Saturday, 13 July 2013

Need I say I laughed my arse off to watch Ezzy Baby Levant and Faith Goldy of Sun Media bitch about the profoundly snobby liberal arsehole commonly known Clayton Ruby?

From: "Andrews, Phil" <>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 15:41:57 -0400
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Need I say I laughed my arse off to
watch Ezzy Baby Levant and Faith Goldy of Sun Media bitch about the
profoundly snobby liberal arsehole commonly known Clayton Ruby?
To: David Amos <>

I will be out of the office until Monday, July 15. If you're sending
invoices, columns or freelance submissions/pitches, please forward
them to and to
After hours, try our news desk at 519-823-6060.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 16:41:49 -0300
Subject: Need I say I laughed my arse off to watch Ezzy Baby Levant
and Faith Goldy of Sun Media bitch about the profoundly snobby liberal
arsehole commonly known Clayton Ruby?
To:,,,,,, "tim.hudakco"
<>,, "greg.weston"
<>,, pandrews
Cc: David Amos <>,,
"" <>, mayor_ford

Hey Deputy Mayor HolyDay

If you are an ethical soul Perhaps you should ask McGuinty's former
assistant running in an different byelection some very serious
questions about the documents that came with this email email to his
boss before I opted to send himRegistered US Mail in 2005. if you were
truly wise you would call me ASAP after you scroll down to see what I
sent your buddy Mayor Ford if he dd not tell you about it already.

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 8:25 PM
Subject: You can't fool me McGuinty I'm too stupid

You lawyers are all the same but at least you can never say that you
didn't know. I will call and leave a message with my cell phone I will
have proof of that contact as well.

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 5:30 PM
Subject: Fw: FYI I just called

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 5:02 PM
Subject: Fw: FYI I just called

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 4:50 PM
Subject: FYI I just called

You are way past too late act ethical now

I will offer a brief explaination of the emails found below to Deputy
Mayor Holyday and all the other canidates in the current by elections
in Ontario..

For the Public Record the copies of the emails exchanges I had in 2004
with the left wing wacko of called a lawyer by the name of Clayton
Ruby and his cohorts were served on me by the the Masschusetts Suffolk
Country Assistant District Attorney Alica McDonell in November of 2004
in front of a judge in the Dorchester District Court during a suppoed
"Pre Trial" Conferance of DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623.

The emails had been edited and then forwarded to the mindless lawyer
Angel Troccoli by her client Norfolks County Deputy Sheriff Robert F.
O'Meara. Even though O'Meara is my brother in law my family and I had
not been in direct comminication with him since 2002 When he hired
lawyers to attack our rights and interests I communicated only with
his lawyers. In fact until the Suffolk County ADA serverd the
aforesaid documents about Claton Ruby and I on me we did not even know
O'Mear's email address. However at the top of the documents served on
us during the heaing was his name and the email address he was
obviously using at the time. It was his girlfriend's email address

As soon as the ADA gaveme the documents I told I would gladly argue
every word but the Dorchester District Court did not have jurisdiction
to argue lawyers arguing within a
matter concerning ongoing Inquiry Commissioned by Canadian Parliament.
A Month earlier the Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs had served
upon me a document signed by Judge Sidney Hanlon claiming many
falshoods but the funniest statement she made was the she did not
believe that I was running for a seat in the 38th Parliament when the
Boston Police Dept and her clerks were trying make me stand before
her lowly sub municipal court to answer unnanamed charges with an
unsigned criminal complaint. When I asked the Boston Police
Commissioner and the Suffolk County District Attorney about the
obviuos malicious nonsense in June of 2004 they all played dumb and
claimed they were not involved. So I took my concerns about their
with the US Ambassdor, The Govern General, the New Brunseick Police
Commission, the Canadian Soliticitor General and many other Canadian
and Yankee law enforcement authorities as i continued to run in the
election of the 38th Parliament..Need I say that when I attempted to
remove the matter to the proper jusrdiction of US District Court most
of the documents filed in the docket of Dorchester District Court
disappeared and the clerks refused to give me attested copies of what
remained of it? However I still have my copies of all the docments.
and I will gleefully use them against Clayton Ruby anytime I wish
because the malice being practiced against my family and I is still
ongoing to this very day.

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369

PS Mayor Ford and his Deputy Mayor Holyday and now Wannabe MPP cannot
deny the obvious fact that I gave them a rather huge tip about Clayton
and his liberal cohorts acting against them last December. Then
reminded them that they owed me a favour when the Toronto Star and
very strange Yankee
Gossipers attacked him about the possibility of the Mayor smoking
crack. It was small wonder to me that Mayor Ford fied most of his
assistants when his
buddies in NewsTalk1o10 blocked my emails so I let legions of people
know that I had published my emails to Mayor Ford in a blog while
Yankees were trying
hard to by a questionable video for 200 grand or so in order to
embarass and Canadian Mayor. Perhaps the strange dudes in Gawker
should hve reviewed the
docuemts that I sent them for FREE years ago about their their own
Mayor Blomberg their Presidents Bush and Obama and their current
former Governors
amongt many other crooked Yankees before asking people for money to
buy a video from some chickenshit drug dealers in Canada so they could
make fun of
the dumb poltiicans in my nativeland..

The only thing I don't know right now is wheter or not Holyday knows
anything about any of this but his poltical boss Hudak should have
informed him not me.

Trust that Timmy Baby Hudak has been fully informed for years as he
supported McGuinty for reasons I that will NEVER understand. His
assistant called me
out of the blue after the writ was drropped for the last Gerenral
Election in Ontario. I was so disgusted i simply asked her if she and
her boss knew who to read

For Mr Holyday's benefit his is just a little proof of the two emails
I sent his boss Hudak and their buddies in Sun Media this year.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:21:10 -0400
Subject: The Sun Media constant yapping about Idle No More,
chickenshit cops and a possible Kathleen Wynne and Andrea Horwath
coalition caused me to think of the right wing wacko Karol Karolak and
his concerns about Indians etc
To:, palmater
<>, Jessica Hume
<>,,,, "tim.hudakco"
Cc: David Amos <>, "john.duncan.c2a"

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <>
To: "sandra" <>; <>;
"takhar" <>; "contact"
<>; "tim.hudakco" <>
Cc: "David Amos" <>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 9:19 PM
Subject: Fwd: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Cst Peddle ask
the nasty Newfy lawyer Tommy Boy Marshall why that is

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <>
To: <>; <>
Cc: "David Amos" <>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 8:46 PM
Subject: Fwd: I chuckled bigtime watching John Cook, Robyn DooLittle,
Ivor Tossell and Chris Waddell
talking on CBC about Mayor Ford and how the press often sits on things
and says nothing at all.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 14:52:42 -0300
Subject: JI chuckled bigtime watching John Cook, Robyn DooLittle, Ivor
Tossell and Chris Waddell talking on CBC about Mayor Ford and how the
press often sits on things and says nothing at all.
To: "greg.weston" <>,,,,,, pandrews
<>, "david.akin" <>,
andre <>,
Cc: David Amos <>, pm <>,
mayor_ford <>


I must say I find it strange that the Gawker boss
would fly to Canada to see a 2 minute video made
by a drug dealer that is purportedly about a Mayor
that must Yankees never heard of then try to raise a
100 grand to buy it/ Go figure what the gossipers
deem important while they ignore far more serious
things I gave them for free over two years ago.

Methinks I will call Alan Lenczner Mayor' Ford's
lawyer again. It would be too much fun not to.

Clearly he used my work or at least my name to
embarass the hell out Clayton Ruby and his liberal
cohorts whilst the press ignored everything as usual.

If it worked once it should work twice but this time
Ford will owe me a HUGE favour N'esy Pas?

In the "Mean" for your benefit perhaps the CROWN
should write a MOU between your mandate and I
ASAP EH Mr Harper?

Why should you nasty neo cons protect evil liberals
anymore??? I am certain Mayor Ford agrees that the
best defense id attack attack attack. If his lawyer does
not agree he can always fire him and hire a wiser one.

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:14:15 -0400
Subject: This email should make Clayton Ruby very nervous
To:,, pandrews
Cc:, David Amos <>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mayor Ford <>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:58:15 -0500
Subject: Re: I just called about the lawyer Clayton Ruby and his
sneaky liberal pals (Thank you from Mayor Rob Ford)
To: David Amos <>

Thank you for your email.

As I promised during the mayoralty election, I am dedicated to
delivering customer service excellence, creating a transparent and
accountable government, reducing the size and cost of government and
building a transportation city.

I will continue to work on behalf of the taxpayers to make sure you
get the respect you deserve.

This note is to confirm that we have received your email and that we
are looking into your matter.

Please feel free to follow up to check the status of your email.

Thanks again and have a great day.

Yours truly,

Mayor Rob Ford
City of Toronto

We're all in this together.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <>
To: <>; <>
Cc: <>; "David Amos" <>;
"pandrews" <>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 4:57 PM
Subject: I just called about the lawyer Clayton Ruby and his sneaky liberal

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <>
To: <>; <>; <>; "thunter"
<>; <>; <>;
Cc: <>; <>; "wrozeluk"
<>; "maritime_malaise" <>
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 5:56 PM
Subject: Fwd: Perhaps Deputy Minister John Adams of the CSE should teach
Wayne Boone and his professor pals how to read EH Rotten Ralphy?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "david.raymond.amos" <>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:20:42 -0400
Subject: Perhaps Deputy Minister John Adams of the CSE should teach
Wayne Boone and his professor pals how to read EH Rotten Ralphy?
Cc:, "john.adams" <>,,,,,,,,,

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Wayne_Boone <>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:51:21 -0500
Subject: RE: I noticed you report about Assange etc but not about my
friend Birgitta Jonsdottir Howcome?
To: David Amos <>

I am not certain why you sent this to me, David.

Wayne Boone CD PhD
Assistant Professor, Infrastructure Protection and International
Security (IPIS) Program
The Norman Paterson School of International Affairs (NPSIA)
Deputy Director, Canadian Centre of Intelligence and Security Studies
Room 1315 Dunton Tower
Tel: +1 613-520-2600 ext. 6672
Cell: +1 613 863-2993
Fax: +1 613-520-2889

-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos []
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 9:43 AM
Melissa_Haussman;; RICHARD_NIMIJEAN
Cc:;; danfour; plee;
Subject: Fwd: I noticed you report about Assange etc but not about my
friend Birgitta Jonsdottir Howcome?

From: David Amos <>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:33:32 -0400
Subject: Notice that I knew Assange before he got World Famous?
To: CLG_News <>

From: "Julian Assange)" <>
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 18:15:46 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Al Jazeera on Iceland's plan for a press safe haven

FYI: Al-Jazeera's take on Iceland's proposed media safe haven

More info

Julian Assange

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:00:16 -0400
Subject: I noticed you report about Assange etc but not about my
friend Birgitta Jonsdottir Howcome?
To: CLG_News <>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Birgitta Jonsdottir <>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 22:37:13 +0000
Subject: Re: RE Canada, the USA, Iceland, Wikileaks, IMMI and Bankers
etc the US Attorney Marc Litt no doubt remembers me EH Wendy?
To: David Amos <>

got your letter David
will try to find time to read all the information soon

all my best

On Jan 8, 2011, at 4:06 PM, David Amos wrote:

> --- On Fri, 1/7/11, Hancox, Rick (NBSC/CVMNB) <>
> wrote:
> From: Hancox, Rick (NBSC/CVMNB) <>
> Subject: Out of Office: FYI pursuant to the voicemails from Joyce I
> talked to her and Laura in Clarke's offices
> To: "David Amos" <>
> Received: Friday, January 7, 2011, 10:19 PM
> G'Day/Bonjour, Thanks for your e-mail. I am out of the office until
> Monday 10 January, at which time I should be able to respond to your
> email. If you need more immediate assistance, please call Gisele
> Allard at 506 658-2696. Thanks/Merci Rick
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <>
> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 14:19:39 -0800 (PST)
> Subject: FYI pursuant to the voicemails from Joyce I talked to her and
> Laura in Clarke's offices
> To:, pm <>,
>,, "Randy.McGinnis"
> <>,,
>, "rick. skinner" <>,
> <>,
> Cc:,,
>,, "jack.macdougall"
> <>,,
>, toewsv1 <>,
>, "Gilles. Blinn"
> <>, "gilles.moreau"
> <>
> --- On Fri, 1/7/11, David Amos <> wrote:
> From: David Amos <>
> Subject: I am on the phone to Mr Cullen right now
> To:
> Cc: "maritime_malaise" <>
> Received: Friday, January 7, 2011, 7:27 PM
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <>
> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 14:29:28 -0400
> Subject: Attn Rebbecca Regan 1 415 436 9333 ext 135
> To:,
> Cc: maritime_malaise <>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Facebook <>
> Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 04:35:07 -0800
> Subject: Birgitta Jonsdottir confirmed you as a friend on Facebook...
> To: David Raymond Amos <>
> Hi David,
> Birgitta confirmed you as a friend on Facebook.
> Thanks,
> The Facebook Team
> To view Birgitta's profile or write on her Wall, follow this link:
> =======================================
> This message was intended for If you do
> not wish to receive this type of email from Facebook in the future,
> please follow the link below to unsubscribe.
> Facebook, Inc. P.O. Box 10005, Palo Alto, CA 94303
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <>
> Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 11:32:28 -0400
> Subject: Birgitta I don't know if you will get my message in Facebook
> so I also sent it this way as a doublecheck
> To:
> Cc: maritime_malaise <>,,
> Happy New Year Birgitta
> My foes have been fairly wicked as of late and attacking my friends as
> well. I may head the smiling bastards off at the pass so to speak go
> into the woods again with no internet etc before I get a bums rush and
> possibly lose another good friend.
> Thus I am passing around the world many email exchanges of mine over
> the years before I am out of touch with everyone. One of them is ours
> from December 8th. I will forward you one example byway of gmail so
> you will see I did not put you down and that accurate I felt you were
> entitled to know so that you would not think I was using your name
> behind your back.
> I understand that you must be busy particulary over Xmass. Trust that
> I am still a fan of yours but I must defend my butt fromany cops etc
> and try to keep out of jail the best way I know how with what little
> assets I have.
> I truly do wish you well but I do wish Iceland and then later IMMI had
> checked my work and got back to me long ago.
> If nothing else please check out this old blog. It contains a very
> rare document that should be of interest to IMMI or any whistleblower
> that as an interest in money. The nasty left wing blogger dude does
> like me at all but at least he created it one month before the RCMP
> falsely arrested me and many months before Iceland lost its shirt to
> the very corrupt banksters. His blog seems to have certain crooks
> quite nervous. If the Yankees, Brits, Saudis and zionists etc are
> reading his old blogs about mean old me perhaps IMMI should save them
> before they go "Poof" too?
> Here is just one that somebody intereting was checking ot yesterday.
> lets just say that Jullian Assange is not the only guy who knows his
> way around the Internet. Hell he probably does not even know what the
> CSE is. Do you?
> Verita Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> P.S. My phone number is 902 800 0369 and I attempted to befriend you
> Skpe last spring in order to try to talk to you but you must have
> opted to ignore a stranger
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <>
> Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 09:41:41 -0400
> Subject: Most folks do not know this lady or what IMMMI is YET. But
> Wikileaks certainly does EH Wayne Lang of the GRC?.
> To:, ""
> <>, danfour <>,
> advocacycollective <>,,
> carole <>, "Wayne.Lang"
> <>, "Barry.MacKnight"
> <>
> Cc: "Jacques.Poitras" <>, acampbell
> <>, maritime_malaise <>,
> From: Birgitta Jonsdottir
> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:14:02 +0000
> Subject: Re: Bon Soir Birgitta according to my records this is the
> first email I ever sent you
> To: David Amos <>
> dear Dave
> i have got your email and will read through the links as soon as i
> find some time
> keep up the good fight in the meantime
> thank you for bearing with me
> i am literary drowning in requests to look into all sorts of matters
> and at the same time working 150% work at the parliament and
> the creation of a political movement and being a responsible parent:)
> plus all the matters in relation to immi
> with oceans of joy
> birgitta
> On Dec 8, 2010, at 1:35 AM, David Amos wrote:
>> I truly enjoyed talking to you. More to the point I am happy you took
>> the time to listen to mean old me. I was impressed with your openess
>> and honesty. In return I took a bit of time to study you more closely
>> on the Internet and I am now even more impressed to view the artist in
>> you. To hell with the politics and the money for a minute. At the
>> risk of sounding odd your sincere soul that I sensed in your voice
>> came shining through the various webpages. An honest person practicing
>> the wicked art of politicking is a rare thing indeed. I must confess
>> that I grinned at the possibility of crossing paths with another
>> kindred soul when I saw you employ the expression Me Myself and I
>> because I often use that expresssion
>> I also sent you another email to your politcal email address on June
>> 24th, 2010 right after you spoke on CBC. (I can resend it if you wish)
>> When you folks ignored that and my calls and only sent me nasty
>> responses I gave up on Iceland and IMMI because I had made everyone
>> well aware I had no respect for Assange and corrupt parliamentarians
>> whatsoever. Assange became the big celebrity after releasing the video
>> from Iraq but I felt sorry for the kid who went to jail that had given
>> him the stuff. Obviously I sent you folks the email below long before
>> Assange made the scene in Iceland. Rest assured that I sent him
>> evidence of my concerns about Iceland or he would not had sent me his
>> bragging emails the following March.
>> Now that Assange is in jail with no hope of bail like I was a couple
>> of times after CBC has been yapping about him for weeks I was feeling
>> a little vindictive so I opted to tease some of his friends and fans
>> (such as McCarthy and CBC) by reminding them that I was still alive,
>> not in jail and kicking like hell. (A host of cops in seven cars
>> pounced on my son (who was visiting me) and I at 2;30 in the morning
>> right after the results of the recent election was annnounced Although
>> I managed to run them off this time need I say it really pissed me off
>> and saddend me to put him on a bus back to Boston)
>> I did not send you that email with the pdf files attached from my new
>> Yahoo address but you will get it in a bit. Heres hoping you will
>> enjoy it.
>> Best Regards
>> Dave
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <>
>> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:33:10 -0300
>> Subject: RE: Iceland and Bankers Whereas the politicians ignore me
>> maybe some fellow bloggers will listen to me eh?
>> To:,,,
>> Cc:,,,
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <>
>> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:23:15 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: You mentioned Iceland and Bankers just now and I smiled
>> To:
>> Cc: "Jacques.Poitras" <>, Dan Fitzgerald
>> <>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <>
>> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 20:52:42 -0300
>> Subject: You mentioned Iceland and Bankers just now and I smiled
>> To:,
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <>
>>> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:24:42 -0300
>>> Subject: Fwd: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious
>>> question. Why have you people ignored me for three years?
>>> To:,,,
>>> Cc: webo <>,,
>>> I wonder if any lawyer will bother to read this email, understand it
>>> and call me back
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From:
>>> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 15:06:39 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious
>>> question. Why have you people ignored me for three years?
>>> To: David Amos <>
>>> Dear David Amos
>>> Unfortunately there has been a considerable delay in responding to
>>> incoming letters due to heavy workload and many inquiries to our office.
>>> We appreciate the issue raised in your letter. We have set up a web site
>>> where we have gathered various practical information
>>> regarding the economic crisis in Iceland.
>>> Greetings from the Ministry of Finance.
>>> Tilvísun í mál: FJR08100024
>>> Frá: David Amos <>
>>> Dags: 29.01.2009 19:17:43
>>> Til:,,,
>>>,, ""
>>> <>, "" <>, Dan
>>> Fitzgerald <>,
>>> Afrit:,,,
>>> Efni: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious question. Why
>>> have you people ignored me for three years?
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>>> FYI Some folks in Canada are watching your actions or lack thereof
>>> more closely than others. As you well know I am one.
>>> You folks should not deny certain responses that I have received over
>>> the course of the last few months from your country CORRECT?
>>> From: David Amos <>
>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 13:57:55 -0300
>>> Subject: Re: Regarding your enquiry to the Prime Ministry of Iceland
>>> To:
>>> Thanx
>>> On 10/8/08, <> wrote:
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> Your enquiry has been received by the Prime Ministry of Iceland and
>>> waits
>>> attendance.
>>> Thank you.
>>> From: Fjármálaeftirlitið - Fyrirspurn <>
>>> Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:23:41 -0000
>>> Subject: Staðfesting á móttöku
>>> To: David Amos <>
>>> Fjármálaeftirlitið hefur móttekið erindi yðar. Erindinu verður svarað
>>> við fyrsta tækifæri. Vakin er athygli á heimasíðu
>>> Fjármálaeftirlitsins, Þar má finna ýmsar
>>> upplýsingar ásamt svörum við algengum spurningum:
>>> The Financial Supervisory Authority (FME) of Iceland confirms the
>>> receipt of your e-mail. Your e-mail will be answered as soon as
>>> possible. We would like to point out our website,
>>> There you can find information and answeres to frequently asked
>>> questions:
>>> Kveðja / Best Regards
>>> Fjármálaeftirlitið / Financial Supervisory Authority, Iceland
>>> Sími / Tel.: (+354) 525 2700
>>> From: David Amos <>
>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:53:47 -0300
>>> Subject: I just called to remind the Speaker, the Bankers and the
>>> Icelanders that I still exist EH Mrs Mrechant, Bob Rae and Iggy?
>>> To:,,,
>>> Cc:,,,
>>> All of you should review the documents and CD that came with this
>>> letter ASAP EH?
>>> Perhaps Geir Haarde and Steingrimur Sigfusson should call me at 506 756
>>> 8687
>>> Veritas Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>> I am listening to RBN right now.
>> I explained a bit of my concerns to people down your way but either
>> the talk shows are never aired or I am now banished from their
>> talkshow forums.
>> Do I sound like that bad a fellow?
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <>
>> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:36:32 -0300
>> Subject: RE the Fed and my whistle blowing efforts in that regard
>> To: thecommonsenseshow <>
>> These are the missing hearings I am trying to tell you about
>> Me talking about a bit Spitzer the year before he got arrested
>> Me talking about Spitzer briefly after he got arrested
>> This is the first page of where I store of my files for public view.
>> This is some of my Spitzer stuff as it pertains to New York Do you
>> know of dr Ward Dean?
>> You can find some of my stuff pertaining to the Fed within this file
>> Anyone can see the email between the US Attorney in New York and many
>> other lawyers etc before and after Madoff plead guilty. I posted it
>> right here beginning in comment #327 within a wicked little forum
>> about corrupt lawyers and judges on Long Island New York
> Birgitta Jonsdottir
> Birkimelur 8, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland, tel: 354 692 8884
> - -
> Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not.
> Andre Gide

Birgitta Jonsdottir
Birkimelur 8, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland, tel: 354 692 8884 - -

Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not.

Andre Gide

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <>
To: "pm" <>; <>; <>;
<>; "Gilles.Moreau" <>;
<>; <>; <>;
<>; "ed.pilkington" <>;
"news" <>; "leader" <>
Cc: "David Amos" <>;
<>; <>;
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 5:27 PM
Subject: Re Teddy Baby Olson was on Fox News today yapping about
Presidential enemies list as he represents the crooks in Koch Industries???
If anyone should know about such things it is Olson after all he assisted
Ashcroft and Bush against me


As Harper sits and bullshits his cohorts in the Council of Foreign
Relations in the Big Apple today I bet he was listening to what was
happening with Obama and the IRS and Holder and his DOJ minions
in Washington.

Hevery body and his dog knows Harper knew about my battles with
the USTreasury and Justice Depts way back when he was the boss of
the opposition in Canada's Parliament. Two simple files easily found on
the Internet cannot be argued.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Office of Chief Counsel, Treasury.
Inspector General for Tax Administration, (202) 622-4068.

When Teddy bitches about polticians using the IRS to attack their
enemies because he knows it true because he helped Bush the IRS
against me when Obama was just a State Senator . The proof was
when I sent him the documents that came along with the letter found
on page 13 of this old file Teddy Baby Olson quit as Solicitor General.

Harper and every body else knows It was no coincidence that I sent the
lawyers Olson as Solicitior General, Ferguson as the co chair of the
Federal Reserve Bank, and J Strom Thurmond Jr the youngest US
Attorney the same pile of documents on April Fools Day 2004.

The sad but terrible truth is that legions of cops, lawyers polticians
and bureaucrats in Canada and the USA knew about the US Secret Service
coming to my home after dark on April Fools Day 2003 bearing false
allegations of a presidential threat and threatening to use their
implied right to use exta ordinary rendition against me as a non
citizen less than two weeks after the needless War in Iraq began and
no WMD were ever found.

You can bet dimes to dollars i called some Yankee Inspector Generals
(starting with 202 622 4068) and reminded them that I am still alive
and kicking and reminding the world of their malicious incompetence

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369

PS Below you can review some emails I sent you and your Yankee cohorts
such asTeddy Baby Olson before Obama was reelected EH Harper? In truth
I would rather settle in confidence with Obama then sue the Hell out of the
CROWN and the Holy See Trust that the evil old Judge Bastarache has known
why for a very long time.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <>
To: "Rob Talach" <>
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why

The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
a lot to you
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marlys" <>
To: "moto maniac" <>
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: Please allow me to tell the police for you

----- Original Message -----
From: <>
To: <>
Cc: <>; <>;
<>; <>;
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 6:35 PM
Subject: Please allow me to tell the police for you

Hey Mr Ruby

I will enjoy arguing how you feel emails informing you of your
partner's obligations are criminal acts. I will wager I will be
complaining of you first. The first question I will ask any court is
whether or not what you just informed me is true and can be found in
law. If not has an officer of the court just dillberately
misreprsented the law to protect his own interests? If that is true
then perhaps your are the one that broke the Rules. What say you Mr.

The interesting part of this is that a lawyer in the USA just
tried to file a criminal harrassment charge against me down there for
sending her partner an email similiar to this. To date no one will
inform me as to the outcome of the first attempt to charge me with

This is definitely not spam. Nor is it unsolicited. You are a
solicitor and this is your business. You would have no qualms about
attacking me on behalf of any client willing to pay your fees. Would
it be crimminal harassment if I warned you away from me and you didn't
go? The email does come from a Yankee web site.Why not add your
complaint to the Yankee lawyer's and we can make it a rather
interesting cross border complaint. You do understand that although I
am a Canadian Citizen, I am also a permenant American resident thus
two different federal codes must be obeyed. Ashcroft had no trouble
giving me a hard time with Canada's blessings. Why can't I register my
indignation about it to lawyers hired by the Canadian government to
investigate a similiar matter at the same time? I think I need a
Yankee judge and jury don't you? After all no would in Canada claims
jurisdiction over me.

I am meeting a bunch of folks that answer for police actions next
week. I will show them this email and explain to them how you are
associated to Ms. Edwardh and that if a lawyer refuses to uphold the
law it not harrassment to remind them of the law before you sue the
bastards. you are a big wig in the Upper Canadian Law society.
Correct? Don't you think it is time to check the work of your partner
and her understanding of the meaning of the word integrity. Better yet
ask landslide Annie. She taught law a long time ago down here in New
Brunswick. Ask her how fearless and pigheaded some Martimers are and
how little respect they have for liars or lawyers. if she won't tell
you ask Joe Day or Rob Moore they are both lawyers that were appointed
or elected to speak for us in Ottawa amongst the upper Canadian snobs.
Cya'll in Court
Mr. Clayton Ruby

David R. Amos
> >From: "" <>
> >To: "David Amos" <>
> >CC: "mandy machin" <>
> >Subject: Re: Text of letter to Joe Day
> >Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:34:37 -0400
> >
> >To continue now is criminal harassment under the Criminal Code. You must stop. clayton ruby
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To:
> > Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 5:28 PM
> > Subject: Re: Text of letter to Joe Day
> >
> >
> > The very second you act ethically I will
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From:
> > To: David Amos
> > Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 6:18 PM
> > Subject: Re: Text of letter to Joe Day
> >
> >
> > Please remove me from your list. clayton ruby
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To:
> > Cc: ;
> > Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 6:31 PM
> > Subject: Fw: Text of letter to Joe Day
> >
> >
> > Hey Ms. Edwardth
> > I talked to Lorne Waldman in person and he acted just like the dude at CCR when I talked to him. Talk about an ignorant bunch of snotty lawyers Mr. Arar is tangled up with. Well you fancy Upper Canadians can never say that I didn't tell you about your sneaky Yankee friends. Do I seem angry? Well tell Ratner and Waldman to go to hell for me will ya and then send me their best lawyers to argue. If Michael Ratner at the Center for Constitutional Rights 666 Broadway, 7th Floor New York, NY 10012 Phone: (212) 614-6464 Fax: (212) 614-6499 don't think email can get him in trouble then he should have a long talk with Frank Quatrone or Martha Stewart and then check the US Mail I sent him a long long time ago. That is what is in the Tif file hereto attached.
> > David R. Amos
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To:
> > Cc: ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
> > Sent: Friday, January 04, 1980 3:55 AM
> > Subject: Text of letter to Joe Day
> >
> >
> > He can never say that he didn't get it. This is an email is sent as triple check as proof that it was done when and where I swear I did it. That is his front door and although no one came to it because I didn't bother knocking I did bring witnesses and obviously took pictures
> >
> > I can easily prove that I was in contact with Wayne Easter's office on November 19th/03 the same day Arar's lawyers from the CCR in the USA were. Apparently the Canadian government and Mr. Ashcroft must have had a different plan as to what to do about me. Doesn't anyone think that Anne McLellan, Wayne Easter and I have lots to argue about within the Arar Commission. My evidence certainly supports Arar's.
> >
> > If anyone whois now seated as a Member of Parliament considers themselves worthy of the public trust perhaps they should speak up andask a few questions and consider asking for a non confidence vote. May I suggest that some member of the NDP who is not a lawyer contact me before I return to the USA. I would prefer to talk to Ed Broadbent. If he chooses to recall, I did wish him luck.
> >
> > Veena tell Geoff Regan to give a call when he gets back from golfing with Clinton and McKenna's buddies will ya?
> >
> > Just so everybody knows I am sending this email to many folks all around the world.
> >
> > What do ya thing should I hang around home long enough to see if Premier Lord calls an election for a Senator in the Federal government or wait until he calls a by-election to fill Bernard Richard's vacate seat at the provincial level? I know the Yankees are sick and tired of me. But i did make lots of folks uphome laugh and think about things. Everybody calls me a rebel or a fool. Both labels I take as my own with a smile. However I must ask why am I so rebelious to expect lawyers to uphold the law or demand that politicians uphold the Public Trust? Why am I so foolish not to trust the law enforcement community? Never forget it was the US Secret Service that came to my door with a town cop that is paid to protect and serve me. They did not mind investigating false allegations made against me as a by lawyers to protect politicians but refused to accept hard evidence of Bank Fraud, Securities Faud and Tax Fraud which is well within the scope oftheir employment. The well paid governent officials within my own nativeland are more than willing to throw me back to the wolves in the USA claiming that they don't have jurisdiction over me. Why? Are they pissed I ran for Parliament and had too much fun telling the truth in the process? Maybe I should hang around and have some fun and piss them off some more. Pat Hannraty did suggest that in one of the CBC debates that I was excluded from. Joe Day ran for many positions in government and never succeeded. However once he became a top dog lawyer for the Irving Clan he wasn't long finding a seat. I say the first order of business for any elected Member of Parliament would be to inspire and act that makes all Senators be elected as well. What say you oh ye honourable members of the NDP? Why not put that on Mr. Martin'.s table to chew on.
> >
> >
> >
> > Friday the 13th of August, 2004
> >
> > Senator Joseph A. Day Ethics Counselor, Howard Wilson
> > 14 Everett St. 66 Slater St., 22nd Floor
> > Hampton, NB Ottawa, ON. K1A 0C9
> >
> > Prime Minister, Paul Martin Geoff Reagan c/o Irwin Cotler,
> > 80 Wellington Street 900 Justice Building
> > Ottawa, ON. K1A 0A2 Ottawa, ON. K1A 0A6
> >
> > Eva Plunkett Inspector General (CSIS) Philippe Rabot > > 340 Laurier Avenue West RCMP External Review Committee
> > Ottawa, ON. K1A 0P8 P.O. Box 1159, Station B
> > Ottawa, ON. K1P 5R2
> > RE: Corruption
> >
> > Hey Joe,
> >
> > The fact that you said I was not worth voting for is no matter to me. I just wish my fellow Canadians had the right to vote you out of your job. That is one thing I agree with Mr. Lord about. To me you are just another lawyer who couldn't get elected so you were politically appointed to a high government position for the benefit of Irving interests. Now that you are in public service not only must you obey the Code of Conduct of your chosen profession, you must act ethically as a well paid federal employee and speak for the public good. Forget your former employer's interests and do your job.
> >
> > It is time to check the work of many high officials and mine as well. I demand that you study of the enclosed material then forward it all to the Prime Minister Paul Martin. Ask him to forward copies of it all to the other above named government employees and to the Arar Commission in particular. I can easily prove prior contact to all the above named persons or their offices and I believe they should be expecting to see this stuff. The CD of the copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you as an officer of the court in confidence in order that it may be properly investigated. I have given you many more documents than the ones I will mention in the following paragraphs. I will send a copy of this letter to many people as a double check on your ethics.
> >
> > One of the documents of foremost importance to me is a recent letter Attorney General Brad Green sent to me dated August 3rd. It is attached to the letter and all the other material I had delivered to Bernard Lord and Frank McKenna just after Canada Day. I deem the aforesaid letter to be so important because he is the first Canadian public servant in any office to even admit knowledge my concerns and allegations in two months of waiting for a proper response. His position in public service and his answer forever prove just how bad things really are in Canada and the USA. I am not sorry for the delay in providing you with this material as I planned and stated within the enclosed email. If you had wanted it, you would have returned my calls or answered my email.
> >
> > I had spoken to many people about my concerns as I ran for Parliament. I made certain that the proper authorities knew of my allegations the instant I was on Canadian soil. If our government was on the up and up, someone should have sent the cops around to pick this stuff up or at least ask me a few questions a long time ago. I cannot wait any longer for my country to act properly in my defense. The Yankees now want me in court.
> >
> > The recent letter from Brad Green and the actions of some other bad actors in Fredericton and the USA gave me cause to pause, rethink and rewrite a bunch of stuff. One would think that Henrick Tonning, the first judge that Green had ever appointed or the unnamed duty counsel in court on the first day of Brad's new plan to defend the rights of the people would have informed him that I was very pissed off and still in New Brunswick. The Sheriff who refused to identify himself in Henrik's court that day was more than willing to take me away and under his jurisdiction. What province writes the Sheriff's paycheck? Even the local rumormill had enough time to generate enough gossip from July 29th to August 3rd for Brad Green to be adequately informed before he wrote such a ridiculous letter to me. Clearly Brad paid no heed my fair warning to lawyers about making one false move. Maybe he should call the former Attorney General in New Hampshire and ask Peter Heed why he paid no heed to me. Now I will prove to both Mr Heed and Brad Green that I wasn't joking and that I am well within the jurisdiction of law enforcement in both New Brunswick and New Hampshire.
> >
> > If the Fredericton City Police arrest me as I approach the legislature one day very soon, Brad Green, Bruce Noble and I will have lots to argue about in years to come in many courts. I will be filing a complaint against them and several others with the Law Society anyway. I am looking to hire an ethical lawyer to sue the bastards long before the Law Society gets around to figuring out how to ignore my allegations. What would you do if you were I? Do you know an ethical lawyer that I can discuss this with? Or would I fare better if I acted ethically in a Pro Se fashion?
> >
> > My encounter with the Ombudsman, Bernard Richard proved much to me about NB politicians. I didn't believe what he said about Wayne Steeves the second he mentioned Connie Fogal. He tried so hard to argue about jurisdiction that he maintained Rule One of the Code of Professional Conduct of the New Brunswick Law Society is not about integrity but jurisdiction. No lawyer is that dumb and the last thing I would want is such a man to speak for me. So I promptly told him I would see him in court and ended our conversation. He was obviously arguing against me for the benefit of Brad Green rather than making a sincere and ethical effort to listen to me and address my concerns to the powers that be on my behalf. Richard likely has few Liberal friends to chum with. For all I know he may have just got back from Larry's Gulch so I allowed him to continue on the fishing expedition byway of email. For his information just in case he is that dumb, I brought up the subject of integrity so he would stop arguing jurisdiction and act more ethically and diligently as a lawyer. When he continued, I quit talking and sought proof of contact. Lawyers must maintain their integrity no matter the jurisdiction or issue.
> >
> > I can easily refute the jurisdictional argument of both Mr. Richard and Brad Green. I am used to that legal dodge. Thirty-three years ago a RCMP officer charged me with speeding by within the city limits of Fredericton. When I questioned his jurisdiction the Crown was quick to inform me that the RCMP have jurisdiction over everyone everywhere in Canada. If I were to unbuckle my seat belt in defiance of a NB law as I drove to Hampton to serve this material upon a lawyer employed as a Senator in the federal government, in what court would I appear? What if I served this material upon the cop that had the authority stop me? If the matter was heard in Hampton or Sussex Provincial Court shouldn't Judge Henrik Tonning immediately recuse himself because of his words to me in court on July 29th. Would I not have the right to make a federal case out of what began as a seat belt offense and change the jurisdiction to the USA?
> >
> > A far better example is what happened on June 24th. A man who claimed represent the Crown as the Sergeant at Arms in the New Brunswick legislature claimed that he and the Fredericton PD had jurisdiction over me and the right to throw me out of the public building. However when I tried to give them this stuff as the Deputy Prime Minister Anne McLellan and Attorney General Brad Green have both suggested, they refused. What right did they have to do so? Should I file a complaint against the Crown in the USA? I was thrown out of a building in NB. Who defends the Crown if not Green?
> >
> > Senator Day, make certain that Jack Hooper of CSIS sends someone to see the priest, Bill Elliott and get the stuff I gave to him the night of his debate on June 21st. Everybody in the churchyard watched that old man holler at me as I gave it to him. Now Mr. Waldman can listen to what Mr. Harper was harping about on June 22nd on the CBC, As I told the priest there were three original wiretap tapes within that envelope I gave him. The tapes are important evidence for the Arar Commission. If nothing else their mere existence proves how far the FEDS in two countries will go to cover things up. Let me know if the priest denies he got them or Hooper won't give them up, I have several more hidden in Canada that the Arar Commission can have. Hooper can hoop and holler about National Security all he wants. I must protect my ass if he won't, If you look at the photo I have provided, you will see me talking to a RCMP officer that was guarding Harper in Sussex on June 19th. Now you know what I was talking about to him. What I want to know is that cop's name. Harper wasn't long spilling the beans to his political advantage on CBC but his lawyers weren't long shutting him up on June 24th after Waldman demanded that he testify at the Inquiry. Why is that?
> >
> > Waldman should have known of me if Arar's lawyers at CCR in the USA had kept him properly informed. Rest assured that I did as soon as I became aware of him. During our conversation I know I said enough for him to check my words. His silence spoke volumes.
> >
> > Mr. Arar's lawyers had no fear of filing a complaint against Ashcroft and the others in the USA after they received my stuff last November. I see no further progress with that suit since it was filed last January. Why have they ignored me? Did they make a deal and settle? Why have they fallen so silent within the inquiry in Canada?
> >
> > If you don't believe me about what Mr. Harper knows, call Arthur Hamilton and ask him about the little talk we had about this a little while ago. Mr. Hamilton can never say he doesn't know because I saved his voicemail to me. I have no doubt that he has had a long talk with our new MP Rob Moore by now. Why are they so silent?
> >
> > I have many questions to ask Geoff Regan and Anne McLellan about the Arar Commission. Geoff has no time to return my call but lots of time to golf with Clinton and McKenna. I demand to know if the many documents that caused the delay in the inquiry were mine. If not, why not? I did do as Anne McLellan suggested and gave this stuff to both Customs and Immigration the instant I landed in Canadian jurisdiction. If I am not called to testify, I will never understand. I did manage to talk to Veena Verma and she had no answers for me only arguments about jurisdiction as usual.
> >
> > Your friend, Mr. Zed can never say he don't know because as you can see I served his law office this stuff on June 25th the day before he and John Herron greeted Paul Martin at the airport. After your review of this stuff you must confess it is obvious to all why Paul Zed and his friend Frank McKenna have been struck so dumb. Paul Zed was elected to speak for that politically minded priest amongst others, correct? Perhaps after they voted according to their conscience they should act according to it as well.
> >
> > I know that I have proved what everybody knows. The word of a lawyer is worthless. Peter MacKay also proved that to all the true Progressive Conservatives in Canada. The fact that another lawyer, John Crosbie advised the former Alliance party on what to say is too funny and sad for the words of this letter. One reason I came home and ran for Parliament is to sooth my own soul because I found Mr. Harper and his buddies to be a truly dangerous bunch of characters. Crosbie did too for awhile anyway. Ain't it funny how he now sings a different tune? There is no doubt that the old lawyer Paul Martin is a monumental a crook. The boat in Sidney proved that to me two days after the election. He can play well within Mulroney's league. It was truly sad that so many Canadians were compelled to vote for Martin simply because they were too scared that Harper may lead our country down a garden path and under an evil Bush.
> >
> > Perhaps the NDP should check my work closely and then help me expose all the crooks in both the Liberal and Conservative camps. I will give this stuff to their local lawyer leader Ms. Weir. Maybe it is time for the NDP to shine for the benefit of all Canadians. Even though the NDP have only 19 seats in Parliament I believe they have the power to inspire a non-confidence vote and cause another election. I think the NDP politicians should think about the following statement a long time then review how they made out in the last election. I did say at the Moss Glen debate that the NDP party was the best spot to place a vote. However NDP people I know argued with me saying that if they did that their vote would be wasted and Harper might get in, so they must vote out of fear for a Liberal. Therefore I fall back on what I had said during the Hampton debate in that every ballot should have one more line on it "None of the above" then I am certain many more Canadians would exercise their right to vote. Many did agree.
> >
> > Senator Day I did come across your wife in the Canada Elections office as she worked in support of Herron. Please don't deny the fact that the person seated beside your wife in Hampton laughed and applauded at many of my remarks, Everybody heard what I said to Herron in front of Rob Moore about suing him. Herron is foolish if he thought I was kidding. Herron is a layman with few political friends. I spoke to him very openly and honestly after the debate in Moss Glen. It should be interesting to see whom he and Rob Moore manage to hire for lawyers to defend them from my actions. I look forward to meeting a judge but I am not certain I would be allowed a jury of my peers. Lawyers do have an unfair stranglehold on Canadian justice. As you check my work, you should see that I am out to shame all lawyers and the political ones in particular. None of this would have been necessary if just one lawyer had upheld their oath or one public servant had blown the whistle. Why is not the question. The answer is Filthy Lucre.
> >
> > Today is Friday the 13th. I am expected to stand in court in Boston and argue allegations of criminal harassment made against me by a lawyer who has practiced crimes against me. Clearly I am not making an appearance. My kids and I will remain in this jurisdiction. I suspect foul play and that it is a ploy to make me return to the USA. I have little doubt that agents of the DHS would never allow me to appear in that court. I notified everyone down in Boston that I look forward to trial. Monday will tell the tale.
> >
> > In closing I must say I considered myself a raging success to finally break surface in the media and in an Irving owned newspaper of all places. A former Irving lawyer needs no explanation as to the reason for my joy. That said, let's see if I can make the Internet work for me in a grassroots sort of way. The Irvings are a little behind the times in that regard. Although I do not wear a blue coat, I did give the folks in Fundy one last chance to vote for a PC (Pissed off Candidate) and I tried to do it in a fun fashion so that my efforts would be remembered. Read the Kings County Record again to check my words. As I watch the boob tube, I find the most honest reporting of the political circus in America can be found on the Canadian comedy shows. The stuff on Barack Obama, Ralph Nader, Melanie Sloan and the Clintons should be pretty funny to you as well as you read the documents I have provided. Now all I can say is Hooray for Canada and thanks to the folks in Fundy that did vote for me. I am glad that at least one percent understood and agreed with me. Quite likely not one of them was a lawyer. Now I only need one lawyer in the right place in government to do the right thing and things will change for the better. Until that happens I will continue torturing lawyers with dilemmas that a simple application of ethics could easily solve. It is just a matter of time before one will break rank with the crooks and become a truly honourable hero for the common man. As I said in my first political speech I am a son of the Keith Clan whose roots can be found in Fundy. Although I have separated myself from that Clan and founded my own in order to declare a Blood Feud in my own name, I will always honour from whence I came. I simply don't care what lawyers or politicians think of me Although I have no religion, I have faith in my forefather's motto "Veritas Vincit".
> >
> > So what say you now, Senator Joe Day? Are you with me or against me? Ignoring me just won't do. Please send your answer to the following address just as Brad Green did. I don't know where I will be from day to day these days. Like it or not you are all now witnesses to my sad complaints. I demand an answer from you in writing even if it is to refuse this demand to do your job. Your friend the Yankee lawyer, David Lutz can turn his back on me then sneak away and try to hide but you are a Canadian public servant now. You must answer me in a timely fashion. I am part of the Canadian Public and a citizen that came to your office in the constituency that I have been hanging my hat for over two months. I demand assistance from the Senator appointed to watch over us and expect you to act with the integrity that is mandated by your license to practice law for a fee. Trust me, I am wise to the delaying and denying game. Forget trying to argue jurisdiction. I am here. What do you think? Should I run for Senator if Lord manages to call an election for one? I can be reached by local phone # 506 434-1379 but everything I say from here on out I want recorded in the Public Record because it appears that lawyers think I must sue the Queen in the USA. Do you think she will get pissed? The reason question is can she afford the relief. Check the bottom line of my first two complaints. Anne McLellan has made the Crown a conspirator against me. Methinks she owes me three times the loss. Now we all know the reason for the cover up. Too many lawyer/politicians in Boston assisted the lawyer, Charles J. Kickham Jr. assist the ex FBI agent William J. Kickham in his crimes against my Clan. If any of the above named parties don't like anything
> >
> > I have stated, Please sue me. I dare ya. I promise I will not file any sort of motion to dismiss the matter but I will demand a jury. I will call many witnesses in my defense. I think the first one would be Mr. Harper. Wouldn't it be fun if he was a hostile one?
> >
> > Cya'll in CourtJ David R. Amos 153 Alvin Ave. Milton, MA. 02186
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Certificate of Service
> >
> > I, David R. Amos, a Canadian citizen presently within the jurisdiction of the Province of New Brunswick in the County of Kings on Friday the 13th of August, 2004 delivered the above named material to the office of Senator Joseph A. Day at 14 Everett St. Hampton, NB. I will also email many people in many places the proof that this was done on this day. Check into my beefs with the USPS and look at the news about the Canadian Postal Service's political issues with Paul Martin today and it should be obvious why this is necessary for me to do in person.
> >
> > David R. Amos

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Cc: ; ; ; ; ; ; ; Marlys ; ; : ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 7:07 AM
Subject: Angie please allow me to introduce you to Clayton

Mr. Ruby

Lets ignore Angie for a minute the following email should fill
you in on my perspective of her. I just received word that The Boston
Police Dept. made good on their threat to file criminal harassment
charges against me on behalf of Angie and I must return to the USA on
Sept 3rd to answer the charges or a warrant will be sent out for my
arrest. Now isn't that special? Should I wait for Ashcroft to
extradite me? Or Perhaps Jack Hooper will send some of his fellas
around to take me away for him and his buddies in DHS. I find it
interesting that they have already appointed me a Probation Officer
and I am yet to be found a felon. So much for being innocent until
being proven guilty. I will return to the USA as ordered after I meet
the Police Commission in Fredericton next week. I will send an email
to you proving to you what I say is true. But I think you may already
know it. My phone has relayed some interesting information and the
cops are avoiding me like the plague.

Upon my return to the USA I will remove the matter to Federal
Court according to its Local Rules and demanding a judge and jury. To
start the circus in a proper fashion, I have already notified many
fancy folks to get ready to be called to testify. Do you think
Cardinal Law will come? How about Bush and Kerry? In the USA I am
looking forward to the argument because at long last I will be
afforded a jury of my peers to tell a very interesting tale to with an
amazing number witnesses to call and a rather astounding amount of
supporting evidence. If you wish Clayton, you can add your name to
Angie's charges against me. I will name you in my personal injury
lawsuits. I will give you first swing before I pounce on you in my
best effort to bankrupt all of you and see your license to practice
law revoked. Joe day should have provided my material to the Arar
Commission by now. the fact that you and your partner now threaten me
will criminal harassment only proves your malice towards me.

The email from your partner Marlys it affirmed to me my
suspicions from last night. I had called Mr. Arar's lawyers and
managed to speak to Karen Spector she claimed to have never heard my
name but I quit talking to her the instant she also claimed not to
have an email address. Whereas I have never met a lawyer that didn't
have one, I immediately checked and left voicemail to a lawyer that I
believe is her and who certainly had an email address. I have elected
to send to her the same stuff I gave the Customs and Immigration
agents the instant I returned to Canadian soil and a copy of a letter
the CCR lawyers received a long time ago well before they filed a
complaint against Ashcroft. I believe that Karen Spector and Michael
Ratner but perhaps she will give the material to the Arar Commission
if Joe Day won't.

I will be naming many people in a personal injury complaint
including you, Marlys, Angie and Anne McLellan. I believe that may be
the malevolent reason for the Boston Police Dept assisting Angie with
her ridiculous charges. They merely want to make me a felon so I can't
sue them. Are they really that dumb or has the government truly gone
past the point of abandoning all hope? Is this necessary or will all
of you have a sudden fit of ethical behavior? Why on earth would
Canada wish to back up Bush and Ashcroft at this point in time? As you
can see byway of the following email it is Angie and her clients who
have in fact been harassing my Clan. I would be careful not to
associate yourself with her if I were you. You can never say that I
didn't try to inform you all of the truth. I must say that it is true
that I am angry and disappointed in the Canadian Justice System but I
would be a liar just like a lawyer if I were to say I was surprised.
Thus I have not lost my sense of reason or humour. I will never
understand why I was ignored and persecuted in the USA but am very
angry to receive the same treatment in Canada.

I sincerely hope that the NDP party listens to my suggestion
for the benefit of all Canadians. What say you Ms. Weir. For months
you have tried hard to pretend that I didn't exist. Perhaps now you
should come clean with the Upper Canadian Law Society and inform Mr.
Layton that you all should consider what I have suggested after you
study what I have given you.

I got really pissed off when Lorne Waldman admitted to me that
he knew the Inspector General of the DHS and then laughed at my
concerns. Mr. Waldman should know I ain't no immigrant and I was named
after men that died fighting Nazi's for the King and this country. One
of them was my fathers friend. his name was David and he was a fine
man from Upper Canada. He won the Victoria Cross. After you read the
following, ask me why I want to sue the Queen in the USA. I dare ya.
As you can see Governor General Clarkson has been informed and I will
make certain that a couple of her Lieutenant Governors get the same
stuff Anne McLellan got. The following words were from the CBC web
site last year at the same time the DHS was persecuting me.

"Zundel has been behind bars since February, when he was deported to
Canada from the United States for overstaying a visitor's visa. Zundel
immediately applied for refugee status in Canada, claiming he'd be
persecuted if he was deported to Germany.

The Solicitor General and Immigration Department responded by slapping
him with a security certificate declaring him a threat to national

A Federal Court judge is in the process of deciding whether the
certificate is reasonable based on secret evidence from the Canadian
Security and Intelligence Service.

Immigration lawyer Lorne Waldman said he would find it very troubling
if Ottawa were to use the security certificate process as leverage in
immigration matters.

"What they were trying to do by using the security process was to
prevent him from having a refugee claim," said Waldman, who was quick
to add he holds "no sympathy at all" for Zundel personally. He
believes Zundel's refugee claim was frivolous and could have been
easily rejected.

"It causes me some concern that the government would be issuing the
certificate and then negotiating with Mr. Zundel," Waldman added.

"If they have the evidence in the certificate, they should proceed
with the process."

"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a
revolutionary act." --George Orwell

What say you all you ethical Members of the Bar?

David R. Amos

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Cc: ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Marlys ;
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 7:09 AM
Subject: Clayton meet Angie

As you can see I have nothing further to say to her because we have
lots to argue in several courts in a couple of weeks.

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Cc: ; Bachrach, Barry A. ; ; ; ; ;
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 3:46 PM
Subject: What was the outcome of your false allegations

Hey Angie and the rest of the Shulman crowd.

The Boston Police Dept and the Suffolk County District Attorney
refused to discuss it with me. August 13th has come and gone and I
have received no word. Now that Barry has withdrawn for our matters, I
will return to the USA to defend our interests. I will look forward to
meeting your law firm in court in September to protect my entire
family's interests. But first I must make my problems with you and
your associates well known in Canada before I return to the USA and be
subject to further harassment by the police and the DHS. The last time
I appeared in that Court Judge Virginia Ward attempted to have me
arrested bythe Canton Police Dept. for no reason whatsoever.

The first question I will ask Norfolk Probate Court is how come
my wife has not been notified of the death of Uncle Franky in June.
She is an heir to his estate as well as your clients. Have they been
notified? I think the reason my wife has not been notified is because
of the fact that neither he nor anyone else has assented to any of the
accountings now on file in that court. What say you? The first
question I will ask you in court is why did you wait until I was out
of the country and running for Parliament to make false allegations of
criminal harrassment? You know as well as I that it was my wife that
came to your office on June 1st to serve you documents to answer
whatever it was that you had her summoned to court for on that day.
According to Barry something happened in Plymouth Probate Court in
July but we have not been informed as to what it was. All of us were
in Canada and you knew it. I did receive a copy of a letter from Barry
to you where he informed you of that fact and we waited for the
conference call that never came. When my wife appeared in Norfolk
Probat Court on July 20th you refused to take her documents and after
the court received and stamped their copy, they read it and gave it
back. Why? You should go find your stuff because your law firm is
going to have to argue every word of it with me. If you want an exact
copy of it perhaps you should contact the Suffolk County District
Attorney he received an exact copy and did acknowledge the receipt of
it. Either he is with me and against you or he stands with you. There
is no middle ground for any lawyer in Public Service in particular to
stand on.

Perhaps your crooked clients should have informed you that
Uncle William J. Kickham is an ex FBI agent therefore he was an
untouchable in the USA. I know I informed Special Agent in Charge Ken
Kaiser and his present and past bosses Mr. Mueller and Mr. Freeh that
their Uncle Willy was a crook and they didn't seem to care. Maybe
someday in the future an ethical Canadian Government will eventualy
look into the reason that is.

The text of the following email clearly states my opinion as to
why you did what you did and when you did it. Did you not think I
would remember the fact that the first day I ever met you in court was
the same day the Secret Service and the Milton Police Deptment came to
my door investigating false allegations made aganst me by the
Massachsetts Trial Court? Obviously the unnamed source of the
allegations did so to cover up the foul play of you and your clients
for the benefit of the FBI and their reputation. I will find out who
that person was under the Freedom of Information Act. The Inspector
General of the DHS has refused to tell me. It should not affect
National Security to be informed of the name someone that made false
allegations against me.

The Honourable Ronald A. Irwin, C.M., LL.B., Q.C., P.C. should
wake up and pay attention he is a lawyer. I just left voicmail to his
assistant. It is time that he act in a fellow Canadian's best
interests. That is his job. Wayne Easter directed me to him.

David R. Amos

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 12:16 PM
Subject: RE You and me and Mr. Shulman

Hey Angie
I got your chickenshit message. Barry is not my lawyer. He speaks
only for my wife. He has told you this before. What part of this do
you not understand? It was you and your clients that have attacked my
interests and that of my children and friends as well as my wife's.
Get it? I repeat Barry only speaks for my wife. Get it?

Your clients sent me these letters. Did you advise them to do so? In
the police report from Plymouth when your client Robert O'Meara stole
our belongings the Police clearly stated that he was acting on your
advice. Is that not your client that is knocking down our home and
stealing or destroying our personal property and that of several of
our friends without exercising due process? Can you think of any
reason why my friends and kids should not sue you too? I saw that you
billed him for talking to the housing court. Did they not inform you
of the law? I listened to Livingstone explain it to you and Whiting
once again on Mar 22rd after the fraudulent sale and did you not
bother to read his backdated court order to the same date. Even he now
admits there appears to be other interested parties. Maybe your new
boss can explain it to you before May 28th.

I did file an appearance in Norfolk Probate Court on April 1st
and served it upon your clients because you once again failed to
notify us of your actions. I did not know Shulman was involved until I
finally saw the docket. You must address your concerns to me and
notify me of your actions as well as Barry. Why do you think you are
entitled to a restraining order because of my reactions to your
actions? You do speak for the bastards that sent me these letters.
Correct? In the photo is that not one of the properties that you wish
to avoid arguing with me about? Nothing you or the court has done is
legal and you know it. It was you who filed my Notice of Appearance in
Plymouth dated January 3rd, 2003 after McCarthy had destroyed the
original because you were the only person to receive a copy of it. You
know as well as I that your clients forged my wife's signature on the
first purchase and sale agreement as does Mr. Schulman. I do not have
to explain to you your practice of fraud against me and the court. I
am suing you and Shulman etc because of it.

Say hey to Mr. Shulman for me and tell him I will wait to argue
him in court since he has chosen to stand with you and ignore the
rules of conduct that allow him to practice law for a fee. I have
never practiced law, nor do I wish to be a lawyer. I have only
defended our interests in my own name and as my wife's attorney in
fact and pursuant to MGL 201b. If Shulman wishes to file a complaint
against me so be it. I welcome it in fact. That will save me the costs
of filing against him. However may I suggest that you quit bothering
my wife's lawyer about my matters. You have far more important matters
to consider like Wiretap tapes and crooked Feds don't you? You sent
Mr. Bachrach the proof that Schulman received a copy of wiretap tape
number 139 without my authorization and now you have sent him the
proof of your own malice towards me. Why did you choose to involve Mr.
Bachrach in my matters? I am sending him a copy of this email and your
pissed off boss as well. Trust me Shulman is no less angry than I and
you know the reason why. We are both upset by your stupidity and
severe lack of ethics and the fact that he is now in bed with a bunch
of crooks because he listened to you and ignored me.

I will bring this email to court and the related documents
already sent to Mr. Shulman if he wishes to file a malicious
restraining order to stop a person from legally defending his
interests and asking his associate to stop her clients from harassing
me. Otherwise I will save them as evidence against him and you in
federal court. The reason Shulman received my email was because you
listed his email on your contact page. Clearly you are tied at the hip
in your actions against me against me. I only knew of this email
address after Mr. Bachrach forwarded me your email to him.

Cya'll in Court:)

David R. Amos

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please Leave Comments here