Wednesday, 21 August 2013

CBC says A Neo-Nazi estate dispute will be overseen by two Jewish groups and a very corrupt Attorney General???

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 21:21:07 -0300
Subject: CBC says A Neo-Nazi estate dispute will be overseen by two
Jewish groups and a very corrupt Attorney General???
To: tlsoontiens@stewartmckelvey.com, bdysart
<bdysart@stewartmckelvey.com>, bdysart <bdysart@smss.com>, nrubin
<nrubin@stewartmckelvey.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "marie-claude.blais"
<marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>, "richard.cohen"
<richard.cohen@splcenter.org>, "Richard.Williams"
<Richard.Williams@gnb.ca>

http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/case-dossier/info/sum-som-eng.aspx?cas=31693

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Britt Dysart <bdysart@stewartmckelvey.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:21:17 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: CBC says A Neo-Nazi estate dispute will be
overseen by two Jewish groups and a very corrupt Attorney General???
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I am out of the office in meetings much of today, and will not have
regular access to my email or voicemail during this time. Please
contact my assistant,Sonja at 506-443-9942 and she will direct your
inquiry. Otherwise, I will contact you upon my return .


***********************************
This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is
confidential and may be privileged. Any unauthorized
distribution or disclosure is prohibited. Disclosure
to anyone other than the intended recipient does not
constitute waiver of privilege. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete it and
any attachments from your computer system and records.
-----------------------------------
Ce courriel (y compris les pièces jointes) est
confidentiel et peut être privilégié. La distribution
ou la divulgation non autorisée de ce courriel est
interdite. Sa divulgation à toute personne autre que son
destinataire ne constitue pas une renonciation de
privilège. Si vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur,
veuillez nous aviser et éliminer ce courriel, ainsi que
les pièces jointes, de votre système informatique et de
vos dossiers.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Teri Soontiens <tlsoontiens@stewartmckelvey.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:21:23 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: CBC says A Neo-Nazi estate dispute will be
overseen by two Jewish groups and a very corrupt Attorney General???
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I will be out of the office the afternoon of Wednesday, August 21,
2013. If your matter is urgent, please contact Chantal MacAusland at
cdmacausland@stewartmckelvey.com.


***********************************
This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is
confidential and may be privileged. Any unauthorized
distribution or disclosure is prohibited. Disclosure
to anyone other than the intended recipient does not
constitute waiver of privilege. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete it and
any attachments from your computer system and records.
-----------------------------------
Ce courriel (y compris les pièces jointes) est
confidentiel et peut être privilégié. La distribution
ou la divulgation non autorisée de ce courriel est
interdite. Sa divulgation à toute personne autre que son
destinataire ne constitue pas une renonciation de
privilège. Si vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur,
veuillez nous aviser et éliminer ce courriel, ainsi que
les pièces jointes, de votre système informatique et de
vos dossiers.



From: Charles LeBlond <cleblond@stewartmckelvey.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:10:39 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: CBC says A Neo-Nazi estate dispute will be
overseen by two Jewish groups and a very corrupt Attorney General???
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I will be out of the office until Monday, August 26, 2013. I will
have limted acess to emails. For immediate assistance, please contact
my assistant Teri at tlsoontiens@stewartmckelvey.com.
Je serai absent du bureau jusqu'au 26 août, 2013. J'aurai un accès
limité à mes courriels. Pour une aide immédiate, communiquez avec mon
assistante Teri à tlsoontiens@stewartmckelvey.com.
.


