the importance of collaborating
> with other groups and including as many people as possible, and their
> ideas, in whatever work must be done. That was especially obvious in
> the creation of the Green Budget Coalition, which analyzed federal
> budgets in terms of their impact on environmental concerns.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: Fry.H@parl.gc.ca ; Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca ; Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca ;
> letters@proislam.com ; Cummins.J@parl.gc.ca ; Canada@cair-net.org ;
> dcr618@msn.com ; madd_professor@cox.net ; Iolmisha@cs.com ;
> derrickcrobinson@gmail.com ; khr909@hotmail.com ; erniemusic2@yahoo.com ;
> kevin_annett@hotmail.com ; radical@radicalpress.com ; thespur@hotmail.com ;
> lisah@whooshnet.com ; dougchristie@shaw.ca ; lawald@web.net ;
> wickedwanda3@adelphia.net ; fbinhct@leo.gov ; info@afi-international.com ;
> wgoss@smss.com ; landrews@smss.com ; jcrosbie@coxandpalmer.com ;
> rgfaloon@coxandpalmer.com ; dhashey@coxandpalmer.com ;
> smay@coxandpalmer.com
> ; kmccullogh@smss.com ; gpetrie@smss.com ; orakwa@paulcomm.ca ;
> Kahentinetha2@yahoo.com ; katenies20@yahoo.com ; media@cupw-sttp.org
> Cc: ceri@shaw.ca ; deanr0032@hotmail.com ; info@politicswatch.com ;
> Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca ; Baird.J@parl.gc.ca ; Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca ;
> McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca ; Dhalla.R@parl.gc.ca ; Casey.B@parl.gc.ca ;
> Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca ; Holland.M@parl.gc.ca ; Hubbard.C@parl.gc.ca ;
> Martin.Pat@parl.gc.ca ; Guergis.H@parl.gc.ca ; Mark.I@parl.gc.ca ;
> Turner.G@parl.gc.ca ; Chong.M@parl.gc.ca ; Comuzzi.J@parl.gc.ca ;
> warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; John.Foran@gnb.ca
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 3:15 PM
> Subject: RE;Budget votes and more War its the same old same old If you
> forgot scroll down
>
>
> I just talked to Paul Dewar's office for the last time.and spoke to Jamesey
> Baby once again. He to me to go for it and sue the Crown I told him I willl
> also sue him and his chickenshit boss too or my name ain't "Just Dave".
> reveiw his Bullshit and start lining up lawyers.
>
> "Katter, Robert (MP)" <Bob.Katter.MP@aph.gov.au> wrote:
>
> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Portions of wiretap tapes to impeach
> George W. Bush and put a stop Harper's motion tommorrow
> Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 02:18:35 +1000
> From: "Katter, Robert \(MP\)" <Bob.Katter.MP@aph.gov.au>
> To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> Thank you for your e-mail which will be forwarded to the appropriate staff
> member to deal with as soon as possible.
> The Kennedy electorate is a large electorate (about 2.5 times the size of
> the entire State of Victoria) with almost 150,000 residents, over 120
> schools and over 140 localities all with various service and sporting
> clubs.
> For this reason we receive quite a large volume of faxes, letters, e-mails
> and phone calls each day and while our staff aim for a 7-day turnaround in
> correspondence - unfortunately this is not always possible. However, if
> you
> have not heard back from anyone at the office within 7-14 days, please
> telephone the office on the numbers listed below.
> If the matter is urgent please phone 1800 810 519, or if you are not in the
> electorate, 07 4061 6066.
> To save disappointment we should advise that correspondence from outside
> the
> electorate is not given the priority that correspondence within the
> electorate is given.
> That said, many thanks for your message, and we will endeavour to get back
> to you as soon as possible.
> Hon Bob Katter MP
> Member for Kennedy
> Innisfail Office: Cnr Edith & Owen Sts PO Box 1638 Innisfail FNQ 4860 Ph
> 07
> 4061 6066 Fx 07 4061 6566
> Mt Isa Office: 52 Miles St Mt Isa NWQ 4825 PO Box 2130 Mt Isa NWQ 4825 Ph
> 07 4743 3534 Fx 07 4743 0189
> Parliament House (Sitting weeks only) Ph 02 6277 4978 Fx 02 6277 8558
> Toll Free Number: 1800 810 519
>
> "Roy, Bruno (Patterson Palmer NB)" <broy@pattersonpalmer.ca> wrote:
>
> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Stevey Boy Harper and Malicious Mikey
> Ignatieff ain't fishing on Brokeback Mountian EH? Here is why
> Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 10:52:58 -0300
> From: "Roy, Bruno \(Patterson Palmer NB\)" <broy@pattersonpalmer.ca>
> To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> I will be out of the office until May 23rd. Should you need any assistance,
> please call my assistant Doris at 856-9800.
>
> Je serai hors du bureau jusqu'au 23 mai. Si vous avez des questions, vous
> pouvez rejoindre mon adjointe Doris au 856-9800.
>
>
>
> "Dewar, Paul - M.P." <Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca> wrote:
> Subject: RE: Portions of wiretap tapes to impeach George W. Bush and put
> a
> stop Harper's motion tommorrow
> Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 13:49:47 -0400
> From: "Dewar, Paul - M.P." <Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca>
> To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
>
>
> Hi David. My name is James and I have been asked to send this message
> onto
> you from Paul…
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for informing me of your concerns regarding Canada's role in
> Afghanistan after February 2007.
>
> The NDP voted against this motion because we believe it is the wrong
> mission for Canada. It does not reflect the peace-making values that
> Canadians want to see our forces undertake on the world stage. This forced
> motion essentially ties our aid and development funds to war-making, and we
> cannot support that.
>
> It is quite clear that Harper's Conservatives aren't interested in due
> diligence. They're interested in dragging us further into a US-style combat
> role and away from our traditional peace keeping role. Much like the
> Liberals before them, the Conservatives have failed to tell Canadians:
>
> - What the chain of command and control will be for this mission.
> - What the definition of success will be for our troops.
> - What our exit strategy will be.
>
> Many Canadians have written me wanting answers and it is our duty as
> representatives of our constituents, to get answers before committing to
> any
> new missions overseas. As any soldier knows, time spent on reconnaissance
> is
> never wasted.
>
> New Democrats recognize that Canada does have a role in assisting
> Afghanis
> in rebuilding their country. Afghanistan is the largest recipient of
> Canadian overseas development aid and we fully support the continuation of
> that funding - outside of this mission.
>
> Thank you again for the time and effort you have taken to share your
> thoughts with me, and for bringing your opinion on this matter to my
> attention.
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> Paul Dewar, MP Ottawa Centre
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com]
> Sent: May 16, 2006 8:13 PM
> To: Allen, Mike - M.P.; rcastrocalvo@yahoo.com; irislana@hotmail.com;
> Angus, Charlie - M.P.; Atamanenko, Alex - M.P.; Bell, Catherine - M.P.;
> Bevington, Dennis - M.P.; Black, Dawn - M.P.; Blaikie, Bill - M.P.;
> Charlton, Chris - M.P.; Chow, Olivia - M.P.; Christopherson, David - M.P.;
> Comartin, Joe - M.P.; Crowder, Jean - M.P.; Cullen, Nathan - M.P.; Davies,
> Libby - M.P.; Dewar, Paul - M.P.; Julian, Peter - M.P.; Marston, Wayne -
> M.P.; Martin, Pat D. - M.P.; Martin, Tony - M.P.; Masse, Brian - M.P.;
> Mathyssen, Irene - M.P.; Nash, Peggy - M.P.; Priddy, Penny - M.P.; Savoie,
> Denise - M.P.; Siksay, Bill - M.P.; Wasylycia-Leis, Judy - M.P.; Emerson,
> David - M.P.
> Cc: Simms, Scott - M.P.; Russell, Todd - M.P.; Manning, Fabian - M.P.;
> Hearn, Loyola - M.P.; Doyle, Norman - M.P.; Byrne, Gerry - M.P.; McGuire,
> Joe - M.P.; MacAulay, Lawrence - M.P.; D'Amours, Jean-Claude - M.P.;
> Hubbard, Charles - M.P.; Murphy, Brian - M.P.; Thibault, Robert - M.P.;
> Savage, Michael - M.P.; Regan, Geoff - M.P.; Keddy, Gerald - M.P.; Eyking,
> Mark - M.P.; Cuzner, Rodger - M.P.; Brison, Scott - M.P.
> Subject: Portions of wiretap tapes to impeach George W. Bush and put a
> stop Harper's motion tommorrow
>
>
> Hey
> Before all the Parliamentarians argue and then vote to support
> further Canadian deaths in one of George W. Bush's Wars for Global Control
> for the benefit of his corporate cohorts perhaps, you should at least
> listen
> to the attachments if you do not wish to bother to read what Billy Casey
> and
> the Bankers got on May 12th. If I can assist in preventing the demise of
> just one more Canadian warrior in a malicious foreign war, all of my work
> will have been worth it EH?
> If everyone ignores me as usual, I will not be surprised. At
> least I will sleep well with my conscience tonight because I know I have
> done my very best to stop the nonsense since early 2002 long before the War
> in Iraq began. None of you deserve to sleep well at all because you all
> supported Harper's orders to send our people to war even before the 39th
> Parliament sat this year. As far as I am concerned the blood of four very
> honourable soldiers can be found on your hands. Shame on all of you for not
> even bothering to honour our dead by lowering the flag on the Peacetower.
> As
> long as I have been aware and could consider myself a Proad Canadian, I
> thought we were peacekeepers rather than poorly paid hired guns for crooked
> corporations, corrupt politicians and their wicked Yankee bible pounding
> buddies.
> Veritas Vincit
> David
> Raymond Amos
>
>
> FEDERAL EXPRESS February 7, 2006
>
> Senator Arlen Specter
> United States Senate
> Committee on the Judiciary
> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
> Washington, DC 20510
>
> Dear Mr. Specter:
>
> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man named,
> David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters raised in
> the
> attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI
> wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this
> previously.
>
> Very truly yours,
> Barry A. Bachrach
> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>
>
> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Jumping Jimmy Flaherty's jump boots versus Crosbie's old
> mukluks in a liberal Senate
> To: Grant.GARNEAU@gnb.ca, Russell_Feingold@feingold.senate.gov,
> duffy@ctv.ca, tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com,
> Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us, Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us,
> Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us, Kandalaw@mindspring.com, kmdickson@comcast.net,
> trvl@hotmail.com, patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov, fbinhct@leo.gov,
> oldmaison@yahoo.com, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, michael.malley@gnb.ca,
> EGreenspan@144king.com, josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.ca,
> alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca, ted.tax@justice.gc.ca,
> Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca, racing.commission@state.ma.us, dwatch@web.net,
> freeman.c@parl.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, graham.b@parl.gc.ca,
> arthur.a@parl.gc.ca
> CC: nwnews@cknw.com, davidamos@bsn1.net, BBACHRACH@bowditch.com,
> david.allgood@rbc.com, mackay.p@parl.gc.ca, stronach.b@parl.gc.ca,
> moore.r@parl.gc.ca, thompson.g@parl.gc.ca, toews.v@parl.gc.ca,
> day.s@parl.gc.ca, casey.b@parl.gc.ca, mlevine@goodmans.ca,
> brae@goodmans.ca,
> steve.moate@utoronto.ca, sarah.mann@rci.rogers.com, rep@karenyarbrough.com,
> dc@thepen.us, paul.neuman@asm.ca.gov, info@afterdowningstreet.org,
> gearpigs@hotmail.com, alltrue@nl.rogers.com, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca
>
> Deja Vu Anyone? Anyone?
> That's what John Crosbie wore in 1979, the last time a budget brought
> down
> a Canadian government in a minority-Parliament situation. It proved to be a
> bad omen, given that the Conservative government of the day foundered on
> Crosbie's document.
> The mukluks proved to be
>

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please Leave Comments here