***********************************
This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is
confidential and may be privileged. Any unauthorized
distribution or disclosure is prohibited. Disclosure
to anyone other than the intended recipient does not
constitute waiver of privilege. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete it and
any attachments from your computer system and records.
-----------------------------------
Ce courriel (y compris les pièces jointes) est
confidentiel et peut être privilégié. La distribution
ou la divulgation non autorisée de ce courriel est
interdite. Sa divulgation à toute personne autre que son
destinataire ne constitue pas une renonciation de
privilège. Si vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur,
veuillez nous aviser et éliminer ce courriel, ainsi que
les pièces jointes, de votre système informatique et de
vos dossiers.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:10:30 +0000
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

johnhugheslawoffice@nb.aibn.com

Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the
server for the recipient domain nb.aibn.com by mx.bellaliant.com.
[4.59.182.109].

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 21:10:29 -0300
Subject: CBC says A Neo-Nazi estate dispute will be overseen by two
Jewish groups and a very corrupt Attorney General???
To: johnhugheslawoffice@nb.aibn.com, gleblanc
<gleblanc@coxandpalmer.com>, cleblond@smss.com,
MLaHood@ccrjustice.org, Marissam <Marissam@yahoo-inc.com>,
"ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca" <ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca>, radical
<radical@radicalpress.com>, "t.wilson" <t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
sdllaw@gmail.com, ahussain@ccrjustice.org, lgazzola@ccrjustice.org,
pastorscott <pastorscott@redemptiongate.org>, mratner
<mratner@ccrjustice.org>, "Fred.Wyshak" <Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov>,
"justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "marco.morency"
<marco.morency@petitcodiac.org>, marc <marc@lemire.com>,
"marc.garneau.a1" <marc.garneau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "gregory.craig"
<gregory.craig@skadden.com>, "gregor.robertson"
<gregor.robertson@vancouver.ca>, "George.Soros"
<George.Soros@opensocietyfoundations.org>, sbell
<sbell@nationalpost.com>, Mark.Potok@splcenter.org, sfogel@cija.ca,
iwhitehall@plaideurs.ca, pgladman@bnaibrith.ca,
ABromberg@bnaibrith.ca, rmarceau@cija.ca, pam.maceachern@nelligan.ca,
rdholmes@mhklaw.com, Nancy.brooks@blakes.com, paul.schabas@blakes.com,
echerniak@lerners.ca, richard.cohen@splcenter.org,
henry.brown@gowlings.com, staleyr@bennettjones.ca, dodged
<dodged@bennettjones.com>, phoward <phoward@stikeman.com>,
paul@paulfromm.com, Morris.Dees@splcenter.org, jsaikaley@plaideurs.ca,
"michael.coren" <michael.coren@sunmedia.ca>
Cc: "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "bernadine.chapman"
<bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "john.warr"
<john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "roger.l.brown"
<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Ian.Shardlow"
<Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>, "danny.copp" <danny.copp@fredericton.ca>,
"Leanne.Fitch" <Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>

Well who gets to oversee the malicious actions of the Attorney General?

Methinks it must be mean old me. Its a dirty job but soembody has to
do it. What say you? Please check the pdf file hereto attached and
argue me in writing if ya dare.

The Chaisson lawyer is a partner in McInnes and Cooper thus he and his
partners have had Hard Copy of some of my concerns about illegal
probate actions practiced against the courts by lawyers for many
years. According to the CROWN Corp known as the CBC(They would not
conceal awful truths would they?) Chaisson dismissed Hughes'
suggestion that the Southern Poverty Law Centre is pulling strings as
"a conspiracy theory." "Where is the evidence? You can't just come to
court and throw wild
accusations like that without any shred of evidence," said Chiasson.

Well trust that I have LOTS of evidence of conspiriacies practiced by
the Southern Poverty Law Center and legions of others that Chaisson
and his fellow lawyers should have disclosed to John Hughes by now.
Perhaps John Hughes should ignore his golfing buddies and finally call
me back. He and I should bury the hachet and he should simply quit
bullshitting me and ask me nicely for an affidavit and invite me to
court on September 10th. The amount being argued within the McCorkell
estate is chump change to me. However the Free Speech issues and the
right to privacy without state intervening on behalf of unethicial
"civil rights" groups certainly is not.

The awful truth is the Attorney General is an elected public official.
The Blais lawyer from Moncton was appointed by her mindless party
leader David Alward to uphold the law not to break it for the benefit
of greedy Yankees. The self appointed Jewish Groups who claim to be
the gusrfians of our civil rights are no such thing that task belongs
to our Justice officials. The Jewish groups should have had no
standing in the mcCorkell matter whatsoever.Hell even Canadian Jewish
lawyers such as Ezzy Baby Levant and Karen Selick agreed with me very
publicly. To watch a corrupt Attorney General and her mindless minions
side with a couple of sneaky Yankee lawyers was truly comical indeed
but to see the Court of the Queen's Bench allow the nonsense of it all
was way beyond ridiculous.

How will the ordinary folk of New Brunswick have any idea what joke
the province may become over this frivolous action if the CBC and
their media buddies do not duly inform them of all sides of the matter
instead of merely slandering people. How many taxpayers dollars have
been spent already on secretive ex RCMP private investigators and the
less that useles litigation team? It had not escaped my notice that
many bloggers etc are not so easily fooled by the Corporate Media. Try
Googling mccorkell new brunswick sometime to see how much of a joke
Maritimers have already become no thanks to Attorney General Blais and
her minions.

Moncton's former city solicitor John Hughes should not have ignored me
years ago so I am not surprised that he ignored once again recently.

The amount of money he wants to argue before the Supreme Court is the
smallest that I have ever seen.

http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/case-dossier/info/sum-som-eng.aspx?cas=31693

Trust that the pdf file hereto attached proves that I could make
Hughes a very wealthy man if he were even remotely ethical and his
friend Attorney General Blais and her boss Stephen Harper know it.

Its just like I hinted in an email to the Yankee lawyer/preacher
Scotty Baby Lively who is also battling the same SPLC dudes that I
published early this morning before I heard the news today. In my
humble opinion Mr Streed should use his rights in the US of A and sue
everyone of the nastyCanadian bastards ASAP in a US District Court
pursuant to US Title 42 Section 1982. If they wish to attack him he
should at least get to pick the turf.

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/the-snobby-lawyerpreacher-scotty-lively.html

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2013/07/31/nb-neo-nazi-mccorkell-estate.html

Hughes contends the Southern Poverty Law Centre is behind the whole
matter and recruited her.

This is "a skillful operation by people who have done this many times,
not only to bankrupt their opponents, but to enrich their own
organization," he said.

But her lawyer dismissed Hughes's suggestion that the Southern Poverty
Law Centre is pulling strings as "a conspiracy theory."

"Where is the evidence? You can't just come to court and throw wild
accusations like that without any shred of evidence," said Chiasson.

How his client pays her legal bills is a matter of client-attorney
privilege, he said.

Judge ruled against cross-examination
Justice Peter Glennie ruled against allowing the cross-examination.

"Cross examination under these circumstances should not become an
application for discovery," he said.

The judge also ruled the temporary injunction should continue until
the hearing on Sept. 10.

"I can't see any good coming out of this," said Chiasson, referring to
the estate going to the National Alliance. "Only evil would come from
that."

Just in case folks think I don't understand the scene laid out above
pehaps they should checkout a letter an evil Special Agent of the US
Treasury Dept wrote me long ago.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ne8Q7TeybUc/SFNyAJCln9I/AAAAAAAABE8/seWnLXU8YMU/s1600-h/IRS.jpg

Or find some fun in reading illegal ex parte documents filed by the US
Attorney in Beantown in order to try to protect his beloved Cardinal
Bernard Francis Law's evil arse.
They begin around page 100 of this file.

http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf

(Wanna see more? Trust that I have lots more All ya gotta do is surf the web)

How about how I used US Title 42 to defend my dumb arse agains the
Janet Reno's pal the VERY VERY EVIL Yankee lesbian Judge Sidney Hanlon
in 2004? Everything Hanlon did against me was ex parte and VERY
ILLEGAL.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1982

42 USC § 1982 - Property rights of citizens

US CodeNotesUpdatesAuthorities (CFR)Current through Pub. L. 113-21.
(See Public Laws for the current Congress.)

All citizens of the United States shall have the same right, in every
State and Territory, as is enjoyed by white citizens thereof to
inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal
property.

Source

(R.S. § 1978.)
Codification


R.S. § 1978 derived from act Apr. 9, 1866, ch. 31, § 1,14 Stat. 27.
Section was formerly classified to section 42 of Title 8, Aliens and
Nationality.


http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/02/november-05-2004-legal-talk-text-of.html

THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
THE TRIAL COURT
DORCHESTER, SS.
DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT
THE COMMONWEALTH OF )
MASSACHUSETTS )
CRIMINAL ACTION
)
DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623
v . )
)
DAVID R. AMOS )
)
AFFIDAVIT OF DAVID R. AMOS
Now comes, David R. Amos, a Citizen of Canada and a Legal
Permanent Resident of the USA and asserts his Constitutional Rights
pursuant to Title 42 Sections 1981, 1982, 1985 and 1986 of the Federal
Code and freely swears under the penalties of perjury that the
following statements are true and to the best of his knowledge.

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Attorney+General+Janet+Reno+Opens+New+Dorchester+Domestic+Violence...-a065078979

United States Attorney General Janet Reno came to Boston today to
announce the opening of the new Dorchester District Court Domestic
Violence Session, under a Department of Justice grant given to Boston.
The Judicial Oversight Demonstration Initiative (JOD) grant is for $7
million over five years, contingent on continued Congressional
appropriations.

Judge Sydney Hanlon, presiding judge of the Dorchester District Court,
will run the new domestic violence session. The domestic violence
court session will conduct arraignments, bail hearings, probation
surrenders, and probation reviews. It will also hear all ex parte and
contested civil restraining orders.

http://www.mass.gov/courts/appealscourt/justices/hanlon.html

http://wikiworldbook.com/global-address-book/Sidney-Hanlon


BTW lots of people hate lots of other people it is not illegal in most
places that are blessed with common sense. However with the right to
Free Speech come responsibility. Freedom has its limits in a
purportedly "Just" Society. Free Speech does not give one the licence
to injure others with your mouth or pen.

R. v. Lucas, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 439 is the leading Supreme Court of
Canada decision on defamatory libel. The Court held that the freedom
of expression under Section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms is subject to the "reasonable limits prescribed by law" set
out in Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.


Hell some offences come with quite a price tag in the British
Commonwealth. For instance libel and hate speech are illegal under the
Canadian Criminal Code Check Sections 300 and 319 if you don't believe
mean old me.

http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/page-150.html#docCont

http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/page-155.html#h-92

For instance the Jewish lawyer Ezzy Baby Levant can have fun preaching
hate on Corporate TV against fools as Arty Topham and legions of
mindless anarchists but just like all of you Ezzy dares not to even
breathe my name over the public airwaves if he wishes to keep his job.
This is a comical video.

http://canadianhumanrightscommission.blogspot.ca/2012/11/muslim-hate-speech-and-authur-topham.html

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=1411

The wacko Arthur Topham that Ezzy Bay speaks of quite simply does not
know when to shut up. Even while he is being prosecuted under Section
319 and after his strange lawyer Dougy Christie has shit the bed Arty
baby continues to hang himself with his own words. Look what the evil
bastard publishes about a Jewish lady lawyer just because he did not
like her opinion of Southern Poverty Law Center's nasty actions
against the McCorkell estate.

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=3081

However if you think Arty Topham and his Hitler worshipers are bad,
trust that you ain't seen nothing yet. Check out Ezzy Levant's # 1 fan
and fellow zionist. Ask yourself howcome Mr Baconfat can get away with
publishing such evil things about the Canadian Human Rights
Commissioners and many others for years?

http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2009/06/welcome-to-alberta-human-rights.html

http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2009/06/jennifer-lynchfuck-you.html

http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2009/06/people-to-steal-your-rights-want-to.html

http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2009_06_01_archive.html

http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2009/07/welcome-to-inquistion.html

Better yet howcome Arty Topham is too afraid to defend himself from Mr Baconfat?

Howcome Byron Prior is not allowed to?

http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2009/10/byronprioreuthenasia-lobotomy.html

Friday, October 9, 2009
ByronPrior...euthenasia, lobotomy?
As I research the Byron Prior story it seems like a tragedy that could
only happen in Newfoundland . Byron Prior's siblings has been abused
by generations of his own parents. Such abuse tolerated and enabled by
Bryron Prior's father, and by the entire community from which he is
from. That is the crime here. It would surprise me to find out that
either Byron or one of his siblings is or was the product of incest.

Arthur Topham has writen this about the Byron Prior case with the
assistance and consent of Audrey Prior, Byron Prior's wife.

On March 28th of this year (2009) I received a short email from Byron
Prior, an associate out in Newfoundland, who I have been in email
contact with for a number of years. His case, as explained in the
websites listed in his email below, is most likely one of the best
examples of the power of the provincial and federal courts, aided and
abetted by a complicit media, to shield themselves and their political
cohorts from the scrutiny of public investigation. Byron's case is a
classic, albeit a relatively unknown one, that epitomizes the level of
corruption which exists within Canada's politically biased judicial
system and how that system becomes criminal itself in its overt and
covert methodologies used to shield the perpetrators of sexual abuse.

When people of power are accused of wrongdoing and there is good
reason for inquiries to be held then those in such positions exploit
their influence for their own self-serving benefit and to the
detriment of our justice system as a whole.

Byron Prior's case, like my own fight with B'nai Brith Canada and the
Canadian Human Rights Commission, is purposely kept hidden in the
twilight and shadows constructed by the Zionist-controlled mainstream
media. Our situations are quite different in terms of the underlying
reasons for the persecutions we face but the fact that the system
itself is abusing us both is beyond question. In my case the "crime"
is speaking the truth as I see it about the Rothschild Zionist global
conspiracy.

In Byron's case the circumstances are far beyond anything so
threatening as the intellectual attack that I am being subjected to by
the state and its Zionist manipulators. His story is a macabre horror
story compared to my own, the details of which would provide ample
subject matter for a full length documentary. The reaction, by
Canada's legal system, to his noble and sincere efforts to gain both
recognition and justice are frightening and ominous.

We have heard Dean Roger Ray tell everyone that freemasons raped Byron
Prior's sister. He has told us the "cover-up"has been perpertrated, by
freemasons, Jesuits, and the illuminati. Now conspiracy retard Arthur
Topham claims kinship with Byron Prior and the involvment of the
"State" and the "Zionists" in his "case" and the Byron Prior tragedy.

Last evening over drinks at "a faculty club" at the U of A, I asked
two members to the Faculty of Law if they knew anything of Mr. Priors
case. Both relied NOTHING other than two "Charter issues" that have
recently dealt with by the Newfoundland Supreme Court . Indeed he was
exculpated and acquitted. None ofus are sure exactly why

Mr.Prior's sexual assault allegations were fully investigated and that
there was NOT enough evidence to lay charges...especially considering
the time that has elapsed. As I understand it ...there is NO legal
means given the lack of evidence to compel Mr. Hickman to provide a
DNA sample. In fact his CharterRights preclude that. That begs the
question are Mr. Priors Charter Rights more important or relevant than
Mr. Hickman's?

So what is justice here? Mr. Hickman ought not be compelled to provide
body samples merely because Byron prior accuses his of something
without evidece, reseasonable or probable cause.There appears to be NO
FACTS in this matter, no evidence to compel further proceedings.

So now with Byron Priors ecouragement the conspiracy constitency has
embraced his cause. The Zionists are to blame, the freemasons raped
his sister ad nauseum...whereas the only conspiracy I see.....is in
Byron Prior's community and his family...they have alll covered up
this disgusting, inhuman incestuous abuse for generations .

Byron Prior is obviously insane ..after all this who wouldn't be...he
should provide the evidence of his allegations to compel a DNA sample
...simply accept the fact there are no legal grounds to forciably
obtain one.

Byron Prior has made a bargain with the devil embracing conspiracy
retards.....he should just put in a deep dark hole.


Posted by Seren at 5:02 AM

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/05/nfld-whistleblower-dodges-libel-charge.html

Truth matters
Defamation law that ignores truth ruled unconstitutional
Peter Walsh - The Telegram (St. John's, NFLD)
Tuesday, May 6

The Supreme Court of Newfoundland has ruled a law that could send
someone to prison for defamation is unconstitutional.

Justice Lois Hoegg made the decision Friday. Her ruling also struck
down a criminal case by Crown prosecutors against Byron Prior of Grand
Bank.

Prior claims that in 1966, a justice official in the province raped
and impregnated one of his relatives. Crown attorneys say Prior wore
placards and distributed flyers which published the allegations.

The Royal Newfoundland Constabulary interviewed Prior's relative in
2004 and in 2007, but the alleged victim denied she had been sexually
assaulted or that she even knew the person Prior said had attacked
her.

Crown prosecutors tried to convict Prior of defamation under Section
301 of the Criminal Code, which says "everyone who publishes a
defamatory libel is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to
imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years."

The problem is, Hoegg said, the Crown couldn't prove that Prior was
knowingly spreading lies.

"I find that it is not justified, in our free and democratic society,
for the Crown to use the heavy hammer of the criminal law against a
subject for publishing defamatory libel when the Crown is not able to
show that the subject knows that his statements are false.

"The expression of truthful, unpopular or even false statements
deserve protection unless expressed in a violent manner," wrote Hoegg.

Hoegg said if the Crown could prove Prior knowingly published
defamatory libel, it would have charged him under a different section
of the criminal code that says "everyone who publishes a defamatory
libel that he knows is false is guilty of an indictable offence and
liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years."

That law has withheld court challenges. Section 301 - the law which
does not mention the matter of truth - has been struck down as
unconstitutional by three other superior courts in Canada.

"The sections catch different types of offender. To me, it naturally
follows that their purpose or objectives must be different," wrote
Hoegg. "I then determined that the objective (of Section 301) was not
so pressing and important as to override freedom of expression. The
section is offensive to modern day notions of justice."

The decision only applies to criminal applications of defamation law.
Hoegg said Prior could possibly be sued in civil court over his
allegations.

Three years ago, a federal politician filed a statement of claim in
the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador to have a website that
contained allegations about him by Prior removed. In the statement,
the politician said a website posted by Prior accuses him and other
prominent Newfoundlanders of wrongdoing.

A website containing the allegations is still active ( see 1). Prior
claims to be a victim of physical and sexual abuse.

pwalsh@thetelegram.com 709-364-2323

Dan F said...

2005 01 T 0010

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRIAL DIVISION
BETWEEN:

WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF
AND:
BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT

AND BETWEEN:
BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFF
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN SECOND DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: THOMAS MARSHALL THIRD DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: DANNY WILLIAMS FOURTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS FIFTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: JOHN CROSBIE SIXTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: PATTERSON PALMER SEVENTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

SUMMARY OF CURRENT DOCUMENT

Court File Number(s):2005 01 T 0010

Date of Filing of Document: 25 January 2005

Name of Filing Party or Person: Stephen J. May

Application to which Document being filed relates: Amended
Application of the Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim to maintain an
Order
restricting publication, to strike portions of the Statement of
Defence, strike the Counterclaim in it's entirety, and to refer this
proceeding to case management.

Statement of purpose in filing: To maintain an Order restricting
publication, to strike portions of the Statement of Defence, strike
the Counterclaim in its entirety and refer this proceeding to case
management.

A F F I D A V I T

I, Stephen J. May, of the City of St. John's, in the Province of
Newfoundland and Labrador, Barrister and Solicitor, make oath and
say as follows:

THAT I am a Partner in the St. John's office of PATTERSON PALMER
solicitors for William Matthews, the Member of Parliament for
Random-Burin-St. George's in the Parliament of Canada.

THAT Mr. Matthews originally retained Mr. Edward Roberts, Q.C. on
or about 30 April 2002 after Mr. Byron Prior, the Defendant/Plaintiff
by
Counterclaim, had made allegations against Mr. Matthews in a
publication called "My Inheritance - The truth - Not Fiction: A Town
with a Secret". In that publication, the allegation was made that Mr.
Matthews had had sex with a girl who had been prostituted by her
mother. That girl was alleged to have been Mr. Prior's sister.

THAT upon being retained, Mr. Edward Roberts wrote a letter to Mr.
Prior. That letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit "1" to my
Affidavit.

THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts' letter to Mr. Prior, Mr. Roberts
received a 1 May 2002 e-mail from Mr. Prior. That e-mail is attached
as Exhibit "2".

THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts receipt of the e-mail, Mr. Prior
swore an Affidavit acknowledging that what had been said in that
publication was false. That Affidavit is attached as Exhibit "3" to my
Affidavit.
Following Mr. Roberts' receipt of that Affidavit, Mr. Matthews
advised that he was satisfied not to pursue the matter any further and
our firm closed our file.

THAT on or about 25 October 2004, I was retained by Mr. Matthews
following his gaining knowledge that a web site, made a series of
allegations against him relating to my having sex with a girl of
approximately 12 years old through to an approximate age of 15 years
old. It also accused him of being a father of one of her children and
accused him of having raped that girl. Upon checking the web site I
saw that Byron Prior, the Defendant, had been identified as the
author of the material on the site.

THAT Mr. Matthews instructed me to write Mr. Prior, to remind him of
the fact that the allegations had been admitted to being false
through a 16 May 2002 Affidavit to advise him of Mr. Matthews'
intentions to commence legal proceedings if the comments were not
removed from the web site. A copy of my letter to Mr. Prior is
attached as Exhibit "4" to this Affidavit.

THAT I attach as Exhibit "5" a transcript from a 5 November 2004
voicemail left by David Amos, identified in the voicemail as a
friend of Mr. Prior.

THAT I attach as Exhibit "6" a portion of a 6 November 2004 e-mail
from Mr. Amos.

THAT until I received his voicemail and e-mail, I had never heard
of Mr. Amos.

THAT Mr. Amos has continued to send me e-mail since his 5 November
e-mail. Including his 6 November 2004 e-mail, I have received a
total of 15 e-mails as of 23 January 2005. All do not address Mr.
Matthews' claim or my involvement as Mr. Matthews' solicitor. I attach
as Exhibit "7" a portion of a 12 January 2005 e-mail that Mr. Amos
sent to me but originally came to my attention through Ms. Lois Skanes
whose firm had received a copy. This e-mail followed the service of
the Statement of Claim on 11 January 2005 on Mr. Prior. I also attach
as Exhibit "8" a copy of a 19 January 2005 e-mail from Mr. Amos.

THAT I attach as Exhibit "9" a copy of a 22 November 2004 letter
addressed to me from Edward Roberts, the Lieutenant Governor of
Newfoundland and Labrador covering a 2 September 2004 letter from Mr.
Amos addressed to John Crosbie, Edward Roberts, in his capacity as
Lieutenant Governor, Danny Williams, in his capacity as Premier of
Newfoundland and Labrador, and Brian F. Furey, President of the Law
Society of Newfoundland and Labrador. I requested a copy of this
letter from Government House after asking Mr. Roberts if he had
received any correspondence from Mr. Amos during his previous
representation of Mr. Matthews. He advised me that he received a
letter since becoming Lieutenant Governor, portions of which involved
his representation of Mr. Matthews. Mr. Roberts' letter also covered
his reply to Mr. Amos.

THAT I attach as Exhibit "10" an e-mail from Mr. Amos received on
Sunday, 23 January 2005.

THAT I swear this Affidavit in support of the Application to strike
Mr. Prior's counterclaim.

SWORN to before me at
St. John's, Province of Newfoundland and Labrador this 24th day of
January, 2005.

Signed by Della Hart
STEPHEN J. MAY
Signature STAMP
DELLA HART
A Commissioner for Oaths in and for
the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador. My commission expires
on December 31, 2009

May 9, 2008 at 11:24 PM


David Raymond Amos said...

Nighty night Danny Doy. Trust that you Fake Left Dudes know less
than nothing about Byron Prior and whatever I learned it was byway of
the school of hard knocks. With luck you are about to get one too
Danny Boy.

Heres hoping I will see your local heroes T.J. Burke and Chucky
Leblanc in court soon let me know if your school gives ya the boot
will ya? I need a good laugh. I am feeling as mean as a snake Werner
lost three cattle just this week like you give a good god damn EH?


http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2013/08/21/nb-neo-nazi-will.html

Neo-Nazi estate dispute to be overseen by Jewish groups

Two Jewish groups and New Brunswick attorney general to weigh in on case
CBC News Posted: Aug 21, 2013 10:36 AM AT

Three outside groups will be allowed to weigh in on a legal dispute
over a New Brunswick man's estimated $250,000 estate being left to an
American neo-Nazi group.

Robert McCorkill died in 2004, leaving $250,000 in artifacts and
investments to the National Alliance, a white supremacist group in the
United States.

Robert McCorkill lived in Saskatoon and Ottawa before moving to Saint
John, where he died in 2004. (Southern Poverty Law Center)McCorkill's
sister, Isabelle McCorkill, wants the will quashed and filed an
injunction last month.

When the matter goes to court in September, two prominent Jewish
groups and the provincial attorney general will join her side.

Anita Bromberg is the head of legal affairs with B'nai Brith Canada —
one of three groups granted intervener status in the McCorkill case.

She said neo-Nazi beliefs are on the rise in Europe and a six figure
gift to the National Alliance could breathe life into the movement
here.

"There's still an attraction to this philosophy, and to revive it is a
dangerous concept," she said.

B'nai Brith will be joined by the Centre for Israel and Jewish
Affairs, another of the interveners.

Richard Marceau, the general counsel for the Centre for Israel and
Jewish Affairs, shares Bromberg's concerns.

"The National Alliance is much weaker than it was in the past and we
don't want to take any chances of money breathing new life into it,"
he said.

The province of New Brunswick, represented by the attorney general,
will also have standing at next month's hearing.

All the interveners will be able to make submissions, trying to
convince the court to wipe away McCorkill's will.

The lawyer representing the interests of the National Alliance did not
object to any of the group's weighing in.

Rare coins, ancient weapons collection
The collection includes Greek and Roman coins that are thousands of
years old, an ancient Iranian sword, Neolithic arrowheads and an
Egyptian stone tablet from the 13th Dynasty, according to a 55-page
appraiser's report from August 2010.

McCorkill was born in 1937, the son of a farmer in Bearbrook, Ontario.

He became a chemist and lived in Saskatoon in the 1990s, when he
joined the National Alliance.

The University of Saskatchewan's Museum of Antiquities was lent a
portion of his coin collection and put it on display for several
years.

When McCorkill moved to Ottawa around 2000, he took his collection
with him. Some of his artifacts remain on loan to the University of
Ottawa's Museum of Classical Antiquities.

He's buried in Saint John's Fernhill Cemetery

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please Leave Comments